All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 25, 2021 - Jim Fetzer
01:17:52
Dr. Lee Merritt | The Medical Rebel - October 19, 2021
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This information is not intended as legal, medical or nutritional advice and is for informational
purposes only.
Vaccine Choice Canada does not endorse or accept responsibility for statements, views and opinions presented by its guests.
Welcome to our weekly call with Vaccine Choice Canada.
My name is Ted Kuntz and I'm the President of Vaccine Choice Canada.
A special welcome to all of those joining us for the first time.
If you find value in these conversations, I invite you to support our work and our mission by becoming a member of Vaccine Choice Canada.
In addition to wonderful speakers, you will receive a weekly Choice Insider newsletter with up-to-date information and calls to action to help us protect our rights and freedoms, most especially our right to medical choice.
Nice to see you all.
Thank you for joining us again this evening.
Thank you for standing up.
We are blessed to have another amazing guest this evening.
Dr. Leigh Merritt described herself as the medical rebel.
The definition of rebel is one who refuses to accept some authority or code or convention.
Dr. Merritt is clearly a rebel.
She is one of the most vocal critics of the COVID jab, declaring it a bioweapon.
Dr. Merritt questions the entire COVID narrative and sees a larger and darker agenda at play.
She states, we are in a fight for our children's future.
And just like the flag of the revolution of 1776, it is truly join or die.
This time they won't need guns and gallows because we have biological and chemical weapons.
I need a medical rebel army.
Please stand with me against the CDC and the WHO tyranny, against big pharma corruption, overzealous health boards, and corrupt medical bureaucrats.
Let's draw the line in the sand.
No mandates, no restrictions on treatments we want, no lockdowns or masks ever.
During a time of massive censorship, we are grateful to be in conversation with well-informed and courageous professionals like Dr. Lee Merritt.
Welcome, Dr. Merritt.
Thanks for joining us.
Thank you very much.
Thank you for having me.
Yeah.
Well, there is so much we want to talk about with you.
One of the statements that I've heard you say a number of times now is that if you think it's about a virus, you will be a victim.
Could you just explain that for us?
I tell people think about being in Beirut or Sarajevo.
These are world-class beautiful cities and then if you weren't paying attention though to the changing things that were happening at the right time you might have walked out of your front door in Sarajevo thinking you were going to have a cappuccino at the local store that you do every every Saturday morning and instead a stray a stray bullet hits you and kills you because Overnight, the country broke out in this factional war, and bombs and things were going off, and it became a bombed out hellhole there for a while.
Overnight.
Well, unfortunately, that's somewhat what's happening to us.
Now, the bombs, we're not seeing bombs, we're not hearing booms, but we're every much at war.
And if you don't appreciate that, Then you're not going to be skeptical enough.
You're not going to be cautious enough and you're going to be in this case, instead of going out to get that cappuccino, you just ran out and got a vaccine because you weren't paying attention that things had changed.
And that's my point.
We want people to be informed so they can be.
They can at least survive and hopefully man up and be a warrior in this to save our children and let the next generation survive.
I do believe we're in, I know it sounds, if I'd said this a few years ago, I would have sounded kooky to me.
Okay, so I get it.
But I think we're in an extinction level event.
And the book that I just sent you excerpts from, It's called Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars, and I really recommend people read the book.
Now, there's some of its technical, economic, actually electrical engineering kind of formula, because they make the point that one of the things we have to keep silent from the public is that economy responds in the same way that the principles of electronics respond.
So V equals IR and they redefine that for economics.
But these are people that are the elites of the world.
This is a book that was reporting on a meeting by what I call the uber elites or the uber lords.
And it occurred in 1954.
And it was published in 1956, this little booklet, and it was found in the 80s.
And when it was found, it was not meant to be found.
It was not meant to come to public scrutiny.
But if you read this book, you realize they're talking in the 1950s about the silent weapon is not directed energy or chemical or biologic.
The silent weapon Is social is automated social organization things such as your UPC code and credit cards and combining the two to know exactly what you're purchasing and what how when you're doing it and where you're doing it.
Who knew about that in 1956?
I mean, my point is, I was a high school student in 1968 working in a grocery store.
We were still pushing buttons and had to add the tax, make the tax addition in our heads, and then manually add it on.
There were no such things as UPC codes, but obviously This is like we've always heard, DARPA and these places are 10 years ahead.
So these people in the 50s knew this automation was coming and how they would use it to control humanity.
That's really kind of where we are.
And the chilling thing they say in that book, and we're sending you excerpts, I guess, that I had put on my Telegram channel.
The Telegram Channel's Freedom Doc, and I look like a mask.
It's the avatar of a medieval plague mask.
But what they say in this book is that economically, the world is always going to be out of balance because these little human people, they're too greedy and there are too many of them.
And we have two choices.
We can let them go to war and just beat each other up, or we can take charge and render benevolent slavery and That's exactly what they're saying.
And if you really look at history, it looks like they're really carrying this out.
So, I mean, I hate to say that, but that's what, you know, I had, I've been giving talks and my first talk, I show this picture from Australia about them, you know, spraying this guy in the face for sitting on the sidewalk.
And I just make the point, anybody that looks around and thinks what's happening, like the lockdowns, lockdown is not a medical term.
How did we end up talking about lockdowns?
Think about it.
We have to listen to their language.
You know, since time immemorial, we've used the term quarantine, but it was only quarantine of the sick.
We have never in the history of medicine quarantined the well, and now we are doing lockdowns of the well.
That's a prison term.
Let's be very clear.
That's for prisoners, and that's the way they're treating us.
So that's all.
And I tell you, I will say one other thing, how I got into this is that I was an unemployed spine surgeon because they closed down the ER or the operating rooms very early.
And so I sat around and I had background history in being as a military surgeon, and I served on the Navy Research Advisory Committee.
And I had a friend that used to work in our bioweapons lab.
So I was kind of tipped off to this ahead of time.
I started doing basic science research about coronavirus, about the vaccine potential, about everything that we're now dealing with, and I found out very early on this was a bioweapon.
It's very clear, and they're just... anybody that doesn't believe that just needs to have a few more facts given to them, I think.
But we're in an interesting time where facts don't seem to matter, the science doesn't seem to matter, As you said, the measures, none of them make sense from a health perspective, so they have to be there for a different agenda.
And yet, when we make these statements or make these claims, they're dismissed by a huge percentage of the population.
The phenomenon is like we've never seen before, isn't it?
Well, we're dealing with, unfortunately, we've had many years of psychological manipulation of the mass mind, starting with the Tavistock Institute and goes way back before World War I.
and in started in Britain and it came to America and it spread around the world and they really
think again it's the elite believe that they have to condition us to do the right things.
One of the things they've done for example when it comes to vaccines is they have specifically
you know it's just like they use words to demean things okay.
In the 1950s, the concern about communists infiltrating our government, so they termed the term McCarthyite.
Now, McCarthy was just a, he was a senator, and his only point was, let's, we shouldn't have communists in the highest ranks of our government offices.
That doesn't make sense.
Nor, you know, to have the Secretary of, Assistant Secretary of State, which we turned out was true, to be a communist.
Well, the term McCarthyism actually was coined by a guy that later we learned very clearly, no question about it, through the Venona transcripts, was in the pay of the Soviet Union.
So these terms are made to demean people for political reasons.
And one of the big ones they've come up with is anti-vaxxer.
You know, I mean, I questioned the flu vaccine before anything else.
I mean, long ago, because I looked at the data, you know, that in Estonia, 67%, or in America, 67% of the people now run out and get the flu vaccine every year, and we have a 0.02% mortality.
In Estonia, they have a 5% vaccination rate with flu vaccine, and they have a 0.02% mortality.
You know, the more you actually look at the data, the less this stuff makes sense.
