All Episodes
Previous Next
July 14, 2021 - Jim Fetzer
01:17:51
Need to Know News (13 July 2021) with Joe Olson and Michael Ivey
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin, where I'm delighted to be joined today by Joe Olson from Houston and Michael Ivey from Asheville, North Carolina.
We're here to bring you all the news you need to know.
We begin with the Arizona Senate conducting a new count of the Naricopa County ballots.
I believe they realize that this is going to be historic.
It's going to be a devastating indictment of the 2020 election.
Maricopa County says there are 2,089,563 ballots.
We did the hand count and they're finalizing that number, but we just wanted a third to tie everything together.
Make sure we have more.
The more data points, the better, said former Arizona Secretary of State Ken Bennett.
The Senate's audit liaison.
We're going to run all the ballots through to see how they match up, said Arizona Senate President Karen Fann, a Republican.
If there ends up being a difference, we'd have another count.
The state is paying $150,000 for the audit, which likely costs much more.
A nonprofit and the Republic have asked courts to compel the body to make public records detailing outside parties helping to shoulder the cost.
County officials oppose the audit.
The Board of Supervisors calls for it to end in May, no doubt because they were complicit in the theft of the election and do not want to be exposed.
Meanwhile, new evidence indicates enough illegal votes in Georgia to tip the 2020 result.
There was both an audit and a statewide recount confirming Biden's victory in Georgia, but ignored in the process was evidence that nearly 35,000 Georgians had potentially voted illegally.
There's going to be much more emerging here, I have no doubt.
New evidence indicates more than 10,300 legal votes were cast in Georgia in the November 2020 general election, a number that will continue to rise over the next several months, potentially exceeding the 12,670 votes that separated Joe Biden and Donald Trump.
Well, it does not change the fact that Biden is our president.
All Americans who genuinely care about free and fair elections and the disenfranchisement of voters should demand both transparency and solutions to prevent a repeat in future elections.
Under the cover of COVID-19, Georgia, like many other states, flooded residents with absentee ballot applications.
I've heard from some that they received as many as six different ballots and wound up sending them all in.
In fact, a friend of mine who reported that said he'll no longer be associated with his former friend who told him he'd done that.
Like sister states, Georgia ignored various legislative mandates designed to prevent fraud and to ensure the integrity of the vote.
These facts, coupled with the closeness of the contest in Georgia and other states, have led to a flurry of accusations and litigation, charging vote fraud, illegal voting, and violation of the Electors Clause of the Constitution, all of which are enormously well supported by research conducted to this date.
Some of the moves of 35,000 Georgia voters who indicated they'd moved from one county to another but then voted in the county from which they had moved could have been temporary, involving students or members of the military, but under Georgia law, temporary relocations do not alter citizens' residency status or render their votes legal.
Given the margin, approximately one-third of the votes at issue could have altered the outcome of the election, yet the media, the courts, and the Secretary of State's office ignored or downplayed the issue.
I say, as do they, the data speaks for itself.
He founded of the approximately 35 Georgians who indicated they'd moved from one to another.
More than 10,300 had updated their voter registration.
The same 10,000 plus all cast ballots in the county in which they had previously lived.
These issues were absolutely systemic.
Under Georgia law, a judge can order an election be redone if he or she sees there were enough illegal, irregular, or improperly rejected votes to cast their results in doubt, or if they see evidence of suspending irregularities.
They were absolutely systemic.
They occurred in every county in the state, in every state house, state senate, every congressional district.
No doubt about it.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yeah, like Rothschild said, I care not who runs the country if I run the banks.
Like Stalin said, I care not who votes if I count the votes.
I've known about the election fraud machines in Texas since at least 2015, when we had a hearing at the Secretary of State's office to authorize the reuse of Hart InterCivic and election systems and software machines, which use the OPTEC Owned by Dominion Software and Counting Systems.
So, Mike Lindell has in his last video, which was Absolute Interference, said that over a million MAGA boats were flipped in Texas.
Well, they didn't flip enough boats to carry Texas for Joe Biden, but they did flip a half dozen house seats, which just in Texas alone flipped enough house seats to give the Democrats the majority so that Nancy Pelosi could be speaker and she could ram through all the garbage that's been happening.
We got this absolutely the same level of fraud in Nevada, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin as we have in Those are great points, especially about the house seats.
I greatly appreciate that, Joe.
all 50 states because the problem is absolutely systemic with every one of the eight manufacturers
of voting machines, which all have joint directorships.
Those are great points, especially about the house seats.
I greatly appreciate that, Joe.
Michael, your thoughts.
Yeah, speaking of election rigging in Texas, it goes way back.
I'm sure that's true in other locales as well, because we know how our beloved Lyndon Baines Johnson won his first Senate seat, and that started a chain reaction of history that we all know about.
Yeah, the beat goes on with this election that was obviously stolen.
As I've said on many occasions, every time you turn over a rock, you're finding more vote fraud.
The question is whether Whether anything will come of it, I'm reminded of there's a scene in the first Star Wars movie of the famous Jedi mind trick, where all Obi-Wan Kenobi has to do is wave his hand and it completely changes the mind of the person that he's talking to.
So, it's kind of like that with all of these issues and the mainstream media, to me.
I think that's another very nice comparison, Michael.
Very, very good.
Meanwhile, the White House is poised to issue an executive order to restore net neutrality.
The order takes several steps to restore telecom oversight, ban sneaky fees, and kill harmful exclusive landlord broadcast deals.
It sounds good, but we want to look to see any hidden features.
The White House this week unveiled a new executive order that will rein in anti-competitive behavior across numerous industries, including a mandate to restore telecom oversight stripped away during the Trump era.
According to a fact sheet circulated by the White House, the order includes 72 different initiatives across a dozen federal agencies aimed at boosting competition and reining in predatory monopolies.
Several aspects specifically target big telecom, including a provision urging the current FCC to restore net neutrality.
83 million Americans are stuck under a broadband monopoly.
Millions more live under a duopoly, usually consisting of a cable giant or apathetic telco.
This lack of competition results in higher prices, body coverage, slower speeds, and terrible service.
Under Trump FCC boss Ajit Pai, the government's answer was to largely ignore them or make the problem worse by eliminating consumer protections, removing barriers to media consolidation, or rubber-stamping harmful mergers that reduce competition even further.
The FCC's 2015 net neutrality rules not only prevented telecom giants from abusing their power to give their own services an unfair market advantage, like imposing pointless broadband cabs to make using steaming alternatives more expensive, but required ISPs to be clear about any throttling or other restrictions imposed on your broadband connection.
