All Episodes
Previous Next
July 1, 2022 - Jimmy Dore Show
01:03:45
20220701_TJDS_20220701_Podcast
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
July 3rd, we're doing a live show in Los Angeles, and then we're going to Chicago, Sacramento, San Diego, Bakersfield.
See you there.
Go to jimmydorkcomedy.com for a link for all our tickets.
Beep.
Hey, this is Jimmy.
Who is this?
Jimmy, this is Al Pacino.
Hi, Al.
What's on your mind today, buddy?
I'll tell you what's on my mind.
A political thought that I had about politics that I came up with all by myself that I thought you would enjoy.
Oh, yeah?
What's that?
Based on yesterday's congressional hearing, Donald Trump is toast.
They got him dead to rights, baby.
Oh, boy.
They finally got the smoking gun.
Trump is going to prison.
Finally.
Al, I hate to break it to you, but I really doubt it.
What?
Yeah, there's been smoking gun after smoking gun since the Comey testimony.
And whether it was Russia Gate or January 6th, they're not going to get him.
It would have happened by now.
I'm sorry.
Yeah, Al.
But, but, but, but, but ketchup.
What about ketchup?
Don't give me that.
You know what the fuck I'm talking about.
He threw ketchup against the wall at the White House.
You can't do that.
It's a waste of food, first of all.
If that had been a good Mariner sauce, I'd have beached the bum myself.
I'll tell you that much.
I'm sorry to tell you, Al, but I'm pretty sure that wasn't the first temper tantrum ever thrown in the White House.
That's a sacred place.
I can't picture John Quincy Adams chucking a turkey leg in a butler.
No way.
Gerald Ford tossing a Swanson's TV dinner like a frisbee into the Rose Garden.
This nation wouldn't stand for it.
I mean, if that's all you got, I don't think Trump's in trouble.
No, it's not smart, Alec.
When they were trying to drive Trump back to the White House, where he's probably going to dump A1 sauce all over Lincoln's bedroom or some shit.
He tried to grab the wheel from the Secret Service agent and go to the riot.
That's bad.
That's bad.
Okay.
Yeah.
Says who?
What do you mean, says who?
Little Miss Fing yesterday before Congress.
Was she there?
Was she?
Was she the one who witnessed it?
Let me call a lifeline.
I'll help you out.
No, that's something she heard happened.
In a court, that's called hearsay, and it's not admissible.
She didn't see it.
We'll get one of the Secret Service guys to say it happened.
If they can, I don't know how far they take this whole secret thing.
Well, Elle, Ell, the Secret Service, has said that this didn't happen.
What?
Yeah.
But that was the main thing.
The takeaway.
Yeah.
Yeah.
How do we know the Secret Service isn't lying?
What do we really know about those guys anyway?
Always with those fishy sunglasses and trotting beside slow-moving vehicles.
You never trust a trotter.
I learned that L's kitchen in 1965.
So that's what we do?
We just cherry-pick who's lying until our preferred version of the truth comes out.
Well, yeah.
Personally, I'm going to trust this Catherine Hutchins.
It's Cassidy Hutchinson.
I'm going to trust Hopalong Cassidy until the cows come home.
Look at her.
So brave.
Such a brave American.
Oh, God damn it.
And pretty easy on the eyes to boot.
A little old for me, but still.
Ah, a brave American.
A true patriot.
Telling the truth like that.
Telling us rumors that she heard that we want to hear, too.
The best that America has to offer.
She just wanted to serve her country.
By interning for Ted Cruz?
By doing everything she could to get into the Trump White House and then winning the trust of those ghouls so swiftly that she moved up the ranks to a position of influence within the Trump White House.
Yes, what a selfless good person she must be.
But she's so pretty.
She has no credibility, Al.
Sorry.
They will not get Trump based on her testimony.
Ketchup or no ketchup.
They're not done, though.
They never are, aren't they?
There could be more testimony.
Other condiments.
Heinz 57 stakes.
Maybe tried to open a car door before the car was fully stopped.
That's dangerous.
Look, whatever.
I'm holding out hope.
And sometimes hope is all you got.
Okay, Al.
I don't want to take your hope away from you, buddy, but I do want you to be happy.
Just don't expect me to agree with you on this.
Okay, fair enough.
But at least you and I can agree on one thing.
That getting Donald Trump is the most important thing in the world right now.
No, I don't.
I get so tired of this.
I gotta go lie down.
that time.
Yeah.
Establishment media sets of artists fighting so good luck the bullshit we can't afford show Anya Parampel is with us.
She's a journalist based in Washington, D.C. and a contributor to the Grey Zone.
She's produced and reported several documentaries, including on-the-ground reports from the Korean Peninsula, Palestine, Venezuela, and Honduras.
Please welcome Anya Parrampel.
Hello, how are you?
Hey, Kurt.
Hey, Jimmy.
Good to see you.
Stephanie, say hello.
Hello.
Hi, Anya.
Okay, Steph is also here.
I gotta say, if what I saw in L.A. was any indication, the special is going to be great.
Oh, that's very sweet.
Yes, that was an indication.
It was an indication.
Hey, Anya, can you come a little closer to the camera show every night?
Oh, yeah.
Yeah, yeah.
There you go.
Yeah.
Look at you, girl.
Okay, stay close to the camera.
You're so smart.
Thank you.
Okay, so you asked me if I was going to cover the, I can't even, what's the lady's name that did the testimony?
Cassidy Hutchinson?
That's it.
So you texted me today.
So you're going to cover that.
I thought she was sainted now.
We all, we all must know her name.
I went to the comedy club in Burbank last night over at Flappers 8, and there were people talking about this.
Like, hey, did you see that testimony from the thing?
