All Episodes
Previous Next
March 25, 2021 - Jim Fetzer
32:58
TCK with Eric Gajewski (25 March 2021): Staged Shootings are Back!
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is a Trankat Night special guest exclusive podcast right here on the TrankatNight.org website.
Folks, today is March 25th, 2021.
I hope you all have a very wonderful and blessed day.
As always, we continue to keep the programming moving along.
Monday through Saturday, typically three or four guests on every day.
Today is going to be no different.
We did have a reschedule this morning.
John Rubino from the Dollar Collapse website will be joining us on the 31st.
Instead of today. I am going to be having dr. Shiva on the program. We just did reschedule with him. I think it's
April the 12th So we have got that working for us. We've got
Gary Wayne coming on the show a little bit later today 1 p.m.
Easter. We also have Leo's agami coming on later So a lot happening here at Tranquil. I just finished up
with John the kids in one of the leading anti 5g
activists out there Well in Europe, but he's recently moved. A lot of people
are moving from Europe. We had ole Damagard on he recently moved from Europe
They're getting the heck out of Dodge. So They're all moving to pretty much Asia as far as I can see.
But now someone who joins us and has joined us not only for web conferences, for radio shows,
he's one of my longest standing guests here at Track At Night is Dr. James Fetzer.
And today we're going to have a terrific program.
We've got to get through all the latest quote unquote hatings, hate crimes and false flags.
And my goodness, from Minneapolis to Colorado to who knows what will happen today.
It seems like almost on a daily basis we're dealing with something.
Jim is going to be breaking it down for us, but just a brief mention of our sponsors right off the bat, plentywellness.com, jacksberry.com, genesisapparel.us, gloryandshine.com.
If you want to pick up a Turbulent Times kit, contact Kathleen Elonia at kathleenelonia at gmail.com.
And Chris Gagne is inviting all Catholics and those like mine in this area to remember those who have gone before us.
Having said that, Jim, take it away.
A lot to get through here today.
We always appreciate your time.
Well, Eric, yeah, it's great to be back.
Listen, when the Democrats have a political agenda to move forward, they can orchestrate events to make sure they provide support.
They're playing the public for suckers and saps.
They have a hate bill, for example, so they need a hate crime.
That appears to be the deal with the massage parlors.
They're calling them like health spas.
But this is where you can get, you know, full body massage, they call it, by Asian women.
It looks like it's tailor-made where Kamala is even now trying to portray herself as an Asian to build on the victimization theme.
And of course, the Democrats have gone whole hog Over identity politics.
The shooting in Colorado at a supermarket is very interesting on a number of counts.
It likewise does not appear to be a bona fide, but rather another staged event.
There are many indications of evidence that's fairly blatant that contradicts the official account.
The shooter is supposed to be 21 years old, but when we see him walked away in his justice briefs, he's got the build and the disposition of a man who I would say is at least 35.
He's bald on the head.
I'll return to more about his identity because it turns out that rather than being a white Domestic terrorists.
This guy turns out to be a Muslim who was born in Syria, who was anti-Trump and pro-refugee, even supportive of ISIS.
So, this guy is really a walking contradiction in terms of what the Democrats especially would like us to believe.
That's one sign something's wrong.
Another sign is that while we see a few bodies lying on the ground, we don't see blood.
Now, the type of weapon he was alleged to have used would have caused massive mayhem to the bodies, but it's not there.
That's another tell that this isn't right.
Here's the third tell.
We got a witness there who can barely control his smirk, telling us how we can't be safe anywhere anymore, even in a grocery store, which is precisely what the Democrats want to use this to promote, you know, that we're unsafe anywhere we go.
The problem being, of course, that we'd be far more safe if the Democrats were to promote concealed carry or if there had been a good man with a gun to oppose a bad man with a gun.
I'll return to that point.
But the fact is that Americans use guns to defend themselves against criminals millions of times a year, saving hundreds of thousands of American lives.
But you're not going to get that from the Democratic Party.
Now, we got an officer who's supposed to have died.
This would be very significant, but it turns out that a colleague of mine, Danny Sears, who has a background in law enforcement, ran this guy through the database.
Listen to this.
His reported name is Eric Tallick.
I checked all the guys in his age group.
He is not showing up.
There are a few in Colorado with his name, but no matches to the man in the report below.
They say he's an 11-year veteran of the department and has seven kids.
That, by the way, is for emotional effect.
No one like this comes up in the database searches.
I looked at two men in his age group with his name in Texas as well.
Not him.
The rest are too old.
The ones who are close all turn out to be someone else.
The photos don't match.
The background does not match.
