All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 15, 2021 - Jim Fetzer
52:39
We are in a Global Revolution | The Richard Dolan Show
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hi, everyone.
Welcome to the Richard Dolan Show, where every week we fight the good fight.
Every week that I'm here, that is.
You'll notice the new digs, new environment.
I'm trying a new room out.
You let me know what you think.
I want something clean, simple.
Here we go.
Now, before I get started on my theme for tonight, I'll just mention that tomorrow night, that's Wednesday, September 15th, I'll be on Fade to Black with Jimmy Church.
And for those of you who have been following the controversy of the famous, infamous Davis-Wilson notes, I'll be talking about that at great length and in as much depth as I can bring to the topic tomorrow.
And you will not want to miss that.
I'll have a lot to say about that.
So that's a big UFO-related controversy, as some of you know.
And if you don't know, you may want to check it out anyway.
That'll be on Fade to Black.
I'll have that link from my website also at richarddolandmembers.com.
Okay.
I want to talk about the main issue here, which is what I call the global revolution.
In fact, a few weeks ago, I did like a special podcast for members of my website.
over at Richard Olin Members, on what can only be called the global revolution.
I did that about two weeks ago and then came the 20th anniversary of 9-11, which of course prompted all of us to do yet more reflection on the sorry state of our world.
And the thing is, when you look over these last 20 years, well, I mean, can you see just how far down a dark road we've gone?
So let me talk about 9-11 first.
You know, this used to be something that I went over many, many times in the early years.
I mean, how could you not?
9-11 changed everything, and we all knew it.
I think after about a year and a half is when I started to go down that rabbit hole, like a lot of other people.
I wasn't, by any means, the first.
There were a lot of people who came after me, but there were a lot who came before me.
For me, it was the researcher David Ray Griffin who started me out on that, especially his book called The New Pearl Harbor.
Great book on that.
Asked a lot of very important questions.
Didn't have a lot of answers, but he had good questions.
And yeah, so from that point, I spent a tremendous amount of time on 9-11 for quite a few years.
I think for many of us who had that experience, 9-11 was the ultimate radicalizing element in our education.
It was for me.
That and UFOs.
But with 9-11, there were just so many things that were wrong.
And actually, before I get into some of those things, because I will, you know, the things that don't make any sense when you when you look into it.
But all of those anomalies don't seem ever to get a hearing anymore.
If you've noticed, like even in so-called alternative media, it's gotten to the point at which, well, let's just say it has the 9-11 inside job community, the 9-11 truth hearers.
Have they just been completely silenced now?
I mean, I'm sure they haven't been, but it seems to me that in a large measure they actually have been.
It has been 20 years now that we've been in this post-911 nightmare.
And, I mean, you know, you've got the millennial generation and Gen Z, they like to think of themselves as alternative.
I'm not seeing a lot in the way of questioning what actually happened that day.
Now, I'm told that there's a group out there that they I don't have my finger on the entire pulse of the internet, so I will admit there's probably a lot that I'm missing.
But it does seem to me that with what passes for our general culture in which we have discourse, 9-11 has been totally buried by the establishment.
I mean, even more than it was 10 years ago, and it was pretty bad 10 years ago.
And I think that the model for burying the truth is pretty simple.
It's pretty straightforward.
You use overwhelming propaganda dominance.
That's it.
I think it's that simple.
You just bludgeon the public with a single unified message that allows for no alternative conclusions ever to enter the public discourse.
Turns out it works really well.
So with 9-11, you know, when you think back, for those of us who remember this, I certainly do, the media onslaught started, like, it was right away.
It was right away.
These massive media organizations telling people just how the whole thing went down.
Right away.
Right away.
With a nearly full story ready to go out, right?
They did this despite an enormous number of discrepancies and an enormous number of just genuinely puzzling questions about what happened that day.
We can start with New York City.
Why not?
You got the two aircraft that were You know, I mean, there are people who said there's no aircraft, but let's just say two aircraft slamming into the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center.
All right.
So on that day, you got cell phone calls.
Made from the air, that should never have been possible, and which experts actually did study this and made that exact conclusion.
Not possible.
Try it yourself sometime.
I used to do this back in the day.
You weren't supposed to take your phone off of airplane mode, but I did it all the time when I flew, and I flew a lot.
I would always try to get a cell signal.
You cannot do it.
It's not possible.
I love the one in which the guy calls his mother using his first and last name to introduce himself on the phone.
Like, yeah, that happened.
That's totally believable.
Then the planes hit, and in both cases, alright?
In both cases, the impact soon leads to catastrophic collapse and not just collapse, disintegration of the buildings.
Despite the fact that both of the aircraft hit the buildings fairly high up and all that steel and all that concrete just disintegrating before our eyes into a big pile of dust.
Dust.
