All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 27, 2021 - Jim Fetzer
33:31
The Gene Code Injection – An Experiment on Humanity – Dr. Madej (Feb., 2021)
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
So, if we're not doing informed consent, we need to stop everything, put a moratorium.
I've never heard any of the patients yet say that they've been told that they are in a live experiment.
I've never heard them say that there's a risk of birth defects or that Pfizer at least has been admitting that they shouldn't have unprotected sex.
None of them knew that.
They didn't know about this allergy to polyethylene glycol.
Are they allergic to it?
This is a risk of anaphylactic shock, among other issues there.
And polyethylene glycol, guess what, can cause blood clotting.
So it can have an increased propensity to clot in your blood if you already have other risk factors.
So this is why we're seeing an increase of cardiovascular events.
It's not all negative.
The HeartMath Institute has studied our hearts because they're the strongest organ in our body.
And the heart's electromagnetic energy is 100,000 times more powerful than our brain.
That's amazing!
What if you got like a dozen people together that was really tapped into that heart energy, that love energy?
Think about the changes that could happen.
Well, we're here again with Dr. Keri Madde.
Dr. Madde, we're so grateful to have you back with us at KLA for this interview.
Thanks, Danny.
It's my pleasure to be back with you.
Good.
Could you start with just a little synopsis or professional bio to give the viewers a little information about you?
Yes, I graduated from medical school in 2001 in Kansas City, Missouri, and I am an internal medicine physician.
I've owned my own clinics and have been medical director of two different clinics and also an attending physician for medical students for eight years.
And now I spend my time public speaking and trying to educate people about vaccines and the current paradigm with COVID-19.
Well, let's get right into it.
Let's talk about these vaccines.
There's been a rollout, and what are we up to in the States?
10%?
15%?
I know that in Israel it's like 30 or 40.
The question is, and before we get into the details, the nitty-gritty of the RNA vaccine, I've heard from some coroners that you can't even properly call this a vaccine because the pharmaceuticals have not claimed that this vaccine prevents infection or transmission.
And you kind of have to have those two, or one of them, in order to claim that it's a vaccine.
What do you say about that?
I agree.
This is unlike any vaccine that has ever been made before.
People should know that a normal vaccine would take a virus, the virus itself, the actual organism, and it would be alive or dead, some other toxins in the solution, and then that would be injected inside of you.
And the idea is it's a weakened version of what would make you sick so that your body could learn how to fight it in the future without becoming overwhelmed by it.
This time, no.
They have never honestly isolated the organism.
The organism in its entirety, the CDC has admitted that and five different countries have admitted that.
So because they could never isolate that organism in its entirety in the sick patient, they took pieces of the genetic material and then filled in the blanks with a recombinant program or a computer-generated program.
So we've got a code that we're using.
So they have to inject a code inside of you.
And the code actually is being injected inside the person.
And the idea is that our bodies are going to be tricked into making part of the virus, not the entire virus, but part of the virus.
So this is completely different.
We're not injecting the actual organism.
We're injecting a code into the human and the human body will be tricked into making part of the virus.
So instead of blocking you from making the virus, we're encouraging your body to make part of the virus.
So you can You know, you don't have to have a science degree to see that there's some danger in this one.
And that we've never used this technology before, large-scale, on the human population.
This is the first time we've ever done that.
And you are so right by saying that there is no data yet to say that this will prevent any transmission.
You can still be contagious even after you get the vaccine.
There are only two endpoints, two things that the drug manufacturers say that these vaccines can do.
They say that they could prevent one positive PCR test as well as one symptom.
That's it.
And they say they're assuming that it could possibly work for about two months after the second shot.
We don't know because, again, we are in the middle of a live experiment as we speak.
And when you speak of... I thought it would at least attack more than one symptom, but that's all they claim is that it can go after one symptom.
And I've heard it said that... I mean, weren't they saying before that, generally speaking, asymptomatic carriers do not pass it on to someone else?
But what this vaccine might do, then, is if it subdues this symptom, then now you might have asymptomatic carriers.
You see the point?
You are definitely bringing up very good points, and these have not been addressed or answered.
