All Episodes
Sept. 22, 2023 - The Truth Central - Dr. Jerome Corsi
45:49
Marxism's Dark History: Starvation as a Political Weapon

While more young people in America and Western Europe embrace the allure of socialism as told by their indoctrinators within the public school system, academia and cultural outlets, its dark history of death, torture, hunger, poverty and devastation has been whitewashed in favor of the glamorization of this destructive philosophy - one which desperately relies upon the forced total compliance of its subjects. On this edition of The Truth Central, Dr. Jerome Corsi digs deeply into a major tool in Communist/Socialist/Marxist regimes' toolbelt: The use of starvation as a political weapon, throughout history and the manipulation of facts glorifying such authoritarianism today.Get your FREE copy of Dr. Corsi's new book with Swiss America CEO Dean Heskin, How the Coming Global Crash Will Create a Historic Gold Rush by calling: 800-519-6268/Follow Dr. Jerome Corsi on Twitter: @corsijerome1Our website: https://www.thetruthcentral.comOur link to where to get the Marco Polo 650-Page Book on the Hunter Biden laptop & Biden family crimes free online: https://www.thetruthcentral.com/marco-polo-publishes-650-page-book-on-hunter-biden-laptop-biden-family-crimes-available-free-online/Our Sponsors:MyVitalC: https://www.thetruthcentral.com/myvitalc-ess60-in-organic-olive-oil/Swiss America: https://www.swissamerica.com/offer/CorsiRMP.phpThe MacMillan Agency: https://www.thetruthcentral.com/the-macmillan-agency/Pro Rapid Review: https://prorrt.com/thetruthcentralmembers/RITA: https://members.sayrita.com/truthcentralreaders/Volkswagen plans job cuts due to low EV demandBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-truth-central-with-dr-jerome-corsi--5810661/support.

| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Gerald Corsi and today is Friday.
It's September 22nd, 2023.
Thank you for joining us on TheTruthCentral.com.
This is Jerome Corsey, and today is Friday, September 22, 2023.
Thank you for joining us on the truthcentral.com.
You can find me on Twitter at CorseyJerome1.
And we are on many platforms.
Take a look at the upper right-hand corner.
You can see how many platforms we're on.
Rumble, many audio platforms as well.
We are on the Apple podcast and posting on many different websites.
So you can see all of that at the upper right-hand corner.
Chris is pointing it out to you right now.
And you can see down a little bit on the page where we're posting some of the Twitter posts.
We have articles here, past articles.
Please take a look at our sponsors.
Today is a special broadcast.
We're going to do a deep dive.
I want to set the stage for really getting deeply into the whole neo-Marxism that we're experiencing.
My book will be out in October.
And I'm going to want to set the stage for some of this.
Today I deep dive on the true nature of what communism is all about, what Maoism is about, what they've produced.
And I think you're going to find that this is, when this book does come out, I expect that it's going to, it's not going to be entirely easy to read, but I expect it's going to be important for many people to really get their hands around what's going on today.
Now, I start out with this neo-Marxist political warfare, and there was a woman who testified to Congress in 1953.
Her name was Bella Dodd, D-O-D-D.
And she was a card-carrying member of the Communist Party of the United States in the 1930s and 1940s.
She testified to the House Un-American Activities Committee, and she explained why she left the Communist Party, which she ultimately did.
Now, her testimony includes a lot of really important things.
I want to start today by her expressing alarm that, quote, if you go through the catalogs of various colleges of America, you'll find that from the period of 1925 to about 1948 or 49, that most of the colleges, for instance, have dropped all their courses on ethics and religion.
You will find that most of the colleges, even the law schools, have dropped their courses on constitutional law.
She asked, if your law schools drop their courses on constitutional law, how much more do the liberal arts colleges do it?
A few minutes later in her testimony, she got to the point.
She said, you will be interested in noting the catalogs about ethics, courses on religion, courses on the Bible.
They have practically been dropped out of the college curriculum.
It is a method of de-spiritualizing the American people.
Dowd's point was that the first enemy of the communists is the belief in the fact that you're created by a divine creator.
She insisted communists have to get rid of God before anything else.
Why?
If the communists can wipe out that belief in God, then it is easy.
If you don't believe in God, all you believe in is a better material advancement, and the communists promise greater material advancement for all.
So, this is the great promise of communism, that it's going to provide the end to social injustice, and that it is going to establish a more just society, less racism.