Oh yes, and at free fall speed.
So at the speed of a brick falling through the air is when the roof hit the ground, you're going to drop the brick at the same, it would have hit the same time.
No resistance from 100 stories of steel and cement in both cases.
Yeah, that's not suspicious at all.
And then of course, the true elephant in the room is Building 7.
It's 47 stories tall.
It was hit by no aircraft.
Nothing hit it.
It's across the street from the rest of the complex.
Comes down at free fall speed later that afternoon.
The roof bends slightly like this.
Why?
And the building just collapses into a disintegrated pile of dust and rubble.
Yeah, it makes perfect sense.
No one ever explained that one, by the way.
Not the 9-11 Commission.
I mean, they tried, lamely, to explain the two main towers.
That was BS.
But Building 7, it's like, why even bother?
You can't.
And then you got the Pentagon.
So there's a story.
I love reviewing this one back in the day.
So you have Hanyin Jor.
He's the lead hijacker.
There's three guys who took that one over, we're told.
He was like five foot seven, weighed 140 pounds, soaking wet.
All right, so with his two accomplishments, he hijacks accomplices.
He hijacks the flight out of DC.
They're about 500 miles out when they decide to take over.
So what does he have?
He has a box cutter knife.
And with that he takes out the two pilots.
One of those pilots, I saw a picture of this guy, he was six foot two, former fighter pilot.
This is not a guy you would trifle with.
All right, but somehow this guy with a box cutter knife.
I remembered reading a statement by one of the Uh, colleagues of that pilot who said, I don't know why this guy just didn't do a simple barrel roll when the plane was hijacked.
A simple thing to do.
Everyone knows how to do it.
Yeah, good question.
Indeed.
There's also an emergency button that was right there.
That wasn't pushed.
They just politely, kindly get out of their seats.
And this guy, he takes over the plane 500 miles away, going the wrong way above the clouds.
Douglas Goldstein, CFP®, is the director of Profile Investment Services and the host of the Goldstein on Gelt radio show.
He is a licensed financial professional both in the U.S.
and Israel.
Securities offered through Portfolio Resources Group, Inc., Member FINRA, SIPC, MSRB, NFA, SIFMA.
a lot, but he nails it because he's that good, even though he flunked a little test a week
before to fly a little puddle jumper Cessna.
Couldn't do that, but now he's flying this thing.
He then makes the most daredevil looping maneuver as he approaches.
Traffic controllers who track this thought, oh, this has to be a jet pilot, a jet fighter
coming in because this is like one hell of a maneuver.
Wind coming at a mile distance level, about 20 feet altitude at 400 miles per hour, an
impossibility by the way for that type of aircraft because there's an effect on this
wind sheeting in which a commercial airliner is either going to go up or down when it's
flying that fast, that low.
But something flew that low because it sheared off the tops of the lights in that area for about a mile coming in.
So you explain that and then it somehow turns into a missile because bullet-like as if it's got depleted uranium at the tip or whatever it punctures Six, this is, it would be comical if it wasn't so tragic, six reinforced steel and concrete reinforced walls of the Pentagon, three rings.
And we know this because we have a photograph of the sixth wall, the third ring, where there's an eight foot wall, this is punch out, someone spray painted it over it.
So that hollow fuselage of an aircraft is going to do that.
Yeah, that makes perfect sense, doesn't it?
Like, we're basically, we're being told to believe that this hollow tube was strong enough and dense enough to puncture all of those levels of concrete and steel, you know.
Oh yeah, and of course, let me go back to New York City, because I just remembered, you got the pristine terrorist passports found in the streets of Lower Manhattan, or at least one of them, amid the debris.
Yeah, thanks for that bit of evidence.
You know, I mean, just ridiculous.
And then you go to Shanksville, Pennsylvania, So in the case of New York City and DC, those aircraft were powerful enough and dense enough to go and just crush and destroy on impact those powerful buildings, right?
But the one in Shanksville, same type of aircraft, just disintegrates.
Where is that plane?
No one's ever seen it.
You have one picture of a sheriff and his deputies looking at a hole in the ground with, where's the plane?
Where's the people?
Where's all the stuff?
Never seen it.
Did it just completely disintegrate on impact?
If that did, then why did the other planes not disintegrate when they slammed into the Pentagon, for God's sake, or even the World Trade Center?
Yeah, it's, you know, these are questions that are legitimate questions that we were not allowed to get into the public domain because that was conspiracy theorizing and that's considered wrong.
And you know, you could just keep going on this, you know.
Let's not forget the beyond inexplicable non-response of the United States Air Defense that day.
I mean, that's just, that's inexplicable.
Right?
That's beyond inexplicable.
For decades, for 40 years prior to that, there had been specific procedures in place to deal with hijacked airliners, which, by the way, were changed in June of 01 by Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld.
