Erika Kirk Accuses Candace Owens Of "Attacking My Family!"
In this segment Jimmy dissects Erika Kirk's recent Fox News interview, pointing out that her outrage comes across as theatrical and designed to deflect from mounting questions about alleged inconsistencies surrounding Charlie Kirk's death. He and Americans' Comedian Kurt Metzger highlight how TPUSA figures—including security personnel and commentators—have been caught in multiple contradictions, fueling suspicion of a coordinated cover-up. Jimmy contrasts Erica Kirk's fury directed at critics of the official FBI story with her lack of anger toward the alleged killer, framing this as narrative protection rather than genuine grief. The video ultimately portrays TPUSA's leadership as suppressing inquiry, ignoring evidence, and betraying Charlie Kirk's own ethos of inviting tough questions. Plus segments on the Trump administration's admissions that tariffs are causing higher prices and Tucker Carlson breaking his silence on the Charlie Kirk assassination narrative. Also featuring Stef Zamorano!
Come see me on tour in Potts Town, Pennsylvania, Waikiki, Hawaii, and the comedy store in Los Angeles.
Go to jimidoor.com for a link for tickets.
Establishment media sets of artists fighting so good luck on bullshit we can't afford like fomenting this world.
Watch and see as a jackdog comedian speeds and jumps the medium and hits him hit on.
It's the chimney door show.
Speaking of bad information, Erica Kirk went on Fox and she's coming out swinging against Candace Owen without naming her.
Here we go.
Watch this.
Now, remember, Candy, Erica Kirk, she's wearing her wrapper bling on her finger still.
She's got it.
She still got her Knights of Malta cross on because that was a big one.
And there's some kind of mason ring she wears too.
Oh, really?
And yes.
And she's, I don't know if she's doing the fake dabbing.
I never saw anybody cry like she cries with dabbing.
Saddam Hussein, you saw a cry like that when he was sending people at me.
Go, you too.
And he died his eye.
So here she is.
Let's get ready.
Here we go.
Come after me.
Call me names.
I don't care.
Call me what you want.
Go down that rabbit hole.
Whatever.
But when you go after my family, my turning point USA family, my Charlie Kirk show family, when you go after the people that I love, and you're making hundreds and thousands of dollars every single episode going after the people that I love because somehow they're in on this.
No, you know, I have to say it.
I've never seen you like this.
No, I'm very.
This is righteous anger because this is not okay.
It's not healthy.
This is a mind virus.
Yes, I believe in our judicial system.
I do.
We have a hell of a team working on this.
Excuse my French.
But this is not okay.
Are you disgusting?
So you want to put these people back in the box where they've been creeping from.
I don't care what box you're in.
But just know that your words are very powerful and we are human.
My team are not machines and they're not robots.
They are human.
We have more death threats on our team and our side than I have ever seen.
I have kidnapping threats.
I have, you name it, we have it.
And the core team is exhausted.
And every time are those threats coming from inside the house?
Yeah.
The security team revealed that trauma all over again.
They watched my husband get murdered.
I have no idea how I watched me not fire that security team that didn't decide to look at the roof.
By the way, Zionist security team.
It's a Zionist security team.
They watched him die.
They're supposed to prevent him dying.
Yeah, they're supposed to prevent him.
You're not supposed to watch it.
All right.
I tried not to stop this.
Let's keep it going.
If I was there that day and thank the good Lord that I did not have to see that happen.
But my team, they are rocked to the core.
So why every single day do they have to be dragged through the mud, analyzed because they're lying because they're lying.
That's why.
And we've caught them in multiple, multiple lies.
That would be why.
So I'm going to play it again and I'm going to stop it this time.
So I wanted to play it all the way through.
I almost did.
So let's watch it.
Righteous anger doesn't seem like anger.
Never mind righteousness of it.
It doesn't seem like anger to me.
And I've been watching auditions for three days.
Kurt, isn't it weird that she's angrier at the people trying to get to the bottom of who killed Charlie than she is at the guy she thinks killed Charlie?
Well, Candace's words have never been this powerful.
Why would they be that powerful unless you fucked up in some way?
Isn't it?
Is it?
Yes.
Isn't it?
It's just amazing that she's not angry at the guy who actually she thinks killed her.
She already forgave him, but she cannot get over the people who are trying to get to the bottom of it.
Isn't that interesting?
Let's watch this again and we'll stop and start.
Come after me.
Call me names.
I don't care.
Call me what you want.
I think you do care.
Go down that rabbit hole.
I think you care, A, and B, nobody has been calling you names.
That's not a rabbit hole to call you names, by the way.
Yeah, that's not a rabbit hole.
That's not a misuse of the term rabbit hole.
But when you go after my family, my turning point USA family, my Charlie Kirk show family, when you go after the people that I love and you're making hundreds and thousands of dollars.
You guys sold t-shirts at his funeral, you phony.
You sold fireworks at the event.
Yeah, that was probably hard to get into.
You had fireworks at his memorial.
What are you bringing this spectacle back to rock?
You guys made $70 million in a few weeks after his death.
And you're upset that someone is still doing the same show she's done every day of her life for the last 10 years.
You're upset about someone still doing a show that she's always done, getting the same numbers that she's always gotten.
Don't your mom work for a defense contractor, which is automatically not a good point.
Right.
You follow it around.
And also that Romanian charity is real weird.
A lot of stuff's real weird about the whole thing.
And you don't have, she doesn't have any questions, again, about the actual obvious BS story that's coming from the same people who covered up the Epstein files.
The same people who covered up the Epstein files are the same people telling you, and the same people who covered up the Butler assassination are the same people who are telling you that it was a low nut Tyler Robinson, and nothing they say makes sense.
Nothing.
The fact that, well, here's what I said.
Let's keep going.
Every single episode going after the people that I love because somehow they're in on this.
Because they're lying.
Why do you never mention that she's caught them in multiple lies?
The lie that, hey, they said that Charlie didn't turn against Israel and he was a staunch supporter of them.
And then she releases the text messages that show that everybody was lying about that at TPUSA.
Josh Hammer was lying about it.
Everybody at TPUSA was lying about it.
