All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 26, 2020 - Jim Fetzer
01:13:24
NeedToKnow Christmas Special (25 December 2020) with Chris Weinert
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin, where today, Christmas Day 2000, I'm very pleased to be joined by my colleague Chris Weiner in Detroit, where we're here to bring you all the news you need to know with a Christmas twist.
We begin with election hearing in the Senate takes a turn as Democrats run for cover.
The drive to bury the truth and hide from the evidence is grossly evident.
Many liberal followers can't see the truth past their noses.
But our country's future is at stake.
The integrity of the election is on the line.
No one wants to challenge the results because they're afraid of what the Democrats will do to them.
They don't want to have a stranger show up and kill their family because they took a stand for the truth.
The situation in America today is that bad.
If people cared, then reporters would be seeking the truth.
Biden would want to vindicate his name by getting to the bottom of it.
Everyone would want to know that this was an authentic election.
But the Democrats only care about waving a victory flag.
The leading Democrat on the Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs is Gary Peters.
He has described the hearing as dangerous.
It's stunning.
Exactly stunning.
Even witness testimony shows 200,000 ballots in Wisconsin were not to be counted.
They were improperly cast, where Biden only won by 21,000.
Similarly in Arizona.
Similarly in Pennsylvania.
The Supreme Court dismissed the case on the grounds of standing, which was completely improper.
There's no doubt in the minds of millions that Democrats stole the election.
He was not duly elected.
He would be a fake president if this were allowed to stand.
Just look at the gross evidence.
Obama got 69 million votes.
He had huge turnouts.
Carried 873 counties.
Trump won 74 million.
Legitimate votes.
He carried 2,497 counties.
Trump won 74 million legitimate votes. He carried 2,497 counties, more than 2,000 more than the
477 carried by Biden with an alleged 81 million votes when he couldn't get 10 people to turn out
to a rally.
No one reasonably looking at the evidence could believe this election was not stolen.
Chris, your thoughts?
Yeah, I agree.
I think that this has always been a long history of the Democrats, as the article pointed out, of using violence and foisting this inequity onto the people or the will of the people.
You know, the wisdom of the crowd type effect where they use thug tactics to go in.
It's always been an agenda of liberal governments, you know, especially in the British government.
You see that really happening and how they colonialize not only China and India under liberal governments in the same manners.
thuggies or things like this, using their own kind to destroy themselves from within
and weaponizing the children against their parents.
It's really weird how they use this targeted departmentalization in a manner that they
have.
It's almost like it's down to a science.
And it's something that stems a long way back.
It's like Boss Tweed or Belmont or even further back in the Democratic Party.
So it's not a new concept.
I'd also like to point out, back in the time of the Civil War, right before that, there
was a dispute on the Senate floor where Senator Brooks actually beat down Charles Sumner with
his cane and almost killed him.
And he was a representative of the Boston Brahmin.
And of course, Brooks was a representative of the Democratic plantation.
agricultural interests, we'll say.
So really you're seeing a paradigm shift in terms of demographics,
but really it's an age-old tactic that you've seen throughout history.
And it's really about perfecting the slave system through debt monetization, in my opinion.
And today's corporation is yesterday's plantation.
Brilliant, wonderful, Chris.
I know it's deep, but man, I really had to go there.
Oh no, that's wonderful.
Meanwhile, the House minority leader caught on urging House representatives
to kill Trump's $2,000 check demand.
First, no response from the Republicans on the most obvious and corrupt election in history.
Now Congressional Republicans want to stop the President's desire to provide more in COVID payment to the people.
Biden manufactured 20 million or more, I think closer to 50, in the 2020 election in November to steal the race from President Trump.
Now the same crowd wants to prevent Americans from receiving more than $600 in the COVID package.
In fact, the President had offered 1,200 months ago, but Nancy Pelosi refused it because she didn't want it to go out before the election.
Meanwhile, they are now attempting to deprive the American people of benefits to which they are entitled.
A bipartisan COVID-19 omnibus spending bill was sent to Trump Pelosi comes after efforts to increase the 600 to 2,000 failed earlier in the day.
The bipartisan COVID release and omnibus bill has been enrolled.
The House and Senate are sending it For the people to the White House, Pelosi said, we urge you to sign this bill into law to give immediate relief to hardworking families.
She wants to make it out as though the Democrats were trying to benefit the public when they already cut in half or more what they would have received months ago if she'd only agreed then.
The package includes a $1.4 trillion omnibus bill that will fund defense spending of domestic programs, $900 billion for COVID relief, heavily criticized by the president for wasteful items and unnecessary spending.
This is really getting back to the old way of doing business, which they're eager to do, why they had to get Trump out.
It even provides $500 million to Israel, which includes expenditures such as $73 million for Iron Dome defense system components to counter short-range rocket attacks, and an Asia Reassurance Initiative Act, $1.4 billion, promoting U.S.
security in the Indo-Pacific region.
But, Chris, this has got scandalous.
More of how business used to be done, which the president has been trying his best to clean up.
Yeah, I'd like to point out, being from Detroit in the 90s, I remember when the Democrats tried to jump onto the NAFTA and permanent normalization of trade with China under the Clinton administration, where they outsourced and actually financed the outsourcing of American production to China initially and had taken over most of the corporations and the intellectual property that was really being And that's most of the revenue that comes out of these, these, you know, third world slave operations like we're seeing.
So really, there's a group of people that have been behind this, not only in turning out China, but Russia and other places as well, for decades, if not centuries in terms of labor forces.
And it's really, I look at it as a meta scale, like as human labor versus the robber barons in this respect.
And I really try to see the forest through the trees in terms of what they're trying to do with this political
and even this multinational theatrics that is really maybe just a front for us
to get fascinated with and to think we know what we're talking about.
I'd like to point out that the Democrats were the ones, the party that put out these trade deals,
tried to put on the TPP as well, which is another absurdity.
A 2,900 and some odd page thing that nobody could read until after they voted on it, crazy stuff there.
I'd like to point out the tough on crime, the PatCon conspiracies, the war on drugs,
the for-profit prisons are all part of their model of this UK and UN colonialization model.
The Walmart and Monsanto model from the decades past is now the Fangs and the Alphabet model.
And all these corporate entities are way too big to jail and they're beneficiaries of TARP and even to a lesser extent, some of Trump's things.
So I'm glad to see him standing up in terms of the stimulus.
And taking the pork out of it for the corporations and trying to give it to the people.
That is, you know, one gesture of good faith that could go a very long way in this very tight holiday season.
Chris, I think you're right.
And it makes the case for the line item veto, that the president ought to have the right to veto items one by one by one and then make it a real political issue.
Meanwhile, Edward Hendry.
Forensic analysis of Dominion voting systems discovers it was designed to commit election fraud.
