Two Israeli Embassy employees were shot and killed Wednesday night as they left the Capital Jewish Museum in Washington, D.C. The suspect in the killing, identified as 30-year-old Elias Rodriguez of Chicago, was initially "observed pacing back and forth outside of the museum" before he approached a group of four people, "produced a handgun," and shot the two victims. As he was handcuffed, Rodriguez repeatedly shouted "Free Palestine.” The shooting was being investigated as a hate crime, a law enforcement source said. Jimmy and Americans’ Comedian Kurt Metzger discuss the details of the case that don’t exactly add up, and Israel’s history of staging false flag operations to achieve geopolitcal objectives. Plus segments on Piers Morgan’s recent turn against Israel, Trump’s “Big, Beautiful Bill” passing the House and evidence that the Biden administration covered up serious side effects from the mRNA vaccines. Also featuring Stef Zamorano, Kim Bright and Mary Holland. And a phone call from JD Vance!
Come see us live in Los Angeles, Buffalo, Toledo, Montreal, Ottawa, Glasgow, Manchester, Belfast, Dublin, London, Liverpool, Birmingham.
Go to JimmyDoor.com for a link for tickets.
Hey, this is Jimmy.
Who's this?
Hey, what's up, dude?
This is JD Vance.
Hey, Mr. Vice President, what a pleasure to hear from you.
Boom.
What?
Boom.
Yeah, boom.
I'm trying to make that my new thing, you know?
Like, hey, what's up, this JD Vance?
Boom.
Like, my trademark, you know?
I like it.
Thank you.
I thought you might, because when I call you, I always sound like a huge redneck for some reason.
Like, I don't even sound like this in real life.
I don't know.
Your show just brings it out in me, I guess.
So doing boom kind of fits in with that.
Well, I think it suits you fine.
Hell yeah, dude, boom.
So what's on your mind, Mr. Vice President?
Oh, man, so much.
One thing about me is that I'm always thinking.
And, you know, I've always been like that.
I remember when I was a kid, my grandma would come out in the yard and say, JD, what are you doing?
And I'd say, I'm just thinking, Grandma.
And everybody would know, like, okay, JD's thinking again.
This could be a while.
Dinner might be late.
My wife Usha says I should start a podcast.
Sounds like you're a very contemplative person.
I don't know what that means, but hell yeah, boom.
So what are you currently thinking about?
That's my question.
Well, one thing is the Pope.
There's a new Pope now.
Yeah, I know.
And he's American, which is good.
I looked it up.
Did you know there have been 266 different popes?
Like, Jesus Christ, settle down.
Hang on to one of them for a while.
266 separate dudes since whoever the first pope was.
St. Peter.
That was the first Pope, St. Peter.
No, that does not sound right.
Trust me, I'm right.
Look, I know I'm a recent convert, but I'm pretty sure St. Peter is the dude who lets people into heaven.
How could he also be the Pope from up there?
No offense, but you're sounding pretty dumb right now.
Okay.
My guess is the first Pope was a guy whose last name was Pope.
So that's why that job is called Pope.
Okay, sure.
Moving on.
Anyway, yeah, Pope Leo, which isn't his real name.
He gets a separate Pope name.
Okay, John Cougar Mellenkamp.
Pope Leo is an American dude from Chicago, which, first of all, makes it easier to talk to him because he speaks a normal language.
And also, it makes it more likely he will be an ally.
Ally of whom?
Donald Trump.
Who else, dude?
It's not the Middle Ages, Mr. Vice President.
I don't think the Pope is supposed to make personal alliances with world leaders.
Okay, I'm getting tired of all these rules that people are always coming to me with.
That's illegal.
This would be unprecedented.
That violates the Constitution, blah, blah, blah.
What a bunch of goody two-shoes, man.
And you're not even the first person to say that very thing to me about the Pope.
Well, who was the other one?
The Pope, when I personally met with him recently.
But I don't necessarily think he's the expert on this.
The Pope isn't an expert on papal matters?
Well, the Pope isn't an expert on what Donald Trump is or isn't allowed to do.
Look, Mr. Trump demands complete personal loyalty.
He's made no secret about that.
And he wants that same loyalty from the Pope of the Church.
I don't see what the problem is here.
All right, okay.
Because we're going to need the Pope and his enormous influence to help push President Trump's overseas agenda.
Also, we want to keep an eye on him so he doesn't get too woke.
You know, the previous Pope was kind of woke.
I don't know if you knew that or not.
Woke, woke how?
Well, you know, he was always like, be kind to immigrants and refugees, that bleeding heart bullshit that leftists are always doing.
That's just kind of boilerplate Catholic messaging.
That's really the kind of thing the Pope should be saying, actually.
Okay, maybe in your version of Christianity, but some of us like a version of Jesus that isn't a huge pussy.
A Jesus that recognizes sovereign borders and doesn't get handies in a twist when heist goes and fucks up a whole ass family, like Jesus with some balls.
And we need a Pope who gets behind that.
I don't really see a Pope or anyone who calls themselves a Christian getting behind that.
What if the Pope doesn't go along with your new muscular brand of Christianity?
Well, I think the obvious recourse would be to put some tariffs on Vatican City.
That's its own country, which means we can tariff it.
Tariff on what?
What do they make?
Are they just...
I don't know.
Like St. Pete's Basilica t-shirts and shit.
They got to make something.
Point is, we are not afraid to make them feel pain if the Pope gets a little too popey.
Well, it sounds like you've thought long and hard about this, like you've said before.
I know, dude, my head hurts from all this thinking.
What are you thinking about, Jimmy?
You know, I don't know, Mr. Vice President.
Oh, man, I bet it's something fancy.
Well, I'll let you get back to thinking and doing your show.
Can you do both at the same time?
You probably can.
You're a pro.
I made a note here to make my next thing I think about my personal brand.