They're all lying about that.
Isn't that interesting to you?
Not interesting to Erica.
Tim Poole was angrier than she is.
Okay.
No.
You know, I have to say it.
I've never seen you like that.
No, I'm very, this is righteous anger.
More righteous anger than you had towards the guy who you think killed your husband.
Isn't that weird?
Yeah.
Yeah.
I'm going to tell you, that's weird.
My TPSUSA family, I'm more emotional about that than for my husband.
That's right.
You are more defensive over your TPUSA family than you are about your own husband.
Yo, go stroke JD Vance's hair.
Maybe you'll feel better.
Yes.
Because this is not okay.
It's not healthy.
This is a mind virus.
So anybody telling you to not ask questions around an obvious cover-up of an assassination that happened in public is in on the cover-up.
Anybody telling, those are the people who are toxic.
That is what's toxic.
Trying to stop people from asking obvious, especially reporters.
I went through this with Seth Rich, and I asked on a panel at the Young Turks with Jenk Uger and my good friend Ben Makowitz from Turner Classic Movies.
When I was put into an article, a hit piece in the Washington Post because I was asking logical questions about the Seth Rich murder, a murder they said was a botched robbery yet.
They didn't take his watch, didn't take his phone, didn't take his wallet.
I was asking logical questions.
They immediately ordered Dave Weigel to put me in a hit piece in the Washington Post for asking logical questions.
And here we are 10 years later, and we caught the FBI lying at least three times about the Seth Rich investigation, and they still won't release his laptop 10 years later.
This is the exact same thing they're doing.
Oh, you're hurting our feelings.
You're hurting our feelings.
How dare you?
We're mourning.
Oh, you can't upset the Seth Rich family.
F off.
I've never heard anything from them.
And I would think they'd want to know who killed him.
You would think they'd want to know.
So this is the same thing.
She's doing the exact same thing.
The person who is toxic here is Erica Kirk and TPUSA.
Keep going.
Yes, I believe in our judicial.
How do you spell that?
Is it J-E-W-D-I-C-I-A-L?
I've never seen her like this.
Let's hear it.
Judicial system.
We got to put that on the soundboard.
Okay, so make a note in the Slack.
We got to put this on the judicial system.
Judicial system.
I do.
We have a hell of a team working on this.
Excuse my French.
But this is not okay.
So you want to put these people back in the box where they've been creeping from.
I don't care what box you're in, but just know that your words are very powerful and we are human.
My team are not machines and they're not robots.
They are human.
Maybe they shouldn't be lying.
And so maybe they shouldn't be lying.
Maybe the people at TPUSA should stop lying.
Maybe your security team should stop lying.
How about that?
Maybe you should stop shaming people who are asking logical questions.
Go ahead.
Dr. Henry Kissinger referred to the victims of MKUltra as bioprogrammable human robotoids.
The word robot means worker.
That's all it means.
It's from Eastern Europe.
You saying we're not robots makes me think you are because of the robotic way that kid walked away holding his cell phone.
A robot.
Covered in blood.
A worker, a drone.
That's what they're going to make, trying to make everyone into.
Death threats on our team and our side than I have ever seen.
I have kidnapping three.
So Candace Owens has already, the FBI has confirmed she was the target of an assassination conspiracy already this year.
And now there's another one that is confirmed.
They won't even respond to it.
Also, TP USA was an in-person meeting for some reason.
Yeah.
I have, you name it, we have it.
And my poor team is exhausting.
Every time they bring this back up, so just like a classic Zionist, they're the victim.
They're the victim.
Not Charlie, not the people trying to get to the bottom of this, not the guy who's an obvious Patsy, but they're the victim.
The people who Charlie had ordered an investigation into their finances, and then eight days later, he was assassinated.
The guy who got rid of the COO and then ordered a Doe-style accounting investigation of his own organization.
Then eight days later, he's dead.
Okay.
What are we supposed to do?
Relive that trauma all over again?
See, that's it.
So when you do that, that is exactly what they did around Seth Rich.
Exactly.
Now, we all watched for 60 years John F. Kennedy get his head blown off, and nobody ever said, how dare you?
Why are you making Jackie O and his family relive this?
Nobody ever said that ever.
We saw pictures.
We saw a video of Ronald Reagan getting shot over and over and over.
Nobody ever said, why are you making it?
So all of a sudden it was Seth Rich.
And now it's this.
When they don't want you to look into it because the establishment is in on it, they don't want you to look at it.
They go, how dare you make us relive?
That is not a thing you say about a murder investigation.
That's not what you say about people questioning the establishment's cover-up of a murder investigation.
That's something you say if you're in on the cover-up.
It's 9-11 they did it.
9-11.
Same thing you could do.
How dare you ask.
I didn't know there was a third tower until two years ago.
Yeah, how dare you?
How dare you question 9-11?
They're the same thing.
And now we all know Building 7 was imploded.
It was a lie.
It was an obvious false flag, much like Vietnam, World War II, World War I. That's right.
Probably Civil War.
All of them.
Was it dawning on everyone?
The Iraq, the Iraq war, the Libya, they're all false flags.
So here we go.
They watched my husband get murdered.
And that's why they're trying to find out who did it.
You phoned.
I tried to avoid it.
I tried to not watch it.
And somehow it got into one of my streams of something I watched.
How?
Because we all are obligated to watch it because it was on purpose.
That's right.
Because then we're supposed to go, I saw a leftist.
You make it some capital and some lowercase.
You're supposed to do that dumb shit.
It's a work, stupid.
No idea how I would have reacted if I was there that day.
And thank the.
Would you probably turn, put your phone to your ear and walk away like a robot under a trance?
Would you, before he even, before his body even hits the floor?
Would you do that?
Is that how you would react?
Is that how you would react?
Okay.
He called you right away and lied about it.
Yeah.
Good lord that I did not have to see that happen.
But my team, they are rocked to the core.
Yeah.
So why every single day do they have to be dragged through the mud, analyzed, hyper-analyzed?
Because they're covering it up and they're lying and they're not asking for answers to the obvious lies by the FBI and the establishment.
That's why that's.
Your security team, especially.
