All Episodes
Previous Next
June 25, 2021 - Jim Fetzer
40:11
TradCatKnight with Eric Gajewski (24 June 2021)
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Today we've got four special guests on the program.
I'm taking a quick peek.
special guest video interview right here on the Trankat.org website.
Folks, today is June the 24th, 2021.
I hope you are having a very wonderful and blessed day as always.
We continue to keep the programming moving here along at Trankat Night.
Today, we've got four special guests on the program.
I'm taking a quick peek.
I know we've got Dr. Mary Mansfield, John Rubino from the Dollar Collapse blog,
Thramholm, a Catholic Danish journalist out there in Denmark is going to join us as well.
But someone has been joining the show.
He's one of the longest tenured guests here on the program is is the man that you see on the screen, Jim Fetzer, and he's joined us for web conferences.
He's joined us for radio shows back when we were doing radio, and he consistently does this show a month in a month out.
We're very appreciative of his insights and analysis on the topics that are banging at
our doors.
Today's going to be talking filibuster, shutting down of Iranian TV, woke agenda, and probably
much more.
But before we do that, folks, just a quick reminder for all the Trad Cat Night listeners,
and if Jim gets us up on his end, for all new subscribers of Trad Cat Night, you're
going to be picking up the web conferences for free, hopefully moving forward.
So this past one that we did on Catholic prophecy, we have been warned.
You'll pick that up if you're an active member for the month of June.
I want to thank all those who consistently help out with the donations and keeping the doors open to these web conferences.
And then just on the sponsor side of things, again, I've got to thank our sponsors.
They keep me in part with the ability to do this work on a full-time basis.
Jacksbury.com, which is a great Catholic website.
We've got Chris Gagne inviting all Catholics and those like-minded to please remember those who have passed on before us.
We've got Jeff Campos and agiftolight.com.
It's a unique candle company that offers a great way to commemorate a special occasion or a loved one through a candle that's going to display your personal photos and or prayers or messages.
We've got 247rosary.com.
And lastly, Richard Gratzinger and his gloryandshine.com.
Having said that, here we go for another great presentation.
Excuse me, Jim, take it away.
And so much to discuss.
I was trying to get there on the drugs this morning, some of the latest of what's been going down, but it looks like John McAfee is
dead. Now this is kind of interesting.
Did you get to know John? Did you ever interview him? I never did, but he was of course a major
contributor to a certain area of computer science and quite a brilliant guy.
He was a brilliant guy.
He was very anti-Christian.
I remember my last interview, I asked him politely three times to stop cussing like he was mother F this, mother F that.
I simply just said, hey, John, just reel it back a little bit.
My listeners don't want to listen to you because You're a smart dude, but you gotta get League of Cussing
out.
So he went on this nasty anti-God, anti-Catholic rant.
And I was like, man, I just walked away from him.
But here he is now, apparently, suicide.
So I don't know what your take is on that.
But, woo, he's about to be extradited.
It most certainly was not suicide.
Right, yeah.
Yeah, no, crazy.
A lot happening on that front.
Of course, Snowden's back in the news.
But I want to get to what you want to talk about here, Jim.
Let's get right into it.
We appreciate your time.
Thank you for joining us.
Well, Eric, we got some major developments internationally that are very worrisome.
Russia fired warning shots at a British destroyer, the HMS Defender in the Black Sea.
Russia said its forces fired warning shots and dropped bombs in the path to deter the destroyer.
These are very sophisticated ships these days, Eric.
They have massive firepower, even though they're relatively smaller in the size of ships in relation to carriers and old battleships and cruisers.
But with today's electronics, they're as powerful as some of the most powerful of the past, even though they're much smaller and more compact.
According to the Russian Defense Ministry, the defender was given a preliminary warning that weapons would be used if the state borders of the Russian Federation were violated, but did not react to the warning.
