All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 3, 2020 - Jim Fetzer
46:41
Need to Know: The Fetzer Report 02 October 2020
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin, with Giuseppe Vef and Juleau from the District of Criminals,
and Susan Bradford from Springfield, Virginia, with Need to Know the News, the latest from the front.
♪♪ ♪♪
♪♪ Today we begin with the president
having been diagnosed for coronavirus.
Fascinating.
They've tested positive, we have been told.
We know, however, 90% of COVID-19 positive test results are false.
Where the test kits are matching dead viral fragments that pose no infection risk.
So if you ever had a cold, we also know CDC has updated their numbers showing fewer than 10,000 have died from the virus alone.
Go back to worldwide deaths from worldometers when we were getting accurate figures, and we got 46,438 in the first quarter of the year, but three times as many from the seasonal flu, six times as many from malaria, and it goes up from there.
Here we have the President reporting he and the First Lady have been tested, they're quarantined, they'll get through it together, Interestingly, just reported, Investors Watch blog, states stop recording fluid pneumonia deaths since COVID started.
Only time they've ever done this, clearly, to jack up the numbers.
It's fascinating, but The quarantine for the president will end the day before the next debate, and in every country in the world, when their leader has been diagnosed with the coronavirus, their popularity has gone up.
Giuseppe, your thoughts?
Jim, that's fascinating, especially if you consider that many on the center left felt that Trump was a bully and he verbally abused old sleepy Joe Biden.
And what's interesting about testing live is ironic sometimes how Intuition or chance goal.
Yesterday, one of my good friends is actually Dr. Judy Michovitz.
I live across the street from her twin sister and I've gotten to be really good friends with her over the years.
And I hadn't talked to her in a while or text her because we're doing this daily and I'm doing the video production and it takes a lot of time.
So I'm like, geez, I haven't texted Judy in a month and all these new tests are coming out.
And so I texted her and I said, Judy, Are any of these new tests effective?
She goes, she texted back, they're all an effing scam.
And so, so the fact that you can find a coronavirus in any of these tests only if you want to, leads me to believe your observation that this is part of Trump's pity party as an effective tool to modulate his bully perception is right on.
Of course, Judy uses precise scientific language.
Susan, your thoughts?
I mean, that would be an act of political genius if what you claim to be true is.
That would be fantastic.
I did notice that the Democrats were trying to figure out the chain of succession, that if Trump needs to drop out, we will have Pence as new president with Nancy Pelosi as vice president.
And then, of course, if Pence were to get coronavirus, Far more ominously, Susan, it could be Hillary Clinton.
This is true.
she could pick her own vice president, which could be Sleepy Joe or Kamala Harris.
So I do wish President Trump a speedy recovery before the election.
And I hope, God willing, that your prediction would be absolutely correct.
Far more ominously, Susan, it could be Hillary Clinton.
This is true.
This is true.
So Kayleigh McEnany, who's just brilliant.
This is Trump's new press secretary.
Trump has condemned white supremacy more than any modern president in history.
Three times during the presidential debate asked if he would denounce white supremacists.
He's also done it in the past in relation to Charlottesville.
Although we observed there were fine people on both sides, it was a completely Fabricated event.
Do you know why people have lost trust in the media?
There was a reporter from your network yesterday, your network, and said in a tweet, the president dodged a question about white supremacy, she said in response to a question from CNN reporter Caitlin Collins.
McNanny signaled disbelief a CNN reporter could say that when Trump specifically denounced white supremacy in response to a reporter on Wednesday.
Meanwhile, Fox News' John Roberts loses his temper at critics of his white supremacist question.
He lost his composure during a report attacking those on Twitter or criticizing him for the way he answered it.
I don't understand why he wouldn't say, I denounce white supremacy.
I've always denounced white supremacy.
On Fox, John Roberts is visibly angry.
The press secretary won't offer a clear denunciation.
But it turns out Proud Boys founder announced he's suing Biden, CNN, and reporters who call the multiracial patriotic group white supremacists and Nazis.