And these are things we need to talk about and bring up, because we are experimenting with all of our lives.
And it's not just, okay, we got a bad flu vaccine.
We won't do that again.
It didn't work or it made some of us sick.
We are now talking about genetic modification.
And even though the drug manufacturers say that it is temporary, they don't know that because please remember, we're in the middle of a live experiment.
The first experiment is due to be completed in the end of October of 2022.
The second one in 2023.
You are literally the lab rat, the guinea pig.
So they don't know.
We would have to have years and then look at your genetic code to see if it was permanent or temporary in you.
That's what a proper research should do.
We're not doing that.
We're assuming, oh don't worry, it's temporary.
The problem is we do know by science and how our bodies work that when you Put a code inside the body like that, that there's a possibility of it becoming taken up into the nucleus.
Once it's in there, it can be taken up into our genome, our permanent genetic code, and stay there permanently.
That is a potential and a possibility, so we have to consider that.
Okay, yeah, let's talk about this code.
Can you explain The gene-altering aspects of this vaccine, and when Moderna says that their mRNA technology is the, quote, software of life, what exactly are they talking about?
Well, again, we are not using a normal way of making a vaccine.
We are putting a code inside of you.
It's recombinant, part from nature and part synthetic, synthesized.
And so it's a genetic code.
And what they're doing is putting an envelope around it with nanolipid particles.
It's nanotechnology.
The nanotechnology is there to ensure it sneaks past your body's defenses because normally your body would kill something like this immediately or disintegrate it.
So it sneaks past the defenses into your cell and then tricks your cell into making that code, which is literally the spike protein or part of the virus.
You'll be spitting out bits of the virus inside of your body.
The idea is that if your body sees part of the virus, it can then gain knowledge on how to fight it in the future.
But we don't know that, and think about all of us are so different.
Some people's immune systems will put out a lot, some a little, some none.
We don't know.
And then we have to look at that code.
That code is very concerning because we've identified some things in there that we should all take pause and listen to this.
First of all, there have been 18 subunits of HIV-1 found within the genetic code.
They claim that that will not allow the body to develop HIV or AIDS, but we don't know that because in Australia, they admitted that people, after they got that mRNA vaccine, some of the people tested positive for HIV.
They said it's a false positive, but we won't know for years.
We will not know if that's truly positive for HIV for many years down the road.
They went ahead and dumped $1 billion of that vaccine in Australia and stopped that.
So that means they are concerned.
The other problem is that there's a sequence, a part of the code is identical to things that are in our body naturally.
One of them is chromosome 8.
There's part of a code that's identical to our chromosome 8.
Now, anything in the code, your body will learn to attack.
So, it's learning how to attack your chromosome 8.
That's intelligence and fertility.
I think that's pretty important.
We don't know the long-term effects of that.
The other thing, there's a protein called syncytin that it codes for.
Well, that happens to be on the human placenta, the woman's womb placenta.
So that means when you start to have a pregnancy, it's a possibility your body will learn to attack the placenta.
So two hits on our fertility, that is a potential.
We really have to be careful.
We are messing with genes, genetic code right now.
Yeah, speaking of fertility, I saw months ago, I saw a University of Oklahoma, I believe it was, don't quote me, study that said that men might consider freezing their sperm before getting this vaccine.
Yeah, you're right.
Oh, Pfizer says you're not supposed to have unprotected sex for 28 days after your injections.
Okay, what happens on the 29th day?
They say that's because there's a risk of birth defects.
They're already admitting this.
That means there is something going on with these vaccines.
But how do you know the 28th day don't and then the 29th day okay?
We don't know these things.
This is unbelievable.
This is unbelievable and it's like you can take one fact out of hundreds that should cancel the whole experiment.
Just that right there.
I mean, what do I tell my daughter if her university says, well, you're going to need the vaccine, and then I point out to her, the vaccine manufacturer itself says that this could cause birth defects.
And we can't just assume that after 28 days, boom.
I mean, we're in crazy world.
I agree with you.
I've never seen anything this frivolous or careless in medicine before.
And it's not like they're saying that there aren't risks.
They say there are, but they say it's for the good of the whole because we are in the Emergency Preparedness Act still.
