All Episodes
Previous Next
Aug. 17, 2020 - Jim Fetzer
02:01:54
Conspiracy Guy (Aug 16, 2020): "Shadow Gate" Documentary with Danny Cirrus
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer, the Conspiracy Guy, where I'm very pleased to report that for this evening's program, I have a man with a great deal of experience in investigative and law enforcement experience, Danny Sirrus, who brought to my attention a stunning development, namely
The release of a video called Shadowgate, which runs about an hour and 20 minutes, by a marvelous investigator who has stunningly already been arrested.
Her name is Millie Weaver.
It looks as though Millie was arrested in order to prevent the release of Shadowgate, but She had already arranged for various sources to put it out if anything were to happen to her.
This is obviously a highly intelligent, very responsible individual, and there are aspects of this arrest that are frankly absurd.
Here we're hearing, and this I believe is then written by Pete Santilli, Last week I was excited when I saw Millie Weaver's tweet with the trailer of her new documentary Shadowgate to be released yesterday.
Yesterday morning I was instead appalled to see a live stream she posted of herself being arrested without a warrant in front of her small son, ostensibly for a grand jury indictment for burglary.
In the hours that have lapsed since, what I've gleaned from Twitter is that her husband, Gavin Wintz, was also arrested, and that they are currently in the custody of the Portage County Sheriff's Office in Ohio, where they're being held without bond until they appear before a Judge Doherty on Monday.
Now here's a photograph of Millie, who's just as smart, intelligent, deliberate, and serious-minded as she is attractive, which is very.
Spiros Skouros contacted the Portage County Sheriff's Office, who confirmed that Weaver was served a secret indictment.
The charges she faces are tampering with evidence, obstruction of justice, and domestic violence.
All of this, frankly, sounds to me completely absurd.
My early afternoon, one of the two whistleblowers seen in the film, Tori, posted Weaver's blockbuster film to her own YouTube account.
And as I watched it, it was all I could do to avoid having my brain splatter all over the wall.
In other words, this was mind-boggling.
Shadowgate features two whistleblowers, Tori and Patrick Berge, who describe a network of government contractors in the intelligence community with access to the NSA's BragNet surveillance and AI programs, and who exploit this information to blackmail and control politicians and other powerful people.
These globalist traitors are the primary administrators of the fourth generation warfare being waged against the American people as we speak.
The film details interactive Internet activities, IIA, and the military's psychological warfare weapon, ShadowNet, which is used to control the public narrative through the fake news to fix elections, to organize Black Lives Matter riots, among others.
Bergen explains how ShadowNet was built by the military with U.S.
tax dollars, And now General James L. Jones.
Whom I'm distraught to say was a very high-ranking Marine Corps general where I myself served in the Marine Corps and was a captain when I resigned my commission to enter graduate school to earn a PhD in the history and the philosophy of science before embarking on a 35-year academic career.
Obama's National Security Advisor took this intellectual property and privatized it for personal gain.
Bergie says Shadownet was used heavily in the Ukraine color revolution by Paul Manafort and that an entire cottage industry has since sprung up with multiple companies using the same software.
Watch it before it gets taken down.
Well, I'm pleased to say that we have it here and they can't take it down.
But Danny, before we go further, I want to give you an opportunity to give me a thumbnail sketch of why this is so important, why you reached out to me, because I 100% agree this is a very stunning development.
Hi, Dr. Fetzer.
It's very good to be on with you today.
Yeah, when I contacted you the other day, I had got an emergency text message is how that thing came down.
And I guess I'm on Pete Santilli's list, and he doesn't send out stuff like that.
And when I looked at it, I just said, I better click and see what he's talking about.
And he went live on air and explained live on that moment, unscheduled, What was going on with Millie Weaver?
And when he said she was being arrested, I couldn't believe it.
I mean, why would Millie Weaver ever be arrested?
You know what I mean?
She's a mom.
I mean, you know, she's a prominent person.
It didn't make any sense.
And then Pete started to explain the significance of what was going on.
And he showed Millie Weaver's arrest.
Which was really caught my eye and there'll be a lot of anomalies I'd like to talk about as we go through that.
But what really also caught my ear is the fact that Pete said that he was sort of a dead man switch.
And in meaning that Millie had sent the video to a few people in case of an emergency or something had happened to her.
And then of course that piqued my interest.
And that he was going to go ahead right away and play the documentary live on air.
And I didn't even know what it was.
I hadn't heard of it yet.
I'm surprised I hadn't heard, but I didn't hear of it.
And he had this look on his face that was very puzzled, by the way.
And then he started to just go right into the documentary.
And I was just completely blown away, sir.
From the very minute the documentary played to all of the revealing facts and that's why I called you right away because I knew right away something was going on when they were arresting her and it quickly looked like she was being arrested to keep this video from going public.
Yes, yes, yes, and I have, of course, revised my agenda.
This was not originally to be today's show, but it obviously takes precedence over what I was going to cover, which will be reserved for next Sunday on Jim the Conspiracy Guy.
Danny, tell us elements of the arrest that were peculiar, and I'd like for you to give us A few pointers about who turned out to be the good guys and the bad.
I mean, obviously, General Jones is the primary perpetrator.
It appears to me this is going to qualify him for an act of treason, if I read it right, and that Paul Manafort, since he said he used it during the Ukraine Color Revolution, you know, what does that say about Paul Manafort?
It also says, of course, they're using this to foment Black Lives Matter and Antifa riots around the country, so it appears this is very much of an anti-Trump administration operation as well, or being deployed for that purpose.
Please comment on all of the above.
Well, let's start from the beginning, sir, on the arrest.
You know, right away my senses went off, and I watched the arrest very closely, and I went back and watched it several times, actually.
And there's several anomalies that came up with the arrest, and that, again, I wish these things didn't happen, but it just wasn't normal.
The police officer, there was only one that came to her door.
He did not act regular.
That is not really how you serve an arrest warrant.
He was polite, but there were many things I noticed about his behavior.
One of the things was, after he talked to Millie and told her that she was under arrest, he was not even sure at first why she was under arrest.
Which that's not possible.
If you're there to serve a warrant, you already have the warrant in your hand.
You know exactly why you're taking that person and what's going on.
He did not know this.
And then he proceeded to get on his cell phone.
And while he's dealing with Millie and her husband and all the chaos kind of going around with their door open, her kids were running around.
He was on the phone with somebody, and he kept kind of saying, yeah, yeah, okay.
You know, he was asking a lot of questions about why he was there to arrest her.
And he was asking where the paperwork was.
He said something about, is that on the green sheet?
I don't have it.
He was very confused about why he was there.
At the same time, Millie managed to get her cell phone on this guy and started filming the police officer, the supposed police officer.
Another detail that came out while he's speaking on the phone was the fact that he was asking somebody on the phone that he needed a transport car.
He did not have a car to take anybody to jail.
And he said it twice, and I thought, what kind of a police officer goes to a home to arrest a suspect with a warrant and doesn't have a car to transport his prisoner?
That's just, nobody would do that.
In his mind, before he even leaves the police department, he's set up to do that, and usually they go in twos, they don't go in ones, they go at least in twos.
He was by himself.
Let me interrupt with a couple questions, Danny, as we proceed, because you're so Chunk full of information.
Now Millie had her kids.
Are they going to arrest the kids too?
Are they going to be abandoned if they're taken into custody, the two parents?
It sounds as though this was totally ad hoc, spur of the moment, great urgency.
This guy would sit out there without having any idea what he was about.
And that this whole thing was totally, frankly, completely contrived.
It looks totally improper.
And, of course, the fact that they're arresting her when they don't even seem to have a warrant.
The charges on their face look to me absurd.
What is Millie Weaver going to be doing charged with domestic violence and with burglary, for example?
I mean, this is just ridiculous!
You know, I would agree, sir.
It was so unprofessional, you know, as I watched it the second and third time.
To go on with the anomalies, he was on the phone seeking instruction exactly why he was making an arrest.
You can hear him asking questions of somebody on the phone, and that's just a no-no.
Again, he's by himself, but one of the quick tales that came around was the video camera that Millie had pointed at the gentleman.
You didn't get a close-up of his face, but she did get a good shot of his uniform.
He was wearing leisure shoes, sir.
Like, some kind of loafer shoes.
He was wearing khaki pants.
Like, just dress, you know, khaki pants.
And he had a... This is obviously not an officer on duty, Danny.
That's what I'm saying, sir.
I was getting to that.
You kind of took the words out of my mouth.
He had a dark shirt on, but it had no police patch on it, which I've never seen that before.
And he had an emergency tactical vest that sort of ID'd him as a police officer, but I did not see any patches or identifying marks on his vest, which I thought was very strange.
Danny, I've been wondering, was this guy a crisis actor?
I mean, this is Johnson.
Sounds like he's impersonating a police officer, not an actual police officer.
Right, I couldn't say for sure, sir.
I didn't see a radio on him, so he wasn't talking on the radio.
I looked on his belt.
I did see a firearm, but I didn't see a radio, so his safety equipment didn't look normal to me, but I was struck back at his confusion for being there and his confusion asking questions on the phone about what paperwork He had to have a right to take Millie and it goes on from there, sir He actually said that the warrant he said this on the phone.
He said the warrant was only for her husband Gavin so that was a problem in his own head that he was there for one person and Ultimately what happened is he took two other people to jail sir on a warrant for what?
You can't go to a location when you have a warrant And when you go in to get your suspect, you can't arrest everybody in the house for that very same warrant, unless you observe a crime that they're committing while you're there.
In other words, they have drugs out in the open, or there's something that you see that you would be able to go ahead and arrest.
But he went ahead and took three people out of her house for that same warrant.
The three people being Millie, her husband, and her child?
No, no, no.
Not a child.
I think it was her brother, I believe.
Her brother?
Yeah, they didn't say the name of the third person.
Who was there to take care of the child?
There were four people there.
Her husband was there, there was another man, and another woman.
And I don't know if the woman was her sister, but you could see in the video she was tending to Millie's children while they were running around.
She was holding them.
How many kids does Millie have?
Two?
I saw two in the video and I heard two running around.
They were quite little toddlers.
