All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 16, 2021 - Jim Fetzer
01:28:06
Need to Know: The Fetzer Report Episode 131 - 15 February 2021
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer in Mass in Wisconsin, where I'm very pleased to be joined together today by Carl Herman in San Ramon, California, and Chris Weiner in Detroit, Michigan.
Chris and I, in particular, are suffering through the very cold spell.
I don't know if it's quite as bad out in California, but it's terrible here.
We want to bring you all the news you need to know.
♪♪♪ ♪♪♪
♪♪♪ It begins, of course, with the second impeachment,
which was a monstrous violation of the Constitution, but where the Democrats are doing everything they can
to preclude Donald Trump from wiping them like a mop again.
There was a 57 votes with seven Republicans crossing the line to vote with the Democrats on the article of incitement for which there was no evidence whatsoever to justify.
There was no incitement.
There was no insurrection.
Alan Dershowitz was very, very good commenting on Hannity.
He said that Trump's legal team, this was on the fourth day on Friday, proved two major points.
Number one, the president could not have incited this violence because it began to occur even before he made the speech.
Actually, I think he meant before he finished the speech.
Second, The words they use, fight, fight, fight, are words commonly used by politicians.
I can vouch for that, because I've defended people over the years who have never used words like that, and I've won all my cases where fighting words have been used.
They're protected by the Constitution.
Meanwhile, we had a wonderful report by Alan Dershowitz on Hannity.
Check this out.
A plus.
A plus today.
They understood what most lawyers don't know what to do.
When you're ahead, sit down and shut up.
Now the defense team started the day by showing how the impeachment managers actually had to manipulate and did manipulate the president's January 6th remarks.
We're gonna walk down and I'll be there with you.
We're gonna walk down We're going to walk down to the Capitol.
And we're going to cheer on our brave senators and congressmen and women.
And we're probably not going to be cheering so much for some of them.
Because you'll never take back our country with weakness.
You have to show strength and you have to be strong.
We have come to demand that Congress do the right thing and only count the electors who have been lawfully slated, lawfully slated.
I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building.
To peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard.
Now as you can see, not only did the Democrats selectively edit the President's speech, they also manipulated key evidence, pieces of evidence, and they frequently relied on guess what?
Well, their best friend's sketchy news reports and rumor to make their case.
...according to those around him at the time, reportedly responded... Trump reportedly... ...reports across all major media outlets... ...major news networks, including Fox News, reported... ...reported... ...reportedly summoned... ...reportedly... ...reportedly not accidental.
According to reports, President Trump was reportedly... who reportedly spoke to the guard.
We can whine, or we can fight back.
Media reports, according to reports, reported reportedly The president's lawyers rightly pointed out today in what
became a 10 minute straight montage showing Democrats themselves frequently using this phrase,
fight like hell or fight, fight, fight in front of their own supporters
We can whine or we can fight back. Me, I'm here to fight back
I'm here to fight back.
But we are going to make sure that this fight does not end tonight.
This is a fight for our lives.
I will fight like hell to fight back against anyone.
We need to say loud and clear that we are ready to fight.
It's a bare knuckles fight.
Now they're going to have to actually fight back.
We will fight back.
We're not going to just take this lying down.
I'm just going to keep the fight up.
What we have to do right now is fight as hard as we can.
We have to rise up and fight back.
Continue to fight.
Fight.
This is going to be a fight.
We'll also fight him and challenge him in every way that we can.
This is what is our fight right now.
There's the fight, there's the fight, there's the fight, and then there's the fight to defend.
And we just have to fight, but this is a fight for our country.
Based on the Democrats' definition, all of them were inciting insurrection.
And what about their violent rhetoric?
Does it count as incitement to insurrection?
As always on this show, we'll let you decide.
You know why there aren't uprisings all over the country?
Maybe there will be.
There needs to be unrest in the streets for as long as there is unrest in our lives.
You gotta be ready to throw a punch.
You have to be ready to throw a punch.
Donald Trump, I think you need to go back and punch him in the face.
That I thought he should have punched him in the face.
I feel like punching him.
I think I'd like to take him behind the gym if I were in high school.
If you were in high school, I'd take you behind the gym and beat the hell out of him.
No, I wish you were in high school.
I could take him behind the gym.
I will go and take Trump out tonight.
Take him out now.
When was the last time an actor assassinated a president?
They're still gonna have to go out and put a bullet in Donald Trump.
I have thought an awful lot about blowing up the White House.
Please, get up in the face of some Congress people.
People will do what they do.
I want to tell you, Gorsuch, I want to tell you, Kavanaugh, you have released the whirlwind, and you will pay the price.
There was a wave of far-left political violence.
We all watched it with sadness and horror all summer.
One year of riots, the Democrats, the media mob.
Oh, now finally they're telling you they care about rioting.
Well, we should all condemn, this shouldn't be political, all these riots or any violence wherever it takes place.
And yes, every conservative condemned what happened at the Capitol.
Yeah, Democrats actually encouraging this summer's riot.
They're not going to stop.
And everyone beware.
This is just a snapshot of some of the damage that people will be waking up to.
I'm proud of New York, and I'm proud of the protests.
There is damage everywhere you look.
Honestly, it looks like a war zone.
Heartwarming to see so many people turn out peacefully.
They keep doing it day after day after day.
Our country is a nation of protests.
The patriots were protesters.
St.
John's Church is on fire.
That's a myth.
I hope someone burns down your whole precinct while you're all inside.
It is not, generally speaking, unruly.
Joining us now with reaction, the host of the Dersh Show podcast, Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz.
You had terrible marks for day one for the president's team.
Today, how would you grade it, sir?
A-plus.
A-plus today.
They understood what most lawyers don't know what to do.
When you're ahead, sit down and shut up.
And it voted that they had jurisdiction.
You, who voted that there was no jurisdiction, can still vote to acquit based on a lack of jurisdiction.
That's what happened in the Belknap case.
You should do it now.
It doesn't matter how you get to the acquittal.
You can do it on jurisdictional grounds.
You can do it on First Amendment grounds.
You can do it on due process grounds.
The goal of these lawyers today was not to lose, not to lose more than the six Republicans they may already have lost, and they did a masterful job in narrowing the issues, making the Senators focus on it, and I think it was a winning argument.
I think they redeemed themselves.
All right, let me ask this last question, because this is important.
You're a Democrat.
Intellectual honesty test here.
Okay.
If they are going to define the president's language as inciting insurrection, doesn't it apply to all the tapes we saw and heard that we've been playing, that they played today?
Yeah.
It applies certainly to some of them, where they say we'll have to fight on the streets, where they say punch in the mouth.
It doesn't apply where they say we're gonna fight, we're gonna fight.
Look, all of that is protected.
We have a very vigorous First Amendment.
You can advocate, you can...
Assert.
You can provoke.
You just can't incite.
And it can't be incitement if you said peacefully and patriotically to have your voices heard.
I think those are the most important words in this whole mess.
So I do think that we're going to see an acquittal.
This is going to go down in history as a terrible, terrible abuse of the Constitution.
The Democrats put themselves above the law by putting a private citizen on trial and putting
him on trial for making speeches protected by the First Amendment. There's an acquittal. At least it
will minimize the damage done. But already there's been a lot of damage done to our Constitution
and to the divisions in our country. In my opinion, the defense eviscerated the prosecution.
I mean, it was absolutely stunning.
It was thorough.
It was overwhelming.
And I'm going to have it available on Jim the Conspiracy Guy tonight and for the next three nights thereafter so everyone can pick it up.
Just a three-hour and 20-minute presentation by the defense, which was just superb.
Carl, your thoughts?
Well, this was the most outlandish court appearance by people who are supposed to be leaders representing us in Congress.
If they did that in a courtroom, that would be their last day in court.
They forged evidence.
They forged evidence.
They manipulated video to have words come out of Trump's mouth that If you were to give a test on the speech that Trump made to ninth grade high school English people, and if you put as one of the choices was the intent was the spirit and the purpose of the speech to cause violence, that would receive a failing grade.
They forged evidence.
They accepted hearsay.
Into the court.
So, the idea that it can get more ridiculous, I just keep on getting surprised.
And it is corporate media that is digging that hole, along with the Democratic leadership.
