All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 27, 2021 - Jim Fetzer
01:24:43
Need to Know News "Texas Tuesday" (26 October 2021) with Joe Olson and Michael Ivey
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer, incapacitated vocally, but delighted to have another Texas Tuesday with Joe Olson from Houston and Michael Ivey, formerly of Fort Worth, now from Asheville, North Carolina, who's going to be assisting me with the stories today.
Since I obviously am unable to read them, we begin with Border Patrol arrests shatter all records at the southern border.
Michael?
Border Patrol agents apprehended a total of 1,600,000 illegal immigrants along the southwest border. So far, in
2021, breaking all records, since 1925 after the agency was formed, when only 22,000 illegal aliens were arrested.
And let's see, the CBP, the Border Patrol, doesn't officially release the number of gotaways, illegal aliens who are detected by Border Patrol, but evade capture.
However, the Commissioner Mark Morgan told a Congressional Republican roundtable that the gotaway number Hit at least 400,000 illegal aliens this year.
Biden administration has faced growing criticisms for the crisis at the southern border, which started to ramp up a year ago in tandem with election rhetoric.
But as soon as they took over, the number of illegal crossings shot up once Biden took office and promptly dismantled many of Trump's border security measures.
The Department of Homeland Security is expelling most single adults under Title 42 health directive that calls for immediate expulsion of all illegal immigrants and non-essential travelers.
However, under Biden, the DHS stopped applying Title 42 to any unaccompanied children, most family units, and some adults.
The administration is faced with a record levels of unaccompanied minors and family units entering illegally, most of whom are subsequently released into the United States.
The White House confirmed that it's been flying unaccompanied children from the southern border to New York in the middle of the night.
And here's a quote from our favorite We have a moral obligation to come to do that and deliver on that.
We care for unaccompanied children until they can be swiftly unified with a parent or a vetted sponsor. We have
a moral obligation to come to do that and deliver on that.
And of course, unaccompanied children are also being transported to other parts of the country.
Now we're on to the Haitian crisis.
Yes.
September presented a new challenge for DHS when 15,000 mostly Haitian illegal immigrants formed an encampment under the International Bridge in Del Rio, Texas.
The administration subsequently released at least 12,400 of them into the interior with the expectation that they will check in with Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
Oh yeah, like that's gonna happen?
Or turn up at their immigration court hearing.
Yeah, like that's gonna happen.
During the Haitian crisis, Border Patrol was forced to close nearby highway checkpoints and state and local law enforcement surged to the bridge to provide security.
In general, drug seizures have been consistently lower than in the past three years, with September hitting a low point.
The morale of our border agency agents is at an all-time low, and now they're facing a November 22nd deadline to get vaccinated with a dangerous COVID-19 vaccine or get fired.
Other, oh yeah, that's that.
You did good.
You did good, Michael.
You did good.
That's sufficient.
Well done.
Okay.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yeah, well, I think there's a lot of evidence that some of these immigrants are actually being released from jail cells all through the third world and brought over here intentionally because they already have a criminal record and their countries are doing the same thing that Castro did to Jimmy Carter In April of 1980, with the Muriel boatlift, there were protests in Cuba, so he just shot a bunch of people in the streets.
Carter said, oh gee, we've got a humanitarian crisis, we'll let you bring them to America, and Castro went, great, we'll dump 30,000 of our hardened criminals on boats and push them over to Miami and let you deal with them.
And so this is, you know, history repeats itself because nobody freaking remembers history, number one.
And number two, because it's been so successful every time they've tried it.
And we've somehow got to break an enormous cycle of criminality across the board.
Educational, scientific, Commercial.
The whole system.
Medical.
The whole system is absolutely rotten top to bottom.
So, me for one, I'm ready to build back better, but we don't need any of these clowns that have been part of the destructive process to be involved in any reconstruction.
Well, the part is the rot at the top, as Michael was explaining.
These are Biden policies.
Yours, Michael.
Yeah, it's a continuation of an agenda that's been going on for a long time and has gotten more obvious as the years have gone by.
The importation of third world people really got a big push with the immigration acts that were passed in 1965, all of which, by the way, were were promoted by Jewish lawmakers at the time. And it's
only gotten worse since then. As we know, one of the main agenda items for the New World Order is to
wipe out individual nations, and the wiping out of the borders of those individual
nations is right at the top of the list.
Yes, yes, yes. And Biden's right in there, pinching.
I mean, me.
Former ESPN reporter Allison Williams says that President Biden's commission on COVID vaccination, his comment on COVID vaccination was something a dictator would say.
Michael.
Former ESPN reporter Allison Williams says that President Joe Biden's claim that the coronavirus vaccination is not a matter of freedom or individual choice is something that a dictator would say.
Williams, who was forced out of her job because she declined to get vaccinated, good for her.
Made the comment during an interview with Megyn Kelly.
The 37-year-old Allison said in a recent Instagram video that her request for accommodation was denied by ESPN and the Walt Disney Company, both owned and operated by the evil empire.
This is not about freedom or personal choice, Biden said last month.
It's about protecting yourself and those around you, the people you work with, the people you care about, The President made the comment just before he announced that the Labor Department is developing an emergency rule to require employees with a hundred or more employers with a hundred or more employees to ensure that workers are fully vaccinated or that they furnish a negative test once a week.
And she said, I've never been so jarred by anything a president said.
And I know Trump said some really crazy things, but to hear the leader of the free world stand up and say, this isn't about your freedom.
I thought, oh my God, it's always about our freedom.
This country existed on the principle of freedom.
We are the land of the free and the home of the brave.
And if we don't have freedom over our own bodies, if our bodily autonomy is not respected, this God-given constitutionally protected right to determine what we do with our bodies, then we aren't free.
Lee Merritt says that's the very definition of being a slave.
Next page.
Williams noticed that when people are forced to choose between getting vaccinated and keeping their job, that represents a form of coercion.
Yeah, everybody acts like, okay, well, this was your choice.
You chose not to get it, so get a different job.
That's not choice.
That's coercion.
By the way, check this out.
What did you make of that when Joe Biden issued his statement saying, we've been patient, but our patience is running thin?
I have never been so jarred by anything a president said, and I know Trump said some really crazy things, but to hear the leader of the free world stand up and say, this isn't about your freedom.
I thought, oh my God, it is always about our freedom.
This country exists on the principle of freedom.
We are the land of the free and the home of the brave, and if we don't have freedom over our own bodies, if our bodily autonomy is not respected, this God-given, constitutionally protected right to determine what we do with our bodies, we aren't free.
That was scary to me, honestly, Megan.
That was something a dictator says.
That is not something a leader of free people says.
What happened to the consent of the governed?
