Oct. 18, 2024 - The Truth Central - Dr. Jerome Corsi
01:22:06
The Philosophical Landscape of Informational Warfare and Enforcement of Election Integrity
Dr. Corsi continues to move forward with his extensive research into suspicious voter roll algorithms with election-interference potential in several U.S. states. On this edition of the show, we will be playing a recent conversation he had on the Courtenay Turner Podcast for a conversation centering on election integrity enforcement and the philosophical landscape of psychological and information warfare. as part of the “The Real Steal” series on The Truth Central. You can find out more about this effort and how to donate to help Dr. Corsi, Andrew Paquette, Dr. Karlene Graves and the team expose this threat and stop “The Real Steal” through the website: https://GODSFIVESTONES.COM If you would like to donate to help Dr. Corsi's and Andrew Paquette's efforts to seek out and expose corrupt algorithms in states' voter databases, visit https://www.godsfivestones.comIf you like what we are doing, please support our Sponsors:Get RX Meds Now: https://www.getrxmedsnow.comMyVitalC https://www.thetruthcentral.com/myvitalc-ess60-in-organic-olive-oil/Swiss America: https://www.swissamerica.com/offer/CorsiRMP.phpGet Dr. Corsi's new book, The Assassination of President John F. Kennedy: The Final Analysis: Forensic Analysis of the JFK Autopsy X-Rays Proves Two Headshots from the Right Front and One from the Rear, here: https://www.amazon.com/Assassination-President-John-Kennedy-Headshots/dp/B0CXLN1PX1/ref=sr_1_1?crid=20W8UDU55IGJJ&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.ymVX8y9V--_ztRoswluApKEN-WlqxoqrowcQP34CE3HdXRudvQJnTLmYKMMfv0gMYwaTTk_Ne3ssid8YroEAFg.e8i1TLonh9QRzDTIJSmDqJHrmMTVKBhCL7iTARroSzQ&dib_tag=se&keywords=jerome+r.+corsi+%2B+jfk&qid=1710126183&sprefix=%2Caps%2C275&sr=8-1Join Dr. Jerome Corsi on Substack: https://jeromecorsiphd.substack.com/Visit The Truth Central website: https://www.thetruthcentral.comGet your FREE copy of Dr. Corsi's new book with Swiss America CEO Dean Heskin, How the Coming Global Crash Will Create a Historic Gold Rush by calling: 800-519-6268Follow Dr. Jerome Corsi on X: @corsijerome1Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-truth-central-with-dr-jerome-corsi--5810661/support.
Med forsikring fra Jensidie er bedriften din i trygge hender.
Vi har alltid vært der ved små og store UL, og det skal vi fortsette med.
Tiden går.
Jensidie består.
Jensidie presenterer en vanlekasje på jobben i 1988.
Vi må ha et aller arkivskap på dokumentene.
Kom igjen!
Å, det var tungt!
Og en vanlekasje på jobben i dag.
Nå må vi ta opp serveren og harddisker.
Kom igjen da!
Med forsikring fra Jensidie er bedriften din i trygge hender.
Vi har alltid vært der ved små og store UL, og det skal vi fortsette med.
Tiden går.
We can see you there best.
On this edition of the show, we'll be playing a recent conversation he had on the Courtney Turner podcast for a discussion centering on election integrity enforcement and the philosophical landscape of psychological and information warfare.
This is all as part of the Real Steel series here on the Truth Central.
You can find out more about this effort and how to donate to help Dr.
Corsi, Andrew Paquette, Dr.
Graves, and the team expose this threat and stop the Real Steel through the website gods5stones.com.
That's gods5stones.com.
Now, here's Dr.
Corsi's discussion with Courtney Turner.
Jerome Corsi, and learn what he's discovered.
How are you doing today?
I'm good, Courtney.
Good to be with you.
Thank you.
Thank you so much for being here.
So I read your substack.
This is not surprising, but it's, you know, pretty disturbing how intricate and eloquent this design is.
So how did you discover it?
And yeah, tell us.
Well, the genius who figured this out was Andrew Paquette, who is a computer whiz.
He's really a computer graphics artist, some note.
He's a PhD in computer graphics, and he's worked on films like Spider-Man and others that are heavily graphic and with computerization.
And so these algorithms, which are mathematical formulas, we're finding in the State Board of Election databases, And they seem to be everywhere.
I mean, everywhere we're looking, we're finding manipulations of the state databases.
And what they do is they permit false records, non-existent voters, to be created.
And then the non-existent voters are able to get real state IDs...
This plot, it's like a marked card spot.
You know, these votes that are non-existent people, not real people, are like a marked card.
And so they hide them in the deck if they want to have a mail-in vote that they can certify.
They pick one of these non-existent voters that has gotten a legitimate state ID.
They voted mail-in.
And then the number on the outside of the envelope of the mail-in ballot matches the voter ID number.
And it's certifiable, even though there's no voter there.
It's not real.
It's done through the computers.
I mean, this is where you can find...
We've reported it in Ohio.
Ohio is doing officially an investigation of it.
And you can see all the articles I've been writing about it.
Yeah.
And, you know, trying to get people to pay attention to the fact that the steal is on again, I believe.
And I think that we have to worry that the election is not going to be...
Fair.
It's not going to be decided by the voters.
It's going to be decided by the criminals who have these algorithms put into the state databases with their mail-in voting schemes.
Yeah, I saw there was a leaked video from someone at the UN saying that they didn't think the UN would survive another Trump administration.
And, you know, I get arguments when I point this out, because people will tell me that, you know, that's all lip service and Trump's not really going to pull us out of the UN. However, if we look at his track record, I would argue he was already making moves that did defund, like the WHO, for instance.
And he was saying that he would want to start defunding the UN. And it looks like the United States funds almost a third of the UN. So it does seem like it would be a real threat to their existence and especially to their agenda if we were to just simply defund them.
That's not even policies or pulling out.
That's just You know, do not continue to support them.
And that seems to be a huge part of, you know, their plans is, you know, to move forward.
It's the UN, really.
So what are your thoughts on all of that?
Is that why you think they're so adamant about doing everything possible, including these assassination attempts?
I think the left is desperate at this point.
It's really the New World Order crowd, the ones that want to have one world government, that want to have the United Nations be a world government or the World Economic Forum.
Which partnered with the UN in 2019, so they're essentially one and the same, but yeah.
One and the same.
And so they would like to be in charge of everything.
And they really don't have much regard for human beings or for people.
I formed the Anti-Globalist Alliance, which we want to get going.
I'll show you the book, which is just published.
Here we go.
This is the new book which will be out now.
Fantastic!
And it's, you know, the Antiglobalist Manifesto, Ending the War on Humanity.
And what this New World Order group wants to do, or things that they can get away with, is the idea that They can essentially steal elections, that they can essentially lie about, they control the intelligence agencies.
I think the intelligence agencies are today running our elections, just like they're running the media.
All the stories we're getting, all the narratives we're getting are created by the intelligence agencies.
I think so, too.
One news agency after another just repeats this nonsense.
So, Yeah, I'm curious if you could, before we continue, I would like to talk a little bit about that because I think it's not just through the mainstream news media apparatus anymore.