That's so important these days, your personal brand.
And speaking of that, boom.
Talk to you later.
Boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom.
Boom.
Boom.
Establishment media sets of artists fighting.
Oh, good luck.
Bullshit.
We can't afford life fomenting this.
Oh, watch and see as the jet golf.
The median speeds and jumps the medium and hits them head on.
It's the Jimmy Tore Show.
This is the Mossad bragging on 60 Minutes about blowing up a nine-year-old girl's face.
Here we go.
How did you convince Hezbollah to buy this?
Well, obviously, they didn't know that they were buying it from Israel.
Who did they buy?
So they're talking about the pagers.
Remember when they rigged the pagers to blow up on regular people?
So it did, and it killed lots of children here.
Or I think they were buying it from.
We have an incredible array of possibilities of creating foreign companies that have no way being traced back to Israel.
Shell companies over sell companies who affect the supply chain to our favor.
We create a pretend world.
We are a global production company.
We write the screenplay.
We're the directors.
We're the producers.
We're the main actors.
The world is our stage.
So, wow, the whole world is their stage, and they're controlling everything.
So, of course, it's definitely not a false flag.
That's crazy.
I'm saying definitely not.
It's crazy talk.
Two Israeli.
So, here it is.
The two were attending an event.
By the way, why would Mossad go on 60 Minutes and admit that?
Well, because they wanted to brag about those exploding pagers that blew a nine-year-old girl's face off.
That's why.
Yeah, why wouldn't you brag about that?
Why wouldn't you brag about it?
An achievement like that.
Jimmy, this is crazy, but after a show of mothership, I have some stupid joke about we're definitely going to World War III.
And I go, ever since we found it out, the Jews can blow up our vapes with a text message.
I'm like, I skimmed the article.
It's a stupid joke.
A guy comes up to me after he goes, hey, man, that was really funny.
I'm Jewish.
My brother is in Mossad.
And they had that technology to blow up vapes in 2007.
He told me they do do that.
So they were attending an event for young professionals at the Capitol Jewish Museum hosted by the American Jewish Committee.
It's just amazing, right?
Like those two people don't deserve.
No, nobody's advocating violence.
Of course, they're going to pretend like everybody's advocating violence who's for ending violence in Gaza.
Somehow you're advocating.
The unattractive couple.
Yeah.
I think she was working like her dad said the irony is she was like she was at the woman was actually trying to do outreach to Gaza and for Palestinians.
That's how I know Israel did it.
That's how I know Israel killed her because she did that.
What do they do to people who do outreach to Gaza?
Does anybody know the answer?
Oh, they kill them.
So, but the guy actually was IDF.
So maybe that's Hannibal, the directive.
Who knows?
Hannibal directors for hostage situations.
Oh, okay, that's right.
It's just a simple false flat.
Well, we don't know for sure, but it's very strange.
So this guy, his 31-year-old Chicago native, Elias Rodriguez.
So he's not Muslim.
You know, oh, Barry Weiss was so pissed off.
So was Douglas Murray.
He's not Muslim.
He's never been.
He's never been Muslim.
He's never been.
He's never been Muslim.
Ah, damn it.
You know what's driving?
He must have been radicalized by Dave Smith.
He must have been.
He pretended to be a bystander after the shooting.
So he shoots the people and then runs in.
He didn't try to run away.
He shoots them outside and then runs in.
Again, this is awesome.
It's like a Luigi Mangioni kind of setup, and he's got a manifesto.
I'm going to tell you this straight up.
I don't believe any, if there's a manifesto, I don't believe you that it's a real thing and not a false flag.
It's the most cliche, hacky thing.
It always doesn't really make sense.
And so this is, and this is right after there were foreign diplomats in Gaza, foreign diplomats, and the Israeli army was shooting above their head.
So that story didn't get any press.
And this story, this happened immediately after that, because that would have really been a bad story for Israel.
So now that's totally not ever going to get talked about.
Right.
We need a wave of censorship, Jimmy.
So an event has to happen so we can have a wave because they're not winning that war.
You know, they look bad.
It's very, everybody's aware they're losing the public.
They lost Piers Morgan.
They lost Piers Morgan.
So they're losing everybody.
And then all of a sudden, this happens.
It's totally coincidental.
I don't feel like they won me back with this.
When police arrived, the man turned himself in and shouted free, free Palestine while being handcuffed.
By the way, it was the nicest arrest I've ever seen.
We're going to show you the video in a second.
They were so nice to him.
I guess those cops weren't IDF trained?
I guess they weren't.
Metropolitan Police Chief Pamela Smith, a lady cop, said the man implied that he committed the offense.
Well, now you know it's fake.
He was allegedly seen pacing back and forth outside the museum before approaching a group of four, shooting two of them with a handgun.
And 31-year-old later went inside.
Then he went inside the museum where he was eventually detained.
According to an eyewitness, he pretended to be a witness once inside the building and he waited for the police to arrive for over 10 minutes.
It's weird that they wouldn't have extra because there's been a wave of anti-Semitism.
You would think they would have security.
You think they'd have security?
There's big fences around like all the other stuff.
And he went inside and he waited around for 10 minutes.
I don't know.
Another witness told CNN that she heard him say, I did it for Gaza, Free Palestine.
So that's to make sure anybody who says Free Palestine is a bad person and anti-Semitic.
How would that help?
How would that help Gaza?
So this would not, so this is the, so what this guy did, maybe this guy actually is just a little off and he was sick of it and he decided to, you know, if he would have.
And he had a psychiatrist from the CIA.
But killing two civilians, totally bad idea.
Yeah, maybe he had a psychiatrist from the CIA.
So here is our friend James Lee.
And here's what he says.
Okay, I guess I have to say this, but these two people did not deserve to die.
I read that he had just proposed to her or is about to propose to her.