And the foundation of this is that people, again, our listeners should be confident that this absolutely is provably election fraud.
If we had an honest vote count, the vote ratio for Trump over Biden would be 3 to 1 or 4 to 1.
And again, quickly, we can prove that through these contested states.
They all coordinated, stopped doing the one thing that they existed to do, to count the votes.
And in, for example, Pennsylvania, when they resumed counting, 600,000 votes for Biden, 3,000 for Trump, a 200 to 1 ratio.
for Biden, 3,000 for Trump, a 200 to 1 ratio. You go ahead and have an assumption of a 50-50 chance
for a vote. 200 to 1? That produces odds of election fraud of a number with 60 zeros behind
it, meaning that it is more likely to win the super lottery three times in a row than it is
for that to be an honest election.
You know, I'm so bitter about this because the Supreme Court declined to hear the Texas suit, which ought to have been the proper way to dispatch all this nonsense.
Chris, your thoughts?
Wow.
You know, I can't help but to think that most of this stuff that's going on is a theatrics that's been created
for this purpose to polarize us into these partisan bases and to reflexively dehumanize one another
in reaction to these, let's say, provocations, which seem to be intended to really trigger people
that are emotionally affected and under immense duress, whether it's economically or socially or constitutionally
or religiously or whatever, politically, obviously.
You're seeing a lot of people backed into a corner in between a rock and a hard place, you know,
as a result of this World Economic Forum reset.
And I wanna point out that most of the people that seem to be involved with this are the usual players
that have been involved with a lot of coverups and misdeeds, historically speaking,
whether it's Dershowitz and his ties to the Epstein thing or Rudy Tower 7 Giuliani, you know,
some of these guys around both sides of this.
It seems like these guys are serving this moneyed interest, no matter what party they're part of, in selling out the American people.
I want to point that out because I think it's really something that people get lost in and the emotions and think one side is, you know, innocent while the other side is guilty.
And it's something that's really unhealthy in terms of not only dehumanizing one another in terms of discourse, but identifying the problem and source of infection as well.
I think a lot of these things, the illusion of persecution is being magnified and sensationalized, like the COVID thing as well, obviously.
A lot of false pretenses and things that, like I say, are meant to trigger and polarize us towards maybe a civil war.
A lot of market manipulation that seems to be coming to the same fruitions and falling through the hands of certain meetings in the aisles of companies like BlackRock and Blackstone that run You know, index funds and things like Citadel, Vanguard, Fidelity and JP Morgan and Morgan Stanley.
A lot of stuff with the silver market that's going on with manipulation, obviously inflating the value of Bitcoin and many other things trying to get us onto crypto.
This is a full spectrum war where they're really trying to take over and it's being run by the usual suspects.
But it's being made to look like it's a grassroots or an innocuous thing or a, it seems to be like a parallel infrastructure of collusion that's going on here so not to be too long winded but I got a little bit more to get into with like the Forex and the Comex and the LBMA but maybe I'll do that at a different time on my show, but I think that really people need to pay attention to these things because You know, a lot of our pensions and retirement funds are being used to propel these things like the COVID hoax and even most of the onus of enforcement is being put on small businesses and even large ones as well, corporate policies to uphold these lunacies that are going on, whether it's the Biden coup or the COVID freakout or whatever you want to call it.
Not to go off on too far of a thing here, but I really think that we need to start seeing the big picture in the forest of the trees here, because this is a full-spectrum war that's been waged.
And it seems like an incestuous relationship between these commodity brokers, the regulators, DARPA, Big Pharma, Big Data, finance, the political structure, FAANGs, you know, they're running up the small businesses and taking over pretty much everything.
So, even educational institutions are being used to create these systems managers that really fall into these dynamics.
So I think that really there's a good reason why this stuff's going on.
And it's not for a good thing, but it's certainly for these people that are trying to make it look like something good.
Yeah, I think the Boulay Society and the Masons have gone to work and you're using things like the Screen Actors Guild and the American Creative Artists Associations or some of these things like for scene actors and for these false flags and even for these sensationalized accounts of political persecution and aggrandizements that are mostly exaggerating false flags.
So, I don't know when they're ever going to investigate some of these organizations that seem to be all infiltrated by the feds, you know, whether it's like the Proud Boys or, you know, Antifa or BLM, and even the punch a Nazi or punch a Trump or whatever.
This is the something that they always do and it's trying to radicalize people out of fear.
So, I think that you look historically speaking, you can probably find the enforcement agencies behind this for budgetary purposes as well as for domestic instability.
And guys like Chuck Schumer really seem to thrive in those environments.
So I want to point out his involvement with like Waco or Oak City or 9-11 investigations and really how he turned those things into intellectual cul-de-sacs and really snuffed out the truth.
Well, that was a bit more than I had anticipated.
Meanwhile, they stormed the Capitol to overturn the results of an election they didn't even vote in.
That obviously indicates they were not Trump supporters.
The FBI and the Capitol Police were aware of violent threats.
This was all being mapped out on Facebook and Twitter in advance.
Even the New York Times has reported it.
James, a brother of accused leftist provocateur John Sullivan, claimed 226 Antifa members began the Capitol riot.
We got an alleged Oathkeeper leader in the Capitol riot who held a top secret security clearance for decades.
This is an attempt, I think, to smear a very good, very strong, very conservative organization dedicated to stand up for the truth, for the Constitution and its principles.
Meanwhile, the Trump team showed videos of Democrat lawmakers who were making all kinds of outrageous statements Former President Trump's legal team accused legislators of hypocrisy as they played lengthy video montages of elected officials speaking about committing assault against Trump, threatening his supporters, backing protests last year that regularly turned violent.
Going on the offense, the attorneys use a strategy pushed by many conservatives.
Michael Van Der Veen, who did an exceptional job, argued Trump did not use inciting language before the breach of the Capitol, but that numerous members of Congress have in the past.
House Speaker Pelosi said the 2016 election was hijacked, that Congress has a duty to protect our democracy.
She called the president an imposter and a traitor, referred to colleagues here in the House as the enemy within.
Moreover, many Democrat politicians endorsed and encouraged the riots that destroyed vast swaths of American cities last summer.
When violent left-wing anarchists conducted a sustained assault on a federal courthouse in Portland, Oregon, Speaker Pelosi did not call it an insurrection.
Instead, She called the federal law enforcement officers protecting the building stormtroopers.
When violent mobs destroyed public property, she said, people will do what they do.
Rioters, some affiliated with the anarcho-communist networks Antifa and Black Lives Matter, ransacked stores across major U.S.
cities, severely damaged government and civic buildings, David Schoen, another of Trump's attorneys, played video clips of Pelosi's and others making inflammatory comments.
It's really stunning stuff and essentially eviscerated the whole charges against President Trump.
Jones said the hatred and anger shown in the clips led House impeachment managers to ignore their own works and actions and set a dangerous double standard.
The House managers spoke about rhetoric, about a constant drumbeat of heated language.
As I'm sure everyone watching expected, we need to show you some of their own words.
If the word people use, fine, but please stop the hypocrisy.
And did you tone down the rhetoric last summer when all this was happening?
Did you condemn the writers?
Or did you stand with Nancy Pelosi, who said people are going to do what they're going to do?
It was a stunning demonstration of logic and evidence.
Carl, your thoughts?
Yeah, it was just a brilliant video.
And going back to what Chris said, is that we are in a war.
And I don't see any other way to describe it.
This is the greatest economic attack on Americans in our history.
To call American workers non-essential?
To what?
Take one for the team and to go into poverty?
This is a coordinated attack by corporate media that then filters into public education,
and it's for a one-party system. It's the only hope that we have is if the military
is finally using these false flags against the American people as evidence to be able to shut
this down. If the Insurrection Act was enacted by Trump, then the military will conduct an
independent investigation, and then the ball is in their court whenever they feel that the case is
strong enough to go ahead and act and use military force, which where I am in California, which by
the way, gentlemen, the weather is beautiful. I played tennis yesterday and will do so tomorrow.
That is going to be a big, shocking upset to see the military arresting these people.
So this, and this was a false flag attack on January 6th.
You had mall cops instead of the National Guard who were there in the summer.