What happened to the power of the people?
Those are the two things that keep standing out to me when I analyze this debate or when I have this discussion with people.
It's two things.
It's freedom and it's consent.
And you can't have one without the other.
And I'm talking about true consent.
Everybody acts like, okay, well, this was your choice.
You chose not to get it, so go get a different job.
That's not choice.
That's coercion.
Okay?
Consent is fundamental to everything we do if we want to be a free people.
Consent is the difference between two of the same acts and one becomes a crime without consent.
And true consent, not pressure, not bullying, not you're going to lose your job if you don't do this.
That's coercion.
And if we can't have true informed consent, what do we have?
We don't have freedom.
And that is why I think it's so important for people to realize this is bigger than this mandate.
This is bigger than this shot.
There is something that is at play here that I don't know what it is, but it is it is chipping away at the very foundation of which this country was built on.
I gotta say, for a reporter, she was showing a real discerning understanding.
I'm very impressed with her intellect, the grasp she has of this issue.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yeah, well, a couple of weeks ago, the FDA made a horrible logistics mistake when they allowed four hours of testimony by independent researchers who came very well prepared and shattered the claimed consensus that was going to be on the panel.
And they voted 16 to 2 to not authorize the Booster jab, but then they turned around and said, well, we'll go ahead and authorize it some other way.
So today there's FDA hearings on jabbing 5 to 11 year olds.
Great article about it.
FDA panel pretends they're deliberating vaccines for 5 to 11.
However, the exclusive Pfizer packaging for kids is already distributed.
This is a slam dunk.
They know that they're going to go ahead and just start poking the hell out of 5 and 11 year olds.
And if they don't hurry up and do it, then there's going to be enough dead bodies that people are noticing what's going on.
There was a great video that was on Rumble, but it had like a three-page long URL, so I didn't bother using that.
But I found it again on BitChute, and it's the press conference held by five members of the European Parliament.
And because they and their staff are now being required to have green cards in order to enter the buildings, they're complaining because, you know, it wasn't enough that they were jabbing the hell out of all of their citizens.
Now when they're starting to jab the MPs and the MPs' staff, it's like suddenly it's personal.
So that's encouraging.
And then also there's a great article at European Resistance.
Yeah, like you, Jim.
Renaissance. Danny Andros has been served summons down in Victoria and it looks like they're yanking
him all the way around on every one of his mandates, the lockdowns, the jabs, and the face masks. So
hopefully there's some good things coming up. Good, good.
Michael. Yeah, like you Jim, I was impressed with how well that woman, Alison Williams, spoke
on her feet right there. And she's got a lot of courage to ditch that cherry job that she's
got with ESPN on principle.
But then when she got to the end of that statement on the video, she said something to the effect of, I don't know what's going on here.
And she should tune in to Need to Know News to find out what's going on and what the agendas are here.
About that story that Joe just brought up, that was, thanks for sending that, Joe.
I have someone on my list who He has extensive experience worked for like 12 or 13 years in the European Parliament.
And this person thought that.
That press conference that those MEPs held, members of European Parliament, was terrific.
And it was.
I mean, even though they're reacting to it coming to their own door, every one of them gave really good statements.
And I want to go back and transcribe some of the things that they said, because Even though it's not a vote of the European Parliament per se, it's just some members of it.
My friend tells me that those people are spread across the political spectrum.
Very good.
of the European Parliament politicians.
Yes.
So it's a really good thing that they did that and they all made really good freedom statements
against forced vaccinations and the vaccine passports, which are being called green passes in Europe.
Very good, very good, very good, yes.
The most welcome development.
Meanwhile, Barack Obama slapped with a reality check after he denounced Trump top culture wars and fake outrage.
This was an attempt to defend Terry McAuliffe in Virginia, which seems to be backfiring massively, even bringing in Joe Biden, whom the country despises.
To defend him, McAuliffe is shooting himself in both feet.
Michael?
Well, that's good news.
I hope Terry McAuliffe goes down in flames.
Oh, no, no.
I meant for you to read the story.
Oh, I know.
I was just giving a little prelude.
Okay.
Okay, what did Obama say while campaigning for Democrat Terry McAuliffe in Virginia?
Obama denounced focusing on cultural issues.
That's a switch.
He like focused on cultural issues his entire presidency.
Instead, saying that Americans should be concerned with recovering from the COVID-19 pandemic.
Oh, they say that about everything.
We don't have time to be wasting on these phony trumped-up culture wars, this fake outrage that, get this, right-wing media Pedals to juice their ratings, Obama said.
Obama appeared to be speaking about McAuliffe's opponent, Republican Glenn Youngkin, whose campaign platform includes supporting parents to have a voice over decisions made by school boards.
And this is Obama again.
Instead of stoking anger aimed at school boards and administrators who are just trying to keep our kids safe, who are just doing their jobs, stoking anger to the point where some of them are actually getting death threats.
We should be making it easier for teachers in schools to indoctrinate our children.
No, no, no.
To give our kids the world-class education they deserve, and to do so safely while they're in the classroom.
Well, of course, critics pointed out that children's education is not a part of the trumped-up culture war, but they're attempting to make it that, I should say.
As many others pointed out, Loudoun County Schools also stand accused of covering up two sexual assaults as they push controversial LGBT policies.
Let's be clear, they are waging the culture war.
We are fighting back.
Covering up a sexual assault in school restrooms to push up a transgender policy in government schools is the definition of waging a culture war.
Post radio host Larry O'Connor said, Barack Obama is telling parents they have fake outrage over school boards covering up sexual assaults and teaching critical race theory.
Representative Ken Buck reacted.
That the right wing media tricked Kerry McAuliffe into telling parents they should influence school boards.
At Glenn Youngkin is surging because he's got answers for Virginia's public education's failures, radio host Hugh Hewitt pointed out.
Two girls were sexually assaulted on school property.
Is that the, breaking from the story, is that the case where a guy who says he identifies as a female raped these two girls?
Yeah, but Michael, yes, Michael, but you want to just do the story straight.
So you're mixing your commentary with reading the story.
Okay.
My child's education is not a trumped-up culture war, Michael Needham, Chief of Staff to Senator Marco Rubio, fired back.
Here in Washington, I was fired for refusing an experimental vaccine.
I saw the COVID patients.
Vax passes start Monday in Seattle.
An elementary school has a gender unicorn on the wall.
A high school handed out a sexual survey asking when kids first had anal.
But sure, it's trumped up anger, another person said.
Gaslighting at its finest.
Zero self-awareness.
Zero accountability.
Schools cover up sexual assault.
That's not trumped up.
That's not culture war.
That's a dereliction of public duty.
The failure to address it is a failure of leadership.
