All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 12, 2020 - The Truth Central - Dr. Jerome Corsi
01:12:26
Dr Corsi SPECIAL BROADCAST 12-12-20: TRUMP STILL WINS!
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Music So, Dr. Corsi, a lot going on in Washington, D.C.
Jericho today and the Supreme Court yesterday.
Help us shed some light on this madness.
Okay, today is Saturday, December 12th, 2020.
It's Dr. Jerome Corsi, and I'm here both with my producer, Craig, and Arthur, who is with the ThePrayerfulPatriot.com.
Welcome, gentlemen.
Good morning, Dr. Corsi.
Morning, Craig.
Okay, now yesterday, we had the Supreme Court on late Friday night dismiss the Texas suit on an issue of standing.
They said, it's out of here.
We're not going to hear this case.
Okay.
Now that occurred about, I don't know, seven o'clock last night, Eastern time.
And it was a big shock to everybody.
Everybody said, Oh, Donald Trump's lost.
He's done.
And, um, what I'm going to try to explain to you here today is that this is just the beginning of the end game.
You know, if you've played chess or any game, even football, any of these games, it's always the last quarter and the last few minutes that are the most interesting and the most exciting and the most complex.
And one or two plays can change everything.
Something that looks like it's going to be a disaster, the last two seconds in an international soccer tournament where the cup is on the line, and the last two seconds somebody scores a goal.
And the team who's about to lose wins.
You can't count that this is done yet.
Now, the psychological operation is going to continue.
They're going to say, well, now Biden wins.
Trump's only got 40 more days.
Orange man bad gone.
Get rid of Donald Trump.
Everything's going to be fine.
It's not going to be everything fine.
That's just the psychological operation that they know, the Democrats know how vulnerable they are.
Why?
Because the basic fact here is they cheated.
They cheated massively.
When they stopped the vote counting and suddenly pumped in all these mail-in votes and redialed the computer so Biden was getting the right percentage of the votes yet to be counted to carry him to the finish line.
And that can and will be demonstrated.
Now that's the underlying truth here.
And with that kind of an underlying truth, I'm confident that that's going to come out.
And the process goes on.
There's only one hard date left in the constitution, and that is the 20th of January, 2021, when the new president's inaugurated.
And by the way, we might not have a new president on the 20th of January.
And it's quite possible that Pence becomes acting president.
And that'll be debated because the left will say, no, it's Nancy Pelosi that becomes acting president.
And we'll have everything that's gone on this year has been a fight.
And it's going to be a fight right to the end.
I mean, this, this, think about it.
We've had, it's hard to remember, but it was January when the Russian collusion was ending.
That was basically still around, kicking around.
And then the Ukraine story started up.
We had an impeachment trial in the Senate, January, February, this year.
Remember that, Craig?
Yeah, absolutely.
It's like ancient history, but yeah, 2020, exciting times.
And Arthur, this continues.
So we get COVID and then we have the shutdown.
I mean, amazing.
You know, this disease suddenly.
And finally, we have Antifa and Black Lives Matter in the streets and we're talking about the 25th amendment to remove Donald Trump because of mental incompetence.
None of that worked and now as I wrote in the plan to remove Donald Trump from the president, I wrote that in June, we would have yet an attempt to remove him by voter fraud, And the post-election chaos that we're now experiencing.
I did predict that in June, didn't I, Arthur?
Absolutely.
And it's been going on the entire year.
And the evil behind this, and the alignment, it's not going to stop.
It will never stop until it is dealt with severely, swiftly, and legally.
Dr. Corsi?
Everybody thinks we're here in a situation where this is all just going to go away once Biden... No.
This doesn't go away.
If Biden gets in, we lose the Constitution, there'll never be another election because there's no reason to have another election if they're allowed to fix elections like they have here.
Okay?
And so we have to fight this right down to the end.
And what I can guarantee you is there's going to be a lot of ups and downs like a roller coaster.
Some days it's going to feel like, oh boy, we're really winning.
And some days, oh, we can't possibly win.
Last night was, oh, we've lost.
No, we haven't lost.
It's a setback, but we have not lost.
There's going to be setbacks.
So you might as well prepare yourself.
You know, I would say in every baseball game, somebody who can hit 300 is probably gonna be in the Hall of Fame.
That means seven out of 10 times they miss.
Anybody who can do 400, there's hit 400.
Ted Williams, very few who have a lifetime average of 400 or over, because they, missing six out of the 10 times, Is still way, you know, the norm.
Seven out of 10, eight out of 10 times, you could still get into the major leagues.
Okay, so losing is part of the winning of games.
Gotta keep that in mind.
Okay, now the Supreme Court did decide on a very technical basis yesterday, which was standing.
What does standing mean?
Standing is that, and remember, Craig, if you'll put up my book about Trump wins.
And by the way, Trump is still going to win.
I'm still confident of that.
He's still going to win.
And we didn't lose at the Supreme Court.
We didn't get heard.
I said this was a winning case.
I was positive it was a winning case.
It still is.
But it didn't get heard.
The first point I make in this book, in part one, is that law is not common sense.
And first-year law students have to learn to think like a lawyer, which means throw out logic and understand what the law is about.
So what did the Supreme Court really do yesterday?
It ruled there's only two justices who wanted to take the case.
Those were Thomas and Alito.
It was a conflict between states because Texas was saying these other states violated the equal protection right of Texas voters by having illegal Unconstitutional, really.
Different ways of voting.
Namely, they pointed to the mail-in voting, which was not put in place by state legislatures.
It was put in place by state governors, Democrats, who said, COVID, we've got to take exceptional measures.
State legislatures didn't get involved.
Instead, the state board of elections said, well, we'll do it this way.
And then the state Supreme Court said, it's OK.
Right up to the last minute, they were making changes.
Article two of the Constitution says only the state legislature can make the changes.
That's still the way it is.
But the Supreme Court said there was a standing issue.
Number one, this issue of between the states is typically resolved in a very, very administrative way.
They usually appoint some group, the Supreme Court appoints a group to study it.
They try to resolve the conflict between the two states.
It's not immediately heard by the court.
And this one, both Alito and Thomas, I think, correctly said, we got to hear this one now.
But the others said, no, we've got it out.
We don't have to.
They also had what they call latches.
Latches is a technical term for the case has to be heard when it's right, at the right time.
