Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Feb. 13, 2021 - Jim Fetzer

01:55:08

The Raw Deal (12 February 2021) with Adam Protester

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	There'll be nobody left behind to grieve, and we will all go together when we go.
	What a comforting fact that is to know.
	Universal bereavement, an inspiring achievement.
	Yes, we all will go together when we go.
	We will all go together when we go.
	This is Jim Fetzer, your host on The Raw Deal, where I have a special guest today I'll introduce
	in a moment who's very outspoken, has lots of strong opinions.
	He also has spent a lot of time on the streets of the District of Columbia.
	He can't explain.
	Before I turn to him, I wanted to say the impeachment by the House has hit a major snag.
	I think it's basically been derailed, not only by the evidence, which would be highly relevant if this were a real legal case rather than a political stunt.
	That Trump did not commit any form of incitement, that they have edited the videos to take out where he emphasizes peacefully and patriotically where the key and where his own followers could not have been at the Capitol in time to participate in the breach.
	This is all very obvious from the timeline, but more importantly, because they've had to deal with The FBI and Capitol Police reporting they were aware of the violent threats days before the riot, were warned about a looming war, that Trump had offered to send 10,000 troops, which they had declined again and again, where even the head of the Capitol Police asserted that he requested additional backup in advance five or six times
	Which were turned down, and I believe Nancy Pelosi was involved here, but we have a Michigan senator thinking the Capitol riot was staged and Mitch McConnell was in on it, where we have James, a brother of leftist provocateur John Sullivan, claiming John, his brother, led 226 Antifa members into the Capitol.
	So that we now have the situation that they're having to argue the Capitol riot was not the result of Trump's inciting his supporters at the Ellipse that day, but rather required, you know, gradual incitement of a long period of time.
	This is very embarrassing.
	David Schoen, a former President Trump's defense attorney, told reporters Thursday That the Democrats were making a movie and have failed to tie the Capitol breach to Trump.
	We have reports about the members there, the participants in the riot, claiming they were there because of Trump.
	I support Trump, fighting for Trump.
	We are defending Trump.
	We're here at his invitation, which is just absurd and revealing of the fact that this was a complete and total hoax notice in particular.
	The timing of the intrusion into the Capitol was such that it disrupted completely the discussion of the evidence of election fraud.
	And yet the entire speech Trump had given, he was emphasizing election fraud and the theft of the 2020 vote.
	So why in the world would he want to disrupt that?
	He has no motive, because if people weren't there, he had no means.
	And most certainly, he could have claimed to have the ability to incite, but the fact of the matter is he did not incite.
	They're going back so far as to talk about Charlottesville, Virginia, but I've done a huge amount on that.
	It was another leftist staged event.
	the Virginia governor, Terry McAuliffe, a buddy of Hillary Clinton, and the mayor of
	Charlottesville, have the Charlottesville police stand down so the Virginia State Police
	could maneuver the peaceful protest against the removal of a statue of Robert E. Lee,
	channeled them into a violent confrontation with Antifa and Black Lives Matter, to be
	bused in by George Soros, many on the same bus, and we're a few blocks away.
	They had a completely staged event involving an automobile.
	It was a Dodge Challenger.
	But as I have explained in many places, check out, for example, How to Spot a False Flag, Part 1 and Part 2, which you can access at jimtheconspiracyguide.com.
	There were two cars, two Dodge Challengers.
	One had a racing stripe, one didn't.
	One had a sunroof, one didn't.
	We had two different drivers, a 20-year-old diagnosed schizophrenic with thick prescription glasses versus a 32-year-old combat veteran who commands a battalion of reservists in Ohio who was actually driving the car.
	So they prosecuted the wrong guy.
	Not only that, but there are two or three different takes.
	One where the Dodge Challenger, driven by the guy from Ohio, crashed into the back of two vans that had been parked there with no drivers sitting in the driver's seat so they wouldn't suffer whiplash or any kind of damage from the collision.
	and another where you see the challenger with no vehicles around him whatsoever.
	And eventually a third scenario would be published on the cover of the New York Times with a black
	Toyota pickup that's not visible in either of the two takes I just described, and where they make
	much of claiming that this woman, Heather Heyer, died at the scene.
	But Mona Alexis Presley, who's done such brilliant work on Las Vegas, discovering that the obituaries for the alleged victims were based on persons who died in different states or on different dates or from different causes of death, discovered Heather Heyer actually died the following day of a heart attack.
	Where the mother of the alleged victim, Heather Heyer, who calls herself Susan Brough, turns out to be the same mother who played the role of Donna Soto in Sandy Hook for Victoria Soto.
	It's the same woman.
	So we're being played again and again and again.
	Not only that, but because they doctored the videos, they've omitted some of the most important evidence.
	Trump's offering the D.C.
	security decision-makers a use of 10,000 National Guard personnel he'd authorized, repaired, and were standing ready if called upon.
	Charging documents brought against riot participants show rioters had fundraised and organized the event through venues like Facebook days or weeks in advance of the event itself.
	Two pipe bombs were set in place the evening of January 5th, long before Trump's speech the following day.
	The rioting began while Trump was still giving the speech.
	It's something like a 30-minute walk between the two locations.
	Those who rioted arrived prepared with special equipment suitable for rioting and climbing that are not seen at any normal peaceful protest, nor were there present at any prior Trump rally, one could cite.
	I believe that the Trump defense team today is going to blow the Democrat case out of the water.
	We already have a report from one senator observing that the more they talk, the more they lose credibility.
	This has just been a vet Trump fest.
	They're trying not only to discredit Donald Trump, but to discourage supporters from maintaining any enthusiasm from the guy who, in my regard, is perhaps the best president of the last half dozen or more.
	And if it all plays out the way I believe, maybe the greatest president in history, I know my guest has a different impression.
	But I'll tell you this, the way in which the Democrats have incited the riots in the streets, including Kamala Harris, including Maxine Waters, including Nancy Pelosi, justifies the following observation.
	Look, son, the same folks who openly endorsed an entire summer of riots are impeaching a private citizen for a single incident that he openly condemned.
	I think that's how it's playing out.
	Now, I'm pleased to have a special guest here today who uses the handle Adam DT Protester.
	Adam, join the conversation.
	Give us a bit of your background, how you wound up on the streets of Washington, D.C.
	Well, Jim, thanks for having me on the show.
	I really appreciate it.
	It's great to break through the censorship that people are experiencing a little bit now, but I've been experiencing for 30 years.
	So, that's a really big get, and I appreciate that, and you made that possible.
	But that being said, you know, I came on to talk about 9-11 and the information I have, that smoking gun information, very important information, And I have to strongly stake a position out since you decided to talk about the, what I call an armed insurrection, an attempted coup that succeeded for an hour.
	So I'll be posting my response of the timeline, in my view, and everything Trump did, because I feel he's like George Costanza, you know, hiding underneath his desk as a middle manager of the Yankees, hiding out in the Oval Office so he can escape prosecution.
	That's my take.
	On what I consider to be a career criminal con man.
	You know, if I went into the evidence I have, I think, you know, it'd shock people.
	So I'm not going to go there, especially out of respect for the fact that you support him.
	Your listeners probably support him as well.
	But I strongly disagree with your narrative about what happened at the Capitol.
	So I'll post what I have on LinkedIn.
	And people can read that, and then, you know, that's what a free country is about, and that's what you believe in, that's what I believe in, which is dialogue, right?
	We don't have to agree on everything, but we should reach an understanding so there can be peace.
	We can't be censoring each other, we can't be demonizing each other, we have to be rational, we have to be reasonable, we have to listen to what each other have to say, and then we have to draw our conclusions.
	Because tolerance and affirmation are not the same thing.
	I'm not going to affirm something that makes me surrender what I believe, but I will tolerate everyone and everything.
	One of the problems in this country is the politicians, the political class, are forcing us to be so angry and divided because they're conflating tolerance and affirmation.
	Somebody that believes in Jesus Is not going to say amen to dudes sticking their dick in each other's ass and calling it enlightenment and gay marriage is not a thing.
	We're not going to believe that.
	I don't care if you put a gun to my head and shoot me.
	I am not going to say amen to teaching children that is normal behavior.
	And so they put us in a position where they conflate tolerance and affirmation and they put us in a box so that we look like extremists.
	I'm not an extremist.
	I love Jesus.
	I believe in Jesus, I believe in the Bible, I believe that marriage is between one man and one woman.
	Now that should be accepted and tolerated by everyone, just as I accept and tolerate that people are gay.
	But when you start to use the government to force me to say amen to gay marriage, I'm sorry, but I'm not going to get on board with Casper the Gay Friendly Federal Law, where you overthrow four states, constitutions, Legislative enactments in order to force that on people.
	And that's what the Conflation of Tolerance and Affirmation does.
	It says, we're not just going to tolerate, we're going to force you to affirm.
	I'm sorry, I'm not going to affirm something I disagree with.
	And I strongly disagree with your narrative about Trump and the coup.
	Okay?
	So I just wanted to put that out there and perhaps now we can talk about 9-11.
	Well, you may or may not know, Adam, that I founded Scholars for 9-11 Truth, that I've organized symposia all over the world on 9-11, that I've been flown around the world to give presentations, that I've published two books on 9-11.
	So if you want to share with us what you regard as your findings about 9-11, I most certainly Welcome back, because it was, in my judgment, a massive false flag brought to us compliments of the CIA, the neocons, and the Department of Defense, most of whom were dual US-Israeli citizens in the Mossad.
	To give a fake pretext for bringing American forces into the Middle East to take out the modern Arab states that served as a counterbalance to Israel's domination of the entire region, and eventually to confront the Persian nation with Iran.
	I just give that as a broad sketch outline of my take, but I'm fascinated to hear what you have to say about it.
	And I certainly appreciate the way in which you've just delineated your views vis-a-vis Donald Trump and the Capitol intrusion, because we disagree very strongly.
	But I like the way you have presented yourself, and I invite you to proceed with your findings from your research on 9-11.
	Well, thanks, Professor Fetzer, and I do consider you a professor because one of the things a professor is supposed to do, from the first professor, I guess, like Socrates and Plato, when they created their Lyceum, is we don't want to pour knowledge into somebody.
	We want to ignite their mind so that they can teach themselves.
