All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 29, 2021 - Jim Fetzer
01:06:43
Need to Know: The Fetzer Report Episode 119 - January 28 2021
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin, where I'm delighted to have as my co-host today David Scorpio from the exotic land of Ecuador and Carl Herman from San Ramon, California.
We're here to share with you all the news you need to know.
Let's go.
I'm going to go.
Putin participated virtually with a conference in Davos of the World Economic Forum, which
has been promoting the Great Reset.
During his virtual appearance, he warned the world's failure to resolve its conflicts could lead to a war that would be the end of our civilization.
Asserting the coronavirus pandemic and increasing political polarization has exacerbated pre-existing global problems, and there's every reason to believe the tensions might be aggravated even further.
Citing experts who've likened the current global environment to the situation in the 20s and the 30s, he cautioned the world's heading down a potentially dangerous path.
In the 20th century, a failure and inability to centrally resolve such issues resulted in the catastrophic World War II.
Of course, nowadays, such a heated conflict is not possible, or at least I hope it's not possible because it would mean the end of our civilization.
He said the destruction of traditional values and freedom self is on the line if the situation is allowed to deteriorate elsewhere.
He addressed internet censorship, asserting media social networks are now competing with elected governments over monopoly of power.
We're now talking about economic giants, aren't we?
In certain areas, they're competing with states, and their audience can include millions and millions of users.
Here's the question.
How does this monopolism correlate with a public interest?
I had a Russian fellow on my show yesterday talking about the Bute and Dock and saying that he was opposing a Great Reset, but it didn't come across in those passages we just discussed.
Scorpio, your thoughts?
Well, Vladimir Putin seems to be a fly in the ointment to the globalist agenda for the last 20 years.
The man's no saint, but he really, he did single-handedly rescue Russia from being completely dismantled and sold off to the highest bidder, because that's what was happening, you know, during Yeltsin's presidency and the collaboration with the Clintons.
It was really incredible what was happening at that time.
And, you know, Putin has put Russia into a very good place.
He's certainly a nationalist.
Some say he has all these assets and he's stolen lots of money.
That's possible, I don't know.
But he's certainly a nationalist.
He's positioned Russia to be in a very good place coming forward.
He's paid off almost all of Russia's debt.
Their national debt is incredibly low, so the bankers don't have quite the leverage over him that they do with Politicians in the United States.
He's outlawed GMO food and he's helping farmers homestead up north.
And now he's declaring no global reset.
So you got to give him serious props, man.
Because this global reset is going to be the most dystopic reality that any of us could ever imagine.
And by the way, Klaus Schwab is a German Jew.
And so are all of his cohorts, just as a side note.
Yeah, he's a disgusting vermin on the face of Earth.
Carl, your thoughts?
Regarding Russia, I really don't know much other than what I read on corporate media, which really puts me at a crippled Disadvantaged, but I can add a few facts into what that story presents.
So the Putin talking about the end of civilization, that's just more of the same fear mongering that we've seen from these generic fear of civilization ending.
It might be a private communication among the leadership.
I don't know.
But if he's going to start spinning these lies of the world wars being anything other than empire of the elites, And then ignore the Cold War drive for empire that resulted in the destruction of the Soviet Union empire and the replacement, as Scorpio said, with gangster capitalism.
And then talking about COVID without saying that that's a farce.
However, you know, he did make the point that it is in the public interest to make sure that we have platforms for First Amendment protected speech, which is the huge deal that I hope people take away with them.
Literally, to guard with our lives, we must have platforms to be able to have the best ideas rise forward, and then people to provide their analyses of the facts.
Very good.
Could I add one thing to what Carl said, Jim?
I believe, now correct me if I'm wrong, Jim, but I believe that when Putin was talking about the end of civilization, I think he was referring to the global reset.
Good, good, good.
That would make sense.
With my native Russian caller, because he was saying that Putin was definitely being emphatic and rejecting it, so.
Okay, that's good then.
Yes, absolutely.
I agree.
Meanwhile, Biden is setting up a commission to study the Supreme Court.
It's obvious this is intended to lead to court packing.
The commission was Biden's response to progressive demands to expand the number of justices on the court to overcome the 6-3 conservative majority, a practice known as court packing.
The extreme left has made it quite clear they will at least consider packing the court as a means to block the ruling of the conservative majority.
Biden and Vice President Harris both played coy about their intent on the matter.
He wouldn't reveal his position until after the election, as on virtually every other significant matter, but did say he would convene a national commission.
We're on the verge of a crisis of confidence in the Supreme Court.
We have to take this challenge head on and everything is on the table to do that.
Well, I agree there's a crisis of confidence in the Supreme Court for failing to take up the Texas lawsuit, but the idea that You know, they should alter the composition of the court to get their preferred outcome by putting in a lot of liberals is a real classic blunder.
Indeed, Biden once opposed the idea of packing the Supreme Court, calling it a bonehead idea during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing in 1983.
If this effort moves forward, he seems content throwing the independence of the court out the window.
Our society is only as strong as its institutions.
We must ensure the integrity and independence of SCOTUS.
That's coming from Mitt Romney, no friend of Donald Trump, but he's correctly opposing the idea of packing the court.
Meanwhile, Attorney General Holder Suggests Democrats should use their new power to move forward with a radical proposal to pack the court.
Our courts badly need reforms, holders said.
The Republicans have abused their power to give themselves an unfair advantage.
It is necessary and totally appropriate to add seats.
This is a guy involved in Fast and Furious, of course, selling weapons to the drug cartels in Mexico and was instrumental in bringing us Sandy Hook, where he had visited the governor of Connecticut on the 27th of November to explain to him that they were going to take an abandoned school, conduct a FEMA exercise, and present it as a mass murder to promote gun control.
