All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 9, 2021 - Jim Fetzer
57:12
COVID: The Grand Delusion - Lee Merritt, MD -
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Well, I'm really glad to be back with AAPS and to see lots of longtime friends and meet some new friends.
And I can't help but think of, you know, Curtis Kane and Dan that we just lost, and my friend from Yuma that died a few years ago.
And thinking about these guys that were here in the 1940s, 1950s, Curtis Kane was here in the 40s.
In the 1950s they were in the AAPS and you know I think if wherever they are they're looking down and saying, we told you so, right?
Because they told us, don't let government take over medicine, bad things will happen.
And here we are in the thrall of unelected medical technocrats.
You know, so, a lot of things they said.
I remember having a discussion maybe 20 years ago here about how, you watch, these suggestions will become protocols, will become mandates.
Here we are.
We're right in that moment.
And then I looked at my old talk on Karl Brandt when I was president.
And this was like 15 years ago.
Karl Brandt was the chief medical officer for the Nazi war machine.
And, you know, he wasn't a bad guy.
He just ended up in an evil system.
And I thought, and I asked the question then, when this happens to us, Will we know when to get off the bus?
Well, I'm going to tell you, now's the time to get off the bus.
This is where the people, I get it, where people have jobs that they don't want to give up, but now's the time to realize our profession is being used and we need to get off the bus.
So, anyway, my talk after the last talk is going to be a little bit weird because I might be saying a lot of the opposite stuff, but in a different way.
We had a weird 2020, and it wasn't reality.
All totalitarian societies have to start with some unreality, a grand delusion.
And although you might... I'm not a virologist, and I'm not a geneticist, and some of this is very complicated stuff.
And if I'm wrong on some technicalities, I appreciate people coming and correcting me.
But I think the one thing that we should be able to agree on, especially in this society, If you look around the world, what's happening to us is clearly not for our health and welfare.
You know, the one thing you could say about mandated vaccines, and I'm not talking about vaccines today at all, really, but if you want to say one thing about the mandates, it doesn't matter whether these are the best vaccines, they're not even vaccines, they're viral-based genetic therapies, but for short, I'm going to call them vaccines, You know, it doesn't really matter what's in them.
It doesn't matter what the side effects are.
All that doesn't matter.
What really matters is this.
If you accede to the principle that someone can tell you what to put in your body, whether it's the government or your boss, you don't own your body.
And by definition, you're a slave.
That is the only thing that matters here.
So we have to choose if we're going to choose mandates.
Now, so I'm going to start by going through the narrative of what we were told happened in 2020, and then I'm going to try and give you some of my ideas about the problems with this narrative.
So the first one is, this virus lived with us for eons in commensal bliss, and suddenly it leapt from bat soup into humans that it was perfectly adapted to make sick.
And this was made possible because of this unsanitary meat market in Wuhan, China.
Now, China is a country of about 4 million square miles, and the meat market is located 8 miles from the only level 4 bioweapons lab in China, but that had nothing to do with what happened.
The virus was quickly isolated from 4 patients in Wuhan, and full genomic sequencing, just like a ticker tape, was thrown out to the world that allowed tracking of the disease.
Of course, our valiant, dedicated public health officials leapt into action.
And nevertheless, the disease spread around the world, causing unprecedented deaths.
Now, I have to say, the one thing I know is, one of my closest things I came to immunology was when I fell asleep right in front of Tony Fauci at a meeting as an intern.
It was four people in a room, so I don't think I made any brownie points.
I actually still think I'm in a nightmare, and I hope I wake up soon.
And then the next thing, we got this testing program going so rapidly and it showed widespread asymptomatic spread of the disease.
Now, drastic public measures were taken after we reviewed the best scientific evidence.
No effective treatment was available, so the only recourse was we had to get a vaccine program, and usually it takes 15 years to get a vaccine to market, but no problem.
We just happened to have this novel platform that was really designed for gene therapy and cancer therapy, and we were able to produce these vaccines within months.
Now, here's the point of vaccines.
COVID, we know, causes this horrible, unprecedented death and destruction.
By just getting a few spike proteins into the mucous membranes, like in your nose, it can make you sick and kill you.
But we've devised this vaccine, and the principle is, we're going to give it to you, and it's going to shower you with trillions of spike proteins, but don't worry, we're sure it's safe and effective.
And of course, this would all have worked very smoothly if it weren't for this disinformation dozen and a few other straggler rebels that are talking against this.
And this vaccine hesitancy required that we do some creative things like, you know, education.
Uh, incentives.
Now, you know, we had free Krispy Kreme donuts.
Uh, I think it was Ohio that had lottery tickets.
My personal favorite was Vegas.
They gave free lap dances if you could prove that you'd gotten vaccinated.
And then in Colorado, of course, you've got a free joint if you got vaccinated.
You can't make this up.
Well, clearly the vaccines were clearly effective.
Oh yeah, I forgot the shot in the beer.
That was another one, too.
Yeah, there are lots of good ones, creative ones.
Clearly, these vaccines were 95% effective because ABC and every government said so, right?
But nonetheless, the wily, apparently Greek virus escaped containment, and now we have to have periodic, unending vaccine boosters.
In fact, Israel, one of the first countries, is now on its fourth mandatory vaccine booster.
And, you know, after beating us over the head with this term, herd immunity, we have to reach herd immunity.
Apparently, there is no such thing because they've determined that one unvaccinated person threatens the whole world.
That's the narrative, okay?
And let's kind of look at some of the evidence here.
Okay, the first thing is, did this really leap out of a bat suit?
Did this really naturally leap out of a bat?
Well, Stephen Quay, this is a very long paper, but it's really worthwhile picking up.
Stephen Quay wrote a paper, and it had to do with the Bayesian analysis of whether or not this actually happened.
And he just looks at the facts as we know it, and the first thing to say is there's no intermediate host.
They haven't found an animal this came from.
There's no animal in the meat market that tested positive for this.
Most tellingly, this cannot reinfect bats.
