All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 1, 2018 - Jim Fetzer
01:54:33
Dr Jim Fetzer - The Raw Deal (10-25-18) Mona Alexis Pressley, Dan Cromer
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
*Pewds* *Pewds* *Pewds*
Drops on you.
Thank you.
Get your friends and neighbours too.
There'll be nobody left behind to grieve.
And we will all go together when we go.
What a comforting fact that is to know.
Universal bereavement and inspiring achievement.
Yes, we all will go together when we go.
We will all go together when we go.
All suffused with an incandescent glow.
No one will have the endurance to collect on his insurance.
Floyds of London will be loaded when they go.
This is Jim Fenzer, your host on The Raw Deal.
Today may be a raucous show.
There's so much to cover.
I have two guests.
I'm very pleased to join me today.
Mona Alexis Presley and Dan Gromer, well known to this audience.
They've done absolutely brilliant work in the past on Parkland School shooting on Las Vegas and all that.
I mean, exposing that it was a movie, where Dan was the first to notice that the soundtrack had been pre-recorded, high quality, then played over the PA system with coordinated special visual effects and a crowd seated with crisis actors.
Recruited by crowds on demand 15 days in advance.
Mona tracked the obituaries even published in USA Today and found they were based on people who died in different states or on different dates or from different causes of death.
Stunning stuff!
And they're here today where we're going to talk about a whole host of issues ranging from the Khashoggi murder Which had certain comical aspects to it, to the migrant caravan approaching the United States.
But we have to begin with a bomb spree scare.
I'm looking at a headline, pipe bomb sent to Hillary Clinton, Obama and CNN studios day after George Soros House targeted.
Mona, Dan, who wants to take the first shot at that one?
Oh, can I please?
Can I please?
If you don't mind, Donna.
Go ahead, Dan.
First of all, good afternoon, Dr. James Sessor, the most dangerous mind in America.
And good afternoon, Mona Alexis Presley, the conspiracy realist.
So it's my pleasure to be back here with you all about a year, about a year after, you know, of course, the Las Vegas event.
But the bomb, the bombs yesterday.
My thought is, I just wish they were real.
I mean, just one bomb.
I just wish one of those bombs would have been real.
Maybe taken out Wasserman Schultz.
Maybe Soros.
Why did they have to be completely fake?
And so fake that seemingly everybody knows that they're fake.
Is there anybody with any credibility out there Well, your point is well taken, Dan, because the Twitterverse has, you know, just been teeming here about the absurdity of it.
Even the Investors Watch blog did a survey.
They just published today they got about 12,000 participants.
What are your thoughts on who committed today's attempted bombings?
They gave you four categories of choice.
Crazy right-winger, Russians, desperate Democrats, ISIS.
Russians got 1%.
Crazy right-winger, 3.
ISIS, 3.
Desperate Democrats, 93%.
No one doubts that this is a false flag.
This is a total hoax.
Mona, why don't you pick up from there with your thoughts about it.
I'll pick the majority and say it's the Democrats.
But maybe it's the Democrats and the Republicans doing it together.
Who knows?
Well, you know how I feel about it.
Yeah, you're not wild about the Donald, I know, Mona, but I'm telling you, this is desperate, Democrats, because everything else they've tried is falling apart.
There's not only not going to be a blue wave, there's not even going to be a trickle.
In fact, what we see looming is a red tide.
Dan.
Yeah, and, you know, I see the...
Every time we, you know, when we experience these events, I try, you know, I think about them, I try to approach them, you know, from all the angles and look at them specifically from the perpetrator's perspective, right?
So, I mean, this was unsuccessful if the, you know, goal was to make this believable.
But it's so bad that it makes me wonder, you know, now I'm, You know, kind of playing PSYOP and PSYOP, but is this just something, is it supposed to be bad?
Is it just setting there to set something else up that will be more real, you know, or real, you know, a false flag with real deaths.
And they can point to this and then say, look, all of those hoaxers, all of those, you know, Trump, MAGA, uh, violent, you know, conspiracy theorists.
Why don't you give us an inventory of the reasons why you think this thing is a flimsy false flag?
Well, number one, there's no postage.
Are we talking about items that were sent through the United States Postal Service?
And seemingly like there's all of these anomalies with the packages.
Take your time, man.
Take your time.
We want a thorough inventory.
Yeah, well... You got packages with stamps, but they're not postmarked.
Exactly.
And then they're returned on top of that.
And I think if, you know, any one of us were in that situation with legitimate mail, it'd probably sit around, you know.
at a post office somewhere for a while.
I mean, and that's the other, one of the other suspicious things is the fast rate at which this supposed mail circulated.
Also, it was coordinated where the mail all arrived at different locations at different times in different cities at the same day, time, with All of these anomalies where, where typically USPS just throws it aside or, you know, or return to center if they can.
So, the coordination is, you know, suspect.
We always see these in these events, right?
And there was the media, all with the same narratives.
They're pushing these violent MAGA folks, you know, push conspiracy theories and they go out.
and the United people in the streets.
So there's that angle to it.
It immediately was negative towards Trump.
So that's another huge, huge sign that this thing was coordinated. - Did you think-- - You had usual suspects coming out and speaking.
I heard a lot of talking points.
I'll tell you, this stuff sounds like it was written weeks ago.
I mean, that's my opinion, but it was just so scripted.
Jeff, wasn't it striking, Dan, wasn't it striking how Jeff Zucker, the head of CNN, immediately comes out and denounces Trump and pins the tail on him when there's been no investigation yet to determine the source?
I mean, that to me was extremely telling that this whole thing was totally scripted.
Exactly.
Exactly.
Yeah.
And you know as well as anyone How these coordinated scripts, um, you know, are all circulated out to the, you know, CIA controlled media and moment one, right?
You know, it's, uh, it's, uh, Bin Laden, you know, moment one, you know what I mean?
So, so we definitely, we have that, that element.
And, you know, this is, um, uh, an interesting aspect to me, like I'm looking at the psychology behind this.
Again, from the perpetrator's perspective, it's almost like, to me it seems like they don't even care.
I mean, do they really care if it looks real?
You know, if it's believable?
I mean, it's just done so brazenly, you know.
And of course, the devices themselves appear to be non-functional.
In other words, they're props.
They look literally to be props.
They don't have an explosive capacity.
They have a watch that's on them that is theatrical.
You know, you have experts saying, well, you know, These aren't real bombing devices, they aren't real explosive devices, but they're what somebody might think a real explosive device ought to look like.
Well, you know, I think they look at how the Americans have gotten fooled by all the false flags we've had so far.
The drills and the hoaxes, I mean.
Everybody bought into it, hook, line, and sinker.
So they're going, well, we don't need to put much into this.
Let's just throw it together.
They're going to believe it anyway.
Well, it's as though it were that way, Mona.
I agree completely.
Yeah.
Maybe that is, yeah, I think that is the explanation.
You know, that was the question I was just raising.
Like, you know, what are they thinking?
I mean, I guess they think we can do whatever we want and they'll believe it.
Right?
In general, that's what it seems like.
Yeah, and certainly that.
And even the people who might suspect, most of them aren't going to do something about it, whether it's, you know, write about it or talk to people about it or, you know, anything you can do.
I'm looking at this package again here, and here's another element to this to see if you guys have noticed this.
And this is the kind of thing too, this is part of those nuances that are interesting to me that I look for.
And this has that element of mockery.
This is mockery to us, the sheep, the dead slaves, the goyim, the misspellings of people's names, Brennan's misspelled.
It's like they tried to make it look like It was sent by somebody, right, who is challenged with their writing skills.
Yeah, so is this supposed to be one of those dumb MAGA flyover state people?
Like, this is, I mean, this is what it looks like.
It looks like a mockery or a parody of, you know, what, you know, someone in South, Redneck in South Georgia would just throw in the mail.
But they overdid it, like they always do with their props.
They went overboard.
And, you know, an honest little typo, something like that, you know, would be much better.
And then what, the return address is all Debbie Wasserman Schultz?
Right?
So to me, again, there's more mockery.
We're talking about one of the most corrupt politicians going, Poston Child, for the swamp and a key personality in Parkland.
Just to confirm that, by the way, we have just published our book on Parkland, where Debbie Wasserman Schultz was worried that the Democrats could lose as many as 11 seats in Florida
And conspired with the woman who's a producer of Dancing with the Stars, this Dina Katz, who's also done many of these women's marches over the Parkland shooting so they could use it to justify this huge, really DNC voter registration campaign in Washington, D.C.
on the 24th of March that got billions of dollars free publicity for the Democrats.
Well, they had to permit, because it's an event that involved closing the streets at least 180 days in advance, and yet they're claiming it was justified just about six weeks earlier by the Valentine's Day event at Parkland, which was totally scripted and staged.
I mean, it's embarrassingly bad, and Wasserman Schultz was up to her eyeballs in that, there's no doubt about it.
Yeah, for sure.
And so she sent all of these iPhones.
And this was another nuance that I found interesting.
And I've mentioned on this program before how CNN in the past has used words to sell their fakery.
For example, they used the word organic to try to sell a fake, you know, an organic crowd of people gathered for a Hansi Trump rally.
Organic was that word.
So this time I noticed with this event, and this was in response to all of the folks questioning it, they called this a serious bomb.
So this is a serious bomb.
So this is an organic event with a serious bomb.
Who said that, Ben? - This really does have several times of a CNN host event.
Yeah, it does.