	And so professors, by nature, are supposed to ignite the mind and You know, lead people to a place where they have a healthy skepticism, an open mind, and they're willing to debate, and they're not afraid of conflict.
	They're not afraid to contest truths.
	They're not afraid to question anything, because there can be no freedom.
	I want to make something very clear to everybody that's listening that calls themselves an American.
	A lot of people call themselves that.
	I don't think they know what an American is.
	But if you want to be free, one of the predicates of being free is freedom of conscience, and freedom of thought, and freedom of expression.
	Anybody out there who believes in censorship of any kind, on any subject, for any reason, you are not an American.
	You are not.
	Pack your bags and leave.
	You are not an American.
	We believe, in this country, That people should be able to discuss any subject to any length with any advocacy and draw whatever conclusions they want because ideas do not hurt people.
	What hurts people is actions.
	And that's why criminal law should never decide something's a crime without a dead body.
	It's not enough for somebody to have the mens rea, they have to have the actus reus.
	We disagree on Trump and, you know, I'll post my answer online because I don't want this show to go down that path, but I'm just saying, anybody that believes in censorship, anybody that says you can't question this, you can't question that, that's not the scientific method, that's not nature, that's not science, that is not the American way.
	So I just wanted to say that before I start because the information I'm about to present to people, and I guess If they're tuning into you, and they can have visuals, you'll probably put up the information I sent you, and we can go through that.
	You can kind of lead me through what you're showing, and then I can speak on that.
	But just as an introduction, before we get started, I'll say this.
	There's a communications modality that the conspirators use.
	Now, they're not very bright people.
	Criminals are generally stupid people.
	Some of them have cunning.
	Like I would consider Obama and Trump to both be cunning.
	I think George Bush is cunning.
	I think Bill Clinton and his wife are cunning.
	But they're not intelligent.
	They're not wise.
	Wisdom is like a providence of God.
	You have to fear the Lord before God will give you wisdom.
	So you might have a bit of an intellect.
	You might be cunning.
	But I don't think you're wise.
	So criminals are pretty stupid.
	And so, if we want to explain their communications modality, which I would like to do today on your show, and I'd like people to go and download a free copy.
	It doesn't cost you a dime.
	It's only 112 pages, which might seem like a lot, but it's got a lot of visuals in it, so there's not a ton of reading.
	But if you look at this communications modality and the evidence in it that prove that 9-11 was pre-planned May 27, 1974, And that Kissinger called for that in his National Security Memorandum No.
	200, April 24, 1974.
	You'll see that it isn't so crazy after all, because that communications modality is something everybody's familiar with.
	And so I'd like to begin, before we start to show the visuals and go through them, which is proof and evidence that 9-11 was pre-planned, I'd like to talk about communications modalities.
	So, everybody should understand Whether they believe in God or not, whether they believe in the Bible or not, the Bible is a thing.
	It's, like, the most published and most read and most knowable book on the planet.
	So, everybody knows the Bible.
	Now, if you talk to somebody who really does know the Bible, who's a Bible scholar, somebody who believes in God,
	they'll tell you that the oral traditions that give us the first books, the Pentateuch,
	the first five books of the Bible, when it was the Old Testament before the Greek Septuagint,
	which is the entire canon of the Bible from beginning to end.
	But back in the day when they just had the first Bible, it was oral.
	So in other words, there was an Aaronite priesthood.
	And in order to become a priest, you had to be born into the Aaronite tribe
	and you had to repeat word for word without flaw the Bible scripture back to the priest.
	Only then could you be a priest.
	And so, this is a form of communications modality, where the priest is in control of the canon, and you have to learn the canon perfectly, repeat it back to him to become a priest.
	Now, as time went on, the priesthood became the Levite priesthood.
	And they found that the thing they wanted to avoid, the demutation, or the dilution of the Bible, was happening anyways.
	And so you started to get more than one oral tradition.
	So they said, well, guys, we've got to write this down.
	There's so much conflict, fratricide, father against son, mother against daughter, you know, infighting amongst us that we need to write this down.
	But they didn't want to go full tilt writing it down because, again, they were worried that if you wrote it down that anybody could get a copy and start to betray everybody and turn the Word of God on its head, create false Bibles.
	So what they did is they wrote it down, but they only wrote the consonants.
	So you still needed to go To have your oral recitation to become a priest by getting all that information from the priest.
	So this is a traditional, well-known, absolutely reality-based communications modality where the person who controls the symbols controls the message and therefore controls the people, but in a good way, because it was God's Word.
	So that should tell you right now, okay, okay, we know in reality, I can go get my Bible, I can look at the four oral traditions, the priestly, the Yahwistic, the Elohistic, the Deuteronomic, and I can see that, yes, that checks out.
	There's such a thing as a communications modality where a group or an individual controls the symbols, controls the message, and controls the people, in this case, hopefully for the good.
	There's another reality-based example of this communications modality, so people can see that it's reality, it's not crazy conspiracy theory, and that is the intelligence agencies.
	So, I'm not going to do a deep dive into how the CIA is not an American institution, in my view, how they were already co-opted and infiltrated and taken over in Switzerland, when Alan Dahls was what you would call a station chief, even though they didn't call him that then, During World War II with the OSS.
	So I won't do a deep dive of that, but that's an important history everybody should research and look into.
	The CIA is a vehicle through which the foreign powers have been able to take over our military and take over our political class, just like the unconstitutional currency.
	And again, we don't have to do a deep dive on that right away.
	So the bottom line is, is that the CIA has an intelligence Proprietary interest in businesses.
	This is well-known.
	I mean, if you look into the Arkansas evidence about Park on Meter creating the parts for the illegal war in Nicaragua, if you look at basically any operation, whether it's Mossadegh being removed in Iran, I think Jay Rockefeller and Kermit Roosevelt were involved in that.
	You look at these things and when they operate with private companies like George Bush Senior's Zapata Oil and Operation Zapata, you look at these things and you see that there's a proprietary ownership of companies.
	And when the intelligence agencies do that, like moving companies, like Urban Moving for 9-11, what they do is they use these in a positive way according to intelligence and they use it
	in a negative way when they're doing bad things
	but the bottom line is it's real it's reality-based and it happens all the
	time so i'm gonna take you down a little fictional narrative so
	you can get i'd get an understanding
	of what i'm talking about it unless you have some input at this point
	no you go right ahead go right ahead okay so
	one of the things about the c.i.a. is that they don't want edward
	They don't actually want that guy.
	He was actually a private contractor.
	I know he had a military background and he tried to get into special ops, but he's not the guy they want.
	He's the guy that might look to be recruited, but the guy they want is kind of like smarter than your average ape.
	But basically an ape.
	They don't want a really smart guy, because a really smart guy who's an ultra-patriot is going to read the Constitution and understand it.
	It's not that long.
	He's going to understand our history.
	It's not that complex.
	And he's going to come to the conclusion, yo, these guys are Satan.
	They're like totally traitors, and they're totally destroying the country from the inside, and they're allowing foreigners to control our foreign policy, and this is nuts.
	So they don't want a guy like that.
	They want a guy who's like the ultra- Ultimate Patriot, but he doesn't question things.
	He's pretty stupid, actually.
	So these are the guys they recruit.
	So they go to a college like Yale or Harvard, and they find some guy in the engineering department, mechanical design, tool and dye, material sciences.
	And so they recruit that guy in college, and they tell him, look man, we're going to pay your college, we're going to give you a job, your life is set.
	It's like the best day of this dude's life, right?
	His parents might have been poor miners in Virginia.
	So he says, yeah, man, this is great.
	And so he gets on board.
	And they have a proprietary, say, tool-and-die company that they've bought or have a huge interest in.
	They set up an office.
	They put his name on the office.
	They get him a secretary.
	It's a legit place to work.
	That way of counterintelligence from KGB, the NSB, the Chinese Communists, whoever, Goes to check, they'll see, yeah, this guy's actually a tool-and-die guy who works at this company.
	So then, once they set that up, he gets out of college, he gets that job, he gets paid, they cut him a check, he then, if, say I'm a case officer in Langley, and I'm sending this guy, hello?
	And I'm sending this guy, I send this guy behind the Iron Curtain to, um, I don't know, one of those, uh, satellite countries back in the day that was part of the Warsaw Pact.
	And I can't communicate with him.
	If I pick up the phone and communicate with this guy, he's dead.
	They're going to roll him up, they're going to roll his whole network up, and he's done.
	So I have to have a way of communicating with him without directly communicating with him.
	And so in addition to the proprietary tool-and-die company, I also have a proprietary interest in a magazine that produces tool-and-die, material science, engineering-type articles.
	And they sell, and they buy, and they advertise for workers, and it's just like your typical magazine.
	It's no different than any other magazine.
	However, when he comes to Langley, I let him know, look, this magazine that we operate is published every week.
	And so if you pick up the third week starting today, that means you won't be picking up the same weekly magazine.
	Since it's published four times a week and you're picking it up all the time, the first time it's the third week, the next time it's the second week, And on and on.
	It just keeps skipping.
	So you're not picking up the same one.
	So I tell them, every third week from today, you start picking up that magazine and focusing on it.
	But I want you to pick it up all the time.
	I want you to read it.
	Circle the ads.
	Order stuff.
	We'll buy it.
	We'll have it shipped.
	I want you to attend conferences.
	So in other words, keep your cover.
	Maintain your cover and the credentials we set up for you from the time you were in college.
	However, when you pick up that third issue, You're picking it up every week, but when you pick up the 3rd, the 3rd this week, 3rd of the week this month, next week it's the 2nd, and on and on, I want you to look at the 9th page.
	And I want you to look at the 11th word.
	And if you do that and you go down and look at the 11th word in sequence, those words together will be the message I want to send you.
	And I don't want you to circle these words, I want you to memorize them, and we teach them how to memorize things pneumatically, or pneumonically, however you pronounce that word, So that they are able, trained, that they don't have to write it down and circle it.
	They can do it in their mind, right?
	Again, we're not hiring dudes that can do that, you know, very well.
	So we train them.
	We give them little tricks so they can do that.
	Now that is absolutely 100% the truth.
	And every intelligence agency, whether it's the German, the Communist Chinese, the Russians, every single intelligence agency on this earth does that.