It's racism, racism, racism, this woke culture.
And the woke don't realize how they're being manipulated.
And they are.
I'm just going to read one more paragraph about how these ideas are extremely powerful, very seductive.
Cultural Maoism motivates the radical left to capture control of our institutions as part of the extreme left's goal of destroying capitalism and taking down the United States Constitution.
At the moment, critical thinking and social justice ideology are winning.
Today, Neo-Marxists control most of our prestigious institutions of higher learning, the well-established beacons of our mainstream media, the backbone of our law enforcement and justice systems.
Today, Neo-Marxist ideology controls the federal government, from the Presidency of the United States to Congress, through virtually every agency in the massive D.C.
bureaucracy and much of the federal judiciary.
Today, cultural Maoists control the cancel culture.
Enforced by the politically correct mainstream media.
We cannot afford to persist with comfortable establishment thinking, hoping that the bizarre nature of the Neo-Marxist social justice critical theory will cause its demise.
It won't.
Okay now, I picked one article today to start this, and it has to do with the famine that we are seeing Worldwide.
And this is very alarming, because the governments are taking control of the food cycle.
And while the food in the United States is becoming dramatically more expensive, it's still available.
That's the first stage.
And I'm going to predict here that what we're going to see is massive, massive starvation across the world.
And ultimately in the United States.
And this is, it's unexcusable this should be happening.
But it is happening, and it's happening in a massive way.
So what this article says is that, by Michael Snyder, Michael Snyder's doing a good job of covering things, that hundreds of millions of people are desperately hungry all over the world.
And by the time you're finished reading this, more children will starve to death.
Even CNN has admitted that we are in the midst of the worst food crisis in modern history.
This is a frightening prospect.
If you take a look at India, India has The crops are failing all over the world.
Final numbers from 2023 will inevitably show the crops are failing all over the planet.
It's a catastrophic year for crops in India.
India's production of rice is down dramatically.
When that happens, millions of people are going to die.
It's pretty shocking, but when you realize that In the Western world, the children are not yet starving, but we are looking to have the mRNA-injected meat, we're looking to have synthetic meat put into the supermarkets, and we're only in the first stages of this crisis, but it's going to deepen when you realize how many people
Are dependent on rice, and when you get a 40% drop in the rice being produced by some of the major rice-producing countries, that spells a formula for starvation.
Now, it's not global warming that's producing this.
I want to show you what the left does.
Now, first, I maintain we're going through a cultural revolution in the United States.
And that cultural revolution has a precedent in China when Mao took over in China.
And Chris, if you'll play the video, it's from the BBC, British Broadcasting Corporation.
They did a short, it's a couple minutes long, video on what the Cultural Revolution was all about.
And Chris, if you'll play that, I think people will find it informative.
16th of May, 1966.
The Communist Party of China issues a directive.
The Cultural Revolution begins as a decade-long political campaign.
It calls for a purge of capitalist influences and bourgeois thinking in the government, teaching, media and arts.
A huge personality cult of Mao is at the center of the revolution.
While other party opponents are removed from the office, Mao's wife Jiang Qing and her close associates are giving important posts.
Mao's quotes in the Little Red Book are made compulsory reading.
With themes such as correcting mistaken ideas, the quotations become the standard of which all revolutionary efforts are judged.
A youth organisation called the Red Cots sprints up throughout the country, preaching the teachings of Mao.
The Red Guards travel all over the country, smashing the old culture, destroying much of the cultural heritage.
They spearhead the interrogation, humiliation, and beatings of teachers, intellectuals, and traditional enemies of the state.
Sixteen million young people are sent to the countryside for re-education and physical labour.
Tens of thousands of officials are accused of being traitors, counter-revolutionaries and capitalist stooges.
President Liu Shaoqi is expelled from the party and dies a lonely death.
Marshal Lin Biao, Mao's named successor, flees the country but dies in a plane crash in Mongolia.
Mao's wife Jiang Qing and her close associates form what became known as the Gang of Four.
They push the leftist agenda against more moderate voices within the party.
In September 1976, Mao Zedong dies.
The Gang of Four are arrested and their plot to control the country stopped, marking the end of the Cultural Revolution.
Going back to what I wrote about this here, you're going to find that the Cultural Revolution was a disaster in China.
These Red Guards demolished museums of historical and religious importance.
Thousands of books were burned.
Temples, the oldest temple in Shanghai, the oldest pagoda.
