All Episodes
June 8, 2021 - Jim Fetzer
01:00:57
Need to Know (7 June 2021) with Carl Herman and Susan Bradford
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin, where I'm very pleased to have today Carl Herman from San Ramon, California.
We are counting on being joined by Susan Bradford on the East Coast as soon as she is able.
Meanwhile, the election overhaul that the Democrats were hoping that would make permanent all of their methods of stealing elections, absentee ballots, long advanced voting, and a host of others, have been defeated by a key Democrat, Joe Manchin of West Virginia, who believes it's the wrong piece of legislation to bring our country together and unite, and I'm not supporting it because I believe it would divide us further.
If they think they're going to win by subverting and oppressing people from voting, they're going to lose, and I can assure you they will lose.
The Republicans are simply wanting to have honesty in voting, and the Democrats are trying to make permanent the way they stole this last election.
Voting and election reform that's done in a partisan manner will all but ensure partisan divisions continue to deepen, he observed.
He wrote, the failure to bring both parties together on voting legislation would risk further dividing and destroying the republic.
We swore to protect and defend his elected officials.
Meanwhile, Facebook has suspended Donald Trump for two years.
Notice that two year period overlaps with a midterm 2022 election.
It's done because of the Capitol riots, allegedly, which they claim Trump was responsible for when it's manifest and obvious he was not.
This is embarrassingly bad.
I find it all rather disgusting.
The move allows him to return before the 2024 election, but look how they're weakening him in the meanwhile.
Earlier, a merged communication platform set up by Trump in the wake of his social media bans has been permanently shut down.
In addition to Facebook, which has over 2 billion monthly users, Trump has been banned from Twitter, YouTube, Snapchat, Twitch, and other social media platforms over the January riot.
Last month, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis signed the first law punishing tech companies for deplatforming politicians.
That was a good move by DeSantis, Carl, but a bad move by Facebook and blatantly political, especially when we know Trump really had neither the motive, the means, nor the opportunity for the intrusion at the Capitol on January 6th.
Your thoughts?
It is completely Orwellian, Jim.
So with Facebook, they are operating entirely as a publisher and not as a platform.
So they are open to lawsuits for lying, for defamation regarding people's statements.
So they can't do that.
And that'll require a legal remedy.
But the courts are also in awful shape, as you know better than any of us.
For the legislation regarding elections is that, again, The major theme that I have to offer is to withdraw consent from these serial, pathological, psychopathic liars and looters.
You cannot trust, don't listen to anything more of what they have to say from an election and hopefully the big news A week from today will be the announcement from Arizona that their audit is complete and that'll give the biggest step forward to being able to explain, document, and prove election fraud.
And again, the data point that I most like from what I've seen from November up until the president has been in
Pennsylvania for their legislature, for the testimony of one of the election experts who worked there
on the evening so that when the swing states stopped counting votes and then they started
counting in the middle of the night, they claimed in Pennsylvania 600,000 votes for Biden, 3,000
for Trump in one batch, a 200 to 1 ratio, which proves election fraud by a number with 60
zeros behind it.
So, until we get a breakthrough though, this is good, good trends, and I'm looking forward to the breakthrough.
As am I, Carl.
I think you're absolutely right.
Every knowledgeable politician in the country understands this was a massive theft.
JPMorgan has done an astounding thing by freezing political donations to the 147 Republicans who voted to overturn Biden's election victory.
Honest to God, Carl, in my lifetime, I never thought I'd see a bank, JPMorgan Chase, free donations on a political basis.
They'll continue political giving to other U.S.
lawmakers after stopping in the wake of January 6th, but the 147 who voted against confirming the Electoral College result will stay banned.
That's reinforcing the theft of the election.
This is outrageous.
Just completely outrageous.
Following a review, the country's largest lender resumed giving through its Political Action Committee, but will continue its freeze on donations to a handful of the 147 lawmakers whom it had previously supported.
Meanwhile, we know from both the FBI and Capitol Police they were aware of the violent threat posed before Before the events of the night, we're delighted to be joined by Susan Bradford here as we talk about the fact that it was all planned in advance.
The FBI knew it was planned in advance.
The Capitol Police knew it was coming.
The New York Times was even reporting.
So that, in fact, we have the brother of accused leftist provocateur John Sullivan Reporting that he let 226 Antifa members into the Capitol.
They were staging the event, pretending to be Trump supporters.
And we know, of course, since Trump was offered the ellipse, he really had no incitement.
He had nothing to do with it.
He had neither the means, the motive, nor the opportunity.
Look at this.
Trump followers don't leave the Ellipse until after Trump finishes speaking, and it's a mile and a half away.
He didn't stop speaking until 1-11.
Meanwhile, the first protesters showed up at 12-40.
By 1 o'clock, the Capitol Police Chief saw officers attacked by 109.
He requested additional National Guard It was all taking place where no one had less motive to intrude a discussion, a debate about the theft of the election than Donald Trump.
His people weren't there.
The one who was in control was Nancy Pelosi in charge of the Capitol Police.
Carl, your thoughts?
Hey, Susan.
That's my first thought.
So the first story with J.P.
Morgan is that the American public again need to withdraw consent from these banksters.