Now, if something really came out of one animal and went to another, You gotta believe it should be able to reinfect the animal it just went to.
This is crazy.
But it doesn't.
And the best match is to humans.
Perfect.
There's also some technical points.
You know, when a real epidemic or pandemic does break out, the first thing you see, you don't see all these people all over getting sick.
If you went back and you looked back in time in the bank's blood, you would see antibodies to this disease where it was trying, it was starting, but it hadn't broken out.
We don't have that.
And posterior diversity is When viruses, if this happens this way, it comes out, it's not one virus that causes this whole thing, it's a family of viruses that are getting close to being able to affect humans and they come up like raccoons trying to get into my chicken coop.
It's not one, it's like they take all their cousins and everything and they finally get in after they've been trying the wire everywhere.
Well that's kind of what viruses do to humans if this happens.
They kind of get in and they do it a little bit, little bit, and then we see that they're different genetic variations from the beginning.
So that's, that's the, the, the, his, he claims the 99.8% chance it is not man-made, and I believe that.
Now, I, I believed this in January, and I'll tell you, oh, did I say something?
Oh, it is man-made.
Sorry, thank you.
Yeah, it is man-made.
Absolutely, it's man-made.
I'm just about to tell you that again.
So, in January, I started watching this in December, and I really started glued to my, as an elective surgeon, I didn't have much to do, and I had a lot to sit around and read.
And I found this paper by Prashant Pradham.
This guy's brilliant.
He and his guys nailed it.
And this is the paper that he wrote.
Now, a lot of people have come on board with this since then.
But here's the paper that he wrote.
This is one of those BioRx.
You just upload it.
You have to upload your data.
Well, even before I read the paper, I suspected it was probably true because it had been forcibly withdrawn.
Now, these guys, what happened is they said, he put it up, and he claimed that they could prove this was man-made, and immediately they were told, no, no, no, you have to withdraw the paper.
They said, wait a minute, wait a minute, it's open data source, just look at it, we're standing behind this.
Nope, had to be withdrawn.
So I knew they'd been pressured, and that's a sign.
And the next thing was that Zero Hedge, which isn't even a medical or scientific journal, Zero Hedge got deplatformed just for reporting on this paper.
That tells you something.
I mean, you're over the target when you're catching that kind of flack.
So, censorship, by the way, I learned this, I figured this out early on.
Censorship's a way to find the truth in this mess.
I was on an airplane with a Taiwanese engineer and he said to me, you know why we didn't get hit with this?
It's because we never listen to what the CCP have to say.
What we do, there's actually a part of government, the Taiwanese government, that looks at social media censorship.
And when they see a pattern, they start following it because they figure that's the truth.
And that's how they knew about this, shut their borders and didn't get hit.
So anyway, this is what the paper said.
This is just so perfect.
This is the greatest paper.
And I tell you what, I decided a couple weeks ago to try and re-find the paper so I could have the whole paper to just review it for this talk.
You cannot find this.
It took me half a day.
Now I did finally unearth it, but it's not easy.
They buried this one.
That's again a sign.
This is a very important paper.
So what he showed was that in the spike protein, keep in mind, They claim this is a 30,000 base pair virus, but all you need to become sick is 181 base pairs in the S1 subunit of the spike protein.
And what they showed is in that subunit there are four sequence insertions.
These are completely absent in SARS, in the spike protein of SARS, and they're not observed in any other coronavirus.
Now that should be a tell.
Furthermore, All of these insertions, four of them, are conserved 100%.
In all the various, you know, they claim they're all these variants, but they all get put in the gene bank and they said they're all have the same four insertions perfectly conserved.
That means they're not varying.
So what that tells you is that that's not a natural thing.
Unexpectedly they said all the insertions when they put them in the computer alignment program like BLAST and stuff, they showed they were consistent with human immunodeficiency virus.
So it looks like four insertions taken from the HIV genetic parcel We're put in different places here.
Now, you probably have seen or heard David Martin.
And David Martin testified before Reiner Fulmich.
And I wrote down the patents.
I took notes of this, went back and listened to it a couple times, took down the patents.
And I checked this to make sure this wasn't just BS.
But his claim to fame is he created a computer program that doesn't just look at words, it actually looks at meaning.
It can actually determine the meaning of what it's reading, and specifically he applies it to patents.
He looks at what the future of technology is by watching the trend in patents, and he's an underwriter of these intangible assets.
And this is what he said.
There is nothing novel about this virus.
That everything that makes you sick, that spike protein, the fur and cleavage site, the TMPRSS site, everything that is key to the disease has been patented before 2018.
And that there are 117 patents alone for the ACE2 targeting mechanism.
And that every unique attribute of this novel SARS coronavirus has been patented.
Now, these are some of the patent owners.
I think it's interesting.
My university is their university.
Not, I didn't go there, but the University of Iowa.
Kind of interesting.
Now, we have to put some of this in perspective.
We have to have a worldview to go along with this.
You don't just, you can't take this in isolation.
In 1999, the two Chinese colonels, Zhao and Wang, wrote this book called, it's translated to Unrestricted Warfare, but I kind of like the Warfare Beyond Rules.
Now, what they basically, their point is this.
That nobody can compete with the United States using super weapons.
They really looked at the Iraq War and they said, you know, the United States has got this.
These guys are crazy.
They're willing to spend billions of dollars on standoff weapons to not lose any soldiers.
But we can't do that.
So what are we going to do?
It turns out if we abandon the Geneva Convention and just say everything's on the table, then you can compete.
It's the David and Goliath problem.
And years ago, when I gave a talk to the DDP on bioweapons, I quoted Rassami Hafsamjami who said, bioweapons are the poor man's atomic bomb and we should consider this.
That's exactly what this is about.
So rather than lob very expensive, you know, munitions at each other and technical jets and all these things, you just get a little bacterium or a little virus or something like that and you create havoc.
And it really makes geographic security outdated.
Okay, so they have a whole thing, and by the way, this is multi-dimensional warfare they're talking about.
It's not just a bio-warfare.
