All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 22, 2020 - Jim Fetzer
53:49
Need to Know: The Fetzer Report 21September 2020
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
🎵 Outro Music 🎵 This is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin with Giuseppe Vaffanjulo
from the District of Criminals and Susan Bradford from Springfield, Virginia with the news
you need to know.
Ruth Bader Ginsburg dead at 87.
Major political battle to take place here.
Chief Justice Roberts mourned her passing.
Our nation has lost a jurist of historic stature.
She spent her final years on the bench as the unquestioned leader of the court's liberal wing and became a kind of rock star to her admirers.
She and Justice Antonin Scalia, both of whom loved opera, became great friends, completely fascinating.
Health issues she incurred included five bouts with cancer beginning in 1999, falls that resulted in broken ribs, Insertion of a stamp to clear blocked artery and assorted other hospitalizations.
President Trump has now announced he will declare his nominee this coming Friday or Saturday.
Two appear to be the odds-on leaders.
Amy Coney Barrett, who has an extraordinary intellectual and judicial record, but also Barbara Lago,
a judge on the 11th Court as an appealing prospect because she has ties to the Cuban community.
She would help to seal the Florida vote.
And I therefore believe in so far, she received 80 votes during her last confirmation
with 15 against and only five abstentions.
It would be very difficult for her not to be confirmed.
I now believe she is going to be the President's pick.
Giuseppe, your thoughts?
Well, Jim, it's interesting timing, the passing of Ruth Bader Ginsburg to the To the globalist left, she was the superheroine Ruth Bader.
To the rest of us who understand how things really work, she was the villain Darth Vader from Star Wars.
I mean, she was the classic operative, dual citizen operative that 80% of the time she would go along and Make the right rulings and then the 20% she pushed forward the Talmudic agenda of pedophilia, the globalist agenda of destroying the sovereign rights of the United States.
So, you know, I'm way happy to see she's gone and bold move by Trump to push this forward in the final six weeks of his presidency.
Normally, You know, when we're in rational times, it's policy to wait and let the next president, even if it's him, do it.
But they're playing some power politics now, that's for sure.
Susan, your thoughts?
Yes, thank you.
So, I was actually looking through Ruth Bader Ginsburg's law record, and I was actually pretty impressed with her.
She has fought against civil asset forfeitures, you know, when a policeman actually has had the right to stop citizens and take their property, whether that person committed a crime or not.
So she was at the forefront of blocking civil asset forfeiture laws.
She also was a great proponent of equal protection, which I think allowed those people who,
women like myself, or minorities to be able to participate in the workforce on equal footing
if they were able to perform the job and with the same level of income.
And she was also, yeah, there were a few other, she really had quite a remarkable track record.
For me, her issue isn't really her, what she did, but what came after.
Because I think she opened the floodgates to maybe more of a radical liberal agenda, but I don't believe that, I mean, when she was actually a star on the bench, I think her views were very moderate, but it was like what came after, and now we have an entirely woke culture that is ready to bring the country through a revolution in order to implement a radical agenda.
But I don't think that Ruth Bader, in and of herself, was necessarily a radical.
Nice.
Very nice.
Very nice, balanced commentary, Susan.
Thank you, RBJ.
Leaders reacted with sadness and shock to her death.
Here's a collection of sentiments.
Some of the nation's former and current officials.
President Trump, when he was first informed, when he was leaving a rally in Bemidji.
Wow.
I didn't know that.
You're telling me now for the first time.
She led an amazing life.
What else can you say?
She was an amazing woman.
Whether you agreed or not, she was an amazing woman who led an amazing life.
I'm actually saddened to hear that.
I'm saddened to hear that.
He later put out a formal statement on her passing, renowned for her brilliant mind and her powerful dissents at the Supreme Court.
Justice Denver demonstrated one can disagree without being disagreeable toward one's colleagues or different points of view.
Her opinions, including well-known decisions regarding the legal equality of women and the disabled, have inspired all Americans and generations of great legal minds.
Former Barack Obama Sixty years ago, Ruth Bader Ginsburg applied to be a Supreme Court clerk.
She studied at two of our finest law schools, had ringing recommendations, but because she was a woman, she was rejected.
Ten years later, she sent her first brief to the Supreme Court, which led it to strike down a state law based on gender discrimination for the first time.
And then, for nearly three decades, as the second woman ever to sit on the highest court of the land, she was a warrior for gender equality, someone who believed that equal justice under law only had meaning if it applied to every single American.
Obama tweeted out a picture of him and Ginsburg walking on the White House lawn with a link to the statement posted on the medium.
Justice Ginsburg, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, fought to the end through her cancer with unwavering faith in our democracy and its ideals.
That's how we remember her.
But she also left instructions for how she wanted her legacy to be honored.