I'm like, no, I don't follow the January 6th.
Like, how could you not follow that?
I'm like, because it's all bullshit.
And they're like, no, his own blah, blah, blah said that he was choking his own driver.
And so, all right, so I looked into this.
So I went and I got the video of that woman's testimony.
And what's her name?
Cassidy.
Cassidy what?
Cassidy Hutchinson.
And I thought it was interesting.
They had a commercial that ran in front of it.
And of course, it just reminds you you're in America because everything is sponsored.
Live from Washington, D.C. It's a Capitol Fourth.
Monday, July 4th, 8-7 Central.
Sponsored by the Boeing Company and American Air Force.
That's right.
That's right.
Sponsored by the good people at Boeing.
I will say it's a mean fireworks show, though.
Yeah, I bet.
Yes, I would like to go.
Where else would the United States of America get the money for a fireworks show unless it was sponsored by the good people at Boeing?
Pfizer, I guess.
I'd probably get it from Pfizer.
Hey, that's the Ukraine money at work.
So, ah, so here we go.
So, let's watch this testimony.
Liz Cheney is chairing this.
She's fantastic.
I think she should be president.
I think she should be president.
And she's pro-torture, which is what it makes.
You need to be.
You're whispering it.
You got to be pro-torture if you're going to be president.
So here's what she said happened, right?
Here's what she said happened.
Here we go.
Here's the president's motorcade leaving the ellipse after his speech.
There's the president.
He's leaving.
Let's speed it up.
Go ahead.
Go faster.
So there's the president.
He's leaving.
And now listen to the story Cassidy Hutchinson's going to tell about what happened.
When you returned to the White House in the motorcade after the president's speech, where did you go?
When I returned to the White House, I walked upstairs towards the chief of staff's office, and I noticed Mr. Renato lingering outside of the office.
Once we had made eye contact, he quickly waved me to go into his office, which was just across the hall from mine.
When I went in, he shut the door.
I noticed Bobby Angle, who is the head of.
When she said that, I thought we're in for a Matt Lauer moment.
Yeah, it's a me too moment.
Yeah, I was like, when he shut the door, I was like, oh, no.
He hit a button under his desk.
Mr. Trump's security detail sitting in a chair, looking somewhat discombobulated and a little lost.
I looked at Tony and he had said, did you effing hear what happened in the Beast?
I said, no, Tony, I just got back.
The Beast is the presidential limo, by the way.
So she says, did you effing here?
Why did you have to put effing in?
Like, who cares if he swore?
Yeah, no kidding.
F-ing here what happened.
Did you effing hear what happened in The Beast?
First of all, this is very ASMR testimony.
Very, very good way to put it.
Here we go.
Yeah, she's very breathy with her speech, right?
Okay, here we go.
What happened?
What happened?
Tony proceeded to tell me that when the president got in the beast, he was under the impression from Mr. Meadows that the off-the-record movement to the Capitol was still possible and likely to happen, but that Bobby had more information.
So once the president had gotten into the vehicle with Bobby, he thought that they were going up to the Capitol.
And when Bobby had relayed to him, we're not.
You don't have the assets to do it.
It's not secure.
We're going back to the West Wing.
The president had very strong, very angry response to that.
She starts smiling when she says.
Yeah.
I mean, just look at her face.
Why is she smiling when she had over?
Is it the face of an honest person?
Is she behaving like she's telling the truth?
No, she seems like an actress.
She seems like she's acting 100%.
No, that's an insult.
You know, I watch some of those American crime story shows where they do the dramatic court scenes, the reenactments, but like the those people do much better.
The actors in those shows do much better.
So here we go.
She's got more to say.
She's going to tell you what the president did as she giggles.
And she's looking down to the left, which some people say is a sign she's lying.
Tony described him as being irate.
The president said something to the effect of, I'm the effing president.
Take me up to the Capitol now.
To which Bobby responded, sir, we have to go back to the West Wing.
The president reached up towards the front of the vehicle to grab at the steering wheel.
Mr. Engel grabbed his arm.
He said, sir, you need to take your hand off the steering wheel.
We're going back to the West Wing.
We're not going to the Capitol.
Mr. Trump then used his free hand to lunge towards Bobby Angle.
And when Mr. Renado had recounted this story to me, he had motioned towards his clavicles.
His clavicles.
His clavicles.
And was Mr. Engel in the room when Mr. Renato told you this story?
He was.
Hey, why don't you get off my clavicle?
This guy's been busting my clavicle.
All day.
All goddamn day.
Why don't you suck out some clavicle?
I got something for you.
I bought some clavicle.
I got something for you right there.
What's that?
My clavicle.
He locked.
He pressed a button and locked his dressing room door in motion towards his clavicle.
There he goes.
Did Mr. Engel correct or disagree with any part of the story for Mr. Ornado?
Mr. Engel did not correct or disagree with any part of the story.
He did not?
Did Mr. Engel or Mr. Ornado ever after that tell you that what Mr. Ornado had just said was untrue?
Neither Mr. Oronado nor Mr. Engel told me ever that it was untrue.
So they told her this.
So by the way, this isn't her test.
She's testimony.
She's not giving you eyewitness testimony.
She's telling you a story she heard from someone else, and it's not accurate.
When is that ever the standard for witness testimony?
Oh, this is what my friend told me.
Told me.
The Elon Musk allegations.
That's right.
Same thing with Elon Musk.
It was not the girl who was allegedly sexually harassed by him, but a friend of the woman who was sexually harassed by him.
And that's not credible, nor is this.
This is not credible.
Why?
Because she's not giving you eyewitness testimony.
She's telling you a story someone else told her.
And now, by the way, those people that told her that story are disagreeing with her version of it.