These two big defailed banks are operating a system operating in Orwellian opposite of the truth.
They say we have a monetary system.
It is not.
It is the opposite.
It is a debt system.
And that is why, when you take a look at the total debt, all that you see is this aggregate debt on a curve of exponential growth.
That's the system that they have.
Completely lying, saying that it's a monetary system when it is a rigged casino looting trillions towards them and they go ahead and using corporate media to complicit lie to deny any solutions that would benefit the American public.
And for the Capitol Mall Police, yeah, the Speaker of the House is the person in charge of the Capitol Mall Police.
So we have the evidence of that the electronic doors were open from the inside.
We have the evidence of a video showing that these mall cops were opening up the partitions to let people through that they retreated and told people come on in so and this was again was the exact time when the evidence was being presented to the house in the national and international forum for the election fraud so all of this is sounding to me better and better good news that these psychopathic liars are about to get caught
Susan, it's just stunning that even a bank is going to interfere with donations to 147 political figures because they voted against certifying the ballots.
I mean, have you heard of anything so outrageous?
It is outrageous.
You know, I do follow the money, and I'm going to be kind of throwing a wrench in the works, forgive me.
See, when I was looking at the lobbying forums of some of these groups, it does appear that maybe Trump and his fellows, through the election themselves, or at least his lobbyists did, if you look at Ballard Partners and the lobbying forums, You'll see that in 2020 right before the election there was a $5 million or $5,000 consulting fee for Washington DC which would have been a consulting fee for the police for a DC was the one and only time that they ever had that that relationship and
After the that was reported on that was that particular entry was removed from their lobbying records, but it still exists under Washington D.C.
with that amount zeroed out.
So I think that for some reason, perhaps for reasons unknown, that Trump did not want to serve a second term.
And I say that because Ballard Partners represented Leonardo SPA, which Repeatedly is the company that was behind the votes swapping in Italy.
So I think that maybe there's a little more here than meets the eye.
Wow, that's certainly an original and distinctive interpretation, Susan.
That's going to take some time to absorb.
We'll have to get back to that.
Meanwhile, we have the violent Minneapolis Black Lives Matter looting sneaker shop Target, Walgreens, CVS, and more.
It seems as though if they want something, they're just going to go out and they're going to take it.
They believe they're entitled.
A man was killed by law enforcement, Winston Boogie Smith Jr., 32, shown here.
The CVS off Lake Street was broken into and looted.
Here we have them smashing windows, automobiles damaged.
Certainly, the Democrats would rather talk about the Capitol intrusion, which they're blaming on the Republicans and Trump supporters, than they would Last summer's events, where we had burning, riots, looting, going apace all over the country, in Portland, in Seattle, in Minneapolis, in many other cities, where the Democrats were outspoken in supporting.
There needs to be unrest in the street.
Protesters should not let up.
If you see anybody from the cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, a gas station, get out and create a crowd and push back.
Tell them they're not welcome anymore anywhere.
Even Nancy Pelosi.
I just don't know why there aren't uprisings all over the country.
Maybe there will be.
They don't want to talk about this, because the whole country was repulsed.
I'm therefore convinced that the whole intrusion at the Capitol is a way of diverting attention.
But when you have recurrences like this, it brings it all back.
We know Sleepy Joe slept through June, July, August, all of a sudden awakens to say, this violence is a threat and must end now.
I don't think it's going to play well.
Carl, your thoughts?
I think it's playing perfectly well for the intended outcome of allowing Americans to choose.
So on one hand you have the Democratic leadership claiming that this is a somehow favorable for people when on the ground you have looting, arson, murder, the destruction of these businesses in these zones.
So that is what is on the ground physically and then you have a group of leaders Saying that this is somehow good, along with claiming that the solution to this problem is defunding the police, and that if you do arrest anybody, it's just a catch and release, and they can go out and do that again.
That is one option.
The other option is just to call it for what it is.
Hey, that's arson and looting and murder, and we don't want to have that as a society.
I can't believe the Democrats are happy about this resurrection and reminder of what happened last summer, which horrified every American.
are getting this show to stand up and see that there is a difference between what
exists in physical reality and what leaders are going to say about it and corporate media will say about it.
I can't believe the Democrats are happy about this resurrection and reminder of what
happened last summer, which horrified every American.
Susan, your thoughts.
I think the rioting is an expression of this kind of a technocratic agenda.
I think that they want to reorganize society, making it more efficient.
One way is they can make it more efficient is to have like drones and technology kind of monitor people instead of the police that will save them funding save them money from pensions.
They used to reorganize society through war.
They can no longer do that so I think these, a lot of these riots like they're funded by, you know, George Soros and by private banks and companies that are kind of advancing this rational enlightenment this kind of corporate technocratic agenda.
So I think this is kind of revolution, the typical Marxist revolution that is trying to move society along to their intended goal, which would be greater tyranny.
And I think they're also attempting to reorganize society.
And we're seeing that they are targeting businesses.
But during the coronavirus, they were looking at creating like these global, like these great big behemoths like Amazon and so forth.
So I think that through these riots are able to target individual businesses and then keep those, you know, it's like eliminating competition while keeping, you know, essentially shoring up market share for themselves, creating chaos that in turn will lead to demands for a solution.
