March 8, 2024 - The Truth Central - Dr. Jerome Corsi
01:01:08
Persecuted for Exposing Potential COVID Vaccine Dangers: Dr. Charles Hoffe's Story
On today's The Truth Central, Dr. Jerome Corsi talks with Dr. Charles Hoffe, who is fighting for his professional life after being persecuted for merely seeking to warn people about potential health hazards stemming from the COVID vaccines. "Do no harm" is an important tenet of the Hippocratic Oath, and Dr. Hoffe has been persecuted, chastised and had his career ruined for upholding that sacred promise.On April, 2021 Dr Charles Hoffe sent an open letter to the BC Provincial Health Officer, Dr Bonnie Henry, informing her of the injuries sustained by his own patients from the COVID vaccines, and questioning the ethics of continuing to administer a harmful vaccine. On May, 2021, the BC College of Physicians and Surgeons issued a statement warning doctors not to question the public health narrative, and that any doctors who did so, would be investigated and possibly disciplined. Dr Hoffe continued to be a vocal advocate for patient safety, medical ethics and the Hippocratic oath. In February, 2022, the College of Physicians and Surgeons of BC issued a citation against Dr Hoffe alleging that he “engaged in unprofessional conduct” and contravened the CMA Code of Ethics by raising questions with regard to vaccine injuries and early treatment. Dr. Hoffe goes in-depth with Dr. Corsi about what happened to him, why he kept fighting and how anyone can help him with his legal defense via GiveSendGo: https://www.givesendgo.com/GANZA (Dr. Hoffe's Legal Defense Fund.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-truth-central-with-dr-jerome-corsi--5810661/support.Join Dr. Jerome Corsi on Substack: https://jeromecorsiphd.substack.com/Visit The Truth Central website: https://www.thetruthcentral.comOUT NOW: Dr. Corsi's new book: The Truth About Neo-Marxism, Cultural Maoism and Anarchy.Pick up your copy today on Amazon: https://www.thetruthcentral.com/the-truth-about-neo-marxism-cultural-maoism-and-anarchy-exposing-woke-insanity-in-the-age-of-disinformation/Get your FREE copy of Dr. Corsi's new book with Swiss America CEO Dean Heskin, How the Coming Global Crash Will Create a Historic Gold Rush by calling: 800-519-6268Follow Dr. Jerome Corsi on X: @corsijerome1Our link to where to get the Marco Polo 650-Page Book on the Hunter Biden laptop & Biden family crimes free online:https://www.thetruthcentral.com/marco-polo-publishes-650-page-book-on-hunter-biden-laptop-biden-family-crimes-available-free-online/Our Sponsors:MyVitalC https://www.thetruthcentral.com/myvitalc-ess60-in-organic-olive-oil/Swiss America: https://www.swissamerica.com/offer/CorsiRMP.phpThe MacMillan Agency: https://www.thetruthcentral.com/the-macmillan-agency/Pro Rapid Review: https://prorrt.com/thetruthcentralmembers/
This is Jerome Corsi, and we have a special show today on TheTruthCentral.com.
This is Jerome Corsey and we have a special show today on the Truth Central dot com.
We're really honored to have with us Dr. Charles Hoff.
He's a South African trained family doctor and emergency room physician who moved to
Canada in 1990.
Bye.
He's worked in a small rural community of Lytton, British Columbia since 1990.
And about 70% of his patients are Canadian Native Indians.
Now, within three months of the start of the COVID rollout, there was a significant safety signal In the form of large life-threatening blood clots from the AstraZeneca vaccine.
So by mid-March 2021, 12 countries in Europe had shut down the AstraZeneca shot for COVID-19.
However, despite the strenuous safety signals in Europe, Canada continued to administer the AstraZeneca vaccine.
So, Dr. Hoff sent an email to 18 medical colleagues in his area who were directly involved in the vaccine rollout.
He questioned the ethics of continuing to administer a treatment that had evidence of serious harm in view of the fact that the recovery rate of COVID was approximately the same as the seasonal flu.
He warned that there was a personal liability issue if doctors administered a medical treatment without warning the patients of the risk to them.
And one of those colleagues sent the email to the Regional Health Authority, three days after Dr. Hoff received a reprimand, where he was warned that he was not allowed to say anything negative about the COVID vaccines in the course of his work in the emergency room.
In addition to this gag order, he was informed that a counter-complaint was being filed with the College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia, as he was putting patients at risk by creating vaccine hesitancy.
He was further told that if he had any questions about the vaccines, that they must be addressed not to his colleagues, but to the local medical health officer in charge of the vaccine rollout for that area.
So, Dr. Hoff, this was the beginning of your problems.
And it started all there, right?
It all started there, by literally just questioning the safety.
And what was your concern, I mean, at that time?
Well, my concern was that vaccines are not a treatment for a disease.
Vaccines are a medical treatment given to healthy people to keep them healthy.
And so there should be literally a zero tolerance for doctors making healthy people sick.
And so that was my concern.
These people were They were terrified of this virus because they watched their television, and so they thought it was a really, really dangerous virus.
We knew at that point it wasn't.
The recovery rate was about the same as the flu, and there was evidence of harm.
And so that was my concern, is that the authorities were ignoring the safety signal.
And so you sent out this warning, and emailed 18 colleagues, and then why don't you give us a narrative of what happened after that?
Yeah, well, as you mentioned, I got this reprimand.
