Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

April 9, 2021 - Jim Fetzer

01:57:18

The Raw Deal (9 April 2021)

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	When you attend a funeral, it is sad to think that sooner or later those you love will do
	the same for you.
	And you may have thought it tragic not to mention other adjectives to think of all the weeping they will do, but don't you worry.
	No more ashes, no more sackcloth, and an armband made of black cloth.
	We'll someday nevermore adorn a sleeve.
	Or if a bomb had dropped on you, get your pets and neighbors.
	There'll be nobody left behind to grieve.
	And we will all go together when we go.
	What a comforting fact that is to know.
	Universal bereavement, an inspiring achievement.
	Yes, we all will go together when we go.
	We will all go together when we go, all suffused with an incandescent glow.
	No, we'll have the endurance to collect on his insurance.
	Lloyds of London will be loaded when they go.
	We will all fry together when we fry.
	We'll be French fried potatoes by and by.
	There will be no more misery when the world is our rotisserie.
	Yes, we all will fry together when we fry.
	We will all bake together when we bake.
	There'll be nobody present at the wake.
	With complete participation in that grand incineration, nearly three billion hunks of
	well-done steak.
	We will all char together when we char.
	And let there be no moaning of the bar.
	Just sing out a tedium when you see that ICBM and the party will become as you are.
	Come as you are indeed.
	The situation could not be more dire.
	Tom Lear's lyrics could not be more appropriate than what we're hearing now when we have tensions in the Ukraine and Russia.
	Looks very much as though things are spinning out of control.
	Kremlin has reported on a diplomat's potential expulsion from the United States.
	We're ready for worst-case scenarios.
	Sputnik.
	Russia is prepared for any worst-case scenario in its relations with the United States, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Thursday, commenting on recent reports about a potential expulsion of diplomats from the United States.
	The situation could hardly be more opposite than under Trump.
	Where Trump wanted to move forward with cordial relations with Russia.
	But from the beginning, Hillary and her crew were seeking to undermine it.
	And now Biden, with the appointment of Blinken, who's a US-Israeli dual citizen, seems to me to be exacerbating the situation, making it much, much worse.
	Here we get a further report from Peskov.
	You see, the hostility and unpredictability of the U.S.
	side's actions in general obligate us to be prepared for the worst scenarios.
	When your interlocutory is quite aggressive and unpredictable, you are naturally mobilized all the time.
	In general, it seems a number of your questions about Russian-U.S.
	relations largely exceeds the volume of these relations.
	Well, Russia is preparing countermeasures for the potential new restrictions.
	Russia does not want relations with the U.S.
	to deteriorate, the Kremlin spokesman assured.
	We have never posed a threat to anyone, but we will certainly not allow anyone, including the U.S., to threaten us, to tell us what we should do or to infringe upon our interests.
	According to the Kremlin spokesman, the appointment of a special envoy by the United States for the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline project would be considered interference in the domestic affairs of other countries because Washington has nothing to do with this venture.
	It's absolutely crucial to appreciate that Russia is in the perfect position geographically and in terms of supply to provide Europe with relatively inexpensive energy.
	On Wednesday, The media reported, citing current and former U.S.
	officials, the White House is looking to appoint a special envoy tasked with halting the construction of the Nord Stream 2 project that would carry Russian gas to Europe.
	This project is extremely important for European energy security and for providing Europe with energy resources.
	But of course, such special representatives on the project, which have nothing to do with the United States of America, and is generally located on another continent, probably speak very eloquently about what is called interference in internal affairs, interference in the economic interests of other countries, and so on and so forth.
	He's nailing it exactly.
	He also observed Russia and its partners are committed to completing the gas pipeline project, which is in an advanced state of construction.
	So far, we see the countries that are partners in this project are quite consistent in their intentions to finalize the project and launch it.
	Meanwhile, Foreign Minister Lavrov says Washington's dead-end policy toward Moscow is not beneficial to the United States either.
	Even a pro-Washington structure like the Atlantic Council has already published material criticizing the absolutely dead-end and perhaps stupid policy of the United States toward Russia.
	Bush does not bring about any results in terms of the goals that were announced when the sanctions were introduced.
	The top Russian diplomat further noted that such unstable behavior had convinced Moscow of the unreliability of Washington and its allies as partners, despite their recent calls for stabilizing relations with Russia amid plans to impose new sanctions.
	Those words do not sound convincing.
	So we will have to wait for concrete action.
	Meanwhile, veteran intelligence officials have written a letter to Biden urging him to avoid a war in Ukraine.
	There are a good number of very significant figures involved here, including Bill Binney, who's our leading cybersecurity expert, Marshall Carter, Chip, Bo, Dan, Graham, Fuller, Robert M. Furukawa, Phil Giraldi, Mike Gravel, John Curacao, Karen Kowatowski, Edward Loomis, Ray McGovern, Elizabeth Murray, Pedro Israel, Orta, Tati Pierce, Scott Ritter, Colleen Rowlick, Kirk Wemby, Sarah Wilton, Robert Wing, Anne Wright,
	These are very good people from the veteran intelligence professionals for sanity trying to inject a note into the Biden administration, which appears to have gone completely bonkers.
	At that time in the past, we alerted you to the dangers inherent in formulating a policy toward Russia built on a foundation of Russia bashing.
	While we continue to support the analysis contained in that memorandum, this new one serves a far more pressing purpose.
	We wish to draw your attention to the dangerous situation existing in Ukraine today, where there's growing risk of war unless you take steps to forestall such a conflict.
	We call to mind two basic realities that need particular emphasis amid growing tensions between Russia and Ukraine.
	First, Since Ukraine is not a member of NATO, Article 5 of the NATO Treaty, of course, would not apply in the case of an armed conflict between Ukraine and Russia.
	Second, Ukraine's current military flexing, if allowed to transition to actual military action, could lead to hostilities with Russia.
	We think it crucial your administration immediately seek to remove from the table, so to speak, Any solution to the current impasse that has a military component in short, there is and can never be a military solution to this problem.
	Your interim national security strategy guidance indicates that your administration would make, quote, make smart and disciplined choices regarding our national defense and the responsible use of our military while elevating diplomacy as our tool of first resort.
	Right now is a perfect time to put those words into action.
	We strongly believe, first, it must be made clear to Ukrainian President Zelensky that there will be no military assistance from either the U.S.
	or NATO.
	If he does not restrain Ukrainian hawks itching to give Russia a bloody nose, hawks who may well expect the West to come to Ukraine's aid in conflict with Russia, There must be no repeat of the fiasco of August 2008 when the Republic of Georgia initiated offensive military operations against South Odessa in the mistaken belief the U.S.
	would come to its assistance if Russia responded militarily.
	Second, we recommend you quickly get back in touch with Zelensky and insist that Kiev halt its current military buildup in eastern Ukraine.
	Russian forces have been lining up at the border ready to react if Zelensky's loose talk of war becomes more than bravado.
	Washington also put on hold all military training activities involving the US and NATO troops in the region.
	This would lessen the chance that Ukraine would misinterpret these training missions as a de facto sign of support for Ukrainian military operations to regain control of either the Donbass or Crimea.
	Third, It is equally imperative the U.S.
	engage in high-level diplomatic talks with Russia to reduce tensions in the region and de-escalate the current rush toward military conflict.
	Untangling the complex web of issues that currently burden U.S.-Russia relations is a formidable task that will not be accomplished overnight.
	This would be an opportune time to work toward a joint goal of preventing armed hostilities in Ukraine and wider war.
	There is opportunity as well as risk in the current friction over Ukraine.
	This crisis offers your administration the opportunity to elevate the moral authority of the United States in the eyes of the international community.
	Leading with diplomacy will greatly enhance the stature of America in the world.
	Now, those are all very sound thoughts, very appropriate, well-founded, rooted in reason, rationality, history and facts.
	Alas, a Biden administration appears to be impervious to all of the above.
	So far as I can discern, the US foreign policy president is in the hands of the Israelis.
	You might as well have Bibi Netanyahu calling the shots.
	They want to Make tension so bad that there actually is an armed conflict and one that ultimately leads to a nuclear conflict between the United States and Russia.
	Hence, Tom Lear.
	We'll all go together when we go.
	Which everyone needs to take to heart, just as I recommend watching Stanley Kubrick's brilliant cinematic masterpiece Dr. Strangelove at least once every year to remind us of the grim reality of nuclear war.
	It wouldn't just be 3 billion chunks of well-done steak today, more on the order of 7 billion.
	7 billion, which could be lost in a nuclear conflagration.
	Meanwhile, at home, the Biden administration is continuing to pursue its aggressive, progressive agenda, even with relation to gun control, for which Americans have shown no interest or enthusiasm whatsoever.
	So, we have, yesterday, Joe Biden issues executive controls.
	Notice the word.
	To fight gun crime epidemic in the United States.
	CNN quoted Biden saying gun control in this country is an epidemic.
	He went so far as to describe it as an international embarrassment, which is projecting because it's the Biden-Harris administration that is an international embarrassment.
	He proposed a number of measures Regarding red flag laws, for example, he states, we know red flag laws can stop mass shooters before they can act out their violent plans.
