Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

July 26, 2021 - Jim Fetzer

55:59

Operation Scorpio #73 Dr Matthew Raphael Johnson Interview

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners, or chatters, are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
	They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff, or affiliates.
	you're listening to a revolution radio freedom slips dot com one hundred
	percent listeners supported radio and now we return you to your host
	okay welcome back to our number two of operation scorpio
	and...
	And in this hour, we are joined by our special guest, Dr. Matthew Raphael Johnson, a man who has been guilty of thought crimes, but a brilliant man nonetheless.
	Dr. Johnson, are you there, sir?
	Believe it or not, I'm here.
	I'm still here.
	I'm not planning on going anywhere anytime soon, although I'm happy to say that if anyone can end up sharing a gulag cell with me, there's a good chance it's going to be you.
	You know, we were talking about Solzhenitsyn in the first hour just briefly, and I was commenting that I don't think he would have been able to write that book and have it published in America, and he certainly would not have gotten the kind of praise he did back at the time it came out.
	Just because the media didn't have a word for something didn't mean it didn't exist.
	Things are pretty much just as bad now as it was 10, 15 years ago.
	The difference is they're more arrogant and more forward about doing it.
	I was almost thrown out of college and grad school many times.
	So the fact that the media hadn't caught on by that point, or they didn't feel comfortable enough to talk about how they're doing it, what are you going to do about it, That's really the only thing that's changed today.
	Solzhenitsyn was always on the outs.
	They found all these other dissidents in the Soviet Union.
	I mean, Gerald Ford wouldn't even meet with them.
	So he was always, he was tailed by the FBI like most of these dissidents were.
	There was no Cold War.
	Solzhenitsyn was always, despite the Nobel Prize, he wasn't much on the outs in the U.S.
	as he was in the Soviet Union.
	Yeah, yeah.
	Well, I don't think you get too much praise teep upon you for telling the truth in this world.
	Well, Matthew, you know, I wanted to get your thoughts on, just briefly on, you know, this farcical meeting between Grover Joe Biden and Vladimir Putin that happened a few weeks back.
	And, you know, I thought, Putin was actually very diplomatic, but I could tell he was laughing into his sleeve a little bit after meeting with Joe, because he made a comment, something along the lines of, well, Joe seems like a nice man.
	He said some things that weren't terribly relevant to the conversation, like tell me about his mother and some other things from the past, but he seems like a very nice man nonetheless.
	That was like a backhanded compliment, you know, sort of a subtle way of saying the man's out of it.
	I don't think he knows what he's talking about.
	What were your observations about that and how do you see the relations between the two countries going right now?
	Well, as always, I'm the first to bring this stuff up, you know, 20 years ago or more, and then eventually, you know, right-wingers kind of catch on.
	I was saying that Russia, even under Boris Yeltsin, Was the only country in the world that had the capacity to challenge what we used to call the new world order back then.
	Now we call it the great reset or the black rock regime, whatever you want to call it.
	Um, I was the first to show that Vladimir Putin was this, you know, um, Eurasianist nationalist of a sort who was going to consolidate power there and challenge the West.
	And he successfully done that.
	Um, I said that in 2001.
	And when I was at the Barnes Review, and I got crap from right-wingers all over the place.
	And of course, it turns out I'm right.
	And you know, I haven't gotten apologies from these people yet, but, but now it's kind of a big thing for our people.
	The entire thing came from me.
	Now we talk about Joe Biden.
	We mentioned, we have to talk about him in quotes.
	There is no such person.
	Joe Biden doesn't know where he is.
	However, about half of his cabinet comes from the BlackRock asset management company.
	with right now owns but $60 trillion.
	They control the standard of poor 500.
	They control the stock market index.
	This is this level of monopoly has never existed in human history.
	This is a brand new revolutionary phase in capitalism that that came because of the COVID nonsense.
	So the the meeting was anticlimactic.
	Putin could be could have, you know, was hide the book on Putin's political theory called Russian populist.
	The bunch of you publishers But he can afford to be diplomatic.
	When he has people like his foreign minister, Sergei Lavrov, doing a lot of the harsher talking.
	Lavrov brought up the persecution of white people in Hollywood and elsewhere just before that meeting.
	He's the one who condemned the witch hunt about the January 6th so-called riot at the Capitol.
	He's the one who's talking about banning this and banning that.
	Putin doesn't have to do it because he has, you know, Peskov and Lavrov.
	Who are extremely vehement about how arrogant the left is.
	Putin did come out and say early on that the Bolshevik Revolution was Judaic and his support of Syria and Hamas and everything else proves what he is.
	But so he has Lavrov doing the harsher language.
	Well, he gets to be the diplomat.
	And yeah, he looks down on most all American politicians, as you should.
	He's far more popular than they are.
	He has a far broader base of support than they do.
	He's not dependent on the BlackRock organization or State Street or Vanguard like American politicians are.
	He doesn't have a media that's going to be either worshipping him or attacking him 24 hours a day.
	And he's actually respected.
	And he's winning through his alliance with the Chinese.
	So he can afford to roll his eyes.
	That's pretty much all you can do in this circumstance.
	Yeah, absolutely.
	And, you know, I think most people are unaware of just what an enormous amount of capital BlackRock controls.
