All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 30, 2020 - Jim Fetzer
52:41
NeedToKnow (30 December 2020) with Michael Ivey
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin, where I'm very pleased to be joined today by Michael Ivey from Asheville, North Carolina, where we are bringing you the news you need to know.
We begin with a Gallup poll where Donald Trump has very appropriately edged out Barack Obama as 2020's most admired man.
Here were the totals.
18% for Trump, 15% for Obama.
Six for the fake President-Elect.
Three for Tony the Rat.
Two for Pope Francis.
Michelle Obama continues to be the most admired woman.
We'll comment on that.
Ten percent.
Six for Kamala.
Four percent for Melania.
Far more deserving.
Three percent for Oprah.
But we know that Michelle is actually a man.
She was born Michael LaVaughn Robinson.
We know what happens when your husband's no longer president.
You let your beard grow.
She has a package most women do not have where their physician, her physician during a campaign in Trenton, walked into her taking a leak in a trailer standing up And revealed that Michelle Obama is not just a man who had a sex change.
Michelle Obama is a man with breast implants and a huge shaving bill.
Notice how their children look just like their parents, who obviously are not Barack and Michelle Obama.
The older like her father, the younger like her mother.
Meanwhile, Tulsi Gabbard is promoting restoring separation of women's sports from men.
It seems to me that's thematic with Michelle misrepresenting herself, where it's completely outrageous how we could have men who are declaring themselves to be women and then actually joining them in the showers and the like Michael, I find this completely offensive on every possible score.
That slide about the most popular people, what are they?
The most popular politicians?
I think it's funny that they chose those people to ask people about in the first place, because it looks like a rogues gallery to me.
That's the most popular man and the most popular woman in the world.
They happen to be, for the most part, politicians, but some not, like Oprah, for example.
Melania, of course, isn't a politician.
Pope Francis, for instance?
Yeah, Pope Francis ranks high, of course, yeah, not surprisingly.
Well, my comment about it is the fact that it reads like a rogues gallery to me as opposed to who ought to be the most popular.
Yeah, yeah.
And speaking of that, Tulsi Gabbard should be on that list.
You know, I've had my problems with Tulsi before, but I think she had the nomination stolen from her this last time.
And if she had been on the ticket, I would have voted for her.
You know, I'm a huge fan of Tulsi too.
Yes, it appears that the reason there was a problem getting the vote results out of Iowa was because Tulsi won and they couldn't allow that to stand.
Meanwhile, S.G., go ahead.
I just wanted to say one more comment about the Michelle Michael Obama issue.
That slide where it shows a side-by-side comparison of the Obama children with their real parents is just so telling.
Anybody who knows anything about physiology can see that those people are their parents.
Yeah, 100%.
And of course, embarrassing to add, in the Hunter Biden laptop, we have a video of a couple young girls in bed with Hunter that appear to be the Obama children, including a little dog that Barack had given to them.
Very, very disturbing.
Not surprising, however, since he was their vice president, obviously, they would have gotten to know each other apparently now a bit better.
Meanwhile, Thomas Massey, a Republican, and Tulsi have teamed up to introduce a bipartisan bill to repeal the Patriot Act.
This is sensational.
The bill is called Protect Our Civil Liberties Act, seeks to appeal both the Patriot Act and the FISA Amendment Act, which allow government agencies to indiscriminately collect data on every American citizen.
Gabbard said intelligence agencies have not been transparent or honest with the American people or even Congress about what they are doing.
The bill also seeks to protect whistleblowers like Edward Snowden and Julian Assange by making it illegal to Retaliate against them?
Well, the Patriot Act, as we know, was authorized after the attacks of 9-11, but it was so massive it obviously had been sitting on the shelf, and moreover, appears to have been modeled after the East German Stasi, widely recognized as the most efficient secret police organization the world has ever seen.
Meanwhile, Nikki Haley, who I believe also has political aspirations for 2020, is declaring socialism went mainstream in 2020, that it's a terrifying trend that It accuses the left of believing government knows best.
If the past year has taught us everything, she observes, it's that when government dictates how the economy is run, Americans suffer.
With a Biden administration set to take power, now is the time to renew the fight for capitalism.
I think she's got that right.