It's an economic, psychological, cyber-security, political, religious, I mean, it's all levels of society they're going to attack.
What are we seeing today in America?
I'll just point that out.
Now, don't think it's just them, though.
When this whole thing happened and we said, oh yeah, it's a bioweapon, came out of the Wuhan lab, I said, let's not point fingers so quickly.
There's a lot of finger-pointing that could probably be had, you know.
A lot of people were funded by us that weren't in China, like Frank Plummer, who's dead, and there's a lot of death, too.
But this was in 2000, and these are our guys, okay?
This is the Beltway insiders that do defense.
You know, think tank stuff.
You know, Kagan and Cheney and Wolfowitz and those guys.
And Rumsfeld when he was alive.
They wrote the policy for the new American century.
And this is a direct quote from that.
It says, advanced forms of biologic warfare that can target specific genotypes may transform biologic warfare from the realm of terror to a, quote, politically useful tool.
Think about that.
These are our people talking about using bioweapons as a politically useful tool.
Now, on that note, there's something you might not have known, that this thing we're dealing with, this whatever, the COVID-19, has genetic and racial targeting.
Whether that was purposeful or not, I'm not making that point, but I'm just going to tell you what it is.
It has to do with the upregulation of the ACE2 pathway.
And the TMPRSS too, to some degree, but mostly the ACE2 pathway.
So it turns out that people have different susceptibilities to have binding.
It has to do with the ability of this stuff to bind to your ACE2 pathway.
And the worst people for risk factors are Caucasians and non-African blacks.
We have a 54% upregulation of this pathway.
African blacks, 34%.
Now this is interesting.
Finnish.
Asians and Finnish are 10% Latinos.
But who thought, who realized Finnish are genetically not like all the other European Caucasians?
And then at the very bottom, interesting duo here, are the Ashkenazim and the Amish.
Now, I had been hearing, you probably had heard this since the beginning, that we hadn't isolated the virus.
And I said, no, I can't believe we shut down the whole bloody world and we don't have a virus.
You've got to be kidding me.
So finally, about three months ago, I said, I've got to look into this.
I've got to figure this out because I just, I can't wrap my head around the fact there's no virus.
Well, and by the way, so this is a friend of mine who's a state senator in Oklahoma who shot that rattler on his ranch.
But to me, it's kind of the metaphor of coronavirus.
You have this huge long virus, this 30,000 base pair virus, but really all you need is just that little nose on the head, just maybe the little part of the head.
So, with basic biology skills I learned in high school and a couple pieces of equipment, I could isolate bacterium in my bedroom.
I mean, it isn't that hard to get a pure culture of bacterium, but that's a whole different thing that we have kind of accepted.
Most of us that aren't in this field, I'll tell you how this happened, most of us that aren't dealing with this all the time, we just take it for granted that somebody knows how this is done and this is being done correctly all the time.
But the real problem here is you're dealing with submicroscopic things.
You can't do like we think of cultures.
So that isn't what happened.
And this comes out of one of the Wuhan papers, and I had some help from Andrew Kaufman to kind of talk me through this.
But here's the thing.
What they did, they took 200 microliters of BELF, which is, you know, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, And they have non-specific primers that just amplify the amount of genetic material in there.
So it doesn't select, it just multiplies.
They threw it into this, what's called the Illumini Mini Sequencer, and it gives you then, it takes the amplified DNA and it gives you these little tiny fragments, somewhere between 30 and 150 base pairs.
And in this 200 microliters, it spit out 56.5 million reads.
They call them reads.
These are very short base pairs.
Think of this 30,000 base pair virus.
Now you've got a jigsaw puzzle with 150 base pair segments.
Now, a computer program is then employed, and it makes these what are called theoretical contigs, or contiguous fragments.
And so what it does, you know, it takes this piece and this piece, and it looks at what the overlapping parts are and says, okay, that could fit here, and this could fit here, and it just makes the best fit.
And then, here's where the trick comes in.
Somebody then decides which contig is the one they're going to believe.
Because it gives you a bunch of these.
And they chose the longest one, which was about 30,000 pairs.
And they had a presupposition, by the way, that they were looking for SARS.
So, you know, it's kind of like if I'm expecting something, this is what I find.
I don't know how much of that played the role here.
This could have been completely without merit, but at least the point here is they took this contiguous big fragment that had holes, and those holes have to get filled in.
And they get filled in somewhat by the computer filling them in, and then ultimately give you a probability, and then you have to decide how to fill the rest in.
And it's a little hard to say, but it was done with, you know, it's not a formal vote, but it's by an agreement.
That's how they really do it.
So what we're left with is not a real viral, you know, specimen that you can see in a big, like, worm-like fashion.
It's called an in-silico genome.
Now, you know, so when it looks really real, when you put it on a piece of paper, it looks really real, but you've got to remember, it was made from a computer Correlation of a bunch of very tiny pieces.
In fact, there's no real big piece of this virus anywhere.
Now, on the right-hand side of that slide is what Prashant Pradham et al.
derived, and it shows the circled parts are the four insertion sites.
But notice what it says.
I just put this in here because you see what it says.
Every time they took a piece of the... they looked through the data bank and they got all these S1 subunit pieces, it said, consensus.
That shows you that is a consensus of what people decided it looked like based on those little pieces.
Okay, so it's a vote.
This is not a real thing.
And it even gets worse.
Stefan Lanca, who is a biologist, who was a virologist and said, please don't call me that anymore.
He said that the basic, he says this is his quote, the basic insight is that these manipulations called alignments simply do not correspond to any complete or known genetic material of a virus.
This doesn't just apply to COVID and coronavirus.
Unfortunately, this applies to measles virus.
He, at one time, put $250,000 on the table and said, somebody prove to me you have an isolate of measles virus that causes measles.
Nobody could do it.
So actually, somebody took him to court because he claimed he did, but he lost.
So the point being is that what have we been vaccinating people against?
Do you know?
This is a real issue.
And it's not one I thought I'd find myself going down because I thought it was a diversion, but I think it's really key to the whole thing.
