All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 27, 2021 - Jim Fetzer
01:24:32
Need to Know: The Fetzer Report Episode 117 - 26 January 2021
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Mattis from Wisconsin, where I'm delighted to be joined today by David Scorpio from the exotic land of Ecuador, and Michael Ivey in Asheville, North Carolina.
We are here to bring you all the news you need to know.
♪♪♪ ♪♪♪
♪♪♪ And it's getting serious.
Here we have Rick Grinnell, who's been the Acting Director of National Intelligence, explaining that Joe Biden's executive actions appear to be authored by or directed by the shadow government to wit Susan Rice.
Look, I've said it before.
I think it's worth repeating.
She's been given a portfolio for domestic policy.
We all know that's a joke.
She doesn't know anything about domestic policy, but she's run the national security portfolio, she's run the UN portfolio, she knows the State Department, really wanted to be Secretary of State, so there's no question she's running domestic foreign policy.
Where Kamala Harris appears to be spending most of her time in the Senate, serving as a tiebreaker, Well, Susan Rice is extremely excited that Harris is being occupied with the Senate, and therefore her shadow presidency is front and center.
We have more and more proof about the inauguration having been completely staged, having been a hoax.
We have this fellow in uniform without proper badges.
This is not, in fact, a general, but it's a nice costume, and look at this.
Here we have a woman in pink and a woman in white in the photograph on the right, standing by it approximately the same time.
Biden is sworn in on the left, but they have disappeared.
This is one of many indications about the pre-recording of the inauguration that it had no legal significance standing.
I reiterate, it took place Ten or fifteen minutes prior to noon on the 20th and therefore cannot have been legitimate.
Meanwhile, and this rather surprises me, the Trump team disavows the newly formed Patriot Party.
I have no doubt the Patriot Party will move forward with or without Donald Trump, whereas 75 million ready-made members and is going to displace the Republican Party, which seems to be reverting to its country club Wall Street character of the past, on the one hand, and the Democrat Party, which has gone full socialist-communist on the other.
Meanwhile, when Trump left the White House, he warned it's not a long goodbye, but he has now opened an office of a former president in Florida.
Which I find very peculiar, because I believe that he has actually surrendered the presidency.
Scorpio, your thoughts?
Thank you.
You know, this country really does need a new party.
Because really, the two parties are just two wings on the same bird, essentially.
And under Mitch McConnell and other rhino Republicans who are really globalists, the Republicans are just, they act as sort of a pseudo-resistance to the agenda that the Democrats push.
But it's a pretty flaccid resistance.
And I believe most of these people are on board.
And I believe that the new coming leader of the Republican Party is going to be none other than Mittens' magic underwear Romney, who is full bore aboard the agenda.
So a new party is very much needed.
And about that inauguration, that's interesting, the story, the points the story made.
And I watched the whole thing live and I thought it was oddly rushed.
It seemed like they wanted to get this over with as quickly as possible.
It was a bunch of wolves in sheep's clothing salivating for the coming slaughter, it seemed to me.
Well, I think that's right, that it was rushed, but it was also done under very peculiar circumstances.
It was recorded and then broadcast, but there were glitches.
Obviously, they did more than one take.
Which would not have been possible had this been an authentic, real event.
Michael, your thoughts?
Well, Jim, let me add one thing.
That's very interesting, this notion that it might have been pre-recorded, because I followed some videos of two different citizen journalists who tried to walk around the perimeter just to get a view of the proceedings, even from a great distance.
And they made sure to have every possible view blocked off.
There was no way to see the inauguration live.
It was impossible.
And that's because it wasn't actually taking place.
As we reported yesterday, a journalist had interviewed 50 people and no one had observed the inauguration taking place because, in fact, it was only virtual.
It was pre-recorded.
Michael, your thoughts?
The story about Susan Rice running policy, being a shadow president, would certainly be no surprise.
She was one of the inner circle of the Obama administration for, I think, the entire time of his administration.
And conversely, we all know that Biden is either, one, completely mentally incompetent, or two, a body double actor who's playing Joe Biden, so it only makes sense that there would be someone who's calling the shots and it certainly is not Joe Biden.
The story about the pre-recording and the faking of the Inauguration.
That's, you know, one of the many anomalies that's being that's being publicized right now.
And that slide where it had one picture juxtaposed against the other that you could name 20 things in those photos that are different between those two photos.
And yet it's supposed to be the same general moment where Biden is taking the oath of office.
Excellent, excellent points, Michael.
There's a lot of people, you mentioned a third party being formed and there's a lot of people who are talking about that right now.
They usually speak of it in the using the moniker Patriot Party.
And if I want to throw in my two cents, I'm hoping Chelsea Gabbard gets in that party.
Oh, that's a great idea, Michael.
I like that.
You know, I've suggested the America First Party, but Patriot Party seems to have primacy.
Meanwhile, we have a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction should swiftly end the Senate impeachment farce.
This is coming from former Representative Bob Barr, who's a very smart guy.
If there was perhaps one mistake our founders made in drafting the Constitution, it was presuming future members of the legislative branch would be sufficiently competent to actually read the document to which they all had sworn an oath.
However, it's increasingly clear many, perhaps most, sitting United States Senator cannot read the plain text of the Constitution or refuse to do it.
The relevant wording is at the very end of Article 2.
Establishing that a constitutionally errant President shall be removed from office, be impeached by the House, and convicted by the Senate for high crimes and misdemeanors.
Unlike other sections where clarity may be obscured by ortained wording, this particular provision is clear and precise, and it applies to THE President, meaning the one and only.
The language pointedly does not provide in any way, shape, or form that a former president or ex-president may be similarly punished, only the president.
The 100-member Senate at the moment is split down the middle, 50 who identify as Republicans, 50 who identify as Democrats.
Democrat leader Schumer has declared openly that as the self-styled majority leader, he will move forward within days to try Donald Trump.
The objective would be to find him guilty of the single argument of impeachment passed by the representatives in relation to the Capitol, which we know was 226 Antifa opposing as Trump supporters.
While many GOP are openly opposed to Schumer's plan, a number of Republican senators, including, oddly enough, The majority leader, Senator Mitch McConnell, has signed on to the notion the basin on which they are proceeding can best be understood by their all-consuming hatred for the former president, a sentiment they share with House colleagues.
The zeal appears to have blinded them, even to common sense and the plain meaning of words, factors that otherwise, and in less toxic times, would lead them to realize that, no matter how powerful and exalted they may view themselves as senator, A person cannot be removed by them from an office he or she does not, in fact, occupy.
It's black letter law.
A court cannot punish someone for a crime if it does not have jurisdiction.
Because this court's a court over individuals outside their defined jurisdiction, the Senate has no power over a former president of the United States.
No matter how much Schumer may dislike Trump, And would like to prevent him from being able to run again at a future date where he would wipe them off.
