All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 2, 2021 - Jim Fetzer
01:22:14
Need to Know: The Fetzer Report Episode 121 - 01 February 2021
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin, where I'm very pleased today to be joined by Carl Herman from San Ramon, California, and Chris Weinack from Detroit, Michigan.
We're here to bring you all the news you need to know.
♪♪♪ ...which is considerable and serious.
We begin with an assassination attempt on the president.
I think there have been a dozen now.
This one occurred Tuesday morning at about 3 a.m.
when a sniper's bullet struck a panoramic casement window on the east wall of Trump's bedroom at his Mar-a-Lago estate.
It might have slain him, had he not recently replaced timber glass with Blast Structures International's bullet-resistant glass, which according to the company's website, can't stop anything less powerful than a .50-caliber round.
A confidential source reported that Trump, who's a light sweeper, was awakened by the sharp crack of the bullet-striking glass, which did not penetrate, Because of material science dissipation fracture, a spider web pattern.
Trump sought to keep it all in the family.
He did not want the police to get involved.
With Trump safe, his private security fanned across a 20-acre estate searching for signs of intrusion, which they could not find.
At 7am, a forensic ballistic expert from Quantico arrived, determined the bullet fragments were from a 7mm Remington Magnum round, found himself in a dilemma sorting it out.
It had been fired at a downward angle.
Had it pierced the glass, it would have sizzled through Trump's skull.
But an attack on the east window meant one of two things.
Either it had been taken from the estate grounds, which lacks elevated terrain, or Somewhere over the Atlantic, seemingly an impossible feat.
Trump's bedroom is 23 feet above ground level.
Beside the building, the main building, no structure on the property is higher.
So his best estimate was someone hovering in a helicopter 200 yards or more off the coast.
If he said that were true, he'd have to be the best marksman in the world.
The concept of sniping from a chopper seems so unrealistic.
They reached out to a Marine Corps Staff Sergeant who's a Scout Sniper Instructor at the Infantry School in Geiger, North Carolina, Hunter Bernius, who explained the odds of pulling it off from a hovering chopper with little or no light was extremely improbable.
Only with proper training specifically for that type of mission to shoot precisely.
You have to account for aircraft vibration, wind speed, direction, all the wind whipping up around him from blade spinning at 400 rpm.
Then there are a dozen other variables.
Takes months and months of training from a qualified instructor but still no guarantee.
Aerial sniping is a skill all its own.
Agreeing with all that, I believe there's an alternative explanation.
It was done using a drone.
Indeed, I believe this was a Mossad hit.
They have the means, the motive, and the ability to pull it off.
You have a rifle on a drone.
It's much less noticeable.
It could make access and attempt to take him out.
I believe this is part of the Israeli plot to have Trump out because he won't bomb Iran.
They believe Biden will be far more amenable, and if Biden's out, Kamala moves up, and they bring in Hillary, then she'll do for Iran what she did for Libya.
Carl, your thoughts?
Well, the idea of assassinating a head of state is very real, and historically all people really need to do is to, if they have not yet done so, be aware of the case, of the overwhelming case, that President Kennedy was assassinated by elements within our own government, as was his brother, who would have been elected president in 1968, as was Dr. King.
So the idea of assassinating an opponent who challenges the deep state's power Yeah, no doubt about it.
within their cards.
And although this is just an unsourced report, I think that you're absolutely right
and that this is happening and this has probably happened many times.
And in this particular case, yeah, we know that the military is developing
drone carried missiles or bombs.
Yeah, no doubt about it.
Chris, your thoughts.
Yeah, I agree with you.
It probably was from a drone looking at the caliber of the bullet and the trajectory and the really the lack of any evidence of an aircraft from what I can gather.
It doesn't seem like there's anything reported like that and I'm sure they would have looked into that.
You know, I often wonder, I'm looking at like things in the Cold War and thinking how Rockefeller and Rothschild
used that whole apparatus through the central banking system
to play communism against capitalism and these illusions of theater through the public,
let's just say, and this is the opiate for the masses.
And I say, this is kind of a situation that I see maybe has a lot of parallels and similarities
and maybe it's even getting out of control.
And maybe it's even an effort by the Democrats to just play dirty and win every beauty pageant
they've ever been in by throwing elbows till they're the last person standing.
I don't know what's really going on here.
I don't know why Israel would try to hit him though because like he's done just about everything for Israel
just like Biden has and just like every president has.
So, you know, I don't know as far as like maybe future power grabs or like maybe his,
maybe even him like treading into the media empire, you know, post-presidency if that is in fact the case.
Or maybe even, in theory, if your theory is correct, about him truly being in charge under the Insurrection Act and military leader of this country and commander-in-chief.
You know, there's a lot of things at play that I don't have enough information, really, to intelligently speculate at this time, but I'm just kind of looking at the possibilities and really just kind of waiting to see how it plays out.
Well, one would have thought that Israel was supportive of Trump, but the mainstream media is completely under Zionist control.
I've got a pastiche about 100 executives from CNN, every one of whom is a dual U.S.-Israeli citizen, another 100 from NBC, every one of whom is a dual U.S.-Israeli, another 100 from the New York Times.
So clearly the mainstream has been out to demonize Trump, drive him out, get Biden in.
And if you want the explanation, it's got to be because Donald Trump has refused to bomb Iran, in spite of the fact that he's given them so much else.
Chris.
And of course, I mean, that's a reason why it seems implausible in the beginning.
And if you don't know that the mainstream is completely controlled by Israel, you might think that Israel would be supporting Trump, but it's obvious that they are not.
And Bibi was among the very first to congratulate Biden on ascending to the presidency.
Yeah, the voting means an opportunity.
Meanwhile, a wonderful piece from The Federalist by David Marcus.
No, Donald Trump did not incite an insurrection.
Democrats and their media allies are milking a tragic riot for all it's worth.
Legally speaking, incitement has an incredibly high bar.
None of Trump's actions come close to beating.
They were set by the Supreme Court in Brandenburg versus Ohio.
The decision held that in order to constitute incitement to violence, Speech must include intent and specific, not abstract, instructions to act.
It also requires that speech would likely produce imminent lawless action, which went a step further than previous legal tests.
So, as a legal matter, it seems very clear.
But what about more generally?
In Salon, a left-wing publication, Amanda Marcotte attempts to make the case that Trump incited an insurrection.
She starts by begging the question.
There's no doubt Donald Trump incited the insurrection on January 6th.
It happened largely in public, as recorded for posterity.
Let's review the record.
I watched the speech.
No incitement.
Talking about the theft of the election and evidence, talking about being peaceful, but protesting to show their support for, you know, undoing a stolen election.
Only a paragraph later she writes, the people who stormed the Capitol are with guns, pipes, bombs, and flex cloths to take members of Congress and Vice President Mike Pence hostage.
There's a gross exaggeration if ever there were one.
Understood Trump's wink and nudge style loud and clear.
But one cannot incite with a wink and a nudge unless those gestures have already been specified to mean a call to violence.
Nothing Trump said in his speech before the violence broke out was a specific call for violence, much less insurrection.
Part of how he knows that the vast majority of those who attended the speech, where he called literally for a peaceful protest at the Capitol, did not engage in any violence whatsoever.
What Trump asks his backers to do is make their voices heard in support of the members of Congress who are working to ensure the election was a fair one.
There was also no insurrection.
At no point was the overthrow of the government of the United States even remotely possible as an outcome.
Not even close.
Those cosplaying idiots taking selfies in Speaker Pelosi's office, parading around with podiums, actually her lectern, had no intention of forming a new government.
This was an expression of anger, not a realistic organized coup attempt.
