Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

March 25, 2021 - Jim Fetzer

01:33:48

False Flags on Five Fronts: Sandy Hook, the Boston Bombing, Charlottesville, Las Vegas and JFK

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	You want to come up now, let's say if you were...
	Ready?
	I'll see you. I'll see you. Are you ready? I'll watch you.
	My mortgage. I'm on Facebook. I'm fine.
	Yep.
	Right here?
	Okay.
	That's good.
	All set.
	Okay.
	Excellent.
	Excellent.
	Oh, there we go.
	Right here? Okay. That's good.
	All set. Okay.
	Excellent. Excellent.
	Now we get, oh there we go.
	I'll give you more minutes.
	Why don't we wait until quarter after?
	And I'd like to welcome you on... Oh, we've got more people coming in.
	That's it.
	Come on in.
	Okay.
	I get settled here and I'd like to welcome you on.
	We got more people coming in.
	That's it, come on in.
	Peter Danforth says hi.
	Oh great.
	Okay. Ready to go Mark?
	Okay.
	Welcome.
	It's Super Bowl Sunday.
	I'm a super star here to show us what's really happening in the world.
	There's been a lot of things that have gone on that have been false flags and we're going to talk about those and because False and fake news turns into fake history and false history.
	And we want to present that.
	We want to correct the record.
	And we have a person here to do that.
	And he's really outspoken so much that we are in a substitute place.
	And thank you all for transferring over here.
	So without any further ado, this is the man of the hour.
	He's on my TV shows.
	And he's just the best person in the world for investigative journalism.
	Give a big Seattle welcome to Jim Fetzer, Professor Jim Fetzer.
	Don Grant was really ahead of his time when he named his program Truth vs. News
	because we're getting from the news is not the truth and the truth is not something the news wants to report.
	The concept of false flags originated in pirate times when pirate ships would fly the flag of a target vessel or a nation friendly thereto in order to Approach them closely enough when they hold down the false flag and run up the skull and bones and attack their target.
	So it's come to be understood generally as events that are orchestrated, organized, and executed by one group only to be blamed on another for the sake of promoting a political agenda.
	And we've had a super abundance of these events in the United States of late, where today I'm going to give you updates about two of the classic cases, Sandy Hook and the Boston bombing, and then explain to you what actually happened in Charlottesville, which has not been widely reported, and even more so expose the Las Vegas massacre, extravaganza, which was a completely fabricated event that is Beginning to fall apart in such a way that the mainstream has dropped it like a hot potato.
	And finally, I'll add some of the very latest developments about research on the death of our 35th president.
	Now the Sandy Hook hoax is collapsing, but we've still had some losses as well as some wins.
	That photograph in the middle is William Shanley, who is a Really courageous guy with the heart of a lion.
	He was a director, a producer of films.
	He filed a trillion-dollar lawsuit against the mainstream media for its inadequacy in covering the Sandy Hook events.
	It would be refused by the courts, of course, but it was a grand symbolic gesture and attracted a lot of attention at the time.
	William, alas, has passed from this earth just this past year.
	We also have another death of academic freedom in this instance where James Tracy sought to regain his position at Florida Atlantic after he'd been wrongfully deprived of a tenure position as an associate professor, ostensibly on the basis of his not having filed certain forms about outside activity.
	Having spent 35 years in higher education, In a wide range of institutions of higher learning, I can assure you that's a preposterous explanation.
	If you fail to file forms on time, you might be called in by the dean for a verbal reprimand.
	At worst, you might have a letter put in your dossier, but to be fired from a tenured position for not filing forms is simply a manifest absurdity, as was even observed by the Chronicle of Higher Education.
	Well, Kevin Carey reported the following.
	This month, Florida Atlantic University fired a tenured professor of communications named James F. Tracy, citing his failure to file routine paperwork.
	That fact is both technically true and essentially false.
	Tracy was actually fired for bringing shame and embarrassment upon his university by publicly and vocally insisting that the massacre of 21st graders and 6th educators at Sandy Hook Elementary School in December 2012 did not occur, or more precisely, was a complete fabrication.
	In fact, James Tracy had done a lot of quite brilliant work on his blog, which the judge, during the trial incidentally, declared to be his private activity as a private citizen over which the university had no proper control.
	Including this piece about Hillary Newtown and the Sandy Hook actors, where he revealed that Francine Wheeler, Who was the wife of a fellow David Wheeler, about more momentarily, both of whom were B-grade actors, where Francine even played the voice of a character in an animated pornographic film.
	And David, it would turn out, played a SWAT team member walking up and down Dickinson Drive carrying a weapon upside down by the magazine, which the lowest private in the Marine Corps would not commit.
	In other words, his ignorance of weapons was so vast.
	But it turned out that Francine just happened to be the personal assistant to Maureen White, who was the leading Democratic fundraiser.
	And of course, gun control was a big issue for the Democrats.
	Here you can see David Wheeler in one of his roles, in this case as a SWAT team member, Profoundly embarrassing that he was found out, but where many of the videos about Sandy Hook have been taken down hundreds, in fact, and we were just discussing one of the excellent videographers who did those things.
	Tracy's article about the press conference by Wayne Carver, the medical examiner, held the day of the event.
	It was a classic in my opinion.
	It was the first serious scholarly article about Sandy Hook, where he took him to task for many anomalies.
	He didn't know of the children.
	He'd autopsied how many were boys and how many were girls.
	He wasn't sure how many times they were shot, but claimed from three to eleven times, which frankly is preposterous.
	He even mentioned in passing the laps.
	He said he hoped this didn't come crashing down on the people of Newtown.
	So James Tracy was doing quite a lot of good, actually, in exposing the hoax and was, in fact, seeking to defend the public from the scam.
	It would turn out that sympathetic but gullible Americans contributed between $30 and $130 million, which was divided by the 26 families.
	So they averaged more than a million dollars apiece for pretending to be the parents of children Who in fact had not died at Sandy Hook.
	He's filed a judgment to have it be set aside.
	We'll see the prospects.
	This is such a politically loaded case in South Florida.
	I'm not optimistic, but I'm a strong supporter of James.
	Here's another article about it.
	Fortunately, James Tracy gave Florida Atlantic University a reason to fire him.
	What if it hadn't?
	What if Tracy had posted goofy offensive conspiracy theories on his blog while complying with rules about outside activity?
	By professors.
	Under that scenario, it would have been tough, if not impossible, to fire him.
	And of course, when we look at the evidence, we find everything he was publishing is well-founded.
	In fact, the school at the time was not compliant with American for Disability Act requirements.
	I reviewed the law.
	All the entrances and exits had to be wheelchair accessible.
	Here you can see one obviously not.
	There's even a section of steel pipe sticking out which could have popped out the eye of a little kid.
	This was a kindergarten through a fourth grade school.
	Not being compliant meant it could not be legally operating as a school.
	Here's further proof, a photograph of the parking lot.
	You'll notice there's none of the familiar blue and white signage for handicapped parking.
	In fact, it was a 28 degree ground temperature day For the school to have been operating, it would have had to have been heated, but there's no steam or heat rising from the building because the boilers were dysfunctional from lack of use for so many years.
	Plus, notice the vehicles in the middle.
	If you followed the driving instructions, you would have come in off of Dickinson Drive, turned right, curled around, then parked facing away from the building.
	But it was much simpler to bring them in in a single file, two by two by two, and put them all in facing the school.
	After all, they were only props.
	Who would even notice?
	Now we have the famous photographs sent around the world at the top here by Newtown View photographer Shannon Hicks.
	This was supposed to be a policewoman leading the children to safety during the shooting massacre.
	But it turns out Shannon shot a second photograph taken earlier in time, the bottom photograph.
	In which you can see a whole host of parents there, hands in their pockets, their arms folded, looking on, while the policewoman rearranges the kids to get a better shot.
	So notice originally we had a little girl in a pink sweater and a short dress, but they replaced her with a little boy in a dark sweater and blue jeans.
	If you look just in between boy number one and boy number two in the photograph at the bottom, where Shannon has acknowledged taking both, You see other parents casually looking on, which leads me to refer to this photograph as lounging at the massacre.
	Here's the area where that particular photograph is taken of the string of kids, but officially there had been 489 students there.
	So if you track 20 for those who were allegedly killed, you would have had 469 to evacuate, which meant they should have been all over the place.
	But when you go to the locations and times that the police specify that the evacuation was taking place, for which we have dash cam footage, there's nothing there.
	We've all heard that you can't prove a negative, but that's simply false.
	You can prove there's no elephant in your living room, for example, which is a negative by going to your living room and Noticing no signs of the presence of elephant, which entitles you to infer that's because there's no elephant there.