It's preposterous to think they should be able to get away with it.
Meanwhile, another clear violation of the Constitution regarding impeachment.
Senator Leahy, rather than the Chief Justice, is to provide over the second Trump impeachment trial, But I checked the clear wording of the Constitution, and it states, the Senate shall have the sole power to try all impeachments.
When sitting for that purpose, they shall be on oath or affirmation.
When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside.
And no person is convicted without the concurrence of two-thirds of the members present.
That language, the Chief Justice shall provide, Is not optional.
You can't just make a substitution willy-nilly.
And the Chief Justice has indicated he's not willing to preside.
We ought to have been the end of it right there.
Scorpio, your thoughts?
Well, this whole notion of impeaching a president that's no longer in office is ludicrous.
And it's clearly just to not only humiliate Trump, but to put a shadow of doubt over anything that he stood for.
And, you know, while we're at it, why don't we impeach George Washington for owning slaves?
I mean, you know, that's got to be an impeachable offense, too, right?
I mean, this is insane.
And these Democrats are drunk on power, and they want to create a uniparty system where they rule in perpetuity.
That is their goal, make no mistake.
And, you know, The one reason why these politicians don't read the bills
is that they're often one or 2000 pages and which is basically impossible to read. No
one has time to do that. And that's part of the reason they make them so long is they damn well
know nobody's going to read them.
Well, you make you make a nice, nice point. But the fact is, they know the reality that
Trump actually secured around 73 million votes and mopped the floor with Biden, who may have
secured a third that many, where 410 votes were secured by by President Trump and his reelection,
which are trying to obfuscate. They don't want him to run again, because he would clean their clock.
Michael, your thoughts?
Yeah, I'm like Scorpio.
It's just such a ridiculous thing that they're moving forward with the trial of Trump in the Senate after he's out of office.
And it makes me curious.
It makes me suspicious.
They use the phrase, an all-consuming hatred for the former president as if that's the only thing
that was going on.
But my suspicion is that they have such high levels of vitriol that they're expressing that
there's something behind it. There's some reason for this.
That's my suspicion anyway.
They want to nullify him as a political leader and a political candidate, Michael.
They don't want to run against him in 2024.
Well, that may be the case.
My suspicion is that it might be something even more immediate than 2024, because there's a lot of people out there who would and did vote for Trump, but Trump gave us plenty of reason not to vote for him.
So, I mean, if you're just looking at what he did objectively, as opposed to the choice on the other side.
So, I don't think he's, you know, he's gonna be the leader of the people who voted for him twice now.
And I just don't quite get this whole thing about being out of office and continuing to vilify him.
How could you think anyone else would be the leader of those 73-4 million who voted for him, Michael?
Well, number one, there's time, and number two, there's ideology.
There's a common ideology there, and it was best expressed by Trump when he was first running for president in 2016.
And I think those same ideologies can be picked up by anyone who has leadership qualities and who has the guts to do it.
Well, I gotta say, I can't imagine that.
I can't imagine that to be the case.
Trump affected a connection with the public that other politicians have failed until you go back to Ronald Reagan or even JFK.
Yeah, that's a good point.
Meanwhile, wasting no time, Biden signed 17 executive orders on the first day.
Fairly stunning stuff.
He swiftly took action on his first day, signing between 17 executive orders and memoranda mere hours after.
Halted construction of the Mexican border wall, began rejoining the Paris Climate Accord, announced intentions of rejoining the World Health Organization, reversed the ban on immigration from Muslim-majority countries.
Actually, it wasn't from Muslim-majority countries, but from countries where terrorism was abounding, some of which happened to be Muslim-majority.
Revoked the 1776 Commission that promoted patriotic civic education and provided new protection for the DACA program, those called DREAMers.
Also began the 100 Days Masking Challenge, mandating masks must be worn on federal property as well as interstate travel.
The ICE agents were ordered to free all the illegal aliens in custody and force them all This is bizarre, because it had nothing to do with the seriousness of the offenses they may have committed.
The memo tells agents that all cases of detainees in ICE custody are now to be considered of no significant likelihood of removal in foreseeable future, suggesting all detainees need to be released.
Release them all immediately, the ICE official wrote to the staff in the memo.
I mean, this is absurd beyond belief.
But look at this.
One of my very astute colleagues observed, these are executive actions.
These are not executive orders.
What's the difference?
It's huge.
The discrepancy is the difference between a citizen question added to the 2020 census after Trump's announcement and no such question at all.
Executive orders are published in the Federal Register and are legally binding.
They give presidents the power to create unilateral directives.
No, they can't be overturned if a court rules they are unconstitutional.
They remain in place until rescinded or modified by a president, reversed by a court, or nullified by legislation.
Executive actions, by contrast, bear little weight.
They're not placed on the Federal Register and aren't subject to legal review.
But these so-called threats to orders often draw a reaction that is sharp as the responses to orders themselves.
In other words, This is more of an illusion than a reality.
I had checked the Federal Register for several of these directives and found none of them were there.
They are, however, being published on a White House website, which is totally different.
Meanwhile, the former White House stenographer Mike McCormick has reported Joe Biden has lost 50% of his cognitive ability.
McCormick, who worked for Biden for six years, details Biden's decline in his new book, Joe Biden Unauthorized.
After working with Biden up close, he reports Biden is not the same man, has suffered at least a 50% decline, and I would emphasize, as a stenographer who's recording his words, he's reflecting especially on the cognitive abilities related to language, which is of fundamental importance.
Meanwhile, only one in five Americans believe Biden can unify the country.
A poll released by ABC and Ipsos Sunday found only 22% have a great deal of confidence in the president's ability to make progress on unifying the country over his term in office.
The poll found 24% have no confidence whatsoever in his prospects for unity.
And of course, there's absolutely no reason to think This guy, for whom the overwhelming majority of Americans did not vote, is going to have any potential for bringing unity to such a divided nation.
Scorpio, your thoughts?
Yeah, you know, the idea that somehow this man is going to unify the country again is absurd.
Their plan to unify the country essentially comes down to censoring dissent and even making dissent illegal with a new Stasi-like secret police force.
Uh, these are, this is a dangerous regime.
This is not an administration.
It's a regime.
And, uh, you know, the idea that, you know, one of the first things they do is stop all enforcement, uh, you know, by ICE and release, uh, illegal aliens and criminals.
Many of these people are hardcore criminals, make no mistake.
The idea that they're going to release these people back on the streets is one of the first things they do.
It really should make it clear to all Americans that this regime has no intention of doing anything to help the American people.
Quite the opposite.
They plan on enacting a long-planned globalist agenda.
This is nothing more than a backdoor route to open borders.
And this is not something that any Americans want to see, especially at a time when there are very few jobs available to legal citizens.
This is outrageous.
