All Episodes
Previous Next
March 13, 2021 - Jim Fetzer
01:25:11
Need to Know (12 March 2021) with Michael Ivey and Holly Seeliger
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin, where today I'm delighted to be joined by Michael Ivey from Asheville, North Carolina, and Holly Seliger from Detroit, Michigan.
We're here to bring you all the news you need to know, a lot of which today has to do with the coronavirus.
We begin with the House passing a gun control bill to expand background checks.
Eight Republicans voted with the Democrats.
This is pretty disgusting.
A couple from Florida, three actually.
Pennsylvania, New York, New Jersey, Michigan.
The Democrat-backed gun control bill is an attempt to take advantage of the situation where they have control of the House and the Senate.
The first measure passed the Democrat-led House 227 to 203, closing a long-standing loophole by expanding background checks for those purchasing weapons over the internet.
The second 219 to 210, with only two Republicans supporting it, would give authorities 10 business days for federal background checks to complete before a gun sale can be licensed.
This is the House Judiciary Committee senior Republican Jim Jordan wrote on Twitter, House Democrats are making it harder for law-abiding citizens to buy a gun.
They actually want to go further, much, much further, banning sales of high-capacity military-style rifles.
They say can fire ammunition rapidly, but these are still simply semi-automatic.
They only fire one round with each depression of the trigger.
Democrat Mike Thompson, who spearheaded a drive for expanded gun control, said 30 people are killed by gun violence daily, with the number growing to 100 if suicides and accidental deaths involving firearms are counted.
But why would anyone want to include suicides or accidental death?
The fact is they exclude all the evidence that American citizens use guns to defend themselves hundreds of thousands of times every year, even into the millions, saving an estimated 200,000 lives of Americans by virtue of being able to defend themselves.
With the Democrats controlling the White House and both chambers are seeking to pursue liberal goals thwarted when Republicans held either the House or the Senate, Democrats claim their position has been strengthened by turmoil within the NRA, a gun lobby closely aligned with the Republicans.
A partisan gun control bill proposed after the mass shooting at Sandy Hook, which was completely staged.
It was a two-day FEMA drill.
I have a book about it.
Nobody died at Sandy Hook.
In fact, they've staged other of these phony events, including in Orlando.
And again in Parkland, plus we have the Phony Political Theater in Charlottesville.
We have the events in Boston where Amazon not only banned the Sandy Hook book, where I brought together 13 experts and where we established the school had been closed by 2008, that there were no students there, and that it was a two-day FEMA drill presented as mass murder to promote gun control.
Because that's all they've got.
They have to make up cases to make their case.
It's outrageous and it's insulting.
But when they control the media, including Amazon.com, they can do a pretty good job of suppressing the evidence.
Michael, your thoughts?
Yeah, ever since they obviously neutered this Fifth Month Act in the Obama administration, that threw the door wide open To these brainwashing false flag events, and it seems like the great majority of them, and there have been a lot since 2010 of these false flag events, have been gun-related, shooting-related.
There was the Boston bombing that wasn't that.
That was a big one, but the great majority of them have been trying to carry out the agenda of brainwashing the American people, guns bad.
You know, they've been trying to get a draconian gun control bill through for decades.
And so far, the American people have been successful at thwarting them on most occasions.
It's very hypocritical.
You know, these people travel around with with security at their side, all of whom are armed, and they pose as being in favor of less gun violence.
That's another one of those weaponized terms, gun violence.
They use it all the time.
When the actual figures, as you were just saying, Jim, prove just the opposite.
More guns, less violence.
Absolutely.
Studies support it.
In fact, if the Democrats had had their way back in 1776, we'd still be a colony of the British Empire.
Holly, your thoughts?
Thanks, Jim.
So I think that this is actually really, we're seeing it as partisan within the House right now and probably the Senate.
But with the American people, we see a massive influx of purchasing of firearms, particularly first time buyers in women.
So there's, I really don't think this is a right versus left issue anymore.
Gun sales for women has been up 40% since 2019.
So I think there there is a really big interest for women and other people to want to protect their home to want to protect their families.
Also food sovereignty.
It's a big issue.
There's still a lot of hunters in America.
So I think that their time to really push this is has gone past.
I don't think they're going to have the American people support whether or not that that will continue in the House and Senate or even get signed by Biden.
I don't know but I think as far as Popular support from the left with gun control.
I just don't think it's there anymore.
Yeah, I mean, with their deep funding in the police, who the hell is going to protect you if you can't protect yourself?
Jim, stupidest political slogan in American history, Michael, just as an anecdotal side to what Holly just said.
I personally know 2 women.
Who have just recently bought a firearm for personal self-protection and started taking lessons with it.
And these are both women who are lifelong Democrat liberals.
Oh, I love it.
That's wonderful, Michael.
Excellent.
Very good.
Meanwhile, Representative Qualthorne taunts pro-gun control Democrats.
Come and take them.
He spoke up on the House floor during the debate on Wednesday.
Let me be clear to everyone in this chamber.
You will not take this right away from us.
I know it's easy to be suckered into the D.C.
bubble, but outside of here, in real America, when we say, come and take it, we damn well mean it.
He finished with a direct challenge to the Democrats.
If you think this bastardization of the Constitution will be met with silence, you know nothing of the America I know.
You want my guns, I know it.
We all know it.
Well, Mr. Speaker, you can come and take them.
I will not let gun-grabbing leftists take away our Second Amendment rights.
Not now, not ever.
Come and take them.
Meanwhile, the House Press Secretary suggested President Biden wouldn't rule out to use executive orders.
The vote for the first bill, as reported, had eight Republicans joining.
A statement from Representative Jody Hoy sums up what it is Republicans suspect is a Democratic agenda.
This gun control agenda is all about undermining and restricting American Second Amendment rights.
House Bill 8 creates a national firearm registry, paving the way for gun confiscation.
Don't take my word for it.
POTUS said he wants to take your AR-15.
The phrase in the popular Gonzales flag was also used in the Texas Revolution where the flag shows a cannon demanded to be turned over to Mexican soldiers and the phrase, come and take it.
Needless to say, the cannon was not surrendered.
Michael, your thoughts?
Well, there's two local things in those stories.
Madison Cawthorn, the new congressman, is my congressman.
I'm mighty proud of what he just stood up and said in Congress in defense of the Second Amendment.
And I guess he's brand new, and that makes one more, in addition to Marjorie Taylor Greene, that we can actually be proud of and actually have the American people As their first consideration.
And these people who keep pushing for these things, like Dianne Feinstein, the witch, they're not actually against guns.
What they're in favor of is allowing the government to have a total monopoly on force and power over the populace.
Very good.
Holly, your thoughts?
So you had mentioned the list of Republicans who had voted for it, and one of them was Fred Upton from Michigan.
And in my home state of Maine, there's also Susan Collins, who's a big rhino.
Pretty surprised that she herself didn't vote for it.
She'd probably be out of office pretty soon if she did.
