NeedToKnow (11 September 2020) with Giuseppe Vafanculo and Michael Ivey
|
Time
Text
🎵 Outro Music 🎵 This is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin with Giuseppe Befangulo
in the District of Columbia and Michael Ivey in Asheville, North Carolina.
We begin bombshell up to 90% of COVID-19.
Positive test results are false.
The test kits matching dead viral fragments that pose no infection risk.
This is a very significant realization.
It turns out the PCR tests millions of scared Americans have been hoodwinked into getting are a sham.
They only pick up partial viral fragments rather than whole viruses and are hardly the gold standard proponents have claimed.
Even the New York Times is reporting they're diagnosing huge numbers of people who may be carrying relatively insignificant amounts of the virus.
More importantly, large number of people who have no virus at all.
They're not infected.
We're shutting down the country over completely imaginary test results.
The entire pandemic has been built on the lie that millions upon millions of people are testing positive for the Wuhan coronavirus, when in reality most of them are healthy, receiving false positive test results.
It is a shock.
It is a shame.
The Times remarkably is barely reporting any of this, not least with the same type of rigor it previously ported on PCR tests being the gold standard.
Okay, and it turns out now, Big Pharma has been scooping up billions of dollars by the test at $150 a pop.
More than 85 million PCR tests have been administered.
This is a stunning scam.
Giuseppe, your thoughts?
Jim, it gets better.
Intrepid investigators this week have released findings digging into the World Health Organization that shows that massive orders and shipments for COVID-19 tests were being conducted in 2017 and 2018.
So they've been ramping up Uh, to pull off this scandemic for a decade, and it really got heated up about two, three years ago.
So, there you go.
There's Blockbuster II.
I think, I think that was, those were World Bank documents, Giuseppe.
Oh, okay.
Yeah, go ahead, Michael, with your thoughts.
Oh, yeah.
Um, John Rappaport has really been knocking it out of the park lately.
I'd, uh, highly recommend people go to his nomorefakenews.com website.
In conjunction with the one that you just brought up, that the New York Times ran that story about 90% of all COVID case positives are not, in fact, people who are infected at all.
In conjunction with that and the CDC admission that only 6% of all the death certificates listed COVID only, He says, combining these two developments, the implication is quite clear.
We're in the middle of a less than average flu season.
No need for any vaccine.
No need for Tony the Rat Fauci.
No need for any Bill Gates.
No need for any CDC or the World Health Organization.
Michael, very, very well stated.
Excellent.
Meanwhile, it's about time the GOP has introduced legislation to reform Section 230 of the Communications Act to rein in big tech censorship.
If censorship's really gotten bad this year, as the tech gods, Twitter's Jack Dorsey, Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg, instruct their minions to double down on ever-so-controlled narratives, hide legitimate and factual information from users, and obscure the truth, In an effort to promote the viewpoints and opinions of people and movements that they favor, whose objective is to destroy America as it was founded.
Several prominent Republican Senators, thankfully, have introduced legislation to turn up the pressure on big tech.
Senator Roger Wicker, Marsha Blackburn, and Lindsey Graham introduced the Online Freedom and Viewpoint Diversity Act on September 8th.
Which would impose greater accountability.
Big tech companies have stretched their liability shield past its limits and national discourse now suffers as a consequence.
Blackburn noted in a tweet.
What's more, rather than allow companies simply deep-six otherwise objectionable material, the bill limits censorship to material that is self-promoting, self-harming, promoting terrorism, or unlawful, and spells out the circumstances under which it's permissible.
This is a very significant development.
There is even more good news.
Private companies are developing alternatives, such as video platforms like Brighton, Brighteon and Twitter like Brighteon Social.
Giuseppe, your thoughts?
Jim, this is outrageous, the censorship to such a draconian degree.
Viewers may or may not realize that Operation LifeLog done by the Defense Department was a total Facebook development.
