All Episodes
Nov. 27, 2021 - Jim Fetzer
01:32:40
Need to Know News (26 November 2021) with Joe Olson and Maryam Henein
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer, Mass.
in Wisconsin, the day after Thanksgiving.
I'm delighted to be joined today by Joe Olson, who's actually out of Houston today.
He can tell us more.
And Miriam Hennane, who's down in Florida somewhere.
We're simply delighted they're here to join me today with all the news you need to know.
Joe wanted to take a break from all the dreary events, but we're back on top of them again.
We got the Christmas parade killer driving in a zigzag pattern to hit as many as possible.
This is pretty serious stuff.
Since he entered it, the media sought to play down any possibility it was motivated by This Daryl Brooks extremist political views, his support for BLM or his hatred for white people, but this is going to be impossible to cover up.
Exemplified in the hours after the tragedy, numerous outlets Falsely reported he was seeking to flee the scene of an earlier crime, which sought to diminish the explanation that was deliberate, but there's no way getting around it.
If it was a knife attack, deliberate disturbance, once he's in his car, he's safe.
There were other roads he could have taken.
There was no need to plow through the barriers and to go after the band and the dancers and everyone else.
After police confirmed they were not chasing him as he plowed through the Christmas parade in Waukesha, the affidavit reveals more crucial details about the deliberate nature of what happened.
According to eyewitness officer Butrant, the vehicle appeared to rapidly accelerate Took an abrupt left turn into the crowd of parade participants and drove in a zigzag to hit as many as possible.
This made it clear he was seeing an intentional act to strike and hurt as many people as he could.
He observed that the vehicle appeared to be moving side to side, striking many.
Another witness?
Driving in a zigzag, direct intent to hit as many parade participants as he could.
Probable cause.
This is now in the indictment.
Praise the defendant be dealt with according to law.
Basis for a complainant's charge of such offense is from various law enforcement officers believed to be responsible, including Detective Casey working traffic control, staging area for a parade from White Rock Avenue to Perkins Avenue South, about 100 entries in the parade with hundreds of participants, thousands watching.
At about 4.35 p.m., Casey heard the Waukesha Police Radio that two people were fighting in the area of White Rock Schools.
A few minutes later, he heard a horn honking from an area north of his location.
Went out to see.
He observed that White Rock Avenue was filled with participants.
He saw a red Ford Escape driving southbound on White Rock Avenue.
People jumping out of the way.
He stepped in front of the Ford Escape, pounded on the hood, yelled, stop.
Detective Casey was wearing a shirt with patches on both stating Waukesha Police, wearing a black hat with white letters that stated police, a neon orange safety vest.
In other words, whoever was driving the vehicle knew the police were directing him to stop.
The Ford Escape Oh, continue driving and turn westbound on East Main Street, driving slowly, brush Detective Casey, causing him to be on the driver's side, pounded even on the window, yelling stop, chase the vehicle as it began to drive faster.
While the defendant was driving, he struck numerous pedestrians, including both parade participants and spectators.
He observed three adult victims on the East Main Strip, A, B, and C. Traumatic injuries as a result of being hit by the vehicle.
The defendant was driving and all three were subsequently pronounced dead.
Victim D, an adult, transported to Waukesha Memorial Hospital, subsequently died.
Victim E, an adult, was transported to Aurora Summit and subsequently died.
We're talking about the five Adults, ages 51 to 83, three of whom were dancing grannies, and one of them was the husband of one of the grannies.
In addition to the five decedents, there were 62 injured victims, children and adults, some in critical condition.
Doctors from the medical examiner's office have conducted external injuries, concluded that death, by the way, for A, B, C, D, and E were multiple blood force injuries.
There was this incident where the crowd control, walking, tried to get the driver's attention, stopped the vehicle.
Based on his training and experience, Buterin estimated the speed to be about 25 miles an hour.
I think that's when he first tried to stop him.
Initially sticking to the north side, but then he looked straight ahead directly at him, had no emotion on his face.
He continued yelling for the vehicle to stop.
The vehicle continued and was honking its horn.
The vehicle got to Main Street, appeared to Butin.
It was increasing its speed.
My estimate was it was going 40 miles an hour when it hit.
He thought it was going to come to a stop and make a right-hand turn out of the parade, but then accelerated rapidly.
Tires squealed.
Abrupt turn into the crowd of participants.
It was an intentional act to strike and hurt as many people as possible.
I think this is very significant.
We got an eyewitness report here.
There are several others.
Brooks killed six, injured at least 62.
Thirteen children remained hospitalized, six in critical condition.
Why did he do it?
As Chris Menden notes, the media is still referring to the massacre as a parade crash or even as an accident, refusing to acknowledge that it was deliberate.
Joe, your thoughts?
Now, I have an amazing coincidence with three counties in Wisconsin, and that would be Milwaukee County, Waukesha County, and Kenosha County.
And, you know, I didn't do any study on this.
I just automatically thought that, you know, since the DA in Milwaukee is the one that gave this guy a really low bail, and that he was probably the DA of a fairly large county like we have here in Texas, but lo and behold, your counties in Wisconsin are really tiny, and each of those cities is the County seat for a really tiny county.
So you've got three district attorneys involved in this, but all of them have a pattern that contributed and that is no bond for criminals.
It's just, you know, unbelievable.
None of the three people would have been shot or injured in Kenosha had there been bail bond system that actually worked and people went to jail or probation system where they were actually watched.
And nobody would have been injured in Waukesha if somebody would have been paying attention to the bond.
Absolutely criminal behavior on the part of a prosecutorial misconduct in three different counties in Wisconsin.
So I think it's time for you guys to clean house up there.
Oh, I couldn't agree more.
Miriam.
Clean house.
Wow.
Where do we start with cleaning house?
I have to say, Given this Thanksgiving week and moving, that I've taken a little break, and in regards to this parade, what's the bigger context here?
One, there is no justice.
The media is corrupt in fabricating facts, fabricating fiction, playing as fact, and people are dying.
But what's really at the heart Of this massacre.
I am asking.
I haven't kept track of this.
Oh, he turns out to be a Black Lives activist.
He's an admirer of Adolf Hitler.
He felt the trial was unjust.
He was out on a thousand dollar bail, included among the offenses, was running over his girlfriend, by whom he has a child.
In an attempt to kill her.
I mean, this is a bad guy.
And he was retaliating.
It appears he was retaliating, possibly based on false beliefs that Kyle Rittenhouse had shot black people.
You know, I think that it's a complicated case, but the narrative Directly contradicts critical race theory, white supremacy, all the host of issues, systemic racism were being sold by the Democrats.
So I think that Democrat controlled media, it's really Israeli, but it's part and parcel of they're all together aligned on this or seeking to turn it into something more innocuous than what actually happened.
Yeah, and it's just indicative of this actor based reality.
And to a certain extent, it's like spending time focusing on these distractions.
This is cultivating racism.
All of this is like, from the get-go of George Floyd, is manufactured racism, is just more divide and conquer and glorifying criminals.
And just as an aside, I'm spending time organizing a protest in front of the jail, given the You know, MMS, mineral salts and the Grenon family, which is a church, and these people have not been given due process.
The sons have been locked up for 17 months drinking contaminated tap water, literally not seeing the sun.
And who are the real criminals?
The media is criminal, the government is criminal, and we're glorifying real crooks.
This is all the same thing.
It's the same playbook to sow division.
Well, Miriam, I do agree with that, that it is increasing racial differences.
Here's another story.
How walk-a-shop parade horror was made possible by left-wing district attorneys' attempts at bail reform.
Experts on criminal justice and law enforcement agree criminal bail reform puts violent criminals back on the street at very little cost to them, at great expense to the communities.
According to Betsy Branner Smith, a retired police sergeant and spokesperson for the National Police Association, law enforcement in cities like Milwaukee, New York, Chicago, and L.A.
are facing not only understaffing but low morale due to those disastrous policies.
