Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

May 7, 2020 - Jim Fetzer

01:52:24

The Raw Deal (6 May 2020)

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Settled and we can start.
	Welcome to The Raw Deal.
	As some of you, but probably not all, may be aware, I have been doing daily updates about the coronavirus for the last over three weeks now with Dean Ryan in Los Angeles and Mike Berra In Seattle.
	And what I wanted to do tonight is, for the first hour, share some of the discoveries we've made, and take the second hour to field calls from those of you who are distressed about what's been going on and want to review the bidding.
	I think that'll work just fine tonight.
	Let me begin Gateway Pundit reported, there it is, CDC equates coronavirus hospitalizations to seasonal flu and finally admits it's much less dangerous for children.
	I mean, really?
	In late February, nearly a month after President Trump banned travel from China, the CDC terrorized Americans by claiming the Wuhan coronavirus had a mortality rate of 2.3% at its Emory Center.
	Two weeks later, the WHO leader sparked a global panic when he claimed COVID-19 had a 3.4% mortality rate, and then compared that number to the annual estimated seasonal flu mortality rate of 0.1.
	These irresponsible and completely inaccurate statements led to the greatest economic crash since the Great Depression.
	And here it is, right in the Center for Disease Control's own report, a key update for Week 17.
	For people 65 and older, current COVID-19 hospitalization rates are similar to those observed during comparable time points for recent high-severity influenza seasons.
	In other words, it's comparable to the flu.
	It's basically the same as the flu.
	In fact, it's actually even less severe because, yeah, for children 0 to 17, COVID-19 hospitalization rates are much lower than influenza hospitalization rates during recent influenza seasons.
	So we're being played.
	Indeed, it goes on and on, because we have to look for the actual number of deaths from coronavirus, which are being massively exaggerated in the mainstream media.
	As of May 1st, 2020, it was 37,308.
	2020, it was 37,308.
	Today, Mike Barrow reported it was 44,000, relatively modest.
	Here's a comparison between January-April of 2018, the total U.S.
	deaths, versus January-April of 2020, total U.S.
	deaths from all causes combined.
	In January through April of 2018, the total U.S.
	deaths from all causes combined was 630,973.
	From January through April 2020, when we're in the midst of this pandemic, the total U.S.
	deaths were only 610,693, 20,000 less than a comparable period in 2018.
	What does that tell you?
	of this pandemic, the total US deaths were only 610,693. 20,000 less than a comparable period in 2018.
	What does that tell you?
	We have been plagued.
	Not only that, but of course the California physicians from Bakersfield who are being massively censored, You can't believe they've actually come into my computer to delete when I have a PowerPoint that includes video of the Bakersfield doctors.
	When I close my PowerPoint I'm told that there's a problem and it has to be repaired and then PowerPoint goes ahead and deletes it!
	I mean, how bad is that?
	How disgusting?
	How outrageous?
	Meanwhile, One News Now reported, and if this doesn't grab you equally telling, you haven't been paying attention, Fauci knew about HCQ, hydroxychloroquine, in 2005.
	Nobody needed to die.
	Dr. Anthony Fauci, whose expert advice to President Trump has resulted in the complete shutdown of the greatest economic engine in world history, has known since 2005 that chloroquine is an effective inhibitor of coronaviruses.
	How did he know this?
	Because of research done by the National Institutes of Health, of which he is the director, in connection with the SARS outbreak caused by a coronavirus dubbed SARS-CoV, the NIH research chloroquine and concluded that it was effective at stopping the SARS coronavirus in its tracks.
	The COVID-19 bug is likewise a coronavirus labeled SARS-CoV-2.
	While not exactly the same virus as SARS-CoV-1, it is genetically related and shares 79% of its genome as the name SARS-CoV-2 implies.
	They both use the same host cell receptor, which is what viruses use to gain entry to the cell and infect the victim.
	The Virology Journal, the official publication of Dr. Fauci's National Institutes of Health, published what is now a blockbuster article on August 22, 2005, under the heading, get ready for this, chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread.
	Write the researchers.
	We report that chloroquine has strong antiviral effects on SARS-CoV infection in primate cells.
	These inhibitory effects are observed when the cells are treated with a drug either before or after exposure to the virus, suggesting both prophylactic and therapeutic advantage.
	This means, of course, that Dr. Foushee is known for 15 years that chloroquine, and its even milder derivative, hydroxychloroquine, would not only treat a current case of coronavirus, therapeutic, but prevent future cases, prophylactic.
	So HCQ functions as both a cure and a vaccine.
	In other words, it's a wonder drug for coronavirus.
	Said Dr. Foushee's NIH in 2005, concentrations of 10 units completely abolish SARS-CoV infection.
	Fauci's researchers add chloroquine can effectively reduce the establishment of infection and spread of SARS-CoV-2.
	Dr. Dieter Rout, the Anthony Fauci of France, had such spectacular success using HCQ to treat victims of SARS-CoV-2 that he said way back on February 25th that it's game over for coronavirus.
	He and a team of researchers reported that the use of HCQ administered with both azithromycin and zinc cured 79 of 80 patients with only rare and minor adverse effects.
	I've reported his results before.
	In conclusion, these researchers write, we confirm the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine associated with atherozithrin in the treatment of COVID-19 and its potential effectiveness in the early impairment of contagiousness.
	A highly publicized VA study that reported to show HCQ was ineffective showed nothing of the sort.
	HCQ wasn't administered until the patients were virtually on their deathbeds, when research indicates it should be prescribed as soon as symptoms are apparent.
	Plus, HCQ is administered without zithromycin and zinc, which form the cocktail that makes it supremely effective.
	At-risk individuals need to receive the HCQ cocktail at the first sign of symptoms.
	But Governor Andrew Cuomo banned the use of HCQ in the entire state of New York on March 6th.
	The Democratic governors of Nevada and Michigan followed suit.
	And by March 28th, the whole country was under incarceration in place fatwas.
	Nothing happened regarding the use of HEQ in the U.S.
	until March 20th, when President Trump put his foot down and insisted that the FDA consider authorizing HEQ for off-label use to treat SARS-CoV-2.
	On March 23rd, Dr. Vladimir Zelenko reported he had treated around 500 coronavirus patients with HEQ and had seen an astonishing 100% success rate.
	That's not the anecdotal evidence Dr. Fauci sneers at, but the actual results with real patients in clinical settings.
	Since last Thursday, my team has treated approximately 350 patients in Kairos, Joel, and other 150 patients in other areas of New York with the above regimen of this group.
	And the information provided to me by affiliated medical teams, we have had zero deaths, zero hospitalizations, and zero intubations.
	In addition, we've not heard of any side effects other than approximately 10% of patients With temporary nausea and diarrhea.
	Said Dr. Zelenko, if you scale this nationally, the economy will rebound much quicker.
	The country will open again.
	And let me tell you a very important point.
	This treatment costs about $20.
	That's very important because you can scale that nationally.
	If every treatment costs $20,000, that's not so good.
	All I'm doing is repurposing old available drugs, which we know their safety profiles, and using them in a unique combination in an outpatient setting.
	The questions are disturbing to a spectacular degree.
	If Dr. Fauci has known since 2005 of the effectiveness of HCQ, why hasn't it been administered immediately after people show symptoms as Dr. Zelenko has done?
	Maybe then nobody would have died and nobody would have been incarcerated in place except the sick, which is who a quarantine is for in the first place.
	To paraphrase Jesus, it's not the symptom-free who need HCQ, but the sick, and they need it at the first sign of symptoms.
	Well, the regressive healthcare establishments wants the HCQ cocktail to only be administered late in the course of the infection.
	From a medical standpoint, this is stupid, said one doctor.
	As a physician, this baffles me.
	I can't think of a single infectious condition, bacterial, fungal, or viral.
	Where the best medical treatment is to delay the use of an antibacterial, antifungal, or antiviral until the infection is far advanced.
	So why has Dr. Fauci minimized and dismissed HCQ at every turn, instead of pushing this thing from Jump Street?
	He didn't even launch clinical trials of HCQ until April 9th, by which time 33,000 people had died.
	This may be why.
	Chloroquine, a relatively safe, effective, and cheap drug used for treating many human diseases, is effective in inhibiting the infection and spread of SARS-CoV.
	That's the problem.
	It is safe and expensive and it works.
	In other words, there's nothing sexy or avant-garde about HEQ.
	It's been around since 1934.
	There is, of course, a far more disturbing, profoundly disturbing interpretation to which that Dr. Fauci is the spear of a monstrous conspiracy where Bill Gates is the mastermind to destroy the economy of the world to create a new world order in which only big corporations and banks survive, where the middle class of the United States and elsewhere has been wiped out, and where the rest of us are left toiling as serfs or slaves in the field.
	David Icke has been propounding that view, and David Icke has been massively censored therefore.
	Keep in mind, if what David Icke was spouting were the musings of a disoriented or insane individual, there'd be no reason to ban it, to censor.
	But it's been going on on a massive scale.
	Even, as I said, The Bakersfield physicians!
	They're taking the video off on my own desktop!
	On my own desktop!
	This is despicable!
	And we've of course given massive confirmation that Anthony Fauci is very in with the deep state where I'm looking right now at a photograph.
	We have many players from the mainstream media.
	Bill Moyers, Judy Woodruff, Barbara Walters, Tom Brokaw.
	In the same group photo with Anthony Fauci, Ted Turner, who by the way advocates a 95% reduction in the world's population.
	That would take us from 6.8 billion to less.
	I mean, 0.8 billion.
	Think about it.
	He wants to get rid of 6 billion people from the face of the earth.
	Ted Turner!
	And he's there with Bill Gates Sr., with George Soros, with David Rockefeller.
	Oh, I mean, this is disgusting beyond words.
	Meanwhile, it's absolutely fascinating that Mike Berra found that there's a show called The Dead Zone, starring Anthony Michael Hall.
	You're not going to believe the elements of this.
