All Episodes
Previous Next
July 22, 2021 - Jim Fetzer
01:18:29
What happened to JFK? Did Oliver Stone get it right? (21 July 2021; Part 3 of 3)
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
...
Well, ladies and gentlemen, welcome to American Media Party.
Periscope, Great Awakenings.
And my name is your host, Scott Bennett, and we are going to be joined by the great Dr. Jim Fetzer to conclude our John F. Kennedy assassination series that we have been doing.
This will be part three, the conclusion of that study, and we will be following it up with some other false flag studies as well.
So this has been a very exciting series.
We're also going to be presenting a very brief report of my meeting with General Michael Flynn this weekend, which was very interesting.
So, but first, let us go to Sovereign Advisors.
Sovereign Advisors is one of the great investment firms that will help you navigate these stormy financial waters and help you invest to maintain your capital, your property and your value.
So let us go to Sovereign Advisors and we'll be right back.
Hello, everyone.
John Michael Chambers here.
I am the creator and founder of American Media Periscope.
Now, the world is changing.
On June 28th, 2021, the Basel III rules changed.
For the first time, the European Central Bank is pushing the price of gold up because they need to maximize the value of their 10,000 tons of gold they control.
What is this about?
It's about global monetary dominance.
And instead of suppressing the price of gold, they are pushing the price up because they need it to go up.
You can take advantage of this paradigm-shifting rule change.
The team at Sovereign Advisors with decades of experience in analyzing political, economic, and social trends can help you take advantage of what may be the most monumental change in gold in the history of the world.
Call my good friend Dr. Kirk Elliott over at Sovereign Advisors 720-605-4000.
So go to Sovereign Advisors and explore all your options.
It's very key.
And before we jump into Dr. Fetzer's presentation, I wanted, producer, if we can put up that graphic, that image that I sent a little bit earlier.
There we go.
That was from this weekend.
I had a very interesting conversation.
With General Michael Flynn.
General Michael Flynn and I had sat down.
I'm not going to reveal too much of it here, but just know, for the bad guys watching, you better fall backwards and run, because your days are up.
He knows who knows what.
He knows what you didn't tell him.
He knows why you lied.
He knows who lied.
He knows all of the reports of Shell Game, the terrorist financing, the Covington and Burling connection.
To the Clinton Foundation, the Clinton State Department, the Joe Biden, Barack Obama terrorist financing racketeering operation with Hillary Clinton and Hillary Clinton's State Department.
General Michael Flynn now knows personally that Covington and Burling and Rob Kellner and Eric Holder and Lanny Breuer and Roger Zachheim, all lawyers at Covington and Burling, Deceived him and betrayed him personally and tried to bury him under a gag order, under a plea deal.
But he was rescued at the last minute because of the prayers of many Americans that were rising up for him.
And one of the prayers that got to save him, really, was when I went in and met with Sidney Powell and General Flynn's brother, Joseph Flynn, and was able to present to them the Shell Game Report, which listed all of the Covington and Burling connections to the Obama General Flynn knows about this.
We sat down together.
Swiss Bank, Union Bank of Switzerland. All of that was given to Sidney Powell, who in turn
then filed a motion demanding all of this material be turned over. And immediately the Justice
Department dropped all charges. So General Flynn knows about this. We sat down together, we took
some photos together, and we were briefed in a very interesting way.
So this also, as I should say, has nothing to do with Clay Clark or the program down in Anaheim.
This was a separate program.
This was a separate mission and a separate meeting with different people.
So it is not connected to what was going on in Anaheim, but it is of a similar venue.
But I thought it was fascinating that God kind of set that up.
I had a wonderful time.
I enjoyed meeting him and I mostly enjoyed talking with him and his staff.
So let's take that photo down and we'll go right to Jim Fetzer, now producer.
So I just wanted people to kind of see that and know that General Michael Flynn now knows who his targets are, who his traitors are, who his liars are.
Who the lawyers are that failed him and the egomaniacs that were behind a lot of the operations against him.
So it was very fun, but that's another story for another day.
But we will have General Flynn on the program and we will extrapolate and expand all of our conversation, which we had.
But Dr. Fetzer, tonight is your night, of course, because you've done such a fabulous work In exposing one of the greatest crimes in the history of the United States, and that was the assassination of John Fitzgerald Kennedy.
And Jim, I'm going to give it right back to you to let you continue with part three of the assassination and put up the slides that you want to go through.
So Dr. Fetzer, I'm going to hand it right to you.
Go ahead, sir.
Well, thanks, Scott.
That was a sensational meeting with Michael Flynn, whom I admire beyond words.
As the first slide shows, this is Part 3, where I'm going to focus on who is responsible and why, beginning with how they framed the Patsy.
The next slide identifies that Lee was actually in the doorway when the JFK motorcade passed by.
They made him remove his over shirt before doing mug shots to make it less obvious.
He told Fritz his face had been pasted on someone else's body when shown one of the backyard photographs.
Indeed, not only that, but everything Oswald told Fritz has turned out to be true.
Now the next slide is the most important photograph taken during the assassination by AP photographer James Icke Alchons.
You see the entire motorcade and the monopoly of important aspects thereof, which are highlighted in the next frame in the next slide.
You can see number one, the hole in the windshield, which is where JFK's left ear would be if it were visible.
Number two, a figure in the doorway that looked very much like, and indeed turned out to be, Lee Harvey Oswald.
Number three, the window in a broom closet per a uranium mining operation from which three shots were fired, the only unsilenced shots, with a Mannlicher Garcano.
It was a CIA asset, the uranium mining company, and you can see that LBJ Security is already responding to the shots, even while JFK are looking around as though they have no idea what's going on.
Take a look at the next slide and we can see the area of special interest there and indeed in the following slide we can see some of the features where I must have published 10 different blogs about what we found in this area.
Notice in particular the man leaning out known as Doorman.
Now, right off the bat, you may think he has a towel over his left shoulder, but no, that's a figure behind him known as Black Tie Man.
So we're witnessing a physical impossibility, because Black Tie Man is both in front and behind him, obvious proof of alteration.
Meanwhile, the figure with his hands up to protect his eyes from the sun has his face blacked out.
He's known as Black Hole Man.
Notice the figure immediately in front of him has been obfuscated, as has his entire shirt.
We'll return to why this happened.
Yet there are some, such as Josiah Thompson and Robert Grodin, who insist there's been no alteration to this photograph, which is manifestly absurd.
Take a look at the next slide and we'll see How we could identify, based upon the height, the weight, the build, the shirt, and the t-shirt he was wearing, that they were indistinguishable from those of the man in the doorway.
Indeed, Ralph Sinque, who's himself a A chiropractor used to dealing with individuals who want to get their bodies into shape so their clothes fit better made that point to me early on that we could already tell based on those features that it was Lee Oswald in the doorway.
