All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 13, 2021 - Jim Fetzer
01:16:28
Need to Know News (12 November 2021) with Joe Olson and Maryam Henien
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer, Madison, Wisconsin, joined today by Joe Olson from Houston, and Miriam Hennane, still in Miami, I believe, Florida.
So we're here to bring you all the news you need to know.
We're glad to have this opportunity for Joe to join us.
We have the Pennsylvania Department of Health refusing to provide full COVID-19 death data.
How bad is that?
The reports were ordered a year ago when the House unanimously approved a resolution requiring the Registrative Budget and Finance Committee to review the Department of Health's reporting on COVID testing and deaths.
State Representative Kate Clonk sponsored the legislation, noting that throughout the pandemic there have been discrepancies in the information published by the Department of Health, including thousands of COVID-positive cases removed from the daily totals, days when there were significant statistical anomalies in the data, The commingling of data in COVID-19 being listed as a factor of death when the death was the result of something else.
So the task force was tasked with reporting rolling reports until 90 days after the governor's emergency declaration ends.
The declaration ended in June, and yet five months later, they issued their first report after a delay due to a lack of information.
Our intent was to review death certificates and records listed on their death the report says.
Although the information sought is generally confidential, the law provides exceptions.
Nevertheless, the request for death records was denied.
The Department of Health said in letters that it's not an agency of the government, that its work is not in the interest of conduct of official duty.
Its work studying and analyzing and reporting the death records is not research.
That's pretty stunning stuff!
This is the first of what will be several studies related to COVID-19 and it made some recommendations.
One, the Department of Health should improve its data collection and presentation on its website.
Two, the department should monitor the accuracy and cause of death reporting by creating a task force to address ongoing issues.
Three, The General Assembly should consider amending the Vital Statistics Law to expressly grant access to records to legislative agencies to avoid further confusion.
The 110-page report goes into detail about the intentions of the study and the difficulties in obtaining data.
Frankly, I don't think there's any doubt about it that what's going on here is a concealment of data because it doesn't support the official narrative that these vaccines are safe and effective.
Indeed, in a November 3rd letter, the acting Secretary of Health, Alison Beam, held to the position that the department is not authorized by law to share the requested death records.
I think that's totally fraudulent.
This is part of an elaborate cover-up.
The states appear to me to be just as complicit as the CDC, NIH, even the AMA.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yeah, there was a hack about a week ago of the European Medical Agency, EMA, on their FISA correspondence with various governments in the EU, and obvious cases of bribe, extortion, blackmail, just as much criminal activity as you could possibly imagine.
Hundreds of pages of this material, and I'll put a link to that article.
And then also, we have two great Americans Jessica Rose and Dr. Peter McCullough, who's the most highly peer-reviewed published cardiologist in the world, and they did a report using nothing but Bears data.
They showed that young males have a 19% Times increase in base rate of myocarditis after they've had the vaccines and that was published at a number of websites and the NIH went in and forced all of them to take them down.
There's one that's still available at in partial form at europepmc.org slash article.
I'll put that link in the comment sections as well.
And it has the abstract, which gives you an idea, but I was able to find online the five graphs that they brought up that were part of the VAR's data, and it's absolutely shocking.
How much longer they're going to be able to deny the unsafety of these things, as well as the un-efficacy of them, is just a mystery to me.
It's shocking.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Absolutely stunning.
And why in the world would they want to conceal reports about data unless it exposed that they've been lying to the public?
Mariam, your thoughts?
Yeah, absolutely.
Let's just say, let's start with saying that in journalism school they teach you to use big numbers.
You know, I've said this example before, 101 ways to get your man.
You just slap a big number.
And this PCR test is not a diagnostic tool and the story could have ended there.
So anyone who's like, oh, 700,000 people have died.
They're being mislabeled as COVID.
Coroners are being paid off.
Hospitals are being paid off.
So I always say they died of COVID.
Let me see the dossier as a functional medicine and A professional and expert so we can see where they vented, where they put on remdesivir, what details matter.
That is where the devil lies.
And as far as VAERS, I spied on a webinar on your, the wait is over parents, let's start jabbing our children.
And I sat on this call on this webinar.
And they stated that while they talk out of both sides of their mouth, while theirs is a repository of information, anybody and anything can be reported and it should not be taken seriously.
While they are telling parents, oh heart murmur?
It's okay, jab your child.
A flu vaccine?
Yeah, you could.
Don't wait.
Don't wait was the takeaway message.
So this is all corrupt.
They keep on doubling down.
I am going to be seeing and meeting Dr. McCullough in St.
Pete next week for a beautiful Medical Freedom event in Florida, if anyone is interested in joining.
Oh, sensational, Miriam.
We can't wait to get a report from you about that event.
Meanwhile, a radical Biden nominee says, quiet part out loud, we want to bankrupt the oil industry.
Just start to think about the catastrophic effects.
If you have any doubt that the radical left is alive and well in the Biden administration, this should wipe it out once and for all.
Soleil Mavara, the administration's dubious pick for controller of the currency, is a radical by pretty much anyone's definition, up for a job that would put her in charge of regulating the country's largest banks.
She published a paper earlier this year with a proposal to end banking as we know it.
And as the video now circulating online shows, she's on record desiring the destruction of the nation's fossil fuel industry.
Scared yet?
Documents show Sally Omavera was a committed communist and planned a career as a professor of scientific communism.
She hid her Karl Marx thesis and conveniently omit she was planning to be a professor of Marxism.
What else is omitted from her CV?
Whatever you think about climate change, the political forces on the left are leveraging the idea in their bid for globalization.
The pandemic is real, and the left politicizes it in a sweeping power grab.
They have no shame.
Except, of course, actually it's merely a mass illusion, but they're using it nonetheless.
Because as Henry Kissinger observed long ago, the facts don't matter, only perceptions.
Speaking in March at a social wealth seminar, Omavera made her feelings about the fossil fuel industry clear.
We want them to go bankrupt if we want to tackle climate change.
Born and raised in the Soviet Union, she graduated from Moscow State University.
In 1989, she still has nice things to say about the defunct USSR, where Western-style liberties were non-existent and millions died from man-made famines, arbitrary executions, and the notorious Gulag Archipelago.
Also, she advocates consumer banking be taken over by the Fed, wants a government to direct where loans are made.
Indeed, she's advocated the idea of a national investment authority, top-down control of the economy, that would basically implement the communist ideal of the state, having the ultimate power over what, in a capitalist system, are free market decisions.
For the record, she denies having communist or market sympathies, but the names that are used aren't nearly as important as the ideas.
Declaring she's a new target for critics because she's an immigrant, a woman, and a minority.
When it comes to the kind of government they conjure up, you got the picture, it's leftist, it's radical, it's a horror show.
If you have any doubt, Biden's on board with her ideas about fossil fuels.