I think in Michigan, I'm surprised that there is a Republican who voted for this, but there are a lot of types of... I don't foresee, you know, the government taking guns from people.
I don't know how something like that could possibly go down.
God willing, something like that never happens, but They do do things like in inner cities, guns for food.
So they try to get people to give up their firearms in exchange for food or social services and try to do like gun buybacks.
So I don't know if that's something that we could see some more of in the future as well.
That's one way I see that they could be trying to take that.
Also, from what I have heard, ammo, just the availability of ammo is extremely difficult right now.
It's very difficult for people to even find it, so that could be another way that we see a lot of this going away slowly.
You're absolutely correct, Holly.
And of course, nowadays, if you call for the police, it can take them as long as 20 minutes to show up.
So while you're waiting for them to come because they are armed, when you are not, your daughter may have been raped, your wife may have been murdered, you may have been mugged.
It's idiotic to think you could, in this era of defunding police, Be safe without being able to defend yourself.
You may not succeed, but at least you got a chance.
And we have a lot of stories of Americans succeeding over home invaders and others, especially using AR-15s, which is the most versatile weapon, I think, ever manufactured for citizens in the United States.
Yeah, go ahead, Michael.
I was going to say, that's also the reason you're mentioning calling the police for the well-known statement, when seconds count, the police are only minutes away.
That's right!
That's exactly right!
I did want to mention quickly that reminded me there's something called Project Green Light in inner city Detroit.
And there are these multiple real time cameras that are placed in certain areas of inner Detroit with a green flashing light and it is recording.
There's facial recognition technology being used in these areas.
And I have actually spoken to people in those areas saying, yes, everything is recorded, but don't expect the police to come when the crimes occur because they just can't get there in time.
The city is spread out for whatever reason you can't expect them to be there.
It'll be recorded but you can't expect to be protected in that in that time.
Detroit, of course, is one of the major centers of urban violence, along with Chicago.
Meanwhile, a Georgetown law professor is fired after seeing black students are playing at the bottom of her class almost every semester.
A colleague suspended for failing to correct her after they accidentally recorded their Zoom chat.
This is bizarre.
Georgetown Law has fired one white professor and placed another on administrative leave after a video of their discussion about a black student was condemned on social media.
Dean Bill Treanor announced Thursday the school had ended its relationship with Professor Sandra Sellers after the video showed her complaining on Zoom that black students were predominantly at the bottom of her class.
She was speaking to Professor David Batson.
Who is also, in this case, placed on leave for not correcting her.
She wasn't complaining.
She was reporting the fact of the matter.
I have 35 years in higher education, and I didn't have a lot of black students, but this is a question of empirical fact.
If black students are regularly at the bottom of the class, how can someone be punished for making an observation?
Professors had stayed on Zoom to discuss students after they left, unaware it was still recording online for two weeks until students noticed the conversation.
They were a bit jumbled, like me, reasoned through that, what you just said, Seller said, of a student's performance, who the Black Law Students Associate claim is the only black person in the class.
You know what?
I hate to say this, I end up having this angst every semester that a lot of my lower ones are blacks, the adjunct professor of meditation and negotiation continued.
This is the woman, the professor, with extensive experience.
Meanwhile, we have a statement coming from the community, from the dean, explaining he's sacking her for making a point that would appear to be factually correct and accurate.
Bettson, also a meditation law expert, did not initially respond, but looks down and nods during the short 43-second clip.
He subsequently returns to discussing the student in question.
What drives him crazy is the concept of how it plays out, of whether this is his own perception playing there with certain people or his own unconscious biases.
Honestly, I don't see what's going on here, why there's any demand for bias.
The black students are calling for resignation and an apology.
They're claiming that there is bias against blacks in grading, but that's most certainly not in evidence here.
It includes conduct that has no place in our educational community.
We must ensure that all students are treated fairly and evaluated on their merits from the dean, although there's no evidence, no reason whatsoever to believe they are not being evaluated on their merits.
Here is the Black Student Association demands the immediate termination of Professor Sellers, requiring a public apology from Professor Batson, critically assessing and improving the grading system, which is subjective of necessity, including an audit of Sellers' past grading and student evaluations to account for her admitted biases, which are not in evidence, Committing to hiring more black professors who would be better situated to assessing black students in a non-biased manner.
Honest to God, this is virtually absurd in terms of how identity politics has gone on forever, forever, forever.
Meanwhile, you have other Twitters.
Nat is not a cat.
This message is inadequate.
Fire her.
Another new age white, wild brown.
I graduated from Georgetown in 2004.
This will definitely have bearing on my decision when student giving calls me asking for money.
But it's just ridiculous.
There's no reason to believe and there's no evidence whatsoever that she's not simply reporting the facts of the matter.
Michael, your thoughts?
Well, if I had my little cue cards of subject matter that things keep falling into, I would be holding up the one that says war against whites and hypocritical double standards.
It's also reminiscent of the Orwellian principle called wrong think and the fact that they didn't even Didn't even toy around with a reprimand in this case, or call her in and ask, you know, why did you say this?
And just anything short of firing, they just went to the immediate dumping her.
And that is characteristic of the degree to which this This racial double standard and the issue of race in general has filtered down to people so that they don't have to enforce it anymore.
Now, just the fear of somebody disagreeing with anyone on a racial basis is enough to make administrations like this act against people.
They're not doing, I mean, they are doing everything possible to continue to drive this wedge between whites and anyone who's not white.
Tim?
Yeah, the black attitude seems to be any great other than an A is biased and discriminatory and based on race.
Just absurd.
Holly, your thoughts?
Well, I think we've been seeing this as a culture in colleges for quite a few years, starting off with some of the smaller liberal schools.
There was a big evergreen college debacle a few years ago, and I think it's sort of branched out of just the liberal schools into these bigger schools.
I mean, Georgetown Law is a huge school.
And I would imagine you'd have to be quite a great professor to or at least have be well renowned to actually get into one of these positions.
Meanwhile, though, she is adjunct.
So I think this is also part of the shift that we're seeing between tenured professors and adjunct and who can be discarded.
And for what reasons, just at the misunderstanding, perhaps within a Zoom call is going to be A scary situation for a teacher about whether they should even open their mouth about issues of race or grades or equality within a school at this point.
So it's definitely surprising that it's gone up so quickly into a school such as Georgetown.
Yeah, I think this is part of the dumbing down of America.
We're going to reach a point where everyone gets every degree, whatever they want.
They don't even have to actually take a course or pass an exam.
It's going to be that absurd.
We're reaching that point.
Meanwhile, Justice Roberts attacks his own Supreme Court justices.
He's often provided the swing vote, but his latest rulings segregated him from the rest of the bench, his first solo dissent.
Accusing fellow justices of expanding the power and size of the court beyond what's appropriate, it involves an incident where Georgia Gwinnett College stopped two students from freely sharing their religious views and materials on campus.
The student sued.
The college paid the legal fees incurred and updated its policy to protect free speech.
