Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

June 19, 2020 - Jim Fetzer

01:56:04

THE RAW DEAL (17 JUNE 2020) - Assassination Attempt At The State Of The Union?

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	We, we, we record it too.
	No, I know, but I'm doing a video version, see.
	All right, here we go.
	One more time now.
	Trouble.
	There we go.
	Here we go.
	I can't hear it.
	Still working.
	Called the wrong damn one.
	Okay.
	And Studio A, of course.
	Yeah, and I called the old Studio A.
	No one will have the endurance to collect on his insurance.
	Floyds of London will be loaded when they go.
	We will all fry together when we fry.
	We'll be french fried potatoes by and by.
	There will be no more misery when the world is our rotisserie.
	Yes, we all will fry together when we fry.
	There'll be nobody present at the wake With complete participation in that grand incineration Nearly three billion hunks of well-done steak We will all jar together when we jar And let there be no moaning of the bar Just sing out a tedium when you see that ICBM And the party will become as you are
	This is Jim Fetzer, your host on The Raw Deal, where I have some rather weighty reports to share with you today.
	In fact, they're profoundly troubling.
	Mitchell, my usual producer, has internet problems, so I'm very grateful to a mad painter to sit in his place.
	I will be taking calls the second hour, and I have no doubt Most of you are going to be very, very troubled by what I have to tell you today.
	Now, what I'm going to be leading up to is as desperate an action as one party could take against the other, in particular against a sitting president.
	And I want to weigh the premises.
	By talking about why the Democrats should feel in such desperate straits, which it seems to me are not getting any better for them, to take such a desperate measure.
	We have now President Trump signing a police reform executive order.
	He's opposed, of course, to the calls to defund police departments.
	He wants increased transparency and accountability for police misconduct, a limit on the use of chokeholds, increased use of non-police personnel to deal with issues related to mental health or drug addiction, all of which is highly, highly appropriate.
	The order titled Safe Policing for Safe Communities acknowledges instances of police abuse and brutality and the negative impact that has had on community relationships with the police.
	It establishes a national certification and credentialing system for law enforcement agencies, creates a federal database to track officers credibly accused of wrongdoing, discourages the use of chokeholds, Unless an officer's life is in danger and encourages Congress to pass further reforms.
	All that seems to me to be totally appropriate.
	He announced he had met with the families of a series of victims and remarked of them, these are incredible people, the family members, and of course their lost ones, and it's so sad.
	Many of these families lost their loved ones in deadly interaction with police.
	To all the hurting families, I want you to know all Americans mourned by your side, your loved ones, will not have died in vain.
	Meanwhile, surprise, surprise, the Democrats slam the GOP police reform bill and what Trump is doing before actually listening to it.
	I mean, this is so typical of the Democrats.
	Well, in particular, the Senate Republicans have yet to release a promised set of reforms, but that hasn't stopped top Senate Democrats from waging a preemptive war on their colleague's forthcoming bill.
	We also have now the former District of Columbia Chief of Police praising Trump's police reform executive order.
	Very positive, the right direction.
	Just as President Trump was signing his executive order, the former DC Police Chief Charles Ramsey was praising the move, saying, this is very positive and moves in the right direction.
	Ramsey told CNN's Brooke Baldwin he believes this is the right way to go.
	I really didn't expect the President to come up with some groundbreaking recommendations, quite frankly, but at least it's a step in the right direction.
	Policing, for the most part, is done at the local and state level, so there's a lot of work that has to be done at the state and local level, understood.
	The former D.C.
	police chief discussed de-escalation and the chokehold with the suggestion that there should be a ban later, he said, as a last resort.
	This had to sting CNN's Brooke Baldwin and the anti-Trump D.C.
	police chief who's been battling out with the president during the riots in D.C.
	Meanwhile, I would remind you all, we're talking about events that are relatively abnormal, very, very rare statistically.
	Here I have records, for example, of the murder of blacks and whites in the U.S.
	in 2013.
	Blacks killed by blacks, overwhelmingly more prevalent than other categories.
	Approximately 54 per million members of the murderers' race.
	When it comes to whites killed by whites, it's less than a fifth that.
	Ten per million.
	When it comes to whites killed by blacks, it's nearly as high as whites killed by whites at 9.8.
	But when it comes to blacks killed by whites, it's less.
	Less than one per million members of the murderers' race.
	Less than one per million.
	So what we're talking about with Blacks Killed by Blacks, it's way more than 50 times as much as Blacks Killed by Whites.
	Where Whites Killed by Whites is more than 10 times greater than Blacks Killed by Whites.
	And Whites Killed by Blacks again is nearly 10 times greater than Blacks Killed by Whites.
	So this is what's known, you know, colloquially as cherry picking.
	It's known as anecdotal evidence.
	It's ignoring the statistical evidence that puts matters into perspective for the sake of political gain.
	This is a fallacy committed by, you know, it's technically known as special pleading, where you only cite the evidence favorable to your case, well known to used car dealers, Politicians and editorial writers, right?
	The used car dealer, look at the great stereo, look at the terrific upholstery, all leather, ignoring the fact that the engine shot needs a ring job and the transmission needs replacement, right?
	That's how they do it.
	Well, here's a very interesting piece by a black Truth!
	Democrats feed racism to control our black community.
	This is very thoughtful, so I'm going to share a part of it.
	For the past few months, we have witnessed the raw and unmasked Democratic Party live and in living color.
	Their constituents are rioting, looting, and murdering because they have finally realized that there are only three areas where the government is supremely prolific and highly efficient.
	Theft, incarceration, and killing.
	Outside this iron triangle, government fails horribly at education, protection, healthcare, economic development, border security, drug enforcement, and infrastructure.
	Yet after months of economic collapse, pandemic hysteria, and racial anarchy, where 60 years of Democratic Party abuse of black America was revealed, black leadership still chooses the government as its vehicle to solve these indignities.
	Why?
	Because this is what the Democrats desire.
	Except for a brief time during Reconstruction, there has never been a time since its inception in 1800 that the Democrats have not had absolute control over most of the black population in America.
	They have used race in one way or another to maintain power ever since.
	The fact that 150 years since the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments were ratified, and 56 years since the 1964 Civil Rights Act, blacks are still rioting over racism and still begging government to eradicate it, should tell us something.
	The Democratic Party uses racism to subdue and control black Americans.
	Not eradicate racism to institute justice.
	Ending racism would end the Democrats' stranglehold on Black America.
	In his book, The Prince, political philosopher Machiavelli stated, for among other ills which issue from being disarmed is contempt A disgrace a prince must guard against.
	There can be no proper relation between one who is armed and one who is not.
	The evidence supports the fact that Democrats hold black people down and in utter contempt.
	For free people to voluntarily disarm themselves is the height of insanity.
	To secure 90% of the black vote for the Democratic Party.
	The black community is not being served.
	It is being occupied.
	This occupation is necessary for the cultural genocide that is taking place there.
	And like a patient, after spending all their money and discovering that their physician is a quack and a con man, blacks are asking hard questions and some are rioting.
	The Democrats said, if you give us your children, we will educate them.
	They lied.
	They said, if you get rid of your men, we will provide for you.
	They lied.
	They said, if you give us your guns, we will protect you.
	They lied.
	The consequence being that Democrats are doing all they can to try to keep blacks in line, going to the extent of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and other top Democratic leaders marching into the U.S.
	Capitol's Visitor Center last week and kneeling for eight minutes and 46 seconds The same amount of time that fired Minneapolis cop Derek Chauvin kneeled on George Floyd's neck, or so we have been told, wearing African kente cloths, which in fact are rooted in African slavery.
	These were related to the slave trade, kind of garments worn by slave owners and traders.
	I mean, the Democrats are embarrassing.
	And all of this appears to me to be part and parcel of why the Rasmussen poll for 5 June showed black approval for Trump surging to over 40%.
	Despite the recent riots over police brutality, Rasmussen has indicated black approval for the job President Trump is doing is now over 40%.
	Our daily presidential tracking poll today shows black likely voters, that's very important, Black likely voters.
	Approval of the job Donald Trump is doing is now over 40%.
	Now, you combine the fact that the Democrats are losing control of the Black vote with the fact that Trump is surging in other areas, such as Retail sales jumped 17.7% in May as economy reopens, largest increase in history.
	Data released by the Commerce Department shows U.S.
	shoppers increased spending at a record 17.7% from April to May.
	The jump in spending was double the amount both economists and forecasters were predicting.
	This is far beyond expectation.
	It suggests what we're going to have is what the Democrats dread, a V-shaped recovery, meaning a rapid drop but a rapid recovery.
	This is a sign.
	Forget this.
	Forbes has reported over 800,000 people have registered to attend President Trump's Tulsa rally.
	While Biden struggles to get even 70.
	Look, we got a photograph here of Biden on television and it has the number watching now, 68.
	68!
	68!
	The number watching Joe Biden on television, 68.
	With nearly a million Americans signed up for President Trump's rally next Saturday, Tulsa's health director sounds the alarm, right?
	They can't have this happen, right?
	They can't have a mega rally in Tulsa.
	It's the hottest ticket ever.
	The left has to stop it.
	They can't let the world see it's alright for regular Americans to meet in public spaces again.
	So we have a number of tweets.
	From those who are producing, Brad Pascal just passed 800,000 tickets.
	Biggest data haul and rally sign-up of all time by times 10.
	Saturday is going to be amazing.
	I mean, mega rallies are also being planned for Florida, Arizona, and North Carolina.
	The Democrat media complex is already going crazy and attacking President Trump for holding rallies during a pandemic.