Proud Boys founder Gavin McInnes has announced he's suing Joe Biden, CNN, and all the reporters who call us white supremacists and Nazis.
Despite the fact the current Proud Boys chairman, Enrique Terrio, is Cuban and African-American, Biden and his media lackeys have been smearing the group as white supremacists since Trump walloped him in the debate.
The Proud Boys are made up of patriotic men from all ethnicities and backgrounds, have long been a boogeyman to the left to point fingers.
McGinnis said he's previously sued the Southern Poverty Law Center.
He told Newsmax smearing people as Nazis is the new N-word as far as he is concerned.
Last month, a Black Lives Matter supporter attempted to murder a proud boy after a memorial for a Trump supporter killed by Antifa in Portland.
Surely in no small part do the lies peddled by the leftist media and scumbag politicians.
Giuseppe, your thoughts?
Jim, we need to step back a moment and look at who began those vicious ad hominem attacks.
If you remember, the nice Irish girl Amy Goodman on Democracy Now!
was interviewing a retired uh... israeli cabinet minister and she uh... in the past the cabinet minister about the
use in america of anti-semitism as a descriptor
uh... often when they're is descent expressed in the united states against policies of
the israeli government
uh...
people here are called anti-semitic.
What is your response to that as an Israeli Jew?
Well, it's a trick.
We always use it.
When from Europe somebody is criticizing Israel, then we bring up the Holocaust.
When in this country people are criticizing Israel, then they are anti-Semitic.
And the organization is strong and has a lot of money, and the ties between Israel and the American Jewish establishment are very strong, and they are strong in this country.
As you know, they have power, which is okay.
They are talented people, and they have power, money, and media, and other things.
And their attitude is, Israel, my country, right or wrong, the identification.
And they are not ready to hear criticism.
And it's very easy to blame people who criticize certain acts of the Israeli government as anti-Semitic and to bring up the Holocaust and the suffering of the Jewish people.
And that justifies everything we do to the Palestinians.
And the cabinet minister, in a rare burst of true honesty, said, well, you know, whenever we run into someone who's saying something we don't like, in Europe we call them a Holocaust denier, and in America we call them anti-Semitic.
It works every time it shuts them up.
And so now we can add a third ad hominem insult, which is racist.
Now, if the left doesn't like what you say, the inconvenient truth, you're a racist.
And if you're a political activist trying to fight their march towards communism and anarchy, then you're a Nazi.
So it's all just immature name-calling, and it's sad that it works.
Oh, you got it right, Giuseppe, and I've done a program, a two-hour conspiracy guy show on mythology related to World War II where you can watch this former minister in a rare moment of candor acknowledge that it's just a trick.
She repeated it twice, just a trick.
Susan, your thoughts?
Thank you, Jim.
And I really admire Gavin McInnes.
He's an incredible talent and comic.
Having said that, I'm a little disappointed in the Proud Boys.
I know we have Antifa on the left, and they have their showing up for racial justice, which is like the white version of Antifa, or Black Lives Matter.
It's like the white version of that.
And we have, of course, African Americans who are part of the Proud Boys.
But I think that They're wasting a lot of our emotional and mental energy, you know, fighting amongst each other and distracting from the larger issues.
It's like part of a divide and conquer strategy of like a worldwide wrestling match played out on the national stage.
And meanwhile, our oligarchs and our plutocrats are getting away with their normal shenanigans.
So I, hopefully they can focus our attention back to where it should be, you know,
on the corrupt powers that it shouldn't be.
And, you know, they can kind of stop some of the chaos that both sides are fomenting in the country.
And of course, the BLM and Antifa are really the vanguard of the Democratic Party, a money laundering operation
and a way to recruit voters, or so they thought, but it appears to be backfiring.
The New York Times claimed Donald Trump paid only $750 in federal income taxes in 2016 and 2017 is wrong.
He actually paid $7,435,857 in taxes in 2017, for example.
What they did was to ignore the fact that he had accumulated tax credit.
So he didn't have to add.
He had to add that extra $750.
but that was all he had to do.
He couldn't avoid the tax liability.