Her post linked to a New York Her post on Stand for America linked to a New York Post article featuring poll results showing socialism was not actually popular among Americans and faced considerable opposition, 75% of Americans preferring free market capitalism.
Michael, your thoughts?
Well, there's yet another example of why Tulsi's campaign for presidency got Cut off at the root when she was probably winning.
You know, those are the reveal.
The repeal of the Patriot Act is one of those things where the ruling oligarchy in this world is not going to go along with it.
And I salute her and this guy, Massey, for making this effort.
But it'll be a cold day in hell before the Patriot Act I think back to the phrase that once a population gives up their rights to governments they never get them back.
I'm afraid that has been the historic trend.
Let's hope it might be reversed in this instance.
Just to show how the Democrats will do everything they can, all corrupt acts, to try to gain control over the government, a federal judge who turns out to be Stacey Abrams' sister Has ordered two Georgia counties to stop removing voters from the rolls ahead of the January 5th runoffs.
These are individuals whose addresses did not correspond.
It's shocking.
She's ordered the two counties for reverse course on removing thousands of individuals from the voter rolls.
The judge, Leslie Abrams Gardner, The sister of former Democratic candidate for governor Stacey Abrams, prominent ally of Joe Biden and Kamala Harris, issued the ruling Monday concluding the counties relied on unverified change of address data to proceed with the action.
You can always, Michael, ask for more and more verification.
Defendants are enjoined from removing any challenged voters in Ben Hill and Muskegee counties from the registration list.
Politico reported the majority of the registration officials were seeking to rescind.
About 4,000 came from Muskegee County, where Biden claimed an easy victory, while an additional 150 were from Ben Hill, where Trump won by a sizable margin.
The election board in each county had approved motions filed claiming the registration should be removed based on data from the Post Office National Change of Address database that showed they'd moved out of the county.
The judge, however, ruled the evidence was not conclusive enough to support their removal and noted they may have violated federal laws because voters weren't given proper notice required within 90 days of a federal election.
Earlier in the day, the Muskegee Election Board filed a motion requesting Gardner's recusal, given their connection with Abrams, but the request was denied.
This is fairly stunning, Michael.
Meanwhile, And it may explain why they're moving in this direction.
Chuck Schumer is reported to be pessimistic about the Georgia Democrat Senate candidates, Wissop and Warnock, their prospects for election.
They don't appear to be very good candidates in either case.
The one has just been embroiled in a scandal, Ossoff, and Warnock is an incredible extremist whose wife has said he's a phony, he comes across good, but she was virtually crying talking about him.
Schumer's office, unsurprisingly, has denied the rumor Well, if they were to lose the vote, if Republicans Loeffer and Perdue were to lose their votes to these Democrats, then Vice President-elect Kamala Harris would become the tiebreaker in the Senate.
Schumer has diligently made calls and fundraiser for both Georgia candidates, is optimistic about their chances, said his office.
Michael, I think it's going to be neck and neck in Georgia, but I do expect that Trump coming to a rally in a few days is going to make a decisive difference.
Your thoughts?
Well, we can hope.
That story about Stacey Abrams' sister, the judge, is just outrageous.
And it lends further credence to those of us who are saying that the rule of law, if not dead, is definitely on life support in this country.
When she can make a decision directly affecting an election, and she is the sister of a well-known Democratic operative, That's just outrageous.
Chuck Schumer, that's actually optimistic that that kind of a thing would leak out because it's probably true.
And then his denial of it.
Hey, he's one of the children of the lie.
So people like that consider it to be a A good thing when they can lie and get away with it.
So what can you say about Schumer?
Just to exhibit the hypocrisy of the Democrats, Stacey Abrams has refused to concede her loss in the gubernatorial race and regards herself as the governor of Georgia in exile.
How bad is that from Democrats who protest that anyone who thinks there's something wrong with this election is some kind of nut job?
Meanwhile, Chief Justice Roberts is accused of coercing the other judges to reject the Texas lawsuit through shouting threats.
This seems to me very consistent with what we have reported from Elle Lynn Wood, who tweeted that a conversation between him and Justice Breyer included Judge Roberts declaring that he would not allow that mother effer to be re-elected, which in my opinion Not only disgraces him, but implies he has no role sitting on any election-related lawsuit or even serving on the Supreme Court.