So, none of those procedures were implemented that day, and so on and on and on and on and on.
All right?
And none or basically none of those or countless other discrepancies, I just gave a sliver here, okay?
There's much more.
Those discrepancies about 9-11, none of them ever got a fair mainstream audience.
I mean, honestly, we can complain about this, but how could the mainstream establishment corporate politically controlled media ever?
You've got a media that's totally captured by the intelligence and financial community.
It was and is an essential tool of public control.
You can't have a mainstream corporate controlled media empire sanctioning questions about one of the most important events in modern history.
Can you imagine what would have happened?
This is an event that prompted a worldwide national security revolution at the time.
So, can you imagine two years into that, some person in the mainstream media is like, wow, you know, the argument for some inside job with 9-11 is a pretty good argument.
Yeah, they've already, the whole world has been, was committed The elites of our world, I should say, were committed to hosing the world public on this.
Like, they couldn't go back.
They could not go back and they could not allow their controlled media ever to ask questions.
And this is why we've been in this enforced fictional reality ever since.
You know, you are expected to just be lied to and you're expected to accept the lie as if, yeah, no big deal.
You know, the event that transformed our world and began the process of stripping our rights away, which is continuing and accelerating now, and I will get into that in a moment.
But we're just supposed to roll over and just, you know, and just take it.
You know, back in the aftermath of 9-11, I argued that That 9-11 was seen as necessary by our global elites for several reasons.
And yeah, we do have global elites.
Like, we have them.
They meet at Davos.
They meet at the annual Bilderberg meetings.
Like, they exist.
No one elected them.
They've got the money.
They've got the power.
They're the puppet masters.
They run the show.
And they decide our fate.
They do.
All right.
But anyway, so they decided that 9-11 had to happen.
Why?
Well, this is what I believe why.
I think the main reason being that they realized, okay, that we are moving into a digital age that they believed allowed for, and actually required, greater control over people.
Not less control.
Greater.
The internet was promoted as this free platform back in the 1990s when it was still new, but that's not what these crazy futurist visionaries really wanted.
The people who think they're running our world, who are running our world, what they have wanted Always what they want, even before the internet, they wanted to implement a global system of population control.
They want to do this for decades.
And by population control, I'm not just talking like depopulation.
I mean, maybe.
But just control over the human population.
Like, absolutely.
Absolutely.
Since the end of the Cold War in the early 1990s, which that coincided with the spread of the internet, okay?
So you have these two major things happening in the 1990s and that allowed for the emergence of a new world of possibilities for them.
Do not ever doubt the ambition of crazed futurists who truly believe in remaking human civilization and the human race itself to conform with their own Frankenstein-like visions of perfection as they see it.
Ultimately, they truly believe That there is too much freedom in this world.
They believed it then, they believe it now.
And that first decade of the internet, those 1990s, that was a wild decade when you look back on it.
That was really the birth of alternative culture and alternative news.
And it posed a genuine threat to the control of that world of theirs.
You know, the old world.
I'm not one of these people who believe that the Internet was always designed to control the world population.
I think it was early on decided that it must be used for that.
But I do believe that the Internet was one of these things that was not fully predictable and in which it got out and it became clear even by the late 1980s that this was a realm of tremendous freedom.
And it became impossible, not impossible, it became difficult to get back under control.
And I believe that ever since, the attempt has been made, and is more and more successful, to get that internet under control.
Back in the 90s, though, it was different.
Remember, there's the media analyst Marshall McLuhan, he famously said, the medium is the message.
Remember that?
Yeah.
Well, in the 90s, the medium was free, and the message was freedom.
Now in retrospect, it's not hard to see how that threat would have to be dealt with.
The problem is, freedom of the internet was a huge thing and the genie, you just can't put the genie back in the bottle like that and just snap your fingers.
Can't happen.
It takes time.
9-11 provided a huge impetus toward that end of controlling the internet.
In other words, using the digital age for purposes of social and population control, rather than for the expression of human freedom.
In hindsight, we look back, it's very easy to see this now.
That's been the goal.
It's always been the goal.
Control the population.
But getting control over it has been like almost trying to wrestle a big, powerful, cumbersome bear.
It's not easy to wrestle to the ground, but over time, that has clearly been happening.
So, yes, 9-11 had to happen from their point of view, because it was the pretext to the first global revolution.
I'll call it the first global revolution.
The thing is, I suspect many of us, or at least some of us, may not have expected 9-11 to be a dress rehearsal for something bigger, right?
I mean, after all, at the time, 9-11 was world-changing, and it seemed like that was the main stage, like everything led up to that.
And in fact, it's true.
Everything did lead up to 9-11, but what Might have been hard for some of us to imagine 20 years ago, is that it in turn was going definitively to lead to something else.