	He then directed the Justice Department to publish model red flag legislation that states can adopt.
	He did not mention Colorado already has a red flag law since January 1st, 2020, which did nothing to hinder much less prevent the March 22nd, 2021 Boulder attack, which we know was indeed a completely fabricated false flag attack.
	Where the party at the door was texting when the shooter was inside, very casually.
	When the journalist who came on the scene asked whether there were any more bodies or whether he was still here, he just casually pointed his thumb inside.
	Where the journalist went in and saw another body, like the two outside, having no blood whatsoever, and heard two shots take place.
	Neither of which sounded like an AR-15, a high-velocity rifle.
	Rather, they sounded like blanks from a handgun, which I'm quite confident was the case.
	He rushed around the building, found a couple elderly just standing there with a shopping cart.
	No one showed any urgency whatsoever.
	Eventually, a SWAT team showed a lot of concern with getting him out of the area, no doubt because he was recording the whole event and blowing their cover.
	They were more concerned with him than they were with the alleged active shooter, for the obvious reason that there was no active shooter.
	It was simply a stunt.
	He was a real threat because he could blow their cover.
	Biden also addressed AR pistols with stabilizer braces, saying, we want to treat pistols modified with stabilizing braces with a seriousness they deserve.
	He suggests having a stabilizing brace on a pistol makes that pistol a hell of a lot more accurate and more lethal.
	He added, modification to firearms that make them more lethal should be subject to the National Firearms Act.
	Now, what everyone is missing here is that Biden declared these as executive actions against the Second Amendment.
	Don't be played and mistakenly suppose these are executive orders.
	He's playing a word game with us and subliminally placing the words executive order on our mind when it's not, as I've been informed by a dear friend with extensive law enforcement background right here in Wisconsin.
	Hat tip to Ron.
	Executive action versus executive orders, they are two different things.
	The use of executive actions by the President of the United States came under intense scrutiny during Barack Obama's two terms in office, but many critics misunderstood the definition of executive actions and the difference with legally binding executive orders.
	Obama issued dozens of executive actions designed to prevent gun violence in January of 2016, fulfilling one of his primary agenda items.
	Many of the national media reports mistakenly describe those proposals as executive orders, which are legally binding directives from the president of the Federal Administrative Agency.
	The Obama administration, however, described them as executive actions.
	And those executive actions, ranging from universal background checks on anyone trying to buy guns, restoring a ban on military-style assault rifles, and cracking down on straw purchases of guns by people whose intention is to resell them to criminals, carry none of the weight of executive orders.
	Basically, a good way to think of executive actions is a wish list of policies the president would like to see enacted.
	Executive orders are quite different and have legal standing under the law as described.
	These are not executive orders.
	These are executive actions.
	And in fact, as Tucker yesterday opened with a completely brilliant critique, I mean, this was Tucker Carlson at his very best last night.
	Be sure to watch the first 10 minutes of his program.
	He explained that while they're focusing on rifles, the AR-15 in particular, which is by far the most popular and versatile lightweight weapon one could possibly have for self-defense or any other purpose, including opposing the tyrannical government, just as citizen soldiers did in 1776 and thereafter.
	That's why they want to take these guns and they've got to create a propaganda campaign to do it.
	As Tucker emphasized, the overwhelming majority of gun crimes in the United States are committed with handguns.
	They are committed with handguns.
	They are not committed with rifles.
	He gave some stunning statistics about the minimal use of rifles.
	Let me remind you that the crime statistics show that there are significant racial differences in those who are committed for violent crime.
	For example, in New York City in 2014, 75% of the shooting arrests were committed by blacks, 22% by Latinos.
	That's 97%.
	seen arrests and were committed by blacks, 22% by Latinos.
	That's 97%.
	Whites account for 1.3%.
	So why is the mainstream talking about the gun violence committed by blacks?
	Here's another.
	Same era.
	Murder.
	62% by blacks.
	32% by Hispanics.
	That's already 94%.
	With only about 2% by whites.
	Rape.
	One area where Latinos exceed blacks.
	86% of rapes arrests were of Latinos.
	41% blacks.
	That's already 87%.
	6% white.
	If New York City were all white, rapes would be down 83%.
	Murder, 91%.
	Shooting, 96%.
	That's already 87 percent, 6 percent white.
	If New York City were all white, rapes would be down 83 percent, murder 91 percent, shooting
	96.
	Not only that, but Black Lives Matter is focused on a highly unusual situation of blacks who
	are killed by whites, mostly allegedly unarmed black men shot by white police officers.
	Those are very, very rare occurrences.
	If we talk about black-on-white murders per million in 2013, there were approximately 54 black-on-black murders per million.
	There were less than 10 whites killed by blacks.
	There were slightly over 10 whites killed by whites, but the category Black Lives Matter has been protesting blacks killed by whites, 0.77, less than one per million.
	So why isn't the media reporting that?
	For the obvious reason, the politics of the situation.
	Dr. Eowyn, my dear and very courageous colleague who maintains the Fellowship of the Minds blog, had the brilliance to impose a 2016 electoral college map over a 2014 murder distribution map And surprise, surprise, the murders are occurring predominantly overwhelmingly in areas where Democrats have imposed gun-free zones, which means that the bad guys know they aren't going to have to deal with any civilians who happen to be in the area, that they can shoot all they want and not be in jeopardy.
	Lori Lightfoot, the mayor of Chicago, has come out condemning gun violence and blaming AR-15s when the overwhelming majority in her city is all done by handguns.
	Why aren't the Democrats talking about that?
	Indeed, they're promoting their gun control agenda on the basis of the false premise that the greater the gun ownership, the greater the homicide rate, Which, as I never tire of explaining, contradicts the empirical data.
	Indeed, worldwide, gun ownership and homicide rates are inversely related.
	The more gun ownership, the lower the homicide rate.
	Yes, it's true.
	For example, in North America, the U.S.
	and Canada heretofore, until now, when Canada is imposing gun bans, have the highest gun ownership in the world and the lowest homicide rate.
	South American countries, for example, Brazil, low gun ownership, high homicide rate.
	African nations, low gun ownership, high homicide rate.
	Russia, low gun ownership, high homicide rate.
	Think about it.
	There are very good reasons why Americans are buying more guns and questioning whether or not the police can even come to their aid.
	The Democrats have discredited themselves on this issue.
	By their defund the police platform, perhaps the most colossally stupid political stance ever staked out by a major political party in the United States in our history.
	It's outrageous.
	But with all the looting, all the riots, all of the arson taking place, Americans, including small business owners, know they cannot count on the police to come to their defense.
	Indeed, we're even getting threats now.
	Cities will be on fire.
	Black Lives Matter activist warns all hell will break loose if Officer Chauvin is not convicted in the George Floyd death, which is being reported as thoroughly and comprehensively on television today as was the O.J.
	trial of the past.
	Let me reaffirm another key point.
	Democrats in the mainstream media are not reporting.
	Americans use guns to defend themselves from criminals millions of times every year.
	Millions of times every year.
	If you took those guns away from law-abiding citizens, they'd be unable to defend themselves.
	The estimates have it that the defensive use of guns is saving 200,000 American lives every single year.
	But the Biden administration won't acknowledge it.
	The Democrats won't admit it.
	They do not have the best interests of the American people at heart.
	It's outrageous.
	Gun sales are skyrocketing, and deservedly so.
	But, of course, they're going to find we're going to have another false flag attack after another.
	As we proceed moving forward when they seek to, you know, embellish the necessity for a gun confiscation, which is absurd.
	Remember, as Dave Hodges reminded us in the 20th century, there were 19 genocides, denocides, where all the citizens of a nation were slaughtered by their own governments, each of which was preceded by gun confiscation.
	We can't let America become number 20.
	We'll be right back after this break with more on the Chauvin trial, where it looks very unlikely that the man will be convicted, and it may be the case Black Lives Matter follows through on their threat.
	We'll be right back.
	♪♪ ♪♪
	♪♪ you
	The Revolution Radio at freedoms.com. We'll be right back after this message.
	Management would like to take a moment to thank the listeners and hosts for their continued
	support that has made Revolution Radio one of the biggest platforms for free speech in
	in an ever-growing dark world of censorship.
	Unfortunately, this platform for free speech has never been free.
	We need the support of the people.
	It is the people like you, yes, you, that keeps the station in the front lines of the battle against tyranny and oppression.
	Please help support Revolution Radio so free speech will not be silenced in a world that seems to be going deaf to the real truth.
	With your support, we will be able to become an even bigger pillar of light in a dark world.
	Revolution Radio, Freedom Substance.com, the number one listener supported radio station on the planet.
	Revolution Radio.
	Hey everyone!
	It's Barbara Jean Lindsay, The Cosmic Oracle.
	If you have questions about your past lives or future plans, need answers from the cosmos about your love life or career, or just want to keep your finger on the pulse of the planet, check out my show, The Cosmic Oracle, here on Revolution Radio at freedomslips.com.
	Was it a conspiracy?
	Did you know that the police in Boston were broadcasting, this is a drill, this is a drill, on bullhordes during the marathon?
	That the Boston Globe was tweeting that a demonstration bomb would be set off during the marathon for the benefit of bomb squad activists.