So if it wasn't incitement and it wasn't interaction, why did the Democrats and corporate media and the big tech tyrants want you to believe it was?
That's quite simple, actually.
The purpose is to create an atmosphere of crisis and emergency, giving cover to extreme and illiberal actions to punish and silence those with whom they disagree.
And it worked.
Trump's banned from Twitter, as are thousands of his supporters.
Big Tech has colluded to destroy his competitor, Parler.
Democrats are moving forward with an absurd and pointless impeachment.
Simon & Schuster cancelled Senator Josh Hawley's book criticizing Big Tech.
People who merely attended the rally never stormed the Capitol being fired and abused.
None of the above actions are just.
None of them can be justified.
This is not some existential threat to the Republic, and it never was.
This is now all about power, about votes on the left milking a tragedy for all it's worth in an attempt to destroy their political rivals.
And we know that Jonathan Sullivan, who has a brother, James, who is a leftist provocateur, let 226 Antifa members in the Capitol riot, where James has written, I'm currently working with the FBI to expose and place total blame on John and the 226 members of Antifa who instigated the Capitol riot.
I think that's exactly right.
Carl, your thoughts?
We are in a push for a one-party propagandistic system where all Americans are going to get in.
That was a great article.
The Federalist has some great stuff like that.
That was awesome.
They also have some absolutely ridiculous articles on the other end of the spectrum.
But that being said, that really did point out that this is a test of basic education and integrity for the American people.
Like, oh my god, so do words mean anything?
That laid it out that if you want insurrection and incitement as a legal charge, like you've committed a crime, buddy, you don't even know what those words mean.
And my take on all of this is that the military has already won this battle.
And what we are seeing is the exposure of these systems in order to maximize the victory and to maximize the destruction, which has to include corporate media, which has to include, in this case, almost everyone on the left, everyone on the left politically in power, and many of those on the right.
That said, while I think this is the show, all we've got so far are hints, promises, threats, still no offensive display with the Trump cards to be able to get what NSA has on everybody.
So it's still scary.
And it's, in my mind, I would say it's 95%.
I'm confident that this are the White Hats.
But if it's the black hats, then all you can do is tip your cap and say, yeah, you got us again.
Chris, your thoughts?
Well, I'd like to entertain the possibility, if not maybe even the likelihood, that maybe Trump might be compromised by the very same Deep State or Mossad or the Jewish finance bankers that have put him in place in the first place.
And arguably, maybe he is having some sort of active conscience with the special appeal of the popular support that he's receiving.
So there could be that possibility.
I'd also like to point out, like I said in my previous comment
about the structure of not only the Cold War, but even World War II, and how the left and right paradigm
is controlled by the Rockefeller family
through a lot of financial interests and a lot of murky trust funds and NGOs
and national endowments and things like this, as well as the intelligence agencies and even the FBI
there to serve as janitors to cover this up.
And now we get the mainstream media and fangs serving in the same capacity, which are arguably
deep state and DARPA derivatives and really functions of Wall
Street, I'd have to say.
So you're seeing a lot of interesting things in terms of the people rising up and trying
to take their power back, take their voices back, in the face of overwhelming force and censorship
and this draconian laws and lockdowns and really being deemed non-essential workers
by their own government and forced into abject poverty.
He's probably putting a lot of people into an interesting predicament at this point.
I don't think it's an accident or a happenstance thing.
So I think there's tremendous potential for a citizen uprising force to gather in a populist movement here, unless these guys are able to steer us into some sort of a destructive stalemate.
There's an excellent complimentary article by Jonathan Turley who's a very thoughtful guy and
expert on the Constitution. The Senate faces a difficult burden with the issue of the second
impeachment where 45 senators have already voted in favor of a motion from Rand Paul
to assert the unconstitutionality of putting a former president on trial
before they took the oath for the impeachment and voted on the dismissal motion raised by Rand Paul.
I, Jonathan Turley, met with all Senate Republicans to discuss the historical and
constitutional issues. I...
I did the same before the first impeachment of Trump.
It was an intense, in many ways, inspiring discussion.
Senators honestly struggled on whether they could vote to remove a president who is no longer in office.
But the Senate is faced with a second prudential issue.
There are cases which, even if legally brought, contain errors so significant they must be dismissed as unsound on prudential rather than constitutional grounds.
This case raises such a fundamental error.
The problem is not what was sent to the Senate, but what was not.
There was no record.
For the first time in history, the House sent an article of impeachment to the Senate without any hearing, any testimony, or any response from the President.
The House simply sent a poorly crafted article.
The issue is whether the Senate wants to legitimize this radical departure from the traditions of both chambers.
Some of us called for the House to hold at least a day of hearings to allow the chance for the President to respond.
Yet the House refused to call any witness or hold any hearing.
House leaders said there was not a day to spare, then did nothing.
They waited almost two weeks to submit the article to the Senate.
So what's going on?
Steve Chapman, I think, has put his finger on it.
How to punish Trump for sedition even if impeachment fails.
The main value of convicting Trump is that would allow the Senate to take a separate vote to forbid him from running for president again.
Under the 14th Amendment, Congress could impose a ban even without conviction.
Congress would simply need to declare Trump engaging in an act of insurrection or rebellion by encouraging the attack on the Capitol.
We know, however, that he did not do that, as a Federalist is already exposed.
This option, however, politically has several advantages.
First, it would only take a simple majority in both houses.
Second, it would give Republicans a middle way between convicting Trump in an impeachment and impersonating potted plants.
For members thinking of running for president in 2024, it would take him out of the race.
What's in it for Democrats?
Their chief purpose is making sure Trump will never be president again.
Using the 14th would be a reasonable alternative if it could attract a significant amount of Republican support.
It could be done quickly, free Democrats to move on to urgent policy matters.
Instead, delaying President Biden's agenda could not be undone.
By a future Congress without a two-thirds vote of each House.
We know that the timeline doesn't support anything like this.
Not only was there no incitement and no insurrection, Trump people weren't even involved.
There's a mere sort of involved collusion between Nancy Pelosi, the Capitol Police, the Mayor of Washington, and the members of Antifa who fake being Trump supporters to create a stage-managed Attempt to invade the house, the Capitol building, very much on the order of the Reichstag fire that of course was executed by Hitler to blame on communists so he could seize greater power
Pelosi clearly is motivated to get Trump out of the way, lest he clean their clock again.
We know from Sidney Powell, Trump won an overwhelming victory, actually 410 electoral votes, taking virtually every state in the Union, including California and Minnesota, as I had predicted would occur.
They're afraid of him.
They're peeing in their pants over the prospect of Trump mopping him up again.
Have no doubt.
Carl, your thoughts?
Jonathan Turley, the author of the first article.
I've appreciated him for over a decade.
He went after President Obama for refusing to prosecute war crimes and torture and keeping Guantanamo Bay open.
He spoke I thought very well during the impeachment trial to make the point that, listen, no crime has been committed and you're considering an impeachment verdict for a non-criminal act.
And now, again, he's just pointing out the obvious.
You're getting charges of having committed high crimes and misdemeanors without any evidence.
That is the definition, or that is a perfect example of dictatorial government, where you do policy based upon what you say.
It is unlimited by any requirement.
It is unlimited by any law.
We just say, hey, he's impeached.
We don't have to explain it.
That Again, it's a fundamental test for Americans for integrity.
Will you accept that?
And now it goes on to the Senate where there's an opportunity for a show trial.
And it's just this final, final test of the American public of whether we will stand for the Republic, we will stand for the dignity of people and basic laws that everyone plays by and everyone understands, or one-party dictatorial control.