	That's because the Democrat frontrunner, old senile Joe Biden, is still hiding in his basement in Delaware and couldn't fill a high school gym with supporters if he paid them.
	So today the Tulsa Health Department director expressed concern with Americans going to an event to see their duly elected president.
	Expressing concern about COVID-19's increasing spread, the Tulsa City County Health Department's director said he wishes the campaign rally for President Trump at the Box Center on June 20th would be pushed back to a later date.
	Here's Dana Q Patriot.
	What are they planning?
	Are they going to send them into a Trump rally to infect everyone?
	Reacting to what we discovered is an ad for COVID positive people needed as test subject Tulsa Box Center.
	If you have been diagnosed as having the COVID virus and really want to make a difference, We're hiring 20 of you to work on a large-scale test on transmission of the virus.
	A large-scale test!
	Please assemble outside the Bach Convention Center on Saturday night wearing all black, or if arriving in a group of four, please dress in the following manner.
	One dressed in all white, one dressed in all black, one dressed in coveralls, one barefoot or wearing flip-flops.
	This will make it easy to identify you.
	Singers or people with a bad cough prefer So what do you think they're gonna do?
	Send them into the Trump rally to infect everyone?
	It sure looks that way to me.
	Now here's a very interesting discovery of my colleague, Mike Barrow, with whom I'm doing these daily updates on Real Deal Reports.
	Anyone notice a trend?
	Here's a voter ID map of just the states where no voter ID is required.
	And guess what states those include?
	Oregon, California, Nevada, New Mexico, Colorado, Nebraska, Minnesota, Iowa, Virginia, Pennsylvania, a group of others.
	If you now contrast all those states with a 2016 election map, you find the states where there's no voter ID required are all Democrat states.
	Meaning they're promoting voting fraud.
	Why?
	Because they realize otherwise they don't have a chance.
	Now, here's the deal.
	Mike Behr a couple days ago on the 15th, we did the show, and he had a video From a woman who is known as the gunner's wife.
	Apparently she's married to a gunnery sergeant in the U.S.
	military.
	And she's an expert lip reader.
	And what she discovered is from footage at the State of the Union that the Democrats were planning to assassinate Donald Trump.
	Nancy Pelosi was equipped with a poison in her palms so that when Trump shook her hand, he would have a heart attack about two hours later and be gone.
	Nancy Pelosi and Mike Pence, who was in on the deal, were talking about it.
	Many senators in the crowd there before the President arrived were talking about it.
	I mean, I'm telling you, this is shocking!
	Now, if you want to see it, you can find it, you know, look for Real Deal Reports for 15 June.
	Mike Berra has a website.
	Dean Ryan has a website.
	You can find it on my Twitter account.
	I have an archive on BitChute, too.
	James Fetzer.
	You can do a bit shoot search and I believe you will find it there too, where you'll actually see the video.
	I have only a few frames here with part of what they say, but I assure you that the evidence we have here really leaves no doubt about it.
	And that's why I wanted to lay some premises about the desperation in which the Democrats find themselves.
	And I think this is completely stunning.
	Trump appears to me to be headed toward a massive landslide.
	Here's one for Nancy Pelosi and saying to Mike Pence, now did you review your papers?
	Meaning to assume the presidency upon the death or the incompetence of the president.
	I'll figure it out.
	I'll be all right.
	It could happen so fast that we would be forbidden time.
	No, they have to see that you have them in case it happens.
	It could happen so fast that we would be forbidden next time.
	Talking about Pence having the papers to assume the presidency.
	There's a whole lot going on in the audience.
	A whole lot going on in the audience.
	Senator Ron Wyden of Oregon appears to be deeply involved and very, very happy.
	You see a lot of people like Eric Swalwell who are just bursting their buttons.
	They know something is going to happen.
	We have an unidentified figure coming up here to the side to speak to Pence, saying we're gonna do good.
	So do I, Pence says.
	We're not out of the woods yet.
	Well, I hope for the best to see everyone's testimony, including you, testimony about what happened.
	Pelosi, hoping so.
	Are you sure the camera's not on?
	Pence is saying, I think, getting a little worried that all this is being filmed.
	Pelosi's saying to him, we never wanted a coup d'etat for you.
	But bear in mind the plan.
	Here's more from Nancy.
	Well, I just don't want to say about both of them, so when he wins, they'll just have to go.
	I'm still replacing half of them.
	Apparently in reference to Gorsuch and Kavanaugh, as Supreme Court justice says, this is just massive.
	It's just massive.
	It's just massive.
	It's actually nauseating to me that the modern Democratic Party would undertake the assassination of the President of the United States, and at a State of the Union event, Right out there in front of God and everybody, where Trump apparently knew what was coming and refused to shake her hand.
	I say, wow!
	Wow!
	That's one cool customer!
	And I have made sure now that this report we have about it Gets to the President by the best access routes I have available to me, but I suspect he already knows.
	It appears to me the President has simply excellent intel or he'd already be dead.
	Now, it failed, right?
	It failed.
	Just think about it.
	This was like Plan F. Plan A was a Russia hoax.
	Plan B was Ukrainegate.
	Plan C was the impeachment.
	Plan D was a coronavirus pandemic.
	Plan E was a rioting and looting.
	Well, we're on to plan F, the actual assassination of the president.
	Notice, it didn't work.
	So, If that was F, now we're on to G, and here we have another report that I find profoundly disturbing.
	Red alert.
	It looks like the mother of all false flags is coming.
	BDA's drop on Wednesday the 10th was a first clue.
	Weapons from Iraq, Seattle, Minneapolis, Antifa, bloodbath plan.
	Get ready, ladies.
	June 21st, a week from today, is on the satanic calendar.
	It's the Summer Solstice Festival.
	That day also sees a ring of fire eclipse.
	Yesterday, a possible Fed insider who claims to be a remote viewer appeared and warned of a massive coordinated sequence of events planned soon.
	His first major post was immediately deleted.
	That post, however, was archived, thank goodness, and here it is.
	I'll read it for you.
	Okay, you dumb blank.
	Ask for it.
	I remote view and will be specific.
	You were warned.
	Many, many people will die soon in a coordinated sequence of events, mostly across America, but in designated worldwide cities targeting mostly urban downtown areas, non-black, more tech, and white, and their buildings.
	Watch for Apaches.
	That's Apache helicopters.
	Those are gunships.
	Someone masquerading as the Fed, but actually Deep State, will open fire from copters on rioters and protesters at just about the moment Antifa begins to realize they, mostly Bernie Sanders supporters, were swindled and hustled by party B, Biden, in favor of Deep State.
	Dems and Bernie was paid off to step down.
	Many, many, many Antifa millennials and zombies will be shot from the skies with exactly two speaker warnings prior to being off.
	These are real rounds, not rubber.
	Cities to look for?
	Atlanta, Philadelphia, New York City.
	What more?
	Boston.
	Somewhere in Florida, Exact city keeps wavering, definitely Seattle, definitely Portland, definitely San Diego, San Francisco, and near Los Angeles.
	Los Angeles are still deciding whether to make Chaz 2 or not, but the timing of the burning swindle reveal will make this complicated.
	Many, many, many will die.
	This is Kent State times a thousand.
	Trump will be blamed, and this will coincide with Q believers becoming pissed off.
	Nothing is happening, and it is time to split the Q movement.
	American Civil War basically oversees cities targeted.
	London.
	Somewhere in Italy, Rome.
	Somewhere in Germany, Munich.
	And as a false flag, Jerusalem.
	Absolute bloodbath.
	They are going all in.
	You may run out of water and food.
	Is that specific enough for you?
	Is it?
	Some selected highlights.
	He expects many casualties.
	Desperate final act by the Dems because HRC Hillary Rodham Clinton and BHO Barack Hussein Obama arrests our commie.
	Fake cops will be a mix of Somalis and the UN.
	Anon asked what the sky will look like.
	Funny you asked that.
	After the big dark, you'll know what that is, the sun will look double and be red on its crown and blue on its beard.
	Not even larvae in here.
	Hmm, okay, the big dark.
	Is that the eclipse or something else?
	Israel is going to get a big surprise, and all of you here will live to see it.
	It happens during bright daytime, clear blue sky.
	F off, Twitter.
	Stunning, absolutely stunning stuff.
	Now, my position to verify all of that?
	Clearly I am not, but if I didn't believe this is basically right, that this is accurate reporting, I wouldn't be sharing it with you.
	About the attempted assassination of that, I have no doubt.
	Summer solstice, June 21st, perfect day for some kind of satanic event.
	Meanwhile, it seems to me the Democrats continue to do a terrific job of self-immolation as a party that would befit a Buddhist monk protesting the Vietnam War.
	Breaking!
	New York Police Department eliminating plainclothes anti-crime unit.
	I mean, if you want, you ought to know something.
	S-T-U-P-I-D.
	This is it.
	The New York Police Department announced on Monday it is disbanding its anti-crime unit, which is a group of 600 officers who wear plain clothes to blend into the community in an effort to fight crime.
	Listen, this is the last unit you want to disband.
	These are the people who actually know what's going on, can take moves to thwart or prevent crimes from happening.
	This is the height of idiocy.
	The height of idiocy.
	Just completely stunning.
	Meanwhile, NYPD investigating whether three cops were served poisoned milkshakes at downtown Manhattan Shake Shack.
	Police investigate after three officers suffered food poisoning symptoms after drinking milkshakes from Shake Shack at 200 Broadway in Manhattan on Monday, June 15th.