	And that one would be set off in one minute in front of a library, which happened as the Globe had announced.
	Peering through the smoke, you could see bodies with missing arms and legs.
	But there was no blood.
	The blood only showed up later and came out of a tube.
	They used amputee actors and a studio-quality smoke machine.
	Don't let yourself be played.
	Check out And Nobody Died in Boston, either.
	Available at moonrockbooks.com.
	That's moonrockbooks.com.
	The Lord is with thee.
	Om Namo Buddhaya.
	Dear Lord.
	Om Namo Buddhaya.
	Jaya Buddhaya.
	Join Revolution Radio every Wednesday 8pm ET.
	Eastern Time on Studio B for Momentary Zen with host Zen Garcia at freedomstep.com, the people's station.
	The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners
	or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
	They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff, or affiliates.
	You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, 100% listener supported radio, and now we
	return you to your host.
	Continuing with the trial for Officer Chauvin, I mean, it's being broadcast upstairs right
	now as I speak.
	They're giving this massive coverage.
	Black Lives Matter activist Maya Eccles, who is also a signed model with IMG worldwide, She looks like one who posed in one of those BLM events during the summer where she was, I think, in Atlanta.
	A very striking pose, you know, seeming to be this great looking black activist all in military style attire.
	Warned in a recent TikTok video that cities will burn if police officer Derek Chauvin is not convicted in the death of drug addict and thief George Floyd.
	Eccles says all hell is going to break loose.
	Let me just point out that this is an example of the elementary fallacy known as the appeal to force.
	You know, if you don't agree that I'm right, you know that I'm going to beat you to a pulp.
	Or, you know, if if that wasn't a fair catch and I'm going to take my football and go home, it's a kind of activity we expect of children on a playground.
	But here you have Black Lives Matter threatening to burn down cities, and I dare say they're talking about 33 cities, which is very suggestive that this has an underlying Masonic theme to it, which many of us find profoundly disturbing.
	She continues, if George Floyd's murderer, and notice, by the way, that's begging the question by taking for granted the issue at stake, which is whether or not this was an instance of murder, where in my judgment, increasingly, it does not appear to be, is not sentenced.
	Just know that all hell is going to break loose.
	Don't be surprised when buildings are on fire.
	Maya Eccles, prominent Black Lives Matter activist, threatened that cities will be on fire if Derek Chauvin is not convicted for the death of George Floyd.
	But bear in mind, the autopsy report found George Floyd had meth, fentanyl, cannabinoids, and morphine in his system, which, when Floyd died, he was also, we are told, COVID positive.
	But we know that COVID part is completely meaningless.
	Meanwhile, Chauvin's lawyer has played a clip of George Floyd allegedly saying, I ate too many drugs.
	I listened to the tape.
	He says I ate too many drugs.
	It appears that he had some in his possession when he was arrested.
	And in order to conceal the evidence, he consumed it.
	This is analogous to mules, you know, who are brought across a border with heroin and in rubbers.
	Uh, in their stomachs.
	Uh, and if the rubber breaks, they die of a massive overdose.
	It looks as though high with high probability, that's exactly what happened here to George Floyd.
	Former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin's defense lawyers played audio of George Floyd allegedly saying, I ate too many drugs while being detained.
	The video clip was presented during cross-examination of Los Angeles Police Sergeant Jody Steiger, a paid witness for the state, who claims that no force should have been used on Floyd.
	Defense Attorney Eric Nelson countered that Floyd was saying, I can't breathe, while resisting being put into the cop car before Chauvin's knee was anywhere near him.
	Made this observation before he was talking about having difficulty breathing even before they put him in the squad car while they were attempting to put him in the squad car.
	I think that latest count has that he may have said I can't breathe some 18 times.
	And of course, it isn't rocket science to observe that if you're able to say, I can't breathe, then obviously you're capable of breathing, but under duress, under stress, which would be, by the way, a symptom or manifestation of a fentanyl overdose.
	If somebody is saying, continues Chauvin's attorney, I can't breathe and they're passing out and they're not resisting.
	That's one form of an analysis, right?
	Because the actions of the suspect are consistent with the verbal utterances he's making, right?
	Nelson asked.
	Other times, and in this particular case, when Mr. Floyd was initially saying that he couldn't breathe, he was actively resisting arrest initially when he was in the backseat of the vehicle, right?
	Nelson went on to explain the officers had to change tactics when the futility of the three officers continuing their efforts forcibly to seat Floyd in the squad's back seat became clear.
	The defense also played the clip of Floyd allegedly admitting to eating too many drugs.
	He added the rowdy crowd scene caused a heightened sense of awareness for the officers When asked if he could make out what Floyd was saying in the clip, Steiger said he could not.
	Nelson responded that in the chaos of a situation, things can be misleading, where Floyd's autopsy showed he'd consumed a fatal amount of methamphetamines and fentanyl.
	I have the toxicology report right here.
	Absolutely true.
	Now, several other points have emerged.
	Namely, that police officers in Minneapolis, such as Officer Derek Chauvin, are taught to restrain a witness by placing their knee on their neck, where actually the argument is being made, and the judge appears to agree, that Chauvin's knee wasn't actually on Floyd's neck, but rather more on his shoulder, on his shoulder blade.
	So the judge has precluded The prosecution from saying that the knee was on his neck.
	We also have another expert testifying that if his knee had been on his neck, it would have only suppressed one carotid artery, but the other would have been functioning.
	In other words, he would not have been killed by having the knee on the neck on one side because blood would continue to flow through the arteries on the other.
	That, in my opinion, is very, very telling.
	So, we have a combination of an alternative explanation of fentanyl plus other drug overdose.
	I could hear clearly, so I can't understand why this witness claimed he could not.
	Floyd saying, I ate too many drugs.
	We have a practice that actually is condoned by the Minneapolis Police Department.
	Well, it looks to me highly, highly unlikely under these circumstances that Officer Chauvin could be convicted of second or third degree murder.
	Even manslaughter, it seems to me, is going to be a tough row to hoe for the following reason.
	You can only find a conviction if the case has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
	What that means is No alternative explanation is reasonable.
	But here we have two competing explanations.
	One is that Chauvin put pressure on his neck and caused him to die from asphyxiation, in which case he may be guilty of second or third degree or even manslaughter.
	Versus Chauvin's knee actually wasn't on his neck, even if it had been on his neck, it would not have caused asphyxiation or death, in that he appears to have ingested a massive overdose of drugs as the autopsy report sustains.
	Now, if the jury is unable to unequivocally prefer one over the other, because one is a A reasonable explanation and the other is not, then and only then can they convict, because no alternative explanation is reasonable.
	In this case, I submit that is not true.
	We have two alternative explanations, both of which are reasonable on their face.
	I am inclined to think the latter, the drug overdose inducing death, is the more probable.
	But the point I'm making doesn't depend upon settling on one or the other, only the recognition that both accounts or potential explanations are reasonable, which means that they cannot convict because there's an alternative explanation that is reasonable.
	I therefore believe that the jury will have to acquit, find him not guilty.
	And I'm impressed with the fashion in which the defense has been proceeding.
	And every one of you, no doubt, is catching bits and pieces.
	Yes, there are multiple experts.
	Yes, there are others who claim he died from asphyxiation.
	But once again, That may sound reasonable, but that he died from an overdose of fentanyl is also reasonable.
	When you have conflicting experts, it's certainly difficult to sort things out and conclude that one and only one of these explanations is reasonable.
	I believe the jury will be unable to do that.
	Now, if that means Black Lives Matter is going to cause all hell to break loose, Well, that is an opportunity then for the mayors of cities like Portland, Seattle, Minneapolis, Chicago, and elsewhere to actually uphold the law.
	Arson, looting, killing, these are all illegal acts.
	They've been countenanced by Democrats around the country throughout the summer.
	It is one of the most disgusting abdications of their duty and responsibility.
	Massive dereliction of duty.
	Which, in my judgment, makes them accessories after the fact to arson and looting and, in some cases, negligent homicides or deaths or manslaughter.
	The mayors and the governors who have failed to enforce the law, in my opinion, are legally liable for failing to take the measures that any prudent person in those positions of responsibility would have taken.
	Here we may find an opportunity to do the right thing.
	But frankly, with Biden-Harris, you know, in office, embarrassing America, I have little doubt that they're going to continue to embarrass America by violating the Constitution and the law and condoning more outrageous riots.
	Remember, we saw Nancy Pelosi.
	We saw Kamala Harris.
	We saw Maxine Waters.
	Those who were opposed to Donald Trump and, frankly, to the rule of law to conduct these violent riots and looting, describing them egregiously, falsely as mostly peaceful.
	I mean, this is insulting to every American.
	And of course, it's just one of the primary reasons why many Americans are becoming first time gun buyers, including many Democrats who may well realize when you can't count on the police, if you cannot defend yourself, you are leaving yourself defenseless.
	Remember, even for an emergency call, it can take the police as long as 20 minutes to show up.
	In the meanwhile, the mayhem occurs in the first five or six, so it may be by the time the police show up, and you've called them because they have guns when you do not, that your daughter has been raped, your wife has been murdered, you have been mugged.