Around the world, most countries are still in an emergency act of one way or the other.
And when they do that, they can bypass all the checks and balances we normally have for drug safeties in the name of this emergency.
So people are expecting that this vaccine is like, they're like all the other vaccines in the past.
They're not.
There's absolutely nothing there to really say it's safe and effective because again, the experiment has not ended yet.
We are the experiment.
Yes, yes, it is different.
You know, I'm living here in Japan.
One year of my daughter's high school, I sent her to America to do a year abroad, and it happened to be in California where they have a very extreme vaccine schedule for students over there, as you probably know.
And She had already had all her vaccines in Japan, and I thought, okay, that's probably enough for her.
So, as you can see, she's got her vaccines, but the vaccine schedule here is way lower.
So, um, I went to a local doctor and I asked him, what do you recommend?
And he was mainstream kind of guy.
He just says, Oh, whatever the doc, whatever my colleagues in, in California are saying, you should probably just go with that.
And I was kind of, I said to myself, Oh, you probably haven't done your homework, but for this one, for this one, do you know what he says?
He says, this is experimental and I don't recommend anybody take it until All the proof is in!
So this guy is a mainstream, pro-vax kind of guy, listen to the experts, but on this one he's saying, hold on.
Bravo to him for speaking up, because that's what a good scientist and a good doctor is supposed to do.
You know, have the patient's benefits.
You know, benefits must outweigh the risks, and so far we are not seeing that at all.
And I'd like to remind people that it's not just genetic modification we're dealing with, It's that nanotechnology, that nanolipid particle that they're putting inside people.
That's brand new on the human race as well.
We're doing another new novel technology.
And it's very concerning because we do know that there's one ingredient called polyethylene glycol, among others in the nanotechnology.
And it's estimated up to 70% of Americans have some sort of an allergy to it.
Well, an allergy could be fatigue or a rash, or it could be something significant like anaphylactic shock, which we are seeing.
We're seeing a lot of that.
People are dying or having to be resuscitated within minutes to hours of this injection.
They're not telling you on the mainstream media that.
That is, to me, like Russian roulette.
And the other thing is informed consent.
We should always do informed consent, even in an emergency situation.
That's by the Nuremberg Code from World War II, so we don't repeat the atrocities of that previous world war.
If we're not doing informed consent, we need to stop everything, put a moratorium.
I've never heard any of the patients yet say that they've been told that they are in a live experiment.
I've never heard them say that there's a risk of birth defects or that Pfizer at least has been admitting that they shouldn't have unprotected sex.
None of them knew that.
They didn't know about this allergy to polyethylene glycol.
Are they allergic to it?
This is a risk of anaphylactic shock, among other issues there.
And polyethylene glycol, guess what, can cause blood clotting.
So it can have an increased propensity to clot in your blood if you already have other risk factors.
So this is why we're seeing an increase of cardiovascular events.
Oh, now you speak of dying after receiving the vaccine.
You're in Georgia, so I'm sure everybody's familiar with the case of Hank Aaron, the famous home-run slugger who died, what, 18 days after he received the vaccine?
This is happening a lot, and you're right, it's not getting news.
They couldn't really escape that one, though.
And so, of course, the answer is, conveniently, well, comorbidities, right?
But the comorbidity thing was completely ignored by the people who are saying COVID deaths are comorbidities.
Isn't it convenient for them to use that in this excuse, but not for the other one?
There's a press release saying we should expect that the people in the assisted living centers or nursing homes, that they could die quickly after receiving the vaccine.
But don't worry, it's not really from the vaccine.
It's just because they're old.
This was actually a public statement given by one of the government officials.
I was horrified to read this, that people would fall for this.
And people in hospice, hospice patients are getting the vaccine.
They're dying anyway.
I know!
Their excuse is that they don't want them to spread it to others.
Well, usually people in hospice are isolated anyway.
This is terrible.
I don't understand this at all.
Well, I think it's only understandable in the context of a larger, more devious plan.
To get us all... I agree with you.
Yeah, to get us all... I mean, even if you ask, say, a super strong pro-vaxxer who's totally confident that the 7 o'clock news is giving them the straight scoop, if you ask someone to, okay, Spell it out.