So what caused the Nation's High Court not to take up the Texas case?
That would have put the entire country out of the misery of believing their election was unsettled.
According to a report in the Epoch Times, which by the way is an excellent news source, it was their Chief Justice yelling and swearing about what would happen if they took up the case.
A GOP elector Matt Patrick said earlier this week an anonymous source had told him the justices went into a closed room to determine whether or not to take the case when it was brought up that the Chief Justice was screaming through the walls And the other liberal justices were insisting that if they were to accept the case and to rule, that there would be riots in the street.
What shocks me about this, Michael, is what do they think is going to happen by their failure to take it up?
They have dramatically increased the prospect for a civil war right here in the United States.
Here's Howard Mortman, C-SPAN communication director tweeting a similar account.
The justices went into a closed room when the Texas case was brought up.
He said he heard screaming through the walls as Justice Roberts and the other liberal justices were afraid of what would happen if they did the right thing.
Moral cowardice.
A spokesperson for the court has disputed the report, but it appears to me that the credibility of the court has been severely tarnished.
Here's a further report from Lin Wood, who believes the credibility of the report given to him about Roberts and Breyer heard in August makes sure that Trump would never get re-elected over the phone.
When asked to give a source, he can't because people are worried about their safety.
Michael, I think that's right.
We are in a real touchy situation where people, I'm convinced, are being taken out because of political grounds and the effect they might have.
When you say taken out, do you mean killed?
Yes, I do.
That's the first time I had heard a description of that meeting that they had over the Texas
lawsuit and the fact that it was behind closed doors.
That's so much for transparency in government.
They completely blew that off.
And if Roberts was indeed that emotional about it so that he was screaming about it, then
it must have been a threat.
And it gets back to rule of law having died and the fact that John Roberts is an overt traitor to this nation.
And in all likelihood, he's being controlled and blackmailed with regard to some of the shady things that he's done in his life.
Michael, I agree with you, and it means that the Chief Justice of the United States is also betraying his oath to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, as so many others appear to be betraying not just the President of the United States, but the Constitution itself.
Over an election that was obviously blatantly stolen, where Obama drew huge crowds and secured 69 million votes, Trump even larger, securing 74.
Where Obama carried 873 counties, but Trump, 2,497, compared to Biden, who only carried 477, principally those with large cities, because as Richard Jarden explained to me, if you're gonna steal an election, you have to go to where the votes are.
But where he couldn't get 10 people to come to a rally, and the idea that he secured 81 million votes is, Beyond belief, it's actually preposterous on its face.
Every political figure in Washington knows that this was a fraudulent election.
We'll be right back.
Meanwhile, a former Penn State, Olivia Troy, says she's worried about Trump supporters causing violence on January 6th.
Several aspects of this report trouble me, Michael.
This is a woman who is a former aide to Mike Pence.
Mike Pence will be counting the ballots on January 6th.
She was appearing on MSNBC Deadline.
She's saying, I'm very concerned there'll be violence because the president himself is encouraging it.
Notice, that's not only criticizing the president, failing to support him, but appearing on MSNBC.
She says he tweets, he incites, He gets his followers and supporters to behave in this manner, and they believe they're being patriots because they're supporting the president.
Well, actually, they are patriots because they're supporting the Constitution and the objective administration of the law and opposing corruption and election theft on a heretofore unprecedented scale.
Michael, your thoughts before we proceed.
Well, that's yet another discouraging sign that a former aide to Pence would take positions like that.
And it reinforces our suspicion all along that Pence was sort of a snake in the weeds, just kind of hanging out and doing what he had to do in order to maintain the position.
And it certainly doesn't bode well for His bottleneck decision that where the votes come to him on January 6th, where he's already booked a flight out of the country.
Right after that happens.
And to Israel of all places, suggesting to me he's more of a Zionist than he is a Christian.
It's outrageous.
And I'm going to put Mike Pence right up there with Chief Justice Roberts and a host of others as among the greatest traitors to the United States in our history.
Yeah, I think they should be on a hanging list.
I agree.
They need to be arrested, prosecuted, and punished in the most severe manner possible.