Chief Justice Roberts, our nation has lost A jurist of historic stature, we at the Supreme Court have lost a cherished colleague.
Today we mourn, but with confidence that future generations will remember Ruth Bader Ginsburg as we knew her, a tireless and resolute champion of justice, former President George W. Bush.
Laura and I join our fellow Americans in mourning the loss of Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
She dedicated many of her 87 remarkable years to the pursuit of justice and equality, and she inspired more than one generation of women and girls.
Former President Bill Clinton With the passing of Ruth Bader Ginsburg, America has lost one of the most extraordinary justices ever to serve on the Supreme Court.
She was a magnificent judge and a wonderful person, a brilliant lawyer with a caring heart, common sense, fierce devotion of fairness and equality, and boundless courage in the face of her own adversity.
Giuseppe, your thoughts?
Yeah, I mean, in the public square of the mainstream media, she's just remarkable, like John McCain was remarkable.
And Susan laid out essentially the real agenda that she was opening the door for this Communist Antifa initiative to try and Bolshevik 2.0.
And I can't get past the fact that on numerous occasions she publicly said that the The age for legal sex should be lowered to 12.
So she was a covert, a proponent of pedophilia.
She really said that?
The age for sex?
On multiple occasions.
I'll put up a couple of screen images of those quotes.
I have them.
We can play them tomorrow.
Susan, your thoughts?
I was not aware that she was a proponent of pedophilia.
I don't necessarily know that she knew that she was trying to open up the agenda for the doors to Bolshevik 2.0.
It certainly ended up being that way.
I think she was a moderate during her era, and she was an inspiration to a lot of women.
I didn't really know about her track record prior to today.
I didn't look into it, but I think she was an inspiration to a lot of women who aspired to be lawyers at a time when they weren't allowed to enter the profession.
Yeah, Giuseppe seems to be...
Looking between the lines, behind the scenes, fascinating.
Meanwhile, Biden begs GOP not to confirm a new justice and Pelosi even warns of impeachment, which sounds incredible on its face.
Trump has said he intends within days to name a woman to succeed the liberal icon.
Just hours before Biden spoke, a second Republican senator, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, joined Senator Susan Collins of Maine in opposing Everest to fill Ginsburg's seat before the next president is elected.
It takes four to break ranks to keep Trump's nominee off the court, where attention has focused on Senator Mitt Romney of Utah, who voted to convict Trump on one count of impeachment, and Senator Chuck Grassley of Iowa, former chairman of the Judiciary Committee, I think Mitt Romney is a certainty to oppose Trump's desire to place on the court before the election.
Meanwhile, Hillary, predictably, must employ every possible obstacle.
To stop McConnell from replacing Ginsburg.
Ginsburg's own words, however, fire back at Democrats, including Chuck Schumer, threatening to pack the Supreme Court with liberal justices.
Well, if anything would make the court appear partisan, then it would be that.
Meanwhile, on the campaign trail, Biden draws a crowd of 200.
This is in downtown Duluth, but it turns out at his rally at the Carpenters Union, he drew only a dozen.
Meanwhile, Trump, here it is.
Biden at the Carpenters Union train hall in Minnesota emphasizes his plan to boost American manufacturing.
It's time to reward hard work in America, not wealth.
Biden declared with roughly a dozen workers looking on.
That's pathetic.
Meanwhile, Trump, 46 days from now, we're going to win Minnesota.
We're going to win four more years in the White House.
He told thousands of supporters at the regional airport in Bemidji.
That's been the consistent pattern.
Biden has drawn, you know, a handful of supporters while Trump has drawn thousands and tens of thousands.
I don't think it's much of a contest politically.
Giuseppe, your thoughts.
Well, I don't necessarily agree.
I thought it was all going Trump's way with momentum because of the Bern Luton murder outrageousness.
But now that the beloved Ruth Bader Ginsburg is gone, that will rally Democrats to champion Biden, I believe, especially if Trump is playing the power politics that he intends to play and nominate before the early November presidential election.
Just when you think it can't get more strained and intense, it becomes more strained and intense.
Susan, your thoughts?
Well said, Giuseppe.
And I think this desperation on the part of the Democrats that they are trying to prevent Trump from appointing a justice before the election really shows that they don't think they're going to win the presidency.
They don't think they're going to win the White House.
And I think, I don't know if you heard the podcast from Michael Moore that he released yesterday.
But it was very disingenuous.
He was encouraging the Democrats to go to the streets, to raise hell, to riot, based upon just very false ideologies, false outcomes.
And I think this is where the Democratic Party is going.
They have a very woke culture.
that is communist at its core.
So I do hope that Trump is able to appoint somebody before the election to prevent this agenda from continuing.