But notice how they made him remove his outer shirt and had his mug shot on the right photographed only in the t-shirt so the comparison wouldn't be so obvious.
Now, Larry Rivera has done some completely brilliant work.
We see in the next slide a finding photographs of Lee Oswald taken from the right perspective and a Billy Love Lady from the right perspective.
And on the left, you see Lee Oswald fits the features of the man in the doorway hand-in-glove.
Billy Lovelady, however, who himself insisted it was odd they'd be confused because he was 2 to 3 inches shorter and 15 to 20 pounds heavier, whom the government claims was the man in the doorway, is clearly not.
The ears are too low, the nose is wrong, the jaw is wrong.
Turn to the next slide and we'll see another of Larry's brilliant gifs of Lee in the doorway.
This is really the coup de grace to anyone who wants to continue to insist that Lee Oswald was the lone demented gunman since he was in the doorway.
He not only cannot have been the lone demented gunman, he wasn't even one of the multiple shooters That were taking aim at JFK that day as the motorcade passed by.
And indeed, as the next GIF shows, the man with his hands up to protect his eyes from the sun actually was.
None other than the very guy the government insisted was the doorman.
There he was standing beside Lee, Billy Lovelady.
He was in the doorway, therefore, and during the commission hearings they, I believe, traded on that equivocation to have him identify himself in the doorway.
It's complex how it all happened.
But Billy Lovelady was in the doorway.
He was, however, not the figure known as Doorman.
If you look at the next slide, we see how Larry has reconstructed.
One of the fascinating aspects about this is that the FBI called Billy Lovelady in for an interview on the 29th of February, 1964, and asked him to wear the shirt he was wearing at the time.
It was a short-sleeved, red-and-white, vertically striped shirt looking nothing at all like the long-sleeved, richly textured, tattered and torn shirt on Dorman.
In fact, the FBI took photographs at the time, sent a report back to J. Edgar Hoover stating that Billy Lovelady came in with the blue jeans and the shirt he was wearing at the time of the assassination.
They concluded That he was the man in the doorway hoping the director would not notice the difference between them, that they weren't actually talking about the same guy who'd been the object of interest and decide to change their station assignment to Alaska.
In the next slide you see the CIA was so insistent on trying to create proof that the photograph had been published too soon for any alterations to be made that they actually dug into the archives of several obscure newspapers and created fake versions.
You can see the original on the left, the fake on the right.
Once again, Ralph Sinque receives my compliments for making this discovery.
The CIA even manufactured fake versions of newspapers to support the false claim that the photograph had been published too soon to have been subjected to alteration.
Indeed, When you discover that the photograph has been altered, and indeed in obvious ways, such as by black tie man being both in front and behind a doorman at the same time, it's preposterous to even suggest that the film
That the photograph could not have been altered, just as there are those who insist to this day that the Zapruder film and the other home movies have not been altered in spite of massive proof that they were altered.
Josiah Thompson, for example, insisted forever The chain of custody precluded it because the film was in the hands of the Secret Service, hoping us to beg the question and not realize the Secret Service were complicit.
So the fact that the film was in the hands of the Secret Service was precisely what was necessary to get it back to the secret CIA lab in Rochester adjacent to Kodak headquarters, known as Hawkeye Works, where David Lifton did such brilliant work in its exposure.
If you look at the next slide, you see one of the backyard photographs that was used to incriminate Lee Oswald in the mind of the American public.
Notice he's holding the Mannlicher Carcano rifle he's supposed to have used to shoot JFK.
He's got a revolver on his hip with which he's supposed to have shot Officer J.D.
Tippett.
Which does not compute if you know that the rounds found at the scene were fired by automatics.
They were of two different manufacturers, where Lee only had a revolver, and where the first officer on the scene initialed those rounds.
But subsequently, as occurred in this case in numerous respects, a substitution was made.
Now you had revolver rounds which had no initials.
The fact is they committed a number of blunders.
But this backyard photograph is fascinating.
This is one of the type where there are four of these backyard photographs where Lee asserted it was his face pasted on somebody else's body, and with time he'd be able to prove it.
Well, Lee didn't live long enough to prove it, but Gary Rivera did.
Take a look at the next slide.
This is a completely sensational GIF where Larry discovered the man who had played the role of standing in for Lee Oswald, Roscoe Hoyt, who was a Dallas police officer with ties to the CIA who had joined the force not long before the assassination would take place.
More about Roscoe as we proceed.
But if you look at the following slide, you'll see Lee Oswald was much too small to have been the figure in the doorway.
Roscoe White had a broader chest, a much more robust physique than Lee Oswald.
So here's another proof of how the evidence was manufactured to frame an innocent man.
In which there can be nothing more substantial than the fact that he was in the doorway at the time the motorcade passed by.
Now, in the next slide you'll see from a study that Jim Mars and I co-authored about the backyard photographs in which we cited brilliant work by Jack White, among others, who had noticed that the newspapers he's holding, two communist newspapers, A Militant and The Worker, had known dimensions.
And therefore they could function as a yardstick for the height of the individual who turned out to be too short, only 5'6", using that standard, whereas we knew from military ID and other sources Lee was about 5'10".
Which means that either they had used someone who was too short to be Lee Oswald for the stand-in, or what indeed appears to be the case, they simply put in the newspaper slightly too large when they created the backyard photographs.
We both had concluded that Roscoe White was indeed the stand-in, in part because he had a funny bump on his right wrist.
Notice there, identified by the Arrow for some bone that never improperly healed.
You found it not only on Roscoe in this photograph, but also on the backyard photograph.
In the case of the individual who stood in for Lee Oswald, you can find the piece about the backyard photographs that Jim Mars and I co-authored on my blog.
Now, the next slide really gives us a big picture.
We're talking about the sponsors of the assassination, the individuals and groups who wanted him out, primarily to replace him with the policies of Lyndon Johnson, the facilitators who made it happen, and then the mechanics, the shooters, the supervisors, and coordinators who were on the ground.
Let me begin with the sponsors.
The CIA, of course, felt threatened by Jack because he threatened to shatter the organization into a thousand pieces.
After the Bay of Pigs fiasco, he conducted a complete review of what had happened here and discovered he'd been Misled by the CIA, deliberately lied to about a popular uprising.
They had notified him that the Soviets had learned the date of the invasion and shared it with Fidel Castro.
The agency had learned this.
Everyone knew we were coming except for the commander-in-chief, who undoubtedly would have called it off under those circumstances.
The Joint Chiefs were upset with Jack because he'd not invaded Cuba.
Contrary to their unanimous recommendation, he's gone ahead and signed an above-ground test ban treaty with the Soviet Union against their unanimous opposition.