A major COVID glitch has emerged with regard to the vaccine because most Europeans, including hospital staff, are refusing to take it.
This is quite significant.
All is not going according to plan in the biggest global rollout of what is arguably the most important vaccine in a century.
And it's not just growing U.S.
mistrust in the COVID injection effort that was rolled out in record time,
an unexpected spike in allergic reactions to the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine,
and now Moderna too, may prove catastrophic to widespread acceptance unless
scientists can figure out what's causing it after the FDA's rushed approval.
Also, why, as we reported yesterday, scientists are scrambling to identify the potential culprit
causing the allergic reaction.
Making matters worse, Europe rolled out a huge COVID-19 vaccination drive
Sunday to try to rein in the alleged pandemic.
But even more Europeans than Americans are skeptical about the speed at which it's been tested and approved and are reluctant to have the shot.
And for good reasons, Michael, because they skipped the animal trial that would be indispensable to taking measures to ensure it wouldn't be harmful to human beings.
Surveys in Poland, where distrust runs deep, shows fewer than 40% are planning to be vaccinated.
Situation is similar in Spain.
No one close to me has it.
I'm obviously not saying it doesn't exist, because a lot of people have dived up, but for now I wouldn't take the vaccine in Bulgaria.
45% have said they won't get the shot.
40% plan to wait and see if negative effects appear.
Only 15% therefore will actually volunteer to be sure the establishment is pounding the table on why it's safe, but it's pretty obvious that it is not.
We have not only had deaths, But we had Bell's palsy frozen half of a face.
There were five deaths of children in Africa immediately upon being received with the injection.
Nobody in Europe seems to care about the so-called scientific justifications that have been advanced, and for good reason.
Things have got worse.
Only 41% in France would take the shot.
The majority will not.
Here's a woman, a French healthcare worker, 78 years old, receiving the first dose of the Pfizer.
Let's hope she fares well.
Not even in Sweden, where public trust in authorities is absurdly and inexplicably high, there's an unusual, even universal, distrust in the vaccine.
At least one saying, if someone gave me a 10 million euro, I still would not take it.
In a paradoxical attempt to force more to sign up, not realizing it'll have the opposite effect, the Polish Prime Minister urged Poles to sign up for the vaccination, saying herd immunity depended on them.
For now, the more European governments pressure their population to be immunized, the fewer are going to sign up, and the worse the rollout will be.
Of that, we can be 100% sure.
Michael, your thoughts?
Those are heartening poll results from Europe, and it emphasizes what a lot of people have been saying, is that even people who just have a hint That this is not about a virus.
This is about tyranny being imposed upon the world.
A lot of people are saying that that's the red line that they won't cross, and so I guess those poll results are reflecting that.
I find it interesting in the media coverage of COVID vaccine issues.
Once again, we see blatant manipulation of language because.
The main term that they're using for people who say, hell no, I'm not going to take that, is vaccine hesitancy.
Like they're not saying, no, this is bullshit.
I don't believe in it at all.
And you're not going to get me to say that.
Oh, I'm just a little bit hesitant about it.
Right?
That's what they're saying.
And I liked in that story that you just posted, The fact that the word scientific was in quotes, because the appeal to science has been another massive linguistic, well, a manipulation of language, weaponization of language, in order to get people to bow down to the god of science.
And if it can be cast as science, then anything goes.
Yeah, this is a form of scientism, or taking for granted something that is supposed to have the imprimatur of science, is therefore reliable.
The president of Tanzania exposed the fraud when he adopted the scientific approach after being sent these test kits, which involves observation, measurement, and experiment by having goats and motor oil and fruit tested.
Most of which turned out positive, showing the whole test as a gigantic fraud, and where even the CDC has considered as much as 98% of the outcomes are false positives, Michael.
And in this context of this whole pandemic thing and the vaccine included, the real science is being totally ignored and stuffed by the mainstream media.
Oh, you're right.
And include it with regard to the face mask issue, Michael, which in my opinion is so serious.
Here we have a journalist hounded after pointing out that only the old and sick are dying from COVID.
A British journalist has been targeted by an angry online mob.
These are going to be government employees who are targeting her.
