All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 16, 2020 - Jim Fetzer
43:26
Need to Know: The Fetzer Report 15 October 2020
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin with Dave Scorpio from the exotic land of Ecuador and Carl Herman from San Ramon, California.
We're here to bring you all the news you need to know.
♪♪♪ And today we begin with some stories that are making
gigantic headlines, but which the mainstream is doing its best to suppress.
Revelations about Hunter Biden, it's pretty ghastly, pretty grim.
Here we have shocking pictures, damning emails emerged from a laptop handed to Trump's right-hand man.
That would be Rudy Giuliani.
They show Hunter lying in bed with what appears to be a crack pipe.
Emails relating to his business activity in Ukraine from a laptop obtained by Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani, where Joe Biden's long been dogged by claims of conflict of interest.
The timing could hardly be better.
From the point of view of the Trump campaign, here you see Hunter asleep with a crack pipe.
I mean, unbelievable.
It's no secret he has considerable personal problems, drug problems, twice married, father of five, a child by a former stricker.
A decades-long history of alcoholism and cocaine addiction even crack, it now turns.
While Biden currently has a lead, according to the official polls, so did Hillary in 2016.
That hasn't been lost on Republicans or Democrats.
According to the New York Post, which revealed the story, the emails show Hunter introduced his father, then the vice president, to a senior executive at Burisma, the Ukrainian energy company, where it's very obvious to anyone looking into the matter that Hunter was given a cushy job there because of access to his father, not because of any competence or qualification with regard to the area.
The fellow who works on damaged Apple laptops, where Hunter left three at McIsakson's shop in Wilmington, Delaware in April of 2019, but never paid the $85 bill for recovering the data, Has been worried that he might even be murdered.
This is a fellow, John Paul MacIsaac, four to four, a former Genius Bar worker, runs his own Mac store.
He's a bit of a character himself.
How it got there?
MacIsaac offers a data recovery service at his store in Wilmington, where hunters simply walked in with three damaged laptops, two had water damage, one had a sticky keyboard, But he never returned to retrieve them, and thereby hangs the tail.
Meanwhile, Facebook is reducing the reach of the damning story.
I mean, this is going to be huge.
It's going to grow.
We're only now looking at the tip of the iceberg.
I have no doubt this will be a dominant issue right up to the election.
Scorpio, your thoughts.
Well, you know, I think it's time to start referring to this is the Clinton-Obama-Biden crime family because they're running a pay-for-play operation for eight years.
The scope of their criminality is absolutely incredible.
And isn't it amazing that we went eight years in the Obama administration without a single criticism of Obama?
And meanwhile, you know, President Trump could drink a glass of water, and they'd blame him for wasting precious natural resources.
I mean, it's really amazing.
And I believe that Hunter also left a crack pipe in a rental car, and that's sort of how the whole crack story around him started.
I think that's a very nice addendum.
Carl, your thoughts?
Yeah, with that article talking about the polls showing, it's the same thing as four years ago.
And really, the first thing is to reject corporate media reporting about anything that's reliable.
They're serial liars.
Now, this is a huge story, and if we assume that White Hats are somehow orchestrating this, then this is the rollout of events that will totally discredit, exactly as Dave says, This is a rogue state criminal empire that is pay-to-play.
What they're doing, and part of what I do as a historian, is document how far back this criminal empire goes.
And the pay-to-play is just how they roll.
They see ordinary human beings as human resources to extract the maximum profit of natural resources.
The wars are a lie, and they're just struggling in panic to try to keep power.
If the White Hats are in charge, then they're just going to continue to roll out this data and slam dunk with arrests in the end.
Well, I believe Trump is such a master of the media that he has laid out a campaign here that's going to be highly embarrassing and very damaging to both Bidens and their prospects for the future.
Meanwhile, Barrett is shining in her final day of questioning before the Senate.
This is a very positive report actually coming from Rush Limbaugh, whom I have found to be really quite a brilliant and astute political analyst.
I never used to listen to Rush.
I have a friend who's a fan When we have got together, which is fairly often, I frequently hear him on the radio and he really does deserve his reputation.
Meanwhile, Barrett keeps the Democrats in Trump at bay during the Senate hearings.
She was very careful in her testimony not to take on the president who nominated her to create distance between herself and past positions
and writings on controversial issues.