And it should become clear to Americans that not only does your vote not count, but this government is actually going to work against your own interest.
Time to wake up and smell the coffee.
This man, this regime, is working to destroy the lives of Americans and nothing short of it.
I think you're absolutely right in that this has to be like a splash of cold water in the face to see the actions they're taking.
And as I say, it appears to be more illusion than reality, because they do not appear to have the force of executive orders, but are rather akin to a wish list.
Michael, your thought?
That's a very interesting thing about the difference in terminology between executive orders and executive actions.
Of course, the media is going to completely ignore that distinction and call them executive orders.
But that's yet another of the many anomalies that have cropped up ever since the election, really, but they continue to pile on.
I was curious, the photo in the slide that showed Biden presumably signing the executive actions, is that, oh, where was that?
Let me see if I can find it is is that one that.
I can't find it either, but it was supposed to be in the oval office.
And I was wondering if that yeah, there it is.
You've got it right there.
Is that 1 that shows something outside those windows?
That's not.
The proper view outside the Oval Office?
Yes, I think it does, because it looks as though there are vehicles here.
It should all be only branches and trees, but there's a parking lot, which seems to be related to a set that they were using here.
I mean, how embarrassing is this, that that's taking place, Michael?
So I think you're right that we still have You know, they're using this prop.
The whole thing is phony, fake, and staged.
This is a Hollywood administration.
Okay, and two other things.
Is it not an illegal act?
I don't understand why it's not an illegal act in itself to order
the release of known convicted criminals and illegal aliens.
I'm totally on board with what Scorpio said just now, as that being an obvious sign that these people have no
compassion for, or they're not working for the American people at all.
It's the same as Angela Merkel and Macron in France swamping their countries with And one other comment on the stories that you just went through, and that is the guy, Mike McCormick, who's the six-year stenographer for Biden.
way back in the 20s. And one other comment on the stories that you just went through and that is
the guy Mike McCormick who's the six-year stenographer for Biden. My friend in Texas
saw live on inauguration day Mike McCormick commenting as Biden was giving his speech and
And at that time, she was certain that what he meant was that that's not Joe Biden.
Not just that his cognitive abilities has slipped, but evidently that's the way that it's being spun by people who carry the story about Mike McCormick.
Excellent.
Excellent point, Michael.
I think you're 100% correct.
And Jim, can I just add one thing?
Of course.
Yeah, this idea of the difference between executive action and executive orders, I think that's a really good point.
But the problem is all rules are out the window right now with this administration or this regime.
They don't care about the rules.
They're just going to ramrod their agenda down people's throats by brute force.
And Michael made a great point that how can it possibly be legal To release criminals onto the street.
I don't see they're not.
They're not even following any rules.
Like I say, all the rules are just out the window and we need to recognize that this is an unlawful administration in every regard.
Yeah, it's it's it's a Fiat decision that he made.
He's not trying to justify it.
And when I say he, I mean the people who are controlling him.
He's not trying to justify it with COVID even.
He's just saying OK, let him out.
You're right, Michael, that in the original broadcast, and I've seen a report on it too, the stenographer was reporting that's not Joe Biden.
Meanwhile, he's rescinding the Trump order banning Chinese communist involvement in the U.S.
power grid.
This is one of the most disturbing of the reports we have about him.
Sub point seven, though, this Executive Order 13920 of May 1st, 2020, securing the United States' bulk power system is hereby suspended for 90 days, with this Trump year order sought to ban, replace, and set new criteria on bulk power system electrical equipment coming from a foreign country or nation that poses a national security threat because a successful attack on our power system present significant risk to our economy, human health, and
safety.
And with Retina of the United States less capable of acting in defense of itself and its allies,
the move prohibited any acquisition, importation, transfer, installation of bulk power system
electric equipment by any person or with respect to any property to which a foreign country or
national thereof has any interest that poses an undue risk to the BPS, the security or resiliency
of U.S. critical infrastructure or the U.S. economy. This is completely outrageous.
The order prohibits utilities that supply critical defense facilities from procuring from the People's Republic of China specific BPS electric equipment and poses an undue risk to the BPS, the security or resilience of critical infrastructure, the economy, national security, or safety and security of America.
Now, how could a responsible president consent to an order of that sort?
According to Biden's executive order, which we know now is actually only an executive action, the fate of the bona fide executive order and America's BPS rests in the hands of Biden's Secretary of Energy and Director of the Office of Management and Budget, whose, where the national pulse has exposed Biden's OMB head as formerly serving as the president of the Center for American Progress, an establishment think tank, And it's taken trips to China and co-authored reports alongside a Chinese Communist Party-backed influence operation.
What's more, Biden's son, Hunter, of course, was previously involved in several business relationships with the Chinese energy industry.
Meanwhile, he's also just picked a CIA director with a seven-year-long relationship with Chinese Communist Party fronts.
I mean, listen, this is about as disturbing as it gets, and Scorpio, while you questioned when I mentioned there was a report of the Secretary of Defense talking about disbanding the U.S.
Army and, you know, leaving our national defense out to China, that was a satirical piece, but I think it had a point, because look what's going on here.
This is like turning the country over to Communist China.
Well, and this Bill Burns character is another dual citizen Zionist Jew whose loyalty is at the very least questionable to the United States.
You know, let's not forget that this Shelly Adelson character, you know, who funded the Republicans and Trump and other causes, he wanted his ass buried in Israel.
Didn't even want to be buried in the United States.
So, these people do not have any allegiance to the United States.
Make no mistake about that.
And, you know, stopping the Keystone Pipeline, again, it's cutting 70,000 jobs immediately, first days in office.
That's really going to help the American people, huh?
And again, this is really part of this Paris Climate Accord, which was a globalist agenda And don't forget that in the Paris Climate Accord, it put strict regulations on America immediately.
It's going to destroy all kinds of industry in the United States, whereas China won't have any limitations put on them until 2030.
And this is a globalist international agreement.
So the globalists are making it clear they want China to move into the forefront and bring down the United States.
People need to see this.
This is no accident.
It's not a coincidence or anything like that.
Well, I agree completely, Scorpio.
Michael, your thoughts?
I find it extraordinarily ominous that one of the first things that the Biden controllers did was to allow the Chinese Communist Party to have any role at all in the provision of the electricity to our power grid.
There's been quite a bit of discussion about Biden's use of the term dark winter.
He used it on two or three different occasions in speeches and in the debates saying that we're headed into a dark winter and he wasn't talking about the weather.
There's a terrific analysis of that in Last Sunday's Patrick Henningsen's The Sunday Wire, which is posted at the Jim Fetzer BitChute site, as well as the Odyssey site.
Now, I don't understand the appointment of this guy named Bill Burns to be the head of the CIA, because it's been publicized that yet another Zionist-Jewish dual citizen named David Cohen was his appointment for the director of the CIA.