	Three police officers fell ill Monday after drinking milkshakes at a Manhattan Shake Shack and the New York PD was investigating if they were poisoned with bleach.
	The officers ordered a meal at the Burgers Chain location at Broadway and Fulton about 8.30pm.
	Notice their shakes tasted strange.
	One of the officers noticed a clump of something in one of their cups.
	A second cop smelled bleach before all three fell ill.
	Investigators found a bottle of cleaning fluid used to clean the shake machine, so it's not clear if the officers were targeted.
	Duh!
	Not clear?
	Really?
	Not clear?
	Since you don't have other customers complaining that they felt sick too, They weren't suffering the symptoms that the police officers suffered, meaning only the cops were suffering the symptoms, meaning obviously, obviously the cops were targeted.
	The three cops were hospitalized at New York Downtown Hospital and recovering in stable condition.
	I mean, this is just stunning!
	New York is gonna turn into a wasteland!
	You got, like, the world's greatest city, the commercial and economic center of the planet Earth, is gonna be devastated.
	Getting rid of 600 undercover cops?
	I mean, give me a break.
	This is enough to make you a wretch.
	And you don't have to have drunk a bleach-laced milkshake to feel that way.
	Meanwhile, Minneapolis City Council unanimously votes to replace police with community-led model so we can all come together and sing kumbaya.
	I mean, I'm telling you, these Democrats are complete and total morons.
	Key facts.
	This past Sunday, a veto-proof majority of the council announced plans to disband its police department and invest in community-based public safety programs.
	That'll do a lot to keep criminals in their place.
	According to Friday's resolution, the City Council will begin a year-long process of engaging With every willing community member in Minneapolis to develop a new public safety model.
	In other words, they have no idea what they're going to do.
	We acknowledge that the current system is not reformable.
	That we would like to end the current policing system as we know it.
	Well, what's the current system?
	You hire police officers, you give them suitable training, you give them the appropriate equipment, you give them specific assignments to maintain law and order throughout the community.
	What's broken about that system?
	What is broken about that system?
	Even in chats, they've had to institute their own policing system.
	I mean, Unbelievable!
	Unbelievable!
	The council declared it would create a transformative new model of public safety in the city.
	Well, those are words!
	That sounds nice, but it's completely vapid.
	It has no substance.
	It has no meaning.
	Where is the plan?
	How could you carry out any policing, and if you have no policing, you know, crime is gonna run rampant.
	If you don't hire officers, give them training, provide them with equipment, give them assignments, supervise them, discipline them when they go wrong, there's nothing wrong with that basic model at all.
	A future Community Safety Work Group will be formed, and will include staff from city departments, including the Offices of Violence Prevention and Civil Rights.
	The Council also voted unanimously on Friday to end the local emergency order that had been declared due to protests in the wake of Floyd's death.
	Meanwhile, we have videos showing the damage done to the Minneapolis Sheraton after being turned into a leftist sanctuary.
	Now I must say, I have actually stayed At the Minneapolis Sheraton.
	I've stayed there myself.
	And they trashed the rooms!
	According to a report from the Minnesota Reformer, over 200 homeless people took cover at a Sheraton hotel located just blocks from where George Floyd died and turned it into a commune during the recent riots.
	They've since been kicked out by the hotel proprietors, and a new video has been released showing the devastated condition they left the hotel in.
	It's hard to imagine Americans would wreak this degree of destruction within their own country, but that's exactly what they did.
	I mean, it's unbelievable.
	Meanwhile, here's a study from the Journal of Public Economics, volume 172, April 2019, pages 174 to 200.
	The title?
	2019, pages 174 to 200.
	The title, "More Cops, Less Crime." But what could be more obvious?
	If anyone has any doubt about it, go to jimtheconspiracyguy.com and watch my presentation from Sunday on the Second Amendment and the politics of gun control, where I go into great detail about the relationship between Weapons, law enforcement, and crimes.
	I mean, it will leave you with no doubt whatsoever.
	Meanwhile, Trump takes aim at Chas again.
	Do-nothing Democrat leadership.
	I mean, he's completely right.
	President Donald Trump took aim at Seattle again on Sunday, calling the leadership there weak and saying the fake news media purposely ignores the radical left takeover in the city for political gain.
	Well let me give you a perfect illustration.
	I reside in the village of Oregon, just 10 miles south of Madison, Wisconsin.
	The largest paper in the state, the Wisconsin State Journal.
	has yet to publish a single word, a single word, about the takeover of six city blocks in Seattle.
	Yet to publish a single word.
	I even called the city desk and left a message.
	I said, what about the Antifa takeover of Seattle?
	Not a single word.
	Trump continues.
	Does anyone notice how little the radical left takeover in Seattle is being discussed in the fake news media?
	That is very much on purpose, because they know how badly this weakness and ineptitude play politically.
	The mayor and governor should be ashamed of themselves.
	Easily fixed.
	Later the president tweeted, interesting how Antifa and other far-left militant groups can take over a city without barely a whimper from soft do-nothing Democrat leadership, yet the same week leaders become radical when it comes to shutting down a state or city and its hard-working taxpayer-paying citizens by means of riots and looting.
	He's exactly right.
	Here's another update.
	Now Chazz has guns.
	Seattle Autonomous Zone warlord filmed handing out AR-15s to followers.
	Raz Simone, the so-called warlord of the Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone, carved out of Seattle by activists, has been filmed handing out assault rifles to minors.
	That's a state felony.
	If only there were anyone there to enforce the law.
	Videos that surfaced Monday from Simone's own June 10th Facebook live stream apparently shows him handing out assault rifles that look like the ubiquitous AR-15 semi-automatic, including to individuals who look far younger than 21.
	Washington state law, which came into effect last year, makes it a gross misdemeanor to transfer an assault rifle to anyone under 21 with any subsequent offenses considered felonies.
	Moreover, under the law, persons between the ages of 18 and 21 are only able to possess semi-automatic assault rifles or pistols in their place of residence or business on real property under their controller when moving houses or traveling to and from allowed storage locations, as well as in the case of selling to those over 21.
	This is Washington State law!
	That apparently doesn't apply in CHAZ, the anarchist commune occupied by Black Lives Matter and other activists over the last week, consisting of several blocks of downtown Seattle around the East Precinct abandoned by the city's police department.
	Seattle Mayor Jenny Durkan, a Democrat, Hasn't lifted a finger to enforce local or state laws inside the zone.
	Inside, she defended Chaz as an experiment in democracy during her Twitter spat with President Trump.
	Razz has rejected the label of warlord and told reporters last week he created a de facto police replacement to keep the peace and unity.
	Honestly, that's it.
	So even in the community of Chaz, they've had to create a police force.
	So what's going to happen in Minneapolis?
	Meanwhile, another report.
	And by the way, these aren't coming from American newspapers.
	These are coming from Russia today.
	Which is among the only respectable sources of news yet available to the American people.
	Seattle's anarchist utopia breaks down.
	Residents report screams of terror on the street.
	An anarchist is someone who doesn't need a cop to make him behave.
	American anarchists.
	Ammon Hennessy once wrote, based on the scenes playing out, In Seattle's Antifa-occupied Autonomous Zone, Tennessee was dead wrong.
	A ragtag collection of Antifa types, anarchists, socialists, and Black Lives Matter activists have occupied a six-block area around an abandoned police precinct in downtown Seattle for a week now.
	Roads into the Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone C-H-A-Z have been blockaded and the would-be revolutionaries inside have set in motion a bold experiment to prove that a cop-free society based on mutual aid can sustain itself.
	Sunday night seems to have proven otherwise.
	When the owner of an auto shop in the zone found a man attempting to light his business on fire, he detained the culprit.
	Or so he told a crowd gathered outside.
	However, rather than let their comrade be handed over to law enforcement, the crowd set about pulling down the fence around the lot in a bid to free the thwarted orsonist.
	The police won't come, he told the cameraman.
	The fire department won't come.
	This is really bad for business.
	COVID was bad enough, and now this stuff basically put the icing on the cake.
	With a council debate mired in intersectional squabbling, Raz and his band have had free reign to impose their own version on Chaz.
	The warlord rapper has been accused of punching journalists while activists were seen on TV placing a Christian preacher in a chokehold on Saturday.
	A number of overdoses has also been reported, to which Seattle's emergency services had to respond.
	So here's an image of America's far-left future.
	Mount Rushmore will be re-designated Mount Leftmore.
	And the little faces of Lenin and Marx and Barack Obama, no doubt.
	Hillary, too, in place of those who figure there now.
	Lincoln, Jefferson, Washington, and TR.
	Old movies are going to be banned.
	Think of Casablanca.
	I mean, those show ordinary heterosexual relationships between men and women.
	Those will be banned, too.
	More statues are going to be torn down, including of the Thinker.
	Down with patriarchy!
	Logic is racist!
	Think about our feelings!
	The NFL is going to re-designate itself the BLMFL, the Black Lives Matter Football League.
	Something, somewhere is not equal, the players are saying.
	Gone!
	Internet, free speech.
	Think about it.
	Meanwhile, the War on Statues, Symbols, Names, etc.
	This is a very thoughtful piece by one Andrew Linth.
	In the aftermath of the death of George Floyd, there have been calls to remove statues of Confederate soldiers, despite the fact Floyd was killed in a northern state, not to mention the fact that the Confederacy had nothing to do with Floyd's death, nor the other recent deaths of African Americans.
	Here's a list of some of the statues of Confederate soldiers that have been targeted.
	Appomattox, a statue dedicated to Confederate soldiers from Alexandria, Virginia, Confederate Soldiers and Sailors Monument in Birmingham, Alabama.
