All Episodes
Previous Next
July 20, 2021 - Jim Fetzer
01:06:39
Need to Know News (20 July 2021) with Joe Olson and Michael Ivey
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer from Madison, Wisconsin, where I'm delighted to be featuring today Joe Olson from Houston, Texas, and Michael Ivey, although currently Asheville, North Carolina, formerly from Fort Houston, Texas.
So we're calling these Texas Tuesdays.
We're very glad to have you here to join us for all the news you need to know.
We begin With a judge dismissing a lawsuit attempting to overturn the Georgia Senate election.
This appears to have been a very reasonable suit, where the plaintiff, Michael Doherty, alleged that two January runoff contests won by then-Democrat candidates Raphael Warnock and John Ossoff were fraught with irregularities and misconduct.
He argued they should be redone with paper ballots instead.
In my opinion, his position is impeccable.
Lawyers for Warnock, Ossoff, and various Georgia officials said Doherty's arguments had already been rejected by other judges, and some of the issues he raised occurred in the November 3rd election, not the January runoff.
Superior Court Judge Brian Amiro rejected the lawsuit, said the challenge wasn't filed on time, while adding the two senators weren't properly served with a lawsuit.
That means it was rejected on procedural grounds.
That does not mean the points he was making are improper.
He therefore ought to refile a proper lawsuit and serve the parties appropriately.
Georgia Speaker of the House David Ralston said Fulton County should be investigated following reports of problems with the November 3rd election and a subsequent audit of the count's results.
Indeed, this is hardly the only state.
Meanwhile, we can ask, is Joe Biden reimagining the Jimmy Carter presidency?
Since before the 2020 election, Biden and others have sought to draw comparison between his administration and the FDR.
But the reality looks a lot more like that of Jimmy Carter.
Biden fostered the comparison as he made one of his last campaign stops in Warm Springs, Georgia, where FDR chose to convalesce after contracting polio.
This place, Warm Springs, is a reminder that though broken, each of us can be healed, that as a people and a country, we can overcome a devastating virus, that we can heal a suffering world, and yes, we can restore our soul and save our country, he said at the time, reading a script.
CNN senior analyst David Gergen argued at the end of Biden's first 100 days that the president was not the next FDR, but that he shared important similarities such as avoiding the tendency to make big policy mistakes at the very moment the team is less prepared, and inner strength stemming from personal loss.
However, Biden's policy decisions and their effects have likened him more to Carter than to FDR.
When it comes to energy, a chief issue at Carter's presidency, Biden has always overseen a sea change that has done tremendous damage to the industry.
Canceling the Keystone XL pipeline, leaving thousands reeling as their jobs evaporated at the stroke of a pen.
When the Biden administration went for the plan to freeze drilling permits on federal land, American energy dependents seemed to slip away.
They then insisted on keeping extra unemployment benefits in his America Rescue Plan, even as the economy struggled to rebound.
Many believe the move contributed to disappointing unemployment numbers.
The result has been an economy more sluggish than expected, while prices at the pump and in the grocery store continue to rise, all of which have raised the specter of stagflation not seen since Carter's presidency.
Fox News host Peter Segreth and Will Kaye drew several comparisons to Carter in late May.
The New York Post is saying Joe Biden's proving to be a master of disaster, more so than even Jimmy Carter.
That's a headline.
Joe Biden is even proving more of a master of disaster than Jimmy Carter.
It's stunning how much success Biden has managed to reverse in just four months.
The long lines at the pump, slowing growth, rising inflation.
It's looking like the Jimmy Carter era, except it took Carter years to produce disasters this president has fostered in scant months.
I think they've got it right.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yeah, we've got a serious malignancy problem in our government and includes all the branches, which would be the judiciary and the military.
There's a great video by four mathematicians called Math Wars, and it explains how the Dominion vote rigging system works.
And it said that they were limited by A six degree polynomial algorithm that was inside the domain program.
And these guys explain it great.
And I'll put it in the show notes.
It's about an hour and a half long.
It's highly technical, but it's also very well explained.
So anybody would be able to understand it.
And certainly anybody that's filing a lawsuit in relationship to crooked voting machines in the United States needs to review this.
Again, the title is Math Wars.
It's at Bit Shoots.
And I will put the link in the show notes.
Excellent, excellent job.
Michael, your thoughts?
That's interesting.
I agree with what Joe said that we had a malignancy problem in all of our All of our governmental bodies and agencies.
I understand that that judge made the decision on procedural grounds, and it seems like that's the favorite dodge, the favorite end run that judges are consistently doing whenever they get suits that are challenging the election that we just went through.
And I use the word advisedly.
Um, but on the other hand, he, uh, he suggested that it be refiled.
So maybe that's just, um, that's just how he's doing it at this time.
And maybe it'll get assigned to another judge.
The story about Biden being like Carter or the administration, that one's hard for me to get behind.
I think it's a strange comparison to compare Jimmy Carter, who actually won his election, or as far as we know he did, and Jimmy Carter could speak in sentences without a teleprompter.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Of course, he meant the administration, stagflation, you know, rising prices at the gas pump, rising prices in the grocery store, compromising energy independence, which Donald Trump had secured for the United States for the first time in our history, doing everything he can to reverse it.
Meanwhile, we have a new poll revealing a whopping 58% of Americans think the leftist media is enemy of the people.
Friday, Rasmussen released its latest poll of Americans' trust in the media, specifically asking if they agreed with Trump's assessment the new media are truly the enemy of the people.
They found a total of 58% agreed with the statement, 34% strongly, 24% somewhat,
36% did not agree, 13% somewhat, 23% strongly, only 6% were unsure.
Among conservatives, the sentiment was shared by 81%, 56% agreeing strongly, 25% somewhat.