One of them was very upset and being consoled by the other woman on the porch.
She was holding maybe a one-year-old and then there was a three or four-year-old that she was consoling.
So this ersatz officer with a warrant for one person, namely Millie's husband, actually apprehended three persons, a husband for whom he had a warrant, Millie, and her brother for whom he did not, leaving behind an additional woman and Millie's two children.
That's exactly it, sir.
And he said, look, I've been nice enough.
It's time to go.
And he did not.
The other thing that struck me is when you do take somebody into custody, sir, you have to have a transport car.
You know who you're going for and how many people you're going to get.
If you have a regular unit, you can take three people, no problem.
You can take two without any problem whatsoever.
So you can scram three in the back seat.
The thing that was very strange as he walked off with Millie with his unidentified uniform, the man generally looked like he threw on a police tactical vest over his regular clothes last minute and went to a location.
He definitely was not prepared.
He looked like he was in a hurry.
And he was scrambling.
It was a very strange experience.
This all looks made up on the fly.
Totally suspicious.
Appears to be completely illegal.
I would say there's a massive lawsuit already here in just what you've described already, Danny.
That this was a complete abuse of the law.
This was a fraudulent arrest for which there was no justification whatsoever.
I find this outrageous beyond belief.
Especially when you factor in that Millie Weaver is a reporter.
She obviously did anticipate that, sir.
rather well-known one who's about to release an important, a very significant documentary exposing the deep state where this all appears to be an attempt to throw sand in the gears to make it not happen where she had so wisely anticipated something like this might a very significant documentary exposing the deep state where this all appears She, she obviously did anticipate that, sir.
There's no doubt that she had had the video out to people like Pete Santilli just in case, but just to, finish the arrest when she kept asking the officer two or three times, what am I being arrested for, sir?
She's very polite.
She didn't have shoes on.
And she had this very dazed and confused look on her face like anybody would that just had police show up to their house.
And he said that she was indicted by a grand jury, not her, her husband.
by a grand jury for burglary and she had this look on her face she said burglary what did we steal and the the officer wouldn't answer any questions at all and then when he walked him to the car just as the video cut out What was very strange is he said, come on, I've been nice, let's go get in the car, he said.
He just said, let's go get in the car.
And then the video cut out, but I noticed Millie was not placed in handcuffs.
Nobody was handcuffed, sir.
When you make an arrest, then that means you are under arrest.
And immediately you're placed in handcuffs, that's procedure, and you're put into the black of a police car.
And there was nobody handcuffed as the video cut out.
It was just, come on, come with me.
Alright, Danny, was he then trying to give them the false impression that they were being placed under arrest when he knew better than to place them under arrest to try to create a scenario where it would appear their actions were voluntary?
I never heard him actually say you're under arrest.
He never said that in the video.
And Danny, as you mentioned to me before, he didn't warn them of the rights.
They didn't get a Mandela.
I mean, this is ridiculous!
Well, he doesn't really need to read them their rights, because if he's not going to question them, he doesn't have to Mirandize them right there if he already has a warrant.
He already has a warrant, so that's a done deal.
But he was very confused again, and how he ended up taking three people with him.
Uh, in a car that he did not handcuff.
Uh, and he just walked off and took two others that weren't even party to the warrant.
Just because they were on the property.
That's just not protocol, sir.
He broke many protocols during this arrest.
I wish Millie, you could hear her phone ringing in the background.
She did say something to somebody on the phone, but I couldn't hear it.
But I wish Millie would have had the forethought to call the Sheriff's Office at 9-1-1 and have deputies roll out there and clear that up because they could have identified this individual.
He definitely did not look like a sheriff deputy, sir, and he certainly was not acting as a professional officer there with a warrant.
He had too much confusion With his questions on the phone?
You would never get on the phone with a suspect in front of you and show confusion on who you were going to arrest and why you were there.
That's not protocol, sir.
Yeah, the whole thing was just made up on the fly.
I mean, it's just outrageous.
This is complete bullshit, Danny.
To put it in technical legal language, just complete bullshit.
I would totally agree, sir.
To me, when it was all over with and forethought, I'm just like, you know, it almost looks like somebody electronically put some sort of a warrant into the system and flagged it as some sort of priority.
So it came out and they were acting on it, but they weren't really sure who was behind it or what was going on.
Again, you can tell the officer's confusion when he's on the cell phone because his paperwork is not in order.
It's definitely not in order.
He's very confused by it and you can hear his questions over the phone that you would not ask that.
If you had that warrant ahead of time and you were going to somebody's house with a warrant, you clearly know Who you're looking for, who you're going to take in custody, and why you're there.
And for him to serve a warrant from a grand jury?
I mean, you know, an indictment for burglary?
I mean, did they show evidence to a grand jury on video of Millie and her husband breaking into a building?
I mean, let's talk, sir, about what burglary really is.
For people who don't know, Burglary is breaking and entering into a building that is not yours.
So, in other words, you pry open a door into a house or into a building, a private property that does not belong to you.
And then you enter the building, and then you remove property that does not belong to you.
That's grand theft.
Anything over $400.
Actually, now it's $1,000.
They raised it.
And you remove property.
So if you break into a structure and then remove property that does not belong to you, that is burglary.
So can you imagine them coming up with burglary, saying that Millie and her husband somehow went into a property somewhere and stole property?
How could they have even got that past a grand jury without evidence?
This all sounds totally fabricated, Danny.
Just as fake as it could be.
And I'll bet anything he was taking them out to this man's personal civilian vehicle.
This wasn't a police car.
And the whole thing appears to be stage managed, but absolutely on the fly.
This is just disgusting.
It really is, sir.
When you now, hopefully, you know, people listening to your video and watching your report on the radio will go and watch that live feed that I'm sure you'll link to and really watch the officer's behavior.
Notice his uniform, his shoes, his pants.
How a vest is thrown over.
He's definitely not organized.
It does look like last minute somebody of authority threw on a police vest and went out to her house very unorganized and in a big hurry to execute this.
You could tell somebody was scrambling to make this happen.
It was intended to preclude her from getting her documentary on the air.
There's no other explanation that makes any even remote sense.
That this was all fake, this was all made up, just to have a pseudo excuse to try to apprehend her, to preclude her getting the documentary out, but she had very intelligently, wisely anticipated something like this might happen and arranged for it to occur anyway.
Well, what would have been interesting, sir, if you think about it, just to break it down, I'm trying not to beat a dead horse on it, but if Millie would have called the sheriff's office and rolled a couple of deputies really quick?
She could have told that officer, listen, the Sheriff's Office is going to be here in two minutes, and they want to look at your warrant, okay?
And I'll cooperate with you, no problem.
I'll sit right here in your custody, but please allow them to show up.
If they would have showed up, sir, they would have looked at any paperwork that whoever that person was, it would have ID'd him.
But number two, if his warrant or whatever he had in his hand, if he didn't have the right paperwork for Millie, they would not have let him take Millie and that other person into custody.
The warrant clearly, he said, was for one person, her husband.
And what it looked like to me is that somebody was trying to take her husband into custody.
Maybe, possibly, to hold him in custody to threaten Millie by saying something like, hey, we have your husband in jail.
We can arrest whoever we want.
You better not release that documentary, but it was too late.
Do you know anything about this portage?
Is this a police precinct?
Or is this a sheriff's office portage?
A portage?
I have not done the research on that particular precinct where she lives, sir.
I haven't been able to determine whether they have their own police or not.
This just wreaks on corruption from beginning to end.
Yeah, when you watch it, and I would challenge any former Leo in your audience.
I'm just going to put that out, sir.
If you've ever worked in law enforcement or around law enforcement, anybody that can hear what I'm saying knows the procedures.
that are pretty standardized for going out to serve a warrant.
You've been there, you know what it looks like, you know how you handle the scene, you know who you take into custody, and you also know once you ID your suspect, you stay with that person, depending on what the warrant is, and you help them get dressed, whatever.
You don't take eyes off, and that person is going to go into handcuffs immediately, and you're going to walk them to the vehicle in cuffs.
Most of the time, unless there's a medical reason, you might cuff them to the front, you know, you might do something else if there's a, like if they're hooked up to an oxygen bottle, you might make some different allowances, but that wasn't the case here.
I mean, the confusion is, sir, is unlike I don't think I've ever seen before.
Danny, you've done a brilliant dissection of the arrest.
This is all complete bullshit.
Before we begin the documentary that this was meant to preclude, to suffocate, to prevent from being broadcast, but where they failed miserably, and by making this arrest, they drew I cannot tell you the amount of intention more than it would have had, had it simply been allowed to be released, Danny.
Because many people would have said, well, here we got one more about deep state machinations.
And you know, there are dozens out there.
I don't think it would have had anything like the attention that's now been generated by this fabricated arrest.
Yeah, I agree, sir.
The fact that they did arrest Millie, and she was able to get it out to, you know, several, I understand.
I don't know the entire list.
I think Pete Santilli just hinted that several people were sent it.
You know, that was pretty smart on her part.
You know, it's funny, sir, in reflection, if you look back, if Millie happened to have been at the store, or not home at the moment, and just her husband, that guy would have just been able to take Gavin to jail, and they couldn't have done anything to Millie.
Or if they wouldn't have been home, it would have been really turned into a basket case.
Yeah, but Danny, what I'm saying is, by arresting Millie, especially without a warrant, they have drawn endlessly more attention to this than would have otherwise been the case.
In other words, what they thought they were doing has backfired massively.
I totally agree, sir.
Worldwide, everybody's talking about it.
You know, you just don't take somebody into custody without a reason, and especially without a warrant.
And if you go to a property with a warrant for somebody, you don't come away with three other people that aren't party to that warrant in any way.
Now, Matt, as we're about to watch the documentary, I want you to offer some tips to the audience of which parts they ought to pay special attention to.
Uh, that's, sure.
I mean, the whole thing was quite breathtaking, sir, scene by scene.
I mean, that's a tall challenge, uh, because it was so, it was so revealing that, uh, I, I had to pause it several times and I actually hit the replay button because I wanted to, and I'm, I'm not joking here.
I actually wanted to rehear the words that they were saying because I was, I don't get shocked that much.