Either way, I do not condone what Happened to them.
But what I will say.
So just take that in for a second.
James Lee has to give a long disclaimer just so he can show us evidence.
Just think about how that.
Just think about that.
Okay.
Wait, wait, look at the top.
This is one little critique I didn't notice before.
Tragedy or false flag.
It's not really either or.
If it's a false flag, it's also a tragedy.
It's also a tragedy.
Yeah.
Is that this tragedy was very convenient to the country for which they served.
Because just yesterday, said country fired warning shots at foreign diplomats who were visiting.
25 delegation representing 25.
25 foreign diplomats.
31 countries, including Italy, Canada, Egypt, and the UK had to run for cover.
Not a great situation.
They are officially because the IDF, the Israeli soldiers, were shooting at the diplomats.
They're lucky, Jimmy.
If they were Jews, they would have been dead.
If they were escaped hostages, they would have been dead.
They would have been dead.
Story is that they had fired warning shots at this group of diplomats and journalists because the tour had veered into an unauthorized area.
So, yeah, so all the diplomats went to an unauthorized area.
So what do you do?
You don't go, hey, go, you start shooting them.
You start shooting over their heads.
You don't give a friendly warning by shooting your gun over someone's head when they wandered into the wrong.
Like somebody goes, where's the bathroom?
And they go in the wrong room.
You don't shoot over their head.
Here's Ryan Grimm, Shill for the Establishment and documented liar.
Even he had something good to say about it.
Watch that.
Ryan Grimm commented that even if every word of that story is true, it is still a deranged, unhinged thing to do.
So even if those diplomats did go into a restricted area, it's still, even according to establishment Shill Ryan Grimm, it's still a deranged thing to do.
He's right about that.
Name one way that's deranged.
By the way, Ryan Grimm, he's Pierre Modri, whatever that guy's name is.
The reason Crystal and him can say the truth about this is because they're funded by that Persian guy, Pierre Modri, the guy from the I know that from you.
So they I forgot.
I forget stuff, even though I don't smoke pot anymore.
I haven't smoked pod for two years.
I smoke to remember, Jimmy.
And I haven't had it in a grony for like two months.
But anyway, who cares?
That's my own personal question.
To which I say I completely agree.
Anyway, day later, this other thing happens.
Day later.
And I'm not saying that this isn't a coincidence, but the end result is that today the media cycle has completely shifted.
Completely.
Okay, the same search terms are now conveniently yielding very different results.
Very funny how that works.
Anyway, the last thing I'll say about this is that I think it's just a really bad sign for this country that a heinous act of violence like that happens and a not so insignificant percentage of the population thinks either A, they had it coming or B, that it was some kind of false flag operation perpetrated by the victims themselves.
Not an ideal situation, let's just put it that way.
The victims themselves, I don't think that couple perpetrated it.
I think the government of Israel, specifically the Lekudrun government with those whack jobs and DB serves.
That already did the Hannibal directive where they killed their own hostages, killed their own people.
It goes back to Edi Amin.
That's an old thing.
The thing of false flags, though, the history of false flags, besides.
So watch this.
So here he is being arrested.
No, no, no.
Look how nice they are.
So he waits till he knows the camera's on and then he screams it, watch how nice they are.
And he even puts his hand out for the guy to come grab it.
No, no, no.
Look how nice they're being to him.
Free creepers!
Well, no, they just gotta get his message out.
Free free palestinians!
So that's the key part that he had to yell free, free Palestine.
So that's a bad phrase because that led to this guy who's not a Palestinian killing those two people.
That's right.
Jimmy, that's bad if you say that.
So Lord Bebo tweeted this out.
This is a former British MI5 agent, and she's going to explain how the Mossad actually bombed their own Israeli embassy in London in 1994 and then framed two prominent Palestinian activists who are still in prison to this day.
So here's an MI, here's like England's CIA person.
Watch what she says.
But the two cases that really got us.
First of all, there was a full flag attack in London in 1994, where a car bomb exploded outside the Israeli embassy in the center of London.
Now, I remember this vaguely.
This is, we're talking 14 years ago.
It's a long time ago.
But it was huge at the time.
I mean, it was a huge worldwide story.
Yeah, yeah.
In fact, there'd been an earlier attack against some Jewish interest section in Buenos Aires earlier that year as well.
Similar sort of MO, modus operandi, with a car bomb driven and parked outside that exploded.
Very minor injuries, that was all.
Nobody was killed.
And it was a very sophisticated device.
It appeared to eat itself, eat all the forensics.
Now, this is very, very rare.
Even the IRA, which is a very sophisticated terrorist organization, could not make bombs that effective.
So it looked like a sort of fairly technical person who put that together.
But what emerged from that, the senior MI5 officer who was in charge of the investigation into it and had seen all the evidence, but also all the intelligence, which isn't necessarily admissible in court, wrote his formal assessment at the end of the case.
And he said he reckoned that Mossad, the Israeli external intelligence agency, had bombed their own embassy.
Oh, sort of controlled explosion outside the embassy.
And as I said, that was a senior MI5 officer.
That was his formal verdict.
If you read that on the internet now, you would say that sounds like some mad conspiracy theory.
But it wasn't.
This was the official position of MI5.
And he said that they did it for two reasons.
One, they were always hassling MI5 for increased security around their embassy and other interests in London.
Because, of course, London had a reputation of giving safe haven to Arab distance from around the world at that point.
And MI5 kept saying, well, there's no reason to increase the threat assessment, you don't need extra protection.
So, letting off a controlled explosion outside, of course, they immediately got what they wanted there.
But crucially, two innocent Palestinians were arrested, charged, and convicted of conspiracy to cause that attack.
And they were very active in the Palestinian support network in London, political campaigning for the people on the West Bank and the Gaza Strip.