Talking about this event, this was supposed to be a serious bomb and an organic...
This sounds like they made up the script themselves.
Maybe this came from the fertile imagination of Jeff Zucker.
This really does have several times of a CNN hoax event.
It does.
And so, and I'll send you this article...
I mean, to me, I was laughing out loud.
They had to, you know, they had to preface that this bomb, this event, was a serious bomb.
As opposed to, what, a not-so-serious bomb?
A happy bomb?
I like that, I like that, I like that.
Mike Adams in response to this published deep state rolls out stage bomb attack on CNN headquarters exactly as Mike Adams and Alex Jones publicly predicted.
It turns out they had actually predicted that this was going to happen and there it happens just as they predicted.
I mean it's embarrassingly bad.
Yeah, yeah.
And at this point, Jim, for me, that's, you know, that's kind of the title that wants to be in the title, you know, the serious bomb, you know, because Parkland, of course, gave us that wonderful line, and I saw that you prominently have it displayed right on the back of the new book, of your new Parkland book, right?
And that's the You know, it was so real, it was so fake.
You know, say the line.
I'm not looking at it.
Yeah, well, it was like a movie.
It looks so real, but it felt so fake.
Right.
OK, so that was that was the gift that we were given from Parkland in this, you know, in the life's rich pageant here.
We got that that line that we have forever.
It's brilliant.
I love it.
I love it.
Now, for me right now, at this point, I'm leaning towards the serious bombs.
These are serious bombs.
The serious bombs didn't have postage.
They weren't acceptable by any physical standard in USPS services.
Damn, since they weren't?
CNN is Johnny on the spot.
Damn, since they weren't?
Postmarked.
I mean, these don't appear to have been processed by the post office, with one exception, which they seem to have just dumped, to give that impression.
How did they get delivered?
I mean, it looks like there may have been couriers who delivered these, and they're going to be on closed-circuit TV.
I mean, you know, the targets here were, for the most part, high-profile, high-security targets, and they're going to... I think this case is going to be cracked today, maybe even before we get off the air.
And Jim, the detail is actually even more absurd.
The story goes that they were not delivered, but they were returned.
So then these were returned to Florida, presumably, so Washington's Schultz territory, and then that's then where they were investigated.
Oh, well then you know, what are the chances, right, that the post office would do anything with them, right?
Because they have no postage.
They're not stamped, they're not paid for, right?
Well, they had stamps on them.
They had six forever stamps, you know, these forever flag stamps.
My point is they weren't They weren't postmarked, so they couldn't have been processed.
So how did they get anywhere?
I mean, my impression was that they were attempted.
I don't have your take about the delivery.
I got the impression they were picked up, intercepted by Secret Service, for example, in the case of the Clintons and the Obamas.
Someone in security got the Soros.
I thought they were at various of these alleged targets, you know, they were picked up, but they did all have this absurd same return address of Debbie Wasserman Schultz.
Yeah, and we're on the same page there.
What's fishy to me is the coordinated return, like, you know, that all of these appear, right, together.
Let's get Mona in here.
Go ahead, Mona.
Okay, sure.
Go for it.
Well, first of all, the first thing I wonder is, well, I need to look around on the internet and see what else is up, because they're distracting us from something.
So I'm always looking for what else is going on.
And as far as the postage goes, I know when I've had postage returned to me, They write all over it.
Not enough postage.
Try again or something.
I mean, they don't just leave it blank and let you, you know, just add more postage on it and send it again.
That's ridiculous.
It's so phony.
It's unbelievable.
Well, if Dan were right and these were all in Debbie Wasserman Schultz's mailbox, as it were, then it could have all been done locally at Debbie Wasserman Schultz's operation, you know, and then they just claim they've all returned to her.
But as you're pointing out, they don't have any signs of having been processed by the post office at all.
Right.
Yeah, that's the thing.
Right.
Yeah.
And that's where I wasn't clear earlier.
That's what I meant by no postage.
They were not, you know, we have no proof that these were processed by the post office.
So then we get reports that they were, you know, intercepted at different, let's say they were intercepted at different locations, then And they're sent all over the country, right?
It's all these different addresses, so why would they all – the timing, it just doesn't make sense from a timing standpoint.
And two, there's no signs of processing, so why would anyone at the post office… You know, make these great efforts to even return mail, if that's the case.
Let me differentiate the ambiguity when you talk about the timing.
The timing, of course, makes great sense in relation to the midterm election.
Here we have, for example, Mike Adams writing, a coordinated false flag bombing to be blamed on Trump supporters in order to alter the outcome of the midterm elections.
This is precisely what I publicly predicted would take place right before the midterm elections, a coordinated false flag bombing of the left-wing media and left-wing political leaders.
It's blatantly obvious that the globalist Democrats are sending these packages to themselves, knowing the media will blame Trump supporters, Alex Jones, conservatives, and gun owners if it weren't such a farce.
The point you're making, Dan, is they're all being delivered at the same time, which never happens.
I mean the post office can't be simultaneously delivering to all these diverse addresses at the same time.
That's not the U.S.
Postal Service.
And all of the packages have problems with them where the post office could reject them, right?
I don't think they even had enough postage to begin with.
Yeah, and now I'm looking at a map here We have packages sent to Washington, D.C., New York State, New York City, New York State, Washington, D.C., Los Angeles.
South Florida to the point is across the entire country.
We're coming up on a break.
We're coming up on a break.
This is Jim Fetzer, your host on The Raw Deal with my special guest.
This is Jim Fetzer, your host on The Raw Deal with my your host on The Raw Deal with my special guest.
We'll be right back after this message.
www.freedomslips.com
That the Boston Globe was tweeting that a demonstration bomb would be set off during the marathon for the benefit of bomb squad activities.
And that one would be set off in one minute in front of the library, which happened as the Globe had announced.
Peering through the smoke, you could see bodies with missing arms and legs.
But there was no blood.
The blood only showed up later and came out of a tube.
They used amputee actors and a studio-quality smoke machine.
Don't let yourself be played.
Check out And Nobody Died in Boston either.
Available at moonrockbooks.com.
That's moonrockbooks.com.
What the heck is the truth, Jihad?
Hey, I'm Kevin Barrett, host of Truth Jihad Radio.
Federal prosecutors, Department of Homeland Security agents, and curious passers-by often ask me, just what is this Truth Jihad thing, anyway?
Well, everybody knows what truth is, but Jihad is a misunderstood term.
Jihad means effort or struggle.
The greater jihad is the struggle to be a better person, while the lesser jihad is the struggle to defend the community.
Prophet Muhammad, peace upon him, did say that the best jihad is a word of truth flung in the face of a tyrant.
And that's what we do here at Truth Jihad Radio!
Every Friday 8 to 10 p.m.
Eastern, 5 to 7 Pacific, right here on Revolution Radio!
Find some comfort at Willow's World, a variety of news, commentary and poetry, at Willow's Poetry Corner, where there are comfy cushions and a tempting selection of delectable comestibles.
A show that's quirkily and quintessentially British, with a unique twist, featuring Willow Andresen, your host.
Join Willow, Mondays and Thursdays, 2-4pm, Eastern Time, Studio A.
The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners, or chatters, are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff, or affiliates.
You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, 100% listener-supported radio, and now we return you to your host.
This is Jim Fetzer, your host on The Raw Deal, with my two special guests today, Dan Cromer and Mona Alexis Presley.
Just for more grist for your mill in discussing the bombing, we got a former FBI assistant director observing bomb plot culprit could be someone who is trying to get the Democratic vote out and incur sympathy.
That certainly looks highly plausible.
He's saying his name is Schwecker.
Chris Schwecker on Wednesday said investigators are going to consider all possibilities when it comes to determining the motive of the culprit.
Who sent suspected explosive devices to the Clintons, Obama and others.
We're already seeing a little bit of a pattern, he told Fox News Wednesday.
They're going to be looking at this as a potential terrorist motive, whether it's on one side or the other.
But I think more significantly, the idea about trying to get out the Democratic vote and incur sympathy is right on target.
Then we have, in addition, a retired FBI profiler saying this may be a false flag to harm the GOP.
A retired FBI profiler who worked on the Unabomber case said Wednesday night the package bomb sent to high profile Democrats could be the result of a false flag operation designed to hurt the Republican Party.
James Fitzgerald, Was on the story on Fox and said there are three groups of potential perpetrators at least in his mind.
These devices were either made and sent by a right-wing guy who doesn't like the Dems and we can't rule out international aspects of this.
Russians messed with our 2000 election, he's saying, just using Facebook, which we know is absurd, but could have done this.
But, of course, the other one is the false flag, he told Martha McCullough, who, by the way, has been writing a very good show as the successor to Megan Kelly, who's just been given the boot from her new position at NBC.
There could be someone in there, some Democrat low-level person.
I'm not suggesting anyone at the top, but they just decided, you know, I'm going to put this out because two weeks before a major election, who's going to look like a bad guy here?
The Republicans.
Dan, you want to take a crack at those?
Yeah, Jim, and I pulled up the quote for you.
This was from NYC Mayor Bill de Blasio yesterday.
This is, quote, this is not a hoax.
This is the real thing.
The bomb that was removed was a serious bomb.
Where does he come up with this?
You know, de Blasio, these ideologues just will peddle any kind of bullshit.
I mean, it's just embarrassingly bad damn.
Right, and that's an example too of him, you know, he had the script it appears, you know, he was ready to go, and he was, you know, one of the first prominent figures, the mayor of New York City.