The day LifeLog Facebook came into existence.
So everything Facebook, Twitter, the globalist parasites who run Google as a communist platform, they all are in cahoots to rob our freedoms.
And that's just outrageous and it needs to stop.
I can't believe that Trump, who has been censored as the President of the United States, hasn't issued some type of executive order.
And it gets even worse.
Joe Biden, the presidential candidate for the Democrat Bolshevik Party in 1995, four years before the 9-11 false flag, wrote the Patriot Act.
It was all sitting there waiting.
So this is just totalitarianism, and we need our rights of free speech, freedom of assembly, all the freedoms back yesterday.
I couldn't agree more.
Michael Ivey, your thoughts?
Yeah, on the general topic of censorship, sort of stepping back and taking a long view of late, I realized that the internet itself was a DARPA project, and it was sold to everyone as this great freedom of expression venue, while quietly the private companies That we're monopolizing the internet gradually.
We're meeting in Davos and Bilderberg and planning exactly how they were going to squelch all the people once they've got everybody hooked.
So that's what I consider a long view of what is happening now.
They're just now rolling out the censorship that has been planned for a long time.
I think you're correct that it has been a double-edged sword because we had about 15 years, a golden age of the internet, free from censorship by and large, and now they're cracking down.
It's remarkable that I even have two stories from the same source, but today I have a third.
This is from NewsTarget, a new venue that is clearly a branch of Natural News and Mike Adams.
Here we have a story, the third in a row from that source.
Wildfires in the West could be coordinated arson attacks, say federal law enforcement.
They continue to rage out of control in Washington, Oregon, and California.
Spreading into populated areas east of Salem and Eugene, Oregon.
Evacuations taking place.
It now appears that the fires are being started by a network of domestic terrorists who pick out vulnerable areas.
Here are several examples.
Law enforcement officers in Washington arrested a 36-year-old man caught setting a fire along State Route 167 in Spokane.
Officers arrested Christine Comello, a 36-year-old woman caught starting multiple fires A 44-year-old man from Eugene, Oregon, Elias Newton Pendergrass, was suspected for an arson attack that burned 400 acres.
Another middle-aged man caught setting fires in the Dexter State Recreational Area in Dexter, Oregon.
The crime network includes California, wherein Salinas, a 37-year-old named Edita Esquivel, was caught intentionally setting fires along Highway 101.
The officers are in the preliminary stage of the investigation, but this appears to be a very serious matter.
They are a page out of the Antifa and BLM playbooks.
Domestic terrorists commit inside the cities, are being taken to the countryside and the suburban areas.
We're in the midst of a real civil war.
Most Americans simply haven't realized its full dimensions.
Giuseppe, your thoughts?
We're in the midst of a globalist, communist, Bolshevik 2.0 attack.
They've taken over the Democratic Party.
George Soros, whose real name is Jorgi Swartz, a Hungarian Jew who sold out his fellow Jews to the Nazis as a young teen during World War II.
He's amassed a fortune by backstabbing, throat cutting.
He's absolutely A subhuman and now his little 4'11 son, Shlomo, who bragged about how he got to pick the vice presidential candidate for the Democrats, the despicable Kamala Harris, totally unqualified.
And that's it, Jim.
People think it's as simple as masks or no mask.
It's far more Despicable than that.
We are under attack by an individual who has billions of dollars and wants to destroy the Republic of the United States.
You got it right.
Yes.
George Soros, a monster.
Michael Ivey, your thoughts?
Yeah, I agree with everything Giuseppe just said.
We're under attack by much more than an individual.
We're under attack by several individuals and corporate and banking entities across the world.
Uh, all of them have unlimited funds.
Uh, specific to what you were saying about wildfires in Northern California.
Um, I haven't studied that issue a great deal, but I do know probably the best source for information who's been stating that as a, um, as an agenda item for The new world order to wipe out everything in Northern California by fires and to drive people into cities in that area is Deborah Tavares.