	Robert E. Lee Monument in Richmond, Virginia.
	Stonewall Jackson Monument in Richmond, Virginia.
	Jefferson Davis Memorial in Richmond, Virginia.
	A statue of Jefferson Davis in Frankfort, Kentucky.
	A statue of a Confederate soldier in Owensboro, Kentucky.
	Meanwhile, NASCAR has banned the display of the Confederate flag at its events, while the Marine Corps has banned the display of any Confederate memorabilia on its bases, and the Navy plans to follow suit.
	As I understand it, by the way, these statues to recognize leaders of the Confederacy was part of the agreement of reconciliation between the North and the South to put an end to the Civil War.
	So here you have these anarchists destroying, seeking to unravel and reignite old tensions that have long remained dormant.
	The war on statues is not limited to those who fought for the Confederacy, nor has it been limited to the United States.
	Statues of those who engaged in the slave trade, or perceived to symbolize racism, have been targeted for removal in the United States, Britain, and Belgium.
	Paintings, also perceived to symbolize racism, have been targeted.
	Wow!
	A series of name changes have also taken place.
	They include Clemson University, in which Calhoun Honors College is being named Clemson University Honors College, due to John C. Calhoun being a supporter of slavery, In country music band Lady Antebellum changing its name to Lady A, due to the antebellum era being associated with slavery.
	Various movies and television series have also come under fire.
	They include Cops, Live PD, and Gone with the Wind.
	How far will this war on statues, symbols, and names go?
	For example, several state capitol buildings have statues representing goddesses of liberty on the top of their capitol domes.
	Will anyone who considers such statues to be idolatrous demand they be removed?
	Will the Washington Monument, the Lincoln Memorial, and the Jefferson Memorial be targeted next?
	What about the Statue of Liberty?
	Some Protestants consider statues and paintings of the Virgin Mary to be idolatrous or perceived to be worshipping the Virgin Mary.
	Should the Roman Catholic Church remove them in order to forge better ties with Protestants?
	Can the same be said in regard to any statues or paintings of the saints?
	Will any of the works of the Renaissance be next?
	Muslims believe no living thing should be depicted as doing so is considered idolatrous.
	So should any and all forms of art be done away with?
	Will all films and television series be considered a fancy face the same fate?
	This war on statues, symbols, names is not a war on racism and bigotry, but instead it is a war on art and history, and it is going too far.
	Which is why it needs to stop.
	Meanwhile, from Natural News, right out of the Marxist playbook, now they want to tear down statues of Washington and Jefferson.
	Natural News.
	The cancelling of Christopher Columbus and Robert E. Lee is just not enough.
	The leftist mob now wants to also tear down the statues in memory of Thomas Jefferson and even George Washington, America's first president, simply because these individuals were white and, according to the history books, own slaves.
	During a recent segment on the fake news laughingstock network, CNN's Angela Rye called for the statues of Washington Jefferson and many others to be taken down in order to appease her feelings of oppression over what these rock formations supposedly represent.
	The cable channel contributor went on a verbal tirade about how her ancestors could have been owned by Washington or Jefferson.
	Which is why the likenesses of these two men must come down immediately.
	And I'm looking at a statue of Christopher Columbus where he has been beheaded.
	American history is not all glorious, right?
	Wine from a comfy chair at CNN's climate-controlled studio.
	George Washington was a slave owner.
	We need to call slave owners out for what they are.
	Whether we think they were protecting American freedom or not, he wasn't protecting my freedoms.
	What could be more absurd than a statement like that?
	Since he was an alive and contemporary of George Washington, obviously he could have been protecting her freedoms.
	But they paved the way for such freedoms as American enjoy, which she is participating in annihilating as I speak.
	To me, I don't care if it's a George Washington statue or Thomas Jefferson, they all need to come down," she added.
	Believe it or not, Rye was arguing with John Avion, editor of the far-left Daily Beast news outlet, who contends that Washington specifically had devoted his entire life to trying to unify the nation.
	Rye disagrees and wants the entirety of American history to be blotted out.
	If doing so will make her feel happier and less angry about everything.
	Mark my words, it won't.
	Listen below as Mike Adams, a health ranger, talks about the threat of these new untouchables for going around destroying monuments, statues, and other relics of American history with no consequence.
	Meanwhile, The ironic thing about Rice's total disrespect for American history is that she would not even be allowed to say such things, let alone on national cable television, if it were not for the freedom she claimed she was never afforded.
	If Washington was truly the tyrant Rice seems to think he was, in other words, And the foundation never would have been laid for black people like Ray to ever appear on TV stations like CNN, spouting nonsense about how their freedoms supposedly do not exist.
	Meanwhile, and I find this disturbing, corporate America pledges $1.7 billion to Black Lives Matter.
	Bank of America, a billion.
	Nike, 100 million.
	Sony, 100 million.
	Walmart, 100 million.
	Warner Music Group, 100 million.
	Nike again, 40 million.
	Google, 25.
	Universal Music, 24.
	Google again, 12.
	Spotify, 11.
	Amazon, 10.
	Bad Robot Productions, 10.
	Facebook, 10.
	GM, 10.
	Goldman Sachs, 10.
	Riot Games, 10.
	Target, 10.
	United Health Group, 10.
	Verizon, 10.
	Get this.
	New law in Blue State, Virginia requires every child to be vaccinated.
	Dr. Eowyn, Fellowship of the Mind, cited.
	Well, we were preoccupied with the coronavirus pandemic and the Floyd riots that followed.
	Gee!
	One nationwide disaster after another.
	What a coincidence!
	Nearly two months ago, on April 22nd, Virginia's legislature passed a draconian bill, H. Bill 1090, which requires every child adolescent 18 years or younger, except those who are homeless, oddly enough, Be vaccinated regardless of parental wishes or consent.
	If the child does not have documentary proof of having received vaccination that are routinely recommended for children of all ages he she shall not be admitted to a school.
	Introduced by a demon rat, of course, Delegate Patrick Ho of Arlington County.
	The bill passed the House by a 51-44 vote.
	Before that, HB 1090 had already been passed by the State Senate and approved, recommended by Governor Ralph Northam, which means HB 1090 is now law in Virginia.
	Stunning.
	Here's more.
	Hydroxychloroquine rated most effective therapy by doctors for coronavirus.
	This is a review of 6,000 doctors around the world.
	Hence, Trump has been critical of the FDA decision to revoke the emergency use of the drug he promoted.
	Which it did, and which I found highly objectionable.
	This is clearly a political decision and not a scientific one.
	The FDA claimed the drug had been shown to interfere, to not do any good in dealing with the COVID virus, but also interfere with Gilead Science's antiviral drug, Remdesivir, the only medicine so far to show a benefit.
	What they're doing is trying to get you away from a cheap, widely available drug everybody knew was working.
	Fauci knew about HCQ in 2005.
	Nobody needed to die.
	I can't emphasize this enough.
	The virology journal, the official publication of Dr. Fauci, I called him.
	Tony the Rat, National Institute of Health, published what's now a blockbuster article on August 22, 2005, under the title, Chloroquine is a Potent Inhibitor of SARS Coronavirus Infection and Spread.
	It's useful even before or after, meaning it's both a cure and a preventative.
	When we get back, I'll give you the phone number to call in and take your calls.
	Now you've got roughly five minutes.
	Yeah, you can leave it running.
	Thanks very much.
	I can if you want.
	Yeah, thank you so much for taking this on today.
	No problem, no problem.
	Here we go.
	Even the government admits that 9/11 was a conspiracy.
	But did you know that it was an inside job and that Osama had nothing to do with it?
	That the Twin Towers were blown apart by a sophisticated arrangement of mini or micro nukes.
	That Building 7 collapsed seven hours later because of explosives planted in the building.
	Barry Jennings was there.
	He heard them go off and felt himself stepping over dead people.
	The U.S.
	Geological Survey conducted studies of dust gathered from 35 locations in Lower Manhattan and found elements that would not have been there had this not been a nuclear event.
	Ironically, that means the government's own evidence contradicts the government's official position.
	9-11 was brought to us compliments of the CIA, the neocons of the Department of Defense, and the Mossad.
	Don't let yourself be played.
	Read American Newt on 9-11.
	Available at moonrockbooks.com.
	That's moonrockbooks.com.
	That's moonrock.com.
	Join me every Sunday night from 10 p.m.
	till midnight Eastern Standard Time on Revolution Radio at pretonslips.com.
	I'm Steve Crawford, host of Factor 3 Live.
	Join me every Sunday night from 10pm till midnight Eastern Standard Time on Revolution Radio at Creationslifts.com.
	Check it out.
	Was it a conspiracy?
	Did you know that the police in Boston were broadcasting, this is a drill, this is a drill, on bullhorns during the marathon?
	That the Boston Globe was tweeting that a demonstration bomb would be set off during the marathon for the benefit of bomb squad activity.
	The bomb would be set off in one minute in front of the library, which happened as the Globe had announced.
	Peering through the smoke, you could see bodies with missing arms and legs, but there was no blood.
	The blood only showed up later and came out of a tube.
	They used amputee actors and a studio-quality smoke machine.
	Don't let yourself be played.
	Check out And Nobody Died in Boston, either.
	Available at moonrockbooks.com.
	That's moonrockbooks.com.
	All right.
	Thanks for listening.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	at RevolutionRadioFreedomSubs.com.
	And now we're going to get back to your host.
	Okay, as I mentioned, Mitchell is not with me today, but a mad painter is filling in for which I'm most grateful.
