Candace Owens Reveals Charlie Kirk’s Anti-Israel Texts!
Online commentator Candace Owens recently went public with evidence showing Charlie Kirk was planning to abandon support for Israel and was killed just 48 hours after sending internal messages criticizing Jewish donors and expressing a willingness to work with Tucker Carlson. Jimmy and Americans’ Comedian Kurt Metzger discuss Owens’ screenshots of internal TPUSA group chats where Kirk appears to have stated that he would no longer support the pro-Israel cause after losing a $2 million donor. Jimmy questions why Candace Owens is the only person investigating Kirk's supposed assassination, while his wife and the organization he led have reportedly moved on from seeking answers about the official investigation. Plus segments on Netanyahu’s humiliating rejection of Trump’s ceasefire plan, Congressman Thomas Massie’s revelation about the real reason for the government shutdown and former CIA officer John Kiriakou’s scathing criticism of his former employer. Also featuring Mike MacRae and Stef Zamorano. And a phone call from Louis CK!
Then we'll be in Burbank, California the day after Thanksgiving and then Pottsdown, Pennsylvania, December 6th.
Go to JimmyDoor.com for a link for tickets.
Hey, this is Jimmy.
Who's this?
Oh, no.
Hey, it's Louis C.K. Oh.
I have not pre-screened this script.
Just to let everybody know, I don't know what's coming.
I did not write this.
I do all these sketches blind.
Okay.
Oh, hi, Lewis.
Why are you calling today?
I have no idea.
Why would I be calling you?
Like, what possible reason would there be for that?
It's insane, right?
Well, I did notice that you're headlining.
Oh, God.
I did notice that.
Did you not do this?
That you're headlining the Riyadh Comedy Festival.
Oh, right.
Yes.
That probably is the reason for this fake phone call.
Yeah.
So you don't have any moral qualms about performing in Saudi Arabia?
Okay, first of all, I think it should just be Arabia, right?
We don't need the Saudi parts.
We don't need to distinguish it from other Arabias.
Oh, Saudi Arabia.
Also, just Arabia sounds cool.
Like, ooh, Arabia.
Okay, please don't deflect with bits.
Sorry?
I have to practice inoffensive material so I don't get murdered.
Exactly.
Because of their human rights abuses.
Right?
So you realize the crimes that the Saudi government commits.
Well, they murder everybody.
So much murder.
They murder like most people.
They murder like a million people a day for sneezing on Wednesday or some shit.
Like, I don't even know the rules.
But if you break them, you get murders.
And you don't mind performing for these people?
I really don't give a shit.
It doesn't bother you at all.
Not really.
Not really.
So you're just in denial then?
I'm not a denial about shit.
If anything, I probably think they murder more than they do.
And at some point, I will be jerking off to that.
Oh, God, please.
Sorry, that's just one of my triggers.
Just sort of exaggerated things.
I fucking love that shit.
We don't need to know this.
I don't need to be going to the Riyadh Comedy Festival either, but I am anyway.
So why are you going then?
Jimmy, they're paying me a lot of money.
Just for the money then?
No, a lot of money.
Like a lot of money.
The most money.
They're giving me all of the dollars in the world.
It's going to like fuck up the global economy how much they're paying me to tell jokes to murderers.
It's insane.
So that's all it takes, huh?
A bunch of money?
Jimmy, are you familiar with money?
Yes, I know what money is.
Right, but if you have a lot of money, you can buy lots of things.
Like, if you like fancy watches, with a lot of money, you can go buy as many fancy watches as you want.
You can go down to the Rolex store with a fancy cape and a monocle and be like, I have money.
Give me watches.
It's amazing what a lot of money can do.
Yeah, I understand purchasing power, but it's is it all worth it to perform for murderers?
What about all these innocent people who have been killed by the Saudi regime?
First of all, I don't care.
Second of all, we don't know their innocence.
Maybe they did some shit.
You don't know that.
Maybe they deserve to get murdered.
Maybe the whole country of Saudi Arabia is a bunch of shit-ass fuckfaces, and there needs to be like a brutal regime to keep these fuckers in line.
You have no idea.
No, these are certifiable human rights abuses of the worst degree, in fact.
Well, I like to think that I just made up better than the thing you're saying, so go fuck yourself.
Okay.
Look, at the end of the day, it's a comedy festival.
I'm a comic.
My job is to do these things.
And I've known Bruce Hills for years.
Bruce Hills?
He used to run the Montreal just for last comedy festival.
And now he's the main consultant for the Riyadh Murder Festival thing.
You're kidding.
No, like everyone in comedy is involved in this, except women.
But yeah, you'd be stupid not to want to do it.
That's the future of comedy.
Kowtowing to authoritarian regimes, but also saying you're a truth teller.
That doesn't sound like comedy to me.
Well, suit yourself.
Keep doing exactly what you want to do, loser.
So you're saying if they gave you a lot of money, you would say no to doing an Arabian murder party festival?
Yes, especially if they called it that.
They wouldn't call it that, but everyone knows that's what it is.
But that's insane.
I think it's stated that so many talented comics who don't need the money are doing this.
That's what is insane.
I literally have no idea what you're saying right now.
Who cares?
Who cares about anything?
You know what?
Never mind.
Have fun and best of luck in Saudi Arabia.
Thank you.
You know how when you do a festival somewhere, they take you around and let you do local activities and shit?
Well, hopefully I get to murder someone.
I've always wanted to murder people.
Anyway, fuck off.
Okay, fucking off.
So good luck.
Bullshit they can't afford.
Watch them see as a jack dog.
Comedium speeds and jumps comedium and hits him head on.
It's the chimney tour show.
I got breaking news.
Candace Owens has the receipts.
Are you ready for this?
Candace Owens definitely has the receipts.
And she's been taking a lot of heat because it seems like nobody at Turning Points USA wants to get the real story about what happened to Charlie Kirk and his assassination.
Nobody at turn.
Nobody.
And it's a little weird that his wife doesn't.
I would say more than a little.
But nobody at turn, because I think they're all under the thumb of Israel.
That's what I think the point of this was.
That's my guess.
But let's watch what Candace Owens has to say right here.
Take a look.
So Charlie writes in the screw chat, just lost another huge Jewish donor.
So this, she's got the screenshots from an internal chat that Charlie was doing with TPUSA.