You guys probably know of her.
Yeah, she's excellent.
Okay.
No, that's terrific.
Yeah, Michael.
Excellent.
Meanwhile, further on the Black Lives Matter and TIFA front, Senator Rand Paul tells Stephen Crowder how corporate America is actually funding the riots that are destroying America.
It's quite shocking.
The senator was attacked by an angry mob outside of the Republican National Convention last month.
Actually, it was leaving the White House.
Made the comments in an interview with Blaze TV's Steven Crowder Thursday, discussing his run-in with the crazed protesters and Black Lives Matter riots in general.
We're seeing these people, some of the same people in Portland and Kenosha and D.C.
and Louisville, Paul said.
How are they getting there?
They're staying at the Willard Hotel, maybe $500 to $1,000 a night.
Who's paying for them to stay in the Willard?
Who's paying for them to have an air flight?
Who's paying them to do this?
And here's the sad truth of it.
It's probably not going to be a sinister name like George Soros.
He means to add a loan.
We're going to be corporate America, which is giving money to Black Lives Matter.
And my guess is if we follow the money, the people who paid for the plane tickets, the hotels who continue to do this as Black Lives Matter, people should not be giving money to a group that's funding thuggery.
Paul proposed, instead of funding Black Lives Matter, that those who desire to promote racial equality should donate to organizations such as the United Negro College Fund or the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People.
He's made a lot of valuable observations.
The notion riders are flooding into American cities from out of town to fuel unrest is hardly a conspiracy theory.
In Kenosha, for example, 102 Of the 175 arrested were residents of other cities around the country.
Giuseppe, your thoughts?
Well, Rand Paul has it exactly right that these are professional provocateurs.
These are foot soldiers, essentially.
And what's interesting about Rand Paul pointing out it's corporate America.
What is corporate America?
Corporate America is essentially owned by the oligarchs.
The oligarchs are controlled by the globalist banks.
And it's interesting that Donald Trump Put in place on the Federal Reserve a non-Zionist, non-Jew Powell.
And what did the Zionists, the globalist banksters do?
They immediately created a shadowy organization, BlackRock, run by Larry Finkelstein, who now owns 5% or more of every major corporation on the planet.
That means they have a say in every major corporation.
So it's all coming down from the same globalists, either the Zionist parasites or the communist
parasites, but it's all coming from the same money and puppet masters.
Giuseppe, you got it right. Very disturbing. Michael, your thoughts?
Yeah, this is again, taking a long view, the working out of what the Bilderberg group has probably been planning for
decades now, this corporate oligarchy that has so much power now that they figure they can do anything, including
imprison the whole world based on some phony pandemic.
Um...
Um, I remember seeing the list when, uh, the Black Lives Matter and, uh, Antifa organizations began to do fundraising or You know, exploded onto the mainstream media and they started getting corporate funding.
I remember seeing a list of those corporations and it's just astounding.
It's like, darn near all of the large corporations in this country and the world.
Well, they're global now anyway.
Are backing the mercenaries, as Giuseppe said, who are rampaging through cities and creating more chaos.
I guess it's part of their order out of chaos strategy, but they certainly are creating chaos here in the United States now.
It would be a good thing if they were to get their priorities straight.
We're right back.
In case you would like to pursue in greater detail aspects of the stories we cover here, you may want to check out my website at jimtheconspiracyguide.com.
Many of the conspiracies, the recent events that were staged or manufactured From Sandy Hook to the Boston bombing to Orlando to Charlottesville to Parkland are recorded in books where I brought together groups of experts to sort out what happened at moonrockbooks.com
And should any of you be so disposed to contribute to my Legal Defense Fund, you can reach out to me, James H. Fetzer, Legal Defense Fund, 800 Violet Lane, Oregon, Wisconsin, 53575.
We now return, and since this is the 19th observance of 9-11, let's take back to that day.