You know, any more, especially in the times that we're living, but I was quite taken back by the revealing bombshell information that was coming out frame by frame in this video, sir.
Well, Danny, we're going to go ahead and play the video, and then you and I will discuss it when we return.
And I'm just, you know, very, very pleased to have you here, Danny.
It's always an honor to be on your show, sir.
Well, this is just working out wonderfully, Danny.
I'm so pleased you're here.
This is the video they sought to suppress.
pay great attention.
What
if I were to tell you that a small group of government contractors were hired by government officials to frame the Trump campaign, set him up for the Russia collusion investigation, provided witnesses for the impeachment hearings, and provided administrative provided witnesses for the impeachment hearings, and provided administrative support services to the Department of Justice during the Mueller investigation.
And what if it just so happened that this same group of contractors are behind the fake news in mainstream media, influence operations on social media, and the civil unrest nationwide pushing the defund the police movement?
The ObamaGate scandal only scratches the surface.
You mentioned shock value.
That is shocking what the Russians did.
I agree.
We need to stop it.
I know that now based on the horror material.
I'm not saying that you lied to the court.
I'm saying you signed something that was a lie and you didn't know it.
Talk about a cover story.
What really happened is much more alarming.
Both parties are equally guilty of covering up what should turn out to be an even bigger scandal, Shadowgate.
The tactical and operational role the shadow government played behind the scenes carrying out the coup against President Trump.
We're going to be looking behind the puppets at who the real puppet master string pullers are.
The material presented in this documentary should concern people of all political affiliations.
This is about real players, people whose names never come up, but should.
Career politicians are definitely part of the Beltway Swamp, even aspects of the Deep State, but they are not the shadow government.
The shadow government consists of government contractors Defense, intelligence, security, and so on.
Our government mostly consists of front-facing desk jockeys that are compartmentalized in cubicles.
They're to cover up for the fact that most of the real work is outsourced to contractors, aka the military-industrial complex.
That way, what the public sees through FOIA requests, investigations, congressional hearings, or otherwise, is as clean as a whistle.
All the dirty work is kept private with contractors in clandestine networks.
These contractors have used their connections, power, and influence To create an unprecedented international criminal enterprise where blackmail is traded and people's personal data is gold.
Two whistleblowers, Tory and Patrick Berge, who both worked extensively within the shadow government as contractors, have come forward with revelations that may be part of the biggest whistleblowing event to date.
I am one of thousands, faceless, patriotic Americans that work within the shadows.
I've been doing that for a very long time.
People that worked for John Brennan approached me while I was in my specialist training, while I was in the Navy.
When I was recruited, it was for electronic warfare.
Then I ended up in information warfare, and ironically, the base that I first went to for electronic warfare is now information warfare.
My job for a company called Dynology, which was owned by Obama's national security advisor, General James Jones, and I answered directly to his son.
I worked for them for about eight years.
From like 2007 to 2010, my focus was primarily in the development on a couple different contracts for the Department of Defense for the development of The capabilities for interactive internet activities being something that helps support CNO, which is computer network operations, hacking and different things like that, and information operations, which would be your actual influence operations, right?
It's a supporting application that really, it's kind of like a Microsoft project, right?
Which allows you to manage large projects, like enterprise-level projects.
But instead of managing the construction of a 14-story building, it's managing the most, you know, malevolent operations that you could imagine.
I was a contractor for various intelligence agencies that were privately created.
So they were private contracting agencies, because unlike what most people think, our intelligence doesn't stay within our borders or within federal buildings.
The ShatterNet was the commercial version of an IIA weapon.
IIA being Interactive Internet Activities.
That's the military nomenclature.
For what basically you've heard being described for the last three or four years with all the fake news and the fake news journalists and fake stories, fake dossier, all these things are Attributes and characteristics of, of, uh, IIA, which is social media, psychological warfare.
We began that really in, um, 2007.
Uh, when, right after the policy guidelines first came, we were on one of the first contracts with the DOD that I'm aware of.
Trying to help the forced psychological operations group understand how to go from dropping flyers from planes.
to a more micro-targeted social media psychological worker application where you could select an individual target or a group target or an entire country if you wanted to.
What I did was something called localization or L10N.
So a localization strategy is you find a group of people that could be a whole country, a city, a certain religious group, you know, six block radius like Chaz.
And you kind of try to get in their minds.
You have to understand how they eat, how they walk, how they talk, what they like, what pushes their buttons, what drives them nuts, what upsets them, what makes them happy.
And then you use that to your advantage to push whatever ideology or product or direction you want them to go.
Marrying together cultural appropriation, language, nuances of the demographic that you are targeting or the nation you are targeting.
It tries into your demographic, your world.
So if I want to blackmail you and put you under my thumb, not only will I know everything, but I will know your deepest, darkest fears.
I will know people I can get in contact to find out more about you.
Maybe you have like an old hockey injury.
So if I wanted to attack you, I'd know where to hit you.
You understand enough about someone and you can hack their shadow, right?
You can use their fears.
You can use their anxieties.
Sound anything like pandemics that you recognize here?
Oh yeah, definitely.
So you can use those things to help reflexively control or influence a target, an individual, whoever it is, right?
Or a group of people.
Or an entire election in an entire country.
What Patrick Berge created was A program that was based off of the strategies that we used in person.
It was a psychological operation, but that crunches data with the use of psychological operations.
So you can predict how your target will respond.
You know, I spent like seven years overseas, right?
Several years, a couple of those years were specifically related to IIA.
So I understood certain things.
When we hijacked the Afghan elections, how did we do that?
We had to understand how the Afghans think.
We had to go to the areas that were anti-Taliban because the Taliban political group was now more militant than it was political.
We used that to our advantage and formulated a plan where we would sway their thoughts to believe that XYZ candidate is the way to go because then you won't get robbed and we'll tame the Taliban.
But we had to do it in their way.
So he created an algorithm that does that for you.
When we were largely doing this, it was done by analysts.
Now, this is more done automated through artificial intelligence, which is just a common iteration of the program or application development process.
The database component ends up allowing you to build behavioral profiles on individual targets.
And through those behavioral profiles, you can develop or implement reflexive control, which allows you to understand with enough information about someone, you can predictably determine how they're gonna react. - I was really good at what I did.
Really good, and I can still do it too.
I'm not doing it now though.
Don't be doing that, Tari.
I don't know if I was, but I help them train algorithms with the strategies that I had created all these years.
They had asked us to bring the application to Classified Network, but Jim sent them a bogus Just a made up ridiculous bid to actually do that because if it went on a classified network, we couldn't turn around and sell it commercially.
We went on after that to another contract in Tampa, took everything with us for psychological operations group, had no idea that we were going to be taking their years worth of work that they paid us to do.
Taxpayers paid us to do, and we kept the intellectual property rights to it.
And re-marketed it and branded it commercially as the shadow.
So I come back here and I see these guys back here in America have just been having a field day utilizing the technology that we've been developing to alter the outcomes of our elections in America.
This technology was so successful they couldn't resist the temptation to not use it commercially and have the power to affect outcomes of elections at home.
The commercial and black market value of such a technology is incalculable.
This is the Mobile Mega Shadernet Mobile.
My laptop sits in here and then I got a 2 4k capture cards.
I can do VTC and this charges all the camera equipment.
So while I'm riding, I'm told I'm getting as much as 40 amps.
These are the same cases that we used to build out our skips, our SC2IPs, which is a small command and control over IP.
And when I was working with JCSE, We would take these cases and build out networks.
This is a small command and control over IP.
It's just only running on one unclassified network.
Sim enabled Wi-Fi router and if I get decent cell connection, I can run the multiple cameras and I can put multiple images in one screen and I can run all that from my cell phone that I have mounted here.
The group of whistleblowers from the NSA and other classified data collection agencies, referred to as the Global Surveillance Whistleblowers, were used as a vector to legalize what was then illegal dragnet spying on everyone 24-7.
The NSA and its former head, General Hayden, declined to comment for this story.
The FISA Amendment Act of 2008 had Section 702 that permitted the government to spy on citizens with a warrant from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.
The NSA data system collects everything through what's called the upstream, where everything is stored for 72 hours, then dumped.
However, if one could twin this stream of data, they could privatize it.
Imagine what you could do with that.
Tori alleges that she worked for John Brennan at the Analysis Corporation and Global Strategies Group.
What is the Analysis Corporation?
It is a company that does a lot of things, varied from administrative work, to analyses, to data collection, biometric collection.
I mean, whatever contract they've been awarded by their government, they do.
It could be something as simple as janitor duties.
In case you missed the Secretary's words upstairs, she reached out to Senator Obama to say that she was sorry that this had happened, that there were these unauthorized accesses to his passport files.
One incident this past summer, Where there was a trainee in the passport office who had an unauthorized access of Senator Clinton's passport file.
Now in the case of Senator McCain, we detected earlier this year, one of the same people Who accessed Senator Obama's passport file, also accessed Senator McCain's passport file.
This is the same individual who was disciplined, but at this point in time still remains working with the contractor.
She claims to be the actual person who moved the electronic files at Stanley Inc.
and CGI in 2008, which publicly was falsely alleged to be a hack.
What can you tell us about the CGI Stanley Passport incident?
See, Brennan has a certain MO, okay?
When he wants to get something, he pretends there's a hack.
So, I was asked, when I was stateside, Hey, would you go by that office and pull all this data from the State Department?
And I said, of course I will.
I put it on two rugged drives.
I mean, they were like the orange tips, really big, you know, drives.
And I put it on there.
And then later, it's like, oh, they were hacked!
And I'm thinking, um, I didn't hack anything.
I was told to do it.
So, I just kind of watched what was happening.
One person actually committed suicide or something, and the other two were found.
I'm like, but there was no hack.
And that's a going thing, you know that, right?
Wow.
If it wasn't a hack, I'm presuming that means you took the information off of their servers and computers.
Correct.
So that information was then missing.
Correct.
What would be the point of that?
What were they trying to hide?
Well, if I removed it, that means someone else was there to replace it.
Right?
So I remove the factual, actual information, and then someone goes behind.
That's like super switch.