So here we go.
Let's listen two more.
You want to say something?
Yeah, I just wanted to say, are you telling me that nobody reached for that guy's clavicles?
Nobody.
Are you sure?
She seemed positive.
So that's it.
So that was the end of it.
So that was that.
So that's the end of the part I'm going to play right now.
But so she's that's so everybody's saying that I go into the comedy club last night.
People are beaming.
Did you see that testimony?
Did you see that?
And this is what they're referring to.
This is the bombshell.
This is called hearsay gossip.
This is the bombshell is not gossip or hearsay.
Did we establish that that's as good as evidence now?
I guess that's good.
They're already making memes about it.
Of course, he's got the Ukraine flag colors and they're making a meme about it that it never happened.
Why do I know it never happened?
Because they never asked the Secret Service their side of the story, the committee, the January 6th committee.
They asked her to tell a story she heard from a Secret Service person, but they never contacted the Secret Service person.
Why do you think that is?
I'll tell you why.
Because it's a bullshit.
What's that?
How is that a proper committee?
You'd think if you'd collect testimony from someone that's secondhand, the proper next step would be to say, okay, now I'm going to interview that person.
Why would you want to interview the Secret Service Anya when you have a young lady who grabs her neck and blinks a lot?
I mean, isn't that?
Doesn't that say credibility?
Cassidy Hutchinson.
Cassidy Hutchinson.
Also, Peter Alexander, by the way, he's the big shot White House reporter from NBC News.
He tweeted out this: a source close to the Secret Service tells me both Bobby Engel, the lead agent, and the presidential limousine SUV driver are prepared to testify under oath that neither man was assaulted and that Mr. Trump never lunged for the steering wheel.
And then underneath it says, So basically, the January 6th committee has nothing on Trump.
Yes.
Yes.
Well, even if they do, I believe all women, so I believe her.
Right?
Don't you believe her?
By the way, here it is: Secret Service agent reportedly willing to testify Trump did not lunge at him.
So senior Secret Service agents are reportedly prepared to testify that Donald Trump did not lunge for the wheel of his vehicle or physically attack the chief of his security detail after his speech near the White House on January 6th, as a former aide said he did in sworn testimony on Tuesday.
So Ingle told investigators that he and Trump discussed Trump's desire to go to the Capitol and took different views on the topic.
Engel noted that they went back to the White House instead of heading to Capitol Hill.
Boy, it's all in the framing, isn't it?
Because the guy who actually was there says they just had they discussed different views on the topic and eventually they landed on heading back to Capitol Hill.
I mean, White House instead of Capitol Hill.
That's a totally different story than that woman just told.
That's a completely different story, isn't it?
And that's the guy she claims told her the story.
This guy says, don't be so this guy's a law professor.
He says, don't be distracted by claims of hearsay.
That goes to whether evidence could be admitted in court, not in Congress.
Yeah, we don't have any standards in Congress.
The key, listen to what he says next, though.
The key is that Hutchinson testified under oath.
If she was lying, she faces felony charges.
The same can't be said for those trying to discredit her testimony.
She was lying because the guy said he freaking didn't do that.
And they're willing to testify.
They're not going to have them testify.
And they're not yet.
They just won't have those guys testify.
So they're not going to prosecute her, even though she's lying.
Isn't that wild?
Who, first of all, tells somebody else's story the way she told that story as if she was going step by step in an eyewitness account.
Yes.
Then I entered to the left.
He proceeded to tell me the story that he had heard.
And what I had heard is I entered and I went to the left.
And then he started to tell me a story.
And then they go, but on the other hand, it explains why she was so unconvincing.
Yeah.
She was so flat and it looked like she was trying to remember lying.
And she was laughing.
She was trying not to laugh at her own performance because she wasn't telling a first-hand account.
So that inauthenticity was on full display just in her body language.
But yeah, I mean, if I were a lawyer, I'm not, I didn't go to law school, but I'm pretty sure that if I were building a case, I would never try to submit evidence based on secondhand testimony.
Yeah.
I think you're all ignoring the fact that she did give specific details, like the clavicle.
She did say clavicle.
She did clavicle.
And she said that Trump said effing.
F-ing.
You got to check this Secret Service guy for two clavicles.
That'll prove.
Tell us what the truth is.
Did you see she heard you say no?
She goes, did he at this point disagree with the thing that the other man had said?
And then she went, no, he did not disagree with the thing that he said.
It's just no.
He's going, no.
I like that he says, don't be distracted by the claims of hearsay.
That's like, say, don't be distracted by the fact that juicy gossip isn't actually evidence.
Don't let that distract you.
What are you one of those nerds who nitpicks science mistakes in Star Wars?
Technically, there's no sound in space.
Shut up and enjoy the show.
Aaron Mate caught this.
He tweets out Peter Alexander saying that the Secret Service people are prepared to contradict that woman's testimony.
And he says, having Russia Gate bombshell flashbacks again, because they said this was a bombshell, that that woman's testimony.
It's not.
The Secret Service.
Go ahead.
It's very similar to how throughout Russia Gate, we would wake up one morning and suddenly it'd be like Colonel Vindman.
Yes.
And Ambassador Yanukovych, like all these people that nobody, nobody ever heard of.
They were.
But suddenly they were like, oh my goodness, these are the most important.
It's very similar to that, where suddenly I wasn't even paying attention to the news cycle.
I just was hearing Cassidy Hutchinson, Cassidy Hutchinson.
And it was the same.
It was this.
It was, yeah, Aaron.
It was a flashback to that.
Yeah.
Yeah.
It's like bombshell.
And then you just look at it for five seconds and you see all the cracks in their story and it's, and there's no evidence.
And that's exactly what happened here.