	His number to reach him, 229-299-5320.
	229-299-5320.
	229-299-5320. 229-299-5320.
	Just give us your name and your state, and we'll get you on with me today.
	I repeat, 229-299-5320.
	Please do call.
	Code 229, number 2995320.
	Please do call.
	Meanwhile, I'll continue.
	We know from this publication back in 2005 in Dr. Fauci's own journal, Virology, that HCQ functions as both a cure and a vaccine.
	So it's incredible that the FDA would be targeting.
	It turns out, by the way, and this is a fascinating development, that on the 2nd of June, A lawsuit was filed against the Food and Drug Administration by the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons
	Contesting its decision to not allow hydroxychloroquine to be available to the public and thereby costing Americans the right to survive the threat it poses and physicians to be entitled to make their own prescriptions and treatment of their patients.
	I'm very impressed by that lawsuit.
	Meanwhile, I have another graph that's completely fascinated of the country, of their case fatality rate, in other words their death rate, in relation to HCQ using.
	So the countries which don't use HCQ are shown in this bar graph in red.
	countries that have mixed HCQ use in orange, those with HCQ use in green, and those with no HCQ use have far higher death rates, numbers of death, and those with no HCQ use have far higher death rates, numbers of death, the rate of death in their Those that are mixed are in between.
	And those with HCQ use are the lowest by far.
	So it's really not a debatable proposition.
	I mean, all of the evidence is on the side of the use of HCQ.
	I have been reporting it here for months and months and months.
	I mean, it's unbelievable.
	The first was a physician in the U.S.
	who had some 850 patients.
	No, no, he was in, yes, we had one in France who had, you know, a whole host of patients who were so ill, I think it was 80, yes, 80 patients in France who were so sick they were all hospitalized, put them on HCQ, 79 of 80 survived.
	We had another American physician with 300 patients put him on HCQ.
	None of them were even hospitalized.
	And of course, none of them died.
	Then we had a physician from New York City with 500 patients.
	He gave him HCQ with his antibiotic and zinc.
	All 500 survived.
	Meanwhile, how could it be the case that the Food and Drug Administration would Not allow the use of an effective treatment for COVID and thereby allow hundreds, perhaps thousands, to die.
	It has to be Bill Gates, where the Bill and Melinda Gates have been funding everybody else.
	There's no reason to think their reach would not extend into the FDA.
	So we got Bill Gates giving $4.3 billion to the World Health Organization.
	You got Bill Gates giving $155 million to the CDC.
	You got Bill Gates giving $280 million to Imperial College.
	That's just stunning all by itself.
	You got Bill Gates giving $18 million to the NIH.
	And I have no doubt that Bill Gates has been controlling the FDA as well.
	Remember, These are really front organizations, the CDC and the FDA.
	These are public relations organizations for the big pharma, which makes vast sums of money off of vaccines, and where they foresee making billions upon billions to protect the public from the coronavirus.
	Using a vaccine when they could actually be more effectively treated by pills that cost us a few cents, as it were.
	We have area code 879.
	Join the conversation.
	Yes, please give us, please give me your name and your state and join the conversation.
	Good evening, this is Gary in Arkansas.
	Hey Gary, good, how are you?
	I'm doing good, very good.
	You were in the Navy As I understand, and you probably swore an oath to support the U.S.
	Constitution, correct?
	Well, I was in the Marine Corps, which is a branch of the Navy, and indeed I did.
	Yes, indeed, of course, I swore an oath to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States.
	Yes.
	So, I'm looking at the Constitution here.
	Part of the 1 Section 8, which is the duties, or rather the powers, Delegated to the Congress by We The People that created the United States.
	And, uh, Article 1, Section 8, Clause 12 says to raise and support armies, but no appropriation of money to that use shall be for longer term than two years.
	So there's no mention in the Constitution of the word police, but there is a mention of standing armies and they're prohibited.
	So the way I see it, the police are a standing army, and they're prohibited by the U.S.
	Constitution.
	Well, I think that's a misunderstanding, Gary.
	I mean, armed forces are designed for combat with other nations.
	I mean, that's their character, as opposed to police forces to maintain security and enforce the laws of a specific jurisdiction.
	So I don't think that argument is going to hold.
	Now, of course, there's a whole history of the interpretation of the Constitution, right?
	By a whole bunch of cases and decisions made by the Supreme Court, which is entrusted with the authority to interpret the Constitution.
	So that the executive enforces the laws, the legislature passes them, and the court interprets what they mean.
	And we have, you know, these histories that are quite lengthy in relation to certain of the aspects of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights that clarify and extend, expand, and apply their meaning to historical circumstances as they have developed.
	Well, the historical context for this provision in the Constitution is the Anglo-Saxon history, which began in 410 with the collapse of ancient Rome.
	Between 410 and 1100, when the Roman occupation occurred, the Anglo-Saxons went through a number of cycles in which they disarmed at the request of their king.
	And when the people were disarmed, the King's Army would go around the countryside, pillage, rape, and murder.
	And when the people got tired of that, they would make new arms, and they would kill enough of the King's Army, and sometimes the King, to establish a free state.
	They repeated this cycle several times, and by 1100, they had come to the belief that in order to have a free state, there were two requirements.
	One of them was a prohibition on standing armies, and the second one was an armed citizenry.
	So if you look at Section 8, this Article 1, Section 8, Clause 15, it's states who is responsible for law enforcement in the United States.
	And that is the fourth branch of government that's almost never mentioned anywhere.
	It's also the only branch of government that is referred to in the Constitution as necessary.
	Gary, which is the fourth branch of government?
	It's mentioned in the second amendment.
	Which is?
	What is it?
	It's in the Second Amendment.
	No, no, no, no, no.
	What is it that is the fourth branch you're talking about?
	It's the thing that is a well-regulated, that is necessary to the security of a free state.
	You're, as it were, generalizing on the Second Amendment the right to keep and bear You're talking about an armed citizenry necessary to maintain a free state as a fourth branch of government?
	Right, yeah.
	That's an interesting idea.
	Do you know, has it ever been litigated?
	Have we had any legal cases about this?
	Well, it's been an institution of the English-speaking people since 410.
	The Anglo-Saxons invented that institution in 410, and the English-speaking people brought it to North America in 1600.
	And between 1600 and the 1840s, that was the institution that regulated the law.
	It was all the law enforcement.
	It wasn't until the 1840s that the police came in.
	My opinion is that the police are an institution of communism, because the people give up their rights to security in exchange for security by the police.
	And it looks like to me the police did the same thing that the King's Army did in Anglo-Saxon times 16 centuries ago.
	I don't know, Gary.
	I'm kind of surprised to hear that kind of argument.
	I mean, you know, You have the local police for your own community, and, you know, they're just enforcing the local laws within their jurisdiction.
	And then you have, of course, you got the county sheriffs, who seem to have a constitutional obligation.
	And then you have, you know, the governor has the state police and the National Guard.
	You find those objectionable inherently?
	The sheriff is elected by the people, and the sheriff is an institution that goes back 800 years in English history.
	So the sheriff is responsible for protecting the rights of the citizens, and the sheriff is elected by the citizens.
	The police are not elected.
	They are appointed by some corporation, like a municipality.
	So it's also, if you were, there's a Supreme Court case from the 90s called Prince, P-R-I-N-T-E versus United States, in which the Supreme Court held that the sheriff is the highest law enforcement officer in the county.
	The sheriff outranks the governor of the state, and the sheriff outranks the president of the United States.
	So that means the sheriff can shut down any government agency and any federal agency by prohibiting them from operating it within the county.
	So that would be one way to deal with this problem here is that the sheriff and the county organization that is responsible for law enforcement should work together.
	In this article 1 section 8 clause 15, It says to provide for calling forth the millimeter to execute the laws of the union to suppress insurrections and repell invasions.
	So that's who is responsible for law enforcement in the United States.
	It's we, the people.
	Well, Gary, this is getting a little less satiric, honestly, of all the issues I addressed.
	This is really, as it were, separable, though it is about law enforcement and the dispensing of the police.
	I take it you're actually sympathetic to the idea that Black Lives Matter and Antifa are promoting a dispensing with police departments, am I correct?
	Well, the police are not constitutional because I think they're standing armies and they should be disbanded because they're not Well, Gary, the Constitution, the Constitution is for the federal government.
	I mean, it's a basic framework for the federal government within the system of federalism allows the states to make a whole lot of determinations of how each of the states is conducted itself that is not dictated by the Constitution.
	So I think that your argument has a flaw.
	Because there's a history of each of the states and their right to implement their own laws and have their own enforcement mechanism, therefore.
	Wouldn't you agree?
	Those laws of the states are subject to the Constitution of the United States, Bill.
	Gary, honest to God, I thought the calls I'd get tonight would have to do with the Democrats' attempt to assassinate the President of the United States.
	Did that not pique your interest?
	Well, I think that's important, but I also think that, I mean, I think it's very interesting that we've got the communists that are taking territory in cities in the United States, and they're out there promoting getting rid of the police and having the citizens defend their communities, which is what the Constitution requires.
	You know, so you think, well, why is it that the communists are doing that?
	Maybe it's just a terrorist campaign to make people think that they can't live without the police.
	I mean, most of the people that I know support the police because they think we can't have civilization without police.
	And the fact is, we've had civilization in this country since the 1600s up until the 1840s or 50s without the police.
	Well, that's very, very interesting, Gary.
	I'm glad you had to Chance to call in and make your argument.
	Is there anything else you'd like to add?
