All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 24, 2021 - Jim Fetzer
01:15:13
Need to Know: The Fetzer Report Episode 137 - 23 February 2021
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin, where I'm joined today by David Scorpio from the exotic land of Ecuador and Michael Ivey from Asheville, North Carolina.
We're here to bring you all the news you need to know.
♪♪♪ ♪♪♪
♪♪♪ We begin with Sidney Powell making a statement as SCOTUS
was supposed to review lawsuits regarding election fraud in Georgia, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Arizona, and Michigan.
Unfortunately, I'm rather staggered by this development.
The court refused to review all of them.
Here's the announcement about Pennsylvania.
No standing before an election, moot after, which means it's impossible to contest an election by that standard.
Where Justices Alito, Gorsuch, and Thomas dissented, Clarence Thomas is turning out to be a good man.
I'm very surprised.
I was never really that much of a fan, but he stated our fellow citizens deserve better and expect more of us when the court decided by one vote to hear none of the election cases where Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett To their eternal disgrace, voted with the liberal justices to deny a review of the lower court decisions.
Four justices have to vote to hear a case to put it on the docket, but only three.
Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch voted to take at least two of the four key cases.
All three took the unusual steps of writing opinions.
The Constitution gives each state legislature authority to determine the manner of federal elections, began Thomas.
Yet, both before and after the 2020 election, non-legislative officials in various states took it upon themselves to set the rules instead.
As a result, we received an unusually high number of petitions and emergency applications contesting those changes.
The petitions here present a clear example.
Justice Alito, for example, had actually intervened in the immediate aftermath in Pennsylvania and directed that the votes that came in after 8 p.m.
on election day had to be set aside where the Supreme Court has already ruled that, in fact, they cannot count in federal elections.
But all of that was set aside.
For more than a century, the court has recognized the Constitution operates as a limitation upon the state in respect to any attempt to circumscribe the legislative power to regulate federal elections.
Because the federal Constitution, not state, gives state legislatures authority to regulate federal elections, petitioners presented a strong argument That the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's decision violated the Constitution by overriding the clearly expressed intent of the legislature.
The mail deadline case did not impact enough votes to change a 2020 election in Pennsylvania alone.
But we may not be so lucky in the future.
Without any doubt, if you put the various suits together, they have far more than enough votes to affect the election without the actual outcome.
Indicating how massively it was stolen is reflected by a tweet from Sydney.
Join drop one nearly all but five or six states 410 electoral votes Biden only 128.
I am frankly ashamed of the Supreme Court.
I have never felt it disgraced itself as it has done here.
Scorpio, your thoughts?
Well, Jim, I have to say I'm really not surprised, you know, unfortunately, that they refuse to hear these cases.
They've lost pretty much every court case they got involved in, and I think, you know, we need to face the sad situation that I believe that every major federal government institution has been compromised, and SCOTUS is no exception.
So I think we need to face facts here.
We're dealing with a rigged system and all of these things have been politicized to enact an agenda.
And at the same time, the SCOTUS allowed for Trump's tax records to be made public so that these lawsuits Can move forward against him.
So, uh, you know, this is, uh, it seems to me like a dagger in the back for Donald Trump.
He's going to spend years fighting these, these, uh, uh, tax cases now.
And, uh, I think there's a concerted effort to destroy both his reputation and his financial empire.
Now, uh, these people are going for it and we're dealing with a very, uh, malicious federal government now, Jim.
Scorpio, I'm afraid you're absolutely right.
I mean, it's outrageous.
You look at the two aspects of those decisions and they're both profoundly troubling.
Michael, your thoughts?
Yeah, Scorpio is right.
According to my view of things, just an incredibly obvious dodge by the Supreme Court to say first that there's no standing to bring such cases before the inauguration.
And then, after the inauguration, they say that the point is moot, that the issue's already been settled.
That's just I hope that there's got to be millions of people around the country who understand what they've done here.
And I don't know.
I don't know how it's going to turn out, but I don't think we can count on any of the traditional institutions of government to be behind us.
They're now working for the global corporate oligarchy.
I think you're right, Michael.
Certainly it's true of the legislative branch, the executive branch, to the extent to which it's under control of Joe Biden and Kamala Harris, and now even the judiciary.
One exception appears to be the military, where since they take their obligation to uphold the Constitution seriously, I am anticipating counting on their intervention, because if it does not occur, we are going to be engaged in a war that is anything but civil.
YouTube took down Ohio legislative testimony citing misinformation.
This is simply outrageous where they're deciding the difference between the true and the false.
Thomas Renz, an attorney with the Citizens Group Ohio, stands up and spoke to the Ohio state and local government in support of the GOP-backed House Bill 90 Which would implement legislative oversight of pandemic-related orders given by Ohio Governor Mike DeWine.
So this is actually public testimony before the Ohio Legislature that YouTube is excluding.
He testified for about 36 minutes that he opposed the harsh orders which DeWine, a Republican in name only, and health officials have imposed.
He noted officials initially thought the fatality rate from China would be much higher than a flu, but it turned out to be close to the influenza fatality rate, because of course, as we know, they're now counting influenza victims as COVID-19 victims.
A YouTube spokesman says we have clear community guidelines that govern what videos may say on YouTube, which we enforce consistently.
We removed this video in accordance with our COVID-19 misinformation policy, which prohibits content that claims a certain age group cannot transmit the virus.
This is completely outrageous.
YouTube, which is owned by Google, censored the testimony by removing it and attempting to justify their action.
Ohio Stand-Up is involved in several lawsuits.
In a recently amended complaint against the Center for Disease Control and Prevention and the Department of Health and Human Services, Renz and other lawyers allege that federal officials intentionally misled the public on facts surrounding COVID.
You can ask the court divorce officials to change how they report those deaths, where the change introduced by the CDC exaggerated the number of deaths by as much as 1600%.
Meanwhile, Congress's escalated pressure on the tax cuts to censor more.
Threatening the First Amendment for the third time in less than five months that Congress has summoned the CEOs of social media to appear before them to pressure and coerce them to censor more content when what we need is precisely the opposite.
