All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 17, 2021 - Jim Fetzer
58:31
Dr. Lee Merritt on the Ted & Austin Broer Show - Sept. 16, 2021
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Well, hello my friends and welcome to the worldwide broadcast of the Ted and Austin
and Breuer Show bringing you the latest world news and health research.
Hope you're having an absolutely fantastic day today and thank you again for all the emails and support.
We have a special guest on the show today, so I'm going to hand this over to Dad and let him introduce.
This is going to be a great show today, so you guys buckle up, get ready.
It's going to be an intense one.
How are you doing this morning, Deb?
Oh, I'm doing great, Austin.
In fact, we're really blessed and privileged this morning to have Dr. Lee Merritt on the show, and I'm really excited about having her on.
In fact, it was Dr. Merritt, I will give her the credit for this, about three or four months ago I was watching some stuff online.
And I watched an interview with her, and she really snapped me tight with this COVID stuff.
And I thought, I knew it was bad, but I didn't know it was this mad bad.
And Dr. Merritt kind of, you know, got me going in this direction as far as what I tell you guys on an ongoing basis every single day.
If you'd like to hear from Dr. Merritt or talk to Dr. Merritt, you can go to TheMedicalRebel.com.
You can also go to her telegram channel, Freedom Doc, but she's absolutely wonderful, brilliant, articulate, and Dr. Merritt, it's so good to have you on with us today, and we've got a whole bunch of questions we want to ask you, but let me start off with this.
You know, is this really a vaccine, or what is this thing you're giving to us with the spike protein?
Oh yeah, no, it's not a vaccine, and thank you.
I don't know if I can live up to your introduction.
It's well-deserved for you, I promise.
You know, it really is not a vaccine, by definition.
You know, a vaccine, we think of, and this is what they always do, they always say, well, you believe in smallpox vaccine, right, or polio vaccine, and everybody says, but that's not what this is.
You know, they want to make it say that if you don't believe in, you know, the term anti-vaxxer, Well, we don't call it anti-blood pressure medicine.
Just if I didn't believe in all blood pressure medicines that were safe, if I thought one was not so good, that wouldn't make me some kind of evil villain.
It's Newspeak.
It's an Orwellian thing that they create new language to then push their agenda through and not have you really critically think about it.
But the real issue here is a real vaccine.
When we think of smallpox, theoretically, and I'm going to tell you, they've lied to us so much, I'm going back and rethinking all of this, but assuming what we did know about smallpox, the vaccine kept you from having the disease.
It appeared, I mean, it appeared that it was, you know, if you took the vaccine, you simply didn't get smallpox.
Well, this is not that.
First of all, This is a, it doesn't stop transmission by their own admission.
If you look at the, like the Pfizer emergency use authorization that they, the data that they put in, they admit it did not stop transmission.
And we're seeing that look how, how the most cases are in the vaccinated people, you know, around the world, they're not telling you that in the United States, but around the world, that's true.
So it doesn't stop transmission.
And it really doesn't make all that much difference if you get sick.
You know, they claim it decreases in 30, in the EU advisory said 30% of people will get a diminution in symptoms if they have the vaccine.
Now, given all the stuff we've heard about all the bad side effects, the fact that Dr. Hoff in Canada showed that 63% of people taking the vaccine had a positive D-dimer test, which means they're doing microvascular clotting or macrovascular, but they're at least doing, they didn't know they were having a big pulmonary embolism.
So presumably this is microvascular clotting, but That's a lifelong problem that will probably kill you eventually.
That's a devastating number and that's why nobody's checking it in the drug companies or the university hospitals, but that's a devastating side effect.
What does that mean?
Well, they didn't really research this stuff.
They did research it, but not for our safety.
They pushed it out on us and they really don't have a lot of data.
But the data they have does not make it a vaccine.
That's really your question.
Now, you know, and the other thing is, keep in mind, we've never, this vaccine has chemicals we've never used in a vaccine before.
I mean, PEG, polyethylene glycol is the one that they always mention.
But polyethylene glycol is just one of many new items here.
But it's the one that gives you 10 times the risk of anaphylaxis with this.
We think.
Anaphylaxis is when your throat closes up, you get hives, you can suddenly stop breathing.
It's the kind of thing that kills people after a bee sting, which is why they carry around an epinephrine pen, right?
Well, polyethylene glycol is apparently doing that in this vaccine.
It's 10 times more than any other vaccine we've rolled out.
This also has things like, well, first of all, we've never had a quote genetic vaccine and this has synthetic genetic material.
It's not real DNA.
It's not real RNA.
It's synthetic.
They have altered it in ways that do not exist in humans.
Just keep that in mind.
You know, I had a very good friend who's a Mormon.
They're Mormon.
And they, uh, you know, Mormons don't drink caffeine.
And she's asking me about which vaccine her husband should take to keep the job.
And I said, let me run this by you.
You're worried about, you know, you legally in your religion can't drink caffeine and you're going to take synthetic DNA and RNA into your body.
Um, you know, well, let me, let me, let me real quick.
It's now that Dr. Maris got your attention and she snapped all you guys tight.
By the way, she's the first physician to publicly name the COVID-19 virus and vaccine as a bioweapon.
Just thought I'd mention that.
She's a board-certified orthopedic spinal surgeon.
She's a classically trained physician, obtained her medical degree from the University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry.
She served 10 years as a military surgeon providing care to active duty Marines in Japan and Quantico, Virginia.
She's appointed to the Navy Research Advisory Committee, and she has studied bioweapons.
Dr. Merritt is really, really, really qualified to discuss this today, and that's why I wanted to bring her on the show.
Plus, Dr. Merritt, one of the first things I heard you say, and I want you to kind of cover this with you from a bioweapons standpoint.
You said that all of the cats, if I remember right, and all of the ferrets in the first study that was being used with these RNA vaccines, probably a decade ago, that they all died of septis.
Can you explain to us how that happens?
Right.
And it was a long time ago, just after... Well, actually, they've been researching vaccines to coronavirus for a long time in the veterinary medicine.
So this didn't start with SARS, but it started with animals.
