Here’s The BIGGEST Surprise From Zelensky’s White House Meeting!
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky recently visited Washington, where he surprised many by wearing a suit instead of his usual military-style clothing while meeting with Donald Trump and Trump reportedly praised the wardrobe change. In this video Jimmy and Americans’ Comedian Kurt Metzger mock Zelensky as desperate for support amid Ukraine’s difficult war situation. They highlight Zelensky’s statements to European allies about sanctions, peace talks, and the need for security guarantees, but argue that his demands are unrealistic considering that the war is essentially lost. The segment concludes that Zelensky’s political survival may be tied to prolonging the conflict, even as Europe and the U.S. appear divided on how to move forward. Plus segments on MSNBC’s desperate rebrand as “MS NOW,” HHS Director Robert F. Kennedy deleting a tweet promoting a new universal vaccine, and millions of Israelis pouring into the streets to protest the ongoing war on Gaza. Also featuring Stef Zamorano and Ryan Cristián!
Come see us on tour in Rutherford, New Jersey, New York, New York, Edmonton, Calgary, Vancouver, Appleton, Wisconsin, Rosemont, Chicago, Louisville, Kentucky, and Fort Wade, Indiana.
Go to jimmydor.com for a link for tickets.
So Zelensky made another visit to the White House today, currently.
So Trump was over the weekend meeting with Putin in Alaska, trying to end the Ukraine war.
And then here comes Zelensky.
And watch Zelensky because he's not wearing his usual stupid t-shirt.
And Trump notices.
watch this you see Trump He goes, oh, look, you're wearing a suit.
I love it.
Did you hear him?
Watch this.
Watch.
Here we go.
I love it.
You don't look like a bum anymore.
I mean, it is an all-black suit on black on black on black.
That's kind of odd.
Yeah, nice suit, but I think he should have worn his dancing girl dress.
That's what I would have liked.
Watch ass nicely with a pretty dress.
Trump is so proud of him.
He started out looking like some kind of military recruit in a t-shirt, still in training.
And now Zelensky looks like he's left the military and is going to go on to be a hired assassin.
And that's all very impressive considering he's never been in the military.
Well, he wears a helmet a lot.
I've seen that.
So there's more to this little video.
So look at Zelensky putting on a suit jacket.
A hard shoe.
He looks tiny standing next to Trump, that's for sure.
And right underneath my favorite tweet underneath this was Phantom Platypus says, that's how you know he needs our tax dollars bad because he's wearing a suit.
So here's what he tweeted out right before.
So he went back to his European friends and he said, I am grateful to all participants of the Coalition of the Willing for today's conversation in Brussels on the eve of the meeting in Washington, D.C. with President Trump.
It was very useful.
We continue coordinating our joint positions.
There is clear support for Ukraine's independence and sovereignty.
Everyone agrees that borders must not be changed by force.
Everyone supports that key issues must be resolved with Ukraine's participation in a trilateral format.
Ukraine, the U.S., and Russia's chief.
This is a historic decision that the United States is ready to take part in.
Security guarantees for Ukraine.
Security guarantees as a result of our joint work must really be very practical, delivering protection on land, in the air, and at sea, and must be developed with Europe's participation.
Of course, we also discussed how to stop the killings as soon as possible.
We are working out a common vision of what a peace agreement should be.
Really fair, swift, and effective.
Thank you.
So.
He's really turned it around, huh?
Yeah.
He's really, so here.
So then he goes, he goes, I've already arrived at Washington.
Tomorrow, I am meeting with President Trump.
Tomorrow, we are also speaking with European leaders.
I am grateful to the president of the United States for the invitation.
We all share a strong desire to end this war quickly and reliably, and peace must be lasting.
Not like it was years ago when Ukraine was forced to give up Crimea and part with our East, part of Donbass, as Putin simply used it as a springboard for a new attack.
Or when Ukraine was given so-called security guarantees in 1994, but they didn't work.
Of course, Crimea should not have been given up then.
Just as Ukrainians did not give up Kiev, Odessa, or Kharkiv after 2022, Ukrainians are fighting for their land and for their independence.
Now our soldiers have successes in Donbass and Sumi regions.
I am confident that we will defend Ukraine, effectively guarantee security, and that our people will always be grateful to President Trump, everyone in America, and every partner and ally for their support and invaluable assistance.
Russia must end this war, which itself started.
And I hope that our joint strength with America, with our European friends, will force Russia into a real peace.
So he's just nuts.
So that sounds like those are like Coke tweets.
That sounds like someone's on Coke and they don't want to stop to make a new paragraph or a new, and so that's what it seems like.
And he definitely puts the blow back into blow-by-blow action.
I'll tell you that.
So at the bottom, he says, I'm grateful for the 18th sanctions package.
We need to prepare the 19th sanction package so Russia sees that we are serious.
So the first 18 didn't work.
But let's do another one.
I bet you that one will scare Russia into ending the war.
I'd rather listen to Bibi talk.
He has nice cartoon drawings.
It's real easy to understand.
I'm sure he does a couple of lines while kind of masturbating, looks in his Coke mirror, telling himself that at this time it's going to be different for him because he's special and the world goes away for a few pathetic moments.
That's wow.
Oh, God, what a.
I can't believe he's still around.
I can't believe he's still around either, but I believe he's not going to be around long.
Here's Lord Bebo tweeted out something interesting I want to read to people.
He said, so this is what happened.
Trump scolded Zelensky and wanted to force him into a peace a while ago.
You remember that?
Their last meeting at the White House?
Yeah.
Zelensky ran to Europe, so Macron and Starmer pushed back, also getting help from the neocons in the USA.
Trump then, understanding the situation, gave the Europeans their war, what they wanted, and used it as leverage for trade negotiations.
But USA secretly held talks with Russia during that time, and the Europeans were entertained by Kellogg, which is Trump's envoy to Ukraine, and Lindsey Graham.
When the peace talks went to a final stage, the Alaska summit happened.