Her confirmation appears to be inevitable.
The ship will submit a six to three conservative majority on the court, be the most pronounced ideological change
in 30 years from liberal icon to conservative jurist.
The 40 year old judge skipped past Democrats pressing questions about issues they'd like to get her
to commit upon, which was highly inappropriate on their part, but of course they would make the effort.
She refused to say whether Roe v. Wade, ruling in 1973 on abortion was correctly decided
though she had signed an open letter seven years ago calling the decision infamous,
pressed her on her approach to healthcare, abortion, racial equity and voting rights,
doing their best really to turn it to their advantage by focusing on her threat to the Affordable Care Act.
Barrett testified she had not spoken to Trump or his team about election cases, declined to commit to recusing herself from any post-election issues that might come before the court, Meanwhile, we have a live update of what was taking place today.
The Republicans blocked the Democrats' attempt to halt her confirmation.
27 were arrested outside of the hearing room.
Members of the panel shared personal stories about Barrett's dedication and emotional anecdotes from the stakeholders.
Barrett's former law clerk, Ramanda Burberry, described her former boss as a sharp legal mind and a brilliant thinker.
Judge Barrett is dedicated and disciplined as a judge.
She is committed above all else to the rule of law, as she has said and as I have seen.
Judge Barrett understands that policy decisions must be left to the political branches.
The role of a judge is to enforce the law as written.
Suggesting she would be a role model for generations to come.
Lindsey Graham has now announced the date there will be a vote by the committee on the 22nd of October, which will no doubt confirm her by the committee and send it to the full Senate for a final vote.
Scorpio, your thoughts?
Well, you know, whether you like Amy Coney Barrett or not, you have to admit she has been an incredible person at this interview that she's been going through.
She hasn't once stepped in the muck.
They've tried to ask her all these questions to trick her and to get her to say inappropriate things.
She's avoided every single time, every pitfall.
It's very, very impressive.
And it was also very impressive when they asked her to hold up her notes, and she held up an empty pad of paper.
Very impressive.
There's no stopping her nomination, and she's only 48 years old, so she'll be a judge for the next 30 years, maybe longer.
She's gonna be a fabulous addition to the court.
Carl, your thoughts?
We'll see.
My only hope is if White Hats are putting these pieces into play and we would need an honest person to be in that position rather than the people who are owned and controlled by blackmail.
It is such, it's both an Simple, easy task to get somebody to tell the truth, but it's also easy to get these bullshitters to obfuscate, and then you get into a situation where good people like Professor Fetzer get to meet one of these judges in action, and they just obfuscate and say whatever that anybody who is on the inside can see is total bullshit and illegal, but the ordinary people through corporate media will never figure it out.
So hopefully this is just another piece in play for the White Hats.
I think this is a very important development and that Trump is going to, you know, deserve a lot of respect and appreciation from conservatives across the nation who have been very concerned about the Supreme Court for decades now.
Meanwhile, a liberal website says blacks are abandoning Biden.
This is very serious.
It's astonishing Black Americans who vote overwhelmingly for one party, which is unlike any other demographic in the U.S.
Actually, affiliation by whites is basically a three-way split between Republicans, Independents, and Democrats.
Hispanics lean more Democrat at 43%, Independents next at 37, and Republicans least at 14.
Blacks in the past have overwhelmingly identified as Democrats or Independents, 67 and 27%, only 3%.
As Republicans, that appears to be changing.
I honestly believe it's going to change on a much more significant scale than they perceive to be the case right now.
We've had polling come from Rasmussen as long ago as December suggesting as many as 40% of black likely voters could support Trump.
Meanwhile, Brett Hume exposes Biden's Achilles heel that he could lose his election because of his senility.
I don't think this is a secret, and yet practically no one is discussing it publicly.
Even Chris Wallace protected Biden during the first debate when he refused to answer questions, but Brett Hume believes it's his Achilles heel.
People begin to say, wait a minute.
We really can't have this guy in the White House.
I think that's his best hope, but that means more debates.
Let Biden talk, because the longer he talks, the greater the chance of it showing through.
Some call it senility, some call it dementia.
We had a report before the first election from a former staffer
that his anti-dementia medication brings with it the unfortunate side effect of incontinence,
that they'd actually had staff meetings about which adult type
of adult diaper he ought to be wearing, which appears to be the reason why they wanted breaks every 30 minutes.