Well, it certainly shows Joe Biden's a joke when he talks about unity.
He could simply put the coitus to this by declaring that a former president cannot be subject to allegement, which the Constitution makes very clear.
Chris, your thoughts?
Yeah, I think it's kind of interesting how these guys really pull this coup off and really announce it with a forethought and have the full corporate sponsorship and the bankers behind them.
And I really think it's almost like a theatrics and Trump might be a fallback plan in case they lose control of this Biden push.
They're trying to see if they can get away with the Biden and if they can't then they can always fall back to Trump is my suspicion.
I really think that the people are starting to rise up and they should and they should continue to do this because I don't think any single man or any savior is going to come for us.
I think really our salvation comes from within and from each other.
And I think that really the only way that's possible is for us to really exchange information, not speculation, not hope, not any of these other things.
you know, until we see some evidence or proof, or at least more of a verbal commitment from Trump.
I don't understand why these people keep ascribing all these things to him that he's never even
talked about. All I've heard him really say is about warp speed or the vaccination program or
playing along with his COVID hoax and stepping aside with that. So there's a lot of issues I
have with with what he's done. And if this is a trap and he's something to do to show this extent
of this, wow, is this is this a heck of a lesson to pay for a price to pay for this lesson. And
And I really hope that what you guys are saying about the White Hats is true, but at this point in time, I don't have the luxury of relying on hearsay or waiting another four years for this to materialize.
Well, we appreciate your position, Chris.
Meanwhile, we have a report of the U.S.
military at the White House arresting Congress.
Special Ops units, including 4,000 deputized National Guard soldiers acting as U.S.
Marshals, have served as indictments on, or were about to arrest, 67 percent of Congress.
Would I could verify this for a fact, early Monday morning, 25 January, between 3 and 6 a.m., military vans, buses, police cars, multitude of police and military troops were very busy at a blacked out White House, even though the mass media refused to report it.
The U.S.
has been functioning under martial laws since Saturday, 9 January, when Trump signed the Insurrection Act.
I believe that to be a fact.
And interrupt military.
U.S.
government is actually running the U.S.
They see Biden as a treasonous agent.
A few days before his inauguration, which was a manufactured event, pre-recorded, had no legal significance, was broadcast on different channels at different times, which would be impossible if a live event More than one take was going on at least 15 or 20 minutes before Trump's administration expired, which means it has no legal significance.
A few days before the inauguration, due to foreign interference in the 2020 presidential election, Trump had signed the Insurgency Act, declared martial law, and shifted his power to the US military.
I believe this is correct.
Early morning, 25 Jan, between 3 and 6, a blackout occurred in Washington, according to two separate videos.
Police and troops were everywhere.
Military vans, buses, police cars pulled up to the White House.
Loaded passengers took them down the road across the bridge.
Some came back.
Mustang medics recording showed many buses and vans, some marked as military, entering the Capitol grounds.
Here is a structure that's going up on the side of the Capitol facing
the Ulysses S. Grant Memorial, which I believe is appropriate as a potential site
for an inauguration of Trump, where Ulysses Grant was a president
when the United States, under the Constitution of 1776, went bankrupt,
negotiated with European bankers, including the Rothschilds, to create a corporation
using the assets of the Republic as collateral, where Trump has sought to undo that
by filing papers six months, 18 months in advance.
Where the assets of the corporation would go to the Republic, reinstated as of 2359 on the 19th of January, just a minute before the 20th, the day of the inauguration.
I believe these stands are for that purpose.
Here's a video of the buses and so forth that were being described there.
Check it out.
Seems like they're prepping to herd them all in.
But they're not in the Capitol though, right?
They're not in the Capitol building, aren't they?
In their apartments?
Or houses or condos or whatever they are.
What could this be?
I can't figure it out.
From what I understand that this is again, this is called chatter because I've only heard it online and I can't back it up with multiple sources.
But this whole operation was set up to let them commit treason so they would certify an election that constitutionally cannot be certified.
And all of the people that created treason.
Does anybody know how many indictments have been created?
This guy's in those vans.
Look at this.
And what's bizarre is all the buses are different.
Different companies.
Venture Tours, Lexbus, Newtons.
We got Enterprise Trucks.
And then we got these really weird buses right here.
I've never seen a bus like that.
Those really weird buses are prisoner transport vehicles, let me report.
Let me add, there are also other oddities, such as a structure going up opposite the White House.
What in the world could that be?
I want to elaborate on this just a tad, because I appreciate Chris's skepticism.
Sometimes a very tiny detail can have enormous significance in the film Total Recall, for example.
Arnold Schwarzenegger plays a character who's on Mars, but where there's a guy, a scientist, who's trying to convince him this is all an illusion, And he's virtually convinced he's just imagining it until a bead of sweat breaks out on the side of his forehead and runs down his face, leading him to realize it's reality, and he blows them away.
We have a similar parallel going on in Washington, D.C.
Not only all these oddities, Which seemed to me to defy explanation.
If Biden was elected the President of the United States, along the following lines, we know Biden has been fed information through an earpiece.
For example, he recently passed a Marine and was instructed to salute the Marine.
Instead of saluting the Marine, he simply blurted out, salute the Marine.
Well, far more telling, in my opinion, is that Marines who are there for ceremonial purposes Are not saluting Joe Biden.
As a former Marine Corps officer, I can tell you that's only occurring because they've been instructed not to salute Joe Biden.
The Marine Corps is a highly disciplined military organization.
If the military recognized Joe Biden as president, you can be damn sure they'd be saluting Joe Biden.
They are not.
This is just as telling and devastating as that bead of sweat.
And I guarantee you, I say this based on knowledge of the Marine Corps, where I served as a commission officer for four years.
I am not wrong about this.
Carl, your thoughts?
Yeah, good point about the lack of any salute.
So we are in an Emperor's New Clothes condition, where you have the most ridiculous naked empire parading in front of everybody to see.
And yet, that's the point of the story.
The parade goes on.
So the White House has been dark.
That is unprecedented.
That is huge.
You do not turn all the lights out on the White House.
It would be as ridiculous as a Hilton Hotel turning out the lights of their business.
Now that video, was that the same evening where you had the bands coming up and circling and the sirens, where you had the bright flashlights on the White House, and then the fireworks behind it?
Was that also that same evening?
Because I saw a video of that too.
Do you guys know?
I don't offhand, Carl.
I know that no one else saw the fireworks that were supposed to be a part of the inauguration.
And we know that inauguration footage was pre-recorded.
It was in Spain seven hours before the event.
I was paying close attention.
It was occurring too early, 10 to 15 minutes too early.
Before the expiration of the Trump administration, meaning it couldn't possibly be legally valid, I have a colleague who was watching it on different channels and they were playing it at different times.
In other words, if this had been a single event being livestreamed, the same events would be occurring at the same time on all the channels.
That was not the case.
So that, you know, we also had the oddities that you had women in pink and white who were in one location at one time and another and too close a time for them to have moved, meaning there were multiple takes.
You had Joe Biden's shoes turning from tan to blue to tan.
And you had this fireworks display that no one in Washington saw.
And I say, look, you have to use what's known as inference to the best explanation.
You have to ask yourself, Which hypothesis confirms a higher probability on the available evidence?
A hypothesis that Joe Biden has been inaugurated President of the United States, or the hypothesis that Biden is not President of the United States and the military is in control?
With all the evidence we've been describing, and they have a zero probability if this was legit and Joe Biden is president, but a high probability if he's not, if the inauguration was staged, and if the military does not recognize him as commander-in-chief, and if, in fact, the military is in control.
So I submit what cannot be conclusive.
