Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

June 26, 2021 - Jim Fetzer

01:55:30

The Raw Deal (25 June 2021)

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	We will all bake together when we bake.
	There'll be nobody present at the wake.
	This is Jim Fetzer, your host on The Raw Deal.
	and incineration, nearly three billion hunks of well-done steak.
	We will all char together when we char, and let there be no moaning of the bar.
	Just sing out a tedium when you see that ICBM, and the party will be come as you are.
	This is Jim Fetzer, your host on The Raw Deal.
	Today will be a bit of an inverse of the usual procedure.
	Mitchell cannot be available the second hour, and since he feels the phone calls, I'm going to take the phone calls early in the first hour and, you know, continue with the stories and coverage during the second.
	But I want to begin by inviting your attention to the collapse of the condominium in Florida.
	I would encourage any of you who are at a computer to go to YouTube and take a look at one of the videos you see there, and watch as I'm going to play it here and talk about it, because there's something I have not noticed.
	Who have suggested that this might have been a controlled demolition.
	I have another who suggested you got two out of three towers as it were coming down.
	You got a middle tower, then it's followed by the other the right wing as though it were suggestive of the South and the North Tower.
	But what was most important is when I went back to take another look at this footage.
	I noticed that in the second tower after the mid part collapses, and this was like at what, 1.30 in the morning, you can actually see flashes of light.
	You can actually see flashes of light in that wing, which are indicative of a controlled demolition.
	I'm going to play it here for myself.
	And you'll see this footage and I hope many of you will go on YouTube and look at what I'm talking about here.
	The center section is just gone.
	Now I'm seeing a flash of light, a flash of light, more.
	Flashes of light in the other wing and it comes down very much resembling a controlled demolition.
	We get all the reports about it.
	Everything else reports about it.
	Authorities responded to the call around 1.30, triggering a large-scale operation.
	More than 30 occupants were rescued after the collapse.
	We have additional issues taking place here.
	At least one dead and others injured as rescue mission continues.
	Now, think about it.
	This is two massive condominiums.
	It's 12-story, 12-floor buildings at 1.30 in the morning.
	How could there only be one person dead?
	They're claiming 99 are missing.
	I find all that quite bizarre.
	Ron DeSantis, the governor of Florida, of course, is speaking about the issue, doing what he can to account for what's happening there.
	But the fact of the matter is that it seems very odd, very strange.
	About 55 units had been damaged, according to the authorities.
	A Surfside mayor said the building was full of occupants at the time of the collapse.
	We have Biden talking about it.
	Now we have four dead, 35 rescued, 159 missing.
	Mitchell gives me a note.
	The building is at 8777 Collins Avenue.
	Mitchell gives me a note.
	The building is at 8777 Collins Ave.
	At least it wasn't 666.
	Authorities didn't immediately say what may have caused the collapse.
	Now, yesterday I featured Joe Olson, who's a structural and civil engineer on my Need to Know program, and Joe was explaining how this was a type of a concrete structure that depends on pressure to maintain its components in place, that they have a Finite lifespan.
	This building went up around 1981.
	He was explaining how.
	I mean, this is not a steel structure reinforced building like the Twin Towers, which, by the way, could not have collapsed.
	Chuck Baldwin, who's a retired high school math, physics, and chemistry professor, calculated that for every unit of downward force, there were 199 units of upward force, so the Twin Towers could not have collapsed.
	We did have a rather similar phenomenon, of course, with Building 7, which did collapse, a classic controlled demolition, at 5.20 in the afternoon, about seven hours.
	After the destruction of the north.
	Now, mind you, this is a fascinating case where the U.S.
	government's own research contradicts the U.S.
	government's official position, because as you hear every time on this program during the breaks, the U.S.
	Geological Survey studied dust samples from 35 locations and found elements Including barium, strontium, lithium, lanthanum, tritium, some of which only exist in radioactive form that would not have been present had this not been a nuclear event.
	So we get this rather fascinating situation taking place.
	Now, I do see we already have a caller on the line, and I'm going to take calls early on, but I want to Introduce one more story before I do so, and we can talk about all of this.
	We have the British destroyer purposefully crossing into Crimea's territorial waters, where Russia reports that it dropped warning bombs in the path to cause the destroyer to divert.
	Now, in relation to this article specifically, the editor notes Unclear if warning shots were actually fired and warning bombs drop.
	There's no footage of the bombs.
	Firing can be heard, but the official British story is that the Russians were conducting gunnery exercises nearby.
	In any case, that's not the important thing.
	The important thing is that the British Navy intentionally sailed into Crimea's territorial waters Disputing Russia's claim to the peninsula with a military asset.
	Imagine the Russian Navy sailing into the territorial waters of the Falkland Islands to make a point of recognizing Argentina's claim to the islands, but not the British.
	The British Ministry of Defense claims innocent passage, but that is total nonsense.
	Innocent passages for when an equally convenient route outside the territorial waters does not exist.
	You do not cross into territorial waters for no reason whatsoever.
	Besides, there's nothing innocent about a warship of a hostile military bloc that would be NATO sailing into your waters to dispute your claim to your territory.
	Will the Russians now make it a point to violate UK's territorial waters?
	Fascinating.
	Mitchell has thus added, the British say they will do it again, and Russia says they will bomb, and the Russians are in the right.
	This is a gross violation of international law.
	Here we have a defense correspondent on board the HMS Defender in the Black Sea.
	We have just completed a transit through Russia-occupied Crimea's territorial waters.
	This was a deliberate move by the Royal Navy warship, which is on its way to Georgia, overhead.
	There are still Russian jets buzzing.
	At times, there have been more than 20 aircraft above the warship.
	There have been warnings from Russian Coast Guard vessels.
	Indeed, we have heard shots fired.
	We believe they were out of range.
	Throughout this transit, The crew on the HMS Defender have been on high alert, and at one stage they did put on anti-flash masks to protect their faces just in case there was going to be an exchange of fire.
	They didn't think that would happen, and it did not happen.
	But the Russian jets have taken an interest in this, and they have warned the ship not to go into Crimean territorial waters, claiming they are Russian.
	The Russian Coast Guard tried to do a maneuver To make sure that HMS Defender altered course, but the warship continued down that recognized shipping lane and could we see the coast as it was within 12 miles, 19 kilometers of Crimea.
	It is now sailing in international waters, but Russian jets are still buzzing this Royal Navy warship as we proceed into the next part of the journey toward Georgia.
	This is really stunning stuff.
	Let me just add, for those who may be unaware, this is a kind of provocation that could precipitate World War III.
	It's completely unnecessary for the British Navy to declare they'll do it again.
	It is completely outrageous and shows that there is skullduggery at work.
	Now, what you need to appreciate is the following point.
	Russia has superior military technology to NATO and the United States.
	Russia has better anti-missile missiles.
	Russia has better anti-ship missiles.
	Russia has better anti-submarine torpedoes.
	They're virtually unstoppable.
	The difference between the Russian military expenditures in the US, while the Russian is a pittance, it's got to be less than 10% of US, is that Russia doesn't have to deal with the profit margins of private corporations who deliberately manufacture inferior products so they'll get maintenance contracts and make double or triple the amount of money they made on the original.
	The Russians know they have limited resources.
	Therefore, because of a strong sense of nationalism and patriotism, the Russian defense industry produces superior weapons.
	I have no doubt that even though the American nuclear arsenal is overwhelmingly larger than the Russian, The Russians have enough to annihilate the United States many times over.
	Mind you, many of you are puzzled why I played Tom Lear in his brilliant satire, We'll All Go Together When We Go, but if this happens, believe me, that's going to be the case.
	There will be no tedium.
	The party will become as you are.
	I mean, it's absolutely unbelievable.
	I have been convinced for a very long time.
	Indeed, I'm hardly alone.
	Most of the world holds this belief that the greatest threat to world peace is a nuclear war.
	And I regard Dr. Strangelove, Stanley Kubrick's masterpiece, as the single most important film ever made, ever made.
	I encourage and recommend everyone to watch Dr. Strangelove at least once every year.
	Now, just to repeat the phone number, though we have Bruce from Texas already on the line, the number is 540- 3-5-2-4-4-5-2.
	5-4-0-3-5-2-4-4-5-2.
	I will not be taking callers during the second hour because of Mitchell's absence, but I will be taking callers the first.
	Bruce from Texas, join the conversation.
	Your thoughts, Bruce.
	Yes, hello, Jim.
	Go!
	Okay, yeah, great.
	I just want to make sure you can hear me.
	Yeah, it took me about 20 seconds to figure out why the British warship is provoking Russia.
	The German economic minister, Peter Altmaier, is on his way to the United States, and Germany is a strong supporter of the Nord Stream 2 project, and he believes that issues are solvable.
	And he gave an interview on German radio, That it was too simple to betray Germany as a sole stock supporter of the contentious pipeline project bringing gas from Russia to northern Germany.