It took place off the coast of Cape Violet on Crimea, which Russia secured, of course, in an international referendum from Ukraine in 2014, where the defender had ventured as much as three kilometers, two miles inside.
A border patrol ship fired the warning shots while an Su-24 jet dropped four bombs in the defender's path.
Prompting the vessel to turn around now.
If this were all that's going on internationally, it might not be so disturbing, but you mentioned.
The U.S.
Department of Justice has seized Iranian domains before claiming they were part of a disinformation campaign, and U.S.-based social media corporations like Twitter and Google have persecuted Iranian news outlets for years, but the wholesale seizure of a major Iranian news agency's website is new.
We're talking about Press TV, where Eric, in past years, I've appeared on Press TV perhaps as many as a hundred times.
It's very objective, covering international developments.
They invite journalists from different nations with conflicting perspectives.
It's one of the best websites in the world today, actually, and this seizure is profoundly disturbing.
Here's a report we have about it.
The domain PressTV.com has been seized by the United States government in accordance with a seizure warrant issued pursuant to 18 U.S.
Code 981, 982, and 50 U.S.
Code 1701 through 1705 as part of a law enforcement action by the Bureau of Industry and Security Office of Export Enforcement and Federal Bureau of Investigation.
The same message appeared on all of their websites, except of course for the name of the outlet specifically.
The sections of the law cited by the notice are for civil forfeiture, criminal forfeiture, unusual and extraordinary threats, declarations of national emergency, and the exercise of presidential authorities, none of which appear to be satisfied in this instance.
Now my Colleagues, Scott Bennett is a former Scions and Intel officer and I read this very similarly.
Be advised.
This is a preliminary attack to disrupt the communication and news platforms from reporting the upcoming attacks upon Iran by the Israeli-U.S.-U.K.
forces, I predict.
Beside the ludicrous legal justification for the shutdown of a news site, there is no requirement for a license since the entity came into being after the agency allegedly in charge of licenses came into existence after.
The claims of disinformation campaigns against the U.S.
are also quite silly because every American English-speaking person who's contributed to Press TV by speaking and offering their opinion on matters is not engaging in disinformation.
They are speaking the truth to the best of their ability.
It is the American people's right to speak and exercise their judgment about topics like 9-11, Israel, Palestine, Yemen, Russia, and other controversial subjects where Americans have the legal standing to file lawsuits against the Department of Justice for shutting down their right to speak about these subjects.
And even bring charges of treason against the DOJ, FBI, and any dual US-Israeli government bureaucrat, such as Signal Mandekar of the Treasury Department, who brings biased sanctions and targets around and its institutions out of a religious or other bias that is in fact unconstitutional.
So perhaps we'll see Americans form a class action lawsuit against the DOJ, FBI.
To demand any and all sanctions and seizures violating Americans' right to free speech be immediately terminated by a command from the courts.
What's next he asks?
Alex Jones, Fox News, OAN, any other news sites ripe for seizure?
Get ready for the war and possibly false flag attack where they remove Biden permanently.
Blame it on Trump or Iran or Russia.
Put Nancy Pelosi and Gavin Newsom as the next president and VP.
Truth is stranger than fiction.
Let me just add why I believe Scott is spot on about this.
Israel has declared it has no choice but to attack Iran's nuclear program given the election of a new president.
Ibrahim Raisi, who's a prominent judge in Iran and an ally of the Ayatollah Khomeini.
This, in my opinion, is completely wrong on the part of Israel, but shows its influence over the American government.
To suppress a news site that would be in the position to report what's going on, where we already know one of Iran's Peaceful use of nuclear energy production sites has been hit, and I believe Scott's got it exactly right.
This presages a massive attack on Iran.
They do not want to be reported from an Iranian point of view or from that of objective international commentators, so they have shut it down.
Meanwhile, Tucker Carlson has been doing a completely brilliant job of exposing what happened on January 6, the so-called insurrection.