	In 2000, let's see, the second season, listen to this, what they were playing.
	Listen.
	Alright, what's going on?
	Just let me think about where to start.
	Well, he saw something.
	What is it?
	He saw a virus.
	I think.
	Some kind of disease.
	A virus?
	Like what?
	Like SARS?
	I don't know.
	All I know is that it's highly infectious.
	It may be fatal.
	Right now, we could all be infected.
	Maybe we should wear masks.
	You have no reason to be scared.
	Let me ask you something I make.
	Animals.
	You been around any animals in the backyard?
	Even, let's say, a skunk, a raccoon?
	We know it acts like a virus.
	It causes high fever and respiratory distress.
	Tracking and treating a mysterious outbreak like this would take the CDC months.
	One who hasn't been exposed already needs to wear a mask.
	China?
	Isn't that where flu viruses come from?
	Yeah.
	A lot of viruses come from there.
	International flight to China?
	That's no coincidence.
	Whatever it is, it originated in China.
	Whatever it is, it originated in China.
	How long is it gonna take?
	Well, it took 34 days to isolate the coronavirus that caused SARS, and that's fast.
	This is it.
	This is your virus.
	So the chloroquine.
	So the chloroquine.
	Now it's a chloroquine.
	This is it.
	This is your virus.
	I'm sorry, but there's no cure for that.
	Chloroquine!
	That's an anti-malaria drug!
	No.
	Listen!
	It suppresses the enzymes!
	A drug called... Chloroquine?
	Chloroquine!
	That's an anti-malaria drug!
	No.
	Listen!
	It suppresses the enzymes!
	It is known as a malaria drug and it's been around for a long time.
	And it's very powerful.
	We started everyone on chloroquine, stopped the thing dead in its tracks.
	Now the CDC would have figured it out eventually, but not in time.
	Now that's from a 2003 episode of a show called The Dead Zone that was written by Stephen King.
	Notice it's talking about a virus originates in China, and it has its properties of suppressing ability to perform human respiration, and chloroquine.
	Chloroquine stopped it dead in its tracks.
	Dead in its tracks.
	2003.
	The movie's entitled, the episode's entitled, Play.
	2003.
	Anthony Fuschi knew.
	By 2005.
	At the latest.
	That chloroquine was an effective inhibitor of the coronavirus responsible for SARS.
	Anthony Fauci is a disgrace.
	Anthony Fauci has abused his position.
	Anthony Fauci wants to murder a very large segment of the American population.
	Anthony Fauci wants the global economic collapse.
	Thank God President Trump stepped in.
	And get this now.
	Get this now.
	An ousted government scientist had filed a new whistleblower complaint.
	And you can count on the Democrats wanting to launch another impeachment revolving around this guy.
	Rick Bright says he was reassigned to lesser role because he resisted pressure to allow widespread use of hydroxychloroquine.
	Well, given what we know, hydroxychloroquine is a universal cure.
	It's virtually 100% effective.
	If this guy opposed it, he deserved to be fired, not just reassigned, not just demoted.
	Fired!
	It's putting the nation's well-being and economic security at risk.
	Disgusting!
	Meanwhile, I published several blogs that are quite notable for what they lay out here.
	One's from State of the Nation entitled, Bill Gates, a menace to society who must be arrested and prosecuted for crimes against humanity.
	At the top, there's a six-part panel layout of the stages of the operation to which we're being subjected.
	Well, Bill Gates is pointing out that we're now at Stage 4.
	Stage 1, use a coronavirus to induce fear.
	Stage 2, control information and apply censorship.
	Stage 3, Shut down and social distancing.
	Stage 4, blame President Trump.
	Stage 5, martial law and checkpoints.
	Stage 6, actually 6, 6, 6.
	Mandatory vaccine rollout.
	Disgusting.
	Super vaccination agenda being foisted on the USA 24-7.
	Bill Gates is not only a glorified bagman, he's also the world's premier frontman for the exceedingly dangerous and deadly super-vaccination agenda.
	His entire life was painstakingly set up so he would eventually transition from his computer virus scam to his human virus scandal.
	One of the primary goals of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is to impose highly toxic childhood vaccination schedules on school children throughout the third world.
	Another goal is to vaccinate all adults and children with annual flu vaccines that not only do not work, but actually cause major outbreaks of the flu strains being inoculated for.
	However, the main goal of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation in 2020 is to see a mandatory COVID-19 vaccine administered to every living human being.
	Not only that, such a draconian global vaccine regimen will be enforced with immunity certificates if Gates has anything to say about it.
	Here's another, by Peter Konick, the farce and diabolical agenda of a universal lockdown.
	And it begins with an image of Bill Gates on a huge billboard in Times Square.
	Time for your next vaccine.
	And you see sheeple there calling out, we will obey.
	Bill Gates has saved us.
	We have our digital tattoos.
	We love you, brother.
	We love you.
	Peter Conant.
	First comes the farce, an almost universal government lie around the globe about a deadly virus.
	Who named COVID-19?
	The decision for a global lockdown, literally for the collapse of the world economy, was already taken at the World Economic Forum Conference in Davos, 21 to 24 January 2020.
	On January 30, who delivered COVID-19 as a public health declared COVID-19 a public health emergency of international concern.
	At that time, there were only 150 known COVID-19 cases outside of China.
	No reason whatsoever to declare a pandemic.
	On March 11, Dr. Tedros, Director General of WHO, converted the public health emergency into a pandemic.
	This gave the green light for the start of implementing the plan.
	The pandemic was needed as a pretext to halting collapse of world economy and the underlying social fabric.
	Here are the key elements as a precursor to what the world is living now and what is to come if we don't stop it to demonstrate how this entirely criminal sham has been planned.
	Parts of the scenario include a massive vaccination program, probably through compulsory vaccination.
	Bill Gates' dream and brainchild is vaccinating 7 billion people.
	Massive population reduction, a eugenics plan, in part through vaccination and other means.
	I mentioned, by the way, that doctors in India concerned that a Bill Gates polio vaccine had led to the paralysis of nearly 600,000 Indian children.
	Had the contents of the vaccine tested and discovered it included sterility and anti-fertility ingredients.
	They gave Bill Gates the boot.
	Meanwhile, Gates has been advocating for years the need for a massive population reduction, and indeed for more than 20 years, the Bill Gates and Melinda Foundation, extensive vaccination programs in Africa, India, and other places around the world have seen a record of involuntary sterilization of women between 14 and 49.
	An electronic ID for every person on the planet in the form of a nanochip possibly injected along with a mandatory vaccination.
	The nanochip could be remotely uploaded with all personal data.
	And I strongly suspect they can use it to affect our moods and even kill us at whim if they so desire.
	Digitalized money, no more cash, all transactions.
	Through credit cards and online.
	I've often asked, what in the world happens to people who have no credit card?
	What do they do?
	Just die on the street?
	Meanwhile, not only will they know every transaction you make, whether you buy a candy bar, a shotgun, or go to a movie, they can cut you off anytime they want and leave you high and dry.
	This is a terrible, terrible idea.
	Then, in addition, universal rollout of 5G, later to be followed by 6G.
	We know 5G is deadly.
	Among its effects is weakening the immune systems of human beings and other living things, making them far more vulnerable to threats in the environment, bacterial, fungal, or viral, than we would otherwise be.
	It's a terrible idea.
	A professor at Washington State who's an expert on this subject has said, rolling out 5G in massive quantity without any safety tests being conducted is the stupidest idea in the history of the world.
	He got it right.
	This is leading to a total control of every individual on the planet.
	It is sold to the public as the Internet of Things, meaning self-driving cars, robotized kitchen equipment, artificial intelligence for the production and delivery of everything.
	What the sales pitch doesn't say is how humans would thereby be marginalized and enslaved.
	Well, that's a pretty terrifying future to be brought to us compliments of Bill Gates.
	Now, Mike Barra also turned up.
	An international arrest warrant for guess who?
	Bill Gates.
	Melinda Gates.
	Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
	Grounds for the international arrest warrant is four pages.
	It looks perfectly authentic to me.
	I believe it is real, but it may require a special mechanism of enforcement.
	Let it happen.
	Meanwhile, Gateway Pundit again, which has been right on top of this.
	Update.
	Dr. Fauci likely broke U.S.
	law when he funded Wuhan Lab to continue coronavirus projects that were banned in the U.S.
	in 2014.
	I mean, what in God's name is going on here?
	I mean, how many signs do we have to have pointing to this man as an arch-villain, a super-villain, a monster, responsible for tens of thousands of deaths in the United States because HCQ could have prevented them all.
	Nobody had to die.
	And it turns out Dr. Burks, who we've seen too many times during these press conferences, daughter is deputy director for the Bill Gates Foundation.
	Can you now figure out why both doctors fought Trump on the drug that worked and are only for developing a vaccine?
	Follow the dots.
	Follow the money trail.
	Meanwhile, and I find this highly ironic, government scientist Neil Ferguson resigns after breaking lockdown rules to meet his married lover.
	Professor Ferguson allowed the woman to visit him at home during the lockdown while lecturing the public on the need for strict social distancing.
	Yes, I don't think they were social distancing during her illicit visits to his home!
	So he's been sacked.
	He actually had coronavirus.
	He was not only exposing her and her husband and their children, but thank God Imperial College had enough of it, and he's no longer on the faculty.
	Meanwhile, this is the guy whose doomsday old pandemic model predicted Armageddon.
	This is the guy whose model said there would be 2,200,000 deaths in the USA and 500,000 in the UK.
	As I previously reported, he has walked back his projections to now fewer than 20,000 in the UK.
	So if you go from 500,000 to fewer than 20,000, you go from 2.2 million in the USA to fewer than 200,000.
	That's what's going to happen on the outside, and we're not there yet.
	In fact, when you actually get more or less accurate figures, the total deaths to date are only 77,000.
	But they're being exaggerated all the time.
	Now, some interesting developments around the country.