	And it's, you know, pretty much 100% kosher operation.
	If you look at the board of directors and the people that own it, it's a kosher operation.
	And, you know, this BlackRock is a huge part of the World Economic Forum agenda.
	And, you know, Larry, I think the guys, the head guys named Larry Fink, I believe, And he wrote a letter to the top corporations around the world, sort of a public letter, and said that corporations are going to have to follow certain guidelines about social standards, environmental standards, and COVID standards, and those that don't will not be
	Able to receive investments from BlackRock and other large investment funding corporations or funding mechanisms.
	So pretty much just telling people either you do what we say or you're going to be cut off from the magic shekels.
	Have you heard about this?
	Well, of course.
	I am, again, the first one to write a lengthy paper on the topic, exactly how much money they have.
	And how many people they have not just in the administration, but in every administration in the Western world.
	Every central bank has people representing BlackRock on the board.
	And well, they have people on BlackRock's board.
	So you're talking about between 40 and 60 trillion dollars of money.
	He created the Great Reset with the Swiss National Bank head, Philip Hildebrand.
	Um, he revised the entire central bank ideology in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, uh, just before, uh, COVID hit.
	Um, I mean, there is, you know, the big bailouts, whether it be COVID or any of the corporate bailouts go through, um, go through Fink where the three guys are, you know, as you know, I've mentioned Fink, uh, Blake Grossman and Robert Capito, who obviously has a Sephardic last name.
	It's 100% Judaic.
	It is now a full monopoly.
	Every aspect of the COVID bailout comes through BlackRock.
	It isn't that a government can hire them to do things.
	They hire governments.
	At the moment, we really don't have a vocabulary.
	This has been a big deal for me for a while, to have a full monopoly.
	And I've been talking about this for a long time, of one company that now controls what politics is.
	Politics is now a BlackRock board meeting.
	You don't have issues, you know, issues or commodities anyway.
	Now political issues are gonna be simply entertainment.
	Politics will have zero connection to any reality.
	Now he has come out to do something called a passive investment,
	meaning that money is only gonna go to the largest firms.
	It used to be active investing meant you would go to a company that looks good,
	with up and coming, some interesting ideas, but that's gone.
	The only people who are getting money now are the huge, you know, the S&P,
	the 500, who they control.
	So that means also credit.
	So now they're going to wipe out medium-sized businesses because no one has access to credit anymore.
	No one has access to funding anymore.
	And with that letter you're referring to, he's been doing this on his website, saying that the leftist ideology is now official.
	You will not have access to anything here.
	And I've also been through, Oh, and by the way, um, they, they cut employee wages by 10% back in 2010, forcing its employees to work 10 hour days.
	Um, so, you know, this is, this is a company that really doesn't even have wealth.
	They are wealth at this point.
	Um, the concept of the so-called ESG investing, which is the ideology you're talking about coming out and saying that there is no money except you support leftist ideology.
	And, um, So, again, we don't really have the vocabulary for this, except maybe like ETF, the exchange traded funds, this kind of mentality, because we've never had this level of monopoly, absolute dominating states and central banks.
	There is no distinction between public and private sector anymore, as I've been saying for 15 years.
	The state is now completely privatized.
	Um, and he's putting people, you know, there's Tom DeMillon, who was on the BlackRock board, has three members of his family in the so-called Biden administration, including his daughter, Sarah.
	He just graduated college in 2019, who is now on the White House National Security Council.
	Wow.
	This is a girl that's still giggling about boys on the phone, who's put into these positions.
	The whole thing is absurd.
	Politics doesn't exist.
	Issues don't matter.
	This is a simple board meeting of a monopoly firm that decides what happens.
	Therefore, everything else is simply a matter of entertainment.
	We're just getting, again, vocabulary isn't there.
	It's really hard to describe this stuff.
	We still use things like public and private sector.
	We still use words like market.
	That's over.
	There are no markets.
	Capitalism is now a monopoly regime that competition is gone.
	And when you talk about the new method of investing, even small companies with brilliant ideas We're not going to get money.
	So you're going to have a complete monopolies usually are complete stagnant stagnation and you're going to have massive inflation and taking over the currency is that this is all just in the last few years.
	This has been a massive revolution in capitalism and this is just getting started.
	Oh, I agree.
	It is just getting started.
	We're at the opening phase of all this.
	And, you know, it's amazing too how the stock market is a totally rigged game now.
	You know, I watched a clip from the enemy war transmissions known as the mainstream media news.
	And it was basically, you know, a bunch of bad news.
	You know, there's droughts, there's floods, COVID's raging, blah, blah, blah.
	All this terrible news.
	And then it was like, in other news, the stock market went up 350 points today.
	You know, completely disconnected from reality, in other words.
	Just, you know, a kosher casino of magic shuckles that just keeps rising upwards because it benefits the BlackRock and the people you were talking about.
	They're going to take care of their own, essentially.
	So, Giuseppe, why don't you jump in, sir?
	Well, Matt, it's wonderful to have you back on the show, and a really lucid and salient point about the Black Rock globalist takeover of the first world.
	And it's not even capitalism anymore, it's some type of completely rigged usuryism and that institutes just an insane level of control and wealth
	transfer.