However, they continued the case, asked for a dollar in nominal damages.
But a lower court said the case was moot.
It was appealed to SCOTUS, and in an 8-1 ruling, the Supreme Court upheld the case was, in fact, not moot and can be continued.
Roberts, however, took exception.
In his dissent, he outlined this ruling risks a major expansion of the judicial role, opening new avenues to keep lawsuits alive and bog down the court system.
While this SCOTUS decision upheld the right to free speech by a Christian student, it also opened up more opportunities for lawsuits to drag on and get muddled.
Chief Justice Roberts' dissents make it clear this decision is a double-edged sword.
Meanwhile, Marjorie Taylor Greene gives an explosive interview to The War Room.
She's just been doing a sensational job.
I don't want to be here at all, she says, of her role as a member of Congress.
I gave up an awesome life.
I gave up an American dream to come into what I consider to be a shithole because I'm pissed off because I watch the greatest country in the world on fire and burning down, and this is going to affect my children and my grandchildren.
I admire this woman beyond words.
She is sensational, speaking the truth.
People think it's all about politics, but it's really an industry itself.
All of their connections, business operations, connected to this big nasty bull we call a swamp, but really it's an economy.
It generates so much money, you have no idea.
A businesswoman who owns a construction company, she was not political until she saw Trump in the Republican primary for the first time.
Someone in politics spoke her language.
I understood easily what he was saying.
But after Trump won in 2016, it was Republicans who failed us.
With full control of the House, Senate, and White House, the establishment refused to send legislation President Trump could sign.
We're going to lose our country because the Republicans we're told we're supposed to support, Green said.
They're no different than the Democrats.
Michael, your thoughts?
Well, as we know, John Roberts shouldn't be sitting on the Supreme Court in the first place after the statements that he made about the election.
Not to mention his appearance on the Lolita Express going down to Epstein Island.
But honestly, I don't understand what the big deal about that case was.
Why did he dissent so vociferously over what?
Having the courts clogged?
Was that it?
It was a simple case of freedom of speech on campus, wasn't it?
In my opinion, yes.
Yes, it was, and I'm very surprised, but he certainly revealed an aspect of him none of us had suspected.
Holly, your thoughts?
My thoughts are that basically there must be something that they're holding over Roberts's head or something.
Right now, he's just completely flipped and it's I'm just completely upset with the Supreme Court as a whole right now, for many reasons.
But the fact that, like you brought up, I think it is about this idea about keeping the courts stuffed up with what they're trying to define as a moot point.
And I don't know if this is Roberts trying to get into the news with something different than what Michael just brought up a couple minutes ago.
But as far as Marjorie Taylor Greene goes, I think the fact that she is just completely hammered in the media constantly.
I mean, you pull up her name and just every single article or anything that comes up about her is completely negative.
And the fact that we're supposed to believe that Georgia voted for Biden when at the same time they're voting someone like Marjorie Taylor Greene into Congress is pretty telling about the amount of fraud that had gone on on the presidential election circuit.
Nice, nice points.
Yes, yes, yes.
Including, of course, the Supreme Court failure to take up the Texas lawsuit or any of the other election suits.
That has disgraced the court and shown they have abandoned the nation and their obligation to uphold the Constitution.
Shameful.
Michael, yes.
I just wanted to make one comment on Marjorie Taylor Greene's having said that she realized that it was the Republicans who failed us.
And it struck me that it has been the case.
I mean, there have been fluctuations back and forth, of course, but it has been the case over the decades of my adult life that there's been a fairly good balance between liberals, Democrats, Republicans, and Democrats.
I mean, conservatives and liberals.
Um, but recently, there seems to have been like this tidal wave of, uh, I don't know exactly what to call it other than Then over the top liberalism that's washing over this entire country.
And you see it when we have votes on important bills, and you have 10 or 15 Republicans switching over to the other side.
So, that does not bode well, and it tends to strengthen the argument of the people who say that our whole country is sort of like a dead man walking right now.
Yeah, I think the right word for it is left-wing insanity.
Absolute insanity.
Just stunning.
Meanwhile, we'll be right back.
Biden gave a talk last night, which really was a commercial for Pfizer, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson.
He didn't address any of the real issues confronting the country.
It all appears to have been pre-recorded, by the way.
Here are a couple of comments.
Remember when Joe Biden and Kamala Harris spent months lying about not trusting the vaccine simply because President Trump spearheaded Operation Warp Speed?
Now they're trying to take credit for it.
Sick people.
Another.
Who let him out of the basement?
Joe Biden's taking credit for things President Trump made happen in this horrible presidential address.
Operation Warp Speed, created by Trump, is the reason why the rollout of the vaccine is successful.
Go back to sleep, Joe.
Trump did that.
Meanwhile, we return, where there are many issues involving the vaccine and the coronavirus, where Amazing Polly is a wonderful discussion, which I'd like to share with you, in part, here.
We're going to talk about profiting from panic today.
Mr. Bajoman.
At Bajoman73 on Twitter sent me this article from the Huffington Post, which was from 2014 by Lawrence Solomon.
Don't believe everything you read about flu deaths.
The CDC's decision to play up flu deaths dates back a decade when it realized the public wasn't following its advice on the flu vaccine.
During the 2003 flu season, the manufacturers were telling us That they weren't receiving a lot of orders for vaccines, says Dr. Glenn Novak, Associate Director for Communications at CDC's National Immunization Program.
According to the National Vital Statistics System in the U.S., for example, annual flu deaths in 2010 amounted to just 500 per year.
Now, just stop for a second.
In 2010, According to the National Vital Statistics System of the U.S., flu deaths amounted to only 500 per year.
500.
See that number?
Fewer deaths than from ulcers, which were 2,977, hernias, which were 1,832,
and pregnancy and childbirth, which were at 825.
It was a far cry from the big killers, such as heart disease, which was almost 600,000,
and cancers, also pushing 600,000.
The story is similar in Canada, where unlikely killers likewise dwarf statistics
Canada's count of flu deaths.
So they go on.
Even that 500 figure for the US could be too high, according to analysis in authoritative journals,
such as the American Journal of Public Health and the British Medical Journal.
Only about 15 to 20% of people who come down with flu-like symptoms have the influenza virus.
The other 80 to 85 percent actually caught rhinovirus or other germs that are indistinguishable from the true flu without laboratory tests, which are rarely done.
In 2001, a year in which death certificates listed 257 Americans as having died of flu, only 18 were positively identified as true flus.
The other 239 were simply assumed to be flus and most likely had Few true flus among them.
Wow!
The statistics are really telling an interesting story.
And of course, as we're watching this year, that's a main focus of what's going on with this flu virus.
Are the statistics correct?
And then they build models off the statistics, don't forget.
So if the statistics are wrong, then the models are wrong.
Let's continue reading.
U.S.
data on influenza deaths are a mess, states a 2005 article in the British Medical Journal entitled, Are U.S.