This shocked the Europeans.
They had no idea, and it happened too quickly and far for them to interfere.
Now Zelensky and Europe noticed that a deal is actually close and the war might stop.
Europe and Zelensky are now freaking out.
They are now thinking how to push back on Trump.
Zelensky ran again to assemble the European warmonger crew and they wanted to travel to Washington together.
Trump said, no, only Zelensky in this meeting.
Watch out.
Watch out for European attempts to disrupt these talks.
So it's weird that the president has to sneak around like he's trying to start a war just to end a war.
Isn't that weird?
That is complicated.
So look, just keep this in mind.
We supplied him with weapons.
Who's that?
That's Gaddafi.
Then we killed him.
We supplied him with weapons and then we killed him, Osama bin Laden.
There's our good friend, we supplied him with weapons, then we killed him.
That's why am I blinking on the Iraqi Saddam Hussein president in the history of Iraq?
Yeah, and now there's Zelensky to be continued.
I thought way back when I was like, oh, they're going to assassinate him because he's getting a big, and then it just kept going on and on.
And now I don't even have faith that they're going to kill him.
I mean, come on, I don't wish death on Zelensky, even though Ukraine put me on a kill list.
And it would be funny if Zelensky went before I did.
Hoisted by your own petard.
So he first goes to Europe, as that first tweet showed, and they make all these stupid pronouncements like we can't give up any land.
It's over.
You're giving up land.
So they make those pronouncements, I think, because they don't want the war to end.
I think that's why.
Yeah, obviously.
Zelensky.
If we could just weaken Russia forever, the 19th of 19th sanctions package.
And we'll slowly just kill them all and just throw 60-year-old men at the problem until Russia breaks up.
They really want Putin out of there.
It's not even about Russia now as much as Putin can't be right.
Yeah.
And they have a hard on for him for a long time.
And they know if they get another, or they feel like this, they just get another guy in there.
They could manipulate Russia however they want, but Putin is the guy in the way of that.
So we'll see how these talks end up.
It looks like Europe, it looks like Europe doesn't want them.
Doesn't look like Zelensky wants a peace deal because he's making ridiculous demands.
He wants another sanctions package, a 19th sanctions package, like that's going to do anything.
But the big news, I think, is that Zelensky finally wore a suit because he realizes he's in trouble.
The last time it didn't go well at the White House for him.
It didn't go well afterwards.
The war is lost.
They've lost the war.
So this idea that they can not lose the war is crazy.
It's over.
We're waiting for MS Now to cover this.
We can't wait for MS Now to cover it.
And just like we said, when this war broke out in 2023, is that when it broke out?
No, was it 2022?
Yeah.
When the war broke out in February of 2022, we said right then that this war is going to end the way Putin wants it to end.
You guys are idiots for allowing this war to happen.
They provoke this war.
They poke the bear.
They've been ramping up for this war since 2014, really, when they overthrew the democratically elected government of Ukraine because the president wanted to be friendly with Russia, not the European Union.
And so then the CIA moved in and we overthrew him.
And then they get a puppet installed, and then they start bombing the Donbass and ramping it up.
And so anyway, this was always a mistake on Zelensky's part.
But now I think Zelensky's in like one of those Benjamin Netanyahu pickles where if the war is over, it's over for him too.
Yeah.
He's already suspended elections.
He wouldn't get re-elected again.
And I wonder if.
Tell me he wasn't popular in the 60 to 80 demographic, which is allowing them to fight how they want.
So, yeah, the age of the Ukrainian soldier is precipitously raised.
I think it's up to like 60 years old now, right, Kurt?
They're finally allowing 60-year-olds to join, which means they are forcing 60-year-olds to join the military.
So, there it is.
So, I think what you need to know about this story is: Zelensky's so desperate he wore a suit.
That's how desperate he is.
He wore a suit.
A black Johnny Cash going to a funeral suit.
Yeah.
They were independent, which is why they all got COVID wrong, the vaccine wrong, lockdowns, masks, the virus origination.
The same thing with Russia Gate.
They all got that wrong correctly.
I mean, in concert, they all got the Ukraine war wrong, the Syrian war wrong.
Now we have an Al-Qaeda guy running Syria.
Isn't it amazing how they got everything wrong that Joe Biden's not demented wrong for four straight years?
But they're independent.
They're insurgents.
MSNBC is changing its name to MS Now.
It's short for MySource for News Opinion and the World.
Great.
MySource.
Ms. Now.
Yeah, that's what it looks like.
Ms. MS used to stand for Microsoft.
Does anybody remember that?
But now it just stands for Bill Gates Penis.
Yeah, but that did not refer to Bill Gates' penis, Kurt.
That's a rumor.
Is that the community note?
I don't want to get community noted on this.
MSNBC will have a new name as it seeks to carve out an identity that will have it competing for scoops and news with current corporate siblings NBC News following the spin-off of the bulk of NBC Universal's cable assets into a new publicly traded company called Versant.
Oh, I hope someone Israeli goes it.
What is the what is the word?
Can you look up that word?
What is Versant?
I know that NPR used to let Verdant.
They would use the Archer Daniel Midland for a Verdant something.
I don't know what Verdant means.
I don't know what Versant means.
I guess.
I have no idea.
I'm doing all content.
But it's like a Verdant forest.
It sounds more like a channel for people like a region of land sloping in one general direction.
That's a Versant.
Oh, I thought I meant a whale's vagina.
Me too.
So I don't.
Well, it could also be archaic.
That's not that good for news.
I don't think they really thought it out because it sounds like a channel for people dealing with MS. Yeah, it does.
MS Now.
That's what it's.
There it is.
That's their.
First of all, it looks pretty Republican, right?
With the, and then it's MS Now.
And here, anyway, how about MSNPC?
How about we do that one?
How about MS 1996?
Was that already taken?
How about how about I got it?
You can be MS14 and street fight it out with MS13.
They should do that anyway.
They call it the worst side story.