	So that's the way they communicate without directly communicating, and it's a communications modality.
	And so now that the people can see that there's a legitimate, actual, historical, and present-day example of this communications modality, I certainly do not expect them to lose their marbles and call me a crazy conspiracy theorist when I say the near-retarded, inbred imbeciles who kill people for profit because that's all they can do with their lives have hijacked that communications modality and are putting it to use and they are doing it to kill people for profit and that is brutal to find out but it's absolutely the truth and we need to look at this truth we need to deal with this truth and we need to lock up the criminals we have to stop
	With locking up the innocent, we have to stop putting Assange in Belmarsh and Snowden in Russia and Thomas Drake under indictment.
	We need to stop persecuting the innocent and we need to start locking up the traitors.
	We have to show them the same mercy in their guilt that they show us in our innocence, which is zero!
	And if we don't do that, then we deserve to lose the country.
	We deserve to be slaves.
	We deserve to be put in jail.
	We deserve to be forced sterilized.
	We deserve to be forced vaccinated.
	We deserve to have our lives destroyed.
	Because we were handed something valuable.
	Something nobody else was handed.
	And if we lose it, don't look at your neighbor, buddy.
	Look at yourself.
	So let's end the censorship.
	Let's look at this information, let's check out this information, let's verify this information, let's not be afraid to think, let's not be afraid to debate, let's not let people tell us you can't look at this, you can't think about this, you can't debate this, you can't question this.
	You say, no, I'm an American, I think for myself, I stand on my own two feet, I have faith in the Lord, I will look, I will think, and I will come to my own conclusions.
	And with that introduction, I'd like maybe you to start throwing up the information I sent you, and you can introduce it, tell me what you're showing the people, and then I can give you a fuller explanation.
	Well, I hate to disappoint you, Adam, but I hadn't anticipated that you wanted there to be visuals, so I don't have them up, and I would have sent you a Zoom link if we were going to do a visual.
	I just want you to lay out your evidence.
	The audience is pretty familiar with a lot of the visual evidence, so just proceed as best you can under these circumstances.
	Sure.
	So you were going to send me a Zoom link, I just don't have that capability right now, and thanks a lot for that.
	Okay.
	So basically, what I discovered was, first of all, that they're using that communications modality to communicate.
	And so I discovered what I call the Original Plan Dissemination.
	So if they're going to use mass media to communicate with each other, so that they don't have to have direct communication, Then there's a couple things they need.
	They need to have control of a proprietary publishing company that they have the proprietary interest in, so they control what gets published in it.
	They have to hire their own people, and they have to craft it into a narrative That produces the evidence or the message that they want to give their conspirators and which I call evidence because we can see it and we can deconstruct it and say, Hey, this is a communications modality that's telling people what's going to happen 27 years in advance.
	So if people were to visit, I'm going to send a talk to Mitchell and send you a bunch of links to put in whatever informational blurb you have at the bottom of this podcast.
	So people can have links to go to.
	So if you were to go to the New York Magazine website and you were to Google May 27, 1974, you would find that there is a copy still online.
	I have copies of it myself on various media, so it's preserved.
	I recommend everybody goes and gets a copy of every single page of this magazine, puts it on media, and preserves it.
	It's very, very important you do this.
	Because in the era of censorship and in the era of electronic media, they don't have to burn books, yo.
	They just press the button and that information's gone.
	So one of the links I had, I'm going to read it out.
	I don't know if anybody's even going to record this and copy the link down, but go ahead and try.
	Maybe you can take a minute right now.
	I'll give you a couple minutes.
	Actually, I'm going to explain some stuff, and that gives people at home an opportunity to go get a recording device of some kind Well, Adam, the show is recorded.
	It's available in an archive.
	I'm recording it right now.
	So don't go overboard here.
	Just lay out what you want us to understand.
	Okay, so the link would be to the New York Magazine.
	So that's not New Yorker.
	It's New York Magazine, May 27, 1974.
	Now when you go and click on that little GUI graphic of the front cover, you'll be able to see every page of that magazine.
	And what I'm telling you is that every Sequence 9, Sum 11 set page has exact information about what I call Reichstag 9-11 27 years in advance.
	And I'm not saying this is, you know, doubtful.
	I'm saying that when you look at this magazine, You will inescapably come to the absolute conclusion that just like the Bible, just like the intelligence agencies do, these two conspirators are using a trade magazine or a magazine as a communications modality to recruit, to plan, and to execute murder.
	It's unbelievable.
	However, if you go and Google New York Magazine, May 27, 1974, I have a picture of it right now, because I'm on my computer, and if you look at that, you'll be surprised at the front page, because it's a picture of the North Tower and Building Number 7, and North Tower is on fire, and there's people trapped at the top of the building, and the title is, What Are Your Chances of Surviving a High-Rise Fire?
	Now, at first, you're going to say, well, that sounds like you're taking facts and fitting it to a narrative, but I'm letting you know right now, as God is my witness, If you go get this magazine, and you look at every Sequence 9, Sum 11 page, it's going to have exact information about 9-11, 27 years in advance, including the North Tower gash.
	So when you look at the North Tower gash, which a lot of us have been saying is a cookie-cutter gash, is something that was controlled charges, where they wrapped them around those perimeter columns and made that look like a plane inserted itself into the building?
	No joke.
	Pardon?
	Pardon?
	No, go ahead, go ahead, go ahead.
	Okay, so if you were to stand in front of that building on 9-11 and take a picture of the gash, which we have a ton of pictures of, and you were to look at this magazine, the cover page story on a sequence 9, sum 11, set page 65, and I'm going to explain what a sequence 9, sum 11, set page is for those people that aren't savvy to this kind of, you know, stuff.
	It's simple math, but You know, it might be difficult for some people, so I'll break that down.
	But, you go to page 65, and it's the cover story pages, what are your chances of surviving?
	Well, pretty darn good, if 27 years in advance, you even know about the North Tower Dash!
	You know about the date, you know about where it's taking place in New York, you know the target, the World Trade Centers, you know everything.
	So, let me give the link now.
	H-T-T-P-S, colon, forward slash, forward slash, books.google.com, forward slash, books, question mark, ID equals, small n, dash, Small K, capital C, capital A, A, A, A, so that's four capital A's, then a capital N. Adam, Adam, you can do searches just by titles, which are much easier to understand than links.
	Don't give us URLs, just give us titles.
	Okay, so anyways, go check out that magazine, May 27, 1974, New York, and if you get a copy of it, you'll see what I'm talking about.
	Okay, so.
	What was the title of the article?
	Oh, you don't have to do that.
	Just go to the link for the magazine and the articles inside it, because you need the whole magazine.
	I'm about to explain that.
	Okay, so when I talk about a Sequence 9, Sum 11 set, what I mean by that is, if I were to take the numbers 29, 38, 47, 56, 65, 74, 83, 92, that would be a Sequence 9, Sum 11 set.
	47, 56, 65, 74, 83, 92. That would be a sequence 9 sum 11 set.
	And the reason I call it that is because the difference between each number is 9,
	and each number adds up to 11.
	So what you're seeing is 9-11, 9-11, 9-11, 9-11, repeated over and over and over, and on every one of those pages is information about what happens on 9-11.
	Now, people might think, well, that sounds really crazy, and again, that's why I started by explaining that there's a communications modality, the Bible, that they have in their house right now, and there's the intelligence agencies.
	Because it's easy to see something that's pre-existing, hijack it, and use it in a terrible way.
	This is parasitical, and that's the very nature of evil.
	It's a parasite.
	You know, you can't murder somebody unless they're alive.
	God has to create before you can destroy what God has created.
	So, when you look at this magazine, you will see immediately that picture on the front cover, and yes, you can go to the cover story, which is on page 65 of Sequence 9, Sum 11 page, and you can read the story.
	Now, I just want to read people the first paragraph of that cover story, and I want them to think about what they saw on TV and what they read on September 12, 2001.
	27 years later, when they woke up the next day, they saw the images on TV, they read the articles, listened to what was written on a Sum 11, sequence 9, page 65, the cover pager's story of What Are Your Chances of Surviving, first paragraph.
	There they were on television, the bodies falling from a high building, spinning in the air, silhouetted against the flames, and smoke behind them.
	The next morning, there they were on the front pages of the papers, caught in mid-air, as firemen and spectators watched, horrified.
	Now Jim, if you read that on September 12th, would that be 100% correct?
	Well, just keep laying on, Adam.
	You're doing a great job here.
	Just know, this audience knows 9-11 is an inside job, okay?
	So, there's no resistance here to that.
	So, you can just give us More, you're talking about how it was all laid out in advance, and I agree with all of that, and you're making very interesting points about where and how exactly it was done, which is valuable information I myself did not previously possess.
	So keep going, just keep on.
	So if you read that first paragraph of that cover story page of that magazine, New York, With the North Tower and the Building 7 on front, North Tower in flames, people trapped, what are your chances of surviving?
	Right there, that should say to you, well that's a huge coincidence, that can't be entirely crazy, can it?
	But there's more!
	So, if you look at the table of contents, you'll see the first shot of the North Tower gash.
	It's a black and white little still, very small, but it shows the North Tower gash, and then when you go to the cover story, page that I just read the first paragraph that totally explains... I mean, if I wrote that on September 12th, I'd get a Pulitzer Prize.
	It's like a perfect paragraph to sum up what happened on 9-11.
	But it was written in 1974.
	So you look at the cover story page next to the front first page with that paragraph, and you'll see a picture of the North Tower.
	And the North Tower gash, again, drawn perfectly, the right location, the exact look of what the North Tower gash ended up looking like, which proves two things.
	Not just that it was pre-planned, but that the cookie-cutter charges were cookie-cutter charges, because the plane does not fit in that space, and planes don't evaporate, and at the end of the day, what I like people to think about when they question 9-11 is simply think of this.
	You saw the giant fireball.
	You saw it.
	Whether it's the supposed jet fuel, whether it's an explosion, you saw the giant fireball.
	Now, 80% of that fireball was outside the building.
	So if jet fuel is responsible, jet fuel is carried in the wings of a plane.
	When the jet fuel in the wings of a plane, which are kept away from the fuselage so that the people inside the plane have the least amount of risk of being burned to death, When those planes explode and the fuel explodes, it doesn't turn back into liquid.