	Think about it.
	You need to be able to defend yourself.
	Americans are getting the message.
	Now, on Wednesday, on this very show, we had the event where we consolidated, simulcast, the Wisdom Circle with Giuseppe Vafangulo, David Scorpio, and Chris Weinert, together with a raw deal here with Judy Mikovits.
	Judy's completely brilliant, fully courageous.
	It must have been astounding.
	How she even described how an airline allowed a police officer to rape her on an airplane.
	I mean, outrageous!
	Because she was protesting various of their policies.
	Judy is an admirable person.
	Everyone, everyone in America should listen at the very least to the first hour of that show.
	Meanwhile, The World Economic Forum globalist Klaus Schwab has declared unvaccinated people to be a threat to humanity.
	This is unbelievable.
	From Natural News, several dozen heads of the World Health Organization, the World Economic Forum and various other globalist bodies have declared that the Great Reset needs to include the establishment of a global pandemic treaty To ensure that all humans are vaccinated in accordance with the government edicts.
	World Economic Forum head Klaus Schwab, who looks an awful lot like an aged Heinrich Himmler of the Nazi SS, Says humans who refuse to go along with a plan are a threat to everyone else.
	He, UK PM Boris Johnson, French President Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Angela Merkel, and many of the other usual suspects all agree.
	These international leaders signed on to a letter that says the next phase of the pandemic transition into a new world order necessitates that the world's social engineers and societal architects build a more robust international health architecture that will protect future generations.
	The letter goes on to declare the Wuhan coronavirus as the biggest challenge to the global community since the 1940s, adding there will definitely be other pandemics and other major health emergencies in the years to come.
	No single government or multilateral agency can address this threat alone, the letter adds.
	Well, we know all of this is complete and total bullshit.
	We know this pandemic was planned in advance.
	It not only benefited the Democrats by depriving the Donald of the opportunity to hold his mass rallies, It explained away their Biden in the basement strategy where nobody cared about him and he couldn't get a handful to turn out anyway.
	And it took, you know, pulled the carpet out from under Trump's campaign for reelection by destroying the American economy, which is indicative of how far Democrats are willing to go to regain political control of the American political apparatus, the executive branch.
	We also know Tony Fauci, to whom I refer as Tony the Rat, has been a major instrument here of destruction of the United States, where he announced back in 2017 that the Trump administration would not only have to deal with seasonal flu and AIDS, HIV, but a surprise pandemic.
	2017 Anthony Fauci was talking about a surprise pandemic.
	Lo and behold, how can it possibly be a surprise if Anthony Fauci knew it was coming in 2017?
	And since he is the highest paid official in the American government, who is paid precisely to prepare for pandemics, why did he not do that?
	We also know, by the way, that Fauci Who is now out there recommending two or three masks, not just one.
	Conducted a study with colleagues of the Spanish flu that was published in 2008, where the Spanish flu is the greatest pandemic ever in world history, bringing about the deaths of tens of millions, and that they discovered most of the deaths were not from the flu, but were from bacterial pneumonia.
	Well, guess what?
	It just turns out that bacterial pneumonia is promoted by wearing face masks.
	I predict that history will record that Anthony Fauci was the greatest mass murderer in American history, perhaps in world history, because the amount of death that he is inducing here in the United States is going to rank in the tens of millions, I have no doubt.
	Remember, Deagle.com has offered the projection that the U.S.
	population is going to drop from 330 million in 2020 to less than 100 million in 2025.
	That's a drop of 230 million.
	That's two-thirds of the U.S.
	million in 2025.
	That's a drop of 230 million.
	That's two-thirds of the US population is going to be wiped out by 2025.
	And I tell you, the principal mechanism appears to be a combination of face masks, which kill
	us slowly.
	These vaccinations, which have mRNA technology, that's going to kill us more rapidly.
	And then with Bill Gates buying up American farmland, they're going to polish off the rest with a food shortage by means of starvation.
	That is what is coming.
	Meanwhile, we have Klaus Schwab, one of the world's great monsters, if ever there were one, continuing.
	The question is not if, but when.
	Together, we must be better prepared to predict, prevent, detect, assess, and effectively respond to pandemics in a highly coordinated fashion.
	The COVID-19 pandemic has been a stark and painful reminder that nobody is safe until everyone is safe.
	He stated just a few weeks ago, he believes nobody will be safe until everybody is vaccinated.
	It does not matter if a vaccine is experimental and still undergoing clinical trials, which is the case for all of the Chinese virus vaccines currently being distributed.
	If the government says you should get it, then you have to get it, according to this guy, this pig, Schwab.
	The other signatories have essentially declared they believe the same thing.
	All injections, no matter their purpose or risks involved, must be taken by all humanity in order for everyone to feel safe against scary germs from China or anywhere else.
	This will bring about a public good that will fulfill the tenets of the New World Order as long planned by the secret societies, the Illuminati and the Bilderbergers, and as delineated on the Georgia Guidestones in the Nogahide Laws and other key deep state texts that function as blueprints for a future totalitarian world.
	Remember, They are doing their best to make the American people more dependent on the government.
	That's what these stimulus checks are all about.
	They wipe out our ability to make money, to earn income by means of small businesses, to impoverish the middle class.
	So they, too, are dependent upon the government.
	And we're going to be confronted with the following proposition.
	That the government is going to give you a stipend in order to survive and enable you to rent a small cubicle as they're doing already in Australia.
	And they will pay off your student debts, your mortgages, your credit cards in return for which you surrender.
	You surrender all of your property and assets and agree to adhere to a regimen of vaccination.
	Now, if you refuse to do that, the plan is to consign you to a FEMA camp as a public health risk.
	And if you further resist, I have no doubt the solution will be to separate your head from your body using a guillotine.
	Guess where?
	Made in China.
	That is the agenda.
	Meanwhile, and I'm completely stupefied, the European Court of Human Rights has ruled that mandatory vaccinations are legal.
	The European Court of Human Rights has ruled mandatory vaccinations are legal and a significant judgment could have a big impact on the rollout of the COVID-19 jab.
	The ruling was in response to a complaint from a group of Czech families who'd been fined and had their children denied nursery care over their refusal to let their kids take mandatory vaccinations against nine diseases, including diphtheria, tetanus, whooping cough, hepatitis B, and measles.
	The parents argued the law was in violation of Article 8 on the right to respect for private
	life, but the court disagreed, saying the compulsory jabs were in the best interest
	of children to ensure every child is protected against serious diseases through vaccination
	or by virtue of herd immunity.
	This is outrageous given what we know about the incidence of autism in the wake of vaccines
	introduction, where there's a perfect correlation.
	The more vaccines have been used, the greater the increase in autism cases, a perfect statistical correlation.
	This is about as strong causal evidence as one could possibly have, where they tend to trace the feature of the vaccination causing the problems to their mercury or aluminum bases, but where it turns out the problem is so severe that we have projections that by 2050, half, half of our children are going to be autistic.
	Meanwhile, we're having to battle, fight this battle here where this ruling appears to be in violation of the Nuremberg Code, which was adopted as international law in the wake of World War II with the discovery that Dr. Mengele had been performing bizarre medical experiments on prisoners involuntarily.
	I'm glad to take your call when we return from the break.
	The number 540-352-4452.
	540-352-4452.
	Mitchell will field your call and get you on the air, and we'll talk about these issues at length.
	I'll continue, by the way, with the observation that Prince Charles has died at the age of 99.
	Jill will field your call and get you on the air, and we'll talk about these issues at
	length.
	I'll continue, by the way, with the observation that Prince Charles has died at the age of
	99.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	This is Robert Hicks, and thanks for watching.
	We'll be right back after this message.
	Was it a conspiracy?
	Did you know that the police in Boston were broadcasting This is a drill, this is a drill on bullhordes during the
	marathon?
	That the Boston Globe was tweeting that a demonstration bomb would be set off during the marathon
	for the benefit of bomb squad activities.
	And that one would be set off in one minute in front of a library, which happened as the Globe had announced.
	Peering through the smoke, you could see bodies with missing arms and legs, but there was no blood.
	The blood only showed up later and came out of a tube.
	They used amputee actors and a studio-quality smoke machine.
	Don't let yourself be played.
	Check out And Nobody Died in Boston, either.
	Available at moonrockbooks.com.
	That's moonrockbooks.com.
	If you think for one second that the Capitol will ever treat us fairly, you are lying to
	yourself.
	So...
	Because we know who they are and what they do.
	This is what they do!
	And we must fight back!
	You can torture us and bomb us.
	Fire is catching.
	And if we burn, you burn with us!
	Pretty.
	Are you awake yet?
	I hope.
	We've tried and we've tried for years and years to use passive resistance and loud voices to make a change.
	But time is over.
	Your governments around the world have no other goal than to decimate your entire existence at the hands of the bankers and the elites.
	The war is coming and it's your choice to decide if you want to be a warrior or a victim.
	Denial is not a choice anymore.
	Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, the number one listener-supported radio station on the planet.
	Not giving up.
	Revolution Radio Even the government admits that 9-11 was a conspiracy.
	But did you know that it was an inside job?
