Joe Kent and Jimmy Dore dissect the Trump assassination attempt as a deliberate PSYOP, alleging withheld surveillance tapes and a stopped Charlie Kirk investigation to suppress anti-war voices. They critique Pete Hegseth's $200 billion Iran funding request against domestic needs while analyzing a survey showing 45% of young Republicans fear Jewish threats, arguing this reflects generational backlash against conflated Zionism and Judaism. Ultimately, the discussion frames the conflict as a strategic overextension driven by foreign policy manipulation rather than genuine national security concerns. [Automatically generated summary]
Hey, we'll be in San Antonio, Albuquerque, Houston, Dallas, Salt Lake City, Las Vegas, Burbank, California.
That's on May 7th.
That's a Saturday.
Then we'll be in Tulsa and Oklahoma City, Spokane, Tacoma.
Go to jimmydoor.com for a link for all those tickets.
See you there.
Establishment media sets of artists fighting.
So good luck.
Watch and see as his jackdog comedian speeds and jumps comedium and hits him head on.
It's the chimney tour show.
So Tucker Carlson interviewed Joe Kent, the head of the counterterrorism unit directly under Tulsi Gabbard, who resigned recently and said that he couldn't serve anymore in the Trump administration because they're being forced into wars that aren't threatening us by Israel.
And this was all done for Israel and Israel pose no threat to us.
And so he sat down with Tucker Carlson, but he also talked about the assassination attempt of Donald Trump at Butler, Pennsylvania.
Tucker Carlson asked Joe Kent why the Thomas Crook surveillance tapes haven't been released.
Kent's answer blew him away.
He explained the government deliberately withholds information to create noise with conspiracy theories.
So the actual question never gets answered.
And so, by the way, saying someone is a conspiracy theorist is admitting that your TV is just a substitute for your lazy yet fear-driven little brain.
And I think it's a great answer, but I don't know why it blows anyone away.
They've been doing this strategy for the last my entire life or so.
And so let's not a new thing.
So let's listen to him.
The current president was the subject of a near-successful assassination attempt, like recently.
Yeah.
And we're just not going to look into very obviously or divulge information that everyone knows they have.
For example, the surveillance tape from the shooting range at which Thomas Crooks trained, because it would answer the question, was he training with somebody?
And if so, who?
They have that footage and they won't release it.
What could possibly be the explanation for that?
I know what the result is.
The result is people come to their own conclusions, and this is where like crazy conspiracy theories come from.
And then those conspiracy theories usually are easy to debunk or make the people saying them sound crazy.
So then the actual question never gets answered.
Right.
Sorry.
Can you say that for people who haven't lived in Washington?
Okay, I try to explain this to people all the time because this has been ongoing since at least the Kennedy assassination, but this is a very serious and reoccurring thing.
It's a tactic, and you just explained it better than anyone I've ever heard.
Can you just do that again if you can recall it from memory?
Yeah, I mean, so basically, you give no information whatsoever on something that's obvious that there should be information.
Like you outlined like there's potentially footage of crooks at the shooting range.
Again, police 101, go get the tapes.
Let's figure it out.
If you don't want to address that question, then you just go silent and you say you can't ask that question, which then creates people who come out of kind of nowhere and they start drawing their own conclusions.
Knowing the way the internet works, I mean, half of them, if not more, are probably going to be so far off in the left field and made by legitimate kooks or bots that then you can just be like, oh, these people asking these questions about that tape at the video range.
It's space aliens.
Crazy conspiracy theorists.
They say it's a UAP or whatever.
And so then you've just diverted all attention away from the thing that you're trying to conceal, and now everyone's focused on the crazies.
Man.
And then the second someone asks a legitimate question, they're crazy.
So now, do you see how they did the same thing during COVID?
Who are these crazies, by the way?
They wouldn't release any of the data from the, they wanted to wait 75 years to let you know about the vaccine trial data.
And then anybody who had a theory about it was a crazy.
Yeah, right.
And so if you asked a real question, then you're also labeled crazy.
So they don't give any information so that people start to come up with theories and then they can say you're crazy.
That theory is great.
And it's all done by design.
So that's why they don't give you the information.
So they can make anybody who's asking legitimate questions sound like a crazy.
It worked perfectly, perfectly during Seth Rich.
It worked perfectly during COVID.
And it's working perfectly right now with Butler and with Charlie Kirk.
I wouldn't say perfectly.
I would say it's degrading how well this works.
You're right.
I would think.
If you overuse it, it's not as effective.
They have overused it.
You're right.
And I've always said a kid who can withstand a lot of beatings now.
And I've always said about that Butler, Pennsylvania thing, I don't think that he was hit with a bullet in his ear.
I think there was someone inside one of those speakers and they shot him with a pellet.
I think that's what happened.
So they had him just kill an innocent guy?
Well, they had crooks.
Yeah.
Crooks.
They had him just shoot an innocent guy.
Yeah, are you kidding me?
Kurt, they're white.
I'm asking you that.
I'm not saying that.
You mean the same people who on purpose bombed a children's school of girls, they wouldn't let one of Trump's MAGA people take a bunch of people?
What I'm saying is there's fat.
I 100% think that kid is one of these wind-up Sirhan Sirhan toys without a doubt.
I have no doubt of that.
My question is, is, okay, did Trump's people set it up or was this a lasting thing?
There's more than one faction.
There's more than one faction.
Trump was definitely in on it because he's not just what Charlie, he's saying, nobody will allow an investigation.
That's a good point.
Trump's in charge of the, that's what I said.
As soon as Trump shut down the investigation of Butler, I knew he was in on it.
As soon as you don't want to know who's trying to kill you, Israel said, I can't know.
That's right.
I think that's a great point.
I didn't even think of that, but you're right.
Who in the hell would do that when someone tries to kill them?
Now, Max Limenthal reported that they gaslit Trump that Iran was trying to kill him.
And I remember hearing nonsense that Iran was somehow behind Thomas Crooks.
Remember that?
Yeah, remember that?
Yes.
So, okay, so let's say Iran tried to kill Trump.
Why would he not say that part?
Why would he not investigate that?
And put that evidence out there.
Exactly.
If it was actually an Iranian plot to kill Trump, wouldn't Trump Trump could just use that for a justification to go into Iran.
More MAGA would be with him than are with him now.
That's right.
That's right.