He had to pay down using his assets, and he did.
So, the main takeaway here is typical tax bills are typically not paid with cash at the time of filing, but with a credit cert because the money was withheld earlier.
Overwithholding is not the only way to earn tax credits.
There are myriad ways people can earn them that could be used to pay tax bills.
So what we have is more propaganda.
From the Times, tax laws give him one more line on which to reduce the AMT.
Trump had 22-7 in General Business Credit, much of it carried forward that he could apply.
The credit is smorgasbord attack initiatives and gives back, and in Trump's case, they range from credits of $322,926 for Social Security and Medicare taxes paid on employee tips to at least $1.5 million
related to rehabilitating the old post office.
In other words, Trump paid the full amount of his taxes, but spent $7,435,107 of his tax credit and $750 of cash.
I mean, he's paying taxes, and the New York Times is just blowing it, ignoring, trying to create a scandal.
They've got it wrong, which they're perfectly willing to do.
It's a disgrace.
Giuseppe, your thoughts?
Well, Jim, the funny thing about America and its tax system is I don't think there's a person in this fine nation that wants to pay taxes, and especially when you come to being a successful businessman or a successful corporate leader, you do everything you can to lower your tax burden.
That's part of the Fiduciary responsibility as a leader of a corporation.
And so the lying globalist New York Times, which is nothing more useful than training a puppy with these days, it's so globalist slanted and so full of anti-Trump vitriol and bile.
Who wants to pay more taxes?
Everybody's looking for a write-off.
Everybody wants to get a child-rearing credit.
I mean, nobody wants to pay more taxes.
Yeah, he fulfilled his tax obligations, and all big businessmen have accountants who take every deduction to which they are lawfully entitled, which is what Trump did.
And the Times is just running a propaganda piece.
Embarrassing.
Susan, your thoughts.
I do agree with much of what Giuseppe said, except for his last point.
The Democrats always seem to like paying more taxes, at least according to their own rhetoric.
But I think Trump has never made a secret out of trying to make sure that he limits his liability for his taxes as low as possible.
He's working within the law, and it looks like the New York Times was attempting to do another gotcha on Trump.
You know, they're desperately trying to get his tax returns.
They may have gotten it, and I still think they don't have a smoking gun that they're looking for.
Well, it's very embarrassing to have the nation's newspaper of record.
Here we had a nice way of showing the Democrats' attitude, the pre-debate poll coming from CNN, Biden 98, Trump 2, even before the debate, the clear victor.
Meanwhile, Trump accused Chris Wallace of taking sides during the debate.
It was obvious.
Wallace interrupted Trump multiple times to chastise him.
Many people were left with a feeling the president was facing off against two people.
He obviously felt the same way.
Moderators are supposed to be unbiased and fair.
Wallace was anything but.
It became clear quickly he intended to go after the president.
His behavior really ruined it as an objective experience.
Meanwhile, here we have another report.
Moderator Chris Wallace and Joe Biden team up against President Trump at the first debate.
As the date proceeded, it was clear that Trump wasn't going to let Joe pose as some pontificating savior of the country.
So moderator Chris Wallace has made it very clear he's not a big fan of Trump when he appears on Fox, seemed to lose his cool.
When Chris was able to restore order, and Joe had that roomy, where were we, look in his eyes, Chris gently steered Joe back on track.
Example, Trump accused Joe of his environmental wackos of wanting to spend over $100 trillion on a Green New Deal.
No, said Joe, that's not my plan.
I own the Democratic Party now, and our Green New Deal will save America.
Wait, Chris.
Didn't you just say the Green New Deal wasn't your plan?
Oh yeah, said Joe.
I meant my clean energy plan.
Chris seemed happy he could clear up a misunderstanding which amounted to a distinction without a difference.
It became clear Trump's commanding president grasped with a situation contrasted with Biden's cranky, irritated, and rattled president.
In fact, it was clear Trump was getting the better of the debate when Joe resorted to calling the president of the United States a clown and a liar.
Biden said Roe v. Wade wasn't on the ballot, was on the ballot now that Judge Barrett had been nominated.