Interestingly, 15% of conservatives do not believe media is the enemy of the people, 7% of whom strongly disagree.
Liberals, of course, weren't on board.
68% of self-identifying liberals disagreed with the statement.
54% strongly, 14 somewhat.
But there were even liberals who believe the news media is the enemy of the people.
A total of 30% agreed with Trump.
11% strongly, 19 somewhat.
The divide is also found along party lines.
76% of Republicans agree, 54% strongly, 22 somewhat.
But more Democrats than liberals Meaning the Liberals, as a subset of the Democrats, are with President Trump on the issue.
37% of Democrats saying they agree.
17% strongly.
20% somewhat.
Rasmussen also asks, how serious a problem is fake news?
83% said it was either very serious, 55%, or somewhat 28%.
That's a huge number.
While the largest percentage that agreed came from conservatives, 91%, even 73% of self-identified liberals believe fake news is a problem.
Finally, Do you trust the political news you are getting?
I take it that means from all sources, which could include Fox, Tucker, Hannity, Laura.
Only 37% answered yes, 43% no, 20% were not sure.
Yes, 43%. No, 20% were not sure.
It broke down to 61% of conservatives, but only 19% of liberals who say they don't trust.
Meanwhile, a travel alert.
If you want a nice example of fake news, remember they can manipulate the COVID case rate by simply adjusting the PCR test to high cycles to guarantee false positives.
They now appear to be targeting Florida, no doubt because Ron DeSantis is making a strong stand and appealing greatly to Republicans and conservatives across the nation.
So they want to tarnish him.
But notice they're also going after other states that, by no mere coincidence, strongly supported Donald Trump, making them the pandemic of the unvaccinated, even though we know that the deaths are occurring now among the vaccinated, not the unvaccinated, at an overwhelmingly greater rate.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yeah, amazing.
I had my first major web post article at InfoWars in April of 2009, and it was titled, Hoax of the Century, on the fake dichotomy of the big warmest and the lukewarmest, claiming that carbon dioxide either warms a whole lot or it warms just a little bit, and that it's a major factor in climate or it's only a minor factor, when in fact it's a no factor because it cools.
So that was my first article, and I went on to co-author a book with a group of guys called Slaying the Sky Dragon, and after our book was published, we realized that we were not making much headway in the media market, so we opened Principa Scientific.
And it was founded, I believe, in 2010, 2011, something like that.
John O'Sullivan and I were the major instruments in founding that and continuing it.
And today, USA Today has a story, news, Fact Check 2001, who advises people to continue wearing masks.
And it's a smear piece on a PSI article that was written several months ago.
Which documents the varying positions of who over time as far as face masks and says fact check who never said that you weren't supposed to wear them when in fact who did say because there was a shortage of face masks and they should go to first responders and people with critical care.
So, you know, bottom line is.
You can irritate the system enough that the system will advertise your alternative views, and in order to slander you, they will actually give you coverage in USA Today.
That's amazing.
I want to tell you, Joe, I think Principia Scientific was a brilliant idea.
I congratulate you on that.
And be sure, send me a link.
We want in the notes a link to that article about CO2, because that's one of the great hoaxes the Democrats are promoting.
Michael, your thoughts?
Oh, there was a great series on CO2 called Redemption of the Beast that was put out by Randall Carlson about four or five years ago.
I always refer people to that because it really gets into the weeds about the science of CO2 and refutes the whole CO2 caused global warming myth.
But going back to the stories, the story about 58% now thinking the media is the enemy of the people.
Wow, that sounds like progress to me.
I've been saying that ever since I realized it right in the aftermath of 9-11 and realized how the entirety of the mainstream media could be held on Point for whatever thing they wanted to push.
You know, we keep one of the reasons that we keep doing this, of course, or maybe it's the main reason is that we keep hoping will reach some form of critical mass by continuing to pump the truth out to the people.
But we're fighting a great deal of inertia.
Built up by our, you know, our laziness and Paul Craig Roberts likes to use the word insouciant society since the end of World War II.
Optimistic thing happened to me last night in that regard.
And that was, I was at my local watering hole and I was drinking a beer, but I was close enough to overhear the conversation going at a table of about six or seven people.
And these were really working class people.
A couple of women, the rest were guys, but they were, you know, not intellectuals, not academics.
These were working class people.
But I couldn't believe the conversation that was coming from their table, and they were talking about this very thing that you can't trust the media, and they were going into historical stuff, like whether Hitler died in the bunker or not, and it was just very satisfying for me to hear people that, if you just looked at them or just heard them talk for 20 seconds, you'd have no idea that they knew about those things.
Michael, that's a sensational report.
Yes.
I think one of Trump's greatest contributions has been calling out fake news media, and now virtually all Americans understand they're being played.
Meanwhile, at MIT... Yes, Michael?
I just wanted to make one comment about that story about Florida being the epicenter of the pandemic of the unvaccinated.
And that is, going back to the media point, I don't believe any In me, COVID-related statistics that are published by the mainstream media.
And that's totally appropriate because they can just make them up.
They can pull them right out of their fanny.
There's no doubt about it.
Meanwhile, an MIT study shows vaccine hesitancy is highly informed, scientifically literate, and sophisticated.
Vaccine hesitancy is a big problem according to the Biden administration.
Less than half the public is fully vaxxed, while about 56% have received at least one jab.
The goal of fully vaxxing the American public appears to have stalled.
Not surprised.
Surprising, when they were first approved for emergency use, which is all that has happened heretofore, 40% of Americans expressed skepticism.
Trying to shame the holdouts has failed spectacularly.
Insulting and degrading them as morons or as ignorant has resulted in a vicious pushback and a hardening of positions.
The administration's plan to send people door-to-door vaccine only feeds anti-vaccine skepticism.