And this one is the worst.
So the underlying assumption that you don't say, that they don't say out loud, but we've come to accept through this mind manipulation of the masses, is all vaccines are always safe in all people all the time.
I mean, that's because otherwise you would treat it just like you did any other drug, like a hypertensive drug.
You know, as a physician, if I don't like Atenolol, that doesn't make me an anti-hypertensioner.
You know, it just makes me somebody that's questioning that maybe Atenolol is not the best drug or maybe not the best drug for you.
That's perfectly acceptable.
But the minute you say, I don't really think you should take the flu vaccine, Joe.
Oh my gosh, the whole world breaks loose.
I noticed on your website when I was going through it this morning is that there's an article that you have that was written in 2015 entitled, How Vaccine Hysteria Could Spark a Totalitarian Nightmare.
Yeah, I think I was ahead of my time, right?
Wow!
When I saw the title all by itself, I just thought, boy, talk about predictive programming here.
I know.
I think I wrote that for World Net Daily or Human Events.
I can't remember.
I was writing for both of those journals.
But yeah.
And I also have a talk about Carl Brandt.
It's a video on there.
And also I wrote something that's called The Lessons of Carl Brandt.
And I got interested because I was taking my son to college.
So this was 2009 or 2008.
And I was taking him to college.
And in Omaha, Nebraska, we lived in Arizona at the time, but I was taking him to Creighton University, and I dropped him off, and I was staying for a little while as he got adjusted, and I was browsing an old bookstore, and here's a book on Carl Brandt, and it had a guy in a white coat, said he did orthopedics, trauma, and spine surgery, and I said, well, that's what I've done all my career, so I flipped it over, and it was Hitler's Doctor, and kind of the joke in orthopedics is, We're in medicine.
It's always the spine surgeons.
We're always the bad guys.
It's like something's wrong with us.
We are, you know, we do crazy things.
But it turned out, I read the book, and it really changed.
It really, it really got me thinking about the profession of medicine that I was in.
Because I could see, I was, I think I was at the time the President of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons.
And we've been the voice of private practice, trying to keep government out of medicine since 1943, when the AMA went all in with the government.
Because we said, when the government's the payer, or when insurance company is the payer, you're not the customer.
And immoral things happen in the history of the world.
So anyway, I gave this talk and I wrote this article about Carl Brannan.
At the end of the article, I said, You know, Carl Brandt really wasn't a bad guy.
We miss the lesson of Nazi Germany medicine if we just say they're monsters, because we never see ourselves as monsters, so we won't learn anything by saying that.
But what we should realize is that they were trained just like us, highly trained physicians, but they were trained with an ethic that believed that you could sacrifice some people for the benefit of others.
And that's a dangerous ethic.
And it happens in every government system that you you say, well, we don't have money for you guys.
So we're going to give it to the because we're giving it to these guys.
All government does is reallocate funds based on their priorities, not on your priorities.
So anyway, I said, nothing good is going to come of this.
And when I gave the talk, I said, looking at what happened to Carl Brandt, you know, he went to the gallows after Nuremberg.
And by the way, the doctors that went to the gallows primarily, there were seven of them, physicians.
And they primarily went there because they didn't kill people themselves, but they allowed people to be experimented on under coercion and without informed consent.
Let's see, what are we doing today?
You have to take a vaccine or you will lose your job.
I'd call that coercion.
We don't know what's in that vaccine, so it really is an experiment.
It's still technically an experimental drug.
And the informed consent, most of the time, is just roll up your sleeve.
So we got the same things going on.
A little different setting, same kind of issues.
And I thought to myself back then, will we as physicians know when it is time to get off the bus?
And I had a slide that showed a bus hanging over a cliff.
And the time is now.
We're in that time.
Physicians need to stop Contributing to the death of people by not doing the right thing for them, and by allowing it to be done.
And by supporting these hospitals that are killing people by omission and commission, and I know you guys have talked about that, you know, putting people in into rooms and just ignoring them because they had a positive COVID test when really they had a small bowel obstruction.
That has got to stop.
And if we And we all think we're doing our job by staying in the system, but again, Eichmann and Himmler didn't run Auschwitz on a day-to-day basis.
They just, you know, Eichmann made it efficient and got the trains to run, but it was the little people like us doing our jobs that kept the bad system going, and at some point you've got to get out of that.
And that's really where we are right now, among other things.
Well, and I think everybody thinks that, you know, if they were in Nazi Germany in World War II, that they would have been one of the good guys to stand up to all this stuff.
And today, we really get to see who we are.
You know, do we have the courage?
Yeah, where are we standing up?
Yeah.
And some are.
A lot of people are, but not enough.
We need more people every day.
And what's your assessment about why more people don't stand up?
Or, you know, how we've been so captured by this narrative?
Well, again, there's a great normalcy bias, we all think that the world hasn't, you know, how can the world be this different?
We never believed people, we didn't live in, it may have been true, but we didn't believe that we were in a world where our government would ever turn against us and kill us.
But we're finding out that that's not something that was just in Stalin's Russia, that that is something that can happen in any country when we're not paying attention for long enough.
So I think that it's hard to wrap your head around an incredible lie like this one is.
This is such a big lie.
You know, it's just like Joseph Goebbels said, tell the lie big enough, long enough, people will believe it.
We question little lies, but look, we got people running out to take a vaccine that they know nothing about, their doctor doesn't know what's in it, they don't do the due diligence they would have done to buy a used car.
You've got to say to yourself, something's wrong here.
And I would I would argue it is we've been conditioned for a long time to believe things that aren't true.
And I will tell you, you know, we may have believed that some politics weren't true and some things they told us about economics they lied to us about.
I think we have to wrap our head around the fact they've lied to us about basic biology.
You know, when Patrick, I'll tell you that Alberta story with Patrick King, when he went to court and he said, prove to me there's a SARS-CoV-2 isolate, and they couldn't do it.
That was kind of my wake up call.
I think that was a couple months, three months ago, maybe now.
And I said, you know, I'd been hearing from Dr. Andrew Kaufman and Dr. Thomas Cowan and Stefan Lanke in Germany, and other people over the years had been saying, Hey, there's a scam and virology going on, guys.
It's not what you think.
There really aren't viruses like we think.
But I just couldn't wrap my head around that.
But then when this whole non-isolate thing came out, and we found out at that time that our CDC doesn't have an isolate either.
They're being sued by lab guys in California.
Apparently 90 countries admit they do not have an isolate of SARS-CoV-2.
So I decided I'm going to really look into this.
I can't stand this.
I can't stand that we've been through all this and there's really no there there.
But it's true.
There's really no there there.
I talk about this a little bit.
I have, if you're interested, I mean, I have a little PowerPoint to describe the lie that we've been living.
But yeah, it's really, it's really that crazy that they've been lying to us about basic biologic things, probably including Lots about cancer, and because one of the things I got into really early on was hydroxychloroquine.
I was sitting home as an unemployed surgeon, I started reading and we knew about, you know,
before Trump ever mentioned hydroxychloroquine, doctors from around the world that had been linked
up a lot of times through the AAPS, the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, but I, you
know, we were on an email and I was getting this stuff from all over, you know, what Didier Raoul
was doing and the Japanese and the, or the Koreans, I mean, and the Chinese, people that had experience
with using hydroxychloroquine started talking about this very early on, chloroquine, because
they had determined that it was effective against SARS. So they started using it and we started
following it. And when then Trump said something about it and the whole world collapsed, like this
was, oh my gosh, that's so stupid, we can't have that, that's not, and Fauci came out against it.
And I'm going, what?
So I really went to the literature and I found out not only did we know about this but we had covered it up.
The medical literature has been suppressed since probably the late 70s.