Virtually all scientific reasoning is inconclusive.
The probability is overwhelmingly in favor of this being a military op and the White Hat's in charge.
The alternative pales by comparison.
Carl, further thoughts?
Understood and agreed.
The fireworks I was referencing, I see a lot of stuff.
I remember watching video of these police vehicles circling around and the sirens and the White House was dark.
And then this was like a possible the same time as the arrest.
And this is in the middle of the night.
You get fireworks exploding behind the White House.
That was a separate video, which to me, if it was real, communicated again, the possibility of arrests.
But the real question, as you're pointing out, Jim, is who's really in charge here?
And there are, as you said, two options.
So under one, My understanding of why I'm so confident the White Hats are in charge is that you did have probably a four to one vote margin for Trump, so all Trump would need to do if he wants to stand with the American people and justice and virtue.
Instead of a psychopathic dictatorial government and empire, is just enact the Insurrection Act.
The military is in charge, assuming they're agreed with the evidence that they've had forever, since the JFK assassination, but certainly since 2018, to totally sting this and set it up.
So either the White Hats are in charge and they're playing out a show for us to stand up and demand the basic truth, or this is going to be a total mockery of justice and truth just to drive us into Civil War 2.0.
But I think that the 90% of the people who rise up in the military, they see this and they stand for the good.
Well, bear in mind Trump signed—I mean, this is a fact, easily verifiable—an executive order on the 12th of September 2018 against foreign interference in American elections that gave him vast powers to seize the assets and prosecute the personnel of any foreign entity Dominion voting machines are based in Canada.
The sidle tabulators are based in Spain.
China bought into Dominion $400 million worth.
Obama appears to have gone to Italy for a range of these Leonardo satellites, nominally under the control of the Vatican, to manipulate the vote.
We have an affidavit from an IT expert in Italy, very high level, acknowledging the manipulation of the vote.
All this satisfies very extensive powers to the government to seize their assets.
Bear in mind too, though Chris may dispute, and I welcome his skepticism, Biden was locked out of the White House.
Biden has not occupied the White House.
And the scenes of him in the Oval Office are from a sound stage, a set.
In addition, he's been instructed not to enter the Pentagon.
He's been excluded from the Pentagon.
And when you put this together with the Marines not saluting him because the Pentagon does not recognize him to be the Commander-in-Chief, I think you've got a very tight case.
If Trump were still in Washington when they're rounding up all the traitors and miscreants and corrupt agents, he'd be accused of being a dictator, a tin pot, who is using the military to promote his own agenda.
He's not there.
He's in Mar-a-Lago.
They're actually trying to take him out, but a White House, a military in whom the American people have great confidence are doing the mopping up, and when they present it to the American people, it will be completely credible.
Chris, your thoughts?
I have many.
I just wonder who's really directing this fakery of the Biden moon landing or the Oval Office experiment that we're seeing and this whole inauguration and why it's going on so far.
Why the lawmakers that are in charge of writing the laws in this country are still insisting that anybody that's telling the truth and standing against this UN soft kill program is somehow another a terrorist.
I have to think that if the Patriots are in charge and the military is in charge, they would have probably surrounded CNN and grabbed these guys out by the cuff of their shirts and definitely thrown them into some sort of a gallows for treason at some point in time, just for betraying humanity, flat out.
So until I see Schwarzenegger come in and start blowing these guys away, I'm really not going to believe it.
And even when I do see that, I still might not believe it because I know these guys have gone through hell and back to pull just about every deception upon us in the world.
As far as credibility and the benefit of the doubt, I think that you're really asking the wrong man here for these type of luxuries.
You know, I'm asking exactly the right man because I want a profound skeptic and that's you.
Oh, well, I'm Catholic as all hell to this.
I'll tell you, Fetz, I mean, like, the military's talking about bringing Warp Speed out, and the vaccine, and the 5G infrastructure, and all this stuff.
The Federal Reserve is paying hospitals to murder citizens.
They're isolating people from their family under this medical hoax.
Are you kidding me?
I mean, like, if there's a military, if there is a White Hat in the world, where the hell are they?
Well, I think that you're rushing the cadence that they have.
Maybe, maybe I'm impatient.
I'll give you that.
I think in the situation, I'm one of the other, uh, one of, one of probably a hundred million Americans about to lose their home.
It's, you know, standing in line for six months for unemployment claims and still haven't gotten a dime.
That's where I'm at.
I've been deemed non-essential by my government and I'm not happy about it.
It is manifestly absurd.
You're right.
All your points are well taken, my friend.
Thank you.
Meanwhile, Biden faces scrutiny over reliance on executive orders.
He's already signed more than three dozen, more than anyone else, including holding construction of the U.S.-Mexico border wall and allowing transgender into the military.
That's going down really badly.
also allowing young men and boys who pretend to be girls to enter into girls' locker rooms
and bathrooms and destroying women's sports, where Bill Clinton had 364 orders over two terms,
George W. Bush 291, Barack Obama 276, Trump in his one term signed 220, but McConnell scuffed
at Biden in his first week and signed more than 30 unilateral actions and working Americans are
getting short shift.
Biden framed his latest as an effort to undo the damage Trump has done by FIOP rather than initiating any new laws.
It's McConnell was far more understanding of Trump's decision to use executive orders in his presidency.
In August, after coronavirus relief collapsed, Trump signed a series of executive orders to defer payroll taxes for Americans earning less than $100,000, pausing student loans, continuing eviction moratoriums, and extending, albeit smaller, enhanced unemployment benefits, all of which were benefiting the American people.
I think this is a Fairly extraordinary.
And by the way, if you go to my blog at jamesfetzer.org, you'll see I'm going through six warning signs about the Biden administration, where it's heading, which includes, you know, vaccine passports, and it includes pursuing domestic terrorists and also taking more aggressive action in Iraq and in Syria and in Afghanistan.
Where I juxtapose that with photographs of them and a close-up study of the years where we know, in fact, that these are two different people and show their signatures are completely different.
So none of these executive orders are being signed by the man the American people believed falsely they were electing president.
Carl, your thoughts?
Yeah, first to go back to Chris.
We do have an opponent with a perfect record.
They have never been beaten.
Maybe you can make the argument the American Revolution threw them back 50 to 100 years, but they've recaptured us.
And maybe that's the point of making America the greatest, just another in-your-face insult.
Yeah, so you think you're free?
You're gonna be number one, all right, but for us?
So the executive orders is that this is just a – if, for whatever, if it's real, if it's a show, this is just a slide toward dictatorship, where you're going to have the Führer, the leader, just tell us what to do.
And it'll be under some excuse to undo the damage, or for the good of the people.
It's just blatant propaganda.
And I'll just add, Chris, I do believe if Trump is re-inaugurated on the 4th of March, as I believe is going to happen as the 19th President of the Republic, that he's going to put an end to all this medical malpractice that's going on with the COVID.
I don't think he believes in it.
I don't think he ever believed in it.
And I understand every reason you're saying why the threat is so ominous, where we're going to continue this issue momentarily, but I just want to say, you know, my take, which is subject to proof, I mean, I'm going to be shown to be right or wrong here and in short order, so I'm very prepared.
I hope you're right.
I know we all hope I'm right, but the point I'm making is if I'm wrong, we're all going to know it.
Your thoughts?