Flu Deaths Figures More PR Than Science?
This article takes issue with the 36,000 flu death figure commonly claimed, and with describing influenza slash pneumonia as the seventh leading cause of death in the U.S.
But why are flu and pneumonia bundled together, the article asks?
Is the relationship so strong or unique to warrant characterizing them as a single cause of death?
The article's answer is no.
Most pneumonia deaths are unrelated to influenza.
Pneumonia, according to the Lung Association, has more than 30 different causes, influenza being but one of them.
The CDC itself acknowledges the slim relationship, saying only a small portion of deaths, only 8.5% of all pneumonia and influenza deaths, are influenza-related.
Because death certificates belie claims of numerous flu deaths, CDC enlisted computer models to arrive at its 36,000 flu death estimate.
But even here, it needed to bend conventional medical Medical terminology to arrive at compelling death numbers.
Cause of death statistics are based solely on the underlying cause of death, internationally defined as, quote, the disease or injury which initiated the train of events leading directly to death, explains the National Center for Health Statistics.
Because the flu was rarely, quote, an underlying cause of death, the CDC created the sound-alike term, Influenza-associated death.
The CDC was not getting enough death certificates that said flu was the cause of death.
So they made up a term, more or less, influenza-associated death, which then would be put on the death certificates or added to as in addition to the other cause of death, which allowed them to go out to the public and say, There were all these deaths from influenza-related death.
You see what they're doing?
Using this new, loose definition, CDC's computer models could tally people who died of a heart ailment or other causes after having the flu.
The CDC's decision to play up flu deaths dates back a decade, when it realized the public wasn't following its advice on the flu vaccine.
Well here, this should bust your illusion of what the CDC is really all about.
The CDC is the Center for Disease Control.
Glenn Novak, who worked there, told this reporter that the manufacturers of the flu vaccine were telling us that they weren't receiving a lot of orders for it.
And so, the CDC stepped in and helped them out.
The CDC stepped in and helped The statistics change by adding this phony term, influenza-related death.
And then the numbers, as you see, went from 500 to 36,000.
It's a crime.
to 36,000. It's a crime. It is a crime what's going on. And this is precisely
what the Coronavirus Task Force people are doing.
They're using that methodology to fudge the numbers here.
If you don't believe me, listen to Deborah Birx herself.
Can you talk about your concerns about deaths being misreported by coronavirus because of either testing or standards or other characteristics?
So I think in this country, we've taken a very liberal approach to mortality.
And I think the reporting here has been pretty straightforward over the last five to six weeks.
Prior to that, when there wasn't testing in January and February, that's a very different situation and unknown.
There are other countries that if you had a pre-existing condition, And let's say the virus calls you to go to the ICU and then have a heart or kidney problem.
Some countries are recording that as a heart issue or a kidney issue and not a COVID-19 death.
Right now we're still recording it and we'll, I mean, the great thing about having forms that come in and a form that has the ability to market as COVID-19 infection, the intent is right now that those, if someone dies with COVID-19, we are counting that.
Can you be sure?
I mean, you hear from coroners that that's not necessarily the case.
Are you sure?
How can you be confident about that?
Is there any concern that it spears the...
She just admitted it to you, to your face, in front of the nation, in front of the world.
Deborah Birx just admitted that they are using those tricky methods to scoop things in under the coronavirus COVID-19.
Death category.
There are people speaking out about this.
This Minnesota senator and doctor, Dr. Scott Jensen, he said he received a seven-page document from the health department to fill out death certificates with a diagnosis of COVID-19, whether the person actually died from COVID-19 or not.
Why is MN inflating COVID-19 death numbers?
So there you have it from a frontline physician and a senator that that is what they are being instructed to do.
And I do have that document.
That document is easily available online where you can see for yourself that they are being instructed to do just what the CDC was doing back in the day with the regular flu in order to sell flu vaccines.
It's all right out there.
Anthony Fauci didn't like this very much.
He doesn't like anybody.
Speculating on whether the tests work, whether the...
Statistics are good, whether the models are flawed, he doesn't like it.
And here's what he had to say about all of it.
What do you say to those folks who are making the claim without really any evidence that these deaths are being padded, that the number of COVID-19 deaths are being padded?
You always have conspiracy theories when you have very challenging public health crises.
They are nothing but distractions.
Conspiracy theory.
As we've discussed before, this is all they have.
They flood the zone.
Remember from Event 201, coronavirus pandemic planning exercise that was held in October 2019?
Their whole strategy was to flood the zone with trusted voices so that only their information would come out.
And when these people are faced with reliable witnesses, like Dr. Scott Jensen, for example, They don't rebut the facts.
They just name call.
And their favorite name, of course, is Conspiracy Theorist.
But I think the public is waking up.
I really do.
And I don't think that this is going to hold water.
All right.
Let me just say that I think Polly is amazing and that this was a wonderful presentation of which we watched about half.
Michael, your thoughts?
Yeah, just yesterday, I was writing to someone who still believes that they used the phrase, there have been hundreds of thousands of deaths due to COVID-19.
And I just put in, dropped in that Deborah Birx clip that you just saw right there where she admits, Oh, now we have a box to check.
So it's easy.
You just go there and check the box and it's a COVID-19 death.
How fun.
And personally, I've been calling this whole subject sort of a silver lining in this otherwise descent of medical tyranny and The silver lining being it's caused a whole lot of people, myself included, to learn about and rethink basics about what makes people ill and what's commonly called the germ theory.
When you get into the medical weeds, so to speak, about literally any viral infections, viral epidemics, the genesis of the idea of virus as being an infectious agent where it causes certain diseases, then you discover that the supposed science on which these concepts are built is extraordinarily thin, and that includes any kind of seasonal flu.
You discover how weak, scientifically speaking, the entire viral disease paradigm is.
You've heard on your show, Jim, Dr. Lorraine Day say that there are no deaths from the flu, that she's never seen one in all her years of medicine, and yet they tell us every year that there's 36, 40,000 flu deaths while they hawk their flu vaccines.
But what I like especially about Polly's presentation is she was showing in relation to the flu the same technique you're using with COVID to exaggerate the numbers, you know, not distinguishing between persons who happen to have COVID when they die versus person who died from COVID.
And word exposes that the CDC is a marketing operation for the big vaccine for the pharmaceutical industry.
The CDC is a marketing, advertising, promotion agency.
It's disgusting.
Holly, your thoughts.
Thanks, Jim.
Just first and foremost, it reminds me of one of my favorite quotes by Mark Twain, who said that there are lies, damn lies, and statistics.
So we are seeing a huge mass hysteria campaign.
I can't really think of anything different than what what to call it at this point, because we've got the economic distress that people are being put through statistical manipulation.
We see all the people being isolated in nursing homes and adult care facilities.
So.
We don't know what is happening to people and how they are even dying, the psychological trauma that people are being put through right now, and also the threats of war or actual war, manufactured famine with all these lockdowns.