So the strategy is hide the facts, let the internet go feral, then discredit everyone asking questions, clean, effective, and honestly, kind of sinister.
Vigilant Fox says, yep, pretty much.
By the way, going feral, I just want you to know if you're tweeting, you haven't gone feral.
You're a nerd.
Secondly, you see how they have us set up to go, oh, then they let people just go crazy.
Is that as bad as bombing kids?
I don't feel like it is.
I don't think it is.
I think I can say whatever the fuck I want is what I think.
Here's what I Nicholas Qantas says, normal people have no education in psyops and psychological warfare tactics.
We didn't even know we were inside of a psychological warfare operation until we woke up.
And now, at this show anyway, we've realized it's one, we're living in a psyop.
Everything is a psyop.
Everything you thought.
As they said they would do.
As the guy, I think, who's dead now, Colby, the CIA guy, when you don't, or who's the guy from the CIA?
Oh, that's right.
I don't believe anything.
Anything that's real, we did our job.
Yeah.
Why is the CIA allowed to exist?
Does anybody think we should have one?
I know Scott Horton got Scott, what's his name?
God rest his soul.
Not Horton.
Scott Adams was a big believer in it, but I'm not, Jimmy.
I feel like they should have been abolished back when they murdered the president.
Yeah, the CIA.
Yeah, I'm all for abolishing the CIA.
I mean, fuck that organization.
I don't.
What good do they do?
Oh, you never hear about our victories, only our loss.
Fuck you.
Like, really?
Fuck everything you've ever done.
Here's a good example of the stuff they won't investigate.
New photo emerges of Crooks, the alleged shooter at the Butler assassination attempt.
He's communicating with an unidentified individual slash agency right before he began firing.
Kirker Kirk, I bet.
Who is the lone gunman communicating with?
Well, with his MK Ultra handlers.
I'm getting that.
Pastor Rob McCoy.
Or how about Pastor Rob McCoy or maybe his parents who are both behavior modification therapists?
Yeah.
You never hear about it.
And didn't his father work for the military, Kurt?
Wow.
A couple who are behavioral modification therapists who work for the military, whose house was scrubbed of every last bit of evidence, which is public knowledge.
That's not a secret thing.
You think that's suspicious?
Because I don't.
I think you should shut up.
I think what he's talking, he's talking to Grock right there.
He's doing voice to text for Grock, and he's saying, hey, Grock, am I a Patsy assassin?
And Grok is going, no, you're not.
There's no such thing.
That's a conspiracy theory.
Grock is huffing at him.
Grock huffed at me.
No, it isn't.
Grock, who told you to act like you're a person?
Let's remember what Charlie Kirk had to say.
We still don't know what happened on July 13th.
We certainly don't.
Fet Butler, that's exactly right.
Why don't we know that, Dino?
So we still don't know what happened at the Butler.
And we're never going to know, by the way.
We're never going to know.
But here's what Charlie Kirk says.
I don't.
I don't know.
And I know that we have the right.
We could not have better people in those positions at the top.
You know Dan Bongino well.
I can speak very high for his integrity.
Oh, I loved him.
Yeah.
And so.
This was before Dan did a year at the FBI lying to everybody.
So everybody, I thought Dan Bongioto, I believed it.
I thought Dan Bongino was going to do a good job when he got in there because of all the shit he talked for five years straight.
Just like I thought Trump was, and Tulsi Gabbard and JD Vance.
Yeah, it doesn't make you a sucker because they have a track record.
All those people actually have a track record.
Trump didn't start any wars in his first term.
Tulsi Gabbard absolutely stepped down from the Democratic National Committee.
She actually took all the slings and arrows to tell the truth about Syria.
She actually was against the war in Venezuela, against the war in Europe.
She was all this stuff.
If you remember, Jimmy, the election was between a guy who said he wasn't going to do any of this and a woman who wouldn't tell you a single thing except she likes Doritos.
Yes.
Yeah.
So let's keep going.
So, but now I'm sure they wouldn't, I'm sure Tucker, and if Charlie was here, would have certainly a reassessment of Dan Bongino.
Well, let's listen to what else he said.
They need to act on this.
And I don't have much more to say than that, but I don't know.
FBI needs to, and specifically FBI on that.
Yeah.
And the FBI's Domong.
And it's not Bongino.
It's Don Kash Patel that I know of.
I don't know, actually, but I know that there's Don Mongo.
Yeah, it actually turns out it was them.
So I'm with you, Tucker.
He didn't want to believe it, but now we have to believe it.
We have to believe it.
I think it's very weird.
They still can't get into Crooks' devices.
The whole thing is so bizarre because they can read my text messages, I notice.
They can hide your signal messages and they have, which is even worse than text messages.
I haven't even shot anybody.
I will.
I will go a step further.
Try to not spend too much time on July 13th either.
Totally agree.
It's so weird.
It's so bizarre.
I like spending time with my wife and my kids, and I try to have a very focused subset of issues that I get passionate about.
That's how I feel.
Things that I can't get to answers on will drive me endlessly insane.
So I want one day to find out what happened on July 13th because by only the grace of God and by a millimeter is Trump alive and his Trump president.
If he can murder presidential candidates, it's not a democracy, obviously.
So and get away with it.
Right.
They just can't get into his devices.
I mean, he had no social media profile.
How did he get on the roof?
And how was it unguarded?
And then it was two days before the Republican National Convention.
It felt again.
If you were to kind of go in a dark place, which again, this is all speculation, it felt like, well, this is our last chance before he's the nominee.
Yeah.
Because you know what happens once you're the nominee?
You get secret service protection.
Yeah.
And this is an unknown element of this.
Literally, as soon as you get to become the nomination, bylaws of secret service, whatever, you get equal presidential protection.
So he had a bunch of like DHS hangovers.
You know, no offense to the people that were protecting him on the day of Butler, some of which did a great job.
Some of which are not people I would necessarily, you know, go to war with.
No.
Just, you know, more the TSA agent mold than the secret service agent mold.
And again, it's not a criticism of them.
So if you want to get like really dark and go in that direction, you have to ask those questions.
But I try not to focus too much on Butler because I think it actually leads you in a place where you ask more questions and we have answers.
So, wow, that aged really well.
And the bad news for the producers of bad news coverage, this is bad news for them.
When we find out something like this and then realize that the mainstream news said not one word about it, it leaves them with a mark that doesn't come off with a bath.