And because cats apparently, and maybe other animals, but I know for sure cats in veterinary medicine, they don't just get the common cold with coronavirus.
They get some kind of like intra-abdominal infections or something that really can take them out.
So the veterinarians were looking at this.
And it's not just this technology, it's the coronavirus itself.
If we're really dealing with something that's coronavirus, it turns out that that has a bad habit.
of giving you what's called now, they changed the name, Antibody Dependent Enhancement.
And what that means is, I vaccinate the animal or potentially the human or animals, I vaccinate the animal against the coronavirus that I want to have you immune to.
And then they're fine.
The animals didn't have a problem once they were vaccinated.
But then the second step was, we expose them to the virus that makes them sick.
And now instead of just, you know, gradually onset making them sick, It gave them this fulminant, overwhelming, you know, sepsis and inflammation, and they died very rapidly.
The ferrets, you know, the ferrets, they didn't allow them to get to the final death stage, but they would have.
When they sacrificed them, they were all, their pulmonary, their lungs were seriously inflamed.
So it's looking like, it's kind of looking like what we see with COVID in a way, this overshoot of inflammation, but this is artificially produced by the vaccine.
And one of the things, the reason is, it's like, and this is true with humans too in this vaccine.
Just think about this.
So you have natural God-given immunity to COVID.
Probably 30% of Europe and Asia had immunity by May of last year based on the Karolinska Institute and the geneticists looking at it in Russia.
So, they came up with these numbers through very sophisticated tests because it's not just about antibodies.
The big lie here is that antibodies are your primary immune response to viruses.
No, they're a cheap substitute.
They are what you throw out as an immediate frontline force to stop a virus.
But what you really do, what real immunity comes from is what's called tissue immunity.
T-cell broad-spectrum tissue immunity.
And that's what, so what we do when we give you this vaccine, and this apparently, you know, in cats too apparently, Let's say you've had the disease and now you have this great perfect God-given immunity and then we give you the vaccine, it wipes that out.
It completely destroys your natural immunity to the disease we want you to be immune to.
Does that make sense to begin with?
And then when we give you the vaccine, then it makes this, it gives you a weird stylized antibody response.
Well, as in the animals, the problem is that antibody response when we're finding it out, look at what's happening around the world.
That antibody response does not neutralize the virus.
It does not neutralize or whatever we want to call this thing that we're vaccinating to, the spike protein.
It does not neutralize that.
It just coats it in some way that it allows it to come into your macrophages and then it can, in the animals, it overwhelmed the macrophage system, the immune system, and the animals died.
It was pretty dramatic in cats, and they've done it, you know, they claim, oh, we've done it mice, it's not so bad.
But the problem is there are some animals that are not good animal models.
So cats and ferrets are really good animal models.
for this disease. If you don't want to find a fever, don't take your temperature. If you
don't want to find the answer is bad, don't do an animal model that actually works. So
the big two are the ferrets and cats. Now people write to me all the time, please send
me those data. Unfortunately, here's the problem. So I can't send you these papers to outline
this. I have it in my bibliography.
Some of them, though, were taken down.
See, I found this out in February or January or February last year when they first started looking at the vaccines.
I started reading the literature and I went way back into the 70s and the basic science literature.
But subsequently, a bunch of that stuff's been scrubbed from the Internet because they don't want you to know.
But even the stuff that's there, it's not like they wrote papers that said, Animals died and vaccines that we're using.
No, no.
It's all buried in deep scientific jargon, in the deep literature.
And most people, even if I send them the paper, they can't find it.
That's the problem.
So I'm just telling you, I'll be glad to share my bibliography.
It's on my website.
You can find it.
You can download it.
You can find anything you want in there.
Well, let me ask you another question.
And thanks for all that information back on those studies.
You know, Pfizer basically has done this research, supposedly.
And also, we've seen the research coming out of Israel.
And what's happened as far as, you know, I guess over the age of 65, you have a 40 times higher death rate with the vaccine.
But if these guys know this, Dr. Merritt, and I'm just asking you to speculate here, what's the point of this vaccine if it's not to heal people and not to give us immunity and we're having all of these side effects from this vaccine?
Is this a eugenics protocol, or what do you think the purpose is?
Is it just to make money?
I mean, why are they doing this?
I don't think it's just to make money, because I'm going to tell you, when people realize what's going on here, they might burn Pfizer down.
I mean, Pfizer's stock is going to go in the tank when this whole thing comes out, so I don't think this really could be explained just to make money.
Now, the big guys figure they're going to make their money quick, get out, and they're going to be gone by the time this all unravels.
You know, I do think there's something bigger afoot.
I mean, you know, I can't speculate on motive, but there are people in the world, I feel like, if we really take a good look at planet Earth, we look more like a ranch.
You know, where there are some distant owners that, you know, probably are the 150 guys that own 60 to 70% of the world's wealth, and we don't know their names.
They live at a distance, so we never see them on the ranch, right?
And then there are all the ranch hands, the on-site managers, the The people that steer the cattle around.
And we see those guys in our politics and our high medical establishment and things like that.
And you know who they care about.
They care about themselves.
And if you notice, the federal government has exempted themselves from the vaccine mandate.
Don't you love that?
Rules are just for the little people.
And that's what gets to what we are.
We are the cattle.
I mean, look at their experimenting on us, and they've been experimenting on us for decades.
This isn't new.
You know, if people knew the actual facts about vaccines, they wouldn't take them.
Like, let's just take the influenza vaccine.
That's just a simple one.
And I didn't start out to be an anti-vaxxer.
I didn't.
I believed everything they told me.
And I started looking at the influenza vaccine because the nurses came to me and said, you know, we know you're kind of a libertarian.
You know, what do you think about these mandates?
This was like 2014, I think.
Or maybe earlier, 2012.
And I said, well, I mean, it's immoral, unethical, and not ever, you know, done in ethical medicine.
But I'll look into it.
And what I found out was shocking that these things just don't work.
And, you know, you can look in the United States, on average, 67% of people get the flu vaccine, and we have a 0.02% mortality from flu every year.