Bader Ginsburg last year opposed the idea of expanding the court.
Nine seems to be a good number.
It's been that way for a long time.
It was a bad idea when President Roosevelt tried to back the court.
Even in simply considering the commission, he's turning the high court into a political football.
I think that's a good coverage.
Your thoughts, Scorpio?
Oh yeah, I have no doubt that Sniffer Joe is going to try to pack the court.
Look, you know, we can make a lot of criticisms about Trump, but at the very least you can say that he put the brakes on certain aspects of this agenda.
So this administration is going to be making up for lost time, and I think they're going to move fast and furious, so to speak, on every issue at hand here.
And, you know, they might just pack the court by, like, maybe two judges.
That way it doesn't look that outrageous, but it's just enough to tilt the balance of power.
Because there's already, you know, one or two turncoats in the uh... court already so uh... you know i i i'm sure they're
going to do that there are they've been signaling it for some time
and let's not forget to that they're already ready to make a dc estate
and puerto rico state and puerto rico had recently about two months ago
uh... did a non-binding vote declaring that they want to become a state
so the stage is already set for uh... two more uh... democrat states in perpetuity
And they're not going to miss this opportunity.
These people are serious.
They want to create a one party state.
Let's not forget that.
And when Joe Biden says unity, he means no dissent allowed.
Well, let's only hope that the filibuster, which apparently has been retained, will lead to defeating these proposals, both of which are monstrous and purely politically motivated, not in the best interests of the United States.
Carl, your thoughts?
Yeah, this is just another move, as Scorpio said, to try to move us to a one-party state.
It's just BS to sell dictatorship.
So when he talks about having a National Commission or a Blue Ribbon Committee or whatever it is that they want to call it this time, These committees all share the same characteristic of ignoring the huge game changer in the room in this case that, hey, is that the same court that decided not to touch the issue of mathematically certain election fraud?
They just want to add to a system that's broken already and already Moved us towards that one party.
So they leave those things out.
And so this is just a further stupefication or attempt, stupefication of the American people.
You got, you know, little baby Bush.
I think his main contribution was to show the whole world that the presidents are not running this show.
They're just a little puppet.
And while I appreciated Obama's rhetoric as a candidate, he became just as stupid.
And now, you know, I think Biden is gonna beat them all.
Biden is gonna beat them all.
Yeah, for the category, the candidacy is the dumbest of the bunch.
Meanwhile, before Morade reveals a tricky way Trump could use the impeachment trial to defeat his enemies, including their Nancy Pelosi, the most serious courtroom deliberations aired a detailed vetting of official campaign objections unfolded in Wisconsin, where the state Supreme Court With a narrow four to three ruling came against Trump in a blistering dissent.
Wisconsin Chief Justice Patrick Roggensack wrote that a significant portion of the public does not believe that the November 3rd 2020 presidential election was fairly conducted.
Four justices on this court cannot be bothered with addressing what the state statutes required, embarrassingly bad, well articulated in the Texas lawsuit that the Supreme Court declined to hear.
The suggestion is to use the occasion of the second impeachment to present the statistical anomalies that make the likelihood of a Biden win so improbable as to be impossible, as Carl has emphasized repeatedly.
Second, provide the immense evidence of demonstrable frauds perpetrated across the six most controversial states, four of which again are delineated masterfully in the Texas lawsuit.
Finally, explain the grave constitutional violations that invalidate the election procedures in these states.
Which use the cover of the COVID virus to subvert constitutional protections, especially of course by promoting mail-in ballots and not verifying signatures, addresses, whether they've been solicited.
As Donald Trump methodically lays out this case before the American voter, he can essentially turn legal guns around and effectively put the Congress itself on trial.
Such a tactic would illuminate the true battle lines of this political struggle, not so much Republican versus Democrat, but rather outsider versus insider, or, as we've also observed, nationalist versus globalist.
Meanwhile, Democrats are furious after one of their own turned on them with a move you won't believe.
This is Tulsi Gabbard pointing out that the bill could be used to unfairly target run-of-the-mill Trump supporters and right-wingers when they're going after domestic terrorists.
When you look at their process and they start looking at what characteristics we're looking for as we are building this profile of a potential extremist, what are we talking about?
Religious extremists?
Are we talking about Christians?
Evangelical Christians?
What is a religious extremist?
Is it somebody who is pro-life?
Where do you take this?
You start looking at a white person, obviously likely male, or libertarians, anyone who loves freedom, liberty, has an American flag outside their home.
Those who attend Trump rallies.
Once you start walking down this path, you see where it leads.
A very dangerous undermining of our civil liberties, our freedoms in the Constitution, and a targeting of almost half the country.
Gabbard is often the only Democrat making sense who's willing to challenge her own party.
I'm very impressed once again.
And of course, earlier this week, she blasted Democrat Adam Schiff and former director John Brennan and Big Tech as more dangerous than the Capitol rioters.
All of these issues I think Tulsi was spot on.
Scorpio, your thoughts?
She's saying a lot of really good stuff.
But unfortunately, as I pointed out the other day, you know, she is a gun grabber.
And that is one of the most important issues we face right now.
But as they say, in the kingdom of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.
So she's definitely one of the more lucid and sane Democrats on the world stage today.
But, you know, look at her competition.
Um, and you know, I'm not so sure about this strategy of Trump turning the thing around on, on the Congress because the problem is he's being, you know, tried for supposedly inciting insurrection, which is an absurd charge.
And it's essentially an attack on free speech is what it really is.
And I'm not sure how those other issues are relevant to what he's charged with, but, you know, I don't think they're going to look good trying to impeach a man that's already out of office.
