Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

April 23, 2021 - Jim Fetzer

01:57:14

The Raw Deal (23 April 2021): The Conviction of Derek Chauvin & latest shooting in Columbus, Ohio

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	["When You Attend a Funeral"]
	And you may have thought it tragic not to mention other adjectives to think of all the weeping they will do.
	But don't you worry.
	No more ashes, no more sackcloth.
	And in our band made of black cloth, we'll someday nevermore adorn a sleeve.
	For it's the bum that drops on you, gets your friends and neighbors too.
	There'll be nobody left behind to grieve, and we will all go together when we go.
	What a comforting fact that is to know.
	Universal bereavement, an inspiring achievement.
	Yes, we all will go together when we go.
	We will all go together when we go.
	All suffused with an incandescent glow.
	We'll have the insurance to collect on his insurance.
	Lloyds of London will be loaded when they go.
	We will all fry together when we fry.
	We'll be French fries, potatoes, fry and fry.
	There will be no more misery when the world is our rotisserie.
	Yes, we all will fry together when we fry.
	We will all bake together when we bake.
	There'll be nobody present at the wake With complete participation in that grand incineration Nearly three billion hunks of well-done steak We will all char together when we char And let there be no moaning of the bar Just sing out a tedium when you see that ICBM And the party will become as you are This is Jim Fetzer, your host on The Raw Deal, where today I'm going to review the most recent developments in relation to the Eric Chauvin trial.
	There are so many absurdities involved here that it's unbelievable and a disgrace to the United States, a situation in which we find ourselves.
	For example, We have a showman juror who feared people coming to my house if they were not happy with the verdict.
	I did not want to go through rioting and destruction again.
	This shows a role of intimidation upon the jurors.
	The juror, Lisa Christian said, also revealed how the riots that broke out at Brooklyn Center in the middle of the trial were right by her home.
	Let me say, by the way, this was the case of the alleged shooting of Daunte Rise.
	I have already reported on it, but let me reiterate, for those who may have missed the memo, that appears to have been a completely staged event.
	We had this young man who was stopped.
	A large black officer sought to put handcuffs on him but failed to close the door to his vehicle.
	For some reason, he fumbled with the manacles and the guy got back in the car.
	A woman, a policewoman with 26 years of experience said, Taser, taser, taser.
	And then claimed she fired what she thought was her taser.
	But we hear no sound of any shot.
	We see no recoil.
	The weapon doesn't automatically reload.
	Meanwhile, she steps back as he drives off and says, shit, I shot it.
	And the officers, the fellow officers say, what?
	Because they didn't hear any shot.
	Because there was no shot.
	And let me add, Had this young man, Daunte Wright, been shot from such a close distance, the bullet would have caused massive internal injuries.
	He could not have driven off.
	Everything about this is fraudulent and just for background.
	Let me remind those who may be unaware.
	Officers carry their handgun on the side of their handedness.
	In other words, if you're right-handed, your handgun's on your right side, your taser on the left.
	If you're left-handed, vice versa.
	The fact is that the handgun is heavy, made of metal.
	Tasers are light, made of plastic.
	They're even usually yellow or orange.
	In other words, it's ridiculous, simply ridiculous, to think this woman mistook her handgun for her taser.
	This is just completely ridiculous.
	Meanwhile, here we have the juror By the name of Christensen saying, when I came home, I could hear the helicopters flying over my house.
	I could hear the flashbangs going off.
	If I stepped outside, I could see the smoke from the grenade.
	One day, the trial ran a little late, and I had trouble getting to my house because the protesters were blocking the interstate.
	So I had to go way around, way around.
	This is the clearest picture yet of the terroristic intimidation jurors face to ensure Chauvin was found guilty in what was fundamentally a rigged show trial.
	That it was not moved out of Minneapolis was a sick joke, but since Charlottesville, this has become the new norm.
	Let me just tell you a bit about Charlottesville, on which I have also done a great deal of research.
	And by the way, If you go on my BitChute channel, you can find fake news on five fronts.
	Sandy Hook, Boston, Charlottesville, Las Vegas, and JFK.
	In Charlottesville, there were two different cars, both Dodge Challengers.
	One had a racing stripe, one didn't.
	One had a sunroof, one didn't.
	Two different drivers.
	The James Field, 20, the diagnosed schizophrenic wearing thick prescription glasses, but another Also absurdly supposed to be named James Field, who was in command of a battalion of reservists in Ohio, 32 years old, who was actually driving the car.
	We had two or three different takes.
	You got one take where there's a vehicle all by itself, nothing around it.
	You got another take where the vehicle is crashing into the back of two vans that were parked there.
	And if you take a close look, you'll see there were no drivers in either of the vans because they knew they were just props and didn't want anyone to get whiplash or a neck injury from the collision.
	When the guy backed out from after hitting the van, I was astonished at the skill with which he drove that car backwards.
	It would befit a NASCAR driver.
	Then we have a third, which was actually published on the cover of the New York Times.
	We have the car, but also a black Toyota pickup truck just to the right.
	And you have figures flying through the air.
	Stuntmen.
	Absolute stuntmen.
	And by the way, I was so outraged about all this, I sent it to the members of the Department of History at the University of Virginia, thinking they might give a damn about contemporary events in their own city, where I had taught at Virginia UVA, Mr. Jefferson's university, twice as a visiting associate professor, In 1977-78, and then they brought me back as a visiting full in, as I recall, spring semester of 1982.
	So I have great affection for the institution.
	No one responded.
	I sent the similar.
	These are videos of what was taking place and exposing the fraud to the president of the university, the provost, the vice provost, and members of the city council.
	One member of the city council seemed intrigued, but when I invited him to come on my show for us to discuss it, he declined.
	It's completely outrageous.
	And the other aspects that were fake you'll find if you check out Fake News on Five Fronts.
	They claim that a state police helicopter crashed and two police officers, state troopers, died.
	But we have footage of them walking away from the crash site.
	They were perfectly fine, alive and well.
	Rumors of their death were greatly exaggerated.
	But of course, the mainstream will never come clean and report these matters.
	From Care 11, a station in Minneapolis.
	I wish it didn't have to happen.
	Alternate juror reflects on Derek Chauvin trial.
	Minneapolis.
	A woman who sat as an alternate on the jury that found Derek Chauvin guilty in George Floyd's murder is speaking out about what it was like to parse through nearly three weeks of testimony in the former Minneapolis officer's high-profile trial.
	Brooklyn Center resident Lisa Christensen told KARE 11's Lou Raguse about her role on the jury as another police killing unfolded in her neighborhood.
	Another fake stage.
	And I'll review the bidding about George Floyd and why it's preposterous that this man was found guilty.
	Christensen, who lives in the city where a white officer, the woman with 23 years experience, shot and killed a 20-year-old black man during a traffic stop this month, said that if she'd been part of the liberation, she would have found Chauvin guilty.
	But Christensen had no idea that she was one of two alternates until the judges dismissed her right before the 12 jurors were sequestered.
	She's asked, did you want to be a juror, Christiansen?
	I had mixed feelings.
	There was a question on the questionnaire about it, and I put I did not know.
	The reason at that time was I did not know what the outcome was going to be, so I felt like either way you're going to disappoint one group or the other.
	I did not want to go through rioting and destruction again, and I was concerned about people coming to my house if they were not happy with a verdict.
	Raguse, there was another police shooting in your hometown during the trial.
	Did that impact you at all?
	Christensen, it did not impact me as far as a trial went.
	However, only being about six blocks from the police department, I could hear everything.
	When I came home, I could hear the helicopters flying over my house.
	I could hear the flashbangs going off.
	If I stepped outside, I could see the smoke from the grenades.
	One day, the trial ran a little late, and I had trouble getting to my house because the protesters were blocking the interstate, so I had to go way around.
	I was aware, but it did not affect me at all.
	There's no reason to assume her fears were unique.
	All the jurors who ultimately ruled on the case were facing similar threats.
	Here's a tweet from Henry K. Lee.
	Vandals hurl decapitated pigs at an animal blood at one time home of former Santa Rosa police officer Barry Broad, who recently testified for the defense in the former Minneapolis PD officer Derek Chauvin's murder trial and the death of George Floyd.
	Hand statue at Santa Rosa Plaza hit too.
	I mean, give me a break.
	Here's another tweet from the same source.
	It's potential that they freshly slaughtered a pig to accomplish this, per J.R.
	Knuckler, L.T.
	Reeve Vandals hurling pig head and blood at one-time home of ex-Santa Rosa police officer Barry Broad, who defended ex-Minneapolis PD officer Derek Chauvin's conduct in the George Floyd case.
	Judge Peter Cahill threatened twice to declare a mistrial but refused to follow through, no doubt out of fear, and ultimately knelt before the mob.
	This is frankly embarrassingly bad what's going on here.
	Let me explain to those who may have missed the memo how it's obvious to me that the case against Derek Chauvin having brought about the death of George Floyd is far weaker than the case for George Floyd having accidentally overdosed on drugs and thereby brought about his own demise.
	You may recall he was sitting in a vehicle with his drug dealer who took the Fifth Amendment and was not Did not testify during the trial, but who had given George Floyd drugs to add to his other list of miscreant activities.
	I mean, this is a guy been in and out of jail multiple times.
	He'd been, you know, one of his arrests was a home invasion where he pointed a gun at a pregnant woman's stomach.
	I mean, give me a break.
	This guy is really quite disgusting.
	He was being apprehended for passing a counterfeit $20 bill.
	He had the drugs in his possession when the police came, so brilliantly he swallowed them.
	We even have video played by the defense saying, I ate too many drugs.
	That's actually the most important evidence in the entire case.
	I ate Too many drugs.
	To my astonishment, the officer who was on the witness seat at the time claimed he couldn't make out the words.