And of course, they will be prepared with that solution for greater control over society.
Fascinating, fascinating.
Meanwhile, we have an unreleased federal report concluding that there's no evidence that free speech online causes hate speech, so that Facebook's rationale for keeping Trump off the air has no valid basis, given this research.
Prepared by the National Telecommunications and Information Administration as a branch of the Department of Congress, responsible for advising the President on all matters related to telecommunication and the Internet.
It was prepared under Trump with a request coming from the 116th Congress, controlled by a 35-seat Democrat majority in the House, a slim Republican majority in the Senate, It was a revision of a 1993 report entitled The Role of Telecommunications in Hate Crimes, where the old report is still available on the web, but the new has yet to find its way there.
Sources close to drafting an approval suspect bureaucrats and establishment politicians with a vested interest in hate crimes are trying to suppress it.
Because its conclusions challenge popular media narratives alleging a rise in internet-inspired hate crimes.
Reports like this are typically made public, said a source who worked closely.
I don't know why it isn't up yet.
According to the source, the updated report was bitterly opposed by the Civil Rights Division, which is the part of the Department of Justice responsible for prosecuting hate crimes.
The Civil Rights Division, said the source, is also at the forefront of efforts to drum up hysteria over white nationalist extremism in the U.S.
The report, nevertheless, was approved by the Office of Management and sent to Congress, but it hasn't appeared on the website yet.
From the report, this is very telling.
The evidence does not show that during the last decade, a time of expansive growth of electronic communications, particularly on the internet and mobile devices, as well as social media, there has been a rise in hate crime incidents.
The report also warns efforts to clamp down online communications undermine First Amendment from the report.
We caution that Evers the Controller monitor online speech, even for the worthy goal of reducing crime, presents serious First Amendment concerns and runs counter to our nation's dedication to free expression to quote President Barack Obama.
The strongest weapon against hateful speech is not repression.
It is more speech.
The report also criticizes academic extremism researchers for failing to back up their assertions of a causal link between online hate speech and real-world hate crime.
This research, and much like it, fails to demonstrate any causal relationship between increased social media use and increased violence.
This research does not present even comprehensive descriptive data correlating increased hate speech on social media with increased hate crime.
Not even correlations, much less causation.
Finally, the report issues a blistering condemnation of Silicon Valley companies for using the hate speech panic to undermine freedom of expression.
There are, of course, significant policy and practical limitations to reliance on automated content moderation when they explain they're increasingly relying on artificial intelligence.
Interestingly, much of this technology is being developed from approaches pioneered by the Chinese Communist Party to stifle political discussion and dissent.
Given that all the major social media platforms have rules against hate speech and, in fact, employ sophisticated algorithmic artificial intelligence approaches to enforce these vague and contradictory rules in a manner also used by tyrannous regimes, it's appropriate to ask what they gain from it.
Certainly, as this report shows, the platforms have no reasonable expectation their censorship will end hate crimes or even diminish it, As no empirical evidence exists linking increased hate speech with hate crimes.
Further, this censorship poses real dangers to our political system.
Under the hate speech prohibitions and other censorship rules, the platforms have removed content that many consider seriously engaged with pressing political and social issues.
I find it stunning that the platforms are moving forward, even when we have evidence to the contrary, but it reflects the fact that it's all political.
It has nothing to do with inciting crimes.
Carl, your thoughts?
Yeah, these are great lineup of stories, Jim.
So again, back with one of my major themes is that we are in a war and people need to recognize that.
And the war of our opponents, this rogue state empire, will employ censorship as the goal.
And then they go to talking points and focus groups to come up with the words to describe and justify the censorship.
And they're going to use whatever public safety with COVID or health.
And then this anti-hate Which is just the destruction of American values of a First Amendment.
So if you want to say something that is provably a lie, then you can be taken to court for any subsequent damages from that lie.
Otherwise, hey, this is the First Amendment and you're welcome to say it here.
But the free speech would call out and demonstrate the rogue state empire And the rogue state empire in the U.S., as with history, has three central components.
You control politics to get the policies that you want.
You control what is used for money, which we talked about with the the big banksters.
And you need to control the media to tell the adults in the news that all of this is for them.
And then that filters into public education.
So this is a war.
The test is, can Americans demonstrate The intellectual integrity for the facts and the moral courage to stand and speak the truth.
Good points.
I'm very troubled by the use of AI, which is not a thinking thing.
They're doing all this based on syntax.
That means specific phrases or expression without the ability to think about what is actually being said.
So I find this really highly insulting, though most Americans wouldn't realize how trivial it is to implement a program based purely on syntax as though it were a filter out of hate speech to impose Censorship is clearly a mechanism of a tyrannous political regime.
Susan, your thoughts?
Great remarks and observations from Carl.
You're absolutely right that they're using AI as a form of tyranny.
They're trying to have AI control society through algorithms and words.
In this specific instance, I think they're targeting the white patriots because, you know, America used to be like a white Judeo-Christian nation, and I think that they want to impose globalism on us so that, you know, those who uphold those traditions of freedom, democracy, are not going to readily embrace globalism.