Maybe by a number of years ago, a lot of us are starting to see the writing on the wall.
That's true.
But 9-11, yes, it is now, we can say, a dress rehearsal.
It was a dress rehearsal I mean, look, yes, it broke the back of the old US Constitution, or you could say it severely damaged it.
You know, we got the perfidious USA Patriot Act immediately after it.
We got the never-ending renewals of the National Defense Authorization Act, the NDAA, that have codified this permanent expansion of state power over citizens.
That's in the United States.
But versions of this state-sponsored revolution went on in nations around the world, even though they were not affected by a terrorist attack on 9-11.
But they decided, hey, US is doing it.
Seems like a pretty damn good idea.
Let's do the same thing.
We'll control our population as well.
And you saw this happen worldwide, led by the US example.
That's international coordination there.
That's not an accident.
And the other thing I'll say before I get to COVID, 9-11 brought about a transformation of the American psyche.
I'll say the world psyche, but I'm an American.
I live in America.
I know America.
And it transformed the American psyche.
And we consented to surrender our liberties.
And in doing that, we surrendered the higher ground.
We consented to having our civil liberties policed in the name of, don't hurt us.
That's what it was.
It was the name of, don't hurt us.
Threat level orange.
It was this internalization of terror in the American psyche.
That's what they did to us, and we were too scared to fight.
It's like the whole country, the whole world retreated into this fetal position while our drones anonymously took out innocent civilians in Iraq and Afghanistan in the name of freedom.
Yeah, that was a great idea.
So yeah, we thought 9-11 was the main event at the time, but it turned out it's just a dress rehearsal for our current global revolution.
Here we are.
The thing is that 9-11 wasn't enough.
It wasn't enough to take us all the way into this dystopian Orwellian totalitarian control.
We needed more.
Ultimately, in America, 9-11 couldn't be enough because, I mean, the fact is Muslims were never going to serve as the ultimate boogeyman.
There just aren't enough in this country.
Maybe in Europe you want to go, but not in America.
Like, you couldn't do it.
It's not credible.
Never was credible for the long term.
So a new enemy had to be in the works.
New enemy had to be in the works.
Now, the main long-term enemy looks like it's going to just be a huge part of the American population itself.
You know, you've got the insurrectionists, which are now going to be the justification for everything that follows.
Everything that follows.
That's going to be the justification.
All right?
And I'm just going to say that was never an insurrection.
You're never going to get me to agree with that.
But that's going to be the very useful bogeyman.
Dan, long term.
But for right now, an even more useful boogeyman's been the virus.
It's been COVID.
Wow, has that been effective.
Now look, I know people have gotten sick from the virus, all right?
And I know that people have died from this virus.
We all have had family members affected by this.
You have and I have, all right?
But of course, diseases and crises have affected our civilization since we have first had civilization.
This is nothing new.
And moreover, the actual deaths and sicknesses from this pandemic do not compare with the countless examples from our past, not just pandemics, but global crises, including the not so distant past.
In no previous crisis of human history have we seen examples of entire nations shutting down their society.
For any comparable threat.
There are no examples of this.
Look at Soviet Russia and Nazi Germany and Communist China.
They did vastly more horrific things.
Yes.
They murdered millions of people.
Yes.
But even they did not shut down their societies at the scale and to the extent that we have done over the last year and a half.
There is literally no historical example of this.
Maybe the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia.
I mean, okay.
But to 100% of their society.
It's just not happened.
It has not happened until the last year and a half.
The level of population control in, say, Australia is higher than any example that I think anyone can throw at us historically.
Try!
Try to outdo what Australia is doing right now.
So the virus is a perfect tool for implementing a global revolution.
Let me just say, the real virus we have to worry about isn't COVID.
The virus is fear.
You want something to worry about, it's fear.
And, you know, you're being told that the cure to that virus of fear is just to surrender to totalitarianism.
So what I want to do is review some of the key points of commonality that we are seeing today that lines up with some of the worst totalitarian revolutions of the 20th century.
This is what I did do for my website a couple of weeks ago.
Everything that I've just done up till now, that was all new.
What I'm about to go over, I have discussed with members of my site, although I've got some slides I'm going to share with you, make it a little easier to follow along.
Now look, not everything that we are experiencing today lines up, of course, with what Stalin and Hitler and Mao did.
Obviously not.
But a lot lines up.
Too much lines up.
So let me talk about where we are now.
You know, Tracy Chapman, who I'm a big fan of, like 30 years ago, had a great song called Talking About a Revolution.
It's a cool song, but that's not the revolution that we're talking about here, right?
This is a global revolution sponsored not by the people, but it's sponsored by the global elites that truly run this world.
It's important It is important to state this, that we are living in the midst of a genuine revolution.
No one, you don't hear this being said very much, but it is very important to understand we're living in it now.