And on a much, much everyday simpler note, you might have heard of Patrick King in Alberta.
Love this guy.
So here's an oil and gas worker.
He's not confused by any preconceived notions, right?
I guess they're kind of like farmers.
I mean, you can't lie to a farmer about the weather.
They can see it.
And he was arrested in Alberta for doing the horrendous thing of violating the state medical law of having too many in a gathering.
You can't have more than 10 in a gathering.
That's the health rule.
Well, so he was going to be fined $1,200 for this, and he decided to fight it himself, acted as his own lawyer, basically.
And he goes to court, but before he goes to court, he subpoenaed the chief medical officer of Alberta and asked her to produce a proof that this thing existed, that she had an isolate of SARS-CoV-2, and proof that this disease existed.
Well, she couldn't give it to them.
And the problem is, they tried to stall, they tried to do all sorts of legal falsehoods to get him to roll over, and God love Patrick King, he was just tough.
And so, at the end of time, they had to say that they didn't have what he wanted.
But they said it's immaterial, and they didn't have what he wanted.
Well, and this is what he said to the judge, Your Honor, just for the record, I want it to be on the record, duly noted, that the Chief Medical Officer of Health, Alberta, does not have the material evidence I request, to which the judge responded, yes, they did say that.
In other words, they didn't have an isolate.
And it turns out there's a lot of other countries, 90 other countries, including our CDC, admits they don't have an isolate of the virus.
Another point on the table here is Millionaire offers 1.2 million to prove that anybody give you an isolate of the virus.
Now, if I were working in somebody's lab, and I knew we had an isolate, man, I'd go get that tomorrow.
So that kind of tells you something.
Now, we talked a little about emerging infectious diseases, and I, you know, I'm not disagreeing with what our previous speaker said about bacterial things and parasites and stuff.
But I have to say, when I was a medical student in 1976 and learning about infectious diseases, we talked about tropical diseases, we talked about malaria, we talked about Leishmaniasis and all these things.
But what we didn't talk about were these emerging infectious diseases, like these viruses that came out of the jungle.
And when I think about it, there are really no Proof of where it came from.
Even now.
This is later.
This is now in the mid-80s that started to be talked about.
And we still talk about, well, we paved the Kinshasa Highway and that's what caused all this stuff to suddenly come out of the jungle.
After thousands and thousands of years of humanity there, it suddenly came out in the mid-80s.
And it's interesting that when you go through these papers, you will stumble upon this comment over and over.
Like this paper.
I mean, I don't care about the decoding 19 genome here, but these guys are genetic people and they're looking at all this stuff.
And they say, it is also still unclear as to the events that led to the virus emergence from bats.
Here's another one.
Zoonotic coronaviruses have only rather recently seriously impacted humans as far as known.
So again, for thousands of years, nothing happened, and then suddenly, in the mid-1980s, we started having all this stuff come out of the jungles at us.
Well, I think there's, and I noticed that the previous speaker said, you know, it's interesting that when these viruses come out from the animal to humans, they change a lot.
I thought that was interesting, because yes, they do, because maybe it's not natural.
So I started kind of looking at what was happening, and I kind of remember some of this.
In the 1980s, from 1981 to 1985, or 1984, there was a project in South Africa called Project Coast.
Now we know a lot about this because of the Truth and Reconciliation Committee by Desmond Tutu.
And this is kind of ugly stuff, but they were basically trying to create bioweapons to decrease the black population in South Africa, even the demographics.
And the head of it was Dr. Wutu Bassel.
I'm probably mispronouncing it.
He's a cardiologist of 7th Med Battalion back then.
And we theoretically were, you know, we had signed the Biologic Anti-Biowarfare Treaty.
We theoretically weren't doing any of this stuff.
But it turns out a guy named Larry Ford, who was an OBGYN doctor in Los Angeles, and by everybody's outward appearance, he was a family man who was just a normal OBGYN doctor, but he was going back and forth to South Africa carrying things like, you know, manipulated cholera and things that could be used against the black population in South Africa.
They called them kefir killing germs, which apparently means the black bomb.
Now there's a lot of suicides around this story too.
David Kelly was another guy involved who was about to testify to MI5 the night before he committed suicide.
And Larry Ford's dead too.
But there are a couple people still alive.
I think he's still alive.
At least he was at the time of the Truth and Reconciliation thing.
Dr. Mike Odendall was a former senior microbiologist and he remembered all this and he talked about Project Larry.
And he said this, quote, Ford spent an entire day showing us how to contain or contaminate ordinary items and turn them into biological weapons.
So what's he talking about?
He's talking about putting something on your doorknob.
In fact, he's talking about a lot of things.
And I actually had Jeremy, I think it's really, if you want to get a flavor, and I think it's important because quite frankly, in today's world, the one thing, if nothing else, you should take away from this is really a lot of suspicion about what's happening in the world around you.
Because we have entered the world of synthetic biology.
Like it or not, just like we entered the nuclear age, we are now in the age of synthetic biology, and strange things can be going on, and we attribute them to natural things that they're not natural.
Just be aware of that.
And so that's what this is about.
So Jeremy has a handout, or if he doesn't have enough, he'll electronically send them to you.
And it's a list of all the things they came up with.
For example, they tried to kill some guy with a poisoned shirt.
Unfortunately, he lent the shirt to somebody else and it murdered that guy, you know?
That's the kind of thing.
Or, like I said, putting stuff on a doorknob.
That's what they're talking about.
Now, he's not the only one that said this.
This is from the book the Chinese colonels wrote, and it's a book worth reading just for the lovely Translation literature, I mean, it's kind of neatly written, but they said, some morning, people will awaken to discover with surprise that quite a few gentle and kind things have begun to have offensive and lethal characteristics.
Again, my toaster's poisoned.
I mean, that's what they're talking about here.
And unfortunately, that could explain some of what we're seeing here.
Now, before I get into that part of it, I just want to go over the death count, because one of the things I found is, if you try to go, I don't know, your state may be different, but some states, especially the states that are hooked up directly to the CDC for all their medical stuff, you can't get a death count.