It's a big, gushy, it's a big, juicy story.
And then as soon as you look at it, it falls apart.
There's nothing to it and there's no evidence.
Aaron Mate, but he, what he connects to here.
So he shows this, this is debunking the bombshell.
And then here's Democracy Now repeating it.
So this is because Aaron used to work at Democracy Now, and Aaron, it's especially acute the pain he feels when he sees democracy now being so shitty.
And Amy Goodman and Democracy Now has been bent on misreporting foreign policy as hard as they possibly can and stuff like this.
So if it has anything to do with Trump, Democracy Now is going to, on purpose, mislead their own viewers, which is what they did with Russia Gate, which is what they did with Syria.
And Amy Goodman and Democracy now won't even have Aaron Mate on.
That's how bad.
So they got somehow compromised over at Democracy Now.
And you decide which donor did it.
But this is garbage again.
And he's pointing it out.
And tip of the hat to Aaron Mate.
Liz Cheney, the case for prosecuting Donald Trump just got much stronger.
So she's already tweeting it out.
There's already got.
She's campaigning for presidency.
And she's doing something.
Oh, my goodness.
The case for prosecuting Donald Trump just got much stronger.
Yeah, dude tested, but he may have produced a smoking gun.
May have.
It may not.
If true, it will be true.
Big if true.
As we heard yesterday, White House counsel Pat Cipollini had significant concerns about Trump's January 6th activities.
It's time for Mr. Chipollone to testify on the record.
Any concerns he has about the institutional interests of his prior office are outweighed by the need for his testimony.
Now, let me ask you this, Anyas.
Is she suggesting that his lawyer testify against Trump?
Is that what she's saying?
White House counsel.
So that would mean a guy who was acting as a lawyer for Trump.
She wants him to come testify against his client.
Is that what she's saying?
Yeah, which I don't think.
How do you even do that, Lee?
Exactly.
Well, apparently, standards are different in Congress.
I assume that in court, you're actually not allowed to do that.
But as they all said, don't be distracted by rational thoughts and questions about why is she saying that to him?
Because of this story that, what's her name?
Chipperson McCaffrey, what's her name?
Cassidy, Cassidy.
Cassidy, Chipperson.
Is this relating out to this?
I can't say one or the other.
It's Cassidy Hutchinson.
Yeah, two last names.
Okay, so why would they, why wouldn't they just get those guys in the story and not his lawyer?
Like, or is this a separate thing they want the lawyer to talk about?
Is this probably a separate thing they want the lawyer to talk about?
Okay.
But I just thought that was outrageous that she wants his former lawyer.
I thought that was crazy.
And you could hear in Liz Cheney's voice that, you know, her father's the timber of her father advocating for torture.
You can hear it.
Well, that's what's so funny about this.
It's going full circle.
When we are talking about lying to Congress under oath or lying under oath before the United Nations, I mean, that was the way that the Bush administration sold its war in Iraq.
You can imagine Colin Powell standing there with his weapons of mass destruction, claiming that this was definitive proof that we needed to go to war in Iraq.
And now you have the spawn of that administration, Liz Cheney, carrying on this legacy of political theater, kind of just designed to, in this case, distract the public, but also behind it is, of course, this it's the same.
It is very, it's exactly an extension of the Russia Gate hearings, all designed to delegitimize Trump and cast him as some anomaly within the U.S. state.
He's somehow very evil and opposed to like our grand tradition of American exceptionalism.
The irony of Liz Cheney trying to get a former president thrown in jail who isn't her father is the irony is not lost on me that her father's a much bigger war criminal than Donald Trump.
Criminal, yeah.
Just criminal, period.
Do you think that this is all because like Cheney had her grown so he could do a get out on her and put it, you know, she will one day house his wicked spirit.
Like I'm not following what you're saying.
What are you saying?
You didn't see get out?
Was she gonna transplant the brains?
Like she's gonna just be the vessel for Cheney's brain to keep him alive.
Oh, okay.
Oh, I did see that movie.
Is that for a Keen Peale guy?
Yeah, Keelan Peale.
Yeah, yeah.
So watch this.
So now she tells this story.
Oh, it's a good one.
You ready for this story?
Watch this.
Oh, wait, hang on.
Why isn't it working?
Oh, wait.
Oh, but I have one more story to tell.
But before we get to that, there was also some controversy over in her testimony.
She said that she had made a handwritten note.
I didn't see, I didn't watch this, but this is what there was controversy about it because I was looking it up and I read this.
It said the handwritten note that Cassidy Hutchinson testified was written by her, was in fact written by Eric Hirschman on January 6th, said a spokesman for Hirschman.
All sources with direct knowledge in law enforcement have and will confirm that it was written by Mr. Hirschman.
So I guess she told some big story about how she had written some handwritten note.
And turns out that's not true either.
Did the notes say try not to laugh?
No, it said sit in your chair.
She got her notes switched with Biden.
So this is what their response is.
While we understand that she and Mr. Hirschman may have different, this is, I mean, the committee's response.
While we understand that she and Mr. Hirschman may have differing recollections of who wrote the note, what's ultimately, no, she's lying.
This is gaslighting.
People can't have different recollections of something.
You know, not everybody's perspective is real.
Yeah.
Obviously, somebody is lying.
I wrote, and I wrote down.
She's telling her truth.
I wrote down that note, or someone else did.
I'm not sure.
What?
Well, you remember it your way, and I'll remember it my way.
Yeah, let's just, you know what?
Let's just agree to disagree on who wrote the note.
And here's one more.
Here's one more goofy thing she says.
Already After Mark had returned, I left the office and went down to the dining room.
And I noticed that the door was propped open, and the valet was inside the dining room changing the tablecloth off of the dining room table.