Yeah, she's not angry at his security team that allowed him to be assassinated in broad daylight.
She's not angry at the security team who didn't have the drone coverage or they took the drone coverage and then they lied about it.
She's not angry that they didn't have someone on top of the building to make sure.
She's not upset at the security team that didn't even look at the rooftop to see a guy get up there, put a gun together, then take the shot.
Oh, here's, well, here's, here, hang on.
Come after me.
Call me names.
Okay, so here's what I said about it.
It's amazing to me how no one will address any of the actual things Candace Owens has said.
The TPUSA people have already been caught lying multiple times.
Remember, you only lie if you're trying to cover something up.
Those people are crying victim, just like their donors do while committing a genocide.
The fact that Erica Kirk, along with everyone at TPUSA, has zero questions about the obvious FBI BS narrative about the assassination is beyond puzzling and beyond belief.
I don't believe them.
I don't believe you.
I don't believe their lies.
I've caught them in too many lies.
And I don't believe that you're just this and curious about actually what happened.
I don't believe you and I don't believe them.
And then I said, and then I said, tell me again how a 30 out 6 bullet didn't blow his head off or leave a drive-through window in the back of his neck.
Seriously, go ahead.
Tell me again.
He had miracle bones, Jimmy.
He had miracles.
Stop hurting everyone.
Tell me how a shooter was allowed to get on that roof in the first place.
Just tell me that.
The door was locked, and the police wouldn't let his million-dollar security team who are from Israel do the security.
You know how people that are IDF-trained are sloppy with that?
Yeah, you know how sloppy they are.
Tell me again how nobody saw a gunman on the roof assemble a gun, set it up, take the shot, then disassemble a gun.
People in the crowd saw that guy, but nobody in his million-dollar security team saw.
And then his security team lied about the drone footage.
But Erica and the people at TPUSA have zero questions about any of this.
Really?
When you watch Kash Patel lie time after time, insultingly obvious ways.
So since he's never told the truth since he got in, you, as someone whose husband was murdered, you don't have more questions for him?
They have no questions about the obvious BS text messages Tyler Robinson was supposed to have sent to his trans lover.
Not one question, not one question about why they paved over a crime scene two days after an assassination.
Not one question about all the suspicious Google searches coming from Israel and Washington, D.C. Not one question about why the people at TPUSA lied about taking the SD cards and being directed to do so by the cops when they were not.
And then after they were caught lying about that, they made up a new lie that they were worried someone would steal the cameras.
Except they didn't take the cameras.
They just took the SD cards.
There is an obvious cover-up happening, just like that cover-up of the Epstein files, just like the cover-up of Seth Rich's murder.
They're trying to silence anybody asking logical questions that everybody should be asking.
And that's the tip-off that this is a coordinated cover-up.
This is the Mockingbird Media 2.0, as Candace has already said.
That's obviously what's going on.
Obama signed it into, they deployed troops to social media.
That's right.
Fake accounts back in 2014, and they've never stopped.
They've never stopped.
So here's what Kelly Renee says: What you're pointing out is a classic psychological pattern.
When major inconsistencies exist, but the people closest to the narrative show zero curiosity, it signals narrative protection, not clarity.
Silence around key questions is often a strategy.
Limit inquiry, reduce cognitive friction, and keep the audience in a controlled frame.
When questioning is treated as a threat instead of a responsibility, it's the hallmark of a narrative management, not truth-seeking.
In healthy systems, scrutiny is welcomed.
In manipulated, controlled systems, it's punished.
You're trying to explain to a chick who dates a guy that sucks, and they tell you all their complaints, and you're like, well, you see how he's lying to you?
And they go, no, I think it's going to work out.
Or, dude, that's going to say, same adult alcoholic adult.
Yes, these are children of adult alcoholics.
Or abused housewives.
They're not angry at the person lying to them or abusing them.
They're angry at the person who points out.
That's exactly what's happening right now with Candace Owens and anybody who's questioning the narrative.
Here is what Ava Pertrucci says.
She says, What irks me is the emotional manipulation.
If she is grieving, if she's a grieving widow to be treated with extra consideration, why is she acting CEO of a political organization?
Politics is a tough game.
No one is immune from scrutiny.
How about Pete Asplund?
He says it's obvious that she's afraid for herself and for her kids and is performing to save their lives.
I don't blame her.
She has no escape from this, but we can discount what she's saying because it's obvious she is lying and knows that her husband was assassinated by people who will do the same to her and her kids if she doesn't play along.
So that's what this looks like.
Yeah, that's impossible.
So that is the most generous reading you could give to what Erica Kirk has been doing and her silence, her lack of inquisitiveness about this, and her lack of questions about any of this.
That's the most generous reading you could give.
Okay.
I mean, I'm sure she grew up in one of them screwed up families because if you're running a Romanian charity that's also child trafficking, child trafficking.
You probably learned early that you're going to have to play ball or have faced terrible consequences.
Could you imagine Jackie O coming out after JFK?
Quit asking questions.
It was Oswald and that's that.
It was a magical miracle bullet.
There was nobody on the grassy knolls.
Shut up.
And I also just want to say that I just can't understand if Candace Owens was such a good friend of my husband's, why I wouldn't be picking up the phone and having a conversation with her directly.
Why do I have to be talking about this on Fox?
She probably doesn't want to be killed because none of her emotions, I've never seen you like this.
It looked like bad acting.
The whole thing looks like she's wearing her Megan Kelly red jacket to go with her blonde hair.
I'm getting one.
Oh, oh, that's a great idea.
I'm going to get one.
A red jacket.
It's a race.
It's just like they want to imprint that blue and red bullshit in every cow's head so badly.
And so, like, it doesn't work anymore.
The old, the old, like, hypnotic bullshit does not work like it used to, and they all are upset about it.
But I think she very possibly is afraid for her life.
I think that's totally a possibility.
So, here, um, Umbral says, TPUSA was created and funded by Israel.
Once Charlie started turning on them, evidenced by his texts, he had to be eliminated.
You don't take money from the mafia and then walk away.
You definitely don't turn their money and influence back against them.
They kill you for that.
That's exactly what they do.