But shouldn't we wait and let the people decide?
No, said Trump.
I'm the president.
I'm president for four years, not just three.
Even the late Judge Ginsburg acknowledged that.
Could you please show us where Roe v. Wade is on the ballot?
Then there was a deer in the headlines moment.
When President Trump asked Biden to name one police organization that supported the weak vice president, he couldn't because there aren't any.
In the end, it appeared moderator Chris Wallace became increasingly exasperated with a president who kicks the press around like yapping poodles.
He yearned for decorum.
What he got was President Trump, who lights up every room with it.
Well, you're called obnoxious charisma that makes Washington swab dwellers' blood boil.
Here's a comment.
I believe Chris Wallace was overwhelmed, and it looks like Upchuck, Schumer, and Pelosi had a major hunt taken off their backside by the bulldog named Trump.
Yay, nice doggie.
One-humored patriot, Team Trump, and his allies, 2020.
Giuseppe, your thoughts.
Well, Jim, I think that, uh, The acrimony over anything Trump, especially in this debate, is really over the top, off the chain, as they say.
And Trump had an agenda that he wanted to show himself as a strong leader, a corporate man, a man of the people, and he wanted to show Joe Biden is weak and too old for the job.
And he achieved his I think he set out to rattle Biden, if indeed it was Biden, and was highly successful.
COVID so we'll all feel sorry for him. I think he set out to rattle Biden if
indeed it was Biden and was highly successful. Susan, your thoughts? I agree
with Giuseppe that I think Trump did display a lot of strength and power and
I thought that Joe Biden was decidedly unpresidential by telling the sitting
president to shut up.
I thought that was very inappropriate.
But it did appear that Wallace was gaslighting the public by trying to couch questions in such a way that really contradicted reality and supported Biden with an alternate reality, while kind of twisting it on the other way for Trump. So I don't
think he was fair or objective. He clearly had an agenda. And as for Joe Biden not supporting the
Green New Deal, Kamala Harris is a big proponent of the Green New Deal. So if he didn't, if you
know, he doesn't support it, why is she on the ticket? And I find it very ironic that he's trying to,
he thinks his new energy project will create jobs, more jobs.
That's on par with saying that the coronavirus didn't cost jobs, it created jobs by creating more opportunities for contact tracers.
So I think it's a bit of a catch-22 with Biden.
Well, James Woods is not only an excellent actor, but an avid Twitter put out, Trump crushed his opponent, Chris Wallace, and there was another fellow on the stage muttering meaninglessly to himself, which I think very much captured the spirit of it all.
Meanwhile, these debate moments may haunt Joe Biden for the rest of the campaign.
One concerns the Green New Deal.
The far-left proposal to remake the U.S.
economy and socialism present has animated AOC and her radical followers.
It's such a popular proposal, it received zero votes when it was up for one in Congress.
During the debate, Biden was asked directly about it.
He claims he does not support it.
This would be news to Joe Biden and whoever wrote his website, because back in June, it said, Biden says a Green New Deal, which has become a litmus test for Democrats, that that is a critical framework when it comes to combating climate change.
No, he didn't support it.
It was a defining issue for him.
So Biden is supposed to believe that it was a crucial framework, that the United States urgently needs to embrace greater ambition on an epic scale, that our environment and our economy are totally And completely connected.
How does one go about not supporting something that's crucial?
AOC, who first proposed the Green New Deal, complete with its attacks on airline travel and cow farts, offered a muted reaction to the debate night rejection.
But this will leave a mark on the left.
I think it was most significant.
Biden was also incoherent on the basics of his own leadership.
Moderator Chris Wallace asked Biden one very good question.
Whether he's ever called up a single Democratic governor or mayor and asked them to deal with the ongoing violent and deadly riots in Democrat-run cities.
Biden admitted that he had not.
Instead, he offered a lame excuse.
I don't hold public office now.
I'm a former vice president.
I made it clear in my public statements that violence should be prosecuted.
But also during the debate, he declared that he himself was a Democratic Party.
