All Episodes
Sept. 3, 2021 - Jim Fetzer
01:13:01
Need to Know News (3 September 2021) with Chris Weinert and Maryam Henein
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer near Madison, Wisconsin, where I'm joined today by Chris Weinhart near Biddeford, Maine, and Miriam Heinen in Los Angeles.
We're here to give you all the latest of the news you need to know.
We begin with Joe Manchin throwing cold water on the $3.5 trillion bill, and he's not going to support such a massive expenditure.
This is very, very serious and a major blow to the Democrat agenda.
I for one won't support a $3.5 trillion bill or anywhere near that level of additional spending without greater clarity about why Congress chooses to ignore the serious effects inflation and debt have on existing government programs, he wrote in a Wall Street Journal piece.
This is a good move for the country.
An overheating economy has imposed a costly inflation tax on every middle and working class American, he observes.
Over the past 18 months, we spent more than $5 trillion responding to the coronavirus pandemic.
Now Democrat leaders propose to pass the largest single spending bill in history, with no regard to rising inflation, crippling debt, or the inevitability of future crises.
Ignoring the future fiscal consequences of our policy choices.
Democrat Senator Kyrsten Sinema, by the way, has also asserted she will not support the budget.
Meanwhile, in another positive development, Florida will start fining businesses $5,000 for violations of the ban on vaccine passports.
The Florida Department of Health has issued notice indicating it will begin to fine businesses, schools, and government agencies that require Floridians to show proof of COVID-19 vaccination.
This is sensational!
Each violation will result in the imposition of a $5,000 fine per individual and separate violation against a business, government, or educational institution.
Healthcare providers are exempt, which also does not apply to vaccine requirements businesses or other entities impose on their own employees.
Governor DeSantis, in my opinion, is taking a real leadership role here.
A requirement to show a passport to take part in everyday life, such as a sporting event, going to a restaurant or to a movie, would create two classes of citizens.
I'm very impressed with the Santas.
Chris, your thoughts?
Yeah, that's great.
I think it's probably about the only governor that seems to be concerned about human liberty and our Constitution.
It's amazing to see how this hoax, what I call the pandemic, was basically forged by this 1% group and really put on the people to prevent any sort of recourse against their coup of this country and this economic system.
I'd say that a big part of the COVID thing is to really cover up for the misdeeds that they papered over in 2008 and then again in 2018.
The United States was about to go bankrupt and in fact, I think their biggest asset on their books is student loan debt.
So I'd have to say that if that's their number one asset, instead of like the production of goods, the United States is going to be transitioning from a production of goods economy to a service economy and eventually to a third world nation if it stays on this course.
So these are some big, big things.
And freedom is a very important thing here as well.
And I'm glad to see that there's some people, whether they're Republican or Democrats, that are actually sticking up for the American way of life and setting partisan politics and this ridiculous COVID thing aside.
Because this is absolutely about destroying the American experiment by all means at any cost.
So yeah, if it's allowed to be crushed by this 1% guild, merchants, whatever class that we're talking about, then yeah, they're going to control trade, the production of goods and the money.
And I think that really the people, the citizens of the world deserve more than this, not only America, but through the world.
Excellent comment since NAFTA, and of course moves in the direction of the Pacific Trade Partnership.
Many have regarded the U.S.
as already a service economy, sad to say.
Mariam, your observations?
In regards to the first story, let's put into perspective that the CARES Act, I just looked it up, $13 billion.
I just looked it up, 13 billion.
They asked for relief in 2020 of 54 billion.
There was a ARP 123 billion.
So a total, it was 350 billion.
This is such insanity and perverse.
And let's not forget that there was a lot of Collecting of money that people pocketed as there's a lot of corruption in regards to the COVID relief and endless printing of money.
And then in regards to Florida, just people that are on the ground in the medical freedom say that DeSantis, they call him DeSatan and not to I don't want to pee on anyone's parade but on May in March 2020 there was an EO 20-80 and in May 2021 there was a bill 2006 and so there are on the Florida Governor website you can see where there are provisions if needed to force vaccinate.
So I'm curious to go to Florida which I will be going soon to just report from The ground, what is happening?
I certainly know there's a lot of small meetings with schools.
They're still fighting.
So it's like, is it good cop, bad cop?
Of course, it's the freer state compared to others, California and New York, but still, just to keep in mind for people.
Well, I know that's apparently the law in Florida, but it doesn't look as though DeSantis would be remotely inclined to enforce it.
I think that would be under extreme circumstances.
Chris, did you want to add a further thought?
Yeah, I think Miriam brought up a great point about the 1% using the two-party thing to really lower the status quo and the expectation from the public.
Absolutely.
That's a great point.
And I think that is something that, like she says, almost a controlled opposition dialogue where, you know, one way or another, they're still giving into part of the demands of this cabal and certainly allowing this theft of our wealth to happen from foreign banking institutions that run our intelligence services, our educational services and our medical services.
So, yeah, this is Wall Street and a bunch of foreign nobility that is trying to do this to the common man.
Nice.
Nice points from you both.
Meanwhile, the Supreme Court has refused to block a Texas abortion ban.
Frankly, I was floored by this.
Very surprised.
The Supreme Court refused to block a Texas ban on abortion after six weeks of pregnancy, basically after the detection of a fetal heartbeat.
When many women don't even yet know they are pregnant, by a 5-4 vote, the justice has denied an emergency request for an injunction on enforcement.
Of the six conservatives on the court, Chief Justice John Roberts joined the three liberals.
The court's order is stunning, wrote Justice Sonia Sotomayor, presented with an application to enjoin a flagrantly unconstitutional law engineered to prohibit women from exercising their constitutional rights and evade judicial scrutiny.
A majority of justices have opted to bury their heads in the sand.
Frankly, I agree with her on this issue.
I'm very, very disturbed.
The law would amount to a near-total ban on the procedure in Texas, as 85 to 90 percent of abortions occur after six weeks of pregnancy, almost certainly forcing many clinics to close, if not to abandon abortion in Texas altogether.
Where it is among a dozen mostly Republican-led states to ban the procedure or seek to do so.
Roe v. Wade, of course, was decided on 22 January 1973 in a 72 ruling.
That a woman had, as a matter of her right to privacy, the option to choose an election.