The White House has confirmed the administration is studying the impact of shutting down the Enbridge Line 5 pipeline, which brings 450,000 barrels of oil a day—about 23 million gallons—to the U.S.
through Michigan, Straits, and McKinsey.
If you haven't noticed, gas parts prices are always sky high.
After his opening decision to shut down the Keystone XL pipeline, why would Biden consider shutting down another pipeline to make fuel prices go even higher?
Is he trying to destroy what the radical left sees as deplorable middle America?
Put the gas, coal, and oil industries out of business.
Nationalize the bank.
What comes next?
Hand over the rest of our hard-wired American freedom to would-be globalist overlords?
I don't think so.
Omavera's nomination is a brazen show of the radical left plans for America, and Biden is with them.
Joe, I find this actually quite shocking.
Your thoughts?
Oh, well, yeah.
While Kissinger was still working, I believe, with the Carter administration, he's on record as saying, if you control the food, you can control the people.
If you control energy, you can control the nation.
So they're trying to control both of those simultaneously by doing the supply chain and the destruction of food crops.
And then they're also going to do everything they can to hobble us and in the energy sector and especially going into winter where they know that the natural elements can kill a whole bunch of people and they can say well it was just just nature you know we had a freeze in Texas last year and it was below freezing for four days which is a record for my area
Since recorded time, but it has been colder than that in the past.
Galveston Bay actually had ice all the way across it at two different times in the previous history, but I've written probably over 100 articles on the global warming fraud.
My most recent one kind of summarizes a lot of it.
It's called Stop Gore Bull Warbling, and that's at Principia Scientific.
Great article.
Well, you're doing a great job, Joe, in getting the word out.
Mariam, your thoughts?
Brazen is correct.
I think that it's a big F-you in the face of the people who have the eyes to truly discern and see, and the prices will continue to rise as we head into dark winter, and it's straight-up communism.
Yep, it's stunning.
It's stunning what's taking place here and it's happening awfully fast.
Really shocking.
Meanwhile, whistleblowers play a key role in enforcing Biden's vaccine rules, which of course are not even legal, doesn't have any constitutional or statutory authority, where the Fifth Circuit Court has put them on hold, but where Biden is moving forward anyway.
Get this, they have a 490-page regulation to cover American businesses with at least 100 workers or about 84 million employees.
If they got a 490-page regulation, when the hell was that written?
Obviously, long ago.
Employees, who will presumably be concerned enough to turn in their own employers, will be the core of informants.
They want to identify violators of the order.
It's not known how many will be willing to accept the risk to themselves or their job security for blowing the whistle on their own employers.
Without them, however, experts say the government would find it harder to achieve its goal of requiring tens of millions at large businesses to be fully vaccinated by January 4th.
There is no army of OSHA inspectors that's going to be knocking on employers' doors or even calling them, said Debbie Berkowitz, a former OSHA's Chief of Staff.
They're going to rely on workers and the union reps to file complaints where the company is totally plouting the law.
Under the regulation, businesses must maintain records on the workers' vaccination status.
But for workplaces where employees aren't required to be vaccinated, they'll need to get weekly tests and wear masks.
OSHA claims it plans to check on compliance by doing spot checks, while also relying on complaints.
We will have our staff available and responsive to complaints, even though, as I've explained many times, this has no warrant or justification.
The new rule, which Biden announced last week, is the administration's most far-reaching step yet to prod more Americans to get a vax, which is bringing about the death or disability of vast numbers of people.
He called the move necessary to combat an outbreak that's killed 750,000 Americans and continues to spread.
With fines of nearly $14,000 for a serious regulation, but it has run into furious opposition from leaders of mainly Republican states who have condemned the plan as an unlawful case of federal overreach and who immediately challenged it in court.
On Saturday, the administration endured a setback when a federal appellate court temporarily halted the order, saying it posed grave statutory and constitutional issues.
Should the regulation survive its legal challenges, which should not happen, where the Supreme Court seems to have lost its way so we can take nothing for granted, The task of enforcing would fall on OSHA, a small labor department agency established 50 years ago to police workplace safety and protect workers from dangers such as toxic chemicals, rickety ladders, and cave-ins at construction sites.
OSHA has jurisdiction in 29 states.
Others Including California and Michigan have their own federally approved workplace safety agencies.
For a task as enormous as enforcement here, OSHA and its state partners are stretched thin.
They have inspectors, but they don't have enough to do extensive preemptive investigations of employers.
OSHA urges workers to first bring unsafe or unhealthy working conditions to the attention of their employers.
And then file a case.
Remember, here's what we got from two Michigan experts on OSHA.
In reality, the standard, the mandate, was promulgated illegally.
The President of the United States does not have statutory authority to demand a regulatory agency create a new standard.
In addition, OSHA does not have jurisdiction over vaccines.
This belongs to the regulatory agencies of Health and Human Services and the FDA.
OSHA regulates workplace health and safety like slips, trips, falls, machine guarding, protection from airborne hazards, dust and fumes, chemical vapors.
They do not have the authority to mandate that employees inject anything in their bodies to control hazards as vaccines are not a control measure for a hazard.
OSHA cannot legally view unvaccinated workers as a hazard.
In order for OSHA to cite any organization for a violation of health and safety standards, they must cite the standard that has been violated.
To date, there's been no COVID standard created.
Therefore, Any penalty, citations, or administrative admonishment should be null and void.
Any organization that's received OSHA fines over the past year should demand a full refund, including damages, and that the company record be expunged from the citation.
There is so much wrong with all of this.
We cannot be afraid to stand up against it and expose it for what it is.
The cracks are beginning to show.
The dominoes are beginning to fall.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yeah, well, this was a stick that Let's Go Brandon held over everybody's head for about three or four months so that he could extort people into going down and getting the jabs because this was going to end up being inevitable.
And the state attorney generals have all said that they were going to file charges against them as soon as Rules were published and so now they've been published.
There's a dozen states that have already filed injunctions against him for being able to do this.
It's a shame that we don't have anybody at the FDA that's bothering to inspect safety because there was a whistleblower that worked for a Texas subcontractor for FDA doing Pfizer trials.
She reported gross irregularities and fraud from a company called Ventivia, which had three locations in Texas and had over 1000 test subjects.
And she was fired by that company.
Not only did FDA not do anything to investigate or sanction that company, they turned around and gave them a contract to do studies on pregnant women and also to do Pfizer studies on little kids.
Now, the British Medical Journal published an article on November 2 called, Researcher Blows the Whistle on Data Integrity Issues with the Pfizer Vaccine.
They spent over a month vetting every bit of the material that this woman provided them.
Her name is Brooke Jackson, and expect that one to result in some criminal actions.
And then one additional thing, Dr. David Martin was at the Red Pill Expo recently, and he came out with a video that's a bit shoot, and I'll put the link to that in the comments.