	More than 900 Missouri residents who snitched on lockdown rule breakers fear retaliation after their details are leaked online.
	This comes from the Daily Mail in the UK.
	St.
	Louis County had urged the community to share details of anyone not following guidelines in response to the coronavirus pandemic in March.
	After more than 900 submitted tips, 29 businesses were reprimanded.
	Many tipsters reported their own jobs for not following social distancing rules.
	I'm worried about somebody showing up at my door, showing up at my workplace, or getting me fired for doing what his ride-a-tipster said.
	Jared hit the file of complaint emails in a Facebook group and said, oh, I release the info in an attempt to discourage such behavior in the future.
	As of Sunday, there have been at least 8,437 cases in Missouri and 376 deaths.
	3,433 of these cases have been in St.
	2,433 of these cases have been in St. Louis County and 177 deaths.
	Meanwhile, the New York police union says officers should stop enforcing social distancing order, call city leaders cowards.
	This is a giant step in the right direction.
	In fact, we have an Israeli virologist who explains social distancing doesn't make any difference at all.
	That the virus has like a 70-day span.
	It peaks at 40 and it's gone by 70.
	So social distancing was never a necessary element of any of this, nor one might well infer is quarantining those who are in good health.
	In normal conditions, a quarantine is imposed upon the sick, not the well.
	The Police Benevolent Association for the City of New York has called for officers to stop enforcing social distancing orders saying politicians have left them hanging to deal with the backlash on their own.
	Union called city leaders cowards who have left the police to fend for themselves.
	Here it comes, the announcement from the Police Benevolent Association.
	NYCPBA calls for the end of NYPD policing of social distancing.
	As the weather heats up and the pandemic continues to unravel our social fabric, police officers should be allowed to focus on our core public safety mission.
	If we don't, the city will fall apart before our very eyes.
	The NYPD needs to get cops out of the social distancing enforcement business altogether, PBA President Patrick Lynch said in a statement.
	The cowers who run this city have given us nothing but vague guidelines and mixed messages, leaving the cops on the street corner to fend for themselves.
	Lynch also blasted politicians for releasing real criminals.
	While discouraging them from properly doing their jobs to enforce laws against things like fare evasion, meanwhile, these same politicians are still watering down our laws, releasing real criminals, discouraging proactive enforcement of fare evasion and quality of life issues, they've said.
	The statement came after a video went viral of a violent clash between law enforcement and citizens who were not complying with social distancing order.
	It's really disturbing.
	Meanwhile, Tucker rips YouTube for polling problematic coronavirus video.
	Censorship is never about science.
	Listen to what Tucker had to say.
	This, by the way, is the only show I recommend watching regularly without failure.
	It's on Fox News at 7 Central.
	I'll be watching it when I finish the show tonight.
	Listen to Tucker. -Good evening and welcome to Tucker Carlson tonight.
	Last night on this show, we played you a clip from a nearly hour-long video produced by two physicians in California, Drs.
	Dan Erickson and Artin Masihi.
	Likely many of you had already seen it.
	That video has had more than 5 million views on YouTube.
	In their presentation, the two doctors presented a flurry of data pointing to what we are currently learning about this virus and how it spreads.
	They recited pages of government statistics and then interpreted them in light of their own long clinical experience as doctors.
	At one point, they noted that the newly adjusted death rate in their state of California, which is much lower than anyone expected it to be, And they asked if government officials there should change their policies based on this new science.
	Watch.
	We've seen 1,227 deaths in the state of California with a possible incidence or prevalence of 4.7 million.
	That means you have a 0.03 chance of dying from COVID-19 in the state of California.
	0.03 chance of dying from COVID in the state of California.
	Does that necessitate sheltering in place?
	Does that necessitate shutting down medical systems?
	Does that necessitate people being out of work?
	So whatever your view of the mass quarantines, and maybe you're enthusiastically for them, the questions you just heard are valid questions.
	In fact, they're critical questions.
	We should all be asking those questions, including and especially our policymakers.
	But as Dr. Erickson pointed out later in the video, dissent of any kind We are pressured to test for flu, but ER doctors now, my friends that I talk to, say, you know, it's interesting, when I'm writing up my death report, I'm being pressured to add COVID.
	to verify illnesses and deaths as related to coronavirus, whether they believe that to be true or not. - We aren't pressured to test for flu, but ER doctors now, my friends that I talk to say, you know, it's interesting, when I'm writing up my death report, I'm being pressured to add COVID.
	Why is that?
	Why are we being pressured to add COVID to maybe increase the numbers and make it look a little bit worse than it is?
	I think so.
	So what you just heard, what Dr. Erickson described, is called lying.
	And lying has no place in science ever.
	It's scary to think it takes place on a large scale in hospitals.
	He says it does.
	Viewers of Erickson's video were shocked and transfixed by this.
	They forwarded the video to friends, you forward it on to their friends, and suddenly millions of people who have spent the last six weeks on a diet of Tiger King and internet memes were watching sober-minded medical researchers reading from charts of statistics.
	It's hard to recall a science video taking off like this one did.
	Not everyone was impressed by it.
	Some criticized the doctor's policy conclusions.
	And of course, that's fair.
	Decent people have different opinions.
	We're not entirely certain what the perfect response to this pandemic is.
	Nobody is certain.
	There's no objective answer at the moment.
	At best, we can plot along with open minds and good faith.
	More informed debate is exactly what we need to make wise decisions going forward.
	Unfortunately for all of us, informed debate is exactly what the authorities don't want.
	They want unquestioned obedience.
	So they're cracking down on free expression.
	Last night, the doctor's video, the one you just saw, was pulled off of YouTube, the largest video hosting site in the world.
	It wasn't an accident.
	YouTube admitted doing it.
	The company cited a violation of, quote, community guidelines, and they did not apologize.
	Looking back, when all of this is finally over, and it will be, it's likely we'll see this moment, what YouTube just did, as a turning point in the way we live in this country, a sharp break with 250 years of law and custom.
	The Two Doctors video was produced by a local television channel in California.
	It was, in effect, a mainstream news story.
	The video was not pornographic.
	It didn't violate copyright or incite violence or commit libel.
	It didn't break any law.
	The only justification for taking it down was that the two physicians on screen had reached different conclusions from the people currently in charge.
	It was a form of dissent from orthodoxy.
	YouTube and its parent company, Google, have now officially banned dissent.
	The CEO of YouTube admitted that openly.
	But then we also talk about removing information that is problematic.
	Of course, anything that is medically unsubstantiated, so people saying like, take vitamin C, take turmeric, those will cure you.
	Those are the examples of things that would be a violation of our policy.
	Anything that would go against World Health Organization recommendations would be a violation of our policy.
	And so remove is another really important part of our policy.
	So you're not just putting the truth next to the lie, you're taking the lie down.
	That's a pretty aggressive approach.
	Removing, quote, anything that would go against World Health Organization recommendations.
	It'll now be taken off the internet.
	Consider that for a minute.
	As a matter just of science, It's ludicrous.
	Like everyone else involved in global pandemic policy, the WHO has often been wrong in its recommendations.
	A lot of people have.
	In mid-January, WHO told us that coronavirus could not spread from person to person.
	In March, they told us that face masks didn't work.
	Those were lies, and they were welcome on Google's platforms.
	Doctors who were actually treating patients with the virus, meanwhile, have just been banned.
	So no, this is not about science.
	Censorship never is about science.
	It's about power.
	Big technology companies are using this tragedy to increase their power over the American population.
	They're working in concert with politicians in order to do it.
	Just today, Facebook removed an events page for a political protest in Michigan.
	Governor Gretchen Whitmer, who runs that state, was no doubt pleased to see it.
	Grossly mismanaging an entire state is a lot easier when citizens are not allowed to complain about it, and now they're not.
	Last week, Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg explained that protests like these are no longer protected political speech.
	They're, quote, misinformation.
	How do you deal with the fact that Facebook is now being used to organize a lot of these protests to defy social distancing, to defy the social distancing guidelines in states?
	With somebody trying to organize something like that, does that qualify as harmful information?
	We do classify that as harmful misinformation, and we take that down.
	Harmful misinformation.
	That is a phrase familiar to anyone who has watched totalitarian regimes in any country.
	It's not how Mark Zuckerberg describes political opinions he doesn't like.
	Our free press exists to push back against obvious abuses of power like this one.
	It's the reason we have a First Amendment.
	It's the only reason we have a First Amendment.
	But suddenly our media are not concerned about freedom of speech.
	Reporters applaud our overlords as they punish us for disagreeing.
	You just saw it in that clip from CNN.
	That happens every day.
	Our media are no longer challenging power, they are colluding with power.
	And that may be why there's been so little critical coverage of the massive expansion of our surveillance state currently in progress.
	In the name of fighting the coronavirus, tech companies are now following you through your cell phone.
	They're watching you from above with drones.
	Those sound like paranoid fantasies.
	They are not.
	It's happening as we speak.
	Needless to say, our politicians approve of this.
	Tucker's brilliant on this, and I gotta say, since the social distancing guidelines turn out to have no scientific foundation, it's really quite shocking how easily the public at large has been manipulated by what I would describe as harmful misinformation coming from authorities like the World Health Organization, Bill Gates, the National Institute of Health,
	Anthony Fauci, especially, and this idiot who's in charge of YouTube, who doesn't seem to have a brain in her head.
	Meanwhile, a fascinating development.
	Incredible moment protesters use dozens of laser pens to send police drone crashing to the ground in Chile.
	Protesters in Chile have taken down a police drone by aiming dozens of laser pens at the gadget.
	Video footage shows the dramatic moment the drone plummets after about 50 lasers were jointly pointed into the sky in Santiago.
	They have used laser pointers during a protest.
	The laser action in Chile's capital was taken after a month of protest had created chaos in the South American nation.
	The bringing down of the spy drone has sparked a range of suggestions over how the gadgets were used so successfully.
	In fact, there's a number of different theories about it.