Am I right?
Come on.
Okay, so here's Joe Scarborough got the word this morning.
He talked about it.
We have breaking news as it pertains to our network this morning.
A new name for the network.
First of all, I guess the guy who does the microphones was off this morning.
It sounds like his voice is being picked up by a microphone sitting in a hallway.
Isn't it kind of amazing, isn't it?
This is drug news, Jimmy.
And if you can't handle it, work by the end of the year.
We will become MS Now, which stands for my source.
Okay, so now you can see his microphone has come back in.
Just like just like my microphone would be working very well in Rutherford, New Jersey, Calgary, Edmonton, Vancouver, Chicago, Appleton, Wisconsin, Rosemont, Louisville, Fort Wayne.
Go to jimmydoor.com for a link for tickets.
Here we go.
News, opinion, and the world.
And look, Andrew, they even have a graphic up.
I like it.
There it is.
Actually, it looks very sporty.
As we go to Versant, we're going to be moving in this direction, MS Now, which I got to say, you know, I got a call yesterday afternoon, and they said, We hope you're okay.
Come on.
I was like, What do you mean?
Like, this is this shows we're independent.
And what I've said on this show time and time again is you look at the people that are running the company, they're entrepreneurial.
Like when you have somebody come into your company after working for like big corporations and say, and you're talking, you're saying, and they go, we want you to be entrepreneurial.
We want you to come up with new ideas.
We want you to push the boundaries.
I'm excited about that.
So I'm excited about this too.
It's like, you know, what's in a name?
Well, whatever you put into the name.
Well, look, my understanding is this decision was a choice by NBC Universal.
Remember, originally they were going to leave the peacock with the different units.
They decided that they wanted that to stay with NBC Universal.
Having said that, despite my sentimentality about the Peacock, I've always loved the Peacock.
The truth is, I've always thought about this network and CNBC and USA and actually all of those assets as insurgent networks.
This is an insurgent network.
And I love the idea, to be honest with you.
You can take out your salt shaker or whatever you want to do.
Kurt, did you know it's an insurgents?
Really?
What does that even mean?
So what's the definition of insurgent?
Because it's certainly not CNBC.
I'll tell you that.
Were they some sort of rebels from within the that's what it sounds like?
I've always said we're insurgents.
So this is changing the label.
I always wanted to get away from NBC.
I always wanted, I believe.
So you act like you can't fire me.
I quit you.
I always wanted that.
Oh, they're rebel or revolutionary.
They're rebel or revolutionary.
Insurgents.
They were always independent, Jimmy.
You know, they only worked for like Raytheon and Pfizer.
Yeah.
Never for actual, you know, they were independent, which is why they all got COVID wrong, the vaccine wrong, lockdowns, masks, the virus origination.
The same thing with Russia Gate.
They all got that wrong correctly.
I mean, in concert, they all got the Ukraine war wrong, the Syrian war wrong.
Now we have an Al-Qaeda guy running Syria.
Isn't it amazing how they got everything wrong that Joe Biden's not demented wrong for four straight years?
But they're independent.
They're insurgents.
They're not as successful as the other insurgents and other conflicts we've had.
He goes on.
Take it with a grain of salt.
Can you imagine the mentality it takes to get your news from these places?
I can't just imagine.
The friends in New York that are from New York, the city, their parents.
That's what they like.
When it's not full-on propaganda, it is just full-on bullshit.
Full-on, like he's doing right now.
We're insurgents.
We're rebels, says the guy with the pocket square at seven in the morning.
Okay, here we go.
I like this because I think it actually does have the sort of end independence.
Oh, no, I like this.
It's good.
I wanted this.
I wanted this to happen.
No, this is good.
We're insurgents.
Yeah, okay.
And actually gets away in some ways from even the idea of legacy media.
Right.
I mean, I think what you're seeing MS do and what you're seeing some of these other networks do now is not just linear, but by the way, I'm watching you on TikTok now.
Did you know that?
No, I'm seeing you on TikTok.
So this is a thing.
And of course, because I'm in with the kids, people actually didn't know this, but this network is the most watched news network on TikTok and on YouTube.
It is.
So we are moving, we're moving a direction beyond corporate news.
And that has nothing to do with the algorithm favoring corporate news.
And also.
It has nothing to do with that.
It has nothing to do with that we get suppressed as independent, actual independent producers and that they switched the algorithm in 2017 after Adpocalypse to appease their advertisers on YouTube.
So they even brag about how much they suppress shows in independent news space.
And then nobody ever, ever went to YouTube, would ever watch a corporate news news clip ever.
I have to hunt in the search to avoid when I want to see a topic and it floods me with MSNBC.
Yeah, MSNBC.
They're the most watched network news.
And so that little qualifier, who the hell watches network news besides a dwindling supply of old people that still believe in network news?
Very few.
So I don't think the numbers are even good by YouTube standards.
I don't believe their numbers are good.
But media.
And again, I think this fits.
It fits.
It's a new marketplace.
And you look at legacy media.
You look at the old media companies.
I could list a lot of names, John Lemire, that met a lot five years ago, 10 years ago, that mean nothing absolutely now.
It's what have you done for me lately?
And are you looking to the future?
Are you trying to hold on to the past?
And this is a question.
Are we going to be like Eastman Kodak throughout the 1980s and 90s?
Or are we going to be like NVIDIA and look at a brave new world?
And I think this actually helps us do that.
The Media Lance game has been changing a lot over the last decade or so, but it's been really accelerated the last few years in this particular moment.
So it does seem an ideal time to rebrand.
An ideal time to embrace a new identity, as you said, to be an insurgent network.
By the way, it's also a line in the sand just about the future.
And the truth is that this network, originally, the MS was Microsoft.
So for a very long time, there has been a rebrand, I would argue, almost in order.
Yeah.
What do you think?
I think it's good.
That's slight smile.
Oh, they got that ding bad eye.
Look, I think that I didn't know the MS was.