I was told that if I had any questions, I should not be talking to my colleagues, and that I needed to be speaking to the medical health officer in charge of this vaccine rollout, who had all the answers.
So, I had actually been away for a couple of months just before that and I just got back to my medical practice and as people started coming into my office, I started discovering what these shots had been doing to them.
And initially, they were all neurological problems.
These were people with either pain, weakness, altered sensation, some kind of neurological loss of function and everyone was different.
There was no pattern to it.
It was and all of them had started in every case within 72 hours of their shot.
And so I sent a letter off to that medical health officer to ask her what the mechanism of injury was.
In other words, what is the diagnosis?
what is the disease process that these injections is creating?
And because as their doctor, I needed to know how to treat it.
And I had no idea because I didn't even know what the diagnosis was.
So I sent this letter to her to ask her these questions.
And of course, I got no reply because they deny that these things could be even from the shots.
But there was no other explanation.
So when I got no reply from her, and day by day, I was seeing more and more VAX injured people.
And at this point, these people had had their shot three months
before, and I'd been away.
And so these were not transient things that just go away in a couple of days.
These were enduring Neurological deficits that I was seeing.
And so then I sent an open letter to Dr. Bonnie Henry, who is our provincial health officer, and I sent it as an open letter where I gave the number of people vaccinated, the number of vaccine injuries, so that you can see at the rate of vaccination.
And I pointed out to her That at that point in the pandemic, and we were probably 16 months into the pandemic at that point, we had not had one single person in our community need any medical care for COVID whatsoever.
But I now had all of these people with serious harm from the vaccine.
So I pointed out that in my firsthand experience as a family doctor, these shots were more dangerous than COVID.
And that, of course, really antagonized the authorities.
I mean, that's remarkable.
You were saying, you write about, that these injuries were all kinds of pain in the head, the neck, the face, limbs, chest.
Yes.
And a tingling, a sense of tingling, or like electric shocks or burning?
That's exactly it.
All of those things.
All of those things.
And some people with just weakness.
And the odd thing about the weaknesses was it was bilateral.
It wasn't like a stroke where you get weakness just on one side of the body.
It was a symmetrical weakness on both sides, which therefore implied that something had damaged their spinal cord for it to be symmetrical weakness.
And as I say, every patient was different, so there was no pattern to it.
And you were just really trying to find an answer to... Correct.
What to do with these people.
Exactly.
I mean, as their family doctor, they come to me and say, this is what I'm experiencing, please can you help me?
And I had no idea how to help them.
So, what happened to the letter that you wrote?
It was an open letter, so it could be read.
What happened to the letter?
Well, that letter went global.
I mean, it literally went viral, and I know that's a bit of a, you know, with a viral pandemic, that's a bit clichéd, but it really did.
Because I was, I described the injuries, I described the rate of injuries, And I mentioned in the letter that at that point, they were all neurological problems in the first, I think, six that I saw were all nerve-related problems, and they were all from the Moderna vaccine.
And so at that point, I don't believe any other doctors had been reporting neurological problems from Moderna.
And so this captured the attention of doctors for COVID ethics in Europe, Well, they're an international group, and many others who were very intrigued by this, especially as I was able to give numbers, I was able to give the rates, because I knew how many people were vaccinated.
And so, yeah, it attracted a lot of attention, but also brought me into a lot of trouble.
What was the rate of the neurological problems?
I think at that point, I think it was 1 in 225, at that point.
1 in 225 at that point.
OK, and then a couple of weeks after that, a vaccine injured patient came into the emergency room.
Why don't you describe what happened?
Yeah, well, so I had this gag order that I wasn't allowed to say anything negative about these vaccines in the emergency room.
And so it was a Saturday evening.
I was actually on call for the emergency room because, you know, it's a small town, low volume emergency room.
So I was actually at home having dinner with some friends.
I wasn't in the emergency room and the nurse phoned me up to say this person had come in and I knew who the person was because I know everybody in this community.
I'm the only doctor here.
So, I said to the nurse, that patient and her whole family all had COVID five weeks ago.
And for the whole lot of them, it was a trivial illness.
It really was nothing serious.
And now she's got this vaccine injury that she was still suffering from quite significantly seven days later.
And this patient came in because she thought there must be something wrong.
She had been told that COVID was this terrifying killer disease.
And that the vaccine would keep her safe.
But COVID was no issue to her.
But the vaccine had made her very much more sick.
And so she thought something had gone wrong.
And so she came into the ER.
And anyway, I discussed it with the nurse.
And I told the nurse, that patient has natural immunity.
The fact that her COVID illness was minor, showed that she had natural immunity.
And in fact, you know, there was a really important scientific study that had already been released.
It was released in, I think, June or July of 2020, where researchers at Duke University in Singapore Who wanted to find out how long natural immunity against a SARS virus would last.
To know, is it durable immunity?
And so they tracked down people who had had the first SARS virus.
Do you remember there was also a SARS 1 came out of Wuhan in 2002 and 2003.
And so, these researchers, and most of it was in the Far East, so Singapore was well situated to find people who had recovered from that.
And so, they tracked down people who had recovered from that virus and asked them if they could take blood from them to see if they were still immune to that virus 18 years later.
And they found that they were.
18 months?
No, this was in 2002.
Okay.
That SARS-1 came out in 2003, and now they were doing this in 2020.
Got it.
So, they could see that their natural immunity lasted at least 17 or 18 years, and they still had it.