And the court was saying, look, Oregon had mail-in voting, almost universal, in 2000.
And it had no state law to do it.
It was done by a motion on, you know, on a ballot.
And people said, well, yeah, we want mail-in voting.
So they did it.
There was no state law.
And in Pennsylvania, all these rules were being made up by the state with the three extra days of counting and all of that, right up to the last minute.
And what the Supreme Court was saying is, you should have been in the court then.
You know, 2000 with Oregon, back when these rules were being promulgated by Pennsylvania, you should have been in the state court saying this violates the state constitution.
And then if the state court in Pennsylvania didn't want to hear it, then it should have come to the Supreme Court or of Oregon, either one, because you had about 17 states where these issues could have been raised.
Because even states where they enacted a law for no excuse absentee ballots, Which meant anybody who wanted to get an absentee ballot could.
They didn't follow the rules for absentee ballots, which remained on the books.
Namely, you had to have strict verification of signature to get a ballot against your registration to vote.
And when the vote came in and had to be checked again for signature, many of these states just said, we don't have time.
We're not going to bother with signature verification.
Our poll workers aren't handwriting experts.
And they let them come in sometimes even without a postmark.
Some of these ballots just were produced and counted.
All the votes we have have to be counted.
Let's count these.
They may have been manufactured on the spot.
Okay, those should have been contested.
And the Supreme Court's right.
I've been saying we should have been in the courts over this election a lot earlier than we were.
We're late getting into the courts.
But we'll still get into the courts.
Now, the next point in this e-book, and this e-book is still relevant, don't think because we've lost one decision on standing at the Supreme Court, with the Texas court case being thrown out, the Supreme Court did not rule at all on the arguments in that case.
They didn't even look at them.
Because if you don't have standing, the court's not going to hear the case.
You've got a divorce case, and you go into traffic court with it, the traffic court isn't going to hear it.
You don't have standing.
Or if you don't like something about a law and you want to bring it in and complain about it, you don't have standing because you've got to have a real dispute.
That law that you don't like has to have hurt you somehow or other.
You're going to have a conflict.
There has to be something the court can litigate and a dispute between parties.
All these things have to be in place before the court hears the substance.
Dismissal on standing Means you didn't bring it to us the right way.
If you brought it to us a different way, we'd have looked at it.
It's a dodge by the court.
Standing is often an issue that the courts use when they really don't want to hear a case.
And this court really doesn't want to decide this election.
Because they're getting all kinds of pressure from the Biden people, all kinds of pressure from the Trump people, and either way, no matter what this court decides, it loses.
Because a certain group of people are going to be pounded on the court.
And what's at stake, the court's going to have to finally realize is whether or not the Supreme Court is legitimate.
That's, that's what's at issue in this case.
Okay.
Now I want in getting into this a little deeper to make sure you understand a couple of things.
Number one, it could not be more serious because we're dealing with the legitimacy of the constitution of the United States and whether or not it's capable of preventing a fraud of this magnitude.
If a fraud gets perpetrated, then any fraud and any election can be perpetrated if it's just done and architected as massively as the Democrats have architected this one over as many years.
The Democrats have been working on this for 20 or 30 years, how to steal elections.
And they finally gotten their pieces in place and they made their move.
They've been trying it and I think many, many elections have been stolen over the last few years.
We just haven't recognized it.
We should have been more alert and we should have been paying attention.
Okay.
Now, any one thing can change this.
So people feel it's going to be a roller coaster, just like this whole year has been a roller coaster.
You think, Oh, Trump's going to be removed in the impeachment trial in the Senate.
Well, he didn't get removed.
Well, the violence is going to mean that he's going to be tried under the 25th amendment because he's not competent to be president.
That didn't happen.
He's gotten through every one of these.
I think he'll get through this one too.
But each one of these challenges is progressively more difficult.
And any one move, as I say, how many soccer games get won in the last two seconds when someone scores a goal, the team that was going to lose wins.
team that is in fact in a baseball game. There's a few key plays, any sport, chess match, one or two
moves, and the end game is always the most complex, even though there's the fewest pieces on the
chessboard, because you play the whole game to get to that moment.
And how it's constructed there is a result of the entire play of the whole game.
Okay, so we're in one of those games now, and I guarantee you it's going to be complex.
you're going to be up and down.
You're going to follow this and say, I don't know where it's going.
But where it's going right now is we're going to get more cases brought into the courts.
That's number one.
Number two, there's going to be a battle over the electors.
That's number two.
Number three, it has to be certified in Congress on January 6th.
That's battle number three.
Number four, no one is inaugurated until the 20th of January.
The battle is going to continue in that period of time, too.
And if there is no one picked president, which is possible, I believe Pence becomes president until this all gets settled out, if it ever gets settled out.
Because then we're in really pretty uncharted waters with the Constitution.
And you're gonna hear us talking about the Constitution, Article Two, the Constitution, Article Three on original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, the 12th Amendment, which goes back to about 1804, the 20th Amendment on the six, how many terms can a president serve and who can only serve two terms, who can serve 10 years, it's complex.
Then the election of 1877 and a law that was passed in 1870, the election was 1876, Hayes-Tilden, it was a mess.
And you're gonna have to learn about that because there's some things that come out of that law.
So I think I'm gonna be explaining this for a while.
And this may sound like you're advanced, this may be a graduate class in electoral politics, but it's gonna be a graduate class for the nation.
Okay, now today the Texas case is out and the lawyers are going to scrutinize how do we, what did the court say?
How do we form this case that we didn't get their attention?
So they're going to be paying a lot of attention to the standing issue.
Now, one of the strategies I'm going to recommend when you get to this kind of a point with the courts is instead of trying to pick the perfect case, Which is what the president's team has been doing.
It's gonna be all of the above.
Let's just try all of the above.
Because we don't know what's gonna work.
So we're gonna try all of the above.
And last night, Lin Wood filed a court case from Georgia that the Supreme Court docketed.
Okay, what does it mean that they docketed?
It means they took it.
That means they're probably gonna have briefs on that.
That doesn't mean they're gonna hear it.
This Texas case was docketed, and they got briefs.
When they read the briefs, they decided they didn't have a case they wanted to take, so they denied standing.
And they didn't hear it.
No one came in and argued that case.
Okay, now, there will be, I believe, one or more cases argued at the Supreme Court, and Lynnwood's case in Georgia may be it.
The case in Pennsylvania is still there.