	If you go to locations and times where the massacre is reportedly taking place, but the evacuation was reportedly taking place, but there's no signs of an evacuation taking place, you're entitled to infer the negative.
	That's because there was no evacuation taking place.
	Here's the piece de resistance.
	We have either the crime scene SWAT team there present.
	Just above the roof of the vehicle, you'll see a string of four windows that have diagrams of candles, but they're undamaged, which is crucial because after the event, the second in particular would be blown out.
	So we know this is before the event took place.
	The flag is at full mass.
	You come down, you look in the background, there's a familiar figure leaning against the wall.
	It's Wayne Carver, the medical examiner, awaiting the arrival of his portable mortuary tent.
	Notice there's crime scene tape up for a crime that is yet to be committed.
	We have other photographs.
	Top left, you can see the windows before.
	Top right, the windows after the event, where the second is so clearly shot out.
	To confirm that, in fact, that photograph was taken before the event.
	In fact, we originally thought it was taken the morning of the 14th of December 2012, but in fact, it was taken the evening of the 13th, the night before they were setting things up.
	On the right, then, you can see it shot up.
	Bottom left, we actually caught the perps here drilling holes in the window frame to simulate gunshots.
	You can see pink rods extruding.
	They're all exactly 90 degrees to the window pane and parallel to one another.
	I used to supervise a marksmanship training for recruits in San Diego when I had 15 DIs and 300 recruits under my command.
	This is a fantasy.
	This is not real shooting.
	No one who is familiar with actual marksmanship would be taken in.
	Here we have a very interesting report.
	When you have a true hypothesis, you can get confirmations from unexpected sources at unexpected times.
	This was published by Richard Plant on March 3, 2017.
	The distance by vehicle between Monroe and Newtown is roughly several miles, 10 max.
	In 2010, I was visiting a friend of mine who lived in Monroe at the time.
	I didn't know when I arrived, but he had an evening appointment.
	One night to go to Sandy Hook Elementary School to pick up a couple of student desks on the cheap for his kids to use at home.
	When we arrived at Sandy Hook School, the parking lot appeared to not have been in use for years.
	Inside, the building showed signs of previous flooding and water stains were up to several inches above the floor.
	There was mold everywhere due to the flooding.
	The caretaker of the building quickly showed us where to locate the desk.
	And we got them out and into my friend's vehicle.
	Further observations of mine indicated this was a very, very neglected building.
	And the caretaker even indicated the building was condemned because it was full of asbestos everywhere.
	This building was a mess.
	And the fake news want us to believe there were 400 plus elementary children in classes on that fateful day.
	He means December of 2012 that a guy named Adam Lonza shot and killed some of the children and adult teachers?
	Give me a break!
	I spent a lot of years in construction and renovation, and there's just no way any authorities would allow young children into a building such as the one I saw in June of 2010.
	No wonder the grief of the townspeople didn't appear genuine even on TV.
	As a contractor, you deal with a lot of people, but the emotion of the witnesses and parents just wasn't genuine.
	Well, those are my thoughts on the Sandy Hook School.
	And they thought they would get away with it?
	Thank God few of us are that stupid.
	And here's a photograph of the parking lot to indicate what I mean.
	Sandy Hook School is not only loaded with asbestos and other biohazards, but had been impacted by a hurricane and by a major flood in 2007, which washed away features that you'd ordinarily find present, such as oil stains.
	So there were none.
	On the other hand, while we had a loss with Tracy, we had a win with Wolfgang.
	Lenny Posner, who of course fames to be the father of Noah Posner, the most well-known
	of the Sandy Hook children, because he not only died in Newtown on 14 December 2012,
	but again in Pakistan on 16 December 2014, where Lenny even sent a death certificate
	to Kelly Watt for Noah when she challenged him about having a son who had died there.
	What happened with Wolfe is that Lenny brought a lawsuit against Wolfe, who under Freedom of Information Act requests obtained documents that included Lenny's address.
	So he sued him for violating his rights.
	It went to court.
	During the three preliminary hearings, Lenny Posner did not even show up.
	The judge therefore directed that he had to submit.
	He allowed Wolfgang Discovery, which was a very significant development, and directed Wolf to conduct a deposition.
	When Wolfgang got a really good lawyer and a new judge came on who was all business, he instructed Lenny Posner to sit for a video deposition.
	At 4.59 p.m.
	Eastern Time, the last possible moment Lenny dropped the lawsuit rather than subject to a video deposition.
	Wolfgang has come up with this photograph, eight of the Sandy Hook girls and their photographs when they were younger.
	We have more proof of how they faked the kids using photographs of older children when they were younger.
	Kelly Watt, the very same.
	Notice the striking resemblance between Noah Posner, top left, and his, the person purported to be his older stepbrother, Michael Vabner, top right, showed it to friends and they agreed, yes, it looked like the same person.
	We have done an extensive study.
	We found they had the same ears, the same eyes, the same eyebrows, the same shape of the face and skull.
	And in fact, we've done a GIF where you can see or hear Noah Posner turning into Michael Vabner.
	This is how they faked it.
	Apparently this proof is so threatening that, and I'm convinced this Lenny Posner has actually come into my blog and removed these images repeatedly, I've now resorted to double-step verification each time I go into my own blog, and it seems to have ceased.
	But this is truly threatening.
	Wolfgang has come up with yet other photographs.
	In fact, even in the lower right here, we see what appears to be an even more recent photograph of Michael Vatner, also known as Noah Posner.
	Obviously these kids did not die.
	And get this, I recently interviewed Wolfgang on my radio program, The Raw Deal on Revolution Radio, and Wolfgang was reporting how he has been contacted by three of the children who want to get their wives back.
	They've given him affidavits about their experience and they want to come out.
	Well, so this is in the offing and it's going to blow apart the whole event.
	I did a recent video overview about Sandy Hook because it remains of such enduring interest.
	Sandy Hook update, Tracy loses, Wolfgang wins, the deep state strikes back.
	But the Honor Network, which is Lenny Posner, the fake father of Noah, submitted a protest to YouTube to which we responded.
	You have 500 characters to respond.
	The person who submitted the claim has done this many times.
	Check his history.
	He has 26 websites he uses to harass students of Sandy Hook.
	His son Noah is a fiction created by photos of Michael Vavner as a child, which we expose in the video.
	Photos of Noah have appeared all over the world millions of times.
	His copyright assertion is completely without merit.
	By upholding his claim, YouTube becomes an accessory after the fact of fraud and theft by deception
	by a bona fide con artist.
	Here is, in fact, from Tony Meade, a simply excellent student of Sandy Hook, who has an article about the
	disappearing witnesses in the second edition of the Sandy Hook book,
	where I released the first for free as a PDF when it was banned by Amazon.com,
	even though it has 13 contributors, including six current or retired PhD professors,
	and demonstrates conclusively the school was closed, where we even found the FEMA manual for the two-day drill,
	which I included as appendix A.
	He sent me, you know, a list of Lenny Posner's 26 websites he uses to attack and harass those who seek to do it.
	I've had the video, which still remains the strike, even though we responded and Lenny technically had 10 days to take it into court or the whole matter would be dropped and the video restored.
	I've had it uploaded on BitChute.
	Which has now changed its name to Speak Out, S-P-K Out, where you can find it if you want a nice review.
	And there, of course, you can actually see David Wheeler carrying that weapon upside down by the magazine.
	Adding insult to injury, the governor of Connecticut, who is deeply complicit, Daniel Malloy, has received a Profiles in Courage award from JFK's grandson.
	This was a Barack Obama Joe Biden, Eric Holder, Daniel Malloy, Connecticut State Police, Newtown School Board, fake families event, largely carried out by the Connecticut State Police under the auspices of a FEMA drill.
	Nobody died at Sandy Hook.
	Let me turn to the Boston bombing hoax, which is also likewise unraveling.
	We have an amicus curiae brief that was prepared by John Remington Graham, who is a retired professor of law.
	Which he submitted to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in relation to their review of the trial record of Zoker Saranova who was convicted of his participation in the Boston bombing.
	We know the whole thing was a charade.
	We have video where you can hear in the background the police on bullhorns calling out, this is a drill.
	This is a drill!
	The Boston Globe was tweeting that a demonstration bomb would be set off during the marathon for the benefit of bomb squad activities and another tweet that one would go off in a minute in front of the library and lo and behold a minute later in front of the Boston Public Library we had one of these puff bombs and I say that as a former artillery officer in the Marine Corps These were so feeble that I don't believe they could have killed anyone unless perhaps you were actually sitting on top of them.
	Here, it looked very dramatic, however, to those who are really unfamiliar, but it was actually a visual special effect.