An ancient temple was destroyed.
They came into people's homes.
They were looking for counter-revolutionary items, including articles of worship, luxury items, reactionary literature, foreign books, concealed weapons, hidden gold, foreign currency, signs of a decadent lifestyle, portraits of Chiang Kai-shek, who set up Taiwan as a nationalist government.
Old land deeds, documents from the Nationalist era, signs of underground activities are incriminating evidence of links with the enemies of the regime.
Piles of plundered loot, heaped with works of art, musical instrument, furniture, watches, nationalist flags, kilos of gold, mounds of jewelry, including silver rings, bracelets, necklaces, and earrings.
They were piled together and destroyed.
Rare books were destroyed, ancient calligraphy, scrolls, valuable paintings.
This was doing away with the old.
They wanted to get rid of all the The remnants of nationalist China, which had been a civilization which for centuries had flourished.
It was largely a peasant society and they were able to feed the people.
Now, one more point.
The Great Leap Forward then also caused mass starvation.
Some 36 million people.
What Mao decided to do was he was going to industrialize China.
He was going to take the peasant farmers off their farms.
He was going to put them into the factories and make them work.
He was going to then get the farms collectivized, which means that no one would really own them.
They would be worked by groups of people who were going to work these as collectives, maybe didn't even know farming.
So what happened is the people starved.
36 million people starved.
China went into cannibalism.
Families traded their children so they wouldn't have to eat their own children.
Some of the literature written about this, this is a book called Tombstone, The Great Chinese Famine, 1958-1962.
1958 to 1962. It was written by Yang Jisheng. That's spelled J-I-S-H-E-N-G.
Cannibalism was no longer exceptional.
Ancient annals report cases of family exchanging children to consume during severe famines, but during the Great Famine, some families resorted to eating their own children.
I met with people who had eaten human flesh and heard them describe its taste.
Reliable evidence indicates there were thousands of cases of cannibalism throughout China at that time.
It's a tragedy unprecedented in world history for tens of millions of people to starve to death and resort to cannibalism during a period of normal, climactic patterns with no wars or epidemics.
The basic reason why tens of millions of people in China starved to death was totalitarianism.
Essentially, what we're experiencing today is the prelude.
It's the beginning of the end, and it ends this way, inevitably.
It did both in China and in Russia.
Now, Russia under Stalin had the similar collectivization of the farms.
And they essentially starved out Ukraine, because the Ukrainian people were the breadbasket.
After Ukraine joined the Soviet Union, it was the breadbasket of the Soviet Union, as it is today.
And what Russia did was starve millions of people in what they call the Holomador, a combination of both hunger and extermination.
It was an attempt to exterminate a lot of the Ukrainians in the western part of Ukraine, the part that was not Soviet Russia speaking, when the Soviet Union took over Ukraine in the 1920s, they basically turned against western Ukraine, which is where the farming occurs largely,
And it was largely dominated by Germans, and so the Russians starved them to death.
This is one of the great underlying, not discussed in the media in the United States, but known in Ukraine, underlying issues in the Ukrainian-Russian war.
Russia has taken back the parts of Ukraine that are naturally Russian-speaking, including down by the Black Sea and Crimea.
Whereas some of the other parts in the West, Kiev and the wheat producers have been blocked from exporting through the Black Sea and they've been exporting through Poland.
Poland's just announced they're going to shut the borders to Ukrainian wheat and they are going to quit supplying Ukraine with weapons.
Chris, I'd like you to play the second video we have.
Now this is from Radio Free Europe, and this video describes, it's very graphic, but it
describes what happened to the Ukrainians during the Holomador.
Go ahead, Chris.
In the early 1930s, millions of Ukraine's people died in a devastating famine.
Known as the Holodomor, it is one of the most tragic chapters in Ukrainian history.
When Ukraine became a part of the Soviet Union in 1922, it was the country's breadbasket, thanks to its fertile fields of wheat.
In 1928, Soviet leader Joseph Stalin introduced collectivization, which was supposed to unite privately owned farms into state collective farms called kolkhoz.
The Soviet leadership argued that collective farms would be more effective and produce a surplus, which would feed industrial workers.
As many Ukrainian peasants were not willing to hand over their land to the state, their fields were confiscated.
Many of them were sent into exile or abandoned their homes.
In 1932, the government's quota on crops was raised significantly and farmers were expected to harvest more than before.