He motioned for me to come in and then pointed towards the front of the room near the fireplace mantle and the TV where I first noticed there was ketchup dripping down the wall and there's a shattered porcelain plate on the floor.
The valet had articulated that the president was extremely angry at the attorney general's AP interview and had thrown his lunch against the wall.
Which was causing them to have to clean up.
So I grabbed Talum sort of wiping it.
Causing them to have to clean up.
Who talks like that?
Nobody talks like that.
Nobody would tell a story if that were something that happened to them.
This is Dante's Inferno.
She's given a tour of all the then here's the place of the broken plates.
Ketchup is on the walls.
Then I was ushered into another room and I saw in the next realm, I saw his clavicle.
And then I heard Donald Trump slam a door.
He slammed the door.
I mean, on one hand, I could believe that people who reach this level in government are that weird, but no, really, that's just, you don't talk like that.
It's not the way you tell a story.
Well, just the way she talks is sus.
I don't understand what her super low voice is for.
I don't know why she has this kind of timing.
She's had vocal fry.
Yeah, she has vocal fry.
You're right.
She was definitely coached because, as you said, it's very ASMR.
She's trying to just instill confidence and comfort, but in a very forced way, like in an auto-tuned way.
She's just, she can't be genuine.
I mean, can you imagine if that story, if any of these stories were real and they'd happen to her and you had the chance to sit down and tell the story, like, wouldn't you be emotional and animated?
I don't think she ever doesn't talk like that.
But she's wearing a CNA.
But you notice she's wearing white also, right?
So that's conscious.
This is this.
That's a conscious thing.
So she wants to, and so why would she do that?
Dress in virgin white and go and tell this, right?
Because she's making, she's going to come spray some false allegations and some bullshit.
And they tell her, wear white.
It makes you look more believable.
Okay.
I've experienced that.
He said something to the effect of he's really ticked off about this.
I would stay clear of him right now.
He's really, really ticked off about this right now.
So he threw ketchup against the wall.
That's the big thing.
Ketchup.
What's that?
She was like, there was catch up on the wall.
That's the noise.
I got to tell you, my buddy, Nick Murphy, he wins the internet.
He said Trump's presidency definitely had its heights and lows.
Come on.
Yeah.
And come on.
Considering John Kerry, it's just funny because John Kerry, Obama's Secretary of State, is married.
And he's the family.
You know, it's all about the ketchup logic.
How deep does this thing go?
I know.
So, so now I'll go back to the comedy club and we'll see what they're saying today.
So what other piece of propaganda will the shit libs be excited about?
They were beaming.
They were beaming.
I've never seen them smile bigger.
And they're like, did you see the thing?
Did you see the testimony?
To see the testimony?
Like, no, I'm not following it.
Oh, yeah, he got Trump.
Trump tried to choke his driver.
And I'm thinking, well, you always say that Trump is a dictator and he tried to overthrow the government.
He couldn't even overthrow his own fucking car.
He couldn't even get his own driver to do what he wanted.
And you guys are telling me to be afraid of this guy?
He couldn't even tell his own driver to do what he wanted.
And he was the president at the time.
So this, again, this whole idea of this guy's, this guy's a dictator.
He's the worst thing ever.
And they've got to convince you.
This is all to convince you that Donald Trump is the worst guy ever.
So he can't run again because they're afraid he's going to run again and beat Joe Biden or Hillary Clinton or John Kerry or whatever piece of shit they put up against him.
Or Liz Cheney.
Right.
Maybe it'll either be Cheney, Clinton, or Clinton Cheney.
It's hard to know who's going to wear the pantsuit in that relationship and be the top of the ticket.
But definitely it's going to be a question of the establishment candidate.
And what they're afraid of is that they're going to run against Trump again.
And so what's so crazy is that this whole distraction is taking place.
It's interesting to analyze and there are things to say about it if the media would cover it in a fair way.
We just did it here.
But beyond the distraction, all of this is happening at a time when NATO is convening in Madrid during the height of this insane proxy war in Ukraine and it's facing a test of legitimacy while the U.S. sanctions that or the sanctions that NATO has put in place in order to punish Russia and take this extreme maximum pressure position are backfiring on the U.S. public.
I think most Americans yesterday were more concerned with gas prices and the price of their food than they were with the testimony of Cassidy Hutchinson.
And that's a direct result of the Biden administration's failed policy that they would have to put up against Trump.
And they don't want to do that.
At the same time, this abortion ruling, the overturning of the over Roe v.
Wade was overturned by the Supreme Court last week.
Trump's base is counting that as a major win for him.
They're so invigorated by this.
I mean, they've taken credit.
Trump has taken credit for the fact that Roe v.
Wade was overturned because he was able to put the judges that he wanted on the Supreme Court, unlike his predecessor, Barack Obama.
And so Trump's base is not concerned with this testimony.
They're like, wow, we just overturned Roe v.
Wade.
Meanwhile, the liberal establishment that has to go up against Trump has created this economic crisis, can't even get their situation straight in Europe.
And so it was the perfect distraction.
And I'm just interested to see how it all ends up playing out in November.
You know, not since Michael Evered at me have I put more hope in a testimony.
Oh, and the last thing I'll say, which I mentioned this over text earlier.
I don't want to be that person, but just if we look at who Cassidy Hutchinson is, media reports all right now, Jezebel, go look it up.
They're like, this 25-year-old woman is destroying Trump.
I'm sorry, but when I, I don't know many people in the early 20s who are somehow, she was an aide to Mark Meadows, by the way, Trump's chief of staff.
That's how she was in the White House.
Apparently, when she got the job when she was like 20, 23 years old.