He's discussed 400 arrests, questioned why so many indictments mention unindicted co-conspirators, observing those individuals appear to be FBI agents or FBI informants who actually drove the plot to attack.
Suggesting this is why 10,000 hours of footage from the Capitol has not been released.
He's also questioning by the individual who shot Ashley Babbitt hasn't been identified, but it appears he actually has been, that he was a black Capitol officer who actually came from Brazil, as I recall, his original origins, and that he's a strong supporter of BLM and had even talked about shooting Trump supporters.
That's all profoundly disturbing, but we're not hearing any of it from the mainstream.
Tucker observed, without fail, the government has thrown the book at most who are present on the Capitol.
There was a nationwide dragnet to find them.
Many are still in solitary confinement tonight.
But strangely, some of the key participants on January 6 have not been charged.
Look at the documents.
The government calls them unindicted co-conspirators.
What does that mean?
It means potentially, in every single case, they were FBI officers.
It turns out now, a case of Thomas Caldwell is a nice illustration.
A 66-year-old former naval officer who allegedly conspired with members of Oath Keepers.
What Tucker's observed is some of the key individuals involved here are only identified by number.
Caldwell's charging document, for example, says he spent the night before the riot in the same hotel as person two.
Another individual, Person 3, led Caldwell to believe there would be a quick reaction force participating in the storming of the Capitol.
But wait!
Here's the interesting thing, said Tucker.
Person 2 and Person 3 were organizers of the riot.
The government knows who they are, but the government has not charged them.
Why is that?
You know why.
They were almost certainly working for the FBI.
So FBI operatives were organizing the attack on the Capitol on January 6, according to government documents.
Eric, I find this strikingly parallel to the situation on 9-11, where the U.S.
Geological Survey undertook a study of dust samples from 35 locations in lower Manhattan and discovered the presence of elements there, including barium, strontium, lithium, lanthanum, tritium, Some of which only exist in radioactive form that would not have been present had it not been a nuclear attack.
I've explained this in many places.
It sounds astonishing.
But the buildings did not collapse.
In fact, the design of the Twin Towers made that impossible.
A retired physics, chemistry, and math teacher, for example, has calculated that for every unit of downward force in the Twin Towers, there were 199 units of upward force.
They could not have collapsed, and the planes that are alleged to have caused the fires that caused the steel to weaken to lead to a collapse could not have made it into the building.
It would have been physically impossible given the design of the building.
It's like throwing an empty beer can against a stone wall.
No matter how hard you throw it, it's not going to pass through the stone wall.
Indeed, planes would have crumpled external to the building, body seats, luggage falling to the ground.
We have photos of the roadway and the sidewalk beneath the facades of both the North and the South Tower, and they are not there.
Indeed, it's a fascinating matter to explain how they fake all four of the crash sites on 9-11.
I've gone into it in great detail.
Check it out on BitChute or 153news.net, where with Brian Roux, I did a presentation on 9-11, who was responsible and why.
Where I explain how each of the four crash sites were fabricated or faked, albeit in different ways, which was confirmed by no less an authority than Major General Albert Stubblebine, U.S.
Army retired, formerly in charge of all U.S.
military signals, including photographic intelligence, where General Stubblebine not only confirmed my findings, but added additional reasons why I was correct.
So what Tucker has discovered here is parallel.
There we had the U.S.
Geological Survey, a government agency providing objective scientific research that contradicted the government's official narrative.
We have the same thing happening here now with FBI documents that contradict the government's official narrative about what happened at the Capitol on January 6.
Tucker has concluded It turns out that this white supremacist insurrection was, again, by the government's own admission in these documents organized, at least in part, by government agents.
He points out, too, that Merrick Garland, Attorney General, has identified white supremacist groups as the greatest domestic terror threat currently confronting the United States.
What's fascinating about that, Eric, is that it was not white supremacists who led all the riots, the looting, the arson that we endured.