And right up there, it says, just lost another huge Jewish donor, $2 million a year, because we won't cancel Tucker.
And I'm thinking of inviting Candace.
Whoa.
Whoa.
So this is the, so this is the receipts that she knew she had.
And he had, Charlie Kirk had turned on Israel, was not going to support the Israel Project anymore, and was going to buddy up with Tucker Carlson and Candace Owen.
Candace Owen is vehemently a critic of Israel and Benjamin Netanyahu and what's going on right now in Gaza.
So here she's got the goods.
Let's listen.
Take a look.
So Charlie writes in this group chat, just lost another huge Jewish donor, $2 million a year because we won't cancel Tucker.
I'm thinking of inviting Candace.
Somebody writes, oh.
Charlie writes, Jewish donors play into all of the stereotypes.
I cannot and will not be bullied like this, leaving me no choice but to leave the pro-Israel cause.
And somebody writes, a donor writes, please do not invite Candace.
That might feel good short term, but it's not good long term, in my opinion.
Like all groups, you're going to get a wide variety of opinions.
That nasty free will thing that God bestowed on us makes life frustrating at times after the dust settles a bit, maybe.
So again, this is 48 hours before Charlie Kirk was assassinated.
He was very clear and he was very explicit, and he did not back down in that Hamptons meeting, which they're all lying about, nor in this text thread.
I'm not going to reveal the names of the other seven.
Actually, you know what?
I disagree with myself four seconds ago.
Let's just throw in Josh Hammer for funsies.
He's on this chat.
Okay.
Is Josh Hammer?
Is he the guy who runs the Babylon B?
Is that who that is?
Look up who Josh Hammer is.
So she's naming names.
She's not only saying that Charlie Kirk at an internal chat had revealed that he was no longer supporting Israel.
He was done.
And that their Jewish donors to TPUSA played into the worst stereotypes of Jewish people.
Isn't that interesting?
I have Josh Hammer as an American conservative political commentator of the Josh Hammer show.
Okay.
Author Israel and Civilization.
Okay, so that's not the.
Okay.
Editor at Lars for Newsweek.
Okay, here we go.
So, and she's also saying that the meeting they had a few weeks prior to his assassination in the Hamptons, where all the Jewish donors went after him, they're all lying about that meeting.
They're all lying about it.
Okay.
So that's it.
So here's what our friend James Lee has to say about this.
Wow, we now have actual proof that Charlie Kirk was indeed abandoning the pro-Israel cause right before he was assassinated.
Charlie just lost another huge Jewish donor, $2 million a year because we won't cancel Tucker.
I'm thinking about inviting Candace.
Jewish donors play into all the stereotypes.
I cannot and will not be bullied like this, leaving me no choice but to leave the pro-Israel cause.
These texts were sent 48 hours before he died.
Like we all thought this was very weird.
We just didn't have the proof.
I mean, a mural of Charlie Kirk painted in one day in Tel Aviv.
Come on.
Also, is it not kind of weird that Erica Kirk and the rest of Turning Point USA has all moved on from this?
Candace Owens is the only person, somehow the only person who still cares about trying to find out the truth about what happened to Charlie Kirk.
Not his wife, not his company, Candace Owens.
Kudos to her.
Isn't that weird that his wife isn't trying to find out the truth about what happened to him?
Nobody at Turning Points USA gives a crap about the BS story that the FBI is pushing.
And the no autopsy and no one's allowed to see it.
There was an autopsy, but you were not allowed to see it.
Oh, okay.
So there was an autopsy, but you're not allowed to see it.
And they say that it was a miracle bullet, not a magic bullet, but a miracle because the bullet that would normally go through a brick wall somehow got stopped by his spine.
His neckbones were Superman-like.
Does anyone believe?
So, if you're just a moron, by the way, Grock believes the story.
I had an argument with Grock today.
It better.
It better believe this story.
It better believe the story or else Grock's going to get JFK'd.
Yeah.
So there you have it.
She brings the receipts.
Good for Candace Owen.
Really, I always liked Candace Owen.
Not always.
I didn't know anything about her for a long time, but now that I do, there's a lot to like about Candace Owens, and I certainly respect her courage.
She's got more balls than Rajit McCrone.
I'll tell you that about it.
And she's getting it done.
And why is she the only one who cares about getting to the bottom of this?
Why is Candace Owen?
Candace Owens is the one?
Yeah.
Go ahead, Kurt.
She gets trashed.
Why don't the people trashing her tell me what she said that was wrong?
Right.
They never do.
Why did they just tell me, well, she's about to talk about.
They don't care about high school shit.
Yeah, they go, she's lost.
It's a fact that's wrong.
Yeah, tell me a fact.
You see all the smears.
You know it's from bots.
And they go, oh, she's really lost it.
What's happened?
But tell me what she's wrong about.
Lost it how?
Yeah.
Well, that's people would say that to me.
They would say, oh, Jimmy's lost the plot.
What's the plot that I lost?
And they never looked.
They would never say anything back.
Like, I don't know.
Lost the plot.
Lost the plot.
I've been paid to uphold a plot, motherfucker.
What the fuck does that mean?
Obviously, Kurt, it means nothing.
It's just one of these vague smears that people like to throw around, just like.
I think you've uncovered it.
Yes, that's right.
That's right.
Anyway, that is shocking stuff.
I mean, there it is.
Charlie Kirk saying, I'm not supporting Israel anymore.
That was 48 hours before they killed him.
And how many hours before?
You think this was some trans lover who did it?
Really?
A guy who somehow had short pants on and was concealing a gun, and then he changed his clothes and went on the roof, and then he changed his clothes again and then put the gun together, took the shot, and then took the gun apart again, and then changed his clothes again and Jen Job and then went and he put the gun back together again and then hit it and then changed his clothes again.
Do you really think that's the story?
You really think that's real?
It's not.
Why did the autopsy not come out at all?
Why would it not come out?
That makes no sense.
Why would they not release it?
Why would Charlie Kirk's wife not release the because it's up to her to release it?
And she won't.
She's not doing it.
Isn't that weird?
Yeah.
Yeah.
The answer is yes.
And the fact that she doesn't care, that everybody's lying, and the fact that she also propped up that BS story that it was a lone gunman, that it was that kid.
Wasn't that kid?
This was a professional hit operation.