Not the guy they're showing on TV.
Plus, none of them are police.
If you listen to the report below, it appears to look very scripted.
No info about what happened or about the suspect yet.
This looks like a false flag as of right now.
We need the suspect's name to see what's going on.
It's not been released yet.
Well, now, of course, it has been released.
Ahmed Al-Assa.
And as I say, he's a very, very odd character here.
Jim Stone has an excellent take here showing how circumstantial it is to arrange these shootings to promote or defend the Democrats' gun control agenda.
Boulder shooting, all you need to know in one line, Jim Stone.
Boulder had an assault weapons ban that was in place for two years, but a lower court judge struck it down.
It was challenged and to be put before the Colorado Supreme Court.
Four days after that move occurred and before it went to the Supreme Court, we have assault weapons used in a mass shooting.
Light clockwork.
It's another fake shooting to influence the court.
Predictable.
It could not possibly be more predictable.
No one would magically come up with an assault weapon complete with ammo during an ammo shortage and shoot him up in four short days when most people would not even know a judge had ruled in their favor.
Most likely, this is another case of crisis actors.
As the story goes now, the Colorado shooter had a Facebook page.
They made sure it was deleted before they let his name out.
I don't know exactly Well, they want to take the story now, but the deleted Facebook page proves he was a Muslim who hated Trump.
However, they don't need white supremacists to accomplish their gun ban.
They just need shooting.
So I'm skeptical.
It appears instead the shooting was entirely fake and that this Facebook for the Patsy either didn't jive with what they wanted, so they deleted it or is fake too.
You decide.
I guess.
Either way, they'll get their gun ban, even if it's total crisis acted.
I take exception to that, but otherwise I think Jim Stone is spot on.
We've had around the country other developments that were positive.
For example, California caves on AR-15 registration fight, where they're reopening a bungled registration system, paying a gun group six figures in attorney fees.
This is a significant development.
California had locked down its registration process for so-called assault weapons, which in fact are not.
Just to give a few particulars about the AR-15, it's a civilian version of a military weapon, where the military weapon fires on full automatic.
Automatic weapons have been illegal in civilian hands forever.
This is only a semi-automatic, meaning each time you pull a trigger, a bullet is fired.
With an automatic antidepressant trigger, it continues to fire until all the ammo is expended.
This is therefore not a weapon of war.
The Democrats get a lot of mileage out of false descriptions, just abuse of language.
We're finding that in the case of the coronavirus pandemic, where they're not distinguishing between getting a A positive result on a test that has 97% false positives,
the CPR test, and actually being infected with coronavirus, which appears to be merely one
of the common cold viruses and not particularly more lethal than any other where we have
studies even out of Johns Hopkins showing that there's been no increase in deaths in any of
the age groups compared to 2019 and no additional consumption of oxygen tanks or IV drips
and stent, which would be necessary if the hospitals actually were overflowing.
But the key point here is a trade on the ambiguity of the word case to not distinguish between
a positive test and actually being infected.
As a Rod Serling meme reflects, imagine a virus so lethal you have to be tested to know you've got it.
Returning to California, they're now going to let gun owners file new registrations, avoid prosecutions of registration violations for at least seven months, and pay the Firearms Policy Coalition $151,821.42 for lawyers fees.
$151,821.42 for lawyers' fees.
In other words, they were defeated.
But that of course means that Democrats have to do something to hype their gun control
agenda, which is now coming full bore, where this very feeble guy, Joe Biden, is being
used as a puppet.
but it appears.
It appears as if he's not going to be.
And even his spokesman is admitting that Barack Obama is behind the scenes pulling the levers, Directing what's happening here.
Well, we had that barrage of 52 executive orders.
How many today is unknown, but it's outrageous.
This guy is governing as though he were a king.
He's usurping the role of the legislature, violating the Constitution.
The problem being that when constitutional violations occur, it takes months or even years to work their way through the court.
And in the meanwhile, all the mischief is taking place.
So Biden calls for gun control, says we need to ban assault weapons.
And I reiterate, the AR-15 is not an assault weapon, which would be full automatic when it is not.
And then when he was asked questions by reporters, he simply walked away.
He even admitted at the time he didn't know all of the details.
But you gotta beware, because a couple weeks ago, Democrat Senator Dianne Feinstein and Congressman David Cicilline introduced a bill to ban assault weapons in High Capacity Magazine just hours after the Democrat-controlled House passed a gun control bill.
We're gonna see much more of this.
Now, Marjorie Taylor Greene, who's a breath of fresh air in the House of Representatives and therefore upsetting the Democrats mightily, such that they, I believe, for the first time in history, forced her out of the committee assignments.