All summer last in Minneapolis, Portland, Seattle, that was not led by White Lives Matter, but rather by Antifa and Black Lives Matter.
We all know this.
Indeed, the efforts to find white supremacists in the United States have been very difficult to sustain because there are virtually none.
Meanwhile, we have the defund the police movement having a broader agenda, which is not to stop the killing of black people.
According to a new book by Brandon Tatum, who himself is a former Arizona police officer, author of the upcoming book, Beaten Black and Blue, being a black cop in an America under siege, According to Brandon, the agenda is to completely destroy and dismantle local police departments so the government can have control of law enforcement in this country and push a nationwide agenda.
In other words, Eric, I was always puzzled when they talked about reimagining law enforcement, what they had in mind.
They never told us.
I think Brandon has put his finger on it.
He explains that if law enforcement is federalized and there are unconstitutional mandates or restrictions, such as involving vaccines or guns, in other words, unconstitutional moves to mandate the wearing of face masks, for example, or forced inoculations or a seizure of guns in violation of the Second Amendment, If you have a federalized police force, no doubt modeled after the East German Stasi, then it's going to be much easier to enforce those mandates, where the problem with all these unconstitutional measures is the time it takes between
When they are promulgated and begin to be enforced and the final opportunity of the Supreme Court to review them and declare them to be unconstitutional, which can take a year or more, these legal processes tend to be protracted.
It is this agenda, he said, that's really the cause of a lot of the turmoil we see in law enforcement and the crime rate we see spiking around the country.
According to the Fraternal Order of Police, murder rates over the past year have skyrocketed in cities where police departments have been defunded.
The murder rate in New York City and Chicago were up 22% in Los Angeles 27%.
In Washington, D.C., 35.
In Philadelphia, 40.
In Minneapolis, 56%.
In Portland, which heretofore had been a relatively peaceful, tranquil community, where my son actually attended Reed College as an undergraduate, a staggering 800%.
So I think this guy is right on top of it.
Tatum himself grew it up in an inner City in Texas said the real issue for the black community is homicide rates in inner cities, where I've reviewed the statistics of, you know, crimes, murders by race, and it turns out there are 55 times as many killings of blacks by blacks as there are killings of blacks by whites.
In fact, killings of black by white is only like 10% of the killings of Well, whites buy blacks.
Ten times more blacks kill whites than whites kill blacks.
What he is suggesting is a crucial aspect of this, by the way, is single family homes, that it's not really race dependent.
He also observes that statistics show twice as many unarmed whites are shot by the police each year as unarmed blacks.
So we're being manipulated again and again.
We've heard of lies, damn lies and statistics.
Well, this is a perfect example.
Now, I have republished a completely brilliant article, which is by far the most important story I have to present today.
Woke Ideology Mimics Precursors to Totalitarian Slaughter, Experts Say.
This is about what we're living through and why what's going on is taking place.
Some of the core tenets of the woke ideology spreading around the country mimic ideas used to justify many of the most horrendous atrocities of the past century.
A recently released documentary exploring the topic called Better Left Unsaid concludes that the self-identified radical left endorses four fundamental truths they hold to be self-evident, noting these tenets have also been used to justify and incite many of the worst massacres of the 20th century.
The first of the four claims is that the world is best viewed through a group oppression narrative lens.
The woke ideology is based on a set of quasi-Marxist theories that divide society into oppressors and oppressed, based on characteristics such as race, sex, class, and sexual proclivities.
Woke is sometimes used interchangeably with critical race theory, which is one of the more prominent ideologies that operate within this framework.
The second claim is that evidence of oppression is the inequality between groups.
If the designated oppressed group does on average worse in some regard than the designated oppressor group, that is taken as virtually unassailable proof of oppression.
For example, if blacks do less well on IQ tests or in academic settings or in white-collar professions, that's supposed to be indicative of discrimination, repression, bias, segregation.