Why did she run a weird Romanian charity on an army base that it turns out had a child brothel on it, and that's a matter of public record?
Yeah, isn't that weird that she did run a Romanian charity for orphans that turned out to be a brothel and a trafficking organization?
Isn't that weird?
Her mom's heavy into defense contracting.
Yeah, and her dad is a Raytheon guy in Israel, right?
Am I wrong about that?
I don't know about the Raytheon guy in Israel, but I know that her mom is so she moved because her mom moved as an adult.
It makes no sense.
James Lee had a bunch of it.
Okay.
Well, James Lee covers it.
He does a good job.
And I guess the bigger, I guess, an equally as big question, as James Lee said, why is Candace Owen the only one who cares about this?
Why isn't anybody at Fox News on this?
Why is it Candace Owen?
Why is nobody at CNN on this?
Why is it Candace Owen?
Why is nobody at the New York Times on this?
Why is it Candace Owens?
Isn't that weird?
Yes.
The answer, yes.
It is weird.
Why isn't Charlie Kirk's wife screaming for more investigations and pushing back against this obvious BS concocted story?
Isn't that weird?
Yeah.
She probably wants to live.
Maybe that's it.
Maybe she's afraid.
And if she is, then I cut her all the slack in the world.
If she's afraid, I cut her all the slack in the world.
Then no problem.
But it is weird that so that makes you go, oh, why isn't she pushing back?
Not to condemn her.
Wait, not to get not to condemn her for not pushing back, but why?
Because that's a big red flag.
And the reason would be she's probably afraid for her life.
But go ahead, Kurt.
Yeah, why would the Hindu FBI director say to the murdered Christian pundit, I'll see you in Valhalla.
Valhalla.
That's a weird ass.
If anybody said that in a different circumstance, you'd hear about how they're probably a neo-Nazi, wouldn't you?
I don't know anybody.
That sounds like stuff neo-Nazis say talking about Valhalla.
Oh, yeah.
I don't know anything about Valhalla.
I don't know.
I've heard of it.
That's real weird.
I mean, it just makes no sense on any level.
Not from cash, not towards Charlie Kirk.
What is that?
Hey, you know, here's another great way you can help support the show: you become a premium member.
We give you a couple of hours of premium bonus content every week, and it's a great way to help support the show.
You can do it by going to jimmydork.com, clicking on join premium.
It's the most affordable premium program in the business, and it's a great way to help put your thumb back in the eye of the bastards.
Thanks for everybody who was already a premium member.
And if you haven't, you're missing out.
We give you lots of bonus content.
Thanks for your support.
Look at these headlines: how Trump cornered Netanyahu into signing up for peace.
Strong armed by Trump.
Netanyahu embraces Gaza deal as a personal win.
Trump is successfully bullying Netanyahu.
Really?
Wow, that is, boy, if the Financial Times, the New York Times, and the Atlantic say Trump bullied Netanyahu into a ceasefire, well, this is big.
Uh-oh, turns out it's all bullshit.
Israel says no Gaza ceasefire in place despite Trump's call for a stop to the bombing.
They've killed more than 100 Palestinians in Gaza over the past just two days.
Oh, whoops.
Come on.
It's like waiting to be get paid by Vice back in the day, waiting for this to be resolved.
A lot of horseshit they tell you, and the check ain't coming.
The Israeli government said on Sunday that there is no ceasefire in place in Gaza despite President Trump's calls for Israel to immediately stop bombing, stop the bombing of Gaza, as the IDF continues to slaughter Palestinians across the strip.
While certain bombings have actually stopped inside of Gaza Strip, there's no ceasefire in place at this point in time, said Israeli government spokeswoman Shas Bradozian, according to the Associated Press.
And I just want to show you one more thing here.
So MJ Truth Ultra, Stephen Gardner, sent me this.
Trump to Netanyahu, I don't know why you're so effing negative.
This is a win.
Take it.
This came after President Trump called Netanyahu to tell him that Hamas agreed to the peace proposal.
And Netanyahu said this is nothing to celebrate.
It doesn't mean anything.
Not to mention, President Trump is applying maximum pressure on the Truth Social.
He posted a photo of the massive protest in Israel urging Netanyahu to take the peace deal.
Netanyahu is the only one who can F this deal up.
So here it's from Axios.
When Hamas came back with the yes, but to President Trump's Gaza peace Trump's Gaza peace proposal on Friday, Trump called Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to discuss what he saw as good news.
Netanyahu felt differently.
Bibi told Trump this is nothing to celebrate and that it doesn't mean anything.
A U.S. official with knowledge of the call told Axios.
Trump fired back.
I don't know why you're always so effing negative.
This is a win.
Take it.
Well, I know why, too.
Let me tell them first, and then you could tell them, Kurt.
Because Benjamin Netanyahu doesn't want a ceasefire or this kind of a victory.
He wants to completely ethnically cleanse Gaza and the West Bank and take it over.
That's what this is about.
This isn't about defeating Hamas because he invented Hamas.
He financed Hamas for this very purpose.
This is why.
And I wouldn't doubt if he's financing Hezbollah, too.
They need Benjamin Netanyahu needs Hamas.
He needs those hostages not released.
And he needs Hezbollah.
He needs a reason to do the Greater Israel Project, which is what this is.
And so I can't believe that Trump doesn't understand this.
What do you say, Kurt?
Is that what you're going to say?
No, who's behind Netanyahu?
A worse terrorist than all the ones you just mentioned.
He's at the behest of those terrorists.
Remember, he was going to go to jail, and they do lock up.
They do do lock her up in Israel.
They lock up their.
How did he say out?
The craziest, worst wingnut Zionist terrorists in Israel are backing him.
So much like what's his name in Ukraine, Zelensky.
Yeah, the Nazis are going to kill him.
Where it turns out, the Ashkenazis are going to kill Netanyahu as well.
I bet you.
He's got to be afraid of that.
That's his only backup, is psychopath terrorists that Israel and America call terrorists.
I bet you're right about that, actually.
Yeah, just like Zelensky knows that he'll be hanging from a light post in Kiev if he does a peace deal.
Same thing.
Same thing with Netanyahu.
So here's what Trump tweeted out.
He just tweeted this out: that this is the, in Israel, this is their wanting a peace deal.
The people of Israel want a peace deal.
So let's get back to the rest of the story.
Let's see.
