All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 19, 2021 - Jim Fetzer
55:06
High Noon with Chicago Brew Featuring Jim Fetzer (17 February 2021)
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Even the government admits that 9-11 was a conspiracy.
But did you know that it was an inside job?
That Osama had nothing to do with it?
That the Twin Towers were blown apart by a sophisticated arrangement of mini or micro nukes?
That Building 7 collapsed seven hours later because of explosives planted in the building?
Barry Jennings was there.
He heard them go off and felt himself stepping over dead people.
The U.S.
Geological Survey conducted studies of dust gathered from 35 locations in Lower Manhattan and found elements that would not have been there had this not been a nuclear event.
Ironically, that means the government's own evidence contradicts the government's official position.
9-11 was brought to us compliments of the CIA, the neocons of the Department of Defense, and the Mossad.
Don't let yourself be played.
Read America Nuked on 9-11.
Available at moonrockbooks.com.
That's moonrockbooks.com.
All right, thanks for listening while we took that short break here at
revolutionradiofreedomslips.com. And yeah, we're going to get back to your host.
All right, welcome back ladies and gentlemen.
I I am looking.
Sorry for the delay, Mr. Fetzer.
Yeah, yeah, that's not a problem.
You don't need your video on unless you want, unless you're recording.
Are you recording?
Yeah, I'm recording.
Yeah, I'm going to put it up.
Yeah, OK, well then fair enough.
You know what?
I'm the reason I'm delayed is I can't find my my recording button.
It seems so it disappeared.
Maybe because you're recording.
I don't.
I don't know how that works so.
Give me a second.
I want to play this intro and we'll pretty much kick it off from there.
Give me a second here.
Shady night, summer breeze make you feel right.
Neon lights, shining brightly make a bravey night.
See the girls with the dresses so tight.
Give you love, give you love if the price is right.
Black or white, in the streets, this is what's going on right here in New Orleans.
New Orleans, New Orleans, New Orleans.
All right.
All right, ladies and gentlemen, welcome back to RevolutionRadioFreedomSets.com on this Wednesday, February 17, 2021.
And we appreciate you all being here.
Check out the website, check out the chat room and help support this network.
It's 11 years and running at this point.
I often said it was 10 years.
It happens to be 11 years as of January 1st, 2021.
11 years and running something that started off as a dream kind of just like playing around Place for people to come together and chat openly and it turned into this wonderful radio network with over 80 hosts two studios and great names such as James Fetzer professor Fetzer Who is with us right now who does three shows?
three days a week Monday, Wednesday, Thursday at Studio B, 11 a.m.
Central Time.
That'd be noon, Eastern Time.
Please help me welcome James Fetzer.
Jim, how are you doing today?
Oh, Brew, it's great to be with you.
Actually, the show is Monday, Wednesday, Friday.
Monday, Wednesday, Friday from 11 to 8 a.m.
Central or 11 p.m.
or to 2 p.m.
or 1pm or 2pm to serve.
Maybe I should shut off my other computer because it's not...
Yeah, I get kind of an echo.
Yeah, let me take care of that. I'll be right back.
All right, very good.
So we're with James Fetzer today and recently he if you want to check him out He's at James Fetzer org.
That is his blog And if I could find his other website, I think it's Jim the conspiracy guy.
Well, he'll let him know Double-check that for us while he takes care of that audio issue.
We're getting a little feedback there, but one of his recent articles is You scroll back up here It's by James Fetzer.
He penned it himself and his blog He brings in different articles from different places and and different authors, but often some that he pens himself And this one is from February 7th 2021 Conspiracy theorists are investigating crimes.
No wonder they want to silence us.
And basically, that's what it is.
You know, you tell a friend about Agenda 21, Agenda 30, you know, you tell them about coronavirus, you make a mention about September 11th, how you don't really believe it, or the funny business at Charlottesville, or some of these alleged school shootings, and you know, something doesn't seem right about them, and you start pointing out anomalies and so on and so forth.
You know, All the way back to JFK, Pearl Harbor, World War I, World War II, French Revolution, the Civil War in the United States, on and on.
You bring up anything that doesn't go with the official narrative.
What do they do today since 1967?
They call you a conspiracy theorist, basically implying that you're crazy, you're off your rocker, wear a tinfoil hat.
But nonetheless, there is truth to many of these things going on.
And one of our great truthers, one of our great investigators, and that's what he is, he's an investigator to all these things, is James Fetzer, Professor James Fetzer.
OK, welcome back, Jim.
Oh, those are terrific comments.
I appreciate all of that.
Mind you, the CIA introduced the concept of a conspiracy theorist intended to denigrate Shift the burden of proof onto those who are investigating the problems with the official account of JFK in particular.
Blasting holes through the Warren Report big enough to run a Mack truck.
I mean, it was outrageous.