In the summer, you had a hundred National Guard fully armed, fully outfitted on the steps of the Capitol.
Instead, this time you had mall cops who opened up the little partitions for people to come in.
Who ordered that?
Who, who denied the National Guard to provide the protection and who ordered those gates open, and then you have the actual assault.
In some states that is a crime to threaten to hit somebody in the face.
And the support of actual arson, actual riots that actually did kill people.
So this is a ridiculous double standard you're having.
It's all projection of one side demonizing the other side for what they themselves do over and over and over again.
Paul, you made several great points there, including that Donald Trump, who's not in charge of the Capitol Police, who are under the supervision of Nancy Pelosi, had offered 10,000 National Guard troops, which they declined, and where the now-retired head of the Capitol Police said he'd requested reinforcement five or six times.
Who could possibly have thwarted that support?
Clearly they weakened the presence of the military to invite this, and with a prior planning.
I mean, the idea of incitement is an absurdity.
Trump was on the right side, the Democrats on the wrong, and it's becoming more obvious every single day.
Chris, your thoughts?
Yeah, Fetz, didn't you play a clip a couple weeks ago of that fake Angelique shaman guy being like led into like these offices and like the tour guide was the guard was like saying this is our most sacred ground or whatever the heck he was saying to this guy.
I thought you played some footage of that.
It could have been you but it maybe was someone else.
Was that you?
No, no.
Yeah, it was right here on this show, Chris.
Yeah, okay.
Yeah, yeah.
I just want to make sure.
Yeah, I don't understand, you know, how people are thinking this is a real thing.
I'm baffled by this.
And, you know, this Sullivan guy, I have to wonder if there's any relation to the William C. Sullivan, the guy that ran the COINTELPRO program and the civil rights weaponization in the 50s, 60s, and 70s for the FBI and COINTELPRO.
Because yeah, I'm really wondering, because like I say, most of these supposed civil rights infiltrations
or movements are really straw bosses and Judas goats and bully men.
In the same way they used mafia back in the 70s, infiltrated by operatives, I think,
that in some ways, shape, or form, are delivering a longer term social corporate agenda
that most the American people couldn't imagine being possible.
But if you ever notice the corporations and the Fortune 500, these guys are all marching in the same direction
as BLM and Antifa at the same exact time.
So I have to wonder about that.
And really, it's kind of funny to hear Pelosi talk about the 2016 election being hijacked.
In fact, I think it was the DNC who, in fact, hijacked the election again in 2016 from Bernie Sanders in the DNC
primary.
And it goes forgotten about.
And it's, better yet, blamed on Russia.
They almost went to World War III to foist the inequities onto Russia to really cover up the misdeeds of the DNC, probably Israel and London at some extent.
So, you think they went into this impeachment ordeal as well, which is a complete waste of time and energy and complete stalemate of anything.
They were pissed about the TPP probably getting cancelled out by Trump, and I can imagine that.
As we mentioned, this Capitol raid was a theatric that was staged.
Arguably, Vegas could be said to be the same thing, where they're trying to really put people into a frenzy and try to take the guns and take the rights from the people.
So that's always the goal that both parties seem to end up working towards, is taking rights from the people.
And I want to point out these persecutions, like the Steele, the Skripal, and the Stormy thing, were fabrications with no basic evidence on them at all.
Kind of like the allegations that you're seeing against Trump for four straight years.
At some point in time, are these people that have made these false allegations ever going to be held to account?
Or do we just keep believing these guys because they're so emotional and put some sort of limbic reaction in front of you?
So I have to wonder why, you know, this kind of instability politically is being presented to the American people, and why Cambridge Analytics was one of the companies that put Trump in there in the first place, along with the mainstream media.
Because if you remember, he was getting a lot of airtime covering up the Sanders disenfranchisement and the DNC primary.
So like anytime you turn on a channel that was Trump and certainly not focusing on the election fraud of Clinton over Sanders.
So a lot of the same parallels of the exact same things going on in 2016 as in 2020, just happening to a different base.
So I think that that's something that maybe could be pointed out and really brought to light.
Because that's amazing to see this going on and to think there's democracy in this country.
It's absolutely absurd.
And what Carl said was amazing about the American labor being deemed non-essential.
This is not the first time this party has also done that.
You know, if you look at NAFTA, CAFTA, permanent normalization of trade with China, and even the TPP, arguably speaking, both parties have sold out the American labor to these things.
And as Carl mentioned, the educational institutions have been hijacked as well.
By Apollo and Alphabet and delivering things like Common Core and No Child Left Behind.
It's straight to the military or the prison system, the for-profit prison system, which arguably these people created legislations on that as well.
So I'm really concerned about, you know, how long the charade has gone on as far as cracking the whip on this Biden fraud.
I think that really they're going to have to put this out there and really let the people I was hoping that Biden's dark winter would be defeated, but it seems like we are experiencing the fullness of this darkness of winter.
such a great job right now, but maybe I'm being impatient.
Paul, did you want to add some comments on Chris' critique?
I was hoping that Biden's dark winter would be defeated, but it seems like we are experiencing the fullness
of this darkness of winter.
And it is a charade, and it is emperor's new clothes status.
But yet, the show goes on.
And we've had a parallel with the directors of the FBI in 2016.
James Comey covering up Hillary's, the Anthony Weiner laptop.
And now in 2020, Christopher Wray covering up the Hunter Biden laptop.
Yeah, Theo Wan's too.
Wasserman Schultz's brother being in the capital investigation for the Seth Rich thing.
They covered a lot of stuff up, man, in 2016 and they never get held to account for it.
The media just is like an accessory looking the other way and focusing on the other way so that the people are completely misdirected.
End Time Magazine has actually published a rather Orwellian doublespeak account of how the election was stolen and how the AFL-CIA played a major role.
You can find it on my blog, where Edward Henry has a brilliant dissembling of what was taking place there.
They were admitting the election was stolen.
In 2016 or 2018, Fats?
Were you talking 2016 or 2018 election?
Or 2020, I'm sorry.
2020.
2020.
Okay, I just want to make sure.
Sorry, I didn't mean to cut it out.
Meanwhile, the Trump lawyer obliterates the fine people hoax once and for all, where the liberal networks were forced to hear it.
This was another wonderful aspect of the fourth A. Trump defense lawyer David Schoen definitively debunked the fine people hoax once and for all.
During day four of the impeachment trial, the best part?
The mainstream was forced to air his remarks in full context for the first time.
As everyone knows, Joe Biden based his entire campaign around the hoax that Trump called neo-Nazis and white nationalist fine people in the summer of 2017.
In relation to the contrived Charlottesville events.
The only reason people believe it is because the mainstream has repeatedly played the clip while cutting out key moments that gave his words context.
Specifically, they cut out the part where he said that I'm not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists because they should be condemned totally.
As he did earlier, he played a video clip where the Democrat managers showed, followed by what they conveniently left out.
This lie traveled around the world a few times and made its way into the Biden campaign talking points and ended up on the Senate floor.
The Charlottesville lie, very fine people on both sides, except that isn't all he said.
They knew it then, they knew it now.
Watch this.
Meanwhile, traitors have spray-painted outside of the home of Trump's impeachment attorney.
He's received nearly 100 death threats.
This is extraordinary, but it shows the intensity of the violence and threats to which the left is resorting.
Speaking shortly after his client's acquittal, Van Der Veen appeared to be almost holding back tears, responding to reports that his Philadelphia-area home has been targeted by vandals.
Noting he would not want to go into detail, a visibly distraught Vander being told Fox News host Griff Jenkins and his home was indeed attacked.
To answer your question, my entire family, my business, my law firm are under siege right now.
I don't really want to go into it.
Meanwhile, talking to pool reporters, he said vandals broke windows in his home, spray-painted really bad words everywhere.
Philadelphia police confirmed an unknown perpetrator at the end of the driveway at his home in Chester County.
Police said it's being watched now by private security.
They've been showing a presence that is spurring further attacks.
President Trump says a mega movement has only just begun, calls the impeachment part of the greatest wish in history.
Meanwhile, we know how massively was the theft, where Sidney actually reported the actual results,
where Trump took virtually all but a few states, 410 electoral votes,
including California and Minnesota, which I was predicting in advance of the event.