This is coming from a report on the security.
We conclude that Dominion voting system is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results.
It intentionally generates an enormously high number of ballot errors.
The electronic ballots are then transferred for adjudication.
The intentional errors lead to bulk adjudication with no oversight, no transparency, no audit trail, which leads to voter or election fraud.
Based on our study, we conclude the Dominion voting system should not be used in Michigan.
We further conclude the results in Antrim County should not have been certified A high error rate, in this case 68.05, staggering, reflects an algorithm used that will weight one candidate greater than another, meaning weight a ballot, a specific candidate, at a two-thirds to approximately one-third.
For example, you could have a ballot for Biden weighted at 1.3 and for Trump at 0.7.
It equals two altogether, but not equitably distributed.
Here's a screenshot from the report from the Dominion Voting System manual explaining one of the steps to set up for rank choice voting.
Really disturbing.
Significantly, the computer system shows vote adjudication logs for prior years, but the adjudication log for the 2020 election cycle are missing.
The adjudication process is the simplest way to manually manipulate votes.
They lack records.
The lack of records prevents any form of audit accountability.
Their conspicuous absence is extremely suspicious since the files exist for previous years using the same Software.
There is no reasonable explanation for the security logs to be missing other than to obfuscate, to make it impossible to prove, massive cheating was taking place.
In accordance with the Help America Vote Act, by the way, the missing logs violates the 90-day safe harbor period prohibiting changes to election systems, registries, hardware, software updates without undergoing recertification.
The only reason to change software after the election would be to obfuscate evidence of fraud and or to correct program errors that would decertify the election.
The report concludes, research is ongoing, however, based on the preliminary results, we conclude the errors are so significant that they call into question the integrity and legitimacy of the results.
In the Antrim County 2020 election, to the point that the results are not certifiable because the same machines and software are used in 48 other counties in Michigan.
This casts doubt on the integrity of the entire election in the state of Michigan.
Chris, I think that lays it out pretty clearly.
Your thoughts?
I think it sure does.
I think that Michigan has been a long hotbed of political corruption in terms of underserving the population and using these metrics and these political demographics as a way of playing political football almost with the desperate and let's just say the public, we'll say.
I think that really in most of the inner city communities, you're seeing these realms of corruption extend far worse than Antrim.
And I'll say that as far as that's concerned, it's probably a smaller, more rural place.
And in the inner cities, man, the minorities are grossly underserved by the supposed party that they supposedly, according to these numbers, support.
But I'd have to say that I don't think as many blacks vote for the DNC blindly as one might think.
I think that they just have You know, straw bosses and bully men in this this type of political infrastructure that they try to corral their community in with these type of things.
I'd also like to ask you a question, but I'm going to get to it a little bit later.
But I was going to say, Fang seems to me, in the 2008 bailout, the foreign proxy by which Rothschild substituted its Class A shareholder ownership of the Federal Reserve In other words, there's a risk transfer mechanism away from the cabal and the robber barons into these tech companies that are the pinnacle of all information exchange, as we know today.
And I have to say, this is not a new concept in terms of DARPA, the CIA, MI5, and these type of intelligence agencies.
if you go to Gladio B and track records like that.
And the mysterious disappearance of evidence is always this same thing where the FBI is there
to bungle every evidence as you remember from the JFK or RFK or MLK things,
the Clinton servers, the CrowdStrike, Dominion, World Trade Center, Tower 7, the Murrah building,
Pentagon, the missing money from there.
So you really see these type of operations.
And then you see the political, let's just say, operations that they participate in
in terms of optic management that they put in like grassrow turf type campaigns
as I like to call them.
Like I saw in 2016 with with things like CrowdStrike where they actually hire in stand-in actors to lend the optic of support.
Very similar like we were seeing with the BLM and Antifa riots where you know white kids are fighting with other white kids in the street over the the rights of blacks and it's it to me seems like something that is staged and it's almost like they're enveloping Limbic reactions amongst the well-intentioned, but the clearly obtuse in terms of intellectual fortitude.
So like I said, they're weaponizing the youth against the system and the elders and harnessing this angst, this sense of impending doom, which is very righteous, towards different political objectives, we'll say.
So I think there's a lot of stuff going on, you know, not only in the streets, but in the ballot box and in the media as we're seeing.
So not to go off on too much of a tangent there, I also wanted to ask you the question, Jim.
Are you familiar with Google Nest and have they been able to hack into like Dominion at all?
This is something that I was asked to ask you and I'm just passing it along.
I don't, Chris, but I'd be glad for further elaboration.
And of course, because you're from Detroit, you are especially attuned to Michigan politics where all of this skullduggery has been taking place.
Yeah, well like I said in other videos in the DNC primary, I found my vote had actually been at first flipped, and then my voting record when I called it out to the Secretary of State was absolutely erased.
So it was obviously, they flipped my vote from Bernie Sanders to did not vote.
And then, of course, when I called them out on it, they just erased my voting record.
So I was like, I had a screenshot of it.
I have it on my old phone.
I have a picture of my ballot.
And I mean, that's the level of mistrust that I actually had in the system here.
You know, the voting machines and everything.
I was at that point in 2016.
So this is not a surprise to me.
I just think that most of the people that haven't been aware of these tactics and how this really works, Maybe they're starting to see this a little bit more, especially in the face of the treachery that we're going through right now with this COVID pandemic hoax, the reset, and this terror that's associated with this coup.
Sensational, my friend.
Just sensational.
Meanwhile, Mel Brooks, baffled by Senate hesitancy to challenge a 2020 outcome.
U.S.
elections could reach a point akin to North Korea, China, Iran, Soviet Union, from what you've just described, Chris, already has, with less than two weeks to go until Congress certifies the election on the 6th of January that would make Joe Biden the next president.
Representative Brooks from Alabama says he's baffled by the reluctance of members of the Senate to participate in his challenge.
During an interview with a Mobile, Alabama radio station, he maintained the manner some states had handled their election was in violation of Article 1, Section 4 of the Constitution, which he said made millions upon millions of the ballots cast on November 3rd illegal.
From him, I was relatively confident this wouldn't be the way things would progress.
When you're looking at a crystal ball and trying to guess how things are going to play out, there's always a degree of uncertainty.
But the law is clear.
Congress has the ultimate decision on any kind of election disputes involving election of the President of the United States.
The question became what the facts are, and to me, having done the study, having done the research, examined the facts, just as we have for Mantram County in Michigan, I have found the evidence to be compelling and completely overwhelming.
There's only one conclusion that can be reached, that the Socialist Democrats engage in massive voter fraud on a level never before seen in the history of the United States.
I came to that conclusion perhaps earlier than others.
But I came to the firm belief that if we just get the evidence out to the public and congressmen and senators, they would come to the right conclusion.