It really is an absurd act, and it's an act of vengeance and an act to try to, you know, humiliate and disgrace a former president, and more importantly, all the ideas that he represented, which is, you know, some of his ideas were nationalist and Actually trying to help the American people.
What a shocker that is.
As it points out, the Democrats already have a bill to make mail-in voting permanent.
No ID verification, no ID at all, no signature verification, nothing.
Just come on in and vote.
It's just going to set the stage for an absolutely absurd manner in which to have an election that's just inviting fraud.
And you know this is all really all this stuff about the homeland terrorists and domestic terrorism.
This is nothing more than a preemptive strike on dissent to try to make people afraid to speak their mind.
Because let me tell you that I predict this regime is going to be one of the most odious and repugnant regimes we have ever witnessed.
They're going to ramrod stuff through that the average American is going to absolutely hate.
And for, you know, for example, one of his executive orders or executive actions was to limit all use of public land and water by 30 percent by 2030.
So they're just saying, you know, look, this is our land.
You can't use it.
You can't have water from it.
You can't have anything.
So, you know, this is just the beginning, Jim.
Yeah, you're right.
I don't think that bill is going to go anywhere, but the very fact they introduce it is so outrageous, because it means elections would be meaningful.
It's a nice reflection of what they sought to do in this last election to beat Trump, though, and it's very revealing of their true motive and purpose.
Yeah.
Carl, your thoughts?
Great comments, Scorpio, and Jim, great catches, as always, on the article.
So the first one, on its face, having a trial.
I mean, anybody who is savvy with the law would love that, because then, just as the article says, you get to make your case.
And the case will be made in front of the American public with the opportunity, the required ability, to cross-examine the liars and the psychopaths on the other side.
Wow!
I mean, any honest person, I would I would love a piece of that.
I would volunteer.
I'll be on that team to take care of that case.
So this really might serve the same purpose as the January 6th, when the evidence was just begun to being presented for a national audience before that event took place.
And Tulsi, I like Tulsi.
And as Scorpio said, she's working on about half of her cylinders there because She doesn't take the next steps.
I mean, the most important facts, she's blind to.
Like, okay, so who ordered the mall cops instead of the National Guard to protect this, the Congress, when you knew this was coming?
And then who ordered the mall cops to open up the elementary school gates to let these people in?
And then who's paying Antifa and BLM for their buses to be there?
And if NSA has it all, you know, what are their comms?
What do we know about who was talking to who?
So it's just the fascinating political theater goes on, gentlemen.
As indeed it does, and the Democrats continue to reveal themselves to be political scoundrels with no principles whatsoever.
Meanwhile, a Democrat introduced a bill barring security clearances for Capitol riders and QAnon believers.
This is just virtually a parody Democrat Florida Congresswoman Stephanie Murphy introduced legislation to bar anyone who participated in the violent protests at the Capitol on January 6th or adherence to the QAnon movement from obtaining or maintaining a federal security clearance
Well, the people who actually were violent appear to have been Antifa members.
They need to be punished appropriately for their misconduct.
But those who follow QAnon or Trump or the like surely are not deserving of this form of censure.
Her bill would participate participants of capital riots from getting a security clearance.
I don't think it's a crazy idea if you participated in a violent attempt to overthrow our government that you shouldn't be allowed to work for that very same government.
I would ask if that applies to Nancy Pelosi and the mayor of Washington who appear to have collaborated with the Capitol Police to bring about this event which was intended to derail discussion of the evidence of Electoral fraud and theft and also to stain Trump supporters who had turned out in huge numbers.
The violence had begun as a peaceful protest by supporters of former President Trump, but the fact is we know Trump supporters weren't there in time to have made a difference.
The cancellation of those who might have a difference of opinion from the Democratic Party and mainstream media has gone into overdrive.
In recent days, the phrase deprogramming conservatives has been heard a lot by the left.
AOC, for example, is cause for the government to de-radicalize Trump supporters.
These are people who are radicalized right now.
It's going to take a very long time to de-radicalize these people in a lot of effort.
We need to double, triple, or quadruple the funding for these programs, she says.
And Katie Couric recently appeared on Real Time with Bill Maher and asked, how are we really going to almost deprogram these people who have signed up for the cult of Trump?
This is embarrassingly bad.
In a recent interview with Don Lamont, as bad as the riot was, his guest said, some Trump supporters are redeemable.
I can tell they are.
You know, some of them are, don't you?
You've met them.
They've gone up to you and said, LeMond, you're right!
An incredulous LeMond said, how do you reason with unreasonable people?
How many times you show them video of Trump supporters and people hundreds, 150 or so close to it have been arrested from the Capitol.
That's not living in reality.
Which, of course, is just buying into the narrative, since those were 226 Antifa members.
William Buckley, one of the founding fathers of modern conservatism, put it this way, liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views, but then are shocked and offended to discover there are other views.
I think that was very discerning of William Buckley.
Scorpio, your thoughts?
Yeah, Buckley was a fascinating character, certainly a talented orator.
But, you know, it's odd that he was both a Skull and Bones member and a Bohemian Club member and had deep connections to the CIA.
That'd be an interesting topic for a show, actually.
But he's certainly spot on there.
That's exactly what's going on.
Yeah, they're surprised that there's even other views than their own.
That's very well said.
And, you know, it's kind of funny about this security clearance thing.
You know, I seriously doubt that any of these so-called capital rioters, uh, would even be applying for security clearance for some kind of job in the federal government.
So this is much ado about nothing.
And they're just trying to keep this narrative alive.
You know, anything that they can do to keep this, Oh my God, we were attacked by these horrible people.
You know, they got to keep this going through it until the impeachment.
So you're going to hear more bogus stories like this just to try to keep the narrative from, from dying essentially.
Carl, your thoughts?