	Well, yeah, a couple other things.
	I took the two numbers for the Gross Domestic Product of the United States for quarter one and quarter two of this year.
	The quarter one was down 40% and quarter two was down 51%.
	So I calculated the decline rate for a curve that would go through those two points.
	And that allowed me to calculate the date at which the U.S.
	economy, if that decline continues, the U.S.
	economy will be down to 10%.
	And that date is December the 18th.
	But Gary, the very first story I reported tonight was that there's been a 17 plus percent increase in retail sales in the month of May?
	I can't discount that, but when I look at this curve for the decline from this decline rate, what it says is that the U.S.
	economy, the productive capacity of the U.S.
	economy in June is 30% of what it is, what it was on January 1st.
	It will be down to 10% in December of this year, and it will be down to 1% In December the 6th of 2021.
	Assuming an extrapolation of the curve, which I would say is obviously not going to be the case.
	I mean, you know, there's so many circumstances at work here that are going to bring us out of this collapse.
	I agree.
	So when I look at this curve and I see that the economy has already lost 70% of its productive capacity in six months, Yes.
	Yeah, that's good, Gary.
	I mean, there are all kinds of consequences if it's that devastating.
	to 10% of what it was in January.
	Do you believe that the electric utility company will be providing electric power to your house?
	Yeah, that's good, Gary.
	I mean, there are all kinds of consequences if it's that devastating.
	So what are you suggesting?
	Well, I'm suggesting those numbers may not be correct.
	And in the same token, you can say, well, the numbers for the May spinning, they're equally bogus.
	Gary, give me your assessment of the political situation in the United States.
	I mean, we've got a major election for president coming up in 2020.
	What do you think are the principal factors?
	I've been studying the economy in this country since 1974, when I discovered that we were headed the path of destruction because of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913.
	But in 1974, I believed that I would not live to see that.
	Well, it's here today.
	There was an economic collapse in the year 1340, which was, at the time, the largest debt bubble in the history of the world.
	That debt bubble collapsed.
	It put everybody in Europe out of work.
	It took a hundred years to recover from it.
	So, what I'm looking at today are numbers that are probably worse than what was, uh, well, it's definitely worse than anything that's ever been seen in U.S.
	history.
	I mean, the maximum unemployment rate in the 1930s was 25%, and those numbers were also focused, and I can prove that from the numbers, because they They do not have a normal distribution in their presentation.
	So those numbers, what they decided in the 1930s is that we're not going to report any unemployment numbers greater than 25%.
	So those numbers were bogus.
	The real unemployment was probably 40% in the 1930s, the maximum.
	Gary, Gary, Gary, Gary, Gary.
	Suppose we assume all your premises are correct.
	I'm asking you, Where are we going?
	How is this going to play out?
	Well, it looks like this is worse than the economic collapse of 1340.
	And so then you go back to something that was worse than that, and that's the collapse of Rome, August the 24th of 14.
	That's when the Visigoths came in and disemboweled lots of people.
	Well, you're suggesting the Visigoths are going to enter the United States and disembowel a lot of people?
	Gary, make this contemporary.
	Give me your scenario of what you think is going to play out for the rest of this year, 2020.
	Well, the smartest man that I know told me a few days ago that he thinks that by the end of July there will be no remnants of civilization in the United States.
	By the end of July?
	Yes, sir.
	I think that's a bit drastic myself, Gary.
	That's only six weeks away.
	Yeah, that's right, Gary.
	I don't see that.
	I mean, what in the world is the basis for such a doomsday scenario?
	I'm just fascinated.
	Tell me.
	It's the rapid decline in the economy.
	The rapid decline in what?
	The rapid decline in the U.S.
	economy.
	Okay.
	Oh, I know.
	It was absurd.
	It was a colossal mistake, and it appears to be the globalist's effort to take out the United States.
	because of healthy people being quarantined. - Oh, I know, it was absurd.
	It was a colossal mistake, and it appears to be the globalist effort to take out the United States.
	I agree with all that.
	Let me reiterate the phone number, by the way, for anyone who might like to call in.
	Mitchell not here today.
	Matt Painter standing in.
	The number is 229-299-5320.
	229-299-5320.
	I repeat, 229-299-5320.
	A whole lot of issues here that were addressed during the first hour, and I'd be glad to have anyone call in.
	And I'm glad to have you here, Gary, to expound a bit more.
	You think the country's gonna be gone in six weeks, right?
	Jim, I've had an international number try and call in, and I can't take international numbers.
	Oh, yeah.
	I'm wondering if that's probably Bill from Australia.
	Yeah.
	He knows, Armand.
	He knows.
	He's able to connect with With Mitch, but you know, it's a little tricky.
	Armand, would you like to add your own thoughts here to this conversation?
	I think this is just a ploy in order to take out the police department, to issue in a federal protection force, and it's looking like Nazi Germany to me.
	Elaborate on that, please.
	I'd like to hear more.
	Well, they're taking the control of your life out of your local hands and taking it to a federal level.
	They've done it with the schools, they've done it with the churches, you know?
	Well, I mean, who do you take to be behind it that wants to make that kind of a move?
	The globalists?
	Pardon me?
	The globalists?
	The globalists, yeah.
	Not President Trump.
	You're talking about globalists, Bill Gates, Ted Turner, Henry Kissinger, David Rockefeller, George Soros.
	Huh?
	Evil people.
	Evil people, indeed.
	Evil people, indeed.
	Gary seems to me to have an overly pessimistic view that we're going to have the end of the civilization in six weeks.
	I'm having difficulty with that one.
	Gary, you're still here, right?
	Yes, sir.
	Yeah.
	So we're never even going to get to November to cast votes, right?
	So you don't have any projections about the outcome of the election.
	It seems to me that anyone who is capable of thought is going to recognize that the Democrats have destroyed themselves.
	They have no credibility.
	And they've gone through a whole host of efforts to take out Trump because they weren't happy with the outcome of the 2016 election, including the Russia hoax, Ukrainegate, the impeachment, then we had, in rapid order, the coronavirus, and now the rioting and looting, and then an attempt to assassinate him at the State of the Union?
	I just find that staggering.
	We seem to have another caller here coming in.
	Gary, you're welcome to stand by and add further thoughts.
	Yeah.
	Mechanic, sure, join the conversation, Mechanic.
	Yeah, Professor, thanks for having me.
	Yeah, however much these people think it's the right idea to Just go ahead and drop police forces in exchange for a police force backed by federal power would be a huge mistake, but a huge gain for the NWO.
	And I'll tell you why.
	It's just one step closer to the bigger agenda, which is that one policing force, that global policing force.
	Well, you know, it's mechanic.
	It's never occurred to me until now.
	I guess Gary and Ahmed and you raise it that there'd be a federal replacement for the local police.
	That's never dawned on my consciousness.
	Do you think there's a move to federalize the police across the nation?
	It's just interesting that this is happening now.
	I've been filming cops for a long time, professor.
	And I told these cops one time when they were writing me a jaywalking ticket for filming them, basically.
	Their thing was, what's your problem?
	I'm trying to keep you guys in business.
	You guys, you're about to be replaced.
	This was six years ago.
	Here we are.
	They're about to be replaced, folks.
	It's gonna happen.
	And if you allow it to happen in your little small town, you're gonna be in for a world of hurt. - What, mechanic?
	Nobody supports it!
	Over 80% of the American people are opposed to defunding the police.
	Everyone knows the more cops, the less crime.
	Everyone, I think, regards this idea of abolishing police departments as nutty.
	Just plain nutty.
	It's not going to win the Democrats any votes.
	None.
	I mean, this is ridiculous.
	Anyone who thinks that's a good idea was already so far gone and went more beyond the Democratic Party right into Antifa and BLM.
	I mean, it's just ridiculous.
	This is just bullshit.
	We have another caller here from the 210 area code.
	Caller, join the conversation.
	Give us your name and state.
	210.
	Hey, Jim.
	This is Bruce in Texas.
	Hey, Bruce.
	How you doing?
	Oh, man.
	Blown away by what's going on.
	I can't believe no one is talking about the attempt to assassinate the President of the State of the Union!
	God!
	I thought that would have the phone ringing off the hook!
	You're the first one I've ever heard to mention it, so thanks for bringing that up.
	Yeah, you can actually see the videos if you go to the Real Deal Reports for 15 June 2020.
	Okay, I'll check into it.
	Yeah, go ahead.
	Go ahead.
	Give us your thoughts first.
	You know, I couldn't catch everything that Gary was saying because his volume was rather low.
	Yeah.
	Can you summarize the constitutionality of a military force?
	Well, I think Gary's basic theme is that while we have the executive, the legislative, and the judiciary as the three commonly recognized branches of government, he's suggesting the armed citizenry collectively as a militia is the fourth.
	And I have on many occasions argued that the fact that we have over 100 million armed citizens is the nation's greatest strength, its greatest source of national security.
	But I've certainly never thought of it as the fourth branch of government.
	It's, to me, been much too informal and extra constitutional, but nevertheless real and significant.
	That's been my take.
	Gary, I'm wondering if we can roll back and look at all the nerve control false flags in the past.
	Yeah.
	You know, Sandy Hook in Las Vegas and so on and so on, and the demonization of white people, you know, and these FBI constructs.
	You know, even going back to Oklahoma City, it looks like everything's been leading up to this, to this arm and to Yeah, but Bruce, do you think they're making any real headway?
	I mean, you have a few of these liberal enclaves like Minnesota and Seattle.
	But outside of that, I don't see the American people jumping on this bandwagon.