	It doesn't just explode partially.
	All the fuel explodes.
	So if you think it was a plane, and you think the fuel in the wings exploded, well dude, you saw the fireball.
	How did the fire You know, how did the plane wings explode, the fuel explode, and then not explode to turn back into liquid to run through the buildings to melt the steel and turn the concrete to dust?
	Which is absurd on the face of it.
	But how does that happen?
	So people can go look at what they saw.
	Some people are now 20 years old.
	They never saw a thing.
	Go back and look at what is shown on 9-11 and you will see the giant fireballs.
	Well, those were jet fuel.
	The jet fuel blew up!
	It couldn't, it couldn't be liquid, it couldn't run through the building to melt all the steel.
	A hundred and ten floors?
	A hundred and ten floors!
	There was enough fuel left over from that explosion of the wings to run through a hundred and ten floors of a building and melt all the steel?
	Okay then, so the jet, uh, or sorry, the North Tower gash is also there.
	Now the next thing I'd like to point out to people is that if you look at Sequence 9, sum 11, page 74.
	So 7 plus 4 is 11.
	65 plus 9 is 74.
	74 plus 9 is 83.
	Again, 8 plus 3 is 11.
	6 plus 5 is 11.
	This is a sequence 9, sum 11 set.
	Any mathematician or even teacher of grade school can tell you what a sequence 9, sum 11 set is.
	So if you look at page 74, The sequence 9, sum 11, set 9, 11, 9, 11, over and over again, you'll see this really weird one-page, I guess, ad, right?
	And it says, there's a whole new way to watch the news in New York by the numbers.
	Now that's complete nonsense, right?
	You know, that's complete nonsense.
	But it's not nonsense If you have the instructions to decode what they're trying to say to you, what they're trying to communicate, and most of us, we're not part of a gang, we're not Masons, we're not Mormons, we're not the KKK, we're not black and white supremacists, we're not Scientologists, we're not a member of any of these British Jew gangs that have operated secret societies from the beginning of this country.
	If you met George Washington and you talked to him today, he'd be the first one to tell you that the whole time after I stopped being a Major General in the British Army, everything I did was to use what I learned against them.
	He infiltrated, he had spy networks, he had intelligence networks.
	He set them up because he knew if he was going to beat an empire, he had to use guerrilla warfare, he had to have intelligence, and he had to play a long game of attrition, a war of attrition.
	He wasn't trying to meet on the battlefield and get eradicated, he was trying to cut and run, he was trying to, you know, use smart war of attrition tactics because they had to cross an ocean to resupply, and he had intelligence agencies He knew about secret societies right from the jump.
	He knew the war he was fighting.
	A lot of people, after the Revolutionary War, got hung.
	If the Founding Fathers had lost, they'd have been hung.
	So there is no question that these types of things, these types of ways of communicating, are as old as the Bible, long before America came into being, and have been used by intelligence agencies To communicate from the time an intelligence agency begins, that's the first thing they do, is logistical development, so that they can communicate with their agents in place, who, by nature, are spies and cannot be revealed.
	So, I want to talk about the information and how it gets decoded, because I think if people go to the magazine and simply see the North Tower gash, simply read that paragraph, I think they're prepared enough that they can now I have enough credence in what I'm saying to do a bit of a drill down.
	I don't want to lose anybody, but I do want to at least provide you with a few of the key instructions that you're given that you can verify.
	So, I'm a carpenter, and as a carpenter, I've been using a black framing square for over 30 years.
	It's my favorite framing square, and the reason why a black framing square is my favorite framing square is because it makes it easy to read the numbers.
	And I don't need a calculator with a framing square.
	My framing square provides me with all the information I need for cutting rafters, for cutting seats, for building a house.
	With my framing square, I do not need to make a single, like, calculation in that sense.
	All my calculations can be done easily and simply in my mind or on a chunk of wood using my framing square.
	So it's a great tool.
	But it's a tool you need to be able to read.
	Yeah, keep going!
	know, just to tell you, I like aluminum framing squares because they don't distort and go
	out of square so easily.
	Huh?
	Huh?
	Yeah, keep going, keep going, keep going.
	Okay, so if you look at a black framing square, it usually has yellow writing on it.
	That's the framing square I've been using for 30 years, and over 30 years actually,
	but I've kind of not been working because of what they've done to me.
	But anyways, my framing square is very easy to see.
	It's black, it's got yellow writing.
	If you go to the Home Depot website right now and you Google framing square, 16 by 24
	inch framing square, you will see black framing squares.
	Now they probably have white writing on them but the bottom line is That's a very popular tool amongst carpenters because they're easy to read, they're aluminum so they don't distort, they can be put back into square fairly easy.
	That's why there's that little divot on the inside interstices between, you know, one arm and the other arm so you can put it back into square if it goes a little bit out of square because some idiot stepped on it.
	So, when I look at that framing square and I put it beside the New York Magazine, what do I notice?
	I say to myself, That's my black framing square on the top of the North Tower.
	So if you go Google that magazine, you will see on the very front page immediately, Oh, I know what he's talking about.
	Yeah.
	I Googled, uh, Home Depot.
	I see what he's talking about, about a black framing square.
	I'm looking at the picture.
	Sure.
	I could see a dude who's used a black framing square immediately think that looks like a black framing square.
	Well, if you go to any website about Masons, the secret society, and by the way, just to let everybody know, if you're wondering whether they're legitimate or not legitimate, in America, we're governed by our consent.
	Nobody seizes power in this country.
	If you want power, you ask for it, and then we decide whether we're going to give it to you.
	If you form a secret society, you have power over no one.
	So you don't murder people, you don't follow them around, you don't shut down their bank accounts, you don't hack their computers, you don't beat them, you don't get the punks in the neighborhood to throw rocks at them, you don't abuse them because nobody gave you the power to do it.
	So all secret societies in America are offensive.
	Washington used the tactics of the British against them because he was fighting an empire!
	So, when you look at that cover, and you look at the Mason symbol, you will notice that the popular Mason symbol has a framing square as a base.
	It's kind of angled so that the interstices of the, what we call the body and the tongue, are at the very bottom.
	So it's like an angle.
	And then, uh, they have a compass overlaying that framing square, and then they have a... Huh?
	And then they have a... They have a seeing eye at the top of the compass.
	So this is a very familiar, uh, uh, symbol of their gang, if you will.
	And I think a lot of people probably already know this symbol, probably think it's benign.
	It's not.
	If you take that symbol, and you orientate the framing square in the exact same orientation on top of the New York cover magazine that I'm talking about, with the North Tower on fire, and Building 7, and what are your chances of surviving, and information about a 9-11 that's exact on each sequence 9, some 11 page, you will see that the framing square, once it's aligned with the framing square of the symbol, The seeing eye is in the darkness.
	And so, in order to take what's hidden and bring it into the light, you have to transpose in the horizontal axis.
	And so that's your first instruction.
	Your first instruction is to transpose what's hidden in a horizontal direction, and it will be revealed.
	There is a second... Pardon me?
	I just wanted to add, we're coming to the close of the first hour and typically I take callers the second, Adam, so you may want to be more concise, perhaps take the first 10 or 15 minutes of the second hour and then we'll take callers.
	Does that sound like a plan?
	Sure, it's your show.
	I'm really grateful to be on here speaking.
	Most people just call me crazy and that's the end of it.
	Well, just know we only have a couple of minutes now.
	Let me let everyone know the number to call in is 540-352-4452, 540-352-4452, to speak to Adam and me about 9-11 or the impeachment.
	540-352-4452 to speak to Adam and me about 9-11 or the impeachment.
	A wonderful, by the way, piece I've just discovered, published by the Gateway Pundit.
	Someone tell President Trump's attorneys that Democrats' footage showing violence at the
	Capitol on January 6 was filmed by Antifa.
	Thank you.
	along with James Sullivan's observation that his brother John led 226 Antifa members into
	the Capitol.
	That would be a good point for them to make.
	Adam, go ahead, make a couple more points and the music will come in for the break.
	It'll run about five minutes and then I'll bring you back in.
	Thank you.
	So that's your first instruction.
	So somebody who's a Mason, who knows that they use a communications modality, who knows
	their symbol, who knows that the information is there to look for, will immediately see
	there's a flip in the horizontal direction instruction.
	There's also a second instruction.
	One arm of the compass is in the darkness, the other's in the light.
	So it's telling you to flip in the vertical plane.
	Now, pilots for 9-11 will also tell you That that's verified as an instruction, because when you look at the cover of the New York Magazine, you'll see right away that it needs to be flipped in the vertical to be oriented correctly.
	In other words, the North Tower and Building No.
	7 are oriented such that if I were to put them in the north direction properly, then I'd flip the magazine vertically, and then the WTC would be furthest north, and then the North Tower would be a little south of that.
	So, these instructions then tell you how to decode information within the magazine.
	Very simple.
	So, if you look at the front cover, you will see 50 cents, May 27, 1974, and you will see that page 74, sequence 9, sum 11 page, told us to look a new way by the numbers.
	Well, May can be written as a number, 05.
	So 50, 0, 5.
	Now there's another instruction that tells us there's a precision coupled range finder that takes the guesswork out.
	So let's look at the number, the date as numbers.
	0, 5, 27, 74.
	And we have 2 plus 7 equals 9, 7 plus 4 equals 11, and 0, 5.
	And we have 2 plus 7 equals 9, 7 plus 4 equals 11, and 05.
	But 05 and 50, if you add the 05 and 50 up, you get 10.
	And if you transpose in the vertical, the 50 becomes a 20.
	And if you transpose in the horizontal, the 10 becomes an 01.
	And you have the complete date, 9-11-2001.
	So, if you think that's just me making stuff up, and it's a total coincidence, well, I urge you to go look at this magazine, go download my analysis, it's only a Precinct analysis, I can give you a full analysis if you contact me, but I'm heavily censored, It's 112 pages, it's totally free, it's easy to read, it takes you step-by-step through this evidence, and you can see that not only was 9-11 planned 27 years in advance, you can see the copy of Kissinger's National Security Memorandum No.
	200.