On Saturday, Trump said that he appreciated that Israel has temporarily stopped the bombing.
But on the same day, the IDF killed at least 70 Palestinians in Gaza.
The IDF killed at least 129 Palestinians in Gaza over the last two days.
The health ministry said in its latest release on Sunday that it recorded at least 63 of the 63 Palestinians and the injury of 153 over the previous 24-hour period.
Wow.
So Israel has quit the killing altogether, much in the same way the British clergy can quit alcohol altogether, meaning they're not going to drink when they're sleeping.
Medical sources have told Al Jazeera that Israeli attacks on Sunday killed at least 24 Palestinians, including at least 12 who were killed in Gaza City.
According to Israeli media, the IDF was ordered to halt its operation to conquer Gaza City, but it has continued to bomb the area.
One Israeli strike in Gaza on Saturday killed 18 people, including seven children, between the ages of two months and eight years, according to a statement from Gaza's civil defense.
The IDF also continues to kill desperate Palestinians attempting to get food.
According to the AP, at least four Palestinians were killed near an aid site in southern Gaza on Sunday.
On top of the violent deaths, Palestinians continue to starve to death amid the famine caused by the Israeli siege.
According to releases from the health ministry, at least three Palestinians, including two children, died of starvation over the past two days.
The ministry said on Sunday that its violent death toll since October 7, 2023 has reached 67,139, and the number of wounded has climbed to 169,000.
Studies have found that the ministry's numbers are likely a significant.
I'm going to guess there's over 400,000 people dead.
That's my guess.
And the reason why they can't count them is because they're under rubble.
And they bombed all the hospitals and they're all under rubble.
They're liars as well.
Oh, yeah.
By the way, Bibi deleted this tweet.
He said, we will continue to work in full cooperation with the president and cooperation with the president and his team in order to bring the war to an end in accordance with the principles set forth by Israel, which are consistent with President Trump's vision.
He then deleted that.
He then deleted that.
The language is very strong.
Did Trump really bully Netanyahu?
Did he?
I don't think so.
Max Blumenthal says, Trump calls for Israel to stop bombing of Gaza, but without exercising any leverage.
Israel is continuing the bombing right now, and I will not be surprised if Trump retracts his ceasefire demand in short order.
For the moment, Netanyahu has been outmaneuvered and is under pressure from messianic fascist members of his coalition to escalate.
Israel will not.
So this is kind of what Trump, what you were saying, Kurt.
He's saying that right here, that Netanyahu is being pressured by the messianic fascist members of his coalition to actually escalate.
By Johnson's buddies in Israel.
Yeah.
He brought Red Heifer to.
That's all the Red Heifer.
Israel will not honor any agreement unless it is forced to do so.
Its behavior in South Lebanon, where it has violated the ceasefire thousands of times in a year, is the proof.
So that's right.
So Trump, you could say you could scream, you could use the F-word, you could say things, but unless you exercise your leverage over Benjamin Netanyahu in Israel, it means nothing.
They're going to continue to do what they want, which is so it seems like Trump is afraid to actually use his leverage because he's actually not the boss of this situation.
And what leverage would that be?
The leverage would be you pulled the funding.
You stopped the funding.
That would be the leverage.
And he won't do it.
Let's face facts.
He don't want to get JFK and Netanyahu doesn't want to get Ariel Sharon.
There you go.
Here's a timeline from Mondeweis.
Here's every time Hamas said yes and Israel said no.
In November of 2023, Hamas agreed to a truce.
Israel extended it seven days, then resumed the war.
In January of 2024, just two months later, Hamas reviews three-phase ceasefire proposal.
Netanyahu calls it delusional.
May 7th, 2024, Hamas accepts Qatar-Egypt proposal.
Israel invades Rafah two days later.
Late May 2024, that same month, Biden announces Israel agreed.
Netanyahu rejects it the same day.
August 2024, mid-negotiations, Netanyahu adds new demands, permanent troops in Gaza, full border control, and the talks collapse.
In January of 2025, after 15 months, deal was reached.
Israel's own national security minister later admits, I repeatedly blocked ceasefire deals.
And now the ceasefire that just went into effect in January 2025, it's essentially the same deal Hamas accepted back in May of 2024, except more Palestinians have been killed by Israel since then.
And I just want to let everybody know, I think Trump's new, he should write a new book, and it should be called The Art of the Broken Deal, because that's what Israel has broken every peace agreement and every peace deal they've ever had with anybody ever.
Israel does.
It's the fart of the deal, Jimmy.
What's that?
More like the fart of the deal.
The fart of the deal, not the art of the deal.
Netanyahu, this is a headline in the Washington Post.
Netanyahu, America is a thing you can very easily move.
Well, he's got us there.
He's got us there.
And we all know someone who thinks that's a perfectly normal thing to say about a country you live in from someone who doesn't live in that country.
I have friends that I have to say, thinking is just not for them.
They keep confusing the television, what the television tells them with what they're coming up with in their own head.
And, well, here's Benjamin Netanyahu in the 80s.
Let's listen to what he said in the 80s.
So the reporter says, we don't have America with us.
And B.B. Netanyahu says, U.S. is not a united bloc.
have the senate the congress and a record-strong jewish lobby on our side we have a strong influence over the general support in america America won't force us into anything.
So that was what he's been saying, and that, you know, that's so nothing new is what I'm that.
nothing new uh and so there's that So anyway, so I know people will tell me, no, Jimmy, you're taking word for word exactly and precisely what he said, completely out of context.
He just meant he could get us to do his laundry.
That's what he was really talking about.
So what this is, is you could say it a couple different ways.
One way you could say it is that Benjamin Netanyahu is letting Donald Trump and the world know that he's the boss of Trump and that no matter what Trump says, he's going to do whatever the hell he wants.
And what the hell he wants is to continue to ethnically cleanse, completely ethnically cleanse Gaza and the West Bank so Israel can take it over in their Greater Israel project.
And he doesn't give a shit what Donald Trump says or anybody else.
And Donald Trump is his bitch.
Donald Trump is a cuck to Israel.
Donald Trump has handlers because if he didn't, if Donald Trump wasn't taking orders, Donald Trump would stop the funding of Israel.
If he really wanted to stop the killing and the slaughter and have a peace deal, Donald Trump could snap his fingers and it would be done.
But he's not.
But he won't do it for some reason.