I mean, it takes a lot of time and effort to track down criminals, much less to get them arrested, indicted, prosecuted, and incarcerated.
These extremely liberal prosecutors who want to talk about restorative justice and what that means is we're putting the public in danger by trying to give these people too many opportunities to reoffend.
It's incredibly frustrating for law enforcement and absolutely dangerous for our communities.
The controversy has reared its head in the wake of the Waukesha parade attack by Daryl Brooks Jr., allegedly accused of five, as of Tuesday, six counts of intentional homicide, Wisconsin's equivalent to first-degree murder.
He has a rap sheet that spans 50 pages, but he was out on bail for only $1,000 after stealing a woman's cell phone, punching her in the face, running her over with an SUV, the same one purportedly used in the assault on the parade.
When we arrest somebody, especially for a violent crime, they're out almost immediately and then re-offend.
That wears on the absolute soul of police officers, she observed.
Here we now have the prosecutor requesting a $5 million cash bail in spite of his extensive criminal record past and prior bail jumping.
Earlier, the Milwaukee court let him out on a $1,000 bail after he allegedly ran a woman over with the same SUV believed to have been used in the attack, despite an active warrant in Nevada and a long criminal past.
Left-wing Wisconsin D.A.
John Chisholm from Milwaukee has announced an internal investigation and its recommendation that bail was set so low.
The state's bail was inappropriate in light of the nature of the charges Chisholm's office asserted.
The bail is not consistent with the approach of the Milwaukee County D.A.' 's office.
In addition to his lengthy criminal record, he had an outstanding warrant in Nevada for bail jumping.
Enter Dog the Bounty Hunter, spoke with Fox News to offer his thoughts.
Chisholm's colleagues in Waukesha took a different approach.
She asked for what was granted of $5 million for Brooks, saying she wanted it to be so high he couldn't possibly pay it.
The problem is that he has a lot of supporters like George Soros for whom $5 million, and I think you only have to put up 10%, so that would be $500,000 or just chump change.
Mike Patton, a Minnesota-based defense attorney, described the fact that Brooks had been freed only three weeks earlier as pitiful.
He should never have been let out because of the warrant from Nevada.
Even if there weren't a warrant in Nevada, the bail should have been sufficient.
This could easily fall in the category of attempted murder.
This is so egregious.
Somebody should lose their job over it.
That's how bad this is.
Here we got Joseph Camp.
Called a prayer for Jessalyn Torres 11, fighting for her life right now after the Christmas Parade attack by Paris pedophile Daryl Edward Brooks.
Brooks was released from custody two days prior to the attack pending trial for violent offenses on $1,000 bail.
At the time he was released for custody, he had an active warrant for his arrest in Nevada for failure to register on the sex offender list.
The district attorney's officer bragged online about his efforts to reform the bail system.
Her pelvis is broken.
She's lost a kidney.
She has lacerations on her lungs and only kidney.
She was bleeding internally, suffered many bruising around her face and body, skull fractures.
Here she is, this 11-year-old girl.
She's very spunky.
She's actually asking the doctors if they can't just please glue her back together.
Joe.
Well, some social media came up with some more damaging information about Mr. Brooks.
Turns out he's a follower of Louis Farrakhan, part of the 5%, which is the black nationalist.
And I could never understand how Louis Farrakhan could ignore the fact that there was probably 10 times as many black slaves captured and sold by Arabs as there were, and Mohammed was big on slavery, as there ever were by whites.
And so, how anybody can Embrace that religion as being somehow a black religion is just beyond me, but that's aside.
We also have the fact that another person has died since that five million dollar bond hearing and now we know more about the extent of damages and there's a dozen kids that are still in intensive care so they can go back and do a re-hearing on this.
Somebody started a GoFundMe Uh, to get the bail money paid, and I wonder if GoFundMe is so principled that they're going to revoke this guy's, um, fundraising efforts or not, because, uh, they certainly didn't have any problem defunding everybody else that's on the conservative side.
Anybody that's a Trump supporter or got picked up on J6 or any of that stuff, they got their GoFundMe accounts canceled.
Absolutely absurd.
But we've got an even worse example of a rogue DA, and that's out in San Francisco.
News clip was put on BitChute today.
It's a segment of about three or four local news things about district attorneys resigning
over the behavior of Chessa Bowden.
Who was he?
Oh, he was the son of Kathy and David Bowden, who were members of the Weather Underground
and are in jail for killing a Brinks driver in a botched armored car robbery.
And they were followers of the creators of Weather Underground, and that would be Bill Ayers
and Bernadette Dorn, both of who are Jews, and both of them had multiple crimes against them,
and both of them had technical difficulties with the FBI investigation,
so the charges against them were dropped.
They were the foster parents for Chelsea Bowden, who was also a Rhodes Scholar.
So tell me, all of the dots don't connect, and these are the ones that are turning loose the flash mobs all over San Francisco, and it's only going to get worse in Frisco.
Yeah, you make great points, Mariam.
Well, this is all indicative of the subversion of America, and are we going to see more and more Outings, whether it's Astroworld or this parade where it becomes, you're scared to even show up in a crowd.
And then you just willingly lock down in your home and get ready for life a la Ready Player One.
And as Joe said, no one's no one's connecting the dots.
If you're paying attention, people are just reading the surface.
And again, It shouldn't matter what color you are.
If you have a long ass rap sheet, and meanwhile, I will again refer to the Grenon family of Genesis Church, where they haven't even been given the chance to post bail.
They've never been in jail.
And then you have these crooks that are out roaming free.
It's disgusting.
And we should know the playbook by now.
It's used over and over again.
Yes.
Good point.
Good point.
I hope this little girl makes it.
Meanwhile, talker.
Media won't investigate motives in Waukesha Massacre.
Here's why.
Last Friday, Kyle Rittenhouse was acquitted of all charges.
Two days later, a BLM supporter drove an SUV through a Christmas parade in Waukesha.
It was a slaughter.
Six were killed, including three grandmothers and an eight-year-old boy.
Forty-seven were injured badly, very badly, many of them children.
Here's a witness description.
We were sitting, my daughter was sitting at my feet.
I was standing above her and I saw a red SUV run over a gentleman.
I think it was a gentleman in a costume.
His body was trampled by both the front and the back wheels.
Please say the man who did this was a career criminal by the name of Daryl Brooks.
As of tonight, Brooks has not publicly explained why he committed mass murder instead.
The media and local authorities have decided to speak for him, and mind you, this is Tucker Carlson's words.
The main thing they want you to know is that these killings had absolutely nothing to do with the Kyle Rittenhouse verdict just two days before.
Nothing whatsoever.
The timing is just one of those amazing coincidences.
There's no evidence that this is a terrorist incident in House Waukesha's chief of belief.
But if indiscriminately murdering women and children at a Christmas parade isn't terrorism, what exactly is it?
Well, it's a vehicular mishap.
Here's how Twitter's in-house news team described it.
Five people dead and more than 40 injured after car drives through parade.
Car.
It's the fault of the red SUV.
Other news organizations had another explanation handy.
It turns out they told us that Brooks was fleeing from a knife fight.
The implication, of course, was that he got spooked and drove through the parade by accident.
You know, as you do.
Then MSNBC took the theory a step further and suggested the police had somehow goaded Daryl Brooks into driving into people by firing a gun at him.
Jim Cavanaugh, former ATF.
The report from NBC is that maybe he was in a knife fight or stabbing.
I've been to stabbings, and I'm telling you, they're very bloody events.
The perps or participants often have blood all over them.
Even if it's coming from a victim, they stab.
Or they may get cut themselves if it's a knife fight.
They often run with a bloody knife.
So this guy might have been in the car with a bloody knife and blood all over him.
He saw the police barricade at the parade route and busted through it.
The officer fired and then he was going to do anything he or they to get away when he ran over these band members is just an act of really cold-blooded murder.
So Brooks was doing whatever he could to get away with the police, so effectively it's the cop's fault, except no, that's not what happened.