	And in that memorandum, I just want to go quickly because like you say,
	you don't have much time, he actually gives us the dates that he is looking for
	vis-a-vis that communications modality. So that is also a really important thing
	to keep in mind when you are analyzing this magazine. And that information
	is in my Pricey analysis which you can get for free. And I will give a link to Jim
	so people can go download it for free. Now that National Security Memorandum
	was April 24, 1974. Now keep in mind that John F. Kennedy fired Kissinger
	and called him a madman. And the reason why Kennedy fired him and called him a madman
	is because when you sit down and tell me population control, what I hear,
	what John Kennedy hears, what Robert Kennedy hears, what Lincoln would hear,
	what Medgar Evers would hear, what Fred Hampton would hear, what William Jennings Bryan
	or Huey Long or Stephen Beacon Africa, what we hear is God makes mistakes
	and you are going to cure those mistakes through mass murder.
	At a profit.
	That's what we hear when you say population control.
	And what we're hearing now is the music for the break, Adam.
	Let him take a deep breath and we'll field callers when we return.
	We'll field callers when we return.
	In breaking news, a visiting Syrian diplomat reports that he is being held in a prison.
	In breaking news, a visiting Syrian diplomat reported today that their population is evolving
	rapidly and advancing into a fifth dimensional consciousness.
	into a fifth dimensional consciousness.
	They are seeking peace with all cosmic cultures, which may mean that the Earth will be asked to join the prestigious Galactic Federation of Light Alliances.
	Please join Debbie West and Michael Hathaway on Lost Knowledge, Saturdays 3 p.m.
	Eastern Standard Time in Studio A for the latest breaking news on the Star Visitor's peaceful contact and the ongoing project of cleansing the Earth.
	Even the government admits that 9-11 was a conspiracy.
	But did you know that it was an inside job?
	That Osama had nothing to do with it?
	That the Twin Towers were blown apart by a sophisticated arrangement of mini or micro nukes?
	That Building 7 collapsed seven hours later because of explosives planted in the building?
	Barry Jennings was there.
	He heard them go off and felt himself stepping over dead people.
	The U.S.
	Geological Survey conducted studies of dust gathered from 35 locations in Lower Manhattan and found elements that would not have been there had this not been a nuclear event.
	Ironically, that means the government's own evidence contradicts the government's official position.
	9-11 was brought to us compliments of the CIA, the neocons of the Department of Defense, and the Mossad.
	Don't let yourself be played.
	Read American Nuked on 9-11.
	Available at moonrockbooks.com.
	That's moonrockbooks.com.
	This is Thomas, a.k.a.
	This is Thomas, aka America's Got Talent.
	A Mad Painter.
	I'd like you to join me Monday nights, 10 p.m.
	Eastern Standard Time for Open Canvas.
	Don't forget to bring an open mind.
	Yes, folks, that's right.
	Bring an open mind to an open canvas.
	Again, that is Monday nights, 10 p.m.
	Eastern.
	You are opposed to government corruption.
	This is Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com.
	You don't need to expect us.
	We're already here.
	The End.
	© BF-WATCH TV 2021 © BF-WATCH TV 2021
	© BF-WATCH TV 2021 you
	you Collision Course is back, back, back.
	Schedule B on Revolution Radio every Saturday night, 6 to 8 p.m.
	You get outer space.
	You get honest answers, real researchers, truthful answers, and a place to engage with questions.
	Take part in the discussion.
	Revolution Radio on Friggenstrips.com hosts Collision Course every Saturday from 6 to 8 p.m.
	Eastern, 5 p.m.
	to 7 p.m.
	Central, 4 p.m.
	to 6 p.m.
	Mountain Time and 3 p.m.
	to 5 p.m.
	City.
	The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs and its website by the hosts,
	guests and call-in listeners or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source
	They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff, or affiliates.
	you're listening to a revolution radio freedom slips dot com one hundred
	percent listeners for radio and now we return you to
	your host let me just say that checking up on that
	bit of a debate the defense presenting here they're showing video after video of democrats in the wake
	of the two thousand sixteen election protesting
	in the house about counting the electors one after another after another
	after another i I tell you, they're mopping the floor with this impeachment effort, mopping the floor.
	Mitchell, if we have no callers yet, I'd like to invite you to raise any questions you might have with Adam before I unleash him for further discussion of what he's found.
	And I think this stuff about printed, published anticipations of 9-11 is really rather fascinating, stuff of which I was heretofore unaware.
	Mitchell?
	Yeah, we live in a world of perpetual propaganda.
	And it's very difficult for people to remain balanced in reality because of this ideological soup bowl of crap that they're dipped into.
	It's very tough for people to essentially have free thinking.
	And, you know, I, I want, you know, I'm going to ask Robert Barnes about this.
	Is Facebook and Twitter and social media and all of their subliminal and mind control efforts to change us?
	Is that even legal in America?
	Go ahead, Adam.
	Well, I first of all would always say that people should be honest and they should be upfront about what it is they believe.
	And what it is they're trying to accomplish.
	I don't believe there should be hidden agendas.
	I don't believe there should be secret societies.
	If you have something to sell me, then tell me what it is and let me make the decision.
	So, yes, people have freedom and our freedom does get extended to criminals and to traitors.
	But that doesn't mean we have to take away the freedom of the people and use that as an excuse to say, oh, Zuckerberg's doing terrible things, or Trump's doing terrible things, so therefore we have to give up our freedom.
	No.
	What we need to do is understand that if there's such a thing as bad speech, and there isn't, but if there is such a thing as bad speech, then the antidote to bad speech is more speech.
	Never censorship.
	When you have censorship, the truth is the first casualty and the truth tellers are the first ones whose lives get destroyed and you never hear about it.
	You have never heard from me.
	You have never heard this evidence before.
	Okay?
	That's because of censorship.
	So if you want to say I'm censoring Hitler because he says bad things, no!
	What you do is you debate Hitler and show he's a fool.
	That's what you do in a free country.
	You don't censor, you debate.
	That is what we believe in.
	So I don't care if somebody's sending me subliminal messages from Mars.
	I don't care.
	I will think for myself, I will draw my own conclusions, and I will have a rigorous debate.
	That is what we need in this country.
	We do not need one scintilla of censorship.
	I think that's very powerful and right, and certainly right-headed, without any doubt, Adam.
	That censorship has got to be extraordinarily limited and, you know, really let a thousand flowers bloom, let all voices be heard.
	Sir Karl Popper, the great British philosopher of science, emphasized that rational debate is the principal instrument in discovering truth.
	Which of course is why the media giants are seeking to curtail and suppress any rational debate because they want to control the official narrative and then punish anyone who takes exception.
	They want to stifle debate because they don't believe in the search for truth.
	They want to dictate.
	They want to be able to dictate and control.
	Well, I guess I would clap back at one thing you said, which is censorship should be extremely limited.
	I guess my question to you would be, Jim, are you the guy that's going to make the limit?
	No, come on!
	There are laws about... No, no, no!
	Not come on!
	Free speech is not criminal.
	If somebody commits a crime, it's a crime.
	We prosecute a crime.
	If they decide they're not going to prosecute criminals, and they're going to leave them on the street, that isn't an excuse to take our free speech.
	Crimes are crimes.
	Speech is speech.
	If somebody commits a crime, they've committed a crime.
	Free speech, by definition, is never a crime.
	Censorship Always is wrong.
	Absolutely, 100%, unequivocally wrong.
	Jim, you complain about the tyrant.
	Who's going to be the guy that decides what the limit on speech is?
	You?
	Adam, you're getting a little carried away here.
	No, that's... You're shouting fire in a theatre.
	It's well known that... Okay, is that a crime?
	Is that a crime?
	I suspect it is a crime.
	Yes, it is a crime.
	It is a legislated Statutorily constructed, approved by the people, democracy generated, star of republic, firm rule, that that is a crime.
	That isn't free speech, it's a crime.
	So we have to stop conflict.
	Well, Adam, you're being a little precious here, and I'm getting a little pissed off by that.
	It's an exercise in speech that is constrained because it's inappropriate.
	That was the sort of thing I was talking about.
	No, no, no, no, no.
	Hammer and tongs like this I don't like.
	I'm giving you a lot of liberty here.
	I want you to be a little constrained, buddy.
	Okay, well, no.
	Because freedom of speech is not a crime.
	It can never be a crime.
	It can never be a crime.
	The minute you make free speech a crime, you have destroyed free speech.
	So crimes are crimes, period.
	Free speech, never a crime.
	So let's move on.
	You're welcome to pursue the further evidence you want to lay out about 9-11, Adam.
	Do it!
	Okay, so Kissinger's April 24th... I think you're pretty thorough.
	You're pretty... Well, go ahead.
	You've got in mind what you want to say.
	Go ahead and say it.
	Yeah, well, you know, it ain't pretty when you have debates, and that's fine.
	We'd rather spill vitriolic than spill blood.
	So on April 24th, 1974, Kissinger, who slithered back into power after Kennedy fired him for his crazy population control beliefs, which is eugenics programs for profit, like we've never heard of those before.
	So, he writes this memorandum calling for population control, and he writes it to the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Agriculture, Monsanto anyone, the Director of the CIA, the Deputy Secretary of State, and the Agency for International Development.
	Okay, so when you look at the oral polio vaccine that killed all those people in Uganda, this is where it came from.
	So, the study should look forward at least until the year 2000.
	This is a direct quote from that National Security Memorandum written by Kissinger.
	The study should look forward to at least until the year 2000.
	And of course, 9-11 happened on 2001, a year later.
	And that the plans he wants to call for, okay, He says, action recommendations no later than May 29th, 1974.
	Well, the plans I'm talking about that people should read and look into, May 27th, 1974, two days before his deadline.
	So you have an April 24th, 1974 memorandum from Kissinger calling for population control.
	You have the date of 2000, which is the minimum date, the year after 9-11 happens.
	And you have a call for plans May 29, 1975 for two days before that deadline.
	This magazine, which I say is a communications modality and lays out the plans of 9-11 within it, is released.
	So it all fits with that National Security Memorandum.
	So I recommend people download the free copy of my analysis, go through it, and see how that magazine is a communications modality, and it gives you all the information of 9-11 27 years in advance.
	Okay, thanks a lot.
	I really appreciate it.
	Yeah, well, I appreciate you too.
	Now, we have a caller from California.
	He's a regular.