The committee's chair, and these are now of course in the hands of Democrats, Uh, set at a joint pace with the impetus with falsehoods about COVID-19 vaccine and debunked claims of election fraud, both of which, of course, are monstrous deceptions themselves.
Because Democrats have made no secret their ultimate goal is to exert control over the content on online platforms.
The key point raised by these last threats from Al-Zandabi is an oft-overlooked one.
While the First Amendment does not apply to voluntary choices made by a private company about what speech to allow or prohibit, it does bar the U.S.
government From coercing or threatening such companies to censor.
In other words, Congress violates the First Amendment when it attempts to require private companies to impose viewpoint-based speech restrictions, which the government itself would be constitutionally barred from imposing.
For the same reason the Constitution prohibits the government from dictating what information we can see and read outside of narrow limits, it also prohibits the government from using its immense authority to coerce private actors into censoring on its behalf.
While Democrats have cheered over the removal of Donald Trump from Twitter, Including many with no affection for Trump have warned how dangerous the move really was.
A close, long-time close aide to the Clintons, Jennifer Palomieri, for example, even tweeted, It has not escaped my attention that the day social media companies decided there actually is more they could do to police Trump's destructive behavior was the same day they learned Democrats would chair all the congressional committees that oversee them.
Meanwhile, Ro Kahana has tweeted, Parlor is hosted by Amazon Web Services, which should deny parlor services until January 21st unless they commit to removing all posts related to incitement of violence concerning the inauguration.
This will help prevent further violence and save lives.
But it's really extraordinary.
We can't figure out what did or did not happen.
Without communicating and investigating and reporting the results of our research, where they're simply begging the question, taking for granted they know the difference between the true and the false, or really, more appropriately, simply imposing their predetermined point of view.
Scorpio, your thoughts?
Well, Jim, we're seeing the expansion of censorship now going out into local community meetings and stuff.
I think this censorship is going to keep expanding.
And I think one thing we really need to examine is that I don't believe that YouTube and Twitter and Facebook are operating as businesses in the traditional sense.
They're deleting users.
They're losing viewers.
And they're promoting a one-sided agenda.
They're completely politicized and they're being used as a weapon now.
And, you know, they're going to reach the point very soon where any point of view that contradicts the official narrative is going to be verboten and censored.
And I think we should really look at the possibility that all of these major platforms, YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, they are not operating with a traditional business model.
I believe that they're operating with covert funding from the deep state.
I don't think their business model adds up at all.
I don't think these companies make money the way that we're told they do.
I think they're being used as tools and as weapons to advance an agenda.
And I just don't believe they're making the kind of money they claim they are.
And the fact that they're deleting more and more users shows they don't care about a traditional business model.
If they did, they'd want as many people to come and watch the stuff as they can so they can make more money.
Scorpio, I think that's a very penetrating and perceptive observation because controversy generates interest.
So the more controversy, the more subscribers, the more your income and revenue if you're operating on the level.
But if you're not, And if, as you suggest, and I am willing to say, you have to be almost certainly 100% correct, given the obvious way they're violating what would normally be expected on a business model.
They're getting covert funding from the deep state.
I think you've got it nailed.
Michael, your thoughts?
Yeah, no doubt about the covert funding, but I think it goes a lot more, a lot deeper historically than just being a business model that's gotten taken over.
I think these large organizations, and I know that's the case with Google and Microsoft, were actually started by some level of the deep state, DARPA or What we've learned to call the CIA.
So I think we're seeing the final working out of their original vision of these things about the Internet itself, for that matter, and how they would serve as tools to control the human population.
The first story there about the attorney Thomas Renz having his testimony.
Censored?
Thomas Renz, I've heard him speak on videos a lot and he's really good, really straight up constitutional guy and he's been working with Dr. Pam Popper who in Ohio has been one of the highest profile dissenters in the medical field through this whole thing.
And their primary thrust is they realized that of all the lawsuits that were being filed against these totalitarian COVID measures, they were all getting squashed when they got to court with the concept of, well, there's an emergency, and so under emergency powers, We're going to let that go.
That's what the courts were all saying.
And that's where those lawsuits were dying.
So they realized that, okay, what we've got to do is challenge the legitimacy of the state of emergency in the first place.
So no doubt in this testimony, I didn't see it.
I hope it's out there somewhere.
That Rims probably undermined the whole COVID-19 propaganda and started stating straight up that we've all been radically deceived, striking at the root.
And that's why he was censored.
That testimony was censored.
We're just seeing extraordinary levels of censorship and false propaganda.
We're sliding into what one would call a third world state, third world nation that's run by global criminal cabal.
It reminds me of that story of back when the Soviet Union collapsed.
There was a particular Russian professional who immigrated to the United States, and when he got here, he looked around for a while, he saw how things worked, and he said, you know, back in the Soviet Union, we knew that everything coming from the government structure was false propaganda.
But here, people look at their TV sets and they believe it!
So hopefully it's getting so obvious that less and less people will believe it.
Well, you're also right about Facebook, for example, having originated as a DARPA project called LifeLog.
And the day they shut down LifeLog, the following day, Facebook sprung up out of Athena's forehead and Mark Zuckerberg became famous thereafter.
So I think you're right on all counts.
Meanwhile, Biden launches a campaign to silence critics of the killer vaccine.
This is very consistent with what we've been observing.
Imagine if an ordinary working man went on a rampage, killed 929 people, maimed 316.
The media would naturally call such a man a serial killer or a homicidal maniac.
Imagine now if a big pharma company did the same thing by releasing a vaccine that killed and maimed a similar number.
Would the drug company be treated the same as a working guy?
Would their product be denounced as a killer vaccine, shunned by the public, or would they be praised on the cable news channel?
Provided lavish funding by the government, granted full immunity from liability, waived through the regulatory process, with a red carpet rolled out for their spectacular nationwide product launch extravaganza.
And what about the small number of critics who don't say the vaccine is a life-saving wonder drug, but actually believe, based upon their research, it's a gene-altering experimental concoction, not sufficiently tested, didn't go through normal protocols, has not met long-term safety standards, excluded.