No more Mr. Nice Guy.
He says there's a guy that you've never heard of, Dustin Moskowitz.
Who was the co-founder with Greenberg, whose name is not really Zucker, but anyhow, he's the co-founder of Facebook, has billions of dollars, and has been able to keep his name scrubbed off of any search engine, and he's one of the principal people.
Dr. Martin goes into excruciating detail about how all these shell companies are set up to protect the parent companies and who the actual parent companies are, People you've never heard of.
The Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, J&J, those are just fronts.
Man, you're gonna be shocked.
45 minutes of absolutely stunning detail.
That's very disconcerting, Joe, but I suspect it all leads back to the Rothschild banking empire, as I've been emphasizing again and again.
Marion, your thoughts?
To dovetail on what Joe is saying, these are puppets.
Joey's not in charge.
He's a deep state asset that's a puppet.
And in regards to any people of credibility at the FDA, I thought that Atlas, I don't remember his first name, he didn't last long, he left.
Scott, yes.
Scott Atlas, to me, seemed like he had integrity.
I had wanted to meet him, to interview him.
490 pages.
How about the HEROES Act?
How about the CARES Act?
Thousands of pages.
When do they fart these documents out?
OSHA didn't have any even press release up until last week.
And now their emergency temporary standard.
They also have templates.
And they talk out of both sides of their mouth.
Like, for instance, I'll give you an example.
People now believe that starting December 1st, you can't go to Costa Rica because you need you need a vaccine card.
Well, my attorney told me you can get it.
You can get in if you have health insurance.
So people are not going to look under the surface.
They're not going to bother.
And they'll just follow orders of these unconstitutional These unconstitutional orders and it's like a boost, a donut, a blowjob.
They're going in tears.
Well, how can we get these people?
How can we get these people?
100 companies with 100 people.
Now we're going to go for companies that are smaller than 100 people and then just keep on boiling people slowly, slowly.
And unfortunately, this is a pandemic of cowardness, just just as much as it is a pandemic.
I think you got it.
I think you got that exactly right.
Sad to say.
Meanwhile, Microsoft takes wokeness to a whole new level in a bonkers presentation.
If you thought someone listing their preferred pronouns in their email signature was strange, wait till you see the latest leftist innovation from Microsoft, which of course was founded by Bill Gates, who's one of the monsters behind their phony pandemic in the depopulation agenda.
The opening to a recent event included each participant declaring their identity.
One example, hello everyone, I'm a Caucasian man with glasses and a beard.
I go by he him and I'm a security evangelist here at Microsoft.
Another, I'm a Caucasian woman with long blonde hair and I go by she her.
I'm a product marketing lead here at Microsoft and co-host of the broadcast Security Unlocked.
Are we really to the point we need to announce our ethnicity, pronouns, and even hair color when talking with one another?
Microsoft claimed it was an attempt to describe those for the visually impaired, but the visually impaired don't know what a red-colored shirt looks like and don't really care if the person was him, he, her, she had a beard or blonde hair.
What happened to treating people like people?
Do we really need to keep announcing our various traits or do we get to keep at least a little bit of our privacy in America?
And when did announcing your ethnicity became important?
The left's obsession with race is crazy.
Actually, it is bona fide insane.
Mark Dice has been calling it out.
And while I'm not a wild fan, he's certainly spot on in this instance.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yeah, well, I've never had a problem with my pronouns, so I didn't have to deal with that issue.
And it all goes back to the Orwell New Think New Speak issues in 1984.
I mean, that's exactly what they structured.
When we read that book in high school back in the 60s, it was a science fiction horror movie But we didn't know it was the blueprint for the future.
They just missed the date by a few decades, but that's exactly where we are.
Oceania has always, slash never, been at war with Eurasia, slash East Asia.
They've divided the world into three spheres, and they're trying to pit us against each other, and they also have the exact two minutes of hate that was in that program.
Absolutely insane.
It is.
It is.
It's lunacy.
Miriam?
I identify as a cat and my pronouns are a meow meow.
And I feel that this is all homogenization with the false allure that you're an individual, what's because you have purple hair or because you can supposedly differentiate and give all your pronouns.
I also can't, I don't even understand how there are all these Pronouns and it's just beyond me.
I don't want to play into it.
I can tell you that as soon as Joey got into power I've said this before any survey any formulaire they have now inputted different genders or I They've given this was not the case under Trump.
So this is all disgusting.
I'm completely I reread 1984 in 2019 and We are witnessing vaporization of truth.
Rewriting Ministry of Truth is alive and well, and we are all criminals committing thought crimes.
Yeah, it's unbelievable.
It's absolutely unbelievable.
Meanwhile, we'll be right back.
Here we have an agenda.
My name is Fiona and I am in second grade at Discovery Elementary.
I am back to talk to you again today and for anyone who thinks I didn't write my speech last time is wrong.
I wanted to be here then just like I do now.
Sorry if I'm I am supposed to be scared when I see people yelling at these meetings.
So I am back today and tomorrow is my birthday.
I am going to get suspended if I don't wear a mask for three more days.
Just because I get suspended for not wearing a mask isn't going to change my mind.
You can keep suspending me.
I still have the right not to wear a mask.
It is not fair that I'm getting punished because you guys, the school board, are not following the law.
That is not fair.
It just isn't right.
I'm still going to stand up for what I believe in and nothing's gonna change my mind.
I've been getting suspended a lot because I'm wearing a mask.
Do you know how dirty masks are?
Because you touch the mask, you put it on your face, you breathe all those germs in because you have lots of bacterias on your hand.
And okay, yeah, I hope you all go to jail for doing this to me.
And my family is proud of me.
And my Uncle Murphy that is in heaven is really proud of me.
and I want to say Burke sucks, but instead of your rules suck.
I mean how about that as well.
A second grader chewing out a school board for their absurd policies.
She's been repeatedly suspended, but she's resilient and speaking out.
Meanwhile, this is just horrifying.
Pfizer secretly added a heart attack drug to children's COVID medicine.
Why would they do that?
As though it weren't obvious.
The FDA Advisory Committee that voted 17-0 to approve jabs for kids as young as 5 was notified that children's formulation of the drug contains tromethamine, a chemical that reduces blood acidity and stabilizes people who've suffered a heart attack.
Each dose contains 10 micrograms of a nucleoside-modified messenger RNA encoding the spike protein, glycoprotein, of SARS-CoV-2 that's formulated in lipid particles and supplied as a frozen suspension in multiple-dose vials.
This is pretty disgusting.
To provide a vaccine with an improved stability profile, the vaccine now uses Tromethamine buffer instead of the phosphate-buffered saline used in previous formulations and exclude sodium chloride and potassium chloride.
This new formulation must be stored at a different temperature than the adult version.