I didn't see that until retrospect, right?
In retrospect, right?
Because for me, going to copy a server off of a consulate, you know, computer, State Department, wherever.
would be normal.
If we had a contract with them, they would tell me what terminal, I'd scan the barcode, make sure that I was at the right computer, and do my job.
So I remove data, that means someone else replaced it.
So what is the relationship between Global Strategies Group, Analysis Corporation, and Canadian Global Information?
They all do the same thing.
They're the jacks of all trades, except for the fact that Global Strategies Group was actually a hub for all information, in and out, in and out.
I mean, all of the directors there were former GCHQ, CIA, NSA, you know, MI6, MI5, German intelligence.
You have to wonder, why are all these former heads heading up Consulting firm and what were they consulting and they weren't consulting they were collecting everybody's data and privatizing
John Brennan, working within his network of contracting companies such as Stanley Canadian Global Information and the Analysis Corporation, helped then-Senator Barack Obama get elected using internet influence operations.
March 5, 2013, Brennan gets confirmed as CIA Director, dodging controversy over his involvement in the CIA-enhanced interrogation scandal.
Now tell us about these data bridges to the NSA.
Is that legally obtained information?
I mean, that's kind of what Snowden did too.
According to sources closely connected to this subject, under John Brennan's direction, Snowden created a data bridge from the NSA database into private servers controlled by private intelligence and cybersecurity contractors, aka the Analysis Corporation, Global Strategies Group, and Canadian Global Information.
The twinning of streams is duplicating the information in the upstream.
That's crazy to think that another company is copying all emails, texts, phone calls, messages, emojis, Instagrams, tweets, anything you can imagine that's being uploaded that has to go into like the 72-hour holding is suddenly being pushed offshore.
That sounds kind of illegal because it is.
June 5th, 2013.
Edward Snowden goes public with the NSA program, PRISM, revealing the NSA collects internet traffic of all US citizens from major internet and telecom companies through the FISA 702 program.
Snowden's actions kicked off, on the federal level, justification for spying on U.S. citizens, including the Senate and Congress, in the name of preventing U.S. citizens with classified or top-secret clearances from being able to repeat Snowden's actions.
This opened the door for the creation of Clearforce.
July 4th, 2013, CGI and GCHQ launched a defense protection partnership, which includes sharing threat intelligence.
So these were all private corporations that even had foreigners working in them, and they had access to NSA servers?
Of course they did.
I mean, how do you think we found, through facial recognition of the FBI, the Belgian bomber?
Why would we have their facial recognition data?
So, is this legal, what you're telling me, and why would they do it?
Why would they set this up this way?
So, sharing our information and our private identifying information, facial recognition, biometrics, outside of the United States for official purposes, like at a consulate, at an embassy, you know, through Secret Service, or anything like that, is legal, right?
Or through Interpol.
But to have a company that houses everybody's data, And any private person can buy that data or investigate that data or analyze that data.
That's not.
And that's exactly what GSG was doing.
Early 2009, John Brennan left government and went to work for a small intelligence contractor here in the Virginia area, suburban Virginia area, just outside of Washington.
The company was called the Analysis Corporation.
There are subsidiaries of subsidiaries.
Some of these companies are spun out, go public, go private again.
It's kind of hard to keep track of them.
In just four months, GSG, CGI and other private contractors allegedly had unauthorized access to the entire Five Eyes network.
Unfiltered, unrestricted, decompartmentalized, outside any government regulation or oversight.
Not surprising, the CIA gets caught one year later spying on the U.S.
Senate.
Their excuse?
It was their own network they had set up for the Senate to use, so they had authorization.
Would you agree that the CIA's 2014 search of Senate files was improper?
This is the annual threat assessment, is it not?
Yes.
These were CIA computers at a CIA lease facility.
It was a CIA network that was shared between Senate staffers conducting that investigation for your report, as well as CIA personnel.
The reality is those computers, in effect, belonged to the CIA, but they were reserved exclusively for the committee's use.
We accelerated our ability, our For want of a better word, invasiveness into communications networks in which legitimate targets coexisted with legitimately protected communications.
Obama takes office and General Jones is being sworn in as National Security Advisor.
His son, General Jones' son, copyrights CKMS, Congressional Knowledge Management System.
Within a couple months after he leaves office in 2010, Dynology gets a contract for CKMS, the Congressional Knowledge Management System.
Which basically controls all of the scheduling, addresses, the documents, everything.
CKMS is going to give you access to unlimited information.
Think about the information you could get from that.
If we look on USspending.gov, we see Dynology was awarded contracts for the Congressional Knowledge Management System.
However, one contract stands out, where Dynology was awarded a contract by the Department of Defense that includes a mention of the Congressional Knowledge Management System.
A closer look shows that the award description is for CKMS Hosting, Labor, Admin, or Data.
The primary place of performance is Germany, and the North American Industry Classification Description is data processing, hosting, and related services.
Even one section stating, manufacturing outside the United States, use outside the United States.
Let it sink in that these official documents suggest the Congressional Knowledge Management System, outsourced to a private contractor, is hosted, managed, and stored in servers in Germany.
This is very disturbing.
With the Senate's computer network compromised by John Brennan's CIA, and the Congressional Knowledge Management System being hosted, managed, and stored overseas by General Jones' company, the ability for these contractors to eavesdrop on both the House and the Senate is staggering.
When I brought this up back in 2018, shortly after that, Dynology lost the contract that they had had since 2011-2012 with CKMS, and that contract went to another company, a company that exists as nothing more than a website and a mail drop a mile or so from Dynology's Tampa office, controlling the entire Congressional's knowledge management.
And if you look at the contracting database, they'll say that, oh, they have an American entity, and it's like, But it's the same CEOs for this Canadian company.
I'm so confused.
So they even falsify information so they can obfuscate where our federal tax dollars are going.
And don't forget, they all share contracts.
They all subcontract, co-contract.
Scigroup has the exact same product as Dynology, the Shatterman, and iSign, right?
The owner of Dynalogy sits on the board of directors of Cycle, which in my opinion is kind of like the owner of Coke sitting on the board of directors of Pepsi.
Tac, CGI, and all these LLCs that just keep cycling and cycling.
All of them.
The social security numbers of 19.7 million Americans subjected to federal background checks as a condition of employment are now in the hands of hackers.
In June 2015, the Office of Personnel Management announced a major data breach.
Tell us about the OPM hack.
Okay, so that's another Brennan job.
Another hack.
Supposed hack.
And this is to obtain, delete, and obfuscate information.
Hillary Clinton was up for the shopping walk about her emails right at the State Department.
And that was coming up.
That was big talk of the town in 2014.
Suddenly the Office of Personnel Management was hacked in December.
Down the line, five months later, Hillary Clinton appears in court and they tell her, hey, you're going to hand over your emails.
A couple days after that, the now-fired, corrupt, leaking former IG of the State Department, Lenin, had requested from our elected officials, to give him a big fat budget to create his own personal IG of the State Department server.
How convenient, very convenient. - Well, we have no evidence that our data has been compromised.
The fact that the contents of our network may be accessed by large numbers of department administrators puts us at unnecessary risk The IT folks in the department have the keys to our IT system, so they really have access, unfettered access, to the system if they wanted to.
They could read, modify, delete.
They could read, modify, delete.
I would like to be completely separate from the department to ensure the integrity of our system, but I also need the department to give us Access to the same systems that we have now.
Give us access.
And he was responsible in releasing her emails that he gave in little, little doses, of course, over time.
But at the same time, the press came out with a report, oh dear, months ago there was a leak.
Do you have evidence that the State Department's network has been attacked?
And does that affect you guys?
There's evidence that has been attacked and it has affected us.
I can't really go into details because of the nature of the information.
For people that don't know, the Office of Personnel Management usually has information on every single American that has applied for any type of clearance.
So if you applied for a White House press pass, or joined the military, or an admin job that could require something like a public Charlie clearance, anything.
All your information is there.
What could they do with all that information?
They started slowly creating these memorandums of understandings with your secretaries of states and attorney generals secretly behind your back, providing facial recognition data, private identifying data, data, data.
This was the most incredible data because if you want to control someone, All you need to do is put that information through a couple of systems and you'll know exactly what buttons you need to push and how to make them nod their head the way you want them to or shake it.
Millions of Americans have received letters like this, notifying them their data are at risk and referring them to a government-contracted credit monitoring agency.
Does this correlate with predictive programming?
Yes.
The merging of John Brennan's tactical intelligence and General Jones's operational capabilities gave birth to Clearforce.
ISI was the relational database component of it.
That's what we named it.
I named it, actually.
And what did you name it iSci for?
I like the iPhone Sci for psychological warfare.
Okay.
You have the component where you need to be able to collect all this information and then you need to be able to collaborate this information with a team of an unspecified amount of analysts and or other legal people that will be looking at stuff And you need to be able to provide the leadership of a tactical operation.
You need to be able to provide them what's called a COPS, a Common Operational Pitcher, right?
So, this provides people at the top a Common Operational Pitcher of all the different assets.
Assets can be journalists, it could be an entire It could be a news organization.
It could be a podcast.
It could be just an individual YouTube influencer.
It could be anybody like that.
And you would either build them from scratch or contract them out.
Just bring them online.
According to Berge, the 2012 changes to the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act of 2012 opened the floodgates for domestic IIA, social media influence operations.
Do you think that some of these smart devices were created in order to gain access to the public by the military-industrial complex?
I know that the iPhone really was released within this, if not the same month of the IIA policy letter.
Uh, for a fact, and you can easily look it up, that the Smith-Munk Act, uh, Modernization Act was modified to allow for the influence, dissemination of propaganda to Americans, which had previously been restricted or prevented by the Smith-Munk Act in the late 40s when it was put in place.
When they modernized that, they took away those protections, allowing it to adapt for social media.
And then within a few months, or just a very short period of time, they came out with the Obilifone.
Everybody in Cleveland, no minority, got Obama's phone!
Keep Obama in president, you know!
He gave us a phone!
Free cell phones to low-income families.
TrackPhone has just started a program here in the Volunteer State called SafeLink Wireless.