Or flu like illness.
So what does an Estonian, they have a 5% vaccination rate and they have a .02% flu mortality.
In other words, they have the same mortality, but what's the difference?
They're taking 95% less risk.
Because flu vaccine is the number one risk for Guillain-Barré prior to these vaccines.
They're the worst.
But Guillain-Barré is ascending paralysis.
Now, that's not the only thing.
I mean, flu vaccine can cause all sorts of things, but the big payout from the government board for compensation is Guillain-Barré syndrome.
And it's a disease I never saw in medical school or residency.
It's all come out since we've been vaccinating everybody with the flu vaccine.
So that's the kind of thing.
Let me tell you another one that really pertains to this vaccine.
I was on the NRAC when they were researching the Gulf War Syndrome.
I just happened to, I was doing a little walk around research.
I was at Bethesda Naval Hospital and I ran into a colleague of mine who was involved in the research on Gulf War Syndrome.
And as you know, people came back.
It was about 34% of the guys that got fully vaccinated and went over to the Gulf War and came back and they had Gulf War Syndrome.
Probably I think about 25% overall had some version of it.
And they came back, and some of them were just mildly ill, but it was all sorts of things.
At first, they thought it was psychological because they couldn't put a handle on it, but these guys started popping up with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis at four times the background rate.
Okay, that's a fatal neurologic disease.
It's the same thing Stephen Hawking's had, and he's the longest-lived person in the world with it, I think.
So most people die within a couple of years.
So they started really looking and they found out that all the people with this problem, with not a myotrophic lateral sclerosis but with Gulf War Syndrome, had gotten their vaccine to go overseas, their anthrax vaccine, from one batch of the anthrax vaccine that had an adjuvant called squalene.
They put these adjuvants in which are just chemicals that make vaccines more robust, give you a bigger immune response, right?
So that was one batch of that that did this all.
And it was, I mean, it was proved in my opinion, beyond a shadow of a doubt, based on antibody
studies of who had what, there's just no question, it was all in this group.
And that was a vaccine that was rolled out just like this, under emergency use authorization,
quick, quick, quick, no time for oversight.
Squalene was a brand new adjuvant, never been used.
So people were hurt by this.
And so the drug companies came out and said, they were pinged by the people's families
and friends and people in the know said, we don't want the squalene in our vaccines.
And we were assured by the FDA and CDC, we didn't have any vaccines that would have this
in it, including flu vaccines.
Until 2017, guess what?
They put squalene in the flu ad.
So the flu ad that they're now mandating all the nurses to get, or the flu vaccine, that's
one of them.
And it's in other vaccines too, because they love squalene because it does such a good
response to immune, it gives you such a good inflammatory immune response immediately that
they can measure.
Well, let me tell you, it's also in this.
So what kind of psychopaths, when you look at motive, what kind of psychopaths who knew that they killed people using squalene in the Gulf War syndrome, By putting squalene in the adjuvant of the vaccine, who would put it in another vaccine?
When you answer that question, you'll know who's behind all this and they don't care about your health or my health.
And here's one of the big tragedies.
I have a friend who works at the VA.
So he was one of those people who went to the Gulf Wars in the Army.
He was one of those people that took that batch of vaccine.
He keeps getting letters saying, you know, you realize you're still at four times the risk of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
Be advised to have free daycare should you ever need it.
And please report any neurologic symptoms to us.
They go on and on.
They send him this letter every year.
Well, guess what they did, though?
He works at the VA and they forced him to get this vaccine that also has squalene in it.
I just wanted to spit when I heard that.
You think about it.
This is the world we're in.
The vaccine industry doesn't really care about you and this is a war.
The other thing is I'm absolutely convinced this is a war and it's aimed at our children.
It is probably a depopulation thing.
I mean, people can laugh at that and they can call this conspiracy, but if you really look at the facts about this vaccine, the other thing we know from the Japanese is when they took the matrix M, which is the adjuvant in this, the thing that wraps around the genetic material that helps distribute this around the body.
Don't you love the name?
Matrix M. So you're getting a jolt of the matrix when you take this.
It distributes 64 times more in the ovaries than it does in the skeletal muscle.
Now, is this by accident?
I mean, I went back again, this is not, I can't find this now because they've scrubbed their site, but Novavax that developed the MatrixM before told us how this, this is wonderful for genetic therapy because we could target organs with this technology, the MatrixM technology.
Well, if they can target organs, why do you think this is accidental?
You see where we are?
Well, you know, the crazy part about all of this stuff, when you get to the point where you're targeting the ovaries and we know that when a woman is pregnant and she starts having secondary sexual differentiation because of the Y chromosome of the male, suddenly the ovaries become testicles.
So in essence, we can be targeting the testicles and the ovaries at the same time, which could reduce the sperm count and also stop the production of eggs.
Is there a possibility that these women who are pregnant, who are taking these vaccines, That they can reduce the amount of eggs that their offspring are going to have from birth, because women have all their eggs at birth.
Is there a possibility that they will no longer be able to have children after their mother had this vaccine?
Kind of like we had with diethylstilbestrol back in the 50s and 60s.
I mean, are we going to have another huge group of people that are having to go to fertility clinics to only find out That even if they take some type of stimulant to produce eggs, that they have no eggs to produce.
What do you think is going to happen with this?
Right.
And I'm not an OBGYN doctor, so I can't speak to the details, but it sure looks like that's what could happen.
But the bottom line is we don't know because, again, the psychopaths running this show didn't really do their due diligence.
And we know this because, you know, I don't know if you've heard about shedding, but people are very concerned about this.
They're not vaccinated.
They go around vaccinated people and they start getting symptoms.
Well, And so we started talking about this shedding problem and like I'm on the five docs with Sherry Tenpenny and Larry Pulesky and those guys and it's you know got Christiane Northrup and Carrie Maude, those are the five.
And Christiane Northrup is an OBGYN specialist.
She's famous for reproductive health in women and women's health and what we're seeing in people that are being shed on.