It's just a table full of people who have gotten every major story wrong in the last 10 years.
That is a table full of people who have gotten every major story completely wrong.
Also, Jimmy, they also got wrong.
It's the most watched news network on YouTube.
Just putting in news into the YouTube search.
So Western Hawaii is seriously alarmed by Trump talking with Adzelinsky.
155K views seven hours ago.
Fox News, 1.9 million views streamed three hours ago.
There's no way they are the number one.
So even that story was wrong.
Also, I like how Erica Molly Jong at Dumb Name Is looks like the bad guy from the movie Weapons, which is a great movie, by the way.
Yeah, she's another person born into privilege.
You wouldn't know about her if her mom wasn't famous.
Yeah.
Isn't that crazy?
Yeah.
That deal didn't go well for Microsoft.
Yeah, but it did not.
But I think that's right.
And look, we know for a fact that people get their news, a lot of it from YouTube and TikTok.
If you're biggest news, you know, if you're the biggest news network out there, that's a big deal.
Yeah, the goal is, again, again, be entrepreneurial and be independent.
We call it, we've always say MS anyway.
Yeah, right.
MS. And then the truth is now is what this is all about.
Right, exactly.
Did he just say entrepreneurial?
Yes.
Like, how are they entrepreneurial?
You guys are not, you guys are a corporate news show that got spun off from a conglomerate.
Yeah.
Can you play that last half again, just of him talking?
No.
I can't.
No, I can take it.
I'll translate.
Joe Biden's out of office.
The entire network was designed specifically for Joe Biden to watch to babysit him while they use the auto pen.
And now, now that Trump's in, there's no need.
We're not babysitting Joe Biden.
So we're going to have to find other things to do.
Here's my new little favorite thing here: BS Now, my source news opinion.
How's that a change?
So there you go.
Nice.
There you go.
They're rebranding over at MSNBC.
Now they're just going to be, what is it?
It's going to be called MS Now.
It's not a good name.
MS Now, not a good name.
It does sound like a TV station devoted to people with MS. It's a multiple sclerosis-based.
I would agree that MS Now is a tumor on the news scene.
I will admit.
They have to compete with my new network, Jimmy.
AIDS Today.
Let's see him combat.
Let's see them.
American Independent.
I have to figure it out.
Democratic service.
American Independent Democratic Service.
AIDS.
What?
What's the problem?
I'm excited.
I'm excited about it.
I think it's the way we always call it AIDS.
Didn't we?
We always used to call it AIDS.
I think it looks really cool.
You know, I hate that stupid rainbow peacock, but the new one looks terrible.
The new one does look terrible.
It looks dystopic more so.
Yeah.
The MSNBC rainbow.
That's what I like a nice rainbow in the NBC Peacock and nowhere else.
Hey, you know, here's another great way you can help support the show: you become a premium member.
We give you a couple of hours of premium bonus content every week, and it's a great way to help support the show.
You can do it by going to jimmydork.com, clicking on join premium.
It's the most affordable premium program in the business, and it's a great way to help put your thumb back in the eye of the bastards.
Thanks for everybody who was already a premium member.
And if you haven't, you're missing out.
We give you lots of bonus content.
Thanks for your support.
We're developing a universal vaccine at NIH, which is a vaccine that addresses the entire phylum of viruses.
So it's a vaccine that mimics natural immunity.
Yeah, now they deleted that tweet with that video.
Okay, we have a special guest with us, Ryan Christian, is an independent journalist known for his commitment to transparency and truth.
Isn't that nice?
He's a winner of the Serena Shim Award for Uncompromising Integrity and Journalism.
Nice.
I'm also a recipient of that award.
He contributes political and social commentary to The Last American Vagabond.
What do you mean you contribute?
I thought you were the last American Vagabond, where he provides an alternative voice to the compromise and the co-opted corporate media.
Welcome back to the show, Ryan Christian.
Thanks, brother.
Good to see you again.
So you are the last American vagabond, right?
Yeah, I'm founder and editor of the platform.
That's me.
I mean, really, it's the name of the platform, but it's, you know, it's meant to be sort of like we are all the last American Vagabond kind of idea, you know.
But yes, that's mine.
Now, you did an interesting segment on this that I'm going to talk to you about.
Maha Action tweeted out: RFK Jr. says we're developing a universal vaccine at NIH, which is a vaccine that addresses the entire phylum of viruses.
Whatever, whoever knew that word phylum?
It's a vaccine that mimics natural immunity.
So the problem is they deleted this tweet, right?
Because here, do you want to hear him say it?
Here?
We're developing a universal vaccine at NIH, which is a vaccine that addresses the entire phylum of viruses.
So it's a vaccine that mimics natural immunity.
And it, but wait.
Wait a minute.
Hang on.
And it is effective against any kind of mutation.
So it doesn't drive the virus to mutate.
And it could be effective.
We believe it's going to be effective against not only coronaviruses, but also flu.
Really?
And it's going to be a much more, much safer and much more effective vaccine.
Yeah.
Now, they deleted that tweet with that video.
And Grock was asked, why did Secretary Kennedy delete his tweet about developing a universal vaccine?
And it says, yeah, it appears he did delete his Twitter post about developing a universal vaccine.
My search of his timeline shows no such content, despite videos and reports from his August 8th, Alaska event discussing an NIH-led natural immune mimicking vaccine for COVID and flu.
So I just want, so you're on this story.
Here's HHS, NIH launched next generation universal vaccine platform for pandemic-prone viruses.
So what the hell is going on with this?
First of all, what is this universal vaccine and why did they delete it, you think?
Well, the platform is continuing.
You can look it up on HHS.
I'm not exactly sure why he chose to delete the tweet.
I think it's because he got a, you know, there was more than one, by the way.
One was on the Maha, then one was something that our RFK himself posted.
And the point is that he got a lot of pushback from largely people in the Maha movement.
But what's important is to look at these.
There's two separate stories here.