So I think this is an effort for them to kind of control speech so that those who are resisting their agenda Very nice.
Yes, absolutely.
Whereas those who are attacking the patriots and nationalists and others who are kind of opposing
this insidious agenda, they will have their free speech, but on the other side, their speech will
be censored through AI. Very nice. Yes, absolutely. Perfect.
Meanwhile, we have a major development in California, which I applaud.
A federal judge has overturned California's three decades old ban on assault weapons, ruling that it violates the constitutional right to keep and bear arms.
U.S.
District Judge Roger Benitez of San Diego ruled Friday the state's definition of illegal military-style rifles unlawfully deprived law-American Californians of weapons commonly allowed in most other states.
He handed down the actually 92-page ruling in response to a lawsuit filed against the state of California by James Miller, Patrick Ross, Ryan Peterson, and the San Diego County Gun Owners Political Action Committee, which I cite by name because they are great patriots for standing up for the Second Amendment.
These are examples of the AR-15 they've sought to demonize.
I have fired the weapon.
It's light, very flexible, highly versatile, highly accurate.
It's just a kind of all-purpose weapon, especially important.
It could be for self-defense or to save your community from rioters or a rampaging mob or looters, but Most importantly, it would be the best weapon to defeat a tyrannical government were it to come to it.
I find it fascinating this occurred.
The state of California ban on these firearms will fail constitutional scrutiny for the same reason its ban on firearm magazines did.
According to one of the attorney for the plaintiffs.
Meanwhile, we know a whole lot of the crime statistics around the country the Democrats are seeking to suppress as a strong racial aspect in terms of New York City in 2014.
If you break it down in terms of black, Hispanic, white, and other, 75% of the shooting arrests were Black, 22% Hispanic.
That's 97% Black or Hispanic.
Murder, 62% Black, 32% Hispanic, 94% Black or Hispanic.
Rape, 46% Hispanic, 43% Black.
That's 89% Black or Hispanic.
If New York City were all white, rapes would be down 83%.
Murder, 91.
46% Hispanic, 43% Black. That's 89% Black or Hispanic. If New York City were all white,
rapes would be down 83%, murder 91, shooting 96. Meanwhile, look what Black Lives Matter is
protesting.
Blacks killed by whites, incredibly rare.
Blacks killed by blacks, 55 times more frequent than blacks killed by whites.
This is a special pleading fallacy we see when used car salesmen talk about the great stereo and the leather upholstery and neglect the fact that the rings are shot and it needs a new transmission.
We are being played.
This is the kind of data the Democrats do not want Americans to know.
Whites killed by blacks more than 10 times as often as blacks are killed by whites.
Whites killed by whites about as often.
But the vast majority of deaths in the United States from guns are blacks killing other blacks using guns.
My dear colleague, Dr. Ewan, like myself, a retired college professor, Brilliantly superimposed a 2016 electoral college map over the 2014 murder distribution map, and guess what?
The areas where the murders are taking place are controlled by the Democrats.
They have free fire zones.
The criminals know they can murder with impunity because there won't be a nosy civilian there carrying a concealed weapon.
This reflects the Failure of the Democratic policies.
Chicago being the sterling example with the most stringent gun control laws, the highest murder rate.
It's outrageous.
The Democrats are ignoring the data.
But then again, that's what they're doing over and over again.
They don't want to admit their Well, I am feeling better and better about these stories.
results are driven ideologically.
There's no correspondence to reality.
Carl, your thoughts.
Well, I am feeling better and better about these stories.
So the Second Amendment is a foundation of what it means to have a free society.
And this goes back to 1775, and actually the winter previous to that,
when our own government attempted to take our weapons, which included cannon,
and that was enough to awake Americans up.
And when the Americans refused to disarm, And the shooting began, that's when the hot revolution began, and I hope we'll be able to avoid that.
One of the ways that we can use Aikido or Jiu-Jitsu to flip this script, to take what we're being told and to use it against our opponents, because we do live in this Orwellian inversion of reality, and that, oh, so we should take away guns to keep people safe if they're in danger.
All right, then.
I think we ought to take away the government's power to use the guns in the military because we can quantify those murders of about 40 million people killed since World War II in these wars for freedom that are absolutely founded on provable lies and the opposite of legal.
If you want to say that you support that Black Lives Matter, Oh, well, okay, I'm all for these lives mattering.
Well, maybe we ought to arrest the 0.01% oligarchs that kill about a million kids, primarily of color, every month from preventable poverty, when they've promised the end of poverty since 1969.
So we are being played.
And it is the Orwellian inversion of reality.
We need to stop listening to these people attempting to divide to conquer us and demand their arrest for the provable crimes that kill millions every year, harm billions, and loot trillions.
Well, think of the absurdity of Joe Biden declaring that white supremacy is a major problem confronting the nation domestically.
You would think all that rioting and looting and arson was committed by White Lives Matter.
It's Black Lives Matter, and the statistics overwhelmingly confirm these are racial statistics that the Democrats don't want the world to know.
Susan, your thoughts?
Thank you, Jim.