Eyewitnesses, many eyewitnesses, described Brooks zigzagging down the street trying to murder as many innocent people as he could.
These killings were absolutely intentional, and no, Brooks was not being chased by the police.
That's a lie.
So much for that theory.
So the question remains, why did Daryl Brooks commit mass murder in Waukesha?
The media doesn't seem interested in finding out, not even a little bit.
So they've decided to ignore the story completely, and they are.
Subpoenas to Roger Stone from some fake congressional committee are apparently more important than six deaths.
Like the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, as far as the national media are concerned, it's simply not happening.
The more we learn about Daryl Brooks, the easier it is to understand why the media don't want to talk about him.
Brooks' social media feeds are full of racist and black nationalist propaganda.
In one of his rap signs, he includes lines from Malcolm X justifying race hate against whites.
He posted a picture of a fruit bowl arranged to display the letters BLM with a raised fist.
And not insignificantly, Brooks also criticized the jury's verdict in the Kyle Rittenhouse case.
On Facebook, one BLM activist was happy to connect the dots here.
He described Brooke's mass murder as retaliation for the Rittenhouse Acquittal Watch.
BLM activists, they have someone in custody.
We may have to wait to see what they say why this happened.
It sounds like it's possible This has to do with a verdict.
That's the obvious conclusion.
It started with his Christmas parade.
The initial person that reached out to me said, this has to do with a verdict.
This has to do with a verdict.
That's the obvious conclusion.
Is it true?
Again, we have not confirmed it, but we can absolutely be certain the national media will
spend zero time trying to find out why.
Why?
Because they're implicated.
News organizations spent more than a year telling us that a case that had precisely nothing to do with race was somehow a referendum on the civil rights of black people and the rise of white supremacy.
So, if it turns out those lies, and they are lies, got six people murdered, they'll probably be the last to tell us that.
We do know that Daryl Brooks should never have been on the street in the first place.
He was a thoroughly loathsome person.
Want evidence?
Well, he bragged about pimping his 16-year-old girlfriend, Brooks.
Now all of a sudden I'm a pedophile?
Let me explain that.
Ten years ago in 2006, I caught a case with my oldest daughter's mama.
Yes, my baby mama.
I didn't know the bitch was 16 at the time.
She gave a statement to police.
Yeah, she was hoeing, and I was pimping, and she was 16, and I didn't know that, okay?
Yeah, so for some reason this guy spent most of his life free.
A few weeks ago, probably not surprisingly, he was charged with punching the mother of his latest child in the face and then running her over with his car.
So he should have been in jail for that.
But the Milwaukee County District Attorney Radical called John Chisholm released books on a thousand dollars bail.
So $1,000 for beating and running over a woman.
Why?
Well, because John Chisholm believes that bail is racist.
A few years ago, Chisholm acknowledged that letting violent criminals out of jail is certain to cost innocent lives.
But, he explained, it's still worth it because equity.
Is it going to be an individual I divert or I put into a treatment program is going to go out and kill somebody?
You bet.
Guaranteed.
It is guaranteed to happen.
It does not invalidate the overall approach.
In other words, the deaths of innocents, old ladies, small children, or small buys to pay because the principle of equity is so beautiful and so important.
That is a diseased way of thinking.
It's how cult leaders and dictators think.
It is not a Western worldview, but suddenly it's a mainstream position within the Democratic Party.
And I think, by the way, the Democrats are in meltdown over this because it's so devastating the position they've been pushing ever since the riots and the death of George Floyd, which I contend was in fact fake but treated as real by the media nonetheless.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yeah, well I've been honing this wedge and driving it for a century and a half.
It's absolutely absurd.
Today I happen to be in Huntsville and I took a photo of the statue of Sam Houston and sent it to Jim so he could post it up on the website.
Maybe next time we do Uh, Texas Tuesdays, you can put it up.
But, uh, interesting gentleman.
Uh, here was a white guy that, when he was 16 years old, was sick of living with white people.
So, he moved into a island out in one of the rivers, I think it was the Tennessee River, with a Cherokee tribe, and was adopted by them.
And, uh, given the name Raven, Married a Cherokee woman and lived with her for years, spoke fluent Cherokee, actually helped create the Cherokee written language, wrote a constitution for him, got all six of the Cherokee tribes to join together to form a Cherokee nation, much like the Iroquois did, and petitioned Andrew Jackson to have them accepted and have treaty rights with the United States so they could keep their land.
A very peaceful A Native American loving guy, and he came to Texas and actually, you know, he won the battle at San Jacinto.
They've got a big statue of him down at Herman Park in Houston, which I keep thinking they're going to try to vandalize, but there's a problem there.
He also was a President of Texas, two terms, and then he was a senator from Texas.
He resigned his senator's term when the Civil War was starting to brew, came down and ran for governor of Texas on the platform of not entering the Civil War.
Texas had joined the Union as an independent nation with the right to leave, and he said, then Texas will just secede and become an independent nation, and we're not fighting on either side of this war.
And he campaigned, drove over 900 miles across Texas by himself in a buckboard and won the vote by 60 percent and then was impeached by the plantation owners run House of Representatives and Senate being the first governor of Texas to be impeached.
So they have a little bit of problem tarnishing this old white guy
because he was absolutely fabulous human being.
And the couple of slaves that he owned, he freed them during the war
and they never left his family.
They lived with the Houston family in the same house until they died of old age.
So the stories about how terrible slavery was are highly exaggerated.
With 90% of the men in Texas away, military age men, which would be like 17 to 50 year old, gone.
There was never a slave uprising in Texas.
There was never a slave massacre in the state of Texas.
When the Texas veterans came back, one of the most famous veterans in Fort Bend County was a white man that had his leg shot off.
He married his black slave, had six, uh, Children with her, and they've got a great big state park down there to their family ranch.
They were absolutely wonderful people.
So get over it.
We've learned how to live with each other.
We don't need to keep having you cut wounds and rub salt in them.
Get over it.
It's time to have a better world.
I don't think the U.S.
is a racist society, though there are outbreaks of it intermittently.
Miriam, your thoughts?
Well, I believe these factors are cultivating racism.
And I think I mentioned last time we were together that I am more African than white, and I have felt racism from Black people, even though I'm North African.
So, I mean, I would love if we could just base circumstances, bail, whatever, On the actual person and not the color of their skin, because inherently what they are creating is racism.
To say that this had nothing to do with Kyle Rittenhouse, I don't buy that.
I think that even spending time on Brooks or these stories is a distraction.
There are tons of people who want to know about Ghislaine Maxwell.
From my understanding, it starts on the 29th.
They're already amping up.
The media I haven't seen the MSM at least not an MSNBC mentioned the Ghislaine Maxwell trial and I just want to point out for Rittenhouse you know luckily he had a judge he got off but why are we caring that this guy all of a sudden is he's saying that he supports BLM that he doesn't think there was any election fraud and is picking on Lynn Wood and not being, from my understanding, accurate.
Why do we care what this kid has to say?
Is that part of a PSYOP too?
I just wonder.
For him to come out and chime in on the elections.
Dude, you know, that's, we all know that there was election effery there.
So I just, I just think that we are stoking the flames of racism and that we forget that we had a black president.
For eight years.
And of course, in certain parts, there are people who are racist, but no more so.
And now that's no longer the case.
Everybody's a white supremacist, including me.
And so it's okay to show racism towards white people.
Oh, I agree.
You're making great points, Mariam.
Great points.
I know Kyle was invited to Mar-a-Lago and met with Donald Trump, and I knew, of course, he'd said actually that he supported BLM and thought changes need to be made, that he believes the election was legit is news to me, however, and suggests he may be less politically astute than many of us would like to believe.
But he represents self-defense.
Sure.
He represents a Second Amendment.