All Alito did was dismiss the fact of emergency injunction to come in and present the certification of the state of Pennsylvania of the election until this issue of the extra three days voting got resolved.
The Supreme Court might yet hear that case.
It might not hear the case until after the election.
There's no rules as to when the Supreme Court has to hear a case.
It's all up to the justices what they decide to do.
Okay, now, any one case can change things.
Let's go to this case in Wisconsin.
First of all, Craig, is what I said, does this make sense to you?
Does it make you feel any better?
Nothing about this makes any sense.
And again, you told us to throw common sense out of this.
Does it make sense in a different context to the law?
And yes, the way you've explained the law, it makes perfect sense.
Okay, Arthur, how about in spiritual terms?
What do you see?
Well, what I see here is a couple things, and I think just rehashing exactly what's been going on, everything is being exposed, including all the prior constitutional arguments about picking a president.
It's almost like we're cleaning out the closet of past historical decisions through the Supreme Court related to presidential elections.
I think it's a house cleaning.
Certainly, we're getting to see the dirty laundry, that's for sure.
We're seeing China, we're seeing Hunter Biden, we're seeing all the ugliness of what the Democrats really did.
Okay, let's stay on track.
Let's go to Wisconsin.
And let's go up to the Gateway Pundit article.
What this article shows is that, okay, today, now, I believe just yesterday, the circuit court threw this case out in Wisconsin.
And the Supreme Court not only of Wisconsin, state Supreme Court, not only took the case, but they scheduled the oral argument today.
So this court wants to make a decision here.
Now what's at stake are two counties.
And these two counties are two of the largest counties in Wisconsin.
They're Dane County and Milwaukee County, where Milwaukee is, largest city in Wisconsin.
And what's at stake is hundreds of thousands of ballots in these two counties are possibly going to be thrown out because they were essentially fraudulently submitted after the stoppage in voting.
And if this case succeeds in Wisconsin, if the state Supreme Court says that what was done was unconstitutional according to the Wisconsin Constitution with the mail-in votes.
Then tomorrow, I guess today actually, today, Saturday the 12th of December is when the state legislature meets.
And the state legislature in Wisconsin, if the state Supreme Court today makes a ruling that these were unconstitutional, these mail-in ballots, according to the state constitution, they really can't put forward the Biden electors.
Okay, or at least it gives the GOP majority in the legislature extra ammunition of saying we aren't putting forward the Georgia, I'm sorry, we aren't putting forward the Biden electors.
Because the two things that are ironclad in the Constitution is the state legislature sets the rules for the voting in a presidential election in the state.
State legislature picks the electors any way they want.
Because our founding fathers had the wisdom to know that voting can get messed up.
And they're looking to the state legislators who they thought were more responsible to be in charge.
We elect the state legislature, so it's still we the people.
That's how the Federalist Papers argued this.
And there is discussion of all this kind of thing in the Federalist Papers.
Now, this red and blue line diagram that's in the Gateway Pundit about says it all.
You see, up until the time when they stopped the counting, At about 6 a.m., I guess it was, on November the 4th, late into the night of Election Day, that night going into the next day, when the Democrats realized they didn't have enough votes, I guess this was a Democratic governor, yes, Democratic Secretary of State,
They stopped the voting and then they resumed the voting and they brought in all these ballots for Biden.
And suddenly the line pops up for Biden, which had been trending with 89% of Wisconsin's expected vote in.
You know, they basically look, they look like Trump was going to win.
They stopped the voting.
Ballots for Biden come in, boom, and now the percentages reverse, where Trump was getting, say, 55% of the vote before the counting stopped.
Biden was getting 55% after the counting resumed.
So they adjust the computers to tilt the results of the remaining ballots that are going to be counted in the machines.
And they bring in this huge quantity suddenly of Biden votes, which can be statistically shown to be fraudulent.
Now, I'm going to point to some underlying realities we've got here.
Number one underlying reality is this is fraud.
It can be proven statistically to be fraud.
The probability of this occurring is so low, it had to be fraud.
It's the only way you could explain a statistical result like this.
And we have evidence of fraud.
We've got affidavits.
We've got videotape, cell phones, all kinds of proof.
But back to my e-book, it hadn't been decided in a state trial court yet.
We haven't had time.
So the issue in Wisconsin is going to be, again, the same issue related as the case that was just thrown out of the Supreme Court in Texas, namely that the rules implemented for mail-in ballots in Wisconsin violated the state's constitution.
Now, they're standing here for this issue because these are Wisconsin voters talking about a Wisconsin state constitution and how the voting was done in Wisconsin.
It's not a conflict between states.
And if this case gets decided either way, for Trump or against Trump, and it goes to the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court probably has to take this case.
Because now that's come up through the lower courts.
That's a lot better than going to the courts for original jurisdiction because you've got a conflict between two states.
Supreme Court doesn't like those kinds of cases.
This kind of case is bread and butter.
It's coming up through the system and you've got a conflict and the state has made a decision in their Supreme Court.
Now the Supreme Court of the United States is being asked to look at the case and see if the way it was decided violates the constitution.
And either side who wins will have an argument here.
And how this turns out will affect whether or not the state legislature's selection of the electors was correct or not, it can be disputed.
So even if Wisconsin today picks the Biden electors, and the Electoral College meets on Monday and gives those votes for the state to Biden, it's still not final.
Because if fraud in the election gets proven here, or a violation of the state and or the federal constitution gets proven here, then That's thrown out.
You can't have, just because the Electoral College met on the 14th, which is mandated by a statute, that date is not set by the Constitution, the Electoral College vote can be null and void if subsequent court action determines it was fraud.
Either a trial, or a state Supreme Court saying it violated the state Constitution, Or someone who accepts, one court that accepts the logic which I put forward from Abbott v. Perez, which is that the courts can accept statistical evidence to show that there was fraud, even if we don't know who committed the fraud.
And you can't let the fact that there was fraud, okay, that's how it was decided Abbott v. Perez was a John Roberts case in one of these voting rights acts.
And the Voting Rights Act, he said a discriminatory scheme to disadvantage Latinos in Texas was not unconstitutional because it didn't work.
The voting data shows that the Latinos were electing their congressmen.
That's using correlation data, regression data, statistical analysis, probability analysis, to come to a conclusion whether the election was discriminatory against Latinos or whether they were not being discriminated against.