One of them is the trend, the shift into the universal platform direction under the guise of we're ending mRNA, which is not happening.
And I want to talk about that too.
This is simply staying with the universal platform.
I'm very skeptical about this in general.
I'm not an expert in this topic, but you and I both have been diving into this research since this entire thing has started.
And we've both interviewed plenty of doctors, but many I speak to are very adamant about this not being the right direction.
The wholesale vaccine direction, which is like the old style, was the one that was rife with all the issues about the concerns and the statements of people being sick after taking them.
They deny that, but there's a lot of denial around a lot of these things.
And there's a lot of issues that came from that.
Now, maybe they're going to do it better.
My gut tells me that this is actually sort of the part of the head fake.
I do think this is probably going to happen.
I doubt that it'll end up being, I mean, think about how unlikely it is that you're going to make something that you make one shot that essentially can apply kind of universally to everything kind of forever that they update.
I mean, I don't know how that ends up not being some sort of overlapping mRNA technology.
It doesn't appear to be, but my thought is that this is sort of a deviation from where I actually think the direction is going.
And now, this starts with the $500 million contract discussion where RFK Jr. said we're ending all these contracts.
Now, on that point alone, my research shows us today only a few of those you can even prove have actually been canceled.
And they were ones that were already being canceled before he made that announcement.
There's no like main list of all those 22 contracts.
I'm skeptical, even those are being canceled.
Just for the conversation, let's assume those are all being canceled.
My important point is that HHS released a document that everybody basically selectively quoted.
What it said was very clearly that they were ending these contracts and then winding down the direction for mRNA shots, but made clear that Arcturus and Amplitude Therapeutics would be allowed to continue the projects they already were, claiming there wouldn't be new ones.
But if you look, the ones that they're both working on are all self-amplifying shots, bird flu, COVID-19, and all mRNA.
So those are continuing.
That's clear.
Secondarily on the post, it says right underneath this paragraph, everyone quoted, we will also still be continuing all other forms of mRNA, food related, everything else.
So my thought was like, okay, this feels very sort of like we're ending anti-function, but you read it and it was like, they're totally not ending anti-function.
They're in fact just focusing on the versions that they think they're going to be the world leaders in.
That's exactly what it said, we're paraphrasing.
So I think this is what it's really about, the self-amplifying shift into this direction.
But you can, you know, you broaden out this picture.
You can continue to see a lot of this over focus on specifically that.
And on top of that, I found new contracts even today for things that are called trans, let me make sure I get the actual phrase right.
It's called a trans, here it is, trans amplified mRNA, which basically is a self-amplifying, but with two different versions of the things amplifying.
I mean, this is the direction it's going.
All of these are in the works.
There's multiple studies in this direction.
So you're saying it was a real miss.
So I reported on that story.
The RFK killed the contracts for the funding for the $500 million for the mRNA vaccine platform that he killed it.
Not Stargate, though.
Stargate, as far as I can tell, was still functioning.
What is that?
Now that's about AI-directed mRNA drugs.
And I think they're trying to make a very fine line about what the difference is by saying that self-amplifying is not the same thing or that somehow the AI-directed versions are not the same thing because it's not the same COVID shot.
I will have to wait and see how it pans out.
But we've seen a lot from the U.S. government, but this administration in particular, doing just that kind of thing, like a head fake, you know?
But the platform itself is one thing.
And then the cancellations, you know, these are different stories, but I think it's all part of the same objective.
And again, I don't think all those 22 contracts have been canceled.
And clearly, there's plenty of them that are continuing.
And on top of that, the $500 million that they canceled for that direction, that was $500 million that was already earmarked for specifically COVID-19 shots.
And they're just pivoting it into the same shots.
It's the same direction, but self-amplifying.
And you can prove that they're continuing.
Now, the Stargate point is very important, I think, because that goes into a whole new realm of what we're talking about.
The AI directive actually was one CEPI is working on.
And that's, as far as I can tell, still supported by the Trump administration.
There hasn't been funding this year, but I get the sense that it's going to continue in the same way.
And that's kind of the way they work this.
It's sort of a like the last Trump administration feigning to stop funding Gavi or rather Bill Gates, but then or the WHO, excuse me, but then ultimately funded Gavi, which is the chief funder of the WHO.
So it was sort of like a shifting of money.
And I think that's how this tends to operate on both sides of the paradigm.
So what does the universal vax have to do with this?
Well, that's again, that's something that they're claiming they're going forward on.
And it came out at the same kind of timeframe.
So I think it is a project that's going to go forward.
And I'm sure that you can make money off these things like anything else.
And I'm also skeptical of just anything in this category, like everyone seems to be today.
My gut tells me that it's really sort of a, you know, we're giving you an old version that will appease some of the people that are only focused on mRNA.
A lot of the Maha people really were unhappy with any of these things.
But I think from my research and the money, they're leaning heavily into self-amplifying shots and everything beyond that.
All the future tech kind of vaccination, great reset overlap kind of things that, you know, even overlapping with like nanotechnology.
Like I've talked about the Ferritin nano, the Ferritin nanoparticle shots that they're currently working on.
The Guardian did a report about this and I think 2016 called it the Magneto shot.
The Rockefeller Institute did a study that proved using these, you could literally control the movements of mice.
Now, it's a whole different topic, but like these things are being studied.
That's the reality and that they're already working on certain versions of this.
So I think that's the direction.
I thought mRNA vaccines were self-amplified.
What is the difference between an mRNA and a self-amplifying vaccine?
It's a good question.
Now, when I first was researching the Pfizer shots in the beginning, all of them really, I think it was BN2.
I always forget the, you know, the two main shots, BNT2B21 or something like that.
They were the two main ones they had.
The one that they ultimately leaned into the most on the original Pfizer documentation that I still have, you can see that it was originally listed as self-amplifying.
And let's not forget, and let me explain it first then, since that's what you asked.
One is what we're told the COVID shots are.
It produces a spike protein and then it stops.