Saying otherwise is a deflection, another said.
Meanwhile, we have Susan Lindauer exposing Terry McAuliffe.
This is really stunning stuff.
Check it out on our BitChute site, BitChute channel, Jim Fetzer.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yeah, I meant to pull it up and I'll put it in the show notes.
McCullough was involved in about a billion dollar public private scam.
And I believe it was in Mississippi where they were going to build an electric
automobile plant and turns out the company that was in charge of it never
built even a good golf cart in China.
And so it was a, they obfuscated with a quarter of a several hundred million
dollars. So I'll find that story and put a link in it, but yeah, this guy's been
a long time player and long time dirty.
And I hope that the people in Virginia wake up and you know, there's a lot of pushback going nationwide.
Ohio just sent the National School Board Association a notice that they were resigning from membership in that group, and I expect probably 20 states will do that.
I know for a fact Texas will soon, and then we had In July of 2021, seven eastern counties in Oregon voted to leave Oregon and join Greater Idaho, and just last week, three counties in Maryland voted to leave Maryland to become part of West Virginia.
So, you know, this top-down shit is getting a little bit old, and there's a lot of people that are really tired of it, so we'll see where it goes from there.
I think so.
If there's an honest vote in Virginia, Terry McCollin is toast.
Michael?
Yeah, that's the thing.
You said it.
If there's an honest vote.
I'm not real confident in that, but we'll see what happens.
Maybe enough people will vote for the other guy so that they can't rig it.
They probably have some sort of worry or they wouldn't be sending Joe and Obama on the coattails to try to maintain that democratic governorship.
And that story that Joe talked about Ohio withdrawing from, what is it, the National Board of Education?
School Board Associations, National School Board Association, yeah.
I think there was another state as well, Ohio and one other state that did the same thing.
Well, there'll be bunches of them.
Okay, Jim?
Yeah, good, Michael, thank you.
Meanwhile, Condoleezza Rice on critical race theory.
I don't have to make white kills feel bad for being white.
Very interesting, Michael.
The story.
On Wednesday, former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice took a surprisingly strong stand against critical race theory during an interview on ABC's The View.
Rice herself was a trailblazer, becoming the first black woman to head the State Department in the George W. Bush administration.
Co-host Whoopi Goldberg went first with a very interesting explanation of what exactly is up for debate.
One of the key issues that, this is Goldberg talking, one of the key issues up for debate is how much of a voice parents should have in their child's school curriculum.
Especially when it comes to subjects like sex education and critical race theory.
I thought they didn't teach critical race theory until they went to, like, law school or something, Goldberg said.
Rice responded, I sure hope not, because I'm not sure seven-year-olds need to learn that.
Goldberg followed up, the question is, do parents need more influence here, or should they leave the lesson planning to the pros?
I would like black kids to be completely empowered to know they are beautiful in their blackness, but in order to do that, I don't have to make white kids feel bad about being white, Rice said.
At that point, co-host Joy Behar argued that as a former teacher, she believed teachers should have more say-so in curriculum than parents because they are trained educators.
In a pervasive view of progressive, oh, it is a pervasive view of progressivism, that society should be managed by experts rather than leaving decisions to regular people.
Behar said, you can't really pit that up against a parent who has just annoyed your teaching, you know, to kill a mockingbird or whatever the curriculum says.
You can't have the parents interfering to that extent in the curriculum.
Behar's comments are ironic, given that it was some on the left who had recently taken to removing the literary classic, To Kill a Mockingbird, from school curriculums for offensive language.
If they're adamant that they don't want to teach what is going to be taught, they're going to have to homeschool their kids, because this is not going to wash, Behar added.
Rice zeroed in on critical race theory.
If I can take a moment to talk about the whole issue of critical race theory and what is and is not being taught, I come out of an academic institution and something that academics debate, what's the role of race and so forth.
I grew up in segregated Birmingham, Alabama.
I went to segregated schools until we moved to Denver My parents never thought I would grow up in a world without prejudice.
My parents told me, you'll overcome it and you can be whatever you want to be.
Rice said that the goal of critical race theory seemed to be the stoking of white guilt more than it empowers Americans of color.
The conversation continued and the hosts, among Rice and the hosts, But the former Secretary of State did have one final thought.
One more thing.
It goes back to how we teach history, Rice said.
We teach the good and we teach the bad of history.
What we don't do is make seven and ten-year-olds feel that they are somehow bad people because of the color of their skin, Rice finished.
Let me say I thought What she was saying was significant, but to me even more striking is that she's appearing in the public domain in a way that suggests to me she's going to have a role in replacing Kamala.
I think that's in the works.
Condoleezza Rice is a much more substantial person than this airhead that is running around the country and would be a more worthy candidate for being a successor to Biden.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yeah, well, I'm still not real keen on the Stanford lady who is definitely a PNEC operative.
Yeah, I understand she's a concert pianist and that she's also highly fluent in Russian.
So, you know, kudos to her for that.
But she's also part of the Hoover Institute where they've covered up all the stuff that Herbert Hoover was involved in with the Milner Group and stage setting World War I and all the stuff that he did as Secretary of Interior under Harding and Coolidge.
absolutely a miserable group of folks out there at Stanford, and I'm not really willing to promote her very much at all.
Now, it's interesting that they removed the books by Mark Twain, who was heralded for over a hundred years
for bringing American vernacular to literature, which was very formal and stated
and mainly English-based up until that time.
And so he was Hallmark, and one of his books was Huckleberry Finn,
where he had a black guy named Jim, who Huck always treated as an equal
and who had very profound thoughts, even though he might've spoken Ebonics.
It was authentic for the time, and there was nothing degrading about it other than it used the N-word, which was common vernacular.
You can't turn on a rap song without hearing the N-word nowadays, so it's completely absurd.
And now, there's one additional thing that just popped up on Gab.
The prosecutor in the Kyle Rittenhouse case had demanded that the judge not allow the use of the words rioters, looters, or arsonists, that they should always be referred to as victims.
These were convicted felons that were out burning the town and shooting and attacking Rittenhouse, who only defended himself.
Well, just in, the judge ruled That they can be referred to as rioters, terrorists and arsonists.
Good for him!
Maybe there is some equality under the law.
Who knows?
Joe, I didn't mean that I would be supporting Candid Rice.
I'm saying she's just much more plausible than Kamala, who made her way on her back, as everyone knows.
Condoleezza Rice is regarded as an independent intellectual of some substance.
I disagree with her, but she's not an airhead like Kamala.
Oh, absolutely not.
No.
Yeah, that's true.
That's a point of curiosity to me because, like Joe said, it's been obvious ever since the Bush administration that Condoleezza Rice is a player with the New World Order agenda.