	When you look through the smoke, yes, there were bodies there, missing arms and legs, but stunningly, there was no blood.
	Now, as Lorraine Day, who was in charge of trauma surgery for San Francisco General Hospital for 25 years, has observed, you cannot have limbs blown off by explosives and there be no blood.
	In fact, what they had done was to bring in amputee actors already missing their arms and legs to play the role of victims of the bombing.
	The blood only showed up later.
	It was fake blood, Hollywood blood, came out of tubes, never changed color.
	Here were the brothers who were photoshopped into this setting there at the Boston Marathon to make them out to be the culprits.
	I was contacted by their aunt, Marette, who is a formidable woman with a law degree from Moscow University.
	Who explained to me they'd been photoshopped and I asked, how do you know?
	And she said, because Tamerlan, the older brother, had a beard.
	But when they photoshopped him in, they photoshopped him in clean shaven.
	I asked, could she prove it?
	She started sending me photographs and links one after another.
	Here's Tamerlan lying in bed with his cat.
	He has a beard.
	A link to a gymnasium where the two brothers were working out.
	He has a beard.
	He was contacted by a friend the day of the bombing, relieved to find they'd been nowhere in the vicinity.
	They had dinner together that night.
	He had a beard.
	When the search was going on for the suspects, there was convenience store footage.
	Zoker inside, Tamerlan out.
	He has a beard.
	He's arrested by the police in Watertown, stripped naked, put into the back of a police car.
	He has a beard.
	The next we see his body with a huge gash in the side.
	He still has the beard.
	Now, I could identify him when he was arrested and put in the police car, but he was also identified by his aunt and his mother.
	The police have claimed that his brother killed him, even accidentally, but how would that be possible after he was taken into police custody?
	In fact, we have a witness who reported seeing him driven over three times by a black SUV, apparently a zoned vehicle, driven by the police.
	Here we have the absurd trial of Zoker.
	It was a farce.
	His defense attorney, of whom I shall make more comment, had formally pled him innocent, meaning not guilty, but in her opening statement she said they did it so the jury didn't have to really ponder the evidence to show the crime had been committed.
	She introduced a confession.
	That purportedly had been written on the inside of a boat.
	Now the lines are completely evenly spaced, perfectly horizontal one after another.
	This is alleged to have been written on the curved surface of the inside of a fiberglass boat.
	Where it turns out that you have to have a special writing implement to write on fiberglass.
	Not even Leonardo da Vinci could have accomplished what is attributed here to Dzhokhar Tsaranov.
	And does anyone in their wildest dreams imagine that you just happen to have the right kind of implement right on the inside of a fiberglass boat?
	In the dark?
	Here is Judy Clark who seems to be mopping up cases like this.
	She gives a pseudo defense but actually convicts them.
	Does nothing to give a serious representation on their behalf.
	In my opinion, she deserves to be disbarred, particularly since it would have been effortless to prove that he was not responsible.
	Here's one of the backpacks.
	The FBI investigated and discovered that both bombs had been inside black and nylon backpacks.
	In fact, the alternative media cracked the case the day of the event, identifying the Kraft International, this is a private army like Blackwater, With khaki trousers, black jackets, black baseball caps, and a skull insignia.
	With a motto of craft is violence does solve problems.
	And you can see on the left two of them together, one of them wearing a black nylon backpack with a white square on the back.
	Here he is before and after delivering the backpack to the location where it would explode and then rushing away no longer carrying the backpack.
	When they photoshopped in the brothers, however, they committed a colossal blunder because the backpacks don't match.
	Zoker's got a silver backpack.
	His brother has a much larger, different design backpack.
	Neither of them is wearing a backpack of the appropriate kind.
	As John Remington Graham observed to me, because the backpacks don't match, there wasn't even probable cause for an arrest, much less an indictment and a conviction and trial.
	So you have this anomalous situation where the two brothers, who clearly did not commit the offense, are one killed by the police, the other on the loose.
	But these guys who actually planted the bombs, or as I say, the alternative media, cracked this case already the day of the event, are supposed to be ignored like the man behind the curtain.
	Now it turns out that John Remington Graham submitted this amicus curiae brief to the first court And to his astonishment, they accepted the brief.
	It was submitted on behalf of three United States citizens, James Fetzer, Ph.D., Mary Maxwell, Ph.D., LL.B., and Cesar Borrugia, M.D., and makes the simple point that since the backpacks do not match, this is a wrongful conviction.
	According to Professor Graham, this is the first time in the history of American jurisprudence that an appeals court has accepted an amicus curiae brief.
	It's already a part of the formal record and it will inevitably lead to the rejection of the conviction and expose the hoax for the grim reality, as I have laid out in the book, and nobody died in Boston either, where I just point out that.
	I was astonished to learn from a Hollywood producer-director by the name of Nathan Foulkes, F-O-L-K-E-S, who identified one of the key players, a tall guy with a cowboy hat, whose name is Carlos Arredondo, as an actor he cast in one of his own films, that they had used a smoke machine.
	So we poured through the footage, the videos, and we found, yes, a studio-quality smoke machine I put on the back cover on the very left.
	This was totally fraudulent, another hoax perpetrated on the American people.
	The situation in Charlottesville is quite remarkable because you ought to have heard a lot about it by now, but in fact you have not.
	It in fact was a production that was divided into three acts.
	Act one was Friday night, 11 August, which featured a torch-lit parade of protesters onto the campus of the University of Virginia.
	Well, I taught twice.
	I was visiting associate professor in 1977-78 and visiting full professor spring semester 1984-85.
	I therefore have great affection for what is known as Mr. Jefferson's University.
	And when I discovered the duplicity involved here, I would write to 75 members of the Department of History, to the President, to the Provost, the Vice Provost, to several members of the City Council, none of whom showed the least interest apart from one woman with an endowed chair.
	Who replied that she was embarrassed to know that I had any association with the University of Virginia.
	The second events occurred the following morning, however, when the protesters who had a permit, these were peaceful protesters, were going to a park where a statue of Robert E. Lee was going to be removed, were manipulated by the mayor of the city, directing the Charlottesville police to stand down.
	So the governor could use the state police to channel them into a direct and violent confrontation with the members of Antifa and Black Lives Matter who had been bused in by George Soros.
	The third aspect or act occurred then a few blocks away, subsequently at an intersection where Several vehicles had been parked in advance, but where we discovered there were two different drivers, two different cars, two or even three different tanks.
	In other words, the whole thing was totally fake.
	Here you can see the two drivers.
	At the top, the man who actually was driving the vehicle.
	He's a 32-year-old Army veteran who commands a battalion of reservists in Ohio.
	Below, the designated patsy, James A. Fields.
	20 years old, diagnosed as a schizophrenic, who's supposed to be on an anti-psychotic medication, wears heavy prescription glasses.
	Notice from the images inside the vehicle, that is not a James A. Field, no prescription glasses.
	It's clearly the other fellow, who believe it or not, is supposed to have a nearly identical name, James G. Fields.
	Clearly it was not the Patsy, it was the Army vet.
	They used two different cars, both Dodge Challengers.
	One had a black stripe, the other did not.
	One had a sunroof, the other did not.
	They had actually two, or as I'm going to show, three different takes.
	Here's one, where you see the vehicle crashing into the back of two vans.
	If you look carefully, you'll see there's no driver in either of the vans because they didn't want them to suffer Injury to their back or to their neck.
	Here's another tank.
	Look on the left.
	That's one vehicle.
	There are no vehicles in front of it.
	That's one of the tanks.
	Then you see the other we've already reviewed as a second.
	But here's yet a third.
	Look on the left.
	Now you have the vehicle beside a black Toyota pickup truck that wasn't there before.
	As you can see from the image on the right.
	So there were as many as three different takes.
	Here you see one of the stuntmen, because they actually photoshopped in stuntmen flying through the air that did not occur at the time the crash actually was taking place, but which was conveniently created to put on the cover of the New York Times.
	And here you see that particular stuntman casually sitting on the black Toyota pickup.
	Here's the image that then appeared on the cover of the New York Times, a Photoshop masterpiece, real attack perhaps, or talented acrobats and a bunch of flying sneakers used to stage a video.
	Notice how lean and fit the two somersaulting pedestrians are, and note the occult numerology of the license plate 1111.
	It was Photoshopped.
	Now, I not only sent a letter to all those members of the Department of History, but three videos That showed exactly the points I was making about two cars, two drivers, two takes, equals totally fake.
	So they had the evidence available to them.
	If they cared about evidence-based history, I was giving them the evidence.
	Now subsequently, there's been an independent report on Charlottesville by a former federal prosecutor named Timothy Heapfee.