	And Normie and Norma, Ray Sheeples have no idea how much this is all controlled.
	So my question to you is, the only solution in my mind is you have to no longer participate.
	You have to figure out barter system, work with organic local and regional farms, and don't even participate, you know, not with allopathic medicine unless you're in a car wreck and you have to go to emergency room.
	Or some event, you know, don't go see a doctor, don't be part of it, and literally have to separate from this satanic rule.
	What are your thoughts on that?
	Well, I think you know, for 20 years, I've been saying this.
	For 20 years, I've been telling people to leave the cities, to build our own institutions.
	There's several organizations that were, one was based on me, you know who I'm talking that tried to do this and failed.
	Building your own institutions takes a lot of work and sometimes I wonder if we really have the maturity
	for that.
	It's not directly political, you're not out in the street or something like that.
	So it requires a tremendous amount of patient investment.
	The only way out is to build a set of local institutions such that it doesn't matter if you get fired.
	It doesn't matter if we have people graduating medical school, we have people who can teach
	and to build these institutions without, but I don't even think they should have names.
	Purely local.
	If something happens, we have people who will, will help you out.
	Right.
	It's just a, you know, an organization.
	And maybe, maybe you could, you know, do a nonprofit, however you want to set it up, but building these, you know, having our people, you know, we have so many winners who would do very well in this society who've now dropped out.
	Um, homeschooling is just the beginning for decades.
	I've been talking about how this is done and it worries me.
	Um, except of course, now you have radicalized upper middle class people.
	You have a middle class people who are agreeing for the very first time that they don't have much of the future, that it really doesn't matter what happened.
	They're in trouble.
	You have wealthy, especially white families that are going to be crowded out of this market.
	From COVID and the Black Rock regime, now mass inflation which is coming and mass unemployment
	means that even people coming out of wealthy families donít see a future and thatís why
	our programs and our supporters are exploding and that also explains the massive censorship.
	We are a huge threat to democracy.
	Facebook officially called me a threat to democracy.
	I was trying to get a paper that says this so I could frame it kind of like that I am
	banned from the Republic of Kosovo which made me very happy.
	These are the things, this is the reward of 30 years of work.
	So you have people with money and support who can pull this off.
	My question is do we have the maturity to be able to put this kind of consistent work
	and we have people who still are afraid to use their names in public.
	Thank you.
	You know, so, you know, people are going to have to put themselves out there and be willing to suffer.
	I've done this with my name and address in public.
	I raised two kids, you know, for 30 years.
	If I could do it, anyone can do it.
	But there's going to have to be a level of maturity and the ability to work very hard at the local level without a whole lot of thanks, without a whole lot of glory before this can even begin.
	Yeah, I totally agree.
	I think one of the problems we face is most people really don't see the gravity of the situation we are facing right now.
	Matt, I thought you made a great point earlier that we don't have the proper vocabulary to talk about this new system and what's evolving in front of our eyes.
	Words that were told that you know that we live in a capitalist system all these old words really are Becoming archaic in many ways and we have to have the proper vocabulary in order to communicate what's happening and you know as far as Blackrock goes I meant to mention this earlier, you know Vanguard is the largest shareholder of Blackrock and So you have these two mega companies that are essentially intertwined.
	They're one and the same.
	And another stumbling block I see too is people think that, well, how are they going to make money if we don't have an open free market?
	I mean, how are these corporations going to make money?
	And this new system isn't going to have anything to do with making money.
	It's going to have to do with the ownership Of all of the assets, the ownership of the entire system, and simply forcing people to become, you know, neo-serfs under a system that most people simply cannot comprehend, because one, they don't have the vocabulary, and two, they can't imagine a system where there's no competition at all.
	And your reference to this monopoly unlike the world has ever seen, that's exactly what is happening now.
	I'm just happy that finally, you know, people are catching up here.
	I coined the word regime with a capital R to refer to the oligarchy.
	But now it's just the three companies.
	You mentioned two of them, BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street.
	They own each other, but BlackRock is still the dominant.
	I'm not even sure people in the other two organizations.
	There is no law that can regulate them because they make the law.
	They don't make money.
	They literally print it.
	There is no distinction between industry, services, education, finance, capital.
	It's all now one thing.
	Government versus private.
	None of these exist anymore.
	It's really hard.
	And so, you know, and even politics, the term is now gone.
	It's now entertainment.
	Issues that, you know, they invented in the first place now have no connection to any kind of reality.
	And that means media.
	And our biggest enemy is, you know, the Fox News people, who are still under this bizarre impression that all of this comes from Chinese communists, and that the Chinese are going to invade this country.
	We need to rebuild our sacred right-wing military to deal with this.
	But even now, you know, Fox News is shutting down its comment sections on YouTube.
	I've seen that several times.
	Even they realize they're becoming isolated.
	You can't function. There is no market. There is no trading, except of course, you do have one
	opposition and that is the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, the alliance of Russia and China
	who have tons of the world's gold. The US has none. A military that could smash the US tomorrow
	owning a huge number of American dollars, functioning in a national socialist basis,
	which they have. I have a book coming out on China. It's been a national socialist state since
	they rounded up all of Mao's supporters in between 1976 and 1978, creating these new enemies.
	questions.
	People who still believe that voting matters.