	That Osama had nothing to do with it?
	That the Twin Towers were blown apart by a sophisticated arrangement of mini or micro nukes?
	That Building 7 collapsed seven hours later because of explosives planted in the building?
	Barry Jennings was there.
	He heard them go off and felt himself stepping over dead people.
	The U.S.
	Geological Survey conducted studies of dust gathered from 35 locations in Lower Manhattan and found elements that would not have been there had this not been a nuclear event.
	Ironically, that means the government's own evidence contradicts the government's official position.
	9-11 was brought to us compliments of the CIA, the neocons in the Department of Defense, and the Mossad.
	Don't let yourself be played.
	Read America Nuked on 9-11.
	Available at moonrockbooks.com.
	That's moonrockbooks.com.
	The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners, or chatters, are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
	They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff, or affiliates.
	You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, 100% listener-supported radio, and now we return you to your
	host.
	This is Jim Fetzer, your host on The Raw Deal, where you're welcome to call in.
	Mitch will handle your call.
	The number is 540-352-4452.
	540-352-4452.
	If you had a question related to our simulcast on Wednesday, you're welcome to bring that
	in too, and I'll field as best I can.
	Meanwhile, having reported that Prince Philip has died at the age of 99, let me just say, everything I've heard about Prince Philip during his lifetime was highly unflattering.
	That Prince Philip was not a good guy.
	Mitchell has a late word about this development, so I'm very glad for him to join me here.
	Mitchell, tell us, what have you got about the death of Prince Philip?
	OK, Jim, I guess the question is, when did he have his COVID shot?
	Oh, oh, fascinating.
	You think it could be related to a COVID shot?
	OK, well.
	Now, um, let's see.
	He had been released from the hospital.
	You got to work backwards in some of these cases, right?
	Right.
	Reverse engineer.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	So we know I was reading a report where he had got out of the hospital in March, uh, the middle of March.
	Um, now he had his COVID shot.
	Him and the queen had their COVID shot.
	On approximately January 9th or so.
	So if he had it's reported he was in the hospital for a month, so that would put him in the hospital.
	Just a few weeks after he got his COVID shot.
	I can't don't can't say it's related, but you know it's it's strange somebody would give.
	Give a person that shot in such, you know, well, it's certainly suspicious.
	It's certainly suspicious.
	He he's elderly 99.
	I hadn't the impression that he was in bad health, but obviously 99 is up there.
	We know the elderly are more susceptible, not.
	Even to the virus, it appears to me, but to abuse, you know, I mean, most of the deaths attributed to the virus have simply been mapped on top of ordinary deaths.
	We have a report from Johns Hopkins that slipped through the cracks, showing there's been no increase in deaths in any of the age groups and 2020 versus 2019, for example.
	We know that the flu has been reclassified as COVID because there were 38 million cases of flu last year and only 1,700 or so this.
	I mean, it's absurd what's going on.
	We got Bruce from Texas on the line.
	Yes, yes.
	Bruce, join the conversation.
	Yes, hi gentlemen.
	I just have a couple of points to make, and you can elaborate on them.
	It's no surprise what's going on between the Ukraine and Russia.
	If you look at Victoria Nuland, she was the architect of the Ukrainian coup back during the Obama years.
	And her husband is Robert Kagan.
	I'm sure you're familiar with the name, but for those who aren't, he is a co-founder of the Project for a New American Century, which is a think tank Yes, yes.
	formulated in 1997 and in 1999 they put out a white paper, which in one phrase they called for,
	or bemoaned the fact that America won't take an aggressive military stance on the world
	until there's a transformative event like a new Pearl Harbor on a 9-11.
	Yes, yes, you're absolutely right.
	The project for a new American century was established in the wake of the dissolution of the Soviet Union
	1991 to lobby for the election.
	For America to enter the Middle East, claiming that it could inaugurate a new 100-year empire worldwide, hence a project for a new American century, which was all rubbish.
	The whole idea was to get the U.S.
	into the Middle East to take out the modern Arab states and served as a counterbalance to Israel's domination of the entire region.
	And then to be used to confront the Persian nation of Iran.
	It didn't succeed because of the intervention of Russia and Iran at the request of the democratically elected president of Syria, Bashar al-Assad, who is supported by 80% of the Syrian people.
	Bruce, you're making excellent, excellent points.
	Yes, Victoria Nuland spent some five billion of American money to foment a revolution, a fake or staged revolution in Ukraine.
	They even brought in Russian weapons to fire on protesters so they could claim it was Russians performing these actions.
	They got rid of a Russia-friendly president and replaced him with a stooge.
	And it's very, very tragic, the abuse of which Ukraine has been subjected.
	Now, from a military point of view, I'm convinced the Ukrainian military wouldn't have a ghost of a chance against the Russian, that Russia could take Ukraine and really militarily, the United States and NATO could do nothing about it.
	Ukraine is not a member of NATO, and I find it Quite shocking that our new Secretary of Defense, this Lloyd Austin fellow, who appears to me to be completely unqualified for the position, spoke with a Ukrainian Minister of Defense declaring unwavering support for Ukraine.
	I mean, this is ludicrous!
	He is not the political leader of the United States.
	It was completely inappropriate that he did that, and it would be a tragic mistake For the United States to become involved as a veteran intelligence professionals for sanity were laying out in what I covered earlier today.
	So, you know, I think the case is very clear cut.
	The United States ought to stay the hell out.
	This whole idea of separating Ukraine from Russia was promoted by Zbigniew Brzezinski in his book, The Grand Chessboard.
	arguing that Ukraine was a breadbasket of Russia.
	If Ukraine could be separated from Russia, it would greatly weaken the bear, where Nikita
	Khrushchev, who was himself an ethnic Ukrainian, declared the independence of the Ukraine,
	which wasn't significant as long as the Soviet Union remained intact, but has become significant
	since.
	And whereas you are correctly observing, Victoria Nuland and Robert Kagan are doing their best, with a whole lot of other Zionist forces, by the way, because the members of the Project for a New American Century were overwhelmingly dual U.S.-Israeli citizens, Which I have opposed strongly.
	During the very first political speech I gave on 15 April 2008 on the grass outside of the Capitol, a Ron Paul freedom rally on tax day, I argued That no dual citizen should ever be placed in a policy shaping or decision making position within the government because how could anyone know that their loyalty to the other state did not outweigh their loyalty to the United States?
	And I dare say what we see unfolding now is the adoption of a foreign policy that might as well be dictated by Bibi Netanyahu, who would like to see the United States and Russia engage in a nuclear war on the order of Charlie Manson's halter-skelter scenario, where he thought if he could promote a racial war, because blacks were stronger, they could defeat the whites.
	But because the whites were smarter, the blacks would need leadership, and Charlie and his band could come out of the mountains there to provide just that.
	I mean, it's insanity, absolute insanity.
	I do believe the Israeli Zionists, who believe that Jews are superior to all other human races, which only exist to serve them, have this at the top of their agenda.
	Bruce, further thoughts?
	Yeah, I was disconnected and Mitchell called me back.
	Thank you, Mitchell.
	And so I caught maybe half of what you said the last five minutes.
	That's okay.
	Okay.
	Yeah, I'll go on to try to conclude here.
	But there's a confluence of agendas here between the globalists who want that Green New Deal and want to move everybody into that realm of renewable energy and what have you.
	Well, natural gas, making it plentiful, Put some kibosh on that plan, for one, and two, you have the Russians blocking Israeli advances into Syria, and you also have the fact that, and it's been a long-standing plan to have the United States and Russia, if they eliminate themselves nuclear, then that leaves Israel as a nuclear power, as a major nuclear power in the world.
	And so they're willing to kill millions just to achieve their goals, and they don't give a rat's butt about the Goyim in Russia or the United States.
	It's really very dangerous, like you say, and I don't know what we can do about it, but I guess speaking out is a start.
	Yeah, well, I appreciate the call, Bruce.
	Anyone else who'd like to join in the conversation, the number 540-352-4452, 540-352-4452.
	Of course, as I think most of this audience is aware, Hunter Biden has been getting a free pass.
	I mean, it's completely stunning.
	The evidence in his laptop, which was concealed by Christopher Wray in relation to the 2020 election, just as James Comey had concealed the contents of the Anthony Weiner laptop in relation to the election of 2016.
	Let me assure you, the contents of these laptops are devastating.
	Absolutely devastating.
	And had the American people been properly informed, Trump would have won 2016 by an even greater margin, but 2020, obviously, because they were controlling the voting machines, where we have a new report, by the way, from an expert, Mike Lindell has put it out, that makes it very, very obvious all the states were having their elections
	Modulated, controlled by a computer or AI program where this brilliant guy, Mike Lindell, features.
	And by the way, you can find it on my blog at jamesfetzer.org.
	The title being Mike Lindell TV releases irrefutable election theft proof on new television special that features world renowned physicist It appears they took the 2010 census in order to determine the population distribution in each of the states, and then they created artificial voter registration profiles that exactly match the same distribution, and then they created a ballots cast that was the same, meaning if you were to look at the graph,
	The graph has peaks and valleys, right?
	It's an irregular graph.
	Now, that's for the census.