	So they're throwing a tantrum over the Nord Stream 2 that they want to shut down so they can have control over the gas going through.
	Bruce, spell it out again, how do you think these are interrelated?
	The North Stream gas line is totally appropriate for Europe.
	It gives them relatively inexpensive gas from an immediate, geographically close proximity supplier.
	Russia has a vast gas supply.
	I got to tell you, it's not in the interest of the United States to try to destroy or interrupt the North Stream Agreement.
	That would make every European resent the United States, because by virtue of our political intervention, their gas prices would soar.
	This is an Israeli op.
	The Israelis want to disrupt any cooperation between Russia and any other state.
	Believe me, mark my words, I see the signs of this everywhere.
	Repeat, go ahead, Bruce, make your argument again.
	Oh yeah, of course we can surmise that Israeli politics and U.S.
	and British politics are tied at the hip.
	But the reason I was calling in was, are you aware that the Department of Justice is approaching the Supreme Court to reinstate the death sentence for Boston Marathon bomber so-called Sarnie?
	Well, you know, I've done quite a lot about Zocaro.
	I have a book I highly recommend.
	I believe you hear about it every time you hear the show, because there are promos for both my 9-11 book, America Nuked on 9-11, compliments of the CIA, the neocons in the Department of Defense, and the Mossad.
	Nobody died in Boston either, where I, in the company of two other American citizens, with the assistance of John Remington Graham, who's a retired professor of law, have submitted an amicus brief to the United States Supreme Court in this case.
	You're 100% correct about the DOJ wanting to reinstate the death penalty, but they didn't do it!
	Zoker was betrayed by his attorney Judy Clark, who while formally pleading them not guilty in her opening statement said they did it, which would have been impossible to prove.
	I have reiterated the evidence so many times in those promos that I'm sure you don't need to be reassured, but This amicus brief submitted to the Supreme Court, which it now appears they're seeking to ignore, creates a crystal clear, simple, inelegant proof that they were not guilty on the basis of this observation that the backpacks don't match.
	The FBI in its investigation and in the indictment for Zokar, both places, states that the backpacks that exploded were black nylon backpacks.
	They were relatively compact.
	They actually had a white square sewn on them, which I believe is to indicate that those were the backpacks that contained the explosives.
	But when they photoshopped Zokar and Tamerlan into the marathon footage, they committed a blunder.
	They forgot about the backpacks.
	Tamerlan, his older brother, is wearing a large, baggy, dark-colored backpack, but it does not resemble, even remotely, the backpacks that exploded.
	And Zoker is wearing a silvery-ish or gray backpack, again bearing no resemblance.
	So this simple amicus brief on behalf of me and two other American citizens makes an elegant point that since the backpacks don't match, you must quit, very analogous to Johnny Cochran, except in that case, They manufactured the outcome by having OJ put on latex gloves before he attempted to put on the gloves, the bloody glove found at the scene.
	And because the bloody glove found at the scene was skin tight, once he put on the latex, it would not fit.
	So we heard from Johnny Cochran, if the glove doesn't fit, you must acquit.
	Well that was contrived in that case but in this since the backpacks don't match you must acquit nothing contrived about it very straightforward we were acutely disappointed because we submitted this.
	It appears to us now as Jack has informed me in the last couple of days that the U.S.
	The court acknowledged our brief and explained they would take it into account, and then
	they simply ignored it.
	It appears to us now, as Jack has informed me in the last couple of days, that the U.S.
	Supreme Court is going to try to pull the same move, meaning both the prosecution and
	the defense do not want to be exposed that this is fraudulent, so that they're excluding
	our evidence, even though it's on the formal docket.
	It has been accepted as evidence, which means, as Jack is explaining, and I've asked him to author a blog about this, which I will publish at JamesFetzer.org, Our brief will either exonerate Zoker and save his life, or demonstrate conclusively that the American judicial system participates in judicially sanctioned murder.
	Those are the only options, Bruce.
	Your further thoughts?
	Yeah, our justice system is beyond the pale.
	It's just depressing, you know?
	Wasn't his brother under custody, handcuffed by a police car, and then he was run over and murdered?
	Following the bombing?
	That's exactly right.
	Yeah, yeah.
	There's a movie they put up.
	What was it?
	Patriot Day?
	With Kevin Bacon.
	That took a lot of liberties and created a phony shootout between the police and the brothers.
	One that never occurred.
	Claiming that Zulker ran over his brother Tamerlan during the shootout and inadvertently killed his brother.
	But your point is impeccable.
	Tamerlan was arrested in Watertown.
	He was stripped naked, put in a police car.
	After that event, there's no possible way Zoker could have had access to him.
	There was no gunfight, but Next we know we have his body lying on a slab with a huge gash in the side, and he's dead.
	D-E-A-D.
	So since he was in police custody, and the next thing we know he's dead, how are you going to explain that other than by foul play by law enforcement and judicial authorities?
	So Bruce, you're making some very, very good points.
	Right, I remember there was some reports or speculation that the two brothers were working for the CIA or some other government agency and they're employed to be inserted into some country in Eastern Europe, maybe in Turkey, as agents of the United States to infiltrate Muslim radicals.
	And, uh, they were probably just kids on the back burner, and they were just asserted to this as patsy, just like Lee Harvey Oswald, you know?
	And, uh, it's really terrible.
	Yeah.
	They were patsies, obviously, like Lee, like Sirhan Sirhan, like, uh, Chapman in the John Lennon shooting.
	Uh, but there's no reason to think they had any undercover covert operative experience.
	They came from Crimea.
	The FBI was aware of them, and the FBI plays roles in framing, just as the FBI, as Tucker has explained so brilliantly, was involved in planning and carrying out the intrusion into the Capitol on the 6th of January to try to provide justification for the phony white supremacist narrative.
	I mean, it's all embarrassingly bad.
	Bruce, we have a couple of minutes to the break.
	I'd like you to have an opportunity to say more and then I'll proceed with other stories.
	Go ahead, Bruce.
	Right.
	Yeah.
	One more and then I'll have to listen offline.
	What do you think about the John McAfee?
	How is it possible that a Spanish prison where their most high profile prisoner and he supposedly kills himself.
	And there's no video.
	They can't afford Amazon Tier surveillance equipment that they sell, you know?
	They kept them in a jail like out of a spaghetti western with iron bars and concrete walls.
	I mean, give me a break.
	I don't understand that either.
	Oh, Bruce.
	Yeah, I believe he was suicided.
	I don't have any serious doubt about it.
	I think he was too much of a threat to the deep state that he would reveal too many secrets.
	The guy was quite a genius, you know, in terms of computers.
	I remember studying McAfee way back when I did a program for PhDs in philosophy and linguistics, studying computer science and artificial intelligence.
	It made a huge change in my career.
	Because I'd been denied tenure at my first appointment at Kentucky.
	I stepped on too many toes.
	I won the first teaching award presented by student government to one of 135 assistant professors.
	I'd given talks, 12 talks at eight different departments, really unheard of.
	I had more publication and better journals, but I was opposing the founding of a PhD program
	at Kentucky.
	They had a very successful MA and I, in other ways, had embarrassed other members of the
	faculty, one of whom would later acknowledge that he voted against me because I was living
	with my girlfriend without the benefit of wedlock.
	Took me 10 years to find another permanent position after a series of temporary or visiting
	and it was because I'd been in this program for AI and computer science that they liked
	my doing hands-on research and I was hired as a full professor with tenure on the Duluth
	campus of the University of Minnesota.
	we'll be right back this is a revolution
	and and
	you Management would like to take a moment to thank the listeners and hosts for all their support that has made Revolution Radio one of the biggest platforms for free speech in an ever-growing dark world of censorship.
	Unfortunately, this platform for free speech has never been free.
	We need the support of the people.
	It is the people like you, yes, you, that keeps the station in the front lines of the battle against tyranny and oppression.
	Please help support Revolution Radio so free speech will not be silenced in a world that seems to be going deaf to the real truth.
	With your support, we will be able to become an even bigger pillar of light in a dark world.
	Revolution Radio, freedomsubstance.com, the number one listener-supported radio station on the planet.
	Revolution.
	Rainbow, rainbow, rainbow, rainbow.
	Hey everyone, it's Barbara Jean Lindsay, The Cosmic Oracle.
	If you have questions about your past lives or future plans, need answers from the cosmos about your love life or career, or just want to keep your finger on the pulse of the planet, check out my show, The Cosmic Oracle, here on Revolution Radio at freedomslips.com.
	Was it a conspiracy?
	Did you know that the police in Boston were broadcasting, this is a drill, this is a drill, on bullhordes during the marathon?
	That the Boston Globe was tweeting that a demonstration bomb would be set off during the marathon for the benefit of bomb squad activities.
	And that one would be set off in one minute in front of the library, which happened as the Globe had announced.