Not so much as a second thought concerning the change in ingredients the FDA granted emergency use for the new drug.
This FDA briefing document was entitled, EUA Amendment Request for Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine for Use in Children 5-11, given to the Advisory Committee prior to its vote.
Many want to know why Pfizer felt the need to replace PBS with Trist and the children's version of its Fauci flu jab.
Does the company know that without it, fully vaccinated children will likely experience visible heart attacks?
Is stress being added to the children's vials that try to cover up the cardiovascular events they cause, or at least minimize them?
Why is none of this being reported by the mainstream?
Many questions without answers, since so few are asking them in the first place.
There may never be any answers unless we begin to demand them.
The FDA claims it conducted a thorough and transparent evaluation of the data.
But how can this be the case when the entire formula was changed under cover of darkness?
According to the Exposé, there's overwhelming evidence against the safety of the vaccine and how changes should never have been granted.
Children don't even get sick from COVID in the first place.
So why do they need a useless and dangerous vaccine that contains hidden heart attack medication?
Right.
Caused by respiratory depression, local irritation, tissue inflammation, injection site infection, febrile response, chemophlebitis, venospasm, hypervolemia, IV thrombosis, extravasation with possible necrosis and slowing of tissues, Transient decreases in blood glucose, hypoglycemia, and hepatic necrosis with infusion via low-lying umbilical venous catheters.
These are far worse than a few COVID sniffles, assuming a child developed any symptoms at all, where most children do not.
They're changing the jab all the time because it's experimental.
If nobody can take legal action against the pharma companies, then what's going to stop them?
One person pointed out Tris is a synthetic skincare additive that's considered to be an irritant.
Sounds delightful, they joked.
Just what you want flowing around your body, through your heart, lungs, and so on.
Completely disgusting.
Joe, your thoughts?
Joe, are you with us?
Yeah, I don't know why it cuts out every once in a while.
That clip with Fiona Lachelle is really incredible, and here's the amazing thing.
She was suspended from school 38 times since the mask law went into effect.
This two-minute video that you referred to, Uh went viral and today the school board announced that they are dropping their mask mandates so she's she's a hero in more eyes than just her her dead uncle and her family she's a hero for all of us and I posted that two-minute video up at gab.com and I said if only we had a few brave men like this
Yeah.
And then getting back to the Tamarithine.
Yeah, that's a really toxic substance to be adding.
And all they're trying to do is delay the micro clots that would be obvious with the child injections.
And over the weekend, since they have released the Pfizer for kids version, Walgreens and CVS both bragged that they had injected over a million kids each over the weekend.
And the CDC on their own records said that they had 94 recorded deaths out of 28 million children from COVID.
And we know that those don't include all the comorbidities, and we know that they're based on phony PCR tests.
So how many kids actually died?
What, maybe a dozen out of 28 million?
And for that, we're going to poison a whole generation of little children?
absolute criminal insanity.
And that was one of the things that really set off David Martin.
He said, if you're going after five-year-olds, all bets are off.
I'm going after you dirty privateers.
Yes, good, yes.
Yes, Miriam, your thoughts.
One, this child knows more than many, many, many, many adults.
What does that say?
As far as Tris, I broke the store.
10 days ago on October 28th.
And of course people co-opt my information, but it did break and Vagabond shared it.
And you could see it on record that I tweeted this.
And when I was writing my title, Tris is for kids.
And then I thought Trix is for kids.
And I called Pfizer and you could see the, hear the call where I ask, why are you adding this
to the children's formula?
This acid buffered, the ward off micro clots.
And now I've heard that it works so well that they're thinking to add it to the adult formulation?
I also will say again that there was a webinar being held this week on the wait is over and I spied on the call and the presentation and I also copied the questions being asked and I stated, why are you adding trits to the children's formulation?
My question just went ignored.
Well, you're doing excellent, Miriam.
I'm very impressed.
That's absolutely sensational that you've been calling it out, keeping on top of the story.
Meanwhile, Kyle Rittenhouse's defense team asked for a mistrial after he testified.
He did a super job on the stage.
A number of legal experts have been so impressed.
If the motion were to be granted, the state could not re-file charges against Rittenhouse because they asked for it to be dismissed with prejudice.
They asked for the mistrial based on the prosecutor's conduct in line of questioning, which violated repeatedly the judge's prior instructions about what they could and could not be allowed to ask.
They questioned him about statements he made before the shooting, which the judge had ruled were inadmissible.
Arguments over the motion led to shouting from the Kenosha judge, Bruce Schroeder, who's excellent, at the assistant district attorney, Thomas Binger, who is disgusting, which lasted for about 30 minutes.
The judge said, take the motion under advisement and rule later.
Meanwhile, here you have a photograph from the time they're having this exchange.
Before the motion, Rittenhouse, who shot and killed two and wounded a third, took the stand.
He recounted his version of events before breaking down in tears Wednesday morning.
Wearing a Navy suit and matching tie, he, now 18 years old, began answering questions from his defense attorney, Mark Richards, who's doing a fine job giving a step-by-step account of what he did on August 25th.
He was 17 at the time.
His lawyers have argued he was acting in self-defense.
There's actually, in my opinion, no doubt about it whatsoever.
Rittenhouse testified he was in downtown Kenosha that night offering first aid, protecting a car dealership with an AR-15.
...encountered Rosenberg before their fatal run-in, holding a chain at one point and threatening to kill him.
At first calm and collected, Rittenhouse began describing the confrontation.
Then he became visibly emotional, crying and having trouble speaking.
A brief recess led to his resuming his testimony, explaining he was threatened by Rosenberg and others around him.
Rosenberg was reaching for the barrel of his gun when he shot him.
Rittenhouse said after the shooting he called Dominic Black, a friend who gave him the gun, and told Black he'd shot someone.
He said he heard people shouting to capture him.
I continue to run after hearing people say cranium him, meaning shoot him in the head, get him, kill him.
People are screaming.
I was just trying to get to the police running down Sheridan Road.
Here he is, breaking down.
He faces multiple felony counts.
He could face life in prison.
He was arrested the third day of the protest following the shooting of a black man who was left paralyzed.
Rittenhouse traveled across the border from Illinois in response to a social media call from a Kenosha-based militia group saying it hoped to protect businesses from protesters A medical examiner who performed autopsies on the two men shot and killed testified detailing their fatal injuries for a jaw horse.
Doug Kelly, deputy chief medical examiner, explained that Huber had died from a single gunshot wound to the chest that caused blood loss and extensive trauma to heart and lungs.
That Rosenbaum had suffered multiple gunshots, including to his groin, hand, thigh, and back.
He testified the shot to the back was the lethal injury, the bullet hitting his lungs and liver.
It could prove significant because they're arguing self-defense.
It turns out he actually was leaning toward him, trying to attack him.