	Could have overheated, malfunctioned, whatever.
	The laser action was taken after a month of protest.
	They have an additional panel here.
	How could laser pens crash a drone?
	The incredible moment protesters used dozens of laser pens to send a police drone crashing to the ground has prompted much discussion over how the aerial gadget was knocked out on Reddit.
	These were mooted as possible causes.
	Lasers could have overheated the drone's battery.
	The device's plastic might have melted.
	The lasers possibly interfered with the anti-collision system on the drone.
	The drone's sensors were affected, making them fail, burn up, causing a critical malfunction.
	It's operator couldn't see anything, so put it down to the ground.
	Another boffin said lasers heat up the air.
	By heating up the propellers of the drone, it causes it to become less dense.
	As the air becomes thinner, the airfoil of the propeller can no longer lift.
	They add, this is clear to see as the drone dips as the laser roll pointed at it, but rises as they miss it.
	If it were due to the electronics being messed up, the drone would just fall out of the sky rather than slowly dip as the propeller becomes less able to produce lift.
	Pretty fascinating.
	Meanwhile, We have a real deal report of romance.
	Michelle Obama has started her PR campaign to make a push to be on the VP ticket with Joe Biden.
	The Independent PAC entitled the committee to draft Michelle Obama for VP has officially started.
	As a person who has everything to lose, Michelle Obama, the American people have everything to gain with another desperate move by the deep state.
	I probably would put that the other way around, but I know they're doing this.
	I received a poll from the Democratic Campaign Committee, official 2020 election poll conducted Friday, March 6th, which I say, would you vote for Joe Biden and Michelle Obama if they ran together against Donald Trump and Mike Pence?
	Meanwhile, we know a lot about Michelle, who was born Michael Laverne Robinson.
	Here's a photograph you'll see in the video version, where they're walking and talking with a third shorter party than themselves, where it's noticeable that Michael Who actually played football for Oregon State before he transferred to Princeton and adopted a female persona, is missing the appendages that are distinctive of human females' mammary glands.
	He has none.
	And interestingly, the guy who is with him is a young, guess who?
	Bill Gates.
	Bill Gates.
	I won't tire of reporting how Michelle Obama's doctor has gone on record.
	I know what I saw.
	Dr. Rafael Espinoza, who was entrusted with former first lady Michelle Obama's care during the 2008 presidential election, is speaking out about something he feels the public needs a definitive answer on.
	With all the talk about Mrs. Obama once being a man, Espinoza couldn't keep his mouth shut any longer.
	I know what I know because I walked in on her or him while he was taking a leak standing up in a bathroom in Trenton.
	They paid me millions for my silence, but after seeing what they did to this country, I just can't keep quiet.
	Let them sue me.
	He continues, I know what I saw.
	Michelle Obama is not a woman who used to be a man.
	Michelle Obama is just a man with breast implants and a huge shaving bill.
	On the campaign trail, no medical staff were allowed to go near her other than to take vitals if she got sick, which she never did.
	But on that occasion, he walked into her taking a leak standing up.
	Many of us have noticed that Michelle has a package that most women do not have, and others have tracked down the actual parents of their alleged children, since two men cannot have offspring, where the older girl looks just like her father, the younger just like her mother.
	And here's a photograph that caused Dean Ryan to practically gag of little Mike Bloomberg sitting beside big Mike Obama.
	I mean, it's really stunning!
	Because Michelle Obama is, you know, quite a bit larger and more physical than little Mike, with broad shoulders distinctive of football players.
	Michelle Obama claims she doesn't want to be VP, But someone just started a committee to draft her.
	We know this is the way politics are played.
	Michelle Obama might be a force to reckon with if she were Joe Biden's running mate, but she has frequently denied interest in running the race.
	Would Obama change the race in Biden's favor?
	I guess there'd be only one way to find out.
	have her run.
	But Biden is, of course, you know, cognitively incompetent, brain damaged.
	I predict he's not going to be the candidate coming out of Milwaukee, far more likely to be Andrew Cuomo, the governor of New York, even though he's a petty tyrant.
	He's a bit of a monster.
	He's responsible for a very large number of deaths in New York, not only by denying hydroxychloroquine availability to patients who needed it, but because he directed it, That nursing home just laden with elderly and ill older citizens had to accept COVID-infected patients that led to the death of, as I recall, some 35,000 elderly in New York.
	Meanwhile, in my email this morning, just in time for the show today, where, by the way, are real deal reports, I'm posting on my Twitter account, at Jim Fetzer, at, you know, the at sign.
	Jim Fetzer, you can find them there.
	They're also being posted by Dean Ryan and by Mike Barrett elsewhere.
	I got the following story.
	Unusual boobs.
	Black woman with one white boob and one black boob.
	I'm only sending this out to certain people that I think can handle it.
	This is unbelievable.
	Photo of woman with different colored boobs.
	And there's the photo of Michelle Obama with a white boob by the name of Joe Biden and a black by the name of Barack Obama.
	I knew you would love it.
	Mike and Dee didn't see it coming.
	Meanwhile, we have the stunning situation of Canada banning assault weapons in the wake of a deadly shooting, which I haven't studied, but I'm confident will turn out to have been a hoax.
	These weapons were designed for one purpose and one purpose only, to kill the largest number of people in the shortest amount of time, said Mr. Trudeau.
	There's no use and no place for such weapons in Canada, meaning Canadians will no longer be able to own rifles like the AR-15, a military-style weapon, ...used in several mass shootings in the United States, including Newtown, Florida, Orlando, Florida, and Parkland, except it wasn't because they were all staged.
	I have books about all this.
	Check out moonrockbooks.com if you want to know the truth.
	By introducing the ban, Mr. Trudeau partially fulfills a gun control promise he made during last year's federal elections.
	He said the government had been in the process of introducing an assault weapons ban when its agenda was overturned by the coronavirus pandemic.
	But he's actually banning some 1,500 different weapons.
	None of those who support gun control address the defensive use of guns which takes place at a staggering rate between 500,000 and 3 million times every single year.
	According to one estimate, there are 1,029,615 defensive gun uses per year for self-protection, for the protection of property and home, work, or elsewhere, excluding military service, police work, or work as a security guard, which yields an estimate of 162,000 cases per year where someone almost certainly would have been killed.
	If they had not used a gun for protection, let me repeat, 162,000 cases per year where someone almost certainly would have been killed had they not used a gun for protection.
	So if you're going to take guns away from law-abiding citizens in the U.S., you're going to have an estimated minimum of 162,000 more cases Or humans are killed by gun-toting savages because they can't protect themselves.
	It's true.
	Worldwide, gun ownership and homicide rates are inversely related.
	The greater the gun ownership, the lower the homicide rate.
	U.S.
	and Canada have the highest gun ownership and the lowest homicide rate.
	Brazil, low gun ownership, high homicide rate.
	Africa, low gun ownership, high homicide rate.
	Russia, low gun ownership, high homicide rate.
	Dr. Ewan, who publishes the Fellowship of the Minds blog, which I highly recommend, had the brilliant insight to overlay the 2014 murder distribution rate with a 2016 political map, electoral college map, and guess what?
	All the areas with the highest gun violence are areas controlled by Democrats who are banning guns and creating free-fire zones for criminals.
	I mean, how dumb do you have to be to recognize that Chicago is a pilot study?
	They have among the most stringent gun control laws, but also the highest gun violence and homicide rate.
	It doesn't work.
	It not only doesn't work in Chicago, it doesn't work across the United States.
	It does not work around the world.
	In fact, Having over 100 million armed Americans is a great source of national defense.
	We have citizen soldiers for home defense to help maintain order, deal with marauding gangs and fighting, invading armies, personal defense.
	When guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns.
	I'll be right back.
	was it a conspiracy did you know that the police in boston were broadcasting this is a drill this is a drill on bullboards during the marathon
	That the Boston Globe was tweeting that a demonstration bomb would be set off during the marathon for the benefit of bomb squad activities, and that one would be set off in one minute in front of the library, which happened as the Globe had announced.
	Peering through the smoke, you could see bodies with missing arms and legs.
	But there was no blood.
	The blood only showed up later and came out of a tube.
	They used amputee actors and a studio-quality smoke machine.
	Don't let yourself be played.
	Check out And Nobody Died in Boston, either.
	Available at moonrockbooks.com.
	That's moonrockbooks.com.
	Is your data safe?
	You have the necessary information to assist you in confidently living through just about any survival situation.
	Is survival, gardening, off-grid living, medical knowledge, or even natural or man-made EMPs on your list of personal concerns?
	Do you have your documents and your personal information in a safe place, in your hands, where you know where it is?
	Well, check out our reloaded EMP-proof thumb drive.
	Over three gigs of survival documents and how-tos, plus the USDA offline food preservation website, and much, much more, including a surprise bonus we just can't tell you about.
	With plenty of room left over to store your most important documents.
	Imagine if Omegavirus, our computer failure, took out your bank, or all the banks for that matter.
	Are your banking records safe in your hands?
	So when they get things fixed and repaired, you can say, hey look, Look, this is what I had.
	You have it.
	I want it back.
	Is your personal data safe?
	Family records?
	Addresses?
	Phone numbers?
	Squeeze on over to freedomslips.com.
	Yes, that's www.freedomslips.com.
	Click the banner on the homepage for the EMP Proof Bullet Drive to get the full scoop of everything that we offer.
	So, folks, keep your data safe for your peace of mind.
	Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com.
	You don't need to expect us.
	We're already here.
	This is the people's war.
	It is our war.
	We are the fighters.
	Fight it then.
	Fight it with all that is in us.
	And may God defend the right.
	Warning!
	Warning!
	We've got to stop it!
	They're going to kill us all!
	See how the company you package?
	Be they the government, be they industry, be they organized labor, be they anyone!
	What you would be is hired!
	The operation of the machine becomes more audience.
	Make yourself sick at heart.
	But you can take part.
	You can even practically take part.