And now he was directing that all of our military forces be withdrawn from It was a myth, but it was one that set them against JFK.
Anti-Castro Cubans were upset with Jack because they believed he had abandoned them at the Bay of Pigs.
to oppose the expansion of international godless communism.
It was a myth, but it was one that set them against JFK.
Anti-Castro Cubans were upset with Jack because they believed he had abandoned them at the
Bay of Pigs.
It was a false belief, but it was one the CIA allowed them to maintain, to deflect criticism
from themselves.
The mafia was upset because Bobby was bringing about more investigations, prosecutions, and convictions than ever before in the history of organized crime.
Indeed, Justice J. Edgar had files on all the members of Congress about their sexual predilections and their affairs and mistresses.
The Mafia had a file on J. Edgar Hoover, including photos of him in Shall we say compromising positions with his close personal aide, Clyde Tolson, which they used to keep Edgar from acknowledging the existence of organized crime until after the Veloce hearings, where it was described in such detail it was no longer politically possible to deny.
The Fed was very upset because Jack had instructed the Department of Treasury to print Hundreds of millions of United States notes on the ground that it was absurd to have a consortium of private banks publish the currency of the United States and charge the United States interest for doing so when it could just as well be done by the Department of Treasury.
So we had United States notes with a red embossed imprint.
I recall as a young Marine Corps officer holding one of these in contrast to the Federal Reserve notes with a green embossed imprint.
The Texas oil men, of course, were very upset because Jack was threatening to cut the oil depletion allowance, a massive tax write-off on the ground that, because oil was a finite resource, in pumping oil out of the ground they were putting themselves out of business.
It was a bit of a fantasy, but nevertheless, they resented the idea Jack might take it away.
And Israel!
Jack was at loggerheads with David Ben-Gurion, the first PM and a founder of Israel, who wanted to develop nuclear weapons for Israel, which Jack opposed.
He did not want a nuclear arms race to break out in the Middle East, and it appears David Ben-Gurion instructed the Mossad to participate in the assassination when he himself resigned from office.
We're going to go through the mechanics and shooters on the ground in the case of—there turned out to be a total of eight.
Where I'm going to give you a name, rank, and serial number of six, where they were, the shots they took, and the effects they had, and identify the seventh, where only the eighth remains unknown, but where it turns out their supervisors included George Herbert Walker Bush, Who'd actually also conducted the Bay of Pigs invasion.
It was codenamed Operation Zapata, which was the name of the Bush oil drilling company.
I believe had it been a success, Zapata would have had a concession to drill all over the Caribbean Basin, and by Edward Lansdale, who in fact had been responsible for assassinations around the world, and where many of us have concluded that he positioned the shooters and determined the sequence of shots.
As I shall explain, the key players, the facilitators of the assassination itself were Lyndon Johnson himself and, of the cover-up, J. Edgar Hoover, whom Lyndon appointed to be the sole investigative agency for the Warren Commission, which preempted the role of multiple investigations, including in Texas, that almost certainly would have got to the heart of the matter.
So Lyndon cut them off.
Now when we go to look at the shooters themselves, the very first we have, we see in the next slide, was a Dallas Tech City Sheriff by the name of Harry Weatherford.
He was a crack shot on top of the Dallas County Jail or Records Building.
The jail was in the Records Building at the time of the assassination.
A researcher asked him if he'd shot JFK and he replied, you little son of a bitch, I shoot lots of people.
He obtained a premier quality silencer for his rifle just a couple of weeks before the assassination.
I'll explain that he acquired the shot that hit JFK in the back.
The next slide shows a man who was inside the Triple Underpass, Jack Lawrence, who was an expert for the Air Force.
He was using a newly developed weapon of which only a few were in possession, one of whom, however, Was by the head of the Air Force, who I believe shared it, Curtis LeMay, who I believe shared it with Jack Lawrence.
So Jack Lawrence knew what he was doing was acting in accordance with the military chain of command.
He fired the shot that passed through the windshield and hit JFK in the throat.
Now, if you go to the next slide, you'll see that bracketed by the fire escape is that window in the broom closet of the uranium mining company that was an asset for the CIA.
Therein was an anti-Castro Cuban we see in the next slide, Nestor Tony Escadro, who fired three shots using a Mannlicher Carcano.
What's crucial is these were the only unsilent shots fired during the assassination to create the acoustical impression of only three shots having been fired.
If you go to Little Havana in Freedom Park, there are only two statues, one of which was to the man who liberated Cuba, the other to Mr. Tony Escadro, who's after all a rather obscure figure, and if you were to ask why he's there, of someone who knew they might very well respond.
He took care of business.
You'll see in this next photograph about his his wife there in the memorial they put up to Tony Nestor Escadro.
Now the next slide shows Roscoe White, who was the Dallas police officer.
He was on the grassy knoll.
He had the easiest shot with a pistol, but They were under explicit instruction that Jackie must not be harmed.
So he pulled his shot and it wound up in the grass where a Dallas police lieutenant picked it up, pocketed it, and the shot was never seen again.
Now Roscoe White appears to have played a major role in the aftermath where several of us believe he was responsible for the assassination of as many as 50 50 JFK witnesses.
A very serious guy.
The next shooter was Frank Sturgis, who may have been the best shot in the world at the time.
Sturgis was firing from the intersection of the triple underpass and the grassy fence.
Now, someone, James Rothstein, Jim Rothstein, an NYPD gold shield detective actually arrested Sturgis when he came to New York before the House Select Committee reinvestigated the case in 1977-78 and arrested him entering the apartment of Rita Lawrence where he'd come to kill her so she couldn't testify.
And he stuck a gun in Sturgis' mouth, his partner in his stomach, and they took him into custody.
He gave him the throwaway line, good shooting, alluding to Dallas, and Sturgis acknowledged he'd shot JFK.
This would be the shot that entered the right temple and blew out the back of his head because he'd supported He had abandoned the men at the Bay of Pigs because among his dalliances was with a beautiful woman who was a spy for East Germany.
Another shooter then, and this is an important indication of what we have going on here, was Malcolm Mack Wallace.
Mack Wallace was a phenomenal shot.
I had a conversation with Madeleine Duncan Brown, a mistress of Lyndon.
Their affair began in 1947.
She bore him a son, Stephen, out of wedlock in 1950, who told me how she was herself a shooter and used to go to a local skeet and trap club.
And when Mack was there practicing, and she said he was diligent the two weeks before the assassination, That he never missed.
Mack was in the book depository, but on the opposite side, firing at John Connolly and the mistaken belief that it was Ralph Yarborough, the liberal Texas senator that Lyndon despised.
He and Jack had a huge argument that day, where he insisted that That Connelly be out and replaced by Yarbrough, but where Jack overrode him on the ground that the Chief Executive of the state should ride with the Chief Executive of the United States, but it was too late to get the word out to the shooters.