Kelly confirmed Rosenbaum was falling forward, not walking away when he was shot in the back.
Meaning he wasn't chasing after Rosenbaum, or that Rittenhouse was shooting him as he was fleeing.
This is an honest testimony.
Monday's testimony was accompanied by graphic photos of the fatal injuries shown to the jury, including the wound to Rosenbaum's head and a bullet wound in his back.
Rittenhouse turned away and looked down during the testimony, but at one point he looked over at jurors as they viewed the autopsy photos.
The trial began last week when 11 women and 9 men were chosen to serve on the jury.
There are now 18 people there after one was excused, and they'll cut it down to 12 for the actual deliberations, which are going to occur after closing arguments on Monday.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yeah, well, the medical examiner, Doug Kelly, also admitted that Rosen had powder burns on his hand, which you can only get if you're holding the barrel of the gun.
So that's obvious that Rosenberg was involved in physical contact with the kid at that point and then also Gage Grosskreutz admitted that he was holding a pistol and bringing it down to shoot Rittenhouse when he had his bicep blown off which he's lucky that that's all he had happen to him so he can go through the rest of his life with one arm incapacitated be a perfect example for him
Uh, the more disturbing detail is that they didn't have copies of the FBI drone footage until about a month before the trial.
They were leaked by somebody at the FBI that's apparently one of the honest ones that we keep hearing about there are at the FBI.
And then they also admitted that there was a infrared high resolution drone camera footage, which showed even more detail.
But when that was subpoenaed by the defense, the FBI said, well, we've destroyed that tape.
So if there's not enough malfeasance on the part of every one of the law enforcement agencies and the prosecutor on this, then we just don't have a justice system.
We just should go ahead and Hang everybody that's white and everybody that owns a gun and everybody that tries to defend themselves and everybody that's not woke.
Let's just hang everybody that's not woke.
We only got to kill A hundred and fifty million Americans to make it a wonderful country.
absolute insanity.
Well, the public's paying close attention to this trial, Joe, and the exposure of the
FBI, for example, withholding evidence or destroying evidence is just devastating.
I mean, that affects every single citizen in the United States, that their touted law
enforcement investigative agency is corrupt and willing to go to these measures for political
purposes.
And one more thing on that, just real quickly.
James O'Keefe had his front door busted down by the FBI Saturday morning, and they released his private information to the New York Times, who published it yesterday.
That's our FBI.
Disgusting beyond belief, Miriam.
This is actor-based reality.
This trial, you have the MSM just flat out lying.
People are eating.
We know this is so that we cannot even claim self-defense.
They are going after the Second Amendment.
They're using Kyle as a poster child.
If someone goes to my GAB or I posted it on my back channel on Twitter.
I spoke with Facebook whistleblower Ryan Hartwig, who sent a press release in regards to, on top of all this chicanery that's happening behind the scenes, there's a whistleblower who had exposed John Pierce in Rittenhouse case discovers another grifter in David Hancock.
So basically you can go and see Viva Frey and attorney Bob Barnes did a show.
Bob Barnes was involved and the long to sum it up basically the fund for to raise money at Free Kyle USA has been It's Milo Fund has been hijacked and we know that there are attorneys, there are people whose job it is to foil the situation and this has happened.
So Gordon Rose is the journalist who is bringing this to light and you can go to Lady B on Gab to check out the press release in regards to this Rittenhouse case.
Good, good, good stuff.
We actually have more about it A look at the key points in his testimony.
Normal teenage stuff.
Rittenhouse said he lived in Antioch, Illinois, just across the state line from Kenosha.
He enjoyed swimming, going to the beach with friends.
Normal teenage stuff.
He was a police explorer at the Gray Lake Police Department, a cadet with the Antioch Fire Department.
He was a certified Dwarf Guard trained in CPR, defibrillator use, and basic life support.
He said his father, grandmother, aunt and uncle, and a cousin live in Kenosha.
An apparent attempt to push back against a prosecution portrayal of him as an outsider who went there looking for trouble.
Why did he go?
The protests began on August 23rd, hours after a white Kenosha police officer shot Jacob Blake, a black man, during a domestic disturbance.
Rittenhouse said he saw video on social media of the unrest.
Two days later, he went downtown Kenosha and volunteered to clean graffiti off of a high school.
He met the owners of a car dealership where the vehicles had been burned, offered his condolences, said he wanted to help.
The owners asked his friend to protect their business and he joined his friend and others that night.
He took his semi-automatic rifle and first aid supplies.
He gave his bulletproof vest, which was issued by the Grayslake Police Department, to a friend.
He said he felt he wouldn't need it because I'm going to be helping people.
What did he say about his encounters with Rosenbaum?
He testified Rosenbaum threatened his life twice.
He'd been putting out fires asking if people needed help when Rosenbaum, carrying a steel chain wearing a mask, began screaming at him.
He was just mad about something.
He's screaming, if I catch any of you evers alone, I'm going to have him kill you.
When he encountered him later, Rosenbaum shouted, I'm going to cut your effing heart out and kill you.
Later, walking with a fire extinguisher after hearing protesters were burning cars at one of the lots his friends were seeking to protect, he saw a fire in a truck on one of the lots.
Then a Joshua Zeminsky approached him with a gun.
Rosenbaum came out from behind some cars and ambushed him.
He tried to run away, but Rosenbaum chased him as Zeminsky yelled, Get him!
Kill him!
Ruttenhaus sent Rosenbaum to a bag at him that he mistook for a chain.
He pointed his rifle at Rosenbaum, but Rosenbaum didn't stop.
He heard a gunshot behind him.
I remember his hand on the barrel of my gun.
He said he fired four times, went up to Rosenbaum to see if it could help him, then ran because people are saying, get his ass, get him, get him.
He also said later he feared that if he let Rosenbaum take his gun, he would have used it and killed me with it and probably killed others too.
What happened as he ran?
He said, Huber hit him in the back of the neck with a skateboard, and someone hit him back of the head with a rock, causing him to stumble.
A man tried to kick him in the face after he went down.
He fired twice at that man, but missed.
He feared he would have stomped my face in.
Huber hit him in the neck again with a skateboard and grabbed his gun.
I can feel the strap coming off my body, he said.
I fire one shot.
In the next instant, Grosskrutz ran up to him.
He lowered his rifle as Grosskrutz raised his hands in a surrender motion.
But Grosskrutz was holding a pistol.
As Rosenhaus lowered his weapon, Grosskrutz pointed the pistol directly at my head.
He fired once, hitting him in the arm.
What about his interaction with police?
After he shot gross groups, he approached a line of police vehicles with his hands up.
People were screaming, I'm just trying to get to the police.
I didn't do anything wrong.
I defended myself.
Walked up to a squad car, told an officer he just shot somebody.
The officer, get the effing back or you're going to be pepper sprayed and go home, go home, go home.