So, I don't know what happened between those two things, but evidently, he's only picking from one ethnicity here.
That's pretty disturbing, Michael.
You make nice points.
Meanwhile, what we have is a situation with a fake president, a fake old swearing, a fake inauguration, a fake Oval Office, executive orders that are only executive actions and have no legal significance.
I believe this is all going to blow up in the face of the Democrats.
Reasons that will become clear.
Meanwhile, the Democrats want conservative news banned.
If the federal government implements a policy that censors Americans or the press, it's a direct violation of the First Amendment.
Children learn this in grade school.
But it seems a Democrat in Florida missed that lesson as a child and then in law school.
She told her followers she thinks President Biden should issue an executive order that bans Fox, QNN, and Newsmax from federally owned property.
She doesn't believe anyone who lives or works on land owned by the government should be allowed to access news.
But you see, that's an action by the federal government which is specifically proscribed by the Constitution itself.
This woman is an idiot!
Prohibiting conservatives from speaking, whether in person, on television, or on the radio, on public property, is censorship and a violation of the First Amendment.
Meanwhile, the GOP has shown a mixed response to the inauguration.
When on January 20th, Joe Biden appeared to become the 46th President of the United States, the inauguration was massively scaled down Because of the pandemic and over security concerns, but also because no one was going to show.
So he put up 200,000 flags to represent 200,000 non-present American citizens.
Senator Roy Blunt played a prominent role.
He spoke to the crowd and called for unity.
Representative Lauren Boebert pointed out the left seemed to be more focused on Biden's predecessor than they were on him.
Very damn peculiar.
Speaking of Biden's predecessor, President Trump wished Joe Biden's administration luck prior to the administration.
He said they had a solid foundation thanks to the hard work of his team over the last four years.
I believe the work was ambiguous.
Meanwhile, the World Health Organization has acknowledged now that the PCR test really doesn't indicate that you actually have COVID.
This is pretty fascinating.
It explains, when you read it carefully, that the cycle threshold is inversely proportional to the patient's viral load, meaning they're using too high a threshold, that disease prevalence alters the predictive value of test results, the risk of false positive increases, the probability that a person who has a positive result is truly infected decreases as prevalence decreases, Most of the assays are indicated as a need for diagnosis.
Therefore, healthcare providers must consider any result in combination with timing of the sample, the specimen type, assay specifics, clinical observations.
What they're basically telling us in medical language is that these tests are giving us overwhelming percentage of false positives.
and mean no more in general that you have had a cold.
I mean, it's about time it comes out, but they ought to have said so in clear
and easily understandable language, Scorpio.
Well, Jim, before I respond, let me ask you a question.
What is the point of this article?
Because, I mean, I see what they're saying, and it's true, but meanwhile, these COVID tests are going all over the world, and it's the gold standard.
What's the point of it all?
I would say it's covering their ass, that the World Health Organization doesn't want to be faulted for having given out false information and impressions about the tests, which they've clearly been doing Here to four and without qualification.
Well, it might be also part of this strategy of confusion that I believe they've engaged in since the beginning of this so-called crisis.
And, you know, it's a shame that Cary Mullis, the inventor of the PCR test, just coincidentally died right before this crisis began because he would have been speaking out about this at every chance he got, no question about it.
You know, he's on record saying that Dr. Fauci is an idiot with an agenda, and he's a dangerous man, and that the PCR test is never, never intended to diagnose disease of any kind.
And, you know, going back to the article about the conservative media, the Democrats want to create a one-party state.
As I was saying, this is part of this strategy, and they want a one-party state like China, and they want to have only one way to think, One way to believe, one way to behave, just like China.
And what they're doing is they're slowly trying to condition and acclimate our minds towards accepting a Chinese-like system.
All of these concepts are extremely anti-American to their core.
And, you know, another element of this is the so-called cancelled culture, which is related.
This idea that if you say the wrong thing, you should lose your job and your livelihood and be publicly disgraced in a walk of shame.
This is part of the Chinese social credit system where if you don't act and behave the right way, you're not going to work.
You can't even get on public transportation.
And notice too that even the NBA is in the clutches of China now because you know the NBA is extremely popular in China.
The NBA refuses to criticize China.
I'm sure you guys already saw that clip from maybe a couple months ago where someone asked one of these head honchos of the NBA a question that was critical of China.
They said well we're just not going to Go there.
We're not going to talk bad things about China.
Next question.
So, you know, that's very telling.
And lastly, you know, going back to this PCR test.
It's important to note that SARS is Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome.
And I was listening to one of these doctors talk about this.
The fact that they call it a syndrome, they're admitting that they don't know the exact cause of it.
That's why it's called a syndrome.
That's very important, I think.
Oh, Scorpio, that's an absolutely telling point, and your other remarks equally.
They're preparing us for the Chinese model of social merit system, 100% correct, and it could not be more undemocratic or un-American to its core, as you are emphasizing.
Michael, your thoughts?
The first story there about the Democrat who wants all conservative news banned from government property, I guess, and other things.
To me, it's just a logical progression.
It's like an expression of the Bolshevik consolidation of information, just like the old Soviet Union gave their people three TV stations, and only one of them was functional, and the other two said, please turn to the one that they wanted you to listen to.
Their rhetoric is rapidly progressing from Deplatforming to demonizing conservatives.
And then it's going to dehumanizing conservatives as being domestic terrorists.
And the dehumanizing part is dangerously close to making it legitimate for people to commit genocide.
I'm moving to the story about the WHO guidance.
I found that hilarious.
It struck me as A talking around and obfuscation of the fact that they're sort of saying, well, we know that the PCRs don't accurately diagnose anything, but they want to maintain that vehicle for the propaganda value as
Using it to say, oh, we have so many cases here, so many cases there, they automatically conflate positive results on these bogus tests with cases.
So it allows them to maintain this false pandemic propaganda.
Michael, you're 100% correct.
The death of Carrie Moas, I dare say is no coincidence.
It was liberate.
I have no doubt.
I wanted to just comment on one statement on slide 37.
It's It's part of the WHO guidance.
The sentence says, where test results do not correspond with the clinical presentation.
In other words, if you get a test result that is obviously wrong, it just says, do it over again.
I thought that was hilarious, supposedly anti-scientific guidance.
And Michael, your point about a strategy of dehumanization, that is so important.
That's very perceptive, and that's exactly where they want to take this.
Thank you for saying that.
Oh, you're both making excellent, excellent points.
Meanwhile, the New York Times has canceled an editor's contract after outrage over a single tweet about Joe Biden.
How bad is this?
The New York Times fired an editor after one tweet she posted that appeared to express joy and excitement over the inauguration of President Joe Biden.
That's pretty peculiar.
The New York Times canceled Lauren Wolf's contract after an outpouring of ridicule over her tweet.