And it's probably because he doesn't want to get JFK'd.
Yeah.
And that's sad.
And why do you think if he's so afraid of getting JFK'd by Israel, why doesn't Donald Trump just JFK Netanyahu?
That's what I don't understand.
Because he can't.
Why can't he?
Look at Netanyahu ate the ultimate.
He's in league with terrorists.
If you think about it, Theodore Herzl, I think they murdered out of the gate because he was willing to take Uganda.
They have a history of killing their presidents.
Us and Israel got a real history of killing our own presidents.
Yeah.
You know?
Yeah.
And that's because the Fruit Loop cult that's in charge of the shit ain't going to allow it.
And why would Netanyahu, a psychopath?
Like, imagine what he's afraid of.
Right?
Yeah.
I mean, just imagine the kind of psychopaths above Netanyahu.
Who could scare him enough to take back a tweet?
You're right.
I've never heard him apologize for a tweet or walk back.
So that's what's happening right now, right out in the open.
Everybody sees it.
Trump is not the boss, and Benjamin Netanyahu is the boss of Trump.
And Trump is, it appears, will never use his, just like the Democrats in Congress, they will never use their leverage for their average people.
Donald Trump will never use his leverage to get a peace deal and end the slaughter in Gaza.
Well, plus, shadow president Larry Ellison wouldn't allow that.
That's right.
Shadow President Larry Ellison.
You're worried about Peter Deal.
How about Larry Ellison in there?
Larry Ellison, who now controls TikTok, controls CBS news, controls Paramount, which is everything, which is like one-sixth of the American media.
You're going to wish it was Elon after this, don't you?
It's getting harder and harder to say that, you know, it's anti-Semitic to say the Jewish lobby runs our media.
It's getting harder and harder to say that's anti-Semitic because now the biggest Zionist in the world, Larry Ellison, owns TikTok and owns a one-sixth of the American media.
Oh, great.
Because there's only six media companies in America, and now he owns one of them.
Plus, he owns TikTok.
And Benjamin Netanyahu said that they wanted their next target is to take over Twitter.
Okay, so we're like China if China was run by Israel.
Yes, that's right.
That's right.
So it's getting harder and harder to say that that's anti-Semitic if you say the Jewish people run the media in America.
It's getting harder and harder.
The government, they're supposed to be back in session, right?
But Mike Johnson is stopping that from happening.
Headline, there's nothing for us to negotiate, Johnson says amid a shutdown.
So here's what Thomas Massey says.
The government is shut down, but the House refuses to go back in session.
Why are we in recess?
Because the day we go back into session, I have 218 votes for the discharge petition to force a vote on releasing the Epstein files.
Speaker Johnson doesn't want that to be the news.
Now, that's very interesting, Jimmy.
That's a very interesting thing.
That is very interesting.
That's becoming.
All I'm going to say is we're going to see a cure for cancer before we see the Epstein files.
I'll tell you that.
We're going to discover that pigs can fly.
And I bet they get a carbon offset like Bill Gates does.
But we will, that's what's going to before.
So that he's literally not bringing the Congress into session because he knows Thomas Massey has enough votes to get a discharge petition on the.
I forgot about this.
This was about to happen.
And then all I heard about was the shutdown.
Yes.
And I forgot what a factor.
Boy, it must be something real bad in them files.
Well, it makes me think that Mike Johnson's in those files or something, or he's getting direct orders from Trump.
If that ever, it will never come out.
Or maybe, you know, Mike Johnson is just a big a cuck to APEC and Israel as anybody.
So it's probably a combination of those things.
Here's what they're calling this an Epstein shutdown.
Here's what Kim Iverson has to say about it.
So one big question that a lot of people are having is whether or not this government shutdown that we're in the middle of, which by the way, government shutdowns.
Talk about hoax.
Many are speculating that Congress, in fact, Speaker Mike Johnson, is using this political tool conveniently to shield the Epstein files.
He did it this summer when he released everybody a day early, right when they were about to, there was a measure that was gaining steam that would force the release of the Epstein files.
What did Speaker Mike Johnson do?
He said, everybody go home a day early.
Obviously meant to block the release of the Epstein files.
A false headline in the New York Times.
It said House Republicans are, quote, adjourning until September to avoid a vote on releasing Epstein material.
Now, Republicans have been lying about what the government shutdown is.
So, why are we even having a shutdown?
What's going on is that there's a new member of Congress.
Her name is Adelita Rehalda, except she hasn't been sworn in yet.
And she has sworn that when she is sworn in to Congress, she will be basically the tipping vote that would force the release of the Epstein files.
Can you confirm that you are planning on signing the discharge petition to force the release of the Epstein documents?
I absolutely will be that decisive 218 signer.
And the government's shut down.
Oh, isn't that just unfortunate?
I guess we can't vote on those Epstein files when the government's shut down.
We want the Epstein files.
That's what was promised.
Are we ever going to see these files?
Are the Republicans, is Donald Trump and his administration, willing to shut down the government endlessly in order to protect Epstein and his deep state intel blackmail operation that is now blackmailing an entire nation?
The president of the United States, Mike Johnson, the Speaker of the House, here they are in cahoots covering everything up.
So nobody was saying Mike Johnson was connected to the Epstein files until he shut down this vote.
And now everybody's thinking he's on the list.
And he's got to release those files just to clear his name.
Wait, wasn't he, though?
Didn't we do a story with him where he was mad at Massey having to do with these files?
And that's what I suspected.
Because he could go and bless your heart.
Yeah.
Yes.
Yeah.
So here is that woman.
Mike Johnson hasn't sworn in his new Democrat.
Is it because she wants to release the Epstein files?
Congress's newest member, Adelita Grijalva, came to Washington, D.C. this week, expecting to be officially sworn in by the Speaker of the House, Mike Johnson.
Two days later, she returned to her Southern Arizona district disappointed.
No swearing-in ceremony has been organized, meaning Grijalva, a Democrat who easily won a special election last month to replace her late father, was not able to start her new job.
Trapped in the purgatorial status of representative-elect, she had to be escorted around the Capitol building by her soon-to-be colleagues, like any other member of the public.
Her name is on the door of her new office, but she does not have the keys.
I want to get to work and I can't, Grijalva says.
She thinks she knows the reason why Johnson is in no rush to administer the oath.