	And you're going to put your money upon the gears, upon the wheels, upon the levers.
	By all means, you're right.
	It'll be as simple as this stuff.
	And you've got plenty to take to the people who want it, to the people who have it.
	It'll help you.
	You called on the thunder, well now you've got thunder!
	Even the government admits that 9/11 was a conspiracy.
	But did you know that it was an inside job and Osama had nothing to do with it?
	The Twin Towers were blown apart by a sophisticated arrangement of mini or micro nukes.
	That Building 7 collapsed seven hours later because of explosives planted in the building.
	Barry Jennings was there.
	He heard them go off and felt himself stepping away and The U.S.
	Geological Survey conducted studies of dust kept from 35 locations in lower Manhattan.
	They found elements that would not have been there had this not been a nuclear event.
	Ironically, that means the government's own evidence contradicts the government's official position.
	9-11 was brought to us compliments of the CIA, the neocons of the Department of Defense, and the Mossad.
	Don't let yourself be played.
	Read American Nuked on 9-11.
	Available at moonrockbooks.com.
	That's moonrockbooks.com.
	All right.
	We're going to take a short break here at Revolution Radio and Freedom Slips.com.
	Yeah, we're going to get back to your host.
	Bye, everyone.
	OK, anyone who'd like is welcome to call in to talk about this coronavirus fraud, the dimensions of which are simply overwhelming.
	Anthony Foushee, Bill Gates appear to be primary players here, but I have no doubt that George Soros and David Rockefeller and a host of others, including political bigwigs such as Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi are also deeply involved here.
	I don't believe they thought through the devastating consequences of shutting down the U.S.
	economy.
	I believe, at least for some, they simply wanted to deprive Trump of the two greatest assets a candidate has when he's a president seeking re-election, namely a strong economy and a surging stock market.
	Well, they certainly took those away.
	But the public seems to be rallying around the president.
	And from what I'm hearing, including aspects of this I'm not open to reporting about, yet, it looks as though Trump has a pretty good idea what's going on and how he's being played.
	I see we have a couple of callers here.
	We have 425 Area Code.
	425 Area Code, give me your name and state and join the conversation.
	425?
	If you're not there, we have a doctor from the District of Criminals.
	You're welcome to join, Giuseppe.
	Good evening, Dr. Fletcher.
	Excellent first hour.
	It's just stunning the level of corruption and malevolence that is being perpetrated by Fauci in Gates.
	And to me, I've been using this phrase for years, but what's-his-face?
	The guy from the government reg, Jack Mullins, said it last week when he said, you know, we're all like frogs put in lukewarm water and the heat's been slowly going up.
	And so, you know, if you drop a frog in boiling water, it'll jump out shrieking.
	But if you just slowly turn it up, it'll just sit there, lay back and you kill it.
	And if you think What's really been going on, especially since 9-11, but clearly before, is the mind control and the censorship of dissonance and accurate, truthful opinions.
	The tracking that's going on.
	People used to care about their privacy and now they're like, oh man, I'm so glad I got my iPhone and my watch and even my refrigerator talks to me.
	It's like insane.
	And then the surveillance society where every stoplight now has a camera and they're starting in some cities like the District of Criminals, they turn it on so if you go through an amber light and you speed up at all, you're going to get a letter in the mail with a picture of your car and your license plate and $100.
	You owe us $100.
	Here's your ticket, pal.
	And that's just so, you know, what kind of fascist BS is this?
	And then the same globalist parasites are poisoning the food, water, and the air.
	They're introducing all these crimes against nature, these genetic modified aberrations that totally disrupt the delicate balance that nature has.
	In fact, if you research it, you'll find that 75% of all species on Earth have been wiped out in the last 100 years.
	That's three quarters of all natural life has been wiped out.
	It's just sickening to me.
	And, you know, the poster boy for all this malevolence is none other than William Henry Gates, you know?
	And to me, I say, I'm not going to swear, but F. Bill Gates.
	He's a sniveling, murderous, satanic psychopath.
	He's like Damon in the Omen, but it's like sequel part five where he's He's kind of a boob and he's overplaying his hand and it's going to blow up his face.
	The thing about that guy is he was born six inches from the home plate and he thinks he hit a home run.
	And the lies that, oh, good old Bill was just a middle class guy.
	His grandfather owned a bank in Seattle as part of the Federal Reserve.
	He was a trust fund baby with millions of dollars came his way.
	That's why he dropped out of College to go with Microsoft.
	But the interesting thing about Gates is they had access to very early computer coding, right?
	$40,000 an hour.
	And so what did he do?
	He didn't learn to really write an operating system.
	He learned to write a virus.
	And he never was disciplined enough to actually write his own operating system.
	He found some fellas I'm not exactly sure about the details of one guy or a team of guys, but they were supposedly like hippies and they had written DOS and they bought it and screwed them with no royalties.
	And over the years, as we've said previously, Microsoft has nothing but bugs and malware.
	And then that brilliant video we talked about last week that showed that Gates, in the opinion of the author, intentionally did this.
	Pulling the same demented hijinks with trying to control viruses in the human population.
	I mean, none other than Bobby Kennedy Jr.
	is going after this guy, calling him a messianic and pretty much a psychopath.
	I don't know.
	It's just the good news, I think.
	Well, you know, the military-industrial complex has long since mastered the Technique of developing, producing weapons that have certain malfunctions or inadequacies so they'll get the contract to maintain them and then they'll make, you know, double, triple the amount of money for the original product which they deliberately produced at some part quality.
	I mean this is one of the many reasons why if we ever get in an all-out war with Russia The Russians, who don't have equipment that's made by padding the box, but have equipment that's made by serious, dedicated engineers and scientists who understand the fate of the nation, may hang in the balance, is in general far superior to U.S.
	American military equipment, whether we're talking about Missiles, anti-missile missiles, anti-sub missiles, I mean, pretty much across the board, they have relatively inexpensive but overwhelmingly more efficient defense mechanisms they can deploy against us, where all American forces in the Middle East can be wiped out in a matter of minutes if we actually go to war against Russia, which I would highly advise against.
	I mean, There are no bounds, however, to stupidity, and the decisions made by our political leaders are frequently proven to be calamitous mistakes.
	I wanted to ask you in particular, Giuseppe, since part of this idea of going to an AI society is to have clinical diagnosis performed by machines.
	I mean, while I realize it's entirely feasible, That you could have a, you know, a program where you take various symptoms that are reported, you know, temperature, blood count, what have you, and could produce highly reliable diagnoses.
	I just wonder whether patients are going to believe a machine.
	I mean, are they going to feel they're getting suitable medical care if they're being diagnosed by a computer program rather than by a thinking thing?
	Well first I would counter the statement that the AI could produce a reliable diagnosis.
	Having practiced oriental medicine for 15 years and before that having seen really good doctors in the 70s and 80s when I was a boy and then a young man and there you know there's so many nuanced things that you tell by how the person is talking or acting or looking and And AI won't pick that up.
	They'll just have it be as a binary choice.
	Well, did that person sigh or not sigh?
	But, you know, it's not going to be able to use intuition.
	I mean, everything with humans is an art to a certain extent.
	You know, you trust your gut, you trust your intuition.
	So, I think that diagnoses will be flawed and do a lot of damage with the prescription drugs and such.
	And secondly, you know, that's what the whole internet of things is trying to get the average person to buy into.
	Can your dryer tell you, oh, you know, put another dryer sheet in or your up and tell you, well, you need to know 10 minutes.
	They're getting slowly entrained to come to accept such AI guidance.
	But I don't know, man.
	A person's health, I would hope they would steer far away.
	Well, what occurs to me is that programs are based upon anticipated circumstances and known variables.
	So that if you have a case where there's a non-anticipated factor at work or something the programmer hadn't considered, but which would be immediately obvious to a physician, a real person dealing with this patient,
	It seems to me that's the major risk here, that you could have wrong diagnoses that would not have been mistakes committed by real physicians as thinking things, but which the computer, which is not a thinking thing, produced because of the Well, I'll tell you, here's an excellent example of that.
	inputs to produce certain outputs and it's not that the inputs were necessarily inaccurate or wrong but that they might not cover all the relevant factors in a particular case and thereby yield a false or misleading diagnosis.
	Well I'll tell you, here's an excellent example of that is when I was practicing in Milwaukee I had a bigger clinic and I submitted to insurance and I had to look up the treatment codes, the billing codes, and the treatment codes are the Western physicians use them.
	They're called the, then they were the ICD-9 codes and now they're the ICD-10 codes.
	And I would run into almost every couple of patients, they wouldn't have the correct code for what was actually going on.
	Give you a list of 10, but none of them was accurate.
	And so you have to, well, this is the closest thing to it.
	I'll just use this one, you know, and if they question it, I'll, I'll, I'll tell them what's really going on.
	So I think that that is going to be the same thing when you try to program these AIs, even though they are heuristic learning, they can teach themselves, but you know, they can't teach themselves.
	They have a gut feeling and intuition.
	So it's going to be a lot of people prescribed with the wrong drugs, having worse side effects than needed because the AI thought you should take three pills three times a day.
	And a good physician would say, well, start with one and see how you feel and blah, blah, blah.
	Yeah, I think most Americans have no idea the superficiality of computers and their programming because it's all based upon the closest proximity syntax.
	It's actually not even syntax.
	It's what is organized or arranged to function as though it were syntax for, say, a human language.
	It's all in terms of programming with higher and lower voltage zeros and ones.
	As having representative significance in certain combinations for the user of the program, and it has a causal effect on the computer to operate in a certain way and to produce certain outputs or behavior if it's a component of some kind of mechanism such as an automobile,
	But without any thought process going on there whatsoever, nothing that the computer processes stands for anything for the computer, it does have causal effects as an input, and it will yield an output depending on how the organism is structured.
	When I first began studying computer science, In, let's see, 1986-87, I discovered a bonanza of philosophical problems on every side that computer scientists had never contemplated.