	But if I could make out the words when I didn't have direct access to the recording in front of me, as did he, how could he not make out the words?
	Here's the deal.
	Using mules to transport drugs like cocaine, they're often put into rubbers.
	Trojans.
	You know, I mean, they put them into rubbers and then insert them up the rectum of the mule.
	So they're carrying around in their intestines these massive doses of drugs, say cocaine or heroin.
	And if it should happen, the rubber breaks and they die an agonizing death from a drug overdose.
	Well, George Floyd did a similar thing by eating too many drugs.
	He ate the evidence.
	He didn't want to be arrested with it, so he ate the evidence.
	Now, this is a big guy.
	He's at least 6'3".
	He could be larger.
	I would say, you know, at least 250 pounds.
	He struggled with the officers.
	He didn't want to be put in the squad car, but get this also of great importance.
	He said, I can't breathe a total of 18 times, but most importantly, before he was ever placed
	on the ground.
	Before he was ever placed on the ground, he was saying, I can't breathe.
	The explanation for which is relatively obvious if you understand the effects of a drug overdose.
	It shuts down your respiratory system.
	What George Floyd was saying is, I can't breathe, was that the effect of a massive drug overdose was overwhelming his ability to breathe.
	We even have the toxicology report.
	We have an alternative autopsy report that George Floyd died from a massive overdose of fentanyl, methamphetamines, and even cannabis.
	Though I doubt very much the cannabis had anything to do with it.
	I've yet to hear of anyone who overdosed from smoking marijuana.
	I mean, it's just ridiculous.
	Meanwhile, We have the claim by the prosecution that Derek Chauvin had put his knee on George Floyd neck and thereby restricted his airway.
	But think about it.
	There's a carotid artery on both sides of the neck.
	If Derek Chauvin's knee had actually been on George Floyd's neck, it might have obstructed the blood flow from one carotid artery on the right, but not from the other on the left.
	Not only that, but he was lying prone.
	I do agree that the officer may have continued to hold his knee on George Floyd, Longer than necessary, but get this.
	Number one, the Minneapolis Police Department is trained to use this technique to subdue uncooperative suspects.
	And number two, even the judge corrected the prosecution from declaring the knee was on the neck because it was actually further back, like on his shoulder, on his shoulder.
	Now, bear in mind, in order to reach a conviction in this case, the jurors have to have been convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that Derek Chauvin brought about the death of George Floyd.
	Okay, beyond a reasonable doubt.
	And that pauses to cause reflection on the meaning of the phrase beyond a reasonable doubt.
	What that means, properly understood, is no alternative explanation is reasonable.
	But that was not the case in this instance.
	We have an alternative explanation that was reasonable indeed.
	I submit far more reasonable than the claim that Derek Chauvin brought about the death of George Floyd.
	He himself said it.
	I ate too many drugs.
	In my opinion, the consequences of this trial were completely indefensible in terms of law and evidence.
	But, just as the juror, who turned out to be an alternate, was explaining, there was a great deal of intimidation.
	The city of Minneapolis awarded the George Floyd family $27 million as the jurors were being selected.
	Well, that certainly conveys the impression that the city of Minneapolis believes the city of Minneapolis did something wrong, to wit that its police officer did something wrong.
	Why else would the city be giving $27 million to the family?
	Number two, it was just as the prosecution was ending its case that we have this completely fabricated shooting in Brooklyn Center, a suburb nearby, which led to a great deal of rioting and protest.
	As the alternate juror has explained.
	And third, you had this fake President of the United States declaring he was praying for the right outcome, for the right verdict, which in his opinion obviously was that Derek Chauvin should be found guilty.
	The fact that the judge didn't move the trial to a different jurisdiction is beyond belief.
	The fact that the judge didn't sequester the jury is ridiculous and indefensible.
	Even the judge acknowledged, in relation to Maxine Waters, coming to incite the crowd if the wrong verdict were rendered, that her reprehensible behavior had given the defense grounds for an appeal.
	I fully expect this verdict is going to be reversed on appeal.
	But there's more than the politicalization of the law, which appears to be going on across the country.
	We have these absurd situations such as a Jussie Smollett incident in Chicago, where this woman named Fox, who's
	a district attorney, dismisses the charges, even though they have a cast iron
	case against Jussie Smollett for faking a hate crime, where the two alleged rednecks who assaulted him at around 230
	in the morning as he was coming out of a subway on what was then the coldest morning
	or night in Chicago that year, carrying a bottle of bleach which would have been frozen solid in a noose.
	I mean, ask yourself, how many rednecks are going to be wandering around Chicago at 2.30 a.m.
	carrying a bottle of bleach and a noose to find a gay black actor coming out of a subway?
	I mean, there's this preposterous on his face.
	Turns out they were two Nigerian bodybuilders.
	One was Jussie Smollett's personal trainer.
	The other was an extra on the set where he was this star of sorts, Empire.
	He paid him with a personal check.
	He paid him with a personal check for $3,500.
	I mean, you couldn't have a more rock-solid case, and yet Kim Fox dismissed the case, where it turns out Kim Fox regards Kamala Harris as her mentor, where the whole event appears to have been a stunt.
	That Kamala Harris can try with Jussie Smollett, who turns out to be her nephew, who had been out on a campaign trial with Kamala because she and Cory Booker had a bill before the Senate, an anti-lynching bill that no one thought was appropriate or necessary, so that they needed a little extra boost, a political stunt.
	That would give the public a reason to think, oh, wow, maybe we need this after all, where she was immediately referring to this as a modern-day lynching.
	Well, I'm telling you, the quantity of bullshit coming out of the Democrats these days is simply overwhelming.
	We're all going to smother, suffocate, and drown.
	There is so much bullshit sweeping across this nation, embarrassingly bad.
	And guess what?
	They are treating the George Floyd, the area where George Floyd died, as what is supposed to be a kind of a sanctuary.
	Listen to this from Zero Hedge.
	George Floyd Autonomous Zone issues rules for white people.
	The George Floyd Autonomous Zone in Minneapolis has issued a list of rules for white people that they have to abide by in order to enter the area.
	Now, this is a public space!
	This is a public highway!
	This is paid for by the taxpayers!
	And we're being told that you have to abide by special rules?
	The zone has popped up around the area that Floyd died and has come to resemble something akin to a religious cult encampment.
	Apparently, baptism, miracles, and other spiritual events can be witnessed taking place in this area.
	I mean, entering the area as a white person comes with potential risks if you make the mistake of behaving in a problematic manner, however.
	All visitors are asked to wear face masks and act with humility, but a lengthier set of rules for white people explains how they'll be treated differently.
	I mean, give me a break.
	How they'll be treated differently.
	Whites are asked to de-center yourself, which is a euphemism for a mandate to behave like second-class citizens and keep quiet.
	Be mindful of whether your volume, pace, and movements are supporting or undermining your efforts to de-center yourself, states the advisory.
	The patronizing tone continues with a demand to contribute to the energy of the space rather than drain it.
	The rules also state white people should seriously consider whether taking photos is appropriate and seek consent from anyone they photograph, despite the whole area being public.
	The rules encourage whites to intervene if they witness white folks doing problematic things, which presumably include doing anything other than engaging in slavish worship for the 21st century deity, George Floyd.
	Black Lives Matter groups routinely issue demands of white people for their events, some of which enforce outright segregation.
	A group of White Lives Matter protesters in Minneapolis, for example, were caught on camera telling a white liberal ally, you're white, you don't belong, and demanding that he leave the area.
	Meanwhile, Black Lives Matter and mobs descended on diners in New York, telling the white restaurant owners to get the F out of the city that you don't belong here.
	And get this, a Minneapolis City Council candidate and former city employee encourages the rioters to burn down wealthy neighborhoods.
	Get this, Margarita Rita Ortega wrote on her personal Facebook page that the poor community is not your oppressors, claimed that the wealthy community of Lake of the Isles has more than needed.
	Prior to running for city council, she was a policy aide at the Minneapolis City Hall, spent 10 years in city government.
	In a subsequent post, she doubled down, saying that wealthy neighborhoods have the insurance and means to rebuild.
	Division has been created and continues not by my hands.
	I'm not the greedy one living in million-dollar mansions while people are sleeping in tents.
	We'll be right back.
	Freedom Slips.com We'll be right back.
	Freedom Slips.com Management would like to take a moment to thank the listeners and hosts for all their support.
	Revolution Radio is one of the biggest platforms for free speech in an ever-growing dark world of censorship.
	Unfortunately, this platform for free speech has never been free.
	We need the support of the people.
	It is the people like you, yes, you, that keeps the station in the front lines of the battle against tyranny and oppression.
	Please help support Revolution Radio so free speech will not be silenced in a world that seems to be going deaf to the real truth.
	With your support, we will be able to become an even bigger pillar of light in a dark world.
	Revolution Radio.
	FreedomSubs.com.
	The number one listener supported radio station on the planet.
	Revolution Radio.
	Hey everyone!
	It's Barbara Jean Lindsay, The Cosmic Oracle.
	If you have questions about your past lives or future plans, need answers from the cosmos about your love life or career, or just want to keep your finger on the pulse of the planet, check out my show, The Cosmic Oracle, here on Revolution Radio at freedomslips.com.
	Was it a conspiracy?
	Did you know that the police in Boston were broadcasting, this is a drill, this is a drill, on bullhorns during the marathon?
	That the Boston Globe was tweeting that a demonstration bomb would be set off during the marathon for the benefit of bomb squad activities.
	And that one would be set off in one minute in front of the library, which happened as the Globe had announced.
	Peering through the smoke, you could see bodies with missing arms and legs, but there was no blood.
	The blood only showed up later and came out of a tube.
	They used amputee actors and a studio quality smoke machine.
	Don't let yourself be played.
	Check out And Nobody Died in Boston, either.
	Available at moonrockbooks.com.
