All Episodes
Sept. 23, 2020 - Jim Fetzer
58:45
Need to Know: The Fetzer Report 22 Sept 2020 with Giuseppe & Rebecca Carnes
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
you you
This is Jim Fetzer in Madison with Giuseppe Vaffanjulo from the District of Columbia and a special treat
They have here Rebecca Karnes from Newtown, Connecticut We have all the latest news you need to know.
There's so much going on in the world today.
Trump has declared he'll name his SCOTUS pick by the end of the week, Friday or Saturday.
The list has narrowed.
Multiple sources have said, in reality, it's revolving around two contenders, Amy Coney Barrett and Barbara Loggia.
You may meet Loggia in Miami on Friday, but he spoke with Coney Barrett yesterday, said a figure.
She is an extremely distinguished jurist.
She has remarkable intellectual credentials.
First and only woman to occupy an Indiana seat on the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals.
Described as an originalist and a textualist, her judicial philosophy is likened to that of her mentor and former boss Antonin Scalia.
The Judge Barbara Lohgann presides over the 11th Circuit Court in Atlanta.
In 2019, she became the first Hispanic woman on the Florida Supreme Court.
She went to law school at Columbia.
In her speech accepting the appointment to the 11th Circuit, she said, it is the role of judges to apply, not to alter, the work of the people's representatives.
Barrett seems to have the edge on multiple grounds.
I originally believed that the nod would go to Barbara Logia in particular because she received 80 votes during her confirmation to the Senate in 2019, but I now see that's a double-edged sword Why were so many Democrats eager to appoint her if she were the kind of strict constructionalist that the conservatives are looking for?
I therefore now believe, in fact, that the nod is going to Amy Conant Barrett on multiple grounds.
Giuseppe, your thoughts?
Well, Jim, I think either choice would be far superior to the Zionist radical communist Ruth Ginsburg who purported to be for equal rights but was really delivering an agenda that was very sinister including improving the opportunity for pedophiles to have legal sex with children so I'm glad she's gone and I think either one of those
Two choices would be a fine choice.
And it's interesting, I was really surprised at the power politics that Trump was playing, going for a replacement before the election.
Typically in the past there was a decorum upon which you'd wait and let the new president, even if it was Trump's reelection, take care of it then.
But it's gotten so intense, so dog-eat-dog now that they're pushing forward.
And I saw just an alert from the Washington Post Yes, I have that included in the stories.
alert a few moments ago that Mitt Romney is going to support the nomination and vote before
the election.
So that should pretty much clear the way for Trump to get his third Supreme Court nominee.
Yes, I have that included in the stories.
Rebecca, your thoughts?
Yeah, I think both these women are really solid.
And just like Giuseppe said, just going to be a breath of fresh air compared to the socialist, borderline communist initiatives that were coming through Ginsburg.
So this is going to be great.
You know, it's funny, I have to tell you guys, when I saw the breaking news on Ruth Bader Ginsburg's Um, CNN broke in with Anderson Cooper saying, on her deathbed, her last dying wish is that no new Supreme Court justices, uh, picked until after the election.
And I just threw my hands up and said, wow, what perfect script writing from the left, right?
You know, so, but.
What completed utter bullshit, Rebecca.
Right.
On her deathbed, her last dying wish.
I know, it's unbelievable.
Right.
Here we have, just as Giuseppe was anticipating, Mitt Romney has indicated he'd vote to confirm a qualified nominee, dooming the Democrats' obstruction chances.
They had Susan Collins demurring, and we had Murkowski from Alaska, both hesitant to make an appointment before the election.
They were counting on Romney, who's been a never-Trumper, but he's fallen in line appropriately.
Meanwhile, and this is another fascinating reason for this appointment now, Biden's holding a 12-point lead among Catholics.
A poll of likely Catholics showed 53% favor Biden and 41% Trump.
This was before the death of Ginsburg.
The poll indicated Biden, who is himself a Catholic, had widened the gap among Catholics after 50% said they voted for Hillary in 2016 and 45% for Trump.
According to the Pew Center, 52% of Catholics voted for Trump, 44% for Hillary.
Barrett has questioned the Supreme Court Roe v. Wade ruling and says Obamacare birth control mandate is a grave violation of religious freedom.
It has seemed to me she's not likely to go for the reversal of Roe, but rather to deny that the federal government ought to be paying for abortions.
The poll does show Trump leading among some Catholic voters.
58% of those who attend mass daily back the president, along with 61% of those who attend services more than once weekly.
69% who seldom attend mass support Biden.
White Catholic voters pick Trump by 5 percentage points, where Biden leads among Hispanic Catholics by 63 to 31.
Meanwhile, this is a commentary from a correspondent of mine, a brilliant black woman, on the two potential nominees.
I vote no on the Latino chick.
First of all, she's an anti-Castro Cuban from Florida.
Nuff said.
Second, One Latino on the court is plenty.
We don't need them banding together to vote in favor of policies for illegal immigrants.
Call me Archie Bunker, but if the Latinos and Asians assume power in corporate and political arenas, the U.S.
Negro will be left on the sidelines again, and plenty of whites, especially working-class Joes, won't fare much better.