Carl, your thoughts?
Well, first, a point that I omitted earlier is that this isn't even an impeachment.
An impeachment has to be against somebody who is in office, in the executive branch or in the judicial branch, which is not the case for Trump.
And then it has to be, for the case of the President, it has to be presided by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.
So, again, it fails to meet the definition of an impeachment.
And the only guy who has been threatened with consequences for the context of all this since the Trump election in 2016, you have the factless Russiagate as admitted in the first crimeless impeachment.
And then you have the illegal prosecution of General Flynn, and the only guy who got busted was Kevin Clinesmith, who altered his report, his 302 report, on the General's interview, and he was threatened with some jail time, but he ended up just getting probation.
So, this is American propaganda, where you have somebody who has an office title like a senator or a congressperson, they suit up, they get dressed up in a nice $500 or $1,000 suit, and then they say the best talking points that their propaganda can come up with, and then corporate media will just go ahead and run with it.
With a straight face.
And it is a war.
And Van Der Veen needs to understand that this is a war.
If he didn't before, he certainly does know that now.
And I am looking forward to the next part of the show.
The Supreme Court on Friday is going to be giving consideration to some of these cases for election fraud.
So we'll see.
I hope this show doesn't continue for the entire long, dark Biden winter.
Well, sad to say, it looks as though other players in the Trump administration were betraying him as well, including William Barr in Durham.
As Chris has observed, we got nothing out of those investigations when there ought to have been a slew of indictments and prosecutions already have taken place.
Chris, your thoughts?
Yeah, great point.
Those guys pretty much seem to be janitors to me.
It reminds me of the quote from Henry VI by Shakespeare, John Cage saying, the first thing we do is kill all the lawyers.
I think that there's almost something like this where they have an oath that's higher to the city of London and to this Israel-Masonic connection than it is to the actual citizens.
And we really have to start looking at these people that have infiltrated all positions of authority and have violated not only their Legal but fiduciary and many other oaths and duties that they should be held and be upholding.
So I want to point out that it almost seems like both parties are playing the righteous outrage against Israel and the Jews and the royal crown and trying to pivot it towards an alternative enemy like say in this case China or Russia depending on which party you're talking about.
And I almost think they use the same dynamics to bring in like the conditions for World War One and World War Two, which ultimately led into bringing in the IMF and the World Bank and taking over the financial institutions through the Fed and many other things in independent countries, you know, leading to the World Economic Forum and of course, creating these situations like we're seeing with COVID and many of these Contingent things like this reset.
So BlackRock, like I said, is taking over the U.S.
Treasury and that's something to be concerned about.
But now Yellen is back in and she's probably even more alarming to me being that she's the one that's been behind like TARP and QE3 and like the Federal Reserve printing money for these type of domestic terror operations and using, I think in many cases, cryptocurrency to pay some of these operatives.
So I think that there's a push by big data to bring in these type of control systems over humanity, whether it's through the insurance or the banking or control of trade or labor or wages.
It's like they've always done.
This is just a new system and a new technocracy by which they're trying to do it.
So I want to point out a lot of parallels that seem to have been done under the Democrats in these liberal agendas.
In the case of, like, say, Wilson, he did the same thing with, like, bringing in the Jim Crow laws.
And really creating a focus on things like the race issue or even pivoting into fighting a war in Europe that we've had no business joining into.
And while this is going on with the domestic unrest, the media's full assist in delivering it and, you know, provoking it and stoking it, along with institutions like the ADL, the JDL start forming, the SPLCs, and all these these quote-unquote human rights centers start popping up.
But they're really more of an inversion, I think, to really Snuff out any realistic grassroots resistance to this takeover, and this social engineering effort so it seems to me part of the UN colonialization agenda just a new generational target and under new means, but it's the same old bloodlines the same old agenda the same people going towards this goal so
I think we got to step away from the two-party paradigm to some extent and really focus on that.
And I hope that if Trump is going through what he's going through and he's going to learn a lesson from the people that have been around him affiliated to this connection that have always been betraying him.
Fascinating, Chris.
Meanwhile, North Carolina GOP condemns Richard Burr after he openly admits to violating the Constitution by voting to convict Trump.
This was embarrassing.
Richard Burr is one of seven Republicans who voted guilty and by his own admission had violated the Constitution in doing so.
Burr, who split from Republican voters and sided with the Democrats, released a statement in which he made the admission, When the process started, I believed it was unconstitutional to impeach a president who is no longer in office.
I still believe that to be the case.
However, the Senate is an institution based on precedent, and given that the majority in the Senate voted to proceed with a trial, the question of constitutionality is now established precedent.
I find that quite bizarre, because unconstitutional acts take place every day, and that does not make them constitutional.
The chairman of the North Carolina Republican Party released the following statement.
North Carolina Republican Senator Byrd of the United States who uphold the Constitution in his vote today to convict in a trial that he declared unconstitutional is shocking and disappointing.
Burr doesn't care about the Constitution, it appears, and isn't worried about upsetting North Carolina voters because he's retiring and will not seek re-election when his term expires next year.
Meanwhile, and in my opinion even more shocking, even though Mitch McConnell agreed that it was unconstitutional and voted against the trial on that basis, he went on a rant against Trump afterwards Declaring that his actions preceding the riot at the Capitol were a disgraceful dereliction of duty and that there's no question none that he is practically and morally responsible provoking the events of the day as though he had made no attention whatsoever to the presentation by the defense team.
I find this outrageous!
Unless a statute of limitations is run, he, speaking of Trump, is still liable for everything he did while he was in office.
He didn't get away with anything yet.
We have a criminal justice system in the country, we have civil litigation, and former presidents are not immune from being accountable by either one.
If Trump had still been in office, I would have carefully considered whether the House managers proved their charge.
But the question is mood, because he's not eligible for conviction, no longer occupying office.
I believe Mitch McConnell just cut the throat of the Republican Party, that he disgraced himself.
Donald Trump had turned it into a party of the working people, A truly populist party, where 70% of Republicans would consider joining a new party formed by Donald Trump.
That appears to be in the works.
It's going to be called the populist party, even though I would have preferred America first.
But I think that McConnell has just signified that the Republicans want to revert to their country club status before and be aloof from the working people that the Democrats have gone full socialist communist and therefore there's a place for a real viable third party today led by Donald Trump when it'll instantly have 100 million voters in support.
Carl, your thoughts?
Yeah, that guy Burr, he's just a tool for this one-party state, and he literally is advocating dictatorship of what is said, when it is said, for as long as it's said.
So how it should be working is that the rules in place should be like any type of a sports game, where people understand they know everybody plays under the rules, but for him to say, Well, if they did it, I guess it's okay now.
That's dictatorship.
So, and then Mitch McConnell, man, if he should be thrown out just for plain stupidity, because again, if we were to press him to say, alright Mitch, so here's the transcript of what Trump said.
Now explain yourself.
You wouldn't be able to do it without sounding like an idiot.
But nobody in corporate media is going to press him with that question.
So that again is how they get away with it.
You have a guy who has a title, he's dressed in a nice suit, and you set the lighting up nice, and then corporate media just goes ahead and replaces those points.
The show just continues to go on, and I'll have some concluding thoughts with my final thoughts about what all this means, but right now, you know, it's as horrible as your guys' weather.
Yeah, when McConnell spoke, I was ready to vomit.
I mean, it was just disgusting!
How disgraceful!
The defense had eviscerated the prosecution's case, and yet he went on and spoke as though they hadn't offered any evidence whatsoever.
As if it never happened.
And that everything the Democrats had claimed was obviously true, when it was blatantly false.
Chris, your thoughts?
Well, I think Trump must be doing something that's really calling these guys, these traditional across the aisle colluders, to account because I have never really seen them side in such a bipartisan manner against one thing in a long time.
So usually these type of situations are against the American people, so I'd say this is probably the same thing.
Mitch McConnell, like many other people in the RNC, have been horribly guilty, not only failing to serve the president, but betraying him in many instances during his full four years.
So guys like William Barr, and like we were talking about earlier, you know, these guys are brought in as janitors, and they're, I think, hired in by higher-ups, and this is something that the American people, I think, are just being led into like a wrestling script with, so that we just The ones that are paying attention are going to lose their minds by the absurdities of the stuff that the people that are ripping us off are trying to suggest to us.