Well, she said she had chills from seeing the landing of Biden's plane in Maryland ahead of his inauguration, which, by the way, was not a military plane.
She falsely accused the former Trump administration of refusing to send a military plane, which appears to be true, but later was informed, falsely in my opinion, that he'd been offered a military plane but refused it in favor of a private flight, I don't believe Wolf then defended her chills tweet from her critics by claiming she'd meant to express her history of the moment.
The idea of criticizing her for praising Bush by the New York, or praising Biden by the New York Times seems to me a manifest absurdity.
In another tweet, Jess, I have to wonder, is there some gross organizing to come after journalists they think are not objective?
After an outpouring of mockery and outrage, she deleted more of her tweets and then completely deactivated her account on social media platforms.
Many saw the tweet as the latest example of a double standard from the mainstream in relation to Republicans and Democrats.
Meanwhile, Katie Couric, her Jeopardy!
test host plan had been put on hold after she remarked that she felt Trump followers need to be deprogrammed.
Katie Couric's opportunity to guest host Jeopardy is reportedly in danger after she advocated last week that supporters of President Trump should be deprogrammed.
Katie suggested on HBO's Real Time with Bill Maher that Americans need to explore how to deprogram Trump supporters, speaking with a show host about the deadly violence at the Capitol, which we know was staged.
It was an orchestrated event of false flag involving 226 Antifa members, Fainting to be Trump supporters, where Nancy Pelosi, the Capitol Police and the Mayor of Washington appear to have been in collusion.
I mean, it's really bizarre, isn't it, when you think about how AWOL so many of these members of Congress have gotten, but I also think some of them are believing the garbage that they're being fed 24-7 on the Internet by their constituents, and they bought into this big lie, meaning People who actually think this was staged, or that Trump supporters are real, and that the Democrats are wrong, she's saying they bought into this big lie.
According to the New York Post, Cork's conversation with Jeopardy producers and Belieber remarks offended the core audience of the legendary game show.
The Jeopardy audience is very conservative, and the show has always steered clear of politics.
Katie's comments so soon after she was announced as a host are very concerning to the producers.
They're worried there will be a backlash.
There have already been complaints.
A source told Page Six that Cork has ruled herself out of becoming Alex Trebek's permanent replacement.
Property viewers are quite a traditional bunch, and they're fearing she might be too polarizing after this at the least.
She already appears to have ruled herself out.
Pretty fascinating development.
Scorpio, your thoughts?
Again, this is just absurd.
Chills.
Who cares?
Why should we care what this vacuous woman thinks about anything?
And since when are people so easily offended by the smallest little statement?
I mean, people need to grow a pair and just, you know, accept that people have different viewpoints and just move on.
This idea that we're supposed to be offended by every little thing is a very, very dangerous development in our society.
And, you know, Katie Couric shouldn't be hosting anything because she's talentless and she's vacuous and that's about it for her.
I think you're 100% correct, and the First Amendment has nothing to do with hurt feelings or differences in sentiment, or even if you find what is being said offensive.
This is political correctness run amok, and the Democrats have gone with it 100% with the greatest zeal and conviction.
Well, just one last thing, Jim.
I agree.
Just let me add one thing.
I think what they want to do is make it so anything that contradicts the official government narrative is seen as some kind of heresy and that you should be punished.
And again, this goes back to the Chinese social credit system.
I agree completely.
Totally un-American, undemocratic, and violative of the First Amendment.
I mean, if you can't speak your mind, what does it mean to be an American?
Damn near nothing.
Michael, your thoughts?
The connecting thread of both of those stories was the attempt by first the New York Times and then the producers of Jeopardy to make a show of being politically objective.
When I saw that New York Times story, I had to laugh because the New York Times is now trying to pose as an objective source of information.
This woman is obviously a sacrificial lamb, and it's ludicrous that they want to be seen as objective because that horse left the proverbial barn decades ago.
Katie Couric's comments being, quote, concerning to the producers has absolutely nothing to do with their actual objectivity of the Jeopardy producers.
It means the Jeopardy producers are concerned that they're about to lose a huge percentage of their viewership, and therefore their advertising dollars.
You're 100% correct, and you made a very deft point about the New York Times.
Yes, making this move in a feigned attempt to appear objective when they are anything but.
Nice.
Very nice.
Meanwhile, the Texas Supreme Court has silently denied Alex Jones all forms of relief,
where Sandy Hook's family and others can sue the conspiracy theorists and InfoWars into the ground.
Very disturbing.
This is another major First Amendment issue.
An empire built on conjecture, conspiracy, and a series of fake homeopathic cures for various ailments stand to be suited to oblivion after a Friday ruling by the Supreme Court.
I've always felt Alex was very good at inviting attention to issues that don't add up.
Including talking about Sandy Hook, where we had contradictory reports from the mainstream, even to the effect that Adam Lanza did not exist, so that for him to draw that attention was very worthwhile, and to invite speculation about what was going on.
He never really followed through, however, to sort out the authentic from the fabricated evidence, Or to assess which of the various hypotheses or conjectures were best found in the nation's legitimate evidence.
Each of four lawsuits that have been filed against him were in Travis County, the largest of three contained in the city of Austin, the state capital, with an ever-present image in the once-sleepy college town, home to the leading public ivy, the Texas University of Texas.
Jones is something of a household name.
After spreading what they're here describing as the false gospel for well over two decades, Jones took a turn toward conspiracy following Timothy McMay's 1995 bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah building.
While General Parton's report right upstairs, and it's very clear Timothy McMay was merely a patsy, that the fertilizer bomb could not possibly have done the damage to the building.
Meanwhile, after the 2012 shooting, That they're claiming, left 20 children and 6 teachers dead.
So as my book, Nobody Died in 1600 Schools, this was all a fabricated event where the school had been closed by 2008, that it was loaded with asbestos and other biohazards, that there were no students there, and that this all was a FEMA drill to promote gun control presented as mass murder.
Jones uses my then vast platform to spread the idea the murders were part of a false flag operation meant to scare the population into giving up their guns, except there appear to have been no murders.
According to the article, of course, none of Jones' claims about the case were true, but they got traction among the easily influenced, which is pretty ridiculous.
Those who are actually looking at the evidence and thinking about the case know That there were no deaths at Sandy Hook, but Jones came around and wound up on both sides of the issue, where he even observed in a 2016 broadcast, if children are lost at Sandy Hook, my heart goes out to each and every one of their parents.
And for the people who say they're parents, I see on the news, the problem is I've watched a lot of soap operas, I've seen actors before, and I know when I'm watching a movie and when I'm watching something real, Well, he was actually spot on.
Take Robbie Parker, for example.