In Nebraska, I wanted to know, what was the death in 2020 versus 2019 versus 2018?
And they couldn't give it to me.
And the guy that runs the web said, I can't believe it's not there.
Wait a minute.
Let me work on it.
Called back.
He says, it's not here.
But I got an idea.
I'm going to hook us up.
Let's call the lady.
I know who does it.
She actually takes the death certificates and counts them.
And that's how I got the death count.
But they don't make it easy.
Trust me, you can't just believe what the CDC is telling you on anything.
But what you can look at, what I did, so I went state by state as I had to.
But this is the worldwide.
The world does get that data, even though they don't present it on the web to you as a local member in the U.S.
So there were 1,850,000 deaths essentially in 2020 for 7.8 billion people.
And if you calculate that out, that's a survival rate of 99.98%.
Now, seasonal ILI, how many people here know we don't count flu anymore?
We haven't for a long time.
We count influenza-like illness.
They tell you, oh, get your flu vaccine because 60,000 people died of flu last year.
No, they died of influenza-like illness and only 4 to 7% of that is flu.
They used to tell you that on the CDC website.
That's all been taken off.
Now they just tell you ILI as if it were flu.
But at any case, so the flu survival rate was 99.99%, so a slight difference, not much.
Compare that to 1918, where the survival in 1918, and this is probably overestimated, was 98.3%.
I mean, if you talk to people whose families lived through that, as I in my rural area, they remember whole families.
One of my neighbor's grandparents went over to check because the neighbor's cows were all lowing.
And they told you back then, don't go to church.
That's how people are getting sick.
They went to church.
He couldn't figure out why the cows were making noise.
Walked over, threw the pasture to their house.
They're all dead on the floor, the whole family.
So that was a bad disease.
OK?
We're not seeing that kind of thing.
But it was 98.3%.
But here's the question.
You ask yourself, where's the worst place in the world?
If you want to protect yourself, where's the worst place in the world?
Well, it's New York State that had a 0.19% death per capita last year.
Where's the best place in the world?
Well, and actually there's a typo there on Uganda.
It's actually, Taiwan, I told you why they locked themselves down early.
So eliminating that.
Where's the best unlocked nation in the world?
Uganda!
I mean, former home of Idi Amin.
Not some place you identify with the latest and greatest medical stuff.
But here's the deal.
As Andy Schlafly said last night, you are free enough, and I have patients from Senegal and Nigeria which are about the same.
Uganda actually was .00005%, it's four zeros, I just missed one.
Why is it so low?
10,000 times better than New York?
Well, there might be several factors, but one of them is you're free enough in Uganda to walk down to your corner store and buy ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine over-the-counter, and we are not.
And that says something right there.
That's the thing.
By the way, everybody's state governor has the authority to change that.
We looked at that at AFLDS, and they have the authority.
It's not something that's written in stone federally.
They can change it.
They could make it over-the-counter.
Here's another graph of deaths, and you can see the blue line is death, and it stayed about the same.
The red line is actually growth of population, and you can see it went up in 2020.
Death rate on the chart on the right, it was 7.612 per thousand, but look down.
2011 to 2014, we're all higher.
So where is this pandemic?
Okay?
Now, it didn't always look like it was a nothing burger, though.
I'm going to say, I'm not here to tell you it wasn't a disease, that something didn't happen.
When this whole thing started, about the middle or first part of January, I started graphing deaths per day, whenever those things were available, on various countries.
This just happens to be Spain, because I did the best on the prettiness.
But, you know, I could have picked the U.S.
or anything.
When it first broke out and you started graphing it, What it showed was an exponential rise, okay?
You heard epidemiologists say, oh, this is the biggest R-naught value we've ever seen, meaning transmissibility.
It really looked bad, okay?
But then what happened?
It just quickly became the normal seasonal death curve.
We always have a winter death curve, and it just kind of slumped into that normal seasonal death curve.
I projected out at this point, roughly this point, in the U.S., had we continued on the curve it started, it would have killed 2 million people in America alone, in the U.S.
alone.
But it didn't do that.
It just became a normal death curve.
So what is happening?
So here is the death curve that happened during the big outbreak.
It's the red line, okay?
That's the deaths.
Well, as the deaths started going down, down, down, down, and people were getting less afraid, what did we start doing?
We started counting cases and reporting cases.
Now, never since the time of Hippocrates have we called a case anything but a sick person.
But suddenly the case is just a positive test.
And what did that do?
It expanded the numbers.
I mean, if you looked at just that blue line and you're just not educated about what this means, that's a panic-looking thing.
Now, where did we get those case numbers?
Well, we got it from the testing.
Now, we all know, I mean, every garage store owner now knows the name of Carey Mullis.
So everybody knows about Carey Mullis saying, you know, we shouldn't be using these tests.
It's not just about the cycle numbers.
It was about the inability not to contaminate them in general use.
They're not meant for that.
They're meant for highly controlled laboratory use. But in any case, let's
give them the fact that they did the, let's assume that these highly trained people in our
CDC were just trying to do the right thing, and so they put the best thing together, they
got this test together. But here's the problem. All over the world, the test was done
wrong.
Now, I looked at, this is the Thermo Fisher directions.
It's not like they sent these tests out and didn't send them with how-to booklets, right?
They all had a how-to booklet.
And if you look at the how-to booklet, it's very clear from that graph, and it's good from the scientific literature, that between 20 and 30 cycles is what you want.
If you want a pure specimen, you don't want any false positives.
Because again, in a lab, you're looking for, did I find something?
It's qualitative, not quantitative.
It's, did I find this particular DNA or RNA?
So that you want to go 20 to 30 cycles.
And in fact, the CDC down below, it said, the CT value cutoffs for all genes in patient specimens, or no, this is from the thing, sorry, are 31.
31 actually should have been the cutoff, but they routinely were cycling these tests between 40 and 50 cycles.
Average about 45 across the world.