And not only that, They noted that, well, then they checked those people's T-cell immunity to see if they would be immune to COVID.
And they found they were.
In other words, if you were immune to the first SARS virus, you would be immune to the second.
And so, the relevance of that is that those two viruses, if you look at their DNA, are 20% different.
They're quite significantly different.
Yet, their natural immunity was broad enough to cover both.
So, it was durable and it was broad.
And I explained this to the nurse and I said, this is a durable, broad, natural immunity.
At that point, the most different that any variant had been from the original Wuhan strain was less than 1% different.
So, I said, if it can protect you against a virus that is 20% different, it's going to have no problem with any variant that comes along from this SARS-CoV-2.
And so I said, you know, on the basis of this and on the basis of the fact that this patient's COVID illness was trivial, please tell this person she does not need her second shot.
She has natural immunity.
And on the basis of me telling the nurse that I was fired from the ER, I had been an ER physician for 30 years with not one single patient complaint against me in those 30 years.
And yet I was fired on the spot For saying that someone with natural immunity to a disease didn't need to be vaccinated against that disease.
How were you fired on the spot?
What happened?
Well, I received... So, obviously, you know, the nurses do a sort of a report to their supervisor at the end of their shift, where they sort of talk about what cases they dealt with and what they did.
So, this nurse just happened to mention... So, in fact, when I told this nurse that this person doesn't need a second shot, she said she's not allowed to tell anyone that they don't need a vaccine.
She's not allowed to.
And so I said, OK, that's fine.
I'll just I'll tell the patient.
And so obviously this nurse.
Relayed this conversation to whoever her supervisor was,
who then relayed this to the people who had given me the gag order,
who who interpreted this as as saying negative things
about the vaccine by saying that somebody with natural immunity
That's what they took that at.
I mean, clearly they were looking for something to take me down on.
It was a witch hunt.
Well, but, I mean, you were right.
If they had natural immunity, why take another vaccine?
Correct.
But this wasn't about science.
This was politics.
So they wanted to vaccinate people who didn't need it?
Correct.
Correct.
And with all the vax mandates here in Canada, they did not recognize natural immunity at all.
It didn't matter.
Even people that did blood tests that showed they had natural immunity, they would not accept that.
You had to have the vaccine.
There was no excuses.
Okay, so they were determined to vaccinate everybody.
You were fired for practicing medicine legitimately.
What was the impact on your income?
Well, so I had a private practice, but about 50% of my work was in the emergency room, and about 50% of my income.
So, I instantly lost half my income.
Fortunately, I still did have a medical license, and so I was literally banned from that ER.
I wasn't even allowed to speak to the nurses.
And they threatened me with legal action if I even spoke to them.
They were very aggressive and extremely unreasonable.
So, I was still able to work in my private practice.
And so, I still had the questions about how do I treat these VAX injured people because I didn't know what the vaccine was doing to them to cause all these problems.
I was starting to see people with pulmonary problems, people with reduced effort tolerance, people who could previously walk a long distance and suddenly couldn't do more than a quarter of a mile and they were spent.
I had people that would walk three miles to my office every week for injections for Various kinds of arthritis and things, and so they were regular walkers, and suddenly, after a quarter of a mile, they were done, just from their COVID shot.
And so, these were the things I was seeing, and a variety of others.
Of course, the strokes started, and the Bell's palsies, and other things, but that's what I saw early on.
Okay, so you're in your private practice, your letter's gone public in Europe, And doctors start to contact you.
What happens?
Well, so they were very intrigued to, to ask for me to tell them exactly what I was seeing because the media, of course, wouldn't report any of this.
And so I, um, I explained to them precisely what I was seeing.
And so through doctors for COVID ethics, um, they had a, a brilliant scientist and a doctor there.
He had retired professor Sucharit Bagdhi.
Who is very intrigued by this and we had some wonderful discussions on their weekly zoom meetings and so it had been revealed.
Dr. Byron Bridle, who's a Canadian scientist, doctor, had got the Pfizer biodistribution study translated from Japanese into English, which revealed that Pfizer knew that this vaccine does not stay in your arm.
It goes intravenous very rapidly.
And so, once we knew that there was certainty that it went intravenous, we knew that those little lipid nanocapsules were going to be absorbed into the lining of the blood vessels.
And of course, where most absorption happens is in capillary networks, because that's where the blood slows right down.
And so we realized then that the way the vaccine works is you've got these little RNA genetic strands wrapped up in a little package, a little lipid package that gets absorbed through the cell lining into the cell.
Once it's in the cell, it releases the RNA and the ribosomes then are able to read that genetic code and make the protein, which was the spike protein.
And so all of these spike proteins were therefore going to be made in the vascular endothelium.
That's the cells around the blood vessels.
So because that spike protein becomes part of the cell wall, that was part of its design,
that's how it's gonna make antibodies against COVID.
The spike, which is a foreign protein, sticks out of the cell wall and your immune cells
therefore recognize this as a foreign protein and generate an antibody against it.
The problem is, if where that is happening is in the lining of blood vessels,
and now you've got spikes that are literally jutting into your blood vessels,
it is absolutely inevitable that blood clots will form.
Because the whole purpose of a blood platelet is to recognize a damaged vessel, which is a rough spot.
It recognizes the rough spot and it causes a clot to stop that damaged vessel from bleeding.
That's why you don't bleed to death when you cut yourself, it stops after a little while,
because your platelets recognize the damaged vessel.