And in fact, it actually had the consequence of obfuscating the politics, because no one would believe that Lyndon Johnson, his crony, one of his most important political allies, would be put in harm's way.
But it happened out of inadvertence.
So it had certain benefits in obfuscating the scene.
In the next slide, we see something resembling what actually happened in Neely Plaza.
You see the green line from the top of the county records building?
That would be Harry Weatherford firing the shot that hit JFK in the back.
He appears to have fired a later shot that completely missed.
But left a mark in the vicinity of a sewer opening on the south grass.
Then you have the shot from inside the Triple Underpass.
Actually here it's brown, better to locate it inside, where Gary King and Larry Rivera and I traveled to Dallas and went there to discover there was a box, a metal box, for fuses and wiring that would have been perfect to hold the folded up version of this new weapon.
That Jack Lawrence appears to have been given by Curtis LeMay.
Then you see the yellow lines for the multiple shots, the three shots fired from the second floor of the DelTex by Nestor Tony Escadro.
You got an orange line there in the middle where Roscoe White fired a revolver with that shot that missed.
You see, further than when the intersection of the Triple Underpass and the Pickett Fence where Frank Sturgis was located, and if you go back to the book depository, of course, you can see from where several shots were fired by Malcolm Mack Wallace and the mistaken belief that John Connolly was Ralph Yarborough.
Now, Olli Dommegaard has identified another shooter who appears to have been the Israeli representative, because you'll notice as I'm going through here, it looks as though each of the groups sponsoring the assassination put up their own shooter, who is a fellow by the name of Clyde Forshaw from a crime family in Toronto associated with the Bronfen family, which represented Israeli interests.
He was in the Pergola area.
There was yet an eighth shooter who was on the grassy, the south grassy knoll.
There's a single tree there.
I wouldn't have believed there was sufficient cover for a single, you know, assassin to be there.
But I've since seen photographs in the possession of two different students of JFK, both of which show him standing, holding his rifle.
There can be no doubt that he was there and appears to have fired an additional shot to which I shall return.
Now, if we turn to the next slide, you'll see what was going on, putting the pieces together.
George H.W.
Bush was even in the Daltex supervising the anti-Castro shooter, Nestor Tony Escadro.
Bush, surprisingly, even brought W. along to Dealey Plaza on 22 November.
CIA officials were at Houston and Maine to pay their last respects, where Lansdale, as I've observed, appears to position the shooters and set the sequence of shots.
Now let's take a look at the next slide, and you'll see A photograph I discovered where Jesse Curry resigned as Chief of Police.
He published a booklet, Jesse Curry's Assassination File, a paperback, only available in 7-Eleven stores.
And when I found this photograph, it was obvious to me that was George H.W.
Bush standing right in front of the Book Depository.
The next slide shows how we can tell it was indeed George H.W.
Bush with that characteristic stance, tilt of the head, and so forth.
He insisted he was off giving a speech elsewhere, but that was complete baloney.
He was even arrested coming out of the Daltex in question.
Only briefly, but one of the deputy sheriffs kept records about it, which Roger Craig, who would later be shot by mistake, meaning he'd be killed to eliminate as a witness, reported.
So it's really stunning that Bush was there and described himself as an independent Houston oil man, which a cover he used when he was working with the CIA.
As I mentioned before, not only was the operation Code name Operation Zapata, but two of the ships were rechristened for the invasion.
One was renamed Houston, the other Barbara, which of course is what George H.W.
Bush did with his planes when he was a pilot.
The next slide shows work by brilliant, well, where we see Bush here, but we have Lansdale waiting to speak to Bush.
There's another photograph of Lansdale in Dealey Plaza where he's walking past the three tramps, so-called, The first of whom was Charles Rogers, also known as the man on the grassy knoll.
The second of whom, the tallest, was Charles Harrelson, the father of Woody Harrelson, the actor.
The third of whom was Chauncey Marvin Holt, who not only ran a school of assassins, he was an artist, a forger, a counterfeiter.
Where I met Chauncey, we had conversations, and he explained to me how he'd prepared 15 sets of Ford Secret Service credentials for use in and around Dealey Plaza.
When he got there, the red pickup truck behind the grassy knoll was not present.
Few know that that was a parking lot used by the Dallas Police Department.
So he wandered around Dealey Plaza, and he told me he saw more hit men and mercenaries than you'd find at a Soldiers of Fortune convention.
He went back and the pickup truck was there, so he left the credentials and headed for the railroad yard with Charles Harrison and Charles Rogers, whom he knew by the name of Montoya.
They hid in a railroad car.
They thought they were going to get away.
They discovered it was loaded with explosives, ammunition, and weapons.
When the police came, actually, after the car was pulled back, they were then marched through Dealey Plaza.
They were never booked.
They were never photographed.
And we had the situation where Actually, Lansdale walks past.
Oh, I see.
Here are the photographs to come.
In the next slide, you see some brilliant work done by Richard Hooke, identifying George H.W.
Bush as having been in the Daltex behind Nestor Tony Escadro.
I mean, this is absolutely fascinating stuff, which is confirmed by the fact that he was arrested coming out of the building.
In the next photograph you'll see some pictures of W, who we believe was looking a bit lost.
In the next slide, Sean, yeah, we see W looking a bit lost.
They seem to have tweaked his nose a bit.
We think because his father was missing in action, having been apprehended and taken for questioning.
But can you imagine taking your son to the assassination of the 35th President of the United States?
If we look at the next slide, we'll see officials of the agency paying their last respects.
These are a number of rather prominent members of the CIA.
The one who bears a resemblance to David Sanchez Morales, who was among the planners of the assassination, actually is not.
But a fellow named Pusha Penny of that sort who looked a lot like him but was not.
They were at Houston and Maine to pay their last respects.
Then here are the photographs to which I previously alluded.
The next photograph shows the three tramps, the first being Charles Rogers, The next slide, Sean.
Yeah, Charles Rogers, Charles Harrison, and Chauncey Holt.
And as I mentioned before, in the next photograph, you see where Lansdale is walking past, where his identification was made by not only L. Fletcher Prouty, who actually worked for Lansdale, but by Victor Kruelock, one of the most honored of American Marine Corps General, so there's no any doubt about it.
He had a distinctive gait, a distinctive twist to his hand, and a distinctive ring.
It was Lansdale.
And then, as I mentioned before, but as we see in the next photograph, once again, there we have Lansdale waiting to speak to George H.W.
Bush.
They were the on-the-ground supervisors of the assassination.
The next slide shows how we put all the pieces together.
The idea that nobody talked was just clever disinformation.
Exposing the cover-up narrows the range of possible suspects.