On the other hand, if blacks do better, say, in athletic contests such as the NBA or the NFL, which is overwhelmingly apparent when you look at the statistical composition of the teams, that somehow is not viewed as a form of discrimination against whites, although it might well have been were this woke ideology remotely objective.
The third claim is that peaceful dialogue and understanding between the groups is impossible, since a dominant group's strategy is to retain its power.
Woke theorists posit that the oppressed have a uniquely valuable perspective on reality unavailable to the oppressors.
Meanwhile, they say whiteness or white heteropatriarchy can't help but try to maintain its hegemony or dominance, even if it does things that benefit members of other groups, such as by abolishing slavery.
Or giving women and blacks the right to vote.
It's still done out of self-interest and in order to further entrench its institutions and norms and thus ensure the privilege of its members.
Proponents of the ideology engage in dialogue between themselves, but with everybody else the communication is supposed to generally flow in one direction only—the acceptance of their views.
Any challenge to their ideology is labeled as self-serving or even as an assault upon the oppressed.
Finally, the ideology at least implicitly acknowledges that because of the above, violence is justified to eradicate the inequalities.
From my experience, they, to the degree they can be grouped together enough to call them
they, tend to advocate for violence against those oppressing and equate it to laudatory
behavior.
Hence, Punxsia Nazi, author of a documentary about this, Kurt Gemungel, observed, I have
catalogs of tweets, written statements, videos of people ranging from students to professors
explicitly calling for violence and downplaying the violence on the left when compared to
the right.
He added, not because of intensity or frequency of such violence, but because of the so-called nobility, the nobleness of the extreme left position.
And we see this, for example, in cases of San Francisco, where looting of Walgreens, for example, takes place in a blatant fashion, and where we see attacks upon various groups by those who believe themselves to be oppressed to aggravate the situation.
These four tenets are common to many of the most brutal massacres and regimes of the 20th century, from the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany to communist China and the Rwanda genocide.
In each case, an entire class of society is painted as unfairly privileged and as such inherently oppressive, and as such inherently oppressive with little regard to specific actions of individual members of the group.
Look at that with regard to the use or making of the January 6th intervention, which was clearly orchestrated, where even the New York Times has acknowledged That the Capitol Police and the FBI had prior notification it was going to take place, where they ignore the role of Antifa and BLM, where now, finally, John Sullivan, perhaps the most prominent of Antifa leaders, whom his brother James, who's of a different political persuasion, had declared led 226 Antifa members into the Capitol dressed as Trump supporters,
has finally been indicted, but many of the others are still in solitary confinement,
even though their actions appear to have been completely modest, minimal, and where there's
no reason to believe Trump or Trump supporters had anything to do with it.
Meanwhile, disagreement with or mere disinterest in this classification, meaning blacks versus
whites, men versus women, all the business about the transgenders, promoting transgenders in the
military by this Lloyd Austin who's going after white supremacists, all of this harbingers a very
bad outcome.
Based upon this Marxist framework, which I believe actually illuminates a very great deal of what's going on.
With reconciliation through dialogue taken off the table, the only remaining recourse is conflict, a revolutionary action where violence is seen as inevitable and ultimately preferable.
Too few people know about the ceaseless carnage that took place under the masthead of the isomers of equity.
He said he avoided using examples of atrocities of the totalitarian nature.
Careful to list only or talk about deaths associated with philosophical doctrine and group guilt and class guilt, but Dave Hodges in the past has talked about the occurrence of 19 demosides During the 20th century, Eric, involving the extinction, the slaughter of whole societies by their own governments, where each of those democracies was preceded by gun confiscation.
This, I believe, is why the Biden administration is continuing to make efforts to go after our guns, although I believe it was seriously compromised, even virtually completely nullified by the defund the police movement, because Americans realized they could no longer count on the police to come to their aid.
If you had an intruder breaking into your home, for example, and you call the police because they have guns and you do not, it can take as long as 20 minutes for the police to show up.