Critical Animal Test Trials uses toxic synthetics that can trigger anaphylaxis, Bill's palsy, miscarriages, antibody-dependent enhancement, and a score of other potentially lethal or debilitating long-term ailments that have not yet been diagnosed since the vaccine was rushed into service at breakneck speed.
What about these critics?
What rights do they have?
In a free country, it's the vaccine manufacturers who should be scrutinized, lambasted, and taken to task for the shortcomings or lethality of their products, but not in America.
Here, it's the vaccine critics who are being condemned and targeted by the state.
Here the White House is asking social media companies to clamp down on chatter that deviates from officially distributed COVID-19 information as part of President Biden's wartime effort to vanquish the coronavirus.
Disinformation that causes vaccine hesitancy is going to be a huge obstacle to getting everyone vaccinated.
There are no larger players in that than the social media platforms, said the White House.
The news is a first sign that officials are directly engaged with Silicon Valley and censoring social media users.
Where they have vowed to squash anti-vaccine disinformation.
Meanwhile, former Clinton advisor Naomi Wolf warns the U.S.
is becoming a totalitarian state before our very eyes.
She spoke with Tucker Carlson just last night.
America is becoming a totalitarian state before our eyes, a feminist author and former Democrat advisor Naomi Wolf told Tucker Carlson tonight, Monday.
Wolf, who served as an advisor on Bill Clinton's re-election campaign in 1996, Seth, that interview with the U.S.
is swiftly moving into a coup situation, a police state, as a result of Biden's ongoing coronavirus-related economic shutdowns.
She added she believes the orders are being improperly extended under the guise of a real medical pandemic.
That is not a partisan thing.
That transcends everything that you or I might disagree or agree upon.
That should bring together left and right to protect our Constitution.
If I knew Biden was open to lockdown, she tweeted, as he now states, which is something historically unprecedented in any pandemic and a terrifying practice, that one that won't ever end because elites love it, I would never have voted for him.
The state has now crushed businesses, kept us from gathering in free assembly to worship as the First Amendment provides, is invading our bodies, which is a violation of the Fourth Amendment, restricting movement, finding us in New York State.
The violations go on and on.
She, who previously authored a book about the 10 steps that would-be tyrants take when they want to shut down a democracy, believes the U.S.
is now at step 10.
Whether they're on the left or the right, they do the same ten things, she explains.
And now we're at something I never thought I'd see in my lifetime.
It is step ten.
And that is the suspension of the rule of law.
And that is when you start to be a police state.
And we are here.
There is no way around it.
She's interviewed U.S.
citizens of various backgrounds and political affiliations who are in a state of shock and horror as autocratic tyrants at the state and now the national level are creating this kind of merger of corporate power and government power.
Which is really characteristic of totalitarian fascism in the 1920s, she told Tucker.
It was a very, very nice interview.
I was very favorably impressed.
Scorpio, your thoughts?
Yeah, that was actually a very, very good interview.
I watched it this morning.
Obviously, there's a lot that I would disagree with Naomi Wolf on, needless to say, but you'd think that so-called liberals and conservatives and everything in between would agree that we want an open society and freedom, and especially freedom of speech.
And the ability to lead our lives without constant government interference.
And it was refreshing just to hear some people from the opposite sides of the so-called political spectrum to talk about these things.
Because, you know, they've done such a good job in dividing people and ramping up the hate on both sides to levels I've never seen before.
You know, to levels of complete irrationality.
And there is indeed a lot of buyer's remorse for Biden coming from Democrats.
I'm seeing lots of tweets and just seeing a lot of things on the web about that.
And because really, when he boils it all down, Joe Biden's job is going to be to sell a globalist agenda to the American public that will not benefit the american public one single bit
that is his job is a salesman to push an unpopular agenda and try to basically con the
american people into accepting it
and you know the liberals really need to reclaim uh... the issues that made them a viable
an important part of society and they've sort of traded all these issues in
for homosexuality We're for gays, we're for gay rights, we're for transgender, we're for whatever perverted sexual act you want.
That's about all they stand up for, that and open borders.
They need to go back to what happened to the anti-war left.
You know, that's one thing that I could always agree with the left on every time, because these foreign wars are bad news for everybody, and they don't serve anybody except for Israel and the military-industrial complex.
What happened to the liberals standing up for workers' rights and keeping, you know, some kind of balance between the corporations and the people that work for the corporations?
That's all gone under the bus now, and instead they're supporting open borders.
The entire political spectrum has been co-opted by this globalist agenda, and people need to see it.
No matter what side of the spectrum you're on, both parties are highly compromised right now.
You got that exactly right.
Yeah, classic liberalism was very big on freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of religion.
Totally opposed to censorship and authoritarianism and so forth.
It's really a stunning transformation.
Michael, your thoughts?
I'm glad you chose that Mike Whitney piece.
Mike Whitney is one of the best truth-telling writers with a large audience right now.
He's published at unz.com and a section of that article that you Didn't read says the government wants to control what you think by controlling what you read and see.
The oligarchs who control the government behind the mask of the political parties assume that you are an ignorant beast incapable of critical thinking.
They want to control what you read in order to push and coerce you into the behavior that helps them achieve their malign objectives.
And the question remains the same.
Does the government have the right to shut me up, or do I have the right to speak my mind?
I'd recommend anything Mike Whitney's writing right now.
Regarding Naomi Wolf, I'm really glad to see her saying things like this.
I think she has been a traditional leftist feminist person.
You mentioned that she worked with the Clinton administration.
It's my Intuition that she was sort of being groomed by the Deep State at one time.
She was a Rhodes Scholar, like Clinton, and she's a good-looking woman, very smart, good writer, and I think she was probably being groomed for something they had in mind for her, but In the interim, she started showing too much independence and telling too much truth.
So there was a separation that occurred at some point.
It might have been that book that she wrote about, I don't remember the correct title of it, but it was basically 10 steps to a fascist totalitarian state.
I think that might have been when she was kind of cut to the side by the deep state.