The rules were repealed in 2017 by Pi in a wave of controversy.
Not only were the justifications proven repeatedly false, the broadband industry was caught using fake and deadpeel to create the illusion of support.
Sounds like something the Democrats have done during the election.
Very, very interesting indeed.
This impacts low-income and marginalized neighborhoods because landlord ISP arrangements can effectively block out broadband infrastructure expansion by new providers.
There's one problem, however.
Most of the initiatives require the Biden administration first appoint a full suit of agency commissioners and a permanent FCC boss.
The fact this hasn't happened six months into Biden's term has started to annoy consumer groups, who warn that the process of appointing and confirming a permanent agency head alone will take months.
Meanwhile, Biden and urban leaders now are going to tackle crime and violence, which has run amok since they went out to defund the police, supported all the rioting, all the looting and the arson by Black Lives Matter and Antifa.
Facing rising fears of summer violence, meaning a massive backlash against their defund the police movement, President Biden is embarking on a political high wire act with strong backing from law enforcement within the movement when overhauling policing is championed by many in his party.
I met at the White House with urban leaders, including Eric Adams, a heavily favored candidate
to be the next mayor of New York City, about increased shootings, which we've been reporting
upon again and again and again.
We know this is a Democrat policy problem because the murderers are concentrated in
areas under the control of the Democrats, which they've turned into free fire zones,
depriving law-abiding citizens of the right to carry weapons, which has no effect upon
the criminals who don't follow the law anyhow.
The meeting was the second in three weeks underscoring the political concern crime has
become for Democrats as they look to protect their thin margins in Congress.
Big city mayors and lawmakers have sounded the alarm on the rise in crime.
Polls suggest it's an increasing matter of concern for many Americans.
White House aides believe Biden, with his long legislative record on crime, is not easy to paint as soft on the issue.
The president has been clear that he is opposed to the defund the police movement, which has been effectively used against some Democrats to paint them as anti-law enforcement.
But believe me, He's been in bed with his own party, which has pushed it massively.
Biden has even tried to boost progressive efforts to overhaul policing, part of the defund the police movement, and has backed the bill that after initial promise stalled in the Senate.
Biden also lent his support to protests that swept the nation last year, which entailed the very rioting, looting, and arson I've described, after the death of George Floyd, a black man at the knee of a white police officer, which sparked a national reckoning on race, including sometime violent protests, seized upon then-President Trump to raise anger among his conservatives, but really, I think, to disillusion every American The Democrats have lost their way, and frankly, they have yet to regain it.
They're only now fearing the consequences of their irresponsible actions and policies of the past.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yeah, back when clocks had numbers 1 through 12 in two hands, the famous saying was that a stopped clock is correct twice a day.
In Joe Biden's case, I think the clock has no hands, and if he's doing something accidentally right on FCC, it's only superficial.
We had a discussion yesterday about the FCC and cell phones.
And I didn't have access to the specified document that I wanted to describe, but you can go to Children's Health Defense FCC Big Telecom Fraudulent Test.
They use a specific anthropomorphic mannequin filled with liquid, and then they use a specific absorption rate, and they measure like two inches inside this liquid-filled plastic skull of radio transmission and look for a sign of heat over one degree centigrade, well that's not how you measure the toxic effect of electromagnetic radiation on living tissues.
And so that's the false pretense that's been used by the IEEE, which is the industry lapdog, and the FCC, which has been absolutely negligent in their approval of Cell phones and certainly now with 5G where you're dealing with something that's even more deadly.
Why do you need to have a video streaming of a two-hour movie in five minutes with 5G if you can't watch it any faster than the two hours it takes to watch it on 4G?
It's absolutely absurd.
We do not need this extra level of data and the only reason it's there is for electronic warfare and 5G should be banned.
And I'll skip the, yeah, I'll skip the Black Lives Matter in the murder situation.
We'll save that for later.
Michael, your thoughts?
Yeah, I echo what Joe just said about Biden.
I'm always suspicious about something that looks good on the surface.
And I wonder about this bill or move that he's trying to create net neutrality, which always sounds good.
Oh, boy, everybody is on the same ground.
But I just haven't studied it enough to know I would be suspicious whether it's some sort of cover for Further consolidation of that industry, or will it include a Trojan horse provisions regarding 5G like Joe was talking about?
Here in Asheville, we are one of those people who are suffering from not having enough providers.
We either have Charter Spectrum or AT&T, and Charter Spectrum keeps going up every month, almost.
It's almost like clockwork.
And I, you know, I don't know what that phrase in the context of this bill means to restore telecom oversight.
And when it's dependent on appointing a full suite of commissioners and hiring an FCC boss, that that sounds like a stalling tactic.
So frankly, I don't know what to make of that.
Well, I think those are good points.
And we wonder, are there provisions that underserved communities, black and minority, are going to be given preference in terms of some of these actions that are being taken?
The fact that he hasn't even got a commission and a permanent head of the FCC is rather stunning, all things considered.
It means, for the time being at least, even such an executive order would be meaningless.
Here in Corporated, six months after the January 6th intervention, the only thing the Democrats remain serious about is power.
Fencing around the Capitol is still up for more than half a year.
January 6th was worse than 9-11, a guest and host agreed on MSNBC.
I mean, how insane is that?
In interviews with Vice, reporters cried.
They said they can't sleep anymore.
They're afraid to go to work.
I used to call the Capitol my girlfriend.
One adult man sat choking back tears.
Democrats sought to launch a truth commission with unfettered authority and access to their political opponents' records and communications.
The riot, Speaker of the House Pelosi in tone, was one of the darkest days in our nation's history.
She would know.
She was clearly instrumental in organizing it with help from the Capitol Police, the FBI, Antifa, and Black Lives Matter.
Performing feats on her behalf to disrupt the discussion of evidence of election theft and voter fraud.
This was clearly a Pelosi intrusion into the Capitol.
Some told CBS they formed a support group and are in therapy now.
Another donated his blue suit to the Smithsonian for posterity.
Perhaps more need to seek therapy.
Meanwhile, the raids on suspects continue.
Some arrested months ago are still being held in solitary.
An FBI agent, every available FBI agent, was reportedly assigned to the case in the beginning, which is still ongoing.
Six months in, they crowed that they'd seized a Lego set from one man's home.
Quite an accomplishment.