Meanwhile, most of the havoc and mayhem occurs in the first five or six.
So by the time the police show up, your daughter may have been raped, your wife murdered, you mugged because you couldn't defend yourself.
Proponents of socialism commonly argue the movement that led to these tragedies were commandeered or hijacked by people who didn't really believe in the ideology, but they have tended to level the argument retrospectively after they or their like-minded predecessors initially endorsed the movements and nascent regimes the documentary points out also.
Proponents usually stop short of detailing how the next attempt will prevent any supposed non-believers from taking over.
The comparison between the preludes to past massacres and the current manifestations of the woke ideology is a fair one, as long as it's not taken as an absolute, according to Eric Smith, an associate professor of rhetoric and composition at York College of Pennsylvania.
We're not saying a massacre is definitely going to happen, but we need to be cognizant and remember our history and be careful about what's going on here.
The same ideas that gave rise to this movie and discussion of communism.
We see a lot of parallels and isomorphisms taking place in the West and within academe, he observed.
Janice Flamingo, a retired English professor at the University of Ottawa and self-declared anti-feminist, backed his arguments during a panel discussion, which was also featured in the film.
As soon as one establishes one of these oppressor groups and oppressed groups, then when you are speaking supposedly on behalf of the oppressed, you can do nearly anything.
Yet, Sand, an evolutionary psychology professor at Concordia, put forth a point during the panel that people professing utopian goals have a tendency toward eliminating those who oppose them.
Utopians believe that the world could be a perfect place except for this one group that is stopping the world from becoming a perfect place.
And, Eric, it's very clear, that one group that is stopping the world from becoming a perfect place in the minds of the ideologues who now dominate the Democratic Party is white Americans.
Hence, all the focus on white supremacy.
Notwithstanding, there's no justification to support it.
Hence the necessity to manufacture the phony attacks of January 6, hence the Attorney General declaring that white supremacy is the major problem confining the nation when there is no evidence to support it and a massive evidence to contradict it.
Eric, this woke ideology is a framework within which we can now understand what's going on in America, which heretofore has come close to defying rational analysis.
It was my discovery in this critique that has enabled me to now see very clearly the agenda taking place.
Let me mention and add an open letter From retired U.S.
military and veterans that I think very well sums up the situation by way of conclusion.
As former members of the U.S.
military who have proudly served our nation, we write to express our support for constitutional freedom and liberty and our concern for our country as many powerful forces seek to bring socialism and Marxism to our land.
When we agreed to serve our country, we pledged to support and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic.
During our active duty service, we did just that.
Today, although no longer active duty warriors, we are still bound to this pledge and believe we are ethically obligated to protect our country.
As such, we put our nation's leadership on notice.
We believe the hard left turn toward socialism and Marxism endangers our citizens and the future of this great nation.
Although a difficult step to take, we believe this is necessary for us to continue to demonstrate the integrity and moral courage our oath requires.
We are disgusted by the dismantling of the rule of law in our great country.
We never thought we would see the return to Vietnam-style disdain for public service.
Unfortunately, this disregard and disrespect is corrosive and will lead to dangerous situations for citizens and law enforcement.
A revolving door for criminals and a two-tiered justice system that offers up different penalties based on the viewpoints of the accused must end.
It disturbed us to see the erosion of fair and honest elections.
Civilians doubt that our electoral system accurately reflects the will of the people.
Current servicemen and women struggle to find clear instructions on how they can execute their own constitutional right to vote and doubt their ballots will be counted.
We reject efforts by those who seek to avoid fair and honest elections by deeming common sense voting measures racist.
The gold standard in voting recognized throughout the world is in-person with identification, yet politicians are seeking to end this in the U.S.
We oppose the politicalization and ideological purging of our military.
The focus of our military should be on training, readiness, and defense of our nation, not leftist cultural wokeness.