After pointing out only a relatively small number of healthy people have died from COVID, that the complete destruction of our way of life is not an adequate response.
She pointed out this doesn't mean she's saying to hell with the old and sick.
Just 377 healthy people under 60 have died of COVID.
That's not a typo.
There are no zeros missing. 377.
Yes, that's sad, but we've locked down an entire country for a virus that mostly kills the very old and the very sick.
The rest of us should be free to decide our own risk.
And Michael, as John Rappaport and Edward Hendry have explained, the very old and the very sick are destined to die anyway.
And while they may have COVID because they've once had a cold, Where even the CDC has now admitted that a positive test may simply reflect that you've once had a cold.
They're dying.
Even if they die with COVID, because they've had a cold, they're not dying from COVID.
This is all completely outrageous.
As for the hard of understanding virtue signalers, that doesn't mean to hell with the old and sick.
It means the Great Barrington Declaration was and is correct.
Help the millions of old and sick to shield while allowing the young and healthy in our economy to carry on living.
Making the implied point that, in a pandemic, you quarantine the vulnerable and the sick, you do not quarantine the healthy.
Precisely the opposite, having been fostered here by Neil Ferguson of Imperial College with his completely contrived model and Dr. Anthony Tony the Rat Fauci.
She's being attacked again and again by people who are either disingenuous or willfully stupid, but frankly she's overlooking the fact that it's all propaganda.
I just woke to find I'm trending.
Apparently the lockdown fanatic FBPE rainbow crowd have decided to be even more willfully stupid than usual.
I'm off to enjoy breakfast in the sunshine before snorkeling with turtles on this gorgeous bay.
Have a great day!
Here's the bay!
Meanwhile, is this man the biggest fool on Twitter?
Someone makes a point that only 377 healthy working age people have died, and he says we are not a fascist state, but 60 million are locked in their homes and peaceful demonstrators are arrested.
That feels quite fascist.
Michael, I think that was a rather illuminating exchange.
Yeah, there's a lot of good facts in what you just went through right there in that Twitter exchange, and they speak for themselves, describing what a sham and what a deception this whole thing has been all along.
I was telling people back in March that this had nothing to do with a virus, that this was an excuse for a descent of tyranny on the On the people of the world, and that this is what World War Three looks like.
It's not nation against nation anymore.
It's these technocratic oligarchs against the people of the world.
And it's not surprising that she would be attacked by a A group of internet trolls, because they buy their troll armies as well, and they direct them against whom to attack.
That's a very subtle and penetrating point about World War III, Michael.
You're 100%.
Meanwhile, Bill Gates is asked, is the vaccine safe?
And he goes on a long, rambling, disjointed talk.
It was very embarrassing.
Clearly, he could not affirm that the vaccine is safe, because it is not safe.
Here are a couple of comments about it.
First of all, he's not a Pfizer expert.
He's a computer scientist.
I know a friend from the Martin Marinetti group who knows him.
Now, my next question is, if Trump knows it has side effects and does nothing, would that make him an accomplice in a legal action?
Meanwhile, the lockdowns were inspired by the Chinese Communist Party, admits Professor Panstown.
Professor Neil Ferguson, the discredited Imperial College computer modeler behind Britain's and America's draconian lockdown policies, has come clean about his inspiration.
None of it would have been possible without the shining example of the Chinese Communist Party.
Back in 2019, about the time someone was being infected by a bat, No European country's pandemic plan seriously entertained the prospect of putting a country on pause.
Then, that's what China did.
I think people's sense of what is possible in terms of control changed quite dramatically between January and March, said Ferguson, who appears to find the idea of emulating a totalitarian state exciting rather than embarrassing or shaming because he boasts about it in the interview.
They claim to have flattened the curve.
I was skeptical at first.
I thought it was a massive cover-up by the Chinese, but as the data accrued, it became clear it was an effective policy, except it was not.
The phrase that we get away with it is instructive.
It implies that, at least on a subconscious model, Ferguson is aware that copying China's lockdown policy was not a morally acceptable act, merely one that peculiar circumstances made possible.
While the lockdowns are unprecedented in modern history and have been responsible for the greatest collapse in GDP in 300 years, as well as the destruction of thousands of businesses and hundreds of thousands of jobs, Ferguson shows zero contrition for having provided the computer modeling doomsday scenario responsible for all of this misery.