He turned himself in at the Antioch Police Department an hour later.
Because the Kenosha station was barricaded.
Officers made him sit on a chair and wait for Kenosha detectives to arrive.
I was vomiting and having panic attacks.
My head was spinning.
I couldn't think clearly.
What did he say about his state of mind?
A defendant's state of mind is critical in a self-defense case must show he was reasonably believed his life was in danger, that the amount of force he used was appropriate.
The assistant attorney, Binger, pressed Rittenhouse about his intentions during cross-examination, whether he meant to kill the three men.
I didn't intend to kill them.
I intended to stop the people who were attacking me.
Defense attorney Mark Richards also asked at one point why he stopped running from Rosenbaum.
Irrelevant in a case where jurors consider whether he did everything he could to remove himself from danger.
There was no space for me to continue to run.
Did he keep his composure?
His youth shone through when he referred to the attorneys as you guys.
He gestured often with his arms, simulating how Rosenberg reached for him, how Rosencrantz Rose Krantz kept his hands up with a pistol as he walked toward the police with his hands up.
When he was driving, Al Rosenblum appeared and chased him.
He cried.
Jack Schroeder called for a recess.
He was composed for most of the rest of his nearly day-long time on the stand, except for a period during the afternoon's cross-examination, where his voice thickened as he listened to Bringer say that he Listen to insisted to bring her that he never wanted to shoot Rosenbaum.
He was chasing me.
I was alone.
He threatened to kill me earlier.
I didn't want to have to shoot him.
The proceedings were slowed in the afternoon as prosecutors prepared to show drone video of the moments leading up to right now shooting Rosenbaum.
After Bringer said the prosecution would be pitching in zooming on an iPod to show events more clearly, defense attorney Richards objected on the ground the device's software might not accurately depict what happened when the pinch zoom was used.
Barringer responded it was no different than using a magnifying glass, but the judge said he would need to bring in an expert to prove the technology does not distort.
After recess, Fincher presented the video without attempting the pinch and zoom.
When he stopped the action at one point and asked Rittenhouse to confirm his gun was raised, Rittenhouse responded, I can't see it.
This was very significant.
There's another story here.
I'll put them together.
Liberals demand new judge in Rittenhouse case after his phone rings during a trial with a patriotic ringtone.
While many of the developments appear to go south for the prosecution, some on the left did not demand a new judge after his phone rang during the trial.
Rittenhouse on trial for shooting three protesters.
Actually, violent felons.
I believe all three have records.
They're truly disgusting persons, where two of the three died.
Judge Schroeder berated the assistant district attorney on what many saw as a sign that the case was possibly headed for a dismissal.
In response, Many on the left latch onto the idea that judges ringtone was evidence he was biased in favor of Rittenhouse.
Among those were former White House photographer Pete Souza, who tweeted, mistrial assigned a new job.
The incident was captured by some on video and circulated on social media.
Broder doesn't seem to care about maintaining even a veneer of fairness.
He's outright performing for the Fox News Laming, said a Democratic activist, Lindy Lee.
Apparently the judge has Lee Greenwood at his ringtone.
That's literally the mega national anthem.
That's about, you know, standing up for the USA.
Can't we just jump ahead to the appeal?
Meanwhile, here we have Tucker talking about it.
Let's catch a part of what Tucker had to say.
In the meantime, Cenk, the Kyle Rittenhouse trial continued today in Wisconsin.
In a move that surprised lawyers everywhere, Rittenhouse took the stand in his own defense.
That is unusual in criminal cases, and it's especially unusual in murder trials.
And the reason is simple.
The stakes are too high.
One wrong answer in a cross-examination and you could wind up spending life in prison.
But this case was different.
By the time he testified today, Kyle Rittenhouse had already won the case.
At this point, there is no remaining doubt that Kyle Rittenhouse acted in self-defense during the riots last summer in Kenosha.
Every shot Rittenhouse fired was captured on videotape and from multiple angles.
Every single witness who testified this week at the trial confirmed exactly what happened.
And here are the facts of it.
A convicted child rapist called Joseph Rosenbaum was released from a mental hospital and then went directly to join the mob that was burning downtown Kenosha.
Once he got to the riot, Rosenbaum saw Kyle Rittenhouse and immediately threatened to kill him.
Rosenbaum then chased Rittenhouse and tried to pull the gun from his hands.
When he did that, Kyle Rittenhouse shot him.
So Joseph Rosenbaum died as he had lived, trying to touch an unwilling minor.
At this point, Rittenhouse ran to find police.
A mob then chased him down the street, howling for his death.
A rioter jumped on Rittenhouse and knocked him to the ground.
Another smashed him in the face with a skateboard.
Yet another drew a loaded gun and pointed it in his face.
Kyle Rittenhouse shot the second two men, one of them fatally.
So those are the facts, and there's no way to interpret them except for what they are, the exercise of self-defense.
Kyle Rittenhouse shot people so he would not be killed.
But if you take a step back from the Rittenhouse story, you see something else entirely.
You see violent insanity completely out of control in the middle of an American city.
And the question is, how did that happen in our country?
And why did nobody stop it?
And it wasn't just happening in Kenosha, of course.
Violent mobs at the same moment overwhelmed New York and Minneapolis and Portland and many other cities.
They killed at least a dozen people.
They caused hundreds of millions of dollars in damage.
They burned businesses.
They torched police stations.
They bombed courthouses.
They invaded suburban neighborhoods in the middle of the night purely to intimidate people because of their race.
Democrats applauded all of this as it happened.
Most Republicans just ignored it, and of course the media lied about it.
In Kenosha, the police barely even showed up.
Officers in armored cruisers sat and watched as rioters torched a car lot with more than 100 vehicles in it.
And they did nothing to stop the chaos.
The question then is, how exactly are we surprised when a 17-year-old lifeguard from Illinois decides to step in?
They hate it when you say that, but it's an entirely fair question.
When legitimate authority refuses to do its duty, its sworn duty, others will fill the vacuum.
That is always true.
It's a physics principle.
But rather than acknowledge that obvious truth and accept the responsibility they bear, the people who made these riots possible in the first place decided instead to crush Kyle Rittenhouse.
Joe Biden publicly called him a white supremacist, something for which someday we very much hope he is sued, because it's totally outrageous and false.
Members of Congress called him a domestic terrorist.
Today, Kyle Rittenhouse spoke for himself.
See what you think.
Once I take that step back, I look over my shoulder and Mr. Rosenbaum, Mr. Rosenbaum was now running from my right side.
And I was cornered from in front of me with Mr. Zeminski.
and there were... there were three people right there.
And I was like, what?
So after a 10-minute break to compose himself, Kyle Rittenhouse returned to the courtroom and proceeded to blow up the prosecution's claim that he had racked his rifle in a threatening manner.