And somehow now she's just come forward with this narrative that completely is keeping the January 6th hysteria attacks on Trump alive.
It just, it all, it's very odd to say.
You're saying you don't think that it was, you're saying you don't think she sincerely felt that America needed to hear about this catch-up plate thing.
Saying somebody probably ginned this up a little bit.
I don't know who did.
I don't even think it's her.
I think they're, you know, there are, obviously, she has coaches and people behind her who she doesn't have the voice of anyone who's ever cared about a servant having to clean something up.
Yeah, that's that.
Boy, it could she is the term non-plus?
I don't think that's the term.
Like she, she seems like so over it.
Like, because she couldn't have a lower register nonchalant.
That's it.
Yeah.
You know, and then.
But also when you look at her face, there's clearly something going on there because she's suppressing.
She's always, she looks like she's constantly suppressing this laughter that she can't even take herself seriously.
Yes.
She does not.
I mean, just watch it again.
I encourage people go and she's just it's like if you were telling a lie that all of your friends put you up to on TV.
Looks like she shot up with sodium pentothal.
Well, if she also, that's a pretty, it's a rough 25.
I'll say that much.
I'm not saying that.
I can't believe you said that.
I think she looks fantastic.
And then the servant said, don't go in there.
He's really mad.
It was causing them to clean up.
It was causing them to clean up.
Wow.
Hey, you know, here's another great way you can help support the show is you become a premium member.
We give you a couple of hours of premium bonus content every week.
And it's a great way to help support the show.
You can do it by going to jimmydoorcomedy.com, clicking on join premium.
It's the most affordable premium program in the business.
And it's a great way to help put your thumb back in the eye of the bastards.
Thanks for everybody who was already a premium member.
And if you haven't, you're missing out.
We give you lots of bonus content.
Thanks for your support.
So here's something that's interesting.
Our friend Caitlin Johnstone tweeted out.
The Ukraine war is the single most aggressively trolled issue I've ever witnessed.
As soon as it started, this site was full of brand new accounts swarming anyone who uttered wrongthink about Ukraine.
And now there are entire extremely coordinated troll factions, very inorganic.
So I've said this about Twitter and other social media platforms, that the CIA and the intelligence community has their fingers in it.
Of course they do.
Of course they do.
And then the gray zone exposed some YouTubers were getting money from the intelligence community in England to do videos attacking people who are questioning the COVID narrative, people like me who are questioning the vaccine narrative and the COVID narrative and questioning lockdowns.
They were funding YouTubers to make negative videos about them.
And she's pointing this same phenomena out.
And then she tweeted this out.
She goes, how do we miss this?
This article is 11 years old.
Revealed U.S. spy operation that manipulates social media.
Military sock puppet software creates fake online identities to spread pro-American propaganda.
What?
You didn't write jokes for this, right?
No, I didn't get this totally anything.
The U.S. military is developing software that will let it secretly manipulate social media sites by using fake online personas to influence internet conversations and spread pro-American propaganda.
A Californian corporation has been awarded a contract with the United States Central Command, CENTCOM, which oversees U.S. armed operations in the Middle East and Central Asia to develop what is described as an online persona management service that will allow one U.S. serviceman or woman to control up to 10 separate identities based all over the world.
The project has been likened by web experts to China's attempt to control and restrict free speech on the internet.
Critics are likely to complain that it will allow the U.S. military to create a false consensus in online conversations, crowd out unwelcome opinions, and smother commentaries or reports that do not correspond with its own objectives.
Of course, that's what's happening.
11 years ago?
So whatever happened with that?
Did they stick with that?
I bet they got rid of it.
I bet they got rid of it.
So here, Caitlin Johnstone says this.
She goes, how did we miss this year-old Newsweek report about a secret and unaccountable Pentagon undercover force, which carries out domestic and foreign assignments that includes campaigns to influence and manipulate social media?
So this is from Newsweek from a year ago.
The largest undercover force the world has ever known is the one created by the Pentagon over the past decade.
Some 60,000 people now belong to this secret army, many working under masked identities and in low profile, all part of a broad program called signature reduction.
The force, more than 10 times the size of the clandestine elements of the CIA, I'll read that again.
The force more than 10 times the size of the clandestine elements of the CIA carries out domestic and foreign assignments, domestic, both in military uniforms and under civilian cover, in real life and online, sometimes hiding private businesses and consultancies, some of them household name companies.
It goes on.
The newest and fastest growing group in this clandestine army that never leaves their keyboards, there are these are the cutting-edge cyberfighters and intelligence collectors who assume false personas online, employing non-attribution and misattribution techniques to hide the who and the where of their online presence while they search for high-value targets and collect what is called publicly accessible information or
even engage in campaigns to influence and manipulate social media.
Hundreds work in and for the NSA.
But over the past five years, every military intelligence and special operations unit has developed some kind of web operation cell that both collects intelligence and tends to the operational security of its very activities.
So that stuff that they're saying Russia is doing, they've been doing it for over 11 years.
And they're doing it to you, the American citizen, which used to be illegal.
Newsweek's exclusive report on this secret world is the result of a two-year investigation involving the examination of over 600 resumes and 1,000 job postings, dozens of freedom of information requests, and scores of interviews with participants and defense decision makers.
What emerges is a window into not just a little-known sector of the American military, but also a completely unregulated practice.
No one knows the program's total size, and the explosion of signature reduction has never been examined for the impact on military policies and culture.
Congress has never even held a hearing on the subject.
And yet the military developing this gigantic clandestine force challenges U.S. laws, the Geneva Conventions, the Code of Military Conduct, and basic accountability.
So all that stuff they want you to worry about, Russia and China, and somebody else manipulating social media, it's your own government doing it.