I think a bomb went off in the lobby first, then a plane hit the building.
Then another plane hit the other building.
And when I was coming through the doors on the other side of the Trade Center, Something, either they blew the lobby up, or something, because they blew the glass out of the doors, and knocked us all down, and I got, uh, smoke and everything on me.
I just feel a little shook up, because I got blasted, you know?
No second flight, it was a bomb.
Bombing another building, not second plane.
It was a bomb.
Who said a second plane?
That's what we're told.
Second plane.
We saw it on television.
All right.
Thanks a lot.
Woods, just small brush fires, you know, the ground smoking, debris everywhere, pieces of metal, paper, insulation, wiring.
And I just looked around and no people, you know, and I'm thinking, where are the people?
It looked like it was a controlled implosion.
It didn't fall over.
It looked as if somebody put TNT all throughout that building.
It pancaked from floor to floor to floor.
It looks like one of those scenes of an old building being, you know, purposely dynamited and blown up.
I spoke to the Chief of Safety for the New York City Fire Department.
He received word of the possibility of a secondary device, that is, another bomb going off.
He thinks that there were actually devices that were planted in the building.
I saw this plane come out of nowhere and just ring right into the side of the Twin Tower, exploding through the other side.
And then I witnessed both towers collapse.
One first and then the second.
Mostly due to structural failure because the fire was just too intense.
I said, you know, we've had such a terrible loss of life.
Maybe the smallest thing to do is pull it.
And they made that decision to pull.
And then we watched the building collapse.
Of course, we know that while the Building 7 did indeed collapse after Larry Silverstein suggested it be pulled, which is a construction term for bring down by controlled demolition, that did not happen with either of the Twin Towers, which were blowing apart in every direction, as we explained.
During our review of 9-11 yesterday, what's fascinating is that this was an Israeli operation.
Many Israelis were arrested on 9-11 in New York City.
There were groups of Israeli so-called art students in both of the buildings.
The motive appears to have been well defined by Wesley Clark on 3 October 2017, to bring down the governments of seven countries in the next five years, beginning with Iraq and Libya, ending with Syria, and then confronting the Persian nation of Iran.
For what objective?
It appears to have been a Zionist plan to expand Israel to the dimensions of the greater Israel, which as you can see here, Requires securing a large chunk of Egypt, of Saudi Arabia, all of Jordan, all of Lebanon, a big chunk of Iraq, and most of Syria.
That was the agenda.
The brainchild behind it appears to have been Bibi Netanyahu, shown here with Ehud Olmert, who flew into New York City the day before 9-11.
Meanwhile, just remember the attitude of the Israelis toward America.
Here's Bibi Netanyahu.
America is a golden calf and we will suck it dry, chop it up and sell it off piece by piece until there is nothing left but the world's biggest welfare state that we will create and control.
That is what we do to countries that we hate.
We destroy them very slowly.
If you want to see the full two hour, you can find it on JimTheConspiracyGuy.com or you can go to my Twitter at Jim Fetzer.
And if you were to go to Moonrock Books, you could obtain a copy of America Nuked on 9-11, where I brought together about 16 experts to dissect what exactly happened on that tragic and fateful day.
You can find it there at Moonrock Books.
Giuseppe, your thoughts?
Well, Jim, that montage I put together, I specifically edited down to the bare bones essentials, much like Michael, who's a musician and a studio operator, recording studio.
If you can take a song and you strip it down to just the singer and an acoustic guitar, if it's a really good song, It will work without all the accoutrements.
And so, the first part of that video was the witnesses, and there were hundreds, if not thousands, who said there was bombs that went off.
And then, the Shanksville, no bodies, no plane exhibits.
And then, within moments after the towers began to come down, the Harley man, who was a total CIA plant, Sets the narrative and then our good friend Lucky Larry Silverstein who just happened to be able to purchase the Twin Towers and then insure them with double indemnity if it were a terrorist attack.