It turns out he didn't rack his rifle at all, and video proved that.
And then Rittenhouse explained why he turned himself in to police after the shootings.
People were saying cranium him and get him, kill him.
People were screaming and I just was trying to get to the police running down Sheridan Road.
And you say I'm trying to get to the police.
Why were you trying to get to the police?
Because I didn't do anything wrong.
I defended myself.
Did you feel as though there was safety where the police were?
Yes.
So they didn't really have a response to that since it's all on videotape.
It's provably true.
So instead, the lead prosecutor in the case, in today's case, who is essentially an NPR pledge drive donor called Thomas Binger, took a very different tack.
He went on to imply that Kyle Rittenhouse must be guilty because he had exercised his constitutional right to remain silent after he was arrested.
Why?
Since August 25th, 2020, this is the first time that you have told your story.
Since August 25th, 2020, you've had the benefit of watching countless videos
of your actions that night, correct?
You've also had the opportunity to listen to the testimony of all 30-some witnesses that have testified in this trial so far, correct?
Yes.
And after all of that now, you are telling us your side of the story, correct?
Correct.
I am making the point that after hearing everything in the case, now he's tailoring his story to what has already been introduced.
The problem is, this is a grave constitutional violation for you to talk about the defendants' silence.
And that is, and you're right You're right on the borderline, and you may be over, but it better stop.
Understood.
This is day one of law school stuff, but just to be clear, exercising your constitutional rights is not an indication that you are guilty.
It is a sign that you are American.
It is your birthright.
The government's own lawyer does not understand that, which you think might get the attention of Merrick Garland's Justice Department, which after all is in charge of justice in this country.
But no.
Marylette Garland is not interested, just as he has ignored the thugs videotaping jurors outside the courthouse.
The judge in this case seems pretty well fed up with all of it.
Today he ruled that prosecutors could not mention statements about shoplifters that Kyle Rittenhouse apparently made weeks before the shooting.
Prosecutors asked Rittenhouse about them anyway, and once again the judge was forced to shut down the trial.
I indicated a bias towards denial is what I did.
Held it open with a bias towards denial.
Why would you think that that made it okay for you without any advance notice to bring this matter before the jury?
You are already, you were, I was astonished.
When you began your examination by commenting on the defendant's post-arrest silence.
That's basic law.
It's been basic law in this country for 40 years, 50 years.
I have no idea why you would do something like that.
And it gives, well, I'll leave it at that.
So I don't know what you're up to.
You could watch televised trials for the next 10 years and never hear a judge talk like that.
That's how completely out of control the prosecution in this case is.
At this point, it's not even clear it's going to make it to a jury.
The defense has asked the judge to dismiss the case without the possibility of retrial, and the judge indicated he might very well grant that request.
So again, what you are watching is willful prosecutorial misconduct.
It's an intentional perversion of justice, and the judge very well knows that.
I heard nothing in this trial to change any of my rulings.
That was before the testimony, Your Honor.
Pardon me?
That was before the testimony.
Don't get brazen with me.
You knew very well.
You know very well that an attorney can't go into these types of areas when the judge has already ruled without asking outside the presence of the jury to do so.
So don't give me that.
Yeah, don't give me that.
Exactly.
Good for the judge.
We should tell you, we're so used to evaluating everything through a partisan lens that it's worth knowing the judge in this case, that guy, was appointed by a Democrat.
The point is, however, he still believes in the Constitution.
That's always the point.
Kyle Rittenhouse should be very grateful he's the judge in this case.
Yesterday, the prosecutor tried to bully a freelance photographer called Nathan DeBruin.
In return, that turned out to be a mistake, DeBruin rad them out on live television.
Watch this.
Mr. DeBruin, you said there was a lot of tension in the room when you met with me and Mr. Binger and Ms.
Beezy?
Yes.
Is it fair to say that you were very nervous?
Yeah, absolutely.
And we did have you read over your statement, right?
Correct.
And we asked if you knew anything beyond that statement.
Correct.
We didn't ask you to change it.
Yes, you did.
Yes, you did.
Right.
That's exactly the kind of justice that Kyle Rittenhouse has received from the government so far.
No one who's been paying attention is surprised by any of this.
Ghouls like Joe Biden politicized this case day one.
What's terrifying and very unnerving to anyone who lives in this country is the number of institutions that joined the Democratic Party in trying to prevent Kyle Rittenhouse from getting a fair trial, which again is your birthright as an American.
Here's one example.
In Virginia, a police lieutenant called William Kelly was fired from his job for daring to donate to Kyle Rittenhouse's legal defense.
Kelly was a 20-year veteran of the Norfolk Police Department.
He had three children and a wife with cancer.
For disagreeing with Joe Biden's view of the Rittenhouse case, the department dismissed him without a pension.
That actually happened.
In Salt Lake City, a local news station decided to terrorize a paramedic called Craig Shepard.
His sin?
Giving $10 to Rittenhouse's legal defense.
So reporters called Shepard's employer.
Another reporter showed up at Shepard's house with a camera crew and then bragged about it.
Quote, ABC 4 News investigator Jason Wynn went to Shepard's home to get his side of things.
But those inside the home didn't want to talk.
Yeah, wonder why.
It is shameful and authoritarian, hurting the weak to appease the strong.
That's the American media 2021.
Having watched the trial, no honest person could fail to admit the obvious.
The media were completely wrong about Kyle Rittenhouse.
They slandered an innocent kid, but they're not admitting it.
There is at least one exception, though, and we want to highlight that person tonight.
Her name is Anna Kasparian.
She's a lefty.
She's on a show called The Young Turks.
She hates this show, and most of the time we disagree with her.
But on the question of this trial, Anna Kasparian was bravely honest, and good for her.
Watch this.
Look, these details matter because if you're going to make an argument that you acted in self-defense, there needs to be some proof that there was an imminent threat.
Now, what really mattered to me was how all of this unfolded.
What was the thing that sparked it?
What started all of it?
And initially, I was under the assumption that Rittenhouse was the person who was chasing after Joseph Rosenbaum.
That that's how it started.
But I was wrong about that.
Okay?
So I want to correct the record.
I was, in fact, wrong about that.
Wow.
You don't see that too often.
But it's not hard, by the way.
Tell the truth.
Let reality be your guide.
It feels good.
That's what decent people do.
There are too few of them.
Hey, Sean Hannity here.
Hey, click here to subscribe to Fox News' YouTube page and catch our... Well, Tucker's been doing a great job of covering here.
And Joe, I mean, give me your thoughts about all of the above.
Yeah, well, in Wisconsin, the standard for self-defense is that you're allowed to use deadly force if you fear death or bodily harm to yourself or others, so he definitely qualifies for that.
Banger is ignoring the fact that it's the Fifth Amendment, which allows you to not have self-incrimination, and further reinforced by the 1966 Miranda hearings, so he's making an absolute Travesty of justice out of this but let's get back to the trigger event.