So we then surmised that it was inevitable with the mechanism, just understanding this vaccine,
that micro-clotting was going to happen in capillary networks.
And, of course, the micro-clots would be too small to see on a scan, and they would be scattered.
So, they would be microscopic and scattered, so you couldn't just do a scan of a certain part of a body and see if these were there, because they'd be too small and too scattered.
And this would also explain why every person's vaccine injury seemed to be different.
Different parts of the body, different symptoms, different effects.
It fitted with this idea that it goes everywhere and so it can affect you literally anywhere.
And so I started doing this blood test called a D-dimer test, which is a blood test that just looks for new clots.
It's called a fibrin D-dimer, and it's only positive if you've had a recent blood clot.
So, the idea from Suture-Bhakti, and I decided to run with this, was to find people who were about to have their COVID shot and ask them if I could monitor their injection.
They would take a blood test for a D-dimer, just before their shot and do a second one a week later and
see what the difference was.
So that I literally had a control group. Each patient was their own control. We had a before
and after measurement. And so that's what I started doing.
And so, and unfortunately, the majority of the patients I got had already had their
shot, but I said, oh, that's okay.
Let's just still do the D-dimer as long as you're within eight days.
Let's do it and see if your D-dimer is normal or elevated.
When I literally had got the first eight people's blood work back, and five out of the eight had elevated D-dimers, which works out a 62% rate of clotting, I was horrified.
And, you know, initially, I had planned to get a large sample.
I had wanted other doctors from around the world to be doing the same thing, that we could pool all our data and do this as a really solidly well-done scientific study that we could publish.
But when I found that literally I was from the first eight, five had evidence of clotting.
And the relevance is that these were not vaccine injured people.
These were people who thought their shot was doing no harm, that it was keeping them safe.
And yet they had evidence of micro clotting.
And so I was so horrified by this.
Because I take my Hippocratic Oath pretty seriously, that doctors should do no harm.
So I had an interview coming up and people were always asking me, what was I seeing in my patients?
And I said, well, this is what I'm seeing in my patients.
And I spilled the beans on this.
And so tragically, just over a week, I think it was nine days after that interview, because this of course went viral immediately, this was a significant safety signal.
And anyway, we had this firestorm in our town.
This was not a forest fire.
It was not a wildfire.
It was a very strange fire that started on a very windy day, right on the edge of town, upwind of the town, and just blast through that town.
And literally, one of my patients had told me that from the first sign of smoke, To the point that the entire town was engulfed in flame was 23 minutes.
It was a terrifying firestorm.
And I was in my office seeing patients and we just had to flee.
It was very ferocious.
And so it annihilated my office, the emergency room where I had been fired from, the lab, everything.
It was just wiped out.
Well, first of all, it reminds me of the fire that occurred in Hawaii recently.
Very similar.
A lot of similarities.
This is not a natural kind of fire.
You know, it's an interesting thing.
Some people had noticed in that fire there in Maui that buildings that had a light blue roof didn't burn.
And they'd asked me, so there were three houses that survived in my town.
And somebody asked me, did any of them have a light blue roof?
And I said, yes, that's very intriguing.
Yes, one of them does.
The house and the garage, all the buildings in this one house has this light blue roof.
And I said, what made you think that?
They said, well, that's what people noticed in Maui.
It's remarkable.
And so your entire medical facility was destroyed.
Your lab where the blood tests were done, everything was gone.
Yes.
Well, how could you practice medicine now?
Well, so I lost all of my equipment.
I had bedside ultrasound.
I had all sorts of stuff that I had bought.
Unfortunately, I had no insurance on it because I didn't think it needed to be insured.
It wasn't my building.
The building belongs to the health region and I just was a tenant.
So and it was a very new building only about 10 years old.
It had, you know, all that met all the fire codes and sprinkler systems and, and all of that.
So I really didn't see any need to have fire insurance.
I thought there's no chance this is going to burn.
So anyway, I lost Everything, even my stethoscope.
I literally, but fortunately, when I left my office, when we were evacuating, I grabbed my laptop.
I grabbed all of my D-dimer patient information so that I had that.
And I grabbed, I had been making duplicates of some of the patient files about the vaccine injuries.
So I still had all that information.
And that was the only thing I saved was that evidence of harm.
Yeah, I lost everything.
I mean, that's just lucky that you did that.
I mean, we're able to do that.
This could have destroyed everything you had, including your scientific evidence of the vaccine danger and the vaccine injuries.
Yes, yeah.
So, I was glad I preserved that.
Well, yes, you're very fortunate, but I mean, if this was an intentional some kind of attack, you've been fired from your job, now your office burns down, And you could have lost all your test results.
You could have been out of luck.
I could have been.
I certainly could have.
Yeah.
Because I still, I still had paper records.
I, I was a bit mistrustful of digital stuff because of, of how easily they can be hacked and people can use ransomware and lock you out and all that sort of stuff.
And so, so I thought that having things on paper, nobody can hack them or, Sabotage them, but obviously I didn't think of fire.
And so that's what happened.
Well, these 15 patients have been vaccinated and eight revealed evidence of clotting.
I mean, then, if these people continue to get new shots, would that accumulate?
Would they be more and more subject to damage?
Well, they would, because, you know, a clotted vessel is permanently damaged.