So a lot of the same players like it seems to be like a lot of parallels to like almost the Nixon agenda where they were going after him left and right and across the aisles.
A lot of similar people even around him in terms of like the in the lower ranks moving up later on.
The guys that become involved with like the Iran-Contra stuff and then eventually end up settling in around Trump in his cabinet or in his distant administration.
So interesting to see all these meetings in the aisles and a lot of the trouble that they've had in terms of going after the Clintons and locking her up and you know the transitions of many of the things that he ran on once he gets in office it seems to be like every president I don't know what goes on once you get the sworn in or whatever, but maybe they show you the original Zapruder film.
I have no idea, but something's got to be up with that because, you know, it seems to happen no matter who wins.
They just seem to abandon everything they ran on and just follow the orders of the billionaires.
Well, I believe this one's going to have a different ending, Chris, but it's... I hope so, man.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
But let me just say, I think that Durham and Barr just ran sham operations here.
It doesn't appear they were actually investigating anybody.
Yeah.
And Barr even came out and said it was no evidence of the theft of the election when it was simply massive and overwhelming.
That, to me, disgraces Barr.
I mean, the guy, I wouldn't cross that street.
I mean, I condemn him.
He deserves to rot in hell.
Yeah, you remember Barr covered up a lot of, like, the Franklin scandal, the Keating Five, the RNC stuff in the late 80s, early 90s.
You know, as far as like the MENA connections and Bush and Clinton, you know, so these are things that seem to be parallels of this bipartisan, you know, collusion working for a deep state or the central bankers or these royal families, whatever they are, they're working towards a goal that ain't for the American people or the American country.
And it seems to be like these parallels seem to repeat and the same, you know, systems managers are doing it.
So, I think that Trump has been a blessing as far as exposing these things, because, man, it's so painfully obvious to me.
I think we all agree.
Meanwhile, we'll be right back.
Here we have actually a wonderful expose of the situation we're in today from a woman who calls herself a good patriot.
Very impressive.
Check this out.
Hi Patriots, I am back and ready to put myself on some more government watch lists.
Let's talk about what's coming down the road so we can make some important plans, like ones that will stop the hostile takeover of the entire world.
If we know one thing about the people that are trying to destroy our country, it's that they can't keep their mouths shut.
Their pride makes them announce their future plans.
We saw it when Bill Gates and his friends coincidentally had a mock roleplay scenario last year about what it would be like to have a worldwide pandemic and how they would handle it.
Then a few months later, it actually happened.
Then we had the Transition Integrity Project report, which, among other things, talked about how they're going to delegitimize claims of And they did just that, which led to a senile man becoming our president.
Now we have things being laid out like the Great Reset and Joe Biden's Build Back Better, which are basically the same plan that leads to the same thing, which is global communism.
No joke.
Using the excuse of a climate change crisis and the possibility of more pandemics, these plans promise a whole new system where we take all the terrible things about modern-day communism, pretend they're really great, and then force the entire world population to comply with them.
This system will include things like having a social credit score like China does, a vaccination pass that allows you to travel and conduct business, worldwide surveillance, Being kicked out of society for non-compliance, the redistribution of your hard-earned wealth, and the absence of bone-in ribeyes.
I'm being dead serious.
They don't like meat.
One of their favorite slogans for this new world order is, you will own nothing and you will be happy.
Hmm.
Well, I own this and I'm very happy.
I'm just saying.
Would you like to be forced to put your hard-earned assets, your home, your property, and the fruits of your labor on the altar of making the world a more equitable place with the false promise of better weather?
Yeah, me neither.
Because where I come from...
Which is a place of rationality and proven historical fact.
Communism doesn't end well for the common folk like you and me.
So remember how I said they like to announce their future plans?
Well, here's a tweet that I took a screenshot of and I'm glad I did because it's since been secretly deleted from my social media pages and the original post is gone as well.
It comes from Klaus Schwab, the head of the World Economic Forum, who is rolling out the Great Reset Plan.
The World Economic Forum is working with the Biden administration to ensure that most people will survive the coming food shortages.
Citizens that have up-to-date vaccination documents will receive regular packages of plant-based protein products.
Wow, that sounds delicious.
And slightly insane.
Uh, most people will survive the coming food shortages.
The vaccinated will receive plant-based protein packages.
And, you know, what a coincidence, his buddy Bill Gates just bought up a bunch of farmland in our country.
About 242,000 acres worth.
Perhaps he's going to be growing all our plant-based protein.
I'm guessing it's going to be soy, because it keeps men wearing overly tight pants, and more importantly, avoiding aggressive physical warfare.
What I'd like to do now is go over Bill Gates' new short video titled, This is How We Prevent the Next Pandemic.
I think it has some interesting statements that will help us prepare better for what's ahead.
So I'm going to let him say something, and then I'm going to respond with my statements, and then I'm going to let you decide who you think is being more forthcoming with What's coming?
Let's get started.
Okay, we're a whole one second in.
Here we go.
So, we all want things to return to the way they were before COVID-19.
Let me ask you a question.
Okay, we're a whole one second in.
Here we go.
So we all want things to return to the way they were before COVID-19.
Let me ask you a question.
Do you really think that Bill Gates, the progressive left, the Biden administration,
and all the corrupt politicians really want things to go back to normal?
He and his friends are literally pushing for a worldwide campaign called the Great Reset that will completely transform the world for the worse.
But yeah, we all want things to go back to the way they were.
Let's keep moving.
But there's one area where I hope we never go back.
Our complacency about pandemics.
We can get ahead of infectious disease outbreaks.
By the next pandemic... All right.
By the next pandemic.
I want to address this because I know a lot of you are going to be saying, he said the next pandemic.
How does he know we're going to have more pandemics?
But here's the thing.
We've already had a lot of pandemics and now we're going to have a lot more because they know, the powers that be know, that we're so easily manipulated and controlled by them.
But a pandemic is simply when an infectious disease spreads across an entire country or multiple countries.
We had H1N1 and SARS and they came and they went.
But the difference is they were allowed to be played out naturally in society with a short virus life cycle and also they weren't used for worldwide political manipulation.
Let's keep it rolling.
By the next pandemic, I believe we can have what I call mega-testing diagnostic platforms.
They can be deployed quickly, cost very little, and test 20% of the entire population every week.
We also want to get treatments out far faster next time.
One of the most promising is monoclonal antibodies.
These manufactured antibodies grab onto the virus and disable it just like your immune system.
Monoclonal antibodies.
Despite the way Bill Gates says it, Monoclonal Monoclonal Antibodies are manufactured antibodies that grab onto the virus and disable it just like your immune system.
So if they do the job that our immune system does, why aren't we teaching people how to build up and strengthen our immune systems instead of pushing experimental drugs that can have serious side effects like infectious mouth sores, heart attack, and death?
Because money.
That's why.
I'd like to see Gates talk about getting vitamin D from the sun, eating healthy organic food, and I'm not talking about his plant-based crap.
Getting exercise and how to reduce stress so we can better fight off sickness.
That would make a huge difference, but that's not how he and his friends make money.
So, there you go.
New and faster mRNA vaccines?
your immune system, it can reduce death rates by as much as 80%. I also think that we'll develop
new vaccines quickly, in large part due to this new mRNA platform. mRNA will become faster to
develop, easier to store, and lower cost. That's a huge breakthrough. New and faster mRNA vaccines.
Yeah, considering the one just released has had over 10,000 seriously bad reactions to it,
over 500 people have already died from it, and those are just the ones that have been counted.
And that our immune systems are more effective, that's going to be a hard no for me.
Moving on.
To stop future pandemics quickly, we need to be able to spot disease outbreaks as soon as they happen anywhere in the world.
And that requires a global alert system.
If there turns out to be some new infectious pathogen, then we need a group of infectious disease responders to spring into action. Think of these as like
pandemic firefighters.
They're going to use their logistics, use their ability to build up capacity quickly.
They're going to go wherever that problem is.
Stopping the next pandemic will require a big investment.
But I think of this as the best insurance policy the world could buy.
Okay, let me translate what this whole thing means.