We see now all the blue-collar jobs in construction, landscaping, etc.
becoming more brown rather than black and white.
As those Joe Lunchpail jobs continue to dwindle, we don't need more immigrants competing with U.S.
black and white citizens for survival.
And the white-collar sector won't be far behind as it's already in peril due to HB visas importing IT workers from India.
Giuseppe, your thoughts?
Well, I thought it was interesting in that article how it was slanted to make the lead be that Catholics are supporting Biden, when as you got further into it, there's clearly similar demographics to the United States, that more conservative, realistic voters will vote for Trump, and more liberal-leaning, young voters We'll vote for Biden, so it's interesting how that whole story was a little deceptive.
And I would say that Trump's best play is choosing the Catholic woman because she has far more gravitas as far as a legal career, and your correspondent really nailed it for the other reasons.
She's just brilliant.
They're both Catholic, by the way.
Rebecca, your thoughts?
Yeah, I have to say those Catholic numbers don't surprise me the way Pope Francis leans considerably to the left and has initiated some really leftist leaning policies.
And I think the Catholics should be very concerned and are concerned With our federal dollars and state dollars being used to fund abortions and of course immigration is a huge issue so I think we have to look very carefully at these two nominees and how they've leaned on those issues and and that's right and Catholics are very divided I think as Giuseppe alluded to you know it's that you know you've got the more conservative older Catholics against the more liberal young Catholics and Pope Francis is leaning considerably
To the left and they are looking to him for guidance.
So that is very crucial, right?
Great comments.
I see where now the appointment because of his standing among Catholics becomes all the more pressing before the election.
And of course, there are going to be all kinds of issues about the election where we do not want the court to be divided four to four.
Meanwhile, the Democrats, true to form, are targeting Mitch McConnell's Kentucky home.
This is really embarrassing.
It even involves an arrest.
Protesters were chanting, one member of the crowd kicked a glass door and damaged it.
How bad is this?
Any Supreme Court nominee selected by Trump, of course, must win confirmation from the GOP-led Senate before joining the court on a lifetime appointment, but it appears pretty clear that's going to happen.
Here are some statements by Democrats in the past that contradict their present stance.
This is Harry Reid, formerly Speaker of the House.
Until now, even though all the partisan Uh, actually hit in the Senate.
Even though all the partisan battles of recent decades, the Senate's constitutional duty to give a fair and timely hearing and a floor vote to the President's Supreme Court nominees has remained inviolable.
That was in 2016 in election year.
President Obama, the day after, The Constitution is pretty clear about what's supposed to happen now.
When there's a vacancy on the court, the President is to nominate someone, the Senate considers the nomination, and either they disapprove of the nominee or the nominee is elevated to the Supreme Court.
Here's then-Senator Joe Biden's statement on the floor of the Senate back in 1992, also an election year.
The Senate should not shrink from its responsibility to act on a Supreme Court nominee simply because once confirmed as an Associate Justice, there will be tough decisions to make.
And again, Vice President Biden more recently.
To leave the seat vacant at this critical moment in American history is a little bit like saying, God forbid something happened to the President and the Vice President, we're not going to fill the presidency for another year and a half.
Meanwhile, Lindsey Graham confirms we have the votes to confirm the Trump pick, and he blasted the Democrats who voiced opposition to pushing through a nominee before the election.
It's pretty obvious that if they, the Democrats, want an outcome, they'll just destroy anybody's life to keep the seats open.
And they said they tried to destroy Brett Kavanaugh so they could fill the seat.
They were dumb enough to say that.
I've seen this movie before.
It's not going to work.
It didn't work with Kavanaugh.
And he added, we got the votes to confirm the justice on the floor of the Senate before the election, and that's what's coming.
Meanwhile, my brilliant black correspondent, Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
The Dems are crapping their pants in fear of Trump's Supreme Court nominee.
The Dems have only themselves to blame for Trump's swamp-dweller reactionary choices for his cabinet and Supreme Court.
The Dems made a colossal blunder throwing in their lot with a revenge-seeking Hillary and New World Order Soros.
Trump was, and still is, someone the opposition could work with.
By choosing to pursue a 24-7 House Trump strategy, the Dems left a void that was filled by worst of the GOP reactionary warmongers, drill baby drill environmental haters, corporatists, and pro-life zealots.
If the Dems had worked with the Trump administration as they have done with every other GOP administration, they would have had some influence over Trump's choices for cabinet positions and Supreme Court jurors.
The Congressional Black Caucus gets a grade of F+.
If they truly give a damn about improving black lives, jobs, housing, education, etc., they should have been at the White House on week one to hash out a Marshall Plan for distressed black neighborhoods.
Call his bluff.
He said, what do you have to lose?
Well, go to the White House and see what you can get.
Giuseppe, your thoughts.
Well, it's pretty humorous that Mitch McConnell got doxxed.
I am no fan of Mitch McConnell.