For many, it was a target that was impossible to meet.
What grain they produced was confiscated with nothing left for them or their families.
Farmers who hoarded their crops were often punished or executed.
The exact number of people who died in the famine of 1932 and 1933 is still not known.
Historians estimate that between 3 and 12 million people perished, most of them ethnic Ukrainians.
For decades, the existence of the famine was denied by the Soviet Union.
Historians in Russia and the West disagree as to whether the famine was man-made and if it was a deliberate attempt to eradicate Ukrainian independence.
Since 2006, Ukraine and 15 other countries have recognized the Holodomor as a genocide
against the Ukrainian people.
It is pretty clear it was a direct result of Stalin's policies of farm collectivization.
And I write about it extensively.
The key to understanding here is that the strategic understanding of the left, you've got to realize that it is driven by the Hegelian dialectic.
As such, the left is a teleologically, means it has an end goal, informed movement, It executes through history and thought along an arc, a trajectory, which is Hegelian.
It defines everything that is as fuel for becoming.
A dialectic process that compels it to negate change, perpetual revolution.
The analysis of the left does not take into account the dialectic will fail.
The whole movement we're experiencing today is built to create a utopia, but it is designed simply to destroy.
And I go deeply into what Marx and Hegel were all about because this is how the left has to be understood.
It's a mistake to treat the historical elements of this assessment as little more than background material.
Assessing the left as if Hegel and Marx were simply providing interesting historical context in today's events is a failure to recognize that for the left, Marx was yesterday and Hegel was the day before.
Between the two, they are the source code of today's left.
You've got to understand the political philosophy.
You've got to understand the phenomenology to know what this is all about.
But the point is to have killed these millions and starved them to death.
And by the way, famine is not a particularly pleasant way to die.
It's one of the more horrific ways to die.
It indicates no regard for God, no regard for life, no regard for these people as human beings.
And so what you're getting a view of here is what depopulation is really all about.
These are worthless, useless people.
They can starve to death.
It won't take us any effort.
We just have to cut them off from food and wait till they die.
We don't have to invade them.
We don't have to kill them.
We don't have to exert any...
Effort.
We have to make sure they can't get out from where they are, and then they die.
That's communism.
That's what the seductive logic of this Hegelian dialectic is all about.
If you don't think that the left would be just as happy to see anyone who disagrees with them die, you're wrong.
They don't want to see them negate.
They understand that the electric vehicles don't work.
They understand that we need to have hydrocarbon fuel in order to propel modern industrial society and feed billions.
It's why they are denying it.
They're denying it because they want to kill billions.
There's too many people.
Since there's no God, these people are just blight.
They're just useless.
They eat.
They have to be taken care of.
They get old.
And so therefore, the entire nature of this dialectic is to cancel and destroy.
Now, it's bizarre how this proceeds, because what happens is, this is really an ancient problem.
I go back to Socrates and Aristotle, who believed in objective reality.
They did believe in God.
They believed that this was a spiritual place.
And that we had to have ethics that were derived from moral principles established by God as to how we as human beings need to live in order to be productive.
Now, there was a dialogue Socrates wrote that was the Gorgias, and it was one of the dialogues that was used in the ancient world most for teaching.
Gorgias was today's modern woke.
He was a sophist.
Sophists engaged in rhetoric.
They didn't believe there was any natural law.
Everything is subjective.
It's what you think it is and you can make it up.
And Socrates had a dialogue with Gorgias in which he refuted this proposition.
So Socrates refuted Gorgias' view of subjective reality.
Well, the Subjective construct reality, while the subjective construct reality may be the human condition, not all subjective constructs of reality work.
In other words, we perceive the world through our senses.
That's subjective.
But it doesn't mean that any subjective view of what's out there, how we should live, is as good as any other.
The Socratic challenge to post-modernism, which is what today's left is, radical, schizophrenic, whatever your reality it is, whatever gender it is, we have to all accept that.
We need diversity.
So create a new gender.
Fine, we'll have to accept it.
That's schizophrenia.
The Socratic challenge to post-modernism is that Postmodernism conceptualizes schizophrenia and other types of mental disease not as aberrant or dysfunctional behavior, but merely as different social constructs of reality that we must accept as legitimate.
Socrates would object, arguing that schizophrenic constructs of reality are dysfunctional, that is, not productive to human growth, physical well-being, or intellectual development.