	Peering through the smoke, you could see bodies with missing arms and legs.
	But there was no blood.
	The blood only showed up later and came out of a tube.
	They used amputee actors and a studio-quality smoke machine.
	Don't let yourself be played.
	Check out And Nobody Died in Boston, either.
	Available at moonrockbooks.com.
	That's moonrockbooks.com.
	I'm going to be doing a lot of moonrock.
	I'm going to be doing a lot of moonrock.
	Eastern Time on Studio B from Momentary Zen with host Zen Garcia at freedomstep.com, the people's station.
	The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners
	or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source who
	expressed them.
	They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff, or affiliates.
	You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, 100% listener supported radio, and now we return you to your
	host.
	Well, it was good to hear from Bruce, and if anyone else wants to call, remember it's this half hour, your
	opportunity.
	The number 540-352-4452.
	Colin and Mitchell can field your call.
	We're inverting the order because he cannot stick around for the second hour.
	Meanwhile, a judge has rejected claims against Trump and other officials for clearing out the protesters.
	This was for a peaceful demonstration outside the White House last summer.
	It seems to me good that there's a cleanup taking place here.
	The ACLU and other civil rights groups accused the then president and top officials in June 2020 of violating the constitutional rights of Black Lives Matter campaigners and individual protesters.
	U.S.
	Judge Dabney Frederick of Washington dismissed the majority of the claims against Trump Explaining in a 51-page opinion that accusations the ex-president and several of his top officials had conspired to clear a path for a photo opportunity were too speculative.
	These allegations, taken as true, do not show sufficient events, conversations, or documents indicating an agreement or meeting of the minds among the defendants to violate the plaintiff's rights based on their membership in a protected class.
	merely alleging that the defendant officials communicated without alleging any details of
	those communications, suggesting an unlawful agreement cannot justify inferring the requisite
	agreement to commit a conspiracy. Very intelligent. She, it's a woman, also dismissed the
	plaintiff's push for a court order that would require the government to change its use of
	forced practices against protesters.
	Frederick, a 2017 Trump appointee, did allow litigation to go forward, challenging federal restrictions on protests at Lafayette Square directly across from the White House, as well as against local police who supported the operation.
	Meanwhile, Trump has made it clear, I have not conceded 2020 laws, might have a different president now if it had not been for having selected Pence, Mike Pence, to be his vice president.
	On the possibility of being reinstated if the 2020 contests were verified as fraudulent, Trump said such a decision would be up to the public or perhaps politicians.
	I think, in fact, it would be up to the judiciary.
	I think there'd be a legal action involved here.
	Former President Trump said Monday, that would have been a week ago, That he's not conceded the 2020 presidential race, that if the election were proven fraudulent, it would be up to the public and perhaps politician to decide how to respond, and that if Mike Pence had sent disputed election results back to state legislatures for review, the country might very well have a different president right now.
	He's absolutely 100% correct that if Mike Pence had performed his duties under the Constitution when there were disputed electors, it was required of him to send it back to the states, to the legislatures.
	To clarify which slate of electors they intended to have counted in the election of 2020, which he failed to do.
	But this, I'm certain, is not going to be left up to politicians.
	It's virtually certain, I would infer, that it would be a matter for the judiciary, but where I wish I could count on the Supreme Court doing the right thing.
	I'm profoundly distraught.
	Over the courts having failed to accept the Texas suit, which outlined in clear and precise language how four key states—Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Georgia—had violated their own statutes and protocols for selecting electors.
	In other words, this was an illegal process that was engaged upon where the Supreme Court rejected Texas' suit for lack of standing.
	Which is, of course, equally outrageous, because in disputes between the states, the Supreme Court is the court of original jurisdiction, meaning it's not requisite that in disputes between the states they go through the state courts, the circuit courts, the appellate courts, or even their respective Supreme Courts.
	These cases go directly to the U.S.
	Supreme Court, and rightly so, under the Constitution.
	He continued, no, I never admitted defeat.
	He told just the news water cooler.
	We have a lot of things happening right now.
	All you have to do is read the newspapers and see what's coming out now that he has not conceded.
	Last week, during an interview with conservative commentator Sean Hannity, Trump had remarked about the 2020 contest that, shockingly, we were supposed to win easily at 64 million votes.
	We got 75 million and still didn't win, but let's see what happened on that.
	He told the Water Cooler host that if the election was tainted by fraud, any decision on reinstating him as president would fall to the public or possibly the politicians, the point on which I disagree with him.
	I think this is just a mistake on his part.
	He was disappointed that former Vice President Mike Pence did not kick some state electoral vote counts back to their state legislatures for review, speculating that if Pence had done so, there might have been a different president in office today.
	I think he's 100% correct.
	Well, he added, I've always liked Mike, and I'm very disappointed that he didn't send them back to the legislatures.
	When you have more votes than you have voters in some cases, when you have the kinds of things that were known, in many cases known already, they're certainly getting better and better known now.
	I was disappointed he didn't send them back.
	I felt he had the right to send them back and he should have sent them back.
	That is my opinion.
	I think you would have found that you might very well have a different president right now had he sent them back.
	100% correct.
	While the discrimination against all things Trump continues here, where we have Rudy Giuliani being denied the right to practice law in New York, I find this fairly stunning and outrageous.
	Rudy Giuliani, the former personal lawyer for former President Donald Trump, Who once held one of the legal profession's most prestigious jobs was suspended Thursday, that was yesterday, from practicing law in New York State by an appellate court that found he made demonstrably false and misleading statements about the 2020 election.
	How ridiculous is this?
	In other words, because Rudy Giuliani believes the election was stolen, which in my opinion, it was obviously stolen.
	Here you have an appellate court denying Rudy the right to practice law over a difference of opinion where the weight of the evidence is overwhelmingly on Rudy Giuliani's side in a ruling released following disciplinary proceedings.
	The court concluded that there is uncontroverted evidence that Giuliani, the former Manhattan U.S.
	attorney, communicated demonstrably false and misleading statements to courts, lawmakers, and the public at large in his capacity as lawyer to former President Donald J. Trump and the Trump campaign in connection with Trump's failed effort at re-election in 2020.
	Giuliani's conduct immediately threatens the public interest and warrants interim suspension from the practice of law.
	This is just disgusting.
	This is just disgusting.
	I mean, if anyone wants to, you know, thinks they have or can retain any lingering vestige of belief in our judicial system, this is just a shot between the eyes.
	This is outrageous.
	Meanwhile, Rasmussen, which has proven to be the most reliable of our polling organizations, the majority of Americans voters support full forensic audit of election results.
	This is big news.
	55% of American voters support full forensic audits of the election results and According to the War Room, 41% of the American people do not believe Joe Biden is a legitimate president.
	This is absolutely stunning stuff and, in my opinion, contradicts the action taken by the appellate court In New York City, in suspending Rudy Giuliani's right to practice law, falsely alleging there is no evidence that it's incontrovertible that the election was clean.
	I mean, that's either colossal stupidity or monstrous propaganda on the part of the court.
	I am shocked.
	We have another caller on the line, Scaredy Cat.
	Scaredy, join the conversation.
	Hi, Jim and Mitch.
	So, nuclear war is what the Jews have lined up all their little duckies in a row.
	So, you know, it's because the main idea, the main factor in who gets the money.
	And Pakistan is the only Muslim country which is a nuclear power.
	All other eight are not Muslim.
	And the Muslim culture will never bend their knee or their backs, especially when they do Meditation.
	The format of it is bowing down to the ground in order to practice never bowing down to any human being.
	So you surrender.
	The idea is complete willful.
	So if you become a Muslim, you deliberately make up your mind, your will.
	It's called willful surrender to God.
	And that is the, uh, in their meditation, which they do five times a day, they, um, they surrender to God.
	And obviously God is the supreme creator of every item that exists in all the universes, universes countably big, universes countably small.
	So it's a complete surrender to goodness.
	That's the idea.
	of the ritual of five times daily prayer of surrender to goodness.
	And the main thing to conduct society, it is said, is you cannot charge interest.
	And the whole world has slowly, slowly, because of international banking, has taken on more or less, you know, Muslims do take out mortgages, We are not supposed to engage in even giving interest.
	So that is also considered a high crime.
	So when I buy a house in the Western system or my husband bought us a house in the Western system, he did take a mortgage and it was very small.
	I mean, he didn't do the 30 years.
	He paid it off as soon as he could work very hard.
	He only took off, I think, 10 or 15 year mortgage.
	And when you engage in mortgage, it's like you're helping The collapse or destruction of society because you cause poverty indirectly by helping the guy, the banker, who is taking interest.
	It is such a serious crime.
	It is the main crime other than thinking of yourself as God.
	That is the biggest crime in Islamic philosophy, the second biggest crime.
	You become an enemy of God if you participate in interest.