More than 800,000 families here in Tennessee qualify for these phones.
The company says this program is about providing a safe link for families, no matter what their level of income is.
Very short time after that, they added Free unlimited data plans to him.
He also suggested that the contiguous release of the Obamaphone with an unlimited data plan played a significant role in fostering the Ferguson riots using IA.
So why do you think they were targeting them for collection purposes?
Think of what you could do, right?
Think of how easily you could start a riot in Cleveland if you had the data.
Oh my goodness.
So you could gather that information and know how to psychologically target them to get them upset?
Or do you think that they were pushing information to them, like tailoring their viewpoint on social media? - I would.
And when I, like I said, I didn't really actually finish this earlier, but I originally, in 2014, I recognized Black Lives Matter movement during the Michael Brown riots as being influenced by IIA, A colleague of mine in South Korea did a traceroute on it.
Tracerouted the source of what I believe to have been IIA to Ukraine.
That's funny, right?
Because Ukraine just always keeps popping up.
And whether or not it was actually the Chardonnay itself, or it was a competitor like McChrystal, right?
McChrystal, what they accused McChrystal of having, is the exact same thing as what we built before him.
Maybe it was a competitor.
Who knows?
It's becoming really a boutique market.
Do you think that many of these social media companies like Twitter, Facebook, that they were created with IA operations in mind and it was never intended to be a free speech platform?
I mean, what's your take on that?
In our ShadowNet flyer, it has a screenshot of South American Um, uh, social network site.
It was kind of like the predecessor for MySpace owned by Google.
And I believe the name was Irkut.
And you can actually look on our flyer and see a screenshot from that.
Which looks like an active engagement from South America.
Now, if you look up what happened to ERCUD, what was really Google's first attempt to free MySpace, you'll see that it was largely shut down and largely contributed to an overwhelming use of fake personas, right?
What was one of the reasons that they attributed to MySpace shutting down last year?
Rampant fake personas.
At the same time, I'm developing these flyers.
For a company that doesn't have a sales staff, they only have a product.
At the same time I'm doing that, our number one partner for a company that doesn't have a product, that is only salespeople, are working John McCain's campaign.
Doing micro-targeted social media for John McCain's campaign.
You are speaking on News pundits and how many of the news pundits are IA assets and intelligence assets.
So tell us more about that.
Mika Brzezinski, her father is, you know, the father of influence operations and psychological warfare.
A towering figure in American foreign policy, an extended member of the NBC News family as well.
Zbigniew Brzezinski, Jimmy Carter's national security advisor.
Jillian Turner, Fox News host, was also vice president of Jones Group International.
Doing an interview with her old boss and my old boss.
Now why would I assume that they would be using anything other than the Shatternet?
Because the owner of the Shatternet has so many key assets.
Why would he need to go to anybody else?
Right?
So they get their talking points from the analysts that are putting it together.
But then they disseminate those talking points through non-attribution to their assets throughout these news organizations.
Utilizing an application like the ShadowNet.
Jillian Turner has a direct connection to Atlantic Council.
General Jones was the chairman of the board of the Atlantic Council.
JGI, Jones Group International, is in oil lobby.
Atlantic Council and BRISMA has a relationship.
BRISMA is an energy company.
Obviously, they have these connections.
This would explain why Fox News focuses mostly on the Biden-Ukraine scandal, never mentioning Jones' connections, nor the Atlantic Council.
Trump focusing on Ukraine isn't just about Biden.
It's about Jones, Hayden, Brennan, McChrystal, the State Department, USAID, and corrupt inspector generals.
With everything in place and after being in control of the office of the presidency for decades, the military-industrial complex had confidence they could take Trump out as a candidate or even as president.
Has IIA been used against President Trump?
Absolutely, through the Russian dossier.
There are so many people, former colleagues of mine, directly connected to the shattering.
John McCain and Lindsey Graham, one of the last two people to have their hands on the Russian dossier before it was handed off to BuzzFeed as part of the dissemination process.
I told the president it was not John McCain.
I know because John McCain showed me the dossier.
It was built, it was a product, it was used as a weapon.
As part of an influence operation.
It was fake information put into it to help create chaos and to influence an election.
Bottom line.
Right?
But those people that were directly involved with that were also directly involved with the Shadow Man.
So you have knowledge of them using military-grade psychological warfare weapons.
On the President of the United States.
Done by the closest people around him, too.
As Trump's election unfolded and as all of the Russia collusion and all these things started happening and becoming exposed, revealed to me it was to keep from exposing the stuff that they've been doing over here, which I believe includes the Maidan massacre in Ukraine.
Where did the dossier come from?
Nelly Orr testified it came from Ukraine.
Where's all the money laundering and crazy IIAs we see going on?
Ukraine.
So Manafort's being accused of social media influence operations in Ukraine in 2010.
World courts charged him with that.
Ukraine was the epicenter of everything.
Like, everything.
And that's because we had named that nation and made them veal to us.
Barack Hussein Obama did.
You know, we deployed troops.
National Guard, of course.
And what states are the ones that work with Ukraine?
It would be California and New York.
So we deployed troops there because, you know, they weren't listening.
It's like, why would you want to stay independent and hang out with the Russians when you can be with us, the Americans and the Europeans?
And they were really upset that they weren't willing to commit to receive debt from the EU and ignore Russia, which they had been attached to for eons.
So we went in there and destroyed them.
That's how Hunter Biden got his job.
That's how we weaseled our way in there.
We got ahold of corrupt people.
We said, we'll help you out with your lawsuits.
You get us in there.
We wrote bills.
We sent the money so we can help them conduct elections.
The Obama aid package in Ukraine, which corresponds with Joe Biden's billion-dollar loan guarantee scandal, is the same aid package where Seidel got a field office in Kiev to provide election training and election management for the Ukrainian Election Commission.
Seidel is one of the most notorious outsource companies for elections, with regular electronic voting machine problems who also tabulate our election results in cloud services in Europe, aka servers outside the United States.
A whistleblower leaked to me in 2019 internal documents from Seidel that appeared to show meddling in the Kentucky election.
Atlantic Council has been citing America's policies for decades now.
And look at what a panic they were in when Trump made that phone call to Ukraine.
They went into absolute panic mode.
75% of the people testifying were all directly connected to General Jones, McCain, and the Atlantic Council.
The now IG of the NSA literally with his wife created the National Anthem.
Inspector General's Office.
Ukraine in 2009.
They created it.
Robert Storch is the deputy head of the U.S. Inspector General's Office.
I recognize how important this task is for NABU and for the effort to address corruption there in Ukraine.
September 30th, 2016.
Obama knows that within 30 days, if the NSA can't fix the over-collection problem by either dumping data or justifying having it, the FISA court will order the IG of the NSA to investigate.
So what does Obama do?
He writes an executive order that makes the IG of the NSA a presidential appointment rather than an appointment by the director of the NSA.
November 30, 2016.
Obama nominates Robert Storch, who is working as deputy IG of the DOJ under Horowitz at the same time.
I'm Rob Storch, and I'm honored to serve as the Inspector General at the National Security Agency.
During the transition period from the Obama administration into the Trump administration, Storch appears to never have actually been confirmed by the Trump administration.
How did this guy get confirmed?
Not one person asked, hey, have you ever worked for, I mean, a couple months before they even had the hearing to see if he's going to be confirmed or not.
Nobody asked him, hey, did you by any chance get an offer from the President of Ukraine to work for them?
It was all over the media, but not one person asked.
You know who else helped them set it up?
Bill Taylor and George Kent, those two clowns, also testified against the President.
One of them has supersonic hearing.
They could hear phones that are not on speaker phone from across the room.
So that's odd.
According to Torrey, the alleged impeachment whistleblower was actually a wiretap, hence supersonic hearing capabilities.
Eric C. Aramela was a decoy to hide the fact that the president was being wiretapped through a 702 data overcollection problem connected to the Sunset Clause, collection problem that the NSA Inspector General Robert Storch oversaw. collection problem that the NSA Inspector General Robert Storch oversaw.
The question is, what has been the Senate Intelligence Committee?
All complacent.
Every single one of them.
Because it's their job to be our voice and ask those questions.
So I guess the question is, are they all just that inept?
Or is there something else going on?
Section 702 of the FISA Amendment Act of 2008 was created to stop illegal surveillance through data collection.
It ends up being used as cover Providing the intelligence agencies front-facing legal access to unauthorized data, while turning a blind eye to private contractors having backdoor access to all data.
I had access through the administrative side platform, because I was one of the first on it, to be able to see all communications Between people like Adam Schiff, Brian Dean, Feinstein's staffers, and General Jones, and many more that I don't want to say because I haven't publicized that yet, actually.
Because there's foreign people.
I did see communications of former GCHQ head Hannigan.
Robert Hannigan was part of the company in GSG, right?
So I gave most of this information to Millie Weaver and she put out a report.
And even though I had legal access to all their communications, because I had my username and password, the minute she did that report, within just, I believe, almost instantaneously, the website was taken down, and my access was revoked.
They changed it.
Well, it wasn't revoked.
They just uphauled the whole server.
It was done.
It was finished.
They made it toast.
I mean, that's what they do.
But nothing ever really does, really.
Because the way they use their servers is by torrents so all their information is hidden somewhere across the planet maybe we should look at some old articles that i put out on hurricane electric to find those servers and those little bits and seed them correctly so i mean you'd be able to seed it with something like a keystone keystone keystone
i want to ask you about john brennan and the black male so who all did he have black male collected on and Any politicians?
You mean that I've seen?
Yes.
A lot of people.
Yes.
And politicians?
Yes.
So would you say there's any side more Democrats or more Republican or is it kind of even?
Very even, Stephen.
Okay, so once this blackmail was collected on politicians, what did they do with it?
Even Pelosi doesn't know what they have on her.
You know, just Blumenthal.
Nobody.
I can keep going down.
But do they know that these people have blackmail on them?
Only if they've butted heads.
Okay.
So we saw a butting of heads.
Between Murkowski, was it?
And Feinstein.
Right?
That's a butting of heads.
That's where it's like, hey, we got this.
You know where she put her up against the wall?
Happens all the time.