Um, I think it's been said that possessing firearms is the one criteria that stands between us and tyranny that we have the right to protect ourselves, but I also wanted just to remind your audience that while whites are being blamed for All the problems that the blacks are experiencing today, the poverty, the violence, the communities, the white Christians and Jews from the time of the Pilgrims rejected slavery.
Those who brought slavery to America were these power elites with these different merchants, with the East India Company.
White spilled their blood to free the slaves during the Civil War and the cabal of these elites have have said that these Marxists have said that they that they could use the black power movement to divide and separate the United States.
They've done it by by bankrolling churches that have promoted These black power movements demanded reparations for slaves from people who never owned slaves.
And it's essentially a mechanism to divide the country.
The elites were the ones who brought drugs and arms to these black communities.
They broke apart the black families through entitlement programs, incentivizing Have children out of wedlock.
So I think I'd like to see the blacks and the whites of America come together see the game for what it is and not allow these elites to divide and destroy us because I think a lot of black lives matter that they are being bankrolled by corporate America and the big banks.
I think that they should be you have enough sense to turn away from that and to you know to come together up with us as people blacks and whites to you know to to fight the oligarchy.
This leads me to the following conjecture.
If they really think they're going to precipitate a war of blacks against whites, this is virtually a Charlie Manson vision, helter skelter.
They may be importing a lot of these migrants, an awful lot of whom are between 17 and 24, look very physically fit, and flying them to regions where they need more blacks to fight the whites.
I mean, it's very odd what's going on.
But from a military point of view, if that's the agenda, it makes a tremendous amount of sense.
We better be aware and take precautions because that may very well be the agenda on which they are embarked.
Meanwhile, we'll be right back.
Here's a portion of the court's decision it's really worth reflecting upon in the California case.
This is from the judge.
You might not know it, but this case is about what should be a muscular constitutional right and whether a state can force a gun policy choice that impinges on that right with a 30-year-old failed experiment.
It should be an easy question and answer.
Government is not free to impose its own new policy choices on American citizens where constitutional rights are concerned.
As Heller explains, the Second Amendment takes certain policy choices and removes them beyond the realm of permissible state action.
I repeat, the Second Amendment takes certain policy choices and removes them beyond the realm of permissible state action.
California may certainly conceive of a policy that a modern rifle is dangerous in the hands of a criminal, and that therefore it is good public policy to keep modern rifles out of the hands of every citizen.
But the Second Amendment stands as a shield from government imposition of that very policy.
I am impressed.
The Second Amendment stands as a shield from government imposition of that policy.
Well said!
One of the best decisions I've ever encountered.
Meanwhile, if you still believe mainstream narratives about COVID, then answer these questions.
Explain how they pulled the Coronavirus Act 2020 legislation together in a matter of days, despite the act being several hundred pages long.
Explain why they have completely changed normal practice and used criteria like death from any reason within 28 days of a positive test to classify a COVID-19 death.
Explain why they banned autopsies of anyone dying from or with COVID-19.
Explain why they changed the law to allow any practitioner to diagnose COVID through observation alone, even if it were done through video consultation.
Explain why undertakers have seen no difference in burials or cremations.
Explain how all-cause mortality is at an all-time low.
Explain how millions of protesters across the globe aren't getting sick with COVID.
Explain how this is the only crisis that needs an advertising campaign paired with a constant barrage of repetitive brainwashing propaganda on television and in the streets.
Explain how hundreds of thousands of persons marched through the streets of London for an afternoon last month, but it wasn't shown once on any TV channel or reported in the mainstream press in the UK or in the United States.
Explain how thousands were yelling, shame on you, Outside the BBC headquarters in London, Manchester and Cardiff last Saturday, but it wasn't shown on the tally.
Explain how the people who are wearing the masks and following the rules are the only ones who are catching COVID.
Explain How the creator of the PCR amplification tool is on record for stating the PCR was not designed as a test for infectious diseases.
Explain why they're using that very test to diagnose for infectious diseases.
Explain why concern has been changed from COVID deaths to hospitalizations to COVID infections to COVID cases.
Explain how the anti-vaxxers are being blamed for the rise in cases when the only people who could possibly be contributing to the statistics are the people who are getting the test in the first place.
Explain why the hospitals were emptier than normal during the height of the pandemic.
Explain why whistleblowers are now reporting the hospitals are filling up with vaccine adverse reactions, but the mainstream media is not reporting it.
Explain why kids need to be vaccinated when, by your own definitions, COVID isn't dangerous to children.
Explain if all the vulnerable people have already been vaccinated.
Why do all the healthy need to get vaccinated if you're already protected by your own vaccine and the recovery rate was already 99.96% without it?
Explain Why the average death with COVID is 82.4 years, higher than the average cause of death without at 81.5.
Explain how you can be banned from COVID and Twitter for sharing official government links.
Explain why there are several class actions in progress taking governments across the globe to court for crimes against humanity, but there's zero mainstream media coverage.
Explain how the flu has disappeared but has been replaced with something with exactly the same symptoms.
Explain why they downgraded COVID-19 from a highly consequential infectious disease just days before declaring a pandemic.
Explain why most government leaders are reading from the same script.
Explain how all the things you were laughing at us for talking about last year are now becoming a reality this, including vaccine passports and mass surveillance.