He serves the globalist oligarchs, not the people of the United States, but it's sad that the radical Antifa BLM, burn loot and murder types think that it will somehow
be effective to go to people's houses like they'll somehow intimidate them. They will intimidate
no one. All they're doing is more marginalizing any political power they might have initially
had because with the sentiment initially that Black Lives Matter is a noble cause. Well
you know what is a more noble cause than the 20% of blacks living in poverty is the 80% of
blacks doing Making it in the United States, and the real crime is the insane hundreds of trillions of dollars in theft by the globalist parasite bankers transferring money from real Americans to their own coffers in these Wall Street machinations and schemes.
So if these protesters really cared, They'd be going to the homes of the Goldman Sachs and BlackRock and trying to intimidate them, but that wouldn't matter either because they have no real power and what they need to do is your brilliant correspondent, man, she was
A-plus accurate, amazing, and so they need to step back and do not align with a satanically evil parasite like George Soros and try to work in the middle.
That's the only thing, time, anything gets done and U.S.
politics is in the middle.
Her name is Beverly.
She's wonderful and she sent me these dazzling commentaries and I just had to share them.
Rebecca, your thoughts?
Well, yeah, I think it's amazing that these socialist-leaning leftist Democrats, that's right, they profess to be peace and joy and harmony, and then they go in with the riots and the looting and now knocking down the doors of congressmen, and it's so antithetical to what they profess to be.
And that's right, and to get back to your point on the nomination, you know, I think the Senate obviously has the numbers Republican-wise to push through a nomination, but I worry that it could get tied up in the Judiciary Committee, and I think if we have a contested election and it turns out to be some sort of ballot counting thing like we saw with Gorin Bush in Florida, guess who's in charge?
Correct me if I'm wrong, it would be Nancy Pelosi would be in charge Okay, good point, but then I worry, could she, I don't know, could she push through a nomination?
would fall if it is contested.
Only if it drags out past January 20th.
Okay, good point, but then I worry, could she, I don't know, could she push through a nomination?
All these are, I think, important questions, yeah.
Rebecca, your concern is well taken because that is clearly their plan.
They want to use mail-in ballots to jam it up to get Pelosi in.
I mean, it's completely outrageous, but I have no doubt that's their take.
And remember, Lindsey Graham already saying we got the votes.
He's the head of the Judiciary Committee.
He knows he's got the votes in the committee.
So it's going to be smooth sailing.
I hope so.
There's a 100% guarantee we'll have a confirmation of the justice before the election.
Jim and Rebecca, not only that, but if there's one thing Mitch McConnell is an expert at, it's knowing all the machinations and protocols to get what he wants to get done in the rules of the Senate.
So there's no way the Democrats will be able to stall this.
That's right.
It's my opinion that Mitch McConnell is the most skillful and adroit majority leader of the Senate since Lyndon Johnson, who had no peers.
So this is really...
That's a pretty determinable guy, Rebecca.
Yeah, I was just going to say the Democrats are very skilled at throwing a wrench in the works that we never see coming, it feels like.
And I wouldn't put it past them that another sexual assault scandal or accusation might throw things off course.
I wouldn't put it past them, right?
Yeah, well, you can't put anything past them.
I agree with that.
Meanwhile, this is utterly fascinating.
Trump is telling a rally crowd he wants Biden tested for drugs before the upcoming debate.
He thinks he's getting a big fat shot.
the ass before he comes out. He really knows how to reach that people. President Donald Trump
suggested Joe Biden might take debate-enhancing drugs, said he would like a drug test administered
prior to their upcoming presidential debates. I got a debate coming up with this guy, Trump told
the crowd. You never know. They gave him a big fat shot in the ass and for two hours he's better
than ever before.
Problem is, what happens after that?
Trump added, we're going to ask for a drug test.
We are.
I'd like to have a drug test.
Most of us.
I'll take it.
You'll take it.
Meanwhile, Biden's path to electoral victory has narrowed.
Not looking good for the former VP.
Consider some of the recent propaganda coming from the biased media.
75% of top executives now say Biden will win.
Professor who accurately predicted every election since 1984 says Biden will beat Trump.
Biden has 71% chance of winning 2020 election against Trump forecast says.
Assume for the moment the 2016 electoral map holds the key data to make an educated assessment.
Hardcore red and blue states are unlikely to change.
California and New York will be won by Biden at no effort of his own.
Except I think now they're actually both in play.
The same can be said on President Trump's side in regard to the Deep South and Midwestern states.
The media is pushing the Biden will win lie by asserting he'll win Texas.
But Texas has been reliably Republican for decades.
No Democrat has won the state in a very, very long time.
So, polls are tricky, given the perceived edge that Biden and State Trump won in 2016.
In Pennsylvania, for example, Hillary led by as much as six points, but lost the state.
Biden hovers around four point, two point leads in the state as of now.
It's not going to happen.
A recent Wall Street analysis made an astute observation.
It points out they're going to be flip-flopping.
If there's going to be flip-flopping, Arizona and Minnesota are at play.
Experts, liberal experts, won't even call Minnesota a battleground state.
But in recent weeks, six Iron Range mayors have denounced Biden and thrown their support behind President Trump.
I declare to you, having lived in Minnesota for 19 years, Trump is going to take Minnesota.