And she's an operative for them, so it's curious to me whether she was sent out to say something like that, maybe to assuage all the angry parents out there for how our schools are being radically turned into indoctrination camps, or maybe they have been for a long time.
She did that all on her own, taking her own volition to say those things about critical race theory.
It's just a point of curiosity to me.
Michael, she wouldn't have even been on The View except for political machinations.
Don't have any doubt about it.
This is not, as FDR said, in politics, nothing happens by coincidence.
Yeah, yeah.
Meanwhile, we'll be right back.
Here we had a performance art in New York City of which I, in this instance, approve 100%.
They got the message across.
Meanwhile, Fauci says no long-term vaccine problems exist despite there being no long-term studies.
Michael?
Okay, let me catch up with you here.
Last Wednesday, disgraced public health official Dr. Anthony Tony the Rat Fauci attempted to claim that there is no true basis behind concerns that COVID-19 vaccines present the threat of long-term side effects.
Fauci made that claim despite the fact that there has not been a single long-term study on the effects of the vaccines during a virtual call with Dr. Rochelle Walensky, the director of the Centers for Disease Control.
But given that the vaccines have barely been available for a year, it's impossible to say that concerns about their long-term effects are unfounded.
U.S.
Surgeon General Vivek Murthy also joined the call, and not one of these people responded honestly when asked by a caller if airline pilots have valid concerns about the vaccine.
That comes as major airlines struggle to keep planes in the air as staff walk out over vaccine mandates.
Fauci responded that there have been hundreds and hundreds of millions of vaccinations so far, and that the safety of these vaccines have been clearly established.
Meanwhile, an OSHA cover-up feeds vaccine conspiracy theories.
Michael, please.
Anti-vaccine propaganda and conspiracy theories are not something the government can successfully control, but the government can absolutely make them worse by acting as if it has a bias toward covering up the side effects or adverse reactions to vaccines.
OSHA is doing precisely that by announcing on its website that it has suspended reporting requirements that normally would cause employers to report adverse reactions to the vaccine.
From the FAQ section of OSHA's website, DOL and OSHA, Department of Labor, as well as other federal agencies are working diligently to encourage COVID-19 vaccinations.
OSHA does not wish to have any appearance of discouraging workers from receiving COVID-19 vaccination and also does not wish to disincentivize employers' vaccination efforts.
As a result, OSHA will not enforce 29 CFR 1904's recording requirements to require that employees record worker side effects from vaccination at least through May 2022.
Wow, that's a trip!
We will evaluate this agency's position at that time to determine the best course of action moving forward.
The recording requirements in question are not specific to COVID or to vaccines in general.
The lengthy, highly detailed rules require employers to record and report work-related fatalities, injuries, and illnesses.
And they apply to all manner of injury and illness that could potentially be classified as work-related.
For example, the rule on occupational exposure to blood Or other potentially infectious materials alone runs over 7500 words and includes detailed requirements for employers to offer hepatitis B vaccinations and information on the hepatitis B vaccine.
Including information on its efficacy, safety, method of administration, the benefits of being vaccinated, and that the vaccine and vaccination will be offered free of charge.
Now it would be one thing if OSHA decided as a general ongoing matter that paperwork requirements deterred employers from offering or requiring vaccinations, And that the government should therefore not overload businesses with such requirements.
That is, it says entirely, I would say moderately reasonable pro-business, pro-vaccine approach to take.
But that's not what OSHA has done here, or why it has done it.
The rule is not being changed.
OSHA is just declining to enforce it for one specific vaccine.
This alone is typical of how the administrative state exercises power.
Never relinquish power on any general principle, but retain the discretion to be selective in order to play favorites and keep the citizenry dependent upon official favor.
Also, the official explanation says specifically that OSHA's first concern is the appearance of discouraging workers.
Says right there in black and white.
Yeah, I think that's very, very telling.
So blatant.
that people won't get the vaccine if their usual rules for reporting side effects
and other adverse reactions are followed.
We're all familiar with government coverups, but normally one does not announce them formally in advance.
Yeah, I think that's very, very telling.
So blatant, Joe, your thoughts.
Yeah, well, under Ronnie Reagan, the federal government funded climatology studies
to the tune of about $20 million a year.
That ramped up under Big Bush to over a billion dollars a year.
Slick Willie doubled that to $2 billion a year.
That continued through the baby Bush reign.
And then when Obama got elected, by that point, we'd already squandered $100 billion on carbon endangerment findings.
And like I wrote in one of my articles, If all you fund is findings for danger, danger is all you're going to find.
Well, the opposite corollary is absolutely true.
If you don't want to find any danger, you won't find any danger.
So, you know, they can find danger with carbon, but they can't find any danger with the COVID jabs.
This just in, Project Veritas released footage secretly recorded of a conversation between New Jersey Democrat Governor Phil Murphy, senior campaign advisor, who admitted that he intends to impose a vaccine mandate if re-elected.
Wendy Martinez said, this is hilarious, that the people in are just All into the S.H.I.T.
and my rights and S.H.I.T.
So there you go.
I think if that becomes widely known, he's going to go down like McAuliffe.
I hope so.
Yeah, that story about OSHA suspending reporting requirements for adverse vaccine effects for this vaccine.
It's just the latest obvious example of greasing the skids, all rules and all sense of individual rights or principles that have been established over the years in democratic societies.
And that is an obvious indication that this whole damn pandemic was all about the vaccine.
I mean, as a step toward the digital platform, of course.
When at the first of that article, It mentioned something about OSHA's suspension of this rule feeding conspiracy theories.
It reminded me of that phrase.
Is this a trick question?
From Ghostbusters, when Sigourney Weaver asks Bill Murray if he wants this body of hers.
He says, is this a trick question?
And so that's become a cultural question now, and it applies there.
And how can OSHA reevaluate its stand if it doesn't know what the side effects were in the meanwhile?
I mean, this is – this is just so blatant.
We know the pandemic's fake, but the vax is real.
We have Chinese Communist Party bosses discussing vaccine impact on U.S.
military forces say everyone who took the vaccine is dead.
I wish I were in a position to verify this, but it certainly sounds plausible.
Michael?
Do you want me to comment or read?
Read.
Okay.
A horrifying video conference from inside China has been intercepted by intelligence sources, and in it, bosses from the Chinese Communist Party discuss the future of the United States after distribution of the vaccine.
Quote, everyone who took the vaccine is dead, unquote, they said.
The leaked segment of the intercepted video Conference begins with the CCP boss who organized the video conference telling the other participants what the CCP wants most is to have U.S.
troops get vaccinated.
The speaker goes on to say once they get vaccinated the U.S.
military will collapse and the CCP will triumph.