I think that there's funded, coordinated efforts that are being seeded through, I would say, a broader intelligence apparatus through even the alternative media, even through some of the, what I call like the indie sphere.
What are your thoughts on that?
Well, I agree.
I think it's very deep, the influence of the intelligence.
And the censorship is the other part of it.
That's the other side of it, is the censorship.
So that we don't get heard.
The truth doesn't get heard.
And they're very good at discrediting those of us who want to tell the truth.
To say that we're the conspiracy theorists.
And if they can minimize the message so that no one hears it.
Yep.
Then the truth is contained, and they want to contain the truth.
It's too threatening.
I also think, so two points I want to make.
One is the United Nations, without the United States funding, the United Nations would collapse.
It's the same with a lot of these international organizations.
We are the biggest economy in the world, and this is their plan.
They're doing the summit of the future now.
They just finished.
They signed it all.
It had to be a big meeting, they signed it.
And so they said, now we're in the one world government.
Of course, they don't have any money.
If we didn't fund the thing, it would collapse.
It's the same as the public schools.
Take your kids out of the public schools.
The public schools will collapse.
Yes.
Don't participate in any of this.
I mean, if they want to do gender changes on your children and all kinds of other things you object to, like taking God out of everything and saying that God doesn't exist, then anybody who believes in God is an idiot.
And people need to fight against the school choice vouchers because that is their ticket to make every single form of education government run.
They want all controlled under their control.
Yes.
And only the thoughts that they want propagated are the thoughts that are going to get propagated in school.
They don't want active inquiry or debate, etc.
They want to...
So terrified, yes.
I think they see...
I think there's a sense where this New World Order crowd feels it's losing.
If we take a look at it objectively, who wants to live the way these people want us to live?
I mean, you only eat bugs.
You can't have meat.
You've got to live in a 15-minute city because we've got to be worried about the climate, save the planet, so therefore you can't have a car.
If you've got a car, it's got to be an electric car, which doesn't work.
All the technology they support doesn't work.
They know it doesn't work.
That's why they support it.
None of these ideas work.
And so therefore the whole engineering of a society in which you're not able to express yourself...
You're not able to raise your children the way you want to raise your children.
The state controls every aspect of your life, including what you think.
And if you wander outside your 15-minute city, your electronics don't work, so you don't have access to any money, which is all digital.
Right.
And all of these ideas are designed to enslave us.
And the whole idea that we want to submit to this I think they know that once the truth is told about who they are, what they want to achieve, no one's going to sign on to this agenda.
And so they're running as fast as they can to grab all the power they can grab, all the money and all the power.
Jensidi presenterer en vanlekarsje på jobben i 1988.
Nå må vi ta opp serveren og harddisker.
Kom igjen da!
Med forsikring fra Jensidie er bedriften din i trygge hender.
Vi har alltid vært der ved små og store UL, og det skal vi fortsette med.
Tiden går.
Jensidie består.
Jensidie presenterer en dårlig dag på jobben på 90-tallet.
Hei, nå er det litt krise her.
Det har vært innbrudd i butikken, og de har bare...
Vi har tatt alt!
Og en dårlig dag på jobben i dag.
Vi har blitt hacka med nå.
Alle filene er låst, og nå skal vi bare ha masse krypte for å få låst opp igjen.
Jensidie har alltid vært der for bedriftene for små og store UL, og det skal vi fortsette med.
Tiden går.
Jensidie består.
And it's just not going to work because ultimately these efforts fail.
Now, they fail after a lot of hardship is done.
There could be billions of people killed.
We're going to have a nuclear war.
I mean, you've got NATO saying that they're going to authorize the sending of long-range missiles by Zelensky in Ukraine into Russia.
Well, Putin's not going to put up with that.
They just changed their military rules of engagement to say that Those kinds of long-range missile attacks by a state, a proxy state like Ukraine fighting us with the backing of the United States or the backing of NATO, other countries, is really a war between the United States and Russia.
And they're going to recognize it as such.
So, I mean, Putin said things like, you know, we'll wipe Kiev off the map.
Well, he could do that.
Wouldn't take very long.
You know, hypersonic missile or two, Kiev would be gone.
Or Washington would be gone.
And these demons who are running things, I believe, are willing to contemplate nuclear war because they think there's too many people and there's too many human beings.
So when it comes to elections, you know, they put these algorithms in the database and Right.
and change the dynamics of the election because they have maybe a hundred thousand or 200,000 of these votes that they can vote at will.
And nobody will know what's happening.
Right.
You know, it's, The book I wrote on the neo-Marxism, cultural Maoism, and anarchy said that what we're living in right now is a period where this Marxism has shifted to be an attack on the culture.
And they've decided that the best way to attack the culture is to have liberating sex and destroy the family.
So there shouldn't be no reason people get married.
There should be uninhibited sex.
Pedophilia now is something that we want to put on the table to normalize it as youth-attracted Minor attracted persons, yes.
Minor attracted persons.
Well, this book says it also combines it with, it's a combination of this neo-Marxism and the cultural Maoism, which is attack on the culture, with the modernism, post-modernism.
Post-modernism maintains there is no objective reality.
Right.
Some of these authors are tough to read, like Baudrillard, who's a French author.
I don't know if you've ever tried to read Baudrillard.
I have.
I have, too.
He writes this book about simulation and simulacra.
Simulacra, right.
And he's arguing that everything is a...
There's nothing real.
Everything is a word...
It's a configuration in thought.
It's like a syncretic formulation.
It's a narrative.
So therefore we want to make a narrative of something.
It doesn't have any truth value except that it's Positive within that structure of language.
Okay, so, you know, I want to take this...
I'm going to write this week, I think, an article on the algorithms in the databases as an example of post-modernism politics.
In other words, so the voting...
We don't need voters anymore, according to Karl Schwab, because what we have is we've got Computers and the computer simulation can model an election and can be more accurate to what the voters really want than the election itself.
So if I have my algorithms, and I'm a political scientist, I have a Harvard PhD in political science, and I've done lots with data, voting data over my career, I can do a simulation of an election in a computer.
And say, here's how the election's going to go.
I can run that simulation.
Well, if I don't like the election, the way people vote, I can throw away the actual votes and run my simulation as if those were the votes.
Because again, that's a simulacra.
It wasn't the election.
It was an image of the election.
But it still has the essence, right?
It's the essence of what...
So my narrative of the election is superior to the election, so I can assert that my simulation, which is completely engineered by me manipulating the voting data with non-existent voters, none of this really happened.
But I can make it the election by asserting that it's true and demanding that it be believed.
And so since there's no objective reality, why wouldn't you accept my simulation of the election as the real election and the legitimate result?
Right.
If I say Kamala Harris wins because the left surged and she suddenly became the most popular, most brilliant person on the planet...
You know, insightful, the guru we need to run everything.
Well, she'll unburden us from what has been.
She'll reimagine society.
We're reimagining a society.
It will be a wonderful place in which to live.
And so, therefore, we ought to let her.
We'll have an election that didn't happen with a simulation.