It's so obviously a false flag performed by Israel and the traitor Dick Cheney who was the inside man for this operation.
I love it when the witness says, no plane, it was a bomb.
And the reporter says, but we saw it on television.
Yes, that's what we saw on television.
Michael Ivey, your thoughts.
I love that clip of the Harley Davidson guy because it's so obvious that he's acting and going through his lines.
Yeah, 9-11 is what really sent me down the proverbial rabbit hole.
And after 22 years of being a professional investigator and teacher of investigators, I'm embarrassed to say that it took me like four or five months to really understand that the whole thing was a pile of you-know-what that we were being told.
And the second very significant realization that came on the heels of that one is that they could not have done it without near complete control of all of our media.
Prior to 9-11, I was kind of a, you know, a moderate CNN junkie, thinking that I was getting Good information about what was going on in the world.
But that was a serious wake-up call to realize that everybody, including NPR, which I also used to listen to a lot, was on the same page telling the same lies and preventing any truth from being told about 9-11.
Hey, Giuseppe, How lucky are you and I on the anniversary of 9-11 to be doing a show with what might be the best 9-11 expert in the world?
A legend!
The legend of Dr. Jim Fetzer.
I'd like to make one quick point which is CNN and NPR were valid information sources up to the early 90s and then it began to change and you know much like you put a A frog in lukewarm water and slowly boil it.
It was gradual.
It wasn't like immediately you had the corporate takeover of it all.
It happened gradually.
So those were viable sources up until about four or five years before 9-11.
Well, Michael makes an important point, because as we previously explained, I have a panel of 100 executives with CNN, all of whom are dual U.S.-Israeli citizens.
I have another panel of 100 executives with NBC, all of whom are dual U.S.-Israeli citizens.
I have another panel of 100 executives from the New York Times, all of whom are dual U.S.-Israeli citizens.
I was astonished this morning to discover that the Jewish Journal Forward has published a piece by Ben Gould.
My fellow Jews, getting rid of Trump is a religious imperative.
I found this outrageous.
Meanwhile, Rabbi Jonathan Sachs observes, I'm afraid American Jewry is making a big, big, big mistake for injecting themselves into politics.
He's certainly got that right.
Ben Gould wants to go ahead and make a case as to why Jews collectively should oppose Donald Trump.
He acknowledges Trump has done good things, moving the embassy, recognizing the sovereignty of the Golan Heights, authoring a peace plan, but that he says hasn't brought a two-state solution any closer.
Nor have they made Israel more secure, in his opinion.
When Trump tried to ban people from Muslim countries, we remembered our expulsions and exile, writes Ben Gould.
When Trump denied refugees fleeing violence and persecution, We remembered our refugees facing imminent death turned away.
When Trump blamed immigrants for crime and economic hardship, remember Jews being singled out and scapegoated.
When Trump refers to COVID-19 as a Chinese virus, we remember Jews being attributed to diseases for centuries.
But all this is based upon faulty analogies, vague language, committing elementary fallacies.
According to him, Our Jewish faith is distinguished by three characteristics, compassion, modesty, and benevolence.
These beliefs and traits are the opposite of Donald Trump, who fought harder to keep Confederate monuments than to defeat the coronavirus.
They should give us no choice but to condemn Trump, and they demand that we join the struggle for racial justice.
As a diverse community that includes black people, it's our basic responsibility To stand up explicitly for members of our faith under attack, but also for the oppressed, whoever or wherever they may be.
We should stand in solidarity with a black community without preconditions, like requiring ideological symmetry or expecting a personal invitation.
He says it all comes down to beating Donald Trump, which is not just political for us Jews, it's religious.
Now get this about the credits of this guy.
You know he served as National Field Director for the Sister District Project, worked on political campaigns for President Obama, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Congresswoman Jan Schakowsky, and Chicago Mayor Larry Lightfoot.