Now, the misjudgment I made was a hesitancy of the United States Senate to do their homework.
They seem to want to be spoon-fed the evidence of voter fraud and election theft.
Rather than engaging in their own investigative efforts, their own research, and reaching their own proper conclusion that the Socialist Democrats successfully exploited and took advantage of and engaged in massive voter fraud and election theft.
I don't know what we can do with the Senators.
I'm baffled.
I'm disappointed.
That at least as of this moment there's not at least one that has stood strong for our country and said I'm going to take the lead.
I'm going to co-sponsor this object so we can have this floor debate auditing the problems associated with our election so American people can get it firsthand and better understand what's needs correcting or else we're going to go through this again and again and again and ultimately in my judgment and in my fear We're going to reach a point akin to the kinds of elections they have in North Korea, Iran, Communist China, the Soviet Union, Venezuela, where the people can go vote, but there's no way the election results reported are going to reflect the truthfulness of the votes that were cast.
Meanwhile, Representative-elect Laura Boebert of Colorado has made an official announcement that on behalf of our constituents, she will object to the electoral college results in the January 6th joint session.
It requires at least one member of the House and one member of the Senate To demand a two-hour debate by both houses on this issue.
The House is very clearly secure that there are a number of representatives in the House who are going to move forward.
This is a contested election.
I believe President Trump should fight everything he has, use all the authority as president to make sure we have a free and fair election.
We need to be looking into these allegations.
We need to be taking them seriously.
I believe that President Trump has every legal right to do so, and I encourage him to do that.
Our country depends on this, our democracy depends on this, our republic depends on this, and no one will trust our election system ever again if we don't fix it this time.
Representative Mel Brooks is leading the effort to challenge the electoral college vote, having gone on the record several times in pledging to do so.
Over a dozen other Republican House members have said they will join.
There do appear to be at least two members of the House who have indicated that they may step forward, including Rand Paul of Kentucky.
Chris, your thoughts?
Well, I have to think if Trump is in fact a white hat, I'd have to say that he's had Caesar's Senate behind him the whole time.
And I think you can say the same for the RNC in terms of his party and support for him, not only in his policies, but his candidacy and even just the decorum that comes with the office of president.
I'd have to say you can cite many cases within his cabinet as well that have ties to Rothschild that are alarming.
And of course, he's been underserved, if not flat out betrayed by most of the people closest to him.
I could cite, you know, Reince Priebus or Session or Barr or Tillerson or Pompeo or Kushner or, you know, even some of his dealings with the World Economic Forum and BlackRock are very alarming.
So I have some concerns about Trump, but I'm glad to see that people are pointing out
the electoral process and this thing in itself being flatly violated.
And I'm glad that there's a couple of people that are having the integrity and the temerity to stand up,
even though they are very few and far between.
You're seeing the media do a tactic like the DNC has always done,
where they gaslight the eyewitnesses and victims, and they pivot the outrage of the people
towards the people that refuse to back down or the people that uphold principles in the face of this.
And of course they keep saying the word baseless evidence.
I'm so sick of that because there's so much evidence.
One case of this is bad enough and there's been dozens and dozens of cases around the country in multiple states.
You know, how these people are sleeping through this, I'd have to say they're showing their cards.
And maybe that's a good thing about Trump is that he's really putting these people, you know, out in public and the people are seeing who's who and what's what and what side they're on right now.
Oh, Chris, I agree.
But if we don't get this squared away, democracy is dead in the United States.
Yeah, I can almost say that it's been dead.
Yeah, here we have a marvelous statement by the president.
There we go.
This may be the most important speech I've ever made.
I want to provide an update on our ongoing efforts to expose the tremendous voter fraud and irregularities which took place during the ridiculously long November 3rd elections.
We used to have what was called Election Day.
Now we have Election Days, weeks and months, and lots of bad things happened during this ridiculous period of time, especially when you have to prove almost nothing to exercise our greatest privilege.
The right to vote.
As president, I have no higher duty than to defend the laws and the Constitution of the United States.
That is why I am determined to protect our election system, which is now under coordinated assault and siege.
For months leading up to the presidential election, We were warned that we should not declare a premature victory.
We were told repeatedly that it would take weeks, if not months, to determine the winner, to count the absentee ballots, and to verify the results.
My opponent was told to stay away from the election.
Don't campaign.
We don't need you.
We've got it.
This election is done.
In fact, they were acting like they already knew what the outcome was going to be.
They had it covered, and perhaps they did, very sadly, for our country.
It was all very, very strange.
Within days after the election, we witnessed an orchestrated effort to anoint a winner, even while many key states were still being counted.
The constitutional process must be allowed to continue.
We are going to defend the honesty of the vote by ensuring that every legal ballot is counted and that no illegal ballot is counted.
This is not just about honoring the votes of 74 million Americans who voted for me.
It's about ensuring that Americans can have faith in this election and in all future elections.
Today, I will detail some of the shocking irregularities, abuses, and fraud that have been revealed in recent weeks.
But before laying out just a small portion of the evidence we have uncovered,
and we have so much evidence, I want to explain the corrupt mail-in balloting scheme
that Democrats systematically put into place that allowed voting to be altered,
especially in swing states, which they had to win.
They just didn't know that it was going to be that tough because we were leading in every swing state by so much,
far greater than they ever thought possible.
While it has long been understood that the Democrat political machine engages in voter fraud from Detroit to Philadelphia to Milwaukee, Atlanta, so many other places, What changed this year was the Democrat Party's relentless push to print and mail out tens of millions of ballots sent to unknown recipients with virtually no safeguards of any kind.
This allowed fraud and abuse to occur on a scale never seen before.
Using the pandemic As a pretext, Democrat politicians and judges drastically changed election procedures just months, and in some cases weeks, before the election on the 3rd of November.
Very rarely were legislatures involved, and constitutionally they had to be involved.
But very, very rarely, and you'll see that as we continue to file our suits.
It's constitutionally absolutely incorrect what took place, even from a legal standpoint.
Many states, such as Nevada and California, sent millions of live ballots to every person on their voter rolls, whether those individuals had requested ballots or not, whether they were dead or alive.
They got ballots.
Other states such as Minnesota, Michigan, and Wisconsin instituted universal absentee balloting right in the middle of an election year, sending absentee ballot request forms to all voters on all rolls.
It didn't matter who they were.
This colossal expansion of mail-in voting opened the floodgates to massive fraud.
It's a widely known fact That the voting rolls are packed with people who are not lawfully eligible to vote, including those who are deceased, have moved out of their state, and even are non-citizens of our country.
Beyond this, the records are riddled with errors, wrong addresses, duplicate entries, and many other issues.
This is not disputed.
It has never been disputed.
Dozens of counties in the key swing states have more registered voters on the rolls than they have voting-age citizens, including 67 counties in Michigan.