	That's boomrockbooks.com.
	♪♪ -♪ O'er the hills and over the waters ♪
	-♪ O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave ♪ -♪ O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave? ♪
	-♪ Hail to the brave, hail to the brave, hail to the brave! ♪
	Join Revolution Radio every Wednesday 8 p.m.
	Eastern Time on Studio B for Momotaro Zen with host Zen Rassia at freedomstep.com, the people station.
	The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests,
	and calling listeners or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
	They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff, or affiliates.
	You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, 100% listener-supported radio, and now we
	return you to your host.
	This is Jim Fetzer, your host on The Raw Deal, where I will be taking callers a second, however
	540-352-4452. 540-352-4452. Meanwhile, it's fairly astonishing that Nancy Pelosi has been
	extolling the virtues of George Floyd without mentioning any of the following.
	George Floyd moved to Minneapolis in 2014 after being released from prison in Houston, Texas, following an arrest for aggravated battery.
	Aggravated robbery.
	I believe that means that the person who was being robbed was injured in the process.
	On May 25, 2020, Floyd was arrested for passing a counterfeit $20 bill at a grocery store in Minneapolis.
	It was under the influence of fentanyl and methamphetamines at the time of his arrest.
	Floyd has more than a decade old criminal history at the time of the arrest and has gone to jail at least five times.
	George Floyd was also the ringleader of a violent home invasion.
	He pled guilty to entering a woman's home, pointing a gun at her stomach.
	She was pregnant at the time, by the way, and searching the home for drugs and money.
	Floyd was sentenced to 10 months in state jail for possession of cocaine in a December 2005 arrest.
	He had previously been sentenced to eight months for the same offense, stemming from an October 2002 arrest.
	He was also arrested in 2002 for criminal trespass and served 30 days in jail.
	He had another stint for a theft back in August of 1998.
	And bear in mind, and I've seen frames from it to confirm it, he also was an actor in porn movies.
	I mean, this is quite a guy for Nancy Pelosi to be elevating as a good man, a father, a husband.
	I mean, it's ridiculous beyond belief.
	So what we have is a Speaker of the House really insulting the American people by spewing out utter garbage about one of these manufactured cases that is intended to promote the Democrat agenda Of confiscating our guns, have no doubt.
	That's what this is all about.
	Well, how does AOC respond?
	Not justice.
	AOC says of the Chauvin guilty verdict, this is not resolution.
	AOC argued it's not justice.
	George Floyd should be at home with his family and that a single trial isn't a substitute for policy change.
	They're very vague on exactly what policy changes they want.
	I mean, the situation is just ridiculous.
	Do they really want to abolish law enforcement in the United States?
	Why are they not reporting that in Chicago, for example, since they moved to New York City, for example, since they moved to defund the police, rapes have gone up 400%.
	That's right.
	In New York City, in the wake of defunding the police, getting the police off the street where they otherwise would be taking a proactive role, Rapes alone are up 400%.
	Well, that's something Bill de Blasio and his wife, who appears to be some kind of communist radical, who has been benefiting at the public trough by using money that the mayor apparently is making available to her, Money that came from the taxpayer to promote her extremist ideology has done such damage to the once greatest city in the world that it's mind-boggling.
	Here we have a tweet.
	This isn't just as AOC says in an Instagram live.
	Justice is George Floyd going home to his family tonight.
	Well, maybe if he weren't passing counterfeit 20s and dealing drugs, you know, maybe if he weren't suffering already from a massive drug overdose, that would actually, in my opinion, take his life.
	There might be some merit, but what AOC is talking about here is just loony tunes.
	This is so removed from reality.
	There's nothing founded in fact about these assertions.
	I don't want this to be framed as a system working, because it's not working.
	It's really important that this verdict is not used as a replacement for policy change.
	In other words, the Democrats are frustrated that Derek Chauvin was found guilty.
	And according to AOC, it's not justice.
	Justice, she continues, is Adam Toledo getting tucked in by his mom tonight.
	Justice is when you're pulled over, not being a gun that's part of that interaction because you have a headlight out.
	Well, this Adam Toledo was a shooting where this kid was out at 2.30 in the morning.
	He wasn't being touched by his mom.
	He was like a 13-year-old kid who apparently just threw the gun he had in his possession over the fence so it wouldn't be evidence against him, just as George Floyd ate the drugs he had in his possession so they wouldn't be used as evidence against him.
	But where this alleged additional shooting to which she refers in Brooklyn Center was completely staged, where the officer is supposed to have mistaken her taser for her handgun.
	I mean, think about it.
	Anyone who's ever held a handgun?
	No, they're relatively heavy in general.
	I mean, a normal standard Glock, what have you, Smith & Wesson, normally heavy, solid metal.
	Tasers are even usually made out of plastic.
	And as I observed already, they're typically orange or red.
	I see no way in which a 26-year-old veteran could have possibly mistaken her handgun for her taser.
	That is completely absurd.
	AOC continues.
	Justice is your school system not having or being part of a school-to-prison pipeline.
	Justice is a municipality and a government that does not, because it trickles downright, value military and armaments more than healthcare and education and housing.
	Well, look, that's what we have elected representatives in Congress for, to adopt policies.
	If she wants to put more money into health care, education, and housing, that's just fine.
	She certainly has a right to do it.
	And if she wants to vote for fewer expenditures for military and armaments, that's fine too.
	But here's what she continues.
	So no, this verdict is not just as frankly, I don't even think we call it full accountability, because there are multiple officers who were there.
	And indeed, there were three other officers who are all going to be standing trial.
	What does AOC think?
	She can snap her fingers and these individuals be found guilty?
	As I've already explained, the evidence is, in my opinion, far more substantial on the side that Jordan Floyd brought about his own death by a massive drug overdose than that he was killed or that his death was precipitated by Derek Chauvin's knee.
	Here we have her continuing.
	It wasn't just Derek Chauvin.
	And I also don't want this moment to be framed as a system working because it's not working.
	What?
	Not working?
	She also tweeted Tuesday that a family had to lose a son, brother, and father, that a teenage girl had to film and post a murder that millions across the country had to organize and march just for George Floyd to be seen and valued is not justice.
	Well, look, the guy's a petty criminal.
	I mean, what other?
	How else should we deal with petty criminals?
	It appears that AOC only thinks it's justice if petty criminals are allowed to do all they want.
	Burglaries, assault and battery, drug dealing.
	Here's another tweet from AOC.
	That a family had to lose a son, brother, and father.
	That a teenage girl had to film and post a murder that millions across the country had to organize and march just for George Floyd to be seen and valued as not justice.
	And this verdict is not a substitute for policy change.
	By the way, Brett Favre, whom I've long admired, you know, a terrific guy, quarterback, wonderful guy, decent human being.
	Made the observation that he did not believe Derek Chauvin intended to kill George Floyd.
	And the social media went after him, hammers and tongs, tarred and feathered.
	They want to ride him out of town on a rail.
	But look at this.
	Here's a report from ABC News.
	Breaking.
	Derek Chauvin found guilty in all three counts in the death of George Floyd.
	Listen to count one.
	Second degree murder.
	Unintentional killing while committing a felony.
	So even on the most serious offense of which he was committed, in my opinion, wrongly, second-degree murder, what Brett Favre said is true.
	He wasn't found guilty of intentional murder, but of unintentional killing.
	That means he didn't mean to kill him.
	But it's while committing a felony.
	The felony, no doubt, is doing, you know, excessive application of force and apprehending of suspect.
	Count two, third degree murder.
	Perpetrating an imminently dangerous act and evincing a depraved mind.
	Well, how can he be found guilty of that when Minneapolis police are instructed to use this technique of the knee on the back, knee on the shoulder, or possibly even knee on the neck to subdue an uncooperative suspect?
	How can that be indicative of a depraved mind?
	I'm inclined to think, yeah, he didn't have to keep the knee down so long, but look, in my judgment, this guy George Floyd had already done himself in.
	I mean, it's ridiculous.
	And we have count three, second-degree manslaughter, culpable negligence, cheating, creating unreasonable risk, culpable negligence, creating unreasonable risk.
	Okay, we can debate.
	Maybe Derek Chauvin was guilty of second-degree manslaughter, but the idea that he was guilty of second-degree murder or third-degree murder, in my opinion, is simply ridiculous.
	Meanwhile, Republicans called for the expulsion of Maxine Waters because she was there inciting, saying, stay on the streets.
	If Derek Chauvin is not convicted, we got to get more confrontational.
	This was completely outrageous.
	Ted Cruz accused Waters of actively encouraging riots and violence, which is unmistakably the case.
	Representative Lauren Barbart tweeted, why is Maxine Waters traveling to a different state trying to incite a riot?
	What good can come from this?
	Representative Ken Buck wrote, Why is a sitting member of Congress encouraging protesters to get confrontational?
	House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy stated, This weekend in Minnesota, Maxine Waters broke the law by violating curfew and then incited violence.
	Speaker Pelosi is ignoring Waters' behavior.
	That's why I'm introducing a resolution to censure Representative Waters for these dangerous comments.
	Speaker Pelosi replied to these concerns by claiming Waters did not need to apologize.
	Pelosi stated Maxine talked about confrontation in the manner of the Civil Rights Movement.
	Notable quotes?
	We're looking for a guilty verdict and we're looking to see if all the talk that took place and has been taking place after they saw what happened to George Floyd.
	If nothing does not happen, then we know we got to not only stay in the street, but we've got to fight for justice.
	Maxine Waters.
	Maxine Waters is inciting violence in Minneapolis just as she has incited it in the past.
	If Speaker Pelosi doesn't act against this dangerous rhetoric, I will bring action this week.
	House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy.
	Meanwhile, a flash poll showed the vast majority agreed with the guilty verdict conducted in a three-hour window following the announcement The vast majority of Americans agreed with the jury's conclusion.