What the left wants to do today is abandon the Enlightenment, which established reason and science as principles where we can advance knowledge.
It forces us to accept that, as normal, the most confused and destructive among us, who can only abolish, not create.
In a world where Plato and Aristotle are scorned, the Marquis de Sade is free to rule.
Now, what you'll find is that a lot of the The people have engineered Current Woke.
For instance, Adorno and Horkheimer, and they produced a book which I've got right here.
Let me pull it from the shelf for a minute.
It's this book, The Dialectic of Enlightenment.
Okay, that was written by Adorno and Horkheimer.
You can see their names there as the authors.
And this is one of the major, major books of the Frankfurt School which established the current woke and advanced the traditional idea of Marxism against the moral teachings of the Enlightenment.
The Moral Teachings of the Enlightenment.
By the way, the book has pretty been well read over the years.
The Moral Teachings of the Enlightenment bear witness to a hopeless attempt to replace enfeebled religion with some reason for persisting in society when interest is absent.
As genuine burgers, the philosophers who come to terms with the powers who, in theory, are to be condemned These theories are firm and consistent, whereas the moral doctrines are propagandist and sentimental, even when they seem rigorous, or else they are mere coup d'etat by reason of the consciousness that morality itself is underivable.
Okay, so these guys basically were attacking religion, attacking morality, and they've devoted a very large section of this book to embracing Marquis de Sade.
Now, Marquis de Sade, if anyone has read it, and I'm sure many out there have heard of it growing up, it's bizarre.
Marquis de Sade was arrested in the French Revolution, I believe, in that period of time, Put into the Bastille, and he wrote these completely lascivious novels, Justine and Juliet, every form of sexual abasement you can think of.
And the virtuous of the two were the ones who were most scorned, whereas the most lascivious of this pair they praised as liberated.
Marquis de Sade didn't.
And the Adorno and Horkheimer, who were basically from Germany, they were both German Jews, communists, Who lost to the fascists in the street battles that prefaced Hitler's rise to power during the Weimar Republic.
And they fled to the United States where they were brought in by Columbia University and put in Hollywood, where they began infecting Hollywood with their communism.
Began writing a series of books that were aimed at destroying the U.S.
culture.
They do it through a cultural war aimed at destroying God and promoting sexual freedom.
Uninhibited sexuality was Herbert Marcuse's calling call for fame.
That's what he wanted to achieve.
Chris, you want to comment on this?
I've covered a lot here, but I'm really trying to demonstrate The destructive nature here of the woke and how its roots go back into an evolution of classical Marxism into cultural Maoism, which we've just seen.
There is no left-wing government that has succeeded, well basically they haven't really succeeded, but none that has lasted a long period of time without the use of brute force or forcing their so-called constituents, their people, into submission.
That's what happens.
You went over this about the Soviet Union, about Maoist China, which still happens today there, These are problems.
Over in freer nations, instead of brute force, they use manipulation, whether it be through entertainment, through literature, or through academia.
And that's another issue right now.
The idea now is the more powerful take advantage of this, find the malcontents, the ones who have fallen for such Well, it's just such indoctrination and use them to divide the country and eventually conquer.
That's another way the Maoists and the Marxists try to crumble free nations.
The UN is meeting right now in New York and it's hosting the Sustainable Development Goals 2023 conference Which is an attempt to supercharge and implement this master plan for humanity.
Now, this is Deep State at its worst World Economic Forum.
These SDGs, Sustainable Development Goals, cover every aspect of life that are a formula for a government, Global, technocratic, totalitarian state.
There's going to be a Summer of the Future scheduled for 2024.
This is the master plan for humanity.
And what it involves is saying that we have to be sustainable.
Now, sustainable means you can't eat too much food, you can't eat meat, we can't burn hydrocarbon fuels, we're running out of everything.
Natural processes of the earth can't be left to their own.
We have to have human intervention in climate so we stop using hydrocarbon fuels.
They know that will produce starvation because we can't produce enough fuel without nitrogen fertilizers to feed the people in the world.
So the agenda here that is being advanced is one that is anti-human.
And it is aimed to reduce the number of people on the face of the earth.
If we just look through the headlines of the day, the State Department refuses to address how much USAID money went to Wuhan and the Institute of Virology to begin the development of COVID.
We're finding that We have another round of COVID mutations occurring that are going to be hitting the United States with more illness and COVID.
We find that the left is trying to reinstitute Roe v. Wade.
The borders are open.