I found literature going back to 1974 about how these agencies lysosomotropic type agents could actually stop What we consider viral illness and and then I so I thought at first it was just they don't like Trump orange man bad but the second the second the second wake up was when I realized there was a paper in 2004 that chloroquine a potent inhibitor of influenza a in vitro in other words oh this is it
This drug, hydroxychloroquine, will stop flu and you won't need a $69 billion flu vaccine.
I said, okay, that's the industry.
It takes down the flu vaccine industry, but I do think now I've come to the conclusion it's more than that.
It really is that you can't be terrorized by wild viruses or whatever we want to call these things, these bioweapons.
If you have a treatment in your back pocket, This is it.
I mean, let's look at Ivermectin right now.
Ivermectin is one of the World Health Organization's essential drugs.
They have a list of essential drugs, and for decades, Ivermectin's been on it.
They're using it now.
The Japanese Medical Association has said, start using it.
It really works, guys.
Forget the WHO, just start using it.
India, they're using it, and there are many areas now declared COVID-free, and they're not doing the vaccines in those areas as much.
They're doing ivermectin.
They're actually The Indian Bar Association is actually prosecuting Dr. Swaminathan, who was the WHO head over there, because she outlawed or she said, don't use ivermectin.
And consequently, the death rate skyrocketed.
They killed a lot of people until somebody, I don't know if it was Modi or who said, no, we're going to use ivermectin.
We know this works.
And so all that all that information is out there, including over 80 peer reviewed studies showing it works.
But what are we doing in America?
The FDA has now told the United States Postal Service to interdict ivermectin coming across the border from Indian places to people that are desperate because they cannot get it through their doctor, they cannot even get it if they had a prescription through some pharmacies, and they cannot get it through their animal supply because they've been told not to sell it to people.
You have to, this is a war, we are in a war and we are being attacked by our own government who wants us dead apparently.
Yeah.
It's incredible but that's a lie that's hard to wrap your, I mean it's really, I get it, it's really hard to believe all this and if I didn't know what I know I wouldn't believe it myself probably.
Well, that's it.
It's there.
And as you said, it's like to accept that your government is against you, is actually trying to kill you.
Your medical system is trying to kill you.
Your media no longer tells the truth.
These are difficult lies to wrap our heads around.
And so we keep stepping away from it until we finally get hurt.
Well, and the other thing is, what it's created is kind of this cult, this cult of believers.
And they've associated vaccine hesitancy or anti-vaxxers with the right wing.
They made it a political thing, okay?
And that also makes it so that if you're in the cult of vaccine believers, you don't care about the facts.
It really has gotten to that point.
No amount of concern until somebody in your family dies.
And even then, I see people that say it had nothing to do with the vaccine, even though, you know, 15-year-olds don't just die in bed at night.
You know, it's just horrible.
And here's a story that I tell people to try and say, just give this consideration.
Let's suppose, let's look at the, here's a way to look at worldview.
Let's look at the PCR test in 2020.
Now, most people have heard the name of Kerry Mullis that got the Nobel Prize for designing the test, and he said, don't use it for diagnosis.
It wasn't just about the cycle amplification.
His point was that when you use it, Away from a lab, it's going to be contaminated.
These things are very, very sensitive, and you're measuring a tiny, tiny, tiny bit of genetic material.
So they're meant to be done in a very sterile environment, in a lab, with micropipettes and people that know what they're doing.
You really can't get accurate results, you know, good predictive value out in the wild, no matter what.
But let's give them that for a moment.
Let's just say, okay, they've decided it would be some kind of approximation, the best they could do.
They rolled it out on the whole world.
Now these tests, but let's see what happened.
It's how they did it is what the issue is.
So if you look around the world, there were three places.
There was the Drosten Group, the CDC, and the Louis Pasteur Institute.
They came up with the genome that was going to be tested against to try and decide if you have SARS-CoV-2 in your body.
So they came up with a genetic sequence to use in these tests.
Now, I'll tell you at the end of this what I did to decide how I found out what that genetic sequence was made to, and that's kind of interesting, but that's not my major point.
So they got these tests and they gave it to commercial vendors and they made the tests like Thermo Fisher.
There's one.
And if you read the brochures that go with these tests, they tell you very clearly how to do these tests.
They show a graph and they say, normally you do these from 20 to 30 cycles.
If you go over 30 cycles, you're going to start getting some false positives.
If you go over 35 cycles, it's junk.
It's so wrong that you can't make any sense of it.
They don't say this in the actual brochure, but I'm adding this point.
It's like the broken clock that gets the right time twice a day.
It should completely be discarded.
But what was the world doing?
The world was averaging 45 cycles in 2020.
And it was up until this magic date of January 21st 21 when it just suddenly decided to do it right.
So let's look at what the possible answers for that is.
You know, lab managers are intelligent people that are well-trained, and they know how to set up new tests, they know how to train their people, they know how to do quality control, so they know they would not produce this in their lab, or they'd be fired if they did this kind of quality testing normally.
But yet, all over the world, these lab managers did it wrong.
Every major lab around the world, in the Western world, did this wrong.
They were doing 40 to 50 cycles.
So here's one worldview.
One worldview is there was some kind of group psychosis of lab managers, and they all did it wrong.
And not only did they all do it wrong, but they did it wrong in exactly the same way.
They all over-cycled the test.
None of them under-cycled the test.
And then on that magic day of January 21st, they all had an epiphany and got it right.
Okay, that's one worldview.
And the other worldview says, I don't believe in the group psychosis of lab managers.
What else could have happened?
What could have happened is somebody told them to overcycle the test.
Now, who could that have been?
It couldn't have been local.
It wasn't just in Ontario.
It wasn't just in Nebraska.
It was all over the world.
So by definition, whoever told them to overcycle the test was at an international level.
And what was the end result of overcycling the test?
It was to make all these people afraid so they would be Like Stockholm Syndrome people, they would do the next step, which is run out and get the vaccine.
They made us afraid because it made it look like everybody was getting this disease, it was going out.
Oh, new asymptomatic spread of a virus, which we've never seen before, by the way.
We're finding it all over with these tests, so it's true.
Well, it made people afraid and do things they wouldn't have done had they not been afraid.
In other words, it harmed people.
And by that, you know, we don't call having an ice cream party, deciding to have an ice cream party with your friends a conspiracy.
A conspiracy is two or more people getting together and deciding to harm a third of more people.
So by definition, this is an international conspiracy.
Now, unless you believe in the psychosis group, that's psychosis of lab manners.
So, in my opinion, if somebody can come up with a third world view, I'll be very happy, but that's what it looks like to me.
Well, I'm sure it's just a coincidence, right?
Right, right, yeah.
It's all, yeah, or it's the biggest coincidence, like, that is a third world view.
There's a third world view, you're right.
A coincidence that they flipped the coin, you know, a hundred times and it all came up heads.
Well, we know that vaccines are the leading cause of coincidences, right?
Yeah, right now they are.
We've got a bunch of hands raised.
Why don't we find out what people, what kind of questions they have.
SJ, let's get you unmuted.
Yes, hi, thank you.
Really interesting, Dr. Merritt.
It's a joy to listen to some sanity during all of this.
One question that keeps coming up in my head, and I don't know if you have the answer, As it pertains to the injection, and obviously there's a lot of adverse reactions and deaths, but then some people get it and have no problem whatsoever.
And not that I've really been challenging those who seem to have drunk the Kool-Aid, but it's something in my own head that I'm thinking, if it's supposed to be creating the spike protein and adhering to ACE2 receptors and causing all these things, why would some people have no problem whatsoever?
Well, you're right.
And I will tell you, I've talked to pharmacists, I've talked to a bunch of people.
They're not all the same.
Even within the same batch, what we're hearing is the vaccines are not all the same.