This is not a hoax.
This is a serious bomb.
But it turns out they're not serious bombs.
They don't even appear to be capable of exploding.
They appear to be devices made up to look like bombs, but aren't real bombs.
So it seems to me he is bombing.
The mayor is bombing in the way he's describing these devices.
Mona, you want to pick up here with some loose ends?
I think it's a distraction and also a way to continue to divide Americans.
Mona, everything is backfiring on the Democrats.
Everything.
They tried to smear Kavanaugh with these fabricated sexual assault allegations.
It was exposed.
The FBI supplemental showed there was no corroboration.
Susan Collins gave a masterful speech, one of the best I've ever heard in my entire life, laying the case out.
And he was confirmed in spite of their best efforts.
They came out looking terribly.
Dianne Feinstein's going to be investigated.
There were charges against this Swetnick person who had the absurd gang rape allegation and her attorney.
That one backfired.
Then you got the migrant caravan making its way up from Mexico.
We've got all kinds of exposés about it.
They seem to be being moved in big trucks.
George Soros seems to be paying for it.
They look rested.
They look friendly, healthy and all that because they're not actually walking.
And moreover, when you look at the images of this massive number headed toward the boundaries of the United States, it's like it's a political campaign commercial for the wall.
I mean, this is backfiring too.
I think the Democrats have to be totally desperate, Dan.
And they're not even Mexicans in those groups of people marching.
You know, this is another Soros staged event.
I've seen photographs and video of this so-called, you know, migrant caravan stopping and engaging in Muslim prayer.
Ah, very good, very good, very good.
Yeah, so they're not from there, you know.
They're being brought in, and like I said, There's footage of all of these Muslims praying in the pyramids.
But I repeat, Dan, you don't even have to get into such subtleties.
Just look at this massive humanity moving toward the border to recognize we need that wall.
Right, right.
Go ahead, Mona, I know you've got reservations.
I'm delighted to have this, you know, multiple diverse points of view.
Go ahead, Mona.
I think it's a waste of money.
I think that all we need to do is quit allowing people to Get welfare from our system.
We can't do it in any country.
So why would we do it?
You know, why would we give it to people who come here?
If they thought that they would come here and they would get nothing, they wouldn't come here.
There would be no problem.
The government knows this.
They just want to keep us scared.
They want us to be afraid of Muslims and people invading us.
The only people that are invading us is our government.
They're the invaders, in my opinion.
I love it, Mona!
I love it!
Dan, you want to offer a rebuttal?
I always enjoy being on the program with an anarchist.
Like Mona.
Do you regard yourself as an anarchist?
Would that be an accurate description, Mona?
Oh, definitely.
I'm a voluntarist, yes.
And I have been really listening to a lot of Larkin Rose and He has a way of, you know, getting to people.
He's totally, he's so common sense.
Who are we talking about?
Who are you citing?
Larkin Rose.
Larkin Rose.
I don't know.
Go ahead.
Tell me more.
Yeah, she's an anarchist in the true sense of the term, you know, not the co-opted, you know, anarchy in the UK.
Let me float this by the two of you.
I found here someone has resurrected an interview that Judge Napolitano gave back on April 21st, 2013.
He was going through how the FBI has investigated, supplied, and controlled 17 of 20 terrorist plots over the last decade or so.
In other words, they were managed by the FBI.
Right.
Right.
You know, we are entrusting the FBI to investigate these.
Could they have had anything to do?
I think they're too amateurish to have been the FBI, but maybe I'm wrong.
Right.
I think it was.
These bombs could be an FBI off itself.
That's what I'm asking.
Yeah, I think so.
I think it could be.
I think the misspelling and stuff is just to make us think that some crazy person, you know, bailed those things.
Or someone who's relatively ignorant.
That's why I thought it was a sign that John Brennan was involved in this because there's no one who's a bigger Trump hater than John Brennan on multiple levels.
So he'll deliberately have his name misspelled.
So, of course, no one would ever think it could be he.
Right.
Yeah.
And that's what I was saying earlier, too.
I mean, it's mockery of the Trump supporters.
Right.
They would be the one to Are, you know, ignorant and misspell.
They're trying to perfect, you know, portray, you know, them as violent as well.
And again, with this whole hoax, it's something I mentioned over and over again.
We have the inversion principle, you know, where this isn't serious.
It's not a serious bomb.
I mean, it's a joke.
It's the complete opposite.
You know what I think, Dan?
You know what I think, Dan?
There's no bombs.
There are no planes going into buildings on 9-11.
No bombs going through the mail yesterday.
Well, you know what?
There are a couple aspects to this that are pretty fascinating.
That you have an FBI profiler introducing explicitly by name false flags.
You know, that's not something that we've found discussed other than, say, on Alex Jones in the past.
I mean, it's like, this is giving legitimacy to the public discourse about false flag attacks and makes it, I think, current.
Gives it a lot of currency.
In addition, I don't see anyone who thinks that the Democrats have much of a prayer and think there's any reason that anyone other than the Democrats would have pulled this off.
In other words, I think this is really reflecting The desperation of the Democrats here, just as that poll result I gave you, where you had 93% of those polled thought this was done by desperate Democrats.
And number three, if something were to seriously happen now between now and then, how's anyone going to take it seriously?
Because it would be all too obvious it could be just one more false flag.
Yeah, and that's what I was alluding to earlier.
Which could be concerning if this is just a setup, you know, if this was just bad, planned to be bad, planned to be taken this way, to then perpetrate something, you know, real or, you know, something bigger.
And then, you know, point to something like this with, you know, point to the hoaxers, continue the censorship.
You know, it could be part of the whole censorship psy-op.
Well, personally, the censorship has gotten worse and worse and worse.
There's no doubt about it.
But it doesn't seem to me it's having the intended effect.
I mean, people who are affected by the censorship, that doesn't make them want to vote for Democrats.
I mean, it's so obvious that the mainstream media and the social media giants are all working to censor conservative thought and conspiracy research.
That's what they're out to stamp out.
And it's because it exposes a chicanery of the Democrats of the past.
I mean, I don't think anyone paying attention is going to draw any other conclusion.
Yeah, yeah, I agree, Jim.
And the point I'd add with that is, oh God, I just lost my train of thought.
It'll come to me, it'll come to me.
Mona, do you want to speak up?
I think, I just think it's all, like you always say, it's a movie.
I think the whole government is a movie.
I think they're rolling in the 5G network to totally control us and enslave us and that's I think that may be the distraction.
And that's why they're playing all these games.
I don't think they care who wins.
They probably don't even count the votes, to be honest with you.
They just say, OK, it's your turn.
You know, you're up.
I don't believe them anymore.
And, you know, I look at like these pictures, you know, how they have the president He has a certain expression for what's going on in the world, and it's the right kind of expression.
You're probably sitting there and going, okay, this is what we're going to tell the public.
And this is the expression you have to have.
And they take a picture of it.
I don't believe anything anymore when it comes to them.
They're just there.
They're sociopaths, they're evil, they're trying to destroy the United States.
Dan, since you're an IT guy, what kind of threat does 5G actually pose?
Are you in a position to address that question?
I can just say in short, it seems that it has the potential to be devastating.
Can you explain how and in what manner?
Well, this is, you know, essentially it's our current, you know, the current Wi-Fi that we have and we use, but many, many more times stronger.
And this has never been tested, you know, long term on humans.
And we as humans, we act as conductors for You know, for the 5G transmission.
And you're talking about the technical sense of electronics or electricity conductors as media through which electricity passes.
Yeah, so this is passing through us.
I mean, it's drawn to us.
We're absorbing this energy.
And, of course, the long-term effects are unknown.
You know, the priority is just, hey, download, you know, movies faster.
Faster, faster, faster.
So, yeah, I'm very concerned about it.
You know, I agree with Mona.
It's not just the health aspect either.
It's the getting us so involved with computers that we totally miss out on life.
You know, everybody's face is stuck in the computer 24-7 and nobody's paying attention to what's going on around us.
You mean there isn't?
There's life without computers, Mona?
I don't know.
I'm one of those guilty ones that have my nose in it all the time.
We just don't, you know, I don't think we're interacting with each other anymore.
When people are outside, they're looking at their phone.
They don't talk to each other anymore.
It's just, I think it's bad for our health and psychologically.
Yeah, these frequencies you know, these frequencies can have profound effects on our mood as well.
Right, yeah.
You know, I'll mention American intelligence media.
They, you know, go very deep into 5G and you know, the potential threats of We're of course going to take callers this second hour, and the number for anyone who doesn't have it at hand is 540-352-4452.
So the 5-2 repeats.
540-352-4452.
Repeat one last time.
- Take callers the second hour and the number for anyone who doesn't have it at hand is 540-352-4452.
So the 5-2 repeats. 540-352-4452.
Repeat one last time.
540-352-4452.
Now, before we conclude the first hour, I gotta ask you guys about your take on the Khashoggi murder, because this was practically a Three Stooges performance!
I mean, I was just dumbfounding how badly this was done!
Even the President has come around to say this was the most clumsy cover-up in all of history!
A really bad cover-up!
Right.
Dan, you want to take a stab at it?
Well, sure.
You know, obviously this fella was connected, wasn't just simply a journalist.
I think, you know, journalism was, you know, a front to some degree.
I think he was a bag man in, you know, in these black ops.
It wasn't his first time.