And they're doing it at the behest of the military-industrial complex, which is why we're in a million wars, and we have a thousand bases around the country, around the world, and no one cares.
Why, we just gave $54 billion to the most corrupt country in Europe.
Well, that same money could have fixed homelessness in the United States three times over.
That's the result.
That's one of the results.
And why are they allowed to do this?
Because of this, the Smith-Munt Modernization Act of 2012 or the SMMA.
What is that, Jimmy?
This sounds boring.
I'll tell you what it is.
It was an act that said that the United States government could not propagandize their own citizens, meaning you and me.
That the government could do propaganda to foreigners, but they couldn't propagandize our own citizens.
That's a good idea.
They got rid of it.
The SMA established, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
Put simply, our government, so the SMA established that via the Broadcasting Board of Governors, Voice of America, and Radio Free Europe, the United States Department and Office of Public Affairs were authorized to disseminate propaganda to foreign publics, but were strictly prohibited from releasing that same propaganda in America for public consumption.
Put simply, our government was permitted to lie to people in their countries, but not to us here at home.
What happened?
Well, Barack Obama changed all that.
The prohibition was lifted in 2012 when the SMMA was signed into law by President Obama, allowing the same propaganda disseminated by our government to foreign publics to now be released in the United States for the very first time.
And yes, our government is also now allowed to create propaganda tailored specifically for the United States public consumption using any media as it sees fit while remaining anonymous as the source of the material being reported.
The SMMA provides for ample funding for U.S. propaganda programming, incentivizing, get this, the corporate media cartel to partner with the BBG for a new source of revenue to backstop its operational budgets that have been declining due to years of increasingly low ratings, social media competition, loss of relevance, and the public's growing loss of confidence in media's reporting veracity, regardless of political affiliation.
So I'm going to tell you what this means.
They're saying that people are done with corporate media and the corporate media is starting to lose revenue, market share, because people don't, the veracity of their reporting, mean they don't trust them.
They think their reporting is false.
And so that's one of the reasons why they're losing plus social media.
So they're losing relevance, corporate media, the establishment media, they're losing relevance, impact, and money.
And so they're saying this SMMA provides for ample funding for U.S. propaganda so they can now give money to these corporate media people, the government, to print propaganda.
The SMMA promotes unholy alliances between the United States Department, the U.S. State Department, and American corporate media that unbinds reporters and news departments from the solemn responsibility to verify information.
So often through Russia Gate, Syria, all the things that we cover, Venezuela, all the things we cover at this show, we've been showing you that they've just, well, straight propaganda as if it came right from the CIA's lips will be printed in the media.
And now you know why.
Because now they can lie to you and do propaganda and it's not illegal.
And corporate media seems to be able to get a paycheck for it.
Grasping the importance of the SMMA in undermining America's free press, its impact on our governance, culture, and socioeconomic structure as a free society cannot be understated.
I think he meant overstated.
Not only is the Fourth Estate utterly compromised, meaning the media, the news media.
Not only is the news media utterly compromised relative to the information it does convey, but there is a far greater mission of corruption in the massive amount of need-to-know information it does not convey.
So they don't tell you certain things, just like they don't tell you Ivermectin is a Nobel Prize winning medicine that is also on the WHO list of essential medicines, been prescribed billions of times and saved billions of lives.
They don't tell you.
That's the part that they leave out.
And that's the point they're making.
They leave out stuff.
Like, hey, the Ukraine military is infiltrated with Nazis, stuff like that.
They leave that out.
Hey, it was the United States and NATO that helped institute a coup in Ukraine in 2014, which led to this invade.
They leave that out.
This is what they're saying.
Systematically omitting relevant information from the public forum, tailoring narratives and messaging in the guise of legitimate news, redundant scripting across networks, and disallowing nearly All critical debate or analysis is classic communications manipulation, strategically designed as part of a larger behavior modification agenda.
Whose behavior are they modifying?
Yours.
Yours.
That's what this is all about.
Now, isn't that just the most disturbing thing you've read today?
Just when you think the United States government intelligence agencies can't be more sneaky, underhanded, or deceitful, they not only are openly manipulating the news media, but covertly manipulating social media too.
So there was, what was it called?
Mockingbird.
Operation Mockingbird, which is where they planted stories and they manipulated, they infiltrated news media.
And that was revealed by the church committee.
Right?
Yes.
That was called Operation Mockingbird.
Go look.
It has its own Wikipedia page.
That's how much everyone knows it's real.
Is that why Twitter didn't want to say give up the numbers of how much is boxed and all that?
Because they're probably.
Probably CIA.
Yeah.
They got some poorly run business so they get money to turns out you're because the CIA budget is clandestine.
We don't know what they're spending their money on for real.
And so there you go.
So when you see suspicious, just like, well, let's remember what started this.
Caitlin Johnstone said the Ukraine war is the single most aggressively trolled issue I've ever witnessed.
As soon as it started, this site was full of brand new accounts swarming anyone who uttered wrong thing about Ukraine.
And now there are entire extremely coordinated troll factions, very inorganic.
And I'll tell you another thing.
Just like on YouTube, there's an algorithm that boosts corporate news over independent news.
Same thing on Twitter and Facebook.
They suppress people like us and they boost people who are friendly to the establishment.
Like, how did I know with that jank nephew guy, that Haas guy?
He got a puff piece written about him in Business Insider magazine.
And for a week, for a week, when I logged into Twitter, they were promoting that article.
Twitter was.
So that's them.
There's people who they like to promote.
There's people who they don't.
I'm one of the people they don't.
And the people they do like are people who are sweet to the establishment, who will always tell you to vote Democratic.
And they're never going to tell you the truth about foreign policy or war or anything.
The people who defend politicians.