	A 220-page independent review.
	But it committed three massive blunders.
	First of all, It identifies James Alex Fields as the driver when, as I've already explained, James Alex Fields was not the driver.
	Instead, it was the 32-year-old.
	We've already reviewed the photographic evidence that establishes that James A. Fields at the lower right was not the driver, whom you can see on the left, top, and top right.
	Second of all, they claim that Heather Heyer died in the car crash.
	Her death is cited actually five times in the report, on page six twice, on page seven, on page 163, and in the timeline on page 193, shown here.
	1.41 p.m.
	James Fields drives vehicle into crowd at 4th Street and Water Street, killing Heather Heyer and injuring dozens.
	Now I asked Mona, Alexis Presley has been doing a brilliant job on the autopsies from Las Vegas and has discovered time after time they're for persons who died in different states or on different dates or from different causes of death.
	In other words, completely contrived.
	Can I interrupt for just a second?
	Did someone in here own a red SUV in the parking lot?
	Yes.
	The alarm's been going off.
	It goes off on and off every 15 minutes or so.
	Sure.
	Thank you.
	So Alexis dug into the case of Heather Heyer and discovered she died the following day, not because of the automobile crash, but from a heart attack.
	Or even her mother has acknowledged that Heather died from a heart attack.
	So that's another colossal blunder in the report.
	Here's a photograph of Heather, who is a fairly attractive young woman, trying to find her in the crowd.
	Some have speculated it might be this woman in the turquoise top that's lying on top of one of the vehicles, but it's rather obvious that she's much too large and corpulent to in fact be Heather Heyer.
	More interesting in many ways is the fact that her mother, the mother of alleged victim Heather Heyer, turns out to be someone we've seen before.
	Compare this with a Sandy Hook mother, bottom left, let the two images overlap each other, change the transparency, it's a perfect match.
	So it seems that Susan Brough, the mother of Heather Heyer, and Donna Soto, who is supposed to be the mother of one of the teachers killed at Sandy Hook, is played by one and the same crisis actor.
	Third colossal blunder, it reports that two state troopers died in a helicopter crash.
	Everyone heard about the crash at the time.
	That's probably one of the few facts you can draw to mind readily about what happened in Charlottesville.
	It's particularly interesting because the National Transportation Safety Board, the NTSB, even released a report on 5 September 2007 17, that didn't identify the cause of the crash, but confirmed that Lt.
	H.J.
	Cullen and Trooper Pilot J.M.
	Bates were both killed in the crash.
	If you look at the text, it's very explicit.
	They're attributing to this, to the NTSB.
	Well, that's rather surprising because we have photographs of the troopers departing the scene of the crash wearing their flight uniforms and very much alive.
	That the NTSB should be participating in this event does not surprise me.
	Since they covered up the causes of the death of Senator Paul Wellstone, his wife, daughter, and three aides and their two pilots on 25 October 2002, as John Peek, Ostella PhD, and I explained in The NTSB Failed Wellstone, published by Michael Rupert on his FromTheWilderness.com website.
	We have proven that government agencies are participants in these events to promote a political agenda and cover up crimes.
	Here, in fact, is a video Where you can see these guys, alive and well, walking away from the scene.
	I mean, there they are.
	They aren't dead.
	They're perfectly alive.
	There's never been a correction of the record to tell us they didn't actually die.
	Right.
	Why upset the public with the truth?
	Maybe they die of shame.
	I mean, it's just embarrassing that this is so blatant.
	So there's always more.
	I published this now in my latest book, Political Theater in Charlottesville, Faux Terrorism, in three acts produced by leftist zealots.
	And let me just note here that the key players included, the production includes George Soros, executive producer and professional agitator, Terry McAuliffe, director and governor of Virginia, Michael Signor, who is the mayor of Charlottesville, who directed the police to stand down, You had Richard Spencer and Jason Kessler playing the role of white separatists or white nationalists.
	You had, and they are in fact Obama supporters up to the point that Trump became elected and suddenly they turned into white supremacists.
	We had a witness there right on the scene, Brendan Gilmore, who turns out worked for the State Department in Africa and appears to have been in the CIA, who's a campaign manager for a candidate for governor of Virginia, to whom George Soros gave $350,000.
	Then you had as extras, you had Antifa, Black Lives Matter, Virginia State Police, the National Guard, You know, I mean, it's just embarrassingly bad.
	You might think you can't top that, but the Las Vegas Massacre exceeds by far in degrees and levels of absurdity.
	It was, of course, problematic from the beginning because the fellow who is alleged to be the shooter didn't satisfy any profile for a mass killer of which the world has ever heard.
	He's a multi-millionaire, lived in a retirement community, where the amenities included golf, you know, bocce, that's bowling, lawn bowling and so forth.
	He's supposed to have had an addiction to video poker.
	Where Ann Coulter made the wry observation that if you think a man can, you know, anyone can make a living playing video poker, you may also believe that someone can make a living smoking crack cocaine.
	It's that ludicrous!
	Here's a photograph rather striking from the scene that again appeared on the cover of the New York Times, and you see what's supposed to be a victim.
	But I took a look at the blood, and there's something wrong here.
	Presumably she was standing at the time, so the blood ought to have been running down her leg.
	Instead, it's running across her leg, because someone dripped it on her when she was lying on the ground.
	Here's a scene from inside the suite.
	He had 23 weapons, all the classic, most popular military-style weapons.
	But you'll notice a stunning dearth of shell casings, because as we're going to discover, the sheriff claims that Steven Paddock fired over 1,100 rounds at the Las Vegas concert, so we should have seen a vast array inside his suite.
	In fact, you see a handful around the body, and it turns out that the prop master here was very careless, because as Scott Bennett, former Army Intel and PsyOps officer, has observed, some of them are for blanks, which have a crimped nose, unlike an open casing for firing a lead slug.
	Others are CO2 cartridges for gas-propelled pellet guns.
	So this is a stage scene, and the woman who threw down just wanted to create the right impression.
	Never imagined it would be subjected to minute, detailed inspection, as in fact turns out to be the case.
	Intel Hub has been doing simply wonderful work of late.
	You'll find they committed a blunder early on, but it was a very telling one.
	And now they've noticed that the victim appears to have suffered two wounds, one to the chest and one to the head.
	Which makes the death more compatible with an assassination.
	A hit with a tap to the body and then to the head.
	To make sure that he's done for.
	So that's suspicious in and of itself.
	Here you have some footage from the scene.
	Where if you look carefully in the middle of the hotel.
	See the flashing lights?
	See the flashing lights in the middle of the hotel?
	This is simulated, simulating a gunshot firing from the middle of the Mandalay.
	You may not see it well, but on higher floors there are three light blasts that are also being emitted from the middle of the Mandalay.
	Notice this is nowhere near the 32nd floor of the Mandalay Bay.
	Stephen Paddock was allegedly the sole gunman firing 1,100 rounds.
	It does not compute.
	We have another video of a man in the crowd turning to fire on the crowd and you can see the light from the flash of his muzzle but there's no impact of any bullets because he's using blanks.
	So there you have at least three different simulated shooters, the machine gun in the middle of the hotel, the three-shot blast above, and this man in the crowd, none of which are firing real bullets.
	Here's a fascinating photograph that typifies what was actually going on here.
	You have the police crouching behind a police car, but look at the civilians!
	One's on his cell phone, another with his iPod, neither of them are remotely concerned and yet you have the police crouching behind the police car.
	A completely staged event, reminiscent of what happened in Dallas when we had that alleged atrocity of a gunman gone wild.
	Here you saw a photograph on the left that was published in the Wall Street Journal right here in Seattle, midnight of the day, where a doctor obtained a copy and thought it was remarkable how they had this photograph already in the newspaper at the time.
	We took a closer look and it's a photoshopped image.
	It actually originated from the setting at the lower right.
	It just would happen that I would be at the Crowne Plaza Hotel for a JFK conference shortly thereafter.
	Walked across the street and lo and behold there's the very setting where they staged this photograph.
	They had to expand the size of the background.
	To introduce the police, but when you look more closely there are orange blank adapters on their weapons.
	They could not have even fired live rounds.
	And notice how cleverly they cut it off at the top so it looked like these were massive pillars going upward when they're actually cut off.
	Again, a photoshopped image.
	Here's a very interesting report from a Facebook friend.
	I contacted these three hospitals, all of which are the closest emergency facilities from the alleged shooting.
	Spring Valley Hospital, AMG Specialty Hospital, North Vista Hospital.
	I asked if they could check their registry for a gunshot victim who was taken there from the mass shooting at the Mandalay Bay Hotel.
	I received the same reply from each facility.