Similarly, you can use that same logic to say whether the voting was fraudulent or not fraudulent.
And that's going to be a more difficult issue for the Supreme Court to dismiss.
Okay.
Craig, is it clear how this one test in Wisconsin, the same issue that the Supreme Court rejected, namely, is the mail-in voting violating a state or a federal constitution, can be heard in Wisconsin because it's relevant in Wisconsin.
You've got Wisconsin voters who are bringing the case, and this is the kind of case that Wisconsin courts can handle.
The Wisconsin Supreme Court has decided to take it, and it will make a decision.
Okay, and that becomes then something that can now reach the Supreme Court, and suddenly the Supreme Court has standing, it can look at the substantive issue of the case, which it did not do when it dismissed the Texas case.
Do you understand that, Craig?
Got it.
Crystal clear.
But boy, it took a while to get there, didn't it?
No, but you have to lay the predicate, because then you don't understand if you jump into the middle of it.
Arthur?
Absolutely.
You got to prove it.
And it reminds me, I don't know if you remember that old TV show called the paper chase with John Houseman.
And in the beginning of that, they said, we're going to take your heads full of mush and make you think like a lawyer.
I know, I know, I know it's the way it goes.
I'm a, you know, I'm going to have to ask these people are going to all want me on the radio today.
And so I'm going to get to tell them.
That I'm on a podcast right now.
And sorry about that, but you know, I'm on a podcast right now.
One of the other things that if I make a point here, and Craig you might want to jump in on this as well, is that what we're seeing is from a spiritual standpoint, a lot of people in America, I would say the West is like this, have a tendency not to see the evil behind it.
I think a lot of people just turn around and they basically want to think good that things are happening, but what we are seeing here is we're seeing a very well orchestrated evil intent You know, with what has happened across these entire states.
And it's very important that we take the exact correct steps to get it undone.
Yeah, absolutely.
Go ahead, Dr. Grossman.
Well, I'll just go on for one more minute.
Okay.
And so, bottom line is, we've seen the incursion here in California.
I live out on the west coast, unfortunately.
The sheeples republic of Kalunia is what it has turned into.
And the move to the left has just been dramatic.
And it hasn't been, I wouldn't call it incremental, it's been an avalanche of leftist policies pushed by primarily people like You know, the San Franciscans, and those who would prefer for us to, once again, just to destroy all the rules of the Constitution, no law, everything is chaos, everything is in the streets, and that's how the leftists then try to create a foothold in places like Los Angeles, San Francisco, and New York, and then try to make it, push it throughout the entire country.
Okay, now let's get back to this.
They're working out these radio, it's gonna be a very busy weekend, very busy next period of time.
We're just gonna keep going through it.
Okay, now, that's the first kind of thing that's going on.
Now, secondly, in a reaction to everything that happened last night, Lin Wood filed some cases.
He filed one, the Supreme Court took it, docketed it.
Doesn't mean it's gonna be heard, just docketed it.
And also, President Trump was saying last night, we can still win.
And listen to what President Trump is saying here.
I mean, let me give you this one here.
Because Trump is, like I am, he's understanding that the fight has just begun.
And here's what Trump was saying.
Here's the article, Craig, you can put it up.
But basically, Trump is saying that we've got more opportunities to come back to the Supreme Court.
We've got state Supreme Courts.
Well, we've got other litigation that's going to come up, and then we've got the 12th Amendment, which sets up procedures for this to be brought to Congress on the 6th of January.
Just because the Electoral College meets tomorrow doesn't really mean anything at this point.
Yes, they're probably going to certify Biden to say he's got 270 electoral votes or more, so he'll be president-elect.
Well, but not while it's still being contested.
Because Trump hasn't conceded in these contests, they're still gonna be in the courts.
I'd say you're probably gonna see about 10 cases in the courts.
Okay, now, let me just point out here that this article is also saying this was just a lack of standing.
Yes, again, they didn't rule on the merits.
That's right, all of that's true.
It's only a technical ruling, that's correct.
There are many lawsuits for the Supreme Court to hear.
On Friday, Arizona GOP Chair Kelly Ward announced that they have just submitted their case to the Supreme Court regarding alleged voter fraud in their own state.
Ward argued the case was necessary due to the lack of due process provided to them by the judicial system when investigating the fraud.
The Wisconsin case that was being heard today And there's going to be more.
Also, the state legislatures could decide that they want to investigate the fraud and find it.
Many of these states have legislatures which are GOP.
And if they do an analysis and determine that the voting procedures were not legitimate or were fraught with fraud, Then, basically, the state legislators will act to restore the will of the people of the respective states.
They will pick the slate of Donald Trump electors or a slate of electors that could not certify the election, in which case it may go.
There's not going to be a new election.
They're not going to do more voting.
The voting part is done.
We're done voting.
That's not going to happen here now.
We're gonna now be in the courts and with all these different procedures going on, the state legislatures can investigate, various states can bring cases to the Supreme Court.
They're going to, and there's gonna be a lot of determination.
And what I want to remember is that in the final analysis of this, There's one fact, and that is that the fraud occurred and it can be proved.
That it takes time in the courts and all the rest.
These are the tactics that the Democrats have used from the beginning to win.
Lawfare.
They've used the law to have warfare.
Just like they were in the streets saying it was peaceful protest.
They're in Oregon streets tearing it up because they've got an Oregon's in charge of Oregon and they will not bring in the National Guard.
President Trump would have to override that with the Insurrection Act.
He didn't want to take that extraordinary means in this volatile time.
Political capital it would cost him.
With the mainstream media ready to jump down his throat for whatever he does.
Okay, I've never seen a time this architected to cause the president to be unable to act.
But the bottom line is that there was, that's bottom line number one, there was fraud, it's illegal, it was criminal, and it was wrong.
And that's going to be determined.
When that determines, that's going to change everything.
But we're going to have to figure out how it can get determined that's in a way that the legal processes can accept it.
And ultimately it'll be the political processes because if all the legal processes fall, then it's going to go to Congress and Congress is going to decide on the basis of politics.
Okay.
And the game changes there too.
Now, I also want to point out to you that Sidney Powell isn't going to sit by idly.
Okay.
Here's an article from Sidney Powell, and I have not yet had time to find out where all of her Uh, filings occurred, but this is what she's saying last night on her blog.
There it is, Craig.
You can pull it up.