I'd like to hear a president, even though she has no qualifications to be president, and she'll just be a figurehead.
And then whomever's in the background, Barack Obama, We can continue to run things the way Barack Obama wants to run things.
And it's all a simulation.
So we're suddenly living in a Truman Show.
Well, and I think that's exactly so.
The video that was just playing was they were talking about the Global Digital Compact.
And I think the reason they had to push all this through so urgently, they had said when they talked about why they're doing their Summit of the Future, yeah, they're going to make the AI the force for good.
When they talked about why they're doing Summit of the Future, they said it was because they were behind on their...
Achieving their 17 Sustainable Development Goals, which need to be achieved for their 2030 agenda.
And they do say that the United States is kind of a thorn in their side and, you know, slowing them down a bit.
And so, which, that's great.
I hope we continue to.
But the Global Digital Compact, I think the reason that they have to achieve all of this, and they talk about the AI, is because their AI world society is 2045.
And so they have to reach this goal by 2030 in order to be able to launch, you know, the AI World Society, they say 2045 as the centennial of the UN. And of course, they talk about in this AI World Society, they talk about how all human governments will be supplanted by AI. So like you were saying, you all know, Harari says we don't need to have elections because AI can do our elections for us.
And I think when you talk about it, I think it's such a good analogy because it really is the stepping stone.
I thought it was interesting in your article when you were talking about the technology, how it was called the spiral, because, of course, all I thought about, and this may be projection on my behalf, but I just kept thinking about the Hegelian dialectical spiral.
That's exactly right.
Yeah.
And I'm like, I don't think that's a coincidence.
But this spiral, right?
So you talk about Baudrillard.
And it's really interesting because the Wachowski brothers, they attributed The Matrix to Baudrillard.
And he then read The Matrix and he said he hated it.
And he said he would never have written that.
And it would never have been, you know, he didn't even want it attributed to him because if he had written it, you would never be able to escape.
It would be much more like the AI World Society.
Objective reality is because it's all a simulacra.
It's this metaverse.
And we live in the metaverse, so we don't have a meta-election.
I mean, just up on the screen, which was the Hegelian dialectic, and the word in German was Aufheben.
Aufheben, yes.
And so Aufheben means essentially negation.
Right, but it's oxymonic, right?
It means to build up and preserve while simultaneously tearing down and destroying.
Exactly.
So you have to destroy in order to create is the whole idea.
And so you produce anarchy.
Yes.
So the anarchy is the result of the synthesis.
It's supposed to come out of this anarchy, the thesis and the antithesis, which conflict with each other.
But really all you get is off heaven.
You get destruction.
You get negation.
It negates what it is.
Yes.
And of course, that's Elfhaven, the culture, the Frankfurt School codified.
But the Elfhaven is actually how you move up the rungs on the ladder.
And that's why I call the dialectical spiral, I call it Gnostic Jacob's Ladder.
Well, that's interesting.
That's a good point.
This whole idea of progression and the ultimate perfection of human beings is a ridiculous idea.
First of all, we're all going to die.
Yes.
Okay, so all this is, you know, pull a sound and fury signifying nothing in one sense is what Shakespeare said.
If one of you know God, there's no purpose to any of this.
This is all just, you know, a bunch of noise and nonsense.
Right.
You know, we think we want to live because we, you know, value our lives, but nobody else values our lives or cares about us, and nor should they.
And so therefore the It always this little small self-appointed group Har du et enkeltpersonforetak Eller en liten bedrift?
Da er du sikkert lei av hre meg snakke om Hvor enkelt det er sende faktura Med fiken S vi gir oss her Fordi vi liker enkelt Fiken Super enkelt regnskap.
Prøv gratis på fiken.no.
Når du forestiller deg et innbrudd, så ser du for deg drama.
Se om du finner noe passord.
Kaos.
At noen tar på det som er ditt, invaderer det du har nærest.
Finn kort informasjon.
Det som bare du og kjæresten din vet om.
Masse private bilder.
Nydelig.
Men sannheten er at mens et digitalt innbrudd pågår, så merker du ingenting.
For sikkerhetens skyld inkluderer vi sikkerhetstjenester i våre abonnement.
Be safe on Telenor.no.
Security.
They want to be the ones at the top ruling everything. And then I think Bill Gates thinks he can become a computer program and survive as a computer program and just keep running into eternity.
Well, King Charles wanted to come back as a virus, right?
Maybe a computer virus?
I don't know.
I mean, these guys are nutso.
You finally get a group of them in the United Nations, and you got this ship of fools.
These people are all here together talking to each other about we're not achieving our sustainable goals.
Well, what's our sustainable goals?
Well, our sustainable goals are that we have to, you know, move everybody into 15-minute cities.
We have to get rid of cars.
We have to, you know, sustainable.
It's like we're running out of things, so we have to use less so we don't run out quite as fast.
We've got to sustain it.
The de-growth agenda.
De-growth Marxism.
Okay, so now that they become, the only way we're going to survive, the only way the human race is going to survive is if we kill people.
That's sure going to make a lot of sense.
That's how we achieve peace too, is through war.
Yeah, that's right.
Peace and war.
And so you finally get to the point where you realize that George Orwell, you know, when he wrote 1984 and, you know, and Oxley Huxley when he was writing, you know, his great...
Elvis Huxley, Brave New World.
Brave New World.
They were actually advocates that these are the futures you're going to live.
Yeah.
They were actually predicting the future that they saw was inevitable and Yeah, Orwell was a Fabian.
He was tied in with the groups who were creating this future.
So they were just telegraphing.
He was trained by H.G. Wells.
They're just trying to desensitize you with these novels to where you're going to end up.
Operational preparation of the environment.
Precisely.
And so therefore, it's a psychological operation from the beginning in order to think that they're exposing this because they hate it and they want it destroyed.
But then you read that the hero of 1984 ends up, a guy named Winston or Winton, whatever it was, he ends up being captured by the state and undergoing psychological reprogramming Like shock therapy.
And he submits.
In the end, the state wins.
He doesn't win.
There's no revolution against the state.
The state wins.
So what the point of that book is, is you can't beat this.
This is going to be your future.
You're going to enjoy it.
You're going to be happy.
You're going to be brainwashed.
And the intelligence agencies are running everything.
Of course, they're running everything by destroying history, reinventing history.
There is no truth.
There is no objective reality.
And so we're living in this post-modernist reality, which is entirely fabricated.
And so therefore, assimilation is as good as reality.
Okay, so to them, a war is just another simulation.
Okay, so we have nuclear war, and things are all destroyed.
Well, that's just a part of the off-haven that we need to get to the next stage.
Exactly.
And we just said, so the nuclear war then will just regenerate the planet with radioactive activity, make it flourish.
And those who do survive, which will be, you know, the nutcases who caused this war in their shelters, they'll be just fine.
But they want to get rid of billions of people because it was just too messy to have all these billions of people.
It's much harder to control.
They run around, they do things on their own, and so therefore, let's not really have elections.
Let's look like we're having elections, but the election is in the computer.
Okay, so the computer is the election.
We all go vote.