All of these are destructive.
We are finding the police are abandoning trying to police the cities because they're becoming unsafe.
At the same time, we have a push for electric vehicles, which is the most ill-conceived government policy objective in modern history.
We are facing a meltdown Across the board.
And economically, we're going to see a global crash, which is in the cards, is being developed, and it's, I think, partly wished for.
That's the deep secret here, being wished for.
Now, as we go through all of the changes here, and the reality, this critical theory, it's based on the idea that the United States is evil.
We're a racist country, that we have established the Constitution in order to preserve the privileges of slaveholders.
They were teaching a generation of Americans to hate the United States.
Even in our churches, this liberation theology, So critical theory is what the Frankfurt School developed.
They wanted critical theory.
And every time you hear critical theory, by the way, Barack Obama with Derrick Bell at Harvard, that was when, when Obama was in law school, that was when critical theory began taking over the Harvard Law School.
Where we get this lawfare, the attempt to destroy the Constitution by, they don't believe in the Constitution anymore.
They want us to be post-Constitution and they want the world to be post-American.
So we now have liberation theology.
Which goes back to the second Latin American Bishops Conference held in Medellin, Colombia in 68.
At that conference, the attending bishops authorized a document that explained that Jesus Christ had aimed his teachings to affirm the rights of the poor while criticizing industrial nations who enrich themselves at the expense of developing countries.
I don't recall any of that in the Bible.
Liberation Theology Movement views Jesus Christ as a socialist concerned about social institutions.
Thus, Liberation Theology shifts the traditional understanding that the mission of Jesus on Earth was to redeem the human race from original sin, opening the gates of heaven to those who had led moral lives devoted to the service of God.
Instead, it was to create social revolutions.
I quote a lot from Gutierrez, Who is one of the predominant thinkers, a Peruvian, Gustavo Gutierrez, a Dominican priest.
He published the seminal work of a Catholic liberation theology, it was the Theologia
de Liberacion, Theology of Liberation.
And here's how he explained, Gutierrez explains liberation theology.
Christ is presented as the one who brings us to liberation.
Christ the Savior liberates from sin, which is the ultimate root of all disruption, of friendship, and all injustice and oppression.
Christ makes humanity truly free.
That is, he enables us to live in communion with himself.
This is the basis for human fellowship.
Now what he means by that is the crisis here to eliminate the immense misery and injustice which capitalist nations bring upon the world.
So he says, in short, political options have to become radicalized and the commitments to which Christians are assuming demonstrate the inadequacy of a theologically pastoral model which aims to save souls And not to perfect us here on earth as a society.
The fact that we get sick, we die, that is to be forgotten.
As soon as you eliminate God, put human beings on the throne of God, and we are then going to create our utopia.
What we create instead is our nightmare.
Anyone who's lived under communism will attest to this.
It preaches liberation, it preaches justice, it preaches that everything will be perfect.
And those who died in Ukraine in the 1920s and 1930s, those who died under Mao, all had drunk the Kool-Aid of thinking that this was going to be the utopia, when all they got was a group of oligarchs who used these theories to empower themselves.
Uh, the trilogy I'm writing, first book was about climate, shows they lie.
Hydrocarbons are not the turning knob of the Earth's temperature.
Second book shows why they lie, because they are all, they've adopted this neo-Marxist ideology, and they are trying to destroy, they are incapable of creating.
They did end up with Liberation Theology and Marcuse.
Once they have propounded these ideas, including Liberation Theology, well, they certainly then don't want any debate, because they consider that debate is itself reactionary.
In other words, Marcuse, when he got to Liberation Theology, wrote an essay on liberation, and then he wrote a He wrote a book which basically was ending toleration.
He wanted to eliminate the idea that we should have free speech, that we should have any debate.
He wanted to have the world be completely schizophrenic totalitarianism.
And the woke intolerance comes directly out of Marcuse.
Marcuse Wrote a book called, an essay called, Repressive Tolerance, in which he argued that we should not tolerate the views that, he said, in the past, in different circumstances, the speeches, the fascist and Nazi leaders, were the immediate prologue to massacre, so therefore we ought to ban any speeches which we don't agree with.
It should be evident now that by the exercise of civil rights by those who don't have them presupposes the withdrawal of civil rights from those who prevent their exercise.
So what he's saying is essentially, and a lot of this stuff is very hard to read.
It takes a lot of discipline to read through these people.