I wrote this, I was so incensed, as a non-Jew, agnostic actually, who cares passionately about liberty and justice in the United States.
I cannot imagine a more inflammatory message than what, to my utter astonishment, I read here.
The very idea of opposing Trump on the ground that his actions on behalf of America contradict Jewish values, and that he ought to be opposed as a matter of religion, should it become widely known, will incite anti-Semitism to a degree heretofore unimaginable.
This has to be the most lunatic position a representative of the faith can adopt.
It reflects a degree of arrogance and paternalism that is profoundly disrespectful of our right to decide political matters for ourselves and is therefore immoral in the extreme.
Where the core of morality is always treating other persons with respect.
As a retired professor of philosophy, I would not have expected a blunder of this magnitude to emanate from a source proclaiming dedication to compassion, modesty, and benevolence, which its message contradicts in both word and spirit.
Trump had good reasons to take the measures he has taken, where Ben Gould comes across as petty, mean, and manipulative, reinforcing stereotypes we all deplore.
His history of involvement with prominent Democrats in the past reveals his grossly partisan agenda.
What a completely despicable declaration.
Giuseppe, your thoughts?
Him, Ben Gold, is a fraud.
He is an operative.
As the classic interview with Amy Goodman shows, anytime the Jew doesn't like an observation about their actual activities, they call the person telling the truth an anti-Semite.
And so all the anti-semitic stereotypes, all the anti-semitic tropes, in reality are absolute factual truths.
Often when there is dissent expressed in the United States against policies of the Israeli government, people here are called anti-semitic.
What is your response to that as an Israeli Jew?
Well, it's a trick.
We always use it.
When from Europe somebody is criticizing Israel, then we bring up the Holocaust.
When in this country people are criticizing Israel, then they are anti-Semitic.
And the organization is strong and has a lot of money.
And the ties between Israel and the American Jewish establishment are very strong, and they are strong in this country.
As you know, they have power, which is okay.
They are talented people, and they have power, money, and media, and other things.
And their attitude is, Israel, my country, right or wrong?
The identification.
And they are not ready to hear criticism.
And it's very easy to blame people who criticize certain acts of the Israeli government as anti-Semitic and to bring up the Holocaust and the suffering of the Jewish people.
And that justifies everything we do to the Palestinians.
And it's sad for the decent people who practice the Judah faith and don't deserve to experience the blowback that's coming at them when more and more people are realizing that, be it the Zionists or the Communists, the international Jew is attacking this country and trying to destroy the Republic.
And so, he's full of you-know-what.
Michael, your thoughts?
Jim, that was an awesome statement.
I'd love it if you would send that to me so I could spread it out.
Yeah, I thought it was funny that that guy said something about interjecting the Jewish community into politics.
I don't know what he's been looking at, but the Jewish community, not Totally as one, but definitely leaders have been inserting themselves into American politics for a hundred years.
I mean, look at the ADL, look at AIPAC.
They intimidate anybody involved so that they maintain their positions of power.
Look at the SPLC, look at the whole operation that Jeffrey Epstein was running to blackmail whoever it was in politics that they needed blackmailed.
It's just a long-standing thing, although they've been very careful to keep it under wraps and hidden and to call anybody an anti-Semite who points it out all these years, like Giuseppe said.
One thing I wanted to say along those same lines in 9-11 as well is that just about anybody who doesn't know much about 9-11 and you start talking to them about the alternate stories that were the truth of what happened.
The first question that they'll always ask is, well, if those guys didn't do it, who did it?
And so that's such an important question.
And I want on this 9-11 anniversary to give a plug to the 9-11 researcher Christopher Bolin.
Although Bolin He has some things that we wouldn't disagree with, like his thing about thermite.
He's probably been the most courageous and detailed explorer and expositor of the Israeli-Zionist criminal network here and in other places in the world.
Responsible primarily for 9-11, in my opinion.