	In an Ipsos poll conducted for USA Today, 71% of respondents said they agree with the finding that Chauvin was guilty.
	62% said they plan on simply accepting the verdict with no further action.
	Although higher numbers of Democrats and Independents agreed with the guilty verdict, 85% and 71% respectively.
	55% of Republicans agreed as well.
	The public, however, was divided on his motivation.
	40% saying he was guilty of murder, which of course has to be deliberate.
	To commit murder, you have to bring about the death of a person and have done so intentionally.
	That was your aim, your goal, or your objective.
	While 32% said his actions amounted to negligence, 11% viewed them as an accident.
	Not surprisingly, perceptions of Chauvin's motivation broke down along partisan lines.
	51% of Democrats, 41% of Independents, saying his conduct amounted to murder, while only 26% of Republicans said the same.
	But across the board, 61% of Democrats, Republicans, and Independents all said they plan on accepting the verdict without taking any further action.
	Among Democrats, 25% said they would accept the verdict and participate in marches and rallies going forward, while only 15% of Republicans said the same.
	Still, 20% of Republicans said they rejected the verdict, but only 5% both rejected the verdict and planned a protest.
	Meanwhile, Alan Dershowitz predicts Derek Chauvin's conviction will be overturned, citing Maxine Waters and Al Sharpton, predicting the U.S.
	Supreme Court will ultimately hear the case.
	Speaking on Newsmax TV, Dershowitz declared that Chauvin's actions were inexcusable morally, but called the verdict very questionable, citing outside influences.
	In fact, Dershowitz declared the verdict should be overturned on appeal.
	The verdict is very questionable because of the outside influence from people like Al Sharpton and Maxine Waters.
	Their threats and intimidation, and hanging the sword of Damocles over the jury, basically saying, if you don't convict on the murder charge or all charges, the cities will burn, the country will be destroyed, seeped into the jury room because the judge made a terrible mistake by not sequestering the jury.
	I think it should be reversed on appeal.
	Despite the amount of attention his trial received, the jury was only fully sequestered on Monday when closing arguments took place, not prior.
	Because they were not sequestered for the duration of the trial, open to outside voices threatening protest and violence, Dershowitz said it would be inconceivable to think the jurors were not consciously or subconsciously weighing the impact Their decision would have on society as indeed we've just heard reported by one of the jurors who wound up being an alternate but who nevertheless was reporting accurately how she felt about it.
	She didn't want them coming to her house.
	That should never, ever be allowed to seep into a jury room, Dershowitz said, adding he has no confidence the verdict was produced by due process and the rule of law.
	He predicted Chauvin's case will ultimately heard by the US Supreme Court, which he said
	would be Chauvin's best hope for a conviction reversal.
	No doubt judging the Minnesota Supreme Court and the Minnesota Appellate Court are going
	to be amenable to similar influences since all these events took place in Minnesota.
	Citing Maxine Waters and Al Sharpton, Dershowitz said, these folks took what they did right
	out of the playbook of the Deep South in the 1920s, when prominent public officials would
	whoop up the crowds in front of the courthouse, demanding the conviction of black people and
	the acquittal of whites.
	The Supreme Court and other courts reversed convictions based on that, because jurors should not be intimidated or influenced by what goes on outside the courtroom.
	Specifically, Dershowitz also cited the infamous Sam Shepard murder trial in the 1950s, where Shepard was convicted of murdering his wife, but was exonerated a decade later.
	The Supreme Court ultimately determined Shepard had been deprived of a fair trial because the jury was tainted by media attention that engulfed the case.
	He also said Judge Cahill, who presided, supports his hypothesis.
	On Monday, Cahill castigated Waters for urging protesters to get more confrontational if Chauvin were not found guilty.
	You got to make sure that they know we mean business, Waters said.
	Cahill said, this is the judge himself.
	Waters' comments could be used by the defense in an appeal to argue for mistrial.
	I will give you that Congresswoman Waters may have given you something on appeal that would result in this whole trial being overturned, Cahill said, after denying the defense motion for a mistrial.
	This goes back to what I've been saying from the beginning.
	I wish elected officials would stop talking about this case, specifically in a manner that is disrespectful to the rule of law and to the judicial branch in our function.
	The judge added, I think if they want to give their opinions, they should do so in a respectful manner that is consistent with their oath to the Constitution and respect a co-equal branch of government, meaning the judiciary.
	Their failure to do so is abhorrent.
	Meanwhile, of course, if you look into death from asphyxiation, it involves the occlusion or blockage of blood vessels in the neck causing an interruption of cerebral blood flow.
	This is as in the case of a person being hanged by the neck until dead.
	But as I've already pointed out, Even if it were to obstruct the major artery on the right side of his neck, it did not obstruct the major artery on the left side of his neck, and therefore it appears to me to have been impossible that this could have brought about the asphyxiation of George Floyd.
	There's a wonderful piece, by the way, an American thinker about why Maxine Waters wanted a mistrial for Derek Chauvin.
	I'll report a part of this before the break.
	Be glad to take your calls and add more as we proceed.
	When Maxine Waters called for people in the streets of Minnesota to be more active and confrontational if Derek Chauvin were to be acquitted, like many, I thought she had handed a gift to the Defense on Appeal.
	In some ways, she did.
	We all heard Judge Cahill describe her behavior as abhorrent.
	And while he didn't think their remarks mattered in terms of the evidence and jury deliberations, he was unequivocal that her actions likely provided the defense with a basis for a mistrial at the appellate level and could well result in the case being thrown out.
	Why, if that's what he thought, didn't the judge declare a mistrial himself?
	Some might say it's because he didn't want to try the case again, but I think he didn't want to be that guy responsible for letting Chauvin off the hook and reaping the wrath of a good part of the country that had long promised to burn it all down.
	Why bear that burden himself and potentially subject his family to violence when it's so much easier to pass the buck to the appellate court?
	We also have to question why someone as politically experienced as Maxine Waters would so brazenly deliver a message of incitement, knowing the optics and, more importantly, that her words and conduct would only serve the interests of the defense.
	And claiming that this was a textbook intimidation of both judge and jury.
	Why would a ruthless, calculating, lifelong, professional, left-wing shit-kicker like Waters knowingly cross state lines to, if not incite, certainly agitate for, continued unrest on America's streets?
	Get this, because without an acquittal or a mistrial, either of which would unquestionably have given rise to increased violence, Representative Waters and most Democrats actually want the bedlam to continue.
	After all, racializing everything by pointing fingers at the strong men of white supremacy, white privilege, and the conveniently invisible and unmeasurable, suspending structural and internalized variants of racism is a bread and butter of the Democrats.
	Without it, they have no raison d'etre, no reason to exist.
	It's really outrageous what has taken place here.
	The ugly underbelly of jury tampering and intimidation was all at work here.
	Completely outrageous and disgusting.
	I want to reiterate again that I'm inviting your calls.
	You have the number 540-352-4452.
	the number 540-352-4452.
	What do the Democrats want?
	If we abolish the police, we're going to see crimes of every kind soar.
	They're going to increase, just as we've already had a 400% increase in rapes in New York City.
	We're going to have the same thing happen across the country.
	There are going to be more murders, more rapes, more robberies, more crimes of every kind.
	I mean, remember, the thin blue line is what really separates us as a civilized society from utter lawlessness, every man for himself.
	And while we may have had something akin to that in the Wild West, so-called, everyone was armed.
	This is why every one of you Must arm yourselves to prepare for the worst if the Democrats get their way, because you won't have the police to protect you.
	That's the message.
	Don't miss it.
	Don't make that mistake.
	Meanwhile, you're welcome to call in 540-352-4452.
	I'll be glad to feel your questions and comments after the break.
	Thank you.
	Listen to Revolution Radio at freedomslist.com.
	We'll be right back after this message.
	Was it a conspiracy?
	Did you know that the police in Boston were broadcasting, this is a drill, this is a drill, on bullhorns during the marathon?
	That the Boston Globe was tweeting that a demonstration bomb would be set off during the marathon for the benefit of bomb squad activities.
	And that one would be set off in one minute in front of the library, which happened as the Globe had announced.
	Peering through the smoke, you could see bodies with missing arms and legs.
	But there was no blood.
	The blood only showed up later and came out of a tube.
	They used amputee actors and a studio-quality smoke machine.
	Don't let yourself be played.
	Check out And Nobody Died in Boston, either.
	Available at moonrockbooks.com.
	That's moonrockbooks.com.
	If you think for one second that the Capitol will ever treat us fairly, you are lying to
	Because we know who they are, and what they do.
	This is what they do and we must fight back!
	You can torture us and bomb us.
	Fire is catching.
	And if we burn, you burn with us!
	Are you awake yet?
	I hope.
	We've tried and we've tried for years and years to use passive resistance and loud voices to make a change.
	The time is over.
	Your governments around the world have no other goal than to decimate your entire existence at the hands of the bankers and the elites.
	The war It's coming, and it's your choice to decide if you want to be a warrior or a victim.
	Denial is not a choice anymore.
	Revolution Radio, FreedomSubs.com, the number one listener-supported radio station on the planet.
	Radio!
	Even the government admits that 9-11 was a conspiracy.
	But did you know that it was an inside job and Osama had nothing to do with it?
	That the Twin Towers were blown apart by a sophisticated arrangement of mini or micro nukes.
	That Building 7 collapsed 7 hours later because of explosives planted in the building.
	Barry Jennings was there.
	He heard them go off and felt himself stepping over dead people.
	The U.S.
	Geological Survey conducted studies of dust gathered from 35 locations in Lower Manhattan and found elements that would not have been there had this not been a nuclear event.
	Ironically, that means the government's own evidence contradicts the government's official position.
	9-11 was brought to us compliments of the CIA, the neocons of the Department of Defense, and the Mossad.