Explain why we have all the answers, but you have not.
Just to show what happened to the flu, There were like 30 million cases of flu last year, but this year only 2,000.
Apparently COVID cures the flu.
It's all outrageous.
Carl, your thoughts?
I'm feeling a change in the momentum, just as in a sports game.
I think that we have the power on our side, as demonstrated through that great article, asking the questions and pointing to the data with COVID.
And then to go back to that first article again on the Second Amendment, is that Americans need to know that shall not be infringed means exactly what it says.
And the history, the letter And the intent of the Second Amendment was that Americans kept individual arms to the greatest firing power practical for defense against their own government.
They had public storehouses for gunpowder and for cannon.
The legislative intent is for the people to have access to the most powerful weapons to keep their own government in check.
That is the intent.
And we have had to live with what has already been attacked and eroded.
And because corporate media, these five corporations that dominate the media, will never remind you of the history that I just reminded you of.
And we'll only use these BS talking points to scare people to get rid of, oh, but their assault rifles shall not be infringed, is what they have an oath to protect and defend.
Carl, it's sensational.
You remind us the whole point was to be for the people to be able to defend themselves against their own government.
Susan, your thoughts?
I'd like to add a few more questions to that list that you mentioned.
Explain how after 9-11, Alan Greenspan said that there would be a shock to the system that would result in broken supply chains, people staying at home.
In the name of efficiency, staying home and work to work instead of at the office, and how the resilient cities would recover through a massive bailout to big business.
Explain how at the same time, Fauci began giving money to the Wuhan lab in China.
Explain how Fauci got his launch at the Vatican when he began promoting AIDS in a similar vein to how he's promoting the coronavirus with lots of hysteria and drummed up manufactured panic to generate profits for the pharmaceutical companies.
Explain how at the Vatican the big pharmaceutical companies are convening with the Clintons and Google Health and CRISPR to trot out these new vaccines that are to transform society forever.
I think there are a lot of, you know, important coincidences and questions that need to be asked.
Wonderful, wonderful, wonderful additions.
Both sets of comments just spot on.
Meanwhile, events in Iran are very strange if you think it's coincidental, but not if you understand Israel appears to be launching a war on Iran.
A large fire broke out Saturday night at a steel factory in the southeast city of Zarand in Iran.
It's the latest in a mysterious string of blasts and accidental blazes at sensitive sites that beset the Islamic Republic.
Raising questions of possible Israeli sabotage attend to what happened a year ago in the summer of 2020.
A governor of Zahran told the Iranian Fars News Agency no injuries were caused in the incident and that it was under control.
The Jerusalem Post has reported.
The incident was reportedly caused by a sudden overflow of molten material, but that's simply ridiculous.
That's what they are designed to handle.
Social media show a sizable blaze appears to have triggered a significant explosion.
Even if Iran suspects Israel is behind these incidents, Tehran officials are unlikely to go public with accusations, given negotiators are reportedly on the cusp of a renewal of the Iran deal in Vienna, and the country is gearing up to vote for a new president to replace Rouhani this month.
Pulling out of the Iran deal, by the way, I regard as one of the great blunders of the Trump administration, which undoubtedly was done under the influence of Bibi Netanyahu.
Israel has vowed to thwart a deal by any means possible with embattled PM Netanyahu, openly verbalizing he's willing to consider any level of action, even if it causes friction with the United States.
There are further reports of other fires afflicting oil facilities throughout the country.
Several have occurred in Iran's southwest Avaz region during the past 48 hours.
One Middle East news source reviews the recent string of fires and explosions hitting key Iranian assets as follows.
Three days earlier, a major fire tore through the Tehran Oil Refining Company.
Another explosion followed by a fire sank Iran's largest naval vessel.
Nine people were injured in yet another blast at a plant producing explosive materials in central Iran.
Three days later, a pipeline explosion at a petrochemical complex near Iran's Gulf Coast left one dead.
Here you can see the fire sinking Iran's largest missile.
Here you can see a refinery on the outskirts of Iran that is smoking in a blaze.
Here you can see the explosion in relation to the latest event here.
Anyone who thinks these are mere coincidence, I would suggest, really doesn't have a grasp of what's going on in the Middle East.
Carl, your thoughts?
Well, with those incidents, we are in a psyop.
It is the fog of war, so who really knows?
But we can confirm the history that has led up to this, principally 1953 U.S.
Operation Ajax to overthrow Iran's democracy?
The key thing that was going on there was that Iran wanted to renegotiate their oil contracts with American and British oil companies.
And I forget what it was, is that at the time, Iran was only getting like 5%, 10%, 15% of their total profits and they wanted to renegotiate.
So instead, the U.S.
overthrew their democracy and installed the Shah and trained SAVAK, their secret police, to stifle any calls for a free country again.
The Shah was in power until 1979, and then the U.S.
refused to extradite the Shah back to Iran to face criminal charges for murdering Iranians.
And then when The US apparently wasn't happy with the new leadership in Iran from 1980 to 1988.
We armed and funded Iraq for our boy Saddam to engage in that war, where about a million Iranians were killed, and then constant calls since then for regime changes, especially when in 2003, Three, I believe, Iran stopped selling oil exclusively for U.S.
dollars with the petrodollar.