	And there was a very significant group within computer science, these formalists, who were advocating what they called program verification.
	Which would, in terms of the language of logic, have been better described as program validation, because they were arguing that if you could show that a computer program, given its premises, will yield a certain output to a certain input, then that, they argued, guarantees what the computer will do.
	When it receives that input, which was a category mistake from the point of view of a philosopher, because you're talking about a program as a series of symbols or signs that stand for something, as opposed to the causal system.
	In other words, a proof, a logical proof, that a program is validated or valid, or in the language of this computer science group, Verified.
	Doesn't tell you at all what the program's going to do when it's executed by a causal system to make an elementary observation.
	You could have a component that was broken that melted or that you had a power outage or a power surge so that, you know, it was just a classic category mistake so that I authored a paper.
	This was actually my first paper in a programming language course.
	That would ultimately be published under the title of Program Verification, The Very Idea, where I explain that we're talking about the difference between abstract relations in logic between premises and conclusions,
	Not even in space-time, in a physical system, a computer system in space-time, where it'll take causal inputs and process them into outputs dependent upon all the variables that are present that affect the outcome of the system.
	No one in computer science had really thought it through.
	I mean, Giuseppe was stunning.
	This paper, which to me as a philosopher of science was obvious, created an international sensation.
	They were publishing articles, letters to the editor from all over the world about it for months and months.
	It has become one of the most widely cited papers ever published in the history of computer science.
	I mean, it's just extraordinary.
	But, I mean, there's that kind of problem when you have automated Medical diagnosis systems.
	They're good for routine cases for which they're programmed, but they're terrible for unusual cases for which they are not.
	In fact, you know, and you need to know enough to know whether a case coming in is a usual routine or not to get the right outcome, because what they're going to do is have everyone proceed as though they were usual or normal cases, and while they might be right, 70 or 80 percent of the time, because most cases are going to be the normal or usual.
	They're not going to be right.
	They're going to be wrong, potentially with fatal consequences, when they aren't normal or usual cases.
	So, you know.
	I find the whole damn thing fascinating, all this stuff about automated cars, self-driving cars.
	I like the idea that you have automobiles now that have these safety features, crash warning systems, and we're seeing them illustrated in any number of television commercials where the driver loses track and all of a sudden as he's about to smash into the rear of a car or a truck parked in front of him, he hadn't noticed, Just in the nick of time, you know, that's terrific.
	I endorse that 100%.
	That's very, very good.
	But that's very, very different than taking a, you know, a human being and subjecting them to a computerized program for a medical diagnosis.
	And I fear the hazards there have not been appreciated by the computer scientists and even the medical experts who are advising them.
	You know, I think it's even worse than that brilliant soliloquy.
	By the way, I bought a couple of those early books you wrote, used on Amazon.
	They're fascinating, heady stuff, you know.
	But think about, to augment what you're saying, you've got this certain level of blinder arrogance on the computer programmer side for the AI, and then you've got a similar arrogance
	For the pharmaceutical vaccine industry that steadfastly refuses to honor actual scientific data and studies, refuses to acknowledge that 80% of all their in-house studies are doctored for the results, and it's not true science.
	For example, a true placebo study would be The vaccine versus distilled water, which is a true placebo, but they'll do their study of the new vaccine versus the old vaccine, which is garbage.
	It's absolutely garbage.
	And so you've got two sides of the coin, both, you know, doing literally the old garbage in, garbage out.
	And that's what they want to bring to the mass public.
	It's ludicrous.
	I'm checking with Mitchell right now to see if 425 left.
	Anyone who'd like to call in, just remind you the number is 540-352-4452.
	540-352-4452.
	I'm so delighted to have you here, Giuseppe.
	352-4452-540-352-4452.
	I'm so delighted to have you here, Giuseppe.
	You have so much to add every time we have a conversation.
	I'm looking at an article too, Let me read a bit about it and get your reaction to it.
	This is suggesting that COVID-19 could awaken human consciousness to how much we're being played.
	Just like 9-11 did, COVID-19 is shifting human consciousness in a major way.
	It's truly an exciting time to be alive, and that's because more and more people are waking up to concepts about our reality and the overall human experience that they were once previously unaware of.
	This has been happening for decades.
	But every single year it seems to amplify, and the process of our awakening seems to be accelerating rapidly.
	This type of awakening happens in all areas that surround human life.
	People learn deep truths about health and medicine, education, geopolitics, consciousness, extraterrestrials, and much more.
	The idea that a small group of corporations and the people who run them have a strong hold on our perceptions, thoughts, emotions, and reactions regarding information and world events is now far from a mere conspiracy theory in the eyes of many.
	It can be seen quite clearly, and mainstream media has been exposed as a true bearer of fake news by many people.
	I would add especially the President.
	Events like the coronavirus simply accelerate the process of awakening and expose mainstream media outlets for what they truly are in this moment.
	There's a reason why mainstream media has such strong connections to intelligence agencies and have their roots in psychological warfare.
	You can find documentation and examples of that in an article The author published a while back, I quote from Edward Bernays, known as the father of public relations, a.k.a.
	propaganda.
	Powerful because it sums up these thoughts quite well.
	The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society.
	Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government, which is the true ruling power of our country.
	We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested largely by men of whom we have never heard.
	Controlling information is what people think is important if you wish to control their lives.
	This is why breaking the illusion is one of the first steps.
	In the consciousness emerging formulation to shift after all, why do you think people like Julian Assange are in jail and people like Edward Snowden are now living in exile?
	With COVID-19, we're also seeing a large number of persons questioning the measures that multiple governments have taken to lock down countries.
	We're seeing people question the information that's being put out by our federal health agencies, including the World Health Organization.
	We have seen a number of scientists in the field, as well as doctors, also question the official narratives.
	And we have seen people like Edward Snowden and many more explain how this pandemic is being used for ulterior motives.
	Can you access these articles?
	I've said before and I'll say again, we're now living in a time where a digital authoritarian fact checker is patrolling the internet and censoring content.
	It deems as false.
	It does not matter if the information is true or false, back my science or not, or whether it's simply an opinion.
	If it doesn't align with a mainstream narrative, you're not meant to see it or trust it.
	Should people not have the right to examine information, check sources, decide for themselves what is real and what is fake?
	Of course we should, but there it is, Yosemite.
	Give me your thoughts, and then we have two more callers I'm going to bring in thereafter.
	Well, I absolutely agree with the statement of that article and it's interesting that in the last few days I've talked to all my siblings because we discovered that my mother's youngest sister put up a baby for adoption and told everyone she was dead so it turns out I have a first cousin I never knew existed.
	And we're all you know happy to meet her and everything but everyone's been saying to me and like you've outlined with your family thinking you're crazy that's generally when I try to tell them what's going on I get that reaction but During the last conversation, my youngest brother said, there's something sinister going on here.
	They're all starting to wake up and see that this is a real, malevolent, totalitarian play.
	And it's a small sample set, and some of my neighbors have brought it up to me as well, but I think it's enough to start to extrapolate and see.
	I think people hopefully are waking up a little bit, because the worst thing is this ridiculous censorship and the cowards The weasels in government who should have long ago nationalized Facebook, nationalized YouTube, nationalized Twitter, and they don't have to be under the government.
	They could set it up as a non-government organization, NGO, run by independent people saying, freedom of speech, people, freedom of speech, you know, as long as it's not something that I don't know, child porn or... Yeah, yeah.
	No, Giuseppe, Giuseppe, those are wonderful ideas.
	I think the original conception was to have private companies operating as objective platforms, allowing everyone to publish their blogs and to post their videos before they took a turn for the worse and began massive censorship.
	We have a caller from the area code 5-1-12.
	Please give us your name and state caller and join the conversation.
	5-1-12.
	Okay.
	Okay.
	Yeah, go ahead.
	You're breaking up a little bit.
	We'll get it.
	Go ahead.
	Tell us.
	Okay.
	I just want to tell your audience a problem that I have observed in this whole discussion.
	And I cannot find the answer to it.
	Can you hear me?
	Yes, yes.
	Go ahead.
	Tell us.
	Okay, I noticed that all the people, the professionals and the reporters and everybody uses these two terms interchangeably to be equal.
	They use the term coronavirus and they use the term COVID-19.
	Yes, yes.
	Also known as And everything I have read is they are not the same thing.
	And it very much muddies the water when they keep... You know, I saw a couple of videos on YouTube today by a medical doctor, and he did it.
	He said, Coronavirus, also known as COVID-19.
	That is wrong!
	And that is deliberately wrong.
	Yes.
	I mean, coronavirus is a general classification of a very common kind of virus.
	Yes.
	It's a family of different strains.
	Yes.
	And it's my understanding that COVID-19 is a strain that they say now exists.
	Yes.
	And there's no test on it, blood test on a patient to absolutely Identify and verify that that patient has COVID-19.
	Yes.
	I just want to know if anybody knows the answer to that and I guess I'll hang up and listen.
	Maybe Giuseppe knows.
	Okay, okay.
	Sure, sure.
	We know.
	Yes.
	No, your question is excellent and what you have said is correct.
	Basically, we've got a whole family of coronaviruses.
	Roughly, it's a genus in relation to individual species, just as the mammal kingdom includes human beings, but also cows and bats and a host of other mammals.
	So, the fact of the matter is, yes, you're correct that the coronavirus is very widespread.
	It's as widespread as the common cold virus, which is itself a coronavirus.
	And the COVID-19 is a very specific instance thereof.
	Giuseppe, would you like to add to this?
	Oh yeah, I think that for the sake of comprehension, they use a simple term like coronavirus or COVID-19.
	There is definitely a long medical or scientific designation for exactly what it is, but You know, you're supposed to be able to say as much as you can in 30 seconds, and it's irrelevant to people understanding, you know.
	So I think that's why they use those two terms interchangeably.
	Yeah, yeah.
	Go ahead, Collar.
	I think it's extremely deceptive.
	But that's precisely why they use it.