Trust in authority is at an all-time low, which makes a government-sponsored vaccine program all the more suspect.
Still, most experts agree some who should be getting vaxxed aren't, but the root cause isn't ignorance or a belief in conspiracy theories.
Rather, it turns out to depend upon cost-benefit analyses.
Get this from the report.
Proponents of the vaccine are unwilling or unable to understand the thinking of vaccine skeptics or even admit they may be thinking at all.
Their attempts to answer skepticism or understand it end up poisoned by condescension and reinforce it.
The condescension is political in nature and crosses party lines.
Sometimes, arguments against vaccination are mistaken for irrational thinking.
That perception of irrational can be almost accidentally, because arguments are usually social interactions, not strictly logical exercises.
A vaccine skeptic may brush off a proponent by saying, it's approved for emergency use only.
It's not FDA approved.
I don't think we should require it.
The skeptic is beginning with a fact that's easily established and shareable, but when pressed, they might reveal their line of thinking is elsewhere.
There are no long-term studies, and I'm worried about possible long-term effects, because the two objections aren't exactly logically connected.
The proponent concludes it's irrationalism all the way, but in fact those are two perfectly good, if independent, lines of argument to not get vaxxed.
A study by MIT shows a substantial portion of public health skepticism was highly informed, scientifically literate, and sophisticated in the use of data.
Skeptics use the same data sets as those with orthodox views on health.
The study's lead author, Crystal Lee, says, the exact same data can be used by either side.
The researchers combed through hundreds of thousands of social media posts and found coronavirus skeptics often deploy counter-visualizations alongside the same follow-the-data rhetoric as public health experts.
Yet the skeptics argue for radically different policies.
The researchers conclude data visualizations aren't sufficient to convey the urgency of the pandemic, because even the clearest graphs can be interpreted through a variety of belief systems.
A lot of people think of metrics like infection rates as objectives at Crystal Leap, but they're clearly not based on how much debate there is and how to think about the pandemic.
That's why we say data visualization has become a battleground.
She's also, I think, alluding to the fact that you could have a frequency of death, for example, based on those infected, Versus a frequency rate based on those that are classified as cases versus a frequency race based upon the whole population, which yield wildly different outcomes.
In fact, because data sets are being used interchangeably, vaccine skepticism becomes logical and rational.
Listen to this.
Most vaccine skepticism, if by that we mean reluctance, is not based on conspiracy theorizing.
It's based on risk-benefit calculations.
You may think it's an innumerate calculation, meaning not based on numbers, but when you look at patterns of uptake in the U.S., two factors stand out, which are larger in their effect than partisanship, age and density.
The older you are, the denser your community, the more likely you are to be vaccinated.
The younger, the more rural your community, the less likely you are to have taken it.
This reflects real facts about the risk of death from COVID.
People may be wildly overestimating their risk from the vaccine and underestimating their risk from COVID, but they have the directional thinking correct.
Those who are in less danger act like it.
This is why vaccine choice is so important.
Why have the same mandate for someone who lives in New York City and for someone who lives in rural South Dakota?
A more holistic approach to vaccine skepticism is needed.
If we are to get everyone who needs to be vaccinated, protected.
Allowances must be made for the legitimate concerns of citizens who, for their own reasons, don't want to be jabbed.
But if indeed individuals are doing their own risk-benefit calculation, it would help enormously if the left would refrain from their sickening condescension toward those with serious legitimate questions.
I think that's an excellent overview.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yes, one of 10 articles I have at Prinsipa Scientific is called Right to Try Voodoo, which goes into the history of our goofy Right to Try Act and the history of the voodoo medicine that they call vaccines.
A lot of the people that are quote anti-vax are actually very scientifically Articulate and they just don't want to have an experimental MRNA vaccine which in the previous 20 years of testing this particular approach to Corona vaccines was 100% fatal in all the test animals so this time they got emergency use without using test animals.
Humans are the test animals.
And then some of us have taken a lot of college chemistry, and we object to putting polyethylene glycol in our bloodstream, which is commonly known as antifreeze and has a very big poison label on the side of it when you put it in your car.
We also are opposed to fetal cells, from human stem lines that were based on aborted babies.
And we also don't like the idea of graphene oxide in our bodies.
So, you know, bottom line is we're not stupid.
And that's why we're not standing in line and getting jabbed.
And we're doing everything we can to keep the other people who might not be as informed to get informed.
Those are sensational points, Joe, not to mention that we now have an affidavit that 45,000 died within three days of getting the jab, which the government is not allowing us to know.
Michael, your thoughts?
Yeah, speaking of that statistic that you just said, oh, and by the way, I'm not sure I could say it better than Joe just said it, but speaking of that 45,000 death statistics, that should always be said with at least 45,000.
That's exactly what the Attorney Thomas Rents said when he brought that out a couple of days ago.
And also, I have his testimony posted now at the Jim Fetzer BitChute site for people who want to hear exactly what he said about the lawsuit that he's filing on behalf of America's frontline doctors.
And regarding that story that you just read, terrific story.
What's not to like about it?
It's saying we're highly informed, scientifically literate, and sophisticated in our use of data.
So, hey, I agree with that thing right down the line.
And what happened to the left-wing, My Body, My Choice, when it comes to abortion and other medical procedures?
It applies equally here.
Each of us must do our own cost-benefit analysis, and it's absurd for the left, which has spent decades and decades and decades Defending abortion on the basis of my body, my choice, to suddenly abdicate their position and say, no, your body, not your choice.
It's insulting and beyond belief, unscientific, but also immoral and politically hypocritical.
Meanwhile, John W. Whitehead of the Rutherford Institute is telling us what to do when the COVID strike force comes knocking at your door.
First, there's a visit itself.