And, um, I suspect that, you know, very well, I think the plan wasn't to kill him.
You know, I would, I would suspect they wanted to get information out of him.
And, um, during that interrogation process, um, he could have, you know, had a heart attack, he could have died.
And so then they had to clumsily, you know, uh, cover up the death.
Um, and two, Khashoggi would have known exactly What he was getting into, who was going to be there.
I mean, he would have known all these details because this wasn't, you know, he would have done this many, many times.
So, you know, that's where I'm leaning with this.
But the cover-up, yeah, has been very bad, which, you know, supports the idea, I think, that it wasn't a planned murder.
Well, no, I think that's wrong.
I think they just had a very shabby plan.
I mean, here's the deal.
They sent down a 15-man hit team.
It included a guy who's a forensic specialist who just happens to have a bone saw.
Once he comes into the consulate, they seize him.
They apparently cut off his fingers one at a time while he's alive.
This is very much in the Well, Hobbit's tradition of, you know, taking off the hand of a thief.
They cut off the fingers because those were the instruments he used to write the columns that were critical of the kingdom.
Then they behead him.
They send out a guy wearing his clothing, a fake beard and glasses, so they can claim That he actually had left the consulate.
Meanwhile, they have a burning session in the back.
They're burning a bunch of documents at the consulate.
And they have a cleanup crew that shows up in the front of the consulate with mops and bleach and trash bags right in front of Reuters and AP journalists.
I mean, this was unbelievable.
Then they claim, you know, they know nothing about it.
They give multiple versions of the story.
First, they know nothing about it.
He came, he got his documents, he left because they had the guy wearing his clothing leave.
They thought that was going to fly.
Then they have to admit, no, well, actually, there was a fistfight that broke out in the consulate.
He was inadvertently killed, which is about as absurd as it gets.
How often do you have a fistfight in a diplomatic mission like this?
Plus, there were like 15 of them.
Did he think he was going to overcome 15?
Plus, how often do people die from fistfights?
I mean, even you have professional prize fighters slugging it out.
And typically they don't kill each other.
It's an extraordinary event when it happens.
So all that was totally implausible.
Now it's turning out he even had a conversation with the Crown Prince before they killed him.
Which suggests to me that the Prince was just telling him, you know, this is your last moment.
So it would instill fear into him.
We have reports that it took seven minutes for him to die.
The president of Turkey claims they have audio, and I suspect even video.
They claimed it was done through his Apple Watch, which I gather is actually technically impossible.
They didn't want to admit they had the consulate bug, but I mean, Erdogan is taking this to make mincemeat out of the Saudi royal family.
Embarrassingly bad.
And now my producer Mitchell is telling me the Saudis have admitted now that it was a deliberate or premeditated murder, which would have been obvious, I think, to anyone who paid the least attention.
But as Trump is now forced to say, this is embarrassingly bad and he's going to have to do something about it.
He's already said whoever was responsible, there are going to be severe consequences for it.
Dan, do you want to add a word or two?
Yeah.
And I mean, and you raised, you know, you just outlined the narrative very well, you know, and yeah, I followed that whole, you know, all the storylines that you mentioned.
The part about it that was so, to me, that the mystery or the confusion was like, why such a bad cover up?
I think they're unaware of how high-tech, how much the public is paying attention, how sophisticated we've become.
Look at how this bomb thing has just blown apart.
The Twitterverse was just bumbling over.
Agreed, agreed.
No doubt about it.
this absurd false flag with these bombs.
And, you know, once you learn how these things are done, once you begin to study any of the serious cases, whether it's 9-11 or Sandy Hook or the Boston bombing, I mean, you're just not that easy to fool again.
And this case was so blatant.
It was comical.
Agreed.
Agreed.
No doubt about it.
I mean, I don't think, I mean, yesterday, yesterday's hoax, I don't think we've had one that was just called out, you know, so quickly by just, you know, by the number of people, you know, like on Twitter especially.
I'm sorry.
So, you know, I guess with one respect that's encouraging, and of course you're right, you know, once you, that's really the thing, is learning the patterns, you know, and how they conduct these events.
Mona has a lot about that.
Mona, do you want to add a few words before we have to go to break?
Go ahead.
Yeah, I think we should go the next step and do something about it, you know, regroup, you know, in the country and get another plan, you know, get a better system going.
What are you talking about?
The United States and the Constitution?
Or are you talking about relations with Saudi Arabia?
I don't think there's anything wrong with the Constitution.
Nobody follows it.
That's the whole problem.
And that's the problem with putting things down on a piece of paper.
Natural law says that we have a right to defend ourselves.
Nobody is allowed to take our guns away, but yet they have all these laws.
It's just, they've gone totally overboard with taking away our freedoms, the surveillance.
The Second Amendment is, they shredded that.
The Fourth Amendment, I think, is pretty much gone.
Well don't you think, don't you therefore applaud having a judge who appears to be a pretty good constitutionalist in the form of Brett Kavanaugh added to the court?
Oh boy, that's not what I...
I've heard he's horrible with the Constitution.
No, I don't think you're right about that, Mona.
I mean, there's room for dispute.
You've got to differentiate between his role as an advisor to President Bush at the time, with the Patriot Act and all that, when he basically had a client and was acting on behalf of the client, versus his role as a judge for the last 12 years, which appears to have been quite sterling.
Dan, do you have a comment here?
Though we're on the verge, we're going to have the break here.
So we're, you know, there's, when we come back from the break, I'm going to bring in Mitchell.
Yeah, let's take that.
Yeah, let's get about the phone numbers, Jen.
Yeah, right.
I'll repeat it again.
But 540-352-4452.
540-352-4452.
540-352-4452. 540-352-4452.
And I'm sure we're there at the break now.
You're listening to Revolution Radio at freedomslips.com.
We'll We'll be right back after this lesson.
In breaking news, a visiting Syrian diplomat reported today that their population is evolving rapidly and a visiting Syrian diplomat reported today that their population is evolving rapidly and advancing into a Yes.
They are seeking peace with all cosmic cultures, which may mean that the Earth will be asked to join the prestigious Galactic Federation of Light Alliances.
Please join Debbie West and Michael Hathaway on Lost Knowledge.
Saturdays, 3 p.m.
Eastern Standard Time in Studio A. For the latest breaking news on the Star Visitor's peaceful contact and the ongoing project of cleansing the Earth.
Who are you?
I am the architect.
I created the Matrix.
I've been waiting for you.
Why am I here?
You are the eventuality of an anomaly which, despite my sincerest efforts, I have been unable to eliminate from what is otherwise a harmony of mathematical precision, which has laid you inexorably here.
You haven't answered my question.
The Matrix is older than you know, as you are undoubtedly gathering the anomaly is systemic.
Creating fluctuations in even the most simplistic equation.
Choice.
The problem is choice.
Right here at Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com.
Be here Wednesday evening at 8 p.m.
Eastern Time for Private Eye Matrix Revealed with Monique Lassonde.
Even the government admits that 9-11 was a conspiracy.
But did you know that it was an inside job?
That Osama had nothing to do with it?
That the Twin Towers were blown apart by a sophisticated arrangement of mini or micro nukes?
That Building 7 collapsed seven hours later because of explosives planted in the building?
Barry Jennings was there.
He heard them go off and felt himself stepping over dead people.
The U.S.
Geological Survey conducted studies of dust gathered from 35 locations in Lower Manhattan and found elements that would not have been there had this not been a nuclear event.
Ironically, that means the government's own evidence contradicts the government's official position.
9-11 was brought to us compliments of the CIA, the neocons of the Department of Defense, and the Mossad.
Don't let yourself be played.
Read America Nuked on 9-11.
Available at moonrockbooks.com.
That's moonrockbooks.com.
This is Thomas, a.k.a.
A Mad Painter.
I'd like you to join me Monday nights, 10 p.m.
Eastern Standard Time for Open Canvas.
Don't forget to bring an open mind.
Yes, folks, that's right.
Bring an open mind to an open canvas.
Again, that is Monday nights, 10 p.m.
Eastern UFOs to government corruption.
This is Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com.
You don't need to expect us.
We're already here.
Thanks for tuning in to Revolution Radio.
Here at Revolution Radio, we are listener-sponsored and commercial-free, but there still are bills to pay.
In order to raise some needed funds to cover the cost, our station is offering a silver special.
In the continental United States for a $60 donation, or in Alaska, Hawaii, or Canada for a $70 donation, we will send you an uncirculated 2018 1-ounce pure silver Eagle.
The $70 donation, the extra $10 is to cover shipping, by the way, outside of the continental United States.
When making the donation, you must put Silver Eagle Promo in the notes on the donation.
And thank you for tuning in to Revolution Radio at revolution.radio and freedomslips.com.
Without you, there is no us.
Revolution Radio, where information never sleeps.
Revolution Radio, where information never sleeps.
Collision Course is back, back, back.
Schedule B on Revolution Radio every Saturday night, 6 to 8 p.m.
You get outer space, you get honest answers, real researchers, truthful answers, and a place to engage with questions.
Take part in the discussion.
Revolution Radio on freedomslips.com hosts Collision Course every Saturday from 6 to 8 p.m.
Eastern, 5 p.m., 7 p.m.
Central, 4 p.m. to 6 p.m. Mountain Time, and 3 p.m. to 5 p.m. Pacific Time.
The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff, or affiliates.
You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, 100% listener-supported radio, and now we return you to your host.