Texas Free Thinker says, Jimmy, it's just that simple.
Just calling them conspiracy theorists is not going to work.
This isn't going to make this go away and address each issue.
Dodging a question just brings more questions.
You know, it's like when the society or whatever for Italian Americans from that mobster was trying to say it's racist to say there's a mafia back in the 70s.
Yeah.
Colombo with that shot.
Yeah.
The government's in that stage.
We all know there's a mafia assholes.
Okay.
Only the only biggest slowpokes don't know, and that's because they haven't felt the pain of what they're doing to all of us yet, but they will.
Brayton Howell says the fact that they're using Charlie's name, likeness, and image to make as much money as TPUSA has, let alone continuing to tweet from his Twitter account, has zero room to ask anyone to stop asking questions.
Amen, Jimmy, says Chris Skirp.
This is why they're freaking out so bad.
They didn't want any of these questions asked.
That's exactly right.
Hey, she has more anger for Candace than she does for her husband's killer.
That's the politics knob.
Hey, private Joker, you're hurting Charlie.
Oh, yeah, me, I'm doing it by asking now that he's dead and not, you know.
Hey, we'll get Candace's response to Erica after a quick message from one of our sponsors.
Stick around.
You ever notice how just standing up after sitting too long feels like a full contact sport these days?
Knees crack back, props, and suddenly you're wondering when walking to the fridge became cardio.
It's not your fault.
Modern life's made us too sedentary, and our bones and joints pay the price.
And that's why I came across the Juvent Micro Impact platform.
It got my attention.
This thing uses safe micro movements, not those high-impact machines that can actually mess you up, to gently activate your body's natural systems that support mobility, comfort, and long-term vitality.
Turns out people using this thing say they're feeling less pain, too.
It can help you improve circulation, support bone and joint health, relieve constipation, and even boost your energy and lymphatic flow.
If you haven't already, go back and listen to my episode with Juven's President to hear the science behind it.
It only takes 20 minutes a day, and it's built for people who want to stay active, strong, and independent without risking injury.
So, here's the deal: head over to juven.com/slash door.
That's j-u-v-e-n-t.com/slash d-o-r-e and use the code D-O-R-E for $300 off.
There's a six-week buy, six-week buyback guarantee and a 10-year limited warranty.
So, you've got nothing to lose except your pain and stiffness.
Try it today.
Your future self will thank you.
Candace responds a little.
She sprounds a little.
Now, I wasn't sure about Erica.
I was waiting kind of a situation for her to be in, obviously, having lost her husband, becoming the CEO and the chairman of a company.
It's just a lot of transition, and it's nice to wait for more information before you pre-judge or some, you know, just assume, make an assumption about somebody, and it maybe is not based in reality.
Well, we are getting a lot more of Erica Kirk this week.
I'll tell you that because she has been doing the rounds in the media really over the last couple of weeks.
And she just gave an interview live with Harris Faulkner on Fox News, where she finally addressed the quote-unquote conspiracy theories.
And I have to say this because it's true, but it completely missed the mark for me.
I am sorry.
It just has.
But the good news is that she is now unmurkying the water in terms of her intentions with this massive political organization.
That's good news, truly, because we knew Charlie, and now we are getting an opportunity to know Erica.
Charlie's whole gig was ask me any question you want.
That's the whole thing.
And now, TPS USA and Erica Kirk is: How dare you ask me a question?
So, turning what Charlie Kirk stood for on its head, completely a 180, a betrayal of Charlie Kirk's modus operandi of his values, completely a betrayal of his motto, which was go ahead, change my mind, ask me questions.
And I know he was pretty sincere, really, at the end of the day, because they killed him.
They killed him.
That's right.
I didn't give him enough credit, but I have to now because they murdered him for it.
Yep.
So, Project Constitution says, Tucker Carlson backed Candace tonight.
Patrick Byrne backed Candace last week.
Two X CIA sources backed the French hit.
The whistleblowers, the flight data, the NEF cousins, the foreign call pings, everything is lining up.
Only one side is still pushing the shut up and trust the FBI narrative.
You already know what side that is.
The mask is off.
The line has been drawn.
Choose wisely.
And I just want to show you how much of a betrayal Erica Kirk and the people at TPUSA are doing around Charlie Kirk's name, his legacy, his motto.
Here, let's watch this.
Let's watch.
Again, I think the best reading of what happened there is who wanted JFK dead the most.
Again, a lot of people said Israel wanted JFK dead.
I'd love to hear that argument, but definitely Lyndon Baines Johnson and parts of our own government and the Cubans wanted him dead, and who actually made it happen.
There were like 15 or 20 things that happened that day that were inexcusable.
They changed the parade route.
He rode in an open-air convertible.
LBJ decided not to ride alongside of him.
The vehicle slowed down right when it went by the Texas schoolbook depository.
A lot there, right?
And then, again, I think that all of us are smarter to believe that it was simply Lee Harvey Oswald.
The more important question is not, oh, who did it?
We have to first acknowledge it, that more than one person did it.
Once we acknowledge that more than one person did it, then we can expose our government to have lied to us about the JFK assassination, which then I think will sober a lot of us about trusting the government in the future.
So there you go.
You don't trust the government, you lying phony.
You don't trust.
That's your, there it is.
There's the head of the organization, Charlie Kirk, saying, once we can prove that more than one person was involved, we know the government is lying to us and you can't trust the government.
Well, we know, so that's what they're afraid of, that we're going to be able to pinpoint the other people involved in this because this was obviously not a lone gunman none.
And anybody saying that is being paid to say that or is the dumbest person in the history of the world.
Or in on it.
The most gullible.
That's what I'm saying.
You're either being paid to say that, you're in on it, or you're the dumbest person in the entire world.
Wow.
There's them going.
They're going directly against what Charlie Kirk says.
Directly against it.
Okay.
It's unreal that the arrogance to be like outraged and then not even have the decency to visibly be emotional and tell me you're emotional.
Right.
I'm actually insulted by that the most.
Oh, I've never seen you like this.
What?
Like slightly changing your tone?
I mean, I'm not seeing any real emotion.