In other words, Somebody you get you go back to your office you're not vaccinated and then you start having symptoms well they're kind of two groups of symptoms one is kind of a viral thing that can happen to anybody I mean you you know but people feel sick around people that are vaccinated there's a non-specific viral like symptom but the one that's we should pay attention to is
Bleeding.
So suddenly little girls go back to school and they start having early menstrual periods that they're too young for or they're around vaccinated people and this happens.
Women of childbearing age start having abnormal menses.
They spot twice a month or they have a huge amount of bleeding or something goes on and then postmenopausal women start bleeding.
I mean, also nosebleeds and things.
I had a huge nosebleed probably from being shed on.
But the point is that what Dr. Northrup says about this is when you see that kind of menstrual problem happening, you're looking at a damage to the reproductive system.
Now, that's just from the secondary effects.
But if it's shedding the spike protein, that's what the vaccine makes in people.
You just not maybe getting a big enough as big a dose as you are if you actually got vaccinated, but it's giving you symptoms and that should be worrisome.
So we found that I found the EMA and there's another colleague of mine found the FDA.
Both of these medical agencies put out circulars.
The EMA did a big conference on this in 2007 or 8.
So we know they knew about shedding.
But when we were talking about this, we heard crickets from anybody that could enlighten us, right?
Well, so the FDA says in their circular, we don't exactly know what's being shed.
Isn't that comforting?
It could be genetic material.
It could be infectious material like viruses.
And it could be some recombinant new Frankenstein thing.
They didn't use the word Frankenstein.
I just threw that in for effect.
So anyway, they don't know what it's shedding.
And they say, it seems to be the first 10 weeks after you get the vaccine, but older people and people with immune compromise can shed forever.
And we know that it has some harmful effects, but we believe you should protect these people.
And then they mentioned elderly, neonates, and the immune compromised.
But what did they tell us?
Nothing.
They told us it was safe in pregnant women, that it was safe to be given out to the whole world, and they had no long-term data on this problem.
You know, that's just a criminal enterprise.
Well, you know what's interesting?
We say they did not do their due diligence.
And I agree with you, they did not.
But how do we know they did not do their due diligence?
Is this the exact outcome that they wanted?
That they wanted to have this?
Sure, that's possible.
I'm not saying, this could all just be, you know, I'm not, again, whether they did or not, this never should have been released on the public.
That's exactly right.
That's exactly right.
Now tell me about myocarditis, because you have some pretty interesting statistics on that.
I really want you to cover that.
That's really important, and I believe you said within five years there was a 66% death rate associated with myocarditis.
Can you give us more detail to my listeners?
Yeah, that's what I was told by a cardiologist that was talking to me, and he was talking to me about two things.
He was talking to me kind of under the table about this, myocarditis, and about cancer.
He was making the point that in his practice there are these cancers that involve the heart, and he's seen two in 20 years, and now he's seen like over 20 in two months.
So cancer is coming out, which we can talk about.
But myocarditis seems to be predominantly affecting young males.
So I was looking at the military.
Why in God's name are we vaccinating the military other than to destroy our national security?
So when you look at the military, they had 20 people die of COVID.
During 2020, all the services put together.
They're a healthy group.
But They've had over 600 cases of myocarditis that we can attribute to the vaccine.
That's because when you go through that they usually have about 800 cases a year.
And now they've had 1400 this year already.
So it's going to be more than that.
But if you look at the five year death rate, again, we've killed 20 times plus more people in the military than COVID ever did.
Why are we vaccinating people?
So that's my concern.
But yeah, myocarditis is a really big problem.
And this is the thing that we're seeing killing 15 year olds and 20 year old men.
I mean, it's a tragedy.
Explain to everybody what myocarditis does and how it works.
It's an inflammation in the heart.
They don't really completely know why the heart gets inflamed in this problem.
You know, honestly, if my son got it, what I would do is I would give him a big dose of ivermectin and I'd keep him on it for a while and I'd do it for like at least eight weeks and see if that made a difference.
I don't know if the hospitals are even thinking along those terms, but we know that that helps with the spike protein problem.
So why not do it?
It's from the vaccine.
Let's try and ameliorate this.
I've got that stuff on my website.
That's the issue is that it's an inflammation and it happens after the vaccine.
Well, what does the vaccine, and I'm using that term, but we shouldn't, but if we learned from that FDA guidance to their pharmaceutical people I was telling you about, About the shedding, what they really call these things are viral-based genetic therapies, VBGTs is what they call them.
And that's what these things were designed to be.
These were not designed to be vaccines.
This technology was designed for cancer care and for gene therapy, but it could never meet the safety bar because you can be sued for those types of therapies.
You can't be sued for vaccines.
So they took it to the indemnified area.
But yeah, these things are causing inflammation all over.
And the way they work is when you take the vaccine, it literally turns your body into a production facility of the spike protein, which is crazy.
To me, this is just a crazy idea to begin with.
I mean, it makes trillions of copies of the spike protein all over your body all at once.
Now let's so this is why it's when we see these old people die of brain bleeds and sudden catastrophic things related to the vaccine it's you know or just waking up dead you know how many people do you hear these stories all the time and you're going to hear more so my uncle Joe got the vaccine and he just didn't wake up the next morning 12 year old kid I just read just didn't It's because they're having an overwhelming response and they're producing the spike protein that goes all over, including your brain and your immune system.
If your immune system isn't perfect, you're going to go down with it.
That's why in Israel, when the independent guys looked at the Israeli data, they showed that early on in the program when 12.5% of people had been vaccinated, What you quoted is right, 40 times the death rate from COVID essentially of elderly people taking the vaccine, people over 65.
So think about your immune system and how it should work.
When we go out in nature, and this is why the lockdowns made things worse, by the way, everything, if you want to think about motive, everything they did made us more apt to die.
That's right.
2020, everything.
The masks, which are damaging to your CO2 problem, and it's damaging because it recycles bad bacteria into your lungs.
I mean, it just goes on and on, besides the damaging to psychological devastation to our children.
So don't ever put a mask on for any reason again.
But the mass problem was a problem.
Lockdowns.