	I don't think anyone's impressed.
	Most of us think this is juvenile.
	You may have heard me remark the other day, I used to think the difference between the two parties was the Democrats were the mommy party, you know, representing the motherly attitude of nurturing and I mean, helpful, loving, caring.
	The Republicans, the daddy party, represent the father of discipline, you know, responsibility, duty, obligation.
	But today I see Democrats are the party of the children, and the Republicans are the party of the adults.
	I mean, it's just ridiculous what we have going on here.
	Right, it's a reflection on what's happened to the destruction of the family, and it's basically like we have a nation now, and the more current world it gets, and the more being a mother it gets, and the more, you know, far-left loony it gets, it's like a nation of children, you know, and now instead of police, we're going to have daycare on the street, you know, and social workers.
	to come and help you so you don't freak out.
	So you can please move your car.
	Don't, man, you know.
	Can you imagine how quickly cops are going to be, oh, you have a mental disorder.
	I got to call you a social worker.
	Just to get them out of their hair, just get them out of their circumstance where they don't have to, it's going to be passing the buck left and right.
	This is going to be ugly.
	Yeah, yeah.
	People can see it for themselves.
	Elaborate on that, will you please?
	I want to hear more.
	Here's the idea.
	Professor, here's the idea.
	What they want to do is they want to start making a dual response team.
	One half social worker, one half police officer.
	Okay?
	De-escalation practice with the company of a social worker.
	That just sounds absolutely horrible to me.
	Well, we already have scans of social workers all over the country.
	We already have a very elaborate social safety network.
	Right, and they've done nothing for us.
	So now, they're going to respond with the police.
	Every time.
	I think they just get in the way.
	I mean, I don't think that makes any sense.
	I grew up with them.
	I know exactly what they do.
	They get in the way.
	I had at least a dozen, between 5 years old and 16.
	They have 150 cases a month.
	Here's the deal.
	They got 150 cases a month.
	They don't know what it's like to walk in that kid's shoes at all.
	No clue.
	You expect them to have the right moves for a guy who's been on crack for 10 years, who just robbed two stores, and, you know, doesn't want to come out of the house?
	Yeah.
	No, not a clue.
	Not a clue.
	I think this is all very confused by people who don't know what they're talking about and are kind of living in an airy-fairy world that bears no correspondence to reality at all.
	That's a Minneapolis City Council.
	They have no idea what they're doing.
	None!
	The idea of Ilhan Omar saying she wants to dismantle the police because they're corrupt to the core, that's just ridiculous!
	Yeah, plenty of good officers.
	The vast majority of police officers are decent, hardworking, self-sacrificing.
	They're doing a job on behalf of society, and they're typically not well compensated.
	But, you know, it is the case that police, in general, are among the most highly respected and receive the highest public approval.
	The Congress, the lowest.
	The Congress, the lowest.
	Professor, if you don't mind me saying.
	Yeah.
	Until we get rid of options and details inside of unions like qualified immunity, there will not be a change in policing behavior.
	Right now, police are installing policy and not law.
	They're violating policy, not laws.
	And that's a lot of the time Uh, what they're up against within their own departments.
	And they put on that uniform.
	And until they get rid of this qualified immunity, for those who don't know, qualified immunity is the bulletproof jacket that they really wear.
	All right?
	It is the protection.
	It allows them to act on the behest of the state.
	Therefore, they're protected from any consequence or prosecution on their actions.
	Okay?
	Proper... If you do that and make them get their own insurance, you will see a different behavior out of police officers.
	Go back over that again, that sounds important.
	All right, so you have qualified immunity, right?
	You're talking about in their role as government agents that they cannot be held legally liable, they can't be sued, they can't go to jail, pay fines for actions they take in their official role, unless, I understand, unless they're improper, you know, not in accordance with standard operating procedure and so forth, which is what's been the case with these recent events.
	Yeah, they're acting outside the law.
	In some cases, literally acting.
	And you know what I mean by that?
	Yeah.
	As actors in a theatrical performance.
	Yes, sir.
	And that's what I think we saw in Minnesota.
	Yeah.
	I think that whole thing was an act.
	I do too.
	The whole thing was theater.
	Yes.
	And I'm starting to look at this Brooks case.
	At least they got the mugshot right, huh?
	Take a look at the mugshot from the Brooks shooting.
	Compare, you know, next to the cop that was in the video.
	And then take a look at the mugshot they got for Chauvin.
	Yeah.
	The Mason with his knee on the neck of the actor known as George Floyd.
	Yeah.
	No, I agree with you.
	I agree with you.
	Those do not appear to be the same person.
	The book Chauvin and the guy with his knee on the neck.
	Yeah, that's the Mason I was talking about.
	I agree.
	Professor?
	Yeah?
	I would add that it's worse than what was just told.
	The police have been in this country since the 1840s, and during that time the Supreme Court has ruled about a dozen times that the police have no duty to protect.
	The police are revenue agents for the corporate government, and their job is to collect revenue for the government, for that corporation.
	So the only institution that is responsible for the defense of the community is the citizens in acting in Article 8, Section 1, Clause 15, to execute the laws of the union, suppress insurrections, and repel invasions.
	I'm not sure what to say to that.
	Do you have a, you know, is there a legislative history to support it?
	Are there cases?
	Determined by the courts that would sustain that interpretation?
	I mean, I gather it's your view.
	I don't dispute that.
	It's whether it's... I don't understand the question you're asking.
	Is there a legal history that supports your interpretation?
	A history of cases decided by the courts, especially by the Supreme Court?
	The Supreme Court has held that the police have no duty to protect, because the police are revenue agents of a corporation.
	- But prior to the 1840s, from 1600 to 1840, law enforcement was performed by the people acting through the militia.
	- Really? - That's what Article I, Section 8, Clause 15. - The people were self-policing.
	The people were self-policing.
	I thought we had marshals and sheriffs in those days.
	I mean, am I mistaken?
	Well, I think there were sheriffs.
	The sheriff has been around since at least 800 years.
	And the duties of the sheriff in the United States today are almost identical.
	Gary, you have so many interesting things to say.
	McCann, your thoughts?
	But the English have gotten rid of their sheriffs.
	The sheriff in England now is only a ceremonial position.
	Gary, you have so many interesting things to say.
	Mechanic, your thoughts?
	This, for me, I've been paying attention to what's happening from the very get-go.
	And, uh, I have to oppose your theory that there are plenty of decent cops.
	Unfortunately.
	Oh, really?
	Okay.
	Unfortunately.
	Yeah, go ahead.
	The policies that they have to enforce the policies, right?
	They are policy enforcers.
	They do not behave on the behalf of the law.
	Those are sheriff deputies.
	All right.
	So police officers are officers of policy, not the constitution.
	as according to the sheriff deputy.
	All right.
	So until they're stripped of these blanket protections that they have, they will continue to abuse our constitutional rights because they don't act on the behalf of our constitutional rights, professor.
	That's not their game, professor.
	Well, I take it they're enforcing.
	That's not how they were trained.
	I take it they're enforcing the laws of their jurisdiction.
	You know, I mean. - I do know.
	I have intermittent encounters with police officers riding here in the village of Oregon and on the highways of Wisconsin and on interstates over the years.
	I certainly know they're enforcing the speed limits.
	I mean, you know, that may be a very trivial example, but Well, I would put more faith in the Sheriff's Department than I would any local PD or municipal.
	Yeah, I think that's right.
	Professor, you understand the role of a sheriff, how they're elected, and where their place is in the Constitution, correct?
	Well, I'm always eager to learn more.
	If you want to spell it out, I'd be glad to review the bidding.
	Okay.
	Here's the deal from what I understand.
	A sheriff elected by the people Yes.
	To enforce and protect the constitutional rights of his county, and that's everybody in it, thus giving him supreme power of the land within his county border.
	Higher than any federal official, higher than any county medical professor, doctor, officer, whatever label he wants to attach to himself, the only constitutional law in the county is imposed by the sheriff.
	Period.
	Period.
	They overrule any federal officer, any sheriff, or not any sheriff, any chief of police, any sergeant, any level police officer.
	They're null and void.
	Police officers typically have a white flag at all entrances and exits of their city limits, knowing where their authority starts and ends.
	And it's pretty narrow.
	Pretty narrow.
	You can even see these within San Diego.
	It's all over the place.
	LA, Orange County.
	The moment you walk out of the city limits, law enforcement is handled by the sheriff.
	Yes.
	Police are hired by corporations, like city municipals, to install their preferred policies that benefit the city themselves.
	I live in a town of 6,000.
	I've seen two people get pulled over in the three years I've lived here.
	Clearly this town is not on that wagon but the vast majority of police stations are corporatized and a part of a bigger structure municipality and or a union structured in the favor of a city by the name of Fraternal Order of Police and if you follow that money trail that leads right to a Freemason organization.
	There you have it.
	That's where your actors come from.
	Really?
	Yes, sir.
	Fascinating.
	Fascinating.
	Go ahead.
	Pastor, let me add a question that I put together to illustrate something a few years ago after, you know, I had learned something from reading your Constitution.
	Which, by the way, I believe that the U.S.
	Constitution is the greatest intellectual achievement of mankind.
	Excellent statement.
	Go ahead.
	The question is, what does a speeding ticket, an order to pay child support, and a property tax bill have in common?
	Answer is, all three of them are a legal item called a bill of attainer.
	Bill of attainer.
	The Constitution prohibits bills of attainers in two separate places.
	People who wrote the Constitution felt so strongly about Bill of Attainers that they put a prohibition against Bill of Attainers in two separate places.