The biggest lie in that article was Don Lamond saying that somebody told him he was right.
And that would never ever happen.
So this idea, again, is just more propaganda to push us into a one-party state and destroy any type of dissent.
And I wrote satire for years just to take extreme examples.
So, you know, what are you going to do?
Are you going to say that Christians need to be put in loony bins because some of them believe in virgin births?
Or this guy, they're following this guy, Jesus, who said, I'm bringing a sword?
And you believe that dead people can come back to life?
These people are clinically crazy.
This is just a crushing of the First Amendment with whatever BS they think can sell.
And these gaslighters, oh my god, if you want to talk about domestic terrorists, well, how about these people who keep on selling us lie-started illegal wars of aggression?
How about these people who pushed factless Russiagate or crimeless impeachment or the illegal prosecution of General Flynn Very good.
Very good, Carl.
arrest his son if he didn't surrender himself.
And these are the same people who assassinated President Kennedy, his brother, and Dr. King.
So this is such an inversion, and I hope to God we are done with this crazy inverted Orwellian show soon.
Very good, very good, Carl.
Meanwhile, we'll be right back.
Here we have the White House all in darkness.
And it suggests to me that indeed it's unoccupied.
The reports have come forward previously about no snipers on the roof.
The building's unlit.
Very strange phenomenon.
Uncharacteristic 100%.
And I believe a reflection of the fact that Joe Biden and Kamala Harris are not a legitimate president and vice president and are not occupying the White House.
Meanwhile, we have a woman named Elizabeth Williamson writing that rioters followed a long conspiratorial road to the Capitol and going after individuals who have Exposed what happened at Sandy Hook.
Not only Alex Jones, who's been on both sides of the fence, but James Tracy and myself.
I added the following editor's note.
The New York Times has become more of a tabloid than a responsible news source as the following article displays.
For those who lack the background to appraise what it reports, Check out Brian Wright's review of Nobody Died at Sandy Hook 2015, Mike Adams' discussion of its ban by Amazon.com and review of my role, The Most Dangerous Mind in America, and Kevin Barrett's brilliant review of the trial, The Legal Linting of a Truth Seeker, Jim Fetzer's Stalinist-style show trial, all of which are linked.
For many of the Capitol rioters and others who believe Mr. Trump won, it wasn't a large leap from Stop the Steal from a pathway of conspiratorial stepping stones, including the Pizzagate claim of 2016 that Democrats were running a child sex ring in the back of a popular Washington pizza parlor, the debunked allegation that a low-level Democratic National Committee aide was murdered for leaking Hillary Clinton's emails, and many more.
But in fact, I've done a piece on Pizzagate.
You can find it at jimtheconspiracyguy.com.
And Comet Ping Pong does appear to have been the center.
And of course, she's alluding to Seth Rich without naming him.
Well, we have a mountain of evidence that, in fact, he did download the files directly from the DNC server because he was a Bernie Sanders supporter, disillusioned with the way they were sabotaging Bernie's campaign and wanted to expose a corruption.
Mr. Trump's false claims of election fraud, she writes, which animated the riot on January 6th, which is wrong in both regards since Trump's claims of election fraud are true and did not animate the riot on January 6th.
have reassembled virtually any way of cast of characters that go way back.
Other conspiratorial theorizers that mass shootings were false flags by liberals to promote gun control include Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, Republican of Georgia, who's come forth, InfoWars ambassador Alex Jones, Fired Florida Atlantic University professor James Tracy and the retired University of Minnesota-Duluth professor James Fetzer, all of whom then embraced Mr. Trump's baseless fraud claims, because in fact they were bona fide, correct, and legitimate.
If you look at these Sandy Hook folks, it's not like they slipped on a banana peel and believe in Sandy Hook conspiracy theories.
This is an expression of a whole world view or an expression of personality traits, said Joe Ucinski, an assistant professor at the University of Miami and author of the book American Conspiracy Theories.
I have extended an invitation to this guy to debate Sandy Hook and suggested that Dave Gehry would be a wonderful moderator where he served that role in a multiplicity of previous debates in which I have participated.
She goes on to attack Ms.
Green, whom I regard as a hero.
Appears to me that Marjorie Green has more balls than any other member of Congress.
He goes after Alex Jones, which is a bit of an easy target, particularly since, as I have observed, he's been on both sides of the issue, affirming nobody died, but also that some did die at Sandy Hook.
Meanwhile, Mr. Tracy, a former journalism professor at Florida Atlantic, has questioned Sandy Hook, leading to his firing in 2015.
He did not protest in Washington on January 6th, but has latched onto 2020 election falsehoods.
The fake news media that have been complicit in U.S.
regime change over the past four years are now acting as the ideological agency to enforce the unfounded legitimacy of the 2020 presidential election, he wrote in his blog, which I think was completely excellent.
He contributed to the book Nobody Died at Sandy Hook, co-edited by Mr. Fetzer, who moved from Sandy Hook in 2012 to the Boston Marathon bombing, helping to write another book entitled And Nobody Died in Boston Either, He helped found an outfit called Moonrock Books, which published false conspiracy theories related to September 11th, the John F. Kennedy assassination, a longtime obsession of Fetzer's, as well as mass shootings in Parkland, Las Vegas, and Orlando.
I stand by the collaborative research published in all of those books and would very gladly publicly defend them in any context.
In late 2019, Mr. Posner won a $450,000 defamation judgment against Mr. Fetzer, later increased to $1.1 million, which included attorney fees, but he's continued to pursue other conspiracy theories, including around the 2020 election.
There actually is a deep state, and they really do not honor the election results nor the will of the people.
Mr. Fetzer wrote on his blog last week.
He also posted his approval of Ms.