How does it all end?
I mean, they can't avoid the fact that this is going to lead to travel passports and 24-7 tracking, monitoring, telling us where we can go, show me your papers, etc.
Right?
Well, in Israel, they already announced that those who do not get vaccinated can only go to the supermarket and pharmacy.
They cannot do anything else.
They can't leave their home for any other reason.
I mean this is it's not just one country people need to wake up and see how these restrictions are happening around the world and how they're happening almost at the same rate the same pace and then look people need to stop getting into the fear because the fear is driving them to go along with these crazy Um, demands and protocols that don't make rational sense scientifically, medically, or just common sense.
Let's put it that way.
Right.
And if they stopped and got out of the fear and started thinking about it, I think quickly they'd see that there is, this has nothing to do with the virus.
This has nothing to do with that at all.
There's a bigger agenda going on a worldwide agenda.
And actually we have, you know, world leaders like Boris Johnson talking about it.
Saying that there's an agenda that we want to achieve by 2030.
Ray Kurzweil, Neil deGrasse Tyson, you see these other people in different fields saying the same thing.
The timeline is 2030 for all of us around the world to be integrated In the transhumanist movement, they called it ID2020.
They're a little bit behind the time, but anyway, this is connecting us to the internet of everything, meaning we would be our own walking little cell phone.
We would go around and our bodies would communicate with any smart device around us.
This is the real plan, everybody.
Wake up.
If you start doing your due diligence, you'll see that this is really what it's about.
It's about utilizing us as property, as chattel, and we are not anything better than that, in the eyes of certain people pushing the buttons.
And what is crazy to me is that no one's, there's been no bloodshed over this, no one's been pointing a gun to anyone's head.
They just tell them, put the mask on, put two on, put three on, you know, do these draconian measures.
You can't sing, you can't dance, you can't worship, you can't pray, you can't do these things.
And people just do it!
Without questioning it, and it goes against our human rights and our constitutional rights, and we're not making a peep about it for the most part.
I really, it's upsetting to me how all the people, our ancestors, our forefathers, have fought and died and went through terrible atrocities for our freedom.
My God, World War II was just yesterday.
Look at what happened.
Look what happened around the world.
We should never forget that.
And here, we're willingly just giving away these huge monumental freedoms and liberties that they died for, for us.
And just letting it go without a conversation or a dialogue?
Yeah.
Yeah.
I'm very upset by that.
Me too.
And you're talking about ramping up the fear.
I think one thing that ramps up the fear is to put us in a state of bewilderment.
And so, when we see something like The governor of California having dinner with his friends at a restaurant, or the health director in England walking through the park with no mask, enjoying the fresh air.
My first impression was, well, that's bad optics for them.
But I almost think that they're just shoving it in our face.
And also these contradictory signals on what we're supposed to do.
Masks don't work.
Yes, they work.
One mask.
No, two.
Maybe three.
Two.
And then, I mean, Fauci came out a week after he said put two on and said, nah, that's not really necessary.
And they gotta know what they're doing.
That guy has to have handlers telling him what to say.
So I think the contradictory messages are part of the plan to drive us nuts.
That's 101 with psychological warfare.
If anyone wants to do their due diligence and read up on it, you'll see cognitive dissonance.
You know, you say, double speak, right?
You say one thing, do another.
Say one thing, go against it, even in the same day.
And that's a perfect way to really confuse the mentality of people.
And it's better than just telling them one thing over and over.
It's better to say one thing than do another, or vice versa, you know?
People need to wake up.
We are in the battle of our minds.
To me, World War III already has happened.
It's already occurring right now, and it's a battle of our minds.
And it's hard.
It's hard because we can't really physically see it so much.
But we have to wake up and see what's really happening.
To me, it's a battle of good and evil.
There's a small group of people that ultimately want to enslave us in a transhumanist way, to control us electronically or through AI.
And to me, there's no other answer.
And I'm listening to these world leaders.
I'm listening for some common sense or rational sense for why we're doing what we're doing medically and scientifically.
I'm not getting that, but I am getting from them how they want us to be part of the transhumanist movement.