	So, Pakistan and, you know, Malaysia tried a couple of years ago to organize.
	It's always in Muslims' mind to go back to a actual reality of money, not paper printing
	and not interest, especially high interest with Jews' charge in their banks called usury.
	So it's always how can we reform or improve the Western banking system by bringing in
	real money system that helps people and helps society become healthy and happy and thriving.
	And Colonel Gaddafi was butchered by Hillary Clinton because he did it for all of Africa.
	He was just about to introduce the gold-backed dinar currency.
	President of Malaysia, Mohamed Mahathir, he's a very old man.
	I hope he's still alive.
	He might be like 97, 98 years old by now.
	But after Colonel Gaddafi, Malaysian President Mahathir, he organized a Muslim Nations conference on money.
	And right now, Pakistan is seriously thinking about getting rid of the IMF system for their country, the International Monetary Fund, the Jew cruelty money.
	Pay it back on their own terms.
	So Jews have lined up all their ducks for nuclear war.
	Pakistan is the only nuclear Muslim power, Muslim country.
	All other nine are not.
	And this is Jews used, you know, all the world wars over the past century and even just local country wars to just murder Christian brothers one against the other because the previous century they had stolen all of Asia's wealth from the ancient civilizations of in the Asia subcontinent which is you know Pakistan India Bangladesh China the ancient civilization they had used the British Empire occupied the British Empire in order to steal
	and crush into dust these ancient civilizations in Asia.
	They did it in the 1800s and now that all the wealth is sitting in Queen Elizabeth's hand in the Tower of London dungeon somewhere, Jew occupied of course, now that was the 1800s, having accumulated From the ancient civilization, the reason why you use ancient is that is the richest, most prosperous, and biggest hoard of money.
	And to break their societies and steal from them is like you got the, you know, mother load.
	And then that made Asia poor.
	Then Europe, using that money, became rich.
	And in the 1900s, in order to steal that money, in order for the Jews to steal that money, They had all the brother wars of all the whites, what, you know, unfortunately we call them whites, but Europe and her, all the English speaking countries, you know, Americans got killed, so on.
	Canada sent in soldiers and all of Britain, all of Europe and Britain murdered each other.
	In the meantime, nobody wanted to do it.
	America tried to stay out of the war.
	And now, this century, that was the 1800s, steal from Asia, make Europe rich, 1900s, steal from Europe, and the English-speaking countries, and including America in that, USA, America, steal from them.
	Now, English-speaking countries, Europe, America, is becoming poor because Jews have all the money.
	And now, the last step is to Complete Jew World Ownership, J-W-O, by using NATO, that is the main point, NATO, to cause a nuclear war so everybody will be so weakened and defeated and crushed and murdered that finally the Jews will have 100% world ownership.
	Well, Scaredy, you know, that's very interesting.
	I agree with most of that.
	Not quite all, as I'm going to explain, but it does tie in with UK provocation and Mitchell telling me the British are saying they're willing to do it again.
	That's very bad.
	Russia says they'll bomb.
	I think they'll probably use one of their anti-ship missiles, which are unstoppable.
	I mean, I'm telling you, the military technology of the Russians is so superior to US, UK, NATO.
	I mean, it's remarkable.
	Meanwhile, the point you make about usury, I admire Islam for its chewing usury.
	This is why The Rothschild banking empire has had such a problem with Muslim states because they need their banks to make money off of money, which is forbidden within the religion.
	But I must say this thing about inside the United States with regard to mortgages and all that.
	When I first retired, I got a stipend, I got a benefit of equal to a year's salary when I retired and I wanted to put that toward a house so that we could basically own the house and not pay mortgage because as we all know, you wind up paying like three times as much for your house by way of a mortgage, a classic 30-year.
	So I thought that was a bad idea to circumvent it.
	But my wife and our financial advisor explained to me why if I did that, then I would lose the mortgage exemption to your taxes and that all the money you put into the house would not be available for investing in stocks, bonds, or whatever.
	Meaning that I'd be shortchanging myself or us as a family entity financially on multiple grounds so that they persuaded me that actually under the laws of the United States and the way taxes are collected and so forth, it was much, much more advantageous to take the mortgage And use the money you otherwise might have invested to buy the house to invest in stocks and bonds so that that money is actually producing income for you that tends to more than offset what you're paying on the mortgage.
	So it turns out to be a little more complicated but I think most of what you had to say was quite right.
	I appreciate your sincerity and conviction and I think you made many telling points.
	And we may even be on the verge of a nuclear exchange with these deliberate UK provocations.
	I mean, this is a very, very bad idea unless you really do want to start a war.
	Scaredy.
	Yeah.
	So just on mortgages and money, see, that's another thing.
	Arena or department that the good guys you Jim and all your Guests that you will have on God willing in the future That's another department to open up is to study money.
	And when you say tax laws well who are designing these tax laws and Just just even keeping aside tax laws I I think if you look at a normal 30-year mortgage, even at a low, tiny amount.
	Oh, and by the way, just a side comment.
	Oh, 5% interest.
	Oh, isn't that cute?
	It's just a little tiny number, five.
	It's like a toddler who's so cute and funny and runs around.
	Well, no.
	Five percent, which is a deception, because by the time you get done with the 30 years, And by the way, of course, you know, mortgage means mort engaged, engaged until death, you know, it takes up your whole life, the solid part of your life where you have the most energy and use.
	And by the time you have paid it off, you've paid off about three and a half, I think, four houses.
	So the banker, you get one house, and the banker gets maybe three or four houses, the money.
	Like $100,000, he'll get $400,000.
	If you have a $100,000 mortgage or price of the house, he will get four of them.
	And it's very sneakily designed because the first month you pay,
	if it's a $1,000 mortgage, you probably pay $999 interest.
	Well, that is common sense.
	We have to really start working out the math, and maybe you and your future girls, and I'll also try.
	In one year, maximum, if you look at 5% interest, even compounded daily and even on the minute, it's only like $5,100 something money, interest.
	So if you pay $5,000 that first year, that will cover the Listen, listen, listen.
	I understand your position.
	That used to be my position.
	Given what I have learned, however, I recognize that it would have been a mistake to buy the house outright.
	Then I would have been cash or investment poor.
	I wouldn't have been able to use the money that I'd invested in the house for stocks,
	bonds to create a portfolio that would produce income for me that I wouldn't have been able
	to produce.
	I would have been unable to take the mortgage deduction from the standard deductions at
	the time which was also saving considerable in taxes so that actually in terms of the
	financial aspects of this, it was more advantageous financially to take the mortgage.
	I appreciate 100% why you as a Muslim would find that an unacceptable alternative.
	We're about to hit the break.
	Scaredy, thank you for calling in.
	The rest of the show, alas, will be without Mitchell.
	I'll be right back.
	Thanks for watching.
	We'll be right back after this message.
	Listen to Revolution Radio at freedomslips.com. We'll be right back after this message.
	Was it a conspiracy? Did you know that the police in Boston were broadcasting,
	This is a drill, this is a drill, on bullhordes during the marathon?
	That the Boston Globe was tweeting that a demonstration bomb would be set off during the marathon for the benefit of bomb squad activities.
	And that one would be set off in one minute in front of a library, which happened as the Globe had announced.
	Peering through the smoke, you could see bodies with missing arms and legs.
	But there was no blood.
	The blood only showed up later and came out of a tube.
	They used amputee actors and a studio-quality smoke machine.
	Don't let yourself be played.
	Check out And Nobody Died in Boston, either.
	Available at moonrockbooks.com.
	That's moonrockbooks.com.
	If you think for one second that the Capitol will ever treat us fairly, because we know
	who they are and what they do.
	This is the Capitol.
	This is the Capitol.
	This is what they do!
	And we must fight back!
	You can torture us, and bomb us.
	Fire is catching.
	And if we burn, you burn with us!
	City!
	♪ Are you awake yet?
	I hope.
	We've tried and we've tried for years and years to use passive resistance and loud voices to make a change.
	But time is over.
	Your governments around the world have no other goal than to decimate your entire existence at the hands of the bankers and the elites.
	The war is coming and it's your choice to decide if you want to be a warrior or a victim.
	Denial is not a choice anymore.
	Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, the number one listener-supported radio station on the planet.
	Not giving up.
	Revolution Radio Even the government admits that 9-11 was a conspiracy.
	But did you know that it was an inside job?
	That Osama had nothing to do with it?
	That the Twin Towers were blown apart by a sophisticated arrangement of mini or micro nukes?
	That Building 7 collapsed seven hours later because of explosives planted in the building?
	Barry Jennings was there.
	He heard them go off and felt himself stepping over dead people.
	The U.S.
	Geological Survey conducted studies of dust gathered from 35 locations in Lower Manhattan and found elements that would not have been there had this not been a nuclear event.
	Ironically, that means the government's own evidence contradicts the government's official position.