	You have these conservatives who will tell you all about what a fraudulent election you had, but we can't wait to get back to the polls and get our people involved.
	Talk about a group of people totally out of ideas.
	You know, and we have to be patient with them.
	They don't fully understand this yet.
	They're not dealing, they're dealing with in the world of images, not realities.
	Parties don't matter.
	None of these things connect with any actual reality.
	And to talk about building your own institutions, if these people, you know, they're not used to building anything.
	Everything is usually done for them.
	It's going to be extremely difficult and we may fail miserably.
	Besides that, of course, The Soviet Union fell under its own irrationality, fell under its own weight.
	This regime is so irrational, is based on so many contradictions.
	These people are not invincible.
	This also may fall to pieces, which is why, and factions may, you know, they're very tight at the upper levels, so they don't have factions that could then break the whole thing open, which is a possibility.
	But the people are not invincible.
	They're not all powerful.
	They're not all knowing.
	They're arrogant.
	They live in their own world.
	They do make mistakes.
	Any confrontation between BlackRock and Russia-China, you know, they're going to be completely destroyed.
	I'm predicting now the regime is going to start using a lot of mercenaries, groups like ISIS that they create, a lot of private sector armies to do their fighting for them.
	You know, ISIS and these proxy armies or mercenaries are going to become more and more important.
	But you're talking about massive, highly advanced, first-world militaries, very motivated and extremely well-equipped, who own, of course, most of the world's gold.
	So BlackRock is controlling a decrepit, dying regime that has a currency that really is teetering into nothing.
	This is a desperate, this is like the last-ditch effort for capitalism to save itself, to remake itself.
	And, um, building our own institutions have a lot to do with not being affected when it all comes crashing down.
	You have radicalization everywhere now.
	Um, and people pulling back from the media.
	I mean, it's gotta be the first thing.
	Pulling back from the mainstream churches, God knows, is extremely important.
	They have so many levers of power, but, um, pulling away from, you know, Fox News and Republicans and stuff like that is absolutely essential.
	It's almost a good thing that so many of us have been kicked off Facebook.
	You have to start doing things on a face-to-face level and people, you know, have to be humble.
	They have to realize this is brand new.
	They need to defer to people who've been doing this a long time and to be building these things and giving them themselves, giving money, giving their time to the point where it hurts and preparing to sacrifice everything, as I know we've done, I certainly have done, and the possibility that it might fail.
	That's asking a lot of a group of people who are so bewildered and broken and mentally ill as our people are, as Americans are.
	And yet, then again, it's been done before.
	The Soviet Union fell under its own weight.
	And of course, we also have the supernatural world on our side.
	Remember, it's not all a matter of pure natural cause and effect.
	So it's been done before, but not at this level.
	And we have allies all over the place, and a radicalizing group of people who are pulling back from these institutions.
	That also is just getting started.
	Well, yeah, and I agree with you about the supernatural part.
	You know, evil does have a way of essentially destroying itself from within, because the corruption spreads like a cancer, and that's really just...
	Another word for very bad behavior and not doing what you say you're going to do.
	And a system based on that is always going to crumble to the ground.
	It's just a matter of time.
	But it's like, you know, a tree can be completely rotten inside, but it keeps standing until it finally falls over.
	And I think that's what we're seeing in this old system.
	And I do think that things are going to get a lot worse before they get better.
	Giuseppe, why don't you jump in, sir?
	I think that everything Matt is saying is lucid and vital for People begin to understand because so many of the average Americans believe the media and if push comes to shove they tune in CNN or tune in MSNBC or tune in Fox and and willingly lap at the trough of the globalists gaslighting and so I think and and I'll frame this as a question that
	People, the American coward, the American weakling, is just going to go along to get along to whatever new system, this so-called Great Reset, where you'll own nothing and you'll be happy but drones will bring you your fast frankenfood.
	I mean, I think it's going to be very dystopian and surreal but In a very superficially pleasant way because you've got all these young people who are so indoctrinated into the globalist New World Order thinking that they are Stockholm Syndrome participants and they think it's good for them.
	And the other thing that I could see happening is, whereas if these Satanists really want to depopulate the U.S., all they have to do, they tested it last year, they had a run on toilet paper and so many other things in the grocery stores here in Stalingrad 2.0, and then they uh... claimed it was a hacker but they shut down a
	a gas pipeline oil pipeline and and within uh... couple days all the gas
	stations were out of gas within a twenty mile radius of where i live here in stalingrad
	two point oh and so i i think that
	do or my question is do you think they're going to
	keep this cash cow uh... obedient sheep
	uh... operating for a while or do you think this is the time when they want to
	truly depopulate.
	Well, you hit it already.
	You're dealing with people who not only are demonic, either knowingly or unknowingly, but also mentally ill.
	Those who run the regime are extreme narcissists.
	They have tremendous signs of schizophrenia.
	They don't suffer from any kind of cognitive dissonance.
	They're not at that level.
	Sociopathy is institutionalized.
	The way the regime functions, the sociopath is always going to do well because he doesn't have the hesitation that we do.
	On the other hand, mental illness amongst the population is so overwhelming, it's so rife, it's so constant.
	Yeah.
	Whether they're like that or they're simply broken people.
	It's extremely difficult for these guys to, you know, they're upper middle class.