It was divided into trimesters.
You could have an abortion for any reason whatsoever during the first trimester.
During the second, the state could regulate how it was done.
But during the third, abortions could only be permitted to save the health or the life of the mother.
In other words, otherwise we're subject to prosecution as murder.
Now, the key point in my opinion about what the court ruled was viability.
Which has to do with the ability of the fetus to exist outside the uterine environment.
It's not a function of heart or brain activity, but actually of the stage of development of the lungs.
So as I read Roe v. Wade, it's not a question of whether this is a developing form of human life.
Of course it is.
That's a matter of biology.
But whether it has developed to the point where it's entitled to be treated as a person, which is a legal, social, political concept entailing certain rights, where the court, as I see it, ruled that the earliest right to life occurs, in other words, the earliest stage of personhood occurs at the end of the second trimester with viability.
Now, I believe Women's circumstances are so varied that it's completely inappropriate, even on American, for one group to seek to impose their views upon another, that every woman should have the opportunity to act in accordance with her conscience and her personal circumstance.
It may be there are too many members of the family already.
She wouldn't be able to make an income to enable to support the family.
Forcing a woman to carry the term an unwanted fetus has all kinds of dire consequences that are well understood.
Epidemiologists and sociologists, including that, unwanted children tend to become juvenile delinquents, become criminals, and a drag on society.
But in my opinion, the most important aspect of this is for every American to respect every other American's right to make this decision for themselves, because otherwise, to do so, to force a woman to carry the term an unwanted fetus is to turn her into a reproductive slave, which I regard as un-American, un-democratic, and grossly immoral.
Justice Blackmun, who authored the majority opinion in 1973, wrote, We acknowledge our awareness of the sensitive and emotional nature of the abortion controversy, of the vigorous opposing views, even among physicians, and of the deep and seemingly absolute convictions that the subject inspires.
In my view, respect for the rights of everyone entails giving them the right to choose, where I believe the slogan, my body, my choice, not only applies to abortion, but of course to this medical tyranny to which we're presently being subjected.
Chris, your thoughts?
Yeah, some great points there.
It's amazing to see how the bipartisan dialogue has been broken down into like polarizing absurdities.
And you'll see like the GOP or the RNC kind of be like the pro-life party.
And then once the child's born, they're the austerity party in terms of social programs or really allowing these kids to have fair opportunities in a very wage-staked, flighted environment.
In fact, you can see there's generations that have been priced out of the housing and the labor market completely and are forced to work in the gig economy.
And then on the other side, you got the DNC, which is pro-choice.
But then they're into this bureaucratic spending like drunken sailors, they're into these abhorrent and overreaching social programs, things like that.
To me, it seems like an absurdity that is part of the controlled opposition dialogue.
It's like a bargaining tactic of the 1%.
And it's really to really get a squabbling over these polarizing absurdities, in my opinion.
So it's very much reminds me of like what you're saying in terms of herd management and them really, you know, using the tug of war mentality to keep half the world Fighting against the other half over these things that are not saying irrelevant, but there's certainly there's probably more important things that people have to worry about.
And one thing that often gets overlooked in this abortion industry, and I will say industry, is the fact that they are using not only organs, stem cells, spare parts, but also fetal tissues in these vaccines.
There is a tremendous amount of money that is being made from the exploitation of human life before it's even given legal status as a human life.
So yeah, this is pretty disgusting to see these guys going to work.
Uh, this is not something that is put out there in the dialogue or in the discourse or discussion at all.
Uh, and this is a very good reason why they don't do this.
So, uh, they want you focused on the misdirection that the distraction and certainly not the real deal.
This is why like in 2010 or 11, when I thought this thing was going to come down back then.
The Tea Party comes out and really starts coming up with like Michelle Bachman and Todd Akin and Palin and all these other people to talk about legitimate rape and things like that instead of talking about this very real thing that's being done with human fetuses.
Another aspect of this Texas case, by the way, is it enables citizens to bring lawsuits against abortion clinics, and I think turns the state into a community of snitches.
I find it shameless, embarrassing, and very inappropriate.
But Miriam, as a woman, I'm keen to have your opinions.
Yeah, as far as snitch, we are cultivating a snitch nation.
We are rewarding a snitch nation.
When it comes to abortion, I don't mind being honest that when I was a lot younger, I got an abortion.
I think it's a very personalized decision.
With that said, since that time, and I wrote a piece And it was very popular because I took it from the perspective of being in the abortion clinic and interviewing some of the women, you know, like a Russian woman who was on her 16th abortion and or young Hispanic women and just showing this procedure and since then learning about Planned Parenthood and its eugenicist ties with
What's your name?
Margaret Stanger.
And the fact that this is a this is a business.
And that's why, you know, you have Planned Parenthood supporting Newsome here in California.
So if someone understands that not only are they selling these body parts, but also using the fetal tissue, as Chris mentioned, as a substrate, to grow their viruses, that that's disgusting. So when we
look under the hood at who is profiting, and let's also keep in mind that CDC had a very successful
abstaining program, which they removed in favor of supporting abortions because it's a business
for them.
So that is what I'm opposed to.
But we should look at every woman should make a decision, I believe.
And again, this shows the hypocrisy.
My body, no choice when it comes to these experimental gene therapy jabs.
Yes, yes, yes.
And in Texas, my body, no choice when it comes to abortion.
Meanwhile, the House and Senate Armed Services Committee have voted to make women register for the draft.
We all know Nixon abandoned the draft in 1973, but it remains on the books as a contingency for a national emergency.
The vote was 35 to 24 to expand registration to include women.
An alternative to suspend draft registration unless a president declared a national emergency and put the Selective Service into standby was submitted, but ruled out of order.
Frankly, it makes no military sense.
By the time you reach the point of declaring a national emergency, gearing up a Selective Service program and getting people registered would be a fiasco.
It would not be timely.
This piece from antiwar.com is opposed to all forms of the draft because they believe it supports war.
My opinion, however, is considerably different.
The flawed thinking behind the question About registration of women is a mistaken assumption.
The primary goal of anti-draft activism is to protect young people from being drafted.
Actually, it's to discourage going to war.
Since 1980, resistance to draft registration has won a profound victory over the state and war machine and has rendered draft registration virtually unenforceable.