It's in Citizens Free Press today.
She's saying, we made emergency filings tonight to SCOTUS.
So pay attention.
We made emergency filings for Georgia and Michigan.
We'll be filing Arizona and Wisconsin shortly.
These cases raise constitutional issues and prove massive fraud.
Our plaintiffs have standing.
We, the people, will not allow rigged elections.
Okay, so there's Sidney Powell fighting.
And the cases that she's gonna bring to court now, the next round of cases, will have standing, because they'll be crafted to have standing.
And we now know that that's how this is going to go.
That's how this endgame is going to get played.
And I believe the court will hear the case, will hear the merits.
And when they do, Trump wins.
Craig, what do you think of that?
Right.
Absolutely.
And the bottom line is everybody just has to fear not, stand strong, stay united and calm down.
Okay, now let's continue this.
So we're going to get filings in the state courts where they're going to try to prove fraud.
We're going to get filings in the Supreme Court where they think they've got standing because some case at the state level has failed.
They've got a voter in the state.
And in fact, this is going to get brought forward in a way where we're going to be able to start reading a new set of briefs.
Forget about the Arizona case.
I mean, sorry, the Texas case.
Forget about the Texas case.
That's done.
That didn't work.
But it doesn't mean that some things are gonna work.
And eventually, the Supreme Court gets peace.
How about this case?
Eventually, they're gonna take one.
Now, it still doesn't mean that we're gonna get a great hearing in the Supreme Court, but I'm gonna tell you next that even if we lose in the Supreme Court, it isn't the end of the game.
If enough of these states' legislators decide that the election was fraudulent in their states and they don't let the electors go for Biden, even if the Electoral College votes Monday that Biden wins, that can get revised because they withdraw their votes from Biden.
If that begins happening, even with one state, it's headed into Congress to decide it.
Okay, now it's a complex process.
And I think, by the way, Jericho marches are going on today, Sunday, Monday.
This is going to be a dramatic weekend, because you're going to be hit, boom, boom, boom, boom, all through this weekend.
What's Wisconsin's Supreme Court going to do?
Which cases did Sidney Powell and the others file at the Supreme Court?
Which ones are the Supreme Court docket?
When do the briefs come in on those?
Are there going to be hearings?
We're going to go through that with every single case at the Supreme Court level.
How many cases are in the state courts?
Are the legislatures investigating the election?
Who's going to prove and determine the fraud?
Okay, now the game is on to prove the fraud.
And it's never been more center stage.
Because we're not going to settle this on just constitutional issues.
We're now going to have to get down to the core issue of fraud.
Okay, now, let's shift gears, and it goes to the Congress.
So, Craig, what do you think about that, what I'm saying there?
Right, absolutely.
And the bottom line is that you can look at this from an angle and the left is looking at it to make you surrender.
Their whole purpose is to defeat anybody that supports Trump and defeat Trump himself emotionally, spiritually.
And I think, Arthur, you can talk about how the importance of keeping your spiritual awareness during a period like this.
Arthur, what do you think?
Absolutely.
Craig's got a point, and that's why I like to end the broadcast with the concept of always victory.
You have to maintain the vision, and the vision is the victory of God in manifestation, and it's outpicturing.
I absolutely agree with this.
And prayer right now is even more critical because of all the things that have to happen to be able to work this all out.
And so make sure that you get your prayer work in there and use the petitions that we have on the Prayerful Patriot.
Dr. Corsi?
I'm a political scientist.
For me, this is the most fun I've had in a long time.
Now we're finally getting down to how the president's selected, and I've been thinking about these issues for 50 or 60 years, reading these laws and trying to figure out what would happen here.
Well, now we got a case, and I can guarantee you this is going to be written about for the next hundred years or next thousand years, because this is historic, how this is being played out, and you're in the middle of it.
It's like watching a baseball game or football game or any kind of sport or chess match that is consequential.
The two best chess players in the world.
And they've each won three games, drawn a couple.
Now this is a match that's going to decide the whole thing.
Okay?
And that's pretty exciting.
Stanley Cup, game seven.
Here we go.
Tied up.
We're in game seven, tied.
We're going into the final two minutes.
We might be into overtime.
This is when the game is really good.
Anybody who really loves the sport, loves a moment like this better than the lopsided game where your team wins, but you're bored halfway through it.
And that's what they want to try to push on us is a lopsided game.
Yeah.
And it's not this game's far from over.
Okay.
Now it comes into the courts for the courts.
Congress says we're taking this baby over here.
And the House gets to pick the President, and the Senate gets to pick the Vice President.
Again, we have 26 of the current delegations.
Each state gets one vote in the House.
They only have 23.
The Senate, right now, we have the majority.
If it's before the January 3rd that it comes to the Congress, then it's the current Congress that decides it.
If it's after January 3rd, the new Congress will be instated.
We'll have more delegations that will be for GOP, maybe 28, because we won more of the House seats in this last election.
And we may have a tie 50-50 In the Senate, depending on what happens with these two seats in Georgia, these two Senate seats that are in the runoff.
And by the way, Mitch McConnell just did a boner, a bad, stupid thing.
He said this $1,200, he wasn't going to go in.
The White House was asking him to do it.
The two Republicans, this $1,200 that Nancy Pelosi wants to give to everybody, check.
And he said, no, no, no, we're not doing it.
Well, I mean, he's got his principle, but he might have thought to elect the president.
Just spend the money.
Who cares?
Well, half of the GOP doesn't like Trump, and Trump's base is not the GOP.
We're going through a fundamental realignment.
From this moment on, U.S.
politics shifts.
We've now got Marxists who want a revolution, and we've got constitutionalists who want to keep God, and the country is divided, and we are, in effect, in a civil war now.
Now, it's not going to be, hopefully, a shooting civil war, and it's hard to divide North and South, because you've basically got the cities, the coast, New York, and New England, Boston, and the West Coast, versus the rest of the country, and the big cities.
I mean, that's this war.
And you might want to say, just give the big cities to the Democrats, and secede the rest of the country from the big cities.
Well, that's going to be hard to do.
Okay, so now when it gets into Congress, something else happens because of the 12th Amendment.
The 12th Amendment, they vote to pick a president, and there's complicated ways, they may not, if it gets to the Supreme Court, now we've thrown out the votes, there's not gonna be another vote, we've thrown out the Electoral College, that's done with, so we're not gonna bother with it.