Here's Charlie Kirk telling you what they should be doing and what people at TPUSA should be doing.
I'm going to continue to ask the question, a 20-hour response in a country the size of New Jersey.
That begs a big explanation.
And more importantly, America is significantly underwriting the Israeli government, $4 billion a year.
We as American taxpayers deserve answers to this.
We deserve answers.
Also, if we're going to get into a regional or world war based on an intel failure, so, I mean, we pay for this.
What are we buying?
Right?
I got smeared as a Jew hater, an anti-Semite, and conspiracy theorist because I said exactly what I just said.
And I refuse to back down despite all the smears thrown at me because I learned during COVID.
I learned when they told us that it came from a bat in the Himalayas.
I learned when they told us the vaccine was safe and effective.
I learned when they told us that Iver Mectam was horse-paced, that you better keep asking questions because it's the only thing that keeps us free.
Thank you so much.
And there you go.
So F you, everybody at TPUSA, and Erica Kirk, who's a toxic liar who is a part of the cover-up now.
I mean, unless you're about to be killed.
Unless she's about to be killed, then I'll cut her some slides.
How about that?
Yeah, I mean, if it turns out, if that turns out, but the fact that you're turned off by her means she's doing what she's got to do to stay alive, I guess.
Could be that way.
And I'll go, and if it turns out it's that, I'll go, hey, I'm sorry that I thought bad of you.
I'm glad you did that to stay alive.
But, you know, until then, I'm just going to trust my eyes.
Hey, you know, here's another great way you can help support the show is you become a premium member.
We give you a couple of hours of premium bonus content every week.
And it's a great way to help support the show.
You can do it by going to jimmydork.com, clicking on join premium.
It's the most affordable premium program in the business.
And it's a great way to help put your thumb back in the eye of the bastards.
Thanks for everybody who was already a premium member.
And if you haven't, you're missing out.
We give you lots of bonus content.
Thanks for your support.
So here, look, it says Trump unveils a $12 billion aid package for farmers hit by the trade war.
Don't spoil us.
Means test it.
Yeah, what he means, what they really mean is Trump unveils $12 billion aid package for farmers hit by the tariff war.
That's what this is.
And of course, all those farmers have to do to get that $12 billion is to move to Ukraine.
That's it.
That's all they have to do.
So here he is.
Let's watch.
I'm delighted to announce this afternoon that the United States will be taking a small portion of the hundreds of billions of dollars we receive in tariffs.
So what we're doing is we're taking a relatively small portion of that, and we're going to be giving and providing it to the farmers in economic assistance.
And we love our farmers.
And as you know, the farmers like me, because, you know, based on voting trends, you could call it voting trends or anything else, but they're great people.
They're the backbone of our country.
So we're going to use that money to provide $12 billion in economic assistance to American farmers.
$12 billion is a lot of money, Meryl.
What do you think?
Peanuts for you, though, right?
Yeah, that's way less than you gave to the Argentinian farmers.
Well, you gave $40 billion to Argentine.
Argentina?
Argentina?
Argentina.
Argentina?
You gave $40 billion to them, actually, $60.
But you gave $12 billion to America.
Do you see the problem?
Also, do you see the problem of I thought that Americans weren't going to pay the price for these tariffs, but apparently these farmers were, so now you've got to give them $12 billion out of the tariff money.
Okay.
All right.
He's a farmer of rice.
This release, this relief will provide much-needed certainty to farmers as they get this year's harvest to market and look ahead to next year's crops, and it'll help them continue their efforts to lower food prices for American families.
So get this.
Farm groups and Republicans, farm state lawmakers have sought the aid in part to support farmers with purchases of seeds, fertilizer, and other expenses for next year's growing season.
Okay.
Why, first of all, why would we need to buy?
Why do we need help?
Why do the farmers need help buying seeds?
Well, that's right, because one company owns all the seeds, and America allows that because America hates you.
That's why the establishment billionaire class hates you.
One company owns all the seeds.
Isn't it Monsanto?
I'm pretty sure.
I think you're right about that.
Yeah.
And as long as they meet the, but they can have the money for the seeds as long as the farmers meet the stipulation that they only use Bill Gates' GMO seeds made from durable styrofoam.
Get this.
Hey, farmers, I like what Covey says.
Hey, farmers, Argentina got $40 billion bailout, and their farmers got a new market for their soybean while you get $12 billion, lost your share of the global soybean market, and a farmers for Trump hat.
That's what you get.
Isn't that something?
Jimmy, I wanted to let you know that there are four corporations that have the monopoly on the seeds.
There's a monopoly on the seeds.
They said it's four major corporations, Bear, which owns Monsanto, Corteva, AgriScience, ChemChina, Syngent Group, and BASF, controlling two-thirds of the seeds and possible pesticide sales.
And guess what?
The farmers don't want it.
Arkansas soybean farmer on bailouts.
I want trade, not aid.
I need a place to sell this stuff.
I can work hard enough and make a product.
They painted us in a corner with this China deal, and China's not buying our soybeans.
They've tore a market in half.
That's what they're saying.
Here is, that's 12, that $12 billion drop in the bucket.
Just like the last time, many farmers aren't going to benefit from this even.
So they're not.
$28 billion in farm bailout was done in 2018 and 2019 when Trump was president the first time.
The big agro companies, the big agriculture companies, were the ones who got the greatest portion of that money.
Complicit and dishonest.
Chuck Grassley applied for that money twice.
Senator Chuck Grassley from Iowa.
So that's where the money's going.
And it's probably all going to one farm, the one owned by a certain foreign interest, so they can just get all the money back again.
Hey, that reminds me of the Piddley COVID checks that both parties wanted to means test.
Remember, remember?
And then Bill Maher dutifully said, oh, everyone was such a pig getting too many $600 checks.
Yeah.
And that's what the problem.
Not the crystal ball, fine work by her pointing out a bailout to the bank during the pandemic.
So here's July 18th.
To ease the pain of Trump's trade war, $12 billion in aid for farmers.
That's 2018.
Maine, 2019, Trump gives farmers $16 billion in aid amid prolonged China trade war.
This is dozens of Iowa farmers get less than $25 from Trump's tariff assistance.