They're different color, they're different viscosity, within the same batch.
Now, my friend Ryan Cole, who you've seen on the internet, he's a hematopathologist, he's one of the American frontline doctors with me.
He took six vials, okay?
Two of the Pfizer, two of the Moderna, two of the J&J, and three of them were magnetic, just in the bottle, and three of them were not.
So, it's like we're the lab rats.
It's a big test.
I mean, if this were really a bad disease, and keep in mind there was a 99.91% survival in 2020.
If you look at the death rate in 2020, I think it was 7.16 per thousand.
And in 2011, I actually have those numbers somewhere in 2011.
Oh, here it is.
In 2020, the death rate was 7.612 per thousand.
In 2014, it was 7.643.
In 2011, it was 7.818.
So where was the pandemic?
one two per thousand in 2014 it was 7.643 in 2011 it was 7.818 so where was the pandemic
in other words so this whole justification of this unprecedented pandemic is is is just not
there so um so the the whole idea of this if because if it were really a pandemic it would
be immoral to put out uh vaccines and then you find out you took the placebo but it appears that's
what's happening.
Some people are getting the placebo, some people getting it.
It'd be interesting to know if it's by age, if they have some that are color-coded for certain people, because, you know, In general, what totalitarian societies like to do is get rid of the useless mouth breathers, the people who are not contributing to society, certainly the dissidents, and then do other things to the working class.
And that's the other problem.
I'm going to tell you, this whole idea of magnetism and nanoparticles and stuff, that is real.
You know, Sherry Tenpenny, my friend, she, it's terrible.
The Ohio State Medical Board is trying to have her see a psychiatrist because She testified before the Ohio Senate, and she said, these are making people magnetic.
And they're trying to get her a psychiatric evaluation.
So she asked, does anybody have data?
I said, yeah, I've got data.
And my friend down in Texas got data, because we did what you're supposed to do in science.
You test things, you don't just take the word for it.
So when they started showing all this crazy magnetism on people's, you know, the spoon on somebody's forehead, I did, I mean this was highly technical, don't try this at home, I took a paper clip, you know that's my new medical examination stuff in my office, is a paper clip and a magnet and I took it to my office and I set up a grid and I just asked people politely if they would mind if they were tested and would they be
And tell me if they don't mind sharing.
Because I did it after I'd done treating them.
It wasn't that we were going to discriminate against them.
But would you mind telling me your vaccine status and would you mind me if I tested you with a paperclip?
And 100% of them said okay.
So I did.
And I will tell you, 60% of the ones, now I don't have huge numbers because I got busy in clinic.
I couldn't do it all the time.
But early on, 60% of the people were positive.
When I did it later, it seemed like some of that went away because later I couldn't see to demonstrate that.
I didn't, the only place I could find the paperclip stick was over the injection site, by the way.
Now I saw somebody, I did the control was the other side.
If I, if it was in the left arm, I tried the paperclip there yet stuck.
Okay.
And then I'd put it on the right arm.
So it wasn't sweat.
It wasn't, there was a control and I didn't find it anywhere else, but now I see people using EMF meters, and they can show that people actually go up on the EMF signature over that.
My problem in my office is, in a big city, unfortunately, there's a lot of noise, and I couldn't really make sense of the EMF readings, so I didn't pursue that, but it's absolutely true.
That's what's happening.
We don't know.
And I have to tell you, you know, Dr. Hoff from Canada made the observation that over time the symptoms change.
Let me tell you the other thing that could be happening that is even a worse situation than what I just described, and that is that there's a delayed effect.
It may be true.
We have some inside information that doesn't come with back, I mean, I can't really give you the backstory right now, that they didn't just put mRNA in these vaccines.
Messenger RNA is a time-limited genetic bit of material.
I mean, in your body, it stays there for a while and then goes away.
If it lingers too long, you get autoimmune disease in the past.
That's one of the signs of autoimmune disease.
So, but there's another thing called SA RNA.
It's called self-amplifying RNA.
And that's apparently in the deep dungeons of these manufacturers.
And if that's true, what that can do is you can program that to put out, let's say, amyloid.
Because I just got a call from a friend of mine who says, oh, their friend got amyloidosis after the vaccine, several months after the vaccine.
Could it be related?
And I said, yeah, I think it could be.
We don't know, but it could be.
So, Let's say you make it to make amyloid and it doesn't pick up steam until it's had a chance to amplify for a while, so it sits there for a few months and then it starts amplifying, then you start having the problem.
Another evidence of that is a doctor I talked to recently And she had a like a 40 year old female patient who had she knew her because right after she got the vaccine she got vaccine remorse and she came to this natural kind of naturopathic clinic.
I shouldn't say that like a complimentary anti-aging medicine clinic.
To do the best she could to not have any of the side effects from the vaccine.
And so they tested her and did things then.
So they know she was okay at first.
And then four months later, she came in because she was starting to feel bad.
They tested her.
Now she has a positive D-dimer.
That's what Dr. Hoff figured out.
She was now having clotting.
And two weeks later, that D-dimer had gone up.
So fine, fine, fine for four months.
And now she's starting to clot.
That's scary.
Yeah, I guess, because it does concern me, because then if not everybody has reactions, then it's very hard for us who are standing our ground to be consistently strong, because they're going, oh, well, sorry, that's just a coincidence.
So, I don't even know how to fight against it.
And why do you think they did it that way?
Yeah, and why do you think they're in there for that very reason and they're insisting everybody get it quick quick quick quick because they know this is this with time this is going to be obvious and you know it's it should be obvious now but with time it's going to be even more obvious and as as Boris Yeltsin it's one of my favorite quotes he said you know you could sit on the throne of bayonets but you can't sit on it for long and that's this the lie is starting to come down you know but I mean I just looked in This is the latest that I have.
I just looked at I did this for a talk that I just gave.
So this is the VAERS as of October 15, 2021.
And just by looking at the VAERS, and people can argue, oh, the VAERS is self-reported.
Let me tell you, it's not completely.
It used to be more self-reported, but now a lot of doctors and nurses, you could tell by the way they write this stuff up in there, they know what they're telling about.
And you can also hear between the lines, they're putting in these big reports and they're screaming between the lines for somebody to hear them.
That's what's happening.
But all the deaths in the years 1990 to 2021, there were 3,885 reported, for an average of 125 per year.
This year now, now I just looked at the United States and our territories, so I know the base of the demographics.
I don't, I didn't, if you put in everybody, you'll get a bigger number.
But just United States and U.S.
territories, 7,674 deaths.
So we're essentially twice What 31 years of all vaccines put together gave us in reported deaths, and this is apples to apples.
Pulmonary embolism, there were 14 reported in 31 years.
We've had 2,817 right now.
Myocardial infarcts, 75 in 31 years.
Now it's 3,478.
Guillain-Barre, which is the most paid out problem in our vaccine compensation fund.
I don't know if you have that kind of thing, but because the vaccine manufacturers are indemnified, by the way, completely, the government, with our tax dollars, we pay our tax dollars so if we get injured, we pay with our own money.
But they do give compensation to people that have been injured.
And Guillain-Barre, which is ascending paralysis, is the number one thing that they pay out.
But it's on the average of $130 per year.
This year alone, 2058.
And I have to say, personally, I studied neurology at the Queen Square Institute of Neurology in London.
It's a world-famous hub of neurology expertise, you know, 800 bed hospital just
with neurologic patients, I didn't see a case of Guillain-Barre at the time. This was
in 1978. I never heard about a case until the flu vaccine really took off.
And then starting in about 2000, whatever that was, we started hearing about somebody knew somebody that had Guillain-Barre.
Really?
Then the nurses.
Now, after a while, the nurses, everybody knew somebody or had seen a case.