We all know that's not true.
It continues to produce spike protein as almost even the largest body of evidence from scientific research now shows that.
And even the experts admitted this, right?
Dr. Luigi Warren, for example.
So my point is that they claimed it was one, which is that's supposed to be the mRNA shot.
The self-amplifying shot produces more of them.
That's what these are, whether by accident or by design.
And so really, that's what we're already seeing.
And so this is really, if you take it at face value, just the continuation of what they were doing.
And we were lied to then and we're being lied to now.
And so I think that's kind of the real obvious shift because, you know, it gets into the conspiratorial side of it.
But, you know, I think your audience is well understanding about a lot of the stuff that happened during COVID-19.
And I wonder what that's really about.
You know, what's the point of lying to us about that then and now?
And, you know, while planting us with something else, in my opinion, that's meant to kind of deviate from what's happening.
So let me see this.
So new study.
Oh, no, that's different.
Oh, that's another story.
No, that's relevant.
That's, you know, that's Dr. Peter McCullough and his foundation.
Well, that's from him talking about the specific.
Now, this is one of the ones that is working, right?
There's the Arcturus and others.
What is this study they did?
I think it was in Uganda.
Can you do that?
It was 93% of the people that took the self-amplifying shots had blood irregularities and all sorts of different problems.
So it's about a study about self-amplifying, which is what they're leaning into.
So that's why that's relevant.
So you keep mentioning Arcturus and another name.
What are those two names you're mentioning?
Arcturus is the company, and I could be mispronouncing it, but that's how it looks like it's spelled to me.
And then Amplitude Therapeutics.
Those are the two that in the HHS release, they explicitly named as being ones that they would continue under the guise that, or the claim that the money was already invested, therefore we didn't want to waste taxpayer dollars.
But they've already done that, for example, with the Moderna shot that was funded in Biden's administration and canceled it recently.
So the logic doesn't line up for me.
I think it's about the fact that that's what they're leaning into, as all of the evidence suggests.
But those are the two companies that they seem to be kind of showing you.
And I can prove to you both of them are working on mRNA, COVID, and flu shots, and both of them self-amplifying.
So he, so Peter McCullough, by the way, who's, you know, one of the most cited doctors in the world, new study, COVID-19 Replicon, Sam.
What's what's SAM RNA?
So there's two ways to write it, both SAMA.
Self-AMP self-amplifying mRNA or S-A-RNA.
They're both the same thing.
Oh, so self-amplifying mRNA injections induce severe blood abnormalities in 93% of trial participants.
And so this is what they're leaning into right now at the HHS under RFK?
Yeah, well, my opinion is that that's the direction they're like aggressively leaning into.
But the evidence, the facts are that those are the ones that they are continuing.
So it's clear that all the ones that you can see that they're, when they're claiming they're shifting away from mRNA in general, the only ones they're going forward with, mRNA and self-amplifying mRNA, are all Arcturus, Amplitude, and self-amplifying.
And then my point is you can look up and find a whole bunch of other research happening that's both funded by them or supported by groups they support that are all working in this.
Like Mary Tally Bowden, for example, just put out a post a while back that showed like 36 different self-amplifying shocks that were all in the works.
And so these things are going to be popping up.
And I think the problem is right now, which kind of seems to be the thing that's happening this, you know, this time in politics, that they make the statement and a lot of people cheer it and then we put it away.
And it hasn't stopped.
You know, you've talked about stuff like this during COVID.
And so, well, just let me just show this.
Self-amplifying RNA in an ever-growing arms race of genetic engineering, a new and deeply concerning player has emerged, self-amplifying RNA, S-A-RNA.
Unlike conventional mRNA shots, which carried the pretense of controlled dosing, self-amplifying RNA introduces a self-replicating genetic mechanism into human cells, a mechanism that has no inherent safeguards, no patient-specific oversight, and no clear understanding of the long-term ramifications.
Now, I'm pretty sure, and again, just from covering this, that the problem with the mRNA vaccines was one of the problems was at first they said, no, it just stayed in your arm.
And then we found out, no, it went through your whole body.
And then we found out that it keeps replicating inside your body.
So what's the difference between that and self-amplifying?
It seems like they just made up a new term for the same thing.
Is that what it sounds like to you, Brian?
No, but see, the difference is if so, the original shots that we were given under during the COVID-19 timeframe, those were self-amplifying shots.
I think you can clearly prove that.
So the point is that what they were claiming, if that even exists, is that you could take an mRNA shot that only produces one spike to routine and one antigen.
And ultimately, that is what you deal with and it stops.
Everywhere you look, that's not true, right?
So I think this was originally the direction, and either they lied or they did make a mistake.
I don't know.
So I mean, again, it sounds like it's the same thing as the COVID vaccines because they could not, I mean, I learned this watching Dr. John Campbell that they, and also I had on Dr. Jay Bhattachara say the same thing on this show, who's now the head of the NIH.
He said that the problem with it was that you didn't know the dosing, right?
So because you didn't know how many it was going to replicate once it got into your body.
And it seems like that's what they're saying about this seems, to me, it seems like they're just rebranding the same thing.
It certainly is one way to frame it.
Oh, okay.
But we know ultimately that there's plenty, you know, the amplifying part of it was clearly, as you mentioned, a major part of the problem.
But there's so many other elements to these things that are dangerous.
Like the self-amplifying part of it's clearly problematic, especially if it's the wrong thing you're being, you know, the wrong antigen, the wrong thing they're aiming at, which we don't talk about.
But so too is the mRNA platform itself, right?
There's been studies peer-reviewed and otherwise that have clearly identified the platform and the way that it's put together that in one case is directly correlated with myocarditis.
So it's like all the moving parts, but the way you frame that is the best way to look at it.
The only reason I'm trying to be objective is that I don't know whether there was their intent to try to mislead you or they just made a mistake.
But what you said is the best way to look at it.
It's in material, there's no difference.
They're self-replicating or rather producing more and more and more of it.