And when they didn't get him, sent in the second string of Biden double.
Trump is not letting it go on Joe Biden's very bad day.
He forgot Mitt Romney's name, forgot what state he was in, and said he was running as a proud Democrat for the Senate.
How can you forget a name like Mitt Romney, who's been a central figure in politics for years?
And why is Joe talking about running for the Senate?
Are you willing to vote for a man with declining mental faculties?
I think not.
I think this is a very serious issue.
I think it's very good that a prominent commentator like Brit Hume is talking about it.
Scorpio, your thoughts?
Well, you know, it's funny how Trump said that, well, he already had the coronavirus, he's immune to it now, and he doesn't have to hide in his basement like the other candidate does.
So that was a great troll on Trump's part.
And because, you know, Biden can't draw a crowd to save his life.
And you know, as you mentioned, the performance by Chris Wallace at the debate was absolutely shameful.
I've never seen anything so biased in my life.
Pathetic.
And you know, really, Biden is running on a, he's promising a mask mandate nationwide, inside and outside.
That's not going to be a very popular thing amongst blacks or whites.
And he's saying he's going to trust the science and will shut down society again if necessary.
Again, not a very popular stance for any normal person, no matter what their race might be.
And I think they're only, you know, what I'm seeing is he's a very weak candidate.
But they're figuring, look, we pulled off a fake pandemic.
We can pull off a fake election with a fake candidate.
And that's their strategy right now.
Their only path to victory is through cheating.
I think you got it right.
Carl, your thoughts?
High hopes and high risk.
Until we get the truth and the arrests, we're all at risk.
Just pedestrian calculation about 98% of the people will still believe what they're told.
So if white hats are beginning to humiliate the Biden family in this pay to play through continued leaks of the deals with China, of the deals with Ukraine and then finally end this thing with arrests because Biden is unelectable and the Democrats know this.
If you take a look at the Biden rallies they are so unenthused and they're in the tens so maybe this is just an orchestrated humiliation of these criminals before before dunking on them.
I hope so.
I'm sure ready.
Well, that's a pretty fascinating thought.
Today, coincidentally, would have been the occasion of the second debate until the debate committee decided to go virtual.
That would have been all in favor of Biden, who would have had advisers whispering in his ear.
He would have had teleprompters the whole bit.
Trump properly judged it wasn't worth the time and effort.
But get this, the debate moderator named Scully had been exposed by email showing he was consulting with a never-Trumper about how best to put Trump in an embarrassing position.
When it was exposed, he claimed he'd been hacked, that he wasn't responsible.
Well, now we have just learned before going on the air, he's admitted the truth that it actually happened.
He wasn't hacked and he's been fired.
But this is just revealing of the corruption.
You got a Chris Wallace on the one hand, who's defending Biden.
You got this guy Scully on the other, who is clearly going to try to trash Trump.
That's pretty bad.
Pretty bad as I see it.
But it's the way the commission has been playing the game.
We'll be right back.
As I mentioned already, this New York Post article is going to be huge.
Here we have a report from Twitter that they're going to suppress it.
I want to be clear, this story is eligible to be fact-checked.
Well, this is Facebook's third-party fact-checking partners, meaning, of course, they'll just call them in, and if it's true, but they don't like it, they'll declare it to be false.
I think we're seeing one more installment.
It's what's going to lead to a massive Legal action to break up the social media giants are already prominent Republicans talking about it.
So we're seeing just the beginning of what's going to become a very major issue as we proceed.
Meanwhile, even WHO, even WHO, the World Health Organization, now says lockdowns are a bad idea.
As we enter the nearly nine-month mark of the coronavirus pandemic, which would have been enough to bring to full term a conception that began in the beginning, and more efforts at a disease or how we've handled it, leading experts believe we've done it Wrong, including the World Health Organization, which many consider the leading health expert for the entire world.
I think that's a very dubious claim.
They seem to be another source that's been corrupted by Bill Gates.
Everything from mask wearing and social distancing, even state and countrywide lockdowns have essentially begun at their say-so.
But it turns out now that they're challenging the use of lockdowns.
They're finding they're having vast consequences.