So he surely was entitled, even obligated, to make those calls, which he failed to do.
It took Biden months to even denounce the riots.
Members of his campaign, including running mate Kamala Harris, have actually raised money to support them.
Some of the beneficiaries included child molesters.
Democrat district attorneys in several cities, including Portland and Seattle, members of his party are engaging in catch and release, putting violent rioters back on the street.
Pretty distressing.
Biden based the claim on FBI Director Christopher Wray, namely that Antifa is just an idea rather than an organization, but Ray has publicly revised his comments to note Antifa is capable of organized action, at least on the local and regional level.
By the way, I thought it was very good When Candace Owen on Tucker the other night spoke about Black Lives Matter and said you have to distinguish the phrase from the organization, and that the phrase of course is meritorious because black lives, white lives, green lives, red lives all matter, but the organization is something else entirely.
Giuseppe, your thoughts?
FBI Director Christopher Wray is the biggest controlled liar since dress-wearing J. Edgar Hoover claimed there was no mafia because the mafia had lots of pictures of him engaging in salacious homosexual events with his boyfriend.
Wray has come out at a congressional testimony and claimed that the biggest Threat to our nation is white nationalist and I condemn him for that.
He's a liar.
He's a weasel and he should not hold that position of power and I believe that the again, you know racist white nationalist is another descriptor used by these globalists To try and undermine the power of the 60% white majority in this country and transfer that power to the weaponized minorities.
There's absolutely a lot of terror going on with Antifa and the burn, loot, and murder component of that organization.
In fact, they are so murderous people are forgetting that A month or two ago, there was a white woman in Indianapolis who said to the crowd, all lives matter, and they murdered her.
Yeah, he actually talked about white supremacists, which, as Tucker observed, oh yeah, it's the white supremacists who are doing the looting and the arson and burning down the cities and going into priest recents.
It's the white supremacists doing that, of course.
I mean, how absurd and contradicted by the facts can it be?
And that's from the director of the FBI.
How deplorable.
Susan, your thoughts?
That's just another example of the Democratic Party gaslighting the public again.
I know that if you go onto the Antifa website, I think it redirects you to the Go Biden campaign, and a lot of the money that was donated to Black Lives Matter for these corporations was re-channeled into Biden.
So they are very much working hand-in-hand, and I believe that Barack Obama, the Community Organizer-in-Chief, is helping to mobilize Black Lives Matter and the other organizations, and they are being funded by the same globalist corporations that are behind both the riots and also the global warming agenda.
You're completely correct, Susan.
If you donate to Black Lives Matter, it goes directly to ActBlue, which is a Democrat fundraising site.
The money goes to Elizabeth Warren, Beto O'Rourke, Kamala Harris, Joe Biden.
I mean, really, give us a break.
Let's have a little honesty in advertising.
We'll be right back.
Meanwhile, a new poll shows more than three in five American citizens, including black and Hispanic legal citizen, oppose illegal immigration from places overrun with drugs and criminal gangs.
Those are people who are highly disposed to support the president.
Meanwhile, Former Twitter CEO calls for political enemies to be lined up against the wall and shot!
This is the United States in 2020?
Former Twitter CEO Dick Costolo has publicly called for people who disagree with him to be lined up against the wall and shot!
But there's no big tech bias, right?
Honest!
Me first capitalists who think you can separate society from business are going to be the first people lined up against the wall and shot in the revolution.
I'll happily provide video commentary.
What a disgrace!
This man is disgusting!
Here he puts the tweet, and it turns out to be an actual violation of Twitter for glorifying violence, but they let it stand.
What else would we expect?
Meanwhile, California Governor Newsom opens the door for reparations as the state continues on fire.
This is embarrassing.
The Sacramento Bee reported Governor Gavin Newsom signed a law Wednesday that opens the door to the state paying reparations of some kind of black Californians, especially those who are descendants of slaves.
So persons who were never slaveholders and who were never themselves slaves are supposed to receive benefits For crimes they didn't commit that are ancient history.
This is very bizarre.