	They work very hard.
	They're doing very well.
	They start talking like us at a cocktail party or YMCA.
	They are, they're in serious trouble.
	Someone will turn them in.
	They may lose their money.
	They'll lose their friends.
	They may lose their job.
	It's so much easier to rail against people like us.
	on the ground that they know that they have no choice, unless of course things get to the point where it's more painful for them to pull away than to stay.
	Most of these people are drowning in debt.
	The Great Reset is based on the idea of forgiving debt in exchange for assets.
	The notion of full-time work, eight hours a day, that's over.
	They've said it very clearly when BlackRock took over the Davos Forum.
	They said the gig economy is going to be the norm, temporary labor.
	And on top of all that, you have the problem of inflation.
	Unemployment now is about 20%.
	That includes underemployment.
	There's no way that could ever be properly reported.
	There's a bunch of ways that they do it to fix it.
	But so is inflation.
	Inflation is much higher than people realize.
	The way that they do this basket of goods idea, tracking prices, When something goes up in price, the way that the BLS takes care of it is that they'll bring in a lower cost alternative.
	So let's say pork goes to the roof.
	They'll bring in some ground beef and put it there instead.
	It's much cheaper.
	That's how they figure inflation.
	That's not how people operate.
	But inflation is figured on this basket of goods, like things like 180 staples that everyone needs.
	And they track these prices.
	But they're not tracking prices because when it gets too expensive, they substitute it with something else.
	That is tremendous manipulation.
	And that means the official inflation rate is going to be a tenth of what it really is.
	We're seeing prices go through the roof.
	We're seeing shortages everywhere.
	This is a revolution.
	Back in the 60s, they used to say the revolution won't be televised.
	Here, it's going to be the revolution won't be noticed.
	But remember, the most important thing, history is not made by masses.
	It's not made by majorities.
	History is made by fanatical minorities.
	We're willing to suffer and sacrifice everything if necessary.
	That's the only time anything gets done.
	That's what drives history.
	We don't need the masses.
	Let them do what they do.
	We need to find each other and support one another financially in every other way and be prepared for the worst.
	That's what drives history.
	There is no exceptions to this.
	It takes a handful of informed, dedicated, virtuous people to fight back.
	Let them scream and yell.
	There are people always going to support us.
	They've been doing it to me for a long time.
	We need to find what we're good at.
	We specialize in something that we can contribute and focus on that.
	We have people who, if they can't drop out, they'll support those who can.
	We need to reach out to these people and say, OK, you don't have to expose yourself, but please support those who do.
	And that's the only way history moves.
	That's going to continue to be the case.
	And so we don't need masses.
	We need cells, absolute, dedicated cells of people who are willing to suffer.
	Without that, we have nothing.
	Yeah, I think decentralization is going to be one of the main keys here in recreating a civilization based on freedom.
	Once you have centralized control of anything, it's always going to lead to its totalitarian state.
	History bears that out.
	And, you know, I don't think there's been many movements where the world changed that was purely based on, you know, kumbaya and everyone holding hands.
	You know, I think the events surrounding Martin Luther King Jr.
	were largely scripted and, you know, controlled from a central source.
	I don't think some of that was organic, but I do think it was a controlled event.
	Sam, you could say, I believe, for Gandhi, I think that was controlled opposition to some degree.
	You know, real change comes in a very different way and you know the fact that both of those men were so lauded by the media and It's to set this paradigm that we're supposed to believe this is how you make change.
	You just walk down the street holding hands.
	I don't think that's the way it's going to go down.
	And recreating sort of a breakaway civilization with people of like mind and refusing to bow down, I do believe that we're going to be threatened with violence here by the powers that be.
	I don't think there's any way around that.
	If you study history, that seems to be how they do when push comes to shove.
	These people are not afraid to kill people and incarcerate people and destroy their lives.
	Well, for I guess maybe the last decade, I spent a lot of time analyzing the U.S.
	military.
	Only recently has this become now picked up by a few right-wing sources.
	I don't think people realize the absolute disaster situation that the military is in.
	Just since 2010, you've had hundreds of crashes, ships crashing into each other.
	2017 was awful.
	You have planes falling out of the sky.
	And all of this is a gag order.
	The old Secretary Mattis put a gag order on any of it.
	The U.S.
	Navy is now down to 275 ships.
	They're completely overstretched.
	In the early 2000s, the Navy eliminated training for junior officers.
	They don't have the surface warfare schools that they used to have.
	They get a bunch of computer disks and are sent down the ship and said to learn it themselves.
	The Davidson Report came out.
	No one is talking about how they've cut so many positions that their training is almost
	non-existent and having an empire based on all of this stuff is very expensive and they're
	not doing it anymore.
	It's all on the job training.
	The defense budget of course is far larger than on budget.
	At this time, you have maybe two-thirds of the Navy strike fighters can't fly.
	Um, you have maybe a third of the pilots necessary.
	Um, you have, um, and of course, you know, you have these aircraft carriers, the Chinese have the DF, DF 26, a carrier buster missile.
	Uh, they're completely obsolete now.
	You know, um, you have, it would take billions and trillions over the next 15 years to rebuild a functional A functional Navy, um, even matches military times reported since 2013, military aircraft crashes have went up 40%.