On your cell phone, you are going to have a required app that allows you to report a possible outbreak, the Global Alert System.
So, if Grandma wears too much perfume one day to church, and six people around her sneeze, and then there's an overly fearful citizen nearby, they can go on their phone and report to the Global Alert System that six people in one room sneezed in the period of ten minutes.
And then a task force is deployed.
That task force will come in question and examine everyone that was in the room, and they'll know who you are because your phone will tell them that you were there, and they will also know everyone else you have come into contact with since.
All of you will be quarantined, probably in an off-site location.
Until they know that you were just allergic to bad perfume and that you don't have Ebola.
Don't believe me?
They're already doing something like this in Canada.
Holding their citizens against their will in hotels with no outside contact until the government says they can leave.
Oh!
Did I mention that Justin Trudeau is a big proponent of the Great Reset?
The global community must not give up on the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the SDGs.
In fact, we should seize this opportunity.
The pandemic has provided an opportunity for a reset.
This is our chance to accelerate our pre-pandemic efforts to reimagine economic systems that actually address global challenges like extreme poverty, inequality, and climate change.
Alright, one more thing.
Wait!
Pause right there.
Zoom in and enhance.
More.
There!
Do you see it?
It's the outfit that's supposed to be worn with deadly viruses.
It's a bit different than this.
I just wanted to point that out.
These videos, tweets, and plans may be scary and concerning, but I look at them as a gift.
Thank you, psychotic world leaders and businessmen, for sharing your future plans for us.
What we do now, Patriots, is get to work on preventing, stopping, and preparing for what's ahead.
I will be back shortly with a video on how we can do just that.
Thank you so much for watching.
Please share this video with your friends who would benefit from it, and if for some reason it gets taken down, which I'm about 95% sure it will, please visit my website at goodpatriot.com or the Warrior Poet Society Network, and you can watch it there.
I'm Good Patriot, thanks again and God Bless!
Just absolutely sensational, in my opinion.
And here's further confirmation.
Well, we got 15,000 Muslim worshippers packing the Temple Mount into fives of COVID restrictions.
Thousands of Muslims.
The broadcaster estimated 15,000.
Israeli security forces prevented dozens of Palestinians from entering.
It was the first time the site had been open after a 45-day shutdown due to rising COVID case numbers.
Already in December, coronavirus czar Zachman Asch of Israel acknowledged Israel had no way to enforce the pandemic restrictions at the Temple Mount.
There is no solution, he said.
Awafa Jordanian-appointed council overseeing Muslim holy sites in Jerusalem claims exclusive authority over the Temple Mount compound, says it's not subject to Israeli jurisdiction.
The Temple Mount is the holiest place in Judaism, the site of the biblical temples, the site of the third holiest shrine in Islam.
Israel captured the Temple Mount in Jerusalem's Old City in the 1967 Six-Day War and extended sovereignty throughout Jerusalem.
However, it allowed the Waft to continue to maintain religious authority atop the Mount.
Where Jews are allowed to visit but not to pray.
Meanwhile, the Temple Mount was also closed for weeks in March when Israel imposed a nationwide lockdown.
Earlier this week, Jerusalem Mayor Moshe Leon warned local Arab officials that unvaccinated residents may not be permitted.
The legality of preventing unvaccinated individuals from attending gatherings or going to work is still under debate, as the country struggles to add incentives to its world-leading vaccination program, which has been losing momentum.
According to data published by CAN News, East Jerusalem is one of the Arab localities with the lowest vaccination rates in the country.
With only 15% of all residents receiving the first inoculation, the number of seriously ill patients in Israel continued a steady decline, reaching 1,002 on Thursday, the lowest number in weeks.
There were also only 54 new seriously ill patients on Thursday, half the amount of the day before.
I find this The numbers are untrustworthy in my opinion because it looks to me as though Israel is using a placebo rather than a real vaccine.
I love the good patriot.
I think she's hitting it right out of the ballpark.
Carl, your thoughts?
Yeah, the good patriot did a very, very good job.
So the situation, going back to what Chris said before, is that we really do have a global empire, and really anybody, any of these other nations could use their people and could use the propaganda the other way.
Their people with titles, put them in a nice suit, good on good media, nice lighting, and could expose and end these false flags, the ongoing lie-started illegal wars of aggression, And the looting by the trillions that Klaus Schwab wants to have us be occupied with anal swabs rather than to understand.
that monetary reform and public banking could go ahead and eliminate 99% of the economic problems.
And then you have this build back better. You know, if you just write that out with lowercase
b b b and then look at what is the closest looking number that looks like 666. What a coincidence that
And then you have Gates, this convicted monopolist, practicing medicine without a license, filling in these screens with vaccines.
I mean, until we win, this is just... I hope this is more of an Emperor's New Clothes end scene with the original Hans Christian Andersen tale for children, is that the children were all pointing And shouting.
And the adults were trying, embarrassed, trying to keep the children quiet from saying the obvious at the naked empire parading in front of them until it was ended in a moment.
Well, they're out to kill 230 million Americans by 2025, and actually billions of the world's population.
It's so stunning.
It's so aggressive.
It's so comprehensive.
It actually boggles the mind.
But that's what they're doing.
Chris, your thoughts?
I have to say as a recent father, children have some of the most amazing natural insights and the most amazing natural instincts in this world and you can probably learn more from your children sometimes in the course of teaching them than you can imagine.
So I think that it's something that we have to really get back to our nature and really look at how our nature has been corrupted by people that have tried to influence it through Social engineering aspects and this political situation that we're seeing is a very perfectly example of this where you're talking about with AOC and her enemies list and things like this staging the Capitol riot and then coming in with the hogwash like she did.
And of course, the moneyed interest behind these endeavors as well with these vaccination carrots on sticks
for help or for subsidies or assistance, that to me is an amazing concept
that I can't believe it's even being floated around out there
and the people aren't just running or fighting like hell against that in itself.
But that's a different conversation in itself there.
So yeah, you're looking at like Bill Gates, putting out these things like vaccines
and buying up the farmland and coming up with the impossible burger and the GMO
while himself using holistic medicine and certainly not going into big pharma
or anything of that nature.
And the Fortune 500 coming up with this all adding this together or the build back another, build back a better, build a burger, whatever they're calling it.
They're trying to push in things like cryptocurrency so that they can really have a better inventory on the tax cattle like a quantum analysis that's going to be maybe governed by AI and seeing the human labor being replaced by robotics.
So, it's always been a war between the robber barons and labor, and I think that this is a new theatrics and a new dimension, and a new psychological as well as physical battlefield that's being maintained and delivered to us.
So, I have to look at this thing through the eyes of a child in a simple manner and realize that if there's ever been an unsustainable demographic, it's certainly not the 99%, it's more like the 1% who takes 95% of the GDP in most nations on Earth, in every UN nation on Earth, I should say.
So, I have to look at who they're targeting in terms of population control and the depopulation agenda, and who they're really going after in terms of patriots.
And that, to me, seems to really be self-evident of what's going on here.
And I think that, really, if these people are all about a eugenics depopulation program, maybe they can start with themselves.
Maybe they can try taking some of their own products, which I don't think they believe in or want anything to do with, but they want to offer them to us and our children.
So I think it's essential to point these these common sense things out.
I don't think you're going to see Bill Gates ever go on a ventilator if he goes to a hospital, I'll tell you that.
But you know, they'll kill anyone in our families that are sent in there and incapacitate them and then do it.
So this is really a massive Medicare fraud that's going on.
And it's It's being funded by the Federal Reserve and Wall Street and Big Pharma, and they're really trying to put the screws to humanity with this nanotech and these adjuvants and these vaccines, which are, I think, and have been proven by many insiders to be carcinogenic delivery systems.
If you listen to like Judy Mikovits or Carrie Majed or Colleen Huber and many others that have talked about this, it's amazing to see what's the sinister nature that's behind this.
And then I'm not even getting into the MRNA or the Neuralase or the stuff that FANGS is trying to put in through DARPA and being funded through subsidies by the Federal Reserve and these Wall Street hedge funds.
So yeah, it's amazing to see this level of corporate socialism that goes on and then the public austerity that's delivered in the face of this.