So, because so much headway was being made by individuals like Harold Weisberg and Mark Lane and And a host of others, eventually David Lifton with his book Best Evidence, perhaps the single most important ever published in the history of the assassination.
They wanted to try to shut things down.
And of course, they began a tradition of attempting to belittle or ridicule citizen investigators, individual citizens who recognizing the government accounts were hopelessly inadequate, didn't reflect the evidence, included Fabricated evidence, as we found in the case of JFK, they'd altered the x-rays to conceal a fist-sized blot at the back of the head, they patched it, that there was evidence of a second shot to the head internal to the x-ray, that the brain shown in diagrams and photographs in the National Archives isn't even
The brain of JFK, that they took the Zapruder film and massively edited it.
They removed 100 frames turning from Houston onto Elm, and then 400 more after the driver, William Grimm, balled the limousine to the left into a hole to make sure JFK would be killed.
Up to that point, he'd been hit twice, once in the back, about five and a half inches down below the collar, just to the right of the spinal column, a shallow shot, only went in about as far as the second knuckle of your
little finger, and then also in the throat by a shot that passed through the windshield. It was fired
from inside the triple underpass, that shot to the back from the top of the county records
building. They had to exclude the limo stop because it would have been such an obvious indication
of Secret Service complicity in saying the president up for the hit, during which he was hit not
just once or twice, but actually David Mantic, MD, PhD, the leading expert on the medical evidence
in the world, believes now we're three times in the hit.
So they had to shut all that off.
They used a very deceptive program that pointed in precisely the opposite direction, claiming Lee Oswald had been the lone demented gunman, when I and my colleagues have discovered there were not just two, three, four, five, six I've identified by name, rank, and serial and number, a seventh identified by only Eight.
So that's seven more than the original official narrative, huh?
And guess what, Brew?
been an eight shooter on the South, though the only one whose identity at this point
in time remains unknown.
Eight.
So that's seven more than the original official narrative, huh?
And guess what, we've been able to establish proof, I mean conclusively, that Lee Oswald
was actually standing in the doorway of the book depository when the motorcade passed
by, which means not only can he not have been the lone demented gunman, he cannot have been
one of the multiple, as you observe now, eight shooters.
Thank you.
George Bush Senior.
How long did it take for anybody to realize that he had any part of this?
Well, it's all very interesting.
I may have been the first to identify him in the photographs where he's standing in front of the book depository that afternoon.
It was in Jesse Curry's JFK assassination files, a little paperback book published by 7-Eleven stores exclusively, where he'd become the head of 7-Eleven security after he retired as chief of police in Dallas.
It was striking to me, but it was easy once you saw the image.
Most have never seen it and therefore would not know, but I have now included it in my various presentations on JFK, for example.
JFK, who is responsible and why, which you can find at BitChute.
Well, actually, it's separate from my channel on BitChute, but you can find it easily under that title, JFK, Who is Responsible and Why?
Well, it turns out, Drew, the best way to understand JFK is by drawing a distinction between the sponsors, the individuals and groups who want to jack out, primarily because they prefer the policies of Lyndon Johnson, with the exception of the anti-Castro Cubans, Who simply wanted revenge for what they believed, albeit falsely, that JFK had abandoned them at the Bay of Pigs, so that a shooter in the Daltex, who actually was the only one using an unsilenced weapon, a man-licker Carcano, fired three shots to set up the acoustical impression of only three shots having been fired.
And get this, he was supervised By George H. W. Bush, who was arrested coming out of the building, identified himself as an independent Houston oil man, which was his cover with the agency.
But a deputy sheriff kept track of the event and was able to corroborate his arrest, where the photograph I have of him standing in front of the book depository occurred later in the afternoon, where he was waiting to hear from General Edward Lansdale, who was photographed walking past the three tramps, and where Lansdale then subsequently is seen waiting to report to Bush, where many of us believe that the assassination has the fingerprints of Edward Lansdale all over it, where he appears to have positioned the shooters and determined the sequence of shots.
Is it true that he had George Bush Jr.
with him that day, or is that not true?
No, it is true.
We got photographs of Junior, or W, you know, walking out looking kind of lost because he doesn't know where his father is during the period during which he was arrested.
I mean, this is really unbelievable, just as no parent We'll take a child to the scene of a child shooting massacre yet in Newtown.
We have photographs of parents bringing children to the scene because it was in fact a FEMA exercise, a two-day drill, a mass shooting exercise involving children.
You'd never think that would take place if it had been a real mass shooting.
Well, here is a case perhaps even worse because he brought his son to the scene of the assassination of JFK.
In the planning of which he had been himself profoundly involved.
Well, I believe that he took his son there to witness history and the power, the coup of the United States by Sessom and Kennedy.
I think that's what he did.
And I think that's what this Raskin, this Congressman Raskin did when he brought his whole family on January 6th to the Capitol to witness the coup that was taking place of them stealing the election.
I think you got that exactly right, Ru.
I mean, that's correct.