Noel Twyman was the first to lay out the dimensions of the plot.
It was actually hatched in Los Angeles in 1960 at the DNC convention, as I shall now explain.
Now, in his brilliant book, Bloody Treason, we have on one page, seen in the next slide, a list of many individuals who talked.
Carlos Marcello bragged about it.
Santo Trafaganda said Kennedy would be killed.
Joseph Miltier, a right-wing extremist, said he'd be shot with a rifle from a tall building.
David Atlee Phillips actually spoke about it.
Lyndon Johnson, Madeleine Brown, Marita Lorenz, even Frank Sturgis and Sam Giancana.
You notice here we do have Chauncey Holt, who actually gave interviews on radio and spoke with me about it.
Charles Harrelson himself actually said he'd shot JFK, which appears to be a false claim.
A fellow by the name of Jim Hicks, who was a communication coordinator, talked about it.
Billy Saul Estes and others who knew Lyndon Lyndon Baines Johnson, up close and personal, talked about Lyndon's role in the assassination.
Now, if you go to the next slide, this is very telling.
All the theories that have been advanced about it, you know, that it could have been a KGB, could have been a Moshe hit, could have been pro-or anti-Castro Cubans, all those, of course, fade into oblivion.
They're basically refuted when you consider that The Mafia could not have extended its reach into Bethesda Naval Hospital and altered x-rays that were under control of medical officers of the United States Navy and Secret Service.
Nor could, say, the KGB have substituted another brain for that of JFK.
Nor could pro or anti Castro Cubans have got possession of the Zapruder film to subject it to alteration.
You put those pieces together and you can see it's a very small range of possibilities that it was an inside job or the ultimate black hit.
You take a look at the next slide and this is the cover of Noel Twyman's absolutely sensational Bloody Treason, the assassination of John F. Kennedy, published in 1997.
Perhaps the most important page of which is shown on the following slide.
Namely, that in order to be successful, they needed to bring together various elements, including the CIA military, the Secret Service, the Mafia, and LBJ.
All the Mafia would have had to do is get the CIA involved, and it would have the CIA recruit the Secret Service and LBJ, and it would have had a perfect conspiracy.
All LBJ had to do was recruit the CIA, who would use the Mafia as needed in the Secret Service, and he had a perfect conspiracy.
Hoover would fall in line after the fact, When confronted by LBJ and the Mafia with the blackmail material they had on him.
In this scenario, right-wing extremists, if involved at all, would provide money for the assassination.
And indeed, there's a remarkable film called Executive Action that I highly recommend about the Dallas origins of the plot.
But here I'm going to be more specific with how it originated, as we'll see from the next slide.
In Los Angeles in 1960, JFK defeated Lyndon Johnson for the presidential nomination.
Jack extended the invitation to run as his vice presidential nominee to Stuart Symington of Missouri, but he gave him overnight to think about it.
Bobby went by the Johnson suite with a purely formality of inviting Lyndon to run as president, which he was sure he would decline.
On the contrary to his surprise, Lyndon jumped on it.
Threatening to expose it, Jack had Addison's disease and wasn't expected to live a long, healthy life.
And that, among his paramours, had been this beautiful East German woman who was a spy, using information obtained by J. Edgar Hoover.
He also threatened that if he were not on the ticket, then any legislative proposals sent down by the White House would be dead on arrival, because in his position as a powerful majority leader, he would block them.
We're in a pickle predicament and couldn't figure a way out.
Jack, for the only time in his political career, had to rescind a political decision and accept Lyndon as his running mate.
Now, when one of Lyndon's wealthy backers learned what was taking place, he burst into the Johnson suite cursing and swearing That now LBJ would help JFK become president.
Bobby Baker took him into a bedroom and explained what they had in mind.
He came out all smiles, saying he thought that was an excellent plan.
Bobby Baker would subsequently publicly declare that JFK would not live out his first term and that he would die a violent death.
In the course of events, Lyndon Johnson would send his chief administrative aide, Cliff Carter, to Dallas to make sure all the arrangements were in place for the assassination.
Now you have the big picture.
I have some fascinating addenda since presenting before we find outlined in the next slide where Dennis Camino has taken a closer look at the use of the body double where I suggested photoshopping had taken place.
He confirms the ears have been changed to avoid instant detection.
The grown autopsy photos are demonstrably Photoshop fakes, and John McAdams, a now recently deceased lone nutter from Marquette University, located not far from where I reside here near Madison, Wisconsin, has a video that shows both a turn on to Elm and the spectators
waving.
Really stunning stuff.
We'll talk about it as we watch it.
Here's the first of the slides where Dennis zoomed in on the ears
and discovered they had been altered.
He did much more where he's very adept and skillful at this, having done a great deal of research on alterations to the
Alchian 6, as it's technically known, where we see in the next
photograph how much alteration was done to this autopsy photograph
to manufacture the fake autopsy photographs that Robert Rodin has promulgated.
Where in Des Moines, Iowa, as we were waiting to speak at a high school class about the assassination over lunch, he offered to let me use them, and I responded to him, yeah, but they're fake.
Here you see more indications in the next slide, too, that Rodin has been marketing fake autopsy photographs, which is not surprising considering to this day he still insists That the Zabruder film is authentic, believe it or not.
Now here we have this McAdams video and we're going to begin at the two minutes in and you'll
notice how he has both a turn the turn from Houston on to Elm you'll see it and then the
spectators waving.
Now here we have the two minutes in and you'll notice how he has both a turn the turn from
Houston on to Elm you'll see it and then the spectators waving.
They've been ordered not to take part in security for the President.
The clock on top of the depository reads 1230.
President Kennedy's limousine slows to seven miles per hour to make the sharp turn from Houston onto Elm Street.
Abraham Zapruder begins filming the motorcade.
Notice the spectators waving here.
The gun misfires and the bullet strikes the president in the back.
Most witnesses believe this shot is a firecracker or a backfire.
The six-bull assassin reloads and fires a second shot.
This shot hits a tree branch between the Assassin and the President.
It ricochets across the plaza, striking the curb on the south side of Elm Street.
Bystander James Pegg is cut on the face by a flying piece of concrete.
On the north side of Elm Street, the only person in the plaza with an open umbrella pumps the umbrella into the air.
A third shot is fired from in front of him of a pig and hits John Kennedy.
A dark inflected man standing a few feet from the man with the umbrella raises his fist in the air.
A shooter on top of the records building fires into the limousine.
The bullet strikes Governor Connolly in the back and exits through his chest.
Secret Service agent John Reddy jumps off of the follow-up car and starts toward the presidential limousine.
Emery Roberts, special agent in charge of the follow-up car, doesn't believe Reddy can make it to the limousine and calls him back.