Now, what does that say?
I mean, these lab managers are highly trained professionals who know how to set up a test.
They know how to train their staff.
They know how to do quality assurance.
This is the story I tell my friends who don't believe there's any conspiracy here.
Everybody just tried to do the best, and this darn virus has taken us down, and there's nothing we can do.
It's an act of God.
I tell them, listen, not only did these lab managers all around the world do the test wrong, They did it wrong in the same direction.
They all over-cycled it.
I mean, if they all had some kind of brain hissy fit, you'd think some of them would have accidentally under-cycled, right?
And even worse than that, on the magic day of January 21st, 2021, they all had an epiphany, and they got better, and they suddenly started cycling correctly.
So, there's two worldviews here, and if you can come up with a third one, I'll take it.
The first worldview is that we had a group psychosis of lab managers, and they all over-cycled the tests exactly the same way in 2020.
I'm not believing that.
Or that someone told them to over-cycle the tests.
Now, why would you do that?
There's only one thing that did, and that was create fear in the public.
Now we don't call a conspiracy, you don't have a conspiracy to throw a surprise birthday party for somebody, right?
A conspiracy by definition is two or more people doing harm to somebody.
Now overcycling, the decree to overcycle couldn't have come from one lab because it was all the labs, all the states, all the nations in the Western world.
By definition this is an international conspiracy because it was to do harm to the people of the world.
Now, this is just... I can't prove this part.
This is my just thinking about what really happened here.
So, let's say this thing started with a man-made pathogen.
And let's start out by saying, what would we call a virus?
We call a virus a little bit of genetic material wrapped in a lipoprotein coating that gets in your mucous membranes and can make you sick or kill you.
What would we call a genetic poison?
A man-made genetic contact poison?
Well, we would call it a little bit of genetic RNA or DNA wrapped in a synthetic lipoprotein coat of my design that gets into your mucous membranes and makes you sick or kills you.
Right?
Do you see a difference?
The only difference is one is synthetic.
Like I say, we have entered the world of synthetic biology.
So I think this is personally what I think happened.
If this had been an airborne deadly virus, like they said, we would have seen it rip across Pittsburgh and, you know, Philadelphia and Omaha and Paris.
But it didn't do that, did it?
If you really look at the numbers, it hit Wuhan, it hit Lombardy area in Italy, and it hit New York City.
And then it kind of fizzled out.
And I'm going to show you a paper that may discuss how that technology was brought about.
But that's what happened.
So I think that this was a pathogen that was created that started it and then kind of fizzled out.
They let it go.
They knew it was going to be the normal flu season.
So then it just became the flu season.
But what kept the fear going?
We started doing these tests that were Quite frankly, when you have a test, like Michael Yeaton said, these tests are 90% false positives.
I still see doctors getting them and kind of saying, as if it could make some difference.
You know, it may not be perfect, but maybe I can make some sense of it.
No.
When you have a test with no gold standard that has 90% false positives, you can't make any sense of it.
This is like a clock.
That is broken and does the right time twice a day.
We need to abandon the testing.
It is absolutely critical because that is misleading us even today with well-thinking people.
We've got our mind cranked around this thing.
Now, and then, what was the purpose of all this?
It was to create Stockholm Syndrome.
This is classic psychological manipulation.
You isolate people.
This is what we know to do to prisoners.
By the way, you know, we talk about quarantine in medicine and we've never quarantined the well, only the sick.
How do we get the term lockdown and just accept it as normal?
Lockdown is a term that we use for prisoners.
Let's pay attention with the words they're using.
So, we went into lockdown, we did all these terrible things, and we isolated people, then we monopolized their perception.
That's the second point in Biderman's chart of coercion.
He looked at the Korean War veterans that were turned against America and how they did it.
And what they did was, they locked them down, then they monopolized their perceptions.
So these people that normally would listen to CNN or something for half an hour a day, suddenly are home in their homes with nothing to do but worry and try to get information, and they're listening to CNN non-stop.
Or whatever, you know.
They could be listening to Fox News, I don't care.
But they were non-stop getting this fear You know, broadcast at them.
And then, here's Dr. Fauci's part in this whole thing.
He was the doctor of confusion, okay?
And I'm just going to put this out, because he was the doctor of confusion by the mask thing.
His primary job, I'll tell you later, but this was a secondary job, was to make confusion.
Because if you take people that are afraid and you add confusion, I learned this from McDonald, my pediatric psychiatrist friend in LA.
And what he said, that is how you get Stockholm Syndrome.
I learned that because I asked him at dinner one night, I said, would you please, for the love of God, explain to me who these people are driving around alone in a car in a mask?
And his comment was, they're Stockholm Syndrome people.
So I really kind of felt with more sympathy that they're so afraid that they're willing to do more than what their captors say.
If they say to wash my hands five times a day, I'm going to do it 20 times.
Wear a mask, I'll wear 10 masks, all that.
That is what Stockholm Syndrome is all about.
And if you want to see some pretty tragic things, it's what it does to our children.
This is why, this is a war against our children, and we'd better wake up now.
This is my point.
Masks are at the key of this, by the way.
But the, you know, this is nonsense.
And I, when I faced, when I went down to Omaha to discuss the mask mandate, I thought it was going to be a slam dunk, because there's no science that demonstrates this makes sense.
But what I found was, I found the entire University of Nebraska academic people in infectious disease and the CEO and all these people standing on the other side demanding masks.
And I just want to go back in time now and take a picture, like you see it in the restaurants, you see it in, you know, it's just crazy.
You go into a restaurant and you have to wear a mask six feet in, but then you're safe when you take it off to go to the bar, you're safe when you sit at your table, you know, down I'm safe, but up No, I'm dangerous now.
I'm going to go to the bathroom.
I'm dangerous.
I have to put the mask back on.
I want one of them to look me at the eye and tell me this is contagion control.
Are you kidding me?
Nobody in their right mind thinks this is contagion control.
This is people control.
It's one of the things in Biderman's chart of coercion is insist on stupid things.