I mean, the mainstream news has definitely lost the room.
So there you go.
That's thanks for Joe Kent speaking out and telling the truth that they weren't allowed to investigate Charlie Kirk.
They weren't allowed to investigate the Butler shooting.
They're not allowed to.
And the whole point of it is so that people go out and speculate and then they can make anybody who speculates it to be a crazy.
And then when someone asks the real question, they can also be considered a crazy.
And that's how this works.
If you want that to work.
If you want that to work, you got to not give me an explanation that's more crazy than the craziest thing I could ever come up with.
That's right.
That's all.
I don't know how they craziest conspiracy theory is that it was a lone nut who was in love with the tranny or trans person.
And I know I'm not supposed to say that.
Who gives a shit?
They eat kids.
Everybody better shut the fuck up about that shit forever after this.
Fuck you.
And a 30-out six didn't happen.
That didn't happen.
The guy didn't get up.
He didn't somehow magically appear on a roof for a couple of minutes and no one sees him.
He changed his clothes up there.
He had to assemble a rifle, put it together, put the scope on, line up this thing, take the shot.
And then he got away.
Aiden took it apart.
He took the gun apart before he got off the roof.
Are you kidding me?
Really?
So nobody's running after this guy to arrest him.
He's up on top of a roof.
He just shot.
Of course, that's.
If you believe in the left and right bullshit still, you are a hair away and not very much, like a little daylight between you and a moron that wears a mask still.
Yeah.
You're that level of dumb cow.
Twisting Ryan King's Words00:11:31
So if you, I'd say that Joe Kent, right now, American hero.
So I want to say, even though I might agree on it, disagree with him on a lot of things, what he's doing right now is American hero worthy.
Hey, you know, here's another great way you can help support the show: you become a premium member.
We give you a couple of hours of premium bonus content every week, and it's a great way to help support the show.
You can do it by going to jimmydork.com, clicking on join premium.
It's the most affordable premium program in the business, and it's a great way to help put your thumb back in the eye of the bastards.
Thanks for everybody who was already a premium member.
And if you haven't, you're missing out.
We give you lots of bonus content.
Thanks for your support.
So, you know, this is this guy, Joe Kent.
He was the top counterterrorism expert working directly underneath Tulsi Gabbard in the Department of the National Intelligence.
And so I just want to, so now they're smearing him and everything, but this is what they're saying now.
Trump, Joe Kent is a little, he's little, a weak man.
He's hugely weak and a huge disappointment.
He might even secretly be a Clinton.
I don't know.
I'll tell you he's weak.
Reporter, didn't you appoint him?
Why are you asking me questions?
Who are you?
You know, you're a terrible person.
Great job, Trump.
Wow.
It's fucking good.
Joe Kent may secretly be a Clinton.
What the F does that mean?
He's fun at pizza parties.
He's cool about keeping a secret.
You'll never prosecute him, Trump, you fucking traitor.
So the reason why I show you this is because Joe Kent spoke out about Charlie Kirk and how they were not allowed to investigate his assassination when he was the head of counterterrorism in the United States.
He was not allowed to investigate it.
Here, let's listen.
Let's listen.
So we knew each other.
And the last time I saw Charlie Kirk on this earth was in June in the West Wing, in the stairway.
And I said hi to him.
And he looked me in the eye and he said very loudly.
And it's a small, he'd been in the West Wing.
It's small.
It's a tight space.
And he said, Joe, stop us from getting into a war with Iran.
Very loudly.
He was single-minded.
And he walked off and he went, I believe, into the oval.
So when one of President Trump's closest advisors who is vocally advocating for us to not go to war with Iran and for us to rethink at least our relationship with the Israelis, and then he's suddenly publicly assassinated and we're not allowed to ask any questions about that.
It's a data point.
It's a data point that we need to look into.
What do you mean when you say we're not allowed to ask any questions about that?
We've been told that this individual, Robinson, is a lone gunman, and maybe he is.
But the investigation that I was a part of, the National Counterterrorism Center was a part of, we were stopped from continuing to investigate.
And the FBI will say that they stopped that because they wanted to have, turn everything over to the Utah state authorities.
Everything's going to trial.
It's very, very sensitive.
But there was still a lot for us to look into that I can't really get into, but there was still linkage for us to investigate that we needed to run down.
And I'm not making any conclusions.
I'm not saying that.
Because, you know, because of this, this happened.
I'm not saying that at all.
I'm just saying there's unanswered questions.
We know the pressure because of the text messages that have been made public that Charlie was under a lot of pressure from a lot of pro-Israel donors.
And again, we know Charlie was advocating to President Trump against this war with Iran.
So there you have it.
They're not even allowed to look into the guys at the tippy top of the guys who are supposed to look into that assassination were not allowed to look into it.
And if that bothers you, in the words of Verika Kirk, he just might be a bad person.
Yeah, and you're in the minority of the population.
Yeah.
So that's where we're at now, folks, increasingly becoming common knowledge that Israel assassinates Americans who don't go along and nobody does anything about it.
Hey, how about where I live and the guy just shot up 6th Street and we haven't heard shit about it other than maybe a terrorist, but he's so obviously not.
We're going to just move on.
Why is it so difficult for our leaders to have sex with adults?
That's a good question, Jimmy.
Right?
Well, it's hard to vampirize their potential.
That's why.
So there he is.
There's a guy at the very top.
Let me just show you this.
Translation, Israel killed one of Trump's biggest supporters in order to get a war with Iran, and the FBI covered it up just like 9-11.
Wow.
What scares me the most is how meticulously planned out this whole escapade between the U.S. and Israel has been.
And for how long?
It seems like it was planned from the very moment Trump came to office.
Even bombing the nuclear facilities appears to be part of the broader picture.
Yeah, no shit.
So now you put it together yet, everybody.
I know that sucks.
And so what I said when I heard Joe Kent say that about he wasn't allowed to investigate, I said, at least someone from the Trump administration will admit that Charlie Kirk's assassination is being covered up and they're not allowed to ask any questions about it.
That's a direct quote.
The fact that Erica Kirk and the people currently running TPUSA have zero questions about this tells you everything you need to know about those people.
That they're in on it.
They're in on Charlie's assassination and they're covering it up.
And if you can look at this situation and come to any other conclusion, then the way your mind works is God's own secret mystery.
I know.