So, I think that there's a big effort to engineer us socially and to monitor our behavior in this duress, and it will probably lead to our social credit scores and the contingent policies that will be associated with these assistance programs, in my theory.
What are your thoughts?
Wow.
Breathtaking.
Marvelous, Chris.
I mean, just spectacular.
Carl, did you want to add a word?
No!
No, it's just overkill with all this nonsense happening, pretending like it's news and legitimate information, when we should just mock it.
I can't believe it's happening.
I mean, like, how have people not left them out of the room or just, like, chased them out of town?
These guys are snake oil salesmen.
They're scoundrels.
They're highwaymen.
And they need to be called out.
Yeah.
I think you're 100% right, Chris.
100% right.
Meanwhile, Biden's cabinet does not look like America.
In an age of identity politics that puts a premium on skin color, they're really running a racist administration, especially exemplifying white racism.
We're constantly told that Biden's cabinet picks must look like America.
They're set to make history in a number of ways.
Six African-Americans, four Hispanics, three Asian-Americans, one Native American.
Half the nominees are women in terms of their religious backgrounds.
They're also diverse.
The majority, at least eight, are Catholic, but five Jews, two black Baptists, and if the Surgeon General is included, two Hindus, To her credit, Shimran then acknowledges the elephant in the room.
One group not representative?
White evangelicals, the group most loyal to President Trump.
Which raises the embarrassing question, what does America actually look like?
According to the U.S.
Census, America is made up of the following ethnicities.
White, 76%.
Hispanic or Latino, 18.
Black or African, 13.
Asian alone, about 6.
Native American, 1.3.
Considered by self-identified religion, America is, according to the Pew Research Center, overwhelmingly made up by Christians, with Jews, Islam, Islamicists.
He's got the wrong word there.
In Hindus, Muslims.
He means Jews, Muslims, and Hindus representing tiny minorities.
More specifically, the Christians include evangelicals over 25 percent, Catholics over 20, mainline Protestants over 14, historically black, so forth.
In other words, given the total absence of white evangelicals, that white cabinet looks something like, but is Clearly not America.
Catholics are the largest religious group in the Biden cabinet, with 8 of 23, or 35%, with Jews 22, two blacks 9%, and one white Protestant.
As Dr. Albert Moeller, president of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminar, put it in a Wednesday edition of his briefing, we're looking at the fact that if you add the Catholic and the Jewish members of the cabinet together, they actually represent the vast majority of the cabinet.
What makes that astounding, just in historical terms, is throughout most of American history, the vast majority of the President's Cabinet, if not in many administrations, all the members of the President's Cabinet were drawn from white Protestantism, from the established Protestant churches.
So don't expect the Biden Cabinet to pursue policies that would be supported by bipartisan majorities in America.
In a survey conducted, six issues commanded bipartisan majorities.
Increased manufacturing jobs, restoring the nation's infrastructure, making Social Security and Medicare financially solvent, reducing federal debt, cutting federal taxes, increasing school choice.
The first two items might get lip service, but nobody should hold their breath waiting for the other four, especially not reducing the national debt, cutting taxes, or expanding school choices.
The reality is, in a world dominated by identity politics, factors like ethnic and religious identity are merely coverage for left-wing political ideology.
The one factor that unites 100% is their shared vision for a secular, Progressive America in which, among other things, religious faith is strictly a private matter with, at best, a merely ceremonial role in the public square.
This being the case, one needs look no further than abortion.
Biden claims to be Catholic, often attends Mass, and occasionally quotes the Bible, but more than anyone else, he's committed to expanding the rights to abortion.
He wasted no time at all In revoking his predecessor's Mexico policy of not providing foreign aid to institutions that provide abortion, he's left no doubt of his intention to make abortion as widely available as possible.
Maybe his cabinet doesn't really look like America because Joe doesn't think like most Americans.
I think the situation is even considerably worse with the transgender moves and all that.
There's a whole lot going on that I think is very un-American and undemocratic.
Chris, your thoughts?
You want to go to Carl first?
You want me to take it?
Oh, Carl.
Yeah, I'm sorry.
Carl, go ahead.
Yeah, it's just more divide-to-conquer nonsense.
And the economic data is that the richest 1% on planet Earth now own more assets than the 99% Corporate media will never ever tell you that.
And the things, those six things that people want, my one published economics paper with monetary reform and public banking, we could have the only limits to the economy are labor and resources.
We could have the most beautiful cities, we could have full employment, but you're never going to get these ideas from lying, looting corporate media.
And Klaus Schwab and his Great Reset is all about destroying independent thinking and working Americans.
And to do that as well, they're demonizing them by having you be afraid of white supremacist racists when really they're trying to destroy the independent working and the independent thought and the independent spirit which makes up America.
Yeah, you're 100% correct, and we knew this was going to be a wipeout for the middle class if they start shutting down the economy, which was an outrageous thing to do, but there it is.
Chris, your thoughts?
Well, I have many.
Where to start here?
So I think it's kind of interesting to point out that the white race has been lumped in and been just like into a lump sum, and people have been forced to pay the collective punishment and guilt for this supposed demographic.
That is a wide variety of people that have been used in the same way that the minorities have by this group of robber barons and this bloodline.
So you always get the Jews who have this privilege who are never criticized and you always seem to have this token system where they play the caste system of the departmentalized identities against each other in the way that Carl said in a divide-and-conquer manner.
And they use things like religion, race, politics, gender ID, And now they're going to be introducing things like nanotech to really dictate and departmentalize further these technocratic mutants that are created by the externalities of these, let's just say, toxic experiments that are being done on humanity.
So the demographics that arise from this are actually political identities that are being harnessed in many instances by half-truths and emotions to provoke them in ways To turn them into like weapons of mass emotional destruction and it's being instituted through schools and the sense of slave training through these hoaxes like whether it's 9-11 and the last generation or this COVID thing in the current one or pick anything really with the Cold War before that or go on and on.
Really it seems to be a war of like Carl says between the 1% and the 99 in terms of controlling none of the production of goods but jobs and controlling the infrastructure, the crucial levels of infrastructure And really, more importantly, controlling wages.
So you always hear about the build back a better burger, the fight for 15.
Really, that seems to be something that's focused on these menial jobs in the gig economy, where people have to work two, three jobs to stay broke, and they're forced into debt slavery.
They can't even live a livable wage.
I think the conversation is always a controlled dialogue that seems to be dictated by the money and interest as well.
And our political spectrum seems to amount to that as well.
And I think that in many cases, they try to avoid any sort of populism from coming in and setting this right.
So it seems to be funded by think tanks and NGOs, funded by the Fed, and even in the intelligence agencies and by the military and the big banks.
These guys are all working towards the same direction.
And it's certainly not for the benefit of humanity, in my opinion.
Well, I think you got that right.
I do think you got that right.
Meanwhile, the former NSA director retired top officer asks the Supreme Court to declare the military draft to be unconstitutional.
I find this bizarre in the extreme.
The filing is a petition that argues the selective service system is unconstitutional because it applies only to men 18 to 26 and not women.
However, there's been a change where the Pentagon announced it would lift the ban on women in combat jobs back in 2013.
Over the following six years, they opened up all jobs previously closed to women.
If the U.S.
enters a war that requires mobilization of the draft, women will be necessary to meet the military needs.
It's bizarre to me in the extreme.
You have these figures making an action that would actually weaken the nation's ability to respond to an international challenge.
We have a Russian diplomat warning Germany against conspiring to pit Moscow against Minsk.
This has to do with Belarus.
Russia paid attention to the fact some Belarusian opposition activists and representatives of the German authorities were discussing the situation in Belarus within the context of relation with Russia.
This looks as though it's another effort to provoke an anti-Russian attitude.
Meanwhile, the Philippines president has told the U.S.
you have to pay for a troop deal if you're going to have U.S.
forces visiting the Philippines, which seems very reasonable.
European powers are blaming Iran for undermining diplomacy, which seems not Where Iran has even gone so far as to acknowledge the possibility that they might even have to consider developing nuclear weapons, which is heretofore been opposed, which I recently advocated and recommended to them to usher in an era of mutually assured destruction that would bring about great stability in the Middle East, just as the fact that the Soviet Union had the ability to annihilate the United States led to an era of stability during the Cold War.