	Paul, join the conversation with Adam and me.
	Yes, thanks.
	I wasn't sure if I was going to call, but then I heard you getting a little impatient and upset, and I realized I wasn't on the air, so I had to... Okay, so here's the $64,000 question for Adam.
	Okay, so here's the $64,000 question for Adam.
	So Adam, where should I avoid being 27 years from now so I can be safe?
	Well, I'm sorry, but I don't belong to a gang.
	So all I can do, and again, this question is kind of like a tricky question that they
	always pose to you, is, okay, well, if that didn't happen, you tell me what happened.
	We've gone around the world, now I'm going to be very conservative with my figures here, and we've killed 100,000 people in this global war crimes against humanity that definitely 100% was incited by Reichstag 9-11.
	So if we're going to do that, if we're going to send our military abroad, set up 800 to 3,000 bases, deplete our wealth, and kill bomb civilians, call it war when it's war crimes, drone lynch people, call it justice when it's injustice, no trial at all, just a finger on the paper by Obama, if we're going to do that, I don't want somebody to tell me maybe.
	I don't want Giuliani to say, if we're wrong, Then let's have a trial by combat.
	If we're wrong?
	No, dude, you tell me for certain.
	And if I can point out that what you told me is wrong, I've done my job.
	I don't have to tell you what really happened.
	I have to tell you what they told you is a lie.
	Jesus is the truth.
	Satan is the father of all lies.
	They're the ones with unlimited resources.
	They're the ones with all the power to hire and fire whoever they want.
	They're the ones with all the power and ability to go around the world and gather whatever evidence they need to.
	They're the ones that can put on a trial.
	They're the ones that can call for evidence, which never happened for Oswald, and never happened in 9-11.
	So, I'm not going to say I'm going to prove this by telling you the future, because you cannot Predict the future.
	All you can do is create a gang and then plan for a future so that you can make money off of it.
	And I don't belong to a gang, so I'll be one of those dudes that's in the dark.
	OK.
	I don't know.
	I don't know where to go with that.
	You know, I'm in a slightly humorous mood this morning.
	Before you had this guest on, I was thinking, OK, if I called today, what would I say?
	And I was I was going to open with Jim, I just woke up, and Joe Biden is president?
	How's that possible?
	And he appointed nothing but Jews?
	Listen, Paul, you'll catch up with it later, but Trump's defense team is mopping the floor with the House.
	They're showing how one Democrat after another after 2016 denied the election, said Trump hadn't won, wanted not for the electors to be counted.
	They just went on and on and on and on.
	The sort of thing they were objecting to Trump supporters doing.
	I mean, it's making the Democrats just ripping the face, the mask off of their true face, which is so ugly.
	I mean, this is backfiring against the House and the Democrats massively, massively.
	Sure, of course.
	Okay, how about this for verification?
	Have you got a wallet?
	Well, you know, in a sense, not an actual, you know, wallet.
	Okay, but can you pull out the money in your wallet right now?
	you gonna do like one of the thing where you fold it up and it looks...
	Yeah, what I'm gonna do is I'm going to tell you the same instructions that I just told
	Jim about in this magazine with the orientation of the Mason symbol, that exact same direction
	will be used with your $1 bill, your $5 bill, your $10 bill, your $20 bill, your $50 bill,
	your $100 bill and they will...
	Okay, okay, okay, look, Adam...
	Let me just...
	That's all great, but it's too esoteric.
	I wanna hear if you have any more what you think happened on 9-11.
	I know all your stuff about the anticipation.
	That's good stuff.
	What else do you have to tell us?
	I want to ask Adam a question.
	In a little bit, I would love to address some of the things that he just said, because there's a way that you can, you know, as you know, Jim, one of the most important things about information is You know, the way you can frame it, and the way you can juxtapose it, and the way you can look at it and say, OK, what is it that we can do with this knowledge?
	OK, but as an example, you know, you've talked a lot about they predict in advance, you know, what a lot of people call predictive programming, or they tell us in advance what they're going to do, you know, TV, movies and so forth.
	And you're talking about a magazine in this instance.
	And I would say, OK, great.
	Yeah, they do this.
	So what possibly can we do with that information?
	Because first of all, when it is, you know, put out there, nobody and I mean, nobody is going to know about it, including you, you didn't know about it in 1974.
	And then what if I knew about it in 1974?
	I mean, if I go around and I tell people, hey, this is what's going to happen, they're going to look at me and go, well, you're not you're not Nostradamus, right?
	Well, who are you?
	You know, you're crazy.
	So it's all very interesting and it reminds me, here's the question I was going to ask you Adam, have you ever seen or heard of a guy on YouTube called NeoTriesToWarnYou?
	He did a series of sometimes lengthy videos talking about this exact thing where part of what they do supposedly is to let you know in advance through all these various means.
	No dude, nobody on planet Earth has seen this magazine for what it is.
	Talked about the sequence 9, some 11 set pages, how they all have the information, how they all have the directions to decode it.
	But I'll tell you this.
	Go to the magazine, look at it.
	There's no such thing as predictive programming.
	This is a communications modality.
	And what that means is that we have criminals.
	And these criminals commit crimes.
	And these crimes are worldwide, and they are crimes against the American people.
	Nobody gave them this power.
	Nobody gave them their consent.
	Nobody said it's okay for you to go forth and murder people for profit.
	So what we do with this information, what we do with this information is we get together, we form indictments, we go get Silverstein, we go get his Australian buddy, we get all the people that lied, all the co-conspirators, and we put them on trial.
	And unlike what they do to us, And the people all over the world and to the American people, we give them due process.
	We give them a trial.
	We give them a defense counsel so that they have a chance to defend themselves.
	That's what we do for them.
	So when I say show them the same mercy in their guilt that they show me and everybody else in their innocence, no, not actually.
	We're actually more merciful because we're not going to murder them.
	We're going to give them a trial.
	We're going to give them due process and then we're going to hang them for treason.
	So that's what I would do with this evidence.
	And thank you very much for your time.
	Good luck.
	My response would be yeah, good luck with that.
	Okay, so thank you.
	Thank you.
	I appreciate I appreciate your support in trying to get the conspirators who murdered our firefighters And who have plunged us into a 20-year endless war.
	I appreciate your support in rounding them up and giving them the same justice they give everybody else.
	Thank you.
	Adam, it's like, it's like you think you're the only warrior out there battling for truth about... No, that's not true.
	That's not true.
	That's not true.
	Adam, I'm telling you how you're coming across and I guarantee you... Well, you know... Adam, shut up!
	I've hosted thousands of shows and I've given you some advice.
	I've let you talk on and on and on.
	Thanks, Jim.
	Thanks for your time.
	Thanks for your time, Jim.
	God bless you, man.
	God bless you.
	I hope everybody looks up that magazine and sees the truth and we can overcome this.
	I'm not cutting you off.
	Adam, I'm not cutting you off.
	If you hang up, you may never get on the air again.
	Don't hang up on me.
	Just shut up and listen to what I'm saying!
	I'm not going to sit here and be told to shut up or that my presentation isn't acceptable, alright?
	I don't believe... Nobody tells you how you're coming across because of the intensity of... I don't believe... I don't believe that the person comes under scrutiny when they provide information.
	I don't believe in a call to personality.
	I don't believe...
	Hi Jim, hi Paul, hi Mitch, and hi Adam.
	So I'm just going to add a different direction and then we can come back to this topic.
	Hi Jim, hi Paul, hi Mitch, and hi Adam.
	So I'm just going to add a different direction and then we can come back to this topic.
	So my subject is that Adam and Jim, you are a very rare man and valuable to society,
	simply because you live in the real world.
	And I'm talking about all your philosophy, but also the very practical, you know, things you can do.
	You're a carpenter, you work with your hands and you have very sharp eyes.
	And about 10, 15 years ago, when my children were still at home, I used to tell them and actually joke with them and their friends that, you know how teenagers, they're young, so they want to set their mark on the world.
	They want to be smart and discover something new and be noticed for something really, really good.
	They have all these ideals.
	And of course, we were also those teenagers.
	So, I used to joke with them that, hey, if you want to be really new, famous for something really new and really modern that's going to wow everybody and help humanity, then to be totally ultra-modern, just go backwards in time.
	That is, try to bring the good things of the past back.
	Here's the key point.
	I think our human family has entered the point of diminishing returns in modernity.
	And because we put everything on the computer, everything is being done by electromagnetic waves and, you know, like the TV remote control and pressing plastic buttons.
	And it's going to what Dennis Fletcher calls colored pixels on a screen.
	And what so he would be called an ultra rightist.
	At the same time, the ultra leftist, in fact, lunatic, loony leftist, Chris Hedges, also called it maybe even a decade ago, five, 10 years ago, electronic hallucinations.
	And how is this being accomplished?
	And what's the purpose of this?
	If the purpose is to deceive all of us, seven and a half billion living human beings, and for what is the ultimate purpose?
	Well, bottom line is theft.
	To confuse us, therefore be able to demolish us, therefore be able to then steal everything, every speck of dust to go into their wallet.
	You talked about a wallet a minute ago.
	That's everything.
	You know, why did they want to flatten the curve?
	Well, how about flattening our wallets?
	And so, can you tell us how, you know, carpentry is therefore very important.
	That's your profession.
	How can we use that to teach the kids to come back to reality?
	And then, I've talked too long, so I'm going to now listen.
	Well, I guess the only thoughts I have on what you said Is the commodification of the person has to stop.
	And that doesn't stop through ad hominems of people and talking about, you know, what they look like, what they sound like, how they present themselves.
	We need to look at the information people have, and we have to analyze it.
	Okay?
	The cult of personality is what gave us Obama and this clown Trump.
	We need to get away from the cult of personality, we need to get away from the ad hominems, and we have to look at the information for what it is, We have a legal system that incarcerates more people than any other country on earth.
	The communist Chinese do not even incarcerate as many people as we do.
	We put more Americans in jail than any country on earth puts its own people.
	If we can put the innocent in jail, if we can put the drug dealer or the drug Addict in jail.
	Then I think we could put the traitors and criminals who are destroying this country in jail.
	And that is what this information is for.
	That is what this dialogue is about.
	It isn't about whether I'm a nice guy.
	It isn't whether I present myself well.