Well, I saw my first case with this.
I took care of my first case with this one before I was involved in cancel culture, but that was a whole other story.
Yeah, I took my first case with this one, so we are seeing things.
It's not just, I mean, we used to listen to doctors that had been in the game for a long time.
I mean, I've been in medicine 45 years.
We have never seen anything like this in a vaccine rollout, never, and myocarditis is the big one.
You know, we have a military epidemiology database, so this is a very It's pretty darn reliable.
I mean, it looks at all the things.
When I was in the military as a surgeon, they didn't have that, but now they can computerize all the records.
They know what's happened to these guys.
On average, they would have about 800 myocarditis cases a year throughout the military.
This year, they've had 1,400 at last I looked, and that was several months ago.
It's probably more than that.
Now, if you look at the death rate of myocarditis, It's about, from a cardiologist friend of mine told me this, I haven't confirmed it, but it's about 60% or 65% over five years.
So we've killed about 400 people, giving them the vaccine in the military.
In 2020, entire COVID deaths for all the military services in the United States was 20.
So we have 20 times the death from the vaccine than we do from COVID, and yet you can't get them to stop.
And they lie about it.
I mean, my friend is Theresa Long, who you may have seen that put that affidavit out very courageously.
She did about this, you know, grounding all the pilots.
Right thing to do.
I mean, when I was in the Navy, I was with the Marine Air everywhere I went.
They never gave a medicine to a pilot that hadn't been on the market for five years.
Because we've had now a death in the cockpit with Delta.
We've got pilots dying in the air.
We've got pilots dying in their rooms.
We've had three Delta deaths in one week or two weeks.
And a bunch of British Air pilots died.
I don't know about the others, but we've had I think around nine pilots now dead.
These are healthy people.
They're the most physically screened people in the world probably for their job.
Commercial pilots, they're flying multi-seat aircraft.
Many of them can stand up, or they're short hops, they can stand up.
But the transcontinental ones, they can stand up and move around.
Military pilots are flying a lot of them in single-seat ejection seats, or dual-seat, but they're still strapped in singly, they can't move around.
And they're not carrying passengers, they're carrying ammunition, they're carrying weaponry, they're carrying potential nuclear weaponry.
Are you crazy?
What is going on here?
And so she finally couldn't take it anymore, and she wrote that affidavit.
And her point is that they should ground every pilot that's been vaccinated.
And then that pilot dies in the Delta airline while he was flying.
That tells you, yep, she was right.
But she just can't.
I mean, she's screaming as loud as she can.
They're not listening, are they?
And they're not listening globally.
They may be listening, but they're not acting because that's not what this is about.
This is a takedown.
We're being taken down.
It's a national security nightmare.
Yeah, this is a global coup, isn't it?
And they've, I mean, you got to give them credit from one perspective, what they've been able to pull off in the last 18 months.
It's phenomenal how they've done this in almost every country globally and had success.
And, you know, this is the point about talking about this as a bioweapon is to point out to people Most people now seem to agree it was made in a lab.
If something is made in a lab and it makes you sick, it goes after humans, it's by definition a bioweapon.
It doesn't matter whether it was accidentally or purposely released, although here's what matters.
I mean, I think it was purposely released, don't get me wrong, but what really matters in all this is The spike protein was patented, and I looked at what David Martin said, those patents existed before 2018.
The spike protein and all the parts that make it pathogenic were patented.
Now, what they discovered, and this is how I knew it was a bioweapon in February of 2020, is that Prashant Pradhan was his name.
He and his colleagues in Delhi, India, they wrote a paper and they showed that when you look at the coronavirus, this one, the spike protein of this one, the SARS-CoV-2, there are four manipulated inserts of the HIV, the human immunodeficiency virus, that have been inserted into that spike protein.
They do not exist naturally.
There's no other coronavirus in nature, and there's many coronaviruses that don't have those inserts.
They had to be made in a lab, okay?
They also found some signatures that go along with the Wuhan lab, but that's beside the point.
These four inserts are there, and they're 100% conserved, meaning if you look at all the genetic sequences of the specimens that were given to the gene bank from sick people with this SARS-CoV-2, COVID disease, whatever we want to call it, They all had those four inserts.
None of the ones in the in the nature did.
So this was a designed bioweapon.
They're telling us that they are making in our bodies with that.
Well, first of all, they told us, oh, you have to take, you have to go to your house and lock yourself down and wear 10 masks and wash your hands a million times a day.
Because if you don't, three or four of these spike proteins getting into your mucus membrane can kill you.
You know, that's how viruses are.
They're tiny little bits of genetic material wrapped in a lipoprotein coat.
They get into your mucus membranes.
They can go places and make you sick.
With mucous membranes being your mouth, your gut, your eyes, your nose, etc.
Well, if three or four can do it, but they're making a vaccine that reproduces this spike, this very spike protein, the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in your body, and it's going to make trillion copies.
Plus, is that insane?
And then they don't, and then they deny that this is killing people?
That's why you need to realize it's a bioweapon.
Sorry.
What's your question for Dr. Merrick?
Dr. Merrick, great to have you here.
I like the opening line of your LinkedIn profile.
No, I'm not out to lunch or something like that.
Oh, I don't go to LinkedIn.
So somebody else must have put that up there.
Oh, well, anyways.
I better check that.
Congratulations on winning a female bodybuilding competition.
Thank you.
You are part of four generations of medical practitioners, and one of your two sons is also in that field.
And so, when you were a young child, you used to accompany your father, who was also a physician, on house calls.
And so, in terms of you being exposed to Western medicine, were both of those previous two generations well indoctrinated in Western medicine?
And if so, how did you come to be red-pilled?
Well, keep in mind, that's a good question, thank you.
Keep in mind, medicine, when my dad practiced it, it was between a doctor and a patient.
There wasn't a bureaucrat in the room, there wasn't a government agent in the room.
It was, my dad literally charged three, in 1971, charged three dollars for an office call and six dollars for a house call, okay?
And made a decent living, you know, because he didn't have all the paperwork to do.
He wasn't spending millions of dollars on computer systems and all those things.
It was a very simple way of practicing medicine, and it put the patient at the center.
Um, so, you know, his biggest problem was he thought the telephone was connected to his dinner chair and his bed, his pillow.
But other than that, you know, he, he was worried when Medicare started coming in.
And he told me nothing good will come of this.
He told me to be a lawyer, by the way.
You know, and so what happened to me, I will tell you, so I actually, my father was, although he practiced small-town medicine, he actually was an MD, a DDS, and a PhD in biochemistry, and he had invented the first fluoride toothpaste, but didn't patent it, so I'm still working, but he That was a different generation.
He had gone to the University of Rochester, New York.
I went there.
My mother was a nurse there.
I was classically trained.
My professor of pharmacology became the head of the FDA.
I believed everything they told me about vaccines, but I'll tell you what they told me.
It's not what the young people are hearing today.
Again, Medicine education has been taken over and it's been changed.
So part of it is, I have the advantage of being an old fart.
In 1976, when I was a first-year medical student, I remember this distinctly because I thought it was such a funny line.
The guy giving a talk on childhood vaccines said, Childhood vaccines didn't cure childhood illnesses.
Plumbers did.
And his point was that it was hygiene and diet that caused the death from these measles, mumps, rubella, whooping cough, and all these diseases to go down.
And he showed us charts.
You can't see those charts today.
Hard to find.
You can find them in certain places, but it's the charts that show By the time they actually instituted the measles vaccine, there was very, very little death of measles, under 300 children a year.
And even in Africa today, nutrition will make a huge difference on the mortality of measles.
You don't need a vaccine, necessarily.
But that's what we were taught.
In fact, this guy, when he gave us that talk, I could tell he thought vaccines were a passing fad.