Now you know how our government has been compromised.
24-7 surveillance mixed with blackmail.
What's the significance of Cambridge Analytica being attached to Trump's campaign?
Everything that I saw with the description of how Cambridge Analytica functioned, What they did, their computer applications, everything that I saw with that, I would describe as, you know, just a later iteration of the Shadow Net.
Was Cambridge Analytica, to your knowledge, an IAEA operation?
Yes, it was.
And I believe that it was so blatant because it was piloted at the same time that the RNC and the DNC were hacked.
It was all formulated correctly.
I have said to you it's all coming out and the question is how.
I didn't inspire Hillary's emails and I have nothing to do with Russia.
So the fact is it looks like I did both.
Does it look like you did both?
If I wasn't me, I would say yes, that's what it looked like.
I was part of the team running Obama's Facebook.
We invented the way social media is used to communicate with voters.
This is how they were going to do it.
You know, they were supposed to go in, they were supposed to sway it, because they were supposed to give up the goods to match the Russia hack.
Why would they be running an IA operation that would be helping Trump win?
Because that doesn't make sense when we know that General Jones is a Democrat and many of these people don't like Trump.
So what gives?
Well, because then we just make it look like Russia was running the Cambridge Analytical Program too.
And it admits to it right here.
I am headed to Washington D.C.
for my testimony for another investigation.
I definitely didn't think that while we're sitting there counting votes that some of those votes were made by people who had seen Fake news stories paid for by Russia on their Facebook page.
So not only did they hack the DNC and the RNC, but nobody talks about that, right?
Because we're only supposed to focus that Russia was hacking just the DNC, not the RNC.
Keep forgetting about that.
Because it was just information Brennan was gaining.
They wanted to get access to servers.
That's the way it goes.
Anyway.
Cambridge Analytica at the same time would be supposedly helping President Trump win.
And the Russia collusion hoax would have stuck better because behind all those LLCs and glitz and glamour, they would have had some statue of Vladimir Putin in a tutu waiting for you.
Yeah, I worked at Cambridge Analytica while they had data sets.
Went to Russia one time while I worked for Cambridge.
I visited Julian Assange while I worked for Cambridge.
pitched the Trump campaign and wrote the first contract.
I have an email from one of our senior data scientists that said that we were actually using Facebook-like data in our modeling.
Methodology was considered a weapon.
Weapons-grade communications tactics.
Well done, Britt.
Looked quite tough, and you did okay with a winky face, little emoji.
When we found out, Cambridge Analytica reached out to WikiLeaks and said, hey, can we help?
What that means is we've got a Russian intelligence operation underway to illegally influence the U.S.
election in Trump's favor.
And we've got the data firm paid by the Trump campaign offering operational help to them.
Are there any ties between Mr. Trump, you or your campaign, and Putin and his regime?
No sir, I'm not.
It's absurd and there's no basis to it.
Cambridge Analytica was used to create the appearance that Russia conducted influence operations to help Trump win the 2016 election.
Stone, Manafort, Davis, McCain, Jones, all of these people have been doing this for, to my knowledge, A decade of my personal fact witness knowledge.
They've been doing this for a decade prior to Trump even running for office.
I met with Roger Stone.
We were at his table at a speaking engagement that he did in Clearwater, Florida.
And I asked Roger Stone at that time, are you, you know, did you work with, do you know Jim Jones?
Did you work with Dynology?
And he acknowledged his relationship.
And it's yeah, sure.
I did ask, I asked him flat out.
I said, did you use the shadow net?
Did you know about it?
He's like, no.
Stone leaving the Trump campaign early on suggests candidate Trump didn't want his campaign tied to Stone's influence operations.
Stone does have a reputation for political dirty tricks and influence operations.
I revel in your hatred because if I weren't effective, you wouldn't hate me.
Manafort and Roger Stone go way back.
Like, from the 80s.
You know?
Like, come on.
These people have been through everything together.
And, you know, this is why they targeted them.
And this is why they went on Manafort for things that were, like, ancient.
It's like, man, not even a statute of limitation.
Not anything.
Come on, man.
Seriously?
Nope.
Psy Group and Wikistrats absolutely connected to the Shadow Net through the owners of the Shadow Net, due to the fact that Psy Group, through Paul Manafort, submitted a proposal to Trump's campaign.
Now Trump's campaign rejected the proposal.
I love that man, right?
That's why I keep voting for him.
Because even when he's given the opportunity, The Trump campaign must have known the Dems would try to use anything against them.
Trump must have sensed that the offer for influence operations was a honey trap to set him up.
Well, do you think that the reason they attached Manafort to Trump's campaign, because that was kind of later, right?
Attached him onto there, do you think it's because they were trying to frame up Trump?
Yes, because they failed with their IAAS.
Yeah, I definitely would say that Manafort was an asset.
Whether or not he fully understood what his role was, you know, they might have lied to him about what their true intentions were.
I believe they fully intended to throw him under the bus, because two things had to happen.
They could not let Hillary win, and they could not let Trump keep his seat.
Right?
So they were trying to kill two birds with one stone, using Manafort to make sure that Hillary doesn't win through IIA, through Wikistrat, through his connections there.
And then those same people turning around, throwing him under the bus by somebody who had previously worked with Manafort and understood what he had been doing and what he was doing, and used that to exploit him as a way to hurt Trump.
Since their whole attempt to have him employ a company to help him win and use these psychological operations that the left was using, I mean, they're doing it, we should do it, and he didn't.
And that's in the Mueller Report.
That's in the New York Times.
There are several instances where he's rejected the opportunity to take advantage of influence operations, be it IIA supported, or just your standard run-of-the-mill influence operations, right?
But they've rejected that. - And the thing is, people like Roger Stone aren't saints, but they're not demons either.
They skirt the outs, and they're great at what they do.
And, you know, you either love him or not.
It's like brie cheese.
But the one thing that you can be sure of is that he sticks to his principles.
And if he's your friend, especially if he's been your friend for 40 years, like he was with President Trump, there's no way he's going to flip on you to save his butt.
Ever.
Because that's what honest people do.
Yeah, he seems to know how the games in the swamp are played.
So, I mean, he knows how they operate.
It was actually framed by people they work with.
I mean, that software was created, you know, by his friend that created the Magic Wheel software.
Like, implemented Shadowknit for the courts so they can, like, randomly have such specified, you know, out of millions of people that were in the pool, they were all like intelligence contractors and never Trumpers.
Come on.
So why wouldn't they just focus their efforts on running IA operations to get Hillary in office?
Oh, they did.
Are you kidding?
They deployed everything from censoring, shadow banning, to dismissals, to full-blown mockingbirds and...
I mean, that's where we saw the real face of the press.
That is exactly where we saw it.
I want all of you to know that that's true not only for the campaign, but if I am fortunate enough to be Your president.
I want you to know and I want you to tell anybody you know, any friends or colleagues at school or work or your neighborhood, whether you vote for me or vote against me, The polls?
98% chance Hillary Clinton wins.
Like, what?
Yeah.
I mean, what?
Those were bogus.
Everything!
That was an IIA.
That was hijacking reality to think, she's already won, so obviously she's the best.
All the superstars coming out, how she's amazing, all these concerts, and all to divert you away from the fact that she could walk, talk, climb stairs, say a word without checking out Hillary Clinton is on stage right now as we speak and she is coughing non-stop.
Did she like chug up a lung or something that one time?
Yeah.
That was super weird.
There is definitely some context that needs to be understood in the relationship between General Jones, Obama, and Hillary Clinton.
General Jones was originally offered by Obama the position of Secretary of State.
He accepted.
his family, talked to his family, he accepted.
And then two days later, without even telling him, which was kind of a jerk move to do, Obama turned around and tapped Hillary Clinton.
And I know that Jones, Jim Jones, told me that his dad was really offended by that.
And then he was offered and accepted the role, the position of National Security Advisor, but actually considered turning it down because he was so offended by what it was, so upset by what had happened.
What would be the point of, like, making Hillary out of the equation to then get Trump in to then want to just impeach him?
Well, because he wasn't their choice.
These people hate Trump.
He's a jackass.
So... We're talking about, at the time, you know... That would just make Pence in charge.
Well, which Pence?
You think John McCain would have rather had Pence in charge?
I think Lindsey Graham would rather have Pence.
Lindsey Graham was so frustrated with Trump, he took his phone and smashed it on YouTube because Trump gave out his phone number.
Trump drove that man crazy.
Trump got in the way of the big game, a contest between contractors and subcontractors over who gets first dibs on defense, security, and tech contracts.
Mueller, since I think it was like August of 2016, was well aware that I had in my possessions portions of the DNC mirrored server in February and March.
Did you know that?
I did not.
And when my private life was collapsing, the same exact day, not without a minute of separation, I was served by Barack Hussein Obama's attorney, three years later, to come and talk about it.
Did you know that?
I did not know that either.
They went as hard as they could.
Stone, the same thing.
They went with nothing.
Like look, Mueller called him in, right?
For these emails and talking about Wikileaks.
When I had actual portions of the DSO, like even Mueller knew I had it.
Why did Mueller never call me back?
When I went to him and told him about all this information, I spoke to him for 15 minutes.
Every one of these people are so corrupt.
It's not even funny.
The Swamp already knew in August of 2016 that the information was compromised by people.
And they knew what type of people had accessed that information.
But they didn't know who.
Some people will say, well maybe they're investigating and how can you investigate it if you don't ever call me back?
And you don't ever really, because there's a lot of things that I need to be able to explain to them that I can't say outside of a classified environment.
So they're not even, if they are investigating it, they certainly aren't doing it with all the information.
Stop.
We all know it was a fix.
Did the DOJ outsource the Mueller investigation to CGI?
Well, yes they did.
So I'll tell you what happened.
So I actually, uh, For my listeners on air, I interviewed former Acting Attorney General Whitaker.
I want to ask you something.
You were Chief of Staff for Jeff Sessions, so there's obviously contracts that are signed, like you know how you hire vendors.
I wanted to know why during the Mueller probe, we spent over $40 million in waste management to a Canadian company that works with Canadian intelligence.
Sounds like paper shredding.