Now we're just in the Congress, it's political.
Well, there's some mechanisms in the 12th Amendment that even at the last hour can question the selection of electors.
Okay, now, Craig, there was an article we looked at last week in which, oh, by the way, I want to just by, I want to go to this blog on the Supreme Court for a minute to make this point.
Take a look at this blog right here.
This is a Supreme Court blog right now, that's it.
That page, that page shows The election cases that are either at the Supreme Court or coming to the Supreme Court.
Got it up, Craig?
What's up?
Look at all those cases.
I thought you all thought this was over.
Pennsylvania Democratic Party v. Bookvar.
That's whether a decision by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court requiring the state to count mail-in ballots received up to three days after Election Day, as long as they are not clearly postmarked after Election Day, violates federal law and the Constitution.
Now that's an Article 2 case.
That's up there.
Another one here, this is Hotz v. Hollins.
It's at the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
127,000 votes cast drive-through voting during the early period in Harris County, Texas.
Changed much of the city of Houston.
State laws were violated and should be invalidated.
Another one.
Carson V. Simon, U.S.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.
This is Minnesota election officials.
Another one in Texas, Michigan.
Michigan Court of Appeals.
That's coming up to the Michigan Supreme Court.
Another one here in the U.S.
District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania.
This is a trial court.
With a number of Pennsylvania election accommodations in light of the coronavirus pandemic, Providing drop-off sites and alleviating signature matching requirements for absentee ballots, as well as lifting restriction on employment, employing out-of-country poll workers, et cetera, violate state election laws of the Constitution.
Another one, U.S.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Okay, this is another one in Arizona.
Then you got another one in Arizona that said the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
That's headed to the Supreme Court.
Georgia, that's in the Eleventh Circuit.
Another one here, Tennessee, that's in the Sixth Circuit.
Okay, we've got all these cases in all these circuits, and by the way, one's at the Supreme Court, People First of Alabama v. Merrill.
That's a good case.
coronavirus pandemic requires alleviating the enforcement of three Alabama election provisions,
that absentee ballots must be signed in the presence of a notary or two adult witnesses.
The applications for absentee ballots must include copies of a valid photo ID.
The counties may not offer curbside voting.
That's a good case.
And here's one at the Supreme Court, Monroe versus Siracosta,
Coronavirus changes in North Carolina, absentee ballots.
That's at the Supreme Court.
Another one, Maine, Supreme Court.
Another one here is Wisconsin, at the Supreme Court.
So, with this list of cases, Craig, do you think we're done?
Ah, gee, that looks like a long list of litigation.
That doesn't appear to be closed to me.
Well, until this is all resolved, we might not have a president elected in 2020.
Arthur, what do you think?
Oh, I think enough people know what the heck is going on here now that they can play this out.
And I agree with you, this is going to take a long time to litigate and to move it through the courts.
It is going to take a while.
Yeah.
But you know what?
It's important because if there's fraud, we can't just let Russia wade through it.
And our founding fathers didn't require it.
Okay, now here's an article, Craig, that we've looked at before.
And this is an article about the 12th Amendment.
Okay, now we're going to all be hearing about the 12th Amendment and the law of 1876.
We've had a lot of contentious elections in our time.
And this Tilden-Hayes election, which was about some 10 years or 12 years after the Civil War ended, was one in particular.
And it got settled in an ugly way.
They created an election commission, which is not in the Constitution.
And that election commission kind of, in a back room, haggled it out.
And they settled it so Hayes, who was the A former governor in Ohio and Tilden from the South, well, they said, we'll make Hayes president if the GOP agrees to remove the troops from the South.
So we're going to end reconstruction, you get Hayes.
That's how they settled it.
They horse swapped and Hayes became president.
He wasn't actually that bad a president.
That's how it was settled.
In the back room, smoking cigars.
It's considered one of the most disgraceful political deals to make a president.
But once it gets to Congress, it becomes political.
Now, when it gets presented to the Congress on the 6th of January, you've got the new Congress in there.
We'll have more seats in the House.
And maybe some of those House seats are going to be up for contention.
Now, we may actually be winning more seats in the House as these elections get to be determined to be fraudulent.
This election is not going to be over maybe for the next six months.
Might as well just get used to it.
Okay?
Now, in this process, when it comes to the Congress on the 6th.
Pence is still vice president until the 20th.
So Pence presides over the joint session of Congress that has to certify what the Electoral College did, because the Electoral College says Biden is the president.
He's not president until that's certified.
He isn't even president-elect until the 6th of January.
Okay, now in previous years, yes, the Congress has started to confirm after the Electoral College, you know, because there hasn't been any real contest.
There was, you know, the contests were 2000.
The elections between 2000 and now didn't get into this kind of a post-election battle.
This year, the Democrats said they would.
I wrote about it in June that we would be doing this.
So six months ago, I was worrying and writing about this.
Okay, now, in this, when they get to Congress, Al Gore in 2000 was presiding over the joint session, and Maxine Waters, Democrat from California, rose and said, Mr. President, meaning, I mean, at this point, Gore, who was yet vice president, but he was presiding over the session, She said basically, Mr. Vice President, I rise to object to the fraudulent 24 Florida electoral votes.
She's still mad about the recount and that it got stopped and she wants Florida's 24 electoral votes recalled.
Now Gore said to her from The podium where he's presiding in the house chamber over a joint session is the objection in writing and signed by a member of the house and a senator, inquired Gore.
See, the congressional rules require a house member and a senator to simultaneously challenge a state's electoral slate.
Okay, so now we got rules of the joint session Which are not in the Constitution, are not in the amendments.
These are just the rules of Congress.
These are Robert's Rules type.
These are procedural rules.
Okay?
Now, the procedural rules have to be in writing, and Gore's Vice President 2000 says, is that in writing?
And signed by a member of the House and a Senator.
And Waters said, the objection is in writing, and I don't care.
In other words, I'm a congresswoman, and I'm here, and I want this, and I don't care if I didn't get a senator, and I don't care if I didn't sign a piece of paper.
And Gore said, the chair will advise the congresswoman that the rules do care.
In other words, He'd have granted her a motion if she'd have had it written down.
Facts don't care about your feelings.
That's right.
And the law doesn't care about common sense.
Okay, so, questions arose in January 2005 about Ohio's slate of legislative votes.