And we know that when Iraq did that and Iraq became overthrown and became a closer U.S.
puppet, that Iraq decided that it was better to trade their oil only with U.S.
dollars.
So there is a lot going on behind the scenes.
And again, a major recommendation is that we, the people, need to demand the arrest of our own leaders Principally for these wars of aggression that have killed about 40 million people since World War II.
Nations that abandon the petrodollar find themselves in the sights of the American military, sad to say.
Susan, your thoughts?
Hi, Jim.
I'm not sure if I can add to what either of you said so brilliantly.
I know that the elites have been trying to promote regime change in Iran for decades now.
It's part of the axis of evil for daring to remove itself from the global system and to try to pursue its self-interest.
I think the long term plan has always been to strike Iran and to have that lead to a type of world war that will allow the elites to consolidate their power over the world.
But I think you both framed the article very well.
I don't know if I could add much more to what you've already said.
Well, I have no doubt that Bibi is striking out against Iran.
Meanwhile, I'm very disappointed that Ron DeSantis, whom I've heretofore admired and thought would be a strong contender for the GOP presidential nomination should Donald Trump choose not to run again, has signed a law banning criticism of Israel with huge ramifications for the First Amendment.
The Santas championed and signed a bill that essentially bans criticism of Israel.
Get this.
2019 HB 741 bans any speech in the public school systems of Florida deemed to be making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews Which is a perfectly reasonable, straightforward anti-Semitism stance, but continues, or the power of Jews as a collective, such as the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government, or other societal institutions.
Well, that's ridiculous.
Even the Jews boast about running Hollywood.
You go through all the lineups, they're all run by Jews.
I have many times reported here about having, you know, images of a hundred executives from CNN.
A hundred executives, every one of whom is a dual U.S.-Israeli citizen.
Another of 100 executives from NBC, every one of which is a dual U.S.-Israeli citizen.
Another of 100 executives from the New York Times, every one of whom is a dual U.S.-Israeli citizen.
Am I thereby violating DeSantis' bill here?
This is outrageous.
HB 741 also bans applying a double standard to Israel by requiring behavior of Israel that is not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation, such as slaughtering the Palestinians in Gaza in the West Bank, Powerful pro-Israel lobbying organizations often push similar measures to shut down criticism of Israel.
Regardless of the political implications of the nation's reputation in America and across the world, Florida's law that narrowly identifies and essentially criminalizes specific political speech in public places is nakedly unconstitutional.
There's no reason I think this law has ever been enforced on any campus.
It would instantly be overthrown by courts, recognizing its violation of First Amendment.
DeSantis has done himself damage.
Meanwhile, even in Texas, another state I have lauded for the way it handled the coronavirus pandemic.
Governor Abbott has proudly signed an anti-BDS legislation into law.
Governor Greg Abbott today signed into law House Bill 89, known as the Anti-BDS Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions Bill, which prohibits all state agencies from contracting with and certain public funds from investing in companies that boycott Israel.
The governor hosted the bill signing at the Jewish Community Center in Austin.
Today also marks Israel's Independence Day.
This is embarrassingly bad, he said.
As Israel's number one trading partner in the United States, Texas is proud to reaffirm its support for the people of Israel and will continue to build on our historic partnership Anti-Israel policies are anti-Texas policies.
We will not tolerate such actions against an important ally.
But this is stunning because this anti-Israel policy bill is anti-American, anti-freedom of speech.
It's outrageous.
He again has discredited himself in the great state of Texas.
Meanwhile, The U.S.
is promising ironclad support for whoever leads Israel, where an opposition coalition formed on Wednesday could bring an end to Bibi Netanyahu's 12-year reign.
The United States said Thursday its ironclad support would remain in place for whoever leads Israel, with a coalition of opposition parties from across the political spectrum seeking to oust Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu after more than a decade in power.
A group of eight parties including some unlikely political allies such as United Arab List reached an agreement Wednesday to form a new coalition government.
Lindsey Graham has announced Israel will be asking for an additional billion in American aid.
Going forward, this is now Lloyd Austin, the Secretary of Defense.
Going forward, we seek lasting security for Israelis and Palestinians alike before pledging to support for a two-state solution of dubious likelihood since the Israelis are so opposed to it.
Meanwhile, while I disagree with Noam Chomsky on many issues on this, I agree 100%.
When Israelis in the occupied territories now claim they have to defend themselves, they are defending themselves in the sense that any military occupier has to defend itself against the population they are crushing.
You can't defend yourself when you're militarily occupying someone else's land.
That's not defense.
Call it what you like.
It's not defense.
Carl, your thoughts?
Yeah, Chomsky really nails it there.
So somebody's claimed the religion is irrelevant to their criminal behaviors, and you have the government in Israel continuing this illegal policy of a war of aggression on the largest concentration camp in world history in Gaza.
These are Crimes Against Humanity.
If you add on to that the documentation of their bombing of schools and electrical plants and water treatments and water, it's Crimes Against Humanity and war crimes.
So again, this is to flip the script and to stop any of this distracting side conversation and to save those lives that are now being blockaded, which is an act of war, Yes, yes.
be slowly starved and tortured all by the choices of the Israeli government with the
criminal complicity of corporate media.