	There were no gunshot victims admitted to this facility.
	You may want to check with local police.
	One woman said, if you are referring to the crisis drill that everyone keeps calling about, then I'm sorry, there were no real gunshot victims.
	That was just a drill.
	Here are the phone numbers you can call if you want to verify for yourself, which I did.
	So I called, and two of them gave me precisely the same report as my Facebook friend.
	No gunshot victims were admitted.
	The third said simply no comment, and I explained I took that to be a no.
	Here's the official setting.
	Paul Craig Roberts, our nation's leading public intellectual, has received several reports from highly qualified medical experts, including a military surgeon with vast experience with Victims of military gunshots, high-velocity weapons that do an enormous amount of damage.
	Explained how he'd reviewed the videos of the patients in the hospital, and it was obvious to him that none of them actually had been shot, that they were all crisis actors.
	He cited one case where the fellow just, when Donald Trump walks into the room, just pops out of bed and stands more or less at attention to greet him.
	He observed that if he'd actually been shot in the leg, as was alleged, he not only would have had no inclination
	to get out of bed, he would have been unable to do it, to even stand up.
	This was followed by a second, an American trauma surgeon, who added a host of additional points, including this one,
	especially telling that none of the victims in the hospitals
	are even connected to the blood pressure equipment or the IV
	drips.
	Now, about six weeks or two months ago, I lost my balance and went down to the emergency medical center
	in Madison at St.
	Mary's, and they had me on my blood pressure monitor from the moment I came in to the time I was given a clean bill of health and release.
	None of them are even connected to blood pressure equipment.
	Totally staged.
	I guess they rented some rooms at the hospital for this stunt.
	Here's another.
	This is a good one.
	Here you see three bodies being transported from a funeral home, Hearst, into an ambulance in order to be presented as though they were victims of the Las Vegas shooting.
	Real dead people, yes, but not victims of the massacre.
	Here's where the Intel Hub went astray.
	They thought they'd found a mini massacre within the massacre.
	Footage shows 17 ambulances pulling bodies out of Hooters the night of the massacre.
	If they paid a little closer attention to their own footage of inside Hooters, they would have seen A group of bored crisis actors, each with their own individual sheet, waiting their turn to be carried out on a stretcher as additional victims of the Las Vegas shooting.
	Here's a very interesting piece.
	Another video where, by the way, we've examined 33 of the videos from the Las Vegas scene taken at the time.
	The sound of shots is very distinct, but there's no evidence of the impact of any shots.
	In this case, you actually have the director come in from behind the scene to have them redo, to reshoot the scene.
	Here we can actually catch a part of it.
	pretty fascinating stuff because you don't normally get the director
	out there moving the actors around but in this case we have it on video.
	What's wrong with that woman?
	I don't know.
	I'm going to go around the back.
	What's wrong with her?
	What's wrong with her?
	No, we're gonna go around.
	Okay, go around.
	I don't see her.
	Wrong.
	Okay.
	Get, get, get, get.
	Okay.
	Hold on.
	Okay.
	Oh my God.
	I hate you."
	Haha.
	All right.
	Hey, don't record me coming out to redo the scene.
	Okay.
	I don't know.
	It's me!
	I'm Sam Rafferty!
	What?
	Hey dude, don't record.
	Bye.
	Mona Lexis Presley has taken the photographs, obituary sketches from USA Today, for example, and done research on, well initially it was 20, 20 of these including Stephen Paddock.
	She discovered that they had We're based upon people who died in different states or on different dates or from different causes of death.
	We have yet to find a single actual victim of the Las Vegas shooting.
	She has done multiple reviews here.
	I've had friends who claim to know somebody who knew somebody, and when we got the name, we tracked it down.
	Even in the case of Dean Ryan, with whom I've done television interviews, We found one friend of his had multiple addresses and multiple phone numbers and appears to be a crisis actor himself.
	Another, a girl he knew that he claimed had been shot.
	It turned out for the first two days she was not shot at all.
	She was perfectly fine.
	And then began feigning to be yet one more victim here.
	The fact that 20 is less than the 58 who are alleged to have died, but it establishes a prima facie case in support of the conclusion that the victims were fabricated and that nobody died at the concert.
	In the absence of authentic evidence sufficient to overcome that presumption, the inference deserves acceptance in the tentative and fallible fashion of science.
	The proof of fakery appears to increase by the day.
	I have now published five or even six blogs of Mona Alexis Presley's work.
	And most recently, in fact, featured her on my show, The Raw Deal on Revolution Radio, where we were joined by Don Kramer, who actually is an audio video expert, who was the first to point out to me That the video, the quality of the audio track was too high quality to actually have been legitimate, that it had been pre-recorded.
	With access to additional evidence, we have a prospect of confirming or disconfirming the best supported hypothesis, which is that the Las Vegas event was not real, but was a movie.
	Made for television production.
	So much has emerged about those who benefit by selling their stock only to buy it back at vastly reduced price, including the Chief Executive Officer of Mandalay Bay MGM, who sold off 80% of his stock in order to buy it back on the cheap after the price fell.
	By putting shorts on MGM Mandalay Bay to make vast sums when the stock should drop, George Soros put a $41 million short on Mandalay Bay and made a bundle And even the prediction of scanners will now be required at every hotel and casino.
	The Chertoff Group is founded by Michael Chertoff, who is our second Secretary of Homeland Security, who is responsible for getting the scanners into the airports with which we all have to cope these days.
	Having had cancer myself, I refuse to go through them.
	I'm now typically allowed to go through the other screener, sometimes given what's intended to be a humiliating pat-down.
	But it's all completely outrageous.
	It used to be fun to go to the airport and greet your friends and relatives.
	Now they've turned it into a tortuous ordeal.
	There are other fringe benefits, but it certainly looks as though buying extras via Crowds on Demand was a cost-effective expenditure.
	Crowds on Demand, a Los Angeles based PR firm began recruiting crisis actors for Las Vegas 15 days in advance.
	So what they did, they had a pre-recorded soundtrack, high quality, of real machine gun fire, even hearing bullets hitting hard surfaces.
	They coordinated it with special visual effects, which we've already seen.
	Those are flashing lights, intended to be coordinated with sound coming from the PA system, so you could hear it everywhere.
	And then they have the crisis actors on cue reacting to the shots when they heard them on the pre-recorded soundtrack.
	Now, Dan made a marvelous point on last Thursday.
	He observed that in the beginning, when you listen to the recordings of the concert, you can actually hear the machine gun shots, but it's rather faint.
	It's rather faint.
	You can hear it in the background.
	It was so faint that the crisis actors couldn't hear it.
	So they had to turn up the volume.
	So then they could hear it, and then they started reacting.
	So of course, if you could hear it before, if it had been real, they would have been responding already to the real shots, even if you couldn't hear them distinctly on the soundtrack.
	But because it was all contrived, it was only when they turned up the audio track that you could finally hear them.
	We had a very fascinating subplot that was incredibly revealing with the There's a security guard, one Jesus Compos, who's curious on many different counts.
	It turns out that in Nevada, to be a security guard, you have to be registered.
	But Jesus Compos' name does not appear on any list of security guards in Nevada.
	There's a security guard who actually works the 32nd floor who reported during a video interview he'd never heard or seen of any Jesus Compos.
	What's interesting about Jesus is the following.
	The initial story they gave was that Jesus knocked on the door when Paddock was firing this massacre, this barrage of bullets, which interrupted him.
	He came to the door, was distracted by Jesus, shot Jesus, but then committed suicide.
	Boom.
	And it was over.
	Well, that makes Jesus, you know, sort of maybe heroic.
	So he was standing by to do five national interviews, including with Hannity, when he simply disappeared.
	He disappeared.
	Nobody could find him.
	Where did he wind up?
	On the Ellen DeGeneres Show.
	And it's very interesting about Jesus, because now he has gained 30 to 50 pounds, and he no longer wears the prescription glasses he's worn in the past.
	Ellen, during this interview, seems very uncomfortable.
	Although it's an emotionally laden story about a lot of people being killed in his heroic action, they don't pan to the audience, suggesting, in fact, there was no audience there.
	Interestingly, in the meanwhile, they had changed the script.
	So now Jesus Compos had come and knocked on Paddock's door before he began firing on the crowd.
	And that the paddock could fire 200 rounds down the hallway at Jesus Campos, one of which had wounded him.
	Do you imagine in a luxury hotel, like the Mandalay Bay, you could fire 200 rounds down the hallway and no one would notice?
	I mean, the place is covered with security cameras everywhere, including in the elevators.
	Las Vegas turns out to be the most heavily surveilled town in the world, with the possible exception of London, which I visited many times.