And this is so contrary to the prevailing Democrat agenda and platform in politics that it's causing them great concern, just as having a black activist drive into a parade full of white people just demolishes it altogether because it deprives them of the narrative that blacks are Always the victims and never can be, you know, shown sufficient deference, which also, of course, is contradicted by the Aubrey trial down in Georgia, where you got three white guys convicted of killing a black man.
And in my opinion, based on exaggerated charges, I mean, that had to not be deliberate.
Apprehended him, yes.
But killing him, no.
I can't see where manslaughter wouldn't be the highest charge they ought to face.
But they were convicted of malice murder and felony murder.
And this is pretty bizarre.
I agree 100%, by the way, about the efforts to exacerbate and create more racism in a country where we don't need it.
I want to also add, if the MSN from the get-go, their talking points, if we use George Floyd, And they specifically say white cop, black man.
They're the ones who are putting race into the incident.
And then after all of that, Keith Ellison to give a big F you to the world on 60 Minutes and say that it had nothing to do with race because it had nothing to do with race.
Also in this case with Daryl Brooks.
That the DA, the Milwaukee DA, stated that the bail, $1,000, that's inappropriately low.
And AOC is, you know, they're pushing for bail reform.
Mariam, this is just so destructive of AOC in the progressive position.
See, I don't think they can recover.
Everyone in the country is fixated on this case now because it's so horrific and the idea they could get away with it.
AOC has no brains, no common sense.
She's an actress.
I don't, I can't understand this guy got a thousand dollar bail and a church that has never had a record, never been arrested, doesn't even get due processes and stuck in jail for 17 months.
Who are the crooks?
The government is.
Oh, Miriam, that's great.
We'll need to learn more about the case you're standing up for.
It sounds very important.
Meanwhile, we'll be right back.
Here we have far-left actress Debra Messing bucking the narrative on the lethal Waukesha parade attack.
One of the few on the left demanding the media to frame the horrific incident as a domestic terror attack is Debra Messing.
Dear mainstream media, The man intentionally drove his car through a parade killing six and injuring 50 plus.
It was not an accident, she tweeted.
Call it by its name.
Waukesha Massacre.
It was a domestic terrorist attack.
Don't minimize, please.
Bessie's been an outspoken critic against conservatives, former President Trump and his supporters.
In one humorous instance, she expressed shock and confusion at a headline from the right-wing satire site The Babylon Bee and later pretended she hadn't been fooled by the joke.
Brooks has been charged with five counts of first-degree intentional homicide, given the extraordinary bail of $5 million.
If convicted, he could face life in prison for each.
Messing is best known for her title role in the television comedy series Will & Grace.
In 2019, Trump tweeted, Messing should be fired from the show.
Well, so it goes.
Meanwhile, we now return This is an interesting piece that appeared on Reader Supported News, which is a left-wing website trying to argue that Rittenhouse was acquitted because the judicial system is dominated by whites.
I'll just read you part of it.
And because there was an opportunity here to engage in debate with an audience I don't normally reach, I actually posted comments on it and got some support where I know of no other of recent where there were any comments at all.
Here's what the author Adam Serwer wrote.
It's one thing to argue the jury reached a reasonable verdict based on the law and another entirely to celebrate Rittenhouse's actions.
The U.S.
is a nation of Washington firearms.
Gun owners are a powerful and politically active constituency.
In state after state, they've helped elect politicians who, in turn, have created a permissive legal regime for the carry and use of firearms, rules that go far beyond how courts originally understood the concept of self-defense.
These laws have made it difficult to convict any gun owner who knowingly puts themselves in circumstances where they are likely to use their weapon.
That is, anyone who goes looking for a fine.
It should come as no surprise then that Kyle Rittenhouse was acquitted of all charges after shooting three men in Kenosha, Wisconsin in 2020.
According to Wisconsin law, Rittenhouse need not have proved he acted in self-defense.
to testify against Rittenhouse at his trial. According to Wisconsin law, Rittenhouse need
not have proved he acted in self-defense. Rather, the state had to prove that he did not
once he entered the plea. Even if Rittenhouse traveled to Kenosha with a firearm because he
wanted to put himself in a position to use it, which is contrary to the facts, by the way,
as David French writes, the narrow nature of self-defense inquiry was one reason people
can escape responsibility for killings that are deeply wrongful in every moral sense.
And so.
Under some circumstances, Wisconsin laws allows an individual to provoke an attack and still claim self-defense.
Let me say, this is just rubbish.
There were five different elements they had to be satisfied in each case.
The law is very specific here.
It ain't easy to justify self-defense.
It's one thing to argue the jury reached a reasonable verdict based on the law, another entirely to celebrate Rittenhouse's actions.
Much of the conservative media and the Republican Party, however, don't see the killings as wrongful in any sense, instead elevate Rittenhouse to the manifestation of retributive violence against our political enemies.
So I wrote It's embarrassing you published an ideological defense of the Rittenhouse prosecution where three members of the same family, the mayor, the DA, and the detective, appear to have conspired against Kyle to deny his legal rights.
Kyle took a citizen's commitment to defend property and human rights more seriously than the Kenosha police, who stood down while looting and rioting was taking place.
He sought to provide medical assistance for which he was attacked.
A meticulous legal analysis by Andrew Branca provides a thorough and detailed exoneration on every account.
That's why the prosecution now wants to include lesser charges they know they have no case.
Kyle was kicked in the face by one rioter, another tried to break his neck with a skateboard, a third admitted he had a handgun and was pointing it at Kyle who shot him in the arm.
They, not Kyle, were the aggressors.
It's insulting for anyone to suggest that he was acting as a vigilante and patrolling with illegally obtained guns, neither of which appears to be the case.
On the contrary, Kyle's actions were heroic.
His father lives in Kenosha, where he worked as a lifeguard.
He's been invited to help defend a car dealership.
He was not looking for trouble, and each of the thugs he shot were trying to kill him.
As a former Marine Corps officer who supervised 15 DIs and 300 recruits through basic training, his performance was admirable.
The attacks were imminent and deadly.
His actions were reasonable.
The media and its allies must attack Kyle because his example of self-defense is inspiring.
And he showed the world why an AR-15 might make a difference for the public good.
He deserves our admiration.
Then we got back from Midwest Dick.
I imagine you approve as well of Dylann Roof, a disciplined and well-trained shooter defending against an impending slave revolt.
Or what about the determined and resourceful Stephen Paddock, who stood his ground against country musing?
Apparently you trained men who went into the jungle and deserts and caves of the peasant peoples of the world and took target practice on them and called it defending freedom.
Not surprising you'd laud Cryin' Kyle.
We have been told, we have been sold the idea that this sort of asymmetrical violence protects our freedom.
We have lived with this lie for all of our lives.
No wonder we cannot see what is laid right in front of us so plainly, and that is this.
An active shooter went on a rampage, killed two and wounded another.
Instead, you are blabbering about self-defense.
If it only was just you.
If only.
But in fact, an enormous number of Americans are right there with you, drooling like Pavlov's dogs, incapable of thinking their way past the insane idea that roaming far from home to take target practice on distant people is justifiable defense.
I replied, well, when you can't deal with a question, change the subject.
Remarkable here example of someone who wants to pretend he has answers when he has no idea what he's talking about in relation to Dylan Roof, who is said to have shot up a church in Charleston, South Carolina.
The video of his entry at 0800 means it was shot at 8 a.m.
when the shooting took place around 8 p.m.
And the first thing the cops did when they arrested him was take him to Burger King for a Whopper.
The Las Vegas situation where Steven Paddock is alleged to have shot and killed 60 by the Wiki narrative was something else again.
They used a pre-recorded soundtrack and special visual effects to create the impression of a mass shooting, but it was a movie.
Nobody died, with the possible exception of the purported shooter.
I've laid it out in detail in one of my presentations with Bayan Ruh, for which I provided the link.
I don't claim to be infallible, so if you can find something wrong, let me know.
I have my email address and all but my first post here, but come to grips with the evidence.