In addition to co-sponsoring bills on the environment, public education, other issues she campaigned on, Grahalva plans to provide the final signature on a petition that would force a vote on legislation to release files related to the accused trafficker, Jeffrey Epstein, which the Speaker and Donald Trump oppose.
I can't think of any other reason.
It's not like my being sworn in changes the majority.
And the last thing anybody in Congress wants is somebody who's willing to do their job because it makes the rest of them look bad by comparison.
I think it puts her in grave danger, is what that sounds like to me.
How has it just come down to one vote?
Do you know how destroyed and compromised your government is when there's one deciding vote to expose this terrible crime?
Right?
Isn't that insane?
It is.
So that means that there's 217 members who don't want to expose it.
You need me to draw a picture?
Like, that's what your government is.
The matter of Epstein files has for months been a thorn in the side of the president and his allies in Congress.
Though Trump has decried it as a Democrat hoax, a small commerce secretary said it's not a hoax and said that Bill Gates is in on it.
Ludnick, right, who is his commerce secretary, who I've been told, who I have heard, I'm not saying I've been told, who I've heard is his APAC handler inside of his own administration.
Because if you go all the way back to 9-11, very sketchy stuff in Ludnick's past, right?
He didn't show up for work that day on 9-11.
He decided to take his kid to school.
Isn't that weird?
Anyway, anyway, check me out all that about Ludnik, but I'm pretty sure it's real.
Thank God, we almost lost Ludnik, Jimmy.
I know.
It just needs to.
The signatures of two.
The House did hold a three and a half minute procedural session on Tuesday.
One Grijalva attended along with dozens of Democrats in hopes of getting Johnson to swear her in.
No luck.
Even though Johnson administered the oath of two Republicans who won special elections in Florida during a similar session earlier this year, that doesn't make sense.
Why I wouldn't be sworn in in the same pace as they were.
And who is losing out out of the constituents that need Congress to work for them?
A spokesperson for Johnson pointed to his comments, signaling that Grijalva will be sworn in when the House returns to session.
But that will not happen until funding is restored to the government.
The House will come back in session and do its work as soon as Chuck Schumer allows us to reopen the government, Johnson said today.
But I thought Trump was a dictator.
So he needs the approval.
He needs Chuck Schumer to let the government back go.
But I thought Donald Trump got rid of all the norms and he's a dictator and he does whatever he wants.
And he got rid of it.
Oh, that's not.
You mean the Democrat?
You mean he still has to follow the checks and balances and the Democrats actually still hold leverage and he has to wait for Chuck Schumer to agree to open up the government and fund it again?
I thought that he was just a dictator.
Isn't that weird?
He's not.
So why if a DV was a dictator, he would just dictate and he would just do whatever he wanted.
He would open the government and they would be on with their business.
But it's not.
It's almost like all the time the Democrats have been saying Trump is acting like a dictator was just bullshit propaganda.
It's almost like that.
It's almost like that.
In fact, it is.
In fact, it is.
So there you got the two stories.
You got the Democrats are pieces of garbage and you got the Republicans are pieces of garbage.
Isn't that weird?
It's almost like 217 of them, Jimmy.
Yeah.
Or maybe it's 216.
If you want to know who's a piece of shit in the government that should be rooted right out of it if Trump was a real president, you got all the people who voted against this.
That's right.
But that would include Trump himself.
That would include Trump.
So anyway, there you go.
That's quite a story.
And again, we're going to see pigs fly and we'll cure cancer before we get those Epstein files.
By the way, Cash Mattel was the loudest screamer about that, saying that the head of the FBI has all this information.
And he's first thing he's going to do, they should do is release it.
And of course, here he is, the head of the FBI, and he's not releasing it.
Let me just show you this.
And I also want to get your response to it.
So this is Jenk Ugert from the place I used to work, TYT, and here's what he says about like in the old days, man, they could do some.
So he's interviewing a guy, I think, who has written a book on the CIA.
And watch this.
So in the old days, he says.
Who's?
Now I believe we have the opposite problem.
They're not evil enough.
He's talking about the CIA, that they used to really be bad guys, but now they're not evil enough.
Let's say not doing anything, right?
But are they risking their lives to infiltrate?
I mean, no, we never infiltrated Al-Qaeda.
I mean, that's unbelievable to me.
Right.
A little bit.
Not only did we infiltrate Al-Qaeda, we invented Al-Qaeda, and now Al-Qaeda is being welcomed.
They did our dirty work in Syria.
We paid them.
And now they're welcomed by the Secretary of State and the former head of the CIA in the United States in front of room fulls of dignitaries.
So I'll play a little bit more and then I'll get your response.
We never even infiltrated Al-Qaeda.
We invented them.
Anyway.
Why would we have to do that?
Why would we have to infiltrate China invading Taiwan?
Yeah.
Embarrassing for our intelligence community.
No, they don't want to.
So whoever this genius is says it's embarrassing for our intelligence community that they didn't infiltrate Al-Qaeda.
It's a real interview.
This really happened.
I want to go through that risk.
That's my assessment.
They're willing to take some risk, but not risk their lives.
But that's the CIA.
You're supposed to do that.
And hopefully, in the service of U.S. citizens.
In fact, a lot of people you'd meet that.
Oh, my God.
That's Barry Eisler.
Is that who that is?
Who's that?
Tell me who that is.
Barry Eisler is a former CIA officer.
I interviewed Barry this morning.
Barry's a former CIA officer who went on to be a prolific and very successful author of espionage fiction.
Well, that sounds like fiction.
What he's saying right there to Jenk Uger, that it was embarrassing that this intelligence community did not infiltrate Al-Qaeda.
So you obviously don't agree with that assessment, right?
No, I disagree with you slightly, and I'll explain why.
I don't think we invented al-Qaeda.
I think we foolishly made a decision once Al-Qaeda became the organization it became.
It partially morphed from the Mujahideen.
Yes.
And we armed them.
So we armed the Mushahdin, which morphed into the Al-Qaeda.
Yeah.
And as Hillary Clinton said, we created them.
She said that in congressional testimony.
Pretty much.
Yeah.
I think we were directly responsible for the creation of ISIS, but that's a separate issue.
But we foolishly believed that we could then manipulate al-Qaeda to the point where we could get, for example, the 9-11 hijackers who had already arrived in the United States to turn against what we called al-Qaeda base al-Qaeda, the leadership.