Donald Trump didn't finish speaking at the Ellipse until 1-11.
I listened to his entire talk.
There was nothing inciting about it.
He was reviewing the evidence for the election fraud, and when he spoke to perhaps as many as a million supporters there, he suggested they be peacefully and patriotically go to the Capitol to express their opposition to the theft of the election, which the mainstream media leaves out.
Is that the intrusion into the Capitol wasn't to stop the counting of the ballots, it was to disrupt the discussion and debate about the theft of the election, which became completely derailed And in case they don't already know, the Capitol Police were not under the control of Donald Trump, but Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House, where the head of the Capitol Security, who has since resigned, requested additional backup five or six times, which were denied.
Where it appears to have been incomplicit with the mayor of Washington, where we see black SUVs pulling up and they're unloading Antifa members to pretend to be Trump supporters wearing some mega gear, but these are clearly not Trump supporters with the intent of disrupting the discussion.
Of the evidence for fraud.
I mean, what could Donald Trump want more than discussion of the election fraud by members of Congress?
So the very idea of imputing to him a motive for wanting to go into the Capitol is completely, frankly absurd.
But that's the depth to which these people have been reduced.
And of course, the claim of incitement had no basis whatsoever.
To incite, you have to be very specific about what actions are being done, not just walk over to the Capitol.
You have to have the intent of creating an incident, an unlawful event that would occur imminently, imminently.
Like, 45 minutes away was an hour, and it was a mile and a half away, so that the Trump supporters actually didn't reach the Capitol until the intrusion had already taken place.
Right.
You know, even after these pretty—on January 6, the Congress, the Senate, the Capitol Police, the mayor, they already knew this event was going to take place weeks in advance.
But yet, on that day, didn't the day already start with the police force, the Washington, D.C.
police force, already understaffed?
Has he pretty much told some people not to show up to work?
Well, it's fascinating, Brew, that the president himself had offered 10,000 National Guard troops to be there to provide protection and coverage.
They had done that before with complete success, but in this case it was declined, and I have no doubt whatsoever it was Nancy Pelosi who declined because she wanted to be a setup.
She wanted to have easy access.
These people were even taking selfies with the Capitol Police and, you know, giving them advice about how to get around inside the Capitol.
We have a completely sensational video of Managers and directors in the crowd in front of the Capitol telling those who were intruding where to go and what to do.
We also in the same video Which is 21 minutes long.
They document the staged shooting of this woman who, it's very obvious, did not die.
She was given a packet of fake blood after she was, you know, about the time she was lying on the ground.
She was carried out by two individuals by her shoulders and her feet.
I mean, that's a complete violation of medical practice.
You'd wait for the EMTs to show up.
They carry her out on a stretcher.
Every aspect of this was phony, it was complete and total bullshit, but they wanted to fabricate an event.
They could call a deadly event to motivate or justify their fake impeachment of Trump, which was really intended to lead to censuring him so he couldn't run for president again.
I mean, think about it, Brew.
He mocked the floor with them in 2020, just as he beat Hillary in 2016.
That was rigged for Hillary too, but the American people turned out in such numbers, they overwhelmed the system.
When the same thing was happening in 2020, they had to stop the count.
And this was multiple states stopped the count at the same time so they could adjust the algorithms and give a jump to Biden of hundreds of thousands of votes to put him ahead and then have the algorithm maintain a slight lead like 50.5 versus Trump 49.5 to guarantee he'd wind up the winner.
It was so egregious.
No one who's taken a serious look at the evidence has any doubt about it.
Oh, it was right in front of your face, and we witnessed this in 2018.
It was so obvious in 2018, we knew it would be a replay in 2020, except we didn't think that it would get by, because we already were on top of it.
Your eyes, my eyes, many people's eyes were already on it, so how could Donald Trump and his team and his administration, how could this have gotten so out of their hands?
It actually did not, Brew.
Let's see, 12 September 2018, signed an executive order within the framework of the state of emergency that obtained then and obtains now to deal with outside interference, foreign interference in the US election, giving him vast powers to seize the assets and prosecute the personnel.
of any foreign entities who engaged in the interference in the U.S. election, plus
any domestic entities that aided and abetted them, which turns out to include CNN, MSNBC,
even the major networks, the New York Times, the Washington Post.
Facebook, Twitter.
Yeah, right.
Turns out Dominion voting machines are based in Canada.
The CIDL, which was a tabulator service, is based in Spain, and they were even using these Leonardo satellites.
Named after Leonardo da Vinci and nominally controlled by the Vatican to actually manipulate the vote, where Barack Obama, during a visit to Italy years before, appears to have been engaged in the planning so they could guarantee a continuation of the despotic democratic regimes, which are doing everything they can to dismantle the United States.
They've got to demonize Donald Trump because he is the one by far most popular political figure in American history.
I would say JFK was beloved far and wide.
FDR, of course, was hugely admired.