She'd been assigned by the minority leader in the House.
In other words, the Democrats were abusing their position to tell the Republicans who they could assign to what committee is just outrageous.
We even had a move to get her expelled from the House of Representatives in defiance of the voters electing her as their representative.
This just shows how autocratic and totalitarian the Democrats have become.
Tweeted, Colorado has everything the left has asked for.
Universal background checks, red flag gun seizure laws, high-capacity magazine bans, a passing gun control grade from Giffords Courage, She says, and it still didn't stop a thug like Ahmad al-Assa from murdering Americans, except that appears to be a fraud.
Meanwhile, Team Biden is weighing declaring gun violence to be a public health emergency to take dramatic executive actions.
If he were to declare it, he could ship more funding to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,
Firearms, and Explosives to increase their inspections of gun dealerships, loosen up
available funds for community gun violence programs.
They're also exploring ways to classify gun kits as firearms, requiring serial numbers
and subject to background checks.
The third gun violence option would include strengthening background checks.
The fact of the matter is that they ought to be doing something about gun violence if
they wanted to do something about gun violence, because it's prevalent in democratic cities
all across the country.
Take a look at Chicago.
Chicago has more killings in a weekend or two than all of the mass shootings put together in a weekend or two.
So why is it Joe Biden to claim that a public health emergency?
It's because they make these democratic cities gun-free zones.
That means that the bad guys Who aren't going to give up their guns anyway, of course.
I mean, they're criminals because they violate the law.
No, they got a free fire zone because the civilians who are law-abiding are unable to carry weapons.
If Chicago were to pass a concealed carry law, the violence in Chicago would drop dramatically.
What's also terribly significant to notice is, given this guy actually turns out to have been born in Syria, and where Biden is allowing all kinds of immigrants come into the United States illegally, the numbers reveal a mass shooting truth, namely that immigrants are behind 47% of the mass murders.
Since 2016, of the last 34 mass shootings, 47% that did not revolve around a family dispute, targeted assassinations of law enforcement, or occurred on Indian reservation, were committed by first and second generation immigrants.
Think about that.
What's really important to appreciate, too, is that Gun violence in the United States is very much dependent or divided by race.
This is one area where if the Democrats want to explore differences between the races in the United States, when you look at crime per capita by race for criminal offenses across the United States, divided into Asian, North American, black and white, Black criminal offenses across the United States are overwhelmingly predominant over all other races.
Property crime, drug abuse, larceny theft, driving other assaults, aggravated assault, burglary, vandalism, weapons carrying, fraud, robbery, all have a predominance of black criminals.
The two categories or three Where they're overshadowed have to do with Native Americans in relation to liquor laws and drunkenness and driving under the influence because American Indians seem to have a genetic incapacity to tolerate and process alcohol.
But otherwise, it's really black, black, black all the way.
Here, for example, are the New York City crime statistics for 2014.
Arrests for violent crime.
Get this shooting.
Blacks, 75%.
Hispanic, 22%.
White, 1%.
Other, 1.5%.
So you got 75% and 22%.
That's 97% of the shootings are by Blacks and Hispanics.
other one and a half. So you got 75 and 22. That's 97% of the shootings are by blacks and Hispanics.
Murder, 62% black, 32% Hispanic, white maybe 3%.
percent.
So you got 94% of murders are committed by blacks and Hispanics in New York City.
An area where the Hispanics outdo the blacks is in terms of rape.
Hispanic 46%.
Black 43%.
46 percent, black 43, that's already 89 percent, white 6 percent, other 5.
If New York City were all white, then rapes would drop by 83%, murder by 91%, shooting by 96%.
I mean, just think about it.
91% shooting by 96%.
I mean, just think about it.
This is outrageous.
The Democrats are pioneering lawlessness and doing nothing about it.
Their gun control laws, which are really to take guns away from law-abiding people, are damaging the cause if they have any interest whatsoever in preserving the well-being of their own constituents.
Meanwhile, Twitter says, calling Ahmad al-Assad a white Christian terrorist doesn't violate its misinformation policies, even though he's from Syria.
Eric, this is just unbelievable.
This is Twitter.
Twitter told Newsweek that characterizing accused mass killer Ahmed al-Assa as a white Christian terrorist doesn't violate its misinformation policies.
Even so, Alyssa is from Syria and has been identified as a Muslim.
How bad is that?
Prior to the suspect's identity being made public, the magazine said numerous Twitter users assumed the suspect was white and characterized the massacre as another example of racial injustice and white supremacy as it followed the mass killing in Atlanta by a white male that was of the Asian women in the massage parlors.