Just to repeat the thing, Revolution Radio is listener-supported.
If you have a chance to contribute, it's a great thing to do.
And remember, one way is by subscribing to the archives.
It's just five bucks a month and it helps to keep Revolution Radio on the air.
You have access to all the shows, Studio A, Studio B, past, present, future.
Great idea!
Kathleen has emailed me to observe in relation to Dan's observation about Bill de Blasio, that he's a Zionist who was a campaign manager for Hillary, making me wonder whether this demented idea could have come from her mind.
I mean, I think Hillary is so incompetent at this point in time, she might even have thought The idea of having a bomb attack at multiple locations would be a good idea.
Frankly, a really dumb idea.
Mitchell is here to join us, my producer.
Mitchell, we want your thoughts on all of the above.
Hey, good afternoon, Jim.
Hello, Dan.
Hello, Mona.
I hope you all are having a great day.
Listen, to me, the real thing is What are we looking at?
We're looking at after the election.
We're looking at indictments.
We're looking at the destruction of the Democrat Party and the exposing of Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and the Democrat machine that tried to politically assassinate Donald Trump.
I mean, they're in deep doo-doo right now.
They need a big, big, big, big distraction.
And this is going to work temporarily, but it's all going to come back.
What's next?
But Mitchell, it's backfiring on them.
It's absolutely backfiring.
Nobody is taken in.
I mean, I'm telling you.
Yes.
Yeah, I agree, Jim.
It's clearly... I guess they can't fool the village idiot any longer.
I don't really know how else to say it.
The Democrats have run out of ideas.
They're trying to carpetbag America.
They're trying to steal the House of Representatives with illegal immigrants, counted as a person, so they get the House of Representatives.
Right now, I say there's 30.
Of course, there's at least 10 to 12.
Minimum of 17.
I believe more than 30 House of Representative members who are misallocated because of illegal immigration in the United States.
So we are looking at the destruction of the Democrat Party.
So they're fighting for their life.
And this is typical Dirty Tricks stuff.
Yes.
Yes.
Go ahead, Dan.
Yeah.
Yeah, I was going to add, and this was the point I was going to make earlier, Tim, that I lost, and he reminded me of Mitchell.
Because if you look at this event yesterday, and you ask yourself, you know, who was this designed to benefit?
Well, clearly, you know, it was designed... It clearly was designed...
Fresh and warm here.
Can I get an extra large salt and caramel hot chocolate, but half hot chocolate and half dark chocolate?
What restaurant are we at?
Let me hang you up off the show.
What restaurant were we at there?
Mitchell, what's going on there?
- I think that you're saying that for a minute.
- Mitchell, what's going on there?
That sounded like brewing.
- It is.
Chicago Brute called in.
He's on hold, kind of, and he's ordering something.
Yeah, he didn't realize his order was going out over the air at Revolution Radio.
Go ahead, Dan.
I had it muted.
I don't know how that happened.
Sorry, go ahead.
Yeah, Brute, we'll bring you in in just a minute or two.
Here, go ahead, Dan.
Okay, so we must ask, with the pipe bombs, who benefits?
Well, this was You know, this was designed to benefit Obama, this whole crew, these so-called deep state players.
But what's interesting to me is how it failed.
I mean, you know, I mean, clearly that's – it was designed, and I assume they thought, hey, we'll benefit from this.
We'll do this.
But it's so, you know, surprising to me how it's just failed so miserably.
You know, and maybe that speaks to some of this desperation and, you know, some of these other things that you outlined earlier.
That's maybe the logical way, at this point, to explain it.
I'm beginning to wonder how much a Democratic party is dependent upon illegal aliens voting improperly.
I mean, Jerry Brown passed a motor voter law back in 2015 that allowed you to automatically register to vote when you obtained your driver's license.
Sounds like a great idea.
Except in California, legal aliens are allowed to obtain driver's licenses and were thereby automatically registered to vote.
Barack Obama went on a Latino radio station and when the anchor said that a lot of Latinos were worried their papers would be checked if they voted, he said, no.
When you're in that voting booth, you are a citizen, and no one's going to check your papers, ignoring the distinction between performing the function of a citizen by voting and being legally entitled to perform that function.
I mean, here you have the President of the United States violating his oath to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution.
Is the whole Democratic Party trying to sustain itself politically on the backs of illegal immigrants?
I mean, this is stunning.
Brew, you're welcome to join the conversation.
No, go ahead.
I'll listen for another minute.
Go ahead.
Dan.
Yeah, Brew.
Yeah, you know, and you touched on it there, Jim, in another angle.
Yeah, it is stunning that it's this obvious, it's this bad.
It's pathetic.
I mean, that's why I started to think, like, wait a minute, maybe this is a setup for something else.
But like I said, I don't think I've seen an event called out so quickly as this one.
Yeah, I regard that as an extremely positive sign.
Extremely positive.
Yeah, and we're talking about Obama, Clinton, Um, you know, uh, De Niro, you know, we're talking about heavyweights, too.
You know, no sympathy for these people.
I mean, that's stunning.
Obama went to Obama.
Obama went to, you know, the Clintons.
And people are like, ha ha ha ha ha, you know.
I mean, the memes on Twitter, uh, yesterday, you know, I was laughing out loud.
I mean, it's just, it was just a tidal wave of, you know, this is a joke.
So, that's encouraging.
I think so, too.
If this all ends in a joke, yeah.
Mitchell, do you want to add a word or two before we bring back Brew?
Who, me?
No, Mitchell.
Mona.
Okay.
Mitchell, did you want to add?
Mona, go ahead.
Go ahead.
Then we'll bring in Brew.
Okay.
Have you read the The article by Jack Mullen, The Kavanaugh Confirmation in Exercise and Non-Linear Warfare, it's a great article.
It puts everything in perspective.
Remember when we talked about non-linear warfare, how Russia does it, on how to keep the country divided so they can keep us under control?
It's a great article.
I want you to know he wrote that for the book I'm editing on Kavanaugh, Mona.
So we're following up Parkland, which we've just published, with Kavanaugh, which will be out within about 10 to 14 days.
Wow.
Cool.
Good stuff.
Brew, Brew, come on in and give us your thoughts about these matters.
Well, let's kick it off with the I don't even know how to start it off with, it's just so ridiculous.
Look, let's start changing some vernacular here, start changing the language.
These aren't bombs, okay?
Let's just get this out of our heads.
These are alleged Explosive devices, okay?
Let's just start changing the lingo.
Let's take control of what it is and call it what it is.
Alleged explosive devices.
Which turned out to be not explosive devices because they didn't have any black powder or stuff that makes things go bang and boom, okay?
Yes.
You know, a bomb, a bomb, you know, when you think bomb, you think, you know, they're dropping bombs.
There's a bomb.
There's like Oklahoma City bomb.
Brew, brew, brew, brew, brew.
They're using the phrase pipe bomb, okay?
And these look like they could be mini pipe bombs.
That's all.
You're correct, technically, of course.
They were supposed to be explosive devices, only it turned out to be not only explosive, which makes this all the more ridiculous.
It's just as ridiculous as it gets. - Right. - What do we think, Bob?
I thought it was serious.
Well, I'm being serious.
So whenever you think bomb, you gotta think of Netanyahu going on a big notepad with a big circular thing with a wick coming out, a bomb.
So, uh, I don't know, I guess jokes over heads.
All right.
So anyway, they, on the new, everyone is, a lot of people reporting this are saying bombings, the bombings.
There were no bombings.
Nothing went boom.
Okay.
You guys were right about the post office, you know, ever since September 11th, they, you know, right off the post office, I'm going to say the return postage, how much postage, I looked up how much a stamp costs.
A stamp today is 49 cents for a one ounce letter.
So he put six stamps, six ounces, so this alleged explosive device only weighed six ounces or less.
Anyway, and today, if you ever get a piece of parcel that doesn't have the stamps that go through the post office that say they got it and they're delivering it off, that's 1 in 10 million.
They don't have a postmark your stamp.
Right, right.
All that's just bogus.
Dan, you're just too logical.
Well, yeah, that's a problem.
Yeah.
You know, and here's the other thing.
Here's an argument we can use.
All these misspellings they allegedly did.
Oh, they misspelled Wasserman Schultz, they misspelled Florida, they misspelled Brennan.
Well, here.
There's a good argument that the school system sucks!
You put all this money in the Department of Education into the school system, Common Core, and now you have these stupid misspellings?
Give us a break.
Florida.
It's pretty phonetically easy.
Yeah, that's why, to me, I see that as mockery.
It's just mockery.
The system, the whole system.
Right, that's what I'm saying.
the Postal Service.
I mean, the whole thing, it's just insulting.
Really, I feel, I mean, people should be insulted.
They should be angry, you know.
But, you know, we'll have, you know, another fake thing tomorrow.
So, you know.
We have a fake thing every day.
Every day.
Right.
That's what I'm saying.
I was listening to earlier, I, you know, the term, you know, the term hyper normalization.
Hyper normalization.
It was a documentary, Adam Curtis in 2016, and he outlined how hyper normalization was used in Russia through the media and actually was the director behind it was actually someone who had an entire career in theater.
Like the guy was really from theater and acting.
And orchestrated this whole, like, media psy-op.
And, you know, creates this self-fulfilling prophecy of, you know, this new world that is, you know, essentially the same as the old world.
And, you know, check out, like, just a five or ten minute clip on YouTube hyper-normalization.