All of this is evidence.
In Wisconsin, the state's Board of Elections could not confirm the residency of more than 100,000 people, but repeatedly refused to remove those names from its voter rolls before the election.
They knew why nobody else did.
I knew why.
They're illegal voters.
It is a travesty that in the year 2020, we do not have any means of verifying the eligibility of those who cast ballots in an election, and such an important election it is, or determining who they are, whether they live in the state, or whether they are even American citizens.
We have no idea.
Chris, he continues and lays out a lot of evidence.
Very impressive.
I agree.
This is the most important speech you'll ever give.
He delivered it well.
Very powerful.
But the Democrats are ignoring it.
It's as though they could care less.
They wanted to get this man out of office because he threatened to destroy the Democratic Party permanently and forever.
Your thoughts?
Well, it's a thing you kind of learned in the 90s from the Clinton tactics where they accuse their opponents of their own misdeeds.
In many cases, they often announce these things preemptively so that there is like a passive-aggressive manipulative resistance against any sort of scrutiny of what's going on here.
You remember months out there talking about will Trump concede if he loses?
And people like you and I were laughing them out of the room thinking, well, who the heck is gonna
even vote for Biden?
And arguably speaking, you didn't see any campaigns or any sort of effort from this guy
until like maybe a month or two before the election.
And then all of a sudden all this money floods in at record pace for a guy that promises nothing,
has no campaign, no platform, nothing really other than going negative against the other party.
And this to me seems like a Shakespearean cafe be Kabuki theater script that is being offered
by AIPAC in some way, shape or form to systematically frustrate the people between
the two polar opposites type of candidates.
And arguably speaking, people fall into this paradigm left and right every time in every election.
So it doesn't matter what kind of evidence we compile, it'll always be a baseless claim according to the DNC.
And they're notorious for these false accusations for crying wolf, for inversion, for things like treason,
You know, and...
Really, if Trump really had this, the forethought of this going on as a possibility.
You got to wonder why he wouldn't have stopped it initially, but maybe he did.
Maybe he put the trap out there and this is part of it but I'm just wondering why it's taken so long to spring the trap but of course there is the process that it has to go through in terms of providing this evidence to the people to generate national support as I fully understand.
So it's kind of a slippery slope here, you know, because I've wondered, you know, when was Trump going to step in and smack these guys down, you know, at least slap their hand out of the cookie jar.
And maybe he's waiting for him to eat every cookie in the jar before he finally just, you know, tells him, hey, I had this videotaped the whole time.
You know, I have no idea.
But like, I was just wondering why Trump went along with this as long as he has, or even with the COVID or the Vax or the Wall Street thing or 5G or the stock market hype or any of this stuff.
I've often wondered why he's gone along with these things as long as he has, you know, whether it's the mailing thing or the stopping the countings or destroying evidence or the servers or intimidating or gaslighting or like any of the rumor and echo stuff that mainstream media is putting out.
I just wondered, you know, at what point in time will the people finally stand up with Trump or with whoever and say enough from this?
Chris, two remarks made by the Biden stand-in, not actually Joe Biden.
They replaced him at the first debate and he's continued to play this role thereafter.
He's clearly an actor.
He knows his lines.
I've heard him repeatedly deliver identical lines when asked about his son Hunter.
He says, I'm very proud of my son.
He's the smartest guy I've ever known in that he believes these allegations are foul play.
He says that to reporters when he's interviewed.
He said it to Colbert on his show.
I mean, it's obvious these are lines and the guy's a good actor, but he's not Joe Biden.
Among the announcements he made that appear to be the way the deep state tells us what they're doing in advance, as though to shift responsibility onto the public once we're informed that we're responsible if they get away with it, was when he declared that we have put together the greatest voter fraud organization in the history of America, and when he subsequently said, I don't need your help to be elected.
I need your help thereafter.
And he didn't need our help to be elected because he had it in the bag using Dominion voting machines.
It's absolutely scandalous, Chris.
And to add to your point, you know, we're talking about that Google Nest or whatever.
That's some interesting stuff.
If you think about the Ethernet cables that are plugged into a lot of these voting machines, the ability for them to flip votes, the amount of times this has happened, You know, you're saying 50 million votes could have been floated in or out.
That's a big number.
And the fact that people don't seem to be concerned with this should be concerning to everybody in terms of democracy or even like in terms of like taxation without representation.
I mean, this is the basis of what this country was founded on.
And yet we're not only going along with this, we're paying for it.
And Chris, I think the reason Trump is being stonewalled by his own staff, Mark Meadows, his chief of staff, Pat Cipollone, who is his general counsel, have both been blocking Sidney Powell from gaining access to the president.
He wanted to appoint her as special counsel.
They opposed it.
There was yelling, all kinds of arguments on Friday evening last.
And this is completely outrageous.
When it comes to list of traitors who deserve to be given a trial and put up against the wall and shot, Mark Meadows and Pat Cipollone are going to be right at the head of the list.
Sure.
I would like to say that if, you know, say if people had done something similar to this, like with Obama, let's just say, and arguably there was a lot of people very upset about Too Big to Jail or the TARP bailouts or, you know, all these things like this, and some of them were his own base.
How did the media go after that?
Did they give it any sort of honest scrutiny or any sort of legitimate coverage?
No.
They put Soros in on one side to send an operation called Occupy Wall Street, And then with the other side, they send in absurdities like Todd Akin or Sarah Palin or Michelle Bachman to lead the Tea Party revolution, supposedly, in outrage against this.
And what does it turn into?
It turns into some sort of a racist or white nationalist scope that is just ridiculed on one side and becomes just a waste of time on the other.
So I almost think that there's a strong effort to infiltrate, like I say, with grassroots operatives, these type of outrages.
And I think they understand that the people are upset.
And I almost think that this is like sort of a Oh, I couldn't agree more, Chris.
the populist movement and to see what it will take, what the threshold of tolerance is from the American people.
And I think when they cross that Rubicon, they're gonna, there's gonna be no way of crossing back.
And I think maybe that's the point of it all along.
I mean, look what they're doing to people with these lockdowns and all this stuff here.
This is crazy.
Oh, I couldn't agree more, Chris.
I think you got it exactly right.
And compliments to the president for doing everything he can, but he's being boxed in.
Meanwhile, we'll be right back.
Rappel rips into the GOP for going along with a porkless relief bill.
We need better Republicans, he observes.
I think he's 100% correct.
There are too many rhinos out there who are Republicans in name only.
Meanwhile, Fauci admits to deceiving the public about herd immunity because he wanted more people to be vaccinated.
Fauci apparently thinks it's okay to lie to the public for their own good in his judgment in a startling interview with the New York Times.