If it's a larger vessel, it can open up somewhat, but in tiny capillaries, they're likely to be permanently blocked. And so, so clotting causes permanent
damage, which is why people, you know, who have a deep vein thrombosis in their leg, usually their
leg remains swollen for the rest of their life, it'll never be back to the same, it'll never
be back to exactly the same as the other one. And so, so blood clots, so the relevance of
these, of what I found with the clotting is firstly, the clots were not rare.
It was more than 50%.
Secondly, clots cause permanent damage.
And the third thing is, it will accumulate with every shot.
And so, here in Canada, Justin Trudeau bought enough of these COVID shots to have nine each, for every man, woman and child in Canada to have nine injections.
And I think at that point, he'd only bought enough for six each, but they clearly were planning to do a lot of shots.
And so the fact that the damage is permanent, and it accumulates, and it is not rare, is very significant.
And that's really what my very simple research established.
I mean, this eventually could kill a lot of people.
Oh yeah, absolutely.
And so, of my VAX injured patients, I would say, so these people are now three years since their vaccine injury.
And I would say only a half of them now have no symptoms.
Most of them have permanent damage.
Permanent deficits are literally permanently harmed by it.
It's amazing.
I mean, so you eventually caught on to the idea of ivermectin.
Yes.
And what happened with that?
I've always had a very inquiring mind, and so I'm always looking for evidence and for new and better ways of doing things.
As a doctor, we are trained in evidence-based medicine.
We've got to have evidence to support what we do.
But medicine and science is never just settled.
It's because we always only know part of the information.
So we've got to keep looking for new and better ways of doing things.
And so, of course, public health had told people that COVID not only is this terrifying killer disease, but there is no treatment.
There's nothing to keep you out of hospital.
Your only hope is the shots.
And I didn't accept that.
That that could be true.
And so I was watching people like Dr. Peter McCulloch, and the FLCCC, Pierre Khoury, and Paul Merrick, and I was listening to what they were saying, and I was listening to others, Dr. Zelenko, and people from around the world, because I was, as a doctor, people would look to me to say, doctor, please help me, what do I do?
And so I was, initially prescribing ivermectin because there was good
evidence that it was effective.
It had an amazing safety record.
It was literally probably one of the safest medications ever discovered.
And it had good evidence that it was quite uniquely situated in helping COVID
because it literally clamped, it literally bound that spike protein,
which was what was causing all the harm.
And so I was telling people that that is what they needed to do.
And of course, the public health was really trying to vilify ivermectin, trying to claim that it was dangerous, and that there was no evidence that it was effective.
And In British Columbia, where I practice, the College of Physicians and Surgeons literally banned doctors from prescribing Ivermectin for COVID.
Ivermectin is a licensed prescription medication in Canada, and I was allowed to prescribe it for any other condition except COVID.
It was safe for anything else but not COVID.
COVID, which of course is logically absurd.
And so because there's really no other medication that could do what ivermectin did in terms of reducing, especially microclotting, which is one of the problems with the COVID pneumonia, those spike proteins in the lungs cause microclotting in the lungs.
And that's why people with COVID pneumonia have such low oxygen levels.
And ivermectin literally was able to To bind onto those spike proteins to stop that micro-clotting and people's oxygen levels would dramatically improve in a short space of time.
And so, because I was banned from prescribing Ivermectin, the only thing I could do for my patients to tell them that they had to use the non-prescription Ivermectin, which was veterinary Ivermectin.
And so here in Canada, it's literally Ivermectin in water.
It's a pure solution of Ivermectin that you draw up with a syringe and you give it to your animal, squirt it in its mouth, but it's very pure.
Literally, it's made in Calgary and Alberta.
And so that's what I was telling people, use the solution.
If you can't get the pills, use the solution.
And so, of course, they were very upset with me telling people to use veterinary products, but it's exactly the same compound.
It's just in a different medium.
You know, if you use penicillin for your horse, it's the same drug.
It's still penicillin.
The fact that you give it to a horse doesn't mean to say it's not safe for people.
It's the same drug.
Same formulation.
Exactly, exactly.
It's just in a different delivery system.
So the state then started vaccinating children.
Yes.
But was there any risk to children?
Well, there was almost no risk to children from COVID.
In fact, in this entire pandemic, we have not had one single healthy child under the age of 16 die of COVID.
Not one.
There have been some that have died with COVID.
These were usually patients with very advanced disease from usually cancer or other things that have then got a positive PCR test at the time that they died.
But they didn't die from COVID.
They died because they had a terminal illness of some other kind.
So when they were And here in Canada, the Pfizer and Moderna shots are authorized from the age of six months upwards.
And they're literally, we're advising parents that your children really need to be vaccinated.
And we're telling them also that by your child getting vaccinated, it'll keep you safe and your grandparents safe and the teachers safe.
Which was absurd because they knew very well that the vaccine didn't stop infection or transmission, but they were using these just as fear, just fear to do this.
And of course, it's now being shown as studies from Switzerland and another study from Taiwan that showed that the myocarditis rate in adolescent males is terrible.
I think it's one in, One in 30 get, and the majority have asymptomatic myocarditis.
So there is no benefit to children getting this vaccine because it's, COVID's no risk to them, but terrible risk of permanent heart damage and a multitude of other things, you know, fertility, And everything else.
But of course, in these young athletes and that sort of thing, it was just devastating that they would prevent these children from playing sport or from enrolling in university or education unless they would get these shots with enormous safety signals that they would just turn a blind eye.
They wouldn't acknowledge them.
So you began going on a speaking tour to get around Western Canada?
Yes.
And what was your goal?