People don't know how they're going to put food on the table.
So you could have issues with suicide and all of this, as she has pointed out, can be Mark is any of these diseases, particularly what we're seeing right now as a CV 19.
And then place on top of that all the kickbacks that like you said, the television, all of our politicians.
Michael brought up the end of the Smith Mundt Act.
So all of this can be a big pharmaceutical advertisement to get people to ultimately the end result is for everyone to get the jab.
And if they can get a bunch of other operations during this This time of hysteria, then people can go along with it if they're scared enough.
Michael, I know you had another word you wanted to add.
Well, this is 1 of my big subjects, and so I could go on quite a while about the issue of viral pandemics and the 1 that we're presumably in right now.
I thought it was cool that Holly just gave a Mark Twain quote.
I have another 1 here.
Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it's time to pause and reflect.
Yes, I agree.
I agree.
And of course, it's easier to fool a man than to convince him he's been fooled.
That's another one.
Yeah.
Meanwhile, this is fascinating.
A group of scientists and doctors in Europe have issued an open letter calling on the European Medicines Agency, the EMA, to answer urgent safety questions regarding COVID-19 vaccines or withdraw the vaccine's authorization.
The letter describes serious potential consequences, warning of possible autoimmune reactions, blood clotting abnormalities, stroke, and internal bleeding, including the brain, spinal column, and heart.
The authors request evidence that each medical danger outlined was excluded in preclinical animal models with all three vaccines prior to their approval for use in humans by the EMA.
Should such evidence not be available, we demand that approval for use of the gene-based vaccine be withdrawn until all the above issues have been properly addressed by the exercise of due diligence by the EMA.
They are supportive of the principle of the use of new medical interventions.
However, there are serious concerns, including but not confined to those outlined above, that the approval of the COVID-19 vaccines by the EMA was premature and reckless.
And that the administration of the vaccines constituted and still does constitute human experimentation, which was and still is in violation of the Nuremberg Code.
In a public statement, they said, no sooner did we deliver our letter That we're too risky for the frail elderly by virtue of the mechanisms to stimulate the production of spike protein with adverse pathophysiological properties.
There are also vulnerable persons who are not old or already ill.
New data showed vaccine side effects are three times as common in those who have previously been infected.
None of the vaccines have undergone clinical testing for more than a few months.
Which is simply too short for establishing safety and efficacy.
Under Resolution 2361, Member States must inform citizens that vaccination is not mandatory and ensure no one is politically, socially, or otherwise pressured to become vaccinated.
States are further required to ensure that no one is discriminated against We're not receiving the vaccine.
Meanwhile, it turns out back in 2001, the Department of Justice legalized non-consensual human experiments where the DoD waived informed consent.
This is outrageous.
This is something they cannot do.
Department of Justice, November 2001, legalizes non-consensual experiments We're experimenting on prisoners of war as explicitly prohibited by the Nuremberg Code, the Geneva Conventions, and U.S.
law.
The Pentagon sought to lift these prohibitions on research involving prisoners.
Lawyers at the DOJ accommodated crafting a memo declaring the use of detainees in biological experimentation was a non-grave breach of the Geneva Conventions, which of course is absurd.
Prisoners are precisely the object who were subject to experimentation by Dr. Mingheili of the Third Reich.
So the very idea of making prisoners an exception is a historical absurdity and a legal and moral abomination.
The DOJ, the General Counsel, requested information about detainee exploitation and the use of interrogation techniques that could be used on suspected terrorists.
They were widely discussed as experimental.
That includes some really bad actors from the Bush-Cheney administration, too, who are interested in doing these sorts of things.
Michael, your thoughts?
I thought that was a funny phrase.
Discrimination against someone for not receiving the vaccine.
I mean, like you're being discriminated against.
The vaccine passports, Michael.
The vaccine passports.
No, I know.
I didn't say that right, but in the context of that story, the statement was that you're being discriminated against if you don't get the vaccine.
In other words, it's discrimination to not take it.
Michael, they meant discriminating against you if you refuse to take it.
Maybe I misunderstood that statement.
That's another thing that I consistently talk to people about is the fact that there are literally thousands of high-level doctors, tens of thousands actually, and medical academics all over the world challenging first these pandemic measures and now they're really stepping up and challenging this mass vaccination campaign.
I'd like to mention that two days ago, Del Bigtree's Highwire podcast featured an interview with a Belgian vaccine developer.
He's also called a vaccine designer.
His name is Geert van den Bosch, who And he's one of the top level people that are in the vaccine orthodoxy at the scientific level, creating vaccines.
It has been for decades.
He's worked for Gates, he's worked for the Gavi organization, and he's come out with a very strident plea to stop this mass vaccination program Saying that the 1 of the workings 1 of the mechanisms of this particular vaccine, these will work to destroy the natural immunity that people already have.
In favor of a non-natural antibody set, and much like Sherry Tenpenny also says, four to six months down the line, a year down the line, when they contact other coronaviruses, they're not going to have any kind of immunity to them.
Right, all the techniques they're implying.
They want us to impose face masks, hand washing, staying inside, social distancing.
Weaken our immune system!
Weaken our immune system rather than strengthen it.
Part of the reason this whole plan is so diabolical.
Holly, your thoughts?
I just wanted to mention that there's also a lot of issues when it comes to insurance and people getting the jab and getting insurance or having potential damages coming forward.
There are a lot of people, as you might have heard, or you know, might know people personally, or I've known people personally who said that they've had friends or family members who have already suffered side effects from getting the jab.
And there's also Discussion within insurance and circle circles now they're saying that if you die or you get injured from if they've determined it is from the job, your insurance won't pay for it as it's being labeled an experimental medical intervention.
So.
It's something that you're actually consenting to still at this point.
So, insurance can kind of get around it that way.
And even having a CV19 test could mean that you are no longer eligible for insurance.
So, they're telling people in the UK and even in America now that your insurance might not even cover you if you do have side effects, if you need to go to the hospital.
And then that also reminds me of, of course, the vaccine injury courts that we have here in the United States since 1986.
There's really no sort of compensation.
It's a completely separate court that people try to go through.
But any claim that you have for any sort of injury, if you actually want to go against these massive pharmaceutical company, they have to be filed within a year of getting the shot, regardless of when you get side effects.
These experimental jabs have only been, we're told, have only been in the works for, what, less than a year, so people don't know what sort of side effects are going to be happening years from now.
The program does not pay fees for lawyers or expert witnesses.
It also provides little opportunity for people filing claims to participate, and the awards do not pay suffering or damages, so I think we're like, as Michael said, not only are we going to see people with potential health effects for many, many years that we know nothing about, they're talking about experimenting on pregnant women right now and children.
They're talking on the mainstream news right now.
They've got over The mainstream news claims they've given it to over 40,000 pregnant women right now doing a test to see what the long-term effects are to women and the babies which from last time I had heard people said even just a couple years ago that pregnant women should not even get a flu shot so now they've completely flipped on that and now they're talking about 12 and under getting this so it should be a huge wake-up call for people and I
I am hopeful that this actually is a big wake-up call to people.