Ronald Reagan had a huge following, but Donald Trump received more legitimate votes from American voters than any other figure in history.
So they want to do their best to try to destroy the coalition, but it's not working.
It's actually backfiring because now that Trump has survived the second impeachment, he's even more popular, standing even taller in the eyes of his supporters than before.
Very good.
You know, let me take a step back here.
You were talking about the woman that allegedly was killed.
And I can say allegedly, because you're suggesting that there is indefinite proof that there was no killing there because of the way it was carried out.
And of course, the way the responders.
This was allegedly a vet.
Was she currently enlisted in the Air Force at the time?
Or was she an Air Force vet?
I think she was.
I think she was supposed to be a vet.
I mean, we could look her up.
No, that's fine.
She was allegedly part of the Air Force and her husband, around the same age, was also part of the Air Force.
And I'm trying to, I was starting to look it up now, but I believe, was her name Roberta Paulson?
Is that what her name was?
No, no, it was Babbitt.
It was something like Ashley or Babbitt.
Look up, use the word Babbitt.
And it looks as though, you know, these are like stage names, just as the officer is supposed to have had his head bashed by a fire extinguisher was named Sicknick, which is a made up name.
I mean, this is all bullshit.
They're just rubbing our noses in it.
I know her name was something like Ashley Babbitt.
OK, I don't know where I got this Roberta Paulson from.
I had to be coming from one of these other ones because I remember anyway, neither here nor there.
You know, did you notice?
It's been suggested Donald Trump, and I don't know the official count, some say as many as 600 rallies that Donald Trump did since he came down the escalator, as little as 450, that nobody, there was no violence, there was no fires, there was no destruction, there was barely any litter, let alone any animosity or anything else at any of these Trump rallies.
Tens of thousands of people showed up to each one of them.
Millions showed up to all in the five years that he was doing them.
But yet, it was at Washington, D.C.
No place else, for the best of my knowledge, did he have to be enclosed in bulletproof barrier.
Only in Washington, D.C.
on January 6th did he fear so much from who may show up in the capital, our nation's capital, which should be safe, that he had to enclose himself in bulletproof glass.
And you've seen this no other place.
And any of his campaign rallies for the most part.
What are your thoughts?
Well, you got to bear in mind, Brew, there have been a dozen or more attempts to assassinate Donald Trump.
57 from what I heard.
How many?
57.
Well, that could be.
Her name Ashley, A-S-H-L-I, Babbitt, B-A-B-B-I-T-T, 35 year old married woman, 14 year military hero.
Serving in Afghanistan and Iraq with the Air Force, pulling tours in Kuwait and Qatar with the National Guard.
But she must have had an intense dislike for Trump.
Even though we see a photograph of her wearing a mega hat, I think this is all part of the setup.
She was, it was a fraudulent event.
I'm very confident she did not die.
Among the signs are when she was shot in the neck, but there was no blood.
I mean, and she was handed a little packet, which appears to have been a fake bud packet just before all this took place.
It's all meticulously documented and you can find it.
On my BitChute channel at Jim Fetzer on BitChute.
Just scroll down.
You'll be sure to find it.
Well, the people that play these roles, these paid actors, you know, if she was a part of the Air Force and a veteran and whatever, she had money.
So did she do it for money?
No, she did it not because she hated Donald Trump.
Not because she liked Joe Biden.
It's because she didn't like you.
She doesn't like America.
Something is wrong with her where she had to do something to try and do something to pull the wool over her fellow Americans eyes that she knew only could go one way in a bad way.
It's nefarious.
It's criminal.
It's it's deceptive.
But yet she went along with it.
And that that's I don't know.
What are your words for that?
I can't even.
Oh, I know it's all disgraceful.
These are people who are very, they call themselves Democrats, but they're actually fascists.
Just as Antifa calls itself anti-fascist, but it practices all the techniques of fascism.
I mean, there's no question about it.
And of course, the Democrats never complained about the Antifa or the Black Lives Matter riots, the looting, the arson, setting buildings on fire.
They actually endorsed it and even encouraged it.
I mean, it's completely outrageous.
And I just say, but Brew, we now have reports Actually even published in the New York Times that the FBI has discovered that the Capitol riot was planned in advance using Twitter and Facebook as mediums of communication for coordination.
How bad is that?
But if it was planned in advance, then it cannot possibly have been the consequence of words spoken by Donald Trump at the Ellipse on the day of the event.
Where, as I say, his supporters weren't even at the Capitol at the time all this was going on.
No, it was completely set up to be a false flag to blame your enemy when it's really you.
And, you know, out of all these people that are allegedly being arrested, John Sullivan, the guy that wore the horns and whatever, how many of these people are actually being identified as federal agents and TIFA members, some sort of agency or a paid actor?
How many of them are that?
And actually, who is the really organic apple pie eating Trump supporter?