I taught logic, critical thinking, and scientific reasoning for 35 years before my retirement as a professor of philosophy in 2006.
I see no indication of any of the above in the article I am critiquing or the comments that have been posted.
You have to do better to understand what's going on here.
Midwest Dick replies.
Well, Doc, I sound correct.
You have proved with geometric logic that the strawberries were stolen.
Don't be modest.
You are infallible, and the families and friends of the 70 or so people you brought back to life should worship you.
Here's another, anonymous.
We don't need vigilantes running around with AR-15s.
We have police.
And if citizens believe the police aren't doing an adequate job, then a reasonable citizen encourages their politicians to provide better police.
In response, Glad you rose to the occasion.
He was not a vigilante, though you and the author here might like to portray him as such.
He was a civic-minded young man who was willing to shoulder responsibilities that the mayor had not, where he even appears to have ordered the Kenosha police to stand down.
The Democrat Party has been on the wrong side of a series of issues that have eroded confidence of the American people.
Defunding the police, for example, was an incredibly stupid platform, where now many cities, including Minneapolis, Seattle, and New York, are reversing course.
That prominent figures such as Maxine Waters, Kamala Harris, and even Nancy Pelosi were publicly encouraging the rioting, looting, and arson across the nation did not improve the party's image.
And discrediting the conscientious efforts of the jury in the Rittenhouse case damages your image more.
It's not just your siding with three goons with lengthy criminal records, including convictions for pedophilia, child rape, domestic abuse, and burglary.
But that the prosecution filed unwarranted charges, subordinated perjury, and withheld evidence in violation of its obligations to the judicial system.
They were pursuing Kyle.
He was not pursuing them.
He was trying to evade them, but they would not let him get away and aggressively assaulted him.
Joseph Rosenbaum, 39, for example, had threatened to kill him if he got him alone and ambushed him in the car lot where Kyle was boxed in.
You might think Rosenbaum was unarmed, but more parties are killed in the U.S.
by being beaten or strangled to death and die from gunshot wounds for the overwhelming who are shot or shot by handguns, not by rivals.
And most murders in America are blacks killed by other blacks, not by whites.
AnthonyHumor26 repeatedly assaulted Kyle with a skateboard, which was a deadly weapon, and in case you're unaware, Gage Rosenkrantz, now 27, admitted under oath that Kyle did not shoot him when his hands were off, but only when he pointed his pistol at Kyle's head.
Do you know that?
There are five elements to self-defense, namely innocence, imminence, proportionality, avoidance, and reasonableness.
The jury had to determine whether his plea of self-defense was or was not applicable to each of the five felonies charged against him.
They found that they did.
So the suggestion that we should not be surprised by his acquittal because of gun lobby exercises influence simply does not apply here.
They took four days to ascertain whether in each instance Kyle was exonerated by satisfying those five criteria with respect to the charges brought against him.
There seems to be a tendency by Democrats to believe their own propaganda.
Terry McAuliffe went down to defeat because he could not appreciate parents' concern about what their children were being taught in the public schools, while Glenn Youngkin understood and appreciated their concerns.
All McAuliffe had to offer was vague allegations of racism and attacks on Donald Trump, who was not on the ballot.
Indeed, one might have thought Democrats would celebrate the election of a black woman as lieutenant governor and of an Hispanic as attorney general.
But they were of the wrong party.
Americans see through the hypocrisy.
I myself voted for Bill Clinton twice and for Barack Obama twice, but when the choice was between a woman with a history of corruption and a popular guy who is not part of the Washington establishment, it was an easy call, actually a no-brainer.
The party appears to be in denial about what happened in Virginia and New Jersey, but I guarantee that it's going to happen again and again.
And Disenchantment without Biden-Harris or handling the pandemic with mandates are not strengthening your cause.
Even the courts are rejecting them.
Preoccupation with race and gender is un-American and divisive.
Removing statues and renaming schools who are honoring some of the greatest figures of American history are mind-boggling to those of us who understand what's going on.
And trying to take our guns is an entirely lost cause.
Don't you realize that if you defund the police, there will be less police and the public will realize that if we cannot defend ourselves, we are lost?
It appears to many that Democrats have become ideologues and zealots, completely disconnected from the realities of life.
You have lost your way.
Anonymous reply.
He was a civic-minded young man.
No, he was the stupidest dude to ever roam the earth.
Number two might be Judge Schroeder.
Number three might be you.
Do you realize you are writing duracinated diatribe of the type English instructors try to get college freshmen not to do any work in a university?
Any chance we can take away tenure?
John Escher.
Meanwhile, glad you had the sense to vote for Clinton and Obama, not glad you think it's okay for 17-year-olds to show up at protests with AR-15s.
Don't make this into something political.
If the evidence supports acquittal, then that is fine.
It is justice.
Don't promote.
The solution is for snot-nosed kids showing up at high-stress environments with semi-automatic weapons, a little common-sense marine.
My comments are in response to an incredibly politically slanted piece suggesting why the Rittenhouse case should be viewed as political when it was a case of self-defense.
That Democrats are still trying to sell the gun control agenda when they are defunding the police and supporting riots, looting, and arson.
May explain why they're going to be wiped out in 2022, assuming they don't steal the election as they did in 2020.
And look at what Biden and Harris have done for Americans in less than a year.
The border is out of control.
Inflation is soaring.
The economy is a mess.
We are energy dependent again.
If you think the American people like any of this, think again.
Biden at 38 percent, Harris at 28 and dropping.
Reply.
Here's an excellent video of what happened in Kenosha that night with Kyle and company.
This was an ad by me where you actually see what happened.
Compare this account with a commentary published by RSN and the other comments here.
Just think it through.
Well, I wanted to give you a sample of what's going on there and how the left is trying to promote a specious theory of the case that bears no correspondence to the facts whatsoever.
And again, as I say, this was much longer.
There were many more parts, but I wanted to engage an audience with which I normally have no contact, Joe.
Yeah, well, the events in Kenosha happened after three days of riots, which were not mediated by the local police or the National Guard.
So you had a failure of leadership on a county and statewide basis, and there was over $50 million of damage.
There can be mass casualty events that are staged crisis actor events, and I think we've all identified a number of those.
But there's also the chance that you're going to someday be in a situation where you're going to be in a live fire exercise and I've had four times in my life where I've had somebody shooting at me with deadly intent and where I've returned fire not with deadly intent but to Mediate the situation, and I don't want to go into detail about it.
It's not important, but what is important is the five aspects that Jim had mentioned earlier on justified use of deadly force, and that's by an attorney named Andrew Branca, B-R-A-N-C-A.
He's got a great site about law of self-defense and his motto is carry a gun to make it you carry a gun to make it hard to be killed know the law to make it hard to be convicted because anytime you use lethal force it's a life-changing event even if you're not injured at all it's still it's something you're going to live with the rest of your life and when
When you're squeezing the trigger, there's a lot that goes through your head.
You need to make sure that what's going through your head is that you are 100% defensible in that use of force.
Nice points, Miriam.
In regards to your back and forth, I mean, I welcome conversation and what we see in this day and age is a lack of being able to grasp details.
And nuance and you know, I wish that I was a judge because I would look at every case and I would also base it on the caliber of the person.
And right now it's just us.
There is, there is no justice.
I mean, I'm glad that Rittenhouse got off and we know that it's not really him that was on trial, but self-defense.
in itself and a continuation of coming after the Second Amendment now that they've pretty much
you know we're better off than in other places I guess but they've done a doozy to First Amendment
and in regards to the First Amendment the way they solved it is freedom of speech but no freedom of
reach. Just anyone that can influence or that is real and not compromised is shadow banned or
censored. We talk about scientists being persecuted and doctors but we don't really often talk about
real journalists who've had careers been part of the mainstream and are now begging him
Here, please take my amazing piece of research.
I'm certainly not the only one.
In any case, deracinated is a French word.
I appreciated that.
And just for the record that Brooks has been charged in the past for mowing down a woman.