I'll just say Christopher Bolin is brilliant on the politics of 9-11 and very weak on the science.
What I found particularly insulting about this piece in the foreword is that Israel manipulated the United States through 9-11 to do its dirty work in the Middle East to benefit Israel.
And then here we have a guy trashing the President of the United States who wants to put America first, and in spite of his largesse toward Israel, I truly believe Donald Trump does want to put Israel first.
So I'm profoundly upset, even insulted, that The Forward would publish that piece.
Yeah, you mean Trump profoundly wants to put America first?
Yes.
You said Israel first just now.
I meant America.
Thank you.
Thank you very much, Michael.
Meanwhile, does Trump's silent majority still exist in 2020?
A new Rasmussen poll claims that it still does, so that in spite of their efforts, they may very well fall short.
In 2016, many Trump supporters refused to talk to pollsters or tell them what they were voting for.
Are they still around today?
They think Rasmussen seems to have the answer.
They seem to be hiding their vote again.
The latest Rasmussen Report national phone and online survey found 17% of likely U.S.
voters who strongly approve of the job Trump is doing say they're less likely to let others know how they intend to vote.
By comparison, just half as many who strongly disapprove say the same thing.
Since the mainstream media users online, even celebrities, have gone out of their way to shame Trump supporters, even doxing young Trump supporters, exposing them to danger, many Americans who support the president may fear coming under attack or even losing their jobs.
We've seen leftists go after people just for wearing a Trump hat.
So it looks very much as though Trump is standing tall with the voters, but that we're getting misleading polling, just as we have in the past, where however even Rasmussen has shown recently Trump's approval rating up to 52%.
Giuseppe, your thoughts?
I think that the Democratic-Bolshevik Party, with their support of the violent burn, loot, and murder of professional provocateurs and the Antifa globalist traitors, are all but ensuring that Donald Trump is re-elected.
Think about it.
In Salt Lake City, Utah, in Kansas City, Kansas.
Ryan Lander, Wisconsin, the real people in the real flyover states.
Would anybody other than a mentally ill college student or professor or someone who is fancy celebrity worship and buys into the whole Lies of what Trump is doing, Trump derangement syndrome.
Do you think that anyone would actually vote for Biden after seeing what these Bolshevik 2.0 terrorists have done to this country and the major cities?
I think it's gonna be a landslide for Trump.
Michael, your thoughts?
Yeah, I was gonna say something similar.
For whatever amount of his silent base that Trump may have lost in the last four years, and frankly, I think he deserves to have lost some of it, because there's a lot of problems that have occurred since then.
I think for the amount that he's lost, he's probably gained four or five times that from the extremely radical positions that the Democratic Party has taken now and has supported and backed all this crazy urban terrorism, rioting and burning and looting.
And people notice that kind of thing and they don't want it.
Michael, I think you've got it exactly right.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Write us with any comments, criticism, pro or con to liveneedtoknowatgmail.com.
I repeat, liveneedtoknowatgmail.com.
Here's a sample from Dave Davis about Kenosha.
Giuseppe found his mentor.
Jim's gratitude cannot be contained.
Perfect matchup.
Jim's the expert on fakery and should be able to discern this Kyle Rittenhouse staged event.
I've examined the footage carefully.
One thug who was supposedly shot in the head by Kyle had a clean, round, cut-out hole through his skullcap, as if it were made previously, with no blood or a puddle on the ground below his head.
This fake story may involve further scrutiny.
Otherwise, you're propagating a false mainstream narrative.
Otherwise, great job in exposing George Floyd.
Well, the mainstream narrative, of course, David, is that This guy was gone reckless and just wildly shooting people right and left.
I think it's very obvious this was authentic footage.
He was actually under attack.
Here he's being assaulted with a skateboard, which is a deadly weapon.
I regard the story as authentic as we have presented it.