And most people weren't vaccinating their children back then, only to smallpox and polio.
Now, what happened to me before I even started worrying about vaccines, quite frankly, I went through, you know, I got older.
You know, I was an orthopedic surgeon.
I would stand, I did trauma call.
When I was 40 years old, I could stand at 35 pounds of lead and operate all night and then do spine surgery all day.
I mean, I thought I was King Kong.
But suddenly when you're 45, things start changing and you start feeling worse and that this just isn't right.
And when I, you know, so at age 50, I went to my OBGYN doctor and I said, you know, I think that things aren't right.
And he gave me some pills or whatever, but it still wasn't right.
And I, a friend of mine said, you know, you talk about this in the surgeon's lounge, here's this anti-aging meeting they hold every year over in San Diego.
You ought to drive over and go to it.
And I did.
And after three days, I sat there with my mouth open and realized I was a member of the Flat Earth Medical Society.
That there's a whole that these guys are really doing what we used to do in medicine.
We used to take the take some education by experienced physicians.
We used to read the medical literature but we used to read the basic science literature too to see where this what the principles were.
And then collate everything and come up with a regimen and see what happens.
So anyway, I started doing anti-aging medicine for myself and my husband and then patients would ask me to do it for them.
Slowly had this crazy practice where four days a week I did spine surgery and one day a week I did anti-aging medicine but I learned a lot.
And Then, when I kind of semi-retired, moved back to the Midwest in the U.S., I had the nurses come to me when they started that mandating around 2010, I think.
They started mandating that nurses take the flu vaccine, so I said, well, I don't really know much about it, but I'll look into it.
I mean, clearly, I'm against mandates for anything, because the principle, and this is the point I'll make to you about mandates, you don't have to know about anything about the vaccine, what's in it, what's not in it.
If you accede to the notion That anybody, your government, your boss, your spouse, anybody can tell you what to put in your body
Then they own your body.
You don't.
And that makes you a slave.
So you cannot accept that, no matter whether it's, you know, being forced to eat cotton candy.
If you are forced to put something in your body, then you're a slave.
And that's what we have to understand here.
So I was against the mandates, but I didn't know why.
And then I started checking out the facts, and that's what I'm saying.
I mean, I really went, in those days, and I will tell you the other thing that's changed.
In those days, even 2010, you could find the medical literature.
It wasn't behind a paywall.
It's kind of the irony of life now.
They want us to believe that we should all practice evidence-based medicine.
Where's the evidence?
What used to be free and you could find either on the internet or you go down to the medical Your local medical school or local college or whatever and go to the medical written published journals to learn things.
Now, if you're not in the university, you can't use their library, and you go to the stuff on the internet, if it's pertinent to what you really want to find out about, it's going to be behind a paywall.
You can't get the whole article.
And my favorite is Science Direct.
There's something called Science Direct.
I mean, I would find an article five months ago and I'd say, and then I'd speak about it in public or somebody would, you know, we'd quote it.
And it was dangerous to the narrative of this vaccine takedown.
And so then it would, the next time I go to find it to refresh my mind or to download or something, it would be behind Science Direct.
And I had to pay $120 or something to get it.
That's very clever.
So that's what happened to me.
You know, when your own health starts going down, you start kind of looking around and saying, are we really doing everything right?
You know, I always used to tell people when I was in private practice, I'd say, you know, trust the doctor who has your disease.
If you can't find a solution, find a doctor that's got your disease because they've learned everything about it.
And by the way, that LinkedIn line is not out to lunch.
So you might want to check that.
I'm not out to lunch.
I don't know.
I don't know what that means, but okay.
Thanks.
I can't remember how to get to my LinkedIn.
That's my problem.
I haven't used it in years.
Ask one of your grandchildren.
They'll figure it out.
Yeah.
Robert, what have you got for Dr. Merritt?
Yeah, hi.
I must say I'm enjoying this an awful lot.
I watch almost all your videos, but somehow in person it's even better, so I'm just having a great time.
Thank you very much.
And I had two questions.
I think one's kind of been answered.
I was curious too about why some people are so affected, some not at all, and some totally.
And I'll just throw it out here, maybe you can comment or not, but like I got this from an Irish doctor that I have to say that it all depends on how quickly it enters whatever it is, the poison we'll call it, the bloodstream.
And in some cases it's as simple as they jab it, Far enough in that it strikes the blood vessel and those people are screwed.
Other times, you know, with this nanolipid blah blah particle technology, uh, it's disingenuous, dishonest of them to say it's supposed to stay in the shoulder.
I think everybody who knew anything about it would say migrate through and into the lymph nodes and into the blood and all that kind of stuff.
So, uh, if you want to comment on it, but I'm also really curious as to what is the worst part of these, these injections.
I've asked the same thing to another doctor.
Like on this show, and he wasn't sure.
Originally I would have said it's a spike protein itself, we just talked about that.
Then along came graphene, both of which are responsible for clotting in different ways with beards, and you may want to comment on that too, is clotting the biggest problem.
But now just lately, in the last couple weeks, I'm seeing parasites all over the place.
So do you know, like, can you want to You know, like what do you think is the worst?
I know it's a witch's brew and there's probably a thousand things we don't even know, but of what you know, what do you say is the worst part of it?
Well, the worst, I mean, you're, of course, you know, it's like when it happens to you, it kills you because of the spike protein.
That's the worst thing, right?
So I'd have to say that we ought to look at what the end result of this is.
Um, one of the things that just came out, and I can't, it was from the UK, I believe, and it showed that over time, this is degrading people's immune system.
It's not, it's, it's, it's a, it's an, it looks like it's an inexorable progressive decline in your immune response.
You're developing essentially acquired immunodeficiency disease, AIDS.
That's what it looks like.
Well, so if you're, if you are, um, I mean, obviously, death is the worst alternative, possibly.
But what about the alternative of being a mind-controlled robot slave to something, to a network?
That sounds crazy, I know, but let me tell you, the person that I started following early on, and you might have heard this and I don't want to be repetitive, but it was Charles Lieber.
Charles Lieber He was the chairman of chemistry and biochemistry at Harvard and for people that don't know he was indicted on around February 4, same day that Frank Plummer from Winnipeg, by the way, that that was part of this, this whole research arm brought that brought this up to us.
He died mysteriously or just unexpectedly in Africa on February 4 same day I think it was like.
Right around there that Charles Lieber was indicted and he was indicted for giving technical or going back and forth and taking money from the Chinese while he was under the pay of the NIH and DARPA.
So he was getting 15 million dollars to do research for our DARPA, the DoD, which is the dark arts of the DoD.
And trust me, a chemist does not get that because he's making coffee taste better.
This is because he was doing highly technical Secret stuff.
And what was it?
He was doing nanotechnology.
And his nanotechnology allowed this vaccine to be made.
Because these were not designed to be vaccines.
These were designed to be genetic therapies and cancer therapies.
And as you say, they were designed to be targetable.
Okay?
The genetic part of this is wrapped in a lipoprotein nanoprotein coating called Matrix M. It was made by Novavax.
Novavax used to brag how they could target organs because you don't want, if you're going to use it as cancer therapy, you don't want it dropping this genetic stuff all over.
You want it concentrating in the brain or the kidney or wherever the cancer is.
So we know they knew they could target this stuff.
Now the problem what what so he made this stuff called um uh silver impregnated nano gel and that has something to do with the the ability of these things to do their job it allows this stuff to get into the membranes and do their job and release it at a time I don't know I'm not I I can't follow that any further but he had something to do that with this but what he really is is he's part of the uh attempt to connect the brain to electronics And our our military people and the Chinese have said that is the future of warfare is the brain.
So there's a group I mean, there's a great deal of interest in connecting your brain to other human brains and make essentially the best supercomputer in the world.