Misconceiving their goal from the start is protecting vulnerable young people rather than helping young people protect the world from wars that depend upon young people as warriors.
Ageist anti-draft activists have assumed as long as the threat of a draft has been eliminated, there's no further need or reason for anti-draft activism.
That's not the stand of anti-war.
Bear in mind, historically, conscription, aka the draft, has been employed by the federal government in six conflicts—the American Revolution, the American Civil War, World War I, World War II, the Korean War, and, of course, the Vietnam War, where Nixon ended conscription in 1973 and we moved to an all-military force.
There are, in my opinion, multiple problems here.
However, the most important being that by abandoning the draft, American families became disconnected from decisions of war and peace, and the executive branch has been able to exercise far more liberality in making its decisions without concern for the political consequences.
So I believe getting American families reconnected to issues of war and peace would be a substantial move forward in regaining control of our own political destiny.
Also, a volunteer force doesn't appear to be completely successful in Vietnam, for example.
More than half of the forces there were private contractors or mercenaries because we did not have enough conscripts In our all-volunteer army.
I would further add that because of abandoning the draft, we have generations of young people who have no military experience, no competence with firearms, have never acquired a sense of discipline and responsibility, have had no training or preparation for various trades, Where military occupational specialties provide a background for young people to enter into the workforce across America, which has now become so far lost that we even have the governor of Oregon abandoning competence in reading, writing, and arithmetic as a high school requirement.
This is absurd.
Chris, your thoughts.
Yeah, you know, you're right.
That's a great point.
You know, you think about Common Core, No Child Left Behind, a lot of the things that Don't Ask, Don't Tell stuff that Clinton brought in.
They've really gone through a lot of efforts to damage the reputation of the United States military.
And I'd have to say, factor in the abhorrent foreign policies that they've put on and even the domestic ones against their own citizens.
This to me leads most people to probably conclude that our military and most national militaries, whether they're under UN charters, they're being directed by this 1% that takes 95% of the GDP in every nation on earth.
So I'd have to say that in terms of nation states, in terms of this sentiment and nostalgia, a lot of people are really waking up to this after generations of seeing their loved ones being sacrificed by this human thresher.
So yeah, this is really part of the socio-economic theater that they try to create with the nation states and with the wars and with these With these type of situations.
And I have to say they're also using the private sector, like you said, with mercenaries to an immense degree, to the point where they probably don't even really need to draft people.
But they're still probably are doing this because I think that there's really some sort of an impressment process they've always used on humanity under these terms, where they put them under duress.
And then the reaction is to form them into like some sort of a national defense type army, where the citizens pay for their collective defense.
And they're really being extorted by their own government in many cases, or the people running their own government.
So I think there's something going on with this.
And I also think that they're going to take nanotech with these vaccines to the next level with this military service, and even with these type of data mining operations.
So we're going on to a really scary point in terms of human capabilities in this technocracy.
So I think that we really need to take a step back from military action, unless it's going to be against these people that are trying to Take over the world with this technocracy.
Yeah, I'm very sympathetic to anti-war.com, but I think he's missed a point on this issue.
Mary, I'm eager to have your thoughts.
It's an interesting way to look at conscription, it was called, as a way to add some type of discipline.
For instance, in Israel, everyone goes to get military training.
As someone who, I'm not in support of war.
I'm sure there's a lot of recruitment now because of a domestic faux war and who knows where these officers will be stationed.
I'm not into war.
I'm not into jabbing the hell out of someone.
I think they're also emasculating or, you know, now that you can allow transgender or pregnant women.
It's a cult.
Let's face it.
If you look at the recruitment tactics and who they get, these are dispensable people.
So if it's meant to ensue or institute a little bit of discipline into a human being, that's one thing.
But if they're just dispensable human beings that they program, I'm not into that or inject with whatever.
Chris, you had a further thought?
Yeah, I think that really, like I said, this is a cycle that we see in human history and it repeats itself over and over again every few hundred years when the human sentiment reaches its all-time lows like it's reaching right now.
We usually will descend into a dark age if these people are allowed to continue and I think really a lot of these dark ages come on to us like in the medieval times like the Condottieri era of like say Central Europe in this time, 1400s and stuff.
After the Hundred Years War, serious carnage, serious plagues, I think the same people were behind these wars, behind the causing of these plagues, and eventually profited immensely from these mercenary-type city-states that came from the fall of empires.
And I almost think that we're seeing the same thing now, with World War I kind of being the fall of empires, and then creating these nation-states, and the rise and fall of these individual nation-states and corporations and things within.
I think this is a big, big plan.
And really, I think humanity's got to step back from the emotion and see who's doing this.
And if they're going to go to war, it needs to be against these people.
Nice.
Very nice.
Very nice.
Meanwhile, we'll be right back.
Here we have a very interesting, subtle opposition to vaccinations.
This is from the New Mexico State Fair Queen, Deanna Guthrie, who's overwhelmingly saddened that she will not be able to attend a beloved New Mexico State Fair in 2021 to fulfill her duties due to the current situation of our state.
This title has meant so much to me, and I hold all of the New Mexico State Fair Commissioners, General Manager Dan Mourning, Queen Coordinator Temple Daniels, and every other New Mexico State Fair staff member in the highest regard.
Through absolutely no fault of theirs, I will be unable to set foot on the New Mexico State Fairgrounds due to the current public health order issued on August 17 by the New Mexico Department of Health and Governor Grisham.
That came out while I was making final preparations for the fair.
I would dearly love to represent the New Mexico State Fair to its fullest with pride and integrity.
Yet after much personal consideration and emotional distress, I'm unable to be fully vaccinated, nor do I choose to be.
I do, however, choose to join the numerous 4-H and FFA Livestock Show exhibitors and the athletes of the Professional Rodeo Cowboys Association, along with everyone else who has chosen to take a stand against the current situation we find in New Mexico at this time.
I am gravely disappointed that we are living in such unfortunate times, yet I do wish the New Mexico State Fair great success in 2021.
That, in my opinion, was a fine statement.
Meanwhile, the CDC is now listing vaccinated COVID deaths as unvaccinated deaths if they die within 14 days.
And we know a very large number of the vaccinated are dying within 14 days.