And now they're telling you that's the future, even though it's the same thing that hurt a lot of people during COVID-19.
So it looks like, it looks like it was a bit of a deception, or as you put it, a head fake that RFK Jr. did when they announced that we're canceling the $500 million for research into mRNA vaccines when they're just actually shifting it, right?
Right, right.
Into what they're called self-amplifying RNA.
Right.
Specifically, the money part first is that that's what frustrates me as people act like we're saving money.
All they did was move that money right back into other versions of it.
But just like Doge, just like Doge.
I'm sorry, just like Doge.
They didn't really cut that money.
Exactly like Doge.
Yeah, but you know, I don't know if RFK, you know, he's such an anomaly to me right now because as I think you've talked about, his past work, which I still support, I still think is valuable.
It just doesn't make sense.
But so I don't know whether he's being corralled, blackmailed, manipulated.
Either way, you know, his statement about ending those, again, my earlier statement, I still don't even, I can't see evidence that those 22 have even ended on top of everything else.
But I've heard statements from people that I can't verify.
They claim that insiders have stated that, you know, he was told to not go, he won't be able to touch mRNA.
If you're in his shoes, I just don't know why you would keep going along with it.
Like, you know, you know, they're using your name to make people feel better about this, but maybe he isn't bored.
I don't know.
But I think the facts are all we can engage with.
Now, is Bill Gates involved in this?
Yes, that's that's another very important point.
I'm glad you asked that because like Arturus and others, Bill Gates is directly involved with at least two of the shots we're pointing to, but through funding.
Well, let's put it, let me be as clear as accurate as possible.
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is involved with funding on two of those.
Now, you know, that doesn't mean Bill Gates personally did it, but you know, it's really about how it would be framed.
Imagine if this was Biden.
What do you think the conservatives would say about that?
You know, it's we need to be equally critical of how these things are going.
And it's just very obvious that we're being lied to about all of this.
Now, the other part of it is the food side of it, which, or any other number of mRNA versions that they're still rolling out.
I mean, Dr. Tenpenny made the point about the self-amplifying raby shot for animals that's suddenly on the market.
You know, it's all over the place.
And I really, you know, it feels like it's coming at you from all angles.
So they're switching up the vaccine formulation from the old-style vaccine to an mRNA vaccine for rabies.
Or specifically self-amplifying.
But again, maybe that's all it really is.
But yes, there's many of them, by the way.
And I mean, if you have looked into the animal side of this for vaccines, if you think it's bad with the human side of it, it's horrifying.
It's less concern, less due diligence, one size fits all.
It's horrible.
I mean, that's why, you know, I've talked a lot about that with way I think you, you know, I think it's a horrible thing.
I think your dog should avoid it like the plague.
But I think a lot of that's popping up now in a lot of the different directions.
Or she points out the RNA pesticides they're using, which actually they've been, some of them have been used since 2015 that they just continue to use through both administrations and spray your food with, you know, or animals.
And, you know, all the, I mean, you've talked about the butter and the far, the fakes, the lab raised, the lab-grown salmon or CRISPR pig meat or, you know, all these different things that are sprinting in the direction.
I think pretty much the Maha movement was against all of this.
So do you, so what kind of pushback did he get on that universal vax tweet?
That I only saw comments.
That's, and at least that was some of the conversation.
I can't confirm that was really what they thought, but it was just, you know, you see it when you get, you know, they posted it and it's got like 30 times more comments than anything else.
And everyone, you know, everyone beneath it is like, what are you talking about?
That's not what you promised.
And, you know, and then he deleted it.
So that's just the way I read it.
Well, it just seems nuts.
It seems, you know, Dr. Marty Bakari was supposed to be on our show last Friday and then they canceled at the last minute because they were afraid I was going to ask him a real question.
Probably unlike CNN or MSNBC, which is just going to ask them Pfizer-funded questions.
They don't want any, they don't run a real question, right?
Just like Bernie Sanders doesn't want a real question.
So it's funny that everybody from HHS will go on CNBC and MSNBC and CNN and Fox, the same people who smeared RFK Jr. and all those people.
And that is interesting.
They can't wait.
They go on the regular, they go on those news networks, but they won't come on a news show like this.
Isn't that kind of amazing?
It's sad, is what it is.
It is, but the point you made there is really important to think about, right?
So he watched them criticize him and lie about him.
And that's where he still goes?
Yeah, or anybody under his purview?
That does seem like a, you know, it just adds more of the question marks for me.
You know, like, I don't know why, but clearly we're being misled all over the place.
Yeah, so they're definitely hiding something and they were afraid that I was going to uncover it, or maybe I already did uncover it, and I was going to corner him on it.
But either way, they ducked that interview.
It was set up for weeks.
And then at the last minute, they're like, hey, yeah, we're going to cancel.
We saw a headline on one of your things: Trump betrays MAGA.
Yeah, was that as bad as anything CNN has said about RFK Jr. or even his cousin?
Guess what?
Hundreds of thousands of people, Jews in Israel, have turned on Benjamin Netanyahu.
Hundreds of thousands are protesting his stupid war because they want his war to end and they know he's the one extending it.
He's the one standing in the way of the hostages being released and returned.
He's the one.
They know this.
Hundreds of thousands of protesters gather in Tel Aviv to demand an end to the Gaza war.
Wow.
Yep, they're protesting because they want the government to stop killing all the people that their sons in the military want to sexually abuse.
Anyway, so here's a little bit of the look at that protest.
This is in Tel Aviv.
Tens of thousands of Israelis have joined nationwide protests in one of the largest demonstrations in Israel since the fighting began.
The day of nationwide protests aimed to pressure the government to halt the military campaign and bring the hostages home.
Stop BB's war.
Protesters block roads outside Tel Aviv and Jerusalem.
Well, look, she spits on them.
More than 30 protesters were arrested.
Look at all those.
The day of protest culminated with a rally at Intel Aviv.