We need watchdogs and something I did before I came to Washington D.C.
was run a watchdog group that asked these types of questions and to make sure that there's not waste, fraud, and abuse.
So why is our Department of Justice outsourcing to Canadian intelligence companies Access to the Mueller investigation.
That definitely seems improper.
Now, this Canadian company, how much were they paying?
And were they paying them with tax dollars?
We have to ask ourselves, why would we use federal tax dollars, an upwards of $40 million, to have them do paper shredding for Mueller?
And administrative tasks and emptying garbage cans.
That sounds like a leaking opportunity.
That sounds like, why are we getting foreign nationals involved in an investigation that we're supposedly investigating the president, the sitting president of the United States?
From CGI's involvement in the passport fiasco in 2008, to CGI involved in the Mueller investigation, we see how contractors have the ability to both perform and clean up their own dirty work.
I think it's about time people understand what happened.
And I've made it no secret that I know what happened.
So, Seth Rich worked for the DNC.
He was asked, just like I, he was asked, hey, why don't you go image the DNC server right there, since you're there for us, so we can keep it safe.
And he did so.
And he uploaded it where he was told.
So he uploaded it where he was supposed to.
And there were a lot of me's that saw it.
Me's meaning group of friends that I have where we sit and talk string theory and predictive analytics.
On the internet.
So we find this and it's like, whoa!
Treasure trove!
Copy.
And we fractioned it so that way we can download it because it was so massive.
And That's what happened.
So I'll tell you what happened to Seth Rich.
So he did his job as he was asked.
At the same time, the RNC was also hacked.
Again, BrennanMO.
That's hack.
And the hack was done on purpose, so you can delete information, insert information, and of course, with them putting Cambridge Analytica and sending them over to President Trump, which was a trap.
That was a trap.
You clearly can see it.
They hacked the RNC.
You mean you had someone within the GOP do it for you because no one died there.
And yes, some of those emails escaped because that is what was considered mitigation.
You have to give them something really bad.
And so when you saw that they had retroactively changed things, the stories and the rumors going in, Seeing that Bernie Sanders' elections were being stolen, the DNC was all about Hillary, not about real elections, that it was all rigged, he came in contact with a guy named Sean Lucas.
So they decided, oh yeah, maybe we can get it out to someone else.
office and they've been served.
Democracy has prevailed today.
So they decided, oh yeah, maybe we can get it out to someone else.
And it was not to Julian Assange direct.
And both of those guys are dead.
In a bizarre twist of events on August 2nd, less than one month after serving the subpoena, Lucas was reported dead.
Hillary's emails were still being examined.
They had to get rid of the evidence.
And the only way that they can access the whole DNC server is if there was a breach.
And that's how you can go in.
And change things.
This is why the FBI never asked for the sermon.
That's the real story.
So as Seth Rich thought that what he was doing was correct, later on he realized it was not.
That's why there was such a big gap.
They didn't need to find him.
They needed to find out who had him and they already knew.
That I myself had portions of the DNC server and others in March and February.
Obama's lawyer for Seth Rich, three years later, says, you need to come and tell us about Seth Rich.
I was like, I don't need to do anything.
I don't know who you're trying to, you're being subpoenaed.
I can't bring you anything because you're three years too late.
And for the record, usually they're going to be three minutes too late.
You know, Hillary doesn't have a patent on him.
Or city dumps, or bleach bed, or, or, or, you know. - Didn't CrowdStrike initially investigate the DNC server creating the whole Russia hacked the election scenario?
When the DNC hired us back in May, we actually came in and deployed our technology called Falcon on all the systems inside the corporate network.
Who are these people that were actually doing the hacking of the DNC?
There were two groups, two independently working groups that we associate with Russian intelligence agencies.
One of them we associate with GRU, the primary military intelligence agency in Russia.
CrowdStrike, owned by that Alperovich guy, who is a senior advisor on the Atlanta Council.
When President Trump called up the Ukrainian president, what did he ask him for?
The CrowdStrike servers, right?
Again!
All immediate direct colleagues, like the brown bag lunch at this big, you know, star chamber that you can imagine existing there.
I'm sorry, Mr. President.
They're all there!
It's like, what can we do?
Orange man bad!
What are the statistical odds of that six degrees of Kevin Bacon existing on virtually everybody connected to the Russian dossier and the impeachment?
The only other person that directly connected to both of them is President Trump, and he's on the receiving end of it.
But yet you never hear this man's name.
General Jones.
That's the guy that heads up Clear Forest.
That's the guy that took Shadownet and made it what it is.
That's the guy that resold, reinvented Shadownet to create the magic wheel of the DC courts to make sure that they get the most compromised juries, you know, put together for anyone that they didn't want.
When General Jones was tapped as the chairman of the board of Atlanta Council, to replace Huntsman, John Huntsman.
One of the first orders of business that he did with the Atlanta Council was to create a partnership with Facebook, right?
That happened a month after Mark Zuckerberg sat in front of Congress.
Yes, I mean, they did not want their information to be sold to Cambridge Analytica by a developer.
And that happened, and it happened on our watch.
So even though we didn't do it, I think we have a responsibility to be able to prevent that and be able to take action sooner.
So as a month after they do that, Facebook partners with General Jones at the Atlanta Council.
To restore election integrity worldwide.
Right?
So, the best out of 7 billion people on the planet.
Mark Zuckerberg picks the owner of the ShadowNet.
President Donald Trump and Mike Pence both ran ads on Facebook that included a symbol of an upside-down red triangle.
Facebook today removed the ads.
Facebook has taken action against what it calls harmful misinformation from President Trump.
The company deleted a post by the president that included a false statement.
To restore election integrity worldwide, we all know that he was connected, directly connected to Cambridge Analytica through SciGroup and Wikistrat.
So essentially what they did was they partnered with Cambridge Analytica again.
This also explains why Facebook went to Atlantic Council, aka Jones, to fix the Cambridge Analytica problem.
They needed to cover their IIA tracks.
What you've seen with the recent riots surrounding George Floyd's death, from your perspective, does that look like an IIA operation?
Absolutely.
Nothing feels natural about what's going on.
More stuff is fake and fabricated right now in the news than what's actually real.
When I say fake or fabricated, I mean like, okay, you have the truth and it's being represented to you with a very specific slant.
It's so far beyond, you know, a couple, you know, Russia making a couple, spending some money on some Facebook ads, right?
If you believe that, then they've already won.
So that's how it works.
It's like the movie Wag the Dog, quite literally.
Oh, you know, movies tell a lot of stories.
And it's almost as if they're making fun of us.
They made fun of Alex Jones when he used to point out all these false flags.
I mean, I guess that's just a term he was using, but if you actually look, what he was pointing out in a lot of instances was IIA operations.
Jane, what more can you tell us about the Salomon Brothers building and its collapse, and its collapse, and its collapse?
As you can see behind me, the Trade Center appears to be still burning.
We are getting information now that one of the other buildings, Building 7 in the World Trade Center complex, is on fire and has either collapsed or is collapsing.
Well, but he didn't know the term IAA, so it would be easier for people to understand someone's hacking a reality.
Because now in this day and age of computing, that makes more sense to people.
They understand it more.
Oh, hack my reality, you mean change the way I see things.
And that is exactly what an IIA is.
It's just that it's software turning out, oh, you need to do this to get this outcome.
Kind of like using that shadow net in the DC courts and saying, oh, prosecutor, you want him to go to jail and you want a guilty verdict?
Well, we're going to have to pull it out.
And then when a pool of jury people come, all of them are potential to give you a guilty verdict.
So then you pick from all the people that will give you a guilty verdict.
So there's no chance that you'll win.
And even Matt Whitaker said that on my show.
He said the judges are corrupt.
That's a major problem for the justice system.
If people are able to use that technology in jury selection to be able to predict who's gonna, you know, throw their vote a certain way.
Is anyone stopping them?
That's a major problem right there.
It is, and Roger Stone, with this commutation, will solve it.
Because this is where it all comes to the surface.
How do you think your jury pool was selected?
Well, obviously, I don't know.
I do know that based on the statistics on the District of Columbia, that the statistical improbability of my jury having a single Republican Should be impossible.
The statistical impossibility of my jury having a single military veteran should be impossible.
The statistical possibility of my jury having no jurors with less than a college education is impossible.
But that was the case.
Well, what if I told you, Roger, that your jury was actually selected?
The jury pool, the grander jury pool, right?
Before the voir dire, as they say, where you kind of select and approve and deny, right?
The majority of it was actually plugged into a program.
But see, this program wanted to select a jury pool that would get you a guilty verdict no matter what.
Hence, the odds, like you say, are so far-fetched.
So the question is, who was the company, who was the vendor that was used to select your greater pool for the jury?
And if your lawyer was able to find that or ask that question, I would not be surprised if you see the name General Hayden pop up.
I do think it might strengthen the possibility of my appeal should that become necessary.
I will never plead guilty to something I didn't do.
It's a matter that does require some research and I appreciate you bringing it up.
That's amazing.
It's like Minority Report in real time today.
Clearforce is kind of like what they built.
It's the next iteration of the Shadowmen.
They took the profile personas and profile capabilities.
They added real-time criminal background, travel, Financial, medical, added all these things in to create predictive behavioral profiles that determine whether or not you're likely to steal or leak.
Clearforce actually sells this to HR, right?
So you could actually go into a job, apply for it, and not get a job because an application with an algorithm designed by Obama's National Security Advisor and or Obama's CIA Director determined that you were predictably likely to steal or leak in some minority report-like fashion.
And you may never ever steal or leak, but you might lose a job because Something read all your posts and looked at your information and determined it.
Think about it.
If people knew just how bad it is, think about how many things he's changing and how much money they're taking.
I mean, think of all the money they're going to lose in contracting.
He's stopped the clearances.
Remember once you're out, now we pull your clearance.
He did that.
Remember?
So now all the future generals or all the future intelligence community persons don't get to use their clearance.
If you're out, it's finished.
You guys were paying me, as taxpayers, were paying me, as the Information Insurance Security Officer, to protect our national security.
So, y'all should want to get to the bottom of this as much as anybody, as much as I do.