As a regular consumer of this cringe-inducing panic pornography, you can be forgiven for not knowing all the power the FBI has failed to unmask.
The suspiciously Antifa-looking suspect who set live and deadly pipe bombs at the Republican National Committee and Democrat National Committee headquarters, he's received nearly zero attention from either Congressional Democrats or their media fixers.
It's funny.
You might also be forgiven for not realizing only one person was killed that day.
Her name was Ashley Babbitt.
She was one of the rioters.
She was unarmed and shot by an officer.
We may or may not know the officer's name.
Frankly, I believe the Babbitt shooting was staged and fake.
Corporate reporters don't seem bothered by any of it or by spreading the lie that Officer Sicknick was beaten to death with a fire extinguisher when he died from a heart attack, nor do they appear to be concerned with tracking down the suspects and instigators of months of national race riots that killed dozens of innocent people, destroyed hundreds of billions in property, and were cheered on by the Democrats Including Nancy Pelosi, Kamala Harris, Maxine Waters, and even Joe Biden.
So, while a bipartisan report released by the top Republican and Democrat on both the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee and Rules and Administration Committee found that Capitol Police failed to protect the Capitol, And while six months later CNN reports are still in complete disarray, the Capitol Police are busy expanding their authority beyond the Capitol they failed to secure unquestionably under the commanded orders and direction of Nancy Pelosi.
Why did that MSNBC guest claim the riot was worse than 9-11?
Because he said, it's given permission to people to pursue autocratic means.
By people, he doesn't mean those in power, but targets of the people in power, the targets of their fear-mongering.
It isn't simple bungling that led election officials to lie about Sicknick, disregarding an active terrorist in the shooting of Babbitt.
It isn't casual foolishness that brings the entire weight of the FBI down on one riot, while many of the leaders of last summer's deadly race riots, including those at the White House targeting Republicans, remain uncharged or free.
It's not just a goofy side note that we're barraged with daily updates on what toys we're seeing from which suspects home while calling down the memories of those American men and women who died or gave their lives in the service of our country on 9-11.
Fear is an industry in politics.
In Washington, fear earns votes, it mints money, and it concentrates power.
But it's a hungry thing.
It requires fences, museum exhibits, and especially daily head guides to keep it going, or it fades away and is forgotten.
A very nice piece.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yes, yesterday you and Carl Herman and I discussed the Commune and Anarch movements in Paris during the 1850s, which culminated in a massacre in 1871 in Paris of over 25,000 mostly peaceful protesters.
and massacre in 1871 in Paris of over 25,000 mostly peaceful protesters.
They were sick of the endless wars, the constant increase in taxation, and the constant erosion
of whatever they had in the way of rights by the ruling monarch monopolists, including
the Rothschild clan.
And Rothschild was the one who founded and funded Marx.
Lenin, Trotsky, Stalin, Hitler, Mussolini, and Mao.
So you wanna know what caused a major portion of our problems in the 20th century, there's your man.
Anyhow, the term agent provocateur was developed in France because the Rothschilds funded people to get inside
the Anarch and Commune movements, cause terrorism and provocative acts
and then get the rest of the group attacked.
And they ended up, after they massacred 25,000 to 30,000, depending on whose estimate you want to believe, They ended up deporting the rulers of that group to Devil's Island in the Caribbean and most of them stayed there till they died or they came back like 20 years later.
But bottom line is we've had this same oppressive government system more so in Europe than we've had in the United States, but now they're putting their boot on our neck forever like George Orwell said they would.
So that's where we are.
Go to France 24, From the Siege of Paris to the Bloody Week, the Commune, 150 years on.
This was written in March of this year, and it's far more objective than if you go to just wiki and look up 1871 Commune Massacre.
Oh yeah, Wiki is a Zionist operation.
They spin everything.
The first rule you learn in graduate school is that serious scholarship requires original sources.
Wikipedia will not allow original sources.
They depend on secondary because you can always find someone who presents the take.
You want to cite as though we're authoritative without having to go to the original sources, which enables them to give any spin to any subject they want.
Absolutely free and clear in accordance with her own misguided policies.
Deliberately slanted.
Michael, your thoughts?
Yeah, Joe, I got that story about that slaughter in the midst of the 19th century in France, and I was wondering what the context was and what the relevance was, and you just explained it, so thanks for that.
If I remember correctly, that fence around the Capitol was put up just before Biden's inauguration.
Should I say fake inauguration?
And so it seems obvious to anybody who thinks logically that that fence was put up to protect the guilty.
The people inside the fence were afraid.
First, because I suppose they thought that they might have a riot, I mean a real riot on their hands, unlike January 6th.
And they didn't feel safe from the possibility that the American populace might actually stand up for themselves and come after them with pitchforks and guns.
This whole thing is a whole thing about how they continue to characterize the January 6th situation as a riot.
And the ridiculous things that they say and the ridiculous follow up that the FBI is doing is actually a great case in point for a couple of things.
One is the fact that The common conception of the FBI is totally wrong.
And in this case, they're showing their face, their real face, that being that they're a criminal operation that works on behalf of the elite and their agenda, and they're masquerading as a law enforcement agency.
That's the first thing, and the other case in point is the rampant use, and this has gone on for centuries, of course, but it's so easy to see these days, of the linguistic aspect of the brainwashing of the populace that goes on constantly.
In this case, we're always being given the words, Rioters, violent, insurrection, words like that just are of interest to me because I think linguistic brainwashing is probably the number one factor that's being used against us these days.
Oh, you're absolutely right.
I mean, Loaded language, spinning, using language the way you describe makes all the difference in the world.
just to offer an illustration.
There may be a young woman, let's say a student who likes to talk.
That would be a neutral description.
But if you want to give it a negative spin, you say, Sally just won't shut up.
If you want to give it a positive, you say, Sally really has a lot to say.
Here you have the same phenomenon, namely a young woman who simply likes to talk,
giving a positive or a negative spin.
You're exactly right, Michael.
This happens in politics all the time.
Meanwhile, we- Go ahead.
Just one addition I wanted to make to that subject is that there was a terrific article
posted about three or four days ago at unz.com on the term hate speech.
So I refer people to that.
Go ahead.
Oh, very good.
Very good.
Yeah.
Uns is just wonderful.
Here we have a must-read epic Twitter thread giving a perfect primer on why Mega doubts 2020 election results.
Daryl Cooper gets it.
He's a researcher, writer, the creator of the history-based Martyr Made podcast and the co-host of The Unraveling with extreme ownership author Jocko Willink.