Dr. Anthony Tony the Rat Fauci, head of the government's coronavirus task force, admitted he did not level with the public about how many people would need to be vaccinated to achieve herd immunity because he didn't think the public was ready to hear his true thoughts, which he feared might discourage people from being vaccinated.
The Times article cataloged Foushee's changing position on how many Americans would need to be vaccinated.
When initially stated, it would be 60 to 70%.
About a month ago, it began to change.
He said it was actually 70 to 75%.
Last week, he upped the figure 75 to 80%.
In the interview with the Times, he changed his estimate yet again, might be close to 90%.
According to the Times, in the interview, Now she acknowledged she had slowly but deliberately been
moving the goalposts.
In doing so, he said, partly based on science but partly on his gut feeling, the country is finally ready to hear what he really thinks.
In other words, Fauci's advice to the public on one of the most critical aspects of the pandemic has not consisted of his honest opinion formed by science.
But rather what he thinks the country is ready to hear.
He went on to more expressly admit he'd fudged his public pronouncements to encourage people to take the vaccine.
According to the Times, he was ready to raise his estimate weeks ago, but refused because many Americans seemed hesitant about the vaccines.
He went on to continue how polling, rather than science, informed his public pronouncement.
When the poll said only about half of all Americans would take a vaccine, I was saying herd immunity would take 70 to 75 percent.
When the newer survey said 60 percent, I thought, I can nudge this up, so I went to 80 to 85.
He went on to explicitly state his future pronouncement might be based on his feeling of what the public thinks, not what science says.
We need some humility here.
We really don't know what the real number is.
I think the real range is between 70 to 90, but I'm not going to say 90.
Why won't he say?
Because doing so might discourage Americans.
He's not sure there's enough voluntary acceptance to reach that goal.
Sentiments about vaccines have bounced up and down.
This man is a disgrace, Chris.
He has done more damage to America than all of our foreign enemies combined.
Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin, Emperor Hirohito, Anthony, Tony the Rat has done more damage to America, caused more death, destruction, and devastation than all of our foreign enemies combined.
Your thoughts?
Yeah, I would have to also say that he's caused this to foreign countries as well.
Globally, the entire population has been subject to victimhood by this type of experimental endeavors by his ilk and the people behind him.
As much as Fauci has been an abhorrent jackass, I should comfortably say, I would say that there's a lot of organized money behind him that stems from these robber barons that have always went after human labor and tried to diminish it by all means possible.
And now they're trying to replace it with technocracy, robotics, and AI.
So I think that it's really important to Not only point out the number of times that Fauci has fumbled and just flat out missed everything, and I think that Niall Ferguson and his coffin is not only this model of death and pandemic, the flatten the curve, the herd mentality type concept, where they're using fear and imagination to put people into their own imprisonment, and using these Gollum enterprises and these fairy tales to really manipulate these type of very real things, like
The Jedi Contract or Nightingale or Warp Speed or some of these other things.
So I think that these guys, you know, they don't believe in their own product.
They're not vaccinating their own children.
It's not like, you know, Bill Gates is going to eat an Impossible Burger or vaccinate his own kids or Fauci either.
So, you know, that's why they go through these efforts to put on these show vaccinations and to put in the propaganda that they do through their mainstream media.
65% of the ad revenue from Big Pharma is the mainstream media's funding, so I'd have to say that's an important statistic to maybe look at.
And while we're talking about statistics, I think that they have manipulated data to say the least, and the absence of double-blind or placebo studies on these vaccines in the warp speed manner which they're trying to usher these in over an arguably fake pandemic that they've conjunctioned in with the World Economic Forum economic reset, I'd have to say that somewhere, I mean, this is like the evidence in election fraud and these things are inextricably tied together and people are, I mean, there's just such a mountain of evidence and they just want to ignore it and just dive into their head into the sand or look at the molehills.
It's crazy.
Oh, Chris, you got it so right.
We've been played so massively here.
Meanwhile, we have a bombshell new legal memo giving Trump supporters hope on Christmas Eve.
This is by William J. Olson and Patrick McSweeney, who are two conservative legal experts.
Here's the note.
The Western Journal is presenting this memorandum written by two prominent conservative legal scholars, essentially verbatim, With only enough editing to format.
This is a second memo by Messrs.
Olson and McSweeney.
Like the first, it outlines a possible legal strategy for the Trump campaign to follow.
Overcoming the court's abdication in Texas versus Pennsylvania.
In refusing to hear Texas versus Pennsylvania, the Supreme Court abdicated its constitutional duty to resolve a real and substantial controversy among states that was properly brought as an original action in that court.
As a result, the court has come under intense criticism for having evaded the most important interstate constitutional case brought to it in many decades, if not ever.
However, even in its order dismissing the case, the Supreme Court identified how another challenge could be brought successfully by a different plaintiff.
This paper explains that legal strategy.
First, we focus on the errors made by the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court declined to hear the challenge brought by the state of Texas against four states that had refused to abide by Article 1, Paragraph 1, Clause 2, the Presidential Electors Clause, which establishes the conditions and requirements governing the election of the President of the United States.
In adopting that provision, the framers vested in each state legislature the exclusive authority to determine the manner of appointing presidential electors.
The framers plan was shown to be exceedingly wise because we have now learned that allowing other state and private actors to write the election rules led to massive election fraud in the four defendant states of Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin.
Individuals can be bought, paid for, and corrupted so much easier than state legislatures.
In refusing to hear the case, the sole reason given was that Texas lacked standing.
In doing so, all nine justices committed a wrong against Texas and the 17, actually 21 states that supported the suits, the United States, the President, and the people.
As Alexander explained in Federalist No.
78, courts have neither force nor will but merely judgment as such.
In deciding cases, courts have a duty to explain their decisions so the rest of us may know if they constitute arbitrary exercises of political power or reasoned decisions of judicial power which the people can trust.
In Texas v. Pennsylvania, all the judges felt obligated to do was to state its lack of standing.
Supported by a one-sentence justification, Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another state conducts its election.
Resolving a case of this magnitude with one conclusory sentence is completely unacceptable.
The Supreme Court docket consists primarily of only those cases the High Court chooses to hear.
However, just when it agrees to decide a case and disputes on the original distinction jurisdiction of the court is involved, it has a duty to decide cases properly brought to them.
Two centuries ago, Chief Justice Marshall construed the obligation of contracts clause in a decision where he wrote, however irksome the test may be, this is a duty from which we dare not shrink.
Trustees of Dartmouth College v. Woodward.
Courts have a duty to resolve important cases, even if they would prefer to avoid them.
In Marbury v. Madison, Marshall described the duty of the Judicial Department is to say what the law is, because every right, when withheld, must have a remedy, and every injury its proper redress.
Abdication, in a case of this sort, is not a judicial option.