But lo and behold, the white supremacy narrative blew up in Twitter users' faces when authorities revealed that his family immigrated to the U.S.
from Syria and that his own brother said in the past that Alissa was bullied for being a Muslim.
But this is just outrageous.
Just outrageous they would allow this.
Now, turning to defensive use of guns, you're not going to hear a word about this from the Democratic Party or the mainstream media.
Dr. Ria Winn of the wonderful Fellowship of the Minds blog publishes this on gun control.
CDC suppresses its findings on defensive gun use.
In 2008, in a landmark though razor-thin 5-4 ruling, District of Columbia v. Heller, The Supreme Court states the Second Amendment protects the individual's right to possess a firearm, unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home.
In its ruling, SCOTUS even leaves open the possibility that the individual's right to bear arms may include military-grade weapons.
Well, talk about vitiating the Democrats' whole campaign, which is based upon a false description of the weapons involved and a mischaracterization of them as assault weapons and weapons of war.
The number of defensive gun uses each year is controversial, but a study ordered by the CDC and conducted by the National Academy's Institute of Medicine reported that defensive use of guns by crime victims is a common occurrence.
Almost all national survey estimates indicate that defensive gun uses by victims are at least as common as offensive uses by criminals.
With estimates of annual uses ranging from about 500,000 to more than 3 million in the context of about 300,000 violent crimes involving firearms in 2008.
And when it says at least as common as offensive uses by criminals, what that's reporting is that civilians often have defended themselves from offenses where the criminal wasn't using a gun but attempting to perpetrate a rape, a robbery, a kidnapping, what have you.
Another study estimates there are 1,029,615 defensive gun uses per year for self-protection or for the protection of property and homework or elsewhere.
Excluding setting to the side military service police work or work as a security guard Yielding an estimate of 162,000 cases per year, where someone almost certainly would have been killed if they had not used a gun for protection.
Well, I can guarantee you those numbers have increased now, and I have no doubt it's in the multi-millions of uses for self-protection, and well over 200,000 Americans are having their lives saved every single year by the defensive use of guns.
Now, Americans, of course, have been particularly alarmed by the campaign by the Democrats last summer to defund the police.
Has there ever been a more stupid, completely, colossally moronic platform for a party to run on in American history?
I think not.
They were supportive of all the rioting, the looting, the arson.
There were even deaths involved here.
They were just fine with that.
The point being that if you're going to defund the police, there are going to be fewer police around.
Even Minneapolis is discovering that the program is backfiring because so many, so many citizens are complaining about the lack of a police response That they know they can't count on the police to defend themselves, and if they can't do it themselves, they're in deep doo-doo.
Let me give you an illustration.
It may take as long as 20 minutes for the police to respond to an emergency call, but the crime and mayhem typically takes place in the first few, so that by the time the police arrive, and you wanted them to come because they have guns when you do not, Your daughter may have been raped.
Your wife may have been murdered.
You may have been mugged.
If you cannot defend yourself, you're not going to be able to survive in a situation by counting on the police because they may not arrive within time or may not arrive at all because the Democrats have been successful in defunding them.
I mean, think about it.
What party is acting in your interest?
For God's sake, it's not the Democrats.
Moreover, we've heard all this attention about blacks being killed by whites, right?
Like unarmed black men killed by white policemen.
You would think if you listen to the mainstream media, that's a predominant offense occurring in the United States.
Well, the evidence is completely the opposite.
If you looked at the murder of blacks and whites in the U.S.
in 2013, for example, per million members of the murderers' race, the overwhelming preponderance of murders is blacks killed by blacks.
Nearly 55 per million.
55 per million.
Whites killed by blacks are slightly less than 10 per million.
Whites killed by whites, slightly over 10 per million.
But blacks killed by whites, less than one.
Less than one per million.
I just want you to understand how much you're being played by the Democrats, who are focusing on the category that is the least frequent form of killing to which blacks killed by whites, When Whites Killed by Blacks is around 10 times more common, Whites Killed by Whites in the same category, but Blacks Killed by Blacks about 55 times more common.
55 times more common.
I mentioned Dr. Rieland and her fellowship of the Minds Block.
Well, he had the brilliance to impose a 2016 murder distribution map on top of a 2016 electoral college map.
And guess what?
The predominant areas where these murders are taking place are all in Democratic controlled areas.
Los Angeles, San Francisco, Seattle, Chicago, New York.
Where all these gun bans are in place.
I mean the evidence is simply overwhelming.
Moreover, The Democrats would have you believe the more guns, the more homicides, but the facts are the opposite.
It turns out the more guns, the fewer homicides.