This is just further fraud and duplicity from the CDC, which has a financial interest in these vaccines.
Moreover, here's an important fact check.
The FDA first approved ivermectin for humans for human use back in 1996, where media are deliberately lying to the public.
The mainstream is lying on behalf of Big Pharma and the medical fascists by falsely claiming ivermectin is a dewormer for animals, when the reality is the anti-parasite drug was first approved for human use back in 1996.
According to the CDC, which is really a private corporation posing as a public health agency, ivermectin should not be used by humans because it is intended for animals, but it's easy to check the facts and expose it's in fact false.
Ivermectin is used with animals but also approved for humans.
The only reason many are having to take the animal version is because governing authorities have made it next to impossible to obtain a prescription for human ivermectin.
Animal is freely available in feed stores and online.
My understanding, by the way, is that they are chemically indistinguishable.
The law is being put forth by the CDC because people have found out ivervectin kills COVID-19, and if a $3 drug kills a disease, then there's no reason to take the dangerous and ineffective genetic therapy, masquerading as COVID-19 vaccines.
If people don't buy the vaccine, then the CDC and its employees do not earn money on the vaccine they helped to develop.
In fact, it appears, and I agree with Al Turner, the time has come for the CDC to be abolished.
Ivermectin has been used in humans in other countries since 1987 and used to treat more than 5.2 million persons worldwide.
Contrast with a corrupt CDC tweet declaring, you're not a horse.
Suggestion being only those who seek out intervectin are those who mistakenly believe they are large farm animals.
This harmful display by the DCDC just goes to show the so-called public health agency has long overstayed its welcome.
Its mission today has nothing to do with public health, if it ever did, and everything to do with patting the pockets of crooks like its current head, Rochelle Walensky, whose husband, Has funneled millions of taxpayer dollars disguised as research grants.
I think it is time to be rid of the CDC.
The same is true of hydroxychloroquine, another safe and effective off patent drug that costs pennies for a pill.
Because HCQ works so well in the early treatment of the virus, the government has been on a crusade to keep Americans from accessing it.
Meanwhile, Tony the Rat Fauci, Rochelle Walensky, Joe Biden, and yes, even Donald Trump—and I regret he's doing this—are all pushing Americans to roll up their sleeves for a virus injection as if it were the only way to save states.
How much longer are Americans going to put up with this nonsense?
Meanwhile, this came from a fan.
The American Medical Association is a source of misinformation, brainwashing, and propaganda.
Stu Peters, who my regard is on a par with Tucker Carlson, he's so good, exposes the manual published by the AMA given to physicians used to teach specific language, social media posts, hashtags, interview techniques, and other forms of brainwashing to indoctrinate an unsuspecting and trusting public to coerce them into a shot and create fear surrounding the pandemic.
Right down to the hashtags they're using.
The AMA is telling physicians what they need to say about the pandemic and the dangerous shots being called vaccines.
Meanwhile, we have a fascinating red alert What does it mean when an intelligence service starts describing the next terror attack despite having no intelligence about it?
This is coming from James Corbin, who is reporting that Switzerland's Federal Intelligence Service is warning A potential terrorist attacks against vaccine infrastructure, including vaccine centers, transport and manufacturing facilities, even though it states here, highlighted, the agency is concerned about attacks from militant groups, a newspaper reported so far.
There are no tangible indications of planned attacks.
In other words, they have no evidence for it.
And what does it mean, therefore, when former cabinet officials start comparing bodily autonomy advocates to suicide bombers?
There's a false flag coming.
And don't you believe it when they pull it off?
Chris, your thoughts.
Well, I have many.
I'll try to keep them brief.
First of all, I want to talk about the process that they're treating, quote unquote, COVID with.
I think that anybody goes in with a common chest cold will be pretty much given a toxic drug
that will pretty much cause their kidneys to shut down and their body to fill with fluid,
their lungs will fill with fluid, and then they'll place them on a ventilator
and then within 24 hours, they'll be dead and probably call it COVID death.
So that's the way they killed my mom in 2016 before there was even a COVID, or 2015, I'm sorry.
And I think that's the way they got Robert David Steele from what I've heard as well and many others.
So this is really disgusting what they're doing.
This is a murder machine that is being subsidized by the Federal Reserve and these foreign bankers.
And I would also say that the ivermectin, I would say it probably does work.
I would say that they're putting warning signs out in these places about not to take these type of things for COVID.
And I'd also want to say that the CDC and World Health Organization, like you brought up, FETS, and even the United Nations are funded by the IMF and World Bank.
This international bankers that are funding these super judicial, super governmental agencies that pretty much have taken over and even trumped the U.S.
presidency.
We'll use a pun there.
And have taken over, uh, in terms of legal status, uh, imposing these UN laws and charters, uh, in response to these, these Gollum enterprise hoaxes that they're putting on in the first place.
So, um, as far as these things are concerned, uh, they could have used HCQ or ivermectin instead of going with this emergency vaccination program, but instead they are trying to do that.
And I think there has to be some sort of malevolence that it has to be perceived to this.
Also, I'd have to say that if they're going to push this on, Big Pharma should be held accountable for any damages and your employer should, too, if they're forcing you to take these vaccines for any future damages that come from this type of situation.
Because I think that there's an abundant amount of proof that shows there is serious, serious repercussions from the vaccine.
And there's a lot of money behind this.
The mainstream media is behind this as well.
Their revenue comes from this.
Two thirds of their ad revenue comes from Big Pharma.
So this to me seems more like a population control or an extortion racket.
Where, like I said, they create these Gollum enterprises and then provide the solution and how to mitigate them.
Reminds me a lot of the predictive stuff they even said, like with 9-11 and, you know, right after it happened, you got guys like Al Paul Bremer and Ehud Barak on every channel on earth telling you about who did it and how and when.
And ultimately, they find out 20 years later, it was these guys who were behind it all along and making immense profits as well and putting in the Rothschild banks into the last seven nations that Wesley Clark mentioned in his memo.
So, Yeah, they know about these things before they happen, just like World Trade Center 1 in 1993, or Oak City, or 9-11.
To me, that's indicative not only of malice of forethought, but of some sort of conspiracy, not conspiracy theory.
You're 100% correct.
Spot on, Chris.