While government agents can approach, speak, and even question citizens without violating the Fourth Amendment, Americans have the right not to answer questions or even speak with a government agent.
Courts have upheld these knock-and-talk visits as lawful reasoning Even though the curtilage of the home is protected by the Fourth Amendment, there's an implied license to approach a resident, knock on the door, ring the bell, seek to contact occupants.
However, the encounter is wholly voluntary.
A person's under no obligation to speak with a government agent in this situation.
Indeed, you don't even need to answer the door or open it.
And if you do, you can stop speaking at any time.
You also have the right to demand government agencies leave your property once the purpose of the visit is established.
They would not be enforcing any law or warrant in this context and therefore do not have the authority of law to remain on the property after a homeowner or resident specifically revokes the implied license to come onto their property.
Second, there's the dangers inherent in knock and talk encounters.
While courts have embraced the fiction that they're voluntary, these constitutionally dubious tactics are highly intimidating confrontation meant to pressure individuals into allowing police access to one's home, which then paves the way for a worthless search of one's home and property.
The act of going to homes and taking steps to speak with occupants is akin to the knock-and-talk tactic used by police, which can be fraught with danger for homeowners and government agents alike.
Indeed, knock-and-talk policing has become a thinly-veiled, warrantless exercise by which citizens are coerced and intimidated into talking with heavily armed police who knock on their doors in the middle of the night.
Knock and shoot policing might be more accurate, however, they rarely end up well.
Here are a couple of examples.
Although 26-year-old Andrew Scott had committed no crime, never filed a bullet or threatened police, he was gunned down by cops who knocked aggressively on the wrong door at 1.30 a.m., failed to identify themselves as police, and then repeatedly shot and killed Scott when he answered the door while holding a gun in self-defense.
Here's another.
Carl Dykes was shot in the face by a county deputy, pounded on Dykes' door in the middle of the night without identifying himself.
Because the report said inmates had escaped from a local jail, Dykes brought a shotgun with him when he answered the door.
Third, the question of how the government plans to use the data it obtains.
Because the stated purpose is to promote vaccination.
Homeowners and others will certainly be asked if they are vaccinated.
You have the right not to answer this or any other question.
Indeed, an argument could be made even asking the question is improper if the purpose is merely to ensure Americans have the information they need on how safe and accessible the vaccine is.
You'd like it, of course, if they explain how risky it is, how many deaths and other damage to those who have taken it have occurred.
Under the Privacy Act 5 U.S.C.
552A, an agency should only collect and maintain information about an individual as is relevant and necessary to accomplish the purpose of the agency.
Here, they could accomplish the purpose by providing the information in writing or orally and would not need to know the vaccination status of the residents.
Indeed, they could just drop off a brochure To the extent the agents do request and collect and store information about residents' vaccine station status, this could be a Privacy Act violation.
Here's the bottom line.
They're coming to your home with one purpose in mind, to collect information about you.
It's a form of intimidation.
You shouldn't answer any questions you're uncomfortable answering about your vaccine history or anything else.
The more you give them, the more it can be used against them.
Just ask them politely but firmly to leave.
In this case, as in so many others with government agencies, the First, Fourth, and Fifth Amendment and your cell phone recording the encounter are your best protection.
Under the First Amendment, you don't have to speak.
The Fourth protects you against unreasonable search and seizure.
Under the Fifth, you have a right to remain silent.
Not to say anything that might be used against you.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yeah, the Fifth Amendment, you have the right to remain silent.
Everything you say can and will be used against you.
My advice, don't open the door at all.
Tell them you're live streaming it to a good friend and tell them that they have no business being on your property.
Anything they want to send you, they can send you by certified mail to guarantee that you got it and that way they can keep the post office busy doing something.
But absolutely, do not open the door because Once you open the door, then, like you say, there's all kinds of things that they can say.
Well, it looked like an unsafe environment, and we think, you know, this guy's a threat to all of humanity, so we need to bust him and take him to a FEMA camp.
Avoid this at all possible costs.
Great points, Joe.
Michael, your thoughts?
Well, it's just amazing to me.
Like, I knew probably by the end of March of last year, a year and three months ago, that this had nothing to do with a damn virus, that it was a descent of tyranny on us.
And it's amazing to me how people can continue to watch these coercive and strong arm tactics being rolled out against us and not realize that it's all tyranny oriented and using Our public health is a Trojan horse, and they're gradually pushing and pushing until we're going to have to do something to push back rather than just talk, because they're taking away our rights of privacy, speech, right to assemble, and probably several others.
Very good.
Very good.
Meanwhile, we'll be right back.
No wonder the young people are so confused.
This is supposed to be a Native American.
This is supposed to be an African American.
This is supposed to be an impressed woman.
This is supposed to be a competent president.
This is supposed to be a hero.
This is supposed to be a scientist.
This is supposed to be an expert.
This is supposed to be mostly peaceful.
This is supposed to be a woman.
How insulting!
You're looking at a Democrat agenda right there in its face.
This is just shameless and embarrassing and insulting.
Meanwhile, deadly COVID mRNA shot is made to murder you while Big Tech censors the victims.
I think it's a key that they have banned discussion about the facts on the social media so Americans can inform one another of what's happening to the members of their family.
Get this, the majority of U.S.
physicians are declaring the COVID shot.
Gee, do you think they know something we don't?
Of 700 physicians responding to an internet survey by the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, which is the most prominent and important medical scientific organization in the United States, Nearly 60% said they were not fully vaxxed.
Contrast the claim with the AMA claiming 96% of practicing physicians are fully vaxxed.
Somebody is not speaking the truth.
Neither represents a random sample, but the AAPS shows physician support for mass injection is far from unanimous.
It's wrong to call a person who declines a shot an anti-vaxxer, states APS Executive Director Janet Orien, MD.