	Now they're claiming that cuts in the defense budget are, uh, the cause, despite the fact that the budget goes up every year, way beyond whatever anyone realizes.
	Um, and of course they're gagged on this.
	You know, the, the FA 18, the super Hornets, very few now are, are flyable.
	The maintenance, the quality, the training, the spare parts.
	These are literally falling to pieces.
	I mean, Marines are going to end up hitching rides on foreign ships.
	No one knows what the Pentagon budget really is because they can't be audited.
	There's never been an audit of the Pentagon.
	There was an attempt.
	Ernst & Young tried to do this a few years ago and they failed.
	There is no way to know where this money goes, how much equipment they have.
	on foreign firms.
	even at a local level, I mean, you know, a section, you know, say military intelligence, no one has any idea.
	They can't penetrate this system.
	On the other hand, you have the opposite in the Russo-Chinese alliance.
	You have a much larger military with even a much higher level of technological sophistication
	that's not based on foreign firms.
	And on top of all that, you have the ideology.
	You have issues like the left completely taking over when Obama purged the upper reaches of the brass
	at the end of his campaign, 2014, roughly.
	That's when the Air Force began purging any conservatives.
	And I've heard this from people in the service.
	I'm seeing the so-called diversity training.
	As we're speaking, I'm looking at the paperwork here.
	You know, most of their time is spent challenging general stereotypes, the rape culture, and defend people against increasing non-white and female applicant pools.
	Standards are collapsing everywhere.
	In 2012, the ADL entered into a partnership with the Air Force Academy in Colorado for intensive training against anti-Israel sentiment, against any kind of conservative ideas.
	Anti-Defamation League has been in the military for a very long time.
	Go to the Air Force website and look up, you know, gay rights, look up diversity training, and it's huge.
	Billions of dollars being sent to this year.
	Oh, yeah.
	National and of all kinds.
	You can't have a military that's supporting left-wing liberal policies abroad and have it be this conservative institution.
	We have some of our people who still think it's 1970 and that they're still fighting the Vietnam War.
	This is an anti-communist conservative movement.
	All of that has been purged.
	Training has collapsed, even the service academies.
	I have a paper on the service academies where standards are no longer existent.
	You have professors resigning because they're, you know, nothing is based on ability anymore.
	How many of these people are there to simply get their college paid for or that they have no other options?
	How loyal are these people going to be?
	The politicization of the FBI and CIA, the divisions that they have.
	So, you know, the U.S.
	has lost pretty much every military engagement it's ever been involved in since World War II.
	They've been all over the place with casualties far higher than we realize.
	I'm one of the first to talk about how high the casualty rates have been, far more than we realize.
	I'm going to utilize these proxy armies to try to do some of their fighting first.
	That element is looking better for us.
	Desertion is at its highest rate since the Civil War right now.
	I was the only one talking about this for a long time.
	Slowly, people are picking up on it.
	No one trusts the services anymore.
	The foreign policy is so absurd.
	The defeats are just getting pushed out of Afghanistan, as I predicted.
	Total humiliation, conditional surrender.
	It took a long time for the U.S.
	to finally pull out of it.
	The Taliban is legitimately popular and has gone already smashing the heroin production at the U.S.
	to protect it.
	These soldiers leaving there are well aware of what's happening.
	So, how that's going to hold up as pay goes through the roof, by the way, for officers anyway, how many times are the grunts going to take orders here?
	The place is literally falling apart and the enemies of liberalism just have the opposite problem.
	So, there's some good news here.
	There's a lot of good news here.
	Yeah, you're making some great points and, you know, it was an utter humiliation in Afghanistan, especially since the Taliban really didn't even have An organized army in the traditional sense.
	Yet, we're basically leaving with our tail between our legs.
	And they've already taken over 80% of the country.
	You're seeing actually more.
	You're actually seeing these police and armies that America organized simply handing their weapons over.
	Because they don't have the will to fight.
	The only reason they're in the game is because they were getting a paycheck.
	They have nothing to defend, whereas the Taliban does.
	They're fighting for their way of life and for their vision of their people.
	Whether we like it or not is completely irrelevant.
	And you know, Matthew, I can't help but think that this feminization of the military and the elevation of people who are wholly unqualified, not only the transgendered, but just forcing diversity at the At the cost of excellence, I can't help but think that this is a deliberate attempt to destroy the military in the United States.
	I mean, the purpose of the military is to kill the enemy.
	It has no other purpose.
	It's not a social justice organization.
	And I've really reached the conclusion this is part of just simply softening up the West for a final fall.
	What are your thoughts on that?
	Because I don't see China or Russia doing any of these things.
	Their militaries look highly masculine and very adroit at what their purpose is.
	Well, we can only hope that the liberal West falls to pieces.
	They're certainly not my enemies.
	I, you know, let them let them collapse.
	They're not, you know, there is no we here.
	They don't represent anything that we do.
	Um, so that's, that's the, that's the concern.
	Um, the Russo-Chinese system in almost every way is superior, is more rational, is now more prosperous than the dying regime in, um, in the West.
	And that's really the attack, the attack of these color revolutions.
	They've been, they were under attack because their systems do well.
	Most of these countries that the color revolutions have been aimed at are countries that are just on the verge of first world status.