Greene's Parkland Conspiracy Theory, saying, no member of Congress is willing to speak the truth about it.
Before now, I would add.
Scorpio, your thoughts?
Well, Jim, yellow is a good color on you, by the way.
You know, about the snipers, you know, a friend of mine in Idaho sent me a photograph that someone took at one of these rallies, sort of an anti-mask rally that was happening in Idaho, and the police had snipers positioned on the rooftop of one of the nearby buildings, and this guy caught a picture of it.
They had guns out, rifles out, and pointed towards the crowd.
An incredible photograph.
And this was about two or three months ago.
So, you know, these people within government, I really believe they are terrified about public reaction.
Because as they unveil this plan, it's going to be so incredibly unpopular.
And they damn well know it.
So they're making contingency plans and getting ready for the inevitable, I believe.
And, you know, it's funny about the conspiracy theories.
That's the new, you know, whipping boy, you know, that defames somebody.
Oh, he's a conspiracy theorist.
But it's funny that, you know, all of politics essentially operates on a conspiratorial basis.
That's how the world is actually run.
they don't want people to know that. But it's funny also, contradictory, it's how the federal
government floats all kinds of funny, bizarre conspiracy theories like, you know, Russia,
Russia, Russia. And, you know, that, you know, some Arabs with box cutters took over, you know,
some airplanes and two airplanes caused three buildings to collapse into their own footprint.
Those are some really wacky conspiracy theories, but they are the official truth right now.
Yep, you're absolutely right.
And of course, I mean, for four years we had to put up with nonsense.
I mean, they really are themselves trading in conspiracy theories in the weak sense, meaning mere rumors, conjectures, or speculations.
Rather than conspiracy theories in the strong sense as empirically testable explanatory hypotheses, where what I do in my research is bring together experts that transfer these conspiracy theories from those that are merely theories in the weak sense to those that are theories in the strong and to sort out the difference between the authentic and the fabricated evidence, which makes it relatively easy to appraise the difference.
Which, of course, this woman is completely ignoring.
And where I would believe at this point in time most Americans are open-minded after going through the coronavirus, the rigged election, and other current conspiracies that are affecting our lives.
Carl?
Yeah, Jim really nails it.
Expresses the highest academic and professional standards for the consideration of factual claims compared to this week smearing propaganda of the most ridiculous straw man arguments in that column in the New York Times.
So the more I see, the more I like it.
And we have talked about the political theory of polarization where You want those choices to be both as clear and far apart as you can to allow for public choice.
Now, that first thing with the White House being dark, that is unprecedented.
And the people are talking about Q's cryptic remark of ten days of darkness, and I think this is on day eight.
And I would like to see some proof of life of Biden and Harris outside of a Castle Rock studio at the grounds.
I know that Congress decided to take this week off in their meeting next week.
And then, gentlemen, what do you think of that scaffolding in front of the White House?
Are those gallows?
FEMA temporary prison?
Because that building, that structure, is still there.
It's never been there before, but it's there now.
When you called the White House earlier in the week, for like three days, all you would get was a message on the White House phone, which I called for, you know, 18 years to talk to people from time to time.
You got a message saying the office is closed?
They've since changed that.
But, wow!
There's so much going on with the apparency of who's in charge.
Are they even at the White House?
And then the propaganda is just getting more extreme.
I think it's pretty obvious they are not at the White House and that they've been using a set, a soundstage, And a friend of mine who was a stuntman in Hollywood for many years knows of at least two in Washington, and there appears to be yet another in the UK.
Meanwhile, Proud Boys leader Enrique Terrio was an FBI informant.
This is supposed to be a right-wing extremist group.
He's actually working for the FBI, appears to be an agent provocateur.
In the Miami hearing, a federal prosecutor FBI agent and Terrio's own lawyer described his undercover work, said he'd helped authorities prosecute more than a dozen in various cases involving drugs, gambling, and human smuggling.
Terrio, in an interview with Reuters, denied working undercover or cooperating in cases against others.
I don't know any of this, he said when asked about the transcript.
I don't recall any of this.
But look at that!
He's already got a federal prosecutor and his own lawyer and a member of the FBI acknowledging his undercover work.
That's really difficult to deny.
Law enforcement officials in court transcript contradict his denial.
In a statement to Reuters, a former federal prosecutor, Vanessa Singh-Johannes confirmed that he collaborated
with local and federal law enforcement to aid in the prosecution of those running
other several criminal enterprises, ranging from running marijuana grow houses in Miami
to operating pharmaceutical fraud schemes.
Terry O'Thirty-six is a high-profile figure organizing and leading the right-wing Proud Boys
in their confrontation with those believed to be Antifa, short for anti-fascism, called here an amorphous leftist
group, but actually a fascist group masquerading as anti-fascist.
This is pretty damn interesting.
He was arrested in early January when he arrived in the city two days before the Capitol Hill riot, charged with possessing two high-capacity rifle magazines and burning a Black Lives Matter banner.
Oterio did not take part in what they're calling the Capitol Hill insurrection.
At least five Proud Boys have been charged in the riot.
The transcript from 2014 also shines new light on his past connections to law enforcement.
During the hearing, the prosecutor and Terrio's defense attorney asked the judge to reduce the prison sentence of Terrio and two co-defendants.
They pled guilty in a fraud case related to the relabeling and sale of stolen diabetic test kits.
The prosecutor said Terrio's information had led to the prosecution of 13 on federal charges in two separate cases and had helped local authorities investigate a gambling ring Pretty tough to evade the conclusion he actually is an informant.
As Trump supporters challenged the Republicans' election loss, Ontario stood out for his swagger as he led crowds of mostly white Proud Boys in a series of confrontations and sweetballs in Washington, D.C., Portland, Oregon, and elsewhere.