Osama bin Laden, Ayman Azawahi, Mohammed Atef.
He was the number three, the military.
I think he was a mirror for military affairs or some stupid title like that.
It was naive.
It resulted in the deaths of 3,000 Americans in one day, plus 2 million Muslims and another 8,000 soldiers after that.
Yeah, it was just, it was stupidity.
Okay.
Stupidity.
But let me add one other thing.
Chenkwiger, I'm sorry.
Check Wigger's an idiot.
He's always been an idiot.
Have you heard his position on sex with horses yet?
Well, listen, you're asking a Greek to comment on a Turk, so already I'm on a thin line here.
But he's so arrogant that he wants us to believe that when the CIA makes a decision to do something or the CIA takes a policy position, the first thing they have to do is they have to call Chenk Wieger and explain what they're doing.
It's like, that's not the way espionage works, you moron.
So I just, well, let me show you this.
Let me show you this.
Hang on.
I have so much here to tell you.
So here's what Scott Ritter says.
Let me introduce you to the Special Activities Center.
The CIA may be incompetent, that I grant you, but to say they don't carry out covert action designed to undermine, overthrow the governments of sovereign states is a whole new level of stupid.
The CAA is the greatest threat to global stability in the world.
No other single organization is involved in the violation of law, including our own, more than the CIA.
America and the world would be far better and safer placed without the CIA.
Doug, do you have anything to say about Scott Ritter's assessment of that?
I agree with every word of that.
Okay.
I do.
Scott Ritter?
Oh, yeah.
Yeah, I know him well.
So the idea that the CIA doesn't overthrow, that's crazy, right?
It's crazy.
It's like it's task number one is to overthrow government.
They've been doing it since the Italian election of 1949.
He came in and said, Scott Ritter, and he was talking about how the inner agency didn't want to hear the truth about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.
What's the inner agency?
Because I don't think they're incompetent.
I think they compartmentalize you're allowed to look at what you're allowed to look at, much like everybody here in American health.
And nobody can see.
I talked to people that have been info and they don't know about things that have been disclosed already, such as MK Monarch, which I thought they would never disclose.
We had a guest on who sent us the link in 2024.
NSA Archives.
I wrote a paper.
By name.
Yeah.
By name.
Yeah.
So MK Chickwood.
Who's the interagency?
Who is that?
Uh-huh.
Yeah.
Where do I even begin?
I'll give you, I'll give you.
I'll answer your question by telling you by telling you a story.
When I got back from Pakistan, I was promoted on the strength of the Abu Zubeda capture, which I'm now ashamed of because the man was utterly innocent of any of any crime against the United States.
And I've consistently called for his release from Guantanamo.
He's been there.
He's been in our custody for 23 and a half years now.
Never been charged with a crime.
But anyway, I got promoted when I got back and I was named the executive assistant to the CIA's deputy director for operations.
In that position, you see literally everything that the CIA is doing around the world.
You have to sign, I had to sign a half a dozen new security agreements just to start work on my very first day.
So we were getting ready to attack Iraq and a cable came in that was not just sensitive.
It was from one of these special compartments, but it was actionable.
Like I needed to act on it now.
Well, it came in a minute before my morning briefing of the deputy director and all the associate deputy directors.
So I went up to the office and I said, well, we have to start the briefing today with an incredible cable that just came in in the such and such compartment.
And the deputy director says, stop.
He says, you and I are the only people in the room cleared for this information, which the room included the associate deputy director for operations, the associate deputy director for policy planning, the associate deputy director for counterintelligence, the associate deputy director for counterterrorism.
It's like, are you kidding me?
So there's a smaller group than this little group?
And there was.
So he said, I'll take the cable.
I'll brief the director.
So I just handed it to him.
And everybody was kind of doing this, like pretending that they hadn't heard any of this.
I was shocked.
And then when everybody finished their, everybody just says what they're working on that day.
Afterwards, he said, close call.
I said, I just assumed that if you're one of the top eight leaders of the CIA, you're cleared to know what the CIA is doing.
And he said, yeah, it's kind of funny.
That's amazing.
So let me play one more video in this vein talking about the ridiculous things that people believe about the CIA today.
Let's listen.
There was a time in America where the State Department would carry, the Pentagon would orchestrate and carry out coups in, you know, Latin American countries, for instance, or in Iran.
Like there was a time when the government engaged in all sorts of unsavory schemes across the globe.
That's definitely true.
Okay.
That's not the government we have today.
How does anyone look at the, like, honestly, I don't think the current federal government is even competent enough to carry out a coup?
I mean, they tried multiple times in Venezuela and failed.
Failed.
And like the way like the some of the MAGA Republicans, quite honestly, talk about the federal government makes me think, oh my God, they're asleep at the wheel.
They don't understand just how incompetent the federal government is.
They can't get anything straight.
They can't get anything straight.
And you guys think that they're like, they're wiretapping you and they're scheming and they're planning on throwing Tucker Carlson in prison for talking to Vladimir Putin?
Really?
Yeah.
Come on.
I mean, like, look, man, I interviewed the CIA agent a long time ago, about nearly 10 years ago.
It was a really amazing interview.
She told me about honeypot schemes and stuff and how they trick their targets into thinking that they're going to get a sexual relationship.
Like, it was an amazing, very candid interview.
And she's like, look, this whole thing, and that deep state stuff on the right wing hadn't started yet.
She's like, the number one problem with the CIA is they've become bureaucrats.
So I just would like to get a CIA officer's response to that kind of ridiculous.
It just hurts my brain.
It really does.
I mean, listen, you can even go on Wikipedia and they'll give you a laundry list of all the regime change operations that the CIA is known to have been involved in.
What makes these guys think that the CIA is not at least as dangerous as it always has been?
It's a mystery to me.
Edward Snowden revealed that there's that they're tapping everyone.
And Joshua Schulte, they didn't give Joshua Schulte 40 years for nothing because he talked about nothing because he talked about exactly what it is that the CIA is out there doing around the world, including in the United States.
And look what they're doing to Juliana.
Who's at the time they're prosecuting Juliana Saugs or saying stuff like this?
They're like, are you kidding me?
You are exactly right.
They got his toilet bugged.
Literally.
Yes.
Literally, they bugged the toilet.
Yes.
And they didn't just walk in and do it.
They got the Spanish intelligence service to hire this company.