Here are some of his tweets.
Most believe some or all of the theories involving midnight ballots, voting machines, etc., but what you find when you talk to them is that, well, they'll defend those positions with info they got from Hannity or Breitbart or whatever.
They're not particularly attached to them.
Here are the facts, actually confirmed facts, that shape their perspective.
One, the FBI, etc., spied on the 2016 Trump campaign using evidence manufactured by the Clinton campaign.
We now know that all involved knew it was fake from day one.
These are Tea Party people, the types who give their kids a pocket constitution for their birthday and have Founding Fathers memes in their bios.
The intel community spying on a presidential campaign using fake evidence, including forged documents, is a big deal to them.
Everyone involved lied about their involvement as long as they could.
We only learned the DNC paid for the manufactured evidence because of a court order.
Comey, head of the FBI at the time, denied on TV knowing the DNC paid for it when we have emails from a year earlier proving that he knew.
This was true with everyone, from CIA Director Brennan and Adam Schiff, who were on TV saying they'd seen clear evidence at collusion with Russia, while admitting under oath behind closed doors that they hadn't, all the way down the line.
In the end, we learned that it was all fake.
At first, many Trump people were worried there must be some collusion because every media and intel agency wouldn't make it up out of nothing.
When it was clear that they had made it up, people expected a reckoning and shed many illusions about their government when it didn't happen.
There have been no consequences for Brennan Schiff.
They keep going on cable and spout absolute absurdities with no repercussions.
Many conservatives I've spoken to now think there's a two-tier system of justice, one for Democrats, one for Republicans.
Look how the BLM Antifa rioters have been treated compared to the mega crowd that went to the Capitol just to let the deep state know the jig was up.
We know as fact A, the Steele dossier was the sole evidence used to justify spying on the Trump campaign.
B, the FBI knew the Steele dossier was DNC op.
C, Steele's source told the FBI the info was on Sirius D. They did not inform the court of any of this and kept spying.
Trump supporters know the collusion case front and back.
They went from worrying the collusion must be real to suspecting it might be fake to realizing it was a scam Then watch as every institution, agencies, the press, Congress, academia gaslit them for another year.
Worse, collusion was used to scare people away from working in the administration.
They knew their entire lives would be investigated.
Many quit because they were being bankrupt by legal forces.
The DOJ, press, and government destroyed lives and actively subverted an elected administration.
Think General Michael Flynn.
The faith we had in the FBI was shattered.
Our trust in the media actually declined because we finally saw what we had long suspected was true.
The press was not interested in reporting facts.
They're just partisan hacks for the globalist regime, which is largely made up of Democrats who hate the idea of American exceptionalism.
This is where people whose political identity was largely defined by naive belief in what they learned in civics class began to see the outline of a regime that crossed all institutional boundaries because it had stepped out of the shadows to unite against an interloper to whip Donald Trump.
GOP propaganda still has many of them thinking in terms of partisan binaries, but a lot of Trump supporters see the regime as not partisan.
They all know that the same institution would have taken opposite sides if it were a Tulsi Gabbard versus Jeb Bush election.
It's hard to describe to people on the left who are used to thinking of government as a conspiracy—Watergate, COINTELPRO, weapons of mass destruction, etc.—how shocking and disillusioning this was for people who encourage their sons to enlist in the army and hate people who don't stand for the anthem.
Yes, exactly.
It seems to be it's the regime versus we the people.
That's why those on the right are so concerned about the Deep State and came to Tulsi's defense, even though she's not an ideological ally, because she's an outsider too.
They could have managed a shock if it only involved the government, but the behavior of the corporate press is really what radicalized them.
They hate journalists more than they hate any politician or government official, because they feel most betrayed by them.
The idea that the press is driven by ratings and sensationalism became untenable.
If that were true, they'd be all over the Epstein story.
The corporate press is a propaganda arm of the regime, and they now see an outline.
Nothing anyone says will ever make them unsee that, period.
This is profoundly disorienting.
Many of them don't know for certain whether ballots were faked in November 2020, but they know for absolute certainty that the press, the FBI, and others would lie to them if there were.
They have every reason to believe that, and it's probably true.
If you trust the FBI anymore, between the corporate media and the FBI, it's a coin toss as to who is more trustworthy, really, as to who is less.
They watched the press behave like animals for four years.
Tens of millions will always see Kavanaugh as a gang rapist based on nothing because of CNN.
And CNN seemed proud of that.
They led a lynch mob against a high school kid.
They cheered on a summer of riots.
They always claimed the media had liberal bias, fine, whatever.
They still thought the press would admit truth if they were cornered.
Now they don't.
It's a different thing to watch them invent stories out of whole cloth in order to destroy regular lives and spark mass violence.
Time Magazine told us during the 2020 riots there were weekly conference calls involving, among others, leaders of the protests, the local officials who refused to stop them, and media people who framed them for political effect.
In Ukraine, we call that a color revolution.
Throughout the summer, Democrat governors took advantage of COVID to change voting procedures.
It wasn't just mail-ins.
They lowered signature matching standards, etc.
After the collusion scam, the fake impeachment, Trump people expected shenanigans by now.
Regarding fake impeachment, we now know Trump's request for Ukraine to cooperate with the DOG regarding Biden's financial activities in Ukraine was a support of an active investigation being pursued by the FBI and Ukraine Attorney General at the time, and so a completely legitimate request.
Then you get the Hunter laptop scandal.
Big Tech ran a full-on censorship campaign against a major newspaper to protect a political candidate.
Period.
Everyone knows it.
All the tech companies now admit it was a mistake.
But, you know, the election's over, so who cares?
Hunter's laptop is still dropping bombshells about his degeneracy, the extent of his corruption, and how Joe knew about it.
The corporate media won't touch it with a thousand-foot pole.
But Don Jr.' 's Trump Tower meeting was wall-to-wall coverage for weeks on every major allegedly neutral network and publication.
And it was innocuous.
Goes without saying, but if the New York Times had Don Jr.' 's laptop full of pics of him smoking crack and engaging in group sex, lots of lurid family drama emails describing direct corruption and backed up by the CEO of the company they were using, the New York Times would not have been banned.
Think back.
Stories about Trump being pissed on by Russian prostitutes and blackmailed by Putin were promoted as fact, and the only evidence was a document paid for by his opposition and disavowed by its sources.
The New York Post was banned for reporting on true information.
The reaction of Trump people to all this was not no fair.
That's how they felt about Romney's binders of women in 2012.