Well, I knew that the media was not being honest, that the media was just spreading fear of the virus, and was vilifying the unvaccinated.
You know, they were saying that the unvaccinated were spreaders of disease, and that this was a pandemic of the unvaccinated, and that these people We're putting other people at risk.
And they were refusing to publish anything about the vaccine injuries.
And so I realized that if the media will not protect the public, then I as a doctor have a duty to protect the public.
And so I linked up with another family doctor here in British Columbia, Dr. Stephen Malthouse, and he and I toured around British Columbia.
We went through Alberta into Saskatchewan, literally doing town hall meetings.
Well, in parts of this pandemic, they didn't allow town hall meetings, so some of our meetings were outside in the cold.
You know, it would be, you know, minus 8 or 10 Celsius, freezing cold, sub-zero temperatures, and these hardy Canadians would stand there for two hours in the ice and snow, listen to us present the evidence of harm.
And So, this obviously antagonized the authorities a lot, that I was contradicting the safe and effective narrative by telling people firsthand what these shots did to my patients, and to warn them about the risks to children, both the myocarditis risk and fertility risks.
So, how did the College of Physicians and Surgeons react?
I didn't respond well to my gag order because it was just wrong.
When a doctor is told they're not allowed to question the safety of a vaccine and they're not allowed to say anything negative about it, that is blatantly dishonest because then there's no informed consent.
So the college then issued this citation against me, which was basically an announcement that they were going to bring me to trial.
That they were going to that I was a spreader of misinformation that I have put the public at risk.
By spreading misinformation about COVID and about the COVID vaccines and for saying that ivermectin is a safe and effective treatment for COVID.
And so that trial was supposed to have started on the 4th of March, but was adjourned because what they are now doing, and this is the College of Physicians and Surgeons, they are asking for something called judicial notice.
And this basically, if this is granted, It completely blocks me from being able to defend myself.
They're asking this disciplinary panel that is employed by the college to discipline me to take judicial notice of the stated facts of the public health, which are things like the vaccine is safe and effective.
The ivermectin, they would say there's no evidence that ivermectin is either safe or effective for preventing or treating COVID.
So, you know, these are some of the examples of their facts.
So they've got a whole list of these facts.
And if they grant judicial notice to these facts, it basically prevents me or any of the expert witnesses that I have recruited to support what I've said, to give expert testimony about what I've said.
It blocks them.
It blocks all that evidence.
And so this would then literally just become a kangaroo court where it's just rigged.
You can't defend yourself.
And so that's where we are at the moment, is my lawyer is working on a response to try and confront this effort by the college to block the evidence from being submitted.
But you've got evidence that these COVID injections cause microclots, they cause neurological injuries, infertility, myocarditis, and death.
Yeah.
You've had 32 vaccinated patients in your practice.
And some have actually died and some more remain disabled by their injuries as they received over three years ago.
Is that all correct?
That is correct.
That is correct.
But every one of your attempts to report the vaccine injuries have been blocked by the medical health authorities.
That is correct.
I was actually put in touch with a vaccine safety specialist after my open letter, who absolutely insisted that none of the vaccine injuries that I was seeing could be from the vaccine.
But nevertheless, I need to just be filling out these forms and report the injuries.
The Canadian system of vaccine injuries is you can't just report them.
Your report basically goes to a public health official who decides whether or not they agree.
And so I submitted 14 vaccine injury reports on my patients.
And every single one was rejected by the health authorities who said, nope, they had no explanation for these people's new symptoms.
And in some of these people, I mean, two of my patients had anaphylactic reactions and they said, well, okay, we'll acknowledge that two of your patients got anaphylaxis, but everything else that they're now living with, all their deficits are not from this injection.
They don't know what caused it, but it can't be the shots because the shots are safe and effective.
So every single, I mean literally a hundred percent of the vaccine injury reports that I submitted were censored higher up.
So none of my, so after that I just gave up.
It was a complete waste of time trying to report them because the vaccine injury reporting system in Canada is censored.
So, all these injuries were then supposed to be coincidental?
I mean, what's the explanation for them?
They have no explanation.
Well, they said if it's a neurological problem, it must be from poor injection technique.
In other words, that the needle went too close to a nerve in the deltoid muscle of the arm.
And I said to this vaccine safety specialist, that makes absolutely no sense because Their neurological symptoms are everywhere in their body.
It's not just in the vaccinated limb.
It can't be from poor injection technique.
That is illogical.
It is unscientific.
And it's dishonest.
I mean, it's just dishonest, I think, is the bottom line.
But the Canadian health authorities keep publishing statistics that these vaccine injuries are rare.
Shots are safe and effective.
And most doctors go along with it.
Well, one month after my open letter to our provincial health officer telling her of the rate of vaccine injuries in my patients and pointing out that the shots seem to be more dangerous than COVID, the College of Physicians and Surgeons here and every college across Canada echoed it, sent a warning letter to every doctor warning you that if you Spread misinformation about COVID or the COVID vaccines that you will be investigated and, if need be, disciplined.
And so they literally created this illusion of consensus in the medical profession by threatening doctors to not question this.
Because, of course, if you had to ask them, so, well, how would you define misinformation?
Well, they can't.
Misinformation is just anything they don't agree with.
Right.
If you don't agree with their lies, if you tell the truth, they want to represent that as misinformation.
That's it.
That's it.
And so, so most doctors just kept their head down, even if they could see the vaccine injuries happening.
They did.