It's completely outrageous, Michael.
And of course, the lockdowns are bringing about overwhelmingly more deaths than would the virus were it to allow to run rampant, given the minuscule number that are dying from it when you tabulate the statistics accurately.
Yes, it's obvious for all to see now that the lockdowns and distancing and the measures taken supposedly to prevent the spread of COVID-19 are having an exponentially worse effect on humanity and the population than any supposed virus that's out there.
Bill Gates, And this guy, Neil Ferguson, what can you say about them?
They're high-level criminals against humanity, and they should be in line for that same rope that I was alluding to earlier.
Michael, I agree 100%.
They have committed crimes against humanity.
Bill Gates, Nigel Ferguson, Tony Fauci, they all deserve to be lined up and shot after an appropriate trial conducted in accordance with the evidence.
Meanwhile, go ahead.
I was just going to say that to me, this Neil Ferguson statements, first of all, why the hell is he even given a platform anymore, given his past actions and lies?
And number two, his statements about China being sort of the template for what they decided to do.
To me, that's just evidence that this entire thing was planned from the first, and they colluded with the government of China in order to bring it about, this oligarchy that runs the world.
I don't think it's just China that's doing this.
There's an oligarchy that Is in control of this entire thing and brought it out the way they wanted to have the people believe in it.
And that included everything that happened in China before they brought it here.
It even turns out that China has indirect ownership of the Dominion voting machines.
Meanwhile, a fascinating piece from American Thinker, which I highly recommend, extraordinarily good articles.
Is nothing happening or is Trump channeling Sun Tzu?
This entire article is worth reiterating.
I'm impatient As I expect most American thinker readers are as well.
We have been promised a coming storm that will biblical or a crack and released on deep state conspirators.
Despite Attorney General Barr acknowledging Spygate is one of the greatest travesties in American history.
There has not yet been a reckoning.
A mid-level FBI attorney, Kevin Clinesmith, pled guilty to falsifying a document which became one of the linchpins of a FICE award on Carter Page and subsequent spying on Donald Trump and his campaign.
But he has yet to be sentenced.
His co-conspirators are writing books, teaching at prestigious universities, and bashing Trump on cable news shows.
A presidential election was stolen and Trump's own executive agency say, hold on, roll over and go back to the street.
The same FBI that sent 15 agents to investigate a garage door handle that Bubba Wallace claimed was the news can't seem to find any reason to investigate a host of election irregularities.
Republican members of Congress who happily rode Trump's coattails to their elections are telling him to accept the results and move on, oblivious to the fact that if they get their wish, their party will become as irrelevant as the Green Party.
Media stalwarts that were once fair and balanced have tilted to the left, becoming unfair and unhinged, rivaling the standard left-wing cable news gabfest.
Perhaps more is going on than I can see, but what is visible to 75 million Trump supporters, those who have endured ridicule and scorn for supporting their president, is that nothing is happening.
This is Trump's administration.
He's the boss.
He hires and fires, just as he did in the real estate development world and on The Apprentice.
The buck stops with him.
If nothing is happening, then that's on him.
Is he flailing away in a vain attempt to win a second term, after all that he's been through and overcome, not only to get elected in 2016, but to stay in office for four years, accomplishing more in one term than most do in two?
Is he about to lose it all to a senile grifter, no more qualified to be President of the United States and the manager of a bowling alley?
At one level, it sure seems that way.
The clock is ticking with important electoral dates breezing by, getting ever closer to the final date of January 20th.
On the other hand, President Trump may be playing a different game, one not so obvious to most observers, certainly not to the media or his supporters.
Sun Tzu was a Chinese military general and strategist, author of a treaty on military strategy known as the Art of War.
Trump is a fan.
As this book, which made a short list of best leadership books, Trump quoted Sun Tzu in this 2012 tweet, long before Twitter was fact-checking his every utterance and attaching warnings and disclaimers to each tweet.
Let your plans be dark and impenetrable as night, and when you move, fall or strike like a thunderbolt.