But it's very personal to me, I won't deny that.
When you have your c*** trying to usurp your president by penning in an anonymous letter to the New York Times, that's a big problem.
This is the biggest and boldest move towards the ultimate surveillance state ever made, and it's near completion.
Micromanaging this technology on a global scale would require integrating it with artificial intelligence.
Imagine artificial intelligence autonomously operating the Shadownet and Clearforce.
Interpol's 2019 publication, Artificial Intelligence and Robotics for Law Enforcement, reveals we are already there.
Quote, although films such as Minority Report and Robocop may not present the most attractive depiction of the future of advanced technologies in law enforcement, understanding how these technologies can be applied by law enforcement agencies for the safety and security of our global community is of critical importance. understanding how these technologies can be applied by law enforcement Short from a major PR rollout, there is an international push for autonomous law enforcement to remove the human factor.
Several features of the Interpol program indicate that they are using an iteration of ShadowNet and ClearForce technology.
This March 2017 United States patent issued to Jim Jones III and ClearForce spells it out.
systems and methods for electronically monitoring humans to determine potential risk.
Several diagrams in this patent look identical to the dashboard layout of the ShadowNet.
The patent mentions integration with U.S. and international databases, local law enforcement, and individual state databases, all fed into international justice and public safety networks.
Full integration of all data, including the Internet of Things, is the objective.
A March 2020 Atlantic Council policy primer, AI, Society, and Governance, references the 2019 Interpol publication stating, The United Nations Interregional Crime and Justice Research Institute and the International Criminal Police Organization are leading the conversation on autonomous patrol robots, tracking and tracing systems, forecasting tools, predictive policing, and more.
The next iteration of the Shadownet and Clearforce is ready to go.
Integration with AI, robots, and the replacement of traditional law enforcement is just around the corner.
Given that leftist organizations managed by Momentum, which is behind the Defund the Police movement, and given that momentum has been connected to IIA operations, the case can be made that Jones and Co.
are running the Defund the Police influence operation simply because they are in a position to benefit by offering an alternative solution that is already in line with the Green New Deal agenda.
We've already seen some of this rolled out with the technocratic response to COVID-19, with autonomous drones, contact tracing apps, nanotech vaccines, and predictive modeling for social distancing and economic shutdowns.
Furthermore, this technology is behind the push for police abolition, defunding law enforcement and replacing it with smart justice, Given we have seen IIA Shadownet technology implemented by the Socialist Democrats and Sunrise Movement, who are using it to push for police abolition.
This political movement is deeply connected to the UN, who has partnered with Interpol to corral us into the artificial intelligence and robotics for law enforcement direction.
Danny, I gotta say, it's just breathtaking change.
Just breathtaking what has been done here.
If anyone ever deserved a Pulitzer Prize, it's Millie Weaver.
This is just sensational.
I would totally agree, Dr. Fetzer.
I told you in the beginning that I was quite taken back.
You know, some of the things that struck me were how they went through event after event, showing in detail how they pulled it off, how they create and use the media to slander people.
You know, it just really, really hits hard when you see that report.
Andy, they're really laying out all the tools for behavior manipulation on a grand scale.
When they can actually predetermine who's gonna be in a pool for the jurors for a trial, so that they'll guarantee that whoever is selected, they're gonna be predisposed to vote guilty, as in the case of Roger Stone.
And where may I surmise this may have also been employed in the relation to me with my Sandy Hook lawsuit, when you see the scale on which they are able to reach out to specific individuals throughout a community, such as through the Obama phone giving them access to vast numbers of poor people that they would otherwise be unable to reach completely when they know what buttons to push to manipulate them.
They can create a crowd.
They can create a riot.
They can create looting virtually at random.
A friend of mine with deep connections to intel for complicated reasons, though he's not a part of the deep state, had told me long ago that mind control is making a tremendous difference here in our society.
But Danny, until I watch this, and now for the second time, and everyone out there has to watch this at least twice, Now I understand what he meant.
Because this combination of having vast surveillance, data, unrestricted data accumulation on every one of us, they do, in essence, an automated personality profile.
They know how they can affect our behavior.
And they use it in accordance with algorithms in order to achieve the desired outcome.
Just as they illustrated with a Roger Stone trial, you want to have a guilty verdict for this man to be convicted.
You have to go back to control the composition of the jury pool, to guarantee that everyone in the jury pool is going to be disposed to vote guilty for Roger Stone, regardless of what evidence is presented regularly.
Roger was talking about the statistical improbabilities of only having one veteran or only having one Republican and so forth.
Well, it was far more deep and devastating than that.
I cannot begin to tell you, Danny, How I am impressed with Millie Weaver and how smart she was to make sure that this would get out to the public, even if there were an attempt to intervene by this totally fabricated, ridiculous arrest, which as I have already observed, I guarantee is going to lead to there be millions and millions more viewers.
Danny, When they banned my book, when Amazon banned Nobody Died at Sandy Hook, where I brought together 13 experts, including six PhDs, when we established the school had been closed by 2008, that was loaded with asbestos, other biohazards, damaged by a hurricane.
There was even a major flood, it turns out, in that area of 2007.
There were no students there.
It was a two-day FEMA exercise.
We even had the manual, which I included in Appendix A. It blew the case apart so that in less than a month, when it went on sale on 22 October 2015 but was banned on 9 November, You know, Rory sold 500 copies.
I released it for free as a PDF.
That's what they did not anticipate.
They did not anticipate that Millie would have a dead man switch to get her video out.
My book, that same source as estimated, has been downloaded 10 million plus times, Danny.
I'm telling you, if they just let the book appear, people would have got it, but they would imagine that Wildest Dreams, it would have sold 10 million copies.
Not on your life!
It would have sold hundreds, thousands, 10,000 maybe, but not tens of millions.
They've done the same thing here.
This has been calamitous for the deep state and I say this woman is a national treasure.
Arresting her was a calamitous blunder.
It's just as the Democrats going for abolishing the police have committed a calamitous blunder because when the American people look out at their country, they look at Seattle, they look at Portland, they look at Chicago, they look at New York, They're saying, defund the police?
What could be a greater form of insanity?
And I'm saying they're doing, the very measures they're taking are going to reelect Donald Trump.
And I'll tell you, watching this, he comes out as clean as a houndstooth, Danny.
I am so impressed.
This is a brilliant piece of work.
Absolutely magisterial.
I say the Pulitzer is the least of the accolades that ought to be bestowed upon Millie Weaver and her associates.
You know, you basically took my thoughts right out of my head, Dr. Fetzer.
It was a brilliant piece.
Millie is definitely going to go down in history for this.
I think it was a big, massive mistake, the way they took her into custody, you know, with all the mistakes they made.
All the confusion around the arrest.
There's something going on here, but Millie really struck hard.
I thought I was really taken back, sir, when the whistleblowers talked about how many public reporters, famous ones that we see on television on a regular basis, that they went to, to try to get this out.
And how many times they were told no.
By these prominent reporters that we see on television that would not touch it.
But then in the end, little Millie Weaver comes along and breaks the story.
That's the one that really gets me, is the fact that we're not seeing this on Fox.
We're not seeing any big newspaper.
We're seeing little Millie Weaver break, you know, definitely the biggest story we've seen in a long time.
And I totally agree, sir.
I'm still shocked when I see it.
Everybody does need to see it two, maybe three times.
There's so much information that hits you every single time you watch it.
Danny, I'm so impressed with all of your analysis, especially of the complete fabrication of the arrest here, the absence of the warrant, the improper procedures.
All of it just comes together to show the deep state was petrified that this would get out.
And now, Unintentionally, of course, they are causing it to go worldwide viral in a way that might never have happened any other way.
Danny, we must do a sequel.
We must follow up with this.
I'm hoping I can enlist you to do, next Sunday, Everything that we haven't been able to cover here in the consequences and ramifications, my friend, because you are spot on.
You brought this to my attention.
You were aware of the improprieties.
You knew that this was a fake arrest and that it was, you have delineated with great precision, Danny.
I cannot thank you enough for joining me tonight.
And I look forward to a sequel next week.
That'd be great, Dr. Fetz.
I would love to cover it.
And if I may, I just want to point out to anybody listening, to all of your audience and your listeners, you know, when Pete Santilli broke this video, at the end of the video... Back to your mic!
Andy, you got away from your mic!
Okay, can you hear me now, Dr. Fetzer?
Yeah!
Okay, what really struck me was when Pete Santilli broke this video, when it was over, I thought it was over.
And it even looked like Pete was surprised, but he brought the two whistleblowers on his show live right after the video.
And if you want to ask me my true opinion, Dr. Fetzer, I think the telling bombshells that the two whistleblowers let out of the bag And the interviews afterward, when they spoke freely, live on air, were so bombshell, sir.
It was almost more bombshell than the video.
And I believe that really needs to be the focus of next week's show.
We'll include that.
And I know there's sensational stuff there, Danny.
You've already given me some tidbits of it.
We'll hold that in abeyance for then, Danny, because this is already so overwhelming.
We don't want to, you know, blow the brain cells of our audience.
Remember the one commentator said if the brains would be splattered all... Well, we're not going to have that here.
We want you to think deeply about it.
Danny, we'll do it again.
We'll include everything we didn't include tonight and more.
That sounds great, Dr. Fetzer.
I definitely look forward to it.
And I just want to thank you publicly for taking my phone call when I did call you.
I know you're busy.
You stopped what you're doing to look at this video after I explained it.
You know, and I know you're really busy and you went to great lengths to put a report together to stop your normal schedule to get this out to the public.
And I really think this is going to be beneficial for everybody listening.
Well, Danny, you're a sensational guy and a great American, and I gotta say, by way of conclusion now, but to be continued, God bless Millie Weaver, God bless Donald Trump, and God bless the USA.
This is Jim Fetzer, The Conspiracy Guy.
Thank you for watching.
This is one you gotta watch at least twice.
Believe me, the second time, I got more and more and more out of this.
You have to understand what's going on in your country today.
Thank you all for watching and be certain to join us next week when I bring back Panty Cirrus to go through the after party, all the conversations and revelations and what happened to Millie Weaver in between.
▲
Export Selection