	Don't let yourself be played.
	Read American Nuked on 9-11.
	Available at moonrockbooks.com.
	That's moonrockbooks.com.
	The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners, or chatters, are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
	They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff, or affiliates.
	You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, 100% listener-supported radio, and now we return you to your
	host.
	Now unsurprisingly, we have Paul on the line, and Paul, I just want to advise you, I want to hear intelligent
	comments about these issues.
	I do not want to hear a racist rant, whether it's about blacks or about Jews.
	We know blacks commit the overwhelming majority of crimes in America.
	That some of these liberals would have you think that every American has an equal propensity for committing crime.
	That's obviously not the case.
	I do agree there's a genetic component to the difference.
	I'm much more interested in what you take to be the Democrat agenda here.
	And although I haven't introduced it yet, we do have the fascinating case of the shooting in Columbus, Ohio.
	of this woman, Mahia Bryant, a very large Black girl, 16 years old, who was assaulting a much
	smaller Black girl with a knife, and where a police officer showed up and as she was about
	to plunge her knife into the smaller girl, he shot her. And even, even Don Lemon of CNN is
	agreeing this was a justifiable shoot, as Mitchell has just informed me.
	I think the fact that Valerie Jarrett is out there trying to stir this up as another white cop shooting a black girl when he was saving the life of another black girl Exposes the hypocrisy and the corruption of the Democrat political agenda here.
	I welcome your thoughts about all that and more.
	Paul, welcome to the show.
	So you said you wanted intelligent comments from me?
	I don't know.
	It's trying to get blood out of Adam Lanza turnip, in my opinion.
	Paul, don't.
	Come on.
	You know, The thought that I had as I'm listening to this show is, you know, I'm not sure what's going on here, Jim, to be honest with you.
	I've been listening to you, I don't know, when were you on Rents?
	Back in 2015 or 2016, right around there?
	Yeah, I was on Rents for about a year and a half.
	Rents is an odd situation.
	Rents is an odd situation, Paul.
	Hosts on rent.
	Listen to me.
	Hosts on rents have to pay to be on rents.
	I've had like eight or 10 shows.
	I never paid for any show.
	That happened after I got cut off of another show and I turned to rents, who'd expressed an interest in
	having me, not even knowing at the time I agreed to do it,
	that he charged for hosts on his show.
	When I had the opportunity to come on Revolution Radio, therefore I seized the opportunity, because of course none of the hosts here Our charge, of course, we don't receive anything for it.
	I've never received a nickel for any of these shows I've hosted over all the many years I've been doing it, and there are now, I don't know, thousands of shows that I've hosted.
	Yes, I would like your intelligent thoughts, Paul.
	It's not that I've ever thought you to be unintelligent, just that you're preoccupied with certain issues where you have said your piece many, many times.
	I'm interested in fresh thoughts from you, my friend.
	Go ahead.
	Well, if you'll allow me to continue.
	So, the reason I brought up how long I've been listening is I don't think I've ever really heard what's happening now with this coverage of George Floyd from your part.
	So, in other words, you know this is a fraud.
	I asked you a few shows ago whether you believed it, and I got some kind of long, convoluted answer that never really answered the question.
	You've had Danny Sears on a couple of times.
	And I think he spelled it out as clear as it could be spelled out.
	What he did, he looked into the record search of Chauvin and found that there just wasn't a guy, you know, that fit all his matching, you know, criteria as far as You know, age and location and so forth that would have, you know, placed him as a Minneapolis policeman.
	I don't think that, you know, he's ever been on the Minneapolis police force.
	I think he's a fake.
	Uh, you know, we believe the former lawyer of the real George Floyd, who said that he died two years ago.
	So what are we looking at it?
	And yet you're covering this and I kind of, I kind of understand what you, what you're doing or maybe why you're doing it because it's pushed out there by the media as something to talk about.
	But it's obviously the same kind of fraud and the same level of fraud as all these fake school shootings.
	The only difference is the perpetrator in these fake school shootings, which more than likely probably didn't even exist anyway, well, he conveniently was dead, killed himself in some way, shape, or form.
	So here we're given this event, which is clearly fake, right?
	The real George Floyd not being the George Floyd that we're shown.
	And we don't even know who the real George Floyd is because I've not seen any mug shots or anything like that published from, you know, the guy that was, you know, supposedly came from Houston.
	And you said there was multiple different reasons why the kneeling and the arrest and everything else was taken from multiple takes, different angles.
	None of it made any sense.
	And this Derek Chauvin is not the real Derek Chauvin that we were showing on, you know, the same cop that was kneeling on George Floyd's neck.
	And yet it's being talked about as if it's a real trial with a real jury and a real judge.
	You know, maybe they had a real staged trial and a real staged jury, and maybe they all thought it was real.
	You know, I mean, aren't you just sick of this nonsense?
	I mean, and this is deliberate mockery.
	Talk about...
	You know, you mentioned the fact that so many other people have, too, that this guy was not the best of character, right?
	Just like this Daunte Wright.
	You know, your typical ghetto Negro who's got nothing going on, right?
	He's just a total scumbag.
	You can see him online, you know, flashing money and guns and acting, you know, the fool.
	Just multiple.
	I could give you at least three, four, five different black guys on channels talking about it in the same way that I talk about it.
	You know, one of them is this guy, Officer Tatum.
	He's a former cop, and you know, just like many of these other blacks that have been, you know, very conservative for a long time, saying that a lot of these blacks, you know, out and about deserve to get pulled over, deserve to get hassled, and the police are doing their, you know, their best, the best thing they can do to be proactive about, you know, putting a little bit of a kibosh on the activities of these punks up to no good.
	You know, just like this kid, this beaner.
	I'm sorry to use that term, but I think that's permitted.
	You know, out and about at 1.30, 2 in the morning.
	As multiple people have made the point, what were you doing as a 13-year-old at 2 in the morning?
	You were in bed at home, okay?
	You weren't out with a gun.
	So, I think I'm among millions upon millions upon millions of whites.
	I'm glad when I hear that if there's a real shooting and they really die, I'm happy.
	It doesn't bother me at all.
	sleep like a baby and Jesse from the comment section from my last call it's
	near unanimous okay I don't know if you took a look at you read but multiple
	people weighed in and said essentially yeah Paul is saying exactly what needs
	to be said and the way to need to be said I only have one negative comment
	that I saw from a guy some some some fag named Panzer Faust who's said
	negative things about me before and all he said was my listening ends when Paul
	You know, something like that.
	I don't even know really what that means.
	And he said he calls.
	So Panther Faust, if you're listening, call into the show, say who you are, and contribute your piece.
	You know, let us hear from you.
	Because as I said in the comments section before, that I called in to contribute, you know, to on-air content.
	When I first listened to your show, after a few times, the very first time I called in, I said, you know what?
	I'm going to call in.
	This guy needs callers.
	Right?
	And I remember the very first show I called in and I kept it.
	You had Dennis Camino on.
	So anyway, I just think I'm just tired of this crap.
	I mean, you've got to be tired of it, too.
	And like I said, the way that you've been covering it is like it's kind of a hybrid thing where you're covering it as if it's a real event.
	But I think you know that it's not.
	And it's just the mockery of these Jews constantly giving us crap.
	They give us these On purpose, they give us characters like George Floyd, like Daunte Wright, and all these other people who aren't really very good people no matter what race they are.
	They're just not very good people, good characters, and they hold them up as heroes.
	It's mockery!
	It's like giving us Joe Biden as president!
	It's mockery!
	It's giving us Barack Obama as president, right?
	Mockery!
	I could go on.
	I think I'm done for the moment.
	Thanks for hearing this.
	Well, Paul, how many times have I explained in my initial assessment that they appear to use a Sigma-7 African-American torso airway trainer for this event, that when he was put into the car, we didn't see him taken out of the car.
	All of a sudden, he's lying on the ground.
	He had hair when he was put into the car.
	Now he's lying on the ground.
	He no longer has any hair.
	That he was manacled behind his back.
	Now he's got his hands in front of the torso.
	When they lift him up to put him on a gurney, he has no legs.
	I've explained all that, Paul.
	Now, heretofore I'd never seen any footage of him on the opposite side, where we now have, and it may have been newly created just to compensate for the points I've made so many times in the past, which anyone can review for themselves, by the way, by going to falseflagconspiracies2020.com and downloading my piece entitled Deception Galore Faking hate crimes and more, where I go into detail about the Jussie Smollett in Chicago, about George Floyd in Minneapolis, and about the race car Bubba Wallace NASCAR, all of which were grossly exaggerated or outright fabricated.
	I've done that.
	I've been there.
	If you wanted me to preface by saying, okay, look, I think the whole thing is staged, but I'm going to give you a dissection of why the Verdict in this case was not a justified verdict, even if it were all real.
	Maybe that would pacify you, Paul.
	I presumed anyone who's listened to my show, as long as you have listened to my show, would know that was what I was doing.
	I was dissecting the trial as it's being reported and observing that even if you take it at face value, which I now affirm was indeed my stance, It's not justifiable to find him guilty.
	This all was a grossly tainted.
	What would interest me, Paul, more than what you've already said is, where are the Democrats going with this?
	What do they think they're going to achieve by defunding the police?
	Are they going to want to get rid of law enforcement altogether?
	And what do they think is going to happen to the country?
	I think everyone is bewildered Okay, so given that preface, and by the way, I mean, I don't really fault you for, you know, any of this.
	least because crime is just going to skyrocket everywhere.
	No one's going to be safe.
	Everyone's going to have to defend themselves.
	To me, that's a very important aspect of this that has yet to receive sufficient consideration.
	So I invite you to add your further thoughts, given that preface.
	OK, so given that preface, and by the way, I mean, I don't really fault you for any of this.
	Like I said, it just seems weird to me.