He comes out of the building all jocular and laughing the day after the alleged slaughter, then turns to see the press assembled, pauses, hyperventilates to get in character, and then begins talking about the death of his daughter, Emily, remembering having the presence of mind to talk about her donation website, where Alex has sought To have the filings dismissed, but the Texas court is allowing them to proceed.
Meanwhile, we have advertising for role players for what appears to be another false flag in Las Vegas.
The last at the Mandalay Bay Hotel is when I, Scott Bennett, and including Mona, Alexis, Presley, and Dan Kramer have thoroughly exposed to have been a movie where they use a pre-recorded soundtrack of machine gun firing Where they have special visual effects of light flashing at the center of the Mandalay Bay Hotel on the fourth floor to stimulate the light flash that would presumably be the cause of the sound of the machine gun.
Where they have loaded the concert with around 500 Crisis players from crowds on demand.
It looks as though they're lining up for a redo of some other False flag in Las Vegas once again.
Scorpio, your thoughts?
Well, Jim, what are they saying?
What's a radiological attack?
Are they talking about like a dirty bomb or something like that?
Oh, I think it's unclear exactly what, but yes, that may well be.
Interesting.
And do they give dates of when these actors need to be working?
Well, we could go back.
We could go back to, see, I didn't notice the dates, Scorpio.
Let me see if we can buff this.
That would be a strong tip off.
These are the days we need you to work.
Well, they've done that before.
The exercise dates are 1-26, 1-28 and 1-29 and they're going to be paid a hundred bucks a day.
So the 26th is going to be the rehearsal and the 28th and the 29th are going to go live.
Well, that's interesting.
You know, Vegas is an absolute ghost town right now, you know, because of this so-called COVID restrictions.
Most of the casinos are closed.
The hotels are closed.
Nothing is going on there, so it might be a good stage in which to try a new false flag.
This will be interesting.
I'm going to keep my eyes out for this one.
Perfect!
You know, Alex Jones Uh, there's always been something a little strange about him.
He's done some good work, I'll admit that, but he's the only man in the history of time to become a millionaire in the conspiracy world, and I just wonder if they're not, you know, I've always had the feeling that, you know, he had a managed operation somehow, because of all the money he makes, just, I don't see how it It's possible, quite frankly.
And maybe they're going to use him as an example here now that it's time to unwind the operation and shut it down.
Use him as an example to scare people who want to speak their mind and free speech.
Well, of course, and they've been using James Tracy and Wolfgang Helbig and me as further examples to not wander off the reservation or challenge the official account.
Michael, your thoughts?
Yeah, Jim, I think the known term for those kinds of lawsuits is a slap suit, which means a strategic lawsuit against public participation.
Also, the term lawfare is used in these situations, which is basically Using the legal system to wage war against free speech.
Yeah.
I don't really have a comment on Alex Jones.
I could make so many comments about Alex Jones that I'm going to skip that for now.
But I wanted to say that the last story there about the role players needed for another show of some kind.
The demise of the Smith-Munt Act, I believe that was 2012 when they revamped the Smith-Munt Act that prevented the intel communities from propagandizing the American people.
So they basically, they called it the modernization of the Smith-Munt Act.
I love these things they come up with.
And after that, and probably before that as well, there have been production crews traveling around the country arranging and doing these shooting events while having their Mockingbird media present them as being real to the people.
So, this is great that they've given us some dates here for this one in Las Vegas.
Well, Michael, you're 100% correct.
Barack Obama nullified the Smith-Mutt Act by the Smith-Mutt Modernization Act of 2012, just in time for Sandy Hook.
And as you correctly observe, it legalized or legitimized USM techniques of propaganda disinformation within the United States that were being used abroad, and unleashed a spigot, a flood of false flag activities Including Sandy Hook, the Boston bombing, Orlando and Dallas, Charlottesville, Parkland, Las Vegas.
You're 100% correct.
And for those who want to know more about the suit brought against me, yes indeed, a slap suit, which is illegal in like 27 states.
Go to jamesfetzer.org and look at this.
The Sandy Hook-Posner vs. Fetzer lawsuit and why it matters.
Jim, I'm curious if that illegality in 27 states applies to where you are in Wisconsin or only... No, that's why they filed in Wisconsin, Michael.
Oh, that's not one of the 27?
Clearly not.
No, yeah, sure.
Okay.
I mean... Connecticut is, I assume?
I'm sorry?
And Connecticut is, I assume?
I don't think Connecticut is either, because they have two lawsuits against Alex Jones, or at least one major one in Connecticut.
Meanwhile, we have Biden seeking direct dialogue with Iran, where Iran's ambassador said to the United Nations that Iran has not spoken with the new Biden administration yet.
I have felt that Iran was really crucial.
To the Israeli desire to take Trump out of office because he was not willing to bomb Iran, and where they unleash the mainstream media, which they control virtually absolutely.
As I endlessly explain, I have a panel of 100 executives from CNN, every one of whom is a dual U.S.-Israeli citizen.
of 100 executives from NBC, every one of whom is a dual U.S.-Israeli citizen,
and another panel from The New York Times, every one of whom is a dual U.S.-Israeli citizen.
So I have felt they wanted to get Trump up because he would not bomb Iran. That created
the anomaly, though, since Biden wants to return to the Iran deal. Notice the JCPOA,
which would, of course, presumably mean Iran couldn't develop nuclear weapons.
But now the Israelis say they will attack Iran if the U.S.
returns to the nuclear deal.
I find this very damn peculiar.
Very damn peculiar.
After all, The Iran deal is to preclude Iran from developing nuclear
weapons.
Now, I was recently interviewed by Iran about the election and so forth, and I added that,
you know, they wanted Trump out.
But I also explained how he'd been so generous to Israel, but he had not been willing to
bomb Iran, and that if Iran were to acquire nuclear weapons, it would seem to me it would
bring peace and stability to the Middle East, because then we'd have a state of mutually
assured destruction between Israel and Iran, like the Soviet Union and the United States
have prevailed for nearly 40 years, and for the first and only time.
They edited that sentence out, which bothered me tremendously.
And I inquired, and they said, because the Supreme Leader had declared that Iran is not going to pursue nuclear weapons.
And I replied, well, this is my opinion, and I was not citing the Supreme Leader on this issue.
And I explained, I was rather taken aback by their editorial role in this regard, because I really do believe that the situation would be stable if Iran did have nuclear weapons.
Scorpio, your thoughts?
Well, Jim, I don't think the Supreme Leader wants to let the cat out of the bag, because anyone with any common sense knows that the smartest thing for Iran to do is get nuclear weapons as soon as possible.
That's the reason why we haven't messed with North Korea.
And, I mean, for God's sakes, Pakistan has nuclear weapons, though.
And as you said, I think it would actually be a stabilizing thing, and that's why Israel is so against it.
And, you know, if Israel attacks Iran, guess who's going to fight the war?