Data shows.
Also, Chuck Grassley will apply for Trump's federal farm bailout cash for the second time.
So it's pretty obvious that the elites are destroying our food system because controlling us through the internet didn't work.
Here's an intelligent, informed farmer and former Republican leader.
He speaks to the proposed $12 billion bailout.
No surprise, it's not about support.
It's about creating dependency.
It's about control.
Let's listen to what he has to say.
Hi, Chris Gibbs, Ohio.
It's Monday morning, December 8th.
In a few hours, the Trump administration is set to announce yet another round of hush money payments to keep farmers and ranchers sedated and to keep them in line as we approach the midterm elections next year.
The justification for these payments is that they're needed to serve as a bridge so that farmers and ranchers can get to that navarna of what the Secretary of Agriculture refers to as the golden age of agriculture that the administration claims is just around the corner.
But make no mistake, this promise is a bridge to nowhere.
There is no master plan to return market share to American agriculture.
Let me put a finer point on it.
There are no trade deals.
There are no signatures.
There is no ink.
The truth is, these hush money payments being funded once again by the American taxpayer highlight the failed trade policies and the economic policies of the Trump administration as they continue to wage war on trade, wage war on our markets that we as farmers developed and wage war on our input costs through tariffs on agriculture in our rural communities.
And what's worse, these hush money payments won't benefit farmers at all.
Nope.
They'll be immediately assimilated by our monopolies that control our fertilizer, seeds, and crop protection supplies, magically resulting in increased costs that match the payments.
These payments will go through farmers like poop through a goose.
So, now the hard truth for my fellow farmers and ranchers.
Where we find ourselves, where we are, because I'm struggling too, is by design.
It's by design that you are now dependent upon this administration for your very survival.
You are now dependent on your neighbor's tax dollars to survive.
That same neighbor who's struggling to buy the very groceries that you provide.
That should make you sick to your stomach and maybe even embarrassed.
What a demeaning place to be for an industry that prides itself on its grit and independence to make an honest living off the land.
But this is what the Trump administration does: it maneuvers industries and people into blind canyons where the only option is to come hat in hand and beg for relief.
And once that relief is granted, they will ensure you remain dependent and that you'll behave.
I got a news flash.
I'm an American farmer and I don't dance.
I don't grovel.
And I sure as hell don't sit and behave for anyone.
It's time for American Ag to saddle up, stand up for what's right, start with your commodity and membership organizations and tell your elected leadership that we want our markets back.
We want our pride back.
And if they don't have a stomach for it, we'll find somebody else.
As Trump would say, what a traitor.
What a traitor.
This low IQ traitor.
Why is that guy so paranoid about paying out billions of dollars to somebody?
That doesn't automatically mean they want you to do what they tell you to do.
Hey, here's more money than you've ever seen in your life.
No strings attached.
Like someone hasn't watched Mr. Beast.
There's always strings attached.
Okay.
I'm certain China will meet their commitment, especially since half their farms are here in America after they bought up half our farmland.
I'm sure.
Doesn't Bill Gates own part of them?
That's true.
There's some competition.
Bill Gates, you don't think Bill Gates is going to get that money?
He's friends with them.
That's right.
Bill Gates is big buddies with Trump.
Bill Gates is the biggest private farm landowner in America.
He is a seed bank of the seeds because all the GMO seeds, they have to buy from Monsanto and you can't grow anymore.
Like a weed dealer that told, like, don't keep the seeds if you find any back in the day.
Yeah.
So here, here is what Agriculture Secretary's Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins said when asked if today's $12 billion bailout to farmers is a tacit acknowledgement that their trade policies are hurting them.
So let's see.
Is Trump's trade policies hurting farmers?
Let's see what she says because you got to give them $12 billion.
And Secretary Rollins, is this bailout today an acknowledgement that the administration's trade policies are hurting U.S. farmers?
And what would you say to U.S. farmers who are worried that China is not going to hold up its end of the agreements that the president was touting?
Yeah, so two quick things to answer your question.
When we were out here earlier this spring, I think I came out and gaggled with a lot of you after the president announced Liberation Day.
And starting then almost immediately, I said this president is resolutely focused.
If there is any evidence that trade is compromising these farmers' ability to sell their product, that we will ensure, just as he did in term one, negotiating China one, that we'll make sure that we are mitigating for that.
The really interesting thing is, though, now that we're eight, nine, 10 months into this, there is almost zero evidence, if any evidence, that what they are doing and the challenges that our farm economy is facing in row crops has anything to do with these trade renegotiations.
Instead, the input costs being so high based on the last administration and not one new trade deal in four years.
Those are really the two basically driving factors in why the farm economy is today what it is.
So you'll see we pivoted from, you know, we're going to do an aid package, assuming the trade has been extremely or potentially harmful.
And instead, now we're just going to support our row croppers based on those input prices, based on no new deals, as we continue to monitor trade.
On the China soybeans, Secretary Besson himself, a soybean farmer, I think at least a couple of days ago, I think he just divested, has said, and the president has said and made very clear in that room that China will meet their commitment.
And so I have full faith in what they've said, and I'm very excited.
I'm encouraged by that.
But as you know, they've failed before to live up to those agreements.
That's true, but it's a new day.
I do.
Yeah, of course.
So China doesn't live up to their agreements, but they will this time.
Why?
Because no reason.
I have concerns.
I do believe that we will get there.
So it's enough money to string you along until it's too late for everyone.
So if you want to know what's happening, this is from Reuters.
Trump announced the aid at a roundtable and blah, Growers, corn, cotton, wheat, potatoes attended the roundtable.
Rollins said that $11 billion of the aid will go to row crop farmers and will be dispersed by February 28th.
The administration is holding back the remaining $1 billion for fruits, vegetables, and other crops to finalize the details that woman just said.
Besant, our Secretary of the Treasury, said the payments will be a liquidity bridge during a period of adjustment to support farmers until they see benefits from Trump's trade deals and other policies.
Really?
A liquidity bridge.
So people receiving government assistance should say, you know, people getting food stamps or welfare, they should say, hey, I'm not on welfare.