We're talking now not just about the economy, though that's a significant concern, but the physical health and well-being of entire communities where people have been out of work for so long they can't afford to put food on the table.
Counts where those without an employer have been unable to go to the doctor, dentist, or other health professionals because they no longer can afford insurance.
Places where the number of those with depression or suicidal tendencies has doubled, if not tripled.
And where children worldwide are literally dying at an alarming rate.
from hunger and lack of nutrition because their parents have not been allowed to work.
All this was predictable. We've been talking about all these consequences for months.
It's nice to see who finally catching up with the truth of the matter.
Scorpio, your thoughts?
Well, there's a lot to unpack there.
As far as the intelligence agencies go, I mean, I'm sorry, the big tech intelligence agencies are deeply embedded in all of these big tech companies since the beginning.
I don't believe for a minute the official story of how Facebook was founded or Google.
I think both of these are highly connected to intelligence agencies.
And we're seeing that in their behavior now.
And, you know, on a less conspiratorial note, This is precisely why monopolies can never be allowed.
This kind of behavior is predictable once monopolies take hold and they'll squelch out any thinking or ideas that they don't personally like or that does not benefit them.
And as far as these lockdowns, it's been a horrible thing, and I really believe that this is more of an economic event than a medical event.
This was to slow the economy down, get people dependent on the government, sort of take out small business, and get people so that they need to get a handout from the government so they can unveil this new system that the World Economic Forum has been talking about.
And thanks to their great work with these lockdowns, a minimum of 100 million new people are now at risk for food shortage.
Good work, WHO!
Yeah, very nice, very nice, Scorpio.
Carl, your thoughts?
There's a lot to say about that.
So again, my only hope is if white hats are beginning to expose these social media giants as being hypocritical and criminal and before slam dunking them through by either nationalizing them or allowing them to be open to lawsuits for being a publisher.
For the WHO, again, this is such ridiculous.
So for them, as professionals, early on in their declared pandemic, which was based on this bullshit statistical model from that guy from Imperial College of 2 million dead Americans who had previously been wrong, Up to 99.999% on predictions of mass casualties.
So for them to say, oh, we don't need to lock down anymore without giving an explanation, I mean, how dishonest can you get?
An honest organization, if they were honest, and of course they're not, would say, okay, so at the beginning, this was the data that we were looking at, and we said this thing.
Now we're going 180, which sounds crazy, and then they would provide the data, but they don't.
Hopefully, hopefully this is all just a setup but otherwise we're so at risk.
So my take, important take on where this is going, is that the democratically controlled areas already are their own declared government through dictatorial policies and they want the non-essentials to be desperate and they're hoping to whip them up into frenzies where some of them might accept payment Well, that's an interesting conjecture, Carl.
to be happening is that no matter what happens, is that the democratic leadership are going to say,
oh, look at the polls, of course, by the one.
And just declare themselves kind of independent fiefdoms unless forced to do something else.
Well, that's an interesting conjecture, Carl.
I have no doubt that the globalists have a major stake in the pandemic, and it appears consistent
with the deagle projections of a stunning two thirds decimation of the US.
population between 2020 and 2025, from about 330 million to fewer than 100 million.
The question has always been, what could possibly cause for such a vast reduction I think we're now beginning to see the outline of how they intend that it should be done.
Very, very stunning.
And massively disturbing.
Meanwhile, the Democrats roll out their election delay strategy.
The Democratic pros laugh about it, mock voters, and fly over a country.
They think the election is over already, no matter what the numbers say.
At social events, they openly talk about their plan to declare victory, regardless of the outcome and claim.
When Trump asks to wait for results, that he's a dictator, Trying to hang on to power.
The rumor is Biden's victory speech is already written.
No concession speech is planned.
Yes, they are following Hillary's advice.
Part of the strategy is to delay the results in the battleground states as long as possible, but declare Biden the winner from the outset.
Based on partial results in exit polls, they're going to have support from the media, Hollywood, and many other prominent figures.
Keeping with this Democrat misinformation operation, a governor, Gretchen Whitmer of Michigan,
said the election results will not be fully counted by election day, that it may take quite a while to happen,
where I would suggest that Democrats may try to fill in the gaps when they see
where they might be short a few votes, they'll manage to get them into the system.
Perhaps she has an unintentional point.
The deadline is there of the 3rd of November, so there can be time for a peaceful transition of power
under a Democratic system.