Well, that's just the ceremony that is the prelude to this great opera being played on the organ, and the organ is the computer, and that's where the real election's happening.
And whoever's playing that organ, the Phantom of the Opera playing the organ...
In the depths of Notre Dame, that's the only reality of the world.
So therefore, you know, don't worry about it because if everybody did vote, it would be messy.
It would be wrong.
We don't need all these people voting.
And they don't know what's good for them anyway.
They think they know better.
So why have the masses who don't really know how to vote?
They don't know what's good for them.
Why should they be involved?
These masses believe in stupid ideas like God, and they have these sky fairies, and they pray to these sky fairies, and you cut into a person who don't see human rights.
The Magna Carta is just some guy's idea in 1250-something or other of what they wanted as rights, which don't really exist except that the king agreed to them and posited them.
Because it was a weak king.
The king was stupid.
Gave these people rights.
Those people were running around with their rights.
Well, we don't need them having rights.
We want to tax them.
We want to work them to death.
They're useless anyway.
We don't need these people.
So this would be a great place except for the people.
Right, that seems to be their worldview.
What is it, the useless eaters?
So I don't disagree with you, but I am sure the audience is wondering if you could possibly delineate the correlation, the connection between the intelligence apparatus and, you know, these, like the elections and the other various strings that they're pulling.
You start out with the fact that we're going to control the narrative, so we're going to control the media.
We're going to be the arbiter of what's going on in reality.
And so then once we're that arbiter, we're going to go to the next step, which is we're going to architect the reality for them.
And we're going to architect the reality in which they live.
Now, in order for this to succeed, we first of all have to make sure they're not too well educated where they can't think for themselves.
Because the ideas we're going to give them are all ideas which are aimed at destroying them.
Like, don't use hydrocarbon fuels.
Because if you do, the earth is going to get too hot because of carbon dioxide and we're all going to die.
The light molecule is somehow going to kill us.
The light molecule is going to kill us.
The one molecule that provides for the greening of the world, the trees, the things that are carbon dioxide, which we exhale.
This is now noxious, so we have to get rid of hydrocarbon fuels.
They really want to get rid of hydrocarbon fuels because they're productive, because they work.
Right.
Because they breed life, literally.
Fundamental to life.
Yeah.
And so therefore, we don't need it because we're not trying to nourish life.
We're trying to nourish death.
This is a death cult.
It is.
It's a death cult.
It worships death.
You know, and the idea that it worships Satan, that it worships the evil, and does so clandestinely.
Okay, so they want to all hide away and worship Satan.
Right.
Under the guise of love and light.
That's their, you know, the...
Hollywood.
They're the entertainers.
They're the singers and dancers.
Right.
You know, and nobody's going to notice their hidden agenda, which is Luciferian.
It's pedophilia.
It's children sexualizing children.
And, you know, all of the worst elements you can think of, which are suddenly glorified as the best and the greatest.
But since it's postmodern, You know, they assert the right to do that.
If you want to worship Satan, well, Satan's just another god.
So, you know, God's silly, but Satan makes sense to these people.
Okay, so that kind of insanity...
Because to me, as I said in that book on cultural Maoism and the like, it becomes a form of schizophrenia.
And schizophrenia is what really then rules, because whatever bizarre idea you have that you want to self-actualize, you also then want the right to self-actualize it, and then you want it to demand that it be celebrated.
Others not only accept it, but they celebrate it.
Right.
And so, therefore, you can have the most bizarre sexual ideas imaginable, and you want to do them in public, you want to do them with children, and you want to be applauded for it.
Okay, now, I mean, these are the kinds of things, and so you get this You know, Bo Diddy, and now he's out there.
Well, okay, so what's going on here?
So, you know, his Satanist group, being opposed by another Satanist group, He's now done his sex orgies and his bizarre behavior with drugs and everything else and filmed everybody.
So he's got his blackmail.
He's his former Jeffrey Epstein.
And this other group over here, Satanists, he's not submitted.
He may go rogue.
He could expose them so that his secrets now are dangerous and they want to make sure that his secrets and he are suppressed.
So they're going to arrest him.
NRK TV-aksjonen trenger deg søndag 20.
oktober.
For at alle skal huske å gi, må alle få besøk.
Bli bøssebærer på TV-aksjonen.no.
They're going to threaten everything he's got, unless he releases to them what they want, which is the blackmail material.
Right.
Once they get the blackmail material released, they'll probably be allowed to live for a little while until they extinguish it.
Because he's no longer useful.
He's no longer in the satanic sect.
And they get you in the satanic sect by getting you to do acts which compromise you.
Which again are filmed.
They have leverage.
I mean, it starts with pederastry and all kinds of other forms of embarrassing and demeaning sex, which are recorded.
And once you submit it to this, well, then you're owned.
Okay, now, as long as you're playing the game, you may get all the wealth or the Kobe Bryants.
You may be the greatest basketball star that ever played.
You'll have exceptional abilities.
But don't dare go off the reservation.
Or you and your family will all be killed and you'll watch your children be tortured to death.
And film doing it.
Right.
Since it's a reality show, they'll just say, well, the helicopter crashed.
Right.
Right.
They just make up the story.
I mean, you know, because since there isn't any reality to these people, except what they posit, and there is no standard of consequences other than that they are no longer in power or they don't get what they want, There's no standard of right and wrong.
There's no standard here of decency.
There's no standard of the kinds of human conduct that allows a society to function.
So what you get is the off-haven.
You get the negation and destruction part.
And your cities are now run by Venezuelan gangs.
And since you've defunded the police, you don't have anybody to protect you.
Right.
But don't worry about that because we've got community organizers.
Right.
And they'll come in and they'll mediate all the problems.
All the problems that they created, yes.
That they created.
Yes.
And the Minnesota gangs will still be in charge.
And don't worry about whether you need goods in stores because they'll just be, you know, flash mobs will occur and they'll loot and take everything and steal it.
You'll lose $150,000 worth of property.
But that's okay.
Your insurance will cover it and just go back in, restock the store and get robbed again.
So, you know, these are the kinds of dysfunctions that are inherent into what we're experiencing here as this dysfunctional reality.
And it is a result of the, you know, the cutting off, the certain cut off God Make people worry that we're running out of resources, and so therefore we have to turn against each other to kill humanity in order to survive.
We've got to destroy this village in order to save this village.
Using fear, right.
And power, but mostly fear.
And if you dare oppose it, we're going to come and arrest you, and we're going to put you in prison the rest of your life.
We're daring to tell the truth.
And this is the reality.
And then we're going to call it sustainable.
By sustainable, they mean degrowth.
They mean limiting.
Limits of growth.
Yep.
You're going to get less and less and less and less until you get nothing at all and starve to death.
And that's okay.
You can solve this problem by just killing yourself and euthanasia will be now not only acceptable, become popular.
Because you might as well exit from this reality, which is just too horrible to face.
It's too horrible to live.
It's too horrible to constantly be in debt, to not have enough to eat, not to be able to raise a family, not to be able to praise God.
So the limits to growth ideology is inherently the kind of growth Club of Rome, all these elite societies propagate in order for control.
And they admitted that.