The Trump defense team, which essentially eviscerated the prosecution on day four Friday,
did such a thorough job of demonstrating that they'd altered, edited the footage, even all
the way back to Charlottesville, leaving out that Trump had explicitly condemned white nationalists
and neo-Nazis.
He said it explicitly.
Just as they omitted that he said peacefully and patriotically go to the Capitol, they edited the film to make it look as though he was being inflammatory.
And then they played a whole lot of clips of Democrats saying things that were more inflammatory and insightful than anything that Donald Trump had said at the ellipse.
We know One of the first discoveries, and it was mentioned, I believe, by Michael Van Der Veen on Friday, was that among the first arrested was a member of Antifa by the name of John Sullivan, whose brother James, who does not share John's leftist, extremist, fanatic outlook,
Blew the whistle on him and said that John had led 226 Antifa members into the Capitol on the 6th of January to create this great brouhaha to disrupt the discussion of voter fraud.
Again, I reiterate that the mainstream never mentions that what actually was disrupted was not the vote per se, But the discussion of election fraud, which is, of course, something that Trump very much wanted and therefore would never have sought to disrupt.
But that's what happened.
That was the goal of Nancy Pelosi, who turns out to be just an unbelievable scumbag.
I mean, that this woman should continue to exercise this level of influence in Washington, D.C.
is an embarrassment to the entire nation.
Did we really need James Sullivan to out his brother John Sullivan since John Sullivan has a history of speeches talking against white people and for Black Lives Matter and for Antifa and he's seen at many of these antagonistic events and he is, you know, an orchestrator of this.
A paid actor by the DNC and whomever, whoever he's getting the paychecks from.
Did we need James to out him?
And don't you find it funny that we have, oh, John's on the dark side.
James is on the good side.
They're controlling from the same family.
They're controlling both sides of the narrative.
I don't think James, who is allegedly what, a Proud Boy, is he?
Is he part of the Proud Boys, James?
I don't know that he's a Proud Boy, but I thought what he contributed of greatest value was that John had led a group of 226 Antifa members.
And you got to bear in mind, Ruth, that now the police have been able to arrest over 200.
And to my knowledge, none of them is a Trump supporter.
Most of them didn't even vote.
So how can they blame this on Trump when these were people who either didn't vote or didn't support him?
I mean, it's absurd.
The politics of the crowd is antithesis of what the Democrats were alleging.
And we're finding out out of those 200, it's somewhere at undercover agents of the federal agency, they're undercover, undercover Capitol Police, paid actors, part of the Antifa groups, part of the Black Lives Matter groups, part of this group and that group.
And again, out of these 200, they're already finding out their roots.
I mean, if we're having true investigations here, but when we usually don't, I mean, they never get to the bottom of any of this because the FBI is doing the investigating and they're fraudulent as it is.
So I mean, obviously, you know, you suggested it there.
Is there any true organic apple pie eating Trump supporters that just got caught up and, you know, pushed into that situation that are were truly in there for it?
Did they catch any of these people unless they were set up?
I don't know what's with these you know again set up because they're tracking people across the country I don't know how just because they saw a facial recognition and so on at the Capitol not even at the Capitol building or in it just because they were near it catching a facial recognition and stopping people at airports or going to their houses once they're home and knocking on their doors and harassing them.
Is that going on?
Is the FBI going after innocent people?
Rue to my knowledge, not a single person who's been arrested in relation to the Capitol intrusion was, in fact, a bona fide Trump supporter.
They did, however, corral an older man.
He actually appears to have been on the opposite side of the Capitol.
He's a decorated former naval officer.
He has some kind of health condition that would have precluded him Entering the Capitol, but they were tying him in with the Oath Keepers, which is a very fine organization of former military and police law enforcement officers who believe profoundly in the Constitution.
They're very disciplined and well organized.
So they use this fellow who, as I say, doesn't even appear to have been on the right side of the Capitol, who doesn't appear to have been involved, to create a fictitious link to Oath Keepers, which has now been used to take down Oath Keepers' website.
I mean, this is how they do it.
They have a false flag.
They create themselves and they use it to parlay and bring about other consequences they would have liked to achieve, but can now do so more easily because of the phony event they staged.
That said, we're three days past an event that happened February 14, 2018, Parkland, Florida.
David Hogg came out of the came out from under his rock, made some noise, his little wiggly
arms, played a role at Parkland, got an honorary scholarship to Harvard, now is playing some
little verbal ping pong with Michael Liddell, trying to start his own pillow company. Tell us a
little more about Parkland High School.
Well, let me start with David Hawkins.
He's the son of an FBI agent who's involved in staging events.
I mean, that tells you a whole lot right there.
He appears to have graduated from Laguna Shoals High School before he came to Parkland.
He's got a youthful look, which made him useful, you know, as a partisan.