It won't be Israel, it'll be the United States.
It's the old Israeli policy of, let's you and them fight.
Yeah, that was the whole motive behind 9-11, to draw U.S.
military into the Middle East that they had the modern Arab states that served as a counterbalance to Israel's domination of the entire region and eventually to confront a peace-loving nation of Iran Which has not launched a war of aggression against any other state since 1775.
Think about that.
Since 1775, where the ratification of the Constitution began in 1787 and George Washington was elected our first president in 1789.
Iran is truly a great nation that is a peace-loving nation.
Would the United States' history were analogous to that of Iran?
Michael, your thoughts?
Yeah, we've known that Iran has been on the Israeli hit list since years before 9-11.
They were being demonized by Netanyahu and called the biggest terrorist state and the promoter of terrorism in the world.
Then when 9-11 happened after that, it was specifically mentioned with Wesley Clark's revelations about the seven countries to be taken down in five years.
So, I'm with you, Jim.
This story is Curious and strange to me because it doesn't seem, first the Obama administration and now the Biden administration seeking some form of rapprochement with Iran is not seemingly consistent with the Israeli agenda when we know that Israelis are running these administrations.
So I don't understand how it's going down.
It's very, very puzzling to me, too.
I mean, after all, rejoining the nuclear deal, the Iran deal, would mean they aren't going to develop nuclear weapons when I think it would be in their best interest to acquire nuclear weapons.
And just to follow up on Scorpio's observation, maybe they already have, but you would think there's no point in having them without letting your enemy know you have them, because that's what ensures, you know, the mutual respect.
And precludes, you know, going to war.
It's a mad policy.
Meanwhile, Scott Bennett, notice of unlawful orders of Biden administration and treason.
Scott's a former army intelligence officer.
He was actively involved in Washington, D.C.
in dealing with the issue to expose the corruption of the election.
He's right.
Joe Biden is not the President of the United States, despite the propaganda machine attempting to bully and brainwash Americans into believing that he is.
I know because I was in Washington not long ago, working with General Flynn's team and others, examining the evidence and affidavits from technical experts, with proof not only of election fraud, but treason, espionage, and cyber-worker attacks, without disposing too much or identifying persons who might be placed in danger.
I can say with absolute authority that the materials provided by the military personnel, the cryptologists, the attorneys, and the analysts prove beyond any doubt the election on November 3rd was a corrupt fraud, an act of high treason committed, and an act of war by China.
I sat down with experts over several weeks, saw amazing things, documents, videos, other material that enraged and nauseated me.
I interviewed technical geniuses who provided testimony and evidence.
Clearly, showing that Barack Obama, John McCain, Mitt Romney, John Brennan, and others have committed high treason and should be prosecuted and promptly executed for their crimes.
So damaging was the material we had CIA, and most likely Mossad, hacking into our phones, our computers, playing microphones, setting up honey traps, breaking into our hotel rooms, searching for evidence.
As a result, we were moved around to different hotels every few days and surrounded by gun-carrying U.S.
officials and special forces.
Essentially, Joe Biden's presidential election was the result of a multidimensional fraud
consisting of mail-in ballots justified by the COVID-19 Chinese virus, Chinese Communist Party
purchasing Dominion voting machines with software that manipulated the elections
to a predetermined percentage, fake ballots transported into vote counting polls to reflect the fake computer
manipulations of the numbers, delusional Democrats, fake Republicans, and a mainstream media
that was hysterical and obsessed with removing Donald Trump by all means necessary.
The Supreme Court also seemed to play a passive-aggressive role by abandoning its constitutional duty to rule on controversies between the states.
And nothing is more controversial than evidence of a corrupt election by a person controlled and bribed by a foreign nation.
Of course, the implications is that those nations supported by Biden are going to attempt to control, dominate, brainwash, imprison, or destroy anyone who supported Trump.
And erase every political act he has taken.
We see this already with Biden's executive orders to stop the border wall construction, subjugate America to the Paris Climate Treaty, assist borders in invading America illegally, and grant them the citizenship and the right to vote, and morally destroy America through a fascistic, transgender, homosexual agenda to indoctrinate the population.
All of these actions may ignite a civil war in America.
As a result of the overwhelming evidence, we can clearly see the election of Biden was a fraud.
As a result, no lawful power or legitimacy, and therefore no word, order, policy, or instruction from Biden or his representatives as any authority, power, or legitimacy should not be accepted or obeyed in any way.
To do so would clearly be an act of treason, a strategy to counteract the false and dangerous Biden
orders.
Use this document as a notice of legal service and all orders, policies, and instructions
from the Biden administration are unlawful and unconstitutional.
Collect legal filings and exhibits provided by attorneys Sidney Powell, Rudy Giuliani, Patrick
Byrne, and Joseph Klein as evidence of the fraud and corruption.
Demand that it not only be recognized by state and federal courts and government agencies
as factual and accurate, but that it mandates the rejection of all Biden administration
claims of presidential authority.
The claim that any political or government person or agency that does not reject as unlawful all claims and orders
from the Biden administration are violating the Constitution,
have abdicated their authority, and are complicit in treason against the United States.
Send this notice by certified mail to all members of Congress, military leaders, state and local government officials, churches and media.
Yeah, that's an excellent statement there.
I don't really have a whole lot to comment on.
Well said.
and rejection of tyrants and their orders as a duty of free men to both God and others.
A very fine statement, Scorpio, your thoughts.
Yeah, that's an excellent statement there.
I don't really have a whole lot to comment on it.
It's well said.
Michael, your thoughts.
Yeah, I agree that article.
It's amazing and it speaks for itself.
And I might add that that article is posted at JamesFetzer.org, is it?
JamesFetzer.org, your blog site?
Yeah, JamesFetzer.org, yeah.
I would encourage any of those of you listening to this to go copy that off of jamesfetzer.org and send it out to your mailing list.
I'm really proud of Scott Bennett, but I've been that about him for a long time.
Do you know, do you happen to know what time period he's describing in that piece as his having been at these meetings where they examined the evidence of treason?
Yeah, it was about a week before the inauguration.
He was back there for five days, I would say.
Okay.
I was curious about that.
Meanwhile, send us fan mail, pro or con.
We want to hear from you.
The live needtoknowatgmail.com.
The live needtoknowatgmail.com.
Here's one from a correspondent of mine, Beverly.
I heard that Rand Paul sent McConnell an email imploring him to not proceed with impeachment.
To consider the opinions of GOP constituents.
Rand Paul is as full of crap as McDonnell after the chaos in the Capitol.
Rand turned tail and ran.
That is, rejected to the electoral votes.
I'm sick of Rand and his father, Ron.
Rand wasn't there for Trump in the end.
Ron failed to educate Trump on the truth about this virus.
Ron had access to Trump, Pew did, via his son, Rand.