Carl, your thoughts?
Well, the overall tenor of those reports are all the same.
It's all about fear and blame and holding up the U.S.
as the great hope of democracy and freedom to bring justice to the world if they would only see it our way.
And of course, that's completely Inverse from reality, as the United States is the most dangerous, rogue state, illegal empire in history.
Publicly admitting that they have a nuclear strike first option on Iran.
And then with Belarus, with Lukashenko, he's been the only leader of that country since they broke away from the Soviet Union.
And their elections are about as honest as American.
Nice points.
So, you know, we have all these solutions, but we're never going to get any type of inspiration.
We're never going to get the important facts.
We're always going to be divided and afraid and looking to our leaders to help us with
this type of corporate media propaganda to keep us small and to keep us afraid.
Nice points.
Chris, yours.
Yeah, I think the Selective Service Act is unconstitutional for different reasons.
I think it's because all these children are being sent in as a form of debt slavery to fight in these foolish wars for the privateers and private interests and using our tax dollars to do it.
So I think that there's an entirely different basis for the argument, which will probably not be presented by the political spectrum.
As far as Belarus, I think that Lukashenko is pretty good.
He seems to have been one to call bullshit on the COVID hoax and not take the sellout from the IMF World Bank.
And really, he's been an advocate of sound money and trying to create an independent nation from the IMF structure of debt slavery.
So he kind of is in a good spot in terms of resources and geography and that pipeline that's going to go from the black and Caspian Sea and run a natural gas to Europe.
So, I think that there's some crucial geographic positions that are being fought for and this political spectrum is kind of like the distraction for that or the justification publicly for this.
So, I just want to point that out.
It reminds me a lot of parallels of Ukraine as far as this type of struggle.
Nice, very nice.
Meanwhile, We want to hear from you.
Send fan mail, pro or con, to liveneedtoknowatgmail.com.
Liveneedtoknowatgmail.com.
Marjorie Taylor Greene tweets, another sham impeachment trial without evidence is happening in the Senate.
We should have a real impeachment in the House.
Joe Biden is compromised by our enemies.
Our national security is at stake.
Hashtag Impeach Biden, where she submitted papers to do that right off the bat.
The most infuriating thing is the way everyone ignores the obvious falsity of the Capitol insurrection event.
If only the defense lawyers would mention that.
The rioters were provably not Trump's people.
But the defense sat there and let the House managers smear the case with that allegation.
Someone said to me they'll never expose any false flag, no matter how it could help them, because it would take away their most powerful weapon, meaning the most powerful weapon for both sides.
I had hoped that wasn't true.
I was thinking maybe someone on Trump's side would impose them and expose them in Dassy.
I was hoping someone was outside of these Gladio-style locks.
Where is the military?
You'd think they'd be pissed by now.
Meanwhile, our cherished Constitutional Republic was founded on the impartial rule of law, the indispensable safeguard for our liberties, our rights, and our freedoms.
It's a sad commentary on our times that the unruly, nihilistic Democrat Party in America is given a free pass to denigrate the rule of law, defame law enforcement, cheer mobs, excuse rioters, and transform justice into a tool of political vengeance And persecute, blacklist, cancel, and suppress all people and viewpoints with whom or which they disagree.
The rights of Americans to peaceably and honorably debate the issues of the day without malice is paramount.
The second bogus impeachment of the most honorable President Trump has been yet another phase in the greatest witch hunt in the history of our country.
No president has ever gone through such disgraceful disrespect.
And it continues because the Stalinist Democrats cannot accept the fact that close to 75 million citizens legally voted for one of America's greatest presidents of all time.
Moreover, This was the highest number of legitimate votes ever recorded for a sitting peace-loving president I dare say for any candidate everywhere since the Biden numbers are fabricated and fake.
These millions of legal and legitimate voters are decent, hard-working, law-abiding, God- and country-loving citizens who have bravely supported the important principles of constitutional government during these times of Democrat-inspired racism, election fraud, and despotic authoritarianism.
Meanwhile, the X-22 report.
Trump, you won't see me for a while.
Be extremely mysterious to direct your opponent's fate.
Trump has told us a plan the entire time.
We weren't listening closely enough.
Yes, he is going to bring down the entire system.
Yes, he's going to make arrests.
But first, he will wake up America.
And have the deep state feels pain during the entire process.
He's allowing them to be exposed to as many people as possible.
He's going to attack them when they least expect it.
He told us he was going away for a while.
He told us Joe Biden will probably be removed by the 25th Amendment.
He said a long time ago he needed to drain the swamp.
Everything is in motion and the deep state is finished.
Last phase.
Meanwhile, any of you whose minds are open to conspiracy, you can benefit from the bonanza of a Volkswagen Conspiracy 2020 conference, 24 presentations.
Check it out at VolkswagenConspiracy2020.com, VolkswagenConspiracy2020.com.
Remember, the secret of freedom lies in educating people, the secret of tyranny in keeping them ignorant.
Our final thoughts, Carl.
I'm with Dave with the X-22 Report.
This is an Emperor's New Clothes condition.
And the U.S.
military has all of the ammunition.
None of the offense has been used.
All of the damning evidence, all of the NSA having all of the communications to destroy and expose these psychopathic, looting, lying criminals.
And we can calculate the cost of the American Empire of annually killing millions, harming billions, and looting trillions of dollars.
So, I can appreciate the concept that the military would have to do a lot more work to get the truth out and to have it stick.
As a scholar, I've been engaged for 44 years now, beginning with Lobbying for ending poverty that led to two UN summits for heads of state.
And with 44 years of experience with poverty, economics, war, I've gotten nowhere.
The people closest to me radiating out, all I can do is point to the facts, but I've been completely ineffective of any lasting social change.
So I have great respect for the military who would have gained this entire thing out and the possibility that this is going to be like everything else that we try with home improvement projects is going to take a lot longer than we think.
Now all that said, March 4th is the deadline that I'm putting for myself to re-engage with my own school district regarding these illegal orders to keep our families of our communities declared as non-essential workers And to pretend that we can be threatened with a year in jail if we walk closer than six feet from a person and find $1,000 for every incidence of that.
So I hope that the white hats in the military are there and that they're ready to strike and that will happen soon.
Chris, your final thoughts?
Yeah, I have my legitimate concerns, I believe, about the deep state regulating and self-regulating the deep state and many of the pushes of the Q phenomenon seems to be ignorant of Zionist and United Kingdom operations to some extent or to the extent to which I've seen it.
So, I think that these bankers that have run the Cold War against each side of this are using the same situation maybe now to pivot us between one side going against China, one side going against Russia.
Well, the same financiers control the intellectual property and just let us clash over the theatrics and the perceived conflicts that they're creating in the first place.
So, I think that a gladial program has been run against the American people for a long time, and it's run domestically by many instruments of the central banks, and the FBI seems to be one of the banker's gestapos that are at least If not in on the the deliverance at least in on the cover up or the bungling of the investigation so I think they really take a lot of stuff out of local law enforcement's hands and put it in their own and then just run these these cases into the shelf or the
Basically into a nowhere situation.
So I think there's also a strong effort to invert perceptions and to control perception management as well.
And it's all seemed to be to take our assets and to take our rights.
And it seems to be the goal of this political operation.
So I hope that there are white hats out there.
Because there seem to be a lot of absurdities that are becoming the brave new normal and I think they're really trying to disenfranchise the majority of people and divide and to conquer and departmentalize us accordingly.
So yeah, if there are white hats out there, I'd love to see them and I'd like to see it happen sometime soon because we've already lost a whole year with the charade and I don't know how much longer they're going to let this blizzard of shamelessness keep going on.
Well, this is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin, thanking Carl Herman in San Ramon, California, and Chris Walker from Detroit, Michigan.
They're two brilliant guys with a lot to say, and they're spot on.
We've lost a year.
To this monstrosity.
It's a complete and total hoax and a sham.
Bone up on it.
Watch our shows and you know what we're up against.
I do believe the military would never allow this to happen.
I do believe it's just a matter of timing.
I do believe March 4th is going to be a crucial date in American history.
So I'm very glad you could join us today.
Tomorrow, please return for more of the news you need to know.
▲
Export Selection