I can't account for the hole in the cab, which I've yet to see myself, but it would appear to me to have a We're open because of course scientific reasoning requires it with the access to new evidence or alternative hypotheses.
We may have to reject hypotheses we previously accepted, accept hypotheses we previously rejected.
And leave others in suspense.
At this point in time, however, given the evidence available to me, I regard Kyle Rittenhouse as an authentic American hero.
Here's a comment from one of my best commentators on my blog.
The Dems are self-immolating on an almost daily basis.
Kamala Harris keeps putting her foot in her mouth while it becomes more and more doubtful Biden could even found his mouth, or his foot for that matter.
Voters see this despite the mainstream media attempt to hide it.
They see the riots and understand the pundits calling them peaceful is nonsense.
They see the attempt to defund the police and know this too is madness.
They have watched the futile and baseless efforts to impeach Trump at taxpayers' expense.
They realize that in 51 years of politics, Biden has accomplished nothing of lasting value.
They have seen his lies in front of the camera all those years.
They have no respect for the Dems taking a knee in the halls of Congress.
They have seen the FBI cover for Hillary's criminality.
They are tired of fighting Zionist wars and fed up with their control of Congress.
They are sick of a press that's so far left they may as well be broadcasting from Beijing.
They knew Kaoshi was a mouthpiece for the pharmaceutical companies and the gates from hell.
Is interested only in becoming the world's richest individual, I dare not call it a man, who will vaccinate everyone's scam.
They know Pelosi is teetering on the edge of her descent into Hades and closer to spitting her choppers out in the halls of Congress than ever before.
American voters are becoming more aware as we speak.
Do not underestimate them.
Trump may well carry every damn state.
Meanwhile, our final thoughts.
Giuseppe, yours.
Well, Jim, replying to our letter writer, I have read the Milwaukee coroner
who handles all the autopsies for the entire Southeast Wisconsin, the report on that young man who we see the
video where one moment he's saying, shoot me, N-word,
and then the next it cuts to him lying on the ground, supposedly dying.
The coroner report states that the autopsy reveals that he was
shot multiple times in the back.
And if you look at that wound on the side of his head, that's a grazing blow of a low, like a .22 caliber bullet.
So he died of multiple bullet wounds into his back, which ruptured his liver and other vital organs.
So Kyle Rittenhouse did not kill that dead man.
His fellow provocateurs did.
That's very, very interesting, Giuseppe.
Michael Ivey, your thoughts?
That is interesting.
I hadn't heard that information yet.
I'll get you guys a copy of the Corners Report.
Yeah, that'd be great.
As a final thought, I have an old friend in Texas, Linda, who is on the same page as all of us are, and she was musing the other day.
All of us I came of age in the 60s and early 70s, and we were all liberal Democrat people back then.
And we were opposed to the Vietnam War, and that was what we saw as the moral position to take.
As the years have rolled on and things have changed so drastically in this country that those of us who are paying attention have gravitated away from those old political positions and into more sophisticated ones and more conservative ones.
And her quip was, it's funny, we were fighting the cultural war back then and we won.
Only to discover that we had lost.
Well said, Michael.
9-11 was brought to us compliments of the CIA, the Department of Defense, and the Mossad.
For America to move into the Middle East and perform dirty work on behalf of Israel.
Now we have some self-proclaimed representatives of the Jewish community who want to defeat Donald Trump because he is Doing all he can to put America first.
I encourage all of us to give this the most serious thought because the future of our nation hangs in the balance.
It's often said that this is the most important election in our history and in a trivial sense it's true of every Election we endure because it determines the next four years, but this election truly is historic.
The alternatives could not be more clear-cut.
weigh and cast your ballot with confidence for the benefit of America, your future, and your children's.
This is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin, thanking Giuseppe Vaffangelo from the District of Columbia's Michael Ivey
from Nashville, North Carolina.
We'll be back on Monday with the news you need to know, and should occasion arise with a special report over the