This is not the first time.
I know he was let out on bail.
That was a charge for which he was being indicted.
You're absolutely right, Miriam.
And by the way, I think you'd make an excellent judge.
Yeah, thanks.
We're lacking, we're really lacking a sense of wisdom here, you know, from, from our elders.
I am really scared about this emerging, these, these kids, these kids that are going to grow up masked That are growing up hateful, vengeance instead of justice.
It's really sad and because we're boiling frogs, people don't have long-term vision.
They don't really see in the long term all the, you know, when we're going to look back when we get to 2030, we're not going to recognize where we're living anymore.
Sad.
I'm sad to say that I think you're 100% right.
Spot on.
Meanwhile, this to me is humorous, but there's some who think that Kyle Rittenhouse was Noah Posner all grown up, where he was supposed to be a Sandy Hook victim.
Having done a huge amount of research on this, my colleague Kelly Watt noticed there was a striking resemblance between the young Noah In a party that was supposed to be his older stepbrother, Michael Vabner, we went to work on this question.
They had the same eyes, they had the same nose, they had the same mouth, they had the same eyebrows, they had the same ears, they had the same shape of skull.
So I asked Larry Rivera, who's done brilliant work proving the figure known as Doorman standing in the doorway of the Texas School Book Depository was, in fact, Lee Oswald, as Harold Weisberg, Jim Garrison, and other serious students of JFK have believed.
So I'm sure he could help to resolve this issue by superposition.
I sent him those two top photographs without identifying them or providing the context.
He did not know it had anything to do with Sandy Hook.
But he provided a gift.
And here you can see Noah turn into Michael Vabner.
Or should we say how Michael Vabner was created out of photographs of himself as a child to be Noah Posner.
Look at this.
I regard this gift as perhaps the most powerful single proof we have that this is a fabrication.
Michael Vabner was already in college at the time of Sandy Hook.
He's since graduated.
He has a position in business in Connecticut.
He did not die at Sandy Hook.
This is a way, a proof of how it was done.
Completely stunning stuff.
Outrageous.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yeah, well, I saw those photos and I don't really see a whole lot of photographic comparison, number one.
Number two, the timelines wouldn't match up because he wouldn't have time to go play in Sandy Hook and then turn around and be with his mom in whatever little city it is in northern Illinois, which is right across the border from Kenosha.
So anyhow, I wish the kid best of luck.
I think he's got some slam dunk liability cases against the media and Joe Biden, as a candidate, made derogatory statements, and as a candidate, you're not protected.
If you're an elected politician, you're pretty much immune from slander and liability, but hopefully he gets to rack that guy's cage a little bit, too.
Yeah, well the way they faked the kids in Sandy Hook was to use photographs of older kids when they were younger, and then, as Mona Alexis Presley has uncovered, she's one of my research colleagues, some of the parents appear to have even used photographs of themselves when they were children to be the decedents at Sandy Hook.
It's that cynical, it's that crass, it's that blatant.
Miriam, your thoughts?
Yeah, I'm not, I'm not familiar with this case.
However, from my understanding of researching crisis actors, that they seem to keep it, Homeland Security keeps, seems to keep it in the family and recirculate these characters, which offhand sounds absurd because the gall or how could they You know, is it a silent F.U.
like, for instance, with George Floyd having the teacher anal sexton as if she really kept his second grade clippings?
Please, come on.
So, you know, it's brazen.
And do they keep it in the family?
Is Homeland Security involved?
Do they power work with Hollywood?
But more and more, as I've said, I really do believe, I agree that we live in an actor based reality and it's the Truman Show and we're the participants.
Again, I think a lot of what happened this week is distraction.
Meanwhile, there's a earthquake.
I mean, the volcano, we're on day 60 of La Palma and there's a huge I mean, even the Theranos case didn't get, I think, the coverage that it deserved, given Kissinger and others.
If Theranos' thing had come out, her invention of a pinprick, I mean, it would have kind of nullified a lot of things with the coronavirus.
I liked all that.
Let me just illustrate how bad it is, Miriam.
Susan Brough, who's supposed to be the mother of Heather Heyer in Charlottesville, supposed to have died in an automobile crash.
She actually did not.
She died the following day from a heart attack.
Is played by the same woman crisis actor who plays Donna Soto, the mother of Victoria Soto, one of the Sandy Hook teachers, the same crisis actors plays both.
And would you believe right now there are major lawsuits against Remington and Alex Jones where Donna Soto is the lead Plaintiff?
I mean, I'm telling you, it is so insulting, and I'm doing what I can to interview and get these things straightened out, but it's a stacked deck.
The courts who are proceeding don't even care whether anybody died at Sandy Hook.
They just take it for granted and move on.
Absolutely.
And I'm pointing out that you cannot just do that, that there's a mountain of evidence that it did not happen, that it was a FEMA drill presented as mass murder to promote gun control, and that the fact is disputed and needs to be investigated and even sent to a jury for trial.
But they're doing all they can to explain I mean, even suggesting, sorry, even suggesting that, that you become, I mean, look at what they did to Alex, look at what they did to your books.
What, what is, if it's not an FU, I mean, there's no shortage of actors out there.
So what is the point of them, you know, like if you just take the case that I'm very familiar with, George Floyd, they're all convicted criminals.
Shawanda is they she was prosecuted for she's charged with prostitution.
Maurice is actually is the one who choked his baby mama and was had an outstanding war warrant.
And then, of course, George, who's been a career criminal since the age of 24, That the MSM did not show any of his mugshots.
So what's the logic of using criminals?
Is it because you can own them?
They belong to you because they're going to go back to jail?
And what's the logic of recirculating these actors when there's no shortage of people you can hire, right?
People running these ops aren't rocket scientists, Mary.
And they commit blunders.
Otherwise, we wouldn't be able to detect and sort them out.
Which is why I have, you know, six books on Sandy Hook, Boston bombing, Orlando, Dallas, Parkland, Charlottesville.
One forthcoming on Las Vegas.
I mean, they were all sham.
They were all sham.
And with a possible exception of the alleged shooter at Las Vegas, nobody died at any of those events.
It's unbelievable.
And then also the, the no shortage of, uh, Luciferian, like 33, like even, you know, I said, I'm writing this press release and Oregon helping organizing this protest.
And so then I look at the Miami.
Federal prison, the detention center.
Oh, of course, it's on 33 4th Street.
The asymptomatic testing center for their bullshit PCR test is on 3333 California Street.
Is it just a coincidence that they use these numbers?
Yes.
No, you're absolutely right.
Yes, yes, yes.
It all has satanic, masonic.
They're telling us what they're doing for others who are aware of the situation.
I just find this such a devastating proof.
I can't imagine how anyone could keep their head screwed on straight and believe Sandy Hook had been real once they understand how it was done.
Meanwhile, the University of California is permanently removing standardized testing for admission.
This is unbelievable!
There was a time when the University of California was one of the great gems of American culture, a first-rate public university in California.
However, the Board of Regents has now announced they're going to eliminate standardized tests from the admission process with no alternative exam to be adopted.
During the board's meeting, they reached a consensus.
UC will continue to practice test-free admission now and in the future.
You might as well say we're going to continue to practice qualification-free admission.
Also, to help students build a successful college path, they'll straighten its relationship with kindergarten through 12th grade schools.
Cecilia Estolano, Chair of the Board, said the Regents are not feeling comfortable using any assessment in the admission process.
I thought I was joking!
They thought the decision to remove standardized tests is significant because it has set a standard that made a difference nationally.
Bob Schaefer, Executive Director of FairTest, the National Center for Fair and Open Testing, told the Times that UC is becoming a national model for test-free admissions.
Many schools are going test-free in their admission in the past two years.
A fourth-year chemistry biology at UC Berkeley told the Epoch Times the decision is a fair move because students have many more challenges due to the pandemic.
He added, it's best to have ACT and test scores optional, so high school students with lower grade point averages can use it as a boost in the admission process.