Limousine driver William Greer sees people on the overpass and believes he is driving directly into the ambush.
slows the car down causing the follow-up car to nearly collide with the limousine.
A fifth shot is fired. This shot hits from the depository building and misses the motorcade
entirely, striking the grass on the south side of Elm Street.
You can freeze it here.
Yeah, this is what is known as a limited hangout.
He's given a very deceptive and misleading presentation of not only the sequence of shots, how many shooters, and what happened in Dealey Plaza, but nevertheless, he makes a couple of interesting claims.
Now, I'm convinced that turn from Houston onto Elm was manufactured so they could claim actually they had the turn because the driver, William Greer, swung out too widely and nearly hit a concrete abutment, having apparently mistaken the frontage road in front of the book depository for Elm Street.
And he had to pause and hesitate to get back into line.
That's why they took it out.
Now, as far as the waving spectators, that looked fairly realistic.
No doubt they actually had spectators waving in some of the footage, but there was something about it that caused them to remove it.
It's also true that Emery Roberts, who was a head of the Secret Service detail, was, you know, responsible for leaving the two agents behind at Love Field, and also called back John Reddy when he ran forward.
Which was absurd, because Reddy was trying to perform his duty.
And then, of course, he talks about Greer slowing the limousine.
Wow, how absurd is that?
You slow the limousine, you make the president an easier target.
Greer didn't just slow the limousine, he brought it to a complete halt.
One more point that's provoked by what we heard from John Adams.
Jim Lewis has gone through the South firing high-velocity bullets through windshields to see if he could hit dummies in the backseat.
This is reported in the third of my trilogy, The Great Zapruder Film Hoax.
He not only discovered that when the bullet passed through the windshield, it makes a small white spiral nebula with a dark hole in the center, as we saw in the the frame of the Altyn 6 looking up close and personal, but
it makes the sound of a firecracker when it passes through. So that is a number of benefits we
derive from taking a look at what we had there, coming from someone who's trying to convince us
that it was in fact, well in this case, notice it's a qualified, it's an assassination with
multiple shooters, but it's most certainly a misleading account.
Now if we go to the next slide, we'll see a fascinating result from Ralph Sincade.
He's done a brilliant expose of what we thought we saw on TV, that Jack Ruby did not actually shoot Lee Oswald.
For many of you, this will be the first time you've ever heard this hypothesis.
Believe it or not, Ruby was taken to an isolation room before the transfer was affected and stripped to his underwear.
An FBI agent by the name of James Bookout put on Ruby's clothing.
But what Ralph discerned was the hairline is wrong, the shoes are wrong.
So we had an FBI agent playing the role.
Once again, as with 9-11 we learned, seeing is not always believing.
Take a look at the next.
Take a look at the next frame.
And you see, this is the famous photograph.
Where we have a man that we believe is Jack Ruby reaching forward to shoot Leo Oswald.
Now I'll notice, Ralph noticed a couple of features.
Look at the shoe there standing forward, that right shoe.
You wouldn't normally pay attention.
Look at the hairline, the back of his head, beneath his hat.
Look at the hairline.
Then take a look at what happened almost immediately as we see in the very next frame.
They all surrounded the shooter.
They made it impossible to identify and then hustled him out of the scene.
They hustled him out of the scene.
Why did they do that?
Because it wasn't actually the man that they were going to frame for shooting Lee Oswald.
Take a look at the next photograph and you'll see what Ralph discovered.
There's Jack Ruby, the way he was dressed, and he was wearing kind of a half of a boot, but compare that with a shoe on the right of the individual who stepped forward to shoot Lee Oswald.
Take a look at the next slide and you'll see Jack's hairline was completely different.
Take a look at the hairline and compare it with the man who stepped forward to shoot, Lee Oswald, as we see in the very next slide.
You'll notice It's not the same.
It was very neatly textured.
This was a completely different guy playing the role of Lee Oswald.
We even have a bit of a suspicion that it was rehearsed.
Take a look at the next slide, and you'll see again his profile in comparison with that of Jack Ruby.
It's pretty obvious they are not the same, and if Larry were to do one of his brilliant superpositions, It would leave no doubt about it.
If you look at the next frame, this is one of the few photographs we have of Bookout, where they appear to have altered his nose.
This is one of the very few photographs we have of Bookout.
There's much more that Ralph Zinkai has done with this, and I highly encourage you to go to his blog, where he has published multiple blogs about this.
Very surprising, completely brilliant finding of Ralph Zinke.
Meanwhile, on the next slide, I give you recommended reading.
These are now contributions to the scientific literature on JFK.
Douglas Horn's Inside the Assassination Review Board's all five volumes Very meticulous, absolutely sensational repository, especially volume four about the switching of the original film for the substitute brought in from Rochester that took place at the National Photographic Interpretation Center in Washington, D.C.
David W. Mantic, MD, PhD.
John F. Kennedy's head wounds, a final synthesis, including his analysis of the Harper fragment.
I'd just like to point out that there was this large triangular chunk of skull from the back of the head.
That was identified by a medical student.
He picked it up.
I suspect it was the same chunk of skull that the Secret Service took from the little boy and threw in the back of the vehicle.
They brought it back to Dealey Plaza and put it somewhere to make it look as though it had been the effect of a shot from behind.
But when the HSCA reconstructed the back of the skull, they didn't even take into account the missing chunk, this triangular chunk, the Harper fragment.
How insulting is that?
And then Larry Rivera himself has a brilliant book, The JFK Horseman, framingly altering the Alchon 6 and Untangling other mysteries about the assassination.
I recommend them all.
And my fourth book on the assassination, JFK, Who, How, and Why?
Solving the World's Greatest Murder Mystery.
So if you get to the next slide, you'll see here we have Douglas Horns inside the Assassination Records Review Board.
I think every student of JFK is grateful for Doug to the tremendous job he did here in collating this mass of evidence and publishing it.
The next is David Bantik's sensational work on John F. Kennedy's head wounds.
If we go to the next slide on John F. Kennedy's head wounds and a new analysis of the harbor fragment, this is sensational stuff.
Then we have, in the next slide, Larry Rivera as a JFK horseman, where he talks about framing Lee, altering the Alchon 6, and resolving other mysteries.
I mean, Larry Rivera has just been doing absolutely brilliant, cutting-edge research, including, by the way, based upon the most recent documents, establishing beyond any doubt that Lee Oswald Never went to Mexico.
The whole idea that he had gone there to obtain a visa to make an escape to Cuba and back to the Soviet Union was totally manufactured, where among the CIA assets in Mexico were, believe it or not, three presidents of Mexico.
And then finally, this is my fourth book on the assassination, JFK, who, how, and why, Where Larry's book and mine are both available at moonrockbooks.com and the others at amazon.com.