I had become the scapegoat because I refused to be silent.
I just, I would be breaking my Hippocratic oath if I kept silent.
Because doctors are not supposed to harm their patients.
And so I've become the scapegoat and here I am.
Here I stand.
I am being punished for it.
If you go to trial, but you're going to go to trial.
Yes.
You may not be able to present any evidence, expert witnesses or your clinical cases.
Yes.
So you're going to be guilty before you start.
I will.
And you know, I've got Peter McCulloch and Pierre Cory and Dr. Jim Thorpe from Texas testifying in each of their areas of expertise on these things, and they will be blocked.
And I've got five others.
These are brilliant and highly qualified men who are truly experts in their fields, and yet they will also be blocked.
If the college has its way to block all of this evidence, then I am defenseless.
This will just be a kangaroo court.
But this is completely consistent with what they've done right from the beginning.
They have tried to bury the evidence of harm.
They did it by censoring Vaccine Injury Reporting.
They did it by threatening doctors, and now they're doing it by trying to prevent me from giving evidence at trial of the evidence of harm.
And so, this just displays their continual dishonesty.
They are revealing themselves.
Well, I want you to get us the names of those doctors and we'll present the evidence with you right here on the show.
We'll build the case right here.
Are you saying the names of the expert witnesses?
Yes, I want all your expert witnesses.
We're going to interview them.
We're going to do interviews with you and with them, and we're going to make it go viral.
Well, yeah, I mean, it's wonderful.
You know, Pierre Cory, one of the things that I was accused of, and there's a whole list of things, was while they were trying to spread hatred against the unvaccinated, saying that they were a risk to society and were spreading disease, I was pointing out that actually the vaccinated are a risk to society because of The fact that they get COVID more than anyone else, and that, you know, the Cleveland study showed that the more shots you get, the more likely you'll get COVID.
But I'd also spoken about something called vaccine shedding, which is where your body's trying to get rid of those spike proteins, and so you breathe them out in the air, and they come out in your skin, your sweat, and your body fluids.
And so Dr. Pierre Khoury has done a brilliant series on his Substack, Where he has basically put his expert testimony on his own substack of what he has prepared for the BC College of Physicians and Surgeons dealing with the evidence for the effectiveness and safety of ivermectin and the issues around vaccine shedding.
So this information needs to be put out there because the world needs to know.
Well, I want you to work with my producer, Chris, here, and we will get all these doctors lined up.
We'll do shows with each one of them.
We'll present their evidence, and it'll be out there.
That would be wonderful.
The world needs to know.
This is all about truth.
Well, you can count on it.
We're going to do this.
We're going to start it right away.
Great.
And we're going to get all the word out there.
I don't care what the Canadian authorities think.
We have a health crisis.
This could be one of the Largest crimes against humanity ever committed.
It is it is it is terrible because the damage really seems to be permanent and ongoing.
And so this this truly is one of the greatest public health disasters ever.
What are the consequences of this trial?
I mean, could you lose your license to practice medicine?
Yes, yes.
So, there's another doctor in Ontario, Dr. Mark Trozzi, who just had a trial a few months ago, and Dr. Peter McCulloch was one of his expert witnesses, and they found him guilty of spreading misinformation Dr. Mark Trozzi.
So they revoked his medical license and awarded him all of their legal costs.
So he basically has a fine for $95,000.
So, they basically remove your ability to earn money so that you then can't afford to defend yourself to appeal it because you're now unemployed and unemployable as a doctor.
I guess you could go and flip hamburgers at McDonald's or something and obviously give you this crippling fine.
So, they could do the same to me.
They could strip me of my medical license and give me an absolutely crippling fine because they've now been investigating me for three years.
So they've obviously spent a lot of money on trying to silence me.
Could they bring criminal charges against you?
I don't know.
Well, you know, that is a very interesting point.
I suppose they could.
They have just rewritten the Health Practitioners Act in British Columbia.
It's called Bill 36.
And under Bill 36, if a doctor is guilty of the crime of misinformation, and we've spoken about what that is, it's a sort of an arbitrary definition, you can get a $200,000 fine and six months in jail.
That's the Health Practitioners Act in British Columbia.
Talk about silencing doctors.
If a doctor is terrified about what they can say about certain treatments, You can't give a patient informed consent anymore.
Once a doctor is no longer allowed to use their medical expertise and knowledge and judgment to tell a patient quite honestly what they think of a certain treatment for that patient, if the doctor's terrified that they're going to get a $200,000 fine for misinformation, You can't practice as a doctor anymore because you can't give your patients informed consent.
This is not just wiping out informed consent, this is wiping out freedom of speech and is absurdly unjust.
And you talk about the criminal record, you'll be in jail as well.
So, this is hard to believe that this is where Canada has got to.
But that's where we are.
Could they force doctors, this college of physicians and surgeons, to vaccinate people even if the doctor thinks it's dangerous?
Well, under Bill 36, one of the criteria for this is that the colleges have the authority to mandate vaccines for all
the doctors, and it can be any vaccine at any time as a licensing requirement.
So that basically this is not just forcing patients to be vaccinated, this is forcing all the medical staff to be vaccinated as a licensing requirement.
So in other words, if you want to be a doctor in British Columbia, you need to be willing to revoke autonomy over your own body, to literally give it up to your licensing body, who will decide what you will be injected with next.
So this is, again, informed consent has gone.
That seems to be a thing of the past, and you don't have autonomy over your own body anymore.