They admitted that that was in 1972.
In 1992, they did their Global Reformation document.
They admitted that they created that propaganda narrative because they needed a common enemy for man to rally behind because nobody was going to buy the junk science.
I'm paraphrasing.
But they said, so we had to come up with a common enemy to get people to rally.
They said, so therefore, the enemy of humanity is man.
Man is the enemy.
That's why you are the carbon they want to reduce.
Because they have an entire conference on the environment and development.
And we protect the environment by reducing the number of people around.
And to do that, let's create vaccines that kill people.
Let's create diseases that kill people.
Let's do anything we can to eliminate people.
Because it's people who are our problem.
Making it unsustainable.
Because these people eat too much.
They breathe too much.
They want homes.
They want families.
They want to waste their time praying to a God that doesn't exist.
They want to have statutes of human rights which restrict how we can terrorize them.
Right.
So let's introduce a bunch of dysfunctional ideas.
Well, they also have these independent ideas and individual agency that runs counter to our collective conscience that we're trying to create.
So the voting with algorithms has a strong comparability to the idea in climate science that carbon dioxide is the noxious chemical.
Because again, since it's not true, it violates all the principles of science that anyone could possibly actually consciously understand legitimately that work.
And in its place, we put this artificial reality.
And so therefore, the metaverse becomes our future.
We have to live in the metaverse.
And to get to the metaverse, you have to be drugged into the metaverse because you might as well be drugged because you're going to merge with this reality.
You spend the rest of your time here in the metaverse in a pod while they mine your energy.
They say that.
They literally say that.
When you read the AI World Society blueprint, they talk about 6G. There's a study from the University of Amherst, Massachusetts.
I know people say this sounds crazy conspiracy theory.
I'm not saying they're doing it, but of their own admission, they've released these documents.
University of Amherst, Massachusetts says they are going to use humans to harness energy for 6G.
And then in the AI World Society document, they say 6G is what is going to power not the Internet of Things and the Internet of Bodies, but the Internet of nanobio things.
That there will literally be like biometric sensors all throughout us.
And this is going to be connected to the smart cities, you know, 15 minute cities, the whole grid that they're creating.
That Ukraine is going to be the central hub for all these nodes that are connected to it.
And that they will.
And then when you look at the agenda 2055, it's like geared towards EMTs.
And of course, it's couched in how they'll be able to, you know, know before you do that you're going into cardiac arrest and they'll come save you.
And it's always couched in how they're going to help you and protect you.
But meanwhile, they'll have every little bit of biometric data on you that they could...
I mean, and it's all from these sensors that are in you.
So theoretically, they could just shut you off.
I mean...
Just like they can run a simulation of an election in the computer that is the election.
They can run a simulation of you that is you.
Yep.
Oh yeah, they talk about that, the digital twin.
They talk about that in the AI World Society too, that you'll have a digital twin and, I don't know, your digital twin could do something and then they could decide you don't get up to live.
It will live a more, you know, sustainable life than you do.
Yeah, so you just might not get to live anymore because your digital twin is better for the environment.
That's right.
And so therefore, as long as your digital twin lives, you don't have to live.
Right.
Because you'll go on into eternity as your digital twin.
Right.
And they become, and it will make the digital twins as close to consciousness as we can.
So in other words, indistinguishable from whether or not they're conscious.
Right.
Right.
Well, they believe that, I mean, there seems to be these two groups.
So I see them as a Hegelian dialectical pole.
But, you know, let's just operate in good faith and say that maybe they really oppose each other.
But there seems to be these two groups.
There are these groups who they talk, they call them like the cosmoerotic humanists, and they claim that they're anti-transhumanists, although their mentor, Barbara Marks Hubbard, is literally a transhumanist.
She's behind the HeartMath, which is going to lull us into global coherence.
This was funded by the Rockefellers.
She talks about building the noosphere, Teilhard de Chardin's vision.
She's going to execute it.
And this Global HeartMath is going to help do that by resonating our You know, biometric field of our heartbeats.
And so her disciples claimed they're cosmorotic humanists, and they claim that we're already in a collective consciousness, that, you know, that we don't need...
They reject the transhumanists.
They say that that's crazy.
But what really is the difference if you believe that you're already part of the undifferentiated all, or whether you have a piece of technology that creates a singularity, You know, as Ray Kurzweil says, singularity is nearer.
When does he say that's going to come to fruition?
2045.
When is the AI World Society?
2045.
And it literally is a singularity.
And I don't know.
I think they're both kind of just, you know, two paths to create the same teleological ends.
But the whole idea, these things, the graphics you're showing here are good.
I mean, these are all the...
The sensors, everything becoming metaverse, your life is in your metaverse, your life is in your cell phone, your consciousness is in your cell phone.
These people don't really believe there is anything to consciousness.
They believe it's all just a matter of calculations and thinking.
Kurzweil's book is one of the key books on this whole AI vision.
And they believe we will merge with AI because...
AI, you know, you can get a program that can play chess or go better than a human being.
So why can't you put that chip into a human being?
The human being is able then to internalize that knowledge and play chess as if it were AI. But AI is then regarded as superior to human thinking.
And so human thinking is there for replaceable.
And not only do they say, well, what is their unique about human consciousness, our ability to self-consciously appreciate an idea?
Well, that's just an illusion.
Well, some of them say, I don't think they think it's an illusion.
They think that it can be merged, that it's all part of this.
I think this really goes all the way back, like Plato would call it the undifferentiated all.
But the theosophist would say, we come from source, and the whole journey of human experience is to return to source.
And the people who are running the UN are mostly these new thought leaders.
And it's the same thing as Theosophy, but rebranded as New Thought, which is a stronger focus on mentalism.
But they don't believe that we have individual mental cognition.
They believe that it's all part of the noosphere.
It's the shared ether.
And that, so that's what I'm saying.
I don't see the difference, though.
What's the difference if you have a technology that, you know, builds that internet ether?
What some of them say, I mean, that's what Bruce Lifton says.
He says that we're going to co-create into this superorganism of humanity.
And, you know, he talks about the different stages of evolution.
He says we started out as the bacteria and we moved to the amoeba.
And he shows the Hegelian dialectical spiral when he talks about this.
Right.
And then he says human beings are so, you know, they're the complex multicellular organisms.
And the reason that they're so intelligent, see here, it's literally the Hegelian dialectical spiral.
And he says the reason they're so smart is because they have so much surface area of membrane.
But now we have this opportunity to co-create into a superorganism of humanity.
And what does he say the membrane of humanity is going to be?
The internet.
Yeah, well, it's insanity.
It's insanity.
It's this whole retreat into nothingness, ultimately.
It's nihilistic, ultimately, because it's denying that there is any intrinsic value.
There's no intrinsic value in a human being.
There's no intrinsic value in the unique experience of living.
In other words, these people are, in a sense, really desperately lonely and desperately wanting.
And that they can't live a fulfilling life just living that life.
Because you say, okay, well, that life's going to end.
It's going to be inconsequential.
Okay?
Yes, it's going to be inconsequential.
You know, you could unplug this entire experience.
It never existed, so it never happened.