This is a revolution.
This is what a revolution looks like.
But the thing is, there's more than one kind of revolution, and this is sometimes what confuses people.
So you've got popular revolutions, like the French Revolution, or the American Revolution, or other revolutions that are ground-up phenomena in which you switch out governments or you threaten the existing form of government.
Yes, that's the kind that get written about in history books.
Those are revolutions.
But there is another kind of revolution.
There are state-sponsored revolutions.
All right, analysts will often or sometimes have referred to them as revolution from above.
You think of the Nazi seizure of power as a classic example, but it's not limited to them.
The Bolsheviks twice in my view, the Bolshevik revolution 1917-18 was one example of a revolution from above and then Stalin in the late 20s early 30s implemented a dramatic revolution from above.
Mao did many of the same things at different times in his career, particularly noteworthy was the Cultural Revolution of the 1960s, 1966 onward.
That was revolution from above, in which of course they manipulated mob psychology to work for them, but that was revolution manipulated from above.
There's a lot of these examples.
Those are national examples.
Since 9-11, most of the world's national governments have been engaged in a slow and steady power grab over their populations that cannot be described in any other way than as a state-sponsored revolution.
The big difference is, it's very simple, there's two big differences that I can think of.
A, no one's calling it by what it is, revolution, and B, it's a slower and it's often a less dramatic process than many of the revolutions of the 20th century.
That's true.
All right?
Like you think of the Bolsheviks of 1917.
You think of the Italian fascists of the early 20s.
You think of the Nazis of the 30s, or the Chinese communists of the 40s and 50s, and a lot of these others.
What you see in those are mostly men with guns who engaged in, like, mass executions, forced displacement of entire populations.
Basically, they put the revolution in your face.
They told you it was a revolution.
People are like, yep, this is a revolution.
And that's how it's described in history books.
And that's not happening this time.
Like that level of violence.
No, that's not happening.
Not not what those nations experience.
No.
All right.
And so I think people are sometimes inclined to miss it.
Now, actually, I do think a lot of people do see this clearly enough.
I think a lot of you listening probably do.
So let's just say the chattering classes, the dumb, dumb journalists, media personalities who are working for the establishment that's pushing this all through.
They, of course, never state the obvious, but this is what is happening.
Anyway, when I did this a few weeks ago for my site, I tried to compare what's happening today with some of these national revolutions of the past.
I'm going to share a couple of slides that I just put together today, just discussing what are some of the main changes we've been dealing with for the past 18 months.
Let me pull this up.
I didn't go through any of my library, I didn't go through any books when I put this together.
This is just my own thoughts on what you see with the classic totalitarian revolutions.
I came to four, basically.
I will gladly want to know what some of you think I'm missing.
I'm probably missing, I may be missing something totally obvious.
Put it down in the comments or in the chat, whatever.
But a massive expansion of state power, that's a no-brainer.
2.
Definite control over information.
which I'm lumping together with psychological warfare. It's kind of the same thing. It's like
3.
controlling your mind. It's getting into your head and controlling the information that comes to you.
Three, destruction of the individual. Very important. And then four, money, money, money.
Wealth transfer to the top and the ensuing loss of economic freedom for a lot of other people.
Not for everyone.
There's always winners as well as losers in that, but yeah.
So let me go through each one of those one at a time.
So let's talk about the expansion of state power.
You've got Honestly, I just tossed this off.
There's so much I know I'm missing here.
But the travel restrictions, domestic and international, I mean, that's right out of a totalitarian playbook.
All right, right out of it.
Overt GPS and tracking population.
I mean, everyone by now has heard of the nasty Australian law that's got you tracked to within a mile or two of your home.
And when you fail to, they call your phone, they contact your phone, they message you, and you've got to face recognition to prove to them that you are near your home.
And they're just doing this?
That's just one example.
I read an article where Italian beaches, they're putting in drones to monitor your temperature, I don't know how they can do this, on the beach so that you don't have a fever.
Remotely.
Like, okay.
Is that true?
I read this.
Insanity.
If that's not true, then something else is going to be true.
Like the tracking of the population is out of control.
It's beyond anything we could have imagined two years ago.
Radical expansion of police powers in every way, shape and form.
I'm not even going to go into these details.
We all know this is happening.
And then the vaccines.
It's one thing to be pro or anti-vaccination, but when you are forcing or legally coercing or economically coercing people to get a needle jabbed into their arm, With significant legal and financial repercussions over someone's freedom of conscience, that's totalitarianism.
There's no way to get around that.
You want to justify it in the name of safety, be my guest, but know what you're doing and you're choosing safety over freedom.
And that is the first, by the way, that's one of the popular things that totalitarian regimes always do, which I'll get to that in a moment, safety over freedom.