Mariam, your thoughts?
So many things to say.
I did a little dig a year and a half ago on the CDC, the CDC and all their private funders, The CDC paying their employees to watch soap operas.
The CDC having its tentacles in any show, whether it's ER or Grey's Anatomy, in order to control the narrative.
The CDC, for instance, consulting to do the movie Contagion.
And now with Ivermectin, they just removed it off of the shelves of Amazon.
I know, for instance, Zach Voorhees had mentioned like, wink, wink, you can get this horse treatment.
I have it on hand and see, so the CDC removed it.
The FDA removed it.
They sent out issues.
I did a little thread on it.
However, I want to tell the audience that, let me just find it.
That there are currently 154, if you go to clinicaltrials.gov, 154 different studies for Ivermectin.
Ivermectin in human immunity, Ivermectin trial in Zambia, in Bangladesh, in The Congo, in Egypt.
Since when do they care about using off-label?
They use off-label drugs all the time.
But let's remember that in order to get their EUA on their vaccines, they could not have any FDA-approved treatments.
And that's why they've poo-pooed on any treatments.
It's the protocols that are killing people.
My uncle also died From Remdesivir, let's ruin his renal function, and then let's put him on a vent, which is also this bag full of miasma of sedatives, including fentanyl.
You're intubating them.
You're putting a human being in a coma, forcing them in a coma.
No family could come and visit.
So with my uncle, I told my dad he's gonna die, 8 out of 10 people, because also the The doctors don't necessarily know how to calibrate the machine, and they might blow out the lungs, cause more inflammation, and it's really a nail in the coffin.
I want to say also that as far as AMA, I had found a protocol A year and a half ago.
In the EMA, there is a, they don't have to get vaccinated doctors.
There's a special provision for them, 8.7 routine universal immunization of physicians.
And in there, the principles of medical ethics, it allows the doctor to opt out, whether they've changed this under the RONA, We're seeing nurses walk out and instead of saying, hey, these frontline nurses, maybe they're treating vaccine damaged people.
Maybe we should speak to them.
No, instead we poo poo on them and crap on them.
So.
There's so much hypocrisy, so much underneath the service that people need to research and understand.
Financial incentives too, Marianne, if I could add to your point.
It seems like, weren't they giving like $39,000 for every COVID diagnosis?
And everybody they put in a ventilator got a certain amount of money.
How's the federal going to pay all this stuff?
And you know what a friend, a roommate said?
Well, they get money for all medical.
You know, like, oh, remove the uterus?
Oh, there's 40,000 right there for a hysterectomy.
Sure, they incentivize, but there are other ways to give oxygen, like canola, or just other ways to give oxygen.
Sure.
Reminds me of, like, the C-section racket.
You know, one in three births are done through C-sections.
They scare these women, these mothers, into these type of choices.
And there's so much health factors that impact the child in terms of natural birth versus the surgery.
So man, it's just amazing to see this accessorized racket.
This is an extortion racket.
A guy now is incentivized to give a c-section.
One of my ex-boyfriend's father was, and he's like, he actually admitted that secretly he opts for the c-section so he can get more money.
Are you kidding me?
And then they got the vaccination schedule for these poor kids when they're finally born.
Yeah, and that's why they want to put COVID on the because of the 1986 act so that they can get their immunity.
That's why they're they're putting it under.
They want to vaccinate children.
civil liability.
For those of us who survive, I believe the medical profession and Big Pharma are going
to undergo the greatest scrutiny and overhaul of history.
Much deserved because they have so grossly abused their role in society and their responsibilities.
Meanwhile, and it's rather fascinating, one of my attorneys and I have been emphasizing
that the $33 million Sandy Hook settlement between Remington and nine of the alleged
surviving families is actually an insurance fraud.
There's no justification that it's never been established that anybody died at Sandy Hook.
And in fact, there's an overwhelming amount of evidence.
That's not the case.
Well, interestingly, after writing to the insurance companies in Remington dozens of times, Remington is now subpoenaing report cards and other academic records for five of the kids.
Report cards, attendance records, disciplinary records of five kindergarten and first grade students.
Actually, they were only first grade students.
According to new court filing, any and all educational records, including but not limited to application and admission paperwork, attendance records, transcripts, report cards, disciplinary records, correspondence.
This is very good.
In addition, Remington subpoenaed employment records for four teachers allegedly killed in the shooting.
Some of the parents have been suing since 2014, alleging the gun manufacturer advertised its line of semi-automatic weapons to civilians, which is of course perfectly legal and appropriate.
They've demonized the AR-15.
Which is a wonderful all-purpose rifle.
It's lightweight, highly accurate, a perfect weapon not only for home defense, but to save your community from rioters or gangs, and most especially to defend the nation against a tyrannical government.
This is the reason they are focusing upon it.
Here you see the actual submission for these documents to be forthcoming, and it's very interesting what may turn up.
My colleague Kelly Watt, for example, was contacted by one of the parents who called himself Leonard Posner.
And during 100 hours of conversation, she insisted that she didn't believe a word he said, didn't believe he had a son who had died, asked for documents and records and proof, some of which he eventually provided, including a kindergarten report card that had the address of Sandy Hook Elementary at 12 Dickinson Drive misspelled.
It's I-N-S-O-N, but on the report card it was E-N-S-O-N, obvious sign of fakery.
Meanwhile, among some of the more blatant disproves, That was real.
We have the FBI consolidate crime report for 2012 for Newtown, of which Sandy Hook is a subdivision.
Notice at the intersection for murder and non-negligent manslaughter in Newtown, the number is zero.
If the shooting had been real, that number ought to have been 27, but it's not.
Here's a photograph sent around the world taken by Shannon Hicks of the Newtown Bee that appears to be a policewoman or other official leading kids to safety, but it turns out she took a second photograph earlier where there are loads of parents present.
They're just casually looking on.
Not only that, I mean, what in the world are parents doing there if this were an actual mass shooting?
Did someone think, oh, I better get on the phone and call some parents here so they could be shot too?
I mean, it's absurd.
But look at this.
They actually rearrange the kids to get a better shot.
So in the lower photograph taken earlier, a little girl in a pink sweater and a short skirt was in the lead.
But to make it more photogenic, they replaced her with a little boy in a dark sweater and blue jeans.