Yeah.
Or is it happening, you know, you can read these ancient, you know, musings about whether the world is, you know, some, you know, some giant turtle somewhere or other is experiencing this.
We are on the back of the giant turtle.
When the giant turtle goes away, we go away.
This all unplugs.
Poof, it's gone.
So it's not real.
It appears real, but it's not real.
Well, in a sense, those thoughts, they're in a sense true.
In a sense, our experience is spiritual.
We're living in the mind of God.
And in a sense, it is ephemeral.
But at the same time, these people refuse to accept that that may be all that there is.
And that that's good enough.
That the experience of living, the experience of a conscious life, lived knowing that it's going to end, knowing that this individuality is going to disappear and was insignificant to begin with, does not have any meaning whatsoever, or it has all its meaning possible because it's fulfilled in God.
Okay, now the concept of being fulfilled in God or being fulfilled in a higher entity that is truly moral, that is truly on a different plane spiritually, that that possibility exists in which there is objective truth, there is right and wrong, there are consequences.
As opposed to this world that they're creating over here, which is chaotic, there's no real consequences to anything, and so therefore everything becomes arbitrary and anything goes.
The most horrible crimes can be committed and they're inconsequential because the people who are the victims were inconsequential.
So what are they complaining about?
We're not supposed to protect them because, again, we didn't want them in the first place.
So the metaverse itself is a destructive idea, but you see it manifested in the fact that, you know, so here I am trying to say, okay, you've got complex codes into your voting systems that permit the voting of non-existent people as if they were real.
Well, again, that's the whole postmodern idea.
It says nothing is real.
Everything's a simulacra.
So the positing, the invention of it is as good as the reality of the experience of it.
Because there is no real experience.
I mean, in the final analysis, Baudrillard said he was a nihilist.
He said there was nothing.
Everything was positive.
There was nothing.
Therefore, he existed in a world where he saw all this is poof, gone.
Right.
And so it's suddenly just invented for him.
It's all happening in his head.
Right.
And there's nobody else out there.
This is all just his personal nightmare.
The hubris.
Yeah.
I have a question for you because you talked about with these voting algorithms and how they're basically exploiting the non-voters that they've calculated.
I've noticed that there is, it looks to me anyway, like a kind of active measure to convince Americans not to vote.
And I personally can tell you more people than I can count on my hands who have told me that they would have voted.
But then, you know, they've heard some of these, you know, people in the it's more of the indie media.
I won't name the names, but they've heard them speak.
And now they've decided they're not voting at all.
And it conveniently seems to be who Kamala and Walls, because when I ask all of them who they would have voted for, it was Trump's.
So it does look like an active measure to me.
Do you have any thoughts on that?
Do you think there's any connection between the two?
Well, certainly there's an attempt to discourage voting in general by these people.
And they don't want you to vote.
And they want you to think you're voting.
And the solutions to these things...
I have to do with non-cooperating.
I have to do with non-refusal to play.
In other words, the massive numbers of people come out and vote.
And there's huge turnout.
Right.
Well, it's going to be very hard to manipulate.
Because it's apparent.
So one of the things I'm trying to do by exposing the algorithms is to make it difficult for them to be used.
I'm comparing it to a magic trick.
Once you know how a magic trick is done, it has to do with deception.
It has to do with diverting your attention.
It has to do with the whole process of...
Isn't that what Crowley said magic is?
Like the manipulation of the perception?
That's all it is.
Manipulation of perception.
Once you understand how the individual trick...
Manipulates your perception to be pulled off.
It can no longer be a trick.
You don't see it any longer as a trick.
You see the steps the magician has taken to divert your attention, to create an illusion.
Sight of hand.
Sight of hand.
The misdirection.
Magic depends upon misdirection.
Of course.
Okay, and once you realize that, you can't watch a magic trick anymore because you know how it's done.
So therefore, by exposing the algorithm and showing people how it's done, it makes it harder for them to be used.
Because again, if the situation is just so overwhelming with the vote, that's why Biden was not an acceptable candidate because We're good to go.
Don't let anybody see that.
And then Gaslighter, well, she's really brilliant now that she's really drawing a crowd.
She's really coming on the scene.
She's coming on.
And look at this poll.
She beat Donald Trump.
No, she didn't.
The poll was made up.
It was oversampled if they bothered to do it.
But instead, why even bother to hold a poll and oversample to just make up the result?
Make it look like a poll.
Right.
Right.
Well, we ran a poll.
We didn't actually question anybody, but then we don't need to question anybody because we can run the poll without questioning anybody because we know better how it should turn out.
And so, therefore, we're running the poll to tell you how it should turn out.
We're reimagining everything.
We're reimagining polls.
Yes, so they can be what Edward Bernig called manufacturing consent.
Manufacturing consent or manufacturing reality or constructing reality so that your entire vision of reality is shaped by the narratives you're being given.
And these narratives then become very powerful motivators of behavior.
And again, this was understood with, you know, people misunderstood, I think, the, you know, when the Nazis, 1930s, 1940s, it was all studying the authoritarian personality.
Why did the Germans suddenly, what was unique about the German character that made it subject itself to obedience to this crazy Nazi regime?
And then, you know, guys like Stanley Milgram came around and showed that, you know, ordinary people could do extreme things and be authoritarian and administer pain and others to subjects that were, you know, they were torturing.
Right.
And the average person was subject to being manipulated to being able to do these horrendous acts.
Right.
And so, therefore, it was no longer the authoritarian personality.
But what it was was the beginning to realize how human behavior can be manipulated.
And then the power of the technology, which has increased in experimentation with drugs, with MKUltra, with various mind control programs, with various narratives.
Bernays, I knew.
I spent time with Bernays.
I had dinner with Bernays.
You said that, yeah.
What was your...
Well, I mean, I understood Bernays.
I mean, I knew what he was talking about.
It was obvious what he was talking about, and he was on to something.
But what Bernays had, to a certain extent...
Was he believed he could use these techniques, you know, for good?
And so he participated in the, you know, in Guatemala, overthrowing the Guatemalian elected leaders who were trying to return land to the people that this banana company wanted to keep for itself.
And so Bernays, that was Bernays as he was older.
And he was a brilliant man, but I mean, I understood him right away.
What he was saying was obvious to me.
And the fact that these manipulations were psychologically possible and that, you know, you could challenge whether or not reality exists at all in postmodernism, unless you invent it.
I mean, I'd read Wittgenstein.
I'd read many of these things in college or before college.
And so therefore, Wittgenstein, who started out to find the definitive logic and ended up with subjective reality so that his Tractatus is very different than his later philosophic investigations in which he's lost this idea There are a group of propositions that can be identified which define reality.
He abandoned that project and he then devolved into this, you know, subjective perception of investigation of reality.
And he became, you know, increasingly lost in that.
Right.
And so, therefore, reading Wittgenstein is, I think, very important to see the progression from traditional logic, which demands objective reality, into this postmodernism that Wittgenstein ultimately helped to create.
Now, his experiences in World War I, which, again, were insanity, It drove many of these people into questioning whether or not there was God, whether or not there was meaning, whether or not there was good.