I don't know if I wrote that here or later.
Slide, but that's a big thing.
Let me talk about information control and psych warfare These are just again a few things that I I just thought of Emphasize emphasis of the group over the individual.
Oh, yeah, and here we go safety over freedom Absolutely get inside your head.
It's all about the group not about the individual It's all about safety not about freedom You know there was once upon a time When, at least in America, we were proud of our heritage of freedom.
Do you, like, remember this?
I remember that.
We were proud of being free.
And it wasn't just Americans.
It was the Western tradition.
It was Canadians.
It was Aussies.
It was the French.
It was the Brits.
It was everyone in Europe.
It was a lot of other people.
They were proud of being free.
We used to have the expression, question authority.
Yeah.
All right.
So what happens is when you get a psychological warfare campaign against you that says, you don't matter.
It's all about the group.
Your freedom doesn't matter.
It's all about safety.
Yeah.
You better get be very careful and get ready to run because that's that's a bad sign.
All right.
Another thing.
Censorship.
No-brainer.
That's obvious.
We see that all around us everywhere.
I am quite sure YouTube's going to go wave the finger-wagging, you know, Schoolmarm Nanny sanctimonious safety thing at me and probably demonetize or who knows, maybe they'll pull this.
Whatever.
I don't care anymore.
I've stopped caring.
That's the truth.
This is too much.
It's too much.
And, you know, we just have to defend.
We've got to defend this freedom that we have, which is such a precious gift.
Let me go on.
Attack on dissenters, including academicians and intellectuals.
You see this in all totalitarian regimes, and we're seeing it here.
You know, we see it with the person on the street, the center, but you also see it with some of the most elite, intellectual, responsible people out there, and they're getting slammed.
They're getting deplatformed.
They're getting silenced.
They're getting their careers often destroyed by not getting in line with the evisceration of their rights and of your rights.
That's right.
The creation of a climate of fear, fear, fear, fear.
That's not just the government.
That's the government working closely with the media, which lives and thrives on your fear.
They want you to be afraid.
And totalitarian regimes want to frighten you because where do you go running for protection?
You go running to the state for protection, obviously.
And here I mentioned the state collaboration with corporate and media to propagandize the population.
That's a straight up totalitarian tactic and we are seeing that globally.
We're seeing governments and major media hand in glove working together to get into your head and to change your opinions if you don't have the right opinions.
And to demonize you and dehumanize you all dissenters and the creation of domestic enemies.
We're seeing that.
That's very important to fascist and communist totalitarian governments.
Very important.
You've got to have you have to have an ongoing domestic enemy so that you've got a reason to slam down that lid on people if you want to control them.
And here's something that we don't talk about enough as well, but this is very important.
The creation of learned helplessness and what's called the bystander effect.
In other words, you know, it's very easy when you see all of this awful stuff coming at us, right?
How do people, how do so many people react?
They don't know how to react.
It's understandable.
They throw up their hands like, this is, this is just messed up.
What do I do?
They don't know what to do.
It's understandable.
I get it.
Some people will drink.
They'll do drugs.
They'll play video games.
They'll just zone out.
They'll zone out with whatever because thinking about the truth that's in front of you is too painful.
It's too difficult.
It's too scary.
So it's a lot easier, you just retreat.
Now the problem with that, like it's understandable, but the problem with that is that it allows for what is happening to go unimpeded and it makes it easier for them.
And it makes it harder for you then finally to switch gears and to go into resistance mode, like real resistance, not hashtag resistance, but like the real thing.
I'm going to talk about that before I wrap this up.
And then the slogans.
You know, you see this with false flags, you see this with totalitarianisms.
Now it's, you know, trust the science.
The old one was flatten the curve.
That didn't last too long.
But slogans are big.
Slogans don't just happen out of the blue, by the way.
All right?
They sound like they come from a Madison Avenue boardroom for a reason, because they come out of very, very intelligent meetings where people figure this stuff out and they throw those slogans out there, because they're very effective for population manipulation and mind control.
All right?
So that's information control and psych warfare.
I'm sure they're missing a lot.
Then let's talk about the destruction of the individual.
That means the destruction of you and me.
How do they do that?
Well, a lot of totalitarian regimes have done this.
You shut down social life and social activities.
That's one very critical way.
You separate people.
You keep them isolated.
You keep them atomized from each other so they don't talk to each other eye-to-eye, face-to-face, don't shake hands.
You don't deal with other human beings the way that you're supposed to deal with them, which is in person.
You separate it out.
In your own little living room, in front of your own little laptop, in your own little device.
Yeah.
That's what they do.
You know, closing off a huge number of businesses and public spaces.
You know, as a way to atomize people, to keep us separate.
You know?
Then there's the masking.
Can we please have enough of this nonsense?