Founded in 2016, the Proud Boys began as a group protesting against political correctness and perceived constraints on masculinity.
Growing into a group with distinctive colors of yellow and black embracing street fighting, their profiles soared when Trump called on them to stand back and stand by.
He, Terry O, became the national chairman of the group in 2018.
Pretty interesting here as we sort out the actual players and the various events that are receiving so much attention in the media.
Scorpio, your thoughts?
Well, this story is interesting on several levels.
For one thing, isn't it funny how, you know, we've been fed this narrative that, oh, there's these really scary white supremacists called the Proud Boys, and it turns out their leader is not white.
He's not even remotely white.
And so how could this possibly be a white supremacist group?
I mean, It's absurd, and it just shows you the level of grift and intentional disinformation that the mainstream media feeds us on every side here, Jim.
I think the big picture is here, though, that You know, all of these groups that get any kind of press coverage by the mainstream media, they're all either infiltrated by intelligence agencies such as the FBI or the CIA, or they were begun by federal agents to, as sort of a, you know, a honey trap operation to kind of flush out potential people that they want to use as cannon fodder for their agendas.
They've done this with the Muslims, all kinds of people.
And, you know, same goes for Antifa, and I believe Black Lives Matter.
And it's like, you know, this whole thing with Antifa and Proud Boys, it's this old game, let's you and them fight.
And that's exactly what's happened.
And I think it's all part of this divide and conquer strategy that we're living under, Jim.
Well, it reminds me of Lennon's observation, if you want to control the opposition, the best way to do it is to lead it.
So we may have frauds in face on both sides of all these issues.
Carl, your thoughts?
That article, yeah, that's just typical of what passes for reporting from our opponents.
So you create confusion and a smear.
And then I love that part where they describe Antifa as an amorphous leftist movement.
So that's just the talking point that Biden was giving.
They're saying Antifa is just an idea.
Well, okay, so you want to talk about what happened on January the 6th?
Well, again, who ordered mall cops instead of the National Guard?
See, somebody who was responsible for security.
That is criminal negligence with a loss of life, okay?
And property.
They either knew or should have known that they needed more than mall cops with a little elementary school gates.
And then who ordered the cops to remove those gates?
I understand that also in the news are reported that two of those cops have been reported dead by suicide.
Now, I don't know if that's suicide or suicide to stop them from talking.
And then, you know, this, as Jim points out over and over with the timeline, all this started before Trump ended his speech.
So, who was leading that and what were their communications?
So, this corporate media reporting is just getting more and more tragic comic.
It's just propaganda.
Great points.
I think you got it exactly right, Carl.
Oh, and Jim, can I just add one quick thing?
Yeah, sure.
Okay, Carl made a great point about this lax security.
You know, this is an old technique.
They use it in the Kennedy assassination by removing all kinds of security to make the event that they wanted to happen all that much easier.
It's an old game and an old technique.
You're 100% correct.
And the men who killed Kennedy, actually, Nigel Turner, Interviewed me on specifically that point about the multiple indications of Secret Service complicity and setting them up for the hit in installment six known as smoking guns.
You're completely right.
Meanwhile, San Francisco schools are going to rename those that have honored Washington, Lincoln, Feinstein, and others.
We're replacing the signage at the 44 schools as it costs over.
400,000 bucks?
Not even revered former presidents George Washington, Abraham Lincoln, and Thomas Jefferson are safe from cancel culture, it appears.
The American icons are among the list of historical figures whose names will be removed from San Francisco's public schools Following a 6-1 vote by the school board, I praise the individual who opposed it.
Washington Jefferson, with both slave owners, and Lincoln, who ended slavery, became controversial because critics claimed he oppressed indigenous people.
But this is just silly and ridiculous.
This is a retrospective fallacy.
They were outstanding individuals, made major contributions to our society, where we revere them for their good work, and should not be holding them responsible for practices that were common at the time, but where we have progressed beyond them.
The presidents were among a long list of men and women whose namesake schools will be renamed, including Francis Scott Key, who wrote the words to the national anthem, and former presidents William McKinley, James Garfield, James Monroe, and Herbert Hoover, Revolutionary war hero Paul Revere, who warned us the British are coming, and author Robert Louis Stevenson.
Even an elementary school named for Senator Dianne Feinstein will be changed over allegations that, get this, she replaced a damaged Confederate flag outside of City Hall when she was the city's mayor in 1986.
My God, this is absolutely unbelievable.
Mayor London Reid rebuked the plan in October as offensive, saying the school board should be focusing on reopening schools closed during the pandemic rather than renaming them.
It's offensive to parents who are juggling their child's daily stay-at-home learning schedule with doing their own jobs and maintaining their sanity, she said.
It's offensive to me, as someone who went to our public schools, who loves our public schools, knows how those years in the classroom were what lifted me out of poverty and into college.
It's offensive to our kids who are staring at screens day after day instead of learning and growing with our classmates and friends.
Replacing the signage at 44 schools will cost more than $400,000, where the price tag could go up to closer to a million for schools to get new activity uniforms, repaint gymnasium floors, etc.
The district is facing a budget deficit.
This is simply absurd.
In the case of Roosevelt Middle School, by the way, it wasn't clear if the board even knew which former president Roosevelt, Thomas or Franklin Delano was named for, but decided to have it removed anyway.
It's a moral message, they said.
It's a message to our families, our students, and our community.
It's not just symbolic.
I think it's a message, all right, a message of calamitous stupidity, ignorance, and excessive zeal for political correctness.
Scorpio, your thoughts?
Yeah, it's excessive zeal for political correctness, but it's also beyond that, unfortunately.
Because if you go into the article deeper, it says that they want to remove all the statues of these people, too.
Those statues have to go.