	And you're just astonished by the extent of the surveillance there.
	So he comes on to the Ellen DeGeneres Show and look at the very great difference between the real Jesus Compass on the left with his glasses and the stand-in for Jesus Compass, the body double, who's not plausible at all, who, by the way, is reporting the initial story.
	That he knocked on the door after Paddock had been doing all the firing and was shot and then Paddock committed suicide.
	So they couldn't even keep the story straight with one of the key actors in the whole event.
	Turns out, Jesus Campos bears a stunning resemblance to the husband of the San Bernardino event, the shooting there, where we actually have the Craigslist ad For crisis actors, good pay, transportation, food, some speaking roles, call date December 1st, going live December 2nd.
	That was an equally contrived event in San Bernardino.
	At the lower left you see a video, a two hour I did with a very highly qualified paramedic, where we spent an hour on Sandy Hook and going through the violations of standard procedure in terms of medical response to a shooting.
	And then an hour on San Bernardino.
	And it explains, of course, there were a lot of people in San Bernardino who were wandering around as though they had no idea what they were doing, for the obvious reason they had no idea what they were doing.
	This video you can find on the real deal staging attacks from Sandy Hook to San Bernardino.
	Now, it would seem rather surprising you would think you could go to the coroner's office to obtain documents to substantiate the deaths, but it just so happens the coroner's office was on lockdown for the simple reason they would have been besieged by request, but they didn't have any.
	Now, because that criticism was so telling, they created a temporizing measure by putting out a list of names and just a few words describing the cause of death, which to the best of my knowledge has no legal significance.
	This is not a substitute for death certificates or autopsy reports at all.
	Now, Mona Alexis Presley has continued her research about Americans who are being conditioned to accept absurdities, where I introduced the quote from Voltaire.
	Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities, which is 100% correct.
	She has done additional interviews.
	The fellow at the top left there, kind of a surfer-looking type with blonde hair, claims he was shot in the back of the head.
	But yet, he's perfectly fine, and when you examine the back of his head, it's not even shaved.
	He didn't even have the hair shaved off the back of his head.
	The fellow below, the black guy, claims he was shot in the neck, but he seems to have perfectly mobile motion of his head.
	No neck gesture.
	I can assure you, with these weapons, if you'd been shot in the neck or in the head, you wouldn't be around to give interviews.
	Mona also came up with a crime map.
	This is for the area one square mile in the vicinity of the concert area where the shooting purportedly took place.
	And it goes from 8 p.m.
	on October 1st to 8 p.m.
	on October 2nd.
	And read from the bottom up what we have here.
	Other disturbance, assault and battery, assault and battery, other disturbance, assault and battery, burglary, Recovered or stolen motor vehicle, burglary, other disturbance.
	I mean, we have a recovered motor vehicle, other disturbance, other discovered robbery.
	What's missing?
	Not a single shooting event, much less a mass shooting.
	This means the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Owned Report contradicts the official story.
	It has no substance, no basis whatsoever.
	Now it turns out, and this is a rather fascinating development, that Stephen Paddock had seven different cell phones.
	It does now appear that he actually was an arms dealer, that what he had in his suite was a showroom.
	A military weapon style weapon showroom with these 23 weapons so you could figure out which one you liked and Paddock would arrange for you to go elsewhere and perform a shooting to see if you liked the weapon before you bought it.
	The Mandalay Bay staff has now admitted that it visited Paddock's room 10 times before the shooting, 2 on the very day of the shooting, and noticed nothing.
	Now, that suggests that either the 23 weapons weren't there or that that was perfectly normal for his suite.
	But the whole thing is, of course, completely atrocious.
	Get this now.
	And here's where Intel Hub, in my opinion, is coming into their own.
	They have noticed that the dead guy we saw in the photograph isn't even Steven Paddock.
	How can they tell?
	Paddock's ear connected smoothly to his head.
	You can see there, the right ear.
	But the ears on the decedent have a curl to them.
	They don't connect smoothly.
	Therefore, this is not the same person.
	It gets worse.
	Turns out the body autopsied by the doctor was 73 inches in length or height, which makes him 6'1", but Steven Paddock, which we know from his Alaskan trapping, fishing, and hunting license, Paddock was 6'4".
	So the body that was subjected to autopsy wasn't Steven Paddock either.
	I do a show called the Goldfish Report with a woman by the name of Louisa every week where we're covering the news before I do the Truth vs. News with Don and Scott Bennett and Michael J. Anderson.
	And she had there visiting a police sergeant who said, explained he had a background with covert activities before he came to work for the police.
	And the body in the paddock sweeps.
	has signs of frostbite. In other words, the body actually had been in cold storage.
	And he observed that you can actually see that it's melting, that there's water on the clothing from melting.
	Here's another startling report. Officials claim only half the Las Vegas shooting victims received full autopsies.
	Well, that's pretty bizarre. Because, I mean, if this really is a mass shooting, you've got to do very thorough
	autopsies.
	You've got to figure out the trajectories and all that.
	In fact, it was obvious to me from the beginning, if this had been a real, you would have wanted to leave the bodies right there on the field, in the concert area, to find them, figure the trajectories, determine the source of the shots, none of which was done.
	Hence, we have here one more proof that the whole Las Vegas massacre was an elaborate fraud.
	Laura, this is Laura Loomer, has been doing exceptional work where Intel Hub has reported that the Patsy Paddock had a shot to the chest as well as a shot to the head.
	That the body seen in the crime scene photos had different ears than Paddock and that the body subjected to autopsy was only six foot one when Paddock was six foot four.
	For those who care about the truth, it was a movie with a pre-recorded soundtrack and coordinated special visual effects where the crowd had been seated with crisis actors.
	There were simulated shots from the fourth floor and a higher floor as well as a man in the crowd turning and firing where you can see the flash of his muzzle but no impact of shots because he was using blanks.
	The three closest hospitals reported no gunshot victims and the obituaries turned out to have been for persons who died in different states Or on different dates or from different causes of death.
	For a comprehensive overview of how it was done and why, check out the Brian Ruse Show Las Vegas Update with Jim Fetzer.
	I would just add, when you stop and think about it, doesn't it make sense?
	Because that's what MGM does.
	It makes movies.
	And surprise, surprise, the Ellen DeGeneres Show is owned by MGM.
	Now it turns out that the Clark County Coroner has been directed by the court to unseal the autopsy reports and has refused to do so.
	And just before I came out, he released 58 autopsy reports, all with names redacted, no ballistics, Stephen Paddock's autopsy kept secret.
	This has turned into a complete and total farce.
	No reasonable person can take the idea seriously.
	If they're familiar with the evidence that anyone died in Las Vegas, it was a movie.
	So here we have the epitome of the entire situation.
	I survived crowds on demand, even though I have a bullet hole in my forehead.
	Researcher can't find anybody who died in the Las Vegas massacre.
	And here, if you check it out, we find that in the Brian Ruscio interview I did on the Las Vegas Massacre, that the FBI wiped the phones and laptops of the last Las Vegas Massacre witnesses.
	What could be more obvious?
	That the FBI is right in there erasing the evidence.
	I mean, how many proofs do we need that this was a total fraud?
	I conclude with some new discoveries in relation to the death of our 35th president, whom I so greatly admired.
	It turned out we had some autopsy photographs that were especially promoted by Robert Grodin, whom many have long regarded as among the premier students of JFK in his book, The Killing of a President.
	He had these autopsy photographs that show a massive gunk.
	Look at the length of the hair, the amount of gunk.
	This looks so artificial.
	That when this five-person civilian panel known as the Assassination Records Review Board, created by an act of Congress in 1992, to declassify documents and records held by the CIA, the FBI, the Secret Service, Office of Naval Intelligence, and so forth, did a deposition of Commander Humes.
	Because of the input of researchers with whom I collaborate, Humes was asked, did he give the patient a shampoo And a haircut during the autopsy because Jack's hair was neatly trimmed.
	If you look, for example, at this House Select Committee reinvestigation, it's a very short, short hair.
	It's all neatly trimmed.
	It looks nothing like this.
	They can't both be authentic, but they can and are all fraudulent.
	But here I decided we now have the technique to compare I had the autopsy photograph that Grodin had tilted, I just tilted it 90 degrees, and found a left profile of JFK, the right profile of Jared Kaye, with all the matted hair and all that, and asked Larry Rivera to do a GIF, and here you find that it's not even the body of JFK.
	This is very interesting because at the time of the line in the state, at the Capitol, on the 24th, Sunday, Bobby and Jackie looked at and had to decide whether to have an open or closed casket, and they said to one another, it doesn't even look like Jack.
	And while we know the explanation why, it wasn't Jack.