This was another one.
Social distancing.
When I saw this kind of thing, I said, six feet?
Are you kidding me?
This is not something science comes up with.
This six feet's a made-up number.
And by the way, that was proven by Lydia Baruba at MIT that showed this.
And also, this isn't the way contagion happens, even if viruses exist the way we thought they did.
They're like part of air fluidity.
Read Dennis Rancourt in Canada.
He's a physicist.
He shows how this stuff's all over the place.
Whatever comes out of your mouth.
But anyway, six feet.
I thought it was just a made-up number.
Well, you know, it gets even crazier.
Maybe it's not.
I ran into this because I reviewed this lady's book on the occult of masks.
Okay, she wrote a book on the occult on masks and why it's anti-Christian and I just reviewed the medical stuff.
But I got so interested in her book that I read the rest of it and it turns out They don't call themselves Satanists, but in the old religion, what they call it, the indoctrination, what do you do?
You wash your hands, put on a mask, and stand six feet apart.
Is this accidental?
I don't know.
I'm just throwing that out as a little food for thought.
Okay.
Now, here's the issue of the dreaded Delta variant, okay?
Part of this, I tried to work this out myself with the numbers, but I really don't have the capability of doing it myself, but you can try it.
I looked at where the Delta variant hits, what is the difference between the Delta variant and the regular, what we've been having, right?
And it's very small.
The difference is very small in a couple sites in the spike protein.
What I did find out is that these, you go back in the basic science of these vaccines, they were designed to be Attaching to a highly conserved area, meaning the areas that don't vary.
So this Delta variant, in my opinion, is all smoke and mirrors.
And at the most, the points in the spike protein, coronavirus has a specific capability of, you know, we all learned about variable and hyper-variable regions, but it varies by species.
And coronavirus turns out to be very low on that scale of variability relative to the amount of variation it does per day.
So, this, I think it's just nonsense.
But at the most, it's 0.3% difference.
And that's what the former Chief Science Officer of Pfizer said, who's a science officer.
Anyway, Michael Yeadon, this is what he said.
The difference between the delta and this was 0.3%, it's nonsense.
And here's the other point.
We had blood that was banked from a SARS survivor from 2002.
And it turns out it neutralized the current virus.
Well, this is about somewhere between 70% and 85% the same as SARS.
and 85% the same as SARS.
So here's a difference of 20 to 30% and it still neutralized it.
Why are we worried about these vaccines?
No, vaccine escape is not what's happening here.
What's happening here is they don't really want to admit the vaccine's killing you around the world.
I mean, this is the number of countries where COVID's very high and there's alerts from, this is from the CDC, and Malta is the most highly vaccinated country in the world, but it's also on the highest level of alert for COVID.
Keep in mind, too, that when this first, you know, one of the good experimental areas is Israel.
And Israel showed, when they claimed it was 90, again, you can't just listen to government data.
Israel said, after they started rolling out the Pfizer vaccine, they used one vaccine, one country, kind of homogeneous, smaller country.
At February 12th, by February 12th, they had vaccinated What was it?
It was like 30% or... No, they vaccinated 12.5% of the people by middle of February.
They had 51% of the COVID deaths were in vaccinated people.
Now, that wasn't the government.
What the government said, it was 95% successful.
Everything is 95% effective.
That's a propaganda talking point.
That's not a research number.
But Seligman, Dr. Herb Seligman and his partner Haim Yativ in Marseille, France.
Seligman is an epidemiologist in Marseille, France.
And they looked at the numbers and they said, that's not right.
And that's what they came up with.
They said 51% of the deaths were in vaccinated people. Now, when they broke it down by age,
they show that if you're over 65 years old, you had a 40 times more likelihood of
dying of COVID than if you didn't take the vaccine. Now, why are we hearing in
America something very different? Because they're purposely massaging the numbers.
They don't count you as vaccinated unless you're two weeks after the second
vaccine. But I can tell you, looking at like like the Pfizer or the Moderna, I
can tell you, you just go to VAERS and you'll find that most of the damage happens,
that people die of blood clots or they die of a brain bleed or they die of
COVID. Before we were starting to do this new definition, it happened within two
weeks.
And they don't count you as dead of COVID, even if you're fully vaccinated.
I mean, if you, if you, yeah, they don't count it within two weeks of the vaccine.
So it has to be after two weeks of the last vaccine dose, then you're fully vaccinated, then you might be counted.
The other thing is, there was a, the CDC came out with a recommendation of cycle amplification for vaccinated versus unvaccinated.
And it's different.
So the unvaccinated get cycled up and the vaccinated get cycled down.
You know, this is, it's just fraud.
I'm sorry, it's just fraud.
Because all around the world, in Wales, just came out, Wales said, what I just had the numbers, it was like 83%, I believe, 83% of the people that were seriously ill were in vaccinated people.
And in a country where 63% is vaccinated.
Well, I have a friend that used to be on Fox News, and she's got a radio show now, and she says, anybody that believes in the Delta variant is a member of the Lambda Delta Nu fraternity for morons.
I thought that was pretty funny.
I just threw that up.
OK, so I'm running out of time.
So real quick, I'm just going to say, here's early treatment.
This is the International Hydroxychloroquine Study Group that's online.
And they showed a meta-analysis of all the studies.
The bigger the green thing, the better it is.
And all these studies show a positive result.
The chance of it being fallacious, the chance of it actually having the probability that it's ineffective, is less than 1 in 10 million by December 9th.
There was only one negative study.
Here's the earlier study that showed countries that used hydroxychloroquine early and often had a 70-some percent, I think it's down to 70% now, improvement rate.
And you've got to ask yourself, why do they have to lie about it so badly?
You know, the issue about these papers, you probably heard about these papers that got withdrawn.
But they didn't get withdrawn because the numbers got massaged.
They got withdrawn because they couldn't produce a database at all that showed that hydroxychloroquine didn't work.
They claimed they had the worldwide database.
They had nothing.