	Almost everyone using a social nationalist or national socialist style system, strong military involvement, a lot of state ownership and state control, and their growth has been through the roof.
	You know, the Chinese occupation of Tibet, I have a book coming out on this topic.
	Tibet's one of the most prosperous areas in the world right now.
	20% growth even under COVID.
	Because of the nature of the system, the Belt and Road Initiative, state control over banks, minimal interest, rejection of usury.
	They're legitimately popular systems for those who are involved in the color revolution.
	And I've been I've analyzed all of these guys.
	They usually they speak English.
	They're educated.
	Everyone educated in the US.
	They have almost zero support for connection abroad in their home countries.
	Sometimes they speak their own language, that accent.
	and they can poll maybe 4% or 5% without huge subsidies.
	And this is how this works.
	The support isn't there.
	The allies of the US are disappearing.
	There's simply no money.
	The Chinese and Russians go in with zero debt, booming economies, and they could pay off the debt,
	say, of Greece or Portugal, even Ireland, and without the ideological nonsense.
	These are national states without the profit that goes into private banks.
	And that's exactly what they're doing.
	The Belt and Road is going all the way into Germany.
	This is why Germany is refusing to impose any of the sanctions.
	Germany's, I believe, number two trading partner is China.
	They don't eat the U.S.
	anymore.
	So this is the counterrevolution to the Black Rock regime.
	Is these these state centered, but still with a lot of private private industry, these essentially national socialist systems in different parts of the world blowing the US out of the water.
	And this is why the color revolutions function, because these are standing embarrassment to the regime.
	This is why the consolidation of the black rock is necessary from the system's point of view and why war against these these countries is apparently on on the agenda.
	But I have no idea how they could ever even think about winning.
	Yeah, I agree.
	It seems like a formula for failure more than anything else.
	Giuseppe, why don't you jump in, sir?
	Well, Matt, your points are ponderous, but I would like to ask your thoughts on the idea that Mao Zedong was Jewish-cultivated and controlled, that the Chinese Central Bank is Rothschild-controlled, that People like Warren Buffett and the other parasites, the Zionist minions, laud the Chinese system.
	Don't you think perhaps China is just a controlled opposition to enforce a digital slave state worldwide?
	Well, I think you really would have to do a lot of mental gymnastics to try to justify that.
	Mao was an absolute disaster.
	The U.S.
	supported, as they always support, Marxist states.
	When he died in 1976, as I said, the right-wing elements of the party rounded up his supporters.
	They've issued full apologies locally for the complete destruction of the country under Mao.
	The state, the party, controls the banking system, telecommunications, and certainly the central bank.
	This is why you have massive calls for war.
	I've never heard anything.
	Warren Buffett praising the Chinese.
	I've never heard that once.
	These are the people who are screaming for war against them.
	Of course, the system is better.
	I mean, they do a lot better.
	They've taken a third world country a couple of decades ago and turned it into the number one largest economy on the planet in 20, 25 years.
	Whatever they're doing, they're doing it properly.
	And this is this is threat when In the early 80s, they came up with the socialism of Chinese characteristics.
	That was the Deng Xiaoping's whole social nationalist idea.
	It is very ethnically based.
	Deng Xiaoping completely rejected Mao.
	In fact, he was condemned by the old guard for attacking that kind of communism.
	It is now a decentralized state.
	In Tibet, for example, all the Buddhist institutions and universities are financed by the central That old culture only exists now because of this incredibly prosperous Chinese state.
	Tibetans don't pay a penny in taxes to Peking right now.
	This is a national social state fully connected with Russia and, of course, much of Central Asia through the Belt and Road Initiative.
	The regime, as it stands now, will do anything to provoke a war with them.
	They survived the 1997 currency meltdown only because the state controlled the central banks.
	South Korea, Japan fell to pieces, but China survived it because the Soros attack on the Thai currency, which led to this huge domino effect, didn't affect the Chinese precisely because they are independent.
	They have no connection.
	Their currency doesn't float, so to speak, against the so-called Rothschild.
	Rothschild now is kind of Their regime 1.0, the 2.0 exists now.
	These guys are footnotes compared to the BlackRock system.
	This is like a 2.0 now, the new revolution.
	You have about maybe two dozen non-Rothschild central banks in the world, much of Central Asia, China, North Korea, Belarus, a few in Central America.
	To some extent, Switzerland, Because the state has to control the majority.
	It's at the Canton level, not the central level.
	I'm not sure about Hungary.
	They're all over the place there.
	There's a few countries that are kind of all over the place, even Turkey, Syria, of course, so many in the Middle East.
	And this is what we call the axis of resistance.
	They are at war with the system as it stands right now.
	People who make those arguments are, you know, I don't know.
	I don't know how to speak.
	It's like attacking Putin.
	You know, throwing, calling communism Jewish, supporting Hamas, supporting Iraq, supporting Syria, supporting the Iranians, you know, having Holocaust revisionist conferences there, supporting this whole axis of resistance.
	But, you know, what does this guy have to do to show what he really is?
	And for people, you know, people just don't comprehend the way that the system works, how international political economy operates.
	Everything is one liner, slogans, labels.
	They simply don't get it.
	These people are not all powerful.
	If that were true, then we have no chance.