	9-11 was brought to us compliments of the CIA, the neocons in the Department of Defense, and the Mossad.
	Don't let yourself be played.
	Read American Nuke on 9-11.
	Available at moonrockbooks.com.
	That's moonrockbooks.com.
	The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners, or chatters, are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
	They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff, or affiliates.
	You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, 100% listener-supported radio.
	And now we return you to your host.
	This is Jim Fetzer, your host on The Raw Deal with this inverted version of the show where
	we've taken a couple of callers, Bruce and Scaredy Cat, but where because of Mitchell's
	necessity to deal with other issues, he won't be here for the duration.
	I'm going to therefore continue to cover the most important stories of our time right now of the last day or so.
	Here's a nice report.
	Is Biden more polarizing than Trump?
	Who is more divisive, Donald Trump or Joe Biden?
	Well, that depends on your definition of divisive, where Steve Crowder believes Trump and Biden have always been part of the division of Americans, but in two very different ways.
	Crowder said Trump was divisive because he pointed out what we all knew for a long time, but too many were afraid to talk about it, including Republicans, namely that the media is dishonest and the left were liars.
	Trump is divisive because he pointed that out, calling out fake news and Democrat lies.
	Biden, by contrast, is divisive because he is now part of the lie.
	Crowder compiled a list of policies and compared them for a clear picture of who looks more divisive on paper.
	Trump versus Biden's most divisive policy.
	Joe Biden.
	Biden sent tax dollars to fund abortion overseas when he revoked the Mexico City policy.
	Biden wanted to spy on domestic terrorists on the Internet.
	Biden supports BLM.
	Biden said Antifa is just an idea.
	Biden supports biological males in girls' sports.
	Donald Trump by contrast.
	Trump forced Canada and European nations to pay their fair share in NATO.
	Trump left the Paris Climate Agreement.
	Trump left the World Health Organization.
	His tough-on-China stance and tariffs brought jobs back.
	Trump forced Mexico to stop migrants coming to the border by levying a tariff.
	Who was tougher on Russia?
	Trump armed Ukraine, shuttered all consulates in Russia, sanctioned Russia over human rights abuses, cyber attacks, 2018 election interference, and the occupation of the Crimea.
	May I say I don't agree with all of that, but it's what he has done.
	Rejoin the World Health Organization and the parent climate agreement.
	Waive sanctions on Russian pipeline to Germany.
	And in March, China said the U.S.
	under Biden isn't qualified to speak to China from a position of strength.
	Pretty damn interesting.
	Pretty damn interesting.
	Meanwhile, when it comes to the ACLU, I mean, I'm really frankly shocked by this discovery.
	The ACLU hired 255 workers for Georgia's Fulton County to be deputy registrars and gave them full internet and voter roll access.
	What could possibly go wrong?
	Carter Jones created two reports as a result of his experience and observations he made in Fulton County, Georgia on Election Day 2020 and on the days before and after.
	Something jumped out from his reporting indicating more wrongdoing in the Georgia election that has not heretofore been reported.
	In the 14-page report, Carter Jones—this is his second—prepared for the Secretary of State.
	Jones shared the myths embodied in the Fulton County elections process.
	In one section of the report provided by Jones, he shared the following.
	During the general election, Richard Barron negotiated with the ACLU to provide 255 deputy registrars to use Znet to cancel absentee ballots.
	During the runoff, this task was performed mainly by a smaller number of non-ACLU deputy registrars.
	SHS received no complaints during the runoff about unnecessary wait times related to not having additional dedicated deputy registrars.
	Georgia law states that no deputy registrars shall engage in any political activity on behalf of a candidate, political party, or body or question, including, but not limited to, distributing campaign literature, engaging in any communication that advocates or criticizes a particular candidate, officeholder, or political party or body, and wearing badges, buttons, or clothing with partisan messages.
	The individuals who worked as deputy registrars, therefore, should remain non-biased, but Holton County hired all CALU workers to be deputy registrars.
	Deputy registrar training is also required.
	This is noting in the ACLU's ad for deputy registrars.
	Georgia attorneys serve as deputy registrar on election day.
	To address, it explains very detailed.
	However, monthly operation reports from Fulton County Board of Records and Elections indicate only 18 deputy registrar were trained in January 2020 at two classes, 31 trained in February 2020 at five classes.
	All months through March through October show zero deputy registrars.
	So a total of 49 registrars were trained, yet 255 ACLU deputy registrars were active on Election Day for the general election, and at most, at least over 80% of these deputy registrars apparently were not trained in that function.
	This is really insulting.
	The deputy registrars working in the election had full access to the internet, had full access to election records, and there are no records maintained that show the 255 were trained.
	What could possibly go wrong?
	This is really just stunning stuff.
	In addition, White farmers now have won a fight against discriminatory criteria for federal COVID relief.
	I find all this idea of racializing federal policies and benefits completely outrageous, unconstitutional on its face, and I'm frankly Just astonished that it's been allowed to go forward, even as a policy by Democrats who have to know better, but are seeking to promote what turns out to be a Marxist agenda, as I shall explain.
	A Wisconsin federal court has temporarily stopped payments in a federal farmer loan forgiveness program that allocates benefits on the basis of racial categories.
	Twelve farmers and ranchers across nine states filed a lawsuit against the Biden administration, claiming they were ineligible for leave because they were white.
	The American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 directs the U.S.
	Department of Agriculture to give preferred treatment to businesses owned by women, veterans, and persons who are socially and economically disadvantaged.
	But federal law uses a controversial critical race theory definition.
	Of socially and economically disadvantaged that can only include minority groups.
	The court entered the emergency injunction temporarily halting payments in the $4 billion program, stating that the white farmers are likely to succeed on the merits of their claim.
	A Texas court likewise recently temporarily halted a program for restauranteurs under the same federal program for the same reason.
	The Texas Court and others who have entered a similar emergency will hold full hearings.
	There's an organization called Will right here in Wisconsin that has been playing a key role here.
	Very, very interesting.
	Will represents a dozen farmers from nine states in a federal lawsuit.
	U.S.
	District Judge William Griesbach issued the temporary restraining order halting payments.
	The Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty, W-I-L-L, represents 12 farmers and ranchers from Wisconsin, Minnesota, South Dakota, Ohio, Missouri, Iowa, Arkansas, Oregon, and Kentucky.
	Each plaintiff would be eligible for the federal loan forgiveness program, but not for their race.
	Will President and General Counsel Rick Eisenberg said, the court recognized that the federal government's plan to condition and allocate benefits on the basis of race raises grave constitutional concerns and threatens our clients with irreparable harm.
	The Biden administration is radically undermining bedrock principles of equality under the law.
	We look forward to continuing this legislation, but urge the administration to change course now.
	How totally appropriate!
	In April of 2021, Will filed a lawsuit in federal court challenging the unconstitutional race discrimination in the American Rescue Plan Act's provisions to offer loan forgiveness based on racial categories.
	The law provides billions of dollars of debt release to socially disadvantaged farmers and ranchers, but the definition of socially disadvantaged includes explicit racial classifications.
	Farmers and ranchers must be black or African American, American Indian or Alaskan Native, Hispanic or Latino, or Asian American or Pacific Islander.
	Other farmers, white for example, are ineligible.
	This is illegal and unconstitutional.
	The United States Constitution forbids discrimination by the federal government against any citizen because of his race.
	For the federal government to distribute benefits on the basis of individual racial classifications, the government would have to prove its discriminatory benefit was narrowly tailored and serves a compelling government interest, which is obviously not the case here.
	I'm very impressed by Will and what they have done.
	We had Tucker last night, and again I reiterate, in my opinion, the one show you really ought not to miss on television is Tucker Carlson on Fox, which is broadcast from 7 to 8 p.m.
	Central Time, 8 to 9 Eastern, I'm uncertain what time Pacific.
	But last night he even had Marjorie Taylor Greene in, who appears to have been one of the only to read this infrastructure bill, which has been cut down to some $1.9 trillion, but where she discovers that it includes the provisions that describe women as socially disadvantaged and that they should therefore be beneficiaries of these programs to which she took offense.
	It turns out that although I was unaware of the fact prior to last night, Marjorie Taylor Greene is the owner of a construction company in multiple states that's been highly successful, and she thinks it's outrageous for women to be classified in general as socially disadvantaged with all that that implies.
	I mean, look, on its face, it's simply outrageous.
	Simply outrageous.
	Given the history of desegregation and anti-discrimination legislation that has been passed by the U.S.
	Congress over the years, go all the way back to the Emancipation Proclamation, that the Biden administration should be ignoring the Constitution in the history of these issues where all the laws that preclude
	discrimination against blacks are based upon discrimination on race and therefore
	apply equally to discrimination against whites.
	They're engaged in a massive campaign of anti-white discrimination and it appears that the January
	6 event was very carefully, very cleverly orchestrated, including by FBI participation
	in planning and execution, as Tucker has also exposed in completely brilliant work.