By the way, we've accepted that term, but we always talk about quarantine and we only in history quarantined the sick, not the well.
How did we get the term lockdown?
That's a term you use for prisoners.
Let's just pay attention to what they're saying.
We are prisoners.
We're being treated like prisoners.
So they did all these things and They made our immune system worse.
And fear, fear and anxiety make your immune system worse.
We know that.
We know there's a psychological component to wellness.
And commuting with God, they shut down the churches.
All these things make your immune system worse.
So anyway, what happens in nature though?
Had they not done this?
Had we been Sweden?
They're Swedish.
They have 1.95 million school children that didn't lock down, that didn't wear masks, that didn't social distance, and didn't miss a day of school in 2020.
Not one of them died of COVID.
What they did is they have great immune systems.
And by the way, their teachers didn't get sick at any higher rate, so they didn't spread it to other people.
Why are we damaging our children in the United States?
Why are we not standing up for our children?
But what normally happens to you and me and all of our children, everybody, we go out in nature and we get involved in other people's lives and we breathe in all sorts of stuff and we are exposed to pathogens and toxins and all sorts of things.
And our bodies learn immunity.
That's what the immune system is for.
So when we learn immunity, we get a few of the copies.
If viruses are what they say they are, and there's some doubt about this when all this washes out, but assuming the old model, We get a few copies of the virus in our nose.
Okay.
And we would are then we would, we would sense it.
We would send out the shock troops.
It's like, okay, send, send a few Marines over there and see if you can knock out those, those, those bad invaders.
Well, in a young person, that's going to be easy because the immune systems on high burn, they send out their immune troops right away.
And it knocks out the thing in your nose and they don't even get sick when they get immune from COVID.
But if you're older and you're slower, you may not be able to stop it at the nose level.
It may get into your lung or something else and you may have to have more treatment.
And then if you're really not doing well with your immune system, it can kill you.
But that's a few copies of the virus that start, get a toehold and then manufacture themselves in your nose and your mucous membranes.
Compare that to when you have no warning and you're given a vaccine that now gives you trillions of copies.
You see the problem?
I mean, it overwhelms the entire system, and that increases the risk of the anaphylaxis like you were talking about, and of course it causes the massive cytokine storm from the macrophages, which cause the body to inflame and lungs to fill with fluid and cause pneumonia.
But let me ask you another question, too.
I'm getting all kinds of questions coming in while you're talking.
One lady is saying, I wonder if you've heard of anything about the widespread itchiness without a rash being a symptom related to the COVID people who are catching from the vaccinated.
Yeah.
Did anyone in the experience experience widespread itching?
What have you heard about that?
Well, you know, the classic example, the classic, this, I got this from Judy Mikovits, the classic response is, I mean, and by say classic, the classic model of viruses, because I'm going to tell you, they may have been lying to us for 40, 50 years about the exact method that viruses, if they exist or not.
So the classic model is that you have, um, your DNA, you have embedded virus DNA in your DNA.
When you take the vaccine, that this stuff may be expressed, and you start, because people
that take the vaccine also are having outbreaks of viral-type illness, shingles, cold sores,
herpes, all sorts of things that are coming out suddenly after the vaccine because their
own immune system isn't dampening it down.
That's why they're getting cancers too.
That can come out of them and go to the victim, the innocent victim that didn't take the vaccine.
That's possible.
The other thing is that the new model is that when you get a rash like this, your body's
toxified with something.
We can call it a virus.
It could happen because your cells are toxic with something.
That's the body's response.
To get rid of things, it gives you diarrhea.
We always thought diarrhea is probably your body trying to expel poisons and toxins and disease.
It is.
Colds and sneezing.
Whenever you get rid of things out of the body, there are only so many places it can go.
It can go out of your urine.
It can go out of your feces.
It can go out of your lungs.
It can go out of your skin sometimes.
That's part of it.
That may be also it.
So they may be getting spike protein, and it could be a combination.
The spike protein probably is what's being shed, but who knows?
The spike protein could come out of them unvaccinated.
You get some of it, and it goes into you, and now your immune system is a little bit dampened for a minute, and your virus has come out.
Who knows?
Also, I heard you say on another interview, because I love watching you on interviews, you were talking about how they had to put something into the injection that would allow your immune system to downregulate so that the spike proteins wouldn't be expelled and your body would start manufacturing them.
And you felt as though that might have increased the risks of cancer, these cancer rates.
Could you go into that a little more detail, please?
Well, I think you hit it right there.
I think it's sad.
They admit that.
The one thing they admit.
See, here's what people need to know.
We don't know what's in this vaccine.
We still don't know.
Most probably people in Pfizer don't know.
It's only the people at the top of the research program know.
And with an emergency use authorization, you've probably seen these pictures.
The bottles go out, the doctors open up the What should be the product information sheet and it's blank and it says on there left blank purposely because they don't have to tell us what's in there during an EUA they only have to tell us the part that is doing the function for which they got approval.
So they could put all sorts of crap in here, excuse my French, but they could put all sorts of junk in here and we wouldn't know it.
And they don't have to tell us.
That is the problem when you allow these people to rush, rush, push, push.
Oh, no time for independent review or analysis.
You know, that's the problem.
This is you get what you pay for content.
Well, so we don't know for sure, but they did admit that they could not, you would normally, you would just reject foreign DNA or foreign RNA.
So to make it, So it actually stays in you long enough to do its job.
They put it in a coating that would make it linger longer and they dumbed down and they added a little bit of genetic material apparently that told your immune system to go to sleep for a little while so they could get it into your machinery.
That's the way I understand it.
Now that explains what we're seeing because Number one, it explains the cancers because, again, you have viral DNA in your DNA and you have cancer DNA in your DNA.
We talk about the junk DNA.
In other words, you have huge genomes.
Humans have lots of genetic material and we only know what a small part of it does.
You know, they call it junk DNA.
Well, it's probably not junk.
It does things, but we just don't know what it does.
But part of that junk DNA is embedded cancer genes in there that you keep under control.
Most people, why do you get cancer at 60 but not at 20?
It's not because your testosterone levels are high, right?