	They're trying to instill fear and panic.
	This is a disinformation operation.
	- But that's precisely why they use it.
	They're trying to instill fear and panic.
	This is a disinformation operation.
	This is a psy-op to try to make the public panic in order to manipulate us while they take out the middle class and small businesses to leave only the monsters like Amazon.com and Walmart to scarf up all the business that was had by the little mom and pop shop.
	Your call has been right on the money.
	Impeccable.
	I'm glad you called.
	Let me go to our next... Yeah, thank you, thank you, thank you.
	Our next caller is Chicago Brew.
	Brew, join the conversation.
	Yeah, Professor.
	I apologize I'm late for class, but I took a wrong turn and I ended up in a COVID test or coronavirus testing line.
	But, you know, I did get paid $66.60 for participating in the filming of that event.
	But anyway... Is that a joke, bro, or is that true?
	Yeah, joke.
	It's a joke.
	Listen, I got just the thing that she's asking.
	This comes from CNN, where they answer the top questions people ask.
	And I actually bookmarked this last night because I was looking for something specific.
	Okay, question.
	Are coronavirus and COVID-19 the same thing?
	How did they get their names?
	Coronavirus and COVID-19 are not the same thing, but sometimes the terms can be used interchangeably.
	But this novel coronavirus is novel because it emerged in humans in late 2019.
	There have been six other coronaviruses known to infect humans, such as SARS circa 2003 and MERS circa 2012.
	Coronaviruses are named for the cloud-like spikes on their surface, or coronas, the CDC says.
	The scientific name for this novel coronavirus is SARS-CoV-2.
	So this COVID-19 is actually SARS-CoV-2, which stands for Severe Active Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2.
	COVID-19, however, is a disease caused by the novel coronavirus.
	The letters and numbers in the COVID-19 come from Coronavirus Disease 2019.
	So there's parts that's coming from CNN as best as they can wish watch.
	Well, it shows sometimes what CNN reports is true.
	Well, listen, we've known, a lot of us have known for a long time, people we listen to, things you've read and so on and so forth, that this is SARS-2.
	This is weaponized SARS.
	They took the SARS version, which was a weaponized influenza, basically, coronavirus, and then when that did its damage, then they passed it off to be weaponized And then, you know, with the gain of function and all this other stuff, which is being alleged took place in this Wuhan lab.
	So it is SARS-2, you know, just with a little bigger punch in a certain manner or way.
	Now, how many people does it affect?
	How widespread it is?
	It's yet to be determined.
	I've heard somebody say at one point it's 1 in 600,000 people.
	1 in 600,000 people.
	This may So how it's getting spread, how it's getting, the delivery system is still unknown to this very minute.
	We do not know the delivery system.
	Are they putting in somebody's water?
	Are they actually putting in somebody's food?
	Are they putting it, you know, somebody recently in their flu shot, vaccine shot, tetanus shot?
	We don't know how this is being delivered.
	This is still a thing going on.
	And then, you know, we have that report out of, or that sound bite out of Britain.
	Where some lady says, we did not infect enough people.
	Yeah, I agree completely, completely.
	Now, Brew, the last part I read while Giuseppe was on was an article suggesting that this pandemic is being seen through, that's causing an awakening of awareness of a lot of people in the United States that they're being played.
	Do you think there's a chance that that's actually taking place?
	Yes and no.
	Because, uh, yes and no, man.
	I mean, we still have a number of people that believe Parkman was real, Sandy Hope is real, September 11th is exactly the narrative.
	We have these outliers.
	We have these people that will just, just, they're wise in a sense.
	You listen to them, you hear them talk.
	They're not dummies.
	But they just can't get past the barrier of you're being played.
	You're being fooled.
	You know, it's easier to fool a million people than it is to convince one person to get fooled.
	This is a situation we're dealing with.
	This is very difficult what we're up against.
	And if we don't break these barriers now, we are doomed.
	Yeah, I think I agree with that.
	We have to think of something as intellectuals here.
	Some of us are smart.
	Some of us think we're smart.
	Some of us are intelligent.
	and I don't know which category I float in.
	I float back and forth.
	But we're going to have to figure something out.
	You know?
	We're going to have to figure something out.
	Okay?
	And we got a lot of great people in this independent media and article writers and so on.
	We need to come together.
	We need to group up instead of all this everyone, every man for himself.
	Who's going to write the best article?
	Who's going to beat the story?
	Who's going to get paid?
	Blah, blah, blah.
	Whatever it may be.
	We are separated.
	This is what Separates us from them.
	They are one point.
	They are one spear.
	They are one firing mechanism that play at the same time.
	Here's your talking points for the day.
	Hit it.
	That's why you hear certain words over and over that day.
	Certain sentences, certain phrases, whatever.
	And they want to hit it, hit it, hit it.
	And it's that brainwashing.
	Giuseppe, Giuseppe, I'd like you to respond to Brew's commentary.
	It's just, you know, in order to remember something or in order to think something or whatever, it's got to be repeated, whether it be an action or a word or a phrase or an answer or whatever.
	And that's what they do.
	And they're very good at it.
	We suck at it.
	Okay?
	I'm sorry.
	Go ahead.
	Giuseppe, Giuseppe, I'd like you to respond to Brew's commentary.
	I think Brew's on fire, and I completely agree with everything you said and good humor.
	A lot.
	I think that we're slowly working up I'm sorry working up.
	We get worked up.
	We're waking up people who it's like a big thick ball of rubber bands, right?
	We're starting to pull off some of the rubber bands along the outside.
	And our only chance is to get numbers, real numbers of people who are like, Bill Gates is evil.
	You know, I'm never taking a Bill Gates vaccine or Fauci.
	He's a mass murderer.
	What the heck is this guy?
	Get this guy on trial.
	And then, because it's the only way, you know what I mean?
	Unless we had like, you know, a couple of battalions of Otto Scorsese Jr. type assassins to go after these globalists, which would be fantastic in my mind.
	But the next best thing is we get enough people in the million.
	That are saying, no, I respect my body.
	I want my rights.
	This is, we're not going to be a Mark of the Beast, Bill Gates tattooed.
	F that.
	We got to keep working to get more numbers.
	And I think people are starting to wake up.
	You know, the guest a couple weeks ago, my friend, Dr. Judy Mikovits, she was interviewed for this new, really interesting looking movie called "Plandemic: The Movie." And she sent me the clip, texted me about a week ago, this fellow's named Nicky Howard, and he is a gifted filmmaker.
	And she said that he took four hours of interviewing and boiled it down to the little clip.
	And the clips everywhere now, I mean, people are sending it to me.
	My brother, who I spoke to earlier today, is like, I'm seeing your buddy Dr. Julie.
	People are sending me her clips.
	So this is what we need.
	I mean, thank God Facebook hasn't shut down yet.
	But people have to wake up.
	That's our only hope.
	And once that's the case, we can beat them back to where we get our rights and we hold our rights.
	Okay, very good.
	We got Paul on the air.
	Paul, join the conversation.
	I don't know.
	We need Batman, Batman, Superman, somebody.
	What to do?
	You mean we need some kind of superhero?
	Well, you know, look, obviously, this is just a little A little poke in the ribs here, but obviously, you know, Trump and all the people that are loyal to him and the military and the police are not going to go to the underground bases and arrest the pedophiles and free us all, right?
	We know that much.
	So, you know, the problem that Brew was illustrating is the main thing.
	It's what we're facing is that too many people are cooperating.
	You know, too many people are going to obey or complacent.
	I still see tons of masks, even in the hot weather that we're having.
	Now, at least every now and then, people that I've seen wear a mask before, neighbors and stuff, are not wearing them anymore.
	I have noticed that, and I've actually said to a few people, hey, thank you for not wearing a mask.
	It's Paul, do they understand that wearing a mask is recycling CO2 and that they're not replenishing their oxygen supply?
	They're actually damaging themselves by wearing masks.
	Was that a question?
	I mean, don't we think the public ought to become aware that masks are not normal and they inhibit a normal re-oxygenation of the blood by recycling CO2, and that it diminishes the oxygen supply to your brain, it kills your brain cells, it can render you unconscious.
	If you're driving a car, that could mean you have an accident, maybe are killed because you wore your mask.
	Jim, you know what?
	I'm not trying to be funny.
	It's not really, it's not humorous, but I swear to God, I think you know this is accurate.
	The average person doesn't have two or three sentences, such as you just said, behind most of their thoughts.
	I mean, for decades and decades, the media has operated on image and association.
	I mean, if you just watch, you know, TV and you go back a ways, or you watch the news, they'll show an image.
	In many cases, it's not going to The thing I'm starting to understand, and I kind of already knew it, but it just shows it more than anything, is people have really been programmed.
	or repeating blues in some cases.
	But the bottom line is most people nowadays, it's unfortunate, they don't give a lot of thought to what they do.
	I think that there's, you know, the thing I'm starting to understand, and I kind of already knew it, but it just shows it more than anything, is people have really been programmed, okay?
	I never, it's something we throw around, we talk about it. - Don't you think it's like 50 years of television?
	Our program.
	50 years of television, Paul?
	From that and just from being around other program people, you know, and repeating the same things and hearing the same thoughts.
	You know, this is not related to anything, but it's related to everything.
	I just saw yesterday.
	Yesterday, what they did, it's a playground near my house.
	There's an elementary school up the street.
	There's like a jungle gym and a big playground box, and that's had yellow tape on it now for like a month and a half.
	Well, they just removed the basketball backcourts and rims from three of these, uh, there's like three courts and, you know, people, adults all the time and then kids been playing basketball on a regular basis.
	Oh, that's terrible.
	That's goddamn awful.
	Hey, we got, we got Bill Graham.
	And now what they have.
	Go ahead.
	I'm here.
	I'm here.
	Can I talk?
	Yeah, how are you going?
	Great.
	Yeah, there was a kid in the car service this morning.
	We got Bill Grant standing by.
	Bill joined the contract.