And they were gaining some traction in the media.
They were getting quite a lot of support.
So, by arresting these people and framing them from an attack and sticking them in prison, the whole network just shattered and hasn't got back on its feet to this day.
So, that would be a clear political advantage.
So, well, again, not saying that this is.
We're saying that we, how many times did I say when they lost?
Look for false flags to happen because the world is turning against what Israel's doing right now.
Meaning, even Kara Starmer is saying things.
People are saying things in parliament.
Countries are starting to do sanctions.
They lost Piers Morgan, for F's sake.
Yeah.
That's what the turning point, Jimmy.
So this is disgusting.
Israel is using their deaths so shamelessly.
These people died just to be used to justify genocide.
Just let that sink in.
Anti-Semitism and false flags are Israel's superpower.
And here's in the Telegraph.
Starmer blamed for emboldening anti-Semitic attacks.
Starmer, Starmer, the prime minister of the UK, who finally said something, something a little critical of what's happening.
Now they're blaming him.
He did it.
It's his fault.
Israel minister accuses Western leaders of giving backing to hatred against Jews.
Nobody hates Jews.
I love Jews.
In fact, most of the Jews I know are anti-Zionists and they're anti-Semites.
I only know the truth about Israel because Jews told me.
That's right.
That's right.
I wouldn't have looked, but look at that.
They're using their deaths so shamelessly.
Oh, you mean like the Holocaust?
Like, what do you think they're going to do?
Not do that?
Anti-Semitism is a form of natural gas for Israel.
They absolutely, Israel and Zionists have to have it or they cannot sustain the country.
If they don't have anti-Semitism, their country falls apart.
And there's, frankly, people aren't generating enough for them to power their golem anymore.
Even Grok thinks that that was staged, by the way.
The video captured inside the DC Jewish Museum shows a man being escorted by security personnel in a manner that appears unusually calm and staged, leading to speculation of a false flag operation where an event is orchestrated to appear as if carried out by a different party to justify certain actions or policies.
The man's deliberate placement of a kafifa, a symbol of Palestinian nationalism, on the floor before being escorted away, along with the calm demeanor of the lack of struggle, suggests a pre-planned scenario rather than a spontaneous reaction to a double homicide, as typically expected in such high-stress situations.
This event coincides with recent political tensions and the broader context of anti-Semitism and radicalism as highlighted by the U.S. president's response to the killings, indicating a complex interplay of domestic and international narratives that may influence the public's perception.
when you see this I'm sorry I'm sorry No, no, no.
This is one of the nicest.
Look how nice they are.
Three, three brothers, five.
Three, three brothers, nine.
Come on.
Come on.
Three.
It is uncannily civil the way they're dealing with that guy who just murdered two people.
Yeah, Jimmy, remember the, this is a while ago.
I can't remember what the fake terror attack was, but two Indian guys drove a truck into some government building and they laid out a swasika flag first on the ground.
Oh, remember that?
Yeah.
Yes, which, I mean, I was like, maybe because they're Indian, that's their symbol.
I don't remember that.
Yeah.
But this is like, how will anybody fall for that?
To fall for this, this is so lame of a thing.
And it's really sad they would murder two people to keep the thing going.
But if you have a criminal history of faking terror attacks, which we can safely say Israel does, why would I ever believe you that you didn't fake at this time?
Why would I ever believe you ever again?
So just so that part that I just played and the Grok part, put that onto the first segment we did at the top of the show, okay?
Okay.
Are you saying these are two segments?
The first one you did.
So the first one I did before Terror is one segment.
And then this one.
This is Doey and Morris.
So this one is more about the Free Palestine and CNN and this guy calling for the nuking of Gaza.
And then so put the Grok part, put that on the first segment, okay?
Not even Sam Harris would suggest such a thing.
Because he knows you can't nuke right in your own goddamn neighborhood.
Hey, you know, here's another great way you can help support the show is you become a premium member.
We give you a couple of hours of premium bonus content every week, and it's a great way to help support the show.
You can do it by going to jimmydoorcompedy.com, clicking on join premium.
It's the most affordable premium program in the business, and it's a great way to help put your thumb back in the eye of the bastards.
Thanks for everybody who was already a premium member.
And if you haven't, you're missing out.
We give you lots of bonus content.
Thanks for your support.
Piers Morgan is now jumping ship when it comes to Israel.
This is happening.
Piers Morgan turns on Israel.
And by turns on, he doesn't mean he put on a skirt and started dancing for Netanyahu because that's a different kind of turn on.
But here it is.
Let's listen.
He has.
So now it's clear to everybody that Israel, what they're doing and what Netanyahu is doing and what Trump is doing by censoring people and kicking people out of the country that we want in the country, meaning people who have green cards or who have residency, who are here pursuing academia and he's kicking them out.
The brightest, the best and brightest that we welcome here, you know.
He's kicking them out because they cross Israel, because they wrote an op-ed for their ideas.
So again, so this is the End of Israel, and this is the end of Israel as an apartheid state.
And people are starting to realize it because the world is turning on them.
There's a brain drain in Israel.
Everybody's leaving there.
Their economy's crashing.
And so, and now they're realizing that they're the people that they used to claim to be fighting against.
And here's Piers Morgan, and he finally realized it.
Here it is.
Listen, you and I have talked about this war in Gaza for ever since it started, this phase of the 75-year conflict.
And I have resisted going as far as you have done.
Not only has he resisted it, but he shamed anybody who told the truth about Israel.
And he wanted to make you genuflect first at the altar of Benjamin Netanyahu and Zionism.
But he would, no matter what you said, he would say, but do you condemn Hamas?
But never ask somebody, do you condemn Israel?
Do you condemn Benjamin Netanyahu?
Do you condemn Zionism?
So here he is, finally got his head out of his ass.
In your criticism of the Israeli government, I resist no more.