Or your estrogen level.
Oh, you got too much postmenopausal estrogen in your system.
No, the estrogen is higher in a 20-year-old female than it is in a 70-year-old female.
But why is it that 70-year-old gets breast cancer?
Well, her immune system is not as good.
We know about the BRCA genes, for example, for breast cancer.
She cannot keep those controlled. And one of the ways we do it is through methylation.
And this is something again I learned from Judy Mikovits because this
is my field. But she said people will ask, you know, because I asked her, I
said, Are we going to be GMO humans if we take this vaccine? Is that
people are asking me that? And I don't see how RNA can get into your DNA. And
she said, Well, it possibly could, but probably not.
What it's going to do, though, is RNA is a very significant, what they call, epigenetic controller of your DNA.
In other words, when you take this RNA, it controls the function of your DNA in ways that we haven't fully worked out, even in the best of times.
We just know it happens, and we know that part of it is through methylation.
So, this could potentially go in and knot up your DNA, so it's not functional, so you can't reproduce.
It could do all sorts of stuff.
We don't know.
Again, this is untested experimental technology that's been released on the whole world.
You're absolutely right, and you know some of the top researchers have been working on epigenetics now for decades, and they're realizing that the epigenetics basically means that if this generation has this problem that's expressed later in the genome several generations down the genetic tree, I guess as far as your reproduction grandchildren, great-grandchildren, etc.
They don't have any idea what it's going to do.
It's like you said before, you said that this should have been tested.
We should have seen this.
I mean we have a problem now That if you're a grandmother and you're shedding spike proteins and you pick up your granddaughter, is that going to affect the granddaughter, her ability to reproduce?
And the question is, I believe you brought it up this way.
That should have been tested.
We should have seen what was going to happen long-term wise with this, so this doesn't turn into a giant eugenics protocol in which we drop the population of the planet by 7 billion, which is kind of their stated goal anyhow.
So, what's crazy to me is this.
We have these people in these hospitals, and these doctors, people of medicine, and they're using a drug called remdesivir.
And we've done extensive shows on remdesivir, and we know that it causes kidney failure, it causes cascading organ failure.
Why in the world, doc, are they doing this?
Why, Dr. Merritt, are they giving people in the hospitals a standard medical protocol, remdesivir, and they know that it kills them?
Because many doctors are now quitting because they say they're tired of killing people in the ER.
What the heck is going on?
Well, you're exactly right.
But what people need to understand, and I'm the past president of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, that group has been fighting against government-controlled medicine since 1943.
Had they won, we wouldn't be doing this.
This wouldn't be happening.
But this is because There is big money flowing to these hospitals to control them and this is how it worked.
So essentially they're being paid and if they don't take the, when you get paid by somebody you do their bidding.
So what happened is big money from people unknown to me fed through the Rockefeller Foundation, the Gates Foundation and all sorts of foundations to the NIH and specifically to the NIAID part that Tony Fauci has authority over, over the last 40
years he had $800 billion of allocation authority essentially through the NIAID.
That's pretty impressive for a guy that's, you know, one person, I mean no president
of the United States has that.
They have to go through Congress, but not at the NIAID.
They can go through their little boards and you know how that works.
They can distribute this stuff.
He distributed NIH funds, not only to labs.
I heard David Martin estimate about $120 billion went to Spending money to labs all over the world to take genetic material from nature and make it pathogenic, damaging to humans.
Great.
That was one of the things.
But the rest of the money got spent for these big research universities like the one near me.
They won't ever tell you the word hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin, but you have to have remdesivir or they kick you out of the hospital essentially.
So, why is that?
Because all these research facilities overbuilt based on believing they have a steady stream of NIH money.
And then, now, if they have doctors in their employ that are trying to use a hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin, if they don't fire them, they'll lose next year's funding.
You see how this works?
So, Tony Fauci, they want to make him the ultimate bad guy.
He's just the bag man.
He's the guy that took this big, you know, bag man and the mob is the guy who takes the mob boss's money, gives it to the capos, the guys that, I mean, I'm not that versed with the Godfather, but I think this is how it works.
The capos are the people that actually do the job, and if they don't do what the mob boss wants, then the bag man goes out and breaks their legs, you know?
Hey, give the money back.
You didn't do what I told you to do.
Well, Tony Fauci doesn't break their legs, but he goes out and withdraws next year's funding.
And that's known to happen.
So that's why they're not doing the right thing.
And Remdesivir, I'm sure, did you have Brian?
I'm sure you've had Dr. Brian.
Oh, yeah.
Oh, he's been always great.
He's a good friend of mine.
And, you know, he's awesome about Remdesivir.
I mean, I knew it was a bad drug, but I knew it just on a very superficial level.
He just ran that dog into the dirt and just figured out every part about it.
But what he didn't know that I told him, I told him, and I don't think I have it handy here, but I told him the actual, like I told you, MF59 is the lab number for, oh I do have it, MF59 is the lab number for squalene.
Well, GS5734 is the lab number for remdesivir when it was developed at Fort Dietrich, the USAMRIID bioweapons facility that we run.
Wait a minute, wait a minute.
We've got to say that again.
Remdesivir was developed at a bioweapons lab?
Yeah, in our bioweapons lab.
In our bioweapons lab, at Fort Detrick.
So the patent now, I'm not saying, they started the process and people go, it's GS-5734, I got this from somebody.
Unbelievable.
Yeah, I know.
But the patent is owned partially by the NIH.
You know, it's government funding.
The patent's owned by the NIH, and I guess Tony, maybe Tony Fauci personally has some money into this, but whatever.
There's lots of money, and so they really want you to push that.
And I heard, for reasons I don't know, and maybe I heard this from Dr. Artis recently, that see, they bought up all the remdesivir from all the people that nobody else has it.
Why would they do that?
You know, on any other day, they say, oh, we need to take care of those poor Biafrans before we take care of our people.
But now it's like, no, no, no, no, they don't get anything.
If this really worked, You know, what's going on here?
Well, I've got to say something here real quick.