Everybody hears about Internet of Things, which is the idea that we'll monitor all of human activity by monitoring what happens in their refrigerator, how many times they run their dishwasher, you know, all the things in your house send signals back to a motherboard, mother house.
Well, there's also IOB, and people are not paying attention to that.
Merck bought InBrain Bioelectronics or something, that's the name of the company, I think it's InBrain, during this whole pandemic, theoretical pandemic, and that's what it was for, is to connect the brain to electronics.
And the Internet of Brains, or Internet of Bodies, is we will be connected.
Now, I have, there's a, and Dr. Zelenko made me aware of this, there's a patent, and here's, so here's what I think For young people that took it, here's the worst situation, I think.
This is U.S.
Patent 11107588.
Now, I know it's true because the fact-checkers came out, and they went after Zelenko, and they said, false, false, false, false.
This is referring, obviously, to cell phones.
But let me just read you my summary of it.
It says it's a plurality of electronic devices configured to be carried around by said subjects.
That doesn't necessarily mean carried around like this.
It could be carried around like this, okay?
So the idea is to get your cell phone is wrong, and it's configured with instructions to do this.
It will generate an ID.
So now I have this thing implanted in me that's magnetic.
The next time I get a vaccine, it's going to up regulate this there's going to maybe increase this the other thing we know about some of this stuff is that it can use your body's components to to grow but the nanotechnology that he made was called nanomesh or nanowire it would be inserted and it could then make its self-form into nanomesh and wrap around nerves
That's what comes out of his patents and his research.
And we know this because the nanowire was mentioned in his affidavit of indictment, but they covered up what it was really being used for.
So we're in bed, excuse me, with the Chinese and all this, I think.
But this generates an ID.
It will transmit and receive the IDs with other proximate devices.
So if you and I are in the same room, or I'm in a crowd of 10 people, if it's just the two of us, we'll get a score that's going to be different than if we're in a room with 10 people.
And then it will connect to a server.
It'll download this and then it will receive treatment instructions based on said received information.
So there's a lot of creepy stuff in this.
I don't think that this is, I mean, I think that for those of us who are probably not going to live long enough maybe for some of this to materialize, Then for us, maybe it's the graphene, or it's the spike protein, and there's things we can do for some of that.
I think that we can help some of the, like, I like this stuff, I just, we just ran out, but we did have it on our site, called carbon, or C60, Greska's C60, and it's a buckyball of carbon atoms that has these weird chemical properties that will transmit electrons, and so it may help Diffuse some of the problem of the graphene may may may break up the graphene it also might might it just helps it's an antioxidant and it also helps get rid of heavy metals so there's a lot of good things NAC we know about that that was there things you can do short of the nanotechnology.
Who knows about the nanotechnology?
Now, my friend, Carrie Made, she says, her father was in robotics at Ford and he helped her make this.
It's a micro EMP or mini EMP.
And it's like a little triangle.
It's made with magnets and copper wire and it's all waterproofed and stuff.
And then you sit in the bathtub and you put this over your arm or your leg and you turn it on and it pulses and gives you little momentary EMPs that will disable any technology Is it more than to turn us into robots?
Is that the transhumanism thing?
Or is it more depopulation?
Or is it both?
I mean, look, you don't want to get rid of everybody.
You've got to have a working class, right?
So if you're going to keep people, it'd probably be the young people.
And then you want them to be tracked, traced, and subservient.
I mean, if that's really what the, if the Georgia Guidestones and the, you know, silent weapons for quiet wars has really given us the vision of what these people are after, they're going to get rid of most of us that are not very productive in their minds, and they're going to keep people, and they want them controlled.
So, I think it's a combination of things.
Yeah, I do.
Dr. Merritt, I didn't ask you what your end point is here.
I don't know how much time you've got for us.
Oh, I can give you a few more.
You want to go a few more minutes?
That's fine.
All right, let's see if we can get a couple more questions in.
Jill, we've got you next.
Let's try that again, Jill.
I think I tried to unmute you while you unmuted you.
Okay, I'll be quick.
I do have a couple questions.
The virus paradigm is like not really happening, but we have a bioweapon.
It's the bioweapon behaving like the old virus paradigm or is it behaving in another way like is it contact and right right that's that's a really good question and that's.
Yeah, so here's what I think happened.
I gave a talk about this, and everything else is data-driven, but this one is my opinion, okay?
But it's based on what I know.
So, what do we call a virus?
Like I said, it's a little bit of genetic material wrapped in a lipoprotein coat that gets into your mucous membranes and can kill you or make you sick.
What would we call a genetic poison?
Genetic contact poison, for example.
A little bit of synthetic genetic material wrapped in a synthetic lipoprotein coat of my choosing that can get into your mucous membranes and can make you sick or kill you.
We have evidence from videos that there was people there was this one video of an Apple store where somebody's just opening up computers, touching the screens, and then and then shutting them.
Touch, open, touch, shutting, open, touch, shutting.
You know, as if they're putting something on there.
It could be.
You don't know.
So I guess what I'm going to say is If this were an airborne virus, when this first started out, I graphed it.
I graphed the death per day, and I watched it come across all these different countries.
And then when it hit the U.S., I watched it come across us, and it looked really bad.
It looked like by July, we'd have 2 million dead in America if it kept going.
But that isn't what happened.
It just became a normal death curve in the winter.
And so I think what happened is, if it had actually been as deadly and as transmissible as we thought it was, looking at the numbers initially, it would have gone everywhere.
It wouldn't have stopped in three cities, but basically it went to Wuhan, it went to the Lombardy area in Italy, and it went to New York City.
And then it just fizzled out.
Even where those athletes came back from the World Military Games that took place on October 19th, right when it was breaking out, they all came back sick, but you notice it didn't really do too much.
A few people got sick from them, but it wasn't as like those three cities.
It was those three cities.
So that was the The toxin, the engineered contact poison, I think, and it may have shed to other people, just like we're seeing the vaccine shed to other people.
And so it may get a little less deadly as it goes, but it's shedding.
So it looks like it's an infectious disease, but it was really spread purposely.
And then when that went away, what did we have?
We would have had the normal downward death curve.
It would have gone away.
Everybody would have gone back to normal.
But no, that's when we instituted the false testing.
And the false testing was beautifully done right at the height of what would be our flu season.
So everything now that was flu or any kind of disease got listed as COVID.
And that kept the fear going because now we also redefined cases.
You know, cases were always sick people, now suddenly they became a positive test.
And that kept the thing going and everybody got Confused.
You know, I asked my friend, Mac, who's a psychiatrist, I said, for the love of God, please tell me who these people are driving around alone in a mask.
And he said, those are Stockholm Syndrome people because they're so afraid.
And what's happened is you mix fear with confusion.
And Dr. Fauci's secondary job was the doctor of confusion.
And he made everybody get confused.
And then it gives you anxiety.
And that anxiety zone you must get out of.
And they got out of it by over cooperating with their captors.
I got out of it by studying everything I could and getting myself ready to fight.
Everybody has their different coping mechanism, but nobody can stay in that anxiety zone.
So that's what happened.
And so you're right.
My question is, and this is just a little off the subject, but something you should know to be healthy for yourself, because we're not out of this yet.
Larry Pilevsky, one of the five docs that I'm with, I asked him at a meeting at the end of the Bard Fest that you guys sadly couldn't come to.
The Bard Fest was great, but I asked him, okay, I'm wrapping my head around this no-virus idea.
I understand smallpox.
By the way, if you don't get smallpox, you don't have bedbugs.
I understand chickenpox.
I got this, okay?
I certainly understand this one, but explain to me what we're dying from every winter.
If there's no virus season, why when it gets cold do we all do this?
And here's what he said, and I think this is brilliant.