And, you know, and that's one of these effective tools that I see.
You know, it's just like if everything's fake, right, every day it's something else, then all of these things then become – the perception becomes upside down, where all these things are real.
And then they get accepted into history.
And I'm glad you said that at the beginning.
You said stop, what, saying bomb, and that is a good point.
We have to, you know, they're being referred to as bombs, as bombs.
But to me, this is the same play as the 9-11 staged with them.
You know, first words we heard was planes, you know, planes, planes, planes.
They were programming us.
That was the first word association we made.
And the reality was there were no planes at all that struck those buildings or, you know, the Pentagon.
But playing, that was the first word.
So yesterday, it's bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb.
So you have to deprogram yourself.
And to me, that was your point.
And that's a good point.
It's like, you know.
And then they emphasize it by saying, no, this is a serious bomb, serious bomb.
So then you know you're dealing with a really thick bomb, which is called a serious bomb.
So, yeah, no bomb.
When they got to tell you it's serious, you know it's not.
Exactly.
Yeah.
When they tell you when they got to tell you it's organic, right, then it's it's the opposite, right?
It's the it's the complete opposite.
And yesterday was another example of this.
And, you know, like Rue was alluding to a moment ago.
Yeah.
What will it be tomorrow?
I mean, they're going to have to like, let's look at this.
Let's look at the play.
How do you play this out?
You know, if you're on that side over the next week, like, you know, how do you play out this new cycle?
Do you just shift gears and just drop something, you know, completely different and move on?
You know, that's a typical approach.
Or is there some new discovery?
You know, do we find a passport with one of these bombs tomorrow?
You know, so.
That will be interesting to me to see.
Well, you didn't import the passport.
They came with pictures, remember?
ISIS flag and other stuff.
Right.
I mean, wasn't it like the ID, right?
It was personal ID.
Yeah, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no.
I'm making fun of this electronic explosive device where it had a picture on it of an ISIS flag.
So you didn't, you know, it already came with pictures.
Yeah, exactly.
You didn't have to scour the scene for any IDs left behind, you know.
That's right, yeah.
How come ISIS hasn't claimed this event yet?
By the way, I was told that flag was a false ISIS flag, so you had a false flag for a false flag.
Very good.
A false flag within a false flag.
I mean, it's actually labeling itself.
I mean, the whole thing is absurd beyond belief.
And I like your observation, Dan, about how stunned you are that the whole thing has been exposed so fast that it fell asleep.
It fell apart immediately.
Yeah, immediately.
Immediately.
And they go into that thinking, we will benefit from this.
Yeah, I'm in.
Let's do this.
I mean, you know, try to get into the mind of the director behind that.
Like, really, I don't, I couldn't sell that.
There's no way I could pitch that idea if I'm working that job.
Hey, you know, that's, yeah, and the reaction's stunning.
And last night, you know, I went through the alternative media outlets that do, you know, live broadcasts, you know, the alternative media last night.
Um, it seems like we're all in agreement, you know, this is fake.
And, and I'm talking about even, you know, outlets that tend to even, you know, sit in the middle or, you know, approach things a little more conservatively.
I mean, just so much outspoken talk immediately.
This is fake.
This is a joke.
Um, that's, to me, that's the most interesting, I think, aspect of this story, you know, currently.
Um, is the reaction.
I mean, you talk about a failure.
Um, and I know that, we know this, we all know this, right?
When they run these ops, um, these drills, you know, some drills go live, some drills do not go live.
Um, but you know, but this was, um, uh, something that should have gone live.
You know, you don't have actors, you don't have a whole movie set like Parkland and Las Vegas.
Maybe they thought, well, okay, at least it's a distraction.
But Dan, just to build on the point you've made about how quickly it was seen through, but not by the mainstream media.
In other words, they were reinforcing and promoting a completely fabricated story that nobody is buying.
So it seems to me this significantly discredits the mainstream media.
Yeah, and they, the mainstream media, reacted To this prize of hoax quickly as I've ever seen.
And then they, you know, double down on their official narrative.
And that's when the, you know, serious talk started.
And you had the mayor tweeting and people and, you know, that's why he came out and said, no, this is real.
This is real.
This is real.
You know, trying to sell this thing because of the reaction.
And then, yeah.
And then, right.
What you say is you have the mainstream media coming out.
Saying the exact same thing, reinforcing it even.
What a bizarre, right?
It's a wonderful totally unintended effect.
They thought they had a clever ruse and it fell totally flat.
Not only that, but it made them look ridiculous.
I don't think we can get more bang for our buck from a bunch of phony, non-explosive bombs than we're getting.
Brute.
Right.
I think it was entertaining, you know, if anything else, but I guess that's a distraction in itself.
We were entertained, you know, with conversation for the day.
I don't know.
Maybe that was their goal was to, for us to, you know, I don't know what their agenda was, but maybe they did that purposefully.
They were that sloppy to see, you know, what would happen.
Well, do you know who was it?
Oh, go ahead.
I apologize.
You know who wasn't entertained?
And I caught this on Snapchat, to where they had all the people that were evacuated from the surrounding buildings of the CNN headquarters in New York, in Manhattan over there, that had to evacuate their buildings as well as the CNN building, and then all the bomb squad people coming up, all the first responders coming up, and creating all that havoc in the streets, and who knows what kind of traffic or whatever.
Tens of thousands of people were affected by their scam.
Okay?
Those people We're not entertained.
It was a drill.
That was the drill.
They wanted to get out into the crowd and do that.
Definitely, that sounds like a drill.
Well, what I'm saying here is there's companies, there's employees, there's workers, there's people doing business, there's people trying to get stuff done, there's people just are tourists in the area, your Uber, your taxi drivers, your bus drivers, people trying to get to point A to point B. Look what they did.
They committed This is felony.
This is felony stuff.
You can't be doing this.
I think it's great that nearby colleagues are pissed off at all this bullshit because, you know, that puts pressure on them to cut it out.
It's just become overwhelming and destructive and a waste of time and nobody believes it.
I think there are a lot of benefits that are accruing here from this complete misconceived scam.
We only have a few seconds in the break.
We have another caller standing by.
When we come back, I'd like to get into the association stuff.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
Thank you.
Thank you.
We'll be right back after this message.
television radio at freedomslips.com.
We'll be right back after this message.
Tranquility Base here.
Were they conspiracies?
The Eagle has landed.
Have you ever wondered if we really did go to the moon?
If Paul McCartney died in 1966 and was replaced by an even better musician, did you know that Saddam Hussein died in a B-1 bomber strike on 7 April 2003 and was replaced by one of his doubles, who was put on trial and hanged in his place?
Or that Osama Bin Laden died in Afghanistan on the 15th of December 2001 and was buried in an unmarked grave in accordance with Muslim traditions?
That the raid in Pakistan was fate?
There's more, including four chapters about the end of World War II which prove that events we've been taught were very different than we have been told.
Don't let yourself be played.
Read, and I suppose we didn't go to the moon either.
Available at moonrockbooks.com.
That's moonrockbooks.com.
Looking for a nightcap to fill your listening needs?
Come join us on Spaced Out Radio with me, Dave Scott, right here on Revolution Radio.
Monday through Friday for three hours a night, starting at 9 p.m.
Pacific, midnight Eastern, we will take you down the supernatural path.
From E.T.
Contact to the paranormal, and all of the spiritual, cryptid, and conspiracy stories in between.
You can find us right here on Revolution Radio, at spacedoutradio.com, on Twitter, at Spaced Out Radio, and on Facebook, at Spaced Out Radio Show.
Spaced Out Radio.
It's a night of talk and interaction.
Are you experienced?
Even the government admits that 9-11 was a conspiracy.
But did you know that it was an inside job?
That Osama had nothing to do with it?
That the Twin Towers were blown apart by a sophisticated arrangement of mini or micro nukes?
That Building 7 collapsed seven hours later because of explosives planted in the building?
Barry Jennings was there.
He heard them go off and felt himself stepping over dead people.
The U.S.
Geological Survey conducted studies of dust gathered from 35 locations in Lower Manhattan and found elements that would not have been there had this not been a nuclear event.
Ironically, that means the government's own evidence contradicts the government's official position.
9-11 was brought to us compliments of the CIA, the neocons of the Department of Defense, and the Mossad.
Don't let yourself be played.
Read American Nuked on 9-11.
Available at moonrockbooks.com.
That's moonrockbooks.com.
The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff, or affiliates.
You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, 100% listener-supported radio, and now we return you to your host.
This is Zach, your host on The Raw Deal, This is my first host on The Raw Deal, and it's just delightful to have so many here today because we have Dan and Mona and Brew and Mitch, and now we're joined by Paul.
Paul, you haven't had a chance to introduce your 25 cents worth, so why don't you go ahead and give us a few of your reflections on these issues we've been discussing with such animation.
Thank you.
Well, thank you for calling on me, Professor.
It's a very exciting class today.
I've been a little busy recently since I'm running the West Coast headquarters for suspicious packages and bone saws.
I'm actually sending out today and yesterday at least 75, I'm hoping to get 100 bone saws out to various members of Congress and the Senate and the media with instructions on self-dismemberment and particularly before they get started to maybe cut up the person next to them.
Isn't it absurd?
Isn't it absurd?
This whole Khashoggi thing was just so amateurishly done.
As even the President has said, this is the worst cover-up of all time!
And, Brew, I'll have your order ready in a second.
What was that?
A caramel macchiato, decaf latte?