Yeah, I'm just getting ready for the fact, and you know, I hate to explore this possibility that you might in fact possibly be wrong, and I don't say that that's the case, but I have to prepare as if it's a possibility, and at least prepare myself logically, rationally, reasonably, not only from what has been said by Trump, what has been done by Trump, and I just haven't seen these things that everybody just, that the Orange Crush is just in love with, and I'm having a hard time getting there, and I think maybe this is part of the show, maybe it's a, you know, ye of little faith and I give you that I'm definitely being
impatient with this but I think I've been patient with him for four years I've been
definitely supporting of him as his office of president I definitely am behind him in fighting
against election fraud I think he got screwed I actually think that you know maybe he's using
this thing as the art of the deal to go against you know Rothschild in terms of a bargaining chip
because look at the most well-armed population of the most dispossessed population on earth right now and
the support they have for for Donald Trump whether he even did much for them or not or whether it's a
you know a great relationship or an abusive one or a neglectful one whatever you know
people can speculate But I'm just saying, look at the amount of support and people are already getting the buyer's remorse immensely from this Biden
And I don't think he ever had the support.
And I think the whole support is coming from the mainstream media and they are caught literally
trying to create this and manufacture this consent that is just not there.
And I think that anybody that's really resisting this coup or this hostile takeover
is being deemed a terrorist for this reason.
They wanna use fear in the manner they always have.
So really, I mean, you don't make your best decisions when you're in fear or under duress and they know that.
And that's why in most courts of law and tort law, any decisions or debts that are incurred under duress
should be null and void.
And I'd like to hear Trump say some stuff like that.
That'd be a pretty good concept, wouldn't it?
I mean, cause we're really funding our own enemies by paying this user as debt, by paying these taxes.
You know, these people are trying to, they declare war on us.
And until somebody gets in there and takes them out, I don't see anything changing.
Well, I love your articulation and your ability to construct arguments, Chris.
Meanwhile, we'll be right back.
I believe that in fact it's the Israelis who are trying to take out Trump in the assassination because he won't bomb Iran.
I believe they are going to take out Biden and they're going to move up Kamala, who's going to bring in Hillary, and then Hillary will do for Iran what she did for Libya.
Look at past presidents in their wars.
Ronald Reagan, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7.
George H.W.
Bush, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.
George H.W. Bush, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.
Bill Clinton, 1, 2, 3.
George W. Bush, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.
Barack Obama, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7.
Donald Trump, none.
None.
None.
And remember that the press in the United States is controlled by the Zionists.
How many times have I pointed out That I have a panel of a hundred executives from CNN, every one of whom is a dual U.S.-Israeli citizen.
Another panel from the NBC, every one of whom is a hundred executives, every one of whom is a dual U.S.-Israeli citizen.
Another panel from the New York Times, every one of whom is a dual U.S.-Israeli citizen.
They want war on Iran.
Trump is not going to give it.
Why would you bother attempting to assassinate the man if he's out of the action and has no potential to return?
Meanwhile, we have lots of reports about COVID vaccine victims.
Many, many side effects, including death.
There are pages after pages after pages of deaths caused by the vaccine.
The UK government has admitted that COVID vaccines are pointless and offer zero protection.
But nevertheless, they're demanding that you continue to wear your mask.
This is outrageous.
The scientific consensus in early 2020 was one of coercion and fear, instructing humans everywhere to separate, lock down, mask up, follow lines on a floor and contact trace, until a vaccine was produced and plunged into everyone's arm.
Now that experimental vaccines are being rolled out, public health authorities can't seem to let go.
Britain's Health Secretary Matt Hancock reprimanded everyone in the country that they must continue to mask up, continue to lock down, continue to contact trace, even after vaccination.
This is absolutely absurd.
Meanwhile, Facebook and the Journal of the American Medical Association, colloquially known as JAMA, Admit they got it all wrong about HCQ.
We've been pointing this out forever that Dr. Anthony Tony the Rat Fauci attacked HCQ when he knew better because an article published in the Journal of Virology in 2005 and extolled its virtues explained that HCQ would defeat the coronavirus if you already had it and it would prevent you from acquiring it if you did it.
But it's cheap, it's inexpensive, it's readily available, it's been around for 65 years, but it doesn't contribute to the profits of the pharmaceutical industry, and more importantly, it won't kill you.
So I think we know what's going on here.
Fauci could have prevented thousands of alleged infections and so forth, even though we know the data is manipulated If he'd remoted HCQ.
Today, the Facebook Oversight Board announced it was overturning a previous case on the efficacy of HCQ, which had previously opposed it, that it contributes to the risk of imminent physical harm, announcing it was a mistake.
How many hundreds of thousands of victims were killed due to Dr. Fauci, the CDC, and tech giant false claims on hydroxychloroquine?
We're living in a very dark age, and people need to know the truth.
is to get back at Trump.
Hundreds of thousands of Americans are dead today.
When will they face justice?
Now get this, here we have a Roman Catholic priest or a monk reporting what's really going on
at the risk of his life.
Listen to this, every word.
We're living in a very dark age and people need to know the truth.
So I'm gonna tell you in English here what is really going on.
Thank you.
It's called the Masonic Takeover of the World.
Everything deep, dark, evil, twisted, perverse, sadistic, uh, masochistic, uh, evil, and satanic that has been lurking in the Lodge, the Masonic Lodge, and in the hearts of the people who run it, is now coming forth into the open day.
They founded their lodges in 1717, they spread around the world, they infiltrated institutions, they overthrew governments, especially they hate Catholic monarchies.
They've infiltrated the church, church institutions, Knights of Columbus.
They founded their own banks in New York City, Chase Manhattan, JP Morgan, Brown Brothers Harriman, Citibank.
They took control of the Republican Democratic parties.
They started the First World War and the Second World War, and they controlled all the sides in them.
They destroyed Austria because the Emperor dared to veto the election of Rampolla Tinderell, their Masonic candidate for the papacy, in 1904.
And so the Cardinals chose Pius X And for that crime, the Masons destroyed Austria, the only nation that ceased to exist after the First World War.
But now it's their ultimate scandemic.
The Bilderbergers, that's the Rockefellers.
This is total world control.
They want control of everyone.
They want to enslave us.
They just don't want to own us.
They want us to be evil like them.
They want to take us to hell like them.
They want us to love evil like them.
They are pedophiles in the worst sense.
They want everyone to be a pervert.
They want everyone to be involved in evil.
They want everyone involved in killing themselves.
That's why they want you to suffocate yourself to death, wearing a diaper on your face.
That's why they want you to willingly stick out your arm and take chemicals injected in you that will destroy you.
Change what you are, make you a GMO creature.
That's why they're racing to install all manners of high-tech equipment so that, far beyond what is necessary for cell phone communications, I can't even say the name, this channel would be blocked, but they want to control because they want to be able to, through their computers, their few families, their few hundred people around the world, they want to be able to control all the automobiles, And all the machinery, and all the jobs, and eventually everyone's online.
They built the internet.
The internet is one of their tools of control, because they know that the more we spend time talking to each other through this method, like I'm doing now, the more we get programmed by it and controlled, because this is not real.
Real is who would be next to me, okay?
I have been doing the nightly prayers in front of the basilica for nearly 10 months and transmitting all along.
And the reason why no one comes is because I transmit.
That's why no one comes.
People don't realize that.
You think that this is real and so you stay home.
You think that what you do on the internet is real and so you don't do anything.
It's the ultimate satanic deception.
And so that's why I'm doing a totally politically incorrect broadcast right now because I hope they cancel my channel.
I hope they cancel me because this is their method of control.
This is not reality.
We need to enter into the streets and take down these evil governments controlled by these evil people.
Don't take the vaccine, it will kill you.
It's not the first one, the second one, but there's a principle more important than whether one vaccine will harm you or not.
The principle is you're giving your life into hands of people who are known mass murderers.
The Masonic Lodges have engineered the deaths of hundreds of millions of people.