The Supreme Court's reliance on standing as its excuse has had one positive result, provoking many to study the origins of that doctrine, who may be surprised to learn the word standing nowhere appears in the Constitution.
There is compelling evidence to demonstrate it was birthed by big government justices during the FDR administration to shield New Deal legislation and to insulate the administrative state from challenges by the people.
Those in favor of the Texas decision argue that standing is a conservative doctrine as it limits the power of the court.
But the true constitutional test is grounded in its text.
The true threshold constitutional test is whether a genuine and serious controversy exists between the states that could be resolved by a court.
The only reason governed by the Supreme Court was Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another state conducts its election.
In truth, Texas did make such a showing.
When Pennsylvania violated the exclusive authority bestowed on state legislatures on the Constitution's elector clause, it opened the door to corruption and foreign intrigue to corrupt the electoral votes of Pennsylvania.
And as Alexander explained in Federalist 68, that's exactly why the framers created the Electoral College.
In the 2020 election cycle, changes to the election process in Pennsylvania were made by judges, state office holders, and election officials, which would never have been made by a state legislature.
If the process by which presidential elections are chosen is corrupted in a few key states, like Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin, by rigging the system in favor of one candidate, it becomes wholly irrelevant who the people of Texas support.
That political reality presents a real, judicially cognizable interest, no matter what the Supreme Court decided.
What happens in Pennsylvania does not stay in Pennsylvania, as electors from all states acting together select the President of the United States.
In the Federalist Papers, both Madison and Hamilton recognized the need to combat the spirit of faction and the tendency of each state to yield to its immediate interest at the expense of national unity.
They reasoned that the Constitution provided a solution to this centripetal pressure while reserving a measure of sovereignty to each state.
When differences arise between states that threaten to lead to disunion, the republic can be held together, as Hamilton observed, either by the agency of the courts or by military force.
A constitutional remedy to enable the state to resolve their differences peacefully is a provision that permits any state to invoke the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court to address and settle their differences.
In their vernacular, the Supreme Court blew it.
Threatening the bonds that hold the Union together.
Fortunately, that might have been only the first round in the fight to preserve the nation.
A strategy exists to resubmit the Texas challenge under the Elector's Clause to the Supreme Court in a way that even the Court could not dare refuse to consider.
Just because Texas did not persuade the justices that what happens in Pennsylvania hurts Texas does not mean that the United States of America could not persuade the justices that when Pennsylvania violates the U.S.
Constitution, it harms the nation.
Article 3, Paragraph 2, Clause 2, confers original jurisdiction on the Supreme Court in any case suit brought by the United States against a state Thus, the United States can and should file suit against Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin.
Like the Texas suit, that new suit would seek an order invalidating the appointment of the electors appointed by the four defendant states that refused to abide by the terms of the Presidential Electors Clause.
That would leave it to the state legislatures in those four states to appoint electors, which is what the Constitution requires.
When those four states violated the Constitution by allowing electors who had not been appointed in the manner prescribed by the state legislature, the United States suffered an injury.
Indeed, there could hardly have been a more significant injury to the nation than that which corrupted its presidential election.
The United States has a vital interest and a responsibility to preserve the constitutional framework of the Republic, which was formed by a voluntary compact among the states.
As with any contractual relationship of participants in an ongoing enterprise, no party is entitled to ignore or alter the essential terms of the contract by its unilateral action.
The President, who has sworn to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution, has the right and the duty to order the U.S.
Department of Justice to bring such an action to the Supreme Court, and should do so quickly.
In rejecting the invocation by the state of Texas of the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court to resolve the dispute between Texas and four other states that refused to abide by the terms of the Presidential Electors Clause, for now, a majority of justices foreclosed the use of that constitutional safeguard by Texas to provide a peaceful means of resolving the controversy.
That is deeply divided states and the citizens of this republic as at no time since the 1860s.
That consequence is too dangerous to be allowed to stand.
If the same case previously brought by Texas were now brought by the United States of America, there is every reason to believe the Supreme Court would be compelled to understand it must hear it and decide it favorably.
Although outcomes are never certain, it is believed and hoped that a majority of the Supreme Court never take the position that the United States has no business enforcing the process established in the Constitution, by which we select the one government official who represents all the people, a President of the United States.
Chris, that's a masterpiece in my judgment.
Your thoughts?
Well, it is a lot.
It's pretty heavy.
I'd have to point that maybe like the initial constitution and the founding forefathers all had connections to the City of London, Masonic connections, and they were mostly lawyers or landowners.
And most of the constitutional provisions were written ambiguously by Hamilton to not necessarily guarantee the rights of the common man, but to guarantee the rights of these people, these lawyers from the Crown and from the Parliament.
So I have to say that most of the things that our ancestors have fought for was the inclusion into this system.
And I don't think they really, as common men, have ironed out a contract righteous enough for the common man in terms of protection from these type of oligarchical overreaches that we're seeing.
And I think they've imposed a system that is really, I don't want to say foolproof, but tamper-proof in terms of the common man, in terms of delivering democracy.
You talk about damage incurred in restitutions and things like that is one of the things that we're talking about in there.
I think that everybody that's fought and died for the Constitution, for this country, for anything really in terms of America, that would count as certain injury.
And I have to say that the people that are really gaining the benefit of this legal system are certainly not ones that have fought for this country in that capacity.
I think they've only used our children to do so, just like they're trying to do with the vaccines and everything else like that.
You know, I'm getting a little bit upset about how they're really...
Layering and departmentalizing this caste system in the way that they are and really trying to create this theatrics for us to get involved with.
You talk about standing as well.
There's no precedent of anything like this in the national history or really to this extent.
So, you know, really the right and wrong thing is being ignored in the face of protecting the law.
And I'm talking about the people that wrote this law in the first place for their own protection.
I think they use this situation as hammer and shield and the common man has no recourse or no restitution in the face of this.
And I think that we need to line up together as common people to assure that this does not continue.
Because like I say, no taxation without representation.
This is beyond disenfranchisement.
This is tyranny.
You're absolutely right, Chris, and it was outrageous that was rejected when Texas submitted.
Texas did surely have standing, as they have outlined.
It appears to have pivoted around the Chief Justice, whom L. Lynn Wood has informed us during a conversation with Associate Justice Breyer assured him, I won't let that mother ever get reelected.
Which in my opinion disqualifies him from hearing any case related to the election but from serving on the Supreme Court in any capacity.
He might add to the list of traitors to the United States who deserve to be given a trial and then subjected to the punishment appropriate of treason, the penalty for which is death.
There's an obvious conflict of interest, and you're absolutely right.
They should have recused themselves if they felt so strongly about one candidate and really ignored the obvious misdeeds that have brought us to this point in the first place.
So yeah, great, great points.
I think also you got to point out that the people on the Supreme Court have been positioned for this very purpose, to bring in this UN colonization agenda in the first place.