An international student studying statistics at UCLA said removing the SAT and ACT could affect the number of applicants.
If the UC schools don't require standardized tests, they will definitely attract more students who really like the University of California.
But there'll be more people taking AP and honor classes to make them more competitive.
A first-year transfer from Santa Monica College now studying history at Irvine said the admission process is fairer to the incoming freshmen without considering test scores.
He did not need to submit a SAT or ACT when he transferred.
It's a good thing.
It makes it equal between freshmen and transfer students.
Don Hung, a freshman studying business at Irvine, said standardized testing is a necessary way to measure everyone.
However, she said, SAT and ACT are not representative of students' intellects, but only of what they know.
They might be really smart people, but they go to schools that aren't very good.
There should be a different way to measure that kind of thing.
Ben Jia Zhang, a first-year electrical engineering student at UC San Diego, Said the UC should keep the SAT and ACT, even though it's not 100% fair to all students.
It's the closest we can get.
Meanwhile, the Biden administration is asking the US Court of Appeals to reinstate the OSHA vaccine.
Rule, which has been rejected by the Fifth Circuit Court.
Several lawsuits challenging the OSHA rule were combined into one intensive in the Cincinnati-based Sixth Circuit Court, 11 of 16 judges of whom are Republican appointees.
Two days after OSHA published a rule, the Fifth Court of Appeals, located in New Orleans, issued an order blocking the mandate.
Overnight, Biden administration filed court papers arguing the Fifth Circuit erroneously interpreted the mandate, saying the speculative compliance costs and similar harms asserted by regulated parties cannot overcome the extraordinary harms to the public interest detailed above.
Simply put, Delaying the standard would likely cost many lives per day, in addition to large numbers of hospitalizations, other serious health effects, and tremendous expense, which constitute harms of the highest order.
The administration also argued that it would deal significant economic damage to the United States.
Biden lawyers contend that forced shutdowns, though numerous studies have shown fully vaccinated, play a relevant role in spreading COVID, not simply the unvaccinated.
The OSHA rule mandates businesses with 100 or more have to either have their employers receive the vaccine or submit to weekly testing.
When it published earlier in November, it triggered a torrent of lawsuits from Republican-led states, individuals, businesses, and others.
The Fifth Circuit Court described the mandate as fatally flawed, told OSHA not to enforce it pending adequate judicial review.
After the ruling, OSHA said it would suspend enforcement.
Our message to businesses right now, according to the press secretary, is to move forward with measures that will make their workplaces safer and protect the workforce.
That was our message before the first day issued by the Fifth Court.
That remains our message.
Nothing has changed.
Meanwhile, John Hopkins' analysis of the U.S.
case-to-fatality ratio suggests COVID-19 patients have a 99% survival rate.
Joe, we've dealt with this at such great length.
I think it's pathetic what Biden is doing here.
Your thoughts?
Well, we had two subjects in this little episode, so let's start with the college entrance exams with the mandatory vaccinations that are going on in California.
of the clot shot.
It looks like the only examination you're going to have to pass is if you have a body temperature of 98.6 because these things are going to be absolutely terminal.
And like we've said repeatedly, Jim and I have 70 Interviews up at BitChute, but the information is absolutely everywhere.
Anybody that has the slightest amount of curiosity, I'll put links in the comment section to doctors that I have personally met and heard them make presentations and reviewed their material, and every bit of it is based on peer-reviewed, most of it NIH, VARs, you know, a whole series of databases that show exactly how dangerous these things are.
So You know, all I could say is if you haven't been shot, don't.
And if you think you need a booster, don't.
Because this is not where you want to go.
Well, this is the destruction of a once great university system.
I mean, this is just reducing higher education to rubble.
I'm just embarrassed and shocked.
Miriam, your thoughts?
Well, the education system, to begin with, compared to, let's say, where I come from in Canada, back before it was Commie Canada, my education... I mean, it's just different.
The way you test people is different.
I know people in California, Egyptians, that applied as African-American in order to get in.
There's just...
So much.
All these systems have to collapse.
As far as the OSHA and the mandates, the fact that Circle Back Gen is saying to keep going forward despite the legal challenges is in itself illegal.
And we all are experiencing fatigue.
I'm just like, maybe you can relate.
I know I have friends that relate.
In my dreams, there is no corona.
And then when I wake up, it kind of just seeps over the reality of this bullshit trauma and having to navigate these vaccinated people like we see the hateful jabbed people.
Just wanting us to disappear or I've been told to die and I hope you get COVID and die.
And I don't want to have hate in my heart for vaccinated people.
However, like for instance, I went to run an errand and I know that the person was vaccinated because now I can, I had a three day headache.
And it was happening in San Francisco when I was rooming with vaccinated people or had a body worker that I was working with that was vaccinated and it's the same type of headache, which So that's just a headache as opposed to all the other shedding.
There are, according to Dr. Sherry Tenpenny, 40 different mechanisms of injury when it comes to this jab.
I just returned from St.
Pete with Robert Malone and Peter McCullough and Dr. Sherry Tenpenny and Dr. Carrie Madej And others, including Dr. Jared Roscoe, who put on the event, he was seeing patients with elevated D-dimer, profuse bleeding, menstruation, and none of them were vaccinated.
In fact, doesn't allow.
And it has to come to the point, let's say, I had an autoimmune condition, I like body work, That I have to say, can I have an unvaccinated person, which sounds discriminatory.
Because, and in essence, if you're an acupuncturist, you're a yoga teacher, all of these health spaces that have been co-opted because these people have forgotten they have an immune system.
I want to say that this week I called Pfizer, actually Pfizer called me back.
And this time it was Pfizer, it's Pfizer's adverse reactions line.
And you can hear the call and I'm calling to report my mother's adverse reactions.
I knew I'm super intuitive.
I was feeling that my mother was hiding something.
And I found out that three days after her second jab, she ended up in the ER.
They told her that it's just the antibodies that are reacting to the replication of the S proteins
because she's an S protein factory and said basically that her body's doing her job.
But now my mother has a permanent respiratory issue from this effing jab.
And when I was speaking to the woman, I said, so how many people do,
how many calls have you taken today?
Oh, if you want that answer, I have to reroute you.
And I said, because I am one person and was speaking to a realtor and found out he knows five people who've died.
That's just me in one day.
I have hundreds of stories that I've collected.
She refused to answer.
I refused to answer and I said, is this line, are you sharing any of this information with VAERS?
No, it's just for us to collect data.
And I said, thanks, I'm glad my mother can serve as a lab rat for your data, because now we're all lab rats.
How much longer is this horror going to continue?
Oh, Miriam, that was- I'm sorry for my rant, but this is really like- Oh, no, no, on the contrary.
This is my space.
On the contrary, it was eloquent and powerful, and I'm so glad you could partake.
Is this the occasion when you must, can you continue with us, or?
No, I must go, because I have to be somewhere at five.
Oh, Miriam, this was perfect.
This was perfect.
You made a marvelous contribution today.
I cannot thank you enough.
Thank you both.
And yeah, I would just say, please go.
I'm posting it on Gab Bitchute.
Go and listen to what these Pfizer cowards are saying.
How do they sleep at night?
I said, you know damn well that you collect these calls all day.
And she goes, we have a lot of different products that I answer.
No, I'm talking to you about this COVID vaccine.
And how much more?
We can all be whistleblowers today.
Gather your balls and stand up while they strip away our rights and destroy this country.
Thank you.
Keep up the great fight, Maryam.
We're just delighted to have you with us.
God bless.
Happy Thanksgiving.
I'm signing off.
We look forward to having you back next week.
Yes.
Thank you.
Bye-bye.
Bye now.
Bye.
They're being dismantled by the thousands.
On November 27, 2012, the High Court of the State of Rajasthan, India's largest state geographically, ordered the removal of all cell towers from the vicinity of schools, colleges, hospitals, and playgrounds because of radiation hazardous to life.