And what they're trying to do is disconnect people from their heritage.
erase history so people don't even know who they are or where they come from.
Those kind of people are much easier to control and that's really the game that's being played
here.
And on a different level, this article is fascinating to me because it's sort of a case
study of government waste.
I mean, the idea it's going to cost $400,000 to change 44 signs?
That's like $10,000 a sign almost.
It's completely insane.
signs? That's like $10,000 a sign almost. It's completely insane.
Well, it's signs at 44 schools, Scorpio. Right, right, but it's 44...
There's going to be multiple signs, but at 44 schools, not just 44.
Okay, but still, that's a lot of money.
I think you could bid that contract down a lot lower than that if you weren't dealing with other people's money, and that's always the problem with government spending.
You're spending other people's money, so hey, let's just take the high road and live high on the hog, and then $1 million to get some new shirts and paint the gymnasiums?
I mean, I would love to get involved in government contracts.
I could bring these contracts in at a fraction of that price and have it done with better workmanship as well.
And just lastly, what kind of name is London Brie?
It sounds like some kind of exotic cheese or something like that.
Yeah, the 400,000 go up to a million when you look at all the repainting they have to do of the name everywhere in the gymnasiums and elsewhere.
Carl, your thoughts?
Yeah, Scorpio's right.
This is just the demonization of history to make people hate history, hate all of our predecessors, hate ourselves, and to surrender to the oligarchy who is just hand-fisting us under their control under this one-party state.
But I did agree with one thing.
Paul Revere, he should not be named for any school because he was a domestic terrorist.
He spied on our own government to discover that Her Majesty's troops were going to take away assault rifles and cannon from those crazy... And look where that led!
The overthrow and the destruction of our own government.
Carl, you're making impeccable points, my friend.
Meanwhile, Trump receives Morocco's highest award for his Middle East work.
This is quite appropriate.
U.S.
President Donald Trump Friday received Morocco's highest award for his work in advancing a normalization deal between Israel and Morocco.
The United States in the last five months helped broker deals between Israel, the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Sudan, and Morocco.
The agreements are aimed at normalizing relations and opening economic ties.
He's the only of our recent presidents who has not initiated new wars, for which he ought to be admired.
Meanwhile, the new Secretary of State, Antony Blinken, says the U.S.
will not return to the nuclear deal until Iran comes back into compliance.
This is very interesting, because many have expected, especially Iran, That Biden would be eager to restore the nuke deal, also known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, which ought to be done concurrently, removing the sanctions.
I think this indicates that the situation may not be so rosy.
for returning to the previous relations with Iran that were negotiated in the Obama administration, which I regarded as the one appropriate action Obama had ever taken, even though it was unnecessary, since our own intelligence agency had already concluded in 2007 that Iran was not pursuing nuclear weapons, which they reaffirmed in 2011, where even the Mossad came aboard in 2012, Just three weeks before Bibi Netanyahu went to the UN and asserted precisely the opposite.
Iran also calls a threat from Israel's military to attack Iran psychological warfare.
They talk more and seek psychological warfare.
They have virtually no plan, no ability, no capability to do so, said the Chief of Staff of Iranian President Hassan Rouhani.
When Israeli Defense Force Chief Aviv Kolhavi made the threatening comment Tuesday, he also expressed his opposition to the Biden administration rejoining the Iranian nuclear deal.
But this did not seem to concern with Israel's influence on the Biden administration.
Of course, some officials of the Zionist regime think that whatever they say, Washington will accept it.
But I think the new U.S.
administration, like other countries, has its independence.
We shall see.
Right now, they're, of course, seeking to undo anything associated with Donald Trump, whether it was good for the country or bad.
Most of which were overwhelmingly good, but in their zeal to defend, defeat their ideological opponent, they're going all out.
Scorpio, your thoughts?
Well, Jim, this is another case of lets you and them fight, unfortunately.
If Israel does an airstrike on Iran, guess who has to fight the war?
It's not going to be Israel.
And, you know, if a war ever was started with Iran, this isn't going to be a walk in the park like it was in Iraq.
Iran is a mountainous country, so you're not just going to roll tanks in there on the sand like you did in Iraq.
It's going to be a very different thing and Iran has, I believe, a million-man army that hasn't been feminized and isn't full of transgender people and, you know, gay rights activists.
And, you know, this Anthony Blinken character, another Obama-era retread, and a Zionist dual-citizen Israeli, and a war hawk, a very dangerous man.
And that leads me to my final question here, is what happened to the anti-war left?
I remember when the political left was vehemently anti-war, those voices seem to have been completely silenced and possibly replaced with conversations about transgender rights and letting transsexuals use girls' bathrooms.
Yeah, nice points Scorpio.
Carl, your thoughts?
In the first article, you know, we have about 200 nations on this planet, and the so-called developing countries have really been under the ownership and the control of their colonial masters.
They could stand up now.
And wouldn't that be awesome to have over a hundred different heads of state just to spill the beans and to tell the truth?
Nobody would stop them.
They could do that.
I don't know what press conference coverage they would get, but that would be an intriguing possibility.
On the second one with Blinken, the war criminal, this is all projection and this is all he accusing Iran of crimes of the United States beginning in, let's just go back to 1953 with Operation Ajax, to overthrow a democracy so that Iran, Iran was saying, look, we need more than 10% of our oil profits to go to us.
We need to renegotiate.
So now they overthrew their country, imposed the vicious shah of Iran, trained their secret police with the CIA, and then when the Shah left the country and the U.S.
refused extradition back for crimes against humanity within Iran, they armed their other puppet, Saddam, and then had a war from 1980 to 1988 that killed about 1 million Iranians.