So if you look at their family histories, their track record, their educational backgrounds, and of course the money behind them, You see that it's like seven to two in terms of people that are actually looking out for this country right now, maybe even nine to nothing.
I don't know.
So there's something that's got to give.
Well, that's profoundly disturbing.
Meanwhile, notice how they observe there are two ways to retain the union intact.
One is by peaceful judicial and the other is by military force.
Oath keepers have said to the president, Invoke the insurrection actor, we will fight a bloody and desperate resolution to throw up Biden and the Chinese communist puppet regime.
Even though it's a Biden stand-in, a body double, they're absolutely right.
The Chinese own the Biden crime family lock, stock, and barrel.
Here are the suggestions coming from Oath Keepers, a very serious organization of individuals with extensive military and law enforcement background who are no one to trifle with.
Invoke the Insurrection Act.
Issue a presidential proclamation directly invoking the Insurrection Act, declaring an insurrection rebellion and coup to be in effect by domestic enemies of the U.S.
Constitution and traitors who were in collusion with and or acting as agents of a foreign
enemy, specifically Communist China, but also other known or unknown foreign enemies, and
to call up the militia, including the National Guard, U.S.
veterans, and patriotic Americans of military age, and U.S. military to suppress the insurrection.
A proclamation to declare that domestic traitors have conspired with a foreign enemy, specifically
Communist China, and have been either bribed or blackmailed by that enemy.
Together they have subverted our electoral system from top to bottom, to rig elections
at every level, and to steal elections with the intent of overthrowing our Constitution
and our way of life.
A. Order the data seized.
Pursuant to that proclamation, orders SOCOM and other trusted military units to seize all databases of the CIA, FBI, NSA, DNI, and the records held by all state electoral systems and administrators.
Order them to take possession of and preserve all evidence of the insurrection, rebellion, coup, Wherever it is housed or held and to counter and suppress any attempt by the insurrectionists to prevent the seizing of the data.
B. Order a mass declassification of the dirty secrets.
Order SOCOM intel officers and other trusted and loyal patriotic intelligence officers to carry out your orders to declassify all the dirty secrets and evidence of crimes by the corrupt and compromised elites in both major parties to expose them all And especially to expose their treason and their willing service to communist China and other foreign powers as spies, agents, and puppets.
Of course, those loyal intelligence officers should not declassify and disclose data that would put at risk loyal American operatives and allies in foreign nations.
We're on legitimate missions that are related to our legitimate national interests.
Only disclose data on traitors and their treason.
See, within all that data will be the evidence needed to expose the vote fraud, who is behind it, as well as expose the corrupt judges, state attorneys general, governors, legislative leaders, election officials, and so on.
D, in order to order a massive public WikiLeaks style data dump to put all the dirty secrets of the compromised elite on display to the American people.
Those secrets are the very swamp water that the D.C.
swamp creatures swim in.
Those dirty secrets both control and shield them all.
Throw the doors open and dump all the skeletons out of the closet and onto the street for all the people to see and all the world to observe.
E, pardon and free Julian Assange.
Ask him to assist in this massive data dump public disclosure.
He is a hero who has dedicated his life to battling the deep state and deserves our thanks and a chance to serve not just America but all humanity by assisting in this great cause.
If!
Fire Barr and remove him from office immediately.
Update!
Bar has resigned but needs to be removed immediately.
Don't let him run out the clock for even a day.
The replacement should not come from within the beltway.
You must appoint a real patriot attorney general who will actually fight and actually clean house.
Look outside the beltway for a real patriot.
We will help you find one who will actually fight for the republic.
This is a populist movement and the people are still being locked out, which is why you keep being betrayed over and over.
Appoint real patriots who are outsiders.
Gee, appoint a special prosecutor and task force.
The new Attorney General should appoint a special prosecutor with a full task force to investigate and indict all those involved in the vote fraud, and to go after the deep state from top to bottom, including within the Department of Justice, prosecuting all traitors in all branches and all levels, to root out all who are actively committing treason, who have been compromised, blackmailed, or bought out by Communist China and or other foreign enemies.
Fire Wray and put a patriot in place as FBI director to clean house in the FBI and actually do their jobs.
Order 2.
Order the U.S.
military to go to DEFCON 2 or even DEFCON 1 to defend our nation from external threats while we suppress this internal insurrection.
It's imperative that we maintain strict control of our nuclear arsenal in patriot hands and that our armed forces stand ready to repel foreign attack and interference while we handle this necessarily drastic domestic housecleaning. 3.
Call the militia into federal service.
Pursue it to your powers as commander-in-chief to call forth the militia.
Call up all National Guard units into federal service.
Likewise, call up all military veterans up to age 65 into federal service as the militia to assist in keeping peace here at home.
Call up all able-bodied Americans between the ages of 17 and 45 who are still loyal to the Constitution to likewise report for duty bearing their own arms.
You have the power to command them and order them to report for duty at their nearest military base or National Guard Armory in their state.
All of the above, as a militia, can be used to keep the peace in our local and state communities under your direct command to suppress the expected riots, terrorism, and armed insurrection by the radical left in the United States, who have been armed and equipped for months now by our foreign and domestic enemies.
You must use your authority to invoke the Insurrection Act and your absolute power to declassify any and all secrets.
Because of the machinations of the complicit mainstream media, most Americans are ignorant of just how corrupt and compromised the establishment has become.
They have no idea how many political, legal, media, and business elites are now compromised puppets of communist China, with the aid of the deep state traitors without our own intelligence and federal law enforcement agencies.
That is why you must use SOCOM and other loyal military units to do a mass data seizure, declassification, and mass data dump to throw all the skeletons out into the street, expose all the dirty secrets used to control American elites, and show the American people all the evidence that will demonstrate who is dirty, who is a traitor, who is a criminal.
This will destroy the credibility of the traitors, make it far easier to defeat them, with the people themselves being the judge, and with our military service members also clearly seen who has turned traitor and who must not be obeyed.
It is critical.
You must do both, expose them all, and then bring them to justice.
Chris, I think that's a magnificent statement, and what they are declaring is that Failure of the judicial system to take measure is going to compel patriots to come to the aid of the nation, and I stand with them 100%.
Your thoughts?
Well, in my opinion, I think it is an age-old divide-and-conquer tactic that the Robert Barons tried to impose with this theatrics and really the systematic frustrations of justice.
I'd have to point out that there might be Chinese involvement with this.
I'd have to say that if you look at the Chinese history, that you'll see the people that have colonialized China since the 1830s stem back from not only London, but the Boston Brahmin, and have used our military You know to enforce this colonization going back to the 1840s, do you know that the Yangtze River has been occupied by American forces since 1844, the Yangtze Patrol that the China Marines, if you ever read into these these type of situations prior to World War Two, this was the case.