There was a black guy who was in the process of kidnapping his three black children from his black mother who was under a rest of warrant for domestic violence against her and had a large knife when the police apprehended him and tried to get him disarmed and that's when a white policeman shot a black man and suddenly this black man is You know, St.
George Floyd or whatever, and now the whole city has to burn for days, and when Kyle goes in there to try to prevent further damage, he's ended up being the vigilante.
Media has covered up the original trigger event, and now the vigilante media is trying to hang him, and if they can't hang him, they'll hang Schroeder as being a white supremacist judge.
This is absolutely horrible, and 90% of the blame goes You got cut off, Joe.
90% of the blame goes... To the media.
To the media, yeah.
Well, they got a great judge.
I'm so glad.
I mean, that there are some highly competent, responsible jurors in Wisconsin.
Miriam, your thoughts?
I so agree with Joe.
The media.
I'm so disgusted with the profession that I graduated from.
We know that fake news is old news, but this is at a whole new level in the past five years, escalating every single day.
What a joke.
This trial is, and yes, thank goodness for this judge.
God blessed him because, for instance, if we look at Peter Cahill in the In the George Floyd, Derek Chauvin trial and the Derek Chauvin trial, I and many others do not think that Derek got a fair trial.
This case should not have been trialed in Hennepin, for instance.
So if it wasn't for this judge, who knows what the prosecution could have gotten away with?
I'm just disgusted with the media.
Yep, I think we all are.
Anyone who's paying attention has to be.
Very good.
In the meantime... Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send fan mail, pro or con, to liveneedtoknowatgmail.com.
Live!
Need to know at gmail.com.
Here's one from HealthSave.
Mandates have nothing to do with public health.
Once again, publicly available data demonstrate that vaccines are not reducing infectivity or transmission, two of the main criteria for an injection to be considered a vaccine.
Public health officials are brazenly proclaiming these embarrassing facts, while at the same time continuing to parrot the mantra to get vaccinated and stop the spread.
At this point, anyone with a working brain can see that whatever the vaccine mandate push is for, it's not about public health and stopping the transmission of COVID.
But real consequences are in force, including millions losing their jobs and livelihoods.
Mandates will affect some of society's most important members, including firemen, police, nurses, sanitation workers, pilots, armed service men and women, and many, many more.
Meanwhile, Kenneth Dukowski.
Yesterday, Fox had some of the Rittenhouse trial on the air.
The corruption of the prosecution was exposed, along with the tolerance of the media for
corruption.
As long as it is the right people being corrupt, I'm referring to the prosecution attempting
to mitigate the defendant's Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment rights.
And then when admonished by the judge, feeling so secure in his perfidy that he attempted
the same wrongful event again.
And when confronted, he was hostile rather than apologetic.
The acid test is whether the judge has the integrity to confront the wrath of the corrupt media and the political structure and dismiss with prejudice the criminal case.
Interesting the legal profession is silent on the outrageous misconduct of the prosecutor.
Meanwhile, remember, Amazon doing its best to ban information the public needs to know, whether it's about Sandy Hook, the Boston bombing, the moon landing, Orlando, Dallas, Charlottesville, or Parkland.
It's available still at moonrockbooks.com, except for Sandy Hook, which is in a legal limbo for the time being.
Meanwhile, remember, 1% control the world, 4% are their puppets, 90% are asleep.
5% know and try to wake the 90%.
The 1% use the 4% to prevent the 5% from waking up the 90%.
Final thoughts.
to wake the 90%. The 1% is a 4% to prevent the 5% from waking up the 90%. Final thoughts, Joe, yours first.
Yeah, about two days ago a group in UK called the Exposé put out a report.
The deadliest batches were sent to the red states.
The jabs produced by Pfizer and Moderna, 100% of the deaths occurred in 4% of the lot numbers.
So this is a selective kill on the part of a politically motivated medical monopoly and I am shocked that the state of Texas, with no hearings at all on safety or efficacy, approved these jabs for children last Friday and I'm doing everything I can to get an investigation of the people involved in that and to make this a moratorium against any further jabs in the state of Texas.
Horrible.
Johnny, Miriam, your final thoughts.
We live in an inverted world, as many of you out there know.
I just yesterday from jail interviewed Mark Grenon, son of Genesis Church.
They've been in jail, the sons and the father, they're the ones who make the MMS, the mineral salts, for 17 months.
They have One of the sons has not seen his newborn, has not seen the light of day, drinks from the tap, which is contaminated water, eats faux food, and meanwhile we are glorifying true criminals and instead of justice we're just seeing just us.
So I implore people to resist to these unconstitutional, Luciferian mandates.
And speak up, find your balls, find your courage.
This is a pandemic of the cowardness.
When does this show air?
Is it aired tonight?
Today?
It'll be up tonight, yeah.
So I will be premiering my updated trailer on George Floyd, The Real Timeline.
I've been told that I need protection given what I have found.
I'll be Premiering at 8 o'clock via Citizen Media News and Pure Social TV, and then on Truth Lives Here, which is my Telegram channel, I'll be doing a Q&A.
I know more about this case than arguably most, and I'm working on a book And a documentary, mostly to show what the media, how the media is complicit in the lies and leaves a lot on the proverbial floor.
So do not trust your eyes.
Obi-Wan Kenobi told Luke Skywalker, do not believe your eyes because they will deceive you.
And yet there's this opposing force of like, just believe what you see on on the video with your eyes.
Hello, Hollywood.
So Godspeed, everyone.
Life is short, and do not be petty.
That's my message.
I'll be glad to post it on my BitChute channel to promote it.
Thank you.
I'll share the Dropbox link.
Thank you, Jim.
Meanwhile, I can't thank Joe Olson from Houston and Miriam Hennane from Florida for the excellence of their commentary.
Everything you've heard here today is just the rock-bottom truth about the matter.
The media, the Democrats, have gone stark raving mad.
They're out to murder Americans to benefit themselves politically.
They're bringing in masses of migrants.
They're dumping them in the red states.
The governor of Florida is planning to bus him to Delaware, Joe Biden's own state, except the guy who's actually in the office is an actor, not Joe Biden.
I have a colleague who's identified multiple of them.
It's not the real Joe.
They have different color eyes.
They have different ears.
They have different shape of skull.
These are properties you cannot change.
They have different signatures.
This is just a fiasco where the Democrats are doing everything they can to turn the United States into a socialist state that is like the Soviet Union, and they're going all out to do it.
Disgusting, unbelievable.
I never thought I'd see anything like this in my lifetime.
Meanwhile, spend as much time as you can with your friends and loved ones because, as I never tire of explaining, in today's world we don't know how much time we have left.
Thank you for joining us today.
Have a great weekend.
▲
Export Selection