And if you look at the intersection in the lower photograph between boy number one and boy number two, You'll see several parents casually looking on, leading me to describe this photograph as lounging at the massacre.
Not only that, but the official report by Stephen Sedinsky III was a complete abject failure.
It took nearly a year for him to complete his report.
But at this point in time, it's relatively trivial to demonstrate that the official report on Sandy Hook, authored by Danbury State's attorney Stephen Zedinsky, does not establish a causal nexus between the shooter, his victims, and the weapons he is alleged to have used.
It suffers from the shortcoming of concluding there were no fingerprints on the .22 caliber rifle allegedly used to shoot his mother and Even more surprisingly, that of the large number of shots that were fired from the 5.56 caliber Bushmaster, that's the AR-15, close to 150 rounds, none of the bullet fragments could be matched to the weapon.
Under these circumstances, it would have been impossible for the alleged shooter, Adam Lonza, to have been convicted in a properly conducted court of law for his alleged offense, because no causal nexus had been established between the purported shooter, his weapons, and the 20 children and seven adults, including his mother, he is supposed to have killed, which one might have naively supposed was the point of the investigation.
But if that was its goal, then its objective was not achieved.
If there's ever been such an abysmal failure in the annals of forensic investigation, I would love to hear about it.
This is absurd.
Chris, your thoughts?
Well, it seems like these crisis actors are the only people with steady jobs in America these days.
It's pretty sad.
While this is normally a point where Posner or some of these other people would come in and gaslight you with the outrage and the emotion, You know, these, these pedophiles that are probably involved with a massive conspiracy, a Judeo-Masonic population control that they're trying to take guns from people and, and certainly trying to take rights from people.
And they're using these despicable tactics.
You know, it reminds me a lot of the Parkland thing too, where, you know, they're, they're getting permits, you know, before the event even happens, you know, for stuff that happens within three months.
So.
Also, looking at the Sandy Hook thing, another point I want to add to your comment there, the tactical imprecision of these quote-unquote law enforcement officers or FBI agents, you know, one of these guys was carrying a gun upside down, pointing the barrel at kids that he's supposedly ushering to safety.
How that's possible and how nobody sees that.
Wow, to me, it's it's a mystery.
But, you know, these are things that people don't really ask about.
I don't even think there's really been much of a ballistics report that's been listed from from the Sandy Hook thing in terms of that, that I've been aware of, nor have there been any.
There's been a lot of sketchy stuff going on.
We'll just say that whether it's, you know, the how big thing or the cases after you, the disclosure that they're covering up with, you know, the courts and the judges and lawyers.
This to me seems like a Masonic operation through and through.
You might as well have made it 33 instead of 27 or 27 and 72 like the Vitruvian Man.
They like throwing these little numbers around to give a wink and a nod and a thumb in the eye to the people that
are paying attention.
Yeah.
So there you go.
Exactly.
The title is the title has 33 in that.
As soon as I see a 33, they've injected articles that I've written and said I was 33.
So it is a big, a subtle FU.
Now, I'm not personally familiar with Sandy Hook.
However, in writing my George Floyd book and minoring in psychology, I'm very interested in the intersection between fact and fiction.
And we know that the media is complicit in carrying out these false flags.
I came across a 45 page, maybe you're familiar with it, Jim, 45 page document from Homeland Security in regards to a school shooting.
And the thought is that these crisis actors work with Homeland Security and they keep it in the family because you see these characters over and over and you're like, how dumb?
Why would they?
That's also a little F you if they circulate people like this teacher with George Floyd, Waynell Sexton, that supposedly kept his You know, a note that he wrote when he was a child.
So I believe that the narrative, there's narrative supremacy and that kind of is a tsunami.
No one pays attention to details.
As I like to say, we live in an age of mediocrity.
Everybody's half-assed.
Details matter.
That's where the devil lies.
So when you're doing these investigations, and then of course you're, you're shamed into questioning or bringing like, how dare you?
So unless you've been doing an investigation, it's very hard from the outside to come in and make, make a judgment.
Just, To know that there are certain characteristics with these false flags that we see over and over again.
Well, I think this development of reminiscence of these records is very positive and could lead to upending the whole matter.
My attorney, in this instance, William Scott, has been extremely diligent in writing again and again and again and again.
Probably two dozen.
Communications with the insurance and Remington and the light.
I'm very proud of him for his the vigor and determination with which he's been pursuing this.
Meanwhile, we have a trial of the purported shooter in the case of Parkland, which of course, as we know, took place on 14 February 2018, if you believe the official report, because his attorneys want him not to be referred to as a killer or the event as a massacre.
Here you see a photograph of Nicholas Cruz, whom I can guarantee you had nothing to do with it because it was another staged event.
Attorneys for the 22-year-old who's accused of murdering 17 people in the Florida high school want prosecutors and witnesses barred from referring to him as an animal, a thing, the killer, or any other manner they believe is derogatory.
His lead attorney, Melissa McNeil, also argued prosecutors and their witnesses should be barred from calling the February 14, 2018 shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School a massacre, the schoolhouse slaughter, an execution, or other inflammatory terms all totally appropriate.
Now here we're seeing what's supposed to be evacuation of students from Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School.
But saying progressive was the first to notice.
The enrollment of that high school at the time was 3,500.
But she has sought to find more than three dozen various students shown in any of these photographs.
It turns out because it was Valentine's Day, they let the kids go home early at one o'clock, and only a few dozen remained behind to participate as student crisis actors.
They also committed various blunders.
In particular, they forgot to list the obituaries for the alleged decedent's notice.
February 14, 2018, Alice Levinson, this is an 84-year-old woman, obviously not a student at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School.
So those who are running these ops are not rocket scientists.
We even have a one-minute clip from inside a classroom where someone is alleged to have been shot.
But when you take a look, it turns out to be a training dummy with no head, with no arms, on a pool of fake blood.
Now watch this.
Listen to the girls doing their best to scream as though they were in fear.
Some are worried about their bottled water, however, or their iPhone.
You got a kid pulling his putts.
The camera swings over and you briefly see what's supposed to be this body, but it's totally fake.
Notice too how many are there in police uniforms, about which I shall comment further.
We can't hear it, by the way.
way are we supposed to be able to hear it?