We decry the assault on our constitutional rights through censorship of written and verbal expression.
And we point out the complicit arrangement between private corporations and those in power to present only one point of view.
Never did we think we would see the day when our media resembled Pravda.
Bureaucratic abuses that have led to business and school closure and excessive lockdowns should not be tolerated by the American people.
We did not get our rights from the CDC, the FDA, or from private corporations.
And as such, We will not tolerate Soviet-style internal passports or anything resembling the Chinese social credit system where citizens are monitored and controlled, whether that system be carried out by the government or by their cooperative partners in the private sector.
The one part where I disagree is this.
We stand with Israel and call upon all Americans to continue with the Middle East peace initiatives, the Abraham Accords, and oppose re-engaging in the Iran nuclear deal.
Iran's acquisition of nuclear weapons is not in the interest of freedom-loving individuals.
Believe it is in the self-interest of all Americans to oppose this deal.
We must continue our efforts for energy independence.
We believe it is in our nation's best interest to reopen the Keystone Pipeline and focus on regaining U.S.
jobs and protecting the national security interests provided by energy independence.
The perforation of our southern border is a lifeline for terrorists, drug cartels, and human traffickers.
The current administration's position on open borders and illegal immigration places our nation at risk from a health, economic, and safety perspective.
As a sovereign nation, we have a right and a duty to protect our borders.
We oppose the establishment of cooperative relations with China as we believe the Chinese Communist Party is focused on global militaristic and technological domination.
It is currently amassing weapons to stage a takeover of Taiwan.
America is bound by the Sino-American Mutual Defense Treaty, which protects Taiwan from invasion by the People's Republic of China.
Our cooperation with China is at odds with our signed alliance and is not an American self-interest.
We must focus on preventing Chinese expansionism and protect our nation from attacks on our infrastructure by securing our gas pipeline and electric grids from penetration.
Conclusion.
We call upon the American people to join us in opposing the advancement of socialism by holding public officials accountable in the public square and the voting booth.
We must elect local, state, and federal candidates who will always act to defend our constitutional republic.
The survival of our nation and its historic values, liberty, and freedom are at stake.
Eric, I could not have said that better myself.
And I'll conclude it with just one supporting little situation popping up here on the 26th in Seattle.
We got a double wokeness event.
We got a Seattle LGBT Pride event, which is going to charge its white attendees reparation fees.
How about that one, James?
So if you're white, you want to show up, it's anywhere between $10 to $50 to cover the cost.
For those of diversity, if you will.
So a little double-wokeness event.
James, before we let you go, shameless self-promotion time.
Thank you for joining us.
Oh Eric, I think that's a very astute observation.
In San Francisco, they're allowing people to come into Walgreens, fill big bags, trash bags full of goods, and ride out of the store on a bicycle with complete impunity.
This wokeness is disgusting beyond belief.
Let me simply observe that.
When it comes to suppressing alternative points of view, I and Mike Palachuk founded Moonrock Books after Amazon.com banned Nobody Died and Sandy Hook, where I brought together 13 experts, including six PhDs, and we established a school that had been closed by 2008 because it was loaded with asbestos and other biohazards.
That there were no students there and that it was a two-day FEMA exercise presented as mass murder to promote the Obama administration's gun control agenda.
We even have the FEMA manual, which I included as Appendix A.
Amazon banned the book after it had been up less than a month, even though it sold nearly 500 copies.
Well, we founded moonrockbooks.com as an alternative of the 12 books that we have published there.
Six, not only on Sandy Hook, but on the Boston bombing, on the moon landing, Orlando, Dallas, Charlottesville, and Parkland have all been banned by amazon.com.
This suppression Oh, good stuff, Jim.
As always, folks, listen, thank you all for tuning into today.
And until next time, we've got to get ready for a Catholic Danish journalist, Ibn Thoranholm, who's going to be joining me here in just a little bit.
▲
Export Selection