In that instance, late Representative Stephanie Tubbs Jones, Democrat, Ohio, and former Barbara Boxer, Democrat, teamed up to challenge the Ohio electoral votes.
The House and Senate then met separately to consider the Ohio slate.
But after a short debate, Congress decided that Vice President George W. Bush was victorious in Ohio.
If you remember, 2004, Ohio was the last state, and it was very, very, where Ohio went in the elections, whether it was going to be Kerry or George W. Bush reelected.
I was very involved in all of that because of Swift Boat.
You know, I co-authored the Swift Boat book and was working with the Swift Boat veterans to try to defeat John Kerry.
And Ken Blackwell was the Secretary of State of Ohio who was involved in all this.
He'd held firm for the rules in Ohio and held an honest election in Ohio.
And George W. Bush narrowly won it.
And so, When the 2005, when the issue came up in January 6th about Ohio's electoral votes, whether they were legitimate or not, and the motion was properly submitted with signature of Representative Stephanie Tubbs Jones of Ohio and Barbara Boxer, Senator, Democrat, California, the House and Senate had to consider it.
They met separately.
Constitution does not mandate what the House and Senate must do to establish whether it certifies an electoral slate.
Wasn't that just peachy?
So, there's no rules.
They can do whatever they want.
And if the House and Senate actually debate or even vote on a disputed slate of electors from a state, what happens if each body reaches a different conclusion?
It's mathematically possible the presidential candidates fall shy of the required 270 votes to assume the presidency, and nobody's president.
And it's unclear how fast all of this must happen.
Okay, now, let's say that we get a Republican Congressman, there's only a whole bunch signed as Texas.
They signed amicus briefs for the Texas Supreme Court case that got dismissed yesterday.
We've got a whole bunch of senators who are pretty mad.
And what if they have one of these motions on the 6th?
And the issue is, okay, the other one of you guys is going to guess what the issue is going to be.
Craig, what do you think it's going to be?
I'm trying so hard to keep up with your pace here, I have lost my ability to think.
Continue.
Arthur, what do you think it's going to be?
Aided breath.
It's going to be whether the Hunter Biden case disqualifies Joe Biden from being president.
Seriously?
Yeah, sure.
Because if he's going to be indicted with a crime, he isn't going to be elected president.
He's going to have to face trial.
Bingo.
Mainstream media has got to discuss Hunter Biden.
Now, I bet you guys hadn't thought about that.
Because here we go.
Now we got the front and center here.
What we got is the election was fraudulent.
And by the way, Hunter and Joe Biden are criminals.
And they're not going to avoid those issues being in front of the American people fully.
So what do you think of that?
Craig?
Uh, I, I, I defer to you.
Arthur, what do you think of that?
Well, this is interesting because we're seeing a push to try to bring Joe Biden's son, Hunter Biden's stuff to the fore.
And I was trying to figure out, they still have to latch Hunter Biden's stuff to Joe Biden, right?
Before that can be proved.
And then, so that's going to take a while to litigate all of that and get that out.
Right.
And you're going to have the house is going to be, you know, possibly both of these are going to be controlled by Democrats.
And they're probably going to just say, forget about the Hunter Biden stuff.
Right.
But, um, you know, I'm not a hundred percent sure that if we have all this kind of play out and the Hunter Biden thing gets served up because it's going to be here and today, is the 12th of December, and this is a month away.
This is the 6th of January, so it's just, what, six days short of a month.
That's plenty of time, and we're going to start, and a lot of people are going to start.
Now, of course, YouTube is going to not want to discuss, and everybody's going to not want to discuss, but I think there's going to be some trepidation as to taking it down.
And in fact, guess who presides over this whole process?
Pence.
So I don't think this is going to go away anytime near soon because you can shout, say, I want to contest this state and this state and this state electors over the Hunter Biden, Joe Biden connection until it's litigated.
And the chair can rule, well that's not going to be litigated until there's a trial, because that's where we started.
Issues of fact get settled at a trial, so put that to a trial.
Then we'll determine what the result is.
So, if in fact there's no vice president, because under the 12th amendment, if the vice president had been the new vice president, Harris had been actually made vice president by the Senate.
But again, it'd have to be confirmed here, and the certification would block it.
If there's no current new vice president, I believe then the The old vice president, namely Pence, takes over.
Now that's got to be argued because, again, I'm not sure there is any constitutional precedent on that.
we're going to be going back in the old books and seeing who talked about it and what they said and
if there's no firm resolution on it we're going to have to make one up just like they made up
the electoral commission in 1872 and 1877 and all these other screwy 1870 issues that came up.
So we are not by any means done with this.
And from my point of view, when I look at it from the point of view of prayer, and the prayers that we've crafted, we've been asking that the will of God be done.
And I think the will of God be, is first of all and foremost, not that we have a quick resolution of this, but the will of God here is that we get to see the corruption.
And now God's saying, okay, now that you can see the corruption, what are you going to do about it?
What are you going to do about it?
You're just gonna say, nothing we can do about it because we've got these rules and so Biden's president because NBC says so.
Or are we gonna say, we the people take these issues seriously and we demand that they be litigated.
We demand to know if the election was fraudulent.
We demand to know if Hunter Biden violated any laws and if Joe Biden violated any laws.
And if they did, we want that adjudicated.
Before we pick one of these critters to be our next president and vice president.
And Donald Trump just had to cool his heels until we figure this all out.
Now that could happen.
At any rate, I do know these issues are going to be there.
Now, Arthur, why don't you go back to that prayer and remind us what we prayed?
Basically, what we have, and we're going to be making adjustments to this, and if we could bring this up, it's the Featured Agreement Prayer.
Right now, it's for the Supreme Court, but as this is unfolding, we're actually working on it this weekend to include all legislators, but we're being very specific about it.
In this particular prayer, we're asking for God's will to be made manifest for the adjudication of specific cases.
Now that Dr. Corsi's laid this out, we have detailed cases that could potentially go to the Supreme Court.
We're going to iterate those.
We're going to make sure that they are listed in that case and in the prayer, in the petition, and we're asking for God's adjudication to support those that need to be in process for this.
Now, why do we do this?
It's because what is happening is the forces of darkness that are unseen behind this put huge amounts of pressure on the people not to follow God's will.
And so there's a lot of peer pressure, or there's pressure that comes in.
It's called aggressive mental suggestion.
It's called the forces of darkness will figure out some way or another.