I think we've reached common ground about what we view is happening and has been happening through this period of this blockade, which frankly is just starvation of the people there, including so many innocent young women and children.
And I think that the incessant bombing and killing, and we don't know how many civilians have been killed, but it is on a daily basis.
It looks like hundreds of people every day.
With no apparent attempt, it seems to me to have any real plan for how this ends or what happens when it ends, other than if you look at what Smodrich has been saying, probably the most right-wing member of a very right-wing government.
He is talking in a genocidal language about kicking all the Palestinians out.
So I think you and I have reached a place in the last few weeks where we are in agreement.
But my question for you, Mehdi, is how does this end?
So now he agrees with Mehdi Hassan, who told the truth one time on MSNBC and they fired him.
Do you remember that?
He told the truth.
He told the truth about Israel and they fired him immediately.
All the lies he told about Syria, all the lies he told about Ukraine, all the lies he told about Russia Gate, all the lies he told about the Twitter files and all the lies he told about Matt Taibbi.
It didn't give him any purchase because as soon as he told the truth, you don't get fired for lying at corporate news.
They fired him immediately.
He told the truth about Israel and they immediately fired him.
So there's so there is not even three strikes are out.
So what he's saying is that he agrees with Mehdi Hassan and Mehdi Hassan has been calling what Israel's doing a genocide.
So there it is.
It's done.
It's over because Pierce Morgan is like the guy who runs around telling everybody they're not dressed up enough at a party.
Why are you dressed so poorly?
And then he realizes his schmanz has been hanging out the whole time.
And that's what this is.
That's what he's finally, he's finally figured out.
He's the he's finally realizing that it's not going to turn out the way he thinks it's going to be.
He's not going to be on the winning side of this.
That's what this is.
He's finally realized that the light goes out in the fridge when the door is closed.
He finally realized that.
He's waiting to see when to jump off the ship.
They all do that.
They think that's being smart.
That's how that scumbag has survived to this day.
Yes.
He's the guy from that hacking scandal.
Remember that?
Yes.
He was wrong about everything.
And he was wrong about the same thing he did with COVID.
He shamed and slandered people right up until the point where it wasn't cool to do that anymore, where he was going to start, it was going to be bad for him.
So then he just jumped ship.
He's a coma point in nature.
Yeah, the Chris Cuomo point, right?
So here, I love this.
One day when it's safe, when there's no personal downside to calling a thing what it is, when it's too late to hold anybody accountable, everyone will have always been against it.
And that's a fact.
That's this today for that's today for Piers Morgan.
That's today for Piers Morgan.
I like this.
I don't feel like we should let this absolve him of his complicity.
I agree.
Pierce is frantically cleaning up house as it seems that he's realizing being on the wrong side of history here will have devastating consequences for him and his career.
Fortunately, the internet never forgets.
Three weeks ago, Piers would have been screaming anti-Semite.
That's exactly right.
Because here he was doing it to Pierce Jeremy Corbyn saying many in our media are finally waiting.
This is on May 16th.
Many in our media are finally waking up to the unspeakable horrors that Palestine are enduring in Gaza.
It's too late.
You refuse to condemn Hamas.
This is on May 16th.
You refuse to condemn Hamas for their unspeakable horrors on October 7th when I asked you.
So I suggest you shit this one out.
Oh, really?
Why is it unspeakable?
Because the IDF did it and not Hamas?
By the way, he didn't.
He did call.
He did not, he did condemn Hamas for the October 7th.
Piers Morgan is a liar.
Corbin has repeatedly and specifically condemned Hamas and their actions on October 7th, including on his on Piers Morgan's show.
Here it is.
At every speech I've made, I've utterly condemned the killing of October 7th.
It was the taking of innocent life.
It was wrong under any circumstances.
I don't support Hamas.
I'm not a friend of Hamas.
October 7th was abominable and appalling.
I do not approve or support or welcome Hamas.
So that's it.
So Piers Morgan has spent the last 18 months asking every pro-Palestinian guest to condemn Hamas.
He's never asked pro-Israel guests to condemn Israel.
Corbyn refused to play Morgan's squalid little game.
Morgan epitomizes the pro-Israel anti-Palestine ballot bias in the media.
And here it is.
So here's a lady carrying her dead child.
And here's Piers Morgan with a microphone.
But do you condemn Hamas?
And here he is.
And now here he is with Jeffrey Sachs saying the same thing.
It just seems to me, I don't see what the end game is here.
I don't see victory in the air for Israel.
I see them.
And that's why he's switching, because he sees that Israel's actually going to be losing this.
The world is turning.
And so he's not doing this because he has great moral character.
He's doing this because he cares about his own skin.
He cares about his future as a broadcaster.
He doesn't actually have a moral compass.
That's why he's for the Ukraine war and lied about it, even though he knows he's lying.
That's why he's for Israel up until this moment, because It now becomes apparent to him that he's going to be on the losing side.
And if it was clear that he was going to be on the winning side, he'd still be calling you an anti-Semite.
He'd still, so here it is.
Eroding global support rapidly with what is now happening.
So, and he sees global support is eroding.
So now he's like, I got to stop being on the wrong side.
How do you see it?
I agree with you.
What Israel, what this Israeli government is doing is catastrophic.
It is a genocide.
It's extraordinarily cruel.
It's extraordinary.
Now, just a few weeks ago, he would have stopped and said, well, it's not a genocide.
And do you condemn Hamas?
And that's anti-Semitic.
But now the wind is blowing differently.
And so he just sits there and lets Jeffrey Sachs say it.
What do you want to say, Kurt?
He'd say, he'd go, is it?
Yeah.
That's what he said.
Genocide chance.
Is it bad?
Is it?
Yeah, okay.
Is it Bedehi?
Right.
Vulgar, vicious, ugly.