What the hell's going on, man?
You could at least order a whiskey and tell the bartender to leave the bottle.
Come on!
It did sound pretty intriguing, Brew.
We couldn't quite figure out what it was.
I thought it was a caramel ice cream sundae of some kind, but I take it it was actually a drink.
Hey, oh, wait a second.
Hold on.
Breaking news.
Breaking news.
Oh, there's a knock at my door.
Anytime somebody comes to my door, it's breaking news.
Hello?
Are you Paul from California?
Yes.
I have a package for you.
Okay, hang on a second.
Let me sign it.
Hmm, what is this?
I hope it's a pipe bomb.
It's a long rectangular box.
It's about the size you could put curtain rods in it.
It's from a D. Cromer Enterprises.
Hmm, I don't know anybody named D. Cromer Enterprises.
Let me... Let me open it up here.
Open the paper.
My goodness!
Dan, you shouldn't have.
It has all the looks.
of a Winchester Repeating Rifle, but it has gears and levers and wires.
What's going on?
Wait a minute, there's a note.
It says, Paul, press this button and think happy thoughts.
Okay, let me press the button now.
It's a small speaker playing music.
Oh, the mechanism's engaging.
All right, so Mona, do you have anything else to add?
A pre-recorded soundtrack.
How about that?
It would appear that I've been shot.
Oh, but wait.
No wounds.
Blood.
Apparently, sources confirmed the same type of bullets used at Las Vegas and Sandy Hook.
The bullets that do no harm.
Oh, thank God I'm still alive.
Dan, you're quite the prankster.
I thought you'd already be dead by now.
I thought you'd already be dead.
Hey, I rehearsed this thing for like 15 minutes.
I was hoping it would go over.
Fairly elaborate.
I'm playing with you.
It's a great skit.
It's a great skit.
That's about how much planning they put into setting up those devices.
The bullets do no harm.
I like that.
Well, I gotta say, I mean, if it hasn't been obvious before, I think this whole thing makes completely clear what a travesty and a caricature of, well, let's just put it bluntly, the Jew agenda that the United States has become.
I mean, at least in the old days, we had some semblance of dignity, right?
We had Walter Cronkite, Howard K. Smith, Uh, you know, uh, Huntley Brinkley, you know, so on.
And what do we have now, right?
It's P.T.
Barnum, for God's sake.
Everything is done for hours on end with this breathless urgency, right?
Breaking news!
Investigations occurring!
You know, they're, they're, they're manhunt for the bombers on now!
Hey, look no farther!
It's me, Paul from California!
For God's sake!
I think you're connecting the spirit of the enterprise, what we have become today, and the The media has so betrayed the American people.
It's grotesque.
It's actually grotesque.
It's a joke.
How long did it take, really, when you think about it?
I mean, 20, 30 years?
I mean, obviously, it all began with the Federal Reserve and just getting complete control of the money and essentially owning all economic activity.
I mean, that's what takes place.
I mean, we used to have, I would think, even though I'm sure they always told us lies, at least we had, like I said, some semblance of presentation and, you know, an air of respectability.
And at least back then, even the National Evening News was only a half hour, right?
I mean, now it's like there's a guy on Rents the other night, and I forget his name, but he's got a website, and he was talking... Say again?
Yeah, yeah, exactly.
And he was talking about the fact that in Las Vegas, they often start the morning local news at like five o'clock, right?
And they just have these ridiculous stories where they're not really news, but for example, they go around and give out prizes to people and, you know, get the reaction and put it on the air.
It's just a circus, it's just a joke, and how anybody could believe stuff.
Gary Holland also came up with a new term for all what we're going through.
It's called drive-thru news.
Drive-thru, get your story, drive to another one and get another story.
Drive-thru news is like, you know, the repeat, just a news cycle.
You know, the number of news cycles we go through just in a day is ridiculous.
You know, just think of this past week, Mona, Dan, Jim, that, you know, caravan.
Uh, Khashoggi, caravan, now this, and now what about the Khashoggi and the caravan, you know?
You know, they're like in Backburner, what's tomorrow, you know?
Right, yeah.
Yeah.
Yeah, Khashoggi takes a total plot twist with the storyline, you know, here's the CNN headline, Khashoggi killing was premeditated body attorney general theft, you know, so now we're getting the opposite narrative, you know, from the mainstream media.
Um, you know, now we've got the turn, we've got the heel turn there, you know, the storyline turn there.
Um, and this, this is the point I wanted to make earlier.
This, um, pipe bomb story from yesterday, uh, reminds me of the, um, Scalise baseball shooting hoax, um, storyline that we had, you know, what, last couple of summers ago, you know, where it, it was, you know, it kind of floated in the media.
What for yeah less than a week right it went away yeah he made an appearance and yeah that was all just kept real real real quiet you know we never heard anything uh about that you know um and this this uh hoax the pipe bomb hoax smells a lot like the Scalia hoax uh to me my personal opinion
Are you saying there was no shooting at that field?
I never heard a perspective that there was never any shooting at that field, but yes, the guy was kind of like a dude but not the ultra type dude that was set up at the Patsy, but I never heard there was technically never a shooting.
Yeah, that was my question too, Brew.
I'm glad you put it out there.
Dan, a lot of us had the impression there was a real shooting there, but it was a guy who looked like he was probably, you know, mind-controlled if we use the language.
Right, right.
Yeah, I understand.
I'm very familiar with that narrative.
Like the hybrid event.
- This is my opinion.
And I haven't been able to substantiate this, so I haven't written about it or spoken publicly, but I believe, my feeling was that that Scalia baseball shooting, that that event was a complete hoax.
Another scam.
Another scam.
Scalise.
Yeah.
Scalia was the former... I'm not talking about Anthony Scalia.
I'm talking about Scalise.
Right.
Well, you know, here's the thing, too, and Brew was mentioning.
Gary Holland, and like I said, there's a lot of things he just reminded me of that were already in my mind, and some of the things he came up with are maybe not so original, but worth mentioning again.
And what he was talking about, and like I said, he was on for an hour with Jeff Rentsch, is all these things put together, including the soap opera nature, the infotainment nature of news and everything, It borders the lines of distinction between reality and actual, real news stories versus these movies and these hoaxes versus the everyday lives people are leading.
And as I mentioned before, most people know their everyday life is pretty mundane, right?
I mean, what do you do?
You go out, you get a cup of coffee, you make yourself something to eat, you go to work if you have a job, you come home, you walk the dog.
I mean, I think that at one point in time, you know, there was a definite distinction, but now with everybody, you know, glued to their phones constantly, I mean, if you go out, you see what I see, right?
Which people just, they're almost like living into and through, you know, their phones on a regular basis.
And then, of course, you come home and they're either going to be on the computer or the phone or television.
I mean, I don't know what the percentage of people that actually read Anything anymore.
I mean, where they turn the page and actually look at printed words on text, but it's just got to be the lowest point in history, I would imagine.
I agree.
I think people, when they do read, it's just the title, and that's it.
Then they inform their opinion from just reading the title.
Right.
So it's almost like we're walking around in this matrix, or as this one researcher, Dave Emory, used to talk about on air, this milieu.
Okay, this milieu of essentially confusion and misinformation and propaganda and brainwashing, you know, mixed in with a little, you know, totalitarianism.
That's hyper-normalization.
That's a new term, exactly.
And just a brief comment on the 5G.
Let's not go into all this.
Go ahead.
I'll send you guys the clip.
It's a short clip of hyper-normalization.
You'll see that Um, and, um, you know, again, it's like, you know, learning, um, learning a play, playbook, you know, uh, looking at the signs.
And when you see that this media tie-off that was, you know, they pulled off in Russia, it will be very familiar to you, and it's referred to as hyper-normalization.
So 5G, you mentioned it before, and it deserves a show in and of itself, and I would highly encourage you, Jim, to do so and bring a good guest on.
So this is one of those real things that's really happening, and not to keep beating the same dead horse, but like the chemtrails, it's really happening.
Or the so-called wildfires that they're starting and burning people off the land and not letting them rebuild.
That's really happening.
Or the millions upon millions of people are coming here uninvited.
That's really happening.
So, for example, I do agree with Mona that the wall is probably a waste of money and time, but I don't agree that there isn't a real invasion, okay?
The government is just a concept, right?
I can't shake hands with the government.
So that part of natural law I agree with.
But, you know, if you live here in California, The so-called invasion is all too real.
There are millions and millions of people here, and they're not making anybody's lives better.
Making traffic worse, competition for jobs worse, competition for housing worse, and all these real things don't get addressed by the media.
Instead, they try to play the heartstrings of suckers, you know, who feel sorry for these people, and they do it in the most ridiculous way.
And I had a conversation with a gentleman the other day who completely agreed with me when I put it this way.
So they played a radio clip, and I mentioned it to him, and he says, yeah, I think I heard something like that too.
Some young man, you know, probably in his mid to late twenties, and he's like, oh, we're just coming here for jobs, you know, and he spoke English, right?
It was a heavily accented English, but he spoke English.
We could just want jobs.
We just want a better life.
And that was basically it.
And all I could think of, my reaction was, so what?
Okay.
Don't we all go back to your own damn country?
I don't care what your problems are down there, and it doesn't really matter what they are, because guess what?
We've got our own problems here.
I just don't want our government to do things in their country that would make their lives worse.
I think we'd all be in favor of making their lives better, but we don't want them all to move here, and that's completely normal.