Those are the people they boost.
I've never had, I've gotten over 300,000 followers on Twitter.
I've never had a tweet that I think got more than 15,000 likes.
I see that happen.
Some people fart on Twitter and they get 70,000 likes.
You don't tell me that that's not being manipulated by the intelligence community?
Of course, you're naive if you think otherwise.
Wait till we get the church hearing on Twitter.
Wait till we get the church hearing on Facebook and YouTube.
We've already caught them.
Grey Zone's already caught British intelligence paying people, YouTubers, to do negative videos about people who question vaccines or COVID narrative.
We've already caught that.
I mean, what if it turns out nobody in real life has blue hair after all?
I'm going to be my reality will be shattered.
And so there, so there you go.
That's how Twitter works.
That's how it's all spooks.
It's all you, of course.
Doesn't Saudi Arabia own a lot of Twitter right now?
And of course, that's the CIA.
Of course, that's NSA.
Of course, that's the intelligence that's MI6.
Of course, that is.
If you think they wouldn't be all over social media, you're the chump.
You're the mark.
Go ahead.
I can't believe we laughed at the TikTok lady.
Yeah.
All right.
I think that's our last story for today.
Thank God.
That's the most disturbing story I've ever seen on the Jimmy Dorse show.
That's a pretty disturbing story.
I've never been here.
Isn't it?
I'm upset and I'd like to go.
Ha ha ha ha.
Hey, this is Jimmy.
Who's this?
This is Hillary supporters.
Oh, my God.
Oh, my God.
Wow, Hillary supporter.
How are you?
Go fuck yourself.
Go fuck yourself.
Okay, then.
We haven't heard from you in forever.
What's going on?
Why are you calling?
Well, yes, it has been a long time since we spoke.
And I will always consider that a long period of relative tranquility in my life.
Even though many of your so-called fans of your quote-unquote show on the alleged internet kept trying to get me to call in, I forebore from doing so.
You forebore?
I forebore.
I forebore from calling in because I am a Hillary Clinton-based entity and character, and she was keeping a low profile, so there was nothing to talk to your dumb ass about.
I see.
But then, oh, my God, did you hear?
Hear what?
Did you hear the news?
No.
There's talk that Hillary's going to run in 2024.
For what?
Dog catcher?
Yes, the best dog catcher.
Wait, is that slang for president?
No way she runs again.
Yes, Way.
Shut up, idiot.
What would that possibly accomplish?
What do you mean it would possibly accomplish?
Hillary would be president.
That's what.
She didn't win last time she ran.
Yes, she did.
She won the popular vote.
Yes, but we have this stupid electoral college system, which she fully knew of, and she should have campaigned accordingly.
Why is it always incumbent upon women in this society to know things about how things work and then act in a way that demonstrates that she has that knowledge?
I'm sorry.
That's misogyny.
And anyway, bird brain, her Royal Highness being president would fix everything.
She would bring Roe versus Wade back, that's for sure.
Uh-huh.
I can tell you that much.
How do you bring back a court case that has been struck down?
I don't know, but Hill will figure it out.
It's what she does.
She's a problem solver.
And the new Roe v.
Wade will be even more powerful and scary than the original.
It would be like if you buried Roe versus Wade in a bad cemetery.
I bet she'd fix gas prices, too.
You bet your patriarchy-loving ass she would.
Of course, she would.
How she would go to these gas companies and say, guys, how about we refine more gas so there's more gas in the supply or however it works.
And they would, because it would be Hillary saying it, not that fossil Joe Biden.
They won't listen to him.
They're just waiting for him to become oil himself so they can sell him.
Yeah.
You really think that would be cold.
You really think that would happen?
Of course it would.
Just like when Hillary was senator from New York and went down to Wall Street and said, hey, guys, knock it off.
All this illegal crap you're doing, enough.
And they did forever.
All right.
I don't know.
Ah, yes.
Everything is fine now because of that.
Hillary supporter, does it bother you that these whispers about Hillary running are really just two op-eds, one from a conservative who wants her to run and a contributor to Fox News?
Don't do this to me.
Do not take this away from me.
Everything has been taken from me.
I'm serious.
Okay, do you know what you're doing?
Okay, what you're doing is called sourcing, okay?
Information exists.
It simply exists, okay?
Once it is information, it doesn't matter where it came from.
It's out there.
It's like saying, where is air from?
Okay, this is rooted in a sense of quote-unquote objective reality.
That is the cultural invention of European males.
It's extremely ethnocentric and it's deplorable.
Stop it.
You know, actually, investigating source is just journalism 101.
Ah, yes.
Journalism, the white man's science.
You're just making yourself look bad at this point.
I feel sorry for you.
You know what?
Fuck you.
She's running.
And there's nothing you can do to make that not true for me.
I tire of this oppression.
Goodbye.
Okay, don't call back.
Don't worry, I won't.
Well, that's that.
Good riddance, I suppose.
Wait, hold on.
I'm getting another call.
Hello.
Hey, this is Jimmy.
Who's this?
Hello, this is Offended Listener.
No!
I am very offended by what I heard on your show recently.
No.
I forget what it was because at a time I was hiding from an insect, but it was very offensive.
I was extremely offended because of that offense and the obvious malevolent intent of this bug.
I suffered a panic attack.
I demand an apology or I am suing.
No, not going to do either.
Goodbye.
Hey, become a premium member.
Go to JimmyDoorComedy.com.
Sign up.
It's the most affordable premium program in the business.
Freak out.
Don't freak out.
Don't freak out.
All the voices performed today are by the one and only the inimitable Mike McRae.
He can be found at MikeMcRae.com.
That's it for this week.
You be the best you can be, and I'll keep being me.
▲
Export Selection