And they may not use the word transhumanist, but they'll use many other catch-all phrases, ID2020, and the New World Order, or the Great Reset.
They're all saying the same things.
So we need to wake up, because in the past, people were enslaved physically.
But this is different.
We can be enslaved, to me, physically, mentally, and spiritually.
Ultimately, if you're looking at what they're after, what they would like from us.
Yes, yes.
Well, you put that very well.
Dr. Matta, how can people find out more about what you're doing, access your work, and where would you have people go to get the inside skinny on this stuff?
Well, Danny, you know that everybody's being censored to the greatest amount right now, and it is a challenge.
I am still on Twitter at Dr. Made.
I still have a Facebook page, Carrie Made, and there's a hidden group called Serendipity's Group on that.
I have a backup website called serendipity'sgroup.org.
Um, all of us.
It's been a challenge, though, trying to keep the information up, but I'm resilient.
I keep posting on different platforms, um, trying to get, you know, all this information out that's being squelched and suppressed.
And all of us are going through it.
And there, of course, name, uh, you know, going after people saying that we're anti-vaxxers.
I'm not an anti-vaxxer.
I'm just giving you information and you should have information for your own informed consent.
Uh, first, do no harm.
I uphold that oath.
Did you happen to read Robert F. Kennedy Jr.' 's huge, powerful expose on Bill Gates from a couple weeks ago?
I didn't get to read that one, no.
Oh, it's shocking.
You'll have to... I'll look that up.
I'll look that up.
Speaking of censorship, he was just knocked off of... Instagram.
Instagram.
He had like between half a million and a million followers.
I think he and Del Bigtree were doing like an Instagram live video and they both were shut down at the same time.
During a live video?
Yeah, uh-huh.
They were both, their whole pages were erased.
Big brother watching you, right?
You know, it's not all negative.
I think we were talking a bit about that before, Aaron.
I wouldn't be here speaking if I thought it was all negative and there's no hope.
You know, it's When we're talking about fear, we all know that fear is a scare tactic that can work well because it keeps you at a lower energy.
Because we're energetic beings.
We're light beings, actually.
But if you scare us into a low energy, you can't fight it.
You just curl up in little balls, just paralyzed.
And you know, love, the frequency of love does have an energy too, and it's the highest energy that we know of.
There is something about it, even scientifically.
So I get my inspiration from the Bible, but I love science because it also proves a lot of what the Bible is saying too.
It's a high frequency love.
So if we connect with each other, And we don't wear the mask.
We are not dehumanizing ourselves and other people.
We touch each other physically.
We kiss because that increases your immune system.
We know that.
We sing.
We dance.
Things that make us happy and joyful with love.
that actually increases our energy.
And it's actually studied, the HeartMath Institute has studied our hearts because they're the strongest organ
in our body.
And the heart's electromagnetic energy is 100,000 times more powerful than our brain.
That's amazing.
And in an average human, that energy goes out six feet.
In a strong individual, it goes out possibly miles, they think.
That's amazing.
What if you got like a dozen people together that was really tapped into that heart energy, that love energy?
Think about the changes that could happen.
Because we can never fight these people in power on the sci-fi nanotechnology level that they're using.
But that is a low energy, a low frequency.
I believe that we are made in the likeness of God, and that if we tap into that Christ light, that spirit within us, in our hearts, and if we can just remember who we are, who we always have been, and we get that spark lit, and we help our brothers and sisters around the world, within a twinkling of an eye, things will be better.
Things will change.
That is a good message of hope.
I thank you for that.
Can we do a quick little YNP10 here?
Yeah.
Okay, good.
I'm going to ask you 10 questions, and you can say yes, no, or you can pass, and you can comment or not.
So here we go.
I'm going to start with a softball, okay?
I asked you five months ago if you're going to take the jab.
Have you changed your mind?
No.
Are you even more resolute, or you were full resolute at that time anyway?
I was fully resolute at that time, so the no is a strong no still.
Good.
Do you believe the shot that Biden got on national TV had a vaccine in it?
I know...
No.
I'm going to say no.
Okay.
I was going to say yes, no, or pass.
I was trying to explain.
No.