And the business, Surgisphere, that claimed to have given them the database was actually owned by somebody else, but the people theoretically staffing it were a science fiction writer and a porn star.
Well, an adult content model.
They call it an adult content model.
You know, you just can't make this up.
Now, this is, you should follow these guys, drastic.
Decentralized Radical Autonomous Search Team Investigating COVID-19.
It's a bunch of guys on Twitter, and I have a friend that was one of these people, and they actually look at all these documents, and they're trying to figure out what's really going on, and they are not part, I really think it's legit.
I actually sent some of the references here to Mike Adams, because his Natural News, Mike Adams, he has labs all over the world, including Taiwan, and his wife is Chinese and reads Chinese.
I said, have her just review some of these and make sure that I'm not getting suckered into this.
And they're apparently legit.
But this is what they showed.
They showed that the funding in 2018, EcoHealth Alliance, run by Peter Daszak, in conjunction with the Wuhan lab, Institute of Virology.
They proposed to DARPA a $15 million project to look at advanced human pathogenicity BAT-CoV project.
This is a gain-of-function project, and by the way, it's now legal again.
It was rejected for full funding, but not because of what they were doing, and so it was subsequently agreed to that the HNHS would fund it, and that's what happened.
And although the Wuhan lab denied having this, they put in this... This is why these guys are so great.
They unearth what's really going on by the paperwork that was paper trail.
You know, Wuhan said, no, no, we don't have any bats here.
They did.
They had cage bats and they had like 20,000 plus specimens of deadly chimeric bat coronaviruses.
In other words, they've taken genetic material from different bats and recombined it.
And they proposed injecting these things into humanized or batified mice.
So these are some of the people involved.
So here's the summary.
The summary is we have an artificial pathogen.
We really don't know much about the disease because we don't have a sufficient number of autopsies.
You know, if we had 200 cases where the hospital determined that somebody was dead of COVID and we could do a blind, unbiased autopsy somewhere, Sequentially, and find out really what people are dying from, I think we're going to find it's a mixed bag of diseases, including possibly some other potentially bioweaponizable things.
But we don't know that, because we don't have the autopsy data like they did in 2018.
I mean in 1918.
In 1918, William Welch went down and autopsied sequentially all these guys that died, or a lot of them.
And he found out things, for example, part of the death was due to Bayer Aspirin overdose.
But anyway, we have these false tests and we have them purposeful misdirection by our medical officials.
That's the kindest explanation.
The way this brought down the whole world is through the money that flowed through Tony Fauci.
David Martin estimates that he spent 120 billion dollars just in taking natural genetic material
and creating pathogenic toxins for humans.
That's basically the sum of what he did over 40 years.
But he did more than that, because he had all this money to flow out to the hospitals, and what he did was, he funded all these hospitals with NIH funding, which then overbuilt, and now if they don't push remdesivir, then they talk about hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin, and they don't fire the staff that are doing that, they'll lose their funding.
So the bag man in the mob terminology is the guy that takes the mob boss money, And he spreads it out to the kapos, and when they don't do their job, he breaks their legs.
Now, you know, that's really what's going on here.
And if you notice, they're trying to throw Fauci under the bus right now.
And it's a psychological operation.
They say, if you listen, they have two words linked together.
Fauci, that bad guy.
The people in the news say, we just had no way of knowing he had funded this.
What a bad guy.
He just slipped by us.
We investigated reporters.
And then because of his actions, there was a lab leak that did all this.
So they connected two things.
Fauci bad.
Don't look any further.
Don't look higher up for where it really is.
And lab leak.
So, I'm going to leave you with some papers that you should just consider, and you can decide motive of your own.
Since the time of the Kuomintang, the bio-weapons were couched as veterinary studies.
Now, again, there's never been a disease that they know of coming out of mice in Australia to justify this called an emerging infectious disease in Australia, but they said there might be.
So, we have too many mice, let's figure out a way to get rid of them.
They took the mice, they vaccinated them with something that sterilized their ovaries, and then they put them back in the wild.
Put a group of mice vaccinated back in the wild.
They went and they shed on other people.
You've been hearing about the shedding of these vaccines that we have, right?
And it's a real deal.
They shed on other mice, they became sterile, and then those mice shed on yet a third group of mice, which became sterile, and then it kind of fizzled out in the population, because they didn't want to kill all the mice.
But they have mathematical formula that says if you want to decrease the population this, you know the death and birth rate, that you can then give this number and you can get rid of the population down to this level.
Now, I know the shedding is real, and what does it do?
It disturbs women's menstrual cycles.
It causes young girls to bleed, elderly women to bleed.
And guess what?
The FDA and the EMA knew about this.
They put out circulars calling For the vaccine researchers, for these genetic agents, to protect certain people who might be at risk from this secondary shedding.
But did they tell us that?
Absolutely not.
Secondly, the Japanese looked at the pharmacokinetic study on this, and they didn't use the whole vaccine.
They just used the lipoprotein coating, the matrix, it's called.
Matrix M.
And guess where, and they looked at the pharmacokinetics, it collected in the ovaries 64 times more than the muscle.
Now keep in mind, these were designed to be genetic agents, like for cancer therapy.
So they were targetable.
And Novavax that made the MatrixM says they were targetable.
Here's a fun thing I just threw in.
The S1 subunit, you can buy it online.
And here's where it goes.
They are down in Mexico making COVID vaccines in GMO tomatoes.
I kid you not.
They've already started doing this for other vaccines.
Hepatitis B, polio.
Think about this.
GMO crops that will vaccinate you without you knowing it.
And this is Daniel Garza.
He's biofarming.
He's a big guy in this.
And he says 200 acres would produce all the childhood vaccines for the world.
We have a few biosafety obstacles.
So I'm going to leave you just with some questions because these are things I couldn't talk about.
Just if you want to go further.
Look at where did mycoplasma come from.
That's an interesting rabbit hole.
Ask yourself right now, why are they spraying for mosquitoes carrying West Nile virus in the fall?
And finally, why did Charles Lieber get indicted?
Look those things up.
▲
Export Selection