Meanwhile, unfit for office, Biden put his son on the Ukraine board he knew was correct.
In other words, there are so many bad aspects to this candidate, it's embarrassing that he was even nominated.
Adding to insult to injury, Obama and Biden reportedly knew about the duplicitous nature of the Ukraine organization, And protected it and Hunter from scrutiny.
Since the revelation broke, the word high-ranking officials are using to describe Joe Biden is unfit.
Senator Johnson's committee, and he is from Wisconsin and has been doing a good job, is writing a devastating report about Joe Biden's illegal activity as it relates to Burisma.
But get this.
Here's Biden.
This is the guy they nominated.
Watch.
I didn't have much time with the former vice president, but I was able to ask him a few questions.
Primarily, what an economic recovery after the COVID-19 crisis would look like if he was elected president, and how he plans to bring and keep jobs here in northeastern Pennsylvania.
We're losing a lot of jobs overseas.
We're losing a lot of jobs from the pandemic.
Especially if fracking is on the chopping block, how are we going to help these displaced workers?
Well, fracking's not going to be on the chopping block, as you say.
No more, no new fracking.
Fracking's not going to be on the chopping block.
We are going to get rid of fossil fuels.
Fracking's not going to be on the chopping block.
What about, say, stopping fracking?
Would there be any place for fossil fuels, including coal and fracking, in a Biden administration?
No, we would work it out.
We would make sure it's eliminated.
Fracking's not going to be on the chopping block.
I guarantee you, I guarantee you, we're going to end fossil fuel, and I am not going to No ability for the oil industry to continue to drill.
Period.
Ends.
Number one.
Three consecutive American presidents have enjoyed stints of explosive economic growth due to a boom in oil and natural gas production.
As president, would you be willing to sacrifice some of that growth, even knowing potentially that it could displace thousands, maybe hundreds of thousands, of blue-collar workers in the interest of transitioning to that greener economy?
The answer is yes.
The answer is yes.
Fracking's not going to be in the chopping block.
I mean, this is embarrassingly bad.
Giuseppe, your thoughts?
I would say that Joe Biden needs a big fat shot in both ass cheeks because it's not working.
You know, Biden is the consummate American politician.
He's a pathological liar.
He's an empty suit who flaps in the wind and goes whatever direction he needs to at the moment for with whom he's speaking.
He's a nothing.
You know, he is just really impaired.
This guy's got real cognitive challenges, and how can this guy be President of the United States?
And you combine that with picking a radical, white-hating bigot in Kamala Harris as his Vice President, and like, they are a recipe for disaster.
Remember, it appears to have been George Soros' son who picked Kamala and then confirmed it with his father, reflecting that the Democratic Party is anything but.
Rebecca, your thoughts?
Oh, I agree with Giuseppe, a completely consummate politician in terms of flip-flopping, waffling back and forth, and pandering.
And what a cliche of a bad politician.
And I have to say, it does surprise me that the Democrats went with Joe Biden as a candidate.
Give me a break.
I mean, the Socialist Democrats are all about women, minorities, white men stink.
And here we have Joe Biden.
And I'll say it again.
I think I said in the last conversation, we had another show.
I really feel like Joe Biden's a vehicle just to bring in Kamala Harris into the seat of the presidential seat, because he'll have some stroke or something soon after the election, maybe.
That's just my own speculation, but I'm really surprised that Joe Biden's even a candidate.
He's obviously not there.
His mental acuity is not there.
And talk about putting drugs into him, you know, to increase his mental capacity for these debates and stuff.
I think they should just go with A Weekend at Bernie's, if you remember that movie.
They just put the sunglasses on and maybe they can use a ventriloquist and put the sunglasses on Biden to make him feel... Because he's like a dead-on-arrival candidate, in my opinion, and not all there, right?
You know, Jim, Rebecca's exactly right.
The Democrats had the perfect candidate to beat Trump and Tulsi Gabbard.
I would have voted for her in a second.
And she was totally locked out of the process.
I'm a huge fan of Tulsi.
But Rebecca is, of course, completely right.
Both AOC and Angela Davis have said they chose Biden not because he was the best candidate, but the most malleable, the most easily manipulated and promote their Green New Deal, their progressive agenda.
Meanwhile, we're taking a brief break.
Let me mention the Question Everything conference will be held on the 7th and 8th of November.
Rebecca will be among the speakers, Catherine Horton Dina Pollard-Sachs, a host of others are going to be addressing a wide range of issues.
This is a sensational conference.
24 speakers, including three on the moon landing, others on the coronavirus.
Some of the best experts on JFK in the world will be there.
November 7th and 8th.
Check it out at mixnstream.com.
You can also participate by pay-per-view from the comfort of your own home.
I think you don't want to miss it.
We now return It turns out Fauci, of course, knew about HGQ back in 2005.
Nobody needed to die.
It's embarrassingly bad.
The Virology Journal, the official publication of Fauci's National Institutes of Health, published a blockbuster article back on August 22nd of that year.
Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread.
We report it has strong antiviral effects on SARS-CoV infection.
These inhibitory effects are observed when the cells are treated with the drug either before or after exposure of the virus.