Now I'm going to play it again.
You may have thought the Parkland police were really Johnny on the spot since they were there so promptly, which you might believe if you didn't know that Parkland gave up its police force in 2004.
Jim, we can't hear the audio.
You couldn't hear the audio?
I couldn't hear.
I don't know if Chris could.
I could not.
Paul, let me.
No, I didn't hear it.
Okay, let me fix it.
Okay.
Okay.
Well, we're going to watch it again in any case.
Here we go.
Let me get it set up.
Hey, Fats, while you're clicking around, think about how many cases the FBI has been involved in,
whether it's entrapment or bungling.
You know, things like the JFK, RFK, MLK, the ADL-PATCON operations in the 90s, the FBI-GTTF operations in the 2000s during the War of Terror.
They report directly for the Department of Usury.
They were founded by a guy, a relative of Napoleon Bonaparte, named Charles Bonaparte, the Attorney General for Theodore Roosevelt.
Another thing you can think about their involvement with Rampart, Cointelpro, the LAPD, Lewis Tackwood.
Man, you could go on and on.
The Louis Free hearings, you remember them being involved with covering for the CIA?
Chris, you're absolutely right.
But this operation didn't have the FBI involved in it.
Now here it is with a sound.
With a sound.
Anyway.
Can you hear the audio so well.
I don't know if... Didn't they have a shooting drill going on that day?
Like where they're doing a law enforcement thing where supposedly they're running an active shooter drill the same day?
You're mixing different cases.
I was thinking of Sandy Hook then.
So.
Now, as I observe, you might think that the Parkland cops are really Johnny on
the spot if you didn't know that Parkland had given up his police force back
back in 2004.
Those were actors in police uniforms.
Perhaps the most interesting interview that occurred in the sequel was of Kelsey Vran, here with David Hogg, who many of us believe was a plant at Parkland.
His father works for the FBI.
He appears to have already graduated from Laguna Shoals High School and come to Parkland so he could serve as a spokesperson.
But get this, Kelsey was interviewed and she said, It was like a movie.
It looked so real, but it felt so fake.
She had it just right.
Those who want more, Amazon.com has banned six of the 12 books we publish at moonrockbooks.com, including the Parkland Puzzle, How the Pieces Fit Together, but it's still available at moonrockbooks.com.
Chris, your thoughts?
Yeah, good point on David Hogg.
Wasn't he involved in witnessing another shooting in 2014 when he graduated high school from Huntington Beach?
Is that correct or no?
Well, you're talking about an event that was supposed to have occurred at Huntington Beach, but it was Laguna Shoals High School.
There was some odd event at Huntington Beach.
And of course, you know, he played a very odd role in all of this.
He actually gave an interview six hours after the March for Our Lives, which was held only a few weeks after, allegedly inspired by the shooting on the 14th of February.
It was in early March, whereas you were implying it requires in order to shut down streets in Washington, D.C., you submit a permit 180 days in advance.
So this whole thing was already mapped out well in advance of the Parkland incident.
Where Debbie Wasserman Schultz appears to have played a key role and recruited Rita Katz, who is a producer of Dancing with the Stars, to be involved in the whole production.
Continue.
Wow.
Yeah.
And also, Fetz, wasn't that Wolfgang Halbig's hometown as well?
And Sheriff Steve Israel, that's another wink and a nod.
You know, when Cruz was found, I thought they found him in like a field.
And there looked like there was some military-type guys that were carrying a knapsack.
They'd set it down in the field, and they had the chopper view, and the kid pops up like a little jack-in-the-box weasel, and he looked like he was drugged out.
Kind of reminded me of the Aurora guy when they found him in the passenger seat of his car holding a hot rifle.
You know, he looked like he was dazed or drugged.
You know, and then, of course, there's that Alexa Miednik, who was seen in Boston, and I believe Aurora, and also Parkland.
So, I mean, these people really get around in terms of crisis actors and being in the quote-unquote wrong place at the wrong time.
Yeah, I loved your observation that crisis actors appear to have the most steady employment of anyone in the U.S.
workforce.
Mariam, your thoughts?
Yeah, it's hard for a normie to wrap their head around that.
So I interviewed in regards to this Homeland Security, this investigator named Ed Cherini, who kind of told me some of the characteristics, one being like, for instance, the one you showed, They do these false flags around on a Monday or they co-opt a holiday.
So we see February 14th and we see George Floyd, May 25th.
And, uh, let's say with George Floyd, there was a name Judea.
Um, there's also code words, apparently if there's informants involved.
So I was told that, which is crazy that Hollywood, um, helps produce these, these, uh, events.
So that's that's crazy in the George Floyd.
Not many people know this, but Maurice, who was being babysat by a park police officer across the street, the park police officer says, what's your name?
And he says, Ricky, Ricky Ricardo.
And when I was interviewing Ed, he told me that it without me saying this part, that supposedly Lucille Ball Oh yeah, you know, you're 100% correct.
No, Hollywood is playing a major role here.
these events. I mean, it makes sense to issue Hollywood to carry out.
But again, it's hard for even me to believe that, that that that's how they recirculate these families and
only people paying attention. It's again, a little F you.
Oh yeah. You know, you're a hundred percent correct.
No Hollywood is playing a major role here. There's no doubt about it.
Hey, Feds, can I ever Their politics is very much on the side of the Democrats.
Go ahead, Chris.
Yeah, I was going to say, you talk about these weird dates that they use.
I think there's a correlation with the Coptic calendar, the Jewish calendar.
They use the lunar calendar as well as the sun one.
So it's kind of a strange time when they pick these things.
But it reminds me very similar to the NASA mission, supposedly, that they were putting us on with in the 60s and 70s.
They always chose these dates that had significance in terms of that calendar.
So I just want to add that to you.
Excellent.
Excellent.
Meanwhile, in this point I ought to have made already, this floodgate of false flag events was unleashed by Barack Obama, who repealed, nullified the Smith-Mutt Act of 1948, which precluded the use of the same techniques of propaganda and disinformation within the United States That were being used abroad by our intelligence agencies, including staged riots, other kinds of uprising and other phony events.
He unleashed them all by the Smith Modernization Act of 2012, just in time for Sandy Hook.