You know, this has been a group of people that have been like I say trying to turn out the labor force and use this theatrics as a limited hangout.
I think that it goes a step beyond the Chinese to simply put it.
I think that there is a group of people that are trying to use the Chinese as leverage or as a target to take the looted assets from the American Empire.
And to position them into a place for China to make them the prominent next force, if they're not already.
And I think there's also a thing going on behind the scenes in terms of debt and things like that with the Chinese people and with Wall Street.
I think Goldman Sachs and BlackRock are probably involved with some of these things to the extent that we are not being told in terms of the public.
I think if you look at things like the National Security Act and how many times, you know, in your history you've seen the FBI or these institutions that are there supposedly to protect the interests of the people completely ignore that interest and cover up for the robber barons or for the complicit.
So I think that a lot of these conspiracies often end up at the same places where they just the investigation gets botched and nothing ever happens.
And if you look at who wrote the National Security Act, it's a member or representative of the Boston Brahmin and Harvard ilk.
Clark Clifford, you know, and many of the secret societies that come out of these places are, you know, trained operatives for Harriman and Rockefeller and to a larger extent Rothschild.
I think that there's a much bigger picture than just simply China.
And I just want to point that out.
I'd also like to point out, if you look into something called the Society of the Cincinnati, it's something that the founding forefathers put together.
It's a secret society.
And this goes back to ancient Rome, where it was basically the patricians trying to keep the plebs from having the same or equal rights as them.
It was the noble families that were doing this.
So I think it's the same formula, the same families to a lesser extent.
And the same bloodlines that are trying to turn us out to this theatrics.
So, I'm maybe a too deep a thinker here or maybe going off on too long of a wonk rant, but I just want to point that out there and maybe just see what people think.
Oh, I think it's sensational, Chris.
Your knowledge of history is wonderful for the context it provides us to understand these very pressing and crucial contemporary events.
Meanwhile, send us fan mail, pro or con, we want to hear from you.
Write to liveneedtoknowatgmail.com.
Liveneedtoknowatgmail.com.
Here's a sample from what Patrick Burnham said in the recent Inverview about his being present Friday night when there was a huge row Where Trump wanted to appoint Sidney Powell as a special counsel but was opposed by Mark Meadows, his chief of staff, and Pat Cipollone, who is his general counsel.
It was outrageous.
Information like this is being kept from President Trump.
Has he heard this specific message?
Is he hearing any messages from we the people?
No one seems to know.
We do know Sidney Powell is being kept from the White House, last we heard.
If he's surrounded by traitors, his safety is at stake.
It's best to believe that if they see he has any chance of overturning this fraud, they will stop at nothing to take him out.
Bet on it.
It's past time to act.
We should be there now.
It's far past time to get on the offensive and take out the trash.
With or without Trump, this situation must be resolved immediately.
The courts have proven there's no legal remedy or recourse.
The longer we wait, the stronger they become.
Pick up the gauntlet, President Trump, and use the power the Constitution has given you to save this republic.
We, the people, will back you up, or we will do it ourselves.
Meanwhile, I have reported with Carl Herman on how the elitist globalists are using the idealist socialists of the Democratic Party to tear down Trump and reduce Americans to rubble.
Meanwhile, bear in mind, it's not coincidental that all corporate media are all in to facilitate the demanded fear that Democrats need in order to achieve their objectives.
There's an alignment of all big government institutions and multinationals to support the same.
Nothing is coincidental.
Everything is political.
It's not about the virus.
It's all about control.
Chris, your final thoughts?
Well, I hope that, man, I have so many things about Trump going along with this that it just makes me concerned.
I don't have the blind faith that you have in him or the faith that you have in him.
Maybe you know something that I don't and I'm missing something here.
But yeah, I hope that he's a white hat.
I hope that America will eventually take this country back.
I think that Trump has had four years to do this.
He hasn't even locked her up or investigated the Clinton Foundation yet.
I don't know what's taking so long with this.
Maybe America's got to just, you know, be facedown in their own filth to really understand that this place needs to be cleaned up.
And maybe that's the point of it all along is to push us to such outrage that we will subvert the Constitution and put a president in that can, you know, go in and clean up the other two branches of office, which are grossly underserving the public, you know, whether it's the Supreme Court or the Congress.
Because arguably something is going on with Congress and them selling us out left and right and something needs to be done with that too.
I'd have to say as far as like dual Israeli citizens and things of this nature, it really needs to be Clamp down on hard APAC needs to be ruled a foreign entity.
And, you know, this is how many times do they pivot the red scare into the domino theory and these guys walk away scot-free.
I mean, I've seen him do it so many times just since World War Two alone and going back before that, you know, we really need to summon the diligence of the fortitude to determine not only who our real enemies are, but how high up this corruption goes and go to the top.
This is Jim Fetzer in Madison thanking Chris Weinhardt in Detroit for joining me today.
You can see why I appreciate his brilliance, his intellectual brilliance, and his mastery of history.
For my final thoughts on Christmas Day, 74 million Americans were not wrong in supporting Donald Trump.
He has the best interests of the country at heart.
He has brought us the most surging economy that has benefited the most low-working workers in the country, where their wages were rising at the highest rate.
He has sought to clamp down our border and prohibit the influx of illegal aliens who undercut and steal away their jobs.
Traitors in California such as Jerry Brown signed a voter voter law that automatically registered anyone who obtained a driver's license to vote in California, which sounds good until you realize that illegal aliens in California are allowed to obtain driver's license and thereby to vote.
I believe that the President has been surrounded by many more traitors than any of us ever imagined.
I believe that Bill Barr, the Attorney General, is among them.
Mark Meadows, his Chief of Staff, is among them.
Pat Cipollone, his General Counsel, is among them.
You don't have to go to Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer To understand the enormity of the deception and deceit by criminal elements right here in the United States.
He has an obligation to protect, defend, and preserve the Constitution from all enemies, foreign and domestic.
We have two brilliant constitutional scholars weighing it out, but his enemies even extend to the Chief Justice of the United States.
If we cannot do it with President Trump, we must do it without him.
I stand with the Oath Keepers.
I am a former Marine Corps officer.
The fate of the nation hangs in the balance.
As John F. Kennedy observed long ago, Those who make peaceful reform impossible make violent revolution inevitable.
I say to you now, if this cannot be resolved by the court, it will be resolved by the people.
We have nothing to lose but the chains in which they want to enslave us.
They're destroying the country economically.
They want to take up two-thirds of the population of the United States.
We have nothing to lose by fighting for freedom and liberty within the Constitution of the United States.
So I say to you, Stock up on supplies.
If you don't know how to defend yourself, learn.
Acquire a weapon with which you're comfortable, because one way or another, this will not stand.
We will preserve the nation.
▲
Export Selection