This is different.
Now they see correctly every institution is captured by people who will use any means to exclude them from the political process.
Absolute lies that were confirmed to be lies were shared as gospel truth, but actual evidence of corruption coming directly from Hunter Biden's laptop was censored.
Remember, more than 50 former Intel officials, without having looked at the laptop, All came forward and said the Hunter Biden laptop was likely Russian disinformation and was being used to influence the 2020 election, but they were the ones influencing the election by using the dog whistle of Russian collusion.
Still, Trump supporters came out in droves.
They knew with this kind of opposition it had to be a very clear victory.
Trump gained millions of more voters than in key demographics.
And yet they showed up in record numbers to vote.
He got 13 million more votes than in 2016, 10 million more than Clinton got.
As election night dragged on, they allowed themselves some hope.
But when the four critical swing states, and only those states, went dark at midnight, they knew.
Over the ensuing weeks, they got shoveled around by gifters and media scam artists selling them conspiracy theories.
They latched onto one, then another increasingly absurd theory as they tried to put a concrete name on something very real.
Media and tech did everything to make things worse.
Everything about the election was strange.
The changes to procedures, unprecedented mail-in voting, the delays, etc.
But rather than admit it and make everything transparent, they banned discussion of it, even in DMs.
The Federalist Margo Cleveland reported Friday that nearly 35,000 Georgians had potentially voted illegally and is enough to tip Georgia.
But according to the regime and their psychofance in the corporate media, Saying it is apparently a conspiracy theory not expressing concern over the integrity of the election.
Everyone knows that.
Just as Don Jr.' 's laptop would have been the story of the century.
If everything about the election dispute was the same except the parties were reversed, suspicions about the outcome would have been taken very seriously.
See 2016 for proof.
Even the court's refusal of the case gets nowhere with them because of how the opposition embraced mass political violence.
They'll say with good reason.
What judge will stick his neck out for Trump knowing he'll be destroyed in the media as a violent mob burns down his house?
It's a fact, according to Time Magazine, that mass riots were planned in cities across the country if Trump won.
Sure, they were protests, but they were planned by the same people as during the summer, and everyone knows what it would have meant.
Judges have families, too.
When the Democrats were out in the street dancing when Biden was declared the winner, you could see the businesses boarded up behind them because they'd been preparing for the promised riots.
Forget the ballot conspiracies.
In fact, the governor has used COVID to unconstitutionally alter election procedures.
The Constitution states that only legislatures can do that to help Biden make up for a massive enthusiasm gap by gaming the mail-in ballot system.
They knew it was unconstitutional.
It's right there in plain English.
But they knew the cases wouldn't seek court until after the election.
And what judge will toss millions of ballots because a governor broke the rules?
The threat of mass riots wasn't implied.
It was direct.
A. The entrenched bureaucracy and state security state subverted Trump from day one.
B. The press is part of the operation.
C. Election rules were changed.
D. Big tech censors opposition.
E. Political violence is legitimized and encouraged.
F. Trump is banned from social media.
Cooper's gained some pushback on the thread, especially the idea there was a grand conspiracy, more like cooperation, though, between the regime, the corporate media, and Democrat governors.
But Cooper responded, this is the first time there was a real outsider to the regime entering the presidential race.
Fiscally illiterate Illuminati, I'm of the opinion it's only okay to believe the 2020 election was rigged if you believe that every single election in living memory was also rigged.
He replied, there's no reason to rig an election when both candidates are regime approved.
If someone tried, the other side would have an incentive to call it out, and the interests they represent would back them.
This is the first time in memory every power center was a lie.
This is precisely why Trump's Twitter account was so vital and why they've taken away.
It was too effective.
He was able to bypass the corporate media and get his message out directly to the people without filters.
But the regime can't have that.
The regime must choose, not the lowly American voter after all.
The regime knows best, comrade.
Completely brilliant, Joe.
your thoughts.
I can't hear you or see you.
Michael, go ahead.
Give us your thoughts.
Okay, yeah, that's certainly an impressive series of tweets by that guy.
I guess that's how you write an essay or an article on Twitter to get around their character limit.
And his characterization of what he's seeing here as a color revolution, what we would call a color revolution in any other country, is exactly correct.
And I also liked his statement, summary statement, It's really a takeover.
is captured by people who will use any means to exclude their enemies from the political process.
It's really a takeover.
And the key concept about what's going on in our world right now, to me, is deceit or deception.
Orwell, back in the late 40s, said that we're moving into a time of universal deceit.
And it seems only appropriate that the covert operation of the Zionist state, which has just about come to be the center of ruling the world, as is their goal, has the motto, I'm talking about the Mossad, of course, by deception.
Every place we turn, we're getting deceit, and in the context of what I just said, I want to give a plug.
Our colleague Jack Mullen, journalist Jack Mullen, recommended a book a little while back called The Controversy of Zion by Douglas Reed.
It was released in 1978 and pretty much buried, but it contains a Terrific overview of the historical working out both psychologically and physically machinations of what we're seeing in the world right now.
Nice, nice.
Yeah, Jack Mullins, a brilliant guy.
A further thought, Michael?
Well, I was just going to say, we're one month away from the 20 year anniversary of 9-11.
And I didn't realize that until a couple of days ago.
And on the pessimistic side, I'm not aware of one Yeah, it's pathetic.
It's outrageous.
Joe, your thoughts?
I'm so glad we're reconnected.
Yeah, I don't know what happened.
19 Muslims hijacking planes as being true history.
Yeah, it's pathetic, it's outrageous.
Joe, your thoughts.
I'm so glad we're reconnected.
Yeah, I don't know what happened.
In Texas, in primary elections, and after the polls closed,
or the polling places, they elect delegates to select
The can in 2000.
In 2008, Hillary won Texas, and I heard she won a whole bunch of other states, and the same little trick happened.
She showed up in mass at a polling place, picked the candidate election, went to the state delegate, and they picked, even though the state had voted for Hillary Clinton, Joe, we're losing you, my friend, I'm sorry to say.
Let's reconnect and we'll let you make up some lost time.
Meanwhile...
When you speak of Texas, it turns out that the Texas Democrats have fled the state in order to deny the Texas House a quorum so they can pass legislation to ensure the integrity of their vote.
It's a public relations stunt.
They're claiming they did it because they want to preserve the integrity of the election.
They are moving to support the Protect the People Act, which the Democrats want to pass to enable them to steal every election forever in the future of the nation.