Since the Democrats are undemocratic, only wanna seize raw power by any means,
they naturally be against deadlines, giving them less time to trick or treat.
A week, a month, two months, whatever Gretchen deems correct
to follow the strategy and get it right, remember?
Will the strategy be successful?
Hard to say.
Will other Republicans and the presidential people be able to stand up to the tremendous pressure to cave even if he wins the election?
Watch Republicans in Congress.
If they start to fold, it could signal the beginning of the end.
Meanwhile, Democrats scramble to secure votes.
The 2020 election is just three weeks away.
They're trying to get Barack Obama out stumping again.
They're rolling videos featuring him in 24 states, telling everyone there's so much at stake.
They should make a plan to cast their ballots.
Michelle, of course, has already attacked the president.
Rolling the Obamas out with just a couple of weeks left, screams of desperation.
His support with major groups, including college-educated whites, blacks, and Hispanics is slipping.
They're trying to pull people back in.
He's appealing to the former president and first lady.
The problem with that is when voters elected Trump, they sent a clear message they were rejecting the previous administration's policy.
Why would they want to go backwards now?
A very nice point.
Scorpio, your thoughts?
Well, you know, we've seen the template for this, where the Democrats just sort of hold back the election results until they can keep adding votes and counting votes until they win.
They've done that in several states during the 2016 elections.
So we'll see.
I think they're just planning on having, you know, massive, let's say, riots and mostly peaceful protests.
If they don't win, I think that's already baked in the cake.
They're gonna call Trump a dictator.
He's refusing to leave office and all this garbage.
So we're gonna be in for a wild ride with this election, no question about it.
But you know, I don't think Obama's gonna make much difference.
I think he's lost his touch.
In terms of being a great speaker, I've seen him recently.
I just found him to be boring and just unimpressive.
He was a great speaker.
I don't know what happened.
And Michelle needs to watch the 5 o'clock shadow.
So that's all I can say about her.
Carl, your thoughts?
Well, Governor Whitmer, the whole thing that they talk about the Democratic leadership is just projection.
They are giving us their playbook.
And for her to say, ooh, we can't count it on Election Day because, you know, she says it's a political agenda to not count on Election Day when it's her political agenda to delay and obfuscate.
And again, you get this This reporting where we know for sure these election results are fraudulent.
My best example of that is in 2016, the president of the American Statistical Association, which among professional organizations in this country is the second oldest, he authored a paper To contrast, the official results between Clinton and Sanders in the primaries in 2016, and he found something on the stunning odds of like the quadrillions to one that Sanders won because the uncountable electronic voting machines without any evidence of a vote, which does not equal an election.
It is not an election when you have a machine with nothing to count.
So, the American Statistical Association president calculated that Sanders had won in 2016, and yet we're still at risk of just being ruled, of just being dictated of what happened, and with corporate media just repeating those lies.
Oh, you're 100% right, Carl.
And of course, Debbie Wasserman Schultz was shifting primaries.
Bernie had won Hillary's column to guarantee she would be the nominee.
They were owned lock, stock, and barrel by the Clinton Foundation.
I think Obama's lost his touch because he was very good at delivering a speech off of a teleprompter.
He had very good speechwriters at the time, and he was a good performer.
But without a teleprompter, without all the apparatus to prop him up, he's a mediocrity and history is not going to be kind to Barack Obama.
That's a good point, Jim.
Meanwhile, Pelosi loses it during a CNN interview, accuses Wolf Blitzer, of all people, of helping Republicans.
Yes, really.
This is frankly stunning.
On Tuesday, CNN host Wolf Blitzer pushed House Speaker Nancy Pelosi over her refusal to accept a compromise with Republicans to deliver coronavirus relief.
Pelosi responded by saying, what I say to you is, I don't know why you're always an apologist and so many of your colleagues are apologists for the Republican position on the situation rule.
It was absolutely Johnny, Wolf Blitzer has been as partisan on behalf of the Democrats as other CNN hosts, perhaps not quite as blatantly as Chris Cuomo or Don Lemon, but there's no question about where he stands.
The fact that he actually functioned as a journalist on this occasion let Nancy Pelosi to go completely bananas.
Nikki Haley observed, they're so used to not having to answer hard questions when they are asked, they end up acting like this.