And then the Israelis and the Americans pimpin' that lie that Iran threatened to wipe them off the map when the speech just says is that, look, Israel is just doing to the Palestinians what caused the Shah to be removed.
So, you know, it is just the inversion of reality.
Yeah, those are great points, Carl.
Could I add one quick thing, Jim?
Please do.
Uh, and of course you refer to the removal of Moshe Dech.
And what was Moshe Dech's great crime?
He wanted to nationalize Iran's oil and use it to help the nation and the people in the country.
That's the kiss of death.
And that's when the CIA comes and does a regime change in the name of democracy.
Yes.
And that was the first coup executed by the CIA by Kermit Roosevelt, who was the cousin of Teddy.
We want to hear from you.
Send fan mail, pro or con, to liveneedtoknowatgmail.com.
Liveneedtoknowatgmail.com.
One of our fans sent us the following.
Hunter Biden's first night at the White House.
I think they captured it exactly right.
And of course, in our last show, we were reporting how the contents of Hunter Biden's laptop have been made available now on the Internet, and they are scandalous to the extreme.
Meanwhile, we've had discussion about Joe Biden and the actor who has replaced him, who participated in the first debate, and who was the participant in the fake inauguration that was pre-recorded.
We pointed out the difference in their ears, where ears turn out to be as distinctive as fingerprints, Indicating that these truly are two different individuals.
So who would it possibly be entrusted with the nuclear weapons?
Well, look at this.
They have different signatures as well.
On the left is a bona fide Joe Biden signature.
On the right, his double or imposter I went back and looked at earlier signatures to verify, and here you see in a photograph in the upper left, Joe Biden's real signature.
In the lower right, the signature put on a presidential document that was posted on the Federal Register.
Meanwhile, I reassert how to legally decline a vaccine.
Don't refuse it or you'll be considered belligerent, but politely decline by doing the following.
Ask the doctor, does the vaccine have MRC5 in it?
They all do.
These are aborted fetal cell tissues and other DNA.
If the vaccine contains MRC5, you have the right to decline.
Also ask, is there the possibility of an I, not L, but I, a trojanic reaction, an adverse reaction caused by multiple compounds or drugs interacting with each other.
They all do.
When the doctor says yes, that's your get out of vaccine pre-card.
Thank the doctor for the offer and walk away.
Remember, doctors have sworn the Hippocratic Oath, which is, first, do no harm.
They must honor it.
This is how we can legally and respectfully decline their offered mandated services, and there's absolutely nothing they can do about it.
Now you know.
Please share with everyone you care about.
Meanwhile, remember, it's not about the virus, it's all about control.
And if your mind is open to the prevalence of conspiracies, the coronavirus, the fake election, and the like, you may be in the mood to check out Volkswagen Conspiracy 2020.
24 presentations I organized and moderated FalseFlagConspiracy2020.com is the link.
Check it out.
The secret of freedom lies in educating people.
The secret of tyranny in keeping them ignorant.
Meanwhile, our final thought, Scorpio.
Well, Jim, I think in a strange way, Sniffer Biden might actually become an ally for our cause inadvertently because he's going to do so many things that people hate that it's going to become clear to people we don't have a government that serves the people at all.
We have a government that's enacting a pre-planned agenda that's not going to benefit anybody in the country.
And on top of that, we have 80 million people, probably more, that are ready to be red-pilled And so I think these are positive things.
But in the meantime, Sniffer Joe is going to do a lot of things that are going to be just absolutely beyond the pale.
Oh, you got that right, Carl.
Your final thoughts?
Hunter should be appointed to be the head of DEA, the Drug Enforcement Agency.
I think that would be an appropriate move for this dad to take.
So again, we've talked about this.
Who is this guy?
If you went to the police and said, look, here's some photographic evidence.
I think I have an impersonation and a possible probable kidnapping case.
I mean, the police would look at that and they would have to arrest this guy
and then do an investigation to see who he is.
Who's behind that mask?
Who's the Scooby-Doo ending with that?
So, two more points.
So the false flag conspiracies of Dr. Fetzer and those panels, if we ever get honest history books, that would be the core of the books, because those are the main driving events that then shape all these policies of war and economics that spill out from them.
Those are the causative events.
and they are provable conspiracy.
So anybody who wants to know more, you should check that out.
And finally, I think in the big picture, it all is good news.
And we're seeing a military operation.
They are in total control of Washington, DC.
They're putting on a light dark show for us.
They're constructing either scaffolding for hangings or a temporary prison.
There is no proof of life of Joe outside of a Castle Rock studio, so I am optimistic that what we're seeing is the art of war to allow the enemy to self-destruct.
We'll see what develops.
as Scorpio said, is that they can't do anything but cause their own destruction by pushing these
policies because so many Americans are awake and then just roasting these guys. So we'll see what
develops the political theater goes on. This Jim Fetzer in Madison is just delighted to
share this platform with David Scorpio from the exotic land of Ecuador.
And Carl Herman from San Ramon, California.
I believe Carl has it exactly right in that if we are not confronting a transition between a corporation formed in 1871 back to the Republic, we are nevertheless confronting the difference between America controlled by the military in FEMA versus a Biden imposter administration.
The fakery is abundant.
We're confronting a theater of the absurd unlike any other phenomenon in the entire course of American history.
I remain confident that it's going to be sorted out and that the legitimate President of the United States will be restored to his proper place.
And by that I mean, of course, Donald J. Trump, who represents the best national interests of the United States And it's been opposed by the globalists and the Democrats who have turned into socialists and communists, where Joe Biden and company appear to be wholly owned subsidiaries of the Chinese Communist Party.
It's pathetic and tragic that we've reached this point in American history.
Well, that appears to be where we are today, right here in the USA.
Thank you for joining us.
▲
Export Selection