And I also hope that he, and I trust that he will win, on the White House, will be reelected in November.
I believe that Trump will nominate before, but the vote will be after,
that he will nominate the Florida Cuban gal that's gonna help him to cement Florida
with some 28 electoral votes.
And that Michael Moore encouraging people to get out and riot and protest is only going to confirm the impression in the American mind that the Democrats tolerate urban violence.
Most importantly, Giuseppe may want to consider it's taken the coronavirus issue off of the front page and replaced it with a debate over the court.
And while it is going to energize Democrats, I think they're in such a dire state politically, it's not going to matter.
And this is all going to benefit Trump much more than it harms him.
My take.
Meanwhile...
We have a U.N.
official blaming U.S.
unrest on gun control.
I don't know how absurd things can get.
Rupert Colville, spokesperson for the U.N.
High Commission for Human Rights, called for the U.S.
to adopt stricter gun control following the riots in Kenosha after Jacob Blake, who had a warrant for felony sexual assault, was shot multiple times after he resisted arrest and attempted to grab a knife from his car.
Agitators took advantage of the shooting to riot and bring unrest to the street.
Kyle Rittenhouse was involved in a heated confrontation, of course.
He ended up having to shoot several assailants, killing two and wounding another, later charged absurdly with homicide.
During the press briefing, the spokesman for the U.N.
described the shooting as a painful reminder of the risks African Americans face when dealing with law enforcement.
Then immediately pivoted to gun control when he declared that America is lacking in gun control.
This is simply ridiculous for the UN to be speaking.
He obviously knows nothing about the relationship between gun ownership and homicide rates, which are inversely related.
So North America with the highest ownership, Canada and North America have also the lowest homicide rate.
Brazil with low gun ownership, high homicide rates.
There are many ways to kill people.
Soviet Union, Russia now, low gun ownership, high homicide rate.
Africa, low gun ownership, high homicide rate.
Machetes are also very effective instruments at killing.
Joe Biden's gun control claims incidentally turned out to be at odds with crime statistics.
Within hours, Biden had praised the original bans on assault weapons in high-capacity magazines claiming weapons of war have no place in our community.
Bans save lives, and Congress should never have let them expire, except it turns out that they don't actually save lives.
Academicians have found no statistically significant difference.
Not only that, but the AR-15 is a semi-automatic weapon.
It is not a weapon of war.
It's not an assault rifle.
The M16, the military version, which is fully automatic, does qualify as a weapon of war, an assault man.
But this is extremely misleading by Joe Biden, where, of course, he believes he benefits by not being accurate in his statistics.
We cannot clearly credit the ban with any of the nation's recent problems with gun violence, they concluded.
Indeed, there's been no discernible reduction in the lethality and injuriousness of gun violence because of the so-called assault weapon ban.
And as we know, Dr. Iwan has demonstrated that the gun violence map corresponds to democratic control.
control map areas of Southern California, for example, Seattle, Chicago, under Democrat control,
create free fire zones for criminals, which they take full advantage of. If the president were
past a universal concealed carry across the nation in all regions, I believe gun violence would
immediately drop significantly. Meanwhile, Giuseppe, your thoughts.
Well, Jim, the globalist overlords who now completely control the United Nations
have such an obsession with removing gun ownership in the United States, and as history shows,
Every country that allows itself to be de-armed is then murdered in the millions of fatalities.
We absolutely will never allow the despicable United Nations, which is such a farce of an organization.
The United States should pull out of funding and put it down in Namibia as the headquarters and let them fend for themselves.
It's just a useless organization and it's just so pushing a communist agenda and history again shows every country allows communist rule in reality allows authoritarian totalitarian rule and millions of its citizens are murdered and lastly the ridiculousness of gun control is best exemplified by the little uh... mini me beetlejuice mayor laurie lightfoot in chicago where she was tweeted a few weeks ago that
After there were like 40 murders and 80 gun incidents in Chicago during a three-day holiday weekend, and she blamed Trump for not having enough gun control, and yet Chicago has the most stringent gun control policies in the United States.
It's absolute lunacy.
Ridiculous.
It is.
They're not willing to admit their gun control agenda is a total, incomplete failure.
Susan, your thoughts?
Thank you, Jim.
I agree with what Giuseppe has said that guns, I don't have a gun myself, but the gun ownership is one of the key factors that's keeping the totalitarians at bay because they know that the American people would fight back.
And I think the earlier examples that you gave with Kyle Rittenhouse show that, one, I think it shows a lack of personal responsibility.
I mean, of course, he was defending himself, but there's arguably, you know, should he have been there?
Should he have reacted as he did?
And of course, the thug who assaulted him didn't take personal responsibility, and the Democrats predictably respond with non sequiturs that, you know, No one took responsibility, therefore we have to take away the guns.