You know, a door will get opened up, a family gets threatened, somebody can't respond.
So the idea is to get the petition to support these people with God's will to protect them, so that the legal system can actually unfold and do what it's supposed to do, and fulfill God's will in the physical.
Dr. Corsi?
I think the real issue to me here is that God's will is that we see where we've gotten to as a country, and that we understand what this communism is about.
We understand what the left is about, and we make a decision as we the people if that's how we want to live.
We understand what Donald Trump is all about, and the Constitution.
We understand what God's all about.
We want to live with God or without God.
And depending on how we adjudicate that, it's not about the election.
It's about the heavenly court here.
And it's about how God decides to handle earth.
As I've said from the very, very beginning, first sentence of the Bible in the beginning, it was God.
And God created heaven and earth.
God created it.
He can unplug it.
Can have a nuclear war in two years?
All this won't make a lot of difference.
Because we'll all be cinders are about to become extinguished again.
Another species gone from this earth.
It's happened before.
Because we're at a crossroads.
And if we get through this by deciding that we're going to reject the evil, which now you can see fully.
So Donald Trump has performed a spiritual role here.
Left has been the catalyst to make us see all this, which has been behind the scenes.
Left has been lying about who it is.
We're just moderate Joe Biden.
Yeah, well, Joe Biden can barely, from his dementia, which appears to be progressive, can barely remember where he is and what he's doing.
But his case, the Democrats chose him because they were planning to replace him with Kamala Harris, so they couldn't get elected a dog catcher.
But yet she's Marxist and Obama's choice, but they're stuck with Joe Biden.
And now his baggage comes along with Ukraine and China.
China gets pulled into it.
The computers in China and the China connections get pulled into it.
The national security issues of this election get pulled into it.
So what the Supreme Court did yesterday was just make us get on the right stage.
And we're getting on that right stage now.
I would say, don't expect the rapid solution of this, but do expect that we're going to now have a full airing of what the issues of right and wrong are here and where we go in the future.
And that's really, that was what I was praying would happen in this election to begin with.
So in a sense, Donald Trump's already won.
He's fulfilled God's mission.
He's brought this before us.
This would not have happened had Donald Trump not been president.
Now, where we go from here determines on we the people.
And it's going to be decided by we the people.
Because in the final analysis, all these little rules and procedures, what's going to keep it going is there's 70 million people who aren't too happy that Donald Trump's not being reelected.
And I don't think there's 70 million people that enthusiastic about Joe Biden.
I think there may be a lot of votes, I don't know how many of those were fraudulent, but a lot.
And so I don't think Joe Biden's got that kind of support, except among the very top elite, maybe among the bureaucracy that wants to be in the In their nice Georgetown clubs and coffee shops and going off to the World Trade Organization and the world this and the world that and the EU and the Davos because they're in the permanent scenic cure of never being fired.
And they like the fact that they're running the shadow government.
They like that.
China likes it that they're running the shadow government.
Those guys will be just happy.
And everybody in the United States who doesn't care about the United States, all the leftists, all the Marxists, They're gonna be happy, but I don't take that to be anywhere near 70 million Americans.
California might be happy.
Well, maybe we do let California succeed, at least the coast, I don't know.
This thing has yet to play out, but it's gonna now play out on that stage.
And for one, I'm planning to have the best time of my life watching to see how this happens and getting in the middle of it to try to keep pushing for God to win.
God will win one way or the other.
God will win.
You can see how I say it.
In the end, God unplugs it.
God wins.
We lose.
And World War is now option one.
Option two might be a thousand years worth of peace, but we're going to have to bury some of this satanic insanity.
We're going to have to put the devils back in hell and keep them locked up there for a while.
Otherwise, we go through door one.
And that's what this is all about.
This is not about a Supreme Court decision yesterday that was disappointing.
This was the beginning of an act.
I say the Democrats are like all the bad terrorists I used to have to deal with.
First act, they come into the bank, everybody puts their hands up, they get the money.
Now they've got all this money they robbed, everybody's scared, they won.
That's act one.
It's good at first act, exciting, fun to watch.
Act two, the telephone rings.
Guy like me is on the telephone saying, I'm your best chance of getting out of here alive.
But first of all, you might want to put that money in the corner because it's going to explode in the next couple of minutes.
You're going to be all covered with orange dye indelible.
You don't want to do that.
And then take a look outside.
It took a while.
They push the button.
The SWAT team's out there.
They want to kill you.
I'd like the hostages to come out.
I'd like to work out the second act here.
And I'd like to work out the third act.
Third act, first of all, second act, you want some pizza?
We're going to be talking about this for a while.
You got any women in the hostages?
Children?
Let's get them out of there.
And third act, let's talk about what's going to happen to you guys when you come out with your hands up.
They'll just position you until they get a good shot, and then they'll take you out.
One way or the other, this is how it ends.
So you take your door one or door two.
That's how it's gonna end.
And now the telephone's just rung.
Democrats thought they pulled this off.
Boy, they've got it running.
The Supreme Court got everything going their way.
I don't think so.
Phone just rang.
This isn't gonna be resolved real easily.
There's a lot more steps here to go.
Trump's going to fight these steps because Trump sees beyond himself in the White House to the role he's playing in human history and in divine history.
And he's going to play that role.
Hand to God remains on Trump.
He isn't going anywhere fast.
And these next 30 days, every day is going to be like a brand new month long news cycle.
So you might as well get ready for that too.
I want to wrap it up because I want to get lots going today.
We're going to come back again tomorrow.
If that's okay with you, can you do that, Craig?
Arthur, is that okay with you?
It's Sunday.
See what we can do.
We'll be back with another one tomorrow.
It's just going to be too much happening to miss.
Craig, any last comments for today?
Yeah, and through the whole thing, fear not, stay calm, read the Bible, stay in the Word.
God's plan supersedes all our plans, and that's what's in motion right now, Arthur.
Yeah, and people need to be protected, so that they do the right thing, that they align themselves up with God.
As all of this is being revealed, we have to pray for that protection and that support, and that save this nation, which is that instrument that's going to be freedom, that's supposed to be freedom for the world.
Dr. Corsi?
Well, this Saturday, December 12th, 2020, very eventful day, In the end, God always wins.
God will win here, too.
Thank you for joining us.
God bless.
We'll be back tomorrow on Sunday.
Always victory.
▲
Export Selection