They reinvent language.
So his proposition is the true Progress in freedom demands progress in the consciousness of freedom, where the mind has been made into a subject-object of politics and policies, intellectual autonomy, the realm of pure thought.
That is to become a master of political education.
If you didn't follow what they did, you had to go through political education, re-education.
When it's really about the abolishment of the culture, they want to abolish the culture.
The end result for Marcuse was that he would not tolerate speech that disagreed with anything that the left wanted to propose.
Marcuse repeated liberating tolerance, as we called it, liberating tolerance, tolerating only right thinking, Begins with censoring words and ideas.
I'll read this paragraph. When tolerance mainly serves the protection and preservation of a
repressive society that is under free speech, when it serves to neutralize opposition and
render men immune against other and better forms of life, then tolerance has been perverted.
And when this perversion starts in the mind of the individual, his consciousness, his needs,
when heteronymous interests occupy him before he can experience his servitude,
Then the efforts to counter the dehumanization must begin at the place of entrance, that is, where the false consciousness takes form, or rather is systematically formed.
It must begin with stopping the words and images which feed this consciousness.
That's why they justify censorship.
We're pretty far advanced in this and people do not understand where it comes from.
You don't understand how these people are living in a different reality than we are.
It will not be possible to beat them.
I'm saying that this is going to have to become, this and other books are I saw James Lindsay was doing great book work on critical theory over the weekend.
He and I discussed the book.
I've given him a copy.
We're going to try to join forces and explain both where critical theory comes from and why this woke nonsense is extremely dangerous.
It will end up in the deaths of millions and the destruction of the productive ability which we have to live by imposing on people these bizarre ideas that the use of hydrocarbon fuels is somehow evil and going to destroy the planet.
What's going to destroy the planet is woke.
And the woke will be the first ones that the oligarchs eliminate, just like Mao and Stalin proceeded to eliminate the people who got them into the revolution, without whom they wouldn't have come to power.
Because once they're in power, they need no more dissent.
They need obedience.
Chris, any final words before we wrap up?
Just like what you were saying and what we were discussing earlier, no left-wing government, no left-wing dictatorial Maoist government, Marxist government, if you will, has succeeded without forcing compliance or manipulating compliance.
You mentioned the word sustainable when it came to the UN Sustainable Development Plan.
That's another way of manipulation, dressing up the harsh realities of the destruction that communism and Maoism and Marxism Well, the candy coating is what people see.
but making it look nicer.
You know the old saying, you can't polish a you know what?
They're trying to package one up and put it away then repackage it with a candy coating.
Well, and the candy coating is what people see.
The fundamental reality here is that anti-human, they hate humans.
You know, basically if you can take God away from people, if you can make them into nothing but material objects
whose lives are insignificant, have no meaning, you know, just here for full of sound and fury,
signifying nothing is what Shakespeare said in terms of this idea,
then you can eliminate them because they're useless.
Why bother with them?
Keep the ones who are technically advanced or the ones who you think are useful, and you certainly include yourself in that group, The oligarchs who have the money to afford living appropriately and when everything else is destroyed, let the masses die in starvation because you do not start from the point of God, you do not start from the point of valuing life,
And it's inherently destructive and it can only negate, it can destroy.
And every time communism, socialism, cultural Maoism has proceeded, it ends up in anarchy and millions of people die in wars.
With the technology we have today, these people are capable of killing billions and they wouldn't think twice to do it.
So in the end, God will win, and I think if we follow the advice of 2 Chronicles 7.14, God will hear our prayer and heal our land.
These are not difficult problems for God to eliminate.
We can have woke become a fad once the American people see how ridiculous it is.
And how do you judge it?
You judge it by what they want you to do.
Sustainability means you are a blight on the earth, which is what it means.
So we have to limit your blight on the earth by limiting your freedoms.
Once you understand how destructive that is and how insane that is, woke can become an insane, mad phenomenon.
Where these popular delusions took over an entire world at a time when we should have been advanced by the enlightenment and once again prove we're a fallen species that we can fall for these satanic temptation ideas without patently understanding how ridiculous they are.
With the grace of God, millions will wake up to the reality That we are walking into our own death and imprisonment if we do not stand up to the woke and say no.
Jerome Corsi today is Friday, September 22nd, 2023.
We'll be back next week with more podcasts.
We're broadcasting every weekday on TheTruthCentral.com.
Thank you for joining us.
Export Selection