And that's because the bad guys can't know who else might be armed and take them out.
And others who are armed, law-abiding citizens, do take them out.
Just reflect on those defensive use of guns statistics, for example.
This is a pattern not just in the United States but worldwide.
Consider it.
If you look at the demographics all over the world, the highest gun ownership has been in North America, the United States and Canada, which has now moved to ban guns.
So you're going to expect to see a great increase in the number of crimes and deaths committed in Canada because they have banned guns.
Let me mention, by the way, John Lott, L-O-T-T, has brilliant books on the war against guns.
Where he produces one study after another after another showing that when guns are banned, crime goes up.
While the US and Canada having the highest gun ownership also have the lowest homicide rate.
Compare with Brazil, low gun ownership, high homicide rate.
Africa, low gun ownership, high homicide rate.
Russia, low gun ownership, high homicide rate.
Here we have Benjamin Franklin saying, we founders call this one the theory of duh.
Disarming innocent people does not protect innocent people.
I mean, how dumb can we get?
But that's what the Democrats want to do.
It's well known That there are, at the time the article I'm looking at was published, 5 million AR-15s in the U.S.
I would bet today there are 10.
It is the most lightweight and versatile weapon one could possibly have.
I fired an AR-15 just a few months ago.
I was really impressed with how easy it was to handle and operate.
It's a perfect weapon for home defense, but more importantly, it's a perfect weapon To defeat a tyranny.
If you want to overcome a tyrannical government, if we're forced to combat our own government within the framework of the Declaration of Independence, which declares that we have the right to abandon a tyrannical government and to form a new one, this is a weapon that would be most useful, that we most want to depend upon.
Pay attention to what's going on.
We're being subjected to a new form of deception.
This happened again and again, by the way, where Barack Obama, for your information,
initiated the whole onslaught of staged shootings in America when he nullified the Smith-Mutt
Act of 1948, where the Smith-Mutt Act had precluded the use of the same techniques of
disinformation and propaganda within the United States that were being used without, just
in time, by means of the Smith-Mutt Modernization Act of 2012 to bring us Sandy Hook.
I've done a huge amount of research bringing experts together on Sandy Hook, the Boston
bombing, Orlando and Dallas, Charlottesville, Parkland, Las Vegas.
Check out my books.
Of the dozen books I've published that Moonrock Books is published.
Six of my books have been banned by Amazon.
If you want to get the truth, if you want to learn what's really going on, go to moonrockbooks.com
and check it out.
Meanwhile, let me close by observing when they come for our guns, the time has come
to use them.
Oh, wow, and I'll supplement and pick back up where Jim has left off.
How about this?
How about this?
I was retweeting some information while you were talking there, Jim,
I was retweeting some information while you were talking there, Jim, this on a bunch of
this on a bunch of alternative news outlets, including Blacklisted News,
alternative news outlets, including Blacklisted News, which I think is a pretty good source
which I think is a pretty good source here on Twitter.
here on Twitter.
Biden administration urging Supreme Court to let cops enter homes and seize guns without a warrant.
Biden administration urging Supreme Court to let cops enter and pick back up where Jim has left off.
That's one of the latest headlines.
We also have FBI data showing knives actually kill more people than rifles.
I just retweeted all this information for those listening, you can retweet it yourself
onto your page, but I couldn't have said it any better, Jim.
I think we're heading towards those times where it's gonna get very bloody, very messy.
seen a few of these false flags this past week. How many more? I mean, as just last
question, we only got a few minutes left, but I mean, how many more do we have to go
through until people begin to realize what the game is?
Because I'll still run into a lot of Americans that think that... Go ahead.
Let me give you two or three clues here. One is you can go to my website, JimtheConspiracyguy.com,
check out how to spot a false flag part one and part two.
In those presentations, I go through a dozen to 15 different examples and you'll understand what's going on.
In the second place, I would observe that I did a false flag and conspiracies conference in December, which I've now released for free to the public.
Go to falseflagconspiracies2020.com falseflagconspiracies2020.com and Finally, David Hodges on the Common Sense Show a couple years ago observed that during the 20th century there were 19 democides during which the government slaughtered the whole population, each of which was preceded by gun confiscation.
We can't let America become number 20.
Yeah, absolutely.
Wow, fantastic, powerful talk, as always, from Jim.
And folks, listen, we've got Jim lined up already for next month, so we're good to go.
We now have to get ready for Gary Wayne, going to be another fantastic program.
I believe we're going to be talking Great Reset and some of the, well, the multifaceted layers, if you will, to the Great Reset.
So tune in for that one, folks.
▲
Export Selection