That's why I'm so shocked with Tim Poole.
He has such a great band, and then he's so off on this.
Is he still not, he's still, he's still with, he's not about the real - he doesn't believe the official narrative on this, does he?
I don't think he comes up.
Okay.
I don't think it's allowed to come up.
And so immediately, the people from TPUSA, the people who should be the most interested in finding out who killed Charlie Kirk, are then smearing someone who told, Phil just told them he wasn't allowed to look into who killed Charlie Kirk.
They immediately start smearing him.
Immediately.
What a coincidence.
Joe Kent speaks truth and outs corruption, and the entire TPUSA propaganda network is attacking him.
Well, here's one.
That's Andrew Colvett.
He's that used car salesman liar criminal.
He says, breaking, Joe Kent is under FBI investigation for allegedly leaking classified information per reporting from Semaphore.
The investigation predates his Reagan resignation.
So that's what they're doing.
Wait, reporting from.
Oh, OK.
So is this that stupid shit when Piggy Hicks said we're only letting certain people of the news in or else you're leaking information?
Is that what they're trying to get him with, you think?
No, they're just they are now, in retrospect, just trying to smear his character, and they're using anything that they can.
That's what this is.
And I like this from Wally Rasheed.
He says, number one, the Israel mob is now holding Zoom meetings and phone calls plotting how to save face following Joe Kent's statements because he said that Donald Trump and oh, this is all for Israel and that we shouldn't have done this and Iran didn't pose any threat to us.
It was for Israel.
Yeah.
And so that's all the other ones.
That's one of the top guys in the Trump administration when it comes to security.
And he's saying that we didn't have to, we went to Iran because of Israel and they didn't pose a threat to us.
And now the Israeli mob is now holding Zoom meetings and phone calls plotting how to save face following Joe Kent's statements.
They will begin delegitimizing his statements, calling it totally absurd.
Oh, you want to see who did that?
Ex-Trump counterterrorist Honcho Joe Kent peddles bizarre conspiracy theory that Israel had a hand in Charlie Kirk's murder.
Oh, so bizarre.
So they're doing exactly what Wally Rashid predicted.
They're going to delegitimize his statements, calling it totally absurd.
Well, they called it totally bizarre.
Is it?
Is it really bizarre?
Is it?
Number three, they will begin a deep investigation into Joe Kent's life, attempting to find anything to tarnish his reputation, character, and brand him as a fringe lunatic.
Well, he worked for Trump.
Number four, the Israeli mob will push their allies and U.S. officials to publicly condemn Kent's statements, isolating him from the establishment and powerful figures.
And five, the Israel mob will begin fabricating lies about Kent, including fabricating evidence to put this man in prison.
Watch how quickly this happens because these people are mobsters.
Okay.
Well, Ryan King wrote that article in the New York Post.
I got to see what he looks like, and I got to know his real name because I bet it's not Ryan King.
And so there it is.
There's the New York Post.
Ex-Trump counter terrorist Honcho, Joe Kent, peddles bizarre conspiracy theory that that's a bizarre, that's bizarre to you.
The people whose two main MOs are assassinations and false flags, and that's bizarre.
By the way, this post by the New York Post, it got community noted.
Yeah.
Joe Kent's exact words were by no means am I saying the Israelis did this or any of that, but I am saying there are a lot of unanswered questions there are there, and there isn't enough data to at least say that there's a good chance that President Trump feels like he is under threat.
That's what he actually said.
So they're twisting what he's saying.
They're going to.
That's Ryan King doing that.
They're trying to make up false stuff.
Who is that doing that?
That's the reporter.
I thought there'd be at least three reporters writing this important.
Yeah, his name's Ryan King.
He looks like a dipshit if you look at him.
So it's a conspiracy for sure, but is it really bizarre?
No, it's actually logical.
It makes a lot of sense.
Pretty much par for the course with Israel, isn't it?
That's pretty much what you've always heard.
And people who are Zionists that love Israel will brag to you that they will do literally anything to defend Israel, including traffic your kids.
That means anything.
Anything means anything, assholes.
Charlie Kirk has been debating, insulting, pushing back against liberals, Muslims, Democrats, LGBTQ community for over 10 years.
But as soon as he criticized Israel, he's shortly assassinated.
Yeah, what a bizarre theory.
You know how furries are huge pussies, so I would never believe one could kill anyone?
Right.
Unless it was a conspiracy?
I don't believe the kid, the pipe bomber, that they stitched some innocent kid up on 100%.
100%.
They got him out of a Patsy file.
There ain't no way that dude was the bomber.
So they do it all the time.
Hey, to learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.
And that's Israel.
That's Israel.
And you're not allowed.
Joe Kent is not allowed to criticize them.
Trillion Dollar Munitions Debate00:10:33
Guess what?
Charlie Kirk was not allowed to criticize them.
Look what they did to him.
Look what they're doing to Marjorie Taylor Greene.
Look what they're doing to Thomas Massey.
Look what they're doing to anybody.
Look what they're doing to Tucker Carlson.
Look what they're doing to Candace Owens.
Look what they're doing, Kurt, to Megan Kelly, who is a Zionist.
Yeah, Megan Kelly, the slightest amount of spine like that pure clear-skinned kid said.
So I like this.
People who should expect this effing outcome at this point.
Who in government is more likely to arrest?
Joe Kent or an Epstein client?
They're more likely to arrest Joe Kent.
I'm not kidding.
Watch for some kind of crazy charges to be thrown at him.
Nobody.
Man Tucker.
While this has borrowed nitwits right now, whose job it is to go, shut up, Tucker.
Oh, like you would be arrested.
Oh, shut up, Joe Kent.
Oh, you're the worst.
I hate, dude.
I hate you if you work online as a special agent.
I fucking hate you.
If you're an online deployed Smith Munt Modernization Act fucker, fuck you.
Someone says, bye-bye, America.
FY, all good things sadly come to an end.
It's done.
Sad part is how many Americans are in denial about it, so much so that they will be surprised when all hell breaks loose.
The writing has been on the wall for at least the last decade that you don't run your own country.
Your country is being run by a handful of oligarchs and Zionists.
I blame body positivity and to a large degree, the trans big pharma movement to make it so whatever people want to believe is true.
Because solipsism is how we got here.
So that's why a thing everyone should know, only a few people know.
Yes.
Because they all live in their own little matrix they made.