	If the others were legitimate, They would display variations that the actual number of registered voters wouldn't correspond exactly to the distribution reflected by the census, and the actual ballots cast would not correspond to that of the registered voters.
	But instead, and this is extremely bizarre and telling, What we have is an exact parallel.
	In other words, they have the same peaks, the same valleys.
	It's like you just have, you know, a spatial separation between the three graphs.
	Frankly, this is just devastating proof.
	One more form of evidence about how the election was stolen.
	Bruce, do you have any more comments you'd like to add at this point?
	Mitchell, any thoughts you'd like to add?
	Meanwhile, I have more to report about another odd case.
	Where a black NFL player is alleged to have killed a white family.
	This is pretty bizarre.
	I'm not at all convinced this is a real event, but I can guarantee you we're going to have one stage event after another here on a weekly basis following the Boulder, because the Democrats are wanting to promote their absurd gun control agenda.
	Frankly, the fact that he did this with an executive action rather than an executive order, I believe, is a reflection of the political reality that they don't have a ghost of a chance of actually getting these forms of legislation through the Congress.
	Let me share this.
	Media just cooked up a scheme to provide cover for black NFL player who killed white family.
	The media is finding itself between a rock and a hard place lately.
	They've been working overtime to convince us that white supremacy is a true threat this country is facing.
	Meanwhile, reality and facts are not working out in their favor.
	First of all, crime is soaring in Democrat-run cities thanks to their Defund the Police campaign.
	I've explained that in detail, where the overwhelming majority of crimes are committed by blacks, number one, using handguns, number two, and where the whole attempt to focus attention on AR-15s is ridiculous and unwarranted because they are rarely ever used, and yet they're getting all the publicity.
	Here's from KMJ Now Radio.
	Movements to defund the police have grown since George Floyd died in police custody in Minneapolis.
	Defunding means reallocating or redirecting funds away from the police department to other government agencies funded by local municipalities.
	More than 20 major cities, think about it, More than 20 major cities have reduced their police budgets in some form, though the scale and circumstances vary.
	The results have not fared well in Los Angeles, Oakland, New York City, Portland, and Austin.
	Homicides in Oakland, California, for example, have risen 314% compared with the same time last year, and law enforcement has seen 113% increase in firearms assault.
	Well, what would they expect?
	John Lott Who is maybe the leading expert on the relationship between guns and crime in the world today has a brilliant book on the war on guns.
	You can still purchase on Amazon.com if they haven't banned it yet, who explains that when you ban guns, crime goes up.
	I mean, what else would you expect?
	I mean, this is just common sense.
	So in the UK and London, when they ban guns, They had an epidemic of knife attacks.
	Remember, you can kill people many different ways over and beyond the use of firearms.
	And when they then banned knives, I said, well, what are they going to do next?
	Ban potato peelers?
	And believe it or not, that's exactly what they did.
	They banned potato peelers.
	I mean, this is so stupid.
	Anyone who climbs onto the gun ban agenda really needs to have their head examined, because they're weakening not only the ability of individual families and citizens to defend themselves from intruders and criminals, especially when the police have been defunded, But to deal with gangs, motorcycle gangs, rioters, looters in their cities.
	So it's not only for personal or family protection, it's also for social or community protection, and by no means least important for national security reasons.
	Many of you are aware that Emperor Hirohito wanted to invade the United States, but his highest ranking military advisors opposed the idea, explaining there'd be a sniper behind every blade of grass.
	So instead, he launched his attack against Pearl Harbor.
	Now, I assert, and I think it's beyond any doubt, That the excess of 130 million armed Americans constitute a massive mobile force to come to the aid of the nation in a national emergency, and where the Supreme Court has ruled already that the Second Amendment, although it mentions, you know, the sake of a militia,
	In order to the right of the citizens to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed that you do not have to be a member of a militia to have the right to keep and bear arms.
	and that right even extends to military weapons. They allowed that possibility, where of course
	the AR-15 is being demonized as a weapon of war, an assault rifle, when it is not.
	Assault rifles are fully automatic. The AR-15 is only semi-automatic.
	The difference being, of course, that with a fully automatic weapon, when you depress a trigger, it continues to fire automatically until all your ammunition is expanded.
	But with a semi-automatic, you only have one bullet fired for each depression of the trigger.
	For each trigger pull, one shot.
	Completely different!
	So it's all part of the semantic games that the Biden administration and the Democrats have been playing with the American people.
	Lying, lying, lying.
	They're very good at that.
	Very good at that.
	Meanwhile, this story, the bad news gets even worse for the media.
	The latest rash of shootings, attacks on Asians, and insurrections at the Capitol have involved black men.
	Remember when the media did not do their best to try and turn attacks on Asians into white supremacy after the massage parlor shooting?
	They tried, eh, for effort, but it didn't work out for them.
	Even liberal utopia San Francisco has given up that spin and conceded that black people are attacking Asians at an alarming rate.
	And of course, that's very notable in San Francisco because of its large Asian population.
	So here you have a report from SFGate, San Francisco gate.
	At least four high-profile attacks involving Blacks and Asians have occurred since January in San Francisco and Oakland, including the beating death of Tian Sheng Yu, 59, last month.
	Two 18-year-old men have been charged with murder.
	Now Chen and his family have joined a chorus of voices in the Bay Area, saying the increasingly visible and deadly incidents of Black-on-Asian violence are racially motivated.
	I don't like to say this is a race discrimination, but I have to say it.
	Roshi Shen's daughter-in-law, Xi Shen, wrote in an email.
	Others, including the police chiefs of San Francisco and Oakland, are just as emphatic that the problem is not hatred of Asian Americans, but a hazardous collusion between angry young men and a vulnerable population with cash in their pockets.
	Those would be the Asians, the Chinese, the Japanese.
	That article is a hoot.
	According to the reporter, black men are not attacking Asians because of racism.
	They're just attacking people who stereotypically make good money.
	That's quite a spin job.
	It's amazing the pretzels liberal reporters will twist themselves into in order to provide cover for black crimes.
	And as I'm reporting, the overwhelming majority of crimes, violent crimes, gun crimes in the United States are committed by blacks.
	It's on the order of 55 times more than any other racial group.
	Now that pretzel twisting has become more apparent than ever with the recent murder of a white family of five in South Carolina.
	Mind you now, I'm not taking for granted this is all accurate, but it's fascinating how he is dissecting the media reports.
	On Wednesday afternoon, Dr. Robert Leslie, 70, and his wife Barbara, 69, The family was murdered by Philip Adams, a former NFL player who killed himself during a police standoff shortly after the shooting.
	Reporters indicate Adams had been treated by the doctor at some point.
	This story was a golden opportunity for a fair-minded press to dive into this man's past and explore the very real possibility that racism was a motive, especially in this divisive climate and with all the other black hate crimes going on.
	God knows the media would have breathlessly explored that angle if the races were reversed, if it had been a white man slaughtering a black family.
	However, The liberal AP reporter didn't go that route.
	Instead, he got into his pretzel suit and wrote a piece about what a good boy this murderer was and how football was likely to blame for the killing spree.
	Look at how the AP framed this story.
	This is fascinating.
	Talk about your fake news.
	Adams, 33, played in 78 NFL games and five seasons for six teams.
	He joined the 49ers in 2010 as a seventh-round draft pick out of South Carolina State, and although he rarely started, he went on to play for New England, Seattle, Oakland, and the New York Jets before finishing his career with the Atlantic Fultons in 2015.
	As a rookie late in the 2010 season, Adam suffered a severe ankle injury that required surgery, including several screws being inserted into his leg.
	He never played for the 49ers again, getting released just before the 2011 season later with the Raiders.
	He had two concussions over three games.
	We're going to take a break here.
	When we return, we'll continue.
	Call in if you got any questions for me about any of these issues today.
	We'll be right back.
	FreedomSlips.com will be right back after this message.
	Hello, this is Bill Hader from FreedomSlips.com.
	You're listening to Revolution Radio at FreedomSlips.com.
	We'll be right back after this message.
	Thank you for listening.
	HA!
	Management would like to take a moment to thank the listeners and hosts for all their support that has made Revolution Radio one of the biggest platforms for free speech in an ever-growing dark world of censorship.
	Unfortunately, this platform for free speech has never been free.
	We need the support of the people.
	It is the people like you, yes, you, that keeps the station in the front lines of the battle against tyranny and oppression.
	Please help support Revolution Radio so free speech will not be silenced in a world that seems to be going deaf to the real truth.
	With your support, we will be able to become an even bigger pillar of light in a dark world.
	Revolution Radio, freedomsubstance.com, the number one listener-supporter radio station on the planet.
	Revolution Radio.
	We try our best to help other people.
	R.I.P Keara Ok cowards!
	It's really about vulnerability!
	We are the ones who are vulnerable.
	Join Revolution Radio every Wednesday 8 p.m.
	Eastern Time on Studio B for Momentary Zen with host Zen Garcia at freedomstech.com,
	The People Station.
	Even the government admits that 9-11 was a conspiracy.
	But did you know that it was an inside job?
	That Osama had nothing to do with it?