It goes on.
The people who are implementing the vaccination are soon to be finished.
Those who are pushing the vaccination behind the scenes will likely have achieved their goals.
Then, shockingly, in the same video, they talk about an antidote.
That, quote, vaccination will no longer be pushed and the antidote will be certainly offered, unquote.
At this point, one of the videoconference participants, shocked, interrupts and asks, the antidote will pop up?
And another comes in asking, what is the antidote for?
The main videoconference speaker replies, it's not to heal the damage brought by the vaccines.
It's to prevent you from transmitting the virus instead of a remedy for the vaccines.
He then delivers the blunt facts.
Those who were vaccinated are sentenced to death.
The antidote for the vaccines is still in the hands of the CCP.
Since the CCP wants you to die, how would they offer the antidote to you?
The Zhao Beijing of China?
Lao Beijing?
The leaked segment abruptly ends there.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yeah, there's an interesting interview with InfoWars and Dr. Fleming, and he's author of a book called, Is the Coronavirus a Bioweapon?
And he's also got a very lengthy list of indictments that could be forwarded to any state
attorney general and any district attorney in any of the over 3,000 counties in the United States for
immediate grand jury hearings, arrests, and prosecution of the people that are perpetrating
this entire fraud.
So that's interesting.
I'll put that link down in the show in the comments, which I've called show notes and people get confused for some reason.
But just in, Jim and I had a great discussion last Thursday about atmospheric radiation physics and thermodynamics, but it's a complex subject and it was difficult to do in about a 20-minute segment.
So over the weekend, I wrote a great article.
It's called Stop Gore Bull Warbling.
Which was a popular bumper sticker at the time that Gore lost the election and was given the $400 million booby prize of concession with the global warming scam where he owned Hundreds and hundreds of shares of Chicago Carbon Exchange found out that it wasn't going to pass and be forced at $100 per ton sold all of his shares and it dropped to one cent per ton and then was removed from the Chicago market.
Absolute corruption wall to wall on the climate scam.
Which, in the last 10 years, I've invested over 10,000 hours of research on.
In the last 20 years, I've invested 10,000 hours of research on the World Trade Center buildings.
In the last year and a half, I've invested probably 2,000 hours in research in the Chinese Gudi Flu.
So, I consider myself at least an informed, objective analyzer of the data of all three of these scams.
And we definitely need to come up with a different scheme, but I encourage everybody to go to Principa Scientific, where we have just posted Stop Gore Bull Warbling, and I'll put the link to that directly in the comments also.
Excellent, Joe!
Excellent!
Michael?
Yeah, that reminds me of the vast amounts of time that all the people like us spend studying these things, and I thank Jim Fetzer for that.
And sometimes I have the thought, you know, if we had done this much studying in a college course that had this same curriculum, we'd all have four or five PhDs by now.
And I'm like you, Jim, with that supposed video from the Chinese People, CCP people, I would want some verification on that.
It looks and sounds fishy to me, and the fact that it was being recorded and they were saying so blatant and damning things, I don't know.
I would need some sort of corresponding verification to know that that was a real video.
I agree with you, Michael, but I do find what they're saying very consistent with all the facts as we know it on the ground.
Meanwhile, it wasn't a prop gun Alec Baldwin shot a firearm that was being used for target practice off the set.
This is disturbing on several different levels, Michael, if you would.
The fallout of the Alec Baldwin shooting tragedy has led to further questions about how a, quote, prop gun could have fired a live round that killed the film's cinematographer, Hala Hutchins.
Halena, sorry.
Furthermore, another question that's gone under the radar is how the Baldwin shooting also led to the wounding of director Joel Souza.
It wasn't a prop gun, it was an actual gun that was being used as a prop.
TMZ reported on the development that sources close to the filming of Rust indicate that the gun used in the incident was also used offset for target practice.
The smoking gun that claimed the life of Helena Hutchins might have been more than just an on-set prop.
It was also being fired recreationally, even when cameras weren't rolling, TMZ reported.
Multiple sources directly connected to the Rust production tell TMZ the same gun Alec Baldwin accidentally fired Hitting the DP and director was being used by crew members offset as well, for what we're told amounted to target practice, the report added.
According to the BBC, a prop gun could mean a range of items from non-functioning weapons to cap guns, but it can also mean a real weapon or one adapted for firing blanks.
However, Hollywood should ban the term from applying to actual firearms.
A disturbing 911 call shed light on how assistant director David Halls had given Baldwin the weapon that ultimately killed Hutchins and wounded Souza.
Mamie Mitchell, the script supervisor of the film, made the 911 call for help.
We need an ambulance out at Bonanza Creek Ranch right now.
We've had two people accidentally shot on a movie set, Mitchell said, as she is talking to the 911 operator.
She instructs someone else to make certain the ambulance has access to the road.
Bonanza Creek Ranch.
We have had two people accidentally shot on a movie set by a prop gun, she said.
We need help immediately.
Bonanza Creek Ranch.
Come on.
It sounds like somebody else is calling for ambulances, the operator said.
Everybody should be.
We need some help, Mitchell said.
Our director and our camera woman has been shot.
So it was loaded.
Was it loaded with a real bullet or what?
The 9-11 operator asked.
I can't tell you that.
We have two injuries from a movie gunshot.
While the phone operator is inputting the details, Mitchell can be heard telling someone, is this effing AD that yelled at me at lunch asking about revisions?
This mother eff Obviously upset.
Did you see him lean over my desk and yell at me?
Mitchell said he's supposed to check the guns.
He's responsible for what happened.
The reckless incident which occurred under the stewardship of co-producer Baldwin has caused some to wonder how the weapon could have had live ammunition when he shot it.
According to the warrant, Halls told Baldwin the weapon was cold, even though it was loaded with live ammunition.
Halls is a veteran of the film industry and has worked as an assistant director on major productions like Fargo, The Matrix Reloaded, and Reno 911.
The gun Paul's picked up was reported one of three laid on a cart by the film's armorer, Anna Gutierrez-Reed.
The Sun reported, it's not clear at this time how many rounds were fired.
Gutierrez-Reed, 24, is the daughter of longtime industry armorer, Thel Reed.
While the shooting is believed to be an accident, there is an ongoing shooting investigation into how such a deadly incident could occur.
According to the publication Variety, the shooting was chalked up by the production company as a misfire of a prop gun with blanks.
Baldwin, who was visibly devastated upon learning that the shooting had led to the untimely death of Hutchins, willingly provided a statement to the Sheriff's Office.
While the production company involved claimed that there was a misfire of a prop gun with blanks, the Sheriff's Office indicated that it was too soon to say what type of round was involved.
The sheriff's office also did not use the word accident, leaving that to be determined by investigators.