Sure.
You can answer however you want, really.
Should people who rushed the vaccine be held responsible for long-term negative effects?
Yes.
Absolutely.
In the context of COVID, is there something wrong with letting children develop natural immunities?
There's nothing wrong with it, no.
And why hasn't that been explored?
Like right now, it seems like there's no interest in testing people to see if they have the antibodies.
They just want to go straight to the vaccine.
Is that strange?
Well, let me bring up the flu, okay?
That's the closest thing we can relate to this coronavirus.
When you are exposed to the flu, you don't have to be sick, you just have to be in the environment, out in the community.
When you're exposed, you actually have a lifelong immunity to that strain, forever.
Isn't that not amazing?
Our bodies have lifelong immunity.
But, when you get the vaccine for the flu, at best, if they happen to pick the right strain, it only lasts for about two months to three months of immunity, and then there's no more immunity.
So you can still, that's why people say they still get the flu, because the shot only lasts for a very short amount of time.
You're never naturally immune when you get the vaccine.
You don't have long-term immunity.
You're a much healthier and smarter body when you do it naturally.
I mean, my parents, we had chicken pox parties, right?
So they wanted all of us to get chickenpox at the same time.
So we got more immune.
But you know, the chickenpox vaccine is a failure.
People don't realize that.
See, kids actually still get the chickenpox.
They look like bug bites.
And now we're seeing children get shingles, which is...
A repercussion of the chickenpox, right?
Elementary school children getting shingles, that was never heard of before with the natural immunity, with actually getting the chickenpox.
Shingles is very dangerous.
So again, you're seeing many examples of how the vaccine is much worse than if you were just exposed naturally in the environment.
Right, right.
Next question.
Is promoting the vaccine on children without long-term studies irresponsible?
It's criminal.
It is.
Number six.
Is COVID-19 essentially harmless for children?
I'm talking about the 0 to 18 range.
And we can even go with their figures.
Looking at all the data the CDC is giving us, they have the best immunity.
Very, very little issues with that.
Much lower than the regular flu.
Much lower.
And we didn't shut down the world for the regular flu ever.
Right.
So negligible.
Next.
Have children been damaged?
And I'm not even talking about the vaccine itself right now, just outside of that.
Have children been damaged by the government response to COVID?
Of course they've been damaged.
I mean, first of all, their neural pathways are still being developed into their mid-twenties.
And when we put this kind of fear, this panic, this could set a neural pathway that's there forever in their brain.
First of all, that's one thing.
Also, the mask.
We know after two hours of using them that the oxygen goes dangerously low.
It's terrible.
It affects your concentration, your memory, your mood, many things.
We've actually seen children pass out from the masks.
Also, social isolation, not getting the proper education.
You can't do proper education from just Zoom meetings.
The lack of social development when they're together in groups.
These are crucial milestones that we're supposed to meet For a human's development, we have no idea the long-term effects that will happen to the children around the world that are experiencing this.
Right.
And you're talking about a physical thing, but also the mental thing.
We don't know what effect it has on a three-year-old to see everybody in their world with their faces covered 24-7.
They're becoming fearful of other humans.
I don't wear a mask as much as possible, only very rarely.
And I've seen parents, their children scream uncontrollably, cry because I don't have a mask on.
They're that fearful, little tiny, under the age of five.
They're that fearful, thinking, I could hurt them just because I don't have a mask on and I'm six feet away from them.
And that's the idea, isn't it?
That's the plan, to get them like that.
Um, next question.
Should the people who pushed for and mandated the measures that have harmed children be held responsible for this harm?
Absolutely.
It's criminal.
Yep.
Crimes against humanity.
Well, number nine was, do you have any good news for us?
But I think you already gave us some good news.
So number 10 is a quick one.
Can we win this fight?
Absolutely.
We already know who wins in the end.
Love and God and being good wins, right?
We always triumph over evil.
I just wish we wouldn't wait till the 11th hour to wake up.
Yeah, 1159, right.
Well, Dr. Maddy, that was great.
Thanks for showing up again, and I wish you all the best in your fight.
Please keep it up.
Yes, thank you, Danny.
▲
Export Selection