This means that Dr. Fauci has known for 15 years So HCQ functions as both a cure and a vaccine.
In other words, it's a wonder drug for coronavirus.
And here we're getting international confirmation of the absurdity of having suppressed it, which reflects that the whole coronavirus pandemic is political, not a medical emergency.
And culture wars, well one culture war in particular would have just killed hundreds of Australians.
Now I've just seen yet another study on hydroxychloroquine.
Now that's a cheap, safe, anti-malarial drug being used for death pangs.
And it's one that many studies lately say can also now cut deaths from this virus by between A third, say some studies, up to a half of the deaths, particularly when taken early and taken with zinc.
But the problem is that President Donald Trump months ago said that he took hydroxychloroquine.
What do you have to lose if you try it too?
I'd take it.
I hope to not be able to take it soon because, you know, I hope they come up with some answer.
But I think people should be allowed to.
Now, because Donald Trump took it, there's been the most savage campaign, particularly by the media, to demonise this drug.
I've never seen anything like it.
We're talking chemistry, for heaven's sake, or medicine.
Journalists have quoted any study that said it didn't work, including one that was so rotted and corrupted.
But Lancet had to pull it.
It's just a major scandal.
And they've ignored the many studies that said, look, this drug does work.
If you use it early, before you need to go to hospital and before the body then starts to overreact to the virus, which is a real killer, by the way.
Unfortunately, in Australia, our medical authorities seem also to have ignored those many studies that say it works.
And they say, do not use this drug.
Victoria is so woke that it's deadly.
So what?
He says it's a crime to prescribe this drug for this virus and Queensland will jail any doctors who do.
I mean, it's just absurd.
It is, it's just absurd.
We also know face masks pose serious risk to the healthy.
It's not a good idea to wear one.
I wrote a letter to the editor of the Wisconsin State Journal.
Editor!
Your front page story, Trump says he's taking untested malaria drug reports, what we are hearing from every media source.
The problem is that hydroxychloroquine is not only tested over 35 years of use, but was certified by the Journal of Virology in 2005.
The article, Chloroquine as a Potent Inhibitor of SARS Coronavirus Infection and Spread, 22 August 2005, establishes its medical potency.
Chloroquine and it's even milder derivative HCQ not only cures current cases therapeutic,
but prevents future cases prophylactic.
So HCQ functions as both a cure and a vaccine.
As Brian Fisher has observed, in other words, it's a wonder drug for coronavirus.
Don't take my word for it.
Check out his article online, which documents the evidence.
What is striking is that this journal is published by NIH, which means that Dr. Fauci is known
about HGQ for minimally 15 years.
It turns out that social distancing and face masks are not only not helpful, but actually harmful and weaken our immune systems.
Recycling CO2 means we're not replenishing our blood with oxygen and killing our brain cells.
The virus is microscopic and not being filtered out.
Historically, the practice has been quarantine the sick, not the healthy.
But none of the sources being reported have done any research.
Which means that we're being barraged with fake news, which might be okay, except that in this case, it's a matter of life and death.
James H. Fetzer, Ph.D.
So, of course, they declined to publish.
Meanwhile, here's the situation.
What you're told paranoid people look like, what paranoid people actually look like.
Giuseppe, your thoughts.
Well, Jim, we have to keep in mind that this enormous scam-demic with Fauci and Gates
as the two front puppets are actually being driven by an insane, global, corrupt,
criminal organization.
That's the vaccine industry, also known as the biologics division of big pharma.
Sadly, a young Tony Fauci convinced President Ronald Reagan that vaccines were necessary for the health
of the American public.
And Reagan agreed to indemnify the vaccine industry, which means they have no liability for death and destruction.
So they could literally inject people with anything, which they do, and cause deaths of babies, which they do.
It's called SIDS.
In reality, it's vaccine murder.
They've destroyed the lives of millions of young people.
By turning them into autistic zombies.
That's because of the heavy metal contamination in all these vaccines.
And now they're racing to try and create an unproven, untested vaccine for a common cold mutation that will rewrite your DNA.
What could go wrong with that?
And so it's just ridiculous, Jim, between hydroxychloroquine and intravenous vitamin C and other natural treatments, there's easily already effective treatments for the novel coronavirus, which is called SARS-CoV-2.
It's just criminal, Jim, and Fauci is a liar.
Fauci is like in a horror movie where you see like the demon has a little organ grinder and the little monkey with the fangs, that's Fauci.
He's a little puppet of Big Pharma and it needs to stop.
More and more people are waking up that this is a scam and I'll tell you what, It's the only people who get SARS-CoV-2 are the ones that are getting a flu vaccine or getting a tetanus shot.
It's in the vaccines.
All vaccines are contaminated and the trigger or the actual cause is in the vaccine.
So, warn to all viewers, do not get a flu vaccine.
It's in the flu vaccine.
Rebecca, your thoughts?
I agree, I agree.
Dr. Fauci is a criminal, or worse.
And I read an article once where someone referenced him as Dr. Faustus, which is of course a famous literary character who sold his soul to the devil, and I think that's an appropriate alternate name for Dr. Fauci.