In an interview he gave six hours after he spoke at the March for Our Lives, Which was a couple of weeks after an allegedly based upon the Parkland event, though it was much too short a timeline since they were involving closing the streets with many events and all kinds of articles.
You know, maybe two dozen or more different types of t-shirts, for example, coffee mugs.
Some have observed it wasn't enough time to organize a cookie sale at a local church.
And in fact, it turns out they had to permit the March for Our Lives six months in advance, according to the requirements for special events in Washington, D.C.
that involves closing the roadways.
We even confirmed with a metropolitan D.C.
police officer who had issued the permit that had been done months before, and months of planning had gone into it, which means, of course, it was planned before Parkland, where Parkland was completely staged.
It may have been a woman who calls herself a sane progressive, and I understand now today why she called herself the sane progressive.
Very observant, very astute, had watched the footage from Parkland over and over and over and discovered it was the same two or three dozen students everywhere that we were missing The 3,000 plus students at Parkland, and it turns out for the following reason, because it was Valentine's Day holiday, they sent the students home at 1 p.m.
Eastern time.
They weren't even there.
David Hogg, when he gave that interview six hours later, said how he was at home when
he realized he had to get back to school because he forgot they were going to stage this phony
attack and he had to be there to do his thing.
So he got on his bicycle and bicycled back to school.
Just think about it.
If you only consider that observation about David Hogg, that he was at home and had to
bicycle back to the school for the event, you realize that just as a discovery that
J. Edgar Hoover had put out a memorandum that someone was in Mexico City impersonating Lee
Harvey Oswald, and you know that the former, like the latter, was a conspiracy and that
it was not a legitimate or modified.
Would you believe Scott Israel The sheriff of Broward County drives a Lamborghini?
I mean, it's ridiculous.
And he had to keep his deputies out of the school because it was a guy in a complete swap outfit, including a helmet, using a SIM gun, firing simulated ammunition, which is made out of beeswax and laundry detergent.
It won't penetrate the skin, which is why we got the miracles.
A couple of the girls, Samantha Fuentes and Maddie Wilford, walking around days later with band-aids over their AR-15 wounds, which is, of course, preposterous.
Maddie, for example, was shot in the chest and the abdomen, and the doctor said she was a very lucky girl because it was a large caliber.
And that young people heal quickly.
Well, it isn't a large caliber, but it is high velocity.
If she'd been shot in the chest and the abdomen, she'd be dead, not walking around with band-aids on her wounds.
And Samantha Fuente, shot in the leg.
Well, even the New York Times published an article about the severe damage to the bones, how they're shattered by eight or 15 bullets.
So there's no way that those were real.
They were describing them as medical miracles.
And when you understand that miracles involve violations of laws of nature, physics, chemistry, biology, in this case, laws of ballistics and wounds.
I mean, they were miracles because they couldn't possibly have happened.
And in fact, of course, obviously they did not.
It was an elaborate scam.
What are the political motives behind some of these alleged, or many of these alleged shootings that have some type of government tie-in, political leader tie-in and so on, whether it be in a school or an office complex?
What is the political goal for these?
Well, most of these are gun control.
Well, when I edited the book on Sandy Hook, which was published on Amazon on 22 October 2015, I had brought together 13 experts, including six current or retired PhD professors, Well, we had established that the school had been closed by 2008, that it was loaded with asbestos and other biohazards, damaged by a hurricane.
I've learned since there was actually even also a major flood in the area in 2007.
And surprisingly, this school was in a flood zone, so that it was also seriously damaged thereby.
So there were no students there.
You get interesting confirmations intermittently in 2010, for example, a contractor had been visiting a friend in Monroe, which is not very far removed from Sandy Hook, discovered Unexpectedly, his hosts were going over to the elementary
school to pick up a couple of school desks on the cheap for his kids to use at home.
When he got there, he observed the dilapidated condition of the school.
The caretaker said he thought it was going to be torn down.
Recounting the anomalies and the contractor, a guy who's used to dealing with buildings,
rebuilding and all that, said it was so deplorable.
I mean, it was obviously non-functional, which just comes up incidentally in 2010, confirming
our hypothesis, our finding, for which we have a rather mountainous evidence that it
was closed already by 2008, where what they did was conduct a two-day FEMA drill, technically
a mass casualty exercise involving children, where we even obtained a copy of the manual.
By the start time and the stop time and all that is exactly right, Dan.
The rehearsal on the 13th, going live on the 14th.
They had porta-potties and pizza and bottled water at the firehouse, which is consistent with FEMA exercises.
They provide restrooms and refreshments.
It was a sign, a portable sign.
Everyone must check in.
Which is consistent with the manual because it says right in the manual, everyone must check in with a controller upon arrival so they can be paid for their participation.
We have many there who are wearing name tags on lanyards.
Well, that's standard SOP again.
For FEMA exercises, they identify the players by color-coded name tags on manuals and We had parents bringing children to the scene, which, as I said, was completely absurd.