Virtually no physicians are anti-antibiotic or anti-surgery, whereas all are opposed to treatments they think are unnecessary, more likely to harm than to benefit.
An individual patient or inadequately tested.
Very appropriate.
It also showed 54% were aware of patients suffering a significant adverse reaction.
Of the unvaccinated, 80% said, I believe risk of shots exceeds risk of disease.
30% said, I already had COVID.
Here you can see a bar graph representing the responses from the physicians.
Other reasons for declining the shot included unknown long-term effects, use of aborted fetal tissue, it's experimental, available of effective early treatment, reports of death, and blood clots.
A 560 practicing physicians, 56% said they offered early treatment for COVID.
Non-physicians were also invited to participate.
of some 5,300 total, 2,548 volunteered comments about associated adverse effects of which they were aware.
These include death, amputation, paralysis, stillbirth, menstrual irregularities, blindness, seizures,
Gee, those are great reasons for taking the vax.
Meanwhile, over the second week in a row, more COVID-19 vaccination deaths and COVID-19 deaths in the U.S.
Look at the graph.
It is skyrocketing.
This is the outcome they want the public not to know before they get the facts.
Namely, that a very large percentage are going to die.
So, two weeks ago, Avairs reported 6,985 deaths due to COVID.
Last week, the number jumped to 9,000.
48.
That number is now at 11,140.
There have been over 400,000 adverse reactions reported, but the adverse system only gets 1%.
Add two zeroes to that.
You're talking about 40 million adverse reactions.
Meanwhile, Ted Cruz has introduced a bill every un-vaxxed will celebrate.
He is saying a bill to prohibit the federal government from creating and maintaining a federal database of Americans who've received or not received the vax.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yes, one of the articles that I wrote The American Medical Association was founded in 1847 and has approximately 250,000 members.
This was July 20th, 2020. An interesting quote. The American Medical Association was founded in 1847
and has approximately 250,000 members. The Texas Medical Association is the largest chapter in the
nation and is actively promoted by the FDA and CCC dogma voodoo.
The problem with the AMA is that they are able to get group insurance rates for the exorbitantly
high liability insurance rates that doctors face. And so doctors are pretty much forced
into joining that group and they've got an administrative group that are not medical doctors.
They're just medical hang-ons and hospital administrators.
And so they end up setting the policy when the actual rank and file of the AMA
probably doesn't promote it.
There was an article that came out that said, private practice clinics suffer 50% reduction
in patients and revenue.
So basically this is big medical, Great points, Joe.
to destroy the little individual doctors.
And like I said in my article, if you like your doctor, you can keep an artificial intelligence,
virtual reality version of your doctor because that's all that's gonna be left
after they finish destroying all of the private practice in the nation.
Great points, Joe.
Michael, your thoughts.
Yeah, you might end up being healthier without a doctor in many cases.
It's not surprising to me that most physicians decide not to take this injection they're calling a vaccine.
I mean, physicians in general are pretty smart people and they're logically applying what we were saying in the previous story, a risk-benefit analysis with evidence from their own field of training.
What is more difficult for me to understand is how so many of them can come to that conclusion regarding themselves or their family, but then they continue to administer this shot to their patients.
Like, they probably work for a doctor's group, and that's what the doctor's group is doing.
They're asking everybody, do they want it, and anybody who says they do want it, they'll give it to them.
They won't go through what they've been through to understand why that's not a smart thing to do.
It reminds me of something that David Martin just said, and it's this, quote, once people understand that countless physicians have been willfully participating in the homicide of humanity, I cannot imagine what it would be to live with that.
That's very, very telling.
Very telling.
Meanwhile, mass protests have erupted across Greece as the government bans the unvaccinated from public spaces.
Look at these crowds!
The biggest transgression in the eyes of the protesters was the government's decision to bar the unvaccinated from public spaces.
They're opposed to plans to immunize teenagers.
The policy barring the unvaccinated from bars, restaurants, theaters, and other entertainment venues will take effect last Friday, remaining in place at least until August.
Teens will be able to receive the vaccine starting Thursday.
This is absolutely outrageous.
I'm very impressed by Greece.
Massive protests all over Greece today after the Prime Minister issued what is essentially medical apartheid.
The media is trying to spin it as an anti-vaccine protest instead of what it's really about.
Freedom of choice and bodily autonomy.
Look at the crowds.
I've been to Athens.
I've been on this street.
According to Reuters, more than 5,000 anti-vax protesters, some waving Greek flags and wooden crosses, gathered in the Greek capital, shouting, take your vaccines and get out of here, calling on Prime Minister Kratos Mitsotakis to resign.
Plan to vaccinate teenagers in Greece sparks huge protests today in Athens and Thessalonica.
With a heavy police presence to oversee them, protesters gathered outside Parliament, taking their protest directly to lawmakers.
They were stating, every person has the right to choose.
We're choosing that the government does not choose us, said Faden Vovalos, a cardiologist who has questioned the scientific research around face masks and the vaccine and heads the Free Again movement, which called a protest.
Vovalos said he started the group in response to the government's tough measures to contain the virus.
I find that highly, highly inspiring.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yes, well, I've been to Paris and they had a million marching in the Champs-Élysées and I've been to London and they had a million marching in front of the Parliament building.
So, this is starting to take roots.
They've got millions marching in Australia, Canada's fixing to fire up.
Why aren't we doing that in the United States?
Pisaki just said that nothing is off the table as far as controlling speech.
And the media platforms.
Well, they already own all of the midstream media.
And so now what they're trying to do is to bump us off of having any voice at all on the quote, alternative media, which is has two major driving factors right now.
One is the election rigging and the other is the mandatory forced death jab.
So how much longer are Americans going to put up with this?