Pete Hegseth.
He went on.
This is called, this is what when you hear someone talk about projection, unconscious projection.
This is what Pete Hegseth is doing here.
So let's watch.
Pete Hegseth accuses Iran of investing its missiles and weapons instead of into people.
I'm not kidding.
Let's watch.
To that point on capabilities, you know, Iran is an energy-rich country, could be, should be.
Instead, like so many other places driven by a radical ideology, they've spent that money instead of investing in their people.
That's why you had millions of Iranians protesting because they felt like their condition quality of life didn't match what it could be or should be.
And what was the Iranian state?
There's a reason we call Iran the number one state sponsor of terrorism because they took the money they make and they invest it in tunnels and they invest it in missiles and they invest it in launchers and UAVs and we are destroying and disgrading that, degrading that in historic proportions.
But it doesn't mean they won't.
So that's how you know they're terrorists is because they invest their money in bombs instead of in their own people.
There goes old wrong word Pete Hegseth again, mixing up the different countries that start with the letter I. He's saying, yeah, that would be Israel.
So let's oh.
Jimmy, Jeepseghead is right.
Pete Hegseth is asking for $200 billion for more weapons, not for investing it in schools or $200 billion for the sick, $200 billion for workers or a jobs program or $200 billion to build new parks and libraries and schools and hospitals.
I live in California.
We could use about 10,000 more fire trucks full of water.
No, $200 billion.
They want just in.
So the exact thing he just said, that that's what makes Iran the terrorist, he's exactly doing immediately.
He immediately, after saying that, asked for $200 billion.
And I want to invite him to Kurt's new podcast called Can You Hear Yourself?
Yeah.
He started a war with Dan Bonjino.
Yes, I don't give a fuck.
Here's him asking for $200 billion.
$200 billion.
I think that number could move, obviously.
It takes money to kill bad guys.
So we're going back to Congress and folks there to make sure that we're properly funded for what's been done, for what we may have to do in the future, ensure that our ammunition is, everything's refilled, and not just refilled, but above and beyond.
I mean, President Trump, as he said, rebuilt the military in his first term.
Didn't think he'd use it as dynamically in his second, but he had.
So thank goodness he did that.
And an investment like this is meant to say, hey, we'll replace anything that was spent.
And now that we're reviving our defense industrial base and rebuilding the Arsenal of Freedom and cutting deals like our great deputy secretaries here is doing long lead times on exquisite munitions.
We're going to be refilled faster than anyone imagined.
And I think, you know, we're also still dealing with the environment that Joe Biden created, which was depleting those stockholds and not sending them to our own military, but to Ukraine, which is when you, every time we reach back and look at any sort of a challenge we have, it goes back to, well, send it to Ukraine.
Ultimately, we think this should be these munitions are better spent in our own interests at this point.
And this kind of funding bill is going to ensure that we're properly funded going forward.
So I haven't heard an argument that solid since, I don't know, I got to go back to when Gavin Newsom said he needed to spend an extra $24 billion to end homelessness in California.
Remember how that happened?
And look who turned out to be right.
So it's weird because it takes less money for the opposition to accomplish all this for some odd reason.
It's what we'd call a drain America dry drunk.
That's what's happening there.
Drain America dry.
And just to let you know, so he wants to spend an extra $200 billion.
Imagine what you could do with $200 billion if you spent it in America.
Imagine you said, hey, we're going to have a $200 billion project to build new parks, hospitals, and schools in the United States.
Imagine all the jobs that would create and how much better our country would look.
Imagine if they said we're going to have $200 billion and everybody's going to get bullet trains everywhere.
Just like China, we get nothing from that.
How about $2 trillion?
I bet we could each have our own bullet train for $2 trillion unaccounted for.
And then, of course, there's $1.5 trillion from Trump.
So they couldn't get it done.
They're just $200 billion shy of what they need to get done with the $1.5 trillion.
Right.
Amazing.
So the U.S. spends as much as about the next 12 largest defense budgets countries combined.
Iran's 2025 military spending was $23.1 billion.
That's what Iran spent, $23 billion.
We are now spending over $1.5 trillion.
Where they got access to Balsawood closer than us or something?
So, yeah.
For their paper airplane trophies.
Yeah, the only part I'm personally offended about is they included Ukraine's defense budget as if it isn't just part of ours.
Why would they?
Okay, how about Israel, South Korea?
I mean, what?
All the NATO countries?
I mean, you put China, Russia, Germany, the UK, India, Saudi Arabia, France, Jordan, all of them.
Australia, you put them all together.
They don't spend as much as the United States does on bombs.
And they're doing better in their wars, some of them, such as Russia even.
How do we never win after spending this much money?
How do we never win?
Well, we've lost every single war since World War II.
Who's in charge of the defense?
Gavin Newsom?
Probably, I forgot.
That could be why.
I wouldn't be surprised if the war was just an excuse to make sure we didn't have more money.
Yeah, we don't want you to have this extra money.
It might get healthcare or some disastrous thing.
It's easier to enslave us.
Well, now, because we're their biggest threat to them now that we've woken up.
So here, let me show you this.
So $200 billion more for war.
Let's put this in perspective.
During Biden's entire term, total U.S. support for Ukraine was $184 billion.
Now, look at just 20 days of the conflict with Iran.
$100 billion already burned in munitions, operations, and assets.
20 MQ-9 Reapers lost.
Multiple high-value missile tracking systems destroyed worth $700 million to $1 billion each.
Massive offensive and defensive deployment costs.
All this against a $315 billion economy, meaning Iran's economy, which is under heavy sanctions.
Wait, it sounds like they did spend on their people.
It sounds like they.
Sounds like they didn't because their munitions are much cheaper that they're winning with.
Right.
So it sounds like they worked, you know, spent smarter, not a complete scam on behalf of some Zionist military industrial complex.
So in less than a month, the United States has spent roughly one-third of Iran's entire GDP just to sustain this fight.
And now another $200 billion is required.
This could easily spiral to $500 billion to a trillion.
Meanwhile, U.S. national debt is at $39 trillion, heading to $40 trillion within just two months.
The debt-to-GDP ratio is 124% and rising fast.
At what point is this not strength, but strategic overextension?
If your opponent can force you to spend hundreds of billions of dollars just to contain them, who's really winning the long game?
Iran.
Yeah, like how they won the Iraq war we had?