I'm 100% certain Trump would have talked to Ron if Rand told him his father requested a few minutes of his time on an important matter.
If Trump were better informed about the virus, Fauci and company would not have led him around the nose with pure mongering.
Here's another.
Here's a quick summary of what I believe is happening behind the scenes, and let me emphasize that I believe this to be true.
The Biden Show is being put on by the military.
Washington is the capital of the defunct and bankrupt corporate republic.
The White House is a movie prize and has no power of the sovereign republic that's being re-established.
All the constitutional precautions are met for the military to take full control due to foreign efforts to hijack the country.
We really are watching a movie, and you should be far less anxious than you likely currently feel.
Justice will come when it is ready, but the deceived have to first be shown that allowing a fraudulent election to install an illegitimate government is a terrible idea.
They cannot be told the last three months have proven that conclusively.
It will be painful for a little while, but the other side brings a public truth and justice we all seek.
A new republic will be announced in due course.
The issue of optics remains that things like FISA gate and SCOTUS gate need to be launched with Donald J. Trump out of the public eye.
There's a method in the madness we are presented with.
Nothing is how it seems.
The process of arrest and financial reset is global.
2021 is a year when we are free.
I see the greatest spring of liberation in human history ahead.
It may feel dark and heavy right now, but this will not last.
Yes, it will be very rough as the truth comes out, and America will be driven to the brink of tearing itself apart, but it will come back from the brink.
The process is managed and contained.
Meanwhile, We know the guy who is walking around as the inaugurated president is not the guy Joe Biden, who was a member of the Senate and ran three times for president, not winning a single primary or caucus in South Carolina a third time around.
Meanwhile, let me reiterate how to legally decline a vaccine.
Step one, do not refuse Otherwise, you'll be considered belligerent.
Instead, you can decline by the following.
Step two, ask the doctor, does the vaccine have MRC5?
Which they all do.
These are aborted fetal tissue and other DNA.
If it contains MRC5, you have the right to decline.
So remember that, MRC5.
Step three, is there the possibility of, and the L should be replaced by an I.
Is it a possibility of an iatrogenic reaction, an adverse reaction caused by multiple compounds or drugs interacting with each other from the vaccine?
They all do.
When the doctor says, yes, it does, that you get out a vaccine pre-card, thank the doctor for the offer and walk away.
Remember, doctors have sworn the Hippocratic Oath, which specifies first, do no harm.
They must honor it.
This is how we can legally and respectfully decline the offered, mandated service, and there's absolutely nothing they can do about it.
Now you know.
Please share with everyone you care about.
Please share with everyone you care about.
Remember, it's not coincidental all corporate media are all in to facilitate the demand and fear Democrats need to achieve their objectives.
There's an alignment of all big government institutions and multinationals to support the same.
Nothing is coincidental.
Everything is political.
It's not about the virus.
It's all about control.
And if you want to learn more about the recent history of America and the ways we have been played again and again and again, check out False Flags and Conspiracies 2020.
The archives are now available.
24 presentations of extremely high quality.
False Flag Conspiracies 2020.com, available to you now.
Remember, the secret of freedom lies in educating people.
The secret of tyranny, in keeping them ignorant.
Meanwhile, our final thoughts.
Scorpio.
Well, Jim, I just got a little bit of breaking news.
A federal judge just banned the U.S.
from enforcing the 100-day ban on deportations that Joe Biden wants.
So that's a nice little blow to the Biden regime there.
And you know, they're now saying, I just heard this morning, they're now saying, Dr. Fauci and other experts, that wearing two masks is just common sense.
So they're actually telling people to put a mask on and then put another mask over it.
I'm already seeing some of these idiot politicians doing that.
And to be honest, if we can expose this COVID hoax worldwide, and it's already happening,
if we can expose that, that is what's going to bring down this global government.
It's going to bring down the WHO.
It's going to bring down all these wannabe two-bit dictators that are pushing this COVID
hoax.
This will take down everything in one fell swoop.
And that's what we really need to be working on because once the global population realizes that they've done this as part of a hoax to gain more power and re-engineer human beings, people are going to take to the streets and be very angry.
They'll never trust the governments again like we do now.
Very, very well said.
Michael, your thoughts?
Yeah, I was going to take on the This extraordinarily optimistic construct about the dissolving of the corporation of the United States and the restoration of the original republic because it's being discussed a lot these days, but based on what Scorpio just said that I agree with the importance of the exposure of
The fact that the entire pandemic construct is a grand deception on the people of the world and a crime against humanity.
I'd like to read a short paragraph that ended a recent video by Dr. Thomas Cowan.
And it goes as follows.
Stefan Lanka and I are about to embark on the precise experiments Which will show that there is no virus, that there is no basis to the viral theory as I explained.
All of this is somewhere between a misconception and a fraud.
I'd say it's 90% fraud.
We will demonstrate that without any shadow of a doubt.
We will publish the research, publish the studies, we'll film the studies and document what we're doing so that forevermore there will be no doubt that all of this stuff we've been told about the nasty The virus that's about to decimate us all is just a spell and a made-up story.
And I'm talking about natural viruses, engineered viruses.
It's all the same.
It's a made-up story that has no place in the future of humanity.
Wow.
Dr. Tom Cowan.
This is Jim Tetzer in Madison, Wisconsin, thanking David Scorpio from the exotic land of Ecuador And Michael Ivey from Asheville, North Carolina, for joining me today.
You can appreciate why I am so grateful to have them sharing this platform with you.
Let me add my further thoughts.
I agree about the coronavirus.
It's a total fake.
The study that came out of Johns Hopkins is going to show also worldwide there's no increase in deaths in any age category For 2020 versus 2019, which means a virus isn't making a difference.
It's all a matter of relabeling.
It's the same as the ambiguity over the word case, meaning a positive result to a PCR test, but it's very different from actually being infected with a virus, the existence of which remains in doubt.
I believe new revelation will show that Anthony, Tony the Rat Fauci, was a key player in this
massive deception, that Fauci is a sadistic narcissist who wants to destroy America for
the benefit of the great reset in his own personal enrichment.
He's as despicable a human being as ever been on the face of Earth.
I also want to assure you that there are increasing signs that the Biden administration is only
a mirage.
We know now the difference between executive actions and executive orders, that this will
be clarified.
And I remain steadfast in my belief that the military is in control.
I also surmise that the reason why Donald Trump may resist joining the Patriot Party
is because he'll come back as the president of the republic, our 19th president.
And if I have it right, this will be on or about the 4th of March, which I take to have
been the original date of inauguration specified by the Constitution, where when the United
States turned into a corporation in 1871, they changed the date of inauguration to 20
January as one of a number of changes that were made to signify the difference.
I'm very glad to have you here to join us.
We'll be back tomorrow with more of the news you need to know.
▲
Export Selection