They're talking about 60 to 70 jobs that babies and children are getting before 18 years old at this point.
Let's please wake up and start to ask questions.
Yeah, you're making key points, and they're having a lot of miscarriages, spontaneous abortions and the like.
I mean, this is very serious business, and it's all very, very bad for human beings and other living things.
Meanwhile, Stats Canada claims the lockdowns, not COVID-19, are driving the excess deaths.
Canada's National Statistical Agency stated in a report released yesterday, there are excess deaths in the country when compared to previous years, but they're not due only to COVID-19, but increasingly to what it calls indirect consequences of the pandemic, citing as examples delayed medical procedures due to lockdowns and increased substance use.
This is very, very serious.
The number of excess deaths has been higher than the number of deaths due to COVID, and these deaths are affecting younger populations, suggesting other factors, including indirect impacts of the pandemic, are at play.
They reported that in 2020 there are an estimated 296,373 deaths in Canada,
represented in excess of 13,798 above and beyond what would have expected
had there been no pandemic. Five percent more deaths than expected.
But the agency went on to point out how last year saw a significant spike in, for example, overdose deaths, as lockdowns forced drug users to withdraw to themselves and away from substance use treatment programs that could have helped them.
Meanwhile, a Stanford medical professor has spoken out.
Lockdowns, worst public health mistake in the last 100 years.
Stanford's Dr. Jay Bhattacharya told Newsweek COVID-19 lockdowns are the single worst public health mistake of the last 100 years, that they're disproportionately impacting the poor, making wealth inequality worse.
Areas that imposed the most draconian lockdowns didn't see the most success in controlling the virus.
I stand behind my comment that the lockdowns are the single worst public health mistake of the past hundred years.
We will be counting the catastrophic health and psychological harms imposed on nearly every poor person on the face of earth for a generation.
At the same time, they've not served to control the epidemic places where they have been most vigorously imposed.
In the U.S., they have at best.
Protected the non-essential class from COVID while exposing the essential working class to the disease.
The lockdowns are trickle-down epidemiology.
People who are older have a higher risk of dying from COVID than those who are younger, a really important fact.
We know who is most vulnerable, so the first blank of the Great Barrington Declaration, let us protect the vulnerable.
ought to be pursued.
The other is lockdowns themselves impose great harm.
Lockdowns are not a natural, normal way to live.
Bacha Yar is one of the co-authors of the Great Barrington Declaration which has received over 13,000 signatures from medical and public health scientists.
stating lockdown policies are producing devastating effects on short and long-term public health,
worsening cardiovascular disease outcomes, fewer cancer screenings, deteriorating mental health,
leading to greater excess mortality in years to come. And it's not going to be abated anytime
soon. We're going to be dealing this for a generation to come. Michael, your thoughts?
Yeah, I thought that Stats Canada story was surprising in as much as it seems to be telling
the straight-up truth.
I don't know what Stats Canada is, but it sounds like it's some official source of Canadian statistics.
Evidently, they're not on the Gates payroll, or they never would have said something like that.
In terms of excess deaths, one of the ways that we could tell that the COVID-19 pandemic was not a true pandemic was the fact that after 2020 was closing, practically literally every Western country I had the statistics that there were no significant excess deaths, and that the deaths attributed to COVID-19
We're basically deaths that would have occurred anyway, but are now being called classified as COVID-19 deaths because the amount that those the other kinds of deaths dropped during 2020 almost exactly matches the number that are claimed to be COVID-19 deaths.
And so that the now that there may be an uptick.
In overall mortality, it's perfectly logical that it would be the result of loss of income, effects of the lockdowns, not going to schools, not having social lives, depression, everything associated with these tyrannical lockdowns.
That's the Stanford guy, Bhattacharya.
He's a high level person and he's one that I had in mind when I said that these people are coming out of the woodwork now to try to stop this.
But his calling it, I had to chuckle when he called it the worst public health mistake.
Because those of us who have done some deep diving on this subject know that this is not a mistake at all.
This was planned for many years to bring in a one world agenda.
And this is what we get.
Yeah, but Michael, you know, that's going into the motivation behind it.
Describing it as a public health mistake in terms of official government policy is perfectly appropriate and gets the point across.
I mean, look, Deborah Birx was telling us this is what they're doing.
They're faking the statistics, just as they invented the flu-associated deaths in that case.
It's just stunning.
Well, I don't blame Bhattacharya at all in his position for calling it that, because that's the right thing to do from a... I'm losing a word here... An appropriate thing to say?
This is all deliberate. You're 100% correct.
An appropriate thing to say? I just wanted to point out that it was not a mistake at all.
Well, depends on what level, see, Michael.
You're right.
I understand your point.
Holly, your thoughts?
I just wanted to touch on the point that he made about the removing elective and what they called non-essential medical care during this time.
So we saw many hospitals actually being open to deal with the influx of people who were told were sick, and then we're seeing these hospitals close.
In the UK and in the US, we saw President Trump had put forward the naval ships that were supposed to get filled with COVID patients, and they were never utilized by several governors.
And actually, there are doctors in the state of Michigan, I don't know the status of the case, but they're actually trying to sue the governor over this concept of non-essential medical care because These doctors were arguing that what started out as a very small of what they called non non elect or elective surgery turned into a huge problem because they were neglected for months due to these lockdowns.
So this.
This doctor did tell the story of an elderly woman, a patient of his, who had problems with blood flow to her legs.
And it wasn't that big of a deal at first, but a small procedure would have restored blood flow to her legs.
But it went on for months.
She couldn't get into the hospital to get these, what they deemed, elective surgeries.
And these are governor mandates.
There's nothing legal or on the books to say that these Procedures can't happen.
So, long story short is that he dealt with so many patients who had turned into full-on medical emergencies, even death, due to these small things that could have been procedures that were done, could have been done easily, within a couple hours or a couple minutes even.
These procedures that were deemed non-essential to make room For these COVID patients, which never ultimately even showed up in the hospital.
So I am hopeful that the legal process will go through that.
When is Dr. Jordan Warnholtz in Michigan is trying to trying to sue the governor and sue the state for what she has deemed non essential medical care.
Yeah, you're absolutely right.
It's like a horse race.
Can they do all the damage they want before the public catches on and the doctors speak out?
Meanwhile, David Ickes observed 16 glaring parallels between 9-11 and the COVID ops.
There are numerous similarities to be seen and understood as the world goes deeper into Operation Coronavirus.
Many nations around the world, including Canada and Australia, are making moves to roll out the next phase, which involves digital identities, biometrics, and digital vaccine certificates or immunity passports, just as Bill Gates foretold all those months ago.
It's imperative we understand this is a far-reaching operation or live exercise designed to fundamentally transform society in alignment with the goals of the New World Order.
By comparing the current COVID op to the 9-11 op, we can discern a pattern and become wiser about the agenda.