	Was that you, Mitchell?
	No, that was...
	Yeah, I'm here.
	Yeah, that was...
	I'm here.
	Oh, and Bill from Australia.
	Bill from Australia.
	Can I talk?
	Go ahead.
	Yeah, how are you going?
	Yeah.
	Yeah, the one's getting the car service this morning.
	I dropped that off and take it in.
	And I put the keys on the desk and the lady started spraying it with bloody spray on it.
	I'm more worried about the spray breathing in the fumes than the disease.
	God!
	This is ridiculous.
	God!
	Is Bill Grant here?
	Bill?
	It reminded me of what Tom said about the antiseptic.
	I did breathe in some and maybe it would kill a germ.
	Maybe, you know, like...
	When you spray that stuff, if you breathe in a bit, who knows?
	But I'm not telling people to do it because the next thing I'll be on the news saying, of course, all these deaths.
	Yeah, don't do that, right.
	Thanks, Bill.
	Bill Grant, yeah.
	Like you say, the proper name for this disease is SARS-2.
	The proper name is SARS-2.
	And by calling the coronavirus, they're grouping it in with all the other viruses.
	And that's just a part of the scam.
	Yes, yes, yes.
	That they can call the coronavirus.
	And half the time, they're only testing for...
	Who knows what they're testing for?
	Who knows if the test even works?
	You know, half the time it doesn't work and this and that.
	It's just a big scam.
	I've got a story I want to add here in a moment.
	Bill Grant.
	Yeah, hey, guys.
	Okay, I'll be quick.
	I'll throw a few things out there fast.
	First of all, like I've said, I call the COVID-19 is the name of a vaccination program.
	That's the Certificate of Vaccination ID program that Ru talked about first on here.
	Second, coronavirus is the virus.
	That's how they started the whole program.
	Call it SARS-2 if you want.
	What we have here, as David Knight points out, is not pandemic level and it's not epidemic level, And I say it's not even flu level.
	I say it's exactly between cold virus level and flu level.
	Right in between there.
	And I think it's designed to look scary and to show you something.
	How many here have an electron microscope?
	They are not testing to look for any viruses anyway.
	Nobody is.
	Nobody has an electron microscope and those who can get it are chosen the allowed ones to have.
	So, the delivery method is this.
	We don't generally have the real SARS-2 virus yet.
	They had intended on giving it to you after you were convinced you needed the vaccines.
	They were going to give it to you later by vaccine by scaring you into getting the vaccine.
	So you do all need masks.
	You do all need the ultimate protection.
	They will release real problems in the future.
	But Bill, these viruses are too small.
	These masks don't protect.
	I know, I know, but I'm saying we do need to prepare for any future possibilities.
	Yeah, but listen, here's a good one.
	This is from Jim Stone.
	Bust it!
	President Magufuli of Tanzania tests fruit, goats, motor oil, and more with COVID tests and results were positive.
	The president of Tanzania was suspicious of the coronavirus testing kits, so he sampled various random items from fruit to goats to motor oil and sent them in for COVID testing under various people's names.
	All but the motor oil came back positive.
	I mean, give us a break!
	I've got a caller here from 925 Area Code.
	I want to bring in, since time is short, caller 925, give us your name and state and join the conversation.
	This is Mike, California.
	Okay, Mike, go ahead.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	Hey, your email friend.
	No, but I was going to comment on the new video with Judy Mikovits, which is actually one of the better ones I've seen in a while, because that kind of covers the whole Fauci corruption.
	Yeah, Judy's terrific.
	Of course, we had her here on the show about a week or so ago.
	She's excellent.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	But this has done very, very well because she gets right to the point of each of the, you know, the starting, starting back with AIDS, getting into the, Yeah.
	Yes.
	Yes.
	Which he said in 2017.
	So how can it be a surprise if he knew in advance it was going to happen?
	I know.
	And why didn't he prepare us since that's his job?
	going to be a surprise pandemic in this administration it's pretty which he said in 2017 so how can it be a surprise if he knew in advance it was going to happen i know and why didn't he prepare us since that's his job i mean this is this guy is a complete disgrace he i think we all share thoughts about what this guy deserves i think Yeah, I think that's why Judy getting out there, she has a lot of dirt on him.
	Yeah?
	About how she was treated, and I think that she is a key person now to get out there and hopefully get the message out about this guy.
	That's my opinion.
	Right, so, okay, just real quick on that.
	I mean, look, everybody here agrees, like, for example, Judy should be on CNN.
	You know, Jim Fetzer should be on FOX or MSNBC.
	They have a complete and total lockdown monopoly of all the information channels.
	That's why most people are never going to hear of Judy.
	They're not going to go out of their way to look.
	They're not going to read her book.
	They don't know that her book exists.
	This is what we're dealing with.
	But what they do know, according to Gavin Newsom now, if you saw his little spiel about, well, we're going to go ahead and do this.
	You can go to a restaurant, but you might want to get your temperature taken with this device.
	We'll touch it to your forehead.
	The restaurant will only be 50% capacity.
	Blah, blah, blah.
	I didn't know before.
	I never liked the guy, but I didn't know how much of a devil he is.
	I remember on this one video looking at some of these comments, and one of the best comments somebody wrote is, the restaurant industry equals sign death.
	And I think in reality, you know, it's just going to take a number of people are going to have to defy.
	I mean, I'm picturing myself.
	I don't know if I'm going to do it.
	I don't go out to restaurants that much, but I swear to God, I'm picturing myself already going to a restaurant when they hold this thing up to the forehead.
	I'm going to say, can I see that for a second?
	I'm going to take it in my hand.
	I'm going to throw it in the fucking... I just lost my appetite.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	Paul, we had a question from the Revolutionary Radio chat room about the phone call, reportedly, between the Democratic governors and George Soros, where they were all agreeing to keep the states they control shut down.
	In other words, the Democratic governors are going to betray the people who elected them to office By keeping their state shut down, even after it's obvious that that's totally unnecessary.
	And I think they're going to find many revolts on their hands.
	I wouldn't be surprised if some of them got strung up from a nearby lamp pole for this kind of dereliction of duty and ultimate betrayal of the best interests of the citizens who put them in office.
	It's a disgrace.
	Well, California, I mean, they just, I mean, the protest, that's true.
	The protest they saw last weekend will be nothing comparative down the road.
	That's my opinion, if this governor decides to do that.
	Good, Michael.
	Bill, yeah, quick comment.
	Bill, then I'll go back to... Yeah, there's stuff about not being able to go out.
	That means you can't protest.
	And if you talk to people, you've got to do it on the phone, and they're listening.
	Yeah, it's absurd.
	It's all part of the say-off that they're trying to stop us complaining.
	Now, these people were elected by us.
	How they get around it is they back both sides, control both sides, like an Australia Labor and Liberal, and your place, Democrat.
	Thank you, Bill.
	Thank you.
	control both sides so nobody can vote them out because whoever you vote in, even though Trump's better than Hillary, he's controlled.
	He met with Kissinger and Kissinger said once, I saw him on a video, he said the big things they do what we want, the little things we let them do themselves.
	So this is a big thing and they're all doing it.
	Thank you, Bill.
	Thank you.
	Paul, would you like to add?
	Paul, a final thought, Paul, as we get near to the end.
	Paul.
	No, I mean, that was one of the better things that Bill from Australia said.
	Yes, you know, we're all just spectators at this point.
	That's the thing that's frustrating.
	We all know, we're all listening to each other.
	I mean, you know, what my life has become now, as I'm waiting for unemployment to kick in, is waiting for one raw deal, real deal show, two in a row.
	Yeah, well, I appreciate that, Paul.
	Bill Grant, would you like to add a few final words?
	Yeah, thank you.
	First of all, I say, I have a saying, hang them in hemp.
	Hang them with a hemp rope.
	If you're going to hang with the rope, make it a hemp one.
	But as far as the drone issue you started the show off with, I say, I've always told people you need to learn to use focused solar.
	You make solar lasers by splitting with a prism, split the rays, divide it up, Use the parts as lasers and refocus them.
	You can use mirrors for that, it's actually better.
	But you can capture drones with drones, fight fire with fight fire, fight AI with AI, fight drones with drones.
	Thank you.
	Thanks very much.
	Brew, did you want to add a few words before I go to Giuseppe?
	Yeah, these are executive orders and policies that these governors are doing, governors and mayors and so on and so forth.
	So, you know, these policy enforcers, aka law enforcement, they're being hung out to dry.
	And if they keep following these unlawful orders, they're going to, you know, like a lot of these uniforms that are finding themselves today being hung out to dry.
	Their policies change from day to day, they don't know what to enforce, as they even see the hard criminals getting let out of jail and then they're supposed to arrest women and children for being in a park.
	So these, you know, they need to take a stand.
	They take their uniform off and they're supposed to be regular Americans that want to go to a park and a ball game and so on and so forth.
	But they're acting like stormtroopers out of like Resident Evil or Star Wars.
	Yes, yes, they are.
	They're wearing masks and they're beating everybody up, but yet they don't have any personality or any wit to them whatsoever.
	But these are supposed to be Americans.
	I know, I know, I know.
	If they enforce these policies, they aren't.
	And they're going to find themselves in a really bad spot.
	Well, I'm going to be in a bad spot for this.
	Yeah, I think so too.
	Giuseppe, would you like to add some final words as we close the show tonight?
	Absolutely agree with what everybody's saying, and would add we're at war, we're awake, and we get it, and we're small in number, and we've somehow, be it Judy, Mike and Mrs. Cliff, or our talks, We gotta wake up enough people to the fact that, do you really want to be enslaved and injected mandatorily and wear a digital mask of a beast?
	I mean, I can't believe that most people would want that life.
	We just have to wake them up.
	Special thanks to Brew Giuseppe, Bill from Australia, Bill Grant, Mike from California, and other callers.
	It's been great having you here.
	Thanks to you all.
	Thanks for listening.
	We'll be back.

▲