	I mean, he has been on fire lately.
	You don't want to miss his shows in order to prop up, to provide propaganda, to support This white supremacist narrative, let me say.
	This appears to be of a piece with Sandy Hook, the Boston bombing, Orlando and Dallas, Charlottesville, Parkland, Las Vegas.
	Barack Obama in 2012 nullified the Smith-Mutt Act of 1948 by means of the Smith-Mutt Modernization
	Act of 2012, just in time for Sandy Hook, where the Smith-Mutt Act of 1948 precluded
	the use of the same techniques of propaganda and disinformation, including staged events
	that the government was using abroad from being used within the United States by nullifying
	the Smith-Mutt Act of 1948.
	Obama legitimized all these staged, phony, fake, false flag events here in the United States.
	And that, it appears, extends right up to the January 6 intrusion into the White House.
	That was a manufactured event, a phony event, and it was brought to us compliments of Barack Hussein Obama.
	The nation swooned over this guy at the time because he was tall, dark, and handsome.
	He's very articulate with a teleprompter, but he's also a man who was born in Nigeria, was actually at Columbia as a foreign student, received many forms of aid because he was a foreign student, who was nevertheless certified by a number of prominent senators, Democrats, including Howard Dean, And McCluskey from Missouri, no doubt Nancy Pelosi and Hillary as well, attesting that he was qualified to be President of the United States when he manifestly was not.
	Now admittedly, I myself voted for Barack Obama twice, and given the quality of his opposition, I think that was justifiable at the time.
	And not knowing all we know now.
	The point I'm making is this man has done a tremendous amount to undermine law and order within the United States and the administration of equal justice under the law.
	In other words, in my opinion, Barack Hussein Obama is a traitor to the United States.
	He was never qualified to be president of the United States.
	And what he has done and appears to be continuing to do now, where he and Susan Rice and others of that very tight group appear to be running the Biden administration behind the scenes.
	It's outrageous.
	He was at one point asked if he would like to serve a third term and he said, well, no, not really.
	But if he could operate behind the scenes to manipulate what was taking place in public, he'd like that.
	Well, that appears to be the case.
	He seems to have got his wish.
	By the theft of the election of 2020.
	Now, Ron DeSantis has been emerging as a spectacular figure in the Republican Party.
	The Washington Post, therefore, has hit a critical desperation level in its latest failed attack on Ron DeSantis.
	The mainstream media's war on Governor DeSantis continues apace the closer we get to the 2022 midterm.
	And after that, the start of the 2024 presidential campaign cycle, the latest effort come from a Washington Post piece featuring a perspective of a 17-year-old Princeton undergraduate student.
	Imagine a 17-year-old Princeton undergraduate, a co-ed, who in the WaPo's words was challenging Governor DeSantis' staunch opposition.
	To the teaching of critical race theory in Florida's public school classrooms.
	The sentence, of course, is completely right.
	I find this really kind of rather seriously embarrassing.
	What in the world is this Princeton student doing here?
	Before they got to what the Princeton student Uma Menon wrote, the paper made sure to downplay the extent to which CRT, critical race theory, is taught as if to suggest the issue is overblown when it's not.
	Critical race theory is an academic framework for looking at systemic racism, whatever that's supposed to be.
	And by the way, they go out of their way to not define it.
	It's of course supposed to imply the whole system, meaning all of the United States government and Constitution is reeked with racism, biased by racism, although states are banning it from being taught in schools.
	Most teachers don't use the term when discussing racism and don't require students read the work of scholars who use the framework.
	Manning attended public school in Florida and graduated in 2020.
	Not surprisingly, one of our senior year teachers taught the New York Times discredited 1619 Project, which should tell you where we're headed.
	Early on in the piece, Menon suggested that DeSantis' ban on CRT marked another step taken by conservatives to politicize racial justice, apparently not realizing it is the left, not the right, who has made the concept of racial justice political in the first place.
	She then claimed, never once did I hear the phrase critical race theory in any of my classrooms.
	This made sense, she alleges, given that public school districts in Lake, Marion, Osceola, Seminole, and Orange counties have stated that critical race theory has never been a part of their curriculum.
	For starters, just because someone stated something doesn't automatically make it true.
	Second, CRT comes in many forms, including in the form of teaching about the 1619 Project, and they don't have to be explicitly labeled as critical race theory for us to know that the concepts employed are similar.
	Critical race theory proponents, like most leftists, are very adept at playing semantical word games, which is why we're now seeing code words like diversity, equity, and inclusion training and anti-racism initiatives in place of the words critical race theory.
	For DeSantis and Florida Republicans, Menon continued, critical race theory has become a scapegoat, a buzzword singled out for attack when politicians want to hide their opposition to racial justice.
	This is just ignorant and stupid and heavily relies on differing interpretation of what justice, racial justice, is all about.
	If racial justice is supposed to mean teaching black Americans to believe that they are all victims and to view white Americans as their oppressors simply because they were born white, then yes, DeSantis and other conservative Republican leaders oppose racial justice and are right to do so.
	What the Florida School Board aims to do by banning educational materials like the New York Times Pulitzer Prize-winning 1619 Project is to deny and downplay the historical oppression that minorities have faced in America, and then falsely claims this ban doesn't prevent factual inaccuracy.
	Instead, it hides facts that are inconvenient to Florida conservatives.
	Last I checked, slavery, the Civil War, the century-plus fight for civil rights were all still being taught by Floridas and Texas public schools.
	So no, there is no downplaying any historical oppression.
	It is a lie that CRT proponents repeat often but are never called out about by the usual suspects.
	In what may have been the most laughable of claims made in the piece, he wrote, the truth is that anti-racism education teaches children to love each other and imagine a better future where racist political agendas won't win out.
	In actuality, the opposite is true.
	As DeSantis and other prominent critics of CRT have observed, CRT teaches white students to hate themselves for being born white, Perpetuating the white guilt complex liberals have lived by and with for decades.
	In addition, it teaches black students that racism is hidden everywhere, which further fosters feelings of resentment and leads to victimhood mentality that's very difficult to break until you realize that racism is everywhere claim simply isn't true.
	I could go on and on, but I think the point has been made.
	I'll no doubt be accused of attacking a teenager simply for countering the Washington Post hit piece on DeSantis, but so be it.
	As Ben Shapiro once infamously said, facts don't care about your feelings.
	And we definitely shouldn't let the possibility of hurt feelings get in the way of telling the truth and correcting the record where necessary, especially when it comes to matters involving the education of impressionable children.
	Now, that's a brilliant critique, in my opinion.
	I must say, I can add more to it.
	I mean, how racist a society can we be when so many of the most glamorous and admired and well-paid members of our society in entertainment and sports happen to be black?
	Where's the bias there?
	Plus, we elected a black man president not once but twice.
	65 to 69 million votes were received by Barack Obama twice.
	I was among them.
	I do a show intermittently called Red Pill with a black host by the name of Rashid.
	And he and I, yesterday, during our conversation toward the end, got into a discussion of the woke ideology, to which I shall return after the break.
	And he was arguing the kind of classic line where the blacks are oppressed and deserve reparations for the oppressors.
	And I asked him a question about what about the American Indians, given that we slaughtered tens of millions of American Indians and stole the continent from them.
	Rashid seemed unconcerned about the American Indians, but when I asked him what he wanted, he said, 40 acres and a mule.
	I'll be right back.
	We'll be right back after this message.
	Management would like to take a moment to thank the listeners and hosts for all their support that has made
	Revolution Radio one of the biggest platforms for free speech in an ever-growing
	dark world of censorship.
	Unfortunately, this platform for free speech has never been free.
	We need the support of the people.
	It is the people like you, yes, you, that keeps the station in the front lines of the battle against tyranny and oppression.
	Please help support Revolution Radio so free speech will not be silenced in a world that seems to be going deaf to the real truth.
	With your support, we will be able to become an even bigger pillar of light in a dark world.
	Revolution Radio, freedomsubstance.com, the number one listener-supporter radio station on the planet.
	Revolution Ringo, Ringo, Ringo
	Oh Oh
	Oh Join revolution radio every Wednesday 8 p.m. Eastern
	Yeah.
	Eastern Time on Studio B for Momentary Zen with host Zen Garcia at freedomstech.com,
	The People Station.
	Even the government admits that 9-11 was a conspiracy.
	But did you know that it was an inside job?
	That Osama had nothing to do with it?
	That the Twin Towers were blown apart by a sophisticated arrangement of mini or micro nukes?
	That Building 7 collapsed seven hours later because of explosives planted in the building?
	Barry Jennings was there.
	He heard them go off and felt himself stepping over dead people.
	The U.S.
	Geological Survey conducted studies of dust gathered from 35 locations in Lower Manhattan and found elements that would not have been there had this not been a nuclear event.