They're actually crowded now to attempt to strip absent members of their committee appointments and to arrest them if necessary.
This is going to have a lot of ramifications, and I don't think the Democrats are going to be very happy.
We now return.
The number of deaths reported after the COVID vaccine has jumped by more than 2,000 in a single week.
You can expect that to increase.
It may even increase exponentially.
AVERS data released by the CDC showed a total of 438,441 reports of adverse events from
all age groups, including 9,048 deaths and 41,000 serious injuries between December 14th and July
2nd. The data released today included 9,049 reports of death across all age groups, an increase
of more than 2,000 compared to the previous week.
Now, normally in the past, if you have any deaths from something like this, they would pull it off.
of the market.
It would not be allowed, and now they have over 9,000 deaths, and they're letting it go forward.
This is completely irresponsible, morally and legally absurd.
AVERS, of course, is a primary government-funded system, but it only reports 1%.
reports 1% release data showed a total of 438,441 adverse events have been reported
and where there were 41,015 serious injuries report up 6,950 compared to last week.
I mean, it's just skyrocketing.
Ought to be pulled off the market immediately.
There's no question about it.
Every precedent in the past would not allow this to happen.
In the U.S., 328.9 million COVID vaccine doses had been administered by July 2, including 134
million of Moderna, 182 million of Pfizer, 13 million of J&J.
Of the 9,048 deaths reported, 22% occurred within 48
For 12 to 17-year-olds, 13,385 adverse events, including 801 rated as serious, 14 reported deaths, and 2 to 70.
37% of people became ill within 48 hours.
For 12 to 17 year olds, 13,385 adverse events, including 801 rated as serious,
14 reported deaths and two to 70.
There should be no deaths whatsoever.
The most recent death includes a 13 year old boy with a previous history of suffering cardiac arrest,
died 17 days after vaccination with Pfizer.
1,934 reports of anaphylactic shock among 12 to 17 year olds,
99% attributed to Pfizer vaccine, 1% to Moderna.
347 reports of myocarditis and periocarditis, heart inflammation, 343 attributed to Pfizer.
57 reports of blood clotting, 56 attributed to Pfizer, 1 to Moderna.
22% of deaths now have been related to cardiac disorders, 50% who died were male, 45% female, others not known.
Average age 74.7.
5% female, others not known.
Average age 74.7.
2,678 pregnant women have reported adverse reports, 994 miscarriage or premature birth,
4,456 cases of Bell's.
59% attributed to Pfizer, 39% to Moderna, 7% to J&J.
398 reports of Guillain-Barre syndrome, 47% attributed to Pfizer, 40% to Moderna, 19% to J&J.
121,091 reports of anaphylaxis.
46% attributed to Pfizer, 46 to Moderna, 7 to J&J.
8,256 reports of blood clotting.
3,959 attributed to Pfizer, 2,699 to Moderna, 1,552 to J&J.
1,796 cases of myocarditis and pericarditis with 1,177 cases attributed to Pfizer,
562 to Moderna, 52 to J&J.
As a defender reports today, the federal health agencies and the makers of one of the most popular COVID vaccines are publicly at odds over if and when fully vaccinated people might need a third booster shot, as though it weren't doing enough damage.
This is completely outrageous.
This is insane.
People are facing huge medical bills after being injured by COVID vaccines.
They have few options beyond what their own health insurance covers because vaccine makers are shielded from liability and because this is an experimental vaccine.
Making no mention of any safety concerns related to the vaccine, President Biden announced plans to wrap up the federal government's efforts to get more Americans vaccinated under a new door-to-door program.
This is completely outrageous!
Reports of COVID breakthrough cases, meaning still getting it even though you've been vaccinated, continue to rise.
4,686 breakthrough cases resulting in death and hospitalization of persons who've been fully vaccinated.
According to the CDC website, the CDC follows up on any reported death to request additional information, learn what occurred, determine whether the death was a result of a vaccine.
There's no question about what's going on here.
It is outrageous.
It is unprecedented.
There's never been a case where we had these kinds of adverse reactions and the product was not pulled.
This is totally abusive.
They want the American people to suffer the consequences of a vaccine Sherry Tenpenny has described as a perfectly designed killing machine.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yes, you had a tape on yesterday with Dr. David Martin, about an hour, hour and a half long.
He said, here's the 90 seconds that were edited out of my tape, and I'm going to tell you right now.
Fauci has funded $191 billion into bioweapons programs over the last 40 years.
That's available under a site called Jim Underline Crenshaw at BitChute.
Also at BitChute, Vincent James, who has the Red Elephant site, Said that bars yesterday increased their count to 9,000.
We've already reported that.
Overnight, it increased to over 10,000 deaths.
I'm telling you, it's going to go on an exponential curve.
It's going to double.
It's going to get more and more, Joe.
You know, I know.
And Pennsylvania had been using a model for the number of inoculations in their state.
When they went back and did the actual inoculations yesterday, they dropped 600,000 previously claimed inoculations to make it seem far more popular than it is in Pennsylvania.
So they're lying about the number of people that they jabbed.
And they're lying about the consequences of the ones they jabbed.
Absolutely outrageous.
It's a mass murder program masquerading as a health measure.
It's outrageous.
Michael, your thoughts?
Yeah, these death and injury figures in my mind constitute prima facie evidence that this has nothing whatsoever to do with any public health emergency.
The public health emergency was jimmed up, as we all know.
We've been over the ways that they've done it.
And these numbers of COVID vaccine deaths and injuries do not, there's another example of the linguistic brainwashing by the way, even to call these injections vaccines.
They don't do not support the devastation being dealt out by these injections.
Dr. Peter McCullough of the Baylor Medical System said a month ago, so no telling what he'd say now, is that he thought we had at least 50,000 deaths based on what was actually reported and the known level of underreporting in that system.
In that regard, I wanted to give a plug to there's a interview that's just come out.
You know, the German lawyer named Reiner Fulmisch has been gathering evidence and a case against this entire global crime.
And he did an interview with Dr. David Martin way back on, I say way back, on June 21st.
And that's what you referred to a minute ago, Joe, right?
Yeah.
Now, that interview is an incredible interview and it's posted now at the Jim Fetzer BitChute site.
And I had to listen to it like three times and transcribe some of it because it's Incredibly obvious evidence that David Martin and his organization have come up with of this pandemic being a global criminal conspiracy.
It's not a public health event at all.
And I was curious about what Joe just said.
Was there a section in that interview that's being spread around that was edited out and it's available somewhere else?