I call him Tony the Rat.
Right, that's good too, I like that.
Medical Mafia run by Don Bill Gates.
Yeah, you know, and this mandated fast mask wearing I have to say is an abomination against humanity on two levels.
First, you have the assault against our physical system where it's called hypoxia.
Hypoxia is when you're breathing in less oxygenated blood and your brain cells and the rest of your circulatory system are going to suffer.
Also, there's hypercapnia, which is you're breathing in more carbon dioxide.
I feel really sorry for the workers that I see in restaurants and in stores that have to wear these face masks for six to eight hours a day.
And this is why I decided not to let my children go back to school and to have them do full remote learning
because they are putting these faith masks over children in schools for six hours or more a day.
This is criminal, this is child abuse, and this is a crime and an assault against humanity
on a physiological level.
But I also want to say on a spiritual level, it is dehumanizing.
They look like zombies.
They look like, you know, someone, I think I look around me about Halloween being canceled
and I think Halloween isn't canceled, it's zombie land.
Look at all these freaks walking around with faith masks on.
You know, Halloween is not canceled.
So, you know, and I just have to say the face mask wearing is such a symbol of how, an assault against humanity, but just how indoctrinated and brainwashed so many people are in this country and world.
It's a shame, yeah.
It's slave training.
Completely brilliant, Rebecca.
We agree with every single word you just said.
Meanwhile, a celebrity biohacker, Josiah Zayner, is under investigation for practicing medicine without a license.
This is very odd.
He taught at health authorities.
He knows how to play the game.
The one time NASA scientist has leaped to social media fame, earns a living performing medical procedures on himself, and then selling genetic engineering supplies to other would-be biohackers.
His stunts so far include carrying out a fecal transplant in an airport hotel room, infecting his room with C-R-I-S-P-R during a conference.
He's not being tailored by a film crew.
If he's not being trailed by a film crew, then he's on YouTube teaching failed customers how to biohack and hectoring the U.S.
Food and Drug Administration.
Now, however, he's under investigation for practicing medicine without a license.
A license according to a letter sent May 8 by the California Department of Humor Affairs.
The agency received a complaint of unlicensed practice of medicine even though he holds a PhD in biophysics.
He was asked to show up for an interview in June and to bring an attorney if you wish.
What the F?
I've been accused of practicing medicine without a license because of genetic self-experimentation and showing people how to access publicly available knowledge.
Well, an attorney of my acquaintance, now former attorney, Allison Maynard, who gave me a lot of valuable advice in my Sandy Hook lawsuit, has realized there's an opportunity here to draw a complaint against Bill Gates.
For the unauthorized practice of medicine.
She's just filed a complaint for unauthorized practice of medicine against Bill and Melinda Gates in California.
I'll file one in Washington State next.
I'm just waiting for them to send me a link to the right form.
Look at this guy being prosecuted for UPM in California who only practiced gene therapy on himself.
Though he also gave recommendation on a website.
Certainly a motivator.
This guy has a PhD in biophysics.
How can they ignore Gates?
So she has now given me a blog here I have just published.
Alison Maynard complains against Bill Gates for unauthorized practice of medicine and explained how others can follow suit.
I think this is a brilliant move.
Giuseppe, your thoughts?
Well when I was looking through your notes and script and I came upon this Zayner character, I said WTF the full phrase.
I mean this guy is an absolute clown and he's reckless.
to inject himself with genetic alterations that I don't care if he has a PhD or not,
they don't know what they're doing.
And although fecal transplants, while it does sound like a homosexual afternoon
of recreation is actually an effective therapy to restore the gut biome in patients
who are severely sickened by glyphosate and have their gut biome destroyed.
As my training as a doctor of oriental medicine has taught me with also my bachelors of nutrition
that 90% of all disease comes from the gut when the biome is destroyed by glyphosate
and GMO modified foods and all that other poison satanic initiatives.
And as such, that's a great idea that the former attorney had to go after Gates, because there's countless pictures of him administering a vaccine for a photo opportunity.
And I'll tell you what, this guy Zayner, he's not long for the world if he's injecting himself with untested genetic modifications, but at least it may be some good will come of it if they can sue Gates and get him To wound Gates and slow him down.
Yeah, Sunny, that's her nickname, was inspired by this case to contemplate a prosecution for unlicensed practice of medicine.
Gates is not an MD.
He's not a PhD.
He's not a virologist.
He's not an epidemiologist.
He's a computer geek who wants to vaccinate the world.
Rebecca, your thoughts?
Well, yeah, Zaner seems radical, but I think the larger point with that article is they just try and vilify anything that is not in accordance with the mainstream medical status quo advice, which is take your vaccine, listen to your MD, and shut up.
And you know what?
In terms of naturopathy and good nutrition, they shut that down.
And I'm not surprised they took someone like Zaner as a kind of radical example of, you know, don't disregard the mainstream medical advice, because look at this guy, you know?
But you know what?
People need to go middle the road and really think about, like Giuseppe said, he's got a degree in nutrition, good nutrition, organic fruits and vegetables, get plenty of sunlight, vitamin C, and naturopathic ways, which the mainstream medical community, media, and otherwise vilify.