These are people that make Adolf Hitler look like an altar boy.
I think Adolf Hitler was an altar boy.
But these people are extremely evil.
Don't trust them with anything.
It is a sin to put more trust in wicked people than in honest people.
Whoever trusted Jesus Christ the way that people trust these globalists.
So, God is putting for us a life and death.
We can believe Jesus Christ and live honestly and naturally and morally upright, or we can become the total perverse puppets of a few hundred families around the world.
So deceived and twisted that we think we're free while we're killing ourselves.
And the decision's coming quickly because in January, they plan to vaccinate everyone in Italy, whether they like it or not.
And in the United States, the military has announced that it can vaccinate everyone in the country in 24 hours.
And they were told to prepare to do that by Donald Trump, not by Joe Biden.
But both of them will command it when they get in power.
Unless one of them is convert.
I think only one probably could convert, Donald Trump.
The other one, I think, lost his soul long ago.
He still has one.
So, this is what the world is facing right now.
It's not a small thing.
We are in a very apocalyptic scenario.
It might be the final apocalypse that John spoke of.
It's so like it.
Don't take the vaccine.
You can use Force to prevent yourself from being vaccinated.
You can use lethal force.
That's force.
It's perfectly legitimate because the right of self-defense.
If someone's trying to kill you, you can, uh, if the only way you can prevent that is killing them, that's perfectly legitimate.
That's Catholic teaching.
It's always been the teaching of the church.
Don't accept the big Masonic lie that we Christians can never use violence or that violence is always evil.
Why can they kill hundreds of millions of people but we can't defend ourselves?
Come on now.
Christians have always held the principle that you need to get rid of the rot before the rot spreads.
If you ran into an individual like one of these Freemasons in the Middle Ages, these people would be hung and quartered before sunset in their village, because everyone would recognize that these people are absolutely evil witches.
You don't have anything to do with them, and you don't tolerate them, and you certainly don't give them a chance.
You certainly don't give them a chance to spread their evil lies.
It's one thing to speak your minds.
It's another thing to use free speech to plan and plot the murder of hundreds of millions of people.
Billions, now they're planning to kill billions.
We, the people, have to stop them.
We cannot endure this.
We cannot tolerate it.
And we can't be peaceful about it.
Yes, we must pray God, because we won't have this victory without him.
But we must fight.
Okay?
And, uh, there are a lot more than us than them.
There's nearly 8 billion of us, and there's only a few thousand of them.
So, um, there's no way they can survive if we stand up for what we are.
Alas, though, billions of people are so stupid they're gonna let themselves be murdered in the next few years by these maniacs.
And we can try to talk sense into some of them, but some of them don't want sense.
They're completely blinded.
We have to steel our souls against what is about to happen, because so many people we love are going to take the vaccine and destroy themselves.
And then they'll wonder why it happened when we told them and warned them.
So we need to keep warning people as much as possible now.
But things are going to happen really rapidly now, because These governments aren't changing.
They're not getting better.
They're getting worse.
They're getting more evil.
They're getting more affixated with this thing.
Because these people have lost all light.
They love darkness.
And we have to be the children of light and act in an entirely different way.
Meaning we have to work for the liberty of people.
But that doesn't mean we can't fight.
Okay?
This is something we have to recognize.
It is our duty, our mission, in this hour.
And the more I say the truth, the darker they turn this video up, you notice.
And so now it's getting really dark, and I'll salute you.
Stay free, stay close to Christ, say your prayers, but be prudent now.
Things are going to get bad.
And don't pretend that nothing's happening, okay?
Prepare yourself.
I think that was a simply spectacular statement without endorsing every aspect, because I believe there are other players over and beyond the Freemasons, but I think he's done a hell of a job of warning the public at great risk to his own life and well-being.
Carl, your thoughts?
Yeah, hell of a job, so to speak, Father.
To go back to Chris, the contingency planning, I do.
We gotta go Dr. King and Gandhi on these parasites and if this thing doesn't turn out.
And I think that it's reasonable for the date that Jim sets as well.
I can't imagine a scenario where Patriots are going to be looped into waiting more past the date early next month now.
For those points, a lot of great points were there.
So, that list of the wars.
Yeah, the U.S.
is the leading rogue state empire.
We have killed more than the Nazis in wars since World War II.
Through these interventions, or whatever it is that they call it, war on terror, war for freedom, war for democracy, war against communism, whatever it's been.
The U.S.
has been the most brutal empire.
We are like the Roman Empire, and the Roman Empire, they approved every war as a defensive war.
When they invaded England, they approved it as a defensive war to keep Rome safe.
It is the most utter hypocrisy.
The hydroxychloroquine, yeah, as Jim said, Fauci was in charge when they published that 2005 paper saying hydroxychloroquine is both a preventative and a treatment.
And the data that is being acknowledged now is that, yeah, 79% better mortality rate from getting this coronavirus.
And finally for the priest, I saw that earlier.
And thank that guy for speaking up and his points.
And you know, nobody gets all of it right.
And the thing that I keep emphasizing to our listeners and to everyone who will hear me out, Excellent.
that we can quantify the damages of the American empire to annual millions killed, billions
harmed, trillions looted, demand the arrest of the leaders of that empire.
Excellent.
Chris, your thoughts?
Yeah, going back to the first thing you said about Trump and the no wars.
Yeah, I think there is a shift between the common use of national militaries and a transition into private sector or mercenary type forces that are often dispatched by central banks or let's just say economic interests that go into places like Venezuela or Colombia, other places around the world, even in the United States as you're seeing with Antifa and BLM.
And the FBI turning a blind eye to this in many cases and the intelligence agencies seeming to pump these people up through CNN and other distribution outlets that they have in terms of propaganda.
So you got to wonder who's putting these guys out there and what's going on and why they're doing this.
They did the same thing in the Wild West to conquer the frontier with the outlaw and the lawman and it's really the way they control oppositions.
They don't leave anything to chance.
Yeah, I'm thinking about some of these things.
It almost seems like an IQ test with this mass thing and this absurdity.
You know, they're trying to, you know, Kloss anal swab is trying to literally do rectal swabs on people to analyze or to diagnose a respiratory infection.
To me, it seems like nothing short of the Tide Pod Challenge, you know, where people are taking dab rigs and trying to smoke those things.
And, you know, if you cough, you lose.
So, I don't know, this is pretty insane.
I can't even believe this is going on, and that people are actually, like, following suit with this, and that, you know, it's even a thing.
I almost think that there's some sort of a social engineering aspect of this absurdity that is just, it's almost laughable at best, and it's almost there to gaslight you or to really piss you off or trigger you, so I think that something's going on with that.
And really, to take the outrage and harness it into a lightning rod into the polarizing party system that they always try to do.
So yeah, I think the concept of vaccines is the justification they're trying to bring in through this absurd in the first place, and that's a pure abuse of language.
You know, you're dealing with the RNAs, the agitants, the nanotech, things like this.
It is technically, and it should be called the carcinogenic delivery mechanism at best, and that's my theory of what they should call a vaccine.
But that's just, you know, from what my research, I've been able to conclude.
And talking to people that actually develop these things, they actually will tell you these things, you know.
Yeah, pretty pretty no-brainer and the most ironic and strange thing is like Wall Street and these bankers have built the success and failure of this infrastructure soft kill paradigm and integrated into the success or failure of the market and the 401ks and the index funds and ultimately the These endowments or these these organizations are being directed you know by Wall Street as well but more importantly intelligence agencies and even above that the United Nations or you know their their lapdogs like the CDC or the World Health Organization.
I also want to point out.