And of course as she was reporting on Tucker last night, she feels we're now at step number 10.
Jim, can I add one thing to what Mike said?
Of course.
First of all, Michael, great points.
I mean, you really nailed it there.
I did not know she was a Rhodes Scholar, but yeah, I think she's showing a little too much independent thought and just great points you made.
And just briefly about the vaccine, you know, it came out just very recently that all the head scientists for both the Pfizer and the Moderna vaccines We're Jewish.
So we got a kosher vaccine here, guys.
So I would even have more caution than before.
And of course, this is all so-called emergency use.
There's no liability for these people whatsoever.
Proceed at your own risk.
You're on your own, guys.
I just, I'm sensing great danger from this thing and we'll see it play out over the next six months to a year and a half as to all the kinds of weird autoimmune diseases that start springing up everywhere.
Yes, yes, yes, yes.
Fascinating.
Meanwhile, a massive crowd welcomed the 81 million vote recipient Kamala Harris back to her California home.
Reported 81 million voters, Kamala Harris and her husband, Doug Emhoff, were greeted by all of two supporters.
when a couple returned to their LA home in Brentwood on a sunny Friday afternoon for the
first time since she was sworn in as vice president. Video by a local reporter shows an older couple
standing in the curb lane waving while holding an American flag in a Biden-Harris campaign sign as
her motorcade drove by. No one else on the street except for a few news videographer
filming the motorcade. I think that's about right.
Meanwhile the CDC 929 dead, 15,923 injured following experimental mRNA COVID injections.
This is a February 12th update.
123 injured following experimental MRNA COVID injections.
This is a February 12th update, very serious stuff.
Over 70% of the recorded deaths were over the age 65, but there were also 151 unknown.
uh... at all.
Only 1% of vaccine injuries and deaths are ever reported to this source, so we don't have any idea what the real numbers are.
These are, therefore, minimal numbers.
Compared to the page published with the one published a week earlier, you'll be able to see they revise their numbers for the total number of vaccines administered while revising the total number of deaths following the vaccine.
Can the CDC resurrect people from the dead?
Over 41 million doses of COVID-19 were administered in the U.S.
from December 14th through February 7th.
During this time, VAERS received 1,170 reports of death.
But then notice here, you know, five days later, of over 52 million doses, now they only have 932 reports of death.
So notice there's a drop of 240 deaths, suggesting, you know, maybe they have this remarkable power to resurrect the dead.
So we still don't have consistent data from the CDC.
We do know 15,923 adverse events, including 929 deaths, in the CDC Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report published on the 19th of February.
They state Monitoring conducted as part of the U.S.
vaccination program indicates reassuring safety profiles for COVID-19 vaccines.
Local and systemic reactions were common.
Rare reports of anaphylaxis were received.
No unusual or unexpected reporting patterns were detected.
Apparently those rather large number of deaths are not unusual.
Are you reassured about the safety of the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines?
Does it sound like a public health agency concerned about protecting the health of American people?
Or does it read more like a marketing brochure for a pharmaceutical industry?
The CDC also owns over 56 patents itself and many of their scientists are royalties on the sale of their vaccines.
Outside the U.S., Spain is halting the second dose of the Pfizer because 46 out of 145 in a nursing home all die.
They are all dead.
Meanwhile, in Germany, residents in their nursing homes are being injected with COVID vaccine forcibly against their will, and many of them are dying as well.
This is just disgusting beyond belief.
Scorpio, your thoughts?
Wow, that's shocking, those numbers from Spain and the nursing homes.
You know, it's really criminal that they're giving these old people the vaccine first.
This really seems to be a pretty obvious effort to wipe out old people so they don't have to pay their pensions and they wipe out the people who remembered the past and how things used to be.
It's very disturbing.
I'm glad to see that Spain is at least Halting, you know, taking, you know, putting their foot on the brakes here a little bit.
And, you know, Moderna has never made a vaccine before.
Moderna was founded as a chemotherapy company.
So you gotta wonder about that, guys.
You know, the idea that you're going to take chemotherapy as some kind of prophylactic against cancer is completely insane.
And you gotta wonder, well, how did they become a vaccine company all of a sudden, you know?
There's a lot we don't know about what's actually happening here, guys.
And also, Jim, I'm not buying these numbers about the vaccine on multiple levels, because they're saying there was 11 million vaccines given in five days, so it went from 41 million to 52 million in five days.
I'm just not buying those numbers.
I don't think they're accurate.
So I don't know what's going on here, but there's a lot of goofy things.
And then, yeah, of course they changed the number of deaths at the same time.
The number of deaths went down, just like you can actually lose YouTube views as your video is up longer.
They're playing with the numbers and all friends, and I think they've lost...
All fear.
They just figure people are so stupid that Goyim Cattle will just believe any statistic they put out in front of us without thinking.
And I think we're seeing the classical overreach here that may indeed backfire as we proceed, Jim.
Well, Scorpio, you've made a lot of points here today, and I think you're absolutely right, and that has got to do with the Jewish superiority, which is a Talmudic belief that the Jews are superior to all the other races, which only exists to serve the Jews.
And it would seem as if this is a very aggressive anti-white agenda, and that you're seeing this anti-white racism being espoused by the so-called diversity movement within the Democratic Party, where a lot of their spokespersons are making no bones about it and promoting the idea of you gotta conceal your whiteness, reduce your whiteness, and giving a whole agenda of things you can do to apologize for the color of your skin.
Which is as racist as it gets.
Michael, your thoughts?
Yeah, I'm glad you brought that up because I neglected to apologize for being white on this program so far.
So, there you go.
Personally, I think the number one agenda item of this entire pandemic rollout was to get something into the bodies of as much of humanity as they possibly could.
And this directly gets back to the term, this is a gigantic crime against humanity.
They're basically introducing something into the human population and they're not telling what the human population I mean they're not telling the human population what that is but there are quite a few people with a really good idea and it has to do with electronic communications and control.
I've had mixed results trying to get my friends and family to not take the vaccine.