I'm just getting a liquidity bridge during a period of adjustment.
It's a liquidity bridge.
That's all.
That's all.
I'm getting a liquidity bridge.
A liquidity bridge.
Nothing sounds more solid and secure and steady than a liquidity bridge.
She's giving me some money to get to the point.
Oh, my God.
The money for the package will come from the Commodity Credit Corporation, a discretionary USDA fund, and will be offset by tariff revenue.
Rollins told reporters at the White House without providing further details.
Payments will be calculated based on how many acres farmers have planted, their production costs, and other factors, said Richard Fordyce, USDA Undersecretary for Farm Production and Conservation.
So we're going to offset the money farmers are losing because of the tariffs with money that we took in from the tariffs.
Do I have that right?
Oh, I think I do have that right.
Okay.
So Amy Klobuchard, the top Democrat on the Senate Agriculture Committee, said in a statement that Trump's trade policies have hurt farmers.
The easiest way to give our farmers more certainty would be for the president to end his tariff taxes.
Farmers have faced higher costs for agricultural inputs like seed and fertilizer, which the Trump administration has said it's examining.
Soybean farmers expect to see their third consecutive year of losses in 2025, according to the American Soybean Association.
Trump said at the White House that he would further help farmers by eliminating many environmental regulations for farm machinery and that he would expect manufacturers like John Deere to lower equipment prices.
Farming equipment has gotten too expensive, and a lot of the reason is because they put these environmental excesses on the equipment, which don't do a damn thing except make it complicated, Trump said.
A John Deere spokesperson said the company supports the farmer aid and that it is doing all we can to help U.S. farmers reduce input costs.
Yeah, they're doing all they can, except besides lower their prices.
You mean except that?
That's not environmental shit on John Deere, by the way.
It's the same as Monsanto, but with tractor equipment.
Scott, by the way, Scott Besson, hey, isn't that the billionaire who runs the hedge fund Trump bailed out in Argentina?
Oh, yes.
I believe the Soros boy is invested in that hedge fund.
It's like they're all on the same team.
Trump also said he's asked China's president Xi Jinping to increase China's recently negotiated soybean purchases accretion.
I think he's going to do more than he promised to do.
Really?
Zijin?
He later, Xi Jinping later quoted as saying, got to help a brother out.
Yeah, even though we're going to start a war in Venezuela because supposedly China's influence is too much there.
Do they ever tell you the truth about anything?
Is it just all over this?
That's right.
So during his first term, Trump gave $23 billion in aid to farmers hurt by his trade policies.
Farmers are set to receive a near-record $40 billion in government payments this year, fueled by ad hoc disaster and economic aid.
Net farmer income could fall by more than $30 billion in 2026 due to a decline in government payments and low crop prices, according to an estimate from the Food and Agriculture Policy Research Institute at the University of Missouri.
Wow.
Okay.
Here's a U.S. announces new trade deals in an attempt to cut costs for consumers.
The U.S. has announced framework trade deals with Argentina, Ecuador, Guatemala, El Salvador, as the Trump administration pushes to reduce food prices.
A senior administration official said on Thursday that while the reciprocal tariffs of between 10 and 15 percent would remain on most goods, imports from four countries, they would be removed on select.
So of course they're taking away.
You will see for Ecuador, for example, bananas is something they want to ship to us.
So we expect tariffs will come off bananas.
What?
They also suggested that levies could be reduced on other goods, like coffee.
We certainly would expect that retailers and wholesalers in America would pass along any positive effects to the American consumer.
Taking off a tariff doesn't change the weather in Ecuador, but it could have a price effect.
So in an effort to bring down prices, they're reducing the tariffs.
But if that is the case, then what was the point of the tariffs in the first effing place?
I thought the other countries paid the tariffs, not Americans.
Well, you'll have to pay some of it.
It sounds like a Democrat plot, what you're saying.
So here they are admitting that the Americans pay the tariffs and that we're going to take the tariffs off some of that stuff because it makes it too expensive.
Oh, so you make a horrible thing, then you walk it back a little bit, but not all the way, but we move forward into shit again, like they do everything.
Right?
We slowly take all your rights and everything away from you.
Like when Trump got in, and now you can say more no-no words than you could before.
Like women don't have dicks.
You can say that.
And you're supposed to be grateful that you're allowed to have the rights you always should have been had.
That's how it works.
The announcement comes as Trump administration is under growing pressure to tackle a cost of living crisis affecting millions of Americans.
Kevin Hassett, director of the National Economic Council, said earlier this week that the United States inflation, which is at 3%, was moving in the right direction, but acknowledged that grocery prices had risen during President Trump's second term.
The affordability gap that was created by former President Joe Biden's runaway inflation is gradually being whittled away by higher growth that we have.
In the end, the most important message is going to be what people see in their pockets, which is higher incomes and a higher ability to spend.
Okay, well, we'll see.
That's what we're waiting for.
So Tucker Carlson went on Theo Von Show, and he's now addressing, finally, he's addressing the hubbub around people asking questions about the Charlie Kirk assassination.
So a couple of months later, here we go.
Tucker's been busy doing great work, by the way.
He's been doing great work.
And so he's had a lot of stuff on his plate.
And so I appreciate that he hasn't been able to get around to this.
But believe me, he is going to.
And here's the start of it.
Who was Charlie Kirk?
Yep.
Oh, really?
No, yeah.
And I love his wife and know his wife well.
And so I feel emotional about it.
So, you know, I just haven't wanted anything to do with it.
But I will say a couple of things.
I don't understand the official story.
Nobody does.
Nobody does.
And nobody can defend it.
And when they defend it, they look like liars.
You know why?
Because they're lying.
That's why.
Okay.
I don't.
I don't.
I don't understand it.
And I want to make sure that there is a like a truly rigorous and honest federal investigation.
Well, there isn't.
And I'm definitely concerned about that.
A. B.
And we all know that there isn't right now.
Kash Patel is covering up the Epstein files.
He's covering up the Butler investigation and now he's covering this up.
After the Epstein ban, you should have completely turned on anyone in government other than Massey.
I think that's right.
Or our MTG.
She's gone.
Here we go.