Haley's right.
Pelosi and most Democrats are accustomed to going on CNN and be given soft walls.
Butzer didn't even ask her a hard question.
Yet anything less than complete and total fealty to Democrats is viewed by Pelosi as a shocking major scandal.
Meanwhile, Biden in the past had called the idea of packing the Supreme Court a bonehead idea.
His comments were made responding to an attempt from then-President Ronald Reagan, who sought to replace three members of the U.S.
Commission on Civil Rights.
The current Democrat nominee had argued against the move, comparing it to FDR's unsuccessful attempt in 1937 to pack the Supreme Court.
President Roosevelt clearly had the right to send to the United States Senate and the United States Congress a proposal to pack the court, Biden argued.
It was totally within his right to do that.
He violated no law.
He was legalistically absolutely correct, but It was a bonehead idea.
It was a terrible, terrible mistake to make.
And of course, now we know that even Ruth Bader Ginsburg has observed that court packing would almost immediately make the Supreme Court up here partisan.
If anything would make the Court of Appeal partisan, it would be that, she said.
One side saying, when we're in power, was only to enlarge the number of judges so we'll have more people who will vote the way we want them to.
So I'm not at all in favor of that solution to what I see as a temporary situation.
Meanwhile, after Biden's controversial court-packing remark, Kayleigh turns the tables on Joe as a really elitist remark.
The court-packing argument has picked up steam in recent weeks, but Republicans accusing Trump of court-packing, which is completely ridiculous.
She's simply replacing a member of the court in accordance with the Constitution.
Republicans came right back accusing the Democrats of attempting to do the same thing, Many have wondered, therefore, about Biden's standing on the issue, ruffling a lot of feathers, including White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany.
McEnany, who is currently in self-quarantine from coronavirus, went on Fox & Friends to respond.
White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany took aim Monday at Democrat presidential nominee Joe Biden, calling him an elitist, suggesting those on the radical left were his puppeteers.
I think she's got that right.
Scorpio, your thoughts?
Well, you have to wonder how Nancy Pelosi keeps getting re-elected.
You know, both my mother and my aunt, both native Californians, absolutely loathe Nancy Pelosi.
And every time Nancy Pelosi comes up in a conversation, my mother always says that Nancy Pelosi needs to be baking cookies for her great-great-grandchildren, not be in office.
And, you know, seeing her behavior on that interview with Wolf Blitzer, who, like you said, threw her a softball.
She acted like a queen that, you know, the plebe dared to ask a question to the queen, and she completely lost it.
The woman is totally out of touch.
And, you know, she even accused, she was on NPR, and she accused the commentator of parroting Republican talking points on NPR of all places.
I mean, give me a break.
And as far as Biden saying that, oh, they're packing the court, it's unconstitutional.
Isn't it amazing that nobody in the mainstream media even corrected his obvious error?
Again, just showing the absolute bias, the one-sided bias of the mainstream media.
It's really quite incredible.
It is, it is.
Some of us conjecture that Nancy Pelosi is suffering from Kuru, which is a disease derived from cannibalism as a part of a satanic cult where Hillary Clinton, John Podesta, and others of their ilk are deeply involved in pedophilia as an element of Pizzagate, which of course is the American franchise of the international Pedogate phenomenon.
Carl, your thoughts?
Yeah, all people need to do is look up John and Tony Podesta artwork and take a look at what they consider to be art.
So I found this, um, the wolf blitzer thing fascinating, and either Nancy is feeling the pressure and the panic, or part of what I think is maybe there is, if the White Hats are in control, if When Trump went into office, they really did have everything.
And then cut deals with these black hats to orchestrate a show while these children were being rescued.
Now, that's a big statement and a whole lot of burden to prove for facts that I'm not going to provide for that.
But I found the interchange where Blitzer, he actually stood up for himself a little bit and pushed.
Not as much as an honest news person would, but he pushed just a little bit.
And then you have this obfuscation of that, of course, the Democrats want to pack the Supreme Court.
And then for Biden to use that term, they're just – it's like the who.
They want people to be intentionally confused so that they give up.
Hopefully this is their last play, and if enough of us continue to stand for the truth and expose them as these ridiculous, parasitical, psychopathic liars, maybe we can just win and have them be put out of power.