	Ironically, that means the government's own evidence contradicts the government's official position.
	9-11 was brought to us compliments of the CIA, the neocons of the Department of Defense, and the Mossad.
	Don't let yourself be played.
	Read American Nuked on 9-11.
	Available at moonrockbooks.com.
	That's moonrockbooks.com.
	The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners, or chatters, are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
	They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff, or affiliates.
	You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, 100% listener-supported radio, and now we
	return you to your host.
	Well I'm very glad to have everyone here.
	As you know, this is an inversion of the usual process.
	I've just been reviewing the attack on Ron DeSantos, which appears to be part and parcel of the woke ideology, where a brilliant piece, which I published on my blog at jamesfetzer.org, I think lends, sheds more light On the current state of politics in the United States and anything I've read in the last several years, frankly, this really, I think, puts it together and explains what's going on.
	Let me share some of the parts of that study with you.
	Some of the core tenets of the woke ideology spreading around the country mimic ideas used to justify many of the most horrendous atrocities of the past century, according to several experts.
	A recent documentary exploring the topic called Better Left Unsaid Concludes that the self-identified radical left endorses four fundamental truths they hold to be self-evident, noting that these tenets have also been used to justify and incite many of the worst massacres of the 20th century.
	Let me observe in passing that Dave Hodges has noted, That during the 20th century, there were 19 demo sides, that is to say slaughters of whole societies by their governments, each of which was preceded by gun confiscation.
	We don't want America to become number 20.
	But when you listen to what's explained here, you can see why the path the Democrats are on is headed in that direction.
	I mean, I am shocked To have to acknowledge this is the case.
	It is despicable.
	The first of the four claims is that the world is best viewed through a group oppression narrative lens.
	The woke ideology is based on a set of quasi-Marxist theories that divide society into oppressors and the oppressed based on characteristics such as race, sex, class, or sexual proclivity.
	Now do you get why we're hearing so much about blacks and women and transgenders and gays?
	It's based upon a distinction between oppressors and the oppressed, based upon characteristics of race, such as race, sex, class, or sexual proclivity.
	WOKE is sometimes used interchangeably with Critical Race Theory, CRT, which is one of the more prominent ideologies operating within this framework.
	The second claim is that evidence of oppression is the inequality between groups.
	If the designated oppressed group is on average worse in some regard than the designated oppressor group, that is taken as virtually unassailable proof of oppression.
	Just think about it.
	So if whites do better at, say, accounting or white-collar business ventures, Then they're automatically oppressing those who aren't
	doing better at accounting or white collar business ventures.
	And what do we say about blacks?
	If you look at the sports teams in the NFL and the NBA, they're overwhelmingly dominated
	by black players.
	I submit that's prima facie evidence that blacks are better as athletic activities than
	After all, these are professional sports teams.
	They pay salaries, they get the best players at each position, and it turns out that they're nevertheless overwhelmingly dominated by black players.
	That's evidence.
	And among the most glamorous celebrities of our time are many black actors and singers and performers.
	I mean, the list is immense.
	My wife's favorite may be Denzel Washington.
	I'm a huge fan of Denzel and Will Smith and any host of others.
	It just goes on and on and on.
	I mean, you know, this idea that because someone's successful in a field that therefore they are oppressing others, then look at this.
	Blacks are very successful in sports.
	Are they therefore oppressing whites?
	And yet it would seem to follow given this framework.
	But then again, they're not concerned with consistency.
	This is politics.
	The second claim, just as I said, taken as virtually unassailable proof of oppression.
	The third claim, peaceful dialogue and understanding between the groups is impossible since the dominant group's strategy is to retain its power.
	Listen to this.
	Woke theorists have posited that the oppressed have a uniquely valuable perspective on reality unavailable to the oppressors.
	Meanwhile, they say, whiteness or white heteropatriarchy can't help but to try to maintain its hegemony or its dominance, even if it does things that benefit members of other groups, such as by abolishing slavery or giving women and blacks the right to vote.
	It's still done out of self-interest and in order to further entrench its institutions and norms and thus ensure the privilege of its members.
	Look at the absurdity of that claim!
	Look at the absurdity of that claim!
	Even if it does things that benefit members of other groups, such as by abolishing slavery or giving women and blacks a right to vote, It's still a form of dominance of the hierarchy by the whites who want to maintain their superiority as oppressors.
	I mean, this is just absurd.
	This is about as ridiculous as it gets.
	It means it's impossible that affirmative action programs, for example, are preposterous.
	They can't work because they're only enhancing the strength or the role of the oppressors over the oppressed.
	So it's a self-sealing argument in the sense that no matter what the allegedly oppressor class were to do to benefit the allegedly oppressed class, it's used against them.
	It's used against them.
	Meanwhile, proponents of the ideology engage in dialogue between themselves, but with everybody else, the communication is supposed to generally flow in one direction only.
	That of acceptance of their views.
	Any challenge to the ideology is labeled as self-serving, or even as an assault upon the oppressed.
	Finally, the ideology at least implicitly acknowledges that, because of the above, violence is justified to eradicate the inequities.
	Violence is justified to eradicate the inequities.
	From my experience, they, to the degree they can be grouped together enough to call them they, tend to advocate for violence against those oppressing and equate it to laudatory behavior.
	Hence, punch a Nazi.
	Author of the documentary, Kurt Gemengold, told the Arabic Times.
	Let me just say, by the way, just as I tout Tucker Carlson on television, I equally tout the Epoch Times.
	This is a simply sensational new publication.
	Article after article, very thoughtful, very thorough, very provocative, very appropriate and timely.
	I have catalogs of tweets, written statements, and videos of people ranging from students to professors explicitly calling for violence and downplaying the violence on the left, which compared to the right, he added, not because of intensity or frequency of such violence, but because of the so-called nobility or nobleness of the extreme left's position.
	Think about it.
	Think about it.
	This is how the Democrats could justify all the riots and looting and arson we lived through last summer, one city after another, Minneapolis, Portland, Seattle, just havoc being wreaked out.
	Why?
	Because it was justifiable.
	It was left-wing violence.
	The way they're going after the white supremacists, you would have thought that this was being perpetrated by white lives matter rather than black.
	The whole absurdity of the democratic political agenda becomes increasingly in focus and clear, and it's grossly hypocritical.
	It's based on double standards, inconsistent ideas.
	It does not have a coherent foundation, but it can be used to wreak havoc.
	And when you see how district attorneys, for example, that were financed by George Soros
	become involved in dismissing lawsuits or excusing individuals, even if they fake hate
	crimes as with Jussie Smollett in Chicago, where it turned out the two rednecks who allegedly
	assaulted him at like 1.30 or 2 a.m.
	in the morning on the coldest night in Chicago up to that point that year turned out to be two black Nigerian bodybuilders, one of whom was Jussie Smollett's personal trainer, the other of whom was an extra on the set of The Empire, the film where he paid them with a personal check for $3,500.
	Listen, there's some good stuff at my False Flag and Conspiracies conference that I've made completely free, okay?
	You can go to falseflagconspiracies2020.com.
	In the upper right-hand corner, you can get access to the archives.
	Ignore all the donate buttons, okay?
	That was our overzealous supporters who set up the website.
	If you wanted to donate to my legal defense fund, that would be terrific.
	But look, there's a benefit here for you.
	Go there and you'll see, you know, one of my presentations, deception galore.
	Well, I talk about, among other matters, faking these hate crimes.
	I discuss not only Jussie Smollett but also George Floyd, which also appears to have been faked, by the way, in case you missed the memo.
	And of course, Bubba Wallace and NASCAR, which was simply ridiculous beyond belief, because they actually cut down the ordinary pole rope for opening the garage door, which didn't remotely resemble a noose, and replaced it with a much heavier cord tied like a noose.
	They're faking and making this stuff up as they go along.
	Where George Floyd appears to have lost his hair when they took him out of the squad car and put him on the ground, where suddenly he's no longer manacled, and where it appears they use a Sigma-7 airway torso training dummy, African-American, as a substitute.
	I mean, it's just outrageous.
	Go there.
	Check it out for free.
	For free.
	You can download directly to your desktop.
	While you're there, you might as well pick up my latest presentation about Sandy Hook, because that's the issue over which I have been hauled into court in order to suppress access to the book, Nobody Died at Sandy Hook, which I released for free as a PDF.
	It now is clear to me that they wanted to find me guilty of a defamation.
	In a completely fabricated case brought against me in order so they could threaten the sources that were releasing the PDF for free with having being in violation of a contempt order issued by a judge.
	And they're thereby seeking to staunch the flow whereby the estimate of a friend who follows the matter, the book has been downloaded more than 10 million times.
	Well, that's too much truth out there for certainty.
	And remember, Sandy Hook was the first of these staged events that Barack Obama legitimized by the Smith Modernization Act of 2012.