Some people are completely walled off, but I've had a couple of successes, so it keeps me motivated in that regard.
The vaccine adverse event reporting system, VAERS, was set up when they were first given non-liability for their products back in 1986.
And so we've got quite a bit of statistical information between 1986 and now, and it turns out that only 1% 1% of the adverse reactions to vaccines, to include deaths, are reported to that system.
So obviously, the statistics that we're getting from the CDC, which is a A private corporation that's an arm of Big Pharma itself are totally bogus and not to be believed at all.
Certainly, there are at least more than 2,000 deaths and probably 40,000-50,000 adverse reactions, if not more than that.
I don't think there's any doubt that you got it exactly right, Michael.
Exactly right.
Meanwhile, is the Gates Foundation out of control?
Bill Gates has a very clear vision for making the world a better place and the ways responsible philanthropists can best use their resources.
His charitable foundation, powered by $50 billion in assets, translates this perspective into action on a global scale.
For a clearer view of how Bill sees the world, or at least how he did a decade ago, turn to his speech at the World Economic Forum in 2008.
Gates saw a capitalist system that saw too many on the outside looking in.
The great advances in the world have often aggravated the inequities of the world.
The least needy see the most improvement and the most needy see the least.
He blamed market incentives for this disparity and prescribed turning to creative capitalism for a fix.
From this perspective, the skill, experience, and wisdom of a philanthropist is as important as the wealth they bring.
So, too, as Bill Gates explained in a 2014 Gates blog post, is the ability to operate outside existing government and philanthropic systems.
With a little oversight to mitigate a rich donor's personal privilege left out from this formula is the public's interest.
The scale of Gates' generosity makes it hard to question his wisdom or his ethics, as Klaus Schwab writes.
Gates' billions of dollars of grants annually have created a blinding halo effect around his philanthropic work as many of the institutions best placed to scrutinize his foundation are now funded by Gates.
Including, that's my mistake in misattributing, this obviously is not Klaus Schwab, this is a critic of Gates, making very penetrating points, Including academic think tanks that churn out uncritical reviews of its charitable efforts and news outlets that praise its giving or pass on investigating its influence.
And the Bill of Melinda Gates doesn't just spend its own money as much as 40% of its assets represent funds that otherwise would have been collected by governments as income or estate taxes.
Here's a tax attorney observing.
People often confuse what wealthy people are doing on their own dime and what they're doing on our dime, and that's one of the big problems about this debate.
It's a rich person's money to spend as they wish, but when they get significant tax benefits, it's also our money.
And so that's why we need to have rules about how they spend our money.
The Foundation's funds have been well-invested, earning $28.5 billion over the last five years, giving away only $23.5 billion in charitable grants.
It has made more than $250 billion in charitable grants to companies in which the Foundation holds corporate stocks and bonds.
The grants are directed at projects like developing new drugs and health monitoring systems and creating a mobile banking system.
Linda McGowey, a professor of sociology at the University of Essex, sees this as a dangerous conflict.
It's been a quite unprecedented development, the amount the Gates Foundation is gifting to corporations.
I find that flabbergasting, frankly.
They've created one of the most problematic precedents in the history of foundations by opening the door for corporations to see themselves as deserving charity claimants.
At a time corporate profits are at an all-time high.
It's no surprise, therefore, that the Gates Foundation has worked to strengthen intellectual property rights, including those over patented pharmaceuticals.
Schwab, not Klaus, observes these patent protections are widely criticized for making life-saving drugs prohibitively expensive, particularly in the developing world.
In fact, James Love, director of the non-profit Knowledge Ecology International, highlights a fallacy that may underlie creative capitalism.
He notes Gates gives so much money to fight poverty, and yet he's the biggest obstacle on a lot of reforms.
There's also a lack of evidence that success in business translates into success in tackling big problems like wealth, inequality, health, and education, areas the Gates Foundation prioritizes.
Add to that the potential for serious conflicts of interest and misuse of tax-exempt funds, and we're left with serious questions about the current laissez-faire approach to foundations.
Especially when you consider his investment in vaccines, his desire to vaccinate the world for him.
Vaccines are a big business and the profit margin looms large.
Scorpio, your thoughts?
Well, Gates admitted a couple years ago that his profit return on his investments in vaccines has been 20 to 1.
He admitted that up at, what's the big meeting they have there in Wyoming?
I forget the name of the area there in Wyoming.
Yeah.
Yeah, well he admitted that a few years ago.
And look, Gates flies around the world in a private jet, but he's preaching to us about our carbon footprint.
He has a $644 million mega yacht, a $120 million mansion, a car collection that all the cars burn that awful fossil fuel, which there's no such thing as fossil fuel.
That's a complete misnomer created by the Rockefellers 100 years ago.
And basically, you know, Gates is a salesman, and I believe that this money that he's donating, it seems to be endless and infinite.
You know, the amount of money he can just pour into anything he wants.
Again, there's a secret financial system in operation here, Jim, that we're not privy to.
I guarantee you this is not his money.
This is much bigger.
He's, you know, he's a salesman to con, again, to con people into agendas they wouldn't accept otherwise.
And this logic from Klaus Schwab, the scale of his generosity makes it hard to question his wisdom or ethics.
What kind of messed up logic is that?
There's no rational train of thought here.
Just because someone throws a bunch of money at something doesn't mean that he has wisdom or ethics.
I mean, I can't believe that they expect the Goyim cattle of the world to swallow that one without some critical thought.
That must have triggered your logic centers there too, Jim.
And, you know, I'll tell you what, Bill Gates and Klaus Schwab and all these people, they are completely tone deaf.
They really don't realize how much they are despised.
And I mean despised by the average person.
Recently, Bill Gates' YouTube channel turned off all comments.
You cannot comment on the YouTube channel anymore because it was flooded, absolutely flooded with negative comments.
It was really actually pretty funny.
They just turned it off maybe a couple months ago.
And before they started playing with the numbers on Gates' YouTube channel, the thumbs down were 3 to 1 on all of his videos.
You know, 3 to 1, negative to thumbs up.