It's disgusting beyond imagining.
The problem is that Netanyahu and his ilk and a lot of the political elite class for decades has said we will rule over everybody.
There will never be a Palestinian state.
There are many motivations for that view.
One is perhaps Netanyahu's view, this is the only way we can be secure.
The other, which is also very popular among parts of the Israeli government, is that God promised us everything.
These other people are on our land.
Now, whatever you say about it, there is no endgame of peace on the Netanyahu plan because the Netanyahu Plan, and this has been for decades, is to rule over the entire land.
And that means ruling over the Palestinians either in an apartheid state, in other words, oppressing the Palestinian people or killing them or expelling them in ethnic cleansing.
It's clear that all of those methods are deliberately being used now.
This constant shouting, Hamas, Hamas, Hamas, is not the point at all.
The point is that the political end game for Netanyahu, Smotrich, Ben-Gabir, the leaders of this government, is to rule over the entire territory of what was mandatory Palestine.
In other words, for Israel to control everything.
In fact, Netanyahu makes no bones about it.
He doesn't hide anything.
He says, we will control Gaza.
Well, what does that mean?
It either means extraordinary oppression, or it means ethnic cleansing, or it means mass murder.
Now, Israel is committing mass murder right now.
It is as simple as that.
And Israel says, well, it's about Hamas, but what is their end game that they offer?
They don't offer an endgame.
They are very clear on the inside.
I know what the end game is because if you follow the Israeli politics, the end game is we control everything.
In fact, some of this extremist coalition is so vulgarly, rapidly, violently extreme that their interpretation of, quote, God's promise to the Jewish people is parts of Egypt, parts of Syria, parts of Lebanon.
They have a very expansive view.
And indeed, Israel is in Syria now.
It is in Lebanon now.
And there are parts of this coalition that say we're going to stay there.
So the problem, Piers, is a political problem.
You're completely right.
It is a political problem.
You're completely right.
It cannot be solved by war or defeating Hamas.
That's not even their purpose.
Their purpose is to control all the land.
What they call greater Israel or Yisrael Hashlemah, mean the big expanse of Israel.
It's a madness.
It's a zealotry.
It's a cruelty.
It's nothing less than that.
And there is no peace possible until there is a state of Palestine living in peace on the internationally recognized borders, which are the borders of the 4th of June, 1967, alongside Israel.
What Netanyahu would never tell you, what this Doran Spielman who was shouting just a moment ago would never tell you, is that all of the Arab states have said, we will have peace when there is a state of Palestine.
What they won't tell you is that the entire 57-member organization of Islamic Cooperation has said we will have peace with Israel when there is a state of Palestine as a UN member state properly constituted.
And in fact, and you know I hang out at the United Nations, more than 180 countries of the world say this with a population of more than 95% of the world population.
There is a madness, a sickness of the Israeli government, this extremist, cruel and zealot government.
But the tragic part is the United States is supporting it.
And here's the Greater Israel Project, in case you don't know what he's talking about.
So there's Israel.
They want to have part of Iraq.
They're already in Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, parts of Egypt.
That's all they want.
Take Iran.
It's right there.
So there it is.
So this isn't just like something I'm saying.
This is their plan.
It's called the Greater Israel Plan, the Great Expansion, as Jeffrey Sachs just said.
This is their plan.
The thing Putin, they said Putin wanted to do that he doesn't want to do.
That's the thing Israel wants to fucking do.
Exactly right.
So good to see Pierce Morgan finally realize that he's on the losing side and on the wrong side of history.
So that's good, I guess.
And he, well, I don't know if he knew that the whole, I think he was thinking that it would go on indefinitely.
Or maybe he just thought, yeah, maybe he did know.
Maybe he did know eventually this was going to turn out like this for Israel.
But at the time, it was better for him to go along with the establishment.
So whatever the establishment does, he goes with it.
He went with it during COVID.
He went with it during Russia Gate.
He went with it during the Ukraine war.
I'm sure he did it with Syria.
I'm sure he was with it on Iraq.
And sure, here we are.
He said, is it wrong to kill children?
He said it's.
And he goes, that's horrible.
He goes, is it?
Is it?
You don't say something like that unless you're that type of dude.
So there's nothing there.
So anyway, it's good.
But again, it's helpful that he did this.
So good for him.
Kudos to him.
Kudos.
They did it.
They passed this big, beautiful bill.
But guess what?
It adds to the deficit.
It doesn't take it away.
What about all that money that I thought Doge was saving?
So this, so remember all that money Doge was saving?
It's gone.
It's all gone.
It was all a mirage.
I know that's hard for some people to take, but I'm sure, you know what?
I actually think Elon Musk was genuine.
He did find fraud, waste, and abuse.
He did.
But they're just not cutting it from the budget.
The Congress wouldn't take a vote on it, and they wouldn't go to the Pentagon to audit the Pentagon and get rid of it.
That's the big, that's the ground zero for fraud, waste, and abuse is the Pentagon.
But of course, not only did they not go to the Pentagon, they're giving the Pentagon hundreds of billions of more dollars.
So that's why that's a big reason why the deficit's going up.
It's going up.
This new resolution, this new budget, is going to projected to increase the deficit by $3.3 to $5.8 trillion on top of the trillions of dollars that it's already in deficit.
So we run a big, like a $2 trillion a year deficit.
This is going to add to that.
So over the next 10 years, it's going to add even on top of that, an extra $3 to $6 trillion.
So they've been lying.
They're screwing you.
It's the uniparty, baby.
It's the uniparty.
They can't actually cut spending from the military-industrial complex.
They can't do it.
While some claim economic growth, so, and by the way, over the, this is all that this, this, these new deficits are driven primarily by tax cuts that exceed the spending reductions.
So some people say, yeah, but when you cut taxes, it's going to, you'll bring in actually more revenue.