The prop was fired at Bonanza Creek Ranch, where filming was underway, the sheriff's office said in an early news release.
The Santa Fe New Mexican reported the set was locked down while deputies began their investigation.
Attempts to get Baldwin from outside To get comments from Baldwin outside the Sheriff's Office were unsuccessful.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yeah, well, you know, firearms are a dangerous necessity.
I lost an uncle who was just a child during World War II to a neighbor kid playing with a .22 that shot him in the heart.
So, you know, there's a lot of hesitance on the part of my parents to educate me with firearms but being in Texas and being you know wildlife and hunting and everything else it was like a pretty much necessity and the fact that you know you could be drafted as a teenager and be sent off to war meant that you really needed to understand firearms so
I probably fired my first live rounds when I was five or six years old, and it's fairly easy to tell if a revolver's loaded.
If the hammer's not cocked, you'll see the live round in the cylinder just by a casual glance without even pointing the barrel in a dangerous direction.
It's real simple to half-cock the hammer and rotate the cylinder, which is standard protocol for anybody that's been around firearms their whole life.
But if you have a bunch of arrogant people like Baldwin, who have disdained gun ownership, they can treat it in a cavalier manner and the results are exactly what we've got.
As far as being multiple shots fired, it looks like the authentic weapon from that era would have been a .45 Colt.
And that cartridge would easily go through a woman's body and hit the guy standing behind him.
So that's a possibility.
And so I wouldn't read too much into being multiple shots fired.
But there's also speculation that there may have been some kind of a romantic tension between the two parties, number one.
And number two, there's a guy, Dave Zubiak, who says that there's a rest coming because they got a hold of Baldwin's computer and found some Let's put it inappropriate.
Video items on there, so we'll find out pretty soon exactly how nasty this thing is, but there can't be anybody in Hollywood that I disdain much more than the Baldwin gang.
And so as as far as I'm concerned, this is orange man bad spending rest of life in orange jumpsuit.
Fast and good stuff, Joe Michael.
Yeah, so far it's early on and you know how these things tend to sift out over time as more information comes in.
So far, it looks like this is just a bad fuck-up by about at least three different people on that set, but we'll see as time goes by.
Does anybody know exactly what kind of gun it was?
I haven't seen that yet.
Was it a revolver?
Absolutely.
Oh, yeah.
Sure.
It was a revolver.
Yeah.
It couldn't be authentic because they didn't have any automatic weapons until the late 1890s.
So.
Oh, what's the setting of this thing they're shooting?
A Western.
So, you know, it's a Western.
OK.
Yeah.
Showing us like a church or a barn out in the middle of nowhere, Michael.
We got more on this story, so you'll have a chance to expand here.
Lethal prop gun fired by Alec Baldwin had misfired before.
Alec Baldwin movie set tragedy.
Michael.
The prop gun used in the fatal shooting of the cinematographer of the movie Alec Baldwin was producing had misfired before on the set.
Sources familiar with the situation told NBC News.
Just a few hours before fire before Baldwin fired the shot that killed the highly regarded cinematographer Alina Hutchins had also wounded the director and also wounded the director Joel Sousa.
Several members of the crew walked off the set of Rust because of safety concerns.
Oh, I hadn't heard that before.
The disclosure came as investigators probing the tragedy at the Bonanza Ranch in New Mexico were seeking to question the three workers who were supposed to make sure Baldwin was firing blanks.
The production company said in a statement Friday that the safety of our cast and crew is the top priority.
and everyone associated with the company.
Though we were not made aware of any official complaints regarding weapon or prop safety on set, we'll be conducting an internal review of our procedures while the production is shut down.
The workers based in and around Albuquerque appeared to have ties to the local film industry before they were hired to work on Baldwin's Western.
Their names were listed on the call sheet for Thursday, the day of the fatal shooting, which NBC News obtained from one of the entities cooperating with police.
Here we have diagrams of the difference between a live cartridge and a blank.
NBC News is withholding their names because police have not characterized the investigation into the deadly incident outside Santa Fe as an accident investigation or a criminal probe.
But those listed on the call sheets as the property master, property key assistant armorer, and property assistant, all bear responsibility for making sure the weapons used in the movie are secure and safe to use, experts said.
Property masters, especially the armorers on big movie sets, are generally very experienced.
But Rust was a low-budget movie, says Toby Bays, which is the, oh, all right, the agent for the local in Hollywood, which is the 7,000-member Property Masters Union.
So it was not immediately clear just how much experience these three crew members have, and none of them are listed as members of Local 44, Bays added.
Tim Barrera, whose job is second assistant director on Rust, is to prepare the daily call sheets for the production schedule, and he said he did not know anything about the property masters who were on the set Thursday.
There's a photo of the lady who died.
Helena Hutchins death has already sent shockwaves through Hollywood and earlier Friday Baldwin tweeted that his heart is broken and that he is cooperating with investigators.
But it also raises fresh questions about whether this set was safe.
The LA Times citing sources was the first to report Friday that there were two misfires of a prop gun on Saturday.
And that six hours before the fatal shooting, union camera operators and their assistants walked off the job to protest working conditions.
Quote, I am totally astonished this happened, especially with an experienced actor like Alec Baldwin.
Said retired property master Christopher Amy, whose resume includes work on television shows like Dexter and movies like National Treasure and Lethal Weapon 4.
Another story Baldwin didn't know the weapon contained a live round, Michael.
An assistant director unwittingly handed Alec Baldwin a loaded weapon and told him it was safe to use in the moments just before the actor fatally shot a cinematographer, court records released Friday show.
Cold gun, the assistant director announced, according to a search warrant filed in a Santa Fe court.
Instead, the gun was loaded with live rounds, and when Baldwin pulled the trigger Thursday on the set of a Western, he killed cinematographer Alina Hutchins.
Director Joel Souza, who was standing behind her, was wounded, the records said.
The Santa Fe County Sheriff's Office obtained the warrant Friday so investigators could document the scene at the ranch outside Santa Fe where the shooting took place.
They sought to examine Baldwin's bloodstained costume for the film Rust, as well as the weapon that was fired, other prop guns and ammunition, and any footage that might exist.
The gun was one of three that the film's armorer, Anna Gutierrez, had set on a cart outside the wooden structure where a scene was being acted, according to the records.
Assistant Director Dave Halls grabbed the gun from the cart and brought it inside to Baldwin, unaware that it was loaded with live rounds, a detective wrote in the search warrant application.
It was unclear how many rounds were fired.
Gutierrez removed a shell casing from the gun after the shooting, and she turned the weapon over to police when they arrived, the court records say.
Halls did not immediately return phone and email messages seeking comment.