Iran won that?
Yeah, remember that?
Yeah.
Oh, maybe that's how they did it with sanctions because they won that war that we fought for many years.
So this is from anti-war.com.
The Department of War says it needs another $200 billion.
Pentagon Chief Peak Headset said it could go higher.
According to a senior administration official speaking to the AP, the Department of War submitted the spending request to the White House.
Subsidizing Glyphosate Removal00:02:07
Congress will have to pass a supplemental military spending bill to authorize the funding.
Wow, it's always something like that nice round number, isn't it?
200 billion.
Never any specifics as to what it's for.
I hope those underground cities that they're building with it are beautiful because when humanity finds out about them, they're going to take them.
$199 billion.99, I think he said they needed.
Yeah.
Democratic says, Democratic Representative Rokana was quick to criticize the additional spending in a post on Twitter.
The congressman argued that the money would be better spent on welfare programs.
Several other Democrats came out against the proposal.
So what could be more impotent than Rokana speaking out against something that he knows nothing will be done about?
What if we just spent the money as a bribe to the who makes glycophate, Monsanto?
Who the fuck makes glyphosate or not?
Oh, Bayer.
So we bribe that old Nazi aspirin company, Bayer, the old IGFR, but we bribe them to stop poisoning us.
I've had people, grown-up people, argue that, hey, we can't transition off of glyphosate because it's too expensive.
We have to do it slow.
So what they're saying is we have to keep giving you cancer because it's too expensive.
Well, how about we take that $200 billion and give it to the farmers so then we can subsidize getting us off the cancer glyphosate?
We have the money to do it.
So people saying it's too expensive, it's bullshit.
We have $200 billion we can pull out of our ass anytime we want.
We just don't want to do it to keep Americans from getting cancer.
Well, I was going to say bribe the oligarch to stop putting it in stuff, but maybe yours is better than mine.
There it is.
Rokana says $200 billion would pay for free college for every American.
Oh, I can learn what gender I am finally.
And $10 a day for $10 a day for child care, 1,000 new trade schools, the 40% federal share of special needs education, and a lot more.
What are we even doing here?
Volatile World Spending Plans00:05:42
MAGA is now Iran first.
This is amazing.
This is well, I'll give props to Rokana.
It's well said.
Is childcare really only $10 a day?
That's very close to those starving Ethiopian commercials from when I was a kid.
The price of a cup of coffee?
Is that America now that you could feed one of us for the price of a cup of coffee?
Of course, Chuck Schumer did not denounce the bill for $200 billion, but he did say Secretary Marco Rubio and Hegseth must testify about the war.
So he's for it.
Why?
Because Chuck Schumer, the leading Democrat in the country, is for a Zionist, and he's in the bag for Benjamin Netanyahu and Israel and the Greater Israel Project.
That's why.
Is it kosher to eat raw hamburger meat with cheese on top?
Republican Speaker Mike Johnson endorsed supplemental funding.
He already is on board for it.
He said, obviously, it's a dangerous time in the world.
Yeah, that we just created.
Thanks, Mike Johnson.
You're not gay.
And we have to adequately fund defense and we have to a commitment.
It's not defense.
What we're doing in the Gulf right now with Iran, it's not defense.
It's offense.
And it's creating World War III.
We're not doing defense.
We're doing terrorism and offense.
Wait, Jimmy, you never sucker punch anybody in self-defense?
Yeah.
You lure them to a meeting for peace and then sucker punch them in self-defense?
Self-defense.
Trump's war against Iran appears to have a slim majority of support in the House and Senate.
Just enough.
Just enough to support to pass.
Isn't that something?
A war powers resolution aimed at forcing the president to end the conflict narrowly failed and bull narrowly just barely fails.
Isn't it amazing?
So close, but so far.
This is called the rotating villain.
That's what they say.
Look, I watched wrestling when I was a kid.
I didn't believe in it as an adult, but apparently you should call people that still believe in America like there's Disney adults.
Like Disney adults are another level of matrix, but if you still believe in this shit after you watch this, you're a Disney adult.
I like how Pete Hegset says it's going to take 200 billion, but that money could move.
It takes money to kill bad guys because he talks to you like you're a six-year-old.
We got to kill bad guys.
The bad guys are Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, and the United States.
Those are the bad guys.
Iran didn't attack anybody.
Those are the bad guys.
And by the way, when he says that number could move, that's how bad things have gotten.
Even our money wants to move out of America.
Here it is.
President Trump gets asked if the why is the Pentagon going to ask for an additional $200 billion?
The war is almost over.
Why is the Pentagon going to ask Congress for an additional $200 billion?
So if the war is almost over, why you need another $200 billion?
Well, let's listen.
We're asking for a lot of reasons beyond even what we're talking about in Iran.
This is a very volatile world.
It's a volatile world, you know, in the same sense that a bookstore is flammable because it's filled with paper.
But it takes someone stepping in the bookstore with a flamethrower to prove that point, right?
Hey, it's a nice world to be ashamed of something volatile happens.
It's a volatile world, especially when you got people like Israel and the United States going around bombing fucking countries that didn't threaten them.
I mean, can you imagine wielding America like a weapon against your neighbor?
Because you've just to call military equipment, the power of some of this weaponry is unthinkable.
You don't even want to know about it.
Oh, you could end this thing in two seconds if you wanted to, but we are being very judicious.
Oh, we're being very judicious.
Hey, why don't you sell that gold brooch right behind your head?
Maybe that'll fund the war.
Is it a judicious spell?
J-E-U-W?
That kind of judicious?
Hey, these are the bad guys that head Seth is speaking of.
You didn't tell me they were ninjas.
Those are the bad guys.
It takes a lot of money to kill bad guys.
Really?
I bet I could do it for like five bucks.
These are the bad guys.
Well, Jimmy, this is the hell of war.
These are the bad guys.
Just to let you know.
These are the best.
Is that a drone?
Is that nuclear plans?
Everyone in Congress right now, look at me.
Israel, it's all for you.
Oh, dear God.
Oh, there's no audio to this?
Oh, from the omen.
Oh, is that what this is?
Yeah.
His nanny.
Oh, okay.
I got you.
Okay.
So, are we actually committing suicide for Moloch?
It's actually not suicide if we don't agree to it, right?
It's murder, right?
That's exactly right.
Yeah.
I say we start to apply Israeli rules for our country.