There is no reason on earth, there is no science, there is no logic to saying you're out in the middle of a sunny day and you got a mask on your face.
Where is your science?
Why?
Why are you doing this?
Are you making a political statement like, I'm here to support the regime?
That's what it seems like.
There's zero science to support that position.
It's sunshine.
The virus doesn't like sunshine.
We all know this.
The virus doesn't like fresh air.
We all know this.
Why are you wearing a mask in the middle of a sunny day in the parking lot when you come out or go in or not even going into a store?
You're walking on the sidewalk and you're just walking.
You got a mask on your face when the sun is shining?
And you're doing this to your kid?
Think about the psychological harm that is being done to young people.
They're going into these schools.
They don't need these masks.
They're wearing these masks in school.
Child needs to have eye contact and needs to be able to read a human face for proper psychological development.
Or you're gonna mess this kid up!
Like, that's how we're designed.
We're designed to read other people.
We're designed to have eye contact.
And we are destroying, there will be a day, and there will be a day, you mark my words, when we look back at the criminal, the criminality of what we've done to this entire generation of young people.
Yeah.
That's for the future.
Hopefully not too distant a future.
The thing is, when you isolate and psychologically damage an entire population, it's a lot easier to control them.
It's a lot easier to control them.
So, yes, destruction of the individual.
I'm sure I'm leaving things out here.
Further comments in below, I'd like to know.
And finally, and again, I'm skimming the surface here, alright?
I'm skimming the surface.
Wealth transfer and the loss of economic freedom.
Yeah, this is a very significant thing that you see with totalitarian revolutions.
They create or they make worse economic precariousness and uncertainty.
Not all of them, but many of them have done this, particularly the communist ones where you get Stalin, you got Mao.
My God, they just wreaked havoc on the countryside, destroyed the economic livelihood Of millions and millions of people who are just scraping by like, you know, making a living and that was destroyed.
That was destroyed.
You create a society of economic uncertainty.
All right.
And that plays into their hands.
That actually does.
Because when you have such economic destruction, that means you could transfer money from those people to your criminal buddies who are running the country with you.
Or in this case on Wall Street or wherever, you know, with what's going on now, you have economic or the big tech to Amazon.
Amazon's made a fortune on this pandemic.
Google has made a fortune on this pandemic, all big tech, all the major corporations, you know, who's lost out all the small businesses, all the mom and pops that were out there actually supporting this society.
And the true foundation of freedom was always in the small business.
We can talk about freedom of speech.
That's critical.
We need that.
But what people forget is economic freedom.
They forget just how fundamental that is.
That is every bit as important as freedom of speech, frankly.
Because if you do not have the freedom to decide your own financial future, then what good is anything else?
You know, you're just a slave.
You're just a serf.
That's what you are.
And that was most of human society until a little over 200 years ago.
And we developed a society based on economic freedom.
We got lucky.
We created an amazing world as a result of that.
But that was all on the backs of small business.
And those are being destroyed.
The estimate that I keep hearing is that 50% of all the businesses that have gone that have shuttered their doors during the pandemic will probably not reopen.
And maybe more than half will, but a lot are going to be lost.
And who do you think is going to win?
It's the major economic powers, obviously, that are going to win out, the major economic entities.
So that's what we're seeing.
The reason we get confused by this, and the reason we don't all understand, is Because when we think of totalitarian, we think of fascism, we think of the 1930s, we think of Hitler, we think of the brown shirts and the parades and the flags.
It doesn't work like that anymore.
That's not what fascism or totalitarian communism is going to look like.
It doesn't look like Stalin.
It doesn't look like Hitler.
It's not going to look like now.
We're not in those worlds anymore.
We're not in the 1930s and 40s.
We're in the 21st century.
The world is going to look different.
All right?
But here's the thing.
The endgame with all totalitarian revolutions is the acquisition of centralized power for a small elite.
That's in common.
That's all of them.
All right?
They take control over the levers of state power.
They are unwilling to stand criticism and dissent.
That's all common and we are seeing that here just as people saw it in the 1930s.
So I mentioned one difference is that it's less violent.
Okay, it's less overtly violent.
You don't see the guys with the guns breaking into people's homes, maybe yet.
You could see it.
I'll tell you why in a moment.
But we're not seeing that now.
But the big, the breathtaking difference between what we are seeing now and the national revolutions of the 20th century is in one word.
Global.
It is global.
This is a worldwide revolutionary moment.
All right?
This has never happened before.
Even the 9-11 revolution was not as significant as what we're seeing now.
9-11 was practice, like a dry run.
So there was coordination with national laws, Uh, being enacted after 9-11.
Yes, that's right.
All right.
Uh, but what we're seeing now is, I mean, you look at, uh, you know, where is the coordination coming from?
I look at the British Commonwealth nations.
So you got UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand.