They'll use any excuse they can, any example in the media to try to strip us of our rights.
Yeah, I'd like to add quickly, Jim, that that gentleman Covell claimed it was an example of how the black community is so oppressed with gun issues.
All three of the individuals who attacked Kyle Rittenhouse were radical Jews.
There was no black involved in the incident.
And there's no question they were attempting to kill him.
Stabbed him over the head with a skateboard.
One even admitted to a friend later his only regret was he hadn't blown him away that he hesitated to shoot and kill him.
Meanwhile, let me recommend A Parkland Puzzle, How the Pieces Fit Together.
This is a fascinating book about what happened there.
It was a staged event where the March for Our Lives held on March 24th, just You know, a little over a month after the February 14th event would have taken months and months of planning.
Indeed, there's a requirement for Washington, D.C.
that permits for events that close the streets must be submitted at least six months in advance.
We discovered proof that had happened so that the Parkland event was a staged event.
That was to promote March for Our Lives as a Democratic voter registration drive, which was featuring gun control merely as the sauce.
It's embarrassingly bad.
For Christmas, if you have friends or relatives with their minds slightly ajar, I highly recommend the Parkland Puzzle.
All the pieces fit together at moonrockbooks.com.
That's moonrockbooks.com.
Meanwhile, Hershel Walker has shredded BLM, calling out NFL owners and players who support trained Marxists.
Black Lives Matter is an anti-government, anti-American, and anti-Christian movement.
Hershel Walker made a wonderful appearance during the Republic Convention.
He also challenged NFL leaders to speak up about whether they will support what he described as a Marxist movement.
Black Lives Matter co-founder Patrice Coulour said during a 2015 interview that she and a co-founder were trained Marxists.
The interview resurfaced online causing controversy.
During the 2015 interview, She outright admitted, myself and co-founder Alicia Garza in particular are trained organizers, we are trained Marxists, we are super versed on sort of ideological theories.
The Heisman Trophy winner continued his remarks, insisting he was calling on all people in organizations, including the NFL and its players, to speak up about whether they will support an organization whose leaders refer to themselves as trained Marxists.
Very appropriate.
Meanwhile, Joe Biden blames every single COVID-19 death on Trump, saying all the people would be alive if Trump had done his job.
This is ridiculous beyond words.
Biden claims Trump.
If the president had done his job, has done his job from the beginning, all the people would still be alive.
All the people.
I'm not making this up.
Just look at the data.
Look at the data.
But he's obviously not looking at the data.
It becomes particularly difficult to blame the deaths in a place like New York City on the president's response, although New York Democratic Governor Andrew Cuomo has repeatedly attempted to do just that.
He's taken to calling COVID-19 the European virus.
Blaming Trump for not banning travel from Europe sooner than he did and duck responsibility for the deaths caused by his own policy of sending infected people into nursing homes.
This is really quite ridiculous.
Trump, of course, restricted travel from China at the end of January, Biden, at the time, in the midst of the Democratic primary, continued holding campaign events well into March.
Dr. Sanjay Gupta made a similar claim against the president on CNN, as the planning was discussing a report that the White House scrapped a plan to send masks to every household via the U.S.
Postal Service.
This Gupta turns out to be a complete stooge.
I'm very embarrassed.
The more I learn about him, the less good he looks.
Giuseppe, your thoughts?
Well, good for Herschel Walker to realize what's really going on.
It's funny that the Democratic Party has become the traitorous Hungarian Jew George Soros' golem.
And in the Talmudic mythology, a golem is a giant statue that comes to life to destroy all the enemies of the Talmudicists.
And that's what the Democratic Party has become.
And most of us, as we were young, we had a certain empathy for the poor and the underclass and wanted to see a little bit more equanimity and equality in economics and living conditions.
But when you see today the machinations that are being spearheaded by George Soros and his ilk to destroy the
sovereign nation of the United States and this has nothing to do with serving the
poor this has everything to do with with craven political power and a
traitorous assault on this country and and what's hilarious going to the COVID-19
ridiculousness of Biden is that Trump really really deferred to Tony tiny
Tony Fauci and Redfield and Burks and all of in the who at that time he
He really let them steer the boat and they were Utterly wrong in what they were projecting.
And secondly, and finally, Biden was part of the Obama administration in 2013 when they completely ignored the H1N1 pandemic.
And by a factor of about 10, there were more deathly ill people in deaths because of that, because they did nothing well months into the pandemic.
So what a hypocrite.
Nice points, Giuseppe.
Susan, your thoughts?
Thank you.
I agree with Giuseppe that Soros was obviously behind Black Lives Matter, and it is a Marxist agenda.