And I just want to say how much I have benefited from collaborative research with the best students to ever undertake the investigation of the death of the 35th President of the United States.
Scott, I can't thank you enough for this opportunity to present the results of our collaborative research.
Extraordinarily powerful, of course, Jim, on so many different levels.
The technical question I want to put, since the material is hot, is why didn't the governor of Texas that was sitting in the front of Kennedy and his wife and even Jacqueline Kennedy, why didn't they talk or go public or say anything?
It would seem that that governor, when he was hit with a bullet and he's right in front, That he would have a wealth of material to say and to talk about this.
Do you have any insight into that?
Oh, absolutely.
He always insists that he was not hit by the same bullet.
He always denied the magic bullet theory.
There was a chunk of lead that was lodged in his left thigh after it passed through his back, shattered a rib, exited beneath his right nipple, entered his right wrist, wound up in his left thigh.
All that allegedly from one bullet.
But where the trajectories indicate he may have been hit by three different bullets after his demise, a request was made to remove the lead to study it, but his widow declined.
Nellie said, if you wanted that, you should have arranged it with him in the advance.
But remember, John Connally was complicit in the assassination plot.
He was part of the plan.
He actually feigned, I believe, feigned a phone call to the White House to alter the route, so instead of going straight up Main Street, which wouldn't have involved slowing down the limousine, he introduced that diversion of turning right off of Main onto Houston, and then the 110-degree turn back onto Elm Street to bring the President into the kill zone.
So, John Connolly was not going to be someone who was going to admit evidence that was going to reveal the plot that he had participated in fashioning with Lyndon Baines Johnson to make him the President of the United States.
And let me add, there's an absolutely brilliant book by Phil Nelson entitled LBJ, Mastermind of JFK's Assassination.
If you want to know how totally ruthless and ambitious and narcissistic And uncompromising was Lyndon Johnson, who always wanted to be president of all the people.
You cannot miss Phil Nelson's brilliant book.
I recommend it without qualification.
Yeah, I remember my aunt in Scotland had commented about Lyndon Johnson being behind it all.
So there was a general suspicion and hostility towards Johnson on a variety of levels.
And of course, You were a Marine Corps officer in those days.
You were from that time, you were a witness and a participant in the culture and everything that was going on.
And having done this research in this book, I'm just curious from your perspective, from someone who has been in that time, you've grown through that time, you were in that culture, you were of the old school Marine Corps, What is this personally and morally?
How has this spoken to you?
How have you interpreted this?
How is this best expressed by you to young generations of people when you say, this is what happened?
How does this affect you?
I'm very curious because I came much, much, much later.
But this has to be an extraordinarily difficult burden and heavy and a repulsive thing.
Yeah, it's all ironic.
I was aboard the LPH, Iwo Jima, anchored out of Kaohsiung Harbor when JK was shot.
The officer of the deck, who was the executive officer of the mortar battery, of which I was a fire direction officer, awakened me at 3.30.
You know, I've reflected on it.
Then he awakened me again an hour later to tell me that the guy who did it was a communist.
It all seemed a little too pat to me at the time.
You know, I've reflected on it.
When I was undergoing basic school training as an infantry officer, I participated in
the basic school men's chorus.
And one evening we were all ordered to get into our whites and under very hush-hush circumstances
rush aboard a bus and take him to in front of bright lights perform, and it was in front
of Jack Kennedy, Jackie Lyndon Johnson.
So I actually had the extraordinary experience of singing for Jack and Jackie whom I admired beyond words.
What we had as a consequence, Scott, and this may be most important from an historical point of view, We had a succession of presidents who would never have held office but for the assassination of JFK.
Remember, the conservatives were worried then that we'd have a Kennedy dynasty, that Jack would serve two terms, then Bobby would serve two terms, then Teddy would serve two terms, so they sought to cut it off.
So first of all, you had Lyndon Johnson, who never would have been in that position, And then you had Richard Nixon, who actually was in Dallas and participated in a meeting at the home of Clint Murchison Sr.
the night before, which was a ratification meeting.
He was involved in the assassination.
He would claim later he also wanted to be president, but he wouldn't kill for it.
Well, he nevertheless was complicit because they knew he could become president and didn't want anyone to occupy that office that might reopen the investigation.
And then after Watergate, and removing Nelson Rockefeller, we had Gerald Ford.
Well, he'd been Jay Edgar's man on the Warren Commission, keeping Edgar informed about the directions they were going, so he could cut it off by supplying the right information to Alan Dulles, of all people, who was a member of the Warren Commission.
And then we had, you know, the intervention of Jimmy Carter that was like an accidental presidency.
However, when Ronald Reagan became president, and there was an attempt on the life of Ronald Reagan, it wasn't actually Hinckley who shot him, it was a Secret Service agent as he pushed Reagan into the vehicle, a flechette that barely missed its heart, telegraphing, let George do it.
And from that point on, George Herbert Walker Bush, who of course had been a director of the CIA, became the de facto president.
And then he served his own term.
Bill Clinton, of course, has a lot of ties that go back to the CIA, his work in MENA and all that.
It appears a Murrah building was blown up in order to recover all the files about the drug dealing out of MENA, Arkansas.
W, of course, was a dim bulb, but they needed him in office along with Dick Cheney, who was really running the shop to bring us 9-11 and get U.S.
forces into the Middle East to benefit Israel by taking out the modern Arab state that served as a counterbalance to Israel's domination of the entire region and eventually To confront a Persian nation of Iran.
So our government has been compromised since the assassination of JFK, Scott.
Every president knowing that they were serving at the end of the barrel of a rifle.
And let's reflect for a moment.
Another episode of Lyndon Johnson's treason was the USS Liberty, in which the Navy vessel, the USS Liberty, which was a signal ship, was in the Mediterranean during the Israeli-Egyptian War.
And was attacked by Israeli F-16s that fire-bombed, napalmed, machine-gunned, I believe torpedo-boated the USS Liberty.
Killed, I think it was 34 soldiers or wounded 150 plus.
And Lyndon Johnson had said, I want to sink it or send it to the bottom.
The Israelis knew it was an American ship and after that episode all of the US sailors were separated and told never to talk about it again, but that should have been an act of war declared.
against Israel for its shenanigans.
I know there were talks about Admiral Morrison, the father of Jim Morrison, doing an investigation or wanting to do it.
And then Morrison, Jim Morrison, was killed.
There's also talk about John McCain's father was the one that covered up the investigation.
But I'll hand it back to you just to comment on that, because I know you know about it.
Go ahead.
Well, Scott, you are correct on all of the above, that it appears that the attack on the USS Liberty, which was brought all the way from off the coast of Africa all around to the Mediterranean to be off of the Egyptian coast, ...was to be sunk deliberately, blamed on the Egyptians, so the U.S.
could enter the war.