I've got a friend of mine who's in the hospital right now, and I found out yesterday he's doing horrible.
He's doing absolutely horrible.
He's 62 years old.
He has the COVID, and I called him up and I sent him the links.
I sent him Dr. Artis' links.
I sent him all the research showing the kidney and cascading organ failure from demdesivir.
I sent it to him.
I sent it to his wife.
And they tried not to let him get the remdesivir and the hospital gave it to him anyhow.
And he's been on it for five days now and he's almost dead.
His name's Jimmy.
And I'm so angry.
I just found this out, you know, last night.
And so I knew you were coming on today.
The thing that bothers me, and I guess more than anything else, We know that these doctors are being controlled by this NIH money, I guess, but isn't there any type of conscience in these guys?
What's going on with this doc?
That's another point.
My son's still in medical training, so there's a pyramid of things happening here.
So, the people I'm talking about that the NIH and Tony Fauci bought are the people on the top of these universities and these big hospitals that took the research funds and took the other funds.
So, whatever.
They've sold their soul.
We can't save them, but they're usually not the treating physician.
Then on the very bottom, you have the residents, the medical students, the interns, people like that.
Auspices of somebody else.
So I give them a moral pass in all this.
But what we're discussing right now are the people in the middle.
They're out of their training, but they work for hospitals.
This came about 67% I think roughly of doctors were independent of hospitals until Obamacare.
And now they all work for hospitals.
I mean, there are very few independent free market doctors.
So there need to be more.
And that's we're working on that.
But but those are the guys right now.
They're in Germany in 1943, okay?
They are taking the money.
Some of them are soulless.
They just have no conscience.
I mean, listen to that Mayo Clinic cardiologist as she said, she had tweeted out, I just wish these people would go off, these unvaccinated would go off and die because they're clogging up my ICU and taking all the respiratory resources.
Really, we shouldn't be treating these people.
They should stay home.
I just, you know, so here we have a corrupt system filled by consciousness, you know, psychopaths that don't have any empathy for human beings.
What are we talking about here?
There are people like that, but there are also a bunch of people that really know better.
They're stuck.
They're in the hospital, they're working, they've got a paycheck, they've got a mortgage, and kids, and spouse, and they don't want to leave their jobs.
But to them, I say, it's Germany 1943, guys.
And you have to decide, are you going to stay in a hospital that is killing people?
By omission and commission.
Simple omissions.
By not recommending outpatient treatment.
They got on board early on and said, no, no, no, there's no outpatient treatment.
You just have to come in if you got a problem.
Then they turn people away at the door to go die.
Then they don't give them ivermectin, which has clearly been shown to decrease mortality and morbidity.
And so is hydroxychloroquine.
It just happens to be right now that ivermectin seems to be – because you can treat people late with ivermectin.
Hydroxychloroquine is really an early drug.
The reason it works so well, like in Africa, is because they have it over the counter.
They don't have to wait for an appointment with a doctor and all that stuff.
So they get it within – if you get it within 24, 48 hours, you're starting to get sick, it just goes away, whatever you've got.
So, that's early, but the ivermectin is late.
And not only are they not allowed to talk about it or to give it, but they're in a bubble also.
They're in an intellectual bubble where they never hear about the papers and the literature.
Everything's being censored to them.
So, there's some people probably in the hospital that still don't get the word.
I've been trying to feed my son a bunch of stuff, but the problem is you'd be surprised how little filters into those people at the university bubbles.
But the people that know need to get out.
The thing that's so frustrating to me, my sister's an MD and she's also got her doctorate from Harvard, and what's frustrating is she's told me personally, she said that we're taught that we can never admit we're wrong because if we do we're going to have a liability issue.
And the problem with all that is that we're not given current literature because we're only given literature by the manufacturers of the drugs that are doing our updating training.
And so we're caught in a situation that if we don't study on our own and do things on our own, we simply never get exposed to the information that you're talking about.
And I'm sure that's something you found.
But this week I did a little parody in which we had a guy come in acting as Klaus Schwab and he was talking about how we all had to get on the last train to Auschwitz.
And that if you take the vaccine, it doesn't matter if you've gotten on the train or not, because you're already on the train.
I mean, what's going to be the death rate from this, Doc?
I mean, how bad is this going to get within 4, 5, 10, 15 years?
Well, I'm concerned.
I've got to tell you, this cancer is just popping up like, you know, tulips in the spring.
I got to say, we're in real trouble with the cancer rate.
And I think, see, that's the other point about this being the Auschwitz, the German experience.
I studied extensively.
I've got a paper out there, The Lessons of Karl Brandt, which every doctor should read.
I mean, well, anybody should read it, in my opinion.
It's on my website.
But Karl Brandt was the senior medical doctor at the end of the war for Hitler, and he was actually a good guy.
He was really trying his best, but he didn't get out of an immoral system when he should have, because you can't be a good guy in an immoral system at some point, and that's what's happening to these people.
And, oh, you asked me a question.
I got off the subject about it.
Oh, informed consent.
The problem is this cancer thing's going to be bad.
And I think if we, the reason that we hung him and six other doctors after Nuremberg, he didn't personally kill anybody.
He tried to save a lot of people's lives.
He actually operated.
It was a trauma surgery.
He jumped in, did surgery, tried to save people.
But they were hung because they were coercing people to take part in an experiment, i.e.
the prisoners.
In Auschwitz and Birkenau and stuff.
And without informed consent.
Now, what are we doing?
Oh, here's 125,000 extra bonus points on your Starbucks if you get the vaccine.
I love the lap dances in Las Vegas.
That's probably the funniest one.
A joint in Colorado.
Free train ride for the kiddies to get the vaccine.
But now the real coercion is you can't keep your job unless you get your vaccine.
That's coercion.
I mean, that is absolute coercion and not telling them informed consent, like you've got a significantly increased risk of cancer if you take this vaccine.
I mean, I can tell you the numbers really easily.
This is from July, but I looked at a bunch of things like brain tumors.
In 31 years of the VAERS, from 1990 to now, they only reported 263 brain tumors they thought were related to the It's going to be bad.
and that's all vaccines put together, which is an average of eight per year.