	So speeding tickets, child support orders, and property taxes are all unconstitutional.
	In fact, three separate courts declared the child support law unconstitutional back in the 1990s.
	Well, Gary, I'm just at a loss.
	I don't know the territory well enough, you know, certainly not to debate.
	that that law had been unconstitutional by three separate courts in the '90s?
	And no one has answered yes. - Well, Gary, I'm just at a loss.
	I don't know the territory well enough, you know, certainly not to debate.
	I mean, I'm very, very intrigued.
	Do the other of you guys have comments on Gary's staked out position here?
	No, this is no surprise to me.
	It's Bruce and Mechanic, right?
	I've got Bruce, Mechanic, and Gary, right?
	Go ahead.
	This term of which the union works under is really a hammer.
	And everything is a nail to them.
	And cops can do no wrong.
	And they will throw piles and piles and piles of money at any type of case that makes a cop attempt to look back.
	Now, what we're watching today is mostly theater.
	And you're watching Sacrificial Lambs on both sides.
	You're watching, straight up, by the numbers, drama sequences take place.
	I wonder how the crystal clear images in the Wendy's parking lot was almost 4K throughout the entire moment, all the way up until the actual shooting, and then it was a camera out of 1985.
	So you're thinking there was deliberate distortion of the quality of the video so we couldn't see what actually happened, right?
	Yeah, no, you've been tuning me on to quite a few things over the years.
	I mean, I don't like the fact the guy was shot in the back.
	I certainly think it was wrong that he put up a fight, that he grabbed a taser, that he apparently aimed the taser at the cop.
	But if that's when he was shot, how was he shot in the back?
	I mean, I find this case a bit troubling.
	Well, here's the deal.
	I saw this video from multiple angles.
	Yeah.
	And I will tell you that he's 18 feet of distance.
	That's what's in the report.
	I think it's 18 feet in the report.
	That's the distance created by bad guy and the cop.
	So at this point, as the bad guy, Brooks, is pointing his taser, newly acquired taser, over his shoulder, it doesn't look like it's deploying, but the cop is hanging out back by a vehicle.
	So it doesn't deploy.
	And I hear what I thought were shots first, and then a him turn around.
	Okay, so I think he might have been shot prior to that, but listen, that's what the video shows us.
	In my view, it's distorted enough for me to question the entire event.
	That's just where I stand on that.
	I'm not satisfied at this point, and I'll continue digging.
	Very interesting.
	Yeah, yeah.
	Come back with more on that.
	Let's see, Bruce, have you got more to say you'd like to add?
	McCandy, you were just speaking, right?
	Gary?
	Yeah, that was me.
	Yeah.
	Well, I would say that I think this whole idea about getting rid of the police, it's being promoted.
	No, no, no.
	I think we should replace them with constitutional law enforcement.
	Right?
	It's a really dumb idea. - They're failing us, we need to replace them. - Yeah, well, what are you gonna replace them with?
	You're gonna replace them with a new police force.
	So, you know, what's-- - No, no, no.
	I think we should replace them with constitutional law enforcement.
	Right?
	And that's the citizens of the community.
	I mean, that worked for 1,600 years.
	1800 to 1850.
	By citizens.
	It was George Mason.
	I don't know.
	Look, you know, every complex society has divisions of labor.
	You have different elements within the society performing different functions.
	And God knows law enforcement is sufficiently complicated and time-consuming and task-specific that you can't have—not just anyone's in a position to perform law enforcement, it seems to me.
	I mean, you're talking in a very general sense about looking out for one another.
	Go ahead.
	We're a nation of self-governing people.
	So people are responsible for law enforcement, so they have to know what the law is in order to enforce it.
	The Supreme Court is not responsible for determining what's unconstitutional law.
	It's the citizens acting through the jury to refuse to convict people of laws that are unconstitutional.
	Jury nullification.
	People don't have the Constitution enough to do that function.
	So it's a terrible lack of education that we suffer from.
	Very interesting.
	Mechanic, your thoughts?
	It just keeps going back to policy, sir.
	The policy is the problem.
	In this case, what we're looking at here, the bigger nature of things is this creation, this narrative that they're trying to elaborate on.
	I think we're going to see a tune, it's not going to, a lot of things aren't going in their favor right now.
	A lot of things just aren't going in their favor right now.
	I want to talk about the shooting.
	In whose favor?
	Okay, let's say those controlling the agenda, right?
	Agenda 21, those behind the U.N.
	document, those behind... The globalists, the globalists.
	The globalists, the cabals, the families that run it all.
	The ones who control the strings, if you would.
	Go ahead.
	So these, these, this bigger concept, right?
	It's really, you have, okay, so let's take a look at Albuquerque, New Mexico, two days ago or less, right?
	We have a situation where they're trying to pull down some statue, a couple of what I believe are probably patriots and militia members were there.
	One individual in a blue shirt was there trying to kind of keep order, it looked like, stop people from damaging it.
	They started coming at him.
	He took a, He took a skateboard to the face.
	He backed off a bit.
	They kept coming after him.
	He created distance.
	Big-time distance.
	I'm talking about this guy got himself about 50 yards away from the bulk of the crowd.
	A few stragglers followed him out.
	Both with skateboards.
	Both the normal Antifa garb.
	All black.
	The black hoodie.
	The black mask with skateboards.
	And he continued to beat on this guy.
	Okay?
	Yelling at the same time, we're going to kill you.
	This man participated in the A2, pulled out his gun and put three rounds in one of the individuals who's currently in critical condition.
	Sounds like a totally appropriate thing to do in self-defense.
	Absolutely.
	And if the whole thing's on video, he's still under arrest for aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and a modified weapon.
	That's ridiculous.
	He was facing two charges right now.
	The police were right there.
	They saw the whole thing.
	Here's the kicker.
	I got to look into this now, too.
	I thought it was real for a moment, for a moment.
	They had my attention.
	And then I found this little kicker.
	From within the crowd, he's a cop.
	He's a cop.
	He's a cop.
	And I look off into the distance and I see a bunch of cops watching.
	Okay.
	What do you mean by saying from within the crowd, he's a cop, he's a cop?
	You're saying this guy... Inside the crowd, during one of these videos that I saw, you can hear somebody near the camera, but they're off of the camera, yelling, he's a cop.
	This guy that they're harassing?
	Right.
	The guy they're assaulting with a skateboard?
	Right.
	So he's a cop!
	So what the hell are the cops doing?
	What's he doing being prosecuted?
	My god, I mean, it was insane.
	He's not.
	According to me, it's fake news.
	Listen, I'm just telling you what... I'm trying to put together the pieces of the puzzle of what I heard that doesn't make any sense.
	So why would they follow this guy away from the crowd?
	He's still got the same cameraman on him, right?
	It's the same guy who's been filming it from the start.
	Yeah.
	Right?
	So he's following the guy as well.
	He's starting to get beat up again by the skateboards, and he draws on them.
	And this guy has a tactical stance, a tactical method of response with the firearm, which tells me he's had tactical training.
	So he actually is a cop?
	He very well may be in law enforcement.
	This could be a story.
	Well, listen, you guys, we're coming close.
	Why don't I get a final statement from each of you?
	Bruce, you want to go first?
	Bruce?
	Mechanic?
	Yeah, I'm right here.
	Final statement?
	Yeah, listen folks.
	Cooperate, but understand and know your rights and how to use them.
	Okay?
	Just spitting out that you know your rights, you can't do this, isn't going to help you.
	Always try to remain cordial and don't answer questions.
	Your biggest asset is the lack of answered questions.
	Do not answer questions.
	Just shut up.
	Period.
	Thanks for having me on, Professor.
	Oh yeah, real pleasure.
	Excellent, excellent.
	Gary, hard to sum up everything you've been saying.
	Go ahead.
	You know, I'd say that the Constitution is probably the best recipe that we have for how to operate a free state.
	So, learn what the Constitution requires of you.
	You know, it provides you with privileges, but it also has duties, and one of those duties is to execute the laws of the Union, suppress insurrections, and repeal invasions.
	Very good.
	Very good, Gary.
	You made a large number of extremely interesting points that I, for the most part, am unable to assess.
	Bruce, are you still here?
	I think you may have dropped.
	Are you still here?
	I'd be glad to have you add a contribution.
	Meanwhile, I think that George Floyd was a psy-op.
	I think it was very much staged.
	We had the Obama Foundation tweeting a George Floyd poster on May 17th when he wasn't killed until May 25th.
	That's extremely suspicious.
	We have the body on the ground with the knee appears to be completely bald, but he seems to have hair in other photographs suggesting it may have been a mannequin.
	Here's an observation of a tweet.
	It just dawned on me the most glaring component of the Floyd psyop.
	It was filmed before COVID-19.
	How do I know not a single person is wearing a mask?
	Not one of the cops, not Floyd, not his pastor, not the market people, not the bystanders.
	I think that's very telling myself.
	When I look and I see, I have noticed no one seemed to be wearing a mask.
	Now a friend, actually Mike Barra said he sees somebody with a mask.
	Well I think virtually all of them in Minneapolis would have been wearing masks and it might have been possible to touch up one of the frames to have someone appear to be wearing a mask.
	I also have video here.
	I'm looking at a couple of frames Where when the body was put up on the gurney, that it seemed to have no legs, which is consistent with it being a mannequin, the torso of a mannequin.
	So I think we've been played.
	The issue was raised about the different actors and so forth.
	I think it's all true.
	I want to thank everyone who called.
	Really good questions and comments.
	And thank you all.

▲