Carl, I have seen some evidence that they actually were rescuing children who'd been kidnapped for the purpose of sexual abuse and child sacrifice, both on the East Coast and on the West.
Of course, this has been a theme of QAnon, and I think that it appears to me to be well-founded, at the very least in this instance.
I believe Trump has been Very incensed and alarmed by this kind of activity just as Richard Nixon was absolutely stupefied when he discovered the existence of snuff films and gave directions that it should be never occur again and it was dealt with in the most severe form possible following his instructions.
A fascinating but widely unknown aspect of the Nixon presidency.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send us fan mail, pro or con, to liveneedtoknowatgmail.com.
Live need to know at gmail.com.
I have a report that showed on my blog that had an interesting alternative point of view.
I had trouble watching the debate.
Harris is so unlikable as a person, it's no surprise she can barely get 2% in the primaries.
What made the DNC think she would make Creepy Joe more likable?
It was like putting rotting garbage next to fresh refuse and paying the stinking pile, praying the stinking pile would be collectively less offensive.
After watching Mike Pence at the RNC, I found myself liking Pence more than I ever expected to.
I felt like Trump was signaling he was dumping Pence for 2020.
The weird thing that happened at George Bush Sr.' 's memorial service, where Trump did not even acknowledge Pence, that was weird.
Why would Trump not even recognize and say, hey, buddy, to his second banana?
Now I think Trump and Pence have played a mind game, making us think Pence had committed a cardinal sin and was about to be replaced.
Mike Pence is a serious individual.
He actually turns out to be the perfect successor to Trump.
Far more substantive than I knew because I've heard so little from and about him.
Meanwhile, final thoughts.
Let me just point out I have a show this evening that Jim the Conspiracy Guy Beginning at 8 p.m.
Central, that may be of more than ordinary interest with Sterling Harwood, a JD and PH, who has just published a new book about the death and replacement of Paul McCartney hypothesis, weighing the evidence pro or con, who will be joined by Claire Kuhn, who has done decades of research on this issue.
Meanwhile, your final thoughts, Scorpio.
Well, I think we're going to be in for a wild ride here in these next couple of months.
You know, today I just talked to a retired Army Ranger down here, and he's convinced that they're going to try to stir up a war with China in the Orient in the very near future.
I don't know if he's right, but he laid out quite a convincing case.
But either way, I think we're going to be in for a wild ride, so put on your seatbelt and get ready.
Fascinating.
Carl, your thoughts?
I'm paying attention to current events more than ever before, and it is kind of the best of times and the worst of times.
For those of you who may have looked, if you go to YouTube, the channel's still up, The Gunner's Wife.
And she is a professional in animation, and she looked at all the tape and did lip reading, because she has to translate lip reading into animation.
And it looked as if Pelosi and Pence were discussing the assassination of President Trump at the 2020 State of the Union Address.
I can't interpret it any other way other than that, given the totality of maybe 20 people's conversations that was all taped before the actual State of the Union Address.
So be prepared for a reversal on Pence.
And we'll just see.
We'll take it one day at a time.
The potential is that before the election could be the last battles in this war, and I certainly hope so.
Carl, I reported that story several times.
Nancy Pelosi had a poisoned palm.
She had a little sticky stuff on her palm.
She extended her hand to Trump in an odd way so he wouldn't notice.
He evidently was forewarned, refused to shake her hand, which became a topic of discussion on Twitter and elsewhere.
But you're 100% correct.
There were members on both sides who were talking about what Washington would be like in the post-Trump world.
I believe for all their efforts to steal the election, they're going to be unavailing.
The lack of enthusiasm is the key here.
No one gives a damn about Joe Biden.
Well, tens of people do.
There's zero enthusiasm, which is a single most reliable indicator.
And a professor with a model has been highly successful based on the percentage of votes and enthusiasm in the early primaries, where Trump was getting like 89% of the vote and Biden like 8.9.
I mean, it was a stunning difference on that order of magnitude.
It's not going to work.
But it won't be for lack of trying.
Jim Fetzer in Madison, thanking David Scorpio in Ecuador, and Carl Herman in Clarita.
San Ramon.
We're being here, the experts, their commentary.
We'll be back tomorrow with the news you need to know, the latest from the front, and things are getting serious.
Thanks for watching.
▲
Export Selection