And you'll be forced to vaccinate others, even if you think it's wrong or harmful.
Well, yeah, I mean, I don't know if they would hold people down and vaccinated, but they have denied people surgeries here.
We had a patient who was a transplant patient who desperately needed a transplant, and they wouldn't do the transplant unless this person was double jabbed.
And the person died because they were terrified of the shots.
They knew they weren't safe.
And they were denied medical treatment because they weren't vaccinated and they died.
So...
They hold these, and they were denying patients a joint replacement, patients that have been on a waiting list for two or three years to get a joint replacement, and they said, you will be taken off the wait list unless you get vaccinated.
So they literally have used coercion in the most cruel ways to force people to have these shots, people who didn't want them, they didn't need them, and they didn't trust them.
And so this is cruel and dishonest.
And you were thrown out, fired out of the emergency room.
Your private practice office was burned to the ground.
How are you supporting yourself?
Well, fortunately, I can still work from home.
So I am now in this little town that has no health facility, patients literally come and knock on my door.
And so I've, you know, I had to buy new equipment.
I sit them down at my dining room table and I stitch up their wounds,
or I lay them on my sofa and I examine them and check them out and tell them what they need.
So I can, and one of the local Indian bands here, one of the local Indian, Canadian Indian groups
who really appreciates me being around has given me use of a couple of rooms
that I can see patients at.
So I...
I'm able to earn some money from just doing it that way, but obviously my overheads have gone up a lot because previously when I would fix up a wound or treat somebody for something in the emergency room, all of the equipment that you needed was provided by the state.
I didn't have to buy the local anesthetic or the suture material or instruments or anything.
Now that's all on my dollar.
I have to buy all of that stuff.
So my overheads are Well, we're going to follow this up with many more interviews.
We're just beginning.
and my earnings are substantially less. So I've been surviving, but it's been tough,
but I'm pretty dedicated, and so I will keep going for as long as they will allow me to.
Well, we're going to follow this up with many more interviews. We're just beginning.
And Chris, would you show the ways people can donate to Dr.
Hoff? He has a few sites that can be what dr up what want to explain how
people can donate Yes.
So this legal defense fund is not money that goes to me.
This is money that goes to the lawyers.
And so, of course, the authorities here have a whole team of lawyers that they are using against me.
And of course, they're using tax dollars.
So they've got a huge budget.
I'm a one-man show.
I have one lawyer who's now had to recruit other lawyers to help him because of the volume of opposition that he's getting.
So this fund is purely for legal defense.
But it would help me enormously if people can just help cover some of those costs.
What's the URL?
What is the URL for this?
What's the site?
Well, it's GiveSendGo.
It's a Christian… GiveSendGo.com?
GiveSendGo.com?
GiveSendGo.
And then if you just go to GiveSendGo.com and then just put in my name, Dr. Charles Hoff, it should come up at that page that you see.
And you can see there where you can donate money to this legal fund.
Is there another site or any other sites?
That's the main one?
That's the main one.
There is another one for Canadians who want a tax receipt.
They can donate to the JCCF, which is the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms.
But it has to be designated.
It's a bit more complicated there because they aren't actually defending me.
They have just offered to have an account where they can give people tax receipts.
I don't believe GiveSendGo gives tax receipts.
How do you reach this other site?
The JCCF, I would have to send you the links, because if they just donate it to the JCCF, it'll just go into a general fund and it will be for whatever other cases they are defending.
But I would have to send you the details for that, of how they designate that money for my legal defense.
Okay, let's do that.
Can people write to you?
Do you have a post office box?
Yes, they can.
Some people have been very gracious in sending me just e-transfer some money, or just send me a check or, I don't know, a banknote or something.
But yeah, my postal address is P.O.
Box 550, that's 550, 550 Lytton, which is L-Y-T-T-O-N, and it's
Lytton, B.C., is British Columbia, and the postal code is V0K1Z0, or 1Z0, I guess you'd say
south of the border.
Why don't you repeat that all together so people get it again?
Okay.
My mailing address is P O P.
Box 550, Lytton, which is L-Y-T-T-O-N, B.C., and then the postal code is V-0-K-1-Z-0.
We're going to do many more of these podcasts with you, and do get to your The people are ready to prepare testimony.
We're going to give the testimony on this show.
And your defense will be right here.
That would be wonderful, because the world needs to know.
They can only hide the truth for so long, and eventually the truth comes out.
If people watch this on CloudHub, my CloudHub channel, cloudhub.com, this will be seen by 40,000 or 50,000 people, maybe more.
Well, that is wonderful.
That is absolutely wonderful.
The truth needs to come out.
We're going to work hard to get it out.
Chris will schedule further shows with you, and please work with Chris, and we'll get you some other media contacts to help get this word out.
What's happened to you is truly egregious, it's wrong, and the public needs to know what's going on.
This has got to be stopped.
Well, thank you.
I really appreciate your support and your encouragement.
This has been a long battle, but I'm pretty dedicated to protecting the public and protecting my patients and standing up for what is right.
Well, you're not fighting alone.
There's millions here fighting with you.
Good.
God bless you for doing this.
Thank you so much.
Really appreciate that.
Dr. Jerome Corsi, we're here with Charles Hoff.
We'll be back with many more of these.
This is an egregious crime the governments are committing against humanity, and it's going to be exposed.
God bless you for doing it, Dr. Hoff.
This is Dr. Jerome Corsi with thetruthcentral.com.