They've been playing with those numbers too, and now the negatives aren't that high anymore.
But I used to follow his channel a while ago just to research, and the negative thumbs down and the negative comments were hilarious.
But they censored all that, and they're just making up reality.
They think they can just make up reality, and the stupid goyim are just going to go along with it no matter how absurd reality becomes.
And again, we might be hitting for some overreach here, Jim.
Great, great point, Scorpio.
Michael, did you sort out, was I right or wrong about the authorship there?
Which Schwab this Schwab was?
In any case, your comments on this piece.
No, I missed what you said exactly about the authorship issue.
The title, I found the title humorous of that article you just read from, is the Gates Foundation out of control?
It struck me that that's isn't that a question sort of like does a bear shit in the woods?
You can't yeah and Well that's what I was about to say that we can't say that
anymore We can't use is the Pope Catholic in that context anymore, because now we actually don't know where the Pope's loyalties and controllers are, you know.
There are quite a few possibilities, so we can't use is the Pope Catholic anymore.
You know, the Gates Foundation and his image as a philanthropist is just over against the things that they actually do.
To me, it's just the current iteration of the same whitewashing of a public image that all these guys do that was started by that miscreant grandfather of the Rockefeller empire hiring What's the guy's name?
Who's the nephew of Sigmund Freud?
Bernays, Paul Bernays.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
But I hired Bernays today.
It's, you know, it's all in the tribe and they do everything they can to fool us.
Good, good comments.
Meanwhile, Pandemic will be with us until everyone on earth is given the COVID-19 vaccine, says Angela Merkel after the G7 Summit.
Talk about depressing thoughts.
The COVID pandemic can only be considered beaten once everyone in the world has been immunized, said Angela Merkel after she met with the G7 leaders.
Speaking to reporters, she stressed in her remarks, pandemic is not over until everyone's vaccinated.
On Friday, the head of EU's executive body, Ursula von der Leyen, said the bloc would put up 100 million to fund the COVID-19 rollout in Africa.
Also on RT, the EU is politicizing COVID-19 vaccine efforts, says Russia.
Slamming comments from the Bloc's head on Sputnik V rollout is deplorable.
I'm with RT and Russia on this.
The Commission President said the EU would help to ramp up manufacturing across the continent under vaccine licensing agreements, as well as buying equipment and training staff.
The 27-nation bloc is going to double its contributions to the vaccine-sharing COVAX facility.
Germany to set up a special task force to speed up future vaccine production.
On Thursday, the WHO's Director General called for vaccine-producing companies to donate jabs to COVAX rather than act individually.
It means some poor countries are still without vaccines, which is to their benefit, I believe.
Others, including Canada, the UK, US, Australia, and those in the EU, have ordered more doses And they technically require.
Scorpio, your thoughts?
Well, you know, that's a stunning statement that Merkel said.
These governments actually think they have the right and the power to demand that every human being on planet Earth takes this witch's brew of an experimental vaccine that nobody really knows what it does.
Nobody knows.
Because it's experimental by its very nature.
And you know, quite frankly, Merkel is the poster child for phony elections.
You know, it's become a lot more obvious that elections are phony with this newest election against Donald Trump.
But here we have a woman that is extremely unpopular.
She has done all she can to ruin Germany, flooding Germany with immigrants from Muslim
countries and black countries, filling it full of people that have nothing in common
with Germany.
In fact, a lot of these immigrants have a deep hatred towards Germany, yet she's been
in power for 15 years.
There's quite a few German expats down here.
And I'll tell you what, I've heard some stories from people about how much that woman has screwed up their country.
She is maligned and hated, quite frankly.
So, again, this woman is a poster child for phony elections.
Excellent, excellent point, Scorpio.
Michael?
Yeah.
A statement like that a public statement like that to me is just only the latest example of what I spoke of earlier that the main agenda point in this entire pandemic deception is to get something into the bodies of as much of the human population as they can.
Angela Merkel has always been a tool of the global criminal cabal ever since she was installed as chancellor in 2005.
And just like Scorpio said, I totally believe that she's probably the beneficiary of several rounds of vote fraud in Germany like we just saw here.
I don't remember the year, it was like 2009 or 2010.
She was given what is now called the Charlemagne Prize, which used to be called the Kudenhof-Kalergi Prize, and that's given by the European Union to the person, the political leader, who best furthers the goals of the Kudenhof-Kalergi Plan, Which, if you read the Koudenhove-Kalergi plan, it was to basically flood and mongrelize all white Christian cultures with third world people.
That's the bottom line.
I mean, they said it in a much nicer way, but that's what the Koudenhove-Kalergi plan, and she was given the prize for being the person who best accomplished that.
Several years ago, so she's a witch of the highest order and I will not say what I wish for her future to be.
Yes, yes, yes.
And I mean, they're trying to, you know, use evolution by outside intervention to alter the genetic makeup of populations in designated areas, which had reached a relatively high peak in evolution.
And they're seeking to destroy that and the cultural coherence of those nations, where Germany has a great history and many contributions to the world.
Meanwhile, bacterial pneumonia causes most deaths in the 1918 influenza pandemic.
Get this, just in!
In 2008, Dr. Anthony Fauci co-authored a paper about the Spanish Flu epidemic that rates as the most devastating modern pandemic.
It swept the entire planet in the wake of the First World War and caused millions of deaths.
So in studying this major and actual pandemic, what did Dr. Fauci and his colleagues find?
They discovered that most of the victims of the Spanish Flu didn't die from the Spanish Flu.
They died from bacterial pneumonia.
And the bacterial noma was caused by, wait for it, wait for it, wearing masks.
Implications for future pandemic.
The vast majority of deaths during the influenza pandemic of 1918-19 were not caused by the influenza virus acting alone.
Instead, most victims succumbed to bacterial pneumonia following influenza virus inflection.
The pneumonia was caused when bacteria that normally inhabit the nose and throat invaded the lungs along a pathway created when the virus destroyed the cells that lined the bronchial tubes in lungs, soft-peddling the fact that it was caused by wearing masks.