	That the Twin Towers were blown apart by a sophisticated arrangement of mini or micro nukes?
	That Building 7 collapsed seven hours later because of explosives planted in the building?
	Barry Jennings was there.
	He heard them go off and felt himself stepping over dead people.
	The U.S.
	Geological Survey conducted studies of dust gathered from 35 locations in Lower Manhattan and found elements that would not have been there had this not been a nuclear event.
	Ironically, that means the government's own evidence contradicts the government's official position.
	9-11 was brought to us compliments of the CIA, the neocons in the Department of Defense, and the Mossad.
	Don't let yourself be played.
	Read American Nuked on 9-11.
	Available at moonrockbooks.com.
	That's moonrockbooks.com.
	The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners, or chatters, are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
	They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff, or affiliates.
	You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, 100% listener-supported radio, and now we
	return you to your host.
	We were talking about this case in North Carolina where a black NFL player allegedly slaughtered
	a family, a white family.
	And the story, the way the AP framed the story, it continues as follows.
	As a rookie late in the 2010 season, he suffered a severe ankle injury that required surgery, including several screws inserted into his leg.
	He never played for the 49ers again, getting released just before the 2011 season began.
	Later, with the Raiders, he had two concussions over three games in 2012.
	Whether he suffered long-lasting concussion-related injuries wasn't immediately clear.
	Adams would not have been eligible for testing as part of a broad settlement between the league and its former players over such injuries, because he had not retired by 2014.
	Adams' father told a Charlotte television station that he blamed football for the problems his son had, which might have led him to commit Wednesday's violence.
	I can say he's a good kid.
	He was a good kid, and I think football messed him up, Alonzo Adams told WCNC-TV.
	He didn't talk much, and he didn't bother nobody, quoting the father.
	The AP story goes on to say how police tried to negotiate with Adams as he took refuge in his parents' home, begging him to surrender, promising they would take care of his disabled mother.
	Good Lord, is this tiny Tim or a vicious killer?
	It's hard to tell at this point.
	In the end, Adams shot himself, eliminating any chance to discover the real reason why he murdered the prominent white family.
	This story and Adams will now be buried six feet underground and never spoken of again except of an example of how evil football is.
	That's pretty distressing.
	I agree.
	And I think it is indeed another illustration of the fake news media.
	There's a lot also going on out there.
	Mitchell, is there anything you would like to contribute?
	Because I have more in terms of international developments where the Israelis have hit an Iranian command ship in the Red Sea, another further disturbing development.
	And what's going to happen here is, of course, unknown.
	But Israel has been targeting Iran.
	I'm convinced Israel, through all of its weight, Correction that this was in South Carolina rather than North.
	That Israel has thrown all its weight and its control over the media to Biden against Trump, I believe, because Trump refused to bomb Iran.
	So now, in my estimation, what we have is Israel trying to influence US foreign policy again to provoke an action by Iran that could justify a massive retaliatory strike.
	All very disturbing stuff.
	Meanwhile, the media has launched a preemptive strike on Florida Governor Ron DeSantis.
	This is one of the good guys, an emerging American hero in my book, a very significant person who has principles, a degree of charisma, and good judgment.
	CBS News expanded its fake news and liberal bias by fabricating a false narrative about Florida Governor Ron DeSantis' vaccine rollout.
	Many view the Republican as the front runner for the 2024 presidential nomination, should former President Donald Trump decide not to seek another term.
	Governor DeSantis followed the science and demonstrated lockdowns in a shuttered economy were counterproductive in slowing the spread.
	His leadership Protected a high senior population and secured elder care facilities while fake news outlet showered praise on New York Governor Andrew Cuomo.
	A New York Democrat caused the highest death rate among our valued elders and is currently under federal investigation.
	We're tampering with COVID data.
	The fake news media continues to push false and misleading reports about DeSantis because they know he would likely beat any Democrat he were to run against.
	That's why the dishonest media launched a new smear campaign against him.
	CBS fake news shows 60 Minutes insists his decision to work with public supermarket chain to distribute vaccines is some bizarre pay-to-play scheme.
	Publix, as you know, donated $100,000 to your campaign, CBS reporter Sharon Alfonsi angrily shouts, and then you rewarded them with the exclusive right to distribute the vaccination in Palm Beach?
	How is that not pay for play?
	First of all, of course, it turns out the pharmacies that had the vaccine were CVS and Walgreens, and they had a long-term care mission, so they were going to the long-term care facilities.
	They got the vaccine in the middle of December and began going to those facilities.
	The third week in December, DeSantis replied, So yes, you had the counties, you had some drive-thru sites, you had hospitals that were doing a lot.
	We wanted to get into communities more, so we reached out to other retail pharmacies, Publix, Walmart, obviously CVS and Walgreens, had to finish the mission and said, we are going to use you as soon as you're done.
	The CVS shell wanted nothing to do with the Santa's Fax Base answer.
	And the 60-minute segment would later cleverly edit the governor's remarks to manipulate the impression.
	But while Fonsi and CBS News may have deliberately laughed out of the salient facts on the ground, meanwhile, we have a report about how CBS failed hit on DeSantis wound up highlighting the California governor's no-bid vaccine contract.
	This is a significant blowback.
	The 60-minute segment on Republican Governor DeSantis regarding vaccine distribution quickly unraveled, but inadvertently brought Democrat California Governor Gasem Newsom into the spotlight.
	The report, published Sunday, accused DeSantis of choosing Publix, Florida's largest grocery store chain, to partner For the vaccine rollouts, due to donations the company made to its political committee, 60 Minutes quickly faced backlash, and critics began taking apart the statement notice, noting that the CBS show aired an edited clip of DeSantis explaining why Publix was chosen, that two Democrats had publicly decried the allegations that Publix donations did not make up a substantial amount of funding, and much more.
	Nearly 90 percent.
	Critics also began calling out 60 Minutes for earning a hit job, as former White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany called it, on DeSantis while ignoring the failures of Democrat governors in other states.
	It turns out that Newsom, who was elected governor in 2018, rewarded Blue Shield and its executives with positions of power during the coronavirus pandemic, which claimed nearly 56,000 Californians lives.
	Remember, they were designated as COVID victims, but almost certainly died from other causes, natural causes.
	Instead of honing in on Newsom's deal with Blue Shield after the company reportedly donated millions, 60 Minutes tried to connect Public's much smaller donation to DeSantis.
	Get this.
	California's Blue Shield contributed $23 million to the governor's campaign.
	$23 million in special causes throughout the years, according to Fierce Healthcare, which of course makes the $100,000 pale in significance.
	The Federalist Molly Hemingway was another to point out the lack of reporting from 60 Minutes regarding Newsom, calling the show propaganda press.
	Here we get a tweet in Mollye's response.
	60 minutes.
	Sunday, Sharon Alfonsi investigates allegations that Florida Governor Ron DeSantis made decisions about COVID vaccine distribution favoring wealthy or connected individuals, including a supermarket chain that recently donated to the governor's PAC.
	What Mollye observes is the propaganda presses avoidance.
	Of the disease that are Democrat governors, the disasters that are Democrat governors Cuomo and Newsom, instead attempting to tear down the governor who has quite obviously handled the COVID crisis the best in the country, even with a super old population, is deserving of mockery.
	I could not agree more.
	I'm delighted that Scaredy Cat is here to join us.
	Scaredy, join the conversation.
	Welcome.
	Hi Jim, and also hi Mitch, and was it Paul from Texas?
	No, Bruce.
	Bruce.
	Bruce.
	Okay, so I'm going to sound like a wicked witch, or maybe a wicked cat meow meow, so I want you to notice that, I'm just going to say it, Jew culture Worked tirelessly over many decades to establish the phrase, quote, separation of church and state.
	And to implement it into American society into the present moment, such as even prohibiting Christians, the majority of America, to gather for the most sacred holiday, Easter last week and Christmas in the winter.
	And other sort of maybe secular but still precious holiday of Thanksgiving back in the fall.
	And at the same time, I want you to notice that the same Jew culture has worked again, tirelessly, relentlessly, in parallel, to hide the actual establishment of the true reality, which is right now I'm going to coin
	the phrase, synagogue and state.
	So for example, we had the riots last summer.
	I'm going to call that premeditated riots, premeditated looting, because everybody noticed
	how pallets of bricks showed up in just normal neighborhoods.
	No normal person does that.
	The government, in the White House, we had President Trump's son-in-law, Jared Kushner,
	He got himself appointed.
	I think his official title was Special Advisor to the President.
	And, you know, that's right in our leader, our American leader's house.
	And we had this premeditated Uh, destruction, what I call demolishocracy.
	He might be technically in the Republican Party, but I have given the name demolishocracy, uh, to the actions of this Jew culture.
	And in fact, the Democrat Party, I call them the demolishocrats.
	And for example, even, um, uh, so church and state.
	It's very fine for it.
	We should regard that as government interference into religion, which our nation.
	I'm a Muslim.
	I might be a foreigner, but I became a U.S.
	citizen at the earliest time.
	When I was 18 years old, I came as a child.
	When I was 18, I had to declare what I wanted to be.
	I swore an oath.
	And when we went into the ceremony, We had to say, you have to relinquish ties, loyalty.