In 2014, that flight MH17 that they shot down to try to blame on Russia, that was carrying 82 of the top 100 virologists that were going to Africa to deal with the Ebola crisis down there that was probably an arguably manufactured situation again, you know, in exchange to put this fear into Africa so they can get a better energy deal through the Obama administration.
I just have to say that that's probably something to think about.
And I'd say that really look at the strategy, how they use these situations, whether it's the Capitol building, which they stage in the first place and then come up with this absurdity and, you know, come up with greater defense measures and deem everybody that resists this coup as a terrorist.
You know, this is like the whole gaslighting military operations they're using and really It's pretty effective, but it's sinister, and it's definitely an inversion at best.
So, getting to what the priest was saying, I think I agree with some of the things that he's saying here, and I can understand he's coming from the concept of, like, maybe St.
Augustine, you know, with the Just War Theory, or, like, the Defensor Paxes thing that was, you know, created and forged because, you know, in the Dark Ages, people had to form these things to not get screwed by the Holy Trinity of oppression and power.
And by that, I'm talking about the Vatican, The royals and the land barons slash bankers so really it's a it's an infrastructure of oppression that they've always put on and Jesus incorporated is no different.
I'll say that the Spanish the French and the English Empires have all been utilized by the people from within this thing and really creating like I say a trinity of obfuscation and accountability.
Wow, that was wonderful.
in on it together and they point people around the block to get next door and
each of them's always chasing around this thing to figure out who's to blame
and really it's all of them working in cahoots with each other to screw us
over so yeah I think this is a holy trinity formula it's been around for a
long time and it's almost like the control opposition thing that they're
doing with the Hegelian dialect except they're just juggling one more illusion
of choice. Wow that was wonderful. Wonderful. Yeah I'm a little jaded Fats.
I'm sorry, man.
I'll really try to not be rude.
Yes, you're doing great.
Meanwhile, you'll be pursued to the ends of Earth.
U.S.
coalition airstrike kills a top ISIS leader.
A top ISIS leader was killed during a coalition airstrike led by the U.S.
in Iraq.
Coalition spokesman Wayne Mariotto said in his statement the airstrike killed 10 ISIS terrorists including Jabbar, Salman, Al-Farhan al-Husawi, part of a joint mission between the U.S.
and Iraqi forces.
Prime Minister of Iraq released a similar statement and they're making much of it where the most senior Daesh leader in Iraq, another name for ISIS, was killed during an airstrike near Kirkuk on January 27th.
But what we need to remember is ISIS was created by the United States in 2012.
Barack Obama, President, Hillary Clinton, Secretary of State, and John Brennan, the CIA director, decided to create a terrorist army to put pressure on the Syrian government of Bashar al-Assad, who's a democratically elected president of Syria.
So don't think we're there in Syria to bring democracy to Syria.
Syria is already a democracy.
Mike Flynn, who is then the director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, opposed the creation of this terrorist army.
So John Brennan recommended to Barack Obama that he fire him, which Barack Obama probably did.
We have all kinds of evidence that ISIS was made in the USA, including many of its members are sporting U.S.
Army tattoos.
John McKay couldn't shake claims about his ties to ISIS, said here to be false.
But in this photograph in the New York Times, there's John McCain standing in front of al-Baghdadi, the head of ISIS.
I mean, how ridiculous is that?
Here's a staged ISIS beheading video that was hacked from a John McCain staffer, where ISIS was known in Washington, D.C.
as John McCain's Army.
Embarrassingly bad.
Carl, your thoughts?
Yeah, just first that we can all feel the pressure of more and more events just speeding up.
And I don't know if it's going to continue for the next month, but we'll certainly have the front row seats to find out.
So bigger and bigger things are happening.
So I'm hopeful that this is going to come to a conclusion one way or the other.
The deal with ISIS, I mean, you know, Chris nailed it before.
This is just another branch of the American empire, and it is all coordinated.
When I worked for 18 years to end poverty through American and foreign policy through results.org.
We had two UN summits for heads of state to end poverty and we had all their pre-agreement to do this and I thought it was a done deal in 1990 at the World Summit for Children and then certainly at the 1997 microcredit summit.
And then, in coordination, all these global leaders of the so-called developed world just reneged on all of their promises and corporate media went silent.
So it is a coordinated game with the wars, with poverty.
Anybody could call this out that this is BS.
And as Jim said, this is a democracy in Syria.
They're just people, the Empire is upset over energy deals going through there, and there is no right to attack anybody there.
It is a war crime, it is war murder, but that's what the American Empire does.
Yeah, excellent, excellent.
Chris, your thoughts?
I think also I'd like to point out that the London Theatre Company often makes these theatrics, these religious or these public terrorist acts as an attempt to really create the theatrics to justify not only military action but hostile takeovers and resource confiscation in many of these regions and depopulating the original victims of geography.
So I'd like to point out that, you know, the concept of Israel using terrorism this measure it's basically been the foundation of Israel since the get go going back to the Balfour document of World War One and things like that and even, you know, the Stern gang or, you know, the King David Hotel or things in after World War Two, the creation of the Mossad and many of the Israeli defense agencies and things like this.
That have often sought to really use the Ottoman Empire and break it up and take over the oil fields in like Baku in the Middle East and appoint, of course, these quote-unquote Saudi royals and these Arab royals that are all somehow or another tied economically or socially to the British crown and the House of Hotchild.
So that's pretty interesting.
And also like how they've done terrorism as a mechanism to really unify with the full assist
of the mainstream media in Hollywood, the demonization of people resisting this oppression
and this takeover, it's very similar to what they're doing right now in America.
It's just, it's coming home to roost domestically.
So yeah, I look at some of these like hijackings from the seventies, you know, it reminds me of stuff
from like the Northwoods or things like that.
I can literally name two dozen and almost a half dozen Lufthansa hijackings that were, you know, supposedly interfered with or destroyed or intercepted by Israel or foiled by Israeli intelligence.
And I think these things were set up all along very similar like 9-11.
And I think really this is like where Dershowitz made his bones being a defense lawyer for Klaus von Bulow, one of the guys who was on the executive board of Lufthansa who wanted to remove the Boeing uninterruptible autopilot system from all his planes because he felt that it was involved with these hijackings.
And of course, he was framed for the attempted murder of his wife.
And of course, he had to deal with a different problem, we'll say, in terms of getting that sorted out.
And certainly, the media was there to demonize him in the same regard.
So, pretty interesting stuff.
You know, when anybody from London turns on this thing, ideologically, they all turn on them.
It's a scumbag alliance.
And really, they're all united by self-interest.
And anybody that betrays the cabal is really jackled up upon by the others.
So, I think that's why I'm Navon Bulow in that case.
So, yeah, I'll point out some of these things.
It's the same formula used in Gladio after World War II or even, you know, like I say, pivoting the Red Scare into the Domino Theory in America, you know, with Roy Cohn and them guys.
So, a lot of similarities and parallels in terms of formulas and the powers that be using, you know, the human emotion and the very real tragedies that are imposed upon us as a mechanism to create and propel these theatrics and, of course, to justify this asset stripping operation.
Nice.
Very nice.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send fan mail, pro or con, to liveneedtoknowatgmail.com.
Liveneedtoknowatgmail.com.
Here's a fan who spoke with a nurse on Tuesday and agreed with me when I theorized the COVID symptom of loss of taste and smell is really a byproduct of carbon dioxide toxicity from wearing a mask all the time.
If we conditionally accept the vaccine, then we stay in order.
Conditional acceptance of vaccine.