And they have been followed in their wake by the Boston bombing, Orlando and Dallas, Charlottesville, Parkland, Las Vegas, all of which I've investigated in collaboration, none of which were bona fide or real.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send FanMailProRecon to LiveNeedToKnow at gmail.com.
LiveNeedToKnow at gmail.com.
Revisiting Roe v. Wade.
A long time ago, an elderly M.D.
told me the reason for passing Roe v. Wade had nothing to do with religious or personal freedoms.
The doctor said, I used to work in clinics.
When coat hanger abortion women were brought in, it was a disaster every time.
Some almost bled to death.
Perhaps elsewhere they did.
She then explained, It was doctors behind the scenes that persuaded Congress to put an end to this butchery by passing Roe v. Wade.
She said his information was never in the press and it was largely unknown and kept well hidden from the public.
Now that a new Supreme must replace Ginsburg, this is dated.
No one is asking about the backstreet abortions.
Wealthy women could always afford them.
It was called D&C, dilation, and Kudlitz.
If additional restrictions are based on abortions with a conservative new judge, then it's poor women who will be at risk for their health.
The reality is some women will get abortions, whether religious groups are against them or not, and it's safer for the procedures to be in the open.
Women's health is more important than belief systems.
Indeed, here's another about the latest developments down under.
Australia is moving into the high level of fascistic behavior we all feared.
The Surveillance Legislation Amendment Identify and Disrupt Bill 2020 And the Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission to combat serious online crime.
The bill aims to address gaps in existing legislative frameworks that will allow the AFP and the ACIC to collect intelligence, conduct investigation, disrupt and prosecute serious criminal activity online.
The bill introduces three new powers for the AFP and the ACIC.
Data Disruption Warrants will allow the disruption of data through modification and deletion to frustrate the commission of serious offenses, such as the distribution of child abuse material.
Network Activity Warrants will allow the collection of intelligence on serious criminal activity carried out by criminal networks operating online.
Account takeover warrants will allow the control of a person's online account to gather evidence about criminal activity to further a criminal investigation.
Essentially, the new fascist state of Australia is taking control of its unarmed citizens' ability to privately communicate with one another.
The police will now be able to take over one's social media account or email and so on and change whatever is on there, able to set people up for arrest and more, including planting, child abuse, pedophilia.
That was not originally there.
Meanwhile, of the dozen books we've published at Moonrike Books, Amazon, in my opinion, acting as an agent of the state, has banned six.
Those about Sandy Hook, the Boston bombing, the moon landing, Orlando and Dallas, Charlottesville, and Parkland.
Remember, 1% control the world.
4% are the prophets.
90% are asleep.
5% know and try to wake the 90%.
The 1% use the 4% to prevent the 5% from waking up the 90%.
That's where we are today.
90%. The 1% use a 4% to prevent the 5% from waking up a 90%.
That's where we are today.
Chris, your final thoughts.
Thanks, Jim.
Appreciate you having me on again.
I'd like to say that this technocratic feudalism that they're trying to put on and run in through UN colonialization mechanisms and through the financial institutions that they imposed after World War II, they are a desperate wet dream.
And I have to say, this is the new Atlantis utopia that this Masonic, Judeo-Masonic order has sought to bring on humanity for a long, long time.
And if humanity doesn't come together and stand up against this, It's not going to be humanity as we know it much longer.
So it's probably not as it is.
And we've got a lot of damage that's been caused by these people.
And every time these guys been on the ropes, they've misdirected, lied, deceived their way out of it.
And I think now it's time for the people to hold their feet to the fire and to hold them accountable for these misdeeds.
Because this is a complete violation of none of the social contract, but any sense of authority or duty.
And certainly it's treason against all of humanity.
It's beyond the nation state and beyond the legal system.
And this is really a moral right or wrong type of situation.
So people that are on the wrong side of humanity and the wrong side of history need to snap out of it, wake out of this fused state and get on the right side.
Great points.
Mariam, your final thoughts?
Yeah, we're living in a world with genetically modified information and arguably we're genetically modifying human beings to go with everything else that's genetically Modified and now ad nauseum have to get your booster shot like you are an iPad, iPod or a tablet.
You have to update your your circuitry and I'd argue that they're going to be completely dependent on this booster because their immune system will be eradicated.
I'd like to just say that personally You know, now I have Chase has cancelled me.
So just to let people know that banks are cancelling people, it's not just General Flynn.
So to wake up, they're holding $3,000 of my money, but more so I had a payment that defaulted.
Now I'm in bad standing with that company.
I'm trying to relink my others.
It's only a matter of time where they'll come after probably my Wells Fargo account.
And so this digital affair You know, death by a thousand bites.
And some people are like, what does Bee Lady do?
What do I do?
I'm very outspoken.
I'm raw.
I'm real.
And I have a health and wellness business.
So I would just invite people to Everything's Made in the U.S.
Please buzz on over to honeycolony.com or simplytransformative.com.
Or if you want to support me, because this is just devastating.
Amazon holding $5,000 of my money, Chase holding $3,000 of our money.
So my email is Mariam, M-A-R-Y-A-M at honeycolony.com.
I work hard.
I'm brilliant.
You being and it's disgusting to just come after me because I believe in empowering people to be their own best health advocate.
It's just, you know, the banks are closing people down now folks.
It's pretty disgusting.
Everyone can see why I enjoy Fridays so much with Chris Einhart near Biddeford, Maine, and Miriam Hennon in Los Angeles, California.
I'm in SF, by the way, Jim.
I'm in San Francisco.
Yeah, Frisco.
You're absolutely right.
Thank you for the correction.
I think Miriam as well detected a key point, namely the idea of controlling our lives by means of financial transactions.
If they can get all of our money into digital currency, our lives will no longer be our own.
They'll be able to cut us off at a whim.
Anything we do they disapprove.
We'll be a source, a cause for them to manipulate our access to money, and our lives will no longer be our own.
Beware.
We're doing our best to inform you of what's truly going on.
We are among the 5% that are trying to awaken the rest of the country to what's taking place here.
The situation is as grim as it could possibly be.
Let me reaffirm, in these uncertain times, spend as much time as you can with your family and loved ones, those you care most about.
Frankly, we do not know how much time we have left.
Export Selection