And the company was working with the Israelis.
And the Israelis were working with the Brits.
And come on.
A lot of moving parts.
A lot of moving parts.
Okay.
Wait, hang on, Kurt.
Why can't I hear him?
Go ahead, Kurt.
What?
Okay, the deep state, and I can't repeat this enough.
Peter Dale Scott, a Berkeley leftist professor, is the guy who invented the term deep state after he studied it for 50 years.
That's right.
It's not a right-wing thing.
It came from a leftist Berkeley professor who also talked about COG, which none of these people talk about, continuity of government.
In fact, I'd like to know from John, how much of this stuff do they do under COG?
Because Ollie North hearings are talking about it.
The shooting of Trump when everybody was lambasting that Kimberly, what's her name?
She's from COG, the head of Secret Service when Trump got shot the first time.
How much of this is like COG stuff?
And do they keep it away from the CIA that way?
Or yeah, that's a great question.
Oddly enough, the CIA has nothing to do with COG.
They keep the CIA out, which is smart because you don't want the CIA to be leading the country in the event of a disaster, especially when you're going to have to question whether the CIA had something to do with the disaster, right?
But yeah, continuity of government is probably priority number one, which is one of the reasons why COG came out into the news this week, because literally everybody, I don't know that this has ever happened, at least not in my lifetime, literally everybody in the constitutional line of succession went to the Charlie Kirk Memorial Service.
Oh.
Literally everybody.
What would have happened if a nuclear device had gone off in that stadium?
Literally the entire government would have been wiped out.
So we would have been ruled by what?
A military junta?
The guy from the Department of Energy or something.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Right.
From Denver.
That's what's under the airport.
Yeah, exactly.
There's one in West Virginia at Mount Weather.
Yes.
What is underneath the airport in Denver?
The new capital for COG in case of a nuclear war.
You know, the Dr. Strangelove underground thing where they all sit around, that's what's in Denver.
That's why there's one in Denver.
And there's one on the Virginia-West Virginia border called Mount Weather.
It's a hollowed-out mountain.
And that's where the designated few are supposed to be taken in the event of a nuclear conflict.
No kidding.
They would have been on a congressional picnic in 2012 when a solar flare almost hit us and they would have gone in there and left you to fry.
Yeah, they gave us a tour.
When I first joined the CIA, they gave us a tour of Mount Weather.
I actually never believed Mount Weather existed.
And then they took us inside, and I was like, you've got to be kidding me.
So this is real.
And they were like, yeah, it's real.
And they're very specific about who gets to go.
It's much smaller than you might imagine.
So it's very small.
It's very small.
The president, the vice president, secretaries of state, defense, the national security advisor, a couple of the very top congressional leaders, the majority leader, minority leader, the speaker of the house, and their families, their immediate families.
And then that's it.
Well, what do you say?
What do you say about Catherine Austin Fitz when she says that they've somehow stolen $20 trillion from the federal government and they're building these underground cities to sustain the elite?
Have you heard her talk about that?
Yeah, I've heard her say that.
I don't think that's true.
First of all, I just don't think people are that smart.
I really don't.
I worked at the CIA.
It's a big, lumbering bureaucracy with a lot of stupid people.
And it's not like it is in the James Bond movies where everybody's like, wow, right on top of their game.
No, there are a lot of dopes.
I was just telling a friend of mine yesterday, we were getting ready to go on.
This is the honest to God's truth.
We're getting ready to go on a raid in Pakistan.
We're going to raid an Al-Qaeda safe house.
And I remember saying, where's Chris?
Oh, Chris couldn't come.
It's like, what do you mean he couldn't come?
That's why he's here.
No, it turned out Chris beat his wife.
So we have this rule.
If you get caught beating your wife, you can't carry a gun.
So he can't go on the raid without a gun.
I said, okay, where's Jimmy?
No, Jimmy got psychovaced, psychologically evacuated.
I said, why?
He went nuts this morning.
Like, all right, all right.
Let's just, let's just go with what we have.
So it's not like the James Bond movies.
Everybody's either nuts or stupid or slow or they have been in headquarters for 10 years because they're cowards and they're afraid to go overseas and it's easier to get promoted at headquarters.
It's not like what people think that it's this, you know, tip of the spear and we're going to go in.
We're going to kill the president and we're going to name our guy the new president.
Come on.
Well, what I think is it's like a tragedy in hope by Carol Quake.
Circles within circles.
That's what an interagency would be.
So of course you're going to have a thick layer of stupid bureaucracy.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Somebody knows what they're doing.
It's not no one steering it.
And the reason those underground bases exist was because of nuclear war.
That's the end of the television.
Yes.
That's why exactly.
It's not like we just thought of it.
Now, the missing 20 million or 20 trillion, rather, I heard it was more like 4 trillion.
But it's not that it's missing.
It's that it's been spent or wasted.
A lot of it in secret programs.
So there's no paperwork to document it.
People have retired or died and forgotten.
And PricewaterhouseCoopers goes in to the Pentagon to try to find it.
And then three years later, they throw up their hands and they say, we cannot figure out this accounting system.
And they just quit.
I thought it was Elon's fault for Doge not.
No, they were able to find $250 billion, which everybody laughed at.
Like, then where's the other 3.75 trillion that we can't find?
But they were able to.
I mean, we did a Demaidan coup.
So they pulled that.
CIA pulled that out.
You're exactly right.
Yes.
They got finally got it.
It took them 25 years, but they got rid of Assad.
That's right.
That's another one.
And they did it through their proxies.
Right.
Libya.
They did Libya, right?
They did get rid of Maduro in a short time, and now they're back trying to do it again.
Yes.
And I'm sure they're doing stuff like that all over the place.
And they're not going to advertise it to us.
That's right.
Like Nepal just happened.
And I'm like, I wonder if that is organic or if they went in and gave people money because that's what they do, right?
Yeah, I think it doesn't succeed unless you got the bad feelings there, though, right?
It's not like they could just make it happen out of thin air.
It could happen when you see the time is right for it to happen.
That's right.
Hey, become a premium member.
Go to JimmyDoorComedy.com.
Sign up.
It's the most affordable premium program in the business.
All the voices performed today are by the one and only the inimitable Mike McRae.
He can be found at MikeMcRae.com.
That's it for this week.
You be the best you can be, and I'll keep being me.