Yes, I will take your vaccine on the condition that you provide me a list of the ingredients and their side effects, the results of laboratory testing over a three-year period for efficacy, three million dollars cash up front in the name of the responsible party who will indemnify me if I am damaged.
Now you are still in honor via conditional acceptance.
Meanwhile, QAnon representative Marjorie Taylor Greene revealed she had a great call with Donald Trump who supports her as she vows to never apologize after being slammed for calling Parkland and Sandy Hook school shootings hoaxes.
Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene announced on Twitter on Saturday she had spoken with Donald Trump She claimed they had a great call and she's grateful for his support.
The QAnon-supporting Congresswoman blasted Democrats throughout.
She called Trump her all-time favorite POTUS as she compared herself to him due to the criticism she has received.
It comes as she faces increased calls for resignation over past comments supporting conspiracy theories around school shootings.
She has claimed the Parkland and Sandy Oak shootings were a hoax.
On Wednesday, a video emerged in 2019 of Green stalking Parkland school shooting survivor David Hawk.
This is just a headline from the Daily Mail.
As I have said, judging from the comments of people who still believe Sandy Hook are about 95% plus, CIA Director Casey said the goal of the CIA is that most of what all Americans believe to be false.
I believe we're there now.
Americans are the most ignorant people on the planet.
No critical thinking.
You can find about Sandy Hook going to my Sandy Hook Update.
Tracy loses, Wolfgang wins, and Deep State strikes back on BitChute.
Just do a search, Sandy Hook Update on BitChute, where you'll discover how they fake the kids by using photographs of older kids when they were younger.
Here you can see Michael Vavner, who's a college graduate now.
Photographs of him as a child were used to represent Noah Bauser as a completely fictional individual who, like the other kids, did not die at Sandy Hook.
It's embarrassingly bad.
Meanwhile, we have the photographs of the guy who's posing as the president and the guy who is Joe Biden.
The ear difference is substantial.
Ears are as distinctive as fingerprints.
They cannot be the same persons.
Here, their signatures are also different.
Surprise, surprise.
Joe Biden wrote J-O-E Biden.
This guy writes Slash r.bidenjr, completely different.
If you have any question about who's signing the orders, there they are.
There's the difference.
Remember, it's not coincidental that all corporate media are all in to facilitate the demand that pure Democrats need in order to achieve their objectives.
Thus, there's an alignment of all big government institutions and multinationals to support the same.
Nothing is conditional.
Everything is political.
It's not about the virus.
It's all about control.
Final thoughts.
Carl, yours.
Well, regarding that last part, is that, yeah, part of the formula to take us over is to isolate just one wacky conspiracy theorist.
In this case, Congresswoman Greene to try to isolate her and to show that she's completely in the minority.
Regarding Sandy Hook, I just did a quick mathematical analysis.
So the alleged victim's mother's average age giving birth was 36, okay?
So you can do a statistical analysis of how likely is that?
Well, it turns out approximately one out of every nine mothers are 36 years or older giving birth for any number
of previous children in the United States.
So we can calculate the odds because you have a group of 20 moms, all averaging 36.
I mean, there are various with it, but the average is 36.
So the odds that those actually are the mothers of first grade children turns into a number where again, it's more zeros than I know how to calculate.
But in doing a comparison, just from memory of having to figure out how to communicate that, if you take the total number of seconds in the known universe, And we gave you the problem and the challenge of, could you just pick one of those random seconds in the last five billion years and see if you can get it right?
Well, it's more likely that you would pick a random two hundredth of one second in the five billion years of history of the known universe, Then for Sandy Hook to actually have occurred with those mothers actually being the mothers of first grade children.
So in wrapping it up though, for people just to hang in there, stand strong in faith and facts with whatever balance you find best with that, I think I am totally with Chris that you do need to do contingency thinking or you're just gonna be scared and upset and take the best plan out that you can.
And I am with Jim that the, if this is a black hat PSYOP, And these guys are better than I thought.
But because we do know that, I would say the rough estimate is 90% of human beings are good people.
And the people in the military are the hardest, they are the toughest, and I think that they have pulled this off.
Chris, your final thoughts?
Yeah, I just want to be clear.
I'm not speculating that I think the people in the military are bad people.
I think that the leadership at the top has really sent these guys into really a bad situation.
It has gone to a full extent to not only censorship the exchange of information, but to also control it and to direct these people based upon the limited extensive information they might have.
You know, most of the military is isolated from the revelations of WikiLeaks or even the dangers of vaccine or the realities of quote-unquote this COVID hoax.
So I think there's really a lot of things that are going on, including these false flags.
You know, I doubt the military at the lowest levels are fully aware of this, but at the highest levels are probably involved with some of this stuff.
So I got to say, you know, maybe the FBI has been involved with this or at least they're being used as if they were.
Uh, you know, as far as David Hogg's concerned, or like, you know, this, uh, fake Anjali Q Shaman guy, uh, these are our lifetime actors that have been in these traumatized, uh, situations that are theatrics in many cases, and have really went to work on the decencies of the common people.
You know, Carl is right.
90% of people are good, and these people know that, and that's what makes them Duly wicked, and they do need to be called out for the deceptions they're trying to put on the innocent and those who are well-intentioned, who might not have taken the time to research this as extensively as you, myself, or others have, in the case of Sandy Hook, or many, many more of these false flag operations.
So, you know, you've got to look at these things.
Who's paying these disinformation agents to come out, and why, and what do they stand to gain from this type of chaos and confusion?
And I think, really, that is the environment and the element that makes the fog of war possible, and I really think that they're trying to stir up a civil war under these pretenses.
Yeah, I think they're going to work on the American people and the American people need to start realizing that a war has been declared upon us and it's really, you know, you need to go at this with the attitude that they're trying to screw you and if they don't you can be pleasantly surprised rather than utterly disappointed, you know, and I have to say as far as like Marjorie Taylor Greene stalking David Hogg.
I don't understand how she was stalking him.
I think that's an abusive language again.
I've seen the footage, what I think they're referring to with that, and I think she had some very valid points asking this kid this, and I would have probably asked him much, much more if I had the opportunity to run into this guy in the streets.
I will say that, and probably worse.
But, you know, that's a different story.
So, I think that really they're targeting this schism in reality and using social media to engineer this pretense to a civil war.
Kind of like they did with the newspapers and the information exchanges back in the Civil War itself.
And then you got Rothschild positioning itself through proxies on both sides of it.
So I really am, you know, thinking that America and the people in the global population is going to have to come together against this enemy that we all face from within.
Well, this is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin, thanking Carl Herman from San Ramon, California, and Chris Weinert from Detroit.
For being here with me today, it's obvious why I regard these guys as two of the most brilliant of my collaborators and associates.
Carl's argument about Sandy Hook Mothers is just dumbfounding, but there's a mountain of evidence that goes along with it.
This woman, Marjorie Taylor Greene, has great courage and integrity.
And if anyone would like to see the proof that she's got it right about Parkland, With which you may be far less familiar than you are with Sandy Hook, go to my blog at jamesfetzer.org and take a look at what I have embedded there, namely a discussion of the Parkland evidence where my exposure
Let Gary Null of all people to toss me off of a show on his PRN FM radio program called Conspiracy Guy.
It was at one show a week.
It was my 65th show.
So I've been there over a year.
And the explanation I got, and this was the totality of it, it was disheartening content.
But the fact is that the truth can be disheartening, and the truth about Parkland and Sandy Hook certainly qualifies.
Thank you for joining us today.
We're going to find out in the short order who's got it right and who's got it wrong, but I remain confident that this is going to play out to the benefit of the American people.
Thank you for joining us today.
I'll be back tomorrow with more of the news you need to know.
▲
Export Selection