And when the Nazis came along, John Foster Dulles and his brother Alan Dulles, who had the State Department and the CIA under Eisenhower, were immediately drawn to fascism.
As was Prescott Bush, father of George H.W. Bush, who ran a Nazi bank until FDR shut it down after Pearl Harbor.
They all thought that this was the creation of an ideological driven state that would demand democracy.
Those are the Dulles' right there.
And of course, they didn't believe in the Constitution or human rights or God or any of the others.
They believed in their own power.
They wanted to become the gods themselves.
Well, they're dead and people don't remember who they are.
And so where did it achieve them?
And that's the point here, is that when you go back through all the insane dictators, all the insane ideologies in the history of the world, and postmodernism and this evolution of Marxism or cultural Maoism, which is the You know, this societal-wide insanity in which the subjective becomes terrorized.
I mean, that book that I've written is my second in this trilogy.
First, it's about energy, global warming, and climate change.
The third will be on transhumanism and...
We're talking about artificial intelligence and perpetual life extension.
These are themes that I think will take some effort to read.
We did a show on it.
I thought you did a fantastic job with it.
Well, it's going to be, I think, an enduring book that will probably be more read after I'm gone and people are ready to understand the concepts here.
Because it's not easy and it's not fun reading all these people.
I mean, I could pull any one of these postmodern books off the shelf and read you a paragraph and you won't know what they're talking about because they all invent their own language.
They do all, yeah, they all invent their own language.
Well, a lot of postmodernism is kind of, I would say, an extension of Hegel and Heidegger, and both of them created their own language.
And it was in German to begin with, so it's not even English, but even in German, it's their own jargon was completely created.
Yeah, I think that German uniquely lent itself to it because of the structure of German.
You know, you could have these compound words and you could have, you know, the being in time.
Right.
That's not normal English construction.
You know, you could have being in time as an entity.
This entity was one being in time.
It was not being in time.
And then the German then negates it all.
So German is one of these highly technical languages that is very, very intricately meshed with concepts bound together.
And the binding together of these concepts leads to constructs of thought.
are unique to thinkers like Kant or Hegel or Marx himself.
And they all write in the same, or Heidegger.
And they all write in the same bizarre, this mega, these words are, you know, compound word reality.
Compound, as opposed to the French, they're fundamentally different when you start reading Rousseau, or you're reading, you know, any of the French writers, or the modern French writers, like, like, you know, Baudrillard is probably my least favorite.
But all of these sartre, you know, these coffee, you know, they see them sitting in the cafes of Paris sipping their little espresso for 14 hours smoking cigarettes.
And what they're doing is they're contemplating, you know, existentialism.
Existentialism, yes.
They have all these grandiose ideas with a French twist to it.
It's got the combination of sex and lust and being and experience and just having coffee all afternoon and intellectualizing.
It's very intellectualized.
German is not intellectualized.
German is mechanical.
It's mechanical.
Yeah, well, I think, you know, when I read both of them, they both have a framework of Gnosticism embedded.
At least that's how I personally read it.
The difference with the French, I agree with you.
It's more of a, I don't mean this to sound patronizing, but it's more of like whining about their Gnostic, you know, Yeah.
Exactly.
Mechanical.
And that's what Hegel actually said.
He said he rejected both Kant and Plato's notion of the dialectic because they were too abstract, they were too intellectual and lofty, and he wanted something that was a scientific method to advance the historicity of man.
I mean, I'm obviously translating and paraphrasing, but that's essentially what he said.
Whereas, you know, Sartre is, you know, everything is, you know, what a pity it is.
How we're suffering, you know.
It's whining.
Etangé, the stranger.
You read a little...
Camus.
Camus.
And, you know, these guys are like wounded puppies.
Yes.
And they feel sorry for themselves.
Yes.
And they can't understand why the world hasn't treated them better.
Yes.
You know, and they do this over coffee and cigarettes and thinking about sex with somebody else's spouse.
Yep.
Poor them.
They're the victims.
And, you know, and in the meantime, the sun goes up and goes down and they do it all over again the next day and don't get anywhere.
Right.
So therefore, you know, these are fundamentally different.
And I look at the philosophies that come out of it as having a lot to do with the cultures and the language.
Latin was probably the best language for...
Truly, you know, thinking about a system that has right and wrong, that works and doesn't work, you know, because...
Well, it's rooted, I mean, it is the root of etymology, so it's more of a, it gives you the puzzle pieces in order to build critical thinking, because you're putting it together rather than projecting onto something.
And it's very structured, it's very structured.
The verbs are conjugated in a certain way, and the The nouns are declined in a certain way, and the structures that form can be very elegant, but yet there are definite rules to Latin that are precise.
Greek, a little bit less so.
I was thinking Greek is similar that way.
Greek is similar, but Greek has an optative and subjective.
They can only be told whether it's wishing or it's could be.
Wanting it to be is the optative.
You have a desire for it to be this way.
Subjective is hypothetical.
It could be.
The forms of the verbs are identical.
You have to tell them apart by context.
So Greek has got a more of a fluidity to it.
Latin doesn't have an optative voice.
It has no optative.
Okay, so in Latin, there is no wishing it to be something.
Latin is, it is or it isn't.
It may be, it is or it isn't.
It has only voices that are either, you know, Active voice, which, you know, it's either it is this way or it might be this way or it will be this way or it used to be this way.
They're very time-oriented and whether it's possible or real.
I think that's why they took it out of schools.
Sorry, I didn't mean to cut you off.
So to go back to the kind of wrap up on the theme here, What fascinated me and what drew me, I think, probably, and the more I think about it, the more I realize that this is one of the reasons I was drawn to these algorithms in voting, is I consider it to be the final postmodern statement on voting are algorithms.
And I've been trying to explain that.
In the video, if you go to God's Five Stones, even more than my substack, which is with the 501c3, God's G-O-D, no apostrophe S, and you spell out 5-F-I-V-E-S-T-O-N-E-S, you can put that site up because that's where we're archiving all this material on the...
So if you take a look at that site, there's a great deal of material on there and a lot of videos that I've been doing.
We'll put this video up there.
That'll be archived as well.
But again, this is a...
God's five stones, you said?
Yeah, G-O-D-S, but no apostrophe.
Five spelled out, F-I-V-E-S-T-O-N-E-S, plural, dot com.
That's the David and Goliath, the five smooth stones that David picked up on his way to kill Goliath, which were the right five stones that God selected for him to do the job.
So this is among picking the right five stones to expose the algorithms that are in voting.
And how far we'll get with it, how much we'll be able to convince people, is I don't know.
But I mean, I struggle with it because I keep trying to think, you know, we get suppressed, we get censored.
But the algorithms are there because they're mathematical formulas and we show you how they work so they can't be denied.
It's like...
You know, you see how the magic trick is done.
Well, you know that that's the logic to the magic trick.
So here when we show you the number schemes and the various ciphers that are used to create these codes, and we show you that they are in the databases, people want to say, oh, it's imaginary.
Well, it's not.
And we're not getting attacked on that basis.
The main thing to do is to try to ignore us.
Sure.