And also, as you may know, that at Yalta, after World War II, the Yalta Conference, there was a plan hatched by Churchill, Stalin, and FDR that planned to elevate communist China to the leader of the New World Order and to reduce the United States to a global welfare state, which is what they've done.
So when we look at these NFL football players, the reason that they're taking a knee
is that they're trying to exploit the Marxist tactic of racial division
to tear the country apart, but they're also looking towards
gaining market share in China because they stand to make so much more money
selling football game appearances in China than they do in the United States.
And I think that they're unfortunately willing to sell the country out to achieve that.
And in terms of Biden trying to blame Trump for the coronavirus,
the government's response was actually born out of the Obamacare,
which happened under his administration with Barack Obama, that bankrupted the healthcare industry,
bankrupted the individual health insurance markets, and ended up providing a very limited
and ineffectual response to the coronavirus to the point where they had to fake actual diagnoses
in order to give the hospitals more money.
So, I think we should put credit where credit's due, and that's, you know, with Obama.
Those are such nice points, Susan.
Actually, meanwhile, here are the states that have received the most coronavirus funding so far.
Vermont, oddly.
This is per capita.
New York, unsurprisingly.
Alaska, North Dakota, Wyoming, Rhode Island, all very small states.
Massachusetts, Hawaii, New Jersey, and California.
More significantly, to substantiate Giuseppe's point, Trump did listen to experts on the pandemic.
They just failed him.
Mark Tyson has a brilliant piece about it on my blog at jamesfetzer.org.
The narrative has taken hold since the release of Bob Woodward's latest book that President Trump was told in late January coronavirus is spreading across America at pandemic rates but ignored the dire warnings of the government experts.
That narrative is wrong and unfair.
The truth is, during the crucial early weeks, the government's public health leaders assured Trump virus was not spreading in communities in the U.S.
They gave him bad intel because of two catastrophic failures.
First, they relied on the flu surveillance system that failed to detect the rapid spread of COVID-19.
Second, they bungled the development of a diagnostic test for COVID-19 that would have shown they were wrong.
It's very telling.
And we know, of course, that Fauci back in 2017 was already predicting Trump would be challenged by a surprise global disease outbreak, since he's the guy charged with preparing the nation for dealing with Pandemics, his failure is manifest and he can be held as a single most responsible agent.
How can it after all be a surprise when he's predicting in 2017 that's going to occur?
How badly did the system fail?
Researchers at Notre Dame found only 1,514 cases, 39 deaths had been officially reported by early March.
When in truth more than 100,000 people were already infected, that's assuming reliance on the test.
On February 21st, Anthony Fauci said in a CNBC interview, he was confident it wasn't the case that infections were more widespread.
Certainly it's a possibility, but it's extraordinarily unlikely.
He explained if there were infected people in the U.S.
who were not identified, isolated, and traced, You'd have almost an exponential spread of an infection for which we are all looking out.
We have not seen that, so it's extremely unlikely it's happening.
We know, too, how the DMC and the coronavirus have conspired together, how BLM, Antifa, and the Democratic Party agenda fit together to exploit for political benefits.
Stunning stuff.
So when Trump told the people on Feb. 25, Coronavirus is very well under control in our country.
We have very few people with it.
He was not lying or playing down more dire information.
He was being told privately.
He was repeating exactly what experts such as Fauci, Renfield, and Messonnier were telling him.
Trump did make serious errors on his own.
On Deputy National Security Advisor Matthew Pottinger's advice, he barred travel by non-U.S.
citizens from China on January 31st, but he did not also shut down travel from much of Europe, as Pottinger recommended, until March 11th, almost six weeks later, because of objections from his economic advisors The outbreak in New York, the worst of the pandemic, was seeded by travelers from Italy.
But the main reason we were not able to contain the virus is that for six critical weeks, the health experts told the president COVID-19 was not spreading in U.S.
communities when it was, in fact, spreading like wildfire.
They were wrong.
The experts failed the president and the country.
Giuseppe, your thoughts?
Well Jim, I think the columnist Thiessen basically has it right.
The reality is the novel coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, was created in various American and Chinese laboratories and mutated over the span of seven years.
It was actually probably released a couple years earlier and it was slow to build up steam.
The COVID-19 scam has been a 10-year initiative by Bill Gates who wants to be the worldwide vaccine fuhrer and has put an insane amount of money and which delivered Philanthropic control over the World Health Organization, over Gabby, over all these NGOs who are like a spider web with Gates as the evil vaccine messiah at the center of it.
In reality, there's two things that have gone on.
The normal cold flu season, the coronavirus is the common cold, has been rebranded as this world pandemic.
There was a worldwide spread of the novel coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, but it was very limited
and has always been limited as far as its mortality effectiveness.
