| Time | Text |
|---|---|
|
World Bank's Port Privatization Plan
00:02:55
|
|
| You know, the average person who's maybe lives in the ghetto or lives poor or lives out in the country, they're hearing it and hearing it and hearing it. | |
| They need somebody to give them some sense. | |
| There's very little of them. | |
| On the short