	It's like dissecting a TV show or a stage play.
	But in answer to the kind of things you just raised, I am one of these people that I don't really
	believe, for example, these increases in crime.
	It just doesn't make a lot of sense to me.
	Like you just mentioned, for example, 400% increase in rape.
	OK, so since when did any cop prevent a rape?
	Cops generally don't prevent much crime at all, but they occasionally will follow up with investigations.
	And the percentage of crimes that they solve is, in most categories, dismally low.
	So I'm not really sure.
	I think in many ways this could be one of these psychological operations to gin up, to kind of, to take you one way, right, and then to pull you back the other way.
	In other words, we need more police, we need more funding, we need more, we need martial law, we need all these things.
	I really don't know.
	But I will say, I'm going to admit right now, I was obviously wrong in my prediction.
	Just like I was wrong when I said Green Bay would win in cover against Tampa Bay in the playoffs.
	So there's two I've been wrong on.
	But I've got a whole slew of things I've been right on.
	Right now I don't have good feelings.
	I think that this is one of these things where They have us now where all of us are just waiting for the next shoe to drop, so to speak.
	And I was just on the phone last night with a friend and he was talking about some articles he had read and a conversation he had had where it looks like they're getting ready, just by the things they've been saying and the things that have been published, they're getting ready for this economic collapse or economic reset.
	And also possibly mix that in there with the problems with the grid.
	And the power will go down.
	So this is the real serious shit that I think they're getting us all ready for.
	Maybe they just said, you know what, we don't need any more riots right now.
	We got bigger, we got bigger plans here.
	So let's just go ahead and we'll find them guilty and we'll be done with this.
	And now we can move on to, you know, whatever it is they're going to do next.
	But mark my words, as long as these people are alive, they're going to continue this, this crap.
	I mean, things are not getting any better. Just think about your history.
	What you start, where you started, right? Well, you started with JFK, I assume, and,
	you know, you moved on to many other topics, and then you broke down 9-11,
	and all these things that you've been doing this whole time.
	Have we gotten any better?
	Or are we just getting worse and worse and worse?
	And I mean, we have a lot of problems.
	There's no doubt about it.
	And there's certain things that we just have to deal with.
	There's no other way out of it.
	There's no voting our way out of this situation.
	Many people have said we're in a war.
	And we have to recognize that fact.
	And these people that are running the show, and it ain't the Democrats.
	The Democrats are there.
	They exist.
	But there's no unanimity among the Democrats, just like there is no unanimity among the Republicans.
	That's part of the stage play diversion.
	And I think people should seriously start, you know, looking at what's coming.
	You know, do they have any Stored food.
	Do they have the capacity for, you know, any sort of power if the grid gets turned off?
	You know, what if they're told that your bank account is frozen and so we can we can sort out this economic crisis, this economic collapse?
	Meanwhile, there's nothing to collapse.
	The money's all basically conceptual.
	The whole money system is electronic now at this point.
	I doubt that very few people do any sizable business in cash anymore.
	And all they really have to do is say, well, you know what?
	We're going to have to reset your bank account.
	I mean, we're in some shit.
	And just like you say, you know, when they come for the guns, it's time to use them.
	No, we have to start thinking about, well, what can we do and what would make sense to do before that happens?
	Because if we wait till that happens, we're already done, in my opinion.
	Paul, I agree with a lot of what you said.
	I've said a lot of those things myself, and you've heard me say them.
	What I'm curious about is why you didn't address my question, which is why are they talking about defunding the police?
	Why would they want to abolish the police?
	What can they possibly benefit from abolishing the police?
	It's going to lead to an increase of crime, whether you believe the 400% increase in rape, which even Tucker was presenting.
	And by the way, I take it you don't watch television, but Tucker's been given a series of absolutely brilliant opening statements about all these issues, about the trial, about racism, about replacement theory.
	You've got the ADL, Wanting to get his sponsors to no longer support the Tucker Carlson Show because he's talking about replacement theory when the ADL supports replacement theory when it comes to Israel.
	They don't want Palestinians coming into Israel because they reproduce at a more rapid rate than the Jews in Israel.
	And it's going to affect the quality of the state as a Jewish state.
	But they deny the right of even Tucker to talk about replacement theory here in the U.S., even though it's obvious the Democrats want massive numbers of migrants to come into the U.S.
	because they're going to reproduce at a faster rate.
	There are going to be more Democrat voters, they think.
	It's going to change the demographics of the state.
	Tucker's absolutely 100% correct to focus attention on the issue, because it's going to affect the future of the nation.
	And it's not surprising the ADL wants to go after him for it, because they don't want to acknowledge that they're actually behind it.
	Well, again, that may have been part of the stage play, too.
	more than one occasion, I discovered all these convoys of trucks bringing migrants to our
	southern border, who on the door of the trucks is the Star of David.
	It's mocking us.
	It's rubbing our faces in it.
	I mean, what American has any control over Israeli foreign policy?
	Mostly, we don't care.
	It's like, okay, what's happening over there with the Palestinians is bad.
	It's immoral.
	I feel for them.
	But in the end, it's not my affair.
	Nothing I can do about it.
	I've never been there.
	I'm not going to go there.
	I have zero.
	Did you miss the point?
	No, listen to me.
	The ADL is a proponent of replacement theory.
	They don't want Palestinians in Israel because it can affect the demographics.
	But they're an opponent of replacement theory in the U.S.
	because they want that to happen here.
	In other words, there's blatant hypocrisy to attack Tucker for pointing out the obvious when they themselves have pointed out the obvious in relation to Israel of precisely the same problem from their point of view with the Palestinians as opposed to from our point of view of migrants from Central and South America.
	But here, my point would be this, okay, no, of course I did miss the point, but I don't care about the irony.
	The average American doesn't care about it, and especially myself.
	I'm a very, you know, I'm a well-known white supremacist, white nationalist, okay?
	Way before I started calling your show, that was my bent, my philosophy, because I see what's going on.
	I see what's being done.
	Of course it's Hypocritical.
	Of course it's ironic, but it fits with the agenda, right?
	Another nation has the right to determine the fate of their own nation and their own race, but we don't.
	Okay?
	All white countries must be inundated with floods of non-whites, and if they don't like it, they're racist.
	Yeah, we all get it.
	That's the agenda.
	I object to it on many grounds, and it's not just because, you know, it's the Jews doing it to us, but it actually is an existential threat.
	To what can't be replaced, alright?
	Pieces of paper like the Constitution are nothing, okay?
	Actual biological, uh, you know, value is, uh, you know, real people, right?
	In other words, white people exist.
	They're real.
	They're biological, okay?
	If they're gone, okay, or our race is, our gene pool is diluted and polluted, Then, uh, that can never be recovered, okay?
	You can toss around terms like democracy and Republican, you can talk about the media all you want, but yeah, you know, just like the other day when we were talking and you, and you make, you make some of these points about, well, individual, I don't have the ability or part of my argument is I'm not distinguishing the individual character, which of course is absurd.
	An individual character can always be considered, but everybody knows, okay, everybody knows that if you take a hundred thousand Low IQ African Somalis and you stick them in Minneapolis, it's bad news.
	It's a big steaming pile of crap.
	Okay, that's what it is.
	You can just toss all the individual considerations out the window.
	That's where I come from.
	So no, I didn't miss your point, but my point is, it doesn't matter to the average American.
	There's nothing they can do about it.
	They can just cry, oh, the poor Palestinians, but in the end, what can we do? It's for them to handle. This is just the
	dumbest argument you've ever made on my show, without any doubt whatsoever. That the ADL is very up
	in arms about Palestinians coming in to replace the Jews in Israel, and yet they want to attack
	Tucker for being concerned about the migrants from Central and South America coming into this
	place.
	White Americans is something you want to take to heart and feel is a significant exposure of their profound hypocrisy because they're driven by politics, not rationality.
	I'm very surprised.
	Meanwhile, Mitchell actually has an answer to my question.
	He believes the Democrats want to create chaos.
	But Mitchell, I'd like you to expand on that.
	Obviously, lawlessness means every American needs to get a gun, every American needs to be able to defend themselves, means no American is going to support the gun control agenda of the Democrats.
	So tell me, how does abandoning the police, defunding or abolishing the police, promote their gun control agenda?
	Which I believe they truly believe in.
	Mitchell, yes, go ahead.
	Well, Jim, I mean, I think it's pretty obvious that after, you know, the five years of the media joining with the deep state and their attack on Donald Trump, They're pretty much now tacit admission that they produce propaganda, not news.
	That the American people, if they don't have a clue now, they never will.
	That they've been so brainwashed that they can defund the police, they can not arrest anybody for smaller crimes, Allow property crimes and damage up to $1,000 or wherever now.
	And expect that that doesn't unleash the worst elements of our society, give them a free reign of low-level criminal activity.
	It's basically, it's the same kind of parallel destruction of just of the justice system as we have in our government where our government doesn't prosecute the FBI, the CIA, the perjurers in Congress, you know, all these people that were involved in the crossfire hurricane investigations and such.
	All of those people got away with Mitchell, let me cut through all this and tell you what is, for me, the bottom line.
	They want to take our guns.
	How is demolishing the police going to lead to their taking our guns?
	No American's going to give up our guns when they're abolishing the police.
	In other words, it seems to me the actions they're taking are contradicting their objective of taking our guns.
	Once they take our guns, we're all sheep being led to the slaughter.
	That much is obvious.
	I understand.
	Here's what I will respond to that, Jim.
	They have already convinced people that you are better off without protection.
	No, nobody in the world believes that, Mitchell.
	That's complete bullshit.
	You don't believe it.
	I don't believe it.
	Paul doesn't believe it.
	Nobody believes it.
	Hey, stand back.
	We're going to come back after this break and we'll pick it up with Mitchell after this break.