Good Lord!
Those four countries are an abomination now.
They are, what other word can you say?
The English speak, the wealthy English speaking world was always The, you know, they consider themselves and others look to them as the leaders of freedom in the world, along with France.
We'll throw France in there because they had their revolutions.
And France isn't exactly the same thing.
You got these four Commonwealth nations, UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand.
What is going on with them?
They are trying to outdo each other in going full on totalitarian.
Australia is winning.
But Canada is doing everything possible to stay in the running, as is New Zealand, as is the UK.
You're going to tell me that there's no coordination there?
And France, and all the others, and the US.
The only reason the US is not quite in the lead is because we have a federal system by which we've got states that are, some of them are resisting all of this.
It's the only reason.
All right.
And we have a Bill of Rights.
We have a Constitution in the United States that actually has enshrined the rights of people to enough of an extent that it's more difficult to erode them because they are enshrined in our history, in our tradition, because we fought a revolution to get those rights.
So it's a little more difficult, but it's happening here too.
But where did the coordination come from?
I mean, It's not that difficult to figure this out.
World Economic Forum, Davos, Klaus Schwab, the whole Great Reset.
Like, that's not a conspiracy theory.
We know this is not a conspiracy theory.
This is real.
There is a Great Reset going on.
They're talking about it.
They're open about it.
So there's Davos.
There's the Bilderberg meetings.
Don't forget those.
This is the unelected masters of our universe.
They run the show.
All right?
So, The most important thing here is that you've got a small group of people who get together behind closed doors, who plan our demise and our control.
You know, it's COVID today, but it's really not COVID.
It's the vaccine today, but it's not the vaccine.
It's not anything specific.
You know what it's about?
It's about our surrender.
That's what this is about.
It takes, it just takes one generation.
One generation to strip away our societal knowledge, our cultural heritage.
Doesn't take much.
You know, since the internet has started, right, people have been getting rid of books, all hard copies going away.
Everything's gone digital.
We delete, we delete, we delete.
We deleted our humanities, which is literally the thing that's humanized us.
Those are gone.
You know, so many millions of people are living online.
What if, what if that goes away?
It can now.
The control, the ability exists.
And if it doesn't go away totally, it can just be managed.
It can be rewritten, just like in 1984.
And just rewrite the past, which we see going on anyway.
And I remember Eisenhower's great farewell speech, you know, where he talks about the dangers of a military-industrial complex and the dangers to democratic Democratic life, democratic dream.
What would Ike say or think if he saw the dystopia, the hellscape that we are creating for ourselves in this world, the destruction of that freedom that I know he cherished, that he believed in?
What would he think?
what would he think? Well, you know, with all of that, we have to, you have to, and I have to keep our chin up.
up.
Why?
Well, the most important gift we have is free will.
You have free will.
You have the right to the sanctity of your own conscience.
Don't give it up.
Value your freedom.
Reject passivity.
Continue to question authority, especially now.
And remember, totalitarianism thrives when the opposition is died down.
This is historically true.
This is a historical fact.
The day that everyone stops fighting for their freedom is the day that measures become even more draconian.
This happened famously in the Soviet Union under Stalin.
Stalin finally didn't eliminate all of his domestic dissent until the early 1930s.
That's when things got even worse.
All right?
When you eliminate the dissent, when you eliminate the last vestiges of resistance, that's when you go full on.
All right?
Here's what we can do.
And here's what we must do.
We can and we must create our own independent culture.
A culture, a series of institutions and interactions that are independent of the state.
And that means in every way possible.
And I realize this is not easy to do.
All right?
It's not easy.
We're all stuck in this matrix.
I get it.
But keep in mind, freedom, yes, freedom is economic, freedom is political, but freedom is also a state of mind.
It is a state of your mind.
You know, there are still those of us who believe in human freedom.
We believe in human dignity.
We believe in the sovereignty of our conscience.
Under God, Yeah.
Under God.
And I think we are not done and we are not defeated.
And don't you dare give up.
What remains of goodness in the world depends on you saying no.
All right.
Well, that's all I've got for you.
So, if you like this content, you know, subscribe to my channel, like the video, notifications, all that.
Go to my website, originalmembers.com.
I do this kind of thing every week.
Oh, yes, and check me out at Fade to Black tomorrow night.
I'll be dishing it out on Wilson Davis, if that's something you've been following.
I'll have a link on my website, or just go to Fade to Black.
All right, that's it.
Thank you for being here.
I see everyone in the chat family.
I'm very grateful for your support.
Honestly, in the Super Chats, I noticed those.
Thank you very, very much for those of you who supported me in that way.
Everyone, thank you.
The Chad family.
I love all of you.
Let's keep our chin up.
Let's keep fighting the good fight.
Thanks for being here with me.
▲
Export Selection