The story noted the task force can also make recommendations on eliminating state laws and policies that perpetuate discrimination and on issuing a formal apology for the perpetuation of gross human rights violation and crimes against humanity on human slaves and their descendants.
It's past time we acknowledge that.
California just became the first state in the nation to mandate the study and development of proposals for reparations.
Meanwhile, Barbara Lee on the need for reparations.
She thanked Newsom.
Our country was built on systems of racism, violence, and oppression, she tweeted.
It won't change unless we take bold action to dismantle systemic racism and examine the need for reparations.
As though, after having many black political leaders, including she herself, many black celebrities, including especially in sports, and having elected a black man president of the United States not once but twice, Black Lives Matter has long promoted reparations in the form of looting.
This is really disgusting.
Chicago Black Lives Matter organizer Ariel Adkins framed the reparations debate this way and defended criminals.
The whole idea of criminality is based on racism anyway, because criminality is punishing people for things that they have needed to do to survive, or just the way that society has affected them with white supremacist BS.
I mean, this is getting disgusting beyond words.
Giuseppe, your thoughts?
Well, first on good old Dick Costello, who is the poster boy for cowardly, weak, A techno nerd with his daily consumption of soy and his shriveled testicles from excess soy intake and estrogen overload, trying to act like he's got a big set by claiming, oh, the revolution and, and capitalists will be shot first.
I'll tell you what, Dick Costello, if there ever is a revolution, will be hiding under his bed crying like a little three-year-old girl.
And that's just ludicrous.
And why wasn't he banned?
I mean, I was banned from Twitter for stating that George Soros should be hanged, and he comes out and talks about violent murder, and nothing happens to little Dick.
And secondly, Gavin Newsom is unbelievably unhinged and a globalist parasite.
The fact that California had nothing to do with slavery.
California was Mexico back then.
And for him to step up and serve this communist, anarchist, global sham that The blacks are so oppressed.
You know what?
80% of blacks are at the working class level or above.
They've done pretty well.
It's the violent malcontents who are the problem, but, oh, you know, enforcing the law, that's racist.
Oh my goodness.
We shouldn't enforce the law when they carry guns and shoot people and rob people and murder people.
Oh, that's all racist.
So, I'll tell you Jim, like we've said again, this is like stepping through the looking glass in the classic Lewis Carroll, Alice in the Looking Glass, where everything is flipped.
Truth is a lie, and it's just madness.
And as Susan so accurately and lucidly stated a moment ago, this is gaslighting with a pipe big enough to drive a semi-tractor trailer through.
Yes, yes, yes.
Black is white.
True is false.
Peace is war.
War is peace.
Susan, your thoughts?
Thank you.
Just... Oh, she froze up.
Go ahead, Susan.
Are we still communicating?
Yeah, go ahead.
For some reason, it wouldn't flip to the speaker's view.
You go right ahead.
Shoot.
Yeah.
Okay, I'll keep speaking.
Okay, good.
I think there's some connectivity issues there.
Just to build on what Giuseppe said with Consuelo, how do you pronounce his name?
Costolo.
I mean, he was talking like a true Bolshevik, you know, that we should line up all basically property owners, those who have property, and that's exactly what happened during the Bolshevik Revolution.
You know, the property owners were lined up against a wall and murdered, and Bolsheviks took Took their property and redistributed their wealth to themselves.
So I think with, you know, rhetoric like that, you know, stated in public, I think, you know, I'm surprised he's still a free man.
And as for Governor Newsom, I don't know where he's going to get the money for reparations because California is effectively bankrupt.
The citizens of California, the residents, are fleeing in droves because they can't I think Susan's making some great points, and your historical one was exceptional, Giuseppe, to which, at the time, California was part of Mexico.
So, you know, just ridiculous beyond words.
Meanwhile, CNN says we're never getting back to normal.
CNN has published an article asserting people need to accept that things are never getting back to normal.
Mandatory coronavirus restrictions, such as wearing face masks, will become permanent.
Can you believe the absurdity here?