	We'll be right back.
	I'm going to be playing a little bit of the song.
	We'll be right back after this message.
	Management would like to take a moment to thank the listeners and hosts for all their
	support.
	Unfortunately, this platform for free speech has never been free.
	We need the support of the people.
	It is the people like you, yes, you, that keeps the station in the front lines of the battle against tyranny and oppression.
	Please help support Revolution Radio so free speech will not be silenced in a world that seems to be going deaf to the real truth.
	With your support, we will be able to become an even bigger pillar of light in a dark world.
	Revolution Radio, freedomsubstance.com, the number one listener-supported radio station on the planet.
	Radio, radio, radio, radio, radio, radio, radio, radio.
	Ongoing, ongoing, we are the world.
	Ongoing, we are the world.
	Join Revolution Radio.
	Every Wednesday 8 p.m.
	Eastern Time on Studio B.
	For more material set, with hosts, send us in at freedomset.com, The People Station.
	Even the government admits that 9-11 was a conspiracy.
	But did you know that it was an inside job and Osama had nothing to do with it?
	That the Twin Towers were blown apart by a sophisticated arrangement of mini or micro nukes.
	That Building 7 collapsed seven hours later because of explosives planted in the building.
	Barry Jennings was there.
	He heard them go off and felt himself stepping over dead people.
	The U.S.
	Geological Survey conducted studies of dust gathered from 35 locations in Lower Manhattan and found elements that would not have been there had this not been a nuclear event.
	Ironically, that means the government's own evidence contradicts the government's official position.
	9-11 was brought to us compliments of the CIA, the neocons of the Department of Defense, and the Mossad.
	Don't let yourself be played.
	Read American Newt on Lime 11.
	Available at moonrockbooks.com.
	That's moonrockbooks.com.
	The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners, or chatters, are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
	They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff, or affiliates.
	You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, 100% listener supported radio.
	And now we return you to your host.
	Now this is that Jim Fetzer continuing my conversation with Mitchell about why the
	Democrats would want to defund the police and promote chaos, which is going to incentivize
	every American to arm themselves because they know they cannot count on the police to come
	to their defense.
	When the overall agenda of the Democratic Party is to confiscate our firearms so that we can be like sheep led to the slaughter.
	I don't believe there's an American alive who believes that we are more safe if we abolish the police.
	Mitchell, I want to give you a... Paul, I'm speaking to Mitchell.
	I want Mitchell to speak and then I'm going to bring in Scaredy Cat, who's standing by, and then we'll come back to Paul.
	Mitchell, your thoughts.
	Well, Jim, in a rational, common sense world, I would 100% agree with you.
	But in a world where the media has become the fifth column against the American people, I have to disagree that the American people are so brainwashed at the subconscious level that their conscious mind is too busy making excuses for
	what's been implanted inside their brain.
	You know, look, look, look, the tendency toward the tendency towards self-preservation is very
	powerful in every human being and It's even an instinctually developed evolutionary consequence.
	So the idea that this propaganda could override the obvious necessity to defend yourself if you're going to abolish a police, you must be able to do it yourself, That is a manifest absurdity.
	You're telling me the power of propaganda is so great, so great in this country, Mitchell?
	Paul, Paul!
	Take, just, take, get rid of Paul.
	Just drop Paul.
	He's overused.
	Drop, Mitchell, drop Paul.
	I'm fed up with Paul.
	He, I give him so much latitude and he abuses it again and again.
	Drop him.
	Drop him.
	You know, there have been trained police officers, Jim, that have said, God, you know, I'm afraid to shoot this perp.
	There was a woman, I believe in Chicago or Detroit or somewhere in the central United States that, you know, she didn't shoot the guy as he was attacking her trying to, you know, kill her.
	And she was afraid to shooting and that was after one of, I think, the Michael Brown shooting because of the riots.
	Even rational people Mitchell, Mitchell, Mitchell, I get all that.
	I get all that.
	I grant you all of that.
	I cannot imagine the American people could think for one second that they're going to be safer without police, and therefore the Democrat agenda is lunatic.
	Lunatic!
	I want to bring in Scaredy Cat.
	Scaredy, come on.
	Come in and join the conversation.
	I don't want to hear from Paul.
	He's done for the day.
	Scaredy, come on in.
	Hi, Jim and Mitch.
	So, last night I went to get a takeout, a little takeout dinner at a restaurant.
	I talked to the guy, he's a nice young man, and I told him, and he had to be behind a plexiglass, and he had to keep bending down because the only gap was at stomach level to talk to me, and so I said, I sympathize, you know, he said, I just casually, like, friendly, in a friendly way, just said, I sympathize with you having to Do that ridiculous maneuver just to talk to a customer.
	And he said, oh, you know, it's just this new COVID stuff.
	And I said, you know that it's a scam.
	And he said, oh, yeah.
	I had said that, oh, you have to put up, I said, working in a corporation, you must No, you're not allowed to.
	You must not be allowed to talk about it.
	But he said, oh, no, it's OK.
	It's just that the customers give us so much grief.
	So it's the general public who believe everything in the media.
	And that's a different subject, the illness and virus.
	That's different from a jury case, a shooting.
	But it's driven by media hysteria.
	And I think we should Start choosing our words a little bit more methodically.
	Instead of calling it mass hysteria, let's just call it media hysteria.
	And then be very mindful and focused on who is causing it.
	And just a little point, I know Paul is off the air, but maybe it's more to you.
	Answer to the question, he was all surprised.
	Why are you talking about something that's already a fiction that is made on TV?
	You know, all these fake staged events which they go hysterical about and then try to infect us with their hysteria in order for us to react as much as in a chaotic way.
	So I think you're doing it.
	So once we all know that it's staged, but It is still important to do the second step, which is what you're doing today, which is not just be in the paralysis of perfection.
	Oh, it's all staged.
	We all know it.
	You know, full stop.
	You know, let's pack up shop.
	Bad things are still being imposed on us by powerful people.
	So yes, it's a stage and almost everything is fake.
	Not the world isn't fake.
	The most, what I call the filthy rich.
	The rich are imposing a fake perception on us and so it's therefore hugely important to analyze the thing anyway, you know, and not be in a perfection paralysis, oh it's all fake, let's just freeze up and Good.
	Scaredy, Scaredy, Scaredy, I appreciate that very much.
	I don't understand why Paul can't appreciate what I was doing.
	I thought it was obvious, but I thank you for spelling that out.
	I appreciate it.
	Brew is here, and I want to get his views, and then come back to you, Scaredy.
	Brew, join the conversation.
	Yeah, I don't know what kind of views I got.
	You know, I don't have any of this Plexiglas being the virus, and viruses are everywhere.
	The irony of it is, it was just months in that year, within that year, months or several months prior that they were saying, take down all bulletproof glass out of stores and everywhere because it's racist.
	We can't, that's just racist to have this sect dividing between people and bulletproof glass at currency exchanges and gas stations and so forth.
	Now that's got to come down because it's racist.
	We're going to pass a law to make it illegal to do that.
	The next thing you're going to ask, they're going to introduce all this COVID garbage.
	and then they'll say, they say, text and laugh between everybody. Whether it be your cashier,
	I think, yeah, cashier, attendant.
	Brew, those, those are good, those are, those are good observation, but I want you to join the issue.
	Why are the Democrats thinking they can concurrently want to take our guns and defund the police?
	I think it's idiotic and contradictory and no American is going to give up their guns.
	That's why the sales are through the roof.
	Even Democrats, people who've never owned guns, are buying guns because of this effort to defund the police.
	Well, it's good for the gun makers, that's for sure, and a lot of these are actually Jewish held, or heavily invested by Jews if they don't own them outright, that's a big deal.
	So it's good for their side in the bottom line.
	I'm talking politics, Ruth.
	Second, it says, well, second it says, everyone buys the firearms, they got the money, and then they can go confiscate them on top of it.
	I don't think Americans are going to give up their guns, Brew.
	I think that's a bottom line issue.
	Okay.
	can raise your hand and put your firearm.
	There's no basis whatsoever.
	So we have all this red flag love.
	But, this is all the Communist Manifesto.
	It's all about, you know, first, uh, first defeating us in our mind with all the propaganda.
	And then just to weaken us, okay?
	Look, I don't know.
	I don't believe anything I'm hearing.
	It's just stuff that would fight us to get our blood boiled, to get us on the air and talk about that instead of what's really going on out there.
	And don't ask me what's really going on out there, except for the destruction of all our freedoms and liberties.
	and COVID shot.
	Okay, okay, okay.
	200 million jabs and this and that.
	You know, what it would do to destroy the lives, you know, as our attention is being diverted.
	This hurt George Floyd case, and Paul was right to want to revisit the situation,
	to reanalyze it.
	We're talking with Pearl and two Floyds.
	We have a Floyd that was in Texas, and a lesbian guy, and a guy that turned into a lawyer, and then we have this... Brew, brew, brew.
	We know all that.
	That is old news.
	That is old news.
	What we did not have... Because I don't think we've actually decided which parent is who.
	We've got two different rap sheets, two different characters, two different wives.
	I don't think we're separating.
	I think we're, as we talk about it, I think we're interweaving them.
	We have to make clear to separate the two to find out who were who.
	Because the plurality of the case is a big deal.
	My point was, even if you assume the trial was legit, that the jury verdict was not justified by the evidence.
	And it's very important that this is all a matter of intimidation.
	Ironically, because of the convention, the Democrats didn't get what they wanted.
	They wanted an acquittal or a mistrial, at the very least, so they could continue with their racist rampage.
	I think this case in Columbus, Ohio, is very significant because you had one black girl who was about to kill another black girl, and the white cop intervened totally appropriately and took out the black girl who has been the aggressor about to kill the other black girl.
	I think that was very appropriate.