This had actually been a child shooting massacre, but it was an exercise and they were treating it as a festive occasion.
In fact, some of the participants got ahead of the game and put up donation sites already the day before the event was to occur.
Even Adam Lonza, the alleged shooter, had his Date of death initially recorded as the 13th, making his feat in shooting 20 kids and six adults the following day all the more remarkable.
One of our participants, by the way, Brew, to get very specific, Paul Preston, who has his own Agenda 21 radio show, he's a school administrator who'd actually supervised active shooting drills.
was so disturbed by what he saw broadcast from Newtown that day that he reached out to his
contacts in the Obama administration in the Department of Education, all of whom confirmed
to him that it had been a drill, that no students had been harmed, that it was done to promote gun
control. That's about as close as you can get to a direct confession as we'll have in this case.
You know, we barely even barely, hardly scuffed the surface of any one of these events that have
official narratives, but truth is behind the official narrative.
There is actually a deeper story that reveals much more than what the media, the politicians, and what goes into these history books written by the victors.
Anybody listening now that's heard you hundreds of times over your very long, illustrious career, What would you say to them when they say you're a conspiracy theorist?
What would you say to them when there's no way that our politicians, our bureaucrats, our government, our local officials, or even just the boy or girl next door would even take part of any of this?
What would you say to them that actually just can't get past that normalcy bias?
Well, I'd say, aren't we all?
I mean, seriously, we can't take For granted, anything the government tells us, because the government has been complicit in these events, whether it's JFK or 9-11 or Sandy Hook or the Boston bombing or Orlando and Dallas or Charlottesville or Parkland or Las Vegas, is a very naive state of mind.
that believes everything they hear or everything they read, even the newspapers, have become
completely corrupt through. What they need is an exercise in critical thinking to review
how we know one after another after another of these events was phony and contrived as a false
flag, meaning they were blaming other than the actual sources responsible for what happened
in order to divert attention just as the Sarnoff brothers were claimed to have been responsible for
the Boston bombing.
But I learned from their aunt, Beretta, who has a law degree from Moscow University, a formidable woman, How they had photoshopped the two young men into the video footage from the Marathon bombing.
And I asked, how did she know?
And she said, because Tamerlan, the older brother, had a beard.
And in the footage, he's clean shaven.
And I asked, could she prove it?
And she started sending me one proof after another, lying in bed with his cat.
He's got a beard.
A link to where they're working at in a gym shortly before the marathon bombing.
And he's got a beard.
A report from a friend of theirs who had lunch with him that day relieved to find they'd
been nowhere near the marathon.
He had a beard.
Footage from a security camera outside a Quick Stop, where Zoker's inside, Timberland's out, he's got a beard.
Even when he was arrested in Watertown, he had a beard.
They stripped him naked and put him into a police car.
And then when his body shows up, he's lying there on the table, quite dead, with a huge gash in his side.
You can see he still has the beard.
But that's not the only blunder they made, Ru.
They forgot to correct the backpacks they were wearing.
Tamerlan was wearing a very large, slightly dark gray backpack, and Zoker, a silver or white backpack, neither of which resembled the two black nylon backpacks that exploded that day, as the FBI reported in its investigation of the Boston bombing.
where we know who were the parties responsible, is Kraft International, a private army,
or they were wearing khaki trousers, black jackets, and black baseball caps with a skull insignia,
where the motto of Kraft is, violence does solve problems.
We have photos of two of them heading toward one of the spots carrying one of these black nylon backpacks with a white patch on it, and then running away, no longer carrying the backpack.
And sure enough, one exploded with these black nylon backpacks with white squares on it, but the backpacks don't match.
You remember the claim in OJ, which was actually highly misleading, in that if the glove, if it doesn't fit, you must acquit.
Well, they made sure those gloves, which were a very tight-fitting, couldn't fit on OJ's hand because they had to put on a latex glove underneath and allegedly to preserve the integrity of the evidence.
But in fact, it was setting up a deliberate method of refuting the evidence that would have been conclusive because the glove did fit, but by putting the latex over it, it did not.
Well, in this case, we have a bona fide exoneration because the backpacks don't match.
Such that a retired professor of law from Canada, John Remington Graham, was very interested in the case.
And I reviewed all the evidence we put together and asked him what he thought was most telling.
And he said it was that the backpacks do not match.
So that he actually constructed, authored an amicus curiae brief
for the First Circuit Court of Appeals that would review the death penalty issued against Zoker,
laid out the evidence.
Since the backpacks don't match, he cannot have been guilty of the crime.
And the court assured him, where he cited three Americans where I was the first name, And that he was bringing this case on behalf of three American citizens.
The court assured him they would take into account his evidence, but they did not, in fact, respond in an appropriate fashion because they ought to simply toss the case away as based on fabricated evidence.
It's a principle in the law, a false in one, false in all, meaning if you can establish there's false evidence introduced by a side, you're entitled to have their entire case dismissed.