Yes, yes.
If you go to BitChute, Jim, underline Crenshaw, and then search for Fauci's $190 billion for bioweapons funding.
He said, we've got all the receipts.
We've got the dates, the grant amounts, goes back 40 years.
He's been funding every form of toxicity possible on the planet with our money.
Yeah, oh yeah, there's some great stuff in that interview at large, and he specifically mentions Fauci, so I have no idea why they would edit that little section out.
Well, because Fauci's involved in the design of bioweapons, and this is one.
This is the product that they come up with that Fauci has supported.
So Boeing is cover.
Meanwhile, Health Freedom, a 101.
I dropped my son off to visit his papa last weekend as I watched him walk toward the door, head to toe in a superhero costume, completely innocent and carefree a thought came across my mind.
I'd do anything to preserve his innocence.
I'd gladly fight for the future world we leave you until my last breath.
The Lord gave me a duty and privilege of raising this beautiful child, and I don't take my job lightly.
So it's no surprise the latest news on a link between heart issues and teens who got the vaccinations has left a pit in my stomach.
My son's school made him get COVID vaccine.
Now he has a heart condition.
Team diagnosed with heart conditions after vaccine.
Pfizer has now added, the FDA has now added heart inflammation warning to the Pfizer and Moderna COVID vaccines.
Devin Davis has tweeted, I think the children having heart attacks would disagree with you when the Alberta government said, all approved vaccines are safe, effective, and prevent serious illness.
They build antibodies to help prevent and fight off disease.
It's much safer and more effective to get immunized than it is to get affected.
Learn how they work.
He's right.
The evidence is completely the opposite.
If the plan forges on even in spite of this, with children having nearly a 0% risk of developing issues from the bug itself, will anything stop it?
Blood clots, strokes, gill and bare, blindness, brain aneurysm, paralysis, prion disease.
If none of them were enough for our elected officials to finally pull the pin on this dumpster fire, what will be enough?
How many mothers, grandfathers, uncles, best friends, and yes, children must be forever changed before enough is finally enough?
What's it going to take?
Very serious, very serious, really underscoring all the data we're reporting.
Joe, your thoughts?
Well, I don't know what more it takes to prove premeditated murder and racketeering of the highest level.
So, we've got at least 10,000, probably 100,000 people that do not need to be on this planet anymore.
I can't think that even confining them is going to be sufficient punishment.
And I can't wait for the military tribunals to start.
Let us hope they do start.
Michael, your thoughts?
Yeah, we're hoping for that a lot.
We're doing everything that we can in order to tell people the need for it and how this whole thing has been a giant grand deception.
Taken as a whole, it's one of, if not the greatest crime against humanity we've seen in a long time, or maybe ever in our lifetimes.
I was born after World War II.
It also crossed my mind that another linguistic brainwashing example is the term that you were using earlier and that they've been using on us called breakthrough cases.
And what they mean by that is cases of COVID that occur in people who are already vaccinated.
So by using the term breakthrough, it's implied that, oh, somehow it broke through the protection afforded by the vaccines, when in fact, the vaccines don't allow any protection against anything.
Oh, they're bringing about your death, actually.
All these medical maladies.
These are all reasons why the FDA, the CDC, ought to be pulling these vaccines.
They do other products that have minuscule consequences that are bad.
Minuscule compared to this.
This is a vast repository of record documenting.
They're unsafe.
They're killing people.
They're doing tremendous damage, and they're letting them go.
They're letting them stand.
This is an obscenity.
This is a total betrayal.
Meanwhile, JFK revisited Film Review.
Oliver Stone keeps digging, but he still doesn't have the answers.
He's put out a new documentary that just played at the Cannes Film Festival.
There's a four-year version, if you want to dig deeper, said Oliver Stone, introducing his documentary, JFK Revisited, through the looking glass.
The words were reminiscent of that dull best man speech gag about if you haven't struck oil after 10 minutes, stop boring.
Because even after this two-hour version of talking heads, photo stats, and redacted files, and some shocking shots of President Kennedy's brain, we are no closer to anything like truth.
Stone's film is not a companion piece, making of or follow-up to his all-star 1991 drama JFK, a director's cut of which played at the cinema on the beach the night before, but a procession of white male authors and experts in boring shirts hectoring you with their theories and old books.
Tarantino cinematographer Robert Richardson is credited with a photography, though he's in the most somber and sober of moods, with Stone himself asking occasional questions and dull reverses that seem clearly to be done in a different room in another day.
Never mind who shot JFK, who really shot this documentary?
The only real fun-making elan comes in the opening montage, which expertly, even thrillingly, recreates the days around the November 1963 assassination, starting with JFK's piece in our Time speech, Walter Cronkite delivering the official time of death and the numb chaos that ensued.
Now let's go back and piece together what really happened and why, says Stone in the voiceover.
He has access to newly declassified documents, he says, and new archives.
The conspiracy theories have been shown to be conspiracy facts, he says, and there's no doubt there are huge inconsistencies in almost every testimony where he goes through them forensically.
You'd have to be a JFK devotee to know exactly what is new and what isn't, but the pile of details is fascinating to the point of being overwhelming.
Lee Harvey's rifle isn't the one they found at the Texas Book Depository.
He can't possibly have made it down the steps.
Gerald Ford, on the commission, moved the bullet hole.
It was an exit wound?
No, it was an entrance wound.
Who really took the photos of the autopsy?
Why did the CIA let Oswald move from New Orleans to Dallas?
What really happened in the attempted plots during motorcades in Chicago and Tampa?
And who were prospecting Patsy's ballet in Lopez?
Although the film acts all macho, like it's brave and thorough documentary with all the answers, the shots of Stone himself striding around downtown Dallas and turning to glare at the camera are nigh on comical.
There's little inventive about the film, visually or politically.
It's the sort of thing we've become used to in all those true crime reconstructions, and some passages even come across as frothing at the mouth babble.
Trust nobody, believe nothing.
If the Kennedy assassination is still the ultimate conspiracy theory, why doesn't Stone look at how that fervor has become a part of modern life in the age of social media and Trump?
Are they connected somehow?
These shadowy worlds of data and Russia and racists and crackpot theorists?
I think Stone believes Kennedy's plan to withdraw from Vietnam was at the heart of the plot to assassinate him, but he is curiously, frustratingly circumspect about actually saying it, and still can't find out who ordered it.
Although a number of times he flashes up the photo of seven wise and eminent Americans, smiling around their Warren Commission table, and the constant request to clip some pipe smoker and CIA chief Alan Dulles gives you a hint.