I went to 30 open Texas and Yeah, I think you're right.
Americans are far too passive, but I think it's got a lot to do with the censorship that we're not able to communicate and share our outrage over what's going on or the facts that we have discovered that the government is suppressing.
Michael, your thoughts?
Yeah, it's encouraging to see massive crowds in another place like that.
As Joe mentioned, they've been in crowds that big in France, London, Berlin, Sydney, in response to both the COVID lockdowns and especially these COVID passports that they're attempting to create a two-tiered society with and shame or coerce everybody into getting these injections.
Australia is especially a bad case when you look at how many people have died, presumably, of COVID.
And I probably wouldn't be too far off to suggest that nobody's died of COVID.
But in Australia, I mean, even the official figures are something like Three in a month for an entire state of Queensland or New South Wales, and they're just totally tyrannical there.
So, we can only hope that these tyrants trying to force this on the world have bitten off more than they can chew at this point, and hopefully these will end up with Nuremberg-like You're 100% correct, Michael.
crimes against humanity because that's exactly what this is maybe the biggest one we've ever seen.
You're 100% correct Michael is a violation of the Nuremberg Code that was became international law in the wake of World
War Two the horrific experiments of Dr. Joseph man Gailey involuntarily on prisoners of war, McCabe stuff.
It is an experimental intrusion, a medical procedure on a person without their voluntary consent, which means they have to be fully informed of the risks as well as the benefits and alternatives, like HCQ and ivermectin is a violation of international law.
and deserving of prosecution and punishment. You're 100% correct. Meanwhile, a million Syrians face
severe water shortages in northeastern Syria after a water station fails. I would figure
this is an Israeli op. The Aleut water station in the Al-Hasakah, which provides clean drinking
water for nearly half a million people, has intermittently stopped functioning due to a
number of factors, including reduced access for technicians to carry out maintenance or repairs
and insufficient electricity.
The ongoing disruptions at the water station must stop, said the U.N.
in a joint statement.
The U.N.
Resident Coordinator and Humanitarian Coordinator for Syria, Imran Reza, the Regional Humanitarian Coordinator for the Syrian crisis, Muhannad Hadi, and UNICEF Regional Director for the Middle East and North Africa, Ted Chaiban, said up to a million are impacted, including many of the most vulnerable displaced families living in camps.
As COVID-19 remains an ongoing threat.
Due to the limited availability of vaccines, actually, the limited availability of vaccines is a benefit, little do they know.
Adequate and uninterrupted access to safe water, sanitation, and hygiene is critical.
The water station continues to be the only viable source of water for those in the area.
We call for the resumption of water and electricity services and the protection of civilians' access to water and sanitation.
In Syria, 70% of the population is without regular access to safe drinking water because of water cuts and destruction of basic infrastructure, which of course is a violation of international law in and of itself.
Meanwhile, an ancient Palestinian Canaanite cemetery has been bulldozed by Israel.
This is another violation of international law.
This is a cemetery thousands of years old, completely outrageous, near Bethlehem.
As Sam Budge, Director of the Office of the Wall and Settlement Resistance Authority, said the Israeli reports indicated occupation used bulldozers to raze a cemetery during the expansion works of Bypass Road 60 connecting Jerusalem and Hebron.
The cemetery is estimated at four dunams, an acre in the area, Just outrageous.
south of Qandir. He stresses this is a blatant attack on Palestinian antiquities and is considered
a war crime against the Palestinian people and their history. Just outrageous. Oldest known
Canaanite cemetery in Palestine, 4,200 years old to build a settler road. Jewish white supremacist
colonists unable to find any archaeological record of their own are destroying ours.
This is an historical sacrilege.
Outrageous.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yeah, well, we've had a continuous stream of crimes against humanity since 1947 by this one little tribe.
And, you know, I don't know what it would take for the people that are actually running cover for these folks, hiding behind the, what I consider to be demonic Directed narrative programming of the Old Testament Torah is the absolutely demonic Talmud and the practices of those people.
And you know, I just wish that the Jewish people would wake up and reject What they are being forced to accept as part of their religion.
They should say that, I'm sorry, the Kazarian group of us has really demeaned all of humanity, and we need to end this right now.
So I don't know what it takes to get them to wake up and actually have a public conscience, but some of them are, so that's hopeful.
Well, we know the final solution for the Zionists is to load all the Palestinians aboard a ship, float it out to sea and sink it.
Michael, your thoughts?
Yeah, I agree with everything that Joe just said.
That article, the first one about the water station, never gave any ideas about why the water station was being disrupted.
It just covered the fact that it was being disrupted.
And that might be a form of censorship in itself.
But it's just the type of operation that the Israeli state would carry out.
It being the case that they've been trying to take down Syria for, what, eight or nine years now, and would have been successful if it weren't for Russia having stepped in.
That story, and then the following story about the ancient cemetery being destroyed, it all fits into the quote by Maurice Samuel from his book, You Gentiles, back in the 20s, and the quote is, We Jews, we are the destroyers, and we will remain the destroyers.
Nothing you can do will meet our demands and needs.
We will forever destroy because we want a world of our own.
And that harkens back to a book I've referred to lately that was recommended to us by our friend Jack Mullen called The Controversy of Zion by Douglas Reed.
That was published in 1978.
Great book.
Chapter 17 of that book is titled The Destructive Mission, and it traces the ideological progression of how the destruction of the other principle, that they term Goyim or Amalek, is hardwired into a conservative Jewish worldview, or at least the Jews that came from Eastern Europe under the Khazarian heritage.
Well, you know, it's all profoundly disturbing and it has a very long history and there's so much evidence to substantiate it.
Meanwhile, Arabic press revealed Palestinian Authority blocks entry of aid to Gaza.