The court's amazing 200-page decision thoroughly reviews the worldwide evidence that cell towers are harming human beings and wildlife.
It's available here.
On July 5th, the Supreme Court of India upheld the decision.
Two weeks ago, the city of Mumbai, the most populous city in India, prohibited cell towers in the vicinity of schools, colleges, orphanages, child rehabilitation centers, and old-age homes, ordered that nearby antennas should not be directed toward these types of buildings.
...or that existing antennae on schools, colleges, and hospitals be removed.
It also prohibited the installation of antennae on residential roofs without the consent of every person on the top floor, as well as of 70% of those in the rest of the building.
It will start the process of dismantling 3,200 illegal rooftop towers within the next few weeks.
Absolutely fantastic!
Order!
India ordered the removal of all cell towers from the vicinity of schools, colleges, hospitals, etc., because of radiation hazards to life.
The court's amazing 200-page decision reviews the worldwide evidence that cell towers are harming human beings and wildlife.
And here's a video about a drone that melted when it came into the vicinity of a cell tower.
Check this.
And I believe there is no soundtrack.
Just see what happens.
There it is bursting into flames.
bursting into flame, bursting into flame, bursting into flame.
bursting into flame. Joe, you sent me this, my friend.
This is a major, major story.
Deserves publication worldwide.
Your thoughts?
Yeah, well, the cell towers are so dangerous to wildlife that in England, wherever they're putting the towers up, they're having to cut trees down within 30 or 40 feet of the towers because the trees are dying anyway, so they just go ahead and preemptively cut them down so that people don't notice.
And then, you know, when you see a little fried squirrel or when you see a flock of birds that all fall out of the sky at the same time, it's like, well, that's just a coincidence.
We live in a world with an enormous amount of radiation.
Anything with a temperature over absolute zero emits electromagnetic radiation, and so our biological systems are accustomed to having a certain amount of background radiation.
What they are accustomed to is specialized, concentrated, triangulated death rays that are resonant frequencies that cause bodily harm, and there was a great doctor Robert O. Becker wrote a book called Body Electric, and I was invited to be a guest on Coast to Coast last Black Friday, by coincidence, 2020, and I did a two-hour discussion with Richard Seart on that, and I have an article called Body Electric Secrets at Principia Scientific, so if you wanted to go there and get an idea what the
What the thesis of the book is, they were able to regenerate amputated limbs on rats and decorted rats.
They were able to regrow spinal columns.
And then he also got real heavily involved in the electrical transmission and radio frequency interference with biological systems.
And that's when he had his funding shut off.
But his book is an absolute must read called Body Electric, Robert O. Becker.
So yeah, I'm opposed to this type of technology.
You can use 5G in a DSL fiber optic line and have no problem at all.
Carry all the data you want in that frequency range and nobody's being irritated and your signal is actually protected.
From interception anything you put out over the airwaves is subject to hacking and malware and you know everything else so why would you even want to do that?
It's my optic on the part of the electronics industry to keep forcing this and we have a watchdog which is a captured agency just like the FCC is captured Regulatory agency just exactly like the pharmaceutical industry watchdogs of CDC and FDA, so.
Joe, your work on this is just terrific.
Virtually peerless.
I'm so glad to have the benefit of your expertise.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send fan mail, pro or con, to liveneedtonowatgmail.com.
Liveneedtonowatgmail.com.
Here's a comment from one of those on my blog.
Jim Stone has been talking about this as well.
It seems we need to be very prepared for this sort of nonsense and very concerned about we manipulate through fear-based misdirection.
Sleight of hand, pre-digitation, all over the web.
Doing a radio podcast.
Yeah, and this is the only place I could find around here that had a 4G signal.
Gotcha. All right, just double checking before I leave. We own this property.
Yes ma'am.
God bless you.
Thanks.
Joe, all that came across, of course, on the air.
So were you being run off of the ranch?
No, I'm parked in a church parking lot.
And thankfully, she just wanted to know if I was OK.
And I said yes.
And so I wanted to give her a brief description.
Yeah, no, good, good, good.
OK, meanwhile.
Sleight of hand re-digitalization, maybe work all over the web, getting people to focus on all this nonsense stuff while the Collider is doing something and 5G is getting installed everywhere, may not be as bad as we think, and other events, congressional bills and activities, Elon Musk stuff going on and who knows what.
So yes, there may be an SV threat, or just a threat is enough for yet some other takedown freedoms.
The zombie stuff that's been pushed for a bunch of years may well be the setup for next spring and summer, when those who are vaccinated start dying by the thousand, perhaps millions across the world.
Well, I got news.
It's not going to be next spring and summer.
It's going to be this winter.
Angry and sick, they may strike out at anyone who comes their way, knowing no retribution will be worse than their impending death.
This may prove to be the predicted reality from 40 years ago.
A statement made in 1981 by French economist Jacques Attali.
The future will be finding a way to reduce the population.
We start with the old, because as soon as they exceed 60 to 65 years, people live longer than they produce, and that costs society dearly.
Then the weak, then the useless that do not help society, because there will always be more of them, and above all, ultimately the stupid.
Euthanasia will have to be an essential tool in our future societies in all cases.
Of course, we will not be able to execute people or build camps.
We will get rid of them by making them believe that it is for their own good.
Overpopulation.
It is much better when the human machine comes to an abrupt standstill than when it gradually deteriorates.
We will find or cause something, a pandemic, targeting certain people, a real economic crisis or not, a virus affecting the old or the fat, it doesn't matter, the weak will succumb to it, the fearful and stupid will believe in it and seek treatment.
Sound familiar?
Remember, 1% control the world, 4% are their puppets, 90% are asleep, 5% know and try to wake the 90%, the 1% use the 4% to prevent the 5% from waking up the 90%.
the 90%, the 1% use a 4% to prevent the 5% from waking up the 90%.
Final thoughts, Joe, yours.
Yeah, well, we've had over a year now of toxic trauma-based mind control.
And so yesterday when Jim and I were planning our show, I said, man, can we please talk about something positive?
Let's talk about the contributions of Western civilization to humanity.
So we had a great little discussion yesterday, and we covered quite a few subjects, and There wasn't an ability to go into depth on any of those, so I've got about probably 10 comments down in the comment section under Faux Science Slayer.
Watch the hour-long discussion that Jim and I had about the Wonderful benefits to humanity from Western culture, and then also you might want to look up Ismard Kingdom Brunel, the greatest engineer you never heard of.
That link is in the show notes, but also one of the guys in the comments, we started off talking about Abu Simbel, which was built in 4500 for Pharaoh Ramesses, and then adjacent to him was his queen,
Nefertiti's temple, and both of those were being flooded by the Aswan Dam, and so I made a discussion
about that and included that as part of Western culture, and one of the guys said, oh that's not
Western culture, and I went whoa whoa whoa the Greeks had a very active trading partnership with the
Egyptians before 700 BC.
Then the Persians came over in the 5th century and conquered the Egyptians, and the Egyptians didn't like being ruled by the Persians, and so in 332 BC, Alexander invaded and, with the help of the Egyptians, overthrew the Persians.
And then Greece ran Egypt until 30 BC, when their influence started dropping off, and the Romans came in and attacked.
And that was the thing that we discussed.
And then the Romans occupied Egypt until 395 AD.
So you had a 300-year period where the Greeks We're ruling in Egypt, and they built monuments, Greek monuments all over, and then the Romans came in for a 400-year period.
And if you think there wasn't an exchange of intellectual and technology between the Egyptians, and that could be the nexus for forming Western civilization that we always credit to the Greeks and the Romans, well, I'm sadly mistaken because that is the origin of Western culture.
And so we're not appropriating it or anything else.
It was gladly shared.
These were symbiotic systems that these people actually benefited from each other's presence.
So, and there again, there's plenty of Roman monuments all over Egypt too.
We lose audio.
So, so,
so, so,
Thank you.
Jim.
I can't.
Export Selection