Because they know that we're right and they know they can't defeat this.
But yet they want to say, well, you know, we're all tired of all the challenges to voting have failed.
The courts have not gotten anywhere.
You know, the courts won't hear the cases.
And people are getting sued for defamation.
And it's the people who brought forward the truth who are getting punished.
Well, all these things discourage people from wanting to pursue this.
And the fatigue sets in.
Right.
Right.
But we're going to continue it, and we're going to continue showing how to try to prevent it from happening, because if they steal this election, we're on a path to nuclear war, and it will probably not be reversible.
So I have just two questions for you, and we can close out.
So you say when the intelligence agencies are running our election, what do you see as being the intelligence apparatus?
And why would our own intelligence agencies want to interfere?
Well, they are using this neo-Marxism, communism, as a destructive element to destroy the family, to break up society, to create confusion.
Once the New World Order crowd takes over, they will have no use for the critical gender crowd.
They'll be immediately eliminated and put in concentration camps because they aren't going to want any more disruption.
Just like the Nazis did, they'll institutionalize Homosexuality and pedophilia, both female and male forms of it.
And there are both.
And so therefore, it'll be the butch homosexuals, which is the other version of homosexuality, and they'll war against each other, but it'll be institutionalized.
And at that point, the woke will be eliminated, and And the New World Order will take over, and they will be the true censors, the true eugenicists.
I mean, this is just a form of, you know, this is Nazism on steroids.
Like Jim Mars said, we've become the Fourth Reich.
And we have become the Fourth Reich.
Jim was right.
And I agreed with him when we talked about it.
You know, he's passed on, but I've spent time with Jim Mars and agreed with him.
Operation Paperclip.
We brought the Nazis here.
We institutionalized it.
And so the intelligence agencies are headed toward control.
And they want to run the show.
They don't need government.
They don't need voters.
They don't need people.
Do you see them as just our, or do you see it as a broader apparatus?
I think they're all in it together.
I think they're using the same schemes of elections in Europe.
They're using the same schemes in Venezuela.
You know, they've invented these schemes, they share them, and so therefore they are, in fact, the intelligence agencies will want to rule the world and they will want to be the surveillance technologies so that the NSA will be our new opticon from, you know, an opticon.
If you go back to, you know, the original kinds of ideas of the all-knowing, all-seeing Intelligence.
Right.
And so, therefore, we will all be in prison.
And that's Jim Mars.
He was a great guy.
Very brilliant.
And he and I were both fascinated with the Kennedy assassination because we both saw it as the ultimate intelligence operation.
Yeah.
Where they killed Kennedy and lied about it and got away with it.
Right.
We both saw it as symbolic of everything else.
You know, why do buildings that were not hit by the airplanes come down in 9-11?
You know, why does it look like a controlled blast?
Yeah.
Where the buildings come down?
You know, why did we invade the road?
Why did Building 7 go down?
Why do we invade Iraq and not find any weapons of mass destruction?
I thought Colin Powell told us they were going to be there.
Why do we have a bad flu that becomes a pandemic?
We have to lock down society.
And then we have a vaccine that doesn't prevent you from getting the disease.
In fact, the vaccine might kill you.
And so therefore, the lies, the constructed realities, the audacity of the intelligence agencies to think that they can put us on a Truman show, where they're really running the reality, we think we're living the reality, we're just living their play.
We're just actors on their play, and we don't realize it.
And that's what I'm trying to expose is what I've been trying to expose.
And ultimately, I think it fails.
I think ultimately, these people produce such horrors that no one would want to live in the societies they want to create.
They don't want to live.
They're creating the societies for you to live in.
Yeah.
They're going to be saved by the scientific arc, as Noah Harari says.
The privilege.
Yeah.
And all these systems create oligarchs.
Yes.
And perpetuate oligarchs that are in play, in existence currently, I think.
They're all lying.
They're all phonies.
They're all corrupt.
And I'm doing what I can to expose all that.
I appreciate that.
So my last question for you is just, what do you think, I know you said that bringing awareness to the sleight of hand so that the magic no longer, the spell no longer has effect, is part of your mission, which I greatly appreciate.
What do you think people can do?
How can we stop this election?
If we eliminated mail-in ballots, it would go a long way.
That's the fundamental.
Mail-in ballots were invented in order to create fraud.
Of course.
Okay, now the second thing you can do is you can take the poll observers and give them the power to sample mail-in votes before they're tabulated and go out and field survey to see if those people exist.
And you can begin throwing away mail-in ballots by the thousands once these challenges prove that You know, 50% of the mail-in ballots, there's nobody there.
Well, you know, throw half of them away.
Well, which half do you throw away?
Well, if you're going to throw away half, throw them all away.
Because you can't tell which half to throw away.
Right.
We have to be able to expose this.
The truth is the disinfectant.
The truth is the remedy.
And so you've got to get the truth so people see the truth.
And one way to do that is to be able to sample, go out and find these people, the mail-in votes, and see if they exist.
And when they don't exist, report that.
Okay, and so therefore, but I think in 2020, people missed the boat.
The boat was not just creating fake boats.
Fake boats that could be certified.
Right.
That's why it required the penetration of the state boat Databases, the Board of Election databases, they're putting in their ciphers and other cryptographic schemes so that you get non-existent voters, non-people, fictional entities.
They could get real voter IDs.
Once they got real voter IDs, now you had the ability to get certified voters.
Non-persons voting.
And that's what it took to really get a certifiable election that you controlled and obviously controlled through the mail-in voting system fraud.
Right.
So people need to get in to be poll watchers.
We need to get rid of the mail-in ballots.
And reinventing a system that's going to be legitimate to vote with You know, billions of people on the planet.
It's not going to be easy.
No.
But the technology does exist.
You miss a payment on a credit card, they sure find you pretty quick.
Right.
That's true.
That is true.
Do you think that they...
What do you foresee for the election?
Do you think that there...
It's still in play.
I think they're going to try to steal it.
I'm trying desperately to wake enough people up that can be prevented.
We still have a month to go.
The more effort that can be made to expose the truth here, the more likely we are to stop this.
Therefore, I'm trying to shine the light on the darkness.
We're trying to We're good to go.
Because we are catching on to them.
Sites like this, God's Five Stones, if you spend any time on this and start reading some of these papers, your mind's going to open up.
Or read that book I wrote on the Neo-Marxism.
It'll be difficult, but it's going to open your mind to the fact that they want us living in their fictional reality.
And so therefore, these are the tools to understand It's a very weak game.
It's a very silly game.
It's a very powerful game for them, as long as they aren't discovered.
Once they're discovered, they're weak and easily hunted down.
And it will fail because it is not in God's plan.
God did create this reality, and so therefore, this will lose.
God in the end will win, but there can be a judgment of God.
We may go through billions of people being killed in a nuclear war before we get there.
Well, I hope we avert that for sure.
Well, thank you so much.
I'm so grateful for the work you're doing and for all that you're doing to shine a light.
If you have anything else you want to add, please do and tell everybody where they can find you and we'll put all the links below.
Well, the Truth Central and Godspivestones.com is the one I want people mainly to go to right now.