	It isn't about whether I'm a nice speaking polite person.
	It's about information.
	So I want everybody to go to this to this information I want you to look at it.
	Nobody's going to go to this information.
	That's what you don't get.
	Okay?
	A handful of people might take a look at it.
	I might take a look at it.
	But nobody is going to go to this information and look at it.
	Great.
	Okay, so don't.
	That's what you don't get.
	So don't.
	Don't go to the information then.
	Have a nice day.
	Why did you call in?
	Adam, why are you so defensive?
	I just can't understand it.
	Defensive?
	The guy just told me nobody's interested in the information I have.
	Why is he on this phone call?
	Why is he on this phone call?
	Adam, you're insulting me.
	I brought you in.
	I've given you all this time in the world.
	I'm probably the most sympathetic host you'll ever have.
	I've been talking with Mitchell that you might even make a good host for Revolution Radio.
	But you're being so obnoxious.
	You're not willing to listen to me.
	And I'm as sympathetic a person as you will find on the face of Earth.
	You don't know how you come across.
	I don't care how...
	Okay, so let me just do this one more time.
	Let me just do this one more time.
	I don't care if my hair is on fire and I'm dressed in a clown suit.
	This is not an argument.
	I don't care if I have my hair on fire and I am dressed in a clown suit.
	People need to look at this information.
	They need to analyze this information.
	They need to discuss this information.
	They need to find out whether it's true or false, and then they need to do something about it.
	That's what I'm on this show for.
	I'm not on this show to make friends, or to get a hosting show.
	I don't care if I spend the rest of my days penniless.
	This is about 9-11, it's about war crimes against humanity, it's about a crime against America.
	That's what I'm here to talk about.
	Give me a couple of minutes, just give me two minutes, if you can just mute him or whatever.
	Okay, you know what?
	I'm going to mute myself, buddy, because there's no reason for you to call into this show to tell me nobody cares about this information.
	So tell you what, buddy.
	Tell you what, buddy.
	You win, I lose.
	But you know what?
	The truth never loses.
	Have a wonderful day.
	Adam, don't hang up.
	Big baby Adam.
	Big baby Adam, go home and play with your toys.
	Let me bring in Scaredy Cat.
	Look, I was giving this guy the opportunity of his life.
	He's been cut off by everybody else and we can all understand why.
	It's got nothing to do with the content or information.
	It's got to do with his incredibly prickly defensive attitude.
	Paul, yeah, I want you and Scaredy Cat and me to talk about this.
	I was just going to read him.
	One of the best commentators on my blog, maybe the best, was listening to this and he said, Adam, raw deal today.
	I wanted to mention this now while the program is still on.
	I knew from the first five minutes of listening to Adam Exactly how this conversation would wind up.
	Too much information, too condescending, and too stuck in his own story.
	He's obviously a very intelligent gentleman, but his delivery is the problem.
	Idealism is a great idea, but it accomplishes zero.
	I mean, I mean, Paul, Scaredy Cat, I mean, I was being as sympathetic as I could to tell him how he can be more effective in delivery, but he wouldn't hear of it.
	Paul first and then Scaredy Cat.
	OK, thank you.
	All right.
	So, yes, Jim, you know, I've made the point and it's always been in sincerity when I've made it that you are indeed a gracious host.
	There's no doubt about it.
	But and the thing is with this guy, if he would just shut up for just a minute or two, I mean, we all agree with what his goals are and we essentially are all sympathetic to his viewpoint of what's occurring in the world and Who these people are, and they need to be brought to justice, we're all in agreement with that.
	But yes, you know, the thing about the magazine in 1974, it's limited of interest, okay?
	Maybe it's true, all right?
	In the end, it's like a big so what, right?
	That's why I asked the question, where should I avoid being 27 years from now?
	I mean, nobody really can do anything with this information.
	Now, the kind of information that you and other researchers have used To dissect 9-11?
	Yeah, we can do something with that.
	The magazine is interesting, but, you know, it's like he never really left that, besides his talk about the Carpenter Square or the Framing Square, which was somewhat interesting.
	Other than that, it's like, you can't just stick on one thing, especially when it was like so long ago.
	It's kind of like, if we all saw it then, what could we possibly do about it?
	Let me bring in Scaredy.
	Scaredy, go ahead.
	I greatly value your interpretation of this whole exchange.
	Thanks, Jim.
	So, a big compliment that I have big boots to stand in and I just have little feet.
	So, I think what it is, How Adam hung up.
	And Adam, please, if you're listening, I'm sure Jim will bring you back on a future show.
	And I think the situation is that, Adam, we are maybe the straw that broke the camel's back.
	You being the camel, we being the straw.
	So maybe, so I think you said 9-11 was predicted in the magazine with, you know, Henry Kissinger and all these signals 27 years ago, and now 9-11 itself is, I think, is it 20 years ago?
	So that occurred, that printing, that page in print happened 47 years ago, if I'm adding my numbers up right.
	And the thing is that My husband told me about these astronomers.
	So this was, I was quite young, so I don't know, quarter century ago.
	They were, they were the bitterest of enemies.
	And they knew about, I think they had figured out the distance.
	So in X number of light years, how far away a certain important star was.
	Something like that.
	And, but then they ended up differing in that, oh no, this is whatever, you know, 37.1 light years away.
	And the other one thinks it's no, no, no, it has to be 37.2 light years away.
	And, and to us on the outside, like every other person is thinking that these should be the best of friends.
	They have such a intimate knowledge of such an important subject as our stars.
	Which hardly anybody, none of us, we just look up in the sky and, you know, twinkle, twinkle, little star, how I wonder what you are up above the sky so high, like a diamond in the sky.
	And we just appreciate the beauty and know a little bit about gaseous formation and that's it.
	And those two have spent their lifetimes learning about it.
	And then at the very end, they've spent their lives So, Adam, I think we are the best of friends here at Revolution.Radio with you.
	We are the best of friends.
	and then they became the bitterest of enemies because each one thinks they're right. Instead,
	you should be the best of friends. So Adam, I think we are the best of friends here at
	revolution.radio with you. We are the best of friends and we just differ about 0.1, you know,
	millimeter of knowledge and evidence. So I've talked a lot.
	Jim, go ahead.
	No, no, I'm scared.
	Why was he so unwilling to consider sympathetic criticism?
	You know, I mean, I want the guy to succeed.
	I mean, obviously, he's a brilliant guy.
	He's just chock full of information.
	But he bristles.
	He bristles at even the mildest Critique of his manner of delivery, and he started talking about his hair on fire.
	And if you don't want to hear, I'm going to take the ball and go home.
	I mean, that was childish, childish, great immaturity there, which may be why he's I mean, as I understand it, he's actually on the streets.
	He's a homeless guy in Washington, D.C.
	And I was I was from our exchanges.
	I was willing to bring him on and give him all that opportunity.
	I even dropped the brakes at the bottom of the hour to give him more time.
	But talk about him.
	Talk about an ingrate.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	No, I was going to make the point really quick.
	Oh, Paul, a homeless guy.
	That's very interesting, because I know a guy right now.
	He's essentially been home.
	He's living in an RV, right?
	But no doubt about the fact that there is tremendous perception and awareness and intelligence in all walks of life.
	And there's a guy, I don't know if you've ever heard of him, another caller to your show on occasion that I've communicated with, and I won't mention the name now, but he's aware also of a physicist by the name of Eric Dollard.
	D-O-L-L-A-R-D.
	Have you ever heard of Eric Dollard?
	Tell me, maybe I'll make a connection.
	Tell me more about it.
	You know, he's a physicist, a brilliant guy.
	There's no doubt about the fact he made a bunch of videos for YouTube years ago.
	They can probably still be found.
	But he was literally one of the videos somebody else made about him.
	They interviewed him in his car.
	He was literally living out of his car in the Mojave Desert.
	So there would be a homeless person there, too.
	So what I'm saying is I'm not taking issue with the fact that you said Yeah, I certainly don't hold that against him.
	bottom line is that there's some people, and I'm thinking of a friend of mine right now,
	who are just kind of not meant for this world, the construct of functioning in society. It's
	not an easy gig, especially here in California. And I'm thinking of a guy I knew from high
	school who wound up home, and it was almost predictable.
	You know, he was a very hard guy.
	Yeah, I certainly don't hold that against him. I mean, if I did, I wouldn't have put
	him on the air. There are all kinds of circumstances that could have led to his present plight,
	which appears to be fairly dismal.
	But I was seeking to lend a helping hand to get his views out there.
	See what he had to say.
	He's got a tremendous amount of knowledge.
	He's a brilliant guy.
	He's very articulate.
	But he's got a defense manner that is virtually self-defeating and for him to hang up on this show and to take it when I was asking him to just hold off so he could hear what I had to say, but he had no interest.
	Those are major character defects that have defeated him in life.
	I have no doubt.
	Perhaps.
	And here's the thing that you I'm sure you can understand, he's very Very angry.
	And I think we can all understand that anger.
	I met a similar man.
	He wasn't homeless, of course, but this is a guy that mentored me in study of the law starting back in the 80s.
	And he was also a brilliant.
	I mean, one of these people in his presence, you could just feel it.
	And when he looked at you, you know, the eyes were like extremely penetrating.
	He was all self-taught.
	He really didn't go to college, but he was actually a self-taught materials engineer.
	He actually did contract work for major corporations.
	And he showed me some of the work and some of the billing statements he submitted to these people.
	And like I said, this guy was one of the most brilliant people I've ever met, but he was also very, very angry and he had lots of personality flaws.
	And I don't know if they necessarily go together, but I'm thinking of at least two or three people right now that either I've known or that I know that are similar where they have this tremendous insight and tremendous perception.
	And sometimes it just goes along with some personality issues and a lot of anger.
	And I think that's just what was there.
	That's not too much more to it.
	Yeah, Mitchell, go ahead.
	It really is frustrating.
	You know the things that you and I and Jim and so many other people we see different things and to us it's so plain and you know it's really tough to try to communicate to people who may who aren't seeing through the matrix the way we do.
	Um, you know, and what we have to learn to accept, and we all have to a certain extent, is that you can open people's eyes or take them along a path only so far.
	And then, you know, they have to, you know, take up that banner to awake themselves.
	You know, you just can't take somebody by the hand and lead them to being, you know, awoke and understanding.