The Associated Press was unable to contact Gutierrez and messages were sent to production companies affiliated with the film and they were not returned.
Well, only one round was fired, I'm sure, but that this was an accident is by no means obvious, Joe.
Yeah, turns out that the crew that walked off was Union crew and they were replaced with lower cost scabs, and that could have contributed a little bit.
And then the assistant director who handed Baldwin the prop gun, this just in in People Magazine, had been terminated from a previous film after a firearms incident on the filming of Freedom's Path in 2019.
an unexpected discharge gun was set off and injured a film crew member so this guy's had a history of doing bad stuff and he's the one that handed it to him and said uh cold gun now it may be excusable never but It's plausible that you could accidentally shoot somebody who was a member of the crew that was actually being filmed in a scene where a shooting occurred, but to have your director of cinematography, Hutchins, who was not in the film, to be the target?
What in the hell was Alex Baldwin thinking?
We're playing cowboys and Indians here.
I'll just play like you're an Indian and blow you away.
What in the hell was he thinking?
Joe, those are excellent points.
I'm very troubled by this whole scenario.
that's not part of the scene and that they're not filming.
That's the cavalier attitude that these people have about weapons and guns.
And the reason why they don't want any of the rest of us to have any, because they're dangerous
with any form of weapons.
Joe, those are excellent points.
I'm very troubled by this whole scenario.
Michael, your thoughts.
Yeah, just a comment on what Joe said.
I haven't seen any information so far that would describe exactly how Baldwin
was holding the pistol at the time.
like he might.
It might not be the case that he pointed it at her.
Well, one of the reports that I got was that he said, so this is how you want it to end.
going to the side and if it was in any kind of building, of course, the cinematographer would have been standing around
watching what was being done.
So I just don't know what the specific circumstances of his discharging the weapon are yet.
Well, one of the reports that I got was that he said, so this is how you want it to end and he pointed the gun at
her and pulled the trigger.
So, you know, yeah, so that there could be some other issues going on there and I'm sure there's enough witnesses
and there's going to be enough testimony that comes out that we're going to find a very disturbing story when this
thing shakes out, but it's disturbing enough as it is.
My condolences to the son and husband of this poor woman and the rest of her family because it's a horrifying thing to have to deal with.
Joe, I think you got exactly right.
There's going to be a very bad, very nasty story here when we know all the facts.
Meanwhile, Biden delays the release of remaining JFK assassination records, citing the pandemic.
Michael.
The pandemic has created backlogs for multiple federal agencies, resulting in pileups of visa applications, unprocessed Social Security benefits, and backlogs in FDA inspections.
On Friday, the White House announced another administrative casualty, a delay in the release of a trove of records related to the assassination of former President John F. Kennedy.
The White House statement signed by President Biden did not make clear exactly how the coronavirus had delayed the release of the records, which must be released to comply with a 1992 Congressional Act.
But said that the National Archivist reported that the pandemic had a, quote, significant impact on the agencies, unquote, that need to be consulted on redactions.
Oh, they're going to release a bunch of stuff with redactions.
The Archivist of the United States directs the National Archives and Records Administration, the repository of public governmental records, The position has been held since 2009 by David Ferrero, a former librarian at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Duke University, and New York Public Library.
He's the 10th person in the role since National Archives were established in 1934.
The White House statement said that the National Archives required additional time to conduct research and work with the agencies, which include the Defense, Justice, and State Departments.
The assassination of the 35th President on November 22, 1963 still holds a grip on the public imagination.
It has also been the subject of an endless stream of, wait for it, conspiracy theories.
Despite an exhaustive year-long inquiry into the murder led by Chief Justice Earl Warren that concluded that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone, surveys over the years have consistently found that most Americans believe others were involved.
The 1992 law required the government to make public the last of the Kennedy assassination documents by October 26, 2017.
That's today!
Oh, 2017.
Unless the sitting president opted to withhold any for national security reasons.
The Trump administration did release a trove of JFK assassination records in the fall of that year.
While the documents have been intriguing to researchers and conspiracy theorists alike, they have not conclusively changed the previous understanding of the assassination.
Mr. Trump, who himself has dabbled in an assassination conspiracy, Claiming that the father of one-time rival Ted Cruz was somehow involved in Kennedy's murder, pushed back the release date of some records to 2021.
In the White House statement on Friday, President Biden said he agreed with the archivist's recommendation that records be withheld from public disclosure until December 2022.
Quote, temporary continued postponement, he said, is necessary to protect against identifiable harm to the military defense, intelligence operations, law enforcement, or the conduct of foreign relations that is of such gravity that it outweighs the public interest in immediate disclosure.
Meanwhile, let me add that I did a show on JFK as the last of those I did on JimTheConspiracyGuy.com.
it's available on my blog, jamesfetzer.org, in particular, the conspiracy guide, 15 November
2020, What Happened at JFK?
Juxtaposing Oliver Stone's film with a Warren Commission report, there's just no competition
there.
But let me add that if there's a national security issue here, then the official account
must be false, because if the official account were true, there is no national security aspect
to the case.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yeah, well, I've had 60 years to redact this information, and it's hard to believe that being dead 60 years that Lee Harvey Oswald is still a threat to the country.
But that aside, we had some really revealing testimony last week when Thomas Massey was questioning Merrick Garland
about the dozens of federal agents that were undercover that instigated the January 6th riot
that they're calling an insurrection and why they had not been indicted.
They're well-known, they've been removing the photos, removing the people's pictures from the photos
just like they did with people during Stalin Russia.
They would remove pictures of people so that they completely disappeared.
Well, when Merrick was cross-examined about all the different names and the people that were
there, he says, the DOJ does not comment on ongoing cases.
Well, let me translate that to you.
DOJ does not comment on cases where they're still involved in cover-ups, and they're not going to comment on them after they've been finished with the cover-ups, because that's the way the DOJ rolls.
It's a rotten criminal enterprise, top to bottom, and all the three-letter agencies, and that includes all of the ones with help, the stupid EPA, OSHA, the FBI, the All of these federal agencies are 100% compromised and corrupted, and they all need to be flushed.
So when we go back better, we won't have any of this stuff.
Let me add that Donald Trump was correct.
Ted Cruz's father, Rafael Cruz, was on the outskirts of the assassination.
It's provable.
He was with Lee Oswald in New Orleans in front of the trademark when he was handing out fair play for Cuba.
Pamphlets, flyers, and he was also on Main Street in Dallas when the motorcade passed by, where he actually appears in the photograph on the cover of my first collaborative book on the assassination, where I had multiple experts.
He was unquestionably not a shooter, of course, not a principal player, but he was a participant, Michael.
Jim, there you go, using logic again.