Meanwhile, Egypt lifts a ban on Mubarak's family assets, surging prices
cause an alarm in Tunisia, Gulf countries consider launch of unified electronic
currency. Not a good idea, by the way.
This is covering developments in several different nations.
Palestinian Authority blocks Qatari aid to Gaza. The Palestinian Authority in Ramallah
has rejected a plan submitted by all parties to deliver a Qatari grant to the
besieged Gaza Strip.
The sources confirmed the PA rejected an Egyptian-mediated agreement between Hamas and Israel as part of an effort to end the stifling humanitarian crisis in Gaza.
Sources pointed out Israel agreed to this method.
The U.S.
is willing to implement it.
There's approval from the U.S., but the Palestinian Authority rejected, which I find very puzzling.
Gaza has been deteriorating in its humanitarian, economic, and living condition for 15 years due to the ongoing severe blockade imposed by Israel, the closure of crossing, and prevention of entry of basic necessities that have driven up poverty and unemployment rates.
There have also been persistent power outages.
Meanwhile, Egypt lifts ban on Mubarak assets.
On Thursday last, Egyptian authorities lifted a ban on the family of ousted President Hosni Mubarak from managing the family assets after more than 10 years of restrictions.
Public Prosecutor Haman al-Sawway agreed to end the ban on the funds of Alaa and Gamal Mubarak, their wives, Heidi Resnik and Khawaja al-Gamal, and all of their children.
Meanwhile, surging prices hit the poor in Tunisia.
The unprecedented surge in prices in Tunisia has become a serious threat to the poor and other vulnerable groups, after a dramatic increase in the cost of many basic items.
The latest government statistics show food prices rose by 7.2%, vegetable prices 13%, vegetable oils 16.5%, milk and dairy products by 8%.
The consumption rate of lamb and beef per capita has fallen from 15 kilograms per year 10 days ago to less than 6 kilograms per year at present, a clear indication of decline in purchasing power of the Tunisian population.
Meanwhile, the U.S.
is mulling new sanctions on Iran for its oil sales to China.
How is Iran supposed to survive if it cannot sell its oil?
According to a report from The Wall Street Journal, the Biden administration is considering fresh sanctions on Iran that target the Islamic Republic's oil sales to China as a way to ramp up pressure on Tehran.
For what good reason could this be done?
This is outrageous and in my opinion reflects the Biden foreign policy as the Netanyahu foreign policy on steroids.
Since April, the U.S.
and Iran have been engaged in indirect negotiation to revive the Iran deal, known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action.
They have dragged out, due to the Biden administration's refusal to lift the Trump-era sanctions.
Why in the world should Iran agree to anything if they won't raise the sanctions?
And if Biden is not willing to do that, how could he be trusted?
U.S.
sanctions wouldn't discourage Chinese buyers, but they could target the shipping sector, making it harder for ships to carry Iranian oil.
Aggressive enforcement, by the way, would mean stealing cargo, as the U.S.
has done in the past with shipments of Iranian fuel to Venezuela.
This is a violation of basic business contracts, clearly a violation of international law.
Earlier this year, the U.S.
seized a tanker carrying Iranian oil off the United Arab Emirates and sold the cargo for $2 million.
It had to have been worth perhaps a hundred times that.
Meanwhile, bombing hits a crowded market in Iraq's Sadr City, killing at least 35.
A major suicide bombing tore through a crowded food market in Cedar City Monday, killing at least 35 people, wounding dozens of others.
Police said more than 60 were wounded.
ISIS claimed credit for the attack.
The United States created ISIS in 2012.
It was a brainchild of Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and John Brennan, which Michael Flynn opposed and therefore was fired.
But it was Hillary Clinton and John Brennan with the approval of Barack Obama who created the terrorist army in the Middle East, a rape and loot and pillage and murder beyond belief.
Joe, your thoughts?
We've been tampering with the Middle East since day one.
It's absolutely indefensible.
American exceptionalism is just the old form of British colonial piracy worldwide.
Under who I call Obambi and Secretary of State Reptillery, we had the Operation Zero Footprint where they secretly funded arms and overthrew the government of Tunisia, Yemen, Egypt, Libya, and then they took the Libyan arms and moved them over to Turkey to attack the northeastern section of Syria.
All of this was well orchestrated.
Libya was the only African country that had no IMF debt, It was the only Arab country that was a net food producer.
Gaddafi had converted a giant aquifer in the southern part of Libya and had a 10-foot diameter concrete pipeline a thousand miles long with pumping stations and turned the Mediterranean crescent of Libya into an absolute tropical
paradise.
And we went in there and destroyed it, killed 250,000 Libyans who are mostly black and mostly Muslim.
So what kind of human being is this Nobel Prize winner, Obama, when he turns around and kills a quarter million
people there and then takes those arms to Syria and kills a half million
Christians in Syria?
It's insane.
Joe, well said.
Point taken.
You are spot on.
Michael, your thoughts?
Yeah, I agree.
Great stuff, Joe.
I also agree with Jim that the Biden foreign policy relative to the Middle East is actually the Netanyahu policy.
We saw how he went down on his knees before retiring Israeli president.
So what else do you need to know?
I don't, like you were saying, Jim, I don't really understand why the Palestinian Authority would reject a deal that brings necessary supplies to their people, so it makes me suspicious that there's a factor that we're not being told in that story.
Like, there had to be a reason why that was the case, and I don't think the story contained that reason.
I think you're right about that, Michael, and it's got to do with some form of Israeli subterfuge, corruption.
Exactly.
Meanwhile, send fan mail.
We want to hear from you.
Pro or con to LiveNeedToKnowAtGmail.com.
LiveNeedToKnowAtGmail.com.
Meanwhile, I've just published, is starvation and population reduction the next card the authorities will play?