Yes, yes, Susan, your thoughts.
Thank you.
I think the fact that DeSantis is stating what he did, he's showing that the United States is no longer a republic of by and for the people, it's essentially a corporation that is run by the Rothschilds and they're trying to dictate what we can and think and say.
In terms of Israel, Israel was, according to some historians, it was founded illegitimately.
It should have been founded under the leadership of a temple.
It was founded under a Rothschild Knesset.
So the state itself is in violation of the terms of its establishment.
And the Rothschilds and their Venetian networks that they have been representing are determined to have to pursue world conquest in the name of an Anglo-Zionist axis.
They are committing unspeakable crimes in the name of Judaism.
And I think the fact that they're blaming Jews for what they themselves are doing is one of the greatest acts of anti-Semitism, in my opinion.
Yes, yes.
Very well said.
Very well said.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send fan mail, pro or con, to liveneedtoknowatgmail.com.
Liveneedtoknowatgmail.com.
Here's a tweet.
Deception lies, propaganda equals COVID-19.
There's no evidence that's been scientifically produced that COVID-19 exists.
CDC says it's scientific evidence that COVID-19 is not available.
COVID-19 was a paper boogeyman, the kill shot.
COVID-19 inoculation is a perfectly designed killing machine.
That was observed by Sherry Tinpenny about the mRNA vaccines produced by Moderna and Pfizer.
Sad to say.
Hi, Dr. Fetzer.
I'm not the only person who wonders if some of the vaccines are placebos.
One, reduce production costs, and two, reduce apparent rate of adverse events.
Hoping your wife, who's taking the shot, unbeknownst to me, is one of the lucky ones who got the fake shot for the fake pirates.
Re-adverse events.
BitChute Channel, welcome.
TheEagle88 is doing great work picking apart the adverse data.
He downloads raw data every week.
So far, 60% of adverse events Are from jabs administered in December, January, and February, which accounts for only 25% of them given to date.
A viewers is either woefully behind or throttling the data, which sounds more likely.
The recent reports are predominantly the mild effects.
Deaths are removed.
Reports of serious events are not being updated if the patient dies.
Glad to see my favorite pair, Michael Ivey and David Scorpio, back together again.
Keep up the good work, sir.
You are appreciated.
Meanwhile, in terms of freedom of speech and freedom of the press, Amazon.com has banned six of the 12 books we published at moonrockbooks.com, including not only on Sandy Hook, but also on the Boston bombing, the moon landing, Orlando and Dallas, as Charlottesville and Parkland Though the Moon Landing book wasn't banned because of what it has to say about the moon, but the fact that it's got a brilliant set of essays on the Holocaust at the end of World War II, which had to be banned because Israeli political power is rooted in a Western sense of guilt over the Holocaust, which if it were revealed to be propaganda would lose its significance.
Final thoughts, Carl, yours.
Thanks to our audience for speaking up into life.
And the idea that we're in this fog of war is important to embrace.
And that said, VAERS does admit now about 5,000 or over 5,000 American deaths immediately following the so-called vaccine.
And I believe it was about 200,000 serious consequences The European similar database is about 15,000 deaths, and they both claim, or at least various claims that they only receive 1%.
to 10% of the actual data, so that would mean 50,000 to 500,000 dead in the United States from their own model.
So the good news moving forward, again, Arizona is going to finish up their audit, they say a week from today.
You have the AMC squeeze of the hedge funds short selling that stock, which could potentially bankrupt many of the biggest players in the rigged casino that is Wall Street and you have the whole narrative regarding Fauci with the released emails where on one hand he's saying one thing about masks and publicly he's saying another and he's claiming in front of Congress that they've never funded any gain-of-function research while the emails reveal that he did indeed participate in that funding with interest.
So hang in there, keep standing for the truth, and we'll see what develops together.
Susan, your final thoughts?
As usual, Carl is very articulate.
I also second his thoughts.
I think that vigilance is the price of liberty.
We've lost a lot of our liberty in the United States, and we are going to have to undergo the process of reclaiming our republic.
That can be done through transparency, through Really getting down to the facts and finding the truth about how we lost our republic.
And then once we do uncover the facts, which are coming out, and Dr. Fetzer is a key player in helping that information come forward.
Once we reclaim our republic, we are going to have to, you know, fight to keep it.
And I think vigilance is going to be a key point how that happens.
Well, I can't thank Carl Herman and Susan Bradford enough for excellent points throughout.
This entire episode reveals our Constitution was a superb document.
The First and the Second Amendment are absolutely vital to have a living republic in which citizens are actually free and capable of expressing their mind.
Look at all the censorship from the beginning to the end of Facebook.
Wanting to silence Trump.
And then you have even the governors of Florida and Texas wanting to suppress the right of the American citizen to speak their own mind.
The face of Amazon banning my books is outrageous.
Well, my case hopefully will be heard by the Wisconsin Supreme Court.
And if it does, then again, if all goes in accordance with the law and the evidence, strike a blow on behalf of freedom of the press and freedom of speech.
May it come to pass.
Meanwhile, thank you all for joining us.
Export Selection