Can Sun Tzu's ancient wisdom and strategy explain the current apparent nothingness happening perception for those who, like myself, are becoming increasingly impatient over all hat and no cattle promises coming from Team Trump?
Is Trump following Sun Tzu's battle plan?
Look at some of his quotes, the one we just offered.
Let your plans be dark and impenetrable as night, and when you move, fall or strike like a thunderbolt.
If Trump has a master plan, it's safe to assume few outside his small inner circle know about it.
An example would be Secretary of Defense Chris Miller speaking to Vice President Pence.
Thanking him for his steady hand and leadership during some of the most complex military operations this country's ever conducted.
Why haven't we heard of such operations or were they dark and impenetrable as night and executed like a thunderbolt?
This is not faint praise.
Pence is not a military guy, but Miller certainly is a former special forces operator and commander.
Miller was close to tears acknowledging Pence's assistance and leadership.
Something is happening.
Another quote from Sun Tzu.
All warfare is based on deception.
Trump is a master of chaos with strategic media leaks and disinformation.
Is Pence a white hat or a black?
The Secretary of Defense says Pence is a white hat.
Attorney Lin Wood says Pence is a black hat.
What about the rest of Trump's inner circle?
Mark Meadows and Pat Cipollone, friends or foes?
Patrick Byrne calls them serpents.
Trump hired them and keeps them on.
Deception and confusion?
Classic Sun Tzu.
Another quote.
In the midst of chaos, there is also opportunity.
Trump tweets in one direction, signs executive orders in another, complains about the GOP Senate while hundreds of conservative judges are confirmed by the same Senate, creates chaos and uses the opportunity to advance his agenda, distracts the media with tweets and comments, and while they're in meltdown mode, he's writing circles around them.
Another quote.
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
Has Trump already won, now waiting for the optimal time to go to war?
The defeated left has been at war with Trump for six years, unsuccessful in their efforts to win, and finally Another quote.
The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting.
As of yet, there has been no storm, no crack, and Trump has followed the Constitution, making legal arguments up to and including the Supreme Court.
What Vice President Pence does when it's time to again follow the Constitution and certify the electoral college votes is yet to be determined.
Will a massive declassification of criminal and seditious activities subdue the Democrats?
Will Trump win without a bloody battle?
Time will tell.
At this point, it's a binary choice.
Either Trump is in over his head and will be dragged out of office, or he is executing his plan on his terms and timing, as he has done since his famous escalator ride at Trump Tower in 2015.
Trump knows the stakes for himself, his family, and America if Kamala Harris and Joe Biden get the keys to the kingdom and promptly hand them over to China.
Want to bet against Trump?
How has that worked out in the past?
Ponder these words from Trump's inspiration, Sun Tzu.
He will win who, prepared himself, waits to take the enemy unprepared.
Mystify, mislead, and surprise the enemy.
He will win who, prepared himself, waits to take the enemy unprepared.
Is Trump unprepared?
Au contraire!
Listen to Oprah interviewing him in 1988, more than 30 years ago.
He looks younger but sounds the same as he does now.
Speaking of China, immigration, and electoral politics, Trump has been preparing for this moment most of his adult life.
Buckle up for an interesting few weeks ahead.
Michael.
That is indeed a very interesting article, Jim, and I certainly hope that it's correct.
I find it to be an extraordinarily Optimistic interpretation of events, and I hope that optimism plays out.
I wish I could be that optimistic, but I remain skeptical about what's happening because all along we've been fed this diet of what people call hopium in the form of the Q phenomenon and all the sealed indictments that are supposedly out there, so I don't know.
I have to remain Skeptical, but you know, we won't have long to wait to find out.
And remember, if he is practicing the art of war, then it would be appropriate that we and the public generally would be in a state of confusion and uncertainty.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send us fan mail, pro or con, to liveneedtoknowatgmail.com.
Liveneedtoknowatgmail.com.
Here are a few comments.
Five questions to ponder from Ron.
If social distancing works, why do we wear masks?
If masks work, why do we need lockdowns?
If lockdowns work, why is the virus on the rise?
If the vaccine works, why are we still wearing masks?
If the vaccine is so safe, why are manufacturers protected from liability?
Del Big Trees, December 17, 2020.