They're certainly laying the foundation now.
You can find it on my blog at jamesfetzer.org.
This appears to be part and parcel of the effort to depopulate the world.
Consider some comments about it.
A hundred thousand to one desperation can be quite an incentive.
What would you suggest?
Waiting till we are dead from starvation or more talk?
In the meantime, it would—well, let me read them in the right order from the bottom up.
Strangely enough, I hope this is true, the verge of starvation may be the one situation that gets 7 billion people off their asses to wipe out the bastards who control this world.
Nothing else has seemed to cause the reaction we so desperately need.
How are the starving masses going to wipe out the 1% who control the world?
In the meantime, it would not hurt to stock up on as much water, beans, rice, and vitamins as you can handle.
It can always be used if it all does not go to hell.
Reply.
Hundred thousand to one.
Desperation can be quite an incentive.
What would you suggest?
Waiting till we're all dead from starvation or more talk?
Meanwhile, part three of my three-parter on What Happened to JFK?
Did Oliver Stone Get It Right?
will be presented tomorrow night on Great Awakenings with Scott Bennett over AmericanMediaPeriscope.net at 9 p.m.
Eastern Time, 8 p.m.
Central.
You don't want to miss it.
Meanwhile, the books that Amazon has banned that reveal the truth about the Boston bombing, the moon landing, Orlando and Dallas, Charlottesville, and Parkland are available at Moonrock Books.
Sandy Hook, still not, because tied up by a court case, but I hope to overcome it.
Meanwhile, I've made available all the presentations at the False Flag and Conspiracies 2020 conference.
Remember, the secret of freedom lies in educating people, the secret of tyranny in keeping them ignorant.
Go to falseflagconspiracies2020.com and take your pick.
Final thoughts.
Joe, yours.
Oh, yeah.
Well, since you mentioned the mood book, We had a great interview that we did on December 17th based on an article that I'd written called Perplexing Apollo Questions for NASA.
Yeah, you have a lunar lander that's sitting underneath your command module and there's a rocket in between them.
There's no docking ports, there's no airlocks on either one of those vehicles.
You have Stage one of the Saturn V rocket has 514,000 gallons of
fuel, and it manages to get the rocket up to 42 miles altitude
with a speed of 5,000.
The second stage holds 340,000 gallons of fuel and it lifts the final stage up to 115 miles altitude with a speed of 15,300 miles per hour.
40,000 gallons of fuel and it lifts the final stage up to 115 miles altitude with a speed
of 15,300 miles per hour.
The third stage only has 86,000 gallons of fuel and you have to reach 24,500 miles per
hour before you can exit Earth's escape velocity.
So then you had no fuel to keep you from crashing into the Moon once you got to the Moon.
You had no fuel to land on the Moon, no fuel to get off of the Moon, and no fuel to get out of the Moon's gravity to get back into Earth's gravity, and no fuel to slow down your enormous acceleration as you came towards the Earth Before you threw out a parachute because you would hit the earth at too high a speed.
Absolutely absurd.
And the other factor is the daytime temperatures at the equator on the moon, 14 days in a row, it's 260 degrees hot.
And then suddenly, as the moon goes into darkness, as it's rotating around the earth with the same side always facing the earth, and so when that side goes to the to the dark side, then your temperature drops to minus 315 degrees Fahrenheit, and that change happens in Like 12, 15 hours.
So you tell me where the tiny little envelope of livable temperatures between freezing and 100 degrees would be on the moon and how we were able to land and get off the moon in that period of time and also play some golf and drive around and spend a couple of days.
Absolutely absurd.
52 years today they've been lying about that.
It's time to end that lie too.
Wonderful, wonderful job.
Michael, your thoughts?
Yeah, I love it when I hear somebody logically completely dismantle the Apollo moon landings like that.
Thanks.
Joe, as Orwell said, we live in a time of universal deceit, and everywhere you look, that's what we find.
I also like that chart that you just showed, slide 61, Jim, of all the food products The many, many food products that you'll find on American shelves, and the owners of all of those food products, and there's only a few of them, and that reminds me of the tyrannical principle of consolidation that has been applied to really world society, to all aspects of human life, continue to be consolidated upward, where
Only a few can control for the many.
You can see it in money, banking, media, information, science, medicine, the energy sector, and that chart's a great indication of how that type of consolidation exists in food production.
And I'm afraid they're beginning to tighten the screws on us with regard to the very food that we eat.
So I encourage everybody to do what you need to do in order to be as food independent as possible.
Well, our Texas Tuesday has been quite sensational with Joe Olson from Houston and Michael Ivey, nominally from Asheville, North Carolina, but his heart is in Fort Worth.
I want to reassure you that this massive global depopulation scheme of taking the earth from 8 billion to 500 million is going to be pursued very, very aggressively, nowhere more so than in the United States, where deagle.com projects that we're going to go from 330 million in 2020 to 65 million in 2025.
in 2020 to 65 million in 2025. That's a diminution of 265 million Americans.
They're doing it in three stages.
Face masks killing us slowly.
If you have any doubts about the damage done by face masks, go to my blog and read six or eight articles about it.
You won't have any doubt.
The vaccines, which are killing us faster, we're giving you endless reports about that.
And ultimately, starvation is going to bring about most of the deaths.
So you must be fortified, pay attention to what's going on.
I agree about stocking up on supplies, also on ammunition.
You have to be able to defend yourself.
When a lot of Americans are starving, they're going to come looking for more food and they're going to think you have it.
So you gotta brace yourself for what is going to come.
Unless some miracle intervenes, we are up against it, hard and fast.
Don't delude yourself, get real.
Meanwhile, spend as much time with your family, your friends, your loved ones, because frankly, we do not know how much time we have left.
▲
Export Selection