A future influenza pandemic may unfold in a similar Manner, whose paper is in the issue of the Journal of Infectious Diseases.
The authors conclude, comprehensive pandemic preparations include not only efforts to produce new and improved influenza vaccines and antiviral drugs, but also provisions to stockpile antibiotics and bacterial vaccines or not use masks.
Don't wear masks.
The work represents complementary lines of evidence from pathology and history of medicine.
The weight of the evidence from both historical and modern analyses that led to the vast majority of deaths is that viral damage followed by bacterial pneumonia.
In essence, the virus landed the first blow while bacteria delivered the knockout punch, and it was because of wearing masks.
Examination revealed a spectrum of tissue damage ranging from changes characteristic of the primary viral pneumonia to evidence of tissue repair to evidence of severe acute secondary bacterial pneumonia.
In most cases, you had The predominant disease at the time of death appeared to have been bacterial pneumonia.
In a quest to obtain all scientific publication reporting on the pathology and bacteriology of the pandemic, they searched bibliographical sources for papers in any language, English, French, German, located papers on autopsies on influenza victims from a pool of more than 2,000 publications in 1919 to 1929.
They identified 118 key autopsy series reports, reviewing 8,398 individual autopsies in 15 countries.
The published report clearly and consistently implicated secondary bacterial pneumonia caused by common upper respiratory flora and most influenza fatalities.
Notice here, however, they're not emphasizing the fact that the causal agent for the bacterial pneumonia was the recycling of the bacteria that were accumulating the mass.
So they really weren't killed by the flu.
They were killed by wearing the masks that were intended to prevent the flu.
Still denying the Rothschilds are behind the Great Reset?
Stop.
It's getting ridiculous.
We gotta face up to the fact that we have been played again and again.
And Tony the Rat is instrumental in manipulating Be the principal press agent, the public relations guy at the front.
Scorpio, your thoughts?
Yeah, this Tony the Rat character is really an evil, evil man.
You know, he's always touted as the preeminent expert on infectious diseases in the country.
Well, according to who?
This man hasn't done anything.
He's had his ass parked in the same government job for, what, going on 35 years or so.
And I think closer to 40 years.
It's really unbelievable.
And I guarantee you there's people much more knowledgeable than him that have actually done research.
This man hasn't done any research.
He's just, you know, been a government employee.
He's a bureaucrat.
Exactly.
He's a bureaucrat.
You know, he came out recently and said that people are going to have to wear masks through the end of next year.
So why is everyone in such a rush to take their vaccine if you're going to have to wear a mask for two more years?
I mean, this is outrageous.
And Jim, you know, it's clear to me these people know what they're doing.
They're getting people to kill themselves.
Between the masks and the vaccines, people are going to kill themselves.
And it's really quite a diabolical plan that they have afoot.
And I totally agree with these points about the infections in people's lungs.
I even know a young girl, a middle-aged girl in town that runs a little store here, and she wears her mask all day long every day, and she has a horrible rash all over her face now from wearing a mask.
I've tried to tell her, don't wear your mask, you're hurting yourself, but she thinks I'm crazy, so she doesn't listen to me.
And on just another note, I'm seeing these people that wear their mask all the time.
They look awful.
They look like death warmed over.
They're all hunched over.
They don't look healthy.
And they have a crazed look in their eyes.
It's really awful, Jim.
Well, they're suffering irreversible brain damage.
There's no question about it.
Many of your cells in your body regenerate.
If you cut yourself, lose a section of skin to an abrasion, it grows back.
Brain cells do not.
And we have projections there's going to be an exponential increase in dementia here within the next couple of years by persons of a greater advanced age.
But it's killing people all across the spectrum.
Scorpio, you're at the bottom.
And just one last thing, Jim.
You know, also when your system, you're totally right, it's totally bad for your brain.
And there's another thing, if you are not getting enough oxygen into your body, let's face it, that's the building block of everything.
If you don't have oxygen and water, you're screwed.
And I really think that this is going to invite all kinds of opportunistic diseases to come in.
And, uh, and hurt these people between that and washing your hands all the time and spraying everything down with, you know, these chemicals.
It's just gonna shut people's immune system down.
We're gonna see all kinds of opportunistic diseases spring up.
And, you know, I totally agree with this point about the Spanish flu.
But I've been doing a little digging and, you know, some of the people that died during this so-called Spanish flu, I'm certain that they were from experimental vaccines they were giving the military.
And if you look at the symptoms that some of these people died from, it's from hemorrhagic fever.
These people were bleeding from every orifice in their body.
So this is not a standard flu.
Something else is going on.
I'm just starting to look into this.
Jim, this is another example of how pretty much everything we're told about history is a lie.
Dig, dig, dig, Scorpio.
You're doing a great job and you're 100% correct.
The masks are killing us slowly, the injections are killing us faster, and then they're going to appeal to starvation.
They're going to cut off our food supply to complete the job.
Michael, your thoughts?
Yes.
Scorpio is exactly right.
This story here gets into the subject of the revolution, I would call it, that's happening right now concerning what is called the germ theory and how it's probably been a bogus assumption by our entire culture all along.
I actually gave a presentation on this very thing To an audience on Sunday, two days ago, we've been using a completely false concept of what we've come to call viruses, what they are, and what these tiny little particles of genetic material do and what their function is, as opposed to thinking of them as an infectious agent that we catch.
The section of that NIH study that you put up right there called Implications for Future Pandemic Planning.
There's a statement that I wanted to comment on and it's in the first paragraph there of slide 54.
It says the pneumonia, the bacterial pneumonia that they identified as being the primary killer I don't think that's right.
when bacteria that normally inhabit the nose and throat invaded the lungs along a pathway created
when the virus destroyed the cells that line the bronchial tubes and lungs.
I don't think that's right.
That's just bringing back the virus as the primary agent of destruction into this.
You know, they identified bacterial pneumonia as the primary cause of death, but then they
snuck the virus back in there.
Oh, it had to be the virus.
So that's just...
The way that people write these scientific papers in order to maintain the narrative that they want to maintain.