CNN also previously published an article arguing wearing face masks is going to become as taboo as drunk driving, despite innumerable experts having warned that face masks are largely pointless from the perspective of preventing the spread of coronavirus and others, of course.
Explaining that they're harmful to your health, put additional stress on your cardiovascular system, kill your brain cells.
CNN is really disgracing itself.
Meanwhile, the New York Times admits the World Health Organization decision not to close borders at the start was based on politics, not science.
The World Health Organization has long encouraged mass tourism and said closing borders wouldn't stop the spread of COVID-19.
A New York Times investigation, surprisingly, since they are so divorced from truth, found the policy was never based on science, but instead on politics and economics.
As reported back, WHO reportedly urged countries not to impose borders, in part to avoid the stigmatization of Chinese people.
In other words, not being seen to be racist and preventing people's feelings from being hurt was more important than stopping the spread of the pandemic.
Giuseppe, your thoughts?
Well, Jim, the entire pandemic is such a psychological operation, such a battering ram to try and destroy sovereign nations and try and create this Mandate technical medical state that everybody has to get vaccines.
Everybody has to use the digital currency.
And if we are doing a show like this, oh, Jim Fetzer, you've been a bad boy, the most dangerous mind on the internet.
Oops, all your money's gone, pal.
Sorry, you got to toe the line.
That's what they want.
They want to clear out the Well, they're going to be sheared.
that our forefathers fought so long and hard for.
And if people don't wake up, pull off those masks and fight for their own personal freedoms
and the freedoms of a sovereign nation, they're gonna end up being those sheep in the pens
getting vaccinated every three, four months as a booster so good for your health.
Well, they're gonna be shared.
Susan, your thoughts.
Right.
You know, I missed the conversation in the previous topic, Yeah, it was about the WHO opposing closing borders because it was politically incorrect, not because it wouldn't stop the coronavirus.
And where the New York Times has actually admitted that measures were being taken that were inappropriate here.
By WHO, which is an unexpected burst of candor from the New York Times, similar to that we reported upon previously.
I think that the WTO is not going to act in a very pragmatic or rational way.
They're basically going to act from an ideological perspective.
So whatever will help them advance globalism.
So I think we can't really look for any rational explanation for what they do.
It's based upon ideology.
Yeah.
I mean, with the early VAX virus strategy, Sweden seems to have the scourge controlled, so how can we not get back to normal?
It seemed very last January, before the spread, but it was actually last week, as many European nations were tightening their restrictions.
We're remaining surprisingly low.
Swedes are out there, look at them there, enjoying dinner, not wearing masks, admitted to making some mistakes, but they're moving forward.
It's clearly a return to normal.
With a population of 10.1 million, Sweden averaged just over 200 new cases a day for several weeks.
On recent days, the numbers jumped to 380.
But remember, they're using testing that's highly inappropriate.
It looks to me as though Sweden represents a return to normalcy, and that CNN is just blowing smoke.
Really embarrassing.
In essence, experts say other countries are quietly adopting the Swedish approach.
Today, all the European countries are more or less following the Swedish model.
Combined with the testing, tracing, and quarantine procedures that Germans have introduced, but none will admit it.
In the spring, when other countries were clamping down, Sweden was often vilified for having gone its own way.
Its borders stayed open, as did bars, restaurants, and schools.
Hairdressers, yoga studios, gyms, and even cinemas remained open, as did public transportation and parks.
Sweden has actually shown the way.
We like what Sweden is doing, and it seems to me to contradict what CNN is insisting to be the case, namely that we'll never return to normal.
God forbid that should be the case.
Giuseppe, your thoughts.
Jim, it's a real tragedy that CNN, once an aggressive, renegade, trustworthy Ted Turner news organization, has now been co-opted so completely by the globalists to the point where they are just liars.