And that's right, Sonny Maynard did a wonderful, outstanding article illuminating the criminal offenses
against humanity by Bill Gates.
This guy is shown in pictures doing medical practices on minorities, obviously Africans,
and on otherwise in the Middle East areas.
He's basically making young women infertile with some of these vaccines.
He's making some of these vaccines because he's administered and supported the administration
to infants have paralyzed them or killed them or worse.
These are crimes against humanity and that's and she made an excellent point.
How can we have these non-medical people like Bill Gates giving out advice and even administering these vaccines to and he and obviously has no medical credentials at all.
You know, yeah, it's a crime.
That's right.
I'm hoping this idea will go viral because it's so appropriate and richly deserved after all the agony and disaster he's inflicted upon the world.
Meanwhile, a UFC star predicts a Trump landslide in a fiery post-victory speech Then Trump calls him live on the air.
I'm sick of all these woke athletes and these mindless cowards like LeBron James, he said.
Very impressive.
Colby Covington delivered a booming post-victory speech Saturday night during which he predicted President Trump will defeat Joe Biden in a landslide and took a shot at NBA star LeBron James and other woke athletes.
Trump later called Covington when he was live on the air for another post-victory.
After Covington's flight, which he won by a technical knockout, he said Sleepy Joe will get the same result as his opponent this November at the ballot box.
Ladies and gentlemen, the silent majority is ready to make some noise.
If you thought that was a beating, wait until November 3rd, when Donald Trump gets his hands on Sleepy Joe.
It's gonna be a landslide.
I love it.
I'm so embarrassed by the NBA and the NFL for taking their involving themselves on behalf of Black Lives Matter, politicizing sports a colossal blunder.
Later during an interview with ESPN, Covington wearing a red Make America Great Again hat adorned with Trump's autograph.
Receive a personal call from Trump.
You're a great fighter, man, Trump said.
I tell you, you make it so easy.
I don't know how the hell you do that.
Congratulations.
I wanted to watch that fight tonight.
I wanted to watch it.
You are great.
Thank you so much, Mr. President.
You gave me the dragon energy when you shook my hand on Sunday at your rally.
It doesn't matter if King Kong was in front of me.
I was not going to lose after getting to shake your hand.
Trump literally called him during the interview.
Fascinating!
Giuseppe, your thoughts?
Oh, that's great, man.
If you get the dragon energy from Trump, that's a real gift.
I think that's awesome that that young man came out and publicly spoke for the silent majority.
He's exactly right.
you know the laughable thing about king james lebron james is uh...
he tweets out things like he's afraid to go out of his house when he's this
six-foot nine super muscular man a and he's a he's got a bunch of pictures of him
uh... photo ops showing him reading books like I don't think the NBA and NFL have any idea how much damage they've done to themselves and it's going to endure.
may know basketball but he is no rocket scientist, he's no intellect, he's just a poser,
and it's great that Mr. Covington put him in his place.
I don't think the NBA and NFL have any idea how much damage they've done to themselves
and it's going to endure.
Rebecca, your thoughts.
Yeah, I am not a Trump fan in the least, but I will say that Covington's remarks
provide a necessary balance to what we're seeing from the BLM supporting athletes on the left
from the NFL and such.
I mean, we're getting so much social engineering messages from these guys on the NFL that it's nice to have a little balance on the other side.
So I will give it that much, right.
I couldn't agree more.
It's about time more speak up on his behalf.
Meanwhile, we welcome fan mail we want to hear from you.
You can write to liveneedtoknowatgmail.com.
I repeat, Live Need to Know at gmail.com.
Here are some messages.
Political coup.
Getting my daily dose of Need to Know.
Excellent reporting as always.
How about Tony the Rat Tuesday?
Dr. Fetzer, Giuseppe, and Susan bringing the facts, facts, facts.
Thank you for bringing the truth.
Meanwhile, this is from a comment on my blog that again seemed to be so highly appropriate.
This is revisiting Roe v. Wade.
A long time ago, an elderly MD told me the reason for passing Roe v. Wade had nothing to do with religious or personal freedom.
The doctor said, I used to work in the clinics.
When coat hanger abortion women were brought in, it was a disaster every time.
Some almost bled to death.
Perhaps elsewhere they did.
She then explained it was doctors behind the scene who persuaded Congress to put an end to this butchery by passing Roe v. Wade.
She said, this information was never in the press.
It was largely unknown and kept well hidden from the public.
Now that a new Supreme must replace Ginsburg, no one is asking about the backstreet abortions.
Wealthy women could always afford them.
It was called DNC dilation and curdling.
If additional restrictions are based on abortions with a conservative new judge, then it's poor women who will be at risk for their health.
The reality is some women will get abortions whether religious groups are against them or not, and it's safer for the procedures to be in the open.
Women's health is more important than belief systems.
Giuseppe, your thoughts?
You know, Jim, the whole abortion question is so ridiculous.
There should be over-the-counter abortion pills, the 24-hour pill.
You should be able to go buy that like you buy Pepto-Bismol.
It should be up to the individual.