They only arrested 30 people out of all those hundreds of thousands.
The decision is widely unpopular.
The decision to invade Gaza City.
So the decision that Bibi Netanyahu made to invade Gaza City, very unpopular among Israelis and many of the hostages'families.
Those who are calling today for an end to the war without Hamas'defeat are not only hardening Hamas'position and delaying the release of our hostages, they are also ensuring that the horrors of October 7th will repeat themselves over and over again.
This is what this is Netanyahu.
Nobody believes him.
Your own people have turned on you, Bibi.
Stop Gaza and genocide.
Look at the this is really happening.
Hundreds of thousands of people.
Look at that.
Wow.
How come even Israelis are sick of the Gaza genocide, but not American Zionists?
Isn't that wild?
Wow.
Now Baby has to prove that he doesn't care about his own people more than he cares about the Palestinians.
It's just that nobody's on his side anymore.
Even the Jews in Israel are against him.
Nobody anywhere on earth is on Benjamin Netanyahu's side, except people right here in America, of course.
Wow.
Netanyahu losing the Jews was not on my bingo card this decade.
I'll tell you that.
The hostage and missing families forum, the initiator of the day of protest, estimated at 500,000 people joined the demonstration in Tel Aviv, a figure not confirmed by the police.
We demand a comprehensive and achievable agreement and an end to the war, said the mother of a hostage, leading figure in the protest movement.
We demand what is rightfully ours, our children.
The Israeli government has transformed a just war into a pointless war.
National media published a video message by Mattan Zangur on Sunday, in which the hostage, weak and emancipated, addressed his family and told them he missed them.
The video was filmed by Hamas and found in Gaza by the army, the family said.
So, so again, it boils down to the hostages.
It doesn't really have anything to do with the Palestinians.
And if it's any consolation, it was never a just war.
It was never a just war.
So this is probably the last minute we have to save the hostages, said a demonstrator.
The protesters, the protests came more than a week after Israel's Security Cabinet approved plans to capture Gaza City 22 months into the war that has created a dire humanitarian crisis in the Palestinian territory.
The hostages and missing families forum campaign group vowed on Sunday that protesters would shut down the country with the goal of bringing back the hostages and ending the war.
Hey, Randy Fine said the war is going great.
You know, Congressman Randy Fine.
Egypt said in recent days mediators were leading a renewed push to secure a 60-day truce deal that includes a hostage being released after the last round of talks in Qatar ended without a breakthrough.
Some Israeli government members who oppose any deal with Hamas criticize Sunday's demonstrations.
Israeli's far-right finance minister Baslalo Smotrich decried a perverse and harmful campaign that plays into the hands of Hamas and calls for surrender.
Well, what you can do is surrender to the laughter when I'm going to be in Rutherford, New Jersey, Calgary, Edmonton, Vancouver, Chicago, Appleton, Wisconsin, and Fort Wayne, Indiana, Louisville, Kentucky.
Go to jimmydoor.com for a leak for tickets.
But there's more to this story.
Benny Gantz, an opposition leader, condemned the government for attacking the families of the hostages while bearing responsibility for the captivity of their children by Hamas for nearly two years.
Israel's military offensive has killed at least 61,000 Palestinians.
The figure does not include the thousands believed to still be buried under the rubble or the thousands killed indirectly as a consequence of the war.
So here's Israeli police viciously attack war protesters.
I don't need to see that.
Wow, who knew there were so many Hamas supporters in Israel?
300,000 protesting in Tel Aviv right now after 2.5 million gathered around the country today.
Imagine a day-long protest with 80 million people in the United States.
Enough, let life win.
Wow.
2.5 million gathered around the country.
There's only like 10 million people in all of Israel.
Wow.
That's wow.
Wow.
Israel is the place that makes Jews unsafe.
Israel is the country that makes Jews unsafe.
Doing a genocide on social media makes Jews unsafe.
Doing a genocide in the name of Judaism makes Jews unsafe.
I'm sure Benjamin Netanyahu wouldn't arm Hamas and let them attack on purpose.
I mean, look how well Israel treats their own Jews.
You don't have to see this.
Israel's growing frustration.
It's not a war.
It's a genocide.
Call it what it is.
So the AP says the headline is: Israel's growing frustration over the war in Gaza erupts in nationwide protests.
It's not a war.
It's a genocide.
Yeah, it's a war.
It's not a war.
A war would be like two militaries fighting each other.
In Israel, Gaza, you have Israel with their F-22s, F-16s, and 2,000-pound bunker buster bombs against guys with the hang gliders.
Not really a war.
Netanyahu says nationwide strike is distancing the release of our hostages.
And I should know, he said, since I have done more than anyone else to prevent their hostages from being released.
Here's one more, one more slide.
In case anyone asks why the hostages aren't being released and the war in Gaza can't be ended, Netanyahu has no interest in that because his political career and land-grabbing plans are simply more important to him.
That's exactly right.
The real tragedy is that is the stranglehold that Netanyahu has on our government and President Trump.
Wow.
There's no greater threat to the hostages than the guy in this photo right here.
Once the hostages come back, his free ride is over.
The hostages' only chance is based around Benjamin Netanyahu's removal from power.
Think about that.
So if Benjamin Netanyahu got ousted, the hostages would be freed.
And it's time for BB to step down and go boating with the cloonies.
That's what I think.
And the Obamas.
And if you've ever seen Benjamin Netanyahu in a speedo, you'd understand why he wants to dominate the world.
So good on the Israelis protesting.
And good on you for coming out to see my comedy coming up.
In Rutherford, Canada, Chicago, Wisconsin, Louisville, Southpen, Indiana, go to JimmyDoor.com for a link for tickets.
Hey, become a premium member.
Go to JimmyDoorComedy.com.
Sign up.
It's the most affordable premium program in the business.
All the voices performed today are by the one and only the inimitable Mike McRae.
He can be found at mikemcray.com.
That's it for this week.
You be the best you can be, and I'll keep being me.