In reality, the comorbidity, which means that somebody already had a bad heart,
like bad lungs, like COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder,
had kidney failure, had cancer.
So when they got a cold or they got a flu, that sped up their death.
They were going to die anyway.
They were dying.
It's just that the system could not handle.
It's the same thing that happens every year with the flu season.
They attribute so many deaths to the flu, but the great investigative journalist John Rappaport has done a lot of work and he's Revealed that every year only less than 10% or around 10% actually die of the flu.
And the same thing's going on here.
And it gets better that there's been PhDs in Europe who have discovered that 80% of the world, because the coronavirus is just a common cold, is already immune to SARS-CoV-2.
So essentially, the only way people are getting it is through vaccines.
The flu vaccine, children's vaccines, tetanus vaccines, they're all contaminated, as Dr. Judy Michovitz, Dr. Rashid Buttar, Dr. Sherry Tenpenny, experts in this field continue to point out.
It's just absurd.
And this whole COVID thing, now they're turning it into a political issue and trying to bring down Trump.
It's not going to work.
And as the CDC quietly acknowledged recently, fewer than 10,000 have actually died in ways that are attributable directly to COVID-19.
Susan, your thoughts?
Thank you.
The coronavirus was actually patented in the Perbright Institute in London, which receives funding from the WHO and the Gates Foundation.
And this has been planned to be used as part of a simulation for the armed forces and healthcare providers to kind of work together globally and transnationally in order to kind of further the agenda of globalism.
And from what I read, I hope this is correct, but I read that in the event of a healthcare emergency, the Department of Health and Human Services has, takes precedence over or has more authority than the president.
So you have, the president has to defer to that department.
And that puts the onus entirely on Fauci and Bricks for what, you know, for the misinformation and the lack of, or actually the poor handling of the virus.
But I think Trump has responded appropriately.
He demonstrated leadership by trying to calm the public down.
He shut the borders to prevent its spread during the coronavirus.
And even now, he has prevented the pharmaceutical companies from exploiting the pandemic by eliminating the middleman, reducing the cost, ensuring that the vaccine will not be mandatory.
And he's making it, you know, available to the public if, you know,
based upon their free will, whether they, you know, they would choose to take it or not.
So I think he's handled, you know, the pandemic very well, given the circumstances.
Very, very, very nice.
Very nice.
Meanwhile, Joe Rogan, the host of debate.
This is a proposal.
Democrats have voiced their opinion against having additional presidential debates.
Can you imagine having an election to decide who becomes the most powerful person in the world without holding debates?
It's time for the Democrats to get their act together.
Many on the right Speculate.
Democrats would like to see Joe Biden sit out the debates with President Trump entirely.
They're excused.
Total fabrication.
The commander-in-chief's alleged habit of making false statements.
But the debate would provide the ideal opportunity, if that were true, for Joe Biden to expose him.
The Trump campaign tried to add a debate before early voting began, which is already taking place, but it was rejected by the commission with the apparent support of the Democrats.
Meanwhile, retired mixed martial artist Tim Kennedy followed up using his massive audience on Twitter, suggesting Joe Reagan, the former host of Fear Factor, current Mixed martial arts color commentator offered to host a four-hour debate between Trump and Biden.
Kennedy promoted the idea, describing it as an opportunity for the two men to share their vision of America.
Who wants this?
He concluded, tweeting, getting a retreat from the president.
Oh, I do.
Of course, Biden's not going to do it.
It would make him look bad.
He's cognitively impaired.
So the Democrats are determined to keep Biden in the basement as much as possible, which is a pity.
The American people deserve better.
Giuseppe, your thoughts?
Well, it's interesting the author of that article ignored the reason Joe Rogan has the
standing to make such an offer.
He has one of the most successful podcasts in terms of millions of daily listeners in
the Western world.
And he's also, for years, has been a stand-up comedian.
And so he's got a lot of followers who would welcome Rogan as the kind of like hip moderator.
And Trump jumped on it right away and said, I'll do it.
And the four hours would really reveal, does Biden have the stamina to endure the rigors of being elected president, which I personally doubt.
And as far as the debates, what they're going to do with Biden is they're going to give him some type of IV with either a natural cocktail of B12, vitamin C, and other natural stimulants that for a day or so will give him a lot of energy, or they'll go the more corporate pharmaceutical route and give him something that will hype him up for a similar amount of time.
So we're not going to really see what Biden's really about in the debates because they'll have him artificially amped up.
I'm really concerned with an infusion of adrenochrome, to tell you the truth.
It could be that bad.
They're so desperate.
Susan, your thoughts?
I think Joe Rogan is a very good and seems to be a very balanced and nuanced interviewer, despite having worked on Fear Factor.
So I think he would be a great moderator.