It's not racist, and it doesn't really matter at this point what the politics are.
It's got to be stopped because their goal is to overturn and to completely swamp this country.
Well, tell me more.
Tell me more about politics in California.
Are longtime residents extremely upset about this, as I believe they ought to be?
I mean, I was born in Pasadena, as you know.
I mean, I am just shocked by all of this, and yet Jerry Brown seems to want to turn California into a sanctuary state and take in millions.
Well, okay, so I just watched, and I would highly encourage anybody to watch, because it's really good.
Adam Carolla interviewed Tucker Carlson on his podcast, and it was a better part of an hour, and they're both of like mind, and it was an excellent interview, I thought, and Tucker Carlson was also born and raised in California.
He went to school on the East Coast and, you know, settled in the Washington area, and he talked about his, you know, his life path and his career path, and But they both made the same points, that what's happening to California is just being turned into an unaffordable shithole, where the only people that can have a good life are people that are making really good money, and then a lot of the people, long-time residents, and I'm going to add to this, long-time white residents, are leaving.
They're fleeing.
They're going to Idaho, and Oregon, and Nevada, and Arizona, and Montana, and of course, these locals up there, in many cases, they don't want all the Californians coming there.
But this is just the reality that's happening.
And since I've been here since a kid, right, since the 70s, I can personally tell you that the pace the last 15 to 20 years is just off the charts.
I mean, it's just it's almost unrecognizable.
You're talking about the rapidity with which the immigrants are coming in and transforming the local culture.
And the way that they're building, they're building all these high-density housing units everywhere, and I mean, I haven't gone and taken a census, but I can pretty much guarantee you, based upon what I see out in public and on the roads, it's the vast majority are non-white foreigners, okay?
Is any pressure being put on state representatives and state senators that deal with this?
No, I don't know.
I mean, you know, people just talk about stuff.
What can we do?
It's out of our hands, because as I've made this point before, and again, it's not an original thought, but we don't get to decide what.
We only get to decide who, and that's the rub.
That's the joke of it.
Okay?
I may vote in this election, although I don't care if it does any good or not.
I may just go right down the list and just vote every single thing Republican and cross a no through all the ballot measures, right?
Because that's just the thing to do if you're going to do anything, right?
Because the other direction is just horrifying.
I mean, you've heard that they're gonna eliminate bail in this state, right?
I don't know if you heard that story.
No.
They're gonna eliminate... yeah, you did not know that, right?
No.
Yeah, no, this is pretty much a done deal you can read about.
They're eliminating bail, and they're going to have some sort of a determination, a program of, you know, released on your own recognizance and or possible, you know, monitor.
But essentially, they're going to stop holding people in jail and prison awaiting trial, right?
And it's just, it's another step, I believe, in what I call the deconstruction of our society.
And the guy that wrote that book, The New Dark Ages Conspiracy, which I recommend, I believe I read that in the late 70s or early 80s, a British guy by the name of White, it's called The New Dark Ages Conspiracy.
And like a lot of other books that I read back then, they predicted everything that's happening.
Essentially the de-industrialization, the offshoring of the jobs, the wrecking of the family, and so on and so on and so on.
Isn't it great?
Go ahead, Mona.
Well, sure, sure.
And, you know, again, I don't hate anybody because of what they are.
I don't want millions and millions coming here because, guess what?
They're not needed or wanted.
There's nothing that they're contributing that we really need.
Except making landowners rich and, you know... That's our government that's encouraging them to come.
Of course, because our government is owned and controlled by you-know-who.
Right?
They bought and paid for our government.
If there's no use in looking at the immigrants, they're not the problem.
We need to look at what the real problem is and take care of it.
Well, but the immigrants are real, they're right in your face.
I don't know why, it almost seems like you're in denial of that, Mona, and I don't, you know, I understand where you're coming from, but it's kind of like, you know, it's saying that the cars aren't the problem, right?
It's the traffic.
Well, you know, come on!
They can't do as much damage as governments in the last 100 years have done to societies.
They can't even compare.
I would love to have, you know, some sort of a, you know, a forum or debate with maybe you and another person about this issue so we could go back and forth on it.
But what you're talking about is a concept for the most part.
People, okay, do things.
Government, like I said, government's real in terms of there's people that work for the government and people that take orders from the government.
But the fact of the matter is, as I said, you can't shake hands with the state of California.
But there are millions and millions and millions of people coming here, and they keep coming, and they keep bringing their family members here, and they keep putting them on welfare.
You made a good point about the welfare, but we don't get to decide that.
And when we did decide it, okay, I forget what year it was, but it was Proposition 87, where the California voters overwhelmingly, over 60%, voted no more public benefits for illegal immigrants.
Some single judge, single judge, decided, oh, no, that's not, that's not, yeah.
Yeah.
That's what voting is all for the slaves.
It doesn't do any good.
We have no voice anymore.
Good point.
Whereas if we had a real self-government, a real so-called democracy, we get to decide issues.
We get to decide the what, not the who.
When you just get to decide the who, the who seems to be able to do whatever it is they want, and all we can do is just bitch about it.
Right.
And that's why people, I think, are giving up.
That's why people don't vote anymore.
There's nothing that we're going to change by anything that we do, whether we protest or anything.
It doesn't do any good.
Exactly.
All of the electronic voting is rigged.
I would have met the software for electronic voting.
And when you follow the money and people who are behind that, they're old people, you know.
I will briefly mention, got a little sidetracked there, but I was starting to talk about the 5G.
I don't know anything, I'm not a scientist, but I read stuff, I listen to people, and the one thing that struck me, you know, there's certain things that just kind of just strike you, as a couple of these videos about it, right, showed what the I guess what you call the physical hardware, you know, looks like.
And it's so amazingly robust, you know, you can't even imagine.
I believe there's a tower that's going up not too far from where I live, because this thing, I mean, just in terms of like the size, you know, the thickness of everything, I mean, it just looks so industrial, so almost military, that it's ominous.
And, uh, the one guy that did this one YouTube video shows the size of the, uh, electronic cables, you know, for the power going into that.
And it was just so thick.
And he just, he says, you gotta imagine the power this thing is gonna, is gonna use and the, and the sort of, uh, power it's gonna project.
And from what I've heard, they, they, for whatever reason, they need to be put closer together than the current towers.
And it's like, you know what?
I don't need to know much, but I just, I guarantee you, this is no good.
And this is the real kind of thing where it's like, you know, nothing, something has to be done.
I mean, I've called into other shows before and talked very bluntly about the fact that there's no, there's no voting our way out of this.
I mean, there's no political solution here.
Sooner or later, people are going to start doing stuff, doing real stuff in the real world with real hardware.
I'll leave it at that.
Phone sauce, yes.
With instructions for self-dismemberment.
I kind of like that.
I thought it was funny.
That was good.
That was very good, Paul.
Brew, you want to add a few thoughts here?
You were starting to talk about the 5G.
No, I'm not going to.
I know enough about it.
No, it's just too long for the whole last bit of what we have here.
A lot of these migrants are being invited.
They had billboards put up.
They've had flyers put up.
There's advertisement on there, local media put up, and then this word of mouth, and then the idea to come here.
And then, of course, You know, you can't afford it here, we'll lend you the money, and then they give it to a coyote or whatever, enough to get here, and then of course these other countries have their embassies and NGOs ready to implement them in the system, and give them every little cheat sheet on how to get through the system, and then muchachos, basically the leeches.
You want to come here for the jobs and a better life?
Well, here's a good physical thing people can do is go and actually videotape and interview those homeless people in the streets of LA, Portland, Chicago, Florida, you name it, wherever.
There are millions of them across the United States.
Not just individuals that had drug problems, but whole families that don't even have a car anymore to live out of.
Those people wanted jobs and better lives, and so they got screwed by the system.
There's many reasons they want these people to come here, not only to diversify the United States, to break down immorality, to break down what's called culture or system or everything, and eventually, you know, our, you know, motivation to just do something, be something better.
Yeah, they already have that in China.
people to put in debt.
They need more money circulating through the system.
They need this, that, and the other.
Now keep an eye on the story that's coming out in 2019 that they're going to recalculate the credit score system to where blah, blah, blah, if you haven't done this or that, you're going to have a higher credit score in order so people can actually get more debt because they'll have a better credit score.
Yeah, they already have that in China.
Yeah, they have that in China, and Eric Schmidt of Google has been working with the Chinese on that That started to put control of us.
Total control.
Okay, folks.
If you don't stop today, then you can't fly.
You can't go out of the country or you can't fly at all anymore.
And there's nothing to do about it.
That's the social credit system, which is basically their whole – that's the beast.
Everyone says the beast, the beast system.
Well, China's got the beast system, that whole thing they're doing there, the social credit system.
That is the beast system.
That's an umbrella for everything under it.
So we're going to have some 60 seconds away here.
Jim, if you want to close up.
Well, I just want to thank you guys for a really delightful, very lively discussion of a whole broad range of issues, each and every one of you.
Since Dan and Mona were the special featured guests, Dan, Mona, perhaps you'd like to have a word or two here by way of parting?
Dan?
I would just like to part by saying thank you again, Jim, for inviting me on the program.
The pleasure was all mine.
My final words are this.
Mona, I want to thank you for being here.
Paul, Brew, and Mitchell, you guys were all terrific.
It was just wonderful having you here today.
Mona, you got maybe a few seconds to add a final parting word.
▲
Export Selection