	The question has become what body was used.
	There's a fellow in New York by the name of Robert Morningstar who has long maintained that Officer J.D.
	Tippett, who would be shot, was a stand-in, that he looked so much like JFK that he was kidded by his fellow officers.
	They'd call him Jack or JFK.
	But when we do a comparison of autopsy photographs where Tippett was given a very thorough autopsy by Earl Rose, who was a world-famous medical examiner in Dallas, it's not Officer Tippett.
	David, Dennis, Dennis David, who is the non-commissioned officer who is recording everyone who went in and out of the morgue during the autopsy of JFK, had reported before, and explained to me personally, that he had received a body in a casket that was instructed not to log in, contrary to standard medical protocol.
	He was referred to as the Major.
	I submit that when you have, you know, millions of members of the American Armed Forces to choose between, you can find somebody who's a pretty close facsimile to almost anyone you like.
	And that the body we actually see in these autopsy photographs is that of the Major.
	Interestingly, as an aside, Robert Grodin and I were together invited to address an advanced high school class in Dubuque, Iowa.
	We'd spent the whole semester studying the assassination of JFK.
	And we were having lunch together in a room, only the two of us, and Robert offered to let me use his autopsy photographs.
	And I said to him, but they're fake.
	To which he replied, not a peep.
	And now, of course, we have further confirmation.
	Well, this is, of course, the famous photograph for the Period of Life magazine used to convict Lee Oswald in the minds of most Americans.
	He's holding the Mannlicher Karneau, with which he's alleged to have shot the president.
	He's got a pistol belt and a revolver with which he's alleged to have shot Officer Tippett.
	He's holding two communist newspapers, The Worker and The Militant.
	So we seem to have the combination of motive and means where we already knew he had the opportunity because, after all, he was employed at the Book Depository.
	Now, what they're not telling you is points like the following.
	Yes, the Mannlicher Carcano World War II Italian carbine was known as a humanitarian rifle for never harming anyone on purpose.
	Officer Tippett was actually shot by automatics.
	In fact, the first officer on the scene discovered four automatic shell casings, two Remington Rand, two Western, which he initialed.
	Oswald only had a revolver, and therefore cannot have shot Officer Tippett.
	When this blunder was discovered, they replaced the four shell casings with revolver casings, but now there were three of one make and one of the other, and they no longer had the initials of the officer from the scene.
	There are many other anomalies here, including that the chin, just look at it, it's a blocked chin.
	Doesn't appear to be Oswald's chin at all, which had rather taper and a bit of a dimple, and there's an insert line between the chin and the lower lip.
	Jack White observed that if you superimpose the images, although these are And there are four of these photographs taken in different poses at different times.
	They ought, therefore, to have different features for the face.
	But when you superimpose them, it's exactly the same face on each of the photographs.
	That's just what Lee Oswald told Will Fritz, the homicide detective, when he interrogated him.
	He said that was his face on someone else's body, that with time he'd be able to prove it.
	Lee didn't survive to carry it out, but others of us have carried forward and he was of course 100% correct.
	Jack White noticed that because the newspapers have a known measure, you can use him as an internal yardstick to determine the height of the individual who stood in for Lee in the background photographs.
	By that measure, he's too short, at only 5'6", to be Lee Oswald, which means either they use someone who is too short to be the stand-in, or, what in fact was the case, they put the newspapers in a little too large when they manufactured the photograph.
	Jim Mars and I did a study published on my blog entitled Framing the Patsy, the Case of Lee Harvey Oswald, where we went through evidence such as I described and more, and concluded that the individual who stood in for Lee Oswald was a Dallas police officer by the name of Roscoe White, not only because he had the blocked chin, but because he has this anomalous little bump on his wrist, apparently from a bone that never healed properly, We find the same anomalous bump on the wrist of the man in the backyard photographs.
	Larry discovered a photograph of Roscoe that was in just the right position from the beach to put it superimposed on the backyard photographs, and indeed it's Roscoe White, who was the stand-in for Lee Oswald, where they then pasted Lee's face on top.
	Roscoe's a bit heftier through the chest than Lee Oswald, so Larry actually also imposed images of Lee on what's supposed to be photographs of Lee himself, and you find Lee is smaller through the chest and the shoulders than Roscoe White.
	Very interestingly and controversial from the beginning, there were many students who believed
	that Lee Oswald was actually captured in the background in the most famous photograph
	of the assassination taken by Associated Press photographer James Ike Alchins, technically known as the Alchins Six,
	where he's alleged to have taken seven photographs, the Alchins One, Two, and so forth, through seven,
	except he doesn't remember taking seven, which appears to be a complete fabrication.
	What's interesting is six.
	However, because you do a close up in this area, and you do have a figure that appears to be peering out,
	there are anomalies about it I'll point out immediately.
	But notice the fellow beside him has got his hands raised to protect his eyes from the sun, whose shirt has been
	obliterated and is nothing but a white blob, and we cannot see his face because it has been blacked out.
	When you look more carefully, you find the individual in the doorway is the right height, weight, build, shirt, and t-shirt to be Lee Oswald, granting the texture of the pixelization in the photographs.
	Apparently, the authorities were so aware of the striking similarity that they had him remove his outer shirt, which was a very richly textured long-sleeved shirt, and photographed him for his mug shot in his t-shirt.
	Larry has demonstrated the success of his technique of doing overlays with photographs, for example, of Marilyn Monroe.
	The top two might be thought to be different persons, for example, but when you superimpose, they find it's one and the same Marilyn Monroe.
	So he did these studies where he found photographs of Lee and photographs of Billy Lovelady, who's the only person who's ever been suggested to have been the man in the doorway by the government.
	Uh, and introduce them into the image in the doorway.
	Here you can see Lee.
	Turns out not only is the right height, weight, shape, shirt, and t-shirt, but he's the same face.
	He's got the same facial features, though they do appear to have tinkered with the hairline just a tad.
	Here's Lee compared with Billy.
	Lee fits hand in glove.
	Billy's wrong.
	The ears are wrong.
	The jaw is wrong.
	The nose is wrong.
	It's clearly not Billy Lovelady.
	Now, he himself said he thought it was odd that they would be confused because he was 2 to 3 inches shorter and 15 to 20 pounds heavier.
	Not only that, But he went to see the FBI on the 29th of February.
	They asked him to come in wearing the shirt he'd worn at the time, and he came in wearing a A short-sleeved red and white vertically striped shirt, completely different than the man in the doorway, but where Larry has been able to confirm that the man with his hands raised to protect his face from the sun was none other than Billy Lovelady.
	So the reason they had to obfuscate the shirt, because otherwise it would have been obvious it was Billy.
	A point I didn't make before, look at the upper right here.
	In the image of the man in the doorway, you see a figure behind him.
	We refer to him as Black Tie Man, who's both in front of and behind the doorman.
	In other words, doorman doesn't have a shoulder, which is, of course, simply absurd from an
	anatomical point of view.
	That's one of the proofs we have, among many, that it was altered, not to mention the obfuscating
	of the shirt and the blacking out of the face of Black Hole Man.
	So, when Larry does the reconstruction using Blender, which enables you to do very precise and detailed reconstructions of scenes, it turns out the original would have looked like this.
	Where you have Billy Lovelady in his vertically striped red and white short-sleeved shirt, 2 to 3 inches shorter, 15 to 20 pounds minimally heavier than Lee.
	Who is on the left, or from a greater distance away, this image, which means that not only can Lee Oswald not have been the lone demented gunman, he cannot have even been one of the shooters.
	For more, I recommend my fourth book on JFK.
	I brought together 15 experts here, and with the exception of the proof that the body in those Groton autopsy photographs is not JFK.
	It's all here in this single volume.
	Thank you very much for being here.
	I'm of course glad to take questions.
	Yeah.
	My first question, do you have any books here?
	any books here.
	I do, but here at the library you're not allowed to.
	So we're going to a restaurant thereafter and I'll have them with me.
	I have a JFK I have a few 9-11, but many of them were purchased when I was in Portland.
	And I have several from the Boston bombing.
	And they're online.
	You'd find these are the color versions.
	They come in at $30 as a color version.
	But because you're here, and I brought them with me, they're available for $20.
	So you can have them, and I'll be glad to inscribe them however you might like.
	Yes.
	Restaurant, what is it called?
	Pardon me?
	The Rodeo Restaurant, where are we going afterwards?
	I'm sorry?
	Restaurant.
	Where are we going?
	Oh yeah, the name of the restaurant.
	Who's got the name?
	Allegra.
	The Allegra.
	Can we get an identification as to how to get to the Allegra?