Here are 16.
We'll look at a few.
MSM and government amp up the fear with incessant coverage and propaganda.
The mainstream media has barely focused on anything other than COVID since March, with the purpose of almost all news being to scare the daylights out of people and render them into docile submission.
Many of the initial projections are about to be completely and utterly wrong.
The Gates-owned WHO, World Health Organization, predicted the infection fatality rate would be 3.4 when a later Stanford study and the CDC put it at more like 0.1 to 0.26.
The Gates-funded Imperial College predicted 2 million Americans would die, actually only 225 so far, and those statistics are embarrassingly fake due to COVID death certificate fraud.
Likewise, in the aftermath of 9-11, there was unending propaganda about how freedom itself was under attack by radical Islamic terrorism.
People were first traumatized and then besieged with a slew of misinformation, which disguised the true perpetrator, shifted attention to fictitious enemies, and fostered the desire in people to want to be saved by subsuming themselves to increased governmental control.
Government reaction kills way more people than the event itself.
In both cases, government reaction is worse than the supposed threat itself, just as in Western medicine, where frequently the cure is worse than the disease.
Chemo, anyone?
The official narrative of 9-11 tells us that around 3,000 Americans died.
However, It spawned the War on Terror, under whose auspices the U.S.
invaded Iraq, Afghanistan, and later other Middle East nations, killing at least a million in Iraq alone.
When Operation Coronavirus began, we were told to lock down for two weeks, To flatten the curve, here we are seven plus months later, people are still walking around wearing masks and not getting too close.
Meanwhile, the result of government lockdowns has been increased stress, anxiety, depression, joblessness, poverty, crime, and suicide.
Many people in organizations have predicted the lockdown will kill more people than it saves.
No investigation of coincidences.
The 9-11 false flag was characterized by a stunning series of coincidences that were never investigated, where the authorities swept them under the rug, such as passports magically surviving office fires and falling to the ground intact, a building crumbling on its own accord eight hours after planes had hit nearby buildings, but not hit, Jet fighters failing to be scrambled from the nearest base.
In the COVID- it was quite an astonishing coincidence that Taoshi, via the NIH-funded Chinese Virology Labs in Wuhan, did the tube of 7.4 to lots of 3.7 for gain of function or in research weaponization of the virus research.
It was also rather coincidental that the U.S.
military, Bill Gates, and other NWO organizations were planning for this exact scenario years before it occurred.
Introduction of a fundamental new paradigm, war on terror versus war on bio-terror.
We are being steadily indoctrinated into a new paradigm of biosecurity whereby authorities hope to advance their agenda control, appealing to the need for public safety against a new enemy in the post-9-11 world.
There was a war on terror that concocted enemy bin Laden and radical Islamic terrorists in the post-COVID world.
There's a war on bioterror And the concocted enemy, an invisible virus.
Meanwhile, COVID similarities, false official narratives.
In both operations, the official narrative is more holes than a piece of Swiss cheese.
In the 9-11 op, we were supposed to believe the terrorists managed to fly planes into buildings with such skill using maneuvers even experienced pilots could not manage, while laws of physics were suspended that day.
And jet fuel magically burnt through concrete and steel, despite the fact that jet fuel doesn't have a high enough burning temperature to do it and the COVID on.
We're supposed to believe the virus is literally everywhere, can be transmitted even via cash, can live on surfaces of days and weeks and thrives in asymptomatic transmission, when no other known virus has ever done so.
For knowledge.
How did the BBC report Building 7 had fallen 30 minutes before it actually did?
Why did San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown and author Salman Rushdie both get calls beforehand telling them not to board planes going to New York City?
Why did the Chinese government run a drill for coronavirus outbreak 30 days before the Wuhan military games?
Why did the U.S.
government run or pass so many simulation drills and laws planning for the coronavirus?
Event preceded by exercise drills that went live or eerily mimicked what later happened.
According to Kevin Ryan, NORAD practiced 28 hijacked events within two years of 9-11, six of which focused on hijackings within the U.S.
One, practicing interception of hijacked planes heading for the U.N.
in New York City.
Webster Tarbley Research, 46 drills and exercising taking place on the day of 9-11 in Operation Coronavirus.
In addition to things such as Dark Winter 2001, Atlantic Storm 2005, Clade X 2018, Crimson Contagion 2019.
of 2005, CLAIDX, 2018, Crimson Contagion, 2019, there was a now infamous event, 201, of October
2019 simulating an actual coronavirus outbreak coming from Brazil and entering the U.S.
to infect millions.
Meanwhile, a CNN investigation finds the U.S.-backed Saudi blockade is leading to deadly fuel and food shortages in Yemen, where hospitals are full of starving children.
Surprise, surprise.
Now the U.S.
is treating the Afghan pullout deal as just an option.
In February 29, peace agreement presented a date to be completed by May 1st.
Secret annexes were never allowed to see, which have allowed the U.S.
to present the date as aspirational.
The Trump administration did most of the heavy lifting for a pullout before inauguration, but indications recently are certain vague violations are being made reference to as a justification for why the U.S.
might not finish the pullout.
Without access to the full peace deal, it's hard to tell if there's a fair reaction, but it looks as though the U.S.
is giving lip service to help the intra-Afghan talks along, planning not really to leave Afghanistan.
Meanwhile, the U.S.
and Israel hold meetings on Iran.
This is profoundly troubling.
We have all the proof in the world that Israel worked for Biden and against Trump, and it appears to be because Trump would not bomb Iran.
And now they believe that Biden will.
Michael, your thoughts?
That was a fabulous David Icke piece.
I think I saw something similar to that about two months ago, but what I saw was more of an outline of the similarities between 9-11 and the COVID-19 operation, and David does a great job of filling in the details there.
Specifically reminded me again of Catherine Austin Fitz's reference to the two principal strategies that these global controllers use against us and that being divide and conquer and fear of an invisible or totally fictitious enemy.
It was terrorists on 9-11 and now it's a killer virus.
How many years have we been in Afghanistan now?
Since American history, 18, I believe.
Since 03?
Yeah, that would be 18.
I guess the international drug traders, otherwise known as the CIA in this country, don't want us leaving for some reason.
They're also looting their lithium, Michael, which is the largest deposit outside of Bolivia.
No, and it's a I agree it's a troubling sign, especially given the ultra Zionist makeup of this new administration about the USA and Israel meeting to discuss what to do about Iran.
Yeah, very troubling.
Holly, your thoughts?
You're muted.
Thanks, Jim.
I just wanted to comment quickly on the excellent article that you shared about comparing the operation of 9-11 to the operation that we are seeing right now.
And I had actually written an article a couple months ago that was on my Patreon, and I was told that I should take it down or asked politely by Patreon to take it down because I was spreading Medical misinformation, but it was about an article I had written comparing the invisible enemies, the term that was used during the Salem, Massachusetts witchcraft trials of 1692 and comparing it to what we are seeing right now as a mass hysteria operation.