Well, some claim economic growth and cuts could offset the costs.
Independent analysis, including those from Penn Wharton budget model, is that where Trump went, did he go to Wharton Business School?
And the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget confirmed there's going to be a significant deficit increase.
And so when you hear, this is the White House spokesperson.
The One Big Beautiful Bill also helps get our fiscal house in order by carrying out the largest deficit reduction in nearly 30 years with $1.6 trillion in mandatory savings.
That's not true.
So she's doing what she does as press secretary, and she lies because this doesn't even come from me.
So that's where it's coming from.
So let's go.
So here's what's in the Baba.
And they just narrowly passed it in the House, by the way.
It was like, I think it passed by one vote or something.
And it took a Democrat to die.
There's a Democrat who died recently, so he couldn't vote.
Tax cuts for individuals and businesses.
Republicans look to make permanent the individual income and the state tax.
So estate tax, that's just for super rich people.
And the income tax also for mostly rich people.
It helps the upper 20%.
Uh, so, uh, But they also did do the thing, no tax on tips, no tax on overtime, and no tax on interest on some auto loans.
We've been waiting for that for a little bit.
So that will help some people.
Some people are pissed off about that.
They're like, why should a waiter not get tipped on his income?
And, you know, why should a salesman at a car dealer?
Okay, relax.
To partially offset loss revenue, Republicans propose repealing or phasing out more quickly the clean energy tax passed by Joe Biden's presidency, helping to bring down the overall cost of the tax portion to about $3.8 trillion.
So the taxes they're cutting are going to add $3.8 trillion to $6 trillion in extra deficit.
Isn't that nice?
The bill includes a temporary boost in the standard deduction, $1,000 increase for individuals, bringing it to $16,000 for individual filers, and $2,000 boost for people who file jointly, bringing it up to $32.
The deduction reduces the amount of income that is actually subject to income tax.
There is also a temporary $500 increase in the child tax credit, temporary, bringing it to $2,500 from $25, $25 to 2025 to 2028.
So that's good.
It then returns to $2,000 and will increase to account for inflation.
The estate tax, which is, so that's after people die, right?
They're still getting a tax break even after you're dead.
The estate tax rises to $15 million.
So if you die and you're worth $15 million, you get a tax cut.
Isn't that money?
Those are the people who need it.
Dead guys.
Dead guys are getting a tax cut.
Several of the provisions Trump promised in the campaign would be temporary.
Yep.
Okay.
So, but here's how this is what they're cutting.
Parents and older Americans face work requirements for food.
So food stamps.
They call it SNAP, supplemental nutritional.
So they're going to cut that by $267 billion while they give hundreds of billions more to the Defense Department.
And so they, so it doesn't matter.
The states are going to probably try to pay.
It doesn't matter.
You don't need to know that stuff.
It's going to go in one ear and out the other.
So they're going to cut food stamps, as if there's anything we should cut.
And they're also expanding the work requirements.
They're expanding the work requirements to receive food aid.
Under our current law, able-bodied adults without dependents must fulfill work requirements until they are 54.
Now they're going to up that to 64.
So the problem is, like, you go on food stamps and you go on Medicaid when you lose your job.
That's a big problem, right?
And they've showed, they've tried this, I think, in Georgia.
And all it does is take assistance away from people who are already working because they have to file paperwork every month.
So this is really regressive, and it's really going after the people who could least afford it, and it's going to do it.
Also, some parents.
So guess what?
Get this.
So it used to be if you had a dependent kid, you could get food stamps, but now only up until your kid is under seven.
So if you had a kid under 18, you can get food stamps without work requirements because you got to take care of your kid.
Well, now they'll go, nope, only if your kid's under seven.
So if your kid is seven and a half or eight, say if your kid is eight, you can't get food stamps anymore.
Why?
Unless you go to work.
They have these work requirements.
New work for also work requirements for Medicaid.
I already told you why that's silly.
It's because usually people lose their health insurance when they lose their job.
That's the big time when people go on Medicaid.
And a lot of working people already who are MAGA, a lot of working MAGA people can't afford Obamacare.
And that's why Steve Bannon came on this show and said, you got to be careful how you cut Medicaid because a lot of MA people are on it.
So to be eligible for Medicaid, there was going to be new community engagement requirements of at least 80 hours per month of work, education, or service for able-bodied adults.
There's already those requirements.
This is just going to make it worse.
It's just Republicans are looking to generate savings with new work requirements.
You mean by getting people off of Medicaid?
Yeah.
Democrats warn that millions of, so they are.
A preliminary estimate by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said proposals would reduce the number of people with health care by about 8,6 million.
More money for the Pentagon.
We already told you about that.
So they're going to give another trillion dollars.
So even though Trump might stop the war, which he hasn't stopped funding the Ukraine war, hasn't stopped funding Israel's Gaza war, hasn't stopped bombing Somalia, they're giving way all, so they're going to give all the money to the Pentagon.
So any money they save with DOS, which they're not even saving that money because Congress won't cut it.
They're just ramping up the deficit, ramping up the debt, and they're giving it to the military industrial complex, just like Eisenhower said, because those are the people who really pull the strings and control our government.
So as of May 2025, the U.S. national debt is approximately $36.2 trillion, with the debt held by the public at around $26 trillion, or roughly 98% of GDP.
The House reckons this bill passed in April is projected to significantly increase the national debt.
According to Penn.
So we already talked, we already did this.
It's going to increase it.
We already told you this.
So, yeah, so it's going to increase going to cut health care for working people and food stamps for poor people.
And it probably is going to lead to higher interest rates, increased borrowing costs, slower economic growth as debt crowds out private investment.
So they're increasing the debt, and that's always bad.
And so they're not doing what you thought they were going to do.
Hey, if you're going to cut food stamps and you're going to cut health care, you should at least cut the budget overall.