	Meanwhile, Joint Chief Chairman Mark Miley defends teaching critical race theory in the military, slams offensive claims troops are turning woke, and links white rage to the Capitol riot.
	Now, this is a very curious development.
	I'm not confident in Mark Miley's intellectual capabilities.
	And when he talks about teaching critical race theory, it's not clear he doesn't mean studying it and evaluating it and appraising it, which we're even doing here on this show.
	So you have to ask about the man's general competence, articulation and intellectual capabilities.
	Here's the story.
	The United States top military officer Wednesday last hit back against growing criticism over teaching critical race theory in the military and said recruits should be open minded and be widely read.
	Army General Mark Miley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, was grilled by Republican congressmen over claims the U.S.
	military is becoming more woke.
	He did not endorse critical race theory, but strongly condemned those who say it shouldn't be taught.
	And here I think there's an ambiguity about the word taught.
	What's wrong with understanding, having some situational understanding about the country for which we are here to defend?
	Miley asked before the House of Representatives Armed Services Committee.
	And I personally find it offensive that we are accusing the United States military, our general officers, our commission and non-commissioned officers are being woke or something else because we're studying some theories that are out there.
	The general stressed the need for greater understanding of the driving forces behind the January 6 attack on the Capitol by former President Donald Trump supporters, which is false, including white supremacists, which also appears to be false, who tried to stop Congress from certifying Democrat Joe Biden's election win, which is also false.
	We even have a report from James, the brother of John Sullivan, a prominent Antifa leader, that he led 226 Antifa members into the Capitol dressed as Trump supporters, where this was an effort to smear Trump.
	And to hype the idea of white supremacists, it doesn't appear to be remotely correct.
	And of course, what they were disrupting was not certifying the election, but discussion of the theft of the election, evidence thereof, where Nancy Pelosi, who is the Speaker of the House, is in charge of the Capitol Police, appears to have been the driving force orchestrating the grand plan, the general set.
	I want to understand white rage, and I'm white, and I want to understand it.
	What is it that caused thousands of people to assault this building and try to overturn the Constitution of the United States of America?
	What caused that?
	I want to find that out.
	I want to maintain an open mind here.
	I'll just say, for this guy to be the Joint Chief, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, not to have a better understanding of what happened here.
	He ought to be listening to Revolution Radio.
	He ought to be here and listen to the raw deal.
	He'd have a better understanding.
	Or my daily news show commentary.
	Need to know.
	If Miley were paying more attention to the alternative press than the mainstream, he would not be so ignorant and misinformed.
	He was responding after a Republican U.S.
	Representative Michael Waltz, a former Army Green Beret, produced a letter from the U.S.
	Military Academy at West Point acknowledging teaching about critical race theory.
	A theory maintains racism is ingrained in U.S.
	law and institutions and that legacies of slavery and segregation have created an uneven playing field for black Americans.
	Controversy surrounding the theory is mushroomed into a national debate over how and which version of U.S.
	history is taught in schools.
	This came to me from cadets, from families, from soldiers, with their alarm, with their concern about how divisive this teaching is, Walsh said, adding it was rooted in Marxism, about which he's 100% correct.
	Miley tried to respond to Walsh directly, but only got the opportunity later when a Democrat lawmaker gave him the chance.
	He noted that university graduates should be aware of all kinds of theories, and just because you read about Marxism didn't make him a communist.
	I've read Mao Zedong.
	I've read Karl Marx.
	I've read Lenin.
	That doesn't make me a communist, he told the lawmakers.
	I do think it's important, actually, for those of us in uniform to be open-minded and to be widely read.
	Miley's comments came a week after a Navy admiral faced up grilling from Republican lawmakers on his inclusion.
	of the controversial book, How to Be an Antiracist, on a recommended reading list for sailors.
	Admiral Mike Gilday, the Chief of Naval Operations, stood his ground at Tuesday's House Armed Services Committee hearing on Capitol Hill, defending the book's inclusion on the list.
	Last month, Republican senators reignited the attack against the woke military by sharing a U.S.
	Army recruiting video that told the story of how a little girl raised by two moms grew up to become a soldier.
	The Texas senator triggered online fury after questioning the role of what he called an emasculated military, comparing it with a video that appeared to show a rugged, shaven-headed Russian recruit parachuting into combat.
	The job of the military is to kill the bad guys, and it is to strike fear in the enemies of America, he told Fox, as he defended himself from accusations he was unloading unserving U.S.
	troops.
	As I recall, by the way, that was also on Tucker's show.
	People sign up to join the military because they want to keep us safe.
	They don't want to sit around in a circle emoting and passing daisies back and forth.
	His comments highlight fears America's armed forces are being softened by woke principles and follow similar criticism of a CIA advert.
	The latest controversy features an American video telling the story of Corporal Emma Malilord, a serving soldier who describes how she came to choose a life in the military.
	The colorful animated recruiting video describes how she defended freedom by attending LGBTQ marches and grew up to join the Army.
	It achieved notoriety when Ted Cruz tweeted out a TikTok clip that opened with a Russian soldier leaping out of a plane before cutting to the animated story of Malalord.
	Holy crap, he wrote in a tweet.
	Perhaps a woke, emasculated military is not the best idea.
	Cruz's words quickly went viral, unleashing an angry torrent of accusations that he was trolling his own country's American Armed Forces and had been suckered by an adversary's propaganda.
	And veterans expressed fury that he could criticize the Army and target a real life-serving soldier.
	And here we have images from the animated special about the corporal's mother getting married after one suffered injuries in a car accident, where, by contrast, the Russian video shows a bare-chested recruit leaping from his bed, working out, then leaping from a plane with a parachute.
	What else sounds quite ridiculous?
	Here's a topper, by the way, Kamala Harris standing in front of a Mexican grill and cantina entitled On the Border.
	I'm here, now what?
	I think that captures a lot of what's going on here.
	We have a ridiculous administration, completely indefensible.
	And here's one more story for our conclusion.
	Homicides have skyrocketed in these six Democratic cities.
	Black people are disproportionately the victims, as numbers show.
	The number of homicides in six major cities across the country has increased compared to last year, disproportionately affecting black people according to crime data.
	We are seeing an uptake in violent crime across the country, specifically gun violence.
	Miami-Dade County Mayor Daniella Levine Cava told the New York Times.
	In Chicago, black people have been the victims of roughly 81% of the 317 murders in the first six months of 2021, data shows.
	317 murders in the first six months of 2021, data shows.
	They were the victims of about 70% of the 295 murders committed in the first six months
	of 2020.
	I am proud to lead a city council that took the first step to responsibly reduce Baltimore's
	budget dependence on policing.
	Former Baltimore City Council President Brandon Scott, who's now the city's mayor, said after the council voted to strip funding from the city's police last year, The number of homicides in six major cities across the country has increased compared to last year, disproportionately affecting black people according to crime data.
	What should be surprising about this?
	The Democrats are defunding the police.
	What do they think would be the consequence?
	A reduction in crime?
	I mean, it's unbelievable.
	The cities where this has increased has been stunning.
	Democrat leaders of most of the cities examined voted to greatly reduce police funding amid widespread Black Lives Matter protests last year.
	In the wake of the death of George Floyd, who died after former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin kneeled on his neck in May of 2020, thousands of protests and riots have taken place across the country.
	Here we have the numbers.
	Crime is surging in 2021.
	Atlanta, Homicides up 58%.
	Shootings, 40.
	Portland.
	Homicides up 533%.
	Shootings, 126%.
	New York City.
	Homicides up 13%.
	Shootings, 64%.
	Los Angeles.
	Homicides up 22%.
	Shootings, 51%.
	Chicago.
	Homicides up 5%.
	It's low because they had so many already.
	Shootings up 18%.
	126 percent. New York City, homicides up 13 percent.
	Shooting 64 percent. Los Angeles, homicides up 22 percent. Shootings 51 percent. Chicago, homicides
	up 5 percent. It's low because they had so many already. Shootings up 18 percent.
	Philadelphia, homicides up 37 percent. Shootings up 27.
	My dear colleague Dr. Ewan imposed a 2016 electoral map over a 2014 murder distribution map and discovered the vast majority of these murders are occurring in the free fire zones created by Democrats.
	This is what the Democratic Party wants to do with a whole nation, the entire United States of America.
	It is grotesque.
	Go to my blog, check out that article about woke ideology.
	You have to understand what's going on here.
	I know of no better introduction to the situation we're in politically than woke ideology mimics precursors to totalitarian slaughter.
	JamesFetzer.org.
	We'll of course continue to pursue all of these issues.
	I want to wish each of you well and to mention, by the way, most of the deaths from the vaccines appear to be caused by blood clots.
	So while it used to be a joke to talk about take two aspirin in the morning and call me, taking aspirin is a good idea.
	Maybe not two, take one a day and spend all the time you can with your family and friends.
	We do not know how much time we may have left.
	Thanks for listening.

▲