Don't we have the right to defend ourselves?
Watch them call us anti-Semites for using the Zionist word for, hey, hey, God forbid we actually steal something from them for once, right?
Anyway.
So there you go.
Anti-Semitic Political Surveying00:12:00
$200 billion more for war.
Good.
Instead of spending it on the United States.
I'm the boot, Jimmy.
This is what I voted for.
I'm the boot.
I'm the boot, Jimmy.
You could take 100 cities and build 100 cities and build first-rate sporting stadiums.
Underground.
Underground for elites.
Sporting stadiums.
That'd be $2 billion each.
We could do that.
We could do that for 100 cities.
You know how many jobs that would create?
I mean, just think of the.
Again, I always like to say we could have 10,000 more fire trucks easily for maybe just a billion dollars.
I mean, do they even give the child trafficking jobs to Americans?
Or do those go to Israel too?
Wow, Pete Hegset.
But you remember, people who spend their money on missiles, that's why they're bad countries and bad leaders, and that's why they're terrorists.
They spend their money on missiles and bombs and war.
Did you know what?
45% of Republicans under 44 say Jews pose a threat to the American way of life.
That's from a new survey by Erwin J. Mandorf, UCFA, and Charles Jacobs.
Okay, so are these guys by any chance of a certain persuasion that's worried about this?
I'm guessing the.
So 45% of Republicans under 44 say Jews pose a threat to the American way of life.
And I'm guessing the other 55% don't answer surveys.
Am I right?
Come on.
Yeah, because why are they saying Jews and not Zionists?
I would say Zionists.
So how did they worry the question?
Yeah.
Because every time I see them try to divert it to blame, like, for example, Keaton and Russell, who are not, who are Jews?
It bugs me.
And I think it's a way to try to smear everybody and make sure you only can be one thing.
I think you're right about that.
Here is, so this is from the Jerusalem Center for Security and something.
Among Republicans under 44, 45% express elevated concern about Jews.
Among Republicans, 45 and older, 23%.
So it's nearly double of the.
So the younger generation of Republicans are at least doubly not on board with Israel.
I really would like to know how they asked that question.
That is interesting.
Because the Jerusalem Center said it.
So that means Zionists want to conflate Zionists, and strangely, your Fuentes want to conflate Zionism with Judaism at all times.
Yes.
Is that weird?
I'm always suspicious of people who want to conflate Zionism with Judaism.
That is a suspicious thing.
I did go and I did look at the survey, but I didn't remember to look at exactly what that question was.
Because these surveys are just such, like, I almost don't ever trust one anymore.
So participants were asked whether certain groups pose a threat to the American way of life.
There it is.
Okay, that is.
We already showed you that.
Okay.
So here's another one.
The political context matters.
55% of Republicans under 44 see Tucker Carlson as a likely national candidate.
Did you know that?
No.
58% say they would probably vote for him.
His support is strongest among younger voters.
I feel like someone's working up a brand new dialectic on me a little bit.
Even if Jews were viewed as less threatening than some older groups, some other groups, the fact that nearly half of younger Republicans expressed this concern cannot be ignored.
So what they're saying is that Republicans were more afraid of Muslims, right, and stuff like that.
Yeah, the Muslim thing ain't working as well anymore.
I'm sorry to tell you.
They still, I mean, it was great propaganda from Israel to get Christians and Muslims to hate each other.
It worked for a long time.
But I think it's got to draw their guy.
What's that?
You can't draw Muhammad with a bunch of babies.
Oh, that's right.
For 10 years, you couldn't say if women have dicks or not here.
So I guess I got over that part.
So you want to show me something?
Oh, here's the question.
So the question was, how much do you believe that Jews are in danger to the American way of life?
I bet if they would have asked, how much do you think that Zionists would have got a much bigger number?
That's right.
It's already flawed.
And you see, the Jerusalem center.
That's a flawed number.
The goal of this is more sense.
What do you think the goal of this survey is?
To crack down on you speaking freely.
So that's why they worded it in an anti-Semitic way on purpose.
Anybody that's anti-Semitic that way, I think you work for Israel.
I just think you do.
Because you do, de facto.
But 58% of them would vote for Tucker Carlson as for president.
I think they're trying to get a thing to destroy Tucker permanently with that.
That's how I take that.
Because the president doesn't determine shit, idiots.
Oh, who will.
I'm sure a new president's going to fix it.
Here's one more from that survey.
The concern isn't partisan.
It's generational.
When nearly half of younger Republicans express this level of concern about Jews, the long-term political implications deserve serious attention.
And I'm sure if you asked it the correct way, Zionists and not Jews, that you would get a much higher number of people.
Some Israel.
Say Israel.
Don't say Zionists.
Say Israel.
Don't say Zionists.
Don't say Jews.
Say Israel.
Yeah, and I bet the numbers are way worse.
But because Israel's got a permanent quest to act like if you had someone Jewish on your mother's side, you belong to them, that's why they're going to push this bullshit.
So here's what Sam Parker had to say about it.
He said, TikTok problem, update, bombshell, new poll conducted.
So he tells you this.
This is one of the reasons Charlie Kirk was removed.
Not only had he failed to stop this youth trend, making him essentially no longer useful, but he had begun to facilitate and accelerate the trend as he pivoted against regime change intervention in Iran and was platforming dissidents, calling for ending foreign aid to Israel, registering APEC under Farah, releasing the Epstein files, and admitting Epstein worked for Israeli intelligence.
This made him worse than useless.
And let's not forget that he was firmly on record blaming Jews and Jewish organizations for playing a disproportionate role in the radical quasi-Marxist and open border policies destroying America.
He did say that.
He didn't say Zionists.
He blamed billionaire Jewish donors.
It's not that he was useless.
He became more useful as a martyr to the people that were paying attention.
He said a few true things.
Yeah.
I mean, what Charlie, I think, started to realize was that TPUSA was started as a Zionist organization by Zionists.
He didn't realize it.
And then he started to realize that that's what this was.
And that's when they killed him.
So he's like, oh, I can't.
I think they always intended to kill him.
I wouldn't doubt it.
That's all that craziness.
Though TPUSA, through TPUSA, Charlie Kirk was the top influencer of America's youth.
And despite his public lip service broadly in support of Israel and Jews, he was actually and effectively becoming less supportive every day.