Let me just say, by the way, if you want to see a review of all these matters, and where, by the way, in this instance, their defense attorney, a woman named Judy Clark, although formally pleading them not guilty in her opening statement, said they did it.
Absolving the prosecution from proving they'd done it, which would have been impossible because the evidence contradicted their having done it.
They weren't even there.
So then I filed a formal complaint against Judy Clark in California, but where the State Bar of California just casually dismissed it, even though it was a clear violation of the conditions, the Code of Ethics for Attorneys, Which require that they not introduce any evidence not consistent with truth and that they be zealous in their defense of their clients where she obviously was not zealous by claiming they did it when they hadn't done it and by ignoring all the evidence that would have exonerated them.
So it's very sad to me Particularly having been born and grown up in California, to find that the California bar is just as corrupt as others that I've had dealing with, very, very disappointing.
Now, Brute, for those who want an instant education, they should go to a website of mine that remains intact, jimtheconspiracyguide.com.
And if you scroll down, To the 5th and the 6th shows where there are like some 65 shows I did there about conspiracies.
I mean, it's a veritable bonanza.
If you go to the 5th and the 6th at JimTheConspiracyGuy.com, you'll find How to Spot a False Flag Part 1.
And how to spot a false flag part two, where I go through 15 or 20 frequently coming back to offer more proof about Sandy Hook or Charlottesville or the Boston bombing or going on and on and on.
I mean, it's just outrageous, all the evidence we have.
So anyone who really is lacking in their education, They ought to face up to the fact that conspiracies are ubiquitous.
They're as American as apple pie, that the most prosecuted case in the United States is for a conspiracy of one type or another, that most American conspiracies are economic, conspiracy to fraud, conspiracy to swindle, and so on and so forth.
Well, if you don't take conspiracy seriously, you're missing the boat completely.
You have no idea what's going on.
So that I regard a better title for those of us doing this research.
If you want to use a citizen crime investigator, which is what we really are, because we're investigating crimes the government has covered up, at least credit us with being conspiracy realists or Alternatively, conspiracy analysts, where you find what I'm doing is using all the analytical abilities I developed over 35 years of offering courses in logic, critical thinking, and scientific reasoning, applied to taking apart these cases that the government has actually conducted itself in order to manipulate public opinion, where I bring together groups of experts
To take conspiracy theories from theories in the weak sense of rumors, speculations, or guesses, to conspiracy theories in the strong sense of empirically testable explanatory hypotheses like Newton's theory of gravitation, Einstein's theory of relativity, Darwin's theory of evolution.
And once you sort out the fabricated evidence from the real or authentic, these cases are really very straightforward to sort out.
Jim, we're down to about three minutes or so.
You know, you just recently had a birthday and it puts you, what, 73 or 74?
I forget.
Am I wrong?
80?
Yeah.
Jim, here's my question.
How do you stay so sharp?
You're a walking encyclopedia.
I mean, I have forgotten more than many people know, but you have retained it and know a hundred times more than I know.
How do you, how do you do it?
You know, Brew, when I was in junior high, we had a huge assembly hall and the motto there was, problems strengthen the mind as well as labor does the body.
I keep engaged.
I keep driving.
I keep taking on new projects.
And the government, sad to say, is providing a super abundance of fake or staged events to analyze the capital intrusion, even the whole impeachment.
As well as a coronavirus fraud, only being three of the most recent examples.
So by keeping my mind engaged, I think I retain my intellectual agility, and I appreciate all those observations, Brew.
Well, absolutely, man.
I mean, you are probably one of the busiest, at 80 years old, you're one of the busiest guys.
You're doing media all day long, and you got plenty of help, Giuseppe and others, and we appreciate you.
You know, again, this audience, I was totally wrong.
Why was I thinking 74?
I don't know.
But 80 years old, I'm actually taking it back at this point.
I wish we had more time.
We've got about a minute and a half.
Let me ask you to your peers out there, to the elderly or the young people.
Even the young ones, what do they have to be afraid of, this coronavirus, this COVID-19, or is it the alleged virus itself that they got to be afraid of, or is it the vaccination, the jab that they're trying to force on them, which is more fearful?
What they have to understand is this is a mass program of genocide.
They're trying to murder a very large segment of the world's population.
Anthony Fauci, Tony the Rat, I call him, did a study of the Spanish flu, and the result of his study was the flu itself didn't kill that many people.
Most of them were killed by wearing masks.
They are killing your brain cells, putting additional strain on your cardiovascular system, and now they want you to wear more masks?
Ask yourself, how can breathing oxygen depleted air help you?
It can.
You accumulate bacteria, give yourself diseases.
Avoid it.
Well, Jim, that's the, uh, the credits there.
I appreciate you being here today.
We appreciate it on this day, February 17, 2021, and we will see you at BitChute, Revolution Radio, and every place else.
▲
Export Selection