	The Cafe Allegro is in the alleyway around the corner from Mega's Bookstore.
	It's going north on the corner of 42nd and University Avenue.
	It's the alley that runs parallel to the University.
	4214 University Way.
	But it's not on University.
	It's in the alley.
	in the alley, it's the 42nd and New Block.
	And, um, do you have the address?
	I don't have it here.
	But it's not on University.
	It's in the alley. It's on, it's on, it's in the alley with the buildings that it's in in front of the University.
	Did you get to go around?
	Just a few blocks away.
	around through the alley and get up. So how far is it from here?
	Forty-second? A couple of blocks from here.
	Just a few blocks away.
	Four blocks away.
	It's about a mile.
	Maybe a mile. Okay, Don suggests that.
	No, just two.
	Yes.
	There's a meeting room upstairs.
	So that's where we'll be.
	Meeting room upstairs at the LA.
	Okay.
	You mentioned that Las Vegas is the most camera-in place and they have cameras everywhere.
	Yes.
	Can you show me some of those pictures of those surveillance cameras?
	Oh, I know.
	It's stunning.
	Here we have, you know, this most surveyed city in the world, and there are no photographs of Stephen Paddock, even at the casinos, in the Mandalay Bay, nothing, nothing at all.
	And one student actually went into the Mandalay Bay to see how much surveillance there was, and he found cameras everywhere.
	Another proof the whole thing was contrived, sure.
	Of which I'm aware of none.
	This was a point that was raised about Sandy Hook.
	the parents should have been bringing lawsuits right in life.
	Well, we're just a 50th person.
	It seems the oral outrage is pretty obvious, but I've seen no movement to bringing lawsuits against the parents.
	Well, we do have a legal expert here who might address whether or not, Bill, do you want to pick up on that?
	Whether or not there could be a public lawsuit about the deception?
	Well, I agree.
	It's got to be exposed.
	I mean, this is my next book.
	I'm working on Sandy Hook on Las Vegas now.
	And what's interesting is there was a delay because I've invited some people to give me, you know, serious studies to go along with the whole lot.
	I've got a super abundance of information.
	But the fact that I've waited has been beneficial because it turned out it wasn't even Paddock in the room, that it wasn't even Paddock who was subjected to autopsy.
	Now the scandal about the absence of autopsy reports and death certificates is becoming manifest.
	You've got the mortician, the coroner, violating a court order.
	And he gives out the death certificates with the name obfuscated and no ballistics?
	Who the hell, whose bodies are they?
	The judge is not going to be happy.
	So this whole thing is falling apart.
	I have a question and I'm curious about it.
	I always get curious about things like this.
	When you have an event as large as the Las Vegas event, I don't dispute the fact that you would have a lot of
	actors, but you also have a lot of people in that community
	who have to be involved somehow.
	The police, the sheriff, hospital staff, doctors, nurses, fireman or firefighter.
	firefighters, how is it that these people, they must know, and it has to be a lot of
	them, that if this is a hoax, they must know that. And how do they keep this a secret?
	Well, let me tell you how blatant it is, their knowledge that it's a hoax. The lobby was
	shot out three different hotels, at the Bellagio, at the Flamingo, at New York, New York. So,
	I mean, that's why the sheriff in his initial interview said, obviously, this wasn't the
	work of one man.
	Because he not only had whatever occurred at the Mandalay Bay, but whatever occurred at three other hotels.
	But you think that the sheriff, for example, is an elected official?
	The sheriff has been reined in.
	The sheriff has been reined in.
	You look at his interviews.
	In the beginning, he was open and honest, and now he's under surveillance.
	He's got an FBI agent standing right behind him.
	How are all of these people brought into this, I guess, and kept silent?
	I guess that's fine.
	My question.
	How many of these hoaxes have I elaborated?
	And I tell you, the evidence I've deduced is rock solid.
	The Sandy Hook parents pocketed over a million bucks apiece.
	Turns out Tony Meade, the very same guy, has documented 10 witnesses who've disappeared, some key players, including in the state police.
	They've died or, you know, had heart attacks or disappeared.
	I mean, there are lots of mechanisms.
	The most important, however, is the following.
	The media is completely under control.
	The media is no longer talking about Las Vegas.
	Frankly, I began doing these interviews in multiple venues about Las Vegas and pointing out it was a pre-recorded soundtrack, that there was these flashing lights, that nobody had died, that Mona had found they were, bits were based on bodies from other states and Other dates and other causes of death and the mainstream stop talking about it.
	You're going to have a hard time finding anything about Las Vegas anymore.
	And our Intel Hub is doing a really good job.
	So this is part of their arrogance.
	They have such complete control of the media.
	Basically, their attitude is, if you don't see it on television, it didn't happen.
	So, I mean, that's basically the attitude.
	But I share your frustration.
	You'd think there'd be a lot of, you know, strong, courageous people who want to speak out the truth, but it's not that way today in the USA.
	Yeah, yeah.
	What do you think the purpose is for all this?
	Well, Sandy Hook was gun control.
	Barack Obama signed no less than 23 executive orders to constrain our access to weapons under the Second Amendment on the 16th of January, just a month and two days later.
	There was an interview with the mayor of Boston on Greater Boston just a month before Sandy Hook, where he was saying that he was bragging about him being good buddies with Joe Biden and telling the daughter of Andy Rooney, who is the host of the show, That Joe Biden had told him that by January 2013, gun control would be a done deal.
	Andy Rooney's daughter was incredulous and said, what could possibly happen to cause legislation to pass that fast, which the mayor would not answer?
	But where we know the answer today, Boston was both to subvert the Fourth Amendment Or the 6th against unreasonable search and seizures.
	They had a massive police force which was undermining posse comitatus, a statute from 1786 that precluded the use of military force to promote, to perform police functions.
	So they grossly violated that in Boston.
	And then they had police evicting, you know, residents from their homes with no warrant, no justification in their pursuit for this 19-year-old college student who in fact had nothing to do with the case.
	It's hitting the fan when this You know, this amicus curiae brief leads to the repudiation of the conviction of Zoker.
	Believe me, Boston is going to fall apart.
	Now, when you're talking about Charlottesville, that appears to have been to demonize Donald Trump.
	You have these guys who are supposed to be white supremacists, they actually are Fake.
	I mean, they're just playing the role.
	So the narrative that got from the press, and it's very clear when you go back to read it, is you got Donald Trump was for America first, meaning he wants to bring our troops home from the Mideast.
	This is the campaign promise I would like to see him keep.
	You know, to save us five and a half trillion we've squandered for no good for the United States.
	Turns into, by stages, a white nationalist, then a white supremacist,
	then a neo-Nazi.
	So this is how the President of the United States, who stands for American first, has turned into a neo-Nazi.
	It was a parody.
	You had the most extraordinary events occurring.
	You had a woman who was a former member of the black congressional caucus saying
	she thought all monuments to George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and Robert E. Lee ought to be taken down,
	which incidentally would include the Washington Monument, Jefferson Memorial.
	I mean, the absurdities are beyond belief.
	You had the United Nations declaring that First Amendment right to free speech should not be allowed to promote or Hate speech as though it were not designed to protect unpopular speech.
	I mean, you know, popular speech doesn't need any defense.
	It's free speech.
	So even I get censored when I just want to talk about the things I've just talked about here to expose the chicanery by the government at various levels, sometimes local and state as well as federal, to perpetrate frauds on the American people.
	So, then when we get to Las Vegas, it was multiple motives, including the very personal profit motives, but also, this was supposed to be a gun control extravaganza.
	23 weapons, I mean, you know, that was just staggering.
	What in the world?
	I mean, I raised the question right from the start.
	What would he be doing with his vast assortment of weapons, when he only needs one to fire on the crowd and another for self-defense, so there was just no way to justify 23 weapons but I do now believe he actually was involved in in arms dealing and this is his showroom and people would review then they could go test fire at a different location and it's now just falling apart.
	This is very interesting by the way there was a woman journalist writing about why she favored having the scanners in all the hotels and casinos in Las Vegas.
	The agenda, by the way, is to expand them to all the churches and schools across the nation.
	So this is bringing hundreds of billions of dollars in profits to the Chertoff Group.
	And she said, it only delays your access into the building by 30 seconds.
	And I thought, well, you know, when you go to the dentist and they're going to do your x-rays,
	they cover you with a lead vest for a millisecond of exposure.
	How much damage can be done to the human body in 30 seconds?
	I mean, this is really a recipe for catastrophe.
	I think it's being contained because it turned out to be such an absurd story.
	No one really bought it from the beginning.
	Real quickly, released a little information about JFK this year.
	What revelations should we take home?
	What's the most profound thing about the new releases?

▲