	You even got Don Lamond, for God's sake, agreeing that this shooting was justifiable.
	So this seriously undermines the official narrative.
	Yes, Mitchell wants to add a thought here.
	Mitchell, go.
	Do you know how petty and stupid all this really is, Jim?
	According to the foster mother, all this started over her not wanting to clean up her room or make her bed or keep the house clean.
	That all the quarreling and everything, that's where it started and escalated from.
	Yeah.
	That's okay, Brew.
	I mean, all kinds of domestic violence occurs that way.
	She didn't do the dishes.
	She didn't cook his meal on time.
	Look, this is standard for America.
	What's not acceptable is one to try to kill the other over something, even if it had originally padding.
	And listen, I want to ask if you or Brew or Scaredy know, When we look at that footage, there's this guy here who is kicking somebody on the ground.
	Now, what the hell was that about?
	He gives a vicious kick to this party on the ground, and it's before the officer intervenes to take out the big black girl who's about to kill the smaller black girl, and I just don't get that kick part.
	Did you pick up on that, Mitchell?
	Complete silence in every news article I've seen.
	Nobody has said, who's the guy stomping the girl's head?
	I tweeted out, I put a tweet out on Twitter, it may have gotten taken down, I don't even know.
	You know, blackheads, stompers matter.
	I mean, you know, it's asinine.
	Very strange, very strange.
	But that's not the same girl gets up and attacks the girl in the peak, I mean, right?
	She knocked that girl to the ground in front of the officer, she kind of wheeled around And then she went right for the girl in pink.
	The girl in pink was actually holding a small dog if you look at the footage.
	A dog?
	Yeah, and she wanted to protect the dog?
	I mean, look, this big girl was about to bring that knife down right into her chest.
	There just isn't any doubt about it.
	It was obvious.
	Brew, do you have any idea about this kicking aspect of this thing?
	I mean, it's in the footage, but I've not heard a word about it.
	And Mitchell's saying when he searches for information, no one is mentioning it.
	Okay, okay.
	Scaredy, I don't know.
	Scaredy, are you... Scaredy, are you aware what I'm talking about?
	Scaredy.
	Did we lose Scaredy?
	No, I'm here.
	I belong to the age of the dinosaurs, happily.
	I know that was 70 million years ago but oh well.
	So, this kicking.
	So, Jim, I have worked as a substitute teacher, what they call a sub, in big city schools.
	And so, I don't watch, I don't have TV, watch TV, and my, just I get the news from you guys, from the radio.
	Okay, okay, so you've not...
	Then you've not seen the video.
	You've not seen the video here of this incident.
	I think this is very antithetical to the Democrats' campaign to defund the police.
	Here you've got the police intervening to save a younger Black girl from an older black girl, where the older black girl is being vicious and aggressive with a steak knife.
	I mean, this is a big knife she has about to plunge into her body.
	If you've even got Don Lamond saying that was justifiable shoot, that's a good thing.
	That's good for America because it contradicts the defund the police narrative.
	If the cop hadn't been there, that girl would be dead.
	I have no doubt about it.
	Mitchell, did you want to add further?
	Um, what was it?
	Yeah, there was something I was going to say.
	Um, this, um, this whole incident, it was all caught on camera, not only from the officer's point of... Right.
	His body cam.
	Not only his body cam, but across the street.
	Yeah.
	But there was other, another security camera across the street.
	Right.
	And it really is, um, bam, bam, bam.
	It happens that fast.
	Yes.
	And, um, You can't react.
	The girl covered those steps to the other girl, Lynn Pink, who was unarmed.
	Right.
	The other girl had a big butcher knife stab and it was... Oh yeah!
	If you don't call that a legitimate shoot and you say that the white officer killed that black girl in malice or anything of such or even racism... Right.
	To me, in my opinion, that proves that your mind has a racist angle, a slant to it that
	it's like whenever time you know you see french fries you put ketchup on it.
	You know there's a funny story about that, Mitchell.
	I.
	My whole life I never put ketchup on french fries until this year when my granddaughter loved ketchup on french fries.
	I decided to try it and I love it!
	I love it!
	But what I think about this shooting is this is sobering for the whole nation and they can see right through that this whole Democrat campaign is falling apart.
	What is AOC going to say about it?
	What is Nancy Pelosi going to say about it?
	They're going to look like blithering idiots.
	They are blithering idiots, but this case makes it crystal clear that what they're saying is lying to the American people on a massive scale about a matter of life and death.
	I think it's wonderful this event took place.
	I think it's a very telling story and very sobering.
	William Grant joined the conversation.
	William, Are you there?
	Okay.
	There he is.
	Hey guys.
	Yeah, go ahead, Bill.
	Yeah, I know it's close to the end of the show.
	Basically, the guy who kicks the girl is supposed to be the father of the girl being stabbed, I believe.
	A father either way of somebody there.
	And it seemed he may have been just trying to get the other girl to stop interfering to make sure she didn't get knifed herself by trying to stop it or assist the other you know or whatever side and either way to get out of the way of the police so he's sort of trying to kick her out of the way to stop her from getting hurt it's seen but I don't know and I feel I've watched the video several times I've even watched some parts of it in slow motion
	And I'll tell you right now, when somebody is laying on their side and you purposely try to stomp their head like a watermelon, you're not trying to help them in any way.
	Yeah, I thought it was, I thought it was outrageously offensive the way he was kicking her.
	I didn't do it in slow motion, but I agree, Mitchell, there was something terribly wrong about that aspect of this whole encounter, that he was being vicious.
	He was being vicious to whoever was on the ground.
	And that person on the ground, that was not the same girl who got up to try to stab the other, right?
	I mean, this, was it the same or not the same?
	I didn't think it was different.
	Different girl.
	Yeah, different girl.
	So, I mean, there's several.
	There are at least three girls involved there in the father.
	I agree that this makes sense.
	It would be the father.
	But there's this third girl that he is tromping.
	And what the hell is going on there?
	That's very peculiar.
	I think the very last thing he did was like when she got up and what he was like kicking her away once she was up and already began to run away.
	And even kicked her in the head.
	I'm not sure if the foot actually hit her head.
	I would, I was very, I was very disturbed by that aspect of the footage.
	I thought, what the F is going on here?
	That was outrageous.
	Mitchell Moore.
	I would say the guy was trying to pick a 60 yard field goal, Bill.
	I mean, he, he, he just put a full out leg kick.
	Yeah.
	I agree.
	This was not just assault and battery.
	This was aggravated.
	He was clearly intending to serious bodily harm to that person he was stomping.
	Mitchell, this aspect is going to have to get more attention.
	It's too significant.
	Well, sure.
	Oh, sure.
	Yeah.
	But the point is the cop acted totally appropriately and he saved one black girl's life by shooting another black girl who was much larger and aggressive with a huge knife.
	She was going to kill her.
	I don't think there's any question about it.
	So I think this was a very good and sobering lesson for the country when they talk about abolishing the police.
	What a stupid, what a colossally stupid idea.
	But it's the end of the show, practically.
	I'll let you guys finish it out.
	Thanks for letting me out.
	Well, Bill, I'm glad you called in with that comment about the father.
	I'm very glad to have that comment.
	Thank you for joining us.
	Thank you.
	No problem.
	It's all quick for me, too.
	I've barely seen it, but yeah, I figured I'd add.
	I heard he was the father either way.
	Let me suggest here.
	Other thoughts are yours.
	And then I'll go back to.
	Let me suggest here.
	Let me suggest here.
	Yeah, Bruce.
	That situation, I don't care if you're a law enforcement or police officer and that's your job to get, you know,
	on call to do, involve yourself in situations or anybody else.
	You see a situation, you see a reckless, you see a fight, you see a perpetrator and you see a potential victim.
	That's what you see.
	You're not really technically, you're seeing the action.
	You're not seeing skin colors.
	I can almost see this happening in black and white as far as vision goes.
	Now if the cop was truly racist and it was a black on black crime in process
	and said he was gonna get hurt, he was truly racist, he would've stood back
	and let it happen.
	Okay, if this guy had a material bullet in his body.
	You just stand back and let it happen.
	Oh, this one's going to kill the other one.
	Okay.
	I'll just wait for it to all over and then I'll run over you.
	We're trying to destroy the fabric.
	And brew and brew, do you know Valerie Jarrett who is those?
	Oh Obama's right-hand woman said that's what the cops should
	have done She criticized him for bringing a gun to a knife fight. I
	mean it was this was lunatic lunatic coming from Brock Oh Brock Obama's
	Is Thinking our common sense the China, you know
	It's a crime to go out to the homeless. It's a crime to do, you know
	It's a charity truck crying that freeze that the parking meter when it's not your parking meter
	These people want to make a fish upside down world. So it's just a matter of attack on our minds
	So everything we say you and whatever is worth ignoring We need to have that on this thing that these are
	international criminal Yeah, they're waiting for and good nationally because these
	people reach good good good good good their international criminals and they
	pretend to be our I I I think I agree with what you're saying there.
	Scaredy, would you like to give a final thought?
	So, great last point, Jim.
	And let's remember that all facts are not created equal.
	This very last paragraph, let's keep that in mind and use it to make friends, you know, in parallel communities.
	So I'm going to go back to the restaurant and try to save enough money to buy a book to give to that young man.
	Thank you.
	Scaredy.
	Scaredy, thank you.
	Thank you for calling in.
	Thanks to Bill for calling in, Bruda calling in, Paul for calling in too.
	Just Just learn to follow my lead, Paul, and you'll get along much better on this show.
	Meanwhile, Mitchell, good stuff, Mitchell.
	Thank you all, everyone, for listening.
	We'll be back on Monday with the latest, and expect there are going to be events over the weekend that we're going to want to cover.
	Expect more shootings.
	There are going to be more efforts.
	It could come down to one of these a day, because they want to get our guns.

▲