Tony the Rat Fauci's first big rodeo after taking over NIH was The the AIDS epidemic the and his big scam that he participated in was again.
Oh, we found a virus.
We found a specific virus that causes this disease and let's call it the human Immunodeficiency virus.
So he was instrumental in giving birth to the totally false concept that there was this virus called HIV caused this collapse of immune systems.
And he was at least partially responsible for the killing of thousands of AIDS sufferers by pushing the big pharma drug that they wanted to get rid of called AZT and it killed thousands.
And the revolution that I spoke of earlier is that there are high-level medical thinkers making the case right now that there has never, there has never been an example of any specific virus having been properly isolated and proven to be the cause of any certain disease.
Only last week, I think last Thursday, Tom Cowan, Andrew Kaufman, and Sally Morell put out a
four-page open statement laying out the logic of how what I just said is true, that no such
infectious virus has ever been properly isolated, and these global controllers are using this fear
of the invisible enemy, like Katherine Austin-Fitts says, for their own benefit. And in this case,
it's the invisible virus. We covered it yesterday, Michael, the wonderful piece, yeah, explaining
that the virus has never been purified and isolated, and if that's the case, then of course
they can't possibly have a vaccine to deal with a virus that's never been purified and identified.
I do believe your comments about germ theory from an historical point of view, that was a preliminary conception that's now been superseded by the discovery of distinctions between viruses, bacteria, fungi, and the like.
So, you know, that's typical of the progression of science.
Not that germ theory was just nonsense, it was simply a prototype of what would come as more sophisticated developments in scientific and medical research.
I would like to emphasize this article was clearly written to obfuscate the facts that the masks were the intermediate causal agent.
It never mentions masks, and yet you cannot get from the nasal and sinus passage down to the lung the way they describe, except by virtue of having the mask be a virtue of the mechanism of recycling the bacteria that accumulate therefore.
So it was a very deceptive article.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send us fan mail, pro or con, to liveneedtoknowatgmail.com.
Liveneedtoknowatgmail.com.
Can you explain this?
How bizarre is this?
Flutas wearing their masks but cutting them open?
Let's see what you can do to answer that one.
My dear friend Mike Palachuk has published a brilliant piece, Covid Schmovid, his latest book, Check it out, Covid Shmovig, Mike Palachuk about Covid-19.
Mike's a brilliant guy.
He's an American scholar of Will Rogers, Garrison Keillor tradition.
He cuts to the muck to make it clear what's going on.
We still have a fake Biden running the shop or so it seems.
I've been taken off of Twitter.
I mentioned you can find me now on Telegraph at t.me slash Jim Fetzer News.
And when we have conspiracy so ubiquitous, you want to check out False Flags and Conspiracy 2020, 24 presentations.
Go to falseflagconspiracy2020.com.
Check it out.
Remember.
The secret of freedom lies in educating people.
The secret of tyranny in keeping them ignorant.
Final thoughts.
Scorpio, yours.
Well, Michael, you made so many good points today.
You know, I didn't know that Angela Merkel had received the Clergy Award, now renamed the Charlemagne Award.
That's fascinating, and it's very fitting.
She certainly deserves that award.
I guess they had to change the name because too many people were learning about what the Clergy Plan really was.
Yep.
Again, another unpopular plan that they don't want the people to know about.
And yeah, you know, about the subject of the mass and re-breathing, you know, one thing's for sure, you're re-breathing your own waste products from your body.
So that includes bacteria and, you know, carbon dioxide.
and whatever other waste products your body is producing.
And obviously it's akin to, you know, sitting in your car and putting a tube or
breathing into the, you know, the tailpipe of your car. It's not exactly the same,
obviously, but it's similar in some ways.
And, you know, as far as that picture of the flute players with the holes cut open in their mask,
that's fascinating to me because it shows that the whole point of the mask is it's an act of
submission.
It's not a medical preventative.
The whole point is to submit to the dictates of our overlords without question.
No matter how stupid, no matter how absurd it becomes, that's the whole point.
And that's what people need to start seeing and wake up to it.
Michael, your final thoughts?
As a final thought, I'd like to read a little excerpt from a very truth-telling psychiatrist named Dr. Mark McDonald, who's part of the America's Frontline Doctors Organization.
He started calling this pandemic a mass delusional psychosis way back in July.
And the quote is, so we have individuals and corporations, not government, that are now pushing this delusional psychosis into the third stage, which is dangerous, which is group control.
We started out with just fear and mass media hysteria.
We then moved to delusional psychosis, and now we have group control.
You don't have to have police officers and government coming after us.
Now we have our fellow citizens castigating us, legally limiting us from getting into vehicles, going into businesses, getting jobs.
At some point, I suspect that we're going to have to be required to get ourselves vaccinated with an unproven, dangerous, and probably ineffective vaccine.
They're going to tell us that it's not required, but if you don't have it, you won't be able to go to school.
You won't be able to get a job.
Employers may be required to fire those who haven't been vaccinated or the employer being subject to fines.
Once you get the general populace to enforce your dictates, you no longer need police enforcement of those dictates.
This is what China has now, their social credit system.
If you violate government dictates, Always presented as being for the greater good, of course, one of your fellow citizens will turn you in.
This is happening right now in China, and we have to reject this fear.
We can't let this happen here.
Well, you certainly said it right.
This is Jim Fetzer in Madison, where I'm just delighted to have David Scorpio from the exotic land of Ecuador and Michael Ivey from Asheville, North Carolina, offer such astute and erudite contributions to analyzing the situation we're in.
Remember, Because of social distancing, fast masking, and all the other methods that Scorpio was describing, we are weakening our immune system so that if we go through this process, we're more vulnerable to other diseases, which makes the cycle of eliminating human people as citizens of the United States and the world work all the more efficiently.
We have seen the destruction, the failure of the major institutions of American society, the legislative branch, the executive branch, and the judiciary now alas.
It remains for the military.
We have yet to hear from them.
But I say, if they have not acted by the 4th of March, it will be up to the American people to restore democracy to the United States.
Mark my words.
Thanks for joining us.
▲
Export Selection