Now, I can't prove this, but it makes a lot of sense.
That we are energetic beings and we get energy partially from the sun.
It's not just from our food, that's a simplistic explanation.
That we know it feels good to be out in the sun.
How many people you see are living into their hundreds because they're down in Florida or Arizona, places where there's lots of sun?
I see a lot of them when I was down in Arizona.
So people that are outside a lot we're outside in the summer and we're getting a lot of energy from the sun and we're expending it on these longer days but that's okay because the day is longer lots of light but in the winter what happens in the caveman area we would have also shortened our days to match the sun's short days but we don't so there's a mismatch in the winter we're out Christmas shopping and cleaning things for the kids coming home and doing all this activity when we really should be Settling down.
Suzanne Somers told us this years ago.
She said, you know, when the lights start, when the sun starts going down, she puts out the candles, she starts going.
Because if you don't, you have a mismatch of energy in, energy out.
And you're getting sick because you become inflamed.
And inflamed people end up with cancer, end up with heart attacks, end up with what we think of as the viral illness.
You know, Nature is very, I mean, usually the simplest explanation for things is the right explanation.
And if you think about it, we've created viruses in our mind to explain that very thing that I just mentioned.
We say, oh, we were overdoing it and we let our immune system lapse and then a virus got us.
Well, we could just say we were overdoing it and got sick because our bodies now were toxic and inflamed.
We don't make that connection.
We invoke this whole viral paradigm, which I think is wrong.
I'm with Stefan Lonk and these guys now.
Dr. Merritt, I think we need to come to a close, and I want to at least have you spend a few minutes talking about what do we do now?
We're in this war.
What do your rebel army do?
Well, number one, you cannot allow yourself to be in lockdown.
Unfortunately, the minute you go in lockdown, then they can do things and you won't see it, and they'll pick your neighbors off independently.
You know, it's just like the Cheka would come by and say, you know, come quietly, comrade, don't disturb the neighbors in the middle of the night.
But if you do it, if we're all together and we're able to associate, and when I see him coming, I call a bunch of people and they all show up, that's going to be different.
So I really think that the lockdown is a terrible situation to be in, whatever you can do.
Don't wear a mask.
You know, anybody that's, you know, what's his name?
Luke Montagnier said people that take the vaccine will be dead in two years.
He didn't really say that.
What he said is if you take the vaccine and then you get another vaccine, it could kill you.
If you take the vaccine and you wear a mask, it could kill you because masks are, besides being a totally psychologically devastating thing to our children, It's terrible what we're doing to the children.
Not just threatening to vaccinate them, but these masks.
Because they're not developing right.
They're beginning chronic Stockholm Syndrome.
They're not right because of this.
My friend is seeing an over 25% suicidal ideation in his children's psychiatric practice.
He never saw over 9 before.
So this is really devastating, but it's becoming normal.
We cannot accept the new normal.
You know, I mean, I see children.
I was in a hotel.
I saw a kid probably 12 years old or 10 years old.
He's got a mask on by himself going into the elevator.
No parent around.
He's accepted that.
Nobody else is wearing a mask.
He's accepted that.
The other creepy thing is, I have my plague mask.
It's a big leather snout that comes out.
It's got goggles.
It's like steampunk.
And I bought one just for fun.
And I got my hat that says, Make Orwell Fiction Again.
I put it on in an airplane, thinking I would have people laugh and, you know, ask me about it.
I put it on in a Southwest airline, as I was getting, just before I got off, just before we landed.
I put this gear up, get up on.
Nobody said a thing to me.
I stood up.
Nobody said a thing.
I looked around.
Everybody's just looking straight ahead.
Like they're ready to go.
They don't even blink with this thing.
And this is really, I mean, it sticks out a foot and a half out of my nose.
I said goodbye to the stewardess.
She just said goodbye.
The pilots, I thanked him for standing up.
He just kind of said goodbye.
I mean, I walked through the entire Omaha airport, Epley airport in Omaha.
Not one person, even kids, they didn't look at me, they didn't think it was weird.
Orwell has become the new normal.
So we we've already taken too many steps back.
We cannot take a step back.
Don't take the vaccine.
Try and get your family not to take the vaccine.
Don't get into lockdown and don't don't wear a mask.
And if they and we're going to the only I think I don't think we're going to vote this way.
I don't think we're going to convince our politicians to be on our side.
I think we're just going to have to do like the French God love the French, you know, there's taking to the streets.
We're going to have to mass up.
I think that's where it's going to go.
I'm not advocating violence, but that's why we have a Second Amendment down here.
And is to keep the government from coming after us as individuals.
And I think, I hope it doesn't come to that.
I think we can do it by just making the people, and that's another point, I think we ought to make the individuals personally responsible.
For too many years, we've allowed Congress to people to say, well, he, when he was in Congress, he voted, you know, but it was the Congress did that.
We need to make it the individual did that, like Dr. Swaminathan.
It's not the who, we're going to make her personally responsible.
If our governor signs a document that prohibits hydroxychloroquine from being given, make her personally responsible.
That's what we have to do.
Those are all good advice.
And one last question, how do you stay sane in all of this?
Well, I think this was my, you know, God works in mysterious ways, and I, for some reason, you know, my great-great-great-whatever grandfather fought in the Revolutionary War, and this is my war.
So, some people are made for their job, and I don't know.
One thing, I don't look at social media.
You know, people say, oh, they say you're crazy on Google.
I say, well, I don't Google myself, and I don't Google anybody else.
You know, when you when you're when they think you're crazy, that's a badge of honor, man.
Right.
You know, I don't look at Twitter.
I don't waste my waste my time arguing with bots.
So put the energy and I will tell you and I will tell this is the saddest thing.
OK, I know there are people in your audience.
I'm sure loved ones have gotten the vaccine or they're worried about them.
They're not listening.
They're afraid of, you know, in a war.
There's always casualties.
It's, you know, my son is still in training and I'm very afraid that he had to take the vaccine or took the vaccine.
I told him to stall, stall, stall, don't do it, don't do it, don't do it.
I know you think mom's crazy, but please don't do it.
And if you, and just don't tell me, but here's what you need to do if you had to take it.
So, you can only take care of the people that need help, that want help.
In other words, if somebody took the vaccine and you want to try and get them the advice, like, I have a thing on what to do for vaccine remorse, things that might help, you can't get them to there because they're dug in.
They're the people that have the tattoo of the vaccine certificate on their arm.
You're not going to save those people.
And you're not going to save the people that really feel defensive about this.
What you can do is save the people that ask for help, need help.
That's what we got to do.
I mean, that's what I feel my role as a physician is.
You don't preach absolution.
You just try and save people from the consequences of their bad actions sometimes.
Right.
And where can we get more of Dr. Merritt?
Oh, well, my website, it's three words, themedicalrebel.com, and there's a big red button, and I try and replace things with new interviews and things.
And I'm around, I'm going to be, I think I'm going to be going to a red pill here down in in Louisiana pretty soon.
So most of it's online.
That's it.
And join me on FreedomDoc.
I'm trying to make 3,000 followers.
I don't buy followers, so mine are organic.
So come join me on FreedomDoc.
Well, I think you'll have a bunch more fans after tonight.
This was a fabulous conversation and I honor you for just standing in your courage and your integrity and speaking truth.
This is an important time for humanity and you're showing us leadership, so thank you.
Well, and I'll tell you what, you said what else to do.
We couldn't do it without you guys.
It's the independent media and it's organizations like you that stand up and broadcast and don't sit down.
I mean, you guys have been great and I think you're getting a message out to so many people.
That's what we need to do.
If you find value in the kind of conversations that we have here at Vaccine Choice Canada, I invite you to support our work and our mission by becoming a member.
▲
Export Selection