I mean, the idea that we'll never return to normal, that's a memo directly from the despot tyrant Bill Gates in his A vaccine global agenda and anyone with half a brain should see that Sweden did it right that vaccine immunity is a farce and the only true immunity is natural immunity and herd immunity and had we done that in the United States instead of the lies of Tony the Rat Fauci and the lies of Gates and Birx and and the other
uh... traders we would already be back to normal months ago it's just
offensive and now jim one last thing
there are acting like uh... in oriental medicine i am a a doctor of
oriental medicine is as some viewers know
in oriental medicine there's always an uptick in in colds and flu when you get seasonal changes that's
just the body reacting to the weather change
and so they're acting like uh... increasing
corona cases will yeah of course the seasons are changing so it's just so
absurd such a malignant satanic corporate agenda and people need to wake up
susan your thoughts There have been some thoughts that the first coronavirus was a test run and the second so-called pandemic might be the real thing.
So I think it wouldn't hurt to take necessary precautions and to see what happens.
But I don't see why we can't get things under control and return back to the old normal because I think the only thing standing between the old and the new is political will.
Well, if you go to my blog at jamesfetzer.org, I have piece after piece explaining that lockdowns and masks and social distancing don't make a difference, and that masks are very harmful to human beings and other living things.
So what CNN is recommending is really a disaster.
It's a recipe for the slow death of the population of the United States, as I believe is the intent.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Write your thoughts, pro or con, to liveneedtoknowatgmail.com.
Liveneedtoknowatgmail.com.
Justifiably, a paranoid has written, Giuseppe, just so you understand, what I sent last was constructive criticism, not meant personally.
It was obviously a tech glitch that made your voice so much louder than Fett's.
Last night's show was great again.
I loved David's Dorian Gray take.
There are others who have that syndrome that reflect the ugliness of their souls on their faces.
Soros is at the top of the list, followed by Pelosi, Gates from Hell, and Dershowitz, to mention a few of the golem.
Maybe, if we are all very fortunate, all these monsters will be found with a knife in their hearts, just as in what I believe was Wilde's only novel.
Meanwhile, for your final thoughts, let me just mention the Question Everything Conference 2020 in Austin, Texas on the 7th and 8th of November.
at the Hilton Garden Inn, only 200 slots.
We have 24 speakers covering all the major issues you'd like to see addressed.
Check it out at mixedinstream.com.
You can find the whole program there.
And remember, you can participate pay-per-view from the comfort of your own home.
Giuseppe, your final thoughts.
My final thoughts are just the monumental evil that's going on is just unprecedented.
I mean, when in the history of this country have we ever seen such a complete and organized attack on the sovereign nation?
And if people don't wake up, take off those masks, and start to live a normal life, there will never be the old normal.
It's up to you, as Susan so brilliantly said, to embrace political will and community will and societal
will and take back your lives.
Susan, your final thoughts. Yes, thank you, Jim.
I would agree with Giuseppe that we need to take back our lives, and I'm actually very hopeful.
I believe that we, the patriots, have already won.
We've exposed the beast for what it is.
They have shown the hand, and it's really a matter of time before the beast leaves the scene, and I believe that is happening.
But also, just to address an email that I received from one of your viewers, I was taken to task over my characterization of Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and I do understand that the late Justice was a cultural Marxist.
I did not mean to dismiss that, but I also wanted to provide a balanced view, but one of your viewers wanted clarity on that point.
Well, thank you, Susan.
We're delighted to have you.
Let me mention, by the way, that Susan will be my special guest on Tuesday on The Fetz Presents, which you can watch at jimtheconspiracyguy.com and the various networks broadcast from 9 to 11 Eastern, 8 to 10 Central, And that on Wednesday, Giuseppe and I will be doing a live stream broadcast with color commentary on the vice presidential debate between Mike Pence and Kamala Harris
And you recognize the importance of this is far greater than normal because clearly Joe Biden is cognitively incapacitated.
I don't think he has much time left on this earth and Kamala will ascend to the presidency where they both referred to the Harris-Biden administration And I think that was a very revealing, even if Freudian, slip, as they are.
Meanwhile, from Madison, I want to thank Giuseppe Vaffanullo from the District of Columbia and Susan Bradford from Springfield, Virginia, for the excellence of their commentary.
All of you for watching.
Have a great weekend.
We'll be back Monday with all the news you need to know.
▲
Export Selection