So, as part of psychological experimentation, trauma involving Harvard University, Cotton Mather was working at Harvard University, and he was also a member of the Royal Society, which Bill Gates also went to Harvard, and he's also a member of the Royal Society.
So, this concept of invisible enemies.
Going back to traumatizing people, mass initiation rituals, people tattling on their neighbors, information gathering, like Michael brought up with Katherine Austin Fitz, civil asset forfeiture, medical experimentation, and then culminating in a mass inoculation ritual, which Cotton Mather had done in 1721.
It was the first smallpox inoculation experimentation.
So if you look at some of these bigger operations of the parallels between these different operations, it's over and over and over again.
We see whether it's a lead up before World War.
Before I mean, Bill Gates was talking about something called disease X in 2018 saying everyone should get ready for another Spanish flu.
And how could he know something like that about a massive operation?
Something like that, just down to a T. So just great that so many people are starting to see these parallels.
And quickly on to what you said about Iran.
I think you're 100% right about the fact that I don't think President Trump wanted to go to war with Iran.
I think there's just too many things on his plate.
What he was working on, you know, supposedly Middle East peace agreement.
So it was just not something that was on his plate as president.
And I think that that's part of the what was it, the seven countries and how many years
or how many countries we were supposed to be attacking, we as the United States for this greater Middle East
project.
And of course, Bill Gates could be talking about it in advance because he was in on the planning
just as Michael has been emphasizing here today, Michael.
I thought that was a great point that you just made, Holly, the parallel that you drew about the Salem witch trials
and the, I think you used the phrase, mass hysteria operation.
There's a psychiatrist who works with America's frontline doctors named Mark McDonald, and his phrase is that this that we're in right now is a mass fear-based delusional psychosis.
Very good.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send us fan mail, pro or con, to liveneedtoknowatgmail.com.
Liveneedtoknowatgmail.com.
I'm reading all over the place of a wide range of serious adverse side effects from having a COVID vaccination.
Loose term, of course.
Experimental inoculation in younger people, pregnant women, older folks.
A virus has required well over 920 deaths following the shot.
Even mainstream news here in Rochester reported the sudden death of a previously healthy 39-year-old woman four days after getting her second shot.
I hope the word will spread so intensely that mainstream will be forced to cover it in many places with something so incredibly intrusive to a human being's body as an inoculation.
People need to know all the info that's available so they can make an informed decision for themselves, for their own body.
To my way of thinking, this is a huge issue.
Once that stuff is in you, it's the point of no return.
Our body, our own individual choice.
Marsha Walsh.
This is an excellent article, speaking of David Icke's comparison, except in one respect.
The magnitude of the destruction, whether in terms of laws lost, economic loss, restriction of liberties, long-term infertility, cultural destruction, almost anything is massively greater in the case of COVID.
But the public's awareness of this catastrophic hoax is also much greater.
After September 11th, Bush rallied most of the public to support the destructive wars in curtailment of civil liberties.
But people voting for Trump in 2020 largely knew COVID was a propaganda tool.
After 9-11, the elites got their way through using corrupt intelligence agencies, politicians, and media.
But after COVID, they went purely and simply through totalitarianism, stolen elections on a massive scale, intimidation, censorship, and arrest of law-abiding citizens.
So the upshot is that the American people and others around the world lost after 9-11, but we won after COVID because tens of millions are now testaments to the truth.
That's from Will, one of the best commentators on my blog at jamesfetzer.org.
I mentioned Volkswagen Conspiracy 2020, which I organized on the 5th and 6th of December, is now available to the public for free.
24 sensational presentations.
Check it out at VolkswagenConspiracy2020.com.
False Flag Conspiracies, 2020.com.
Available to the public for free.
The secret of freedom, remember, lies in educating people.
The secret of tyranny, in keeping them ignorant.
Meanwhile, final thoughts, Michael.
That was a great comment by your writer Will there, Jim.
I certainly hope he's correct in his last statement there, saying that we've won because so many people are now testaments to the truth.
I hope that bears out.
For my final thoughts, I mentioned earlier that I've been reading some Vernon Coleman, Dr. Vernon Coleman from England today, so I have a short excerpt from him.
It goes like this, Into thinking things are going to get better all by themselves.
Unless we deal with this threat, things are never going to get better.
I've been warning for many months that the mask, the distancing, the vaccines are all here forever unless we stop it.
It's all part of Agenda 21.
So the millions who rely on mainstream media are constantly being lied to, misled, and betrayed.
Millions who rely on the medical profession are being denied facts and informed consent.
It's an unprecedented betrayal of trust.
Meanwhile, I find myself praying more than ever before.
Dear Lord, please give us the strength we need for the journey ahead, the wisdom to make the right decisions, and belief in a full recovery.
Yesterday is the past.
It's lost and gone forever.
But the future is ours to win or lose, and we cannot afford to lose, because if we do, then we will have nothing.
No freedom, no democracy, no humanity, and no hope.
End of quote.
Well said Holly your final thoughts.
Thanks Jim for having me on today and thanks Michael.
I do have hope as well.
I think we have really hit critical mass as far as people starting to wake up.
We are seeing a lot of states who are opening up and saying that they don't want to have the mask mandates anymore.
I'm hoping that corporations will start to lift some of these you know mandates within their There are corporate structures as far as making people wear masks.
I am hopeful to see more and more parents pulling their kids out of the public school system.
It's tough to see the collapse of public school, but we do need a restructuring and having families come together.
People starting to realize that we need to start taking care.
of our elderly and not necessarily putting people into nursing homes anymore. All of this has been
a huge wake-up call for people. So I am hopeful that there are still people who have a few brain
cells left and can see that this is an operation after a full year of this going on. So I think
overall there is a sense to at least people are starting to realize that something is not right.
And from there, hopefully people who have the voice and the knowledge and the research,
like Jim, people who have been doing this for many, many years, can sort of guide people and
lead the way. And And because it's very scary to kind of wake up to something like this.
So many people are depressed and don't know what exactly is going on.
But the people who have done the research, we just got to take people by the hand and try to be kind to people because they have to wake up.
But it's going to be really hard for some people who have been fighting this.
Michael Ivey of Asheville, North Carolina and Holly Seelinger from Detroit, Michigan have covered the bases very well.
Do something about it.
Use your knowledge.
Put it to work.
Write letters to the editor.
Share information with your friends and relatives.
Don't wear the mask.
Don't take the shot.
It's going to affect you permanently and forever.
There's a mountain of evidence and proof.
Just check out my blog, jamesfetzer.org.
Just go back and back and back until you find something you like.
Such as 20 reasons these masks are harming you, that they're immoral and they don't do any good, and share it with friends, neighbors, teachers, principals, state legislators, your governor.
We must stand up for ourselves because, by God, the mainstream media and the powers that be aren't going to do it for us.
They're exploiting us for their own good and to our eternal detriment.
Thank you for joining us today.
▲
Export Selection