We already have 195 reported just for that one tumor.
And then you look at leukemia, it's an average of 48 per year.
We already have 229 reported just for this year.
So it's gonna be bad.
I mean, we're seeing it in young people too.
Active duty people that take the vaccine and now have myocarditis and brain tumors.
I mean, that's a real story.
It's sad, it's terrible.
So that's a big one.
And, you know, uh, you
There's a, Luke Montagnier had that video that kind of went viral for a while, you don't see now, but it's, people said, if you take the vaccine, you'll be dead in three years.
Okay, well, I asked Judy Mikovits about that, and she said, she knows him, she called the office, and his secretary said, no, he didn't really say that, but they censored what he really said.
And what he said is, if you take the vaccine and then wear a mask, you're probably gonna be dead in three years.
Why is that?
Well, because a mask, gives you CO2 retention which increases inflammation which
might trigger this thing.
So he thinks it's a trigger, you can tell. He's a virologist, a Nobel laureate.
So he thinks it's a trigger. He said if you take another vaccine of any kind, it might trigger this
and you'd be dead in three years. So I think he's looking at things like the tumors, like the
antibody-dependent enhancements.
There's multiple factors that can take you down.
I have a thing on my website for people that, you know, a lot of people got snockered.
Let's face it, they didn't have the informed consent, they didn't really know what this was, and they had been command and conditioned over years of taking flu vaccines to just do what the FDA said, CDC said.
Oh, it's that season, this year it's COVID, last year it was flu, but this year you take the COVID vaccine.
Well, if you do that and you have vaccine remorse, if you go to my website, I do have up-to-date, I try to up-to-date it every week, ideas about how we can ameliorate this.
By the way, doctor's website is themedicalrebel.com.
I'll repeat that.
www.themedicalrebel.com.
Also, her telegram channel is freedom slash doc and we'll have all this posted on our Instagram.
We'll also send it out with her information that we sent out to email to a whole bunch of you guys this afternoon.
Now, one other thing I want to talk to the listeners about today because you really understand this about the Gillian Bray and full paralysis and how it's descending paralysis.
Tell us how it starts and how it ends up with you from the vaccine.
Well, I can tell you about the patient I saw and keep in mind, I've been in medicine 45 years.
I studied neurology at the Queen Square Institute of Neurology, which is like the premier neurologic hospital of 800 bed hospital just for neurology patients from all over the world.
I never saw a case of Guillain-Barre back then.
This is 1978.
And then as we had more and more flu vaccine given out, I started hearing more stories or met people that had it, that have resolved.
But here is my first case, okay, of actually seeing it myself in real time.
So a woman develops, she's in her 70s, she's living alone, she's doing fine, she's not sick.
She starts having leg weakness.
She gets admitted to the hospital and now the leg weakness becomes, because after about a week she couldn't take care of herself, daughter couldn't take care of herself, so she goes in the hospital.
At this point, on a Sunday, she tells my colleague that she's got back pain and that she's got leg weakness.
I guess he asked her about the back pain.
She was complaining of leg weakness.
So he calls me because I'm a spine surgeon to see if I could do a consult on her.
This is before I got cancel cultured out of my contract.
But anyway, so I saw her and by the next day, she couldn't open her eyes.
She couldn't open her mouth to talk.
Well, that's what we call ascending paralysis.
It kind of starts at your feet and your toes and works up your legs.
You get weaker and weaker and it kind of moves up your body until you can have what she had, which is called a locked-in syndrome.
Now, some people will recover from this, but we don't know who they will be.
And some people are in complete recovery.
And you're seeing this more and more from this vaccine.
Yeah, again, on average we'd see 130 a year, and in the first six months of this year, we saw 1,430.
Unbelievable.
Dr. Merritt, I want to thank you.
We're about out of time.
I want to thank you from the bottom of my heart for coming on the show.
You've been absolutely as expected.
You've been excellent again.
I just appreciate you so much, and we'll definitely have you back on again.
Guys, I want to thank Dr. Merritt.
Remember, go to her website.
Very, very important.
Dr. Leigh Merritt.
Also, guys, remember this.
You know, we can do all things through Christ who strengthens us.
So we've got to stand the ground right now.
Dr. Merritt was right.
One of the things they did, they made us socially isolate.
They made us basically not go to church anymore.
They took away our spiritual aspect of our lives.
This is all part of it to increase the stress, increase the cortisol, and increase the effectiveness of what they're doing to us as far as killing, I guess, as many people as they want or whatever their goal here is.
I don't know.
But guys, thank you so much for listening today.
Austin, go ahead and finish it up, and we will talk to you guys tomorrow.
God bless you guys.
Absolutely awesome show as always.
And she made a really valid point.
And I remember we brought this up last year.
This was the first time in history that we've ever seen quarantining
of healthy individuals with no symptoms.
Meaning everybody had to stay in their house, locked down, even if you were perfectly healthy, extremely strong and had no problems and no symptoms of anything, you were still locked down.
That was the big, big, big eye-opener for me back then is when I realized, okay, none of this makes sense with what we're doing.
With these measures.
So again, thank you for the continued support.
I want to give everybody a heads up.
We have more of the vitamin C powder, antioxidant, and we have the quercetin plus back in stock.
So be sure to check it out on the website of healthmasters.com.
Thank you again for everything you guys have continued to do.
Thank you for standing up, getting truth, getting freedom out there, and continually, continually just look at what's happening.
And ask questions to what's going on, because that is one of the most important, most effective things we can all do right now, is ask questions.
Not just blindly consent to something because somebody tells you to do so.
That doesn't mean you have to be all the time militant about something, but when somebody starts telling you you need to go get a gene therapy, experimental injection, or you're not going to be able to do this or do that, Got to kind of ask yourself, is it really about your health or is it about compliance?
Thank you again for the support.
You guys have a blessed, safe, awesome night.
And we'll talk to you again tomorrow as always.
Good night.
Broadcasting to the U.S.
and around the world by way of clear digital audio.
22,500 miles above the planet.
▲
Export Selection