	It's a process and it's very difficult for the people that are trying to, well, wake people up.
	It's very frustrating.
	And that is, that is one of the more important things I think you ever said.
	And I, I remind myself all the time.
	I don't know about you Jim, but I have to remind myself all the time that I can't, I can't make you see what I see and I can't make you understand what I understand.
	I can only tell you, I can only tell you.
	And it's sometimes it's frustrating as hell.
	I get into these altercations with people all the time, especially over the mask stuff at stores.
	And it's like I show them the law or what isn't the law.
	I show them a court case I carry with me in many cases.
	I tell them, you know, it's like they still don't know.
	They don't see because they just they can't cross the bridge.
	And it makes me you know, when I raise my voice or I get really insistent,
	it makes me look like the bad guy.
	It's frustrating.
	Like you said, Mitch, it's frustrating.
	Yeah, it really is.
	It can be.
	Skarity, further thoughts?
	Yeah, let's not discard him.
	Let's see.
	The things he said were so important and and powerful because the rest of us constantly compromise.
	We constantly, even though we ourselves know we are good intentions, we are living as inside society.
	So we are constantly, in reality, being bad.
	Like, for example, we're using credit cards.
	We know we shouldn't use it.
	We know we should use cash and even put in a mighty effort to go back to, you know, going away from paper money into gold or possibly silver is better.
	Probably silver is better.
	Silverback money.
	But that's like going back decades and decades.
	Redoing a mountain, undoing a mountain of wickedness and work and sturdy wicked methods that have been put in place.
	So if we can't use silver coins, let us at least use cash.
	But a lot of times we don't use cash.
	We just go ahead and swipe the credit card.
	And so we, every one of us, 99% of us are being wicked.
	Not, although we don't want to be wicked, but overall society has become so bad
	that we are perpetuating badness.
	And so this is why Adam is so mightily, mightily valuable, that he's still in that ideal state.
	And the reason that he's homeless and a pariah in society And being discarded from society is because he's holding on to the good things.
	And the way that we can bring him back, so let us not say, don't hold his hand anymore.
	I think to think of him as a valuable man and do our best, maybe a couple of months from now, just constantly try to bring him back in, but make it more Make it easy.
	So, Paul brought up a very good point that there's this anger and you use huge anger, Paul said.
	He's very angry.
	And you said, Jim, he's very prickly.
	So, we know that now.
	That is part of our knowledge.
	And so, let's use it to help him.
	And the most important thing is how can we, in order to bring him back, he won't because he's ideal.
	and therefore he has pride and dignity. And the Japanese culture have a very good way of saying
	this, is we have to let our enemy, not our enemy, but who we are, our opponents, say in a chess game
	or something, our opponents' safe face. So Jim, we have to help him save face. So go ahead.
	Well, I think those are all wise and appropriate observations.
	I think Paul and I are two who are especially sympathetic to someone like Adam because we both been accused of excessive intensity, enthusiasm, so forth.
	It just depends.
	You know, it's made a difference.
	It's been the school of hard knocks for Paul and for me, and I was hoping benefit to benefit Adam from our experience.
	I mean, he's got so much to say, but he's utterly unwilling to consider that he might be more effective if he were only to modify his style, as though it were insulting to suggest that style should make a difference to success in delivery when it's so obviously prominent.
	I mean, Paul, what am I missing, you know, with this guy?
	Well, think about this for a second.
	He's just got a little bit of that, you know, spit in your eye kind of stuff.
	And I get that.
	I mean, that's just one of these things you just... But here's what I was thinking about while you were talking and while Scaredy Cat was talking, doing a nice job of breaking things down.
	Imagine discovering what he discovered if it's all on his own.
	In other words, you know, he's showing us what to look for.
	Okay, but did somebody show him?
	If no, Imagine how amazing it is just to, you know, take these things on your own, looking, digging, and then to perceive this, you know, to come upon it.
	I mean, it's got to be an amazing thing.
	I mean, he told me on the call, he said, there's nobody else, you know, that knows this or that's doing this.
	Nobody, I guarantee it.
	Words to that effect.
	Yeah.
	I kind of understand that.
	It's sort of like when I show people Stuff in the law, you know, or I show them the court decision ruling against Newsom, you know, they're seeing something that is always there, been there for a long time, right?
	I mean, the California codes have been around for over 100 years, and there's very been very little modification to the various codes concerning what we're looking at here with with fraud, for example, fraud and contract and obligation.
	Simple stuff.
	Nobody knows it's there.
	Well, Paul, I was commending him for it.
	upon something that we didn't see.
	And if he saw it with his own eyes, it's amazing too.
	He should be, shall we say, commended for it.
	But yeah, you can't spit in people's eye.
	Paul, I was commending him for it.
	I was telling him, in spite of the fact that I've done massive research on 9-11,
	he was bringing up discoveries with which I was unaware.
	And I wanted to go further and ask him a bit about his background.
	as you just along the lines you're saying.
	I mean, where do you go to school?
	I mean, the guy has as vast as he all self-taught.
	Did he go to college?
	If so, where?
	What did he study?
	I mean, he might be working now as a carpenter, but I've known others who had You know, practically PhD level who were carpenters or in comparable circumstances.
	So to me, he was a very, very interesting guy.
	And I wanted to do what I could to help him be more effective.
	And he just rejected it categorically out of hand as though I were somehow insulting Yeah, I wouldn't take anything about what the way you operated the show.
	It was, I mean, you gave him tons of time.
	You just let him keep talking.
	So there's absolutely nothing you did wrong.
	And, you know, speaking of just for the fun of it, I mean, again, all in good fun, people are people, right?
	You could, everybody can learn and to know, but, you know, talking about a carpenter, you know, right now I'm a, I'm a security guard.
	Okay.
	Love it before that I did before that I did delivery and before that I did a tow truck and of course for as I mentioned before on the show for 30 plus years I was in landscaping and gardening and some of my fondest memories of my former profession were just outdoors digging in the dirt, you know, that's what I did and You know, so Anyway, let me go back to Mitchell if he would join us once again Mitchell I just sort of like your critique of the whole experience here with Adam Well, you know, it's it's it's difficult to to see things so clearly and have others essentially blind.
	Yeah, I've experienced this pretty consistently since the 1980s.
	So, you know, you have to learn to get what you can get.
	When you're trying to communicate and convey things that people believe are conspiratorial, you know, it's it's the conspiracy too far or the conspiracy too often.
	You know that derails so many people.
	So yeah.
	Tough.
	OK, OK.
	No, I know, I know.
	He was overly preoccupied about conspiracy theorists, which I'm explaining really.
	They're attacking the conspiracy theorists because the conspiracy theorists are investigating crimes, which is the reason they want to silence us.
	So, I mean, he fits in that category because he's exposing evidence of prior planning It's a show.
	is, you know, the Trump defense team and others. I mean, I've got one article after another
	now about the prior planning of the assault on the Capitol, which obviously means it cannot
	possibly be the case that he was guilty of incitement.
	Of course not. Salute to Chris.
	It's a show, Jim. I'll have you know, I've mentioned before, I rarely if ever watch,
	quote, the news. And I only just listen to people like yourself comment on it.
	But I watched a 41 minute clip, 41 agonizing minutes of CNN from last night with with Chris Cuomo and all the assorted cast of contributors and characters, and then clips of wonderful people like Jamie Rankin speaking and Ted Lou, that weaselly little gook, and all these stupid women.
	I'm sorry, all women of the world, I love you, but I can't stand stupid, deranged women.
	And it's just like, my God, the shit show that nobody is interested in.
	I can't imagine very few people would have watched what I saw and taken it in any way seriously.
	I didn't understand what the hell they were talking about.
	Not because it was over my head, but because I didn't understand what the hell they were talking about most of the time.
	Good God, these people.
	It's just unreal.
	One Republican Senator James Imhoff of Oklahoma said during a break, to me, they're losing credibility the longer they talk.
	And I think it was just endless recycling of nonsense.
	Today, they've been talking about, you know, how the Democrats were making a movie.
	They're making a movie.
	They're doing all this editing.
	And I don't know if you caught it, Paul, when I got a new report here.
	Someone ought to point out to the Trump team that those who were filming the storming of the Capitol were Antifa.
	Why would anyone be there filming if it weren't previously planned so they could edit it for just the specific purpose of attempting to trash Trump?
	And disillusion his followers.
	And would you believe Nikki Haley, whom Trump had appointed as ambassador to the UN, has come out against Trump saying we were misled, we should never have followed her.
	This is one of the benefits here of letting this drag out.
	You can see who all the real enemies are of the Constitution and of the President of the United States.
	Okay, okay.
	So yeah, I'll take an issue with the greatest in history, but that's for another day.
	I believe it will be borne out.
	Meanwhile, we're in the final couple of moments.
	Paul, yeah, real quick, yeah.
	A closing remark and then Scott can kick.
	OK, OK.
	So yeah, I'll take an issue with the greatest in history, but that's for another day.
	But yeah, it's clear to anybody who has any semblance of, shall we say, objectivity, that it's
	sort of a breathless, borderline hysterical, but certainly alarmist agenda to demonize
	a certain group of people.
	And Chris Cuomo came right out and said it, right?
	White nationalists, okay?
	White Republican Trump followers.
	They actually said that even if Trump is impeached and so forth, get this.
	That he and his co-contributors, most of whom, not all, but most of whom were Jewish, they were talking about, well, but the base, the base still remains.
	What are we going to do about that?
	These people, they just got to go.
	It's very sick.
	Scaredy, just a real short comment, alas, because of time considerations.
	Gentlemen, I don't like women either.
	Women love men.
	There you go.
	We love women.
	We love women.
	We love you, Serdy, and all the women we know.
	Paul's making a point about argument, whatever.
	I'll let him defend himself.
	You don't even have to say that, Jim.
	We just know.
	Real women know.
	And Nikki Haley, she was insanely against Palestine and pro the thieves who stole and are stealing Palestine.
	And she totally, wasn't she a governor of one of the Carolinas and was totally against the South?
	Yeah, governor of South Carolina.
	Scarrity, Paula, thank you, Adam.
	Were you still here, I thank you, too.
	I'll send you another video, finally.
	Thanks, everyone.

▲