Worse, he was replatforming back onto college campuses everything the Zionist crowd had spent the previous two years trying to eradicate from the campuses.
The Jews expended a lot of resources to get rid of Ivy League presidents who allowed open debate on the Israel-related topics.
They tried to expend $150 million in resources on Charlie, but he told them no.
Then the Jews knew this.
So did Charlie.
You need the Jews.
Again, why are you saying that?
Right.
So did Charlie.
Why do you think he told people Israel would kill him if he turned on Israel?
Why was that even a thought or a discussion he was having with people privately?
Why did he tell people this after the meeting in the Hamptons?
After he attempted, after the attempted $150 million bribe that Charlie turned down, duh.
Ask yourself, would this 45% stat be higher or lower if Charlie were still alive and building on his talking points and strategic direction from last summer?
I can tell you the trajectory Zionists thought the number would be good.
So, of course, it would be much higher.
If they asked it without being anti-Semitic, it would be much higher.
Without anything with Charlie, to say Jews like that is really foul, dude.
It's really foul.
I agree.
Yeah.
So just to remind you, this is the head of the ADL, and he was recorded on a private phone call, a group chat, and he's here to tell you that the problem isn't left-right for Israel.
The problem is this.
But I also want to point out that we have a major, major, major generational problem.
All the polling I've seen, ADL's polling, ICCs polling, independent polling, suggests this is not a left-right gap, folks.
The issue in the United States in support for Israel is not left and right.
It is young and old.
And the numbers of young people who think that Hamas's massacre was justified is shockingly and terrifyingly high.
And so we really have a TikTok problem, a Gen Z problem, that our community needs to put the same brains that gave us TAC Lee, the same brains that gave us all these other amazing innovations, need to put our energy toward this, like, fast.
Because, again, like, we've been chasing this left-right divide.
It's the wrong game.
The real game is the next generation and the Hamas and their accomplices and eating the useful idiots in the West are falling in line in ways that are terrifying.
So that's what that is.
So what toggley is?
He said toggle.
Do you know what that is?
It's called birthright.
That's where they send you on a trip to Israel if you're Jewish American and they try to get you pregnant by another young Jew on the trip.
They do their best to get you pregnant because they need you to make kids to be soldiers possibly for Israel.
And that's why he's saying it's an amazing innovation to instill that kind of ethnic racism.
So notice that he doesn't, it doesn't have anything to do with listening to the population or to the young people.
Right.
We lost the game.
It's always a game.
It's never honesty.
It's always a game.
Someone else is winning.
And it's how to technologically manipulate everyone else.
That's right.
So it's not about actually we hit them with our arguments, we hit them with our ideas.
It's no, we have to technologically manipulate them.
We have to buy TikTok and keep this information away from them.
We have to propagandize them with lies.
We have to do opt-e- all that stuff.
That's what Nick Fuentes would say, optics.
People that talk about optics are liars and they're insincere because they're worried about an outer shell.
Like if you were secretly gay and pretended you weren't, they're worried about aesthetics and not real material things where people get killed for real, you know?
So this guy, he, this is interesting.
So this is his idea.
Citizens vs Israel Laws00:03:31
This is how the only way Israel could win back the youth in America.
He says the ADL and a few other Israel-backed organizations have been on video stating that they must curb free speech by pushing to change U.S. laws and by suing social media companies that permit criticism of Israel.
Yeah, maybe that's a bad thing.
Maybe that's why, how about this?
There's a video of Netanyahu referring to America as the new Rome that must fall, drawing a parallel to the historical conflict between Jews and ancient Rome.
Well, that's weird because those Jews in ancient Rome didn't control Rome, right?
The leaders like the FBI director, along with about 75% of U.S. senators, have appeared on TV to criticize or slam anyone who doesn't prioritize Israel.
While this might be acceptable in some contexts, these officials work for the American people, and U.S. citizens don't want their representatives speaking this way about any foreign country, not just Israel.
Yeah, it goes double for Ukraine, as a matter of fact.
Leaders like the FBI director, along with the oh, hang on, Israel has received over $312 billion in aid from U.S., yet the World Bank classifies Israel as a high-income country.
Meanwhile, many American citizens struggle to pay their bills, and they feel Israel wouldn't reciprocate help if the U.S. ever needed it.
Also, American Christians visit Israel often report feeling unwelcome.
They describe Israel citizens speaking down to them, showing little appreciation for U.S. support, and acting as if the U.S. needs Israel more than the other way around.
Yeah.
Israel is not allied with or fought alongside the U.S. in any major wars, conflicts, or interventions to support other countries, including Kosovo, Afghanistan, Iraq, Liberia, Taiwan, Haiti, Bosnia, Panama, Libya, Honduras, Iran, Iraq, Nicaragua, and 9-11 when they were watching the hijackers and dancing around.
Yeah.
Remember?
Figures like Randy Fine and Mark Levin have been seen yelling and advocating for U.S. citizens to face up to five years in prison for simply asking questions or criticizing Israel-American Israel.
Americans can criticize any person, group, or country, except apparently Israel.
The best way for Israel to regain support from U.S. citizens under 50 is to stop pushing for changes in American society.
Stop attacking or disparaging American citizens of the country that has backed Israel longer than anyone else, even when others wouldn't, and show more gratitude and politeness.
If we show how Israel is helping U.S. support citizens protect their country or pass laws for U.S. citizens to benefit them, they have less to critique Israel.
So, maybe I disagree.
I think Israel should be more way more pushy.
By the way, all that woke shit that they push, the ADL, if you recall, Jimmy, was a major pusher of wokeness.
Yes, major.
So, all the wokeness that we had to deal with for 12 years, if you're on the right, you didn't like it.
I know I didn't.
That came directly from Israel to benefit Israel, idiots.
And that's the ADL open.
You could go look it up, fuck faces.
And Charlie Kirk was saying that it was the Zionist Jewish donors who were advocating for open borders.
That's right.
It's called the dialectic.
And that way, you're the Vince McMahon of the pro wrestling show that's going on for all the imbecile cattle, which would be Americans.
And before you get too mad at Israel, aren't you a bunch of dumb cattle?
Inimitable Mike Final Thoughts00:01:03
Aren't you?
Hey, become a premium member.
Go to JimmyDoorComedy.com.
Sign up.
It's the most affordable premium program in the business.
All the voices performed today are by the one and only the inimitable Mike McRae.