Should at least cut the Pentagon.
They're not.
They're doing the exact opposite because this is how all empires end.
They're just sucking the money out of the U.S. Treasury, and they're not investing it back in your own country.
They're just putting it in the pockets of millionaires and billionaires.
Just like the Democrats, just like the Republicans, they're not doing it.
They're doing it right in your face.
So hopefully the Senate stops this.
And I think people are willing to take on cuts that are painful to them if they think it's going towards a good cause.
But it's not.
They're cutting stuff that people, that's painful to people, and they're just taking all that money and giving it to the defense contractors because that's who really runs the country.
Sad to hear.
Come see us live in Los Angeles, Buffalo, Toledo, Montreal, Ottawa, Glasgow, Manchester, Belfast, Dublin, London, Liverpool, Birmingham.
Go to jimmydoe.com for a link for tickets.
Let's talk about vaccines.
Here's the new FDA head, Marty McCarry, and here's what he has to say recently.
Talk to me about the heart inflammation in young boys and young men.
It seems reprehensible that the Bible.
So we're talking about the COVID shot, and he's talking about the Biden administration covered up the actual science.
So let's listen to him.
Administration wouldn't have warned us about that early and often.
It was part of the Biden medical establishment censorship complex because any information that related to complications of the vaccines or vaccine injuries was considered COVID vaccine hesitant content.
And so it was censored or blocked or slow-walked.
And so we now have tragically this information that the heart inflammation that occurred in young, healthy men and boys was not disclosed as soon as it should have been.
And as a result, thousands of kids probably had this myocarditis complication and didn't have to have it.
So that sounds criminal to me that they knew that this thing they were mandating or else you couldn't go to school, you couldn't go to work, you couldn't travel.
They knew A, it didn't stop transmission and contraction and they kept that secret.
And now he's saying, this is the head of the FDA saying that the Biden administration suppressed the information about the damage it could do in terms of myocarditis to children and of course everybody else.
Doesn't that sound criminal to you?
It does to me.
Absolutely, Jimmy.
And we've been, we wrote, our science department, Brian Hooker and Carly Oblonowski wrote a paper proving that the government knew at least three months before they went out to the public about the myocarditis risk.
This new FDA is at least putting warning labels on.
They have not yet pulled the COVID shot for kids from the market.
There was a leak in the Washington Journal earlier that they might do that.
Senator Johnson, Ron Johnson, to his great credit on Wednesday, held a whole hearing that I attended at the Senate about corruption and the COVID injections.
And as he told us, it's a slog, but there's a lot more information that has not yet come out on what they knew and when they knew it.
So the FDA has, so there's a little, there's a little, so there's good news, a lot of good news coming out of Maha and the new HHS department headed by Bobby.
But here's the Washington Post, the FDA to limit COVID shot approval to 65 years and over and those with medical conditions.
And here's Vinny Prasad.
He's the new head of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research.
And here he makes this announcement.
So based on prior immunologic endpoints, that means proof that the vaccine can create antibodies in people, companies can apply for, and we will consider approval for 65 and older and or people at high risk of severe COVID-19.
So if you're older than 65 or you're high risk for COVID-19, we're going to use the immunologic endpoints we've been using to grant approval.
This is a tremendously broad category.
This effectively means 100 to 200 million Americans, those with the most favorable benefit to harm balance, will be covered by such approvals.
The CDC has a list of the conditions that qualify as high risk for severe COVID-19.
You can peruse the list.
It's also in our New England Journal paper.
It is a broad list.
There's a lot of things on this list.
I'll just highlight a few.
Obesity is on this list.
Physical inactivity is on this list.
Mood disorders, including depression, is on this list.
And all immunocompromise conditions are on this list.
In other words, at-risk Americans can be reassured that they will be covered by such approval.
So some people are pushing back.
So that was good news to hear.
I mean, that's a night and day change from the old administration, but a lot of people who are in the medical freedom space are saying it's not enough.
And so Mary Tally Bowden, who we're all familiar with at this show, she says he is very careful not to mention that pregnant women are actually on the list of high-risk patients because he knows people will freak out, but they are on the list.
Pregnant women will continue to get these shots without placebo-controlled trials.
And so, in fact, here it is.
The FDA will no longer recommend annual COVID vaccinations for healthy people younger than 65, but adults over 65 and anyone six months who has one or more chronic underlying health conditions, such as asthma, cancer, diabetes, or pregnancy.
So they're still recommending, they're still going to cover that this for someone who's pregnant.
Does that sound what is that?
So tell me, tell me, tell me about that.
Yeah, our position is that these mRNA shots are not ready for prime time.
You know, over 20,000 deaths have been recorded in the adverse event reporting system.
We think they should be taken off the market.
This has been our position for a long time.
It's certainly generally the position of the health freedom movement.
However, Bobby Kennedy has said as secretary from the beginning, we are not going to take people's vaccines away.
And so what this is doing is enabling insurance coverage.
My hope is that with greater transparency, very few people are going to be going to get these boosters going forward.
But this was a kind of clearly a compromise decision by doctors Prasad and Makari.
And it's concerning.
It's concerning that they know better, is what a lot of people are saying, because if you listen to certainly Vinny Prasad before, I mean, and of course, the head of the NIH, right, Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, he talks about how you don't know, they can't control for what they're actually putting in you and where it's going.
And that he said that it's going to take a couple of more Nobel Prize discoveries or inventions to make the mRNA vaccine platform worthy.
Hey, become a premium member.
Go to jimmydoorcomedy.com.
Sign up.
It's the most affordable premium program in the business.
Freak out.
Don't freak out.
Don't freak out.
All the voices performed today are by the one and only the inimitable, Mike McRae.
He can be found at mikemcray.com.
That's it for this week.
You be the best you can be and I'll keep being me.