	I mean, in your heart, you're loyal to your grandmother and all this you left behind, but those are just human, very valuable human ties.
	But when it comes to the country, political and technical legal loyalty, you have to be loyal to your country.
	And I don't understand why I, all the ceremonies at that time, You weren't, as far as I know, didn't have this dual loyalty business, dual citizenship, because I remember everybody, there were people of all countries, 100 countries in that ceremony, huge packed courtroom with a judge or somebody, some court officer was saying the oath of your new citizenship is to USA, United States of America.
	And so now, So this is why I use the phrase, our nation.
	So I'm here.
	This is my country.
	I'm not going anywhere else.
	I don't have any other place to go.
	So I'm saying our nation is founded on this, you know, government shouldn't interfere in religion.
	Yet we have the current, present, deep reality of synagogue and state.
	You mentioned, you know, looting.
	I will call that the looting as soon as the John Floyd, actually the officer, officer, I forget his name, Chauvin, it's going to be premeditated rioting, right?
	Because everybody is conspiring to establish in the near future this rioting if you were The white American police officer, if he was declared innocent, all the Jew culture is conspiring now to create, with the snap of a finger, they will create riots because the Jew culture's stealing of human communication that is all our media.
	They are already fanning people up.
	Uh, and, and who should be helping us?
	Well, we have the U.S.
	Avril Haines as our DNI.
	That is such a powerful position.
	17, all of our 17 security and intelligence departments and agencies report to her.
	That includes FBI.
	You know, I've named you our People's Bureau of Investigation one man over the billions of dollars funded FBI.
	I'm willing to bet that you're going to get a lot of support from the other caller who's joined us.
	Go ahead. Sorry, I've talked to all scary. I'm willing to bet that you're going to get a lot
	of support from the other caller who's joined us. Paul, please share your thoughts with Scaredy and
	me. Yeah, scaredy cat. We've had somebody call in six. So if you're interested to take the
	minutes tonight of our local national Nazi party meeting, I'll put in a word for you.
	Thank you.
	So, you know, thank you for your contributions to the show.
	I believe that they're anti-Semitic enough to qualify in my book.
	Jim, I got a question for you.
	I just was curious because of the way that you were covering the trial in the first part of the show that I heard.
	Do you believe anybody died?
	Where?
	George Floyd or anybody else?
	Well, it's very curious, Paul.
	I mean, it's actually a reasonable question notwithstanding we have a trial here over who, you know, was responsible for his death because we have a Another attorney, a previously representative in Texas, who said the real George Floyd died three years before.
	And of course, I have several times explained how it appeared to be a fake death using a Sigma-7 African-American airway training dummy that the guy is, you know, manacled behind his body.
	Uh, when he's put in the car and yet when he's lying on the ground, he, his hands are in front and now he's lost his hair.
	It looks like the Sigma seven airway training dummy and when he's lifted up onto a gurney, he has no legs.
	Now they may have created another video, you know, uh, to show him being taken out of the vehicle.
	Cause I, that's something I'd certainly not seen before, but I think there's a, A good question here as to who or what we're dealing with.
	It's rather analogous to Las Vegas, where we had Steven Paddock.
	We were shown what's supposed to be his body in his suite in that wing of the Mandalay Bay Hotel.
	And yet his dimensions, according to his Fish and Wildlife card, are not the same as the dimensions of the body allegedly subjected to autopsy.
	So, I think we have real questions that are raised about these cases, both of them similar.
	So, it's not as absurd as it sounds.
	No, well, it's not an absurd question at all, and if we were in a court of law and I asked you that question and you were on the witness stand, I would just say it's a yes or no answer, sir.
	But seriously, the reason I ask it is because of all the coverage that you've done, you've had Danny Sears on it and you've talked about it before.
	And so when we or when you talk about autopsy reports and fentanyl overdoses and so on and so forth, you're creating a hybrid event, which I don't believe exists.
	In other words, as Oleg Domogarov once said on a separate presentation, that he's never found an event that he considered to be a hybrid event where people actually died.
	So this is exactly the kind of thing that just almost a The kind of thing that Scaredy Cat is mentioning with her with her portrayal of Jew culture.
	And of course, my my tongue in cheek, you know, intro was, you know, out of all due respect for the contributions of her calls, because I think that she sees things the way that we all should see things.
	And that's through this lens, this mask that they're putting over our faces.
	If you will, Paul, there are two separate issues.
	One has to do with the court proceeding and the evidence being presented there, which is precisely what I was dissecting.
	The other has to do with the authenticity or lack thereof, which is a whole lot of that indeed.
	But by the way, let's bring it through.
	Brew has joined us here and I want to give him a shot at all this too.
	Brew, join the conversation.
	Well, look, this whole George Floyd business been convoluted since the beginning.
	I mean, since it began last year, we started pointing out all these different things, all these anomalies, the dummies, the, the, the lawyer saying the original George Floyd died in 2017.
	So we've got a tale of two George Floyds.
	We have this porn actor, George Floyd that has tattoos, this, that, and the other, and so on.
	And then we have a real, another George Floyd with, who had all these other different connections, you know, I don't even know if that's the same person of Because all the rap sheets are so intertwined because they took two separate people, I believe, two separate events, I believe, and merged them together.
	And this would be in a form a hybrid event.
	Maybe the real George Floyd that this lawyer speaks about died in 2017 off just whatever, but then they have this porn star George Floyd that has something to do with that convenience store.
	Now let's go on the timelines.
	We know it didn't happen last summer for, uh, just, uh, when Danny points out, look at the gas prices, Jim, look at the gas prices.
	We know it didn't happen last summer.
	So, you know, when did this George Floyd porn star event happen?
	When, when diesel fuel was 99 cents.
	And when did the actual George Floyd?
	Now let's go to the trial today.
	Prove me wrong.
	That is not the same Derek Chauvin, the alleged police officer, Minneapolis sitting on trial.
	We noticed right from the beginning, as soon as they arrested him and said, Oh, here's his mugshot.
	Well, as soon as he posted his mugshot, it wasn't the same person with an event that just happened within weeks.
	No way he lost so much weight and his face was thinner, this, that, and the other just by a mug shot.
	Just that mug shot alone posted immediately.
	It was like it's not even the same guy.
	Already we know they're pulling a fast one.
	So what we've got is the two tails.
	I don't know how you guys are going to figure it out.
	I don't have the time to do it.
	There's too much information out there.
	But, you know, we have to do these things.
	Everything they're doing with this Melbourne trial.
	This is being done in a Hollywood studio somewhere.
	There's no way they've got a real trial going on.
	Exactly.
	So there is no figuring it out.
	As Danny Suris said, there is no trial.
	It's all BS.
	I bet you right now you can't go to whatever courtroom they're saying it's in.
	That's pretty fascinating.
	Now what I was doing was simply taking the cases that's being presented and televised
	at face value and explain why, in my opinion, given the evidence and testimony presented,
	they are not going to be able to convict Derek Chauvin, whether it's a real guy or not, whether
	George Floyd actually died or not, who it was who died, whatever, all the stunt work,
	leaving that to one side.
	I was explaining why, if you look at the trial on its face, just accept that what's going
	on there is what's being presented, I do not see how the jury can convict.
	I think they have a reasonable alternative explanation that will mean they cannot find
	him guilty because that must be done beyond a reasonable doubt.
	And I do not see how they can do that here.
	All your other questions obviously are totally legitimate.
	I've been, you know, indulging in a lot of that with my analysis.
	You can find my take on one false flag after another in many different places.
	So, you know, I'm not disputing.
	That this may be some kind of another kind of hoax like Sandy Hook, Charlottesville, Orlando, Las Vegas.
	But Paul, I'm just talking about why even if all that were true that I don't see how the jury can reasonably come to a conclusion of these guilty guilty of the death.
	Nobody's quibbling with that and I am not and you're doing a great job.
	It's just I have not heard this sort of analysis from you on other events, you've basically called out every other
	event as false and phony and a fraud and that's fine.
	And you basically have done that here too, but there's two things going on.
	You're doing a good job of this.
	In other words, it's listenable.
	I listen to a lot of it and of course it makes sense.
	The points you're making are, as you would often say to others, impeccable or spot on.
	These are the sorts of words that I would use.
	But my question is simply, do you believe that it's a real event?
	Do you believe it's a real trial?
	Do you believe that anybody such as this George Floyd character died?
	And I would be surprised if you answered yes to either of those questions.
	Yeah, it's all open to doubt.
	You guys make great points.
	Bru, thanks for calling Scaredy.
	Paul and, of course, Bruce from Texas.
	We're down to the final minutes.
	I just want to say to everyone, look, we're in a serious situation.
	This attempt to grab our guns is not going to end.
	We're going to get one fake event after another.
	Be aware.
	Keep alert.
	We'll continue to do our best to expand exactly what's going on and present it for you right here on The Raw Deal, and I'm very grateful to all of you who listen and all of you who call in and add your contributions.
	Valuable and insightful today as before.
	Bruce, Scaredy Cat, Paul, and Bruce, thank you all for calling, and Mitchell for doing a great job of production once again.
	We'll be back next week.

▲