It shouldn't even get to the point where you have to have an abortion.
These religious zealots are such hypocrites.
They're so worried about the unborn baby, and yet they show no concern For the born children who live in squalor, who have no opportunity, so I think that we have to act like adults in the 21st century and give the opportunity for these young women to be able to buy an over-the-counter pill that removes the necessity for abortion.
Rebecca, your thoughts?
Well, I am completely against abortion.
However, I would never deny a woman's right to choose.
I, therefore, though, do not agree with federal and state funding, my tax dollars being used to support abortion.
And I think it should be noted that a lot of these vaccinations contain aborted tissue from aborted fetuses.
It is big business.
Planned Parenthood is big business.
And it's for very nefarious reasons, not just for the reason of giving minority and women
who can't afford abortion a way to get an abortion.
It goes way beyond that.
And there are so many foundations that will support women who can't afford an abortion
if unfortunately that's what they choose to do.
But in terms of state and federal tax dollars being used to fund abortions, I'm completely
against that.
And on a personal spiritual level, I am wholeheartedly against abortions.
Well, I personally favor a woman's right to choose, but it looks very clearly with the
nomination confirmation of Amy Barrett that you're going to have no federal funding for
I expect that to happen.
Not that Roe v. Wade is a precedent which gives women the option for safe legal abortion is going to be overturned.
One more development on which I want to report.
I had a major debate on Monday on another show about a video where there's a mega
Make America Great Again song sung to the tune of the YMCA,
you know, made so famous by the village people.
And I was emphasizing how important it is in bringing people together, that diverse groups,
because this was a very gay guy in red pants who was singing this song, dancing around.
It was to me so powerful and effective, it brought tears to my eyes.
At the very end of this program, Monday, we had this intense disagreement, particularly by a fellow who is a very successful attorney in California, where I was seeking to make these points.
Well, last night, in Ohio, Donald Trump completed By playing this very song, listen to it here.
This was the version, not the one from Beverly Hills, but this version, the audio track only.
Here you'll see the video as well.
And we don't segregate.
Just like Putin.
We'll make America great.
We are all in this together.
Colors are red, white, and blue.
And they stand for every one of you.
And together is what we're gonna do.
We're gonna make America great.
Everybody sing MAGA MAGA
Let them hear our voice All you girly boys
Stand up and make some noise MAGA
Everybody MAGA
The American crowd Patriotic and proud
Shout it, shout it out loud So, that's why, when it comes time to vote, just remember, we're all in the same boat, we're together, we're united folks, and we won't let them divide us, no man!
Walk away from the hate, we're all human.
And we don't segregate, just like women.
Help make America great!
We are all in this together.
Everybody say N-A-G-A!
M-A-G-N-A Black, white, and brown
From every city and town We don't let haters keep us down
M-A-G-N-A M-A-G-N-A
The American crowd Magianic and proud
And now we turn to our final thoughts Giuseppe, I'll begin with you, my friend.
Your final thoughts for today?
Well, that was quite the video.
Really, uh, really, uh, really good.
And, uh, I would just say that, um...
You know, the message of that video is really, really important.
Really criminally evil individuals like George Soros are trying to destroy our individual freedoms, trying to destroy the sovereign republic of the United States and turn us into a communist member of the North Atlantic Union and to have us be enslaved with Mandatory vaccines to have us chipped to have all currency be digital so you get out of line and you do a show like this and all your money's gone poof in a second because it's all digital and people need to wake up
and realize there is no Democratic Party anymore.
Right now, they are a bunch of radicals serving the Soros globalist agenda.
And, you know, Donald, I'm not the biggest fan of Donald Trump,
but he is, who's there right now, and what he champions is the real America.
And so we need to fight to retain the real America.
Rebecca, your final thoughts.
Well, that video was mind-blowingly weird, but I would have to say,
what it said to me was, these are very divisive times,
and we're pointing the figure at each other, we're yelling, and we're hating,
both sides are hating each other.
There's divisiveness, there's chaos.
And my opinion is that's kind of what they want to distract us what's from really going on behind the curtain.
I mean, in my opinion, this is a spiritual battle of good versus evil going on.
You can see it unfolding all the way around us on politics.
It's hard to solve a political battle when it's really a spiritual battle, in my opinion.
So I think people should just remember, instead of pointing the finger and hating and yelling, let's think more about what's going on behind the curtain, how we can join forces together as humanity on a spiritual level.
Well my colleague Scott Bennett sent me a note where he was blown away because at the end of our conclusion Monday I emphasized that Donald Trump ought to be using this as his theme song and then Scott wrote he was just amazed that Tuesday he actually used it as his theme song.
I can't say how delighted I am to have Rebecca here with us and to announce that she will be joining us as a regular on Tuesdays and Thursdays.
I'm ecstatic about this.
So here we have Jim in Madison, Wisconsin, thanking Giuseppe Vefangelo and the District of Columbia and Rebecca Carnes in Newtown, Connecticut, scene of all scenes, We're here together to bring you the news you need to know.
We'll be back tomorrow with the latest from the front.
We're glad you're joining us.
We'll see you then.
Export Selection