And as Giuseppe said, he would command a very large audience.
He's exceedingly popular, one of the top-ranked interviewers in the nation.
So I think he'd be a fantastic platform.
He seems to be more balanced than our politicos pretend to be.
And I'm looking forward to Biden's debates in the next month.
I'm not sure if he is going to be able to handle them or do perform well, but I'm looking forward to the debates with President Trump.
I think how the nation would react if they try to finesse him completely.
I can't see it working.
Meanwhile, Rogan wants to moderate a debate.
Trump has agreed to it.
If the Democrats have to steal the election to win the Oval Office, America is done.
There's no doubt that would be the necessity.
Meanwhile, an FBI agent who found Hillary Clinton's emails on the Weiner laptop says his immoral agency bosses sat on the discovery for a month and told him to erase his findings until he went directly to the U.S.
Attorney.
This is fairly stunning.
This is FBI agent John Robertson who's trying to get the message out.
He feared he would be made a scapegoat when he found the new emails less than two months before voting day in the wake of the DailyMail.com's revelation that Anthony Weiner, whose wife Huma Abedin was Clinton's top aide, ...was sexting an underage girl.
He watched nervously as the Bureau did nothing for a month until he went outside the chain of command and spoke with the U.S.
Attorney's Office overseeing the case.
The only odd vice from his boss was to erase his office computer, which meant leave no record of his investigation.
It's really outrageous.
Meanwhile, a book by Washington Post Justice Department correspondent Devin Barrett is said to be a comprehensive, revealing, and dramatic look inside the Bureau's role in the 2016 presidential election.
Central to the investigation is Clinton's use of a private email server while she was Secretary of State, how the inquiry was handled over the FBI and former Director James Comey closing it with no criminal charges, Rebuking her staff for being extremely careless, which was not a criminal offense, to being, you know, deliberately violative of procedures, which were.
The FBI seized Weiner's computer and the agent who was tasked with going through it found yet more Clinton emails.
It was completely disgusting.
Meanwhile, I even have a book about it, exposing the Russia hoax.
Giuseppe, your thoughts?
Well, Jim, I prefer the pronunciation Weiner for former Congressman Anthony Weiner, which is a remarkably appropriate last name for all his antics with underage women and quite the philanderer, it turns out, and made no secrets about it.
From what you and other intrepid researchers have revealed, there's some horrific things on that Clinton, Hillary Clinton laptop, including Gold Star Detective Jimmy Boots Rothstein, former New York police officer, has seen it and revealed.
It's amazing how they can suppress these things and people end up dead, people end up bought off, and all of a sudden, you know, you can't even really find any leaks of that, which is just stunning, the level of power They offer.
And, you know, to sum up, the Clintons, the Obamas, a lot of these deep state operatives, they're just satanically evil and what their machinations involve.
And it's good for this FBI agent, Robertson, to come out and risk his own life telling this tale.
I've seen a report that 10 of the 12 N.Y.P.D.
officers who viewed the contents are dead.
Susan, your thoughts?
Yes, I think you're right, Jim.
I think that was Frazzled Trip with the activities surrounding that little girl.
Yes, so I think Hillary Clinton is very naive to think that she can smash her Blackberries and expect the data to go away because the NSA records everything.
They have all the information that any of us send electronically in the cloud, so it is retrievable.
But I think that Trump probably realizes that if he doesn't kind of expose and bring some of these people to justice, they'll continue to To frustrate his efforts to make America great again.
They'll continue to be a problem.
So I think he's trying to maybe nip them in the bud.
I expect major indictments to come down following the election.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send fan mail, pro or con, to liveneedtonowatgmail.com.
Liveneedtonowatgmail.com.
Here's some recent.
Robert Willis.
They're going to kill A.G.
Barr.
Political coup.
What a scam.
What is it going to take for people to wake up in this country?
Robert Willis.
Soros is in control of most schools.
Rock boards.
Political coup.
Another home run by the Need to Know crew.
Keep the truth coming.
Robert Willis.
Right.
Great show.
Meanwhile, fan mail.
Thundersteel 1988.
Dear Need to Know crew, thanks for such a scintillating and information-laden program today.
I have several brief comments I wish to expound upon.
First, I have to tell Giuseppe how utterly impressed I am with his overall political and intellectual acumen.
I immensely enjoy his commentary and share many of his beliefs.
Once situated and comfortable with the format, he has been spot-on on proverbial fire.
Kudos to you for helping save the Daily Show and for making its transition silky smooth.
Second, I rarely disagree with the great James Fetzer, but the Big Ten Conference basically pulled a Joe Biden who reversed his stance on crime some 70 days after the first riot.
The Big Ten believe, since they were the first league to suspend operations, they would dictate whether college football would be played at all this year.