There may have even been a plan to nuke Cairo.
I mean, it was that serious.
Moshe Dayan was such a brilliant general, he mopped things up, didn't need any U.S.
support.
But you are, in my opinion, 100% correct.
We even have communication between the pilots, the Israeli pilots and their command and control, saying it's flying an American flag.
Should I still attack?
And they were directed to attack.
My understanding is that Lyndon Johnson actually personally ordered the callback of the American planes that were flying to the defense of the liberty, as you observed.
He wanted that ship to go to the bottom of the sea.
Miraculously, it stayed afloat.
But it is one of the outrages of recent history, and in my opinion, you're 100% correct to describe Lyndon Johnson as having committed another grossly treasonous act.
It's amazing how much left-wingers, and this even includes some JFK students, want to deflect attention from Lyndon Johnson onto Alan Dulles.
Alan Dulles was kind of a studious guy.
Believe me, Alan Dulles would not have undertaken this assassination.
Alan Dulles wouldn't have been in the position.
I've outlined the bare bones of the situation.
I'll only say that this attempt to divert attention to Alan Dulles is to try to give LBJ kind of a cleansing he does not deserve.
He was the brainchild behind the assassination of JFK, have no doubt.
And I reiterate that Noel Twyman did a completely sensational job of putting it together earlier, I think, in a more thorough way than anyone else ever.
Remember, that book was published in 1997.
Let me reiterate, however, that David Lifton, in his book Best Evidence, first published in 1980, Gave us a lot of leads, a lot of breakthrough.
You know, the massive wound to the back of the head which turned out to have been done by surgery to the head he was supposed to put us on it.
That the body wasn't actually in the Navy ambulance that Jackie rode to Bethesda.
That it had already come into the hospital in a black hearse from Walter Reed where they'd offloaded it.
At the airbase outside in a body bag, put it onto a helicopter and flown it to Walter Reed so that bullet fragments could be removed by the best pathologists in the military.
It's all stunning stuff.
So I got to give a gold star to David Lifton, who in many ways, I think, published what may be the single most important book ever on the assassination of JFK.
And how different the world was after that.
After JFK's assassination, we did have the Vietnam War.
My father was drafted into the war as a Marine Corps fighter pilot.
You were a part of the Marine Corps in those days as well.
So many others went to Vietnam.
There's the other Gulf of Tonkin false flag.
So much capitalistic exploitation of that war.
And then you have a whole generation that has been ripped up and ruined from it.
That are now in their late 70s and early 80s that are being subjugated to another extermination, another genocide, which is the COVID-19 vaccine, which we have exhaustively done reports on about the death and the impending organ failure that that vaccine is doing.
Well, the military and the VA And these fools like General Milley and others are exterminating our military, our veterans, our seniors, by pushing this.
And this will destroy our ability to defend our nation, our national security, our entire military will be decimated.
And it's remarkable that we have been a nation that has been so deceived and manipulated and brainwashed with the America, Star Spangled Banner, Jim Cagney, you know, Dance-a-thon, where the reality of the evil, the corruption, the manipulation, the lies, the deception, the murders, never mind the Central American MS-13, which again, George Bush, tremendous criminal, they were all participant in the cocaine trade, arms for, you know, Iran hostage arms and such, Colonel North was doing, Oliver North,
All of that is now coming against us with the infiltration of these MS-13 and all of these people from South America.
It seems this country has endured so much deception that we're at a breaking point and I think it's very critical and essential that these sort of programs awaken people and give them the full burden of truth so that they will never again be surprised or caught off guard or lured or led down this path Which very soon could involve again another assassination, specifically Joe Biden and Kamala Harris to usher in some other kind of police state.
I could see that happening if they did it to JFK.
They certainly could do it to Biden.
But Jim, I'll hand it to you to get your closing thoughts because we're coming at the end of the program about what all this means, what is happening now and where we're going.
Go ahead, Jim Fetzer.
Well, I think you're right, Scott, that just as they had to steal the election of 2000 to bring us George W. Bush and Dick Cheney in order to facilitate 9-11 and the Patriot Act, they had to steal the election of 2020 to bring us Joe Biden and Kamala Harris to usher in the vaccine mandate and to open the borders, to flood the nation with migrants, to let the country go to hell.
Anyone who has any doubt That this nation under full bore attack from multiple directions is being very naive.
Pull your head out of the sand.
There's a massive assault on the United States.
And they're continuing to do the best they can to denigrate Donald Trump and his followers
in many completely fantastic and unwarranted ways because they fear him.
They know he's a guy who can clean their clock again.
He did it in 2016, even though it was rigged for Hillary.
He did it again in 2020 until they actually started altering the votes.
He'd won an overwhelming re-election from coast to coast carrying California and Minnesota, as I was predicting,
where Sidney Powell had posted a map where Trump actually won 410 electoral votes.
And where now you have all these state authorities trying to defend the Democrat position
in the face of massive evidence of voter fraud.
Not only in Arizona, in Georgia, in Pennsylvania, in Michigan, in Wisconsin.
This was the greatest election theft in the history of the United States.
We've had others, but they were trivial.
They were child's play by comparison.
And none of this is good for America.
And the censorship Being imposed by the social media giants means that Americans aren't even able to share their thoughts with their friends, their relatives about COVID, about the administration.
They are obliterating hundreds of thousands of posts, whether it's on Facebook or Twitter.
They're taking down more and more YouTube.
We're in the grip of a totalitarian state, Scott, and it is a shame.
And I'm thankful that we have around 150 million armed Americans who are in the position to come to the defense of the nation, but I think this whole COVID thing has been so cleverly designed as to take us out without even firing a shot.
Well, you and I swore that oath, Jim, when we raised our right hand to support and defend the Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic, and these are domestic enemies, and we will stand as patriots, as veterans, To stand against any threat to the constitution.
We stand with our president, Donald J. Trump, the commander in chief.
We stand with General Flynn.
We stand with other patriots that are rising up.
And I think information and the truth telling is psychological warfare.
And we thank John Chambers and American Media Periscope for giving us a platform.
This is part of an awakening process.
you shall know the truth and the truth shall set you free and it will change
your DNA will change your composition it will change your conviction and your
thinking and it is all right to be righteously enraged at evil and be
refusing to tolerate it so this is part of an awakening process this is part of
a training operation to empower you as the audience to understand these things
to see them to develop your senses so that you can serve your place in
in defending this republic.
And I know, Jim, you and I stand together in that mutual agreement.
So, thank you again for being with us.
Such an incredible production, Dr. James Fetzer.
We will continue with Dr. Fetzer in our forthcoming series on additional Revelations and false flags and other events that will be in the coming weeks.
So stay tuned and thank you again for joining us.
God bless you.
▲
Export Selection