	They're not all powerful.
	Countries realize they can do better outside the system.
	Who the hell would want to be a part of a dollar-based system right now?
	There's nothing in the West.
	Steven Levy Right.
	Well, those are compelling points.
	That gives some hope, right?
	They want you to think they're all powerful, but clearly the history of the satanic chicken swingers, they overreach and then they get slapped back hard and perhaps this time they will really get slapped back to the point where they're no longer a factor.
	That would be good worldwide.
	Well, the whole point of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization And the Belt and Road was to exclude these people.
	The SCO was designed for a state-centered, in a very general sense, social nationalist order based on regionalism rather than, of course, simple globalist liberal ideology.
	And of course, they're doing extremely well.
	The US doesn't own a penny of gold.
	They have pieces of paper that are traded on the market.
	But then actually Russia and China control their economies don't have to produce anything for 30 years.
	And it wouldn't matter.
	Because the gold they have, their currency is untouchable right now.
	The only thing the regime has left is constant threats of warfare, the endless provocations, constantly, you know, having these radar planes coming close to the border and getting chased away.
	This happens every month now.
	and they're well aware that they want someone to shoot and they're not doing it.
	The Poseidon mapping, targeting planes, which are threatening, are all over these countries,
	hopefully mapping out targets.
	Pretty soon something's gonna happen because they have no right to be there.
	But of course, these countries also don't have an empire.
	They don't have bases in every country in the world.
	They have, but you said their military is far superior.
	The technology is far superior and there's actual motivation.
	They get maybe their officers are maybe 50% of the pay.
	I have a whole thing on American military officers.
	Oh my God, they're at 1% right now.
	That's going to go up to maintain their loyalty.
	These people are going into the service elsewhere for patriotic motives.
	They're not getting the pay that they would here.
	They're a totally different group of people.
	And of course, there is no base.
	You know, China still is a Han national state.
	And Russia still is.
	You know, I mentioned Lavrov.
	The ethno nationalism is absolutely essential here.
	This is the ideology and religious in both cases.
	So their policies make them very, very popular.
	Who wants to deal with a country with a broken down dollar and no gold and no future?
	And you have one of the other countries coming in will take care of your debt.
	You know, investing in the whole Crimea has been rebuilt.
	Central Asia has been rebuilt.
	And now Afghanistan is going to be rebuilt by these people, which is why which is why the US was so reticent to leave here.
	And the only thing you don't want to be in Afghanistan is a heroin deal.
	Or a collaborator with the American government.
	It took Afghanistan, I'd say, two months to win their drug war.
	See, they didn't have a drug war where every enemy soldier gets a lawyer.
	What kind of a war is that?
	There, they simply put a gun to your head and said, you plant these poppies, we're going to kill you.
	And apparently it worked.
	That's exactly what happened in the Philippines.
	That's what happened in China before they were forced to open the opium wars.
	It doesn't take long when you have this motivated group of people.
	Drugs in the West, you know, flood the stock market.
	Before the bailouts, that was the only real liquidity after 2008 they're able to count on.
	When you have the state having such a tight control over things in the East, you don't have this problem.
	And you know, profit still matters.
	But it is not the only motive force and money is flooding into this system, including gold.
	Their currency is stable forever.
	And I'm not really sure what BlackRock can do against them, except threats of war.
	And don't forget, a lot of this stuff, not being able to, a lot of this issue, this, this is all short term.
	This is all asset stripping.
	It's not really producing anything.
	This is what they can grab the last minute before it all comes crashing down.
	They're well aware that this is short term.
	That's why our action is so important.
	They're not really thinking, you know, 30 years from now.
	They're stealing what they can do now and escape with it.
	If they bring the whole thing down after they leave, that's another matter.
	So they're not looking, you know, decades into the future.
	But in the East, that's absolutely the case.
	Yeah, yeah, absolutely.
	Well, Matthew, we're down to the last couple of minutes here.
	Why don't you give us, you know, your website and, you know, what you're currently working on and the best way to find your work to get a hold of your books?
	Well, yeah, you know, I'm the type of guy that forgets to do that.
	You know, I don't exactly promote myself very well, but I need the support of listeners financially and every other way.
	And this is a full-time job.
	This is 30 years of work after grad school.
	This doesn't, you know, amateurs can't come up with these things.
	They couldn't even follow these things up.
	This is a handful of us who are dedicated to this and do this full-time.
	My website is rushjournal.org, R-U-S journal.
	You can donate there, from there.
	But my main place right now is Radio Albion.
	It's based in Great Britain.
	And which is also the name, put that in the website.
	I have a weekly lecture series every Wednesday and every Thursday, a half hour discussion on foreign affairs with Sven Longshanks.
	I'm always on with guys like you all over the place.
	I have two books, a book on China, as I mentioned, and my philosophical work, my book on nominalism, the ontology of death, which I've been working on for a decade now.
	I have about eight, and of course, I have a Patreon page, which is very important.
	A lot of essays that don't exist in any other place are there.
	Foreign Affairs.
	That's it.
	You guys support me this way.
	It'll be, you know, this is what I need.
	Great.
	Okay, Matthew, thanks for coming on again.
	We really appreciate it.
	Great conversation and we'll talk soon.

▲