Meanwhile, this is from a retired professor of law about an effort to ensure that Mike Pence does the right thing.
When something is not done when it should have been done on account of fraud, mistake, urgency, or impossibility, the correction of the omission, especially if accomplished by judicial decree, relates back to the time when the act should have been done.
This case can assist you in dealing with time deadlines.
And when Congress exercises its authority to set the date of federal elections, the law of any state allowing receipt and counting of votes on another date is unconstitutional and as such null and void, as held by unanimous vote of 9-0 in Foster v. Love in 1997.
This case is decisive and eliminates all mailed votes received and counted in Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin after November 3rd, 2020, and as a bit of constitutional history.
Anglo-American legal tradition includes the constitutional right of the people to free lawful and fair elections expressed, for example, In the eighth section of the English Bill of Rights of 1689, and among the rights protected by the Ninth Amendment to the U.S.
Constitution, every voting citizen in the United States has standing to complain of an infringement of this right in any federal election in which he participates, reflecting on the impropriety of the Supreme Court in denying the submission by Texas.
Meanwhile, from one of the commentators on my blog, to all those Trump bashers here, reconsider your position.
There is one man between the demise of this country, and that is not an exaggeration, and the continuance of this republic without a bloody civil war that will cause endless suffering and loss of life and property.
That man is Donald J. Trump.
Why not use all that negative energy to join forces with those trying to save the USA?
That Jewish London banker narrative is tired and worn out.
The message has been repeated almost endlessly.
It's boring.
It's repetitive, in my opinion.
It diminishes this blog.
I repeat, one man between the demise of this country and the continuance of this republic without a bloody civil war, that man is Donald J. Trump.
It's not coincidental that all corporate media all in to facilitate the demand and fear that Democrats need to achieve their objectives.
Thus, there's an alignment of all big government institutions and multinationals to support the same.
Nothing is coincidental.
Everything is political.
It's not about the virus.
It's all about control.
Michael, your final thoughts, my friend.
Well, every time you do one of these shows, I'm impressed with the comments that smart people send from out there.
I love those bullet points by Del Bigtree.
And the last one about there being one man between us and a bloody civil war.
I'm not sure that I would agree with that.
In my opinion, The illusion of power residing in the political system is just that.
It's an illusion.
And the real power has been exercised by the corporate oligarchy behind the scenes for a long time.
And the whole division of right and left Republican, Democrat, liberal, conservative.
That was laid out way back, you know, when Cecil Rhodes was talking about how easy it is to manipulate and control a political system that allows everyone to vote.
He said it's easy to do that.
All you have to do is control both sides.
While being completely in agreement with the fact that Trump's coming out the winner in this has everything over the opposite possibility, I can't go as far as to say it's going to save the USA.
Michael, you're absolutely right.
This is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin, thanking Michael Ivey in Nashville, North Carolina, for his very incisive and penetrating comments today.
We cannot take for granted that Donald Trump is going to be able to save the nation.
I do believe he is practicing the art of war, that Sun Tzu is his inspiration, and I have every confidence in his ability to execute his plan.
But There are traitors on every side.
Even Mitch McConnell, the Senate Majority Leader, has been betraying the President by discouraging members of the Senate from standing with members of the House to challenge the electoral outcome.
That means at this point in time, everything is uncertain.
January 6th will be the most fateful day in the history of the Union.
Prepare yourself for what may happen.
If the outcome is not, as a Constitution, law, justice, and truth would require, then it may be up to us, we the people, to exercise our obligations to defeat tyranny and regain control of our own country in accordance with the aspirations of the Declaration of Independence.
Which gives every man the right to take up arms to oppose tyranny.
I encourage you to brace yourself, to be prepared.
Stock up with supplies for at least a month, preferably more.
If you're unable to defend yourself, acquire the ability to do so with weapons that you're comfortable with because the police are not going to be there.
Remember, The Democrats campaigned on the platform of defunding the police.
They actually want to dissemble the police, which has served a program as it's ever been manifest.
Another reason why Trump appears to have won this election by more than 50 million votes.
I close with the words of John F. Kennedy, which resonate to this day.
Those who make peaceful reform impossible make violent revolution inevitable.
Thank you for joining us today.
▲
Export Selection