I think that one of the, I don't know many of the details, but I know that recently Candace said that Egyptian registered aircraft were following Erica Kirk Charlie's widow around for a number of years in different places in the world.
That's one of the weirdest things I've ever heard.
Yes.
And I just want to say that that is factually true.
Yes.
That's true.
So that's like the one data point that I happen to know is true.
What does that mean?
I have literally no idea.
I can't even guess, but that's very, very strange.
And what does Egyptian could mean aircraft from Egypt?
Who knows?
I think that they were registered in Egypt.
And so, but that fact is true.
So I that I'm pretty sure they're registered Egyptian military planes.
I could one of one of the planes for sure, the president of Egypt flew in.
We know that.
Okay.
Now, and also her claim that there were kind of a disproportionately large number of foreign registered cell phones at the event.
That's also true.
So what does that add up to?
I don't know, but it means that the FBI has a moral and legal obligation to look in every direction and to be open-minded as you would in any investigation in journalism and science.
It's all the same process.
I don't know the answer, and I'm going to sift through everything as open-mindedly as I can, as honestly as I can, to get to what the truth is.
That's again, that's science, that's law enforcement, that's journalism.
It's all the same.
That's justice.
And I just want to make sure that is happening.
And I just don't have a ton of confidence in the FBI or the men who run it.
And I'm not saying that out of ignorance.
Ha!
At all.
That's a scary part, too.
What Candace is saying is clearly causing a lot of turmoil.
Is it true or not?
I can't assess it.
I'm not the FBI.
I'm a freaking podcaster, but I do know how the system works.
And it's really simple.
The FBI has this case.
And of course, the state of Utah.
It's their job to not only find out what happened, present it to the public in a way that restores some confidence that you can have justice in this country.
We have functioning law enforcement.
I don't have confidence in that because there's a lot of evidence that we don't have that.
So restore confidence by being honest and telling a story that makes sense.
So why?
And if they don't do that and they haven't done that, they have not done that.
How can you be mad at Candace Owens or anyone else for filling a vacuum that they left?
Yeah.
I can tell you how you can be mad at Candace Owens.
You're a liar.
You have something to cover up.
The people at TPUSA have a lot of financial crimes that they're covering up.
The FBI is covering up for who knows who they're covering up for the CIA.
It's not even convincing that you're mad.
I'm not convinced you're mad about it.
I think you're just covering for the Mossad?
Are they covering up the messages?
That explains Egyptian planes, doesn't it?
Yes.
Yes.
Well, Candace is bad.
Okay.
No.
The people with the authority are the ones responsible and they're the ones who should be held responsible when there's a failure.
Not some podcaster, not me, not you, not Candace, the people whose job it is.
And their default assumption was we acted alone.
Really?
Why do you think that?
What about life suggests that people typically act alone?
What was the last time you acted alone in anything?
I don't know.
You know, right?
So, A. B, we know that people had foreknowledge of this because they posted about it on X and said Charlie Kirk is going to be killed on this date.
And he was.
Is that true?
Yes, it's true.
Were they just guessing?
Was it a guessing thing where every day they want to get maybe, maybe?
Have those people been interviewed?
Have they been hauled into FBI HQ and had a long conversation with how they knew that?
Like, let's get really specific.
Why did you post that?
Who have you talked to?
Like, if I were doing this investigation, because I spent my whole life doing non-criminal investigations called journalism, like, what do we know is true?
How do we find out?
Call everybody.
Be open-minded.
It's like a very, it's the same process.
If I was doing this investigation, they would be at the very top of the list.
We know because we've got public postings on Twitter that people know, just like a 9-11.
We know people bet against American Airlines and the banks that were in the World Trade Centers.
They shorted those stocks.
Those people clearly had foreknowledge of 9-11.
Who were those people?
We still don't know.
So I would start there.
But so you're saying that just the fact that there could possibly be some foreknowledge to be invested in.
There was foreknowledge because they were, I saw the tweets.
And so I saw at least two that said, you know, everything's going to change when Charlie Kirk gets to the college in Utah.
Okay.
So those people, I'm not saying they're part of a conspiracy, but they have there's evidence that they had foreknowledge.
Okay.
So that's where you begin.
And then I could go on.
Like, tell me how this guy who seemed normal became a radical trans furry murderer.
It's not enough to tell me, oh, trans.
I'm not pro-trans, by the way.
But was that the guy or his boyfriend?
Well, exactly.
Exactly.
Right.
Tell me how this guy became so radicalized that he murdered a stranger.
I'm not saying it didn't happen.
I'm saying I want an explanation for how it happened.
Why wouldn't I?
I agree.
Why do people like Candace so much?
She's an amazing broadcaster.
Yes.
Because they sense in her, she might be wrong.
Is she lying to me?
Not on purpose.
They sense the purity of her intent.
That's the truth.
And I can say, as someone who's dealt with government officials my whole life, I'm not vouching for everything Candace claims.
I don't even know a lot of what she claims because I'm working on her stuff.
And it makes me sad also.
But the point is, do I trust Candace more than I trust your average DOJ official?
Are you joking?
It's not even close, dude.
Yeah.
Not even close.
Do I trust the FBI more than I trust Candace?
Not even close.
Why would you?
Why would you?
Not even close.
So good on Tucker.
Good on Tucker.
Fantastic.
And thanks to Theo Vaughn for bringing him on.
Love Theo Vaughn.
Love that guy.
Look, if they do a heel turn, these people, this is the thing because they're not listening to what people are saying.
So they'll just do this high school popularity thing if they don't like Tucker.
Yeah.
Or they don't like, I don't care who you like.
Okay.
I'm sure they're all nice.
Who gives a shit?
I want to hear something that's not an obvious lie.
Just something that's not a complete insult to my fucking intelligence all the time.
You know, like women have dicks.
I want to hear something that's not insulting to me.
Hey, become a premium member.
Go to jimmydoorcomedy.com.
Sign up.
It's the most affordable premium program in the business.
All the voices performed today are by the one and only the inimitable Mike McRae.
He can be found at MikeMcRae.com.
That's it for this week.
You be the best you can be, and I'll keep being me.