The day after the decision by the Big Ten presidents, the Pac-Ten also followed suit and canceled their season.
It was Notre Dame, which I have an immense dislike for, who joined the ACC for a year in order for college football to be played.
They gave up their independent status first time ever to play a full schedule.
Immense props to the ACC for seeing through this charade and for marching forward with Notre Dame.
The Big Ten had zero interest in playing until they got resistance and opposition from another major conference.
As such, I'm glad Jim can watch his league play.
I have other disdain for the college presidents and those universities who held their fans and players hostage over this fraud-demic.
Lastly, I would love to have a segment of the Foushee Friday Show or perhaps a weekend report dedicated to questions from viewers.
An example would be, how was the Smith-Mundt Act rescinded, changed by Obama?
Why has President Trump not tried to change it by executive order, etc.?
I'm certain many viewers like myself need clarification on certain questions that are not easily researched but heard on your network.
So I hope some sort of Fauci follow-up Friday show will happen.
Thank you for sharing the news.
I need to know.
Giuseppe, your thoughts?
Well, it seems to me ThunderSteel88 is a keen judge of content.
You know, it's great.
Keep the fan mail coming.
We appreciate everybody's insights and observations.
And, you know, we don't want to redo the past with Fauci Friday.
That's the old days.
But we can certainly brainstorm and come up with a new interesting nickname, probably dictated by the breakneck events of current politics and life in general.
Susan, your thoughts?
I'd like to address the Smith-Mundt question.
The Smith-Mundt Act was put in place to prevent the federal government from spreading propaganda to the American citizens.
It was in place through the Clinton administration when they tried to, actually they were concerned about information coming forth with regards to their treason with respect to China.
So the Clinton administration moved the I moved the USIA, which was the information line for the State Department, out of the USIA and into the State Department and they put the Voice of America, which was geared at spreading information to the Eastern Bloc during the Cold War, they put that under the Broadcasting Board of Governors and then prevented the
those agencies from spreading information to the American people.
But as the elite, the cabal began to move forward with the agenda of implementing the China agenda,
the agenda of implementing the China agenda, they wanted to further like indoctrinate the people.
they wanted to further like indoctrinate the people. And so the Smith-Mundt Act was rescinded
And so the Smith-Mundt Act was rescinded while Clinton, while Hillary Clinton was Secretary of
while Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State to cover up essentially what they were doing and to
State to, you know, to cover up essentially what they were doing and to further indoctrinate the
people as they have done quite late brazenly to the point of actually predicting Hillary Clinton's
imminent victory in 2016. So I believe that this was being finessed by the Clintons and as
why President Trump has not placed it back through executive order is a very good question,
but I think there may be some structural changes involved that he'd have to do before that could
happen. That's very interesting Susan, because my understanding has been it was rescinded by
the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act of 2012 under Barack Obama, which was just in time to bring a
Sandy Hook and then a whole floodgate of other of these false flag events by thereby legalizing them.
So I'm fascinated by your additional observations and contributions here.
Meanwhile, if anyone has the inclination to support my legal defense fund at the suggestion of Giuseppe, I have adopted a digital mode using Zelle, where you can make contributions directly to jfetzeratd.umn.edu.
Jfetzeratd, that's for Duluth, .umnuniversityofminnesota.edu using Zelle.
If you think that's a good idea.
Meanwhile, our final thoughts.
Giuseppe, yours.
I find it very interesting in the last couple of days that the great Pharmaceutical Vaccination Alliance has now changed their public Persona and their public position and now they're aligning with people who demand more vaccine safety Concern over vaccine Testing that there's never been a placebo true double-blind placebo test So it tells me they've got something rolling out soon that they're gonna hang the first egg
First, Moderna vaccine, which is probably going to be the first to market, is going to hang that one out to dry as the evil boogeyman, and then every other remaining one is going to be considered safe and ready to go.
It's really fascinating.
They've totally changed their strategy in the last couple days.
Susan, your thoughts?
Well, we're definitely living in interesting times, Jim, and we never know what's coming down the pike, but I'm looking forward to seeing what lies ahead, for sure.
Well, I think it's my final thought that this, uh, the emergence of the The Supreme Court nomination is actually going to turn out to be a political plus for Trump.
It is the case that there's a surge of Democratic donations because of it, but their candidates are terrible choices.
They're not inspiring any enthusiasm.
No one's turning out.
They'd already lost the election before this issue emerged.
So they have a few last final grasps, but it's not going to make a difference to the outcome.
This is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin, thanking Giuseppe Vaffangelo from the District of Columbia and Susan Bradford from Springfield, Virginia, for the excellence of their commentary.
We're glad you're here with us.
We'll be back tomorrow with all the news you need to know.
▲
Export Selection