If the official story is true, why would it pose any threat to the entities that were listed in that archivist's report?
It's simple logic.
Something else is happening.
And that speaks for itself.
I did want to make a plug in this context for Laurent Guéhenno's new book called The Unspoken Kennedy Truth, which I find wonderful.
Let me add, by the way, that the documents that Trump released were highly revealing.
They were only released in hard copy, not digital, so you couldn't do a search.
But my distinguished colleague, Larry Rivera, Worked their way through them.
Larry's a native Spanish speaker born in Puerto Rico and discovered that the entire story, the scenario of Oswald visiting Mexico City was a complete charade and fabrication and that among the CIA assets and bringing it about were three presidents of Mexico Where J. Edgar Hoover had actually sent out a memorandum to his station chiefs observing that someone was in Mexico impersonating Lee Harvey Oswald.
And I say, if that's all you knew about the assassination, you'd understand that he was framed and it was a conspiracy.
Yeah, and back to Ted Cruz and his lovely dad, Rafael.
I've seen Ted at three different Tea Party meetings up close, and I saw his dad at a Tea Party meeting.
His dad was enrolled as a student at University of Texas.
Nobody knows how he got paid to do that during the time that Fidel overthrew the country.
He makes himself out to be some giant anti-Castro fighter.
He was in the United States until he completed his college degree and was working, and then He was notified that he hadn't signed up for the draft, so him and his wife fled to Canada, and that's where Ted was born.
So Ted was born a Canadian, and his dad didn't even change his citizenship from Canadian to American until after Ted decided to run for the Senate.
So tell me again what wonderful patriot Mr. Ted Cruz is.
I'm sorry, the whole thing stinks top to bottom, and by being a CIA insider, He was able to get his son into Harvard.
So, you know, Ted may be a smart guy, but I've got no use for the Cruz-Camo-Rhino gang.
Nice, nice points, Joe.
Very.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send fan mail, pro or con, to liveneedtonowatgmail.com.
Liveneedtonowatgmail.com.
Here's a comment.
Michael, could you read it?
Sure, the video conference call is allegedly intercepted from the CCP.
This relates to that CCP video earlier.
They could be discussing a new recipe for Kung Pao Chicken, for all I know.
If you believe the translation, the CCP is congratulating themselves for suckering the U.S.
military into vaccinating their troops, and that it will lead to their total collapse as a fighting force.
They also say the vaccine is a death sentence.
I never trust the translation, but I do have one friend that could verify its accuracy.
The only trouble is, he is the dictionary picture of a Karen.
He was the first to go for the double mask.
He lived in China, setting up computer chip manufacturing.
Yes, my pal was instrumental in offshoring high technology.
And then see what y'all think about this.
What is that link to?
Before it's news, Communist Party bosses discuss vaccine impact.
Oh, that's the video that it's about.
Would you please read this as well?
Trump supporters are notoriously gullible, but was it that easy to outsmart the author of the art of the deal, Donald Trump?
Or was he on the trap?
In on the trap.
Oh, in on the trap?
You can bet your life that he was.
Don't forget that Trump pardoned Israeli terrorists before leaving office, but refused to preemptively pardon his own supporters after the Capitol Falls flag.
Right now, 500 plus Trump supporters are still in solitary confinement.
I didn't realize there were that many for being too stupid to believe the lies of Donald Trump.
He's now in the process of fooling them again by cozying up to Ashley Babbitt's family so they'll contribute cash to the con, C-O-H-N, cone artist again so he can backstab them again like he did on January 6th when he set them up to be arrested, face recognized, and then walked out on them instead of them to the Capitol.
Trump loves the uneducated.
I don't necessarily agree with that, but I sure welcome all points of view.
Meanwhile, remember, Amazon.com has been blatant in its censorship.
Six of the 12 books we've published at Moonrock Books have been banned by Amazon, not only on Sandy Hook, but The Boston Bombing, The Moon Landing, Orlando, and Dallas, Charlottesville, and Parkland.
Check them out.
They're not available at Amazon, but five of the six are available at moonrockbooks.com.
Meanwhile, final thoughts.
Joe, yours.
Yeah, well, there's a disproportionate outrage over the treatment of some beagles under NIAID funding by Fauci, which, you know, I'm glad that people are finally getting upset.
I mean, he's killing Tens of thousands of little children, but we're going to get in and been doing it for decades, but we're going to get bent out of shape over some poodles.
But that's fine because, you know, we're dealing with the cultures that are quite a bit different from us.
The Chinese and the Koreans both enjoy eating dogs, and they claim that the dogs taste better if you torture them before you kill them.
So what I'm thinking is, you know, that Chinese guy might have been talking about Chinese recipes, and maybe it included Some dim sum dachshund, some young poodle, and the new menu item, beagle ramen.
So, who knows?
I hate to laugh about torture of animals, but the overall thing is that as a species, human beings are being tortured into extermination by these people, and we need to grab a hold of the reins of this society and hang a bunch of these folks.
So, Final thought.
Michael, yours.
Great point, Joe, about the disproportionality involved when we can look on and watch so many people being killed and maimed.
And then what we get upset about is cruelty to these beagles, which I got upset about, too.
I'm a big dog guy, and that really pissed me off.
For a final thought, I'd like to read a quote from Chuck Baldwin.
It goes like this.
Anyone who has but a modicum of knowledge of the fundamental principles of liberty knows by now that the COVID narrative is not at all about health.
It's all about total government control over our lives.
If freedom lovers in America will stand up en masse right now and refuse to comply with the anti-Christ COVID mandates, and I mean regardless of the cost, liberty will be preserved.
But if we couch down in fear or complacency and continue to go along with this beastly system, by this time next year a free America will not exist.
It may not be easy, but it is very simple.
For the sake of our freedom and the freedom of our children, do not comply.
Well, I always enjoy Texas Tuesdays with Joelson and Texas and Michael Ivey, formerly of Fort Worth.
Let me say, I think the reason why the Beagle case is so telling is the following.
When it comes to vaccinations and their benefits or lack thereof, there's great controversy in the United States.
There's no controversy over cruelty to animals, of which this was an extraordinary example.
The beagles were put with their heads in cages where flesh-eating bugs could eat them to death while they were alive.
Their vocal cords were severed so they couldn't cry out in pain.
This was an act of unparalleled cruelty toward animals in my judgment, for which Anthony Fauci was responsible.
Anyone who still preserves doubts about the efficacy or not of the vaccines joins in solidarity with recognizing this man is a sadist.
It is cruelty to animals more than warrants the realization.
If he could do that to two innocent dogs, what would he be willing to do to human beings, including our children?
It leaves no doubt about it.
Thank you for joining us today.
▲
Export Selection