But after all this time, all this research, all this hype, you want and deserve more than just a hint.
By coincidence, this week, beginning tomorrow night, I will appear on Awakenings, Great Awakenings, with Scott Bennett on AmericanMediaPeriscope.com.
We didn't plan this.
We didn't know about Oliver's film, but it's a remarkable coincidence.
I'm entitling this, What Happened to JFK?
Did Oliver Stone get it right?
Referring to his original masterpiece of 1991, not to this piece of drivel that fails on all counts.
It'll be presented on Friday, Wednesday, initially, Part 1, from 9 to 10 p.m.
Eastern Time, Part 2 on Friday, and if we have more to cover, which I predict will be the case, the following Wednesday will be Part 3.
Meanwhile, Joe, your thoughts?
Yes, I had the great honor of meeting Dr. Fetzer in Dallas in 2018.
I read through that piece in the wrap on the JFK movie and I would have to defer to you because you're an absolute expert.
It's a shame that you as an advisor on whatever he wants to do in the way of an update.
Well, let me assure you, in the first five minutes of my presentation, you'll know more about the assassination and what happened than in this whole movie, given what we've heard about it.
I'm just unimpressed in the extreme.
Michael, your thoughts?
Yeah, I'm not surprised at all that Oliver Stone's new revisitation of the JFK assassination is a limited hangout.
To me, Oliver Stone is to the JFK assassination what Richard Gage is to 9-11 evidence.
He won't get close to the idea of who's responsible, who did it.
He just kind of nibbles around the edges and tries to keep people interested.
If he was really serious about getting to the truth of that, all he had to do was make a phone call to Dr. Jim Fetzer and get him on screen for about a two-hour PowerPoint, and Jim Fetzer would lay it all out for them in two hours.
And then, Jim would get huge royalties for the proceeds when millions went to see the movie and discover the real truth of the JFK.
God, I appreciate that, Michael.
That's so wonderful.
You're going to get a chance to test what Michael just said on this Wednesday.
That's tomorrow night and Friday.
And then I expect there will be a part three the following Wednesday.
You don't want to miss this.
America Media Periscope.
Check it out online with Scott Bennett.
Great awakening.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from news and fan mail, pro or con.
To liveneedtoknowatgmail.com.
Liveneedtoknowatgmail.com.
Here's a comment from my blog.
Jim, Joe is trying to say something.
Yeah.
Okay, go ahead, Joe.
There's no doubt about it, Joe.
AFK, he had just silvered for the Federal Reserve.
And he also blocked supplying nuclear and technology to Israel.
So there was multiple parties and motives to take him out.
There's no doubt about it, Joe, no doubt about it.
Meanwhile, complain about President Trump all you want, elections come down to a choice between just two people.
President Trump is certainly not without faults, but he was honestly elected and did a good job overall.
He certainly was a better choice than Hillary.
In 2020, President Trump was a clear choice of the people, while demanded, incoherent Biden was selected with counterfeit ballots and machine-swapped votes.
I would rather have a president who is elected by the citizens than one like Biden who is simply a puppet dictator installed with immense help from the deep state, which now includes all of big tech.
Very nicely done.
Speaking of getting too much truth and thereby having to be censored, Amazon has banned six of the books that we have published at Moonrock Books, not only about Sandy Hook, but also the Boston Bombing, the Moon Landing, Orlando and Dallas, Charlottesville and Parkland.
You can, however, still gain access to the truth by going to moonrockbooks.com.
Check it out.
Meanwhile, False Flag and Conspiracy 2020, my December 5-6 conference, which was virtual.
We had 24 presentations.
I've made them all available for free.
Go to falseflagconspiracy2020.com.
Remember, the secret of freedom lies in educating people, the secret of tyranny in keeping them ignorant.
Final thoughts.
Joe, yours.
Yeah, turns out National File.
Joe, we're breaking up, I'm sorry.
Go ahead.
OK, and yeah, National File.
Look up Rona Romney, whatever her last name is, and Jenna Ellis.
They're having a big cat fight and it looks like the RNC is fixing to take a dive.
They need to.
OK, thanks Joe.
Michael, your final thoughts.
Yeah, I want to refer people once again because it's so blockbuster of an interview to that interview with Dr. David Martin and Rainer Fulmisch posted at the Jim Fetzer BitChute site.
The name of it is COVID-19, a manufactured illusion.
And I'd like to read just a short segment of something that David Martin says from that.
Quote, the illusion that most people fall into is we are not involved in administering a vaccine against a pathogenic virus.
We are injecting a spike protein mRNA sequence, which is a computer simulation.
It's not derived from anything natural.
It's a computer simulation of a sequence which has been known and patented for years.
This is about getting people to be injected with the known to be harmful S1 spike protein.
The tragedy is that now we have hundreds of millions of people who are being injected with a pathogen-stimulating computer sequence, which is being sold under what the Patent Office, the medical profession, and what the FDA in its own clinical standard would not qualify as a vaccine.
But by using the term, We're now subjecting hundreds of millions of people to what was known in 2005 to be a biological weapon."
Very well said.
I'm simply delighted to be joined on these occasions by Joe Olson from Houston, with apologies for the internet connection falling apart here at the end, and Michael Ivey from Asheville, North Carolina.
I cannot emphasize sufficiently that what's going on here is a monstrous abuse of the law, of policy, of past practice.
The CDC and the FDC would never allow any medication that had the kind of adverse reports we're getting now for these COVID vaccines to remain on the market.
They should be removed!
Do everything you can.
Raise hell with your mayor, with your representative, with editors in your newspaper, with your senators.
This is outrageous.
And you heard the suggestion that if AVERS is showing 9,000 deaths, they're only reporting 1%.
Add two more digits, You understand why the expert was saying he thought it was at least 500,000.
I project it's around 900,000 deaths to date, and the numbers are going to increase dramatically, dramatically.
Watch it happen.
Go after the FDA, the CDC, Foushee has received you.
He is a Pied Piper.
He's leading the public to their death.
This is going to be mass murder on a scale unprecedented in history.
I cannot say enough about the tragedy that's unfolding before our very eyes.
We are doing our best to educate you about what's going on.
Don't be ignorant.
Act on what we are telling you.
Be warned.
Take precautions.
Protect yourself.
And spend time with your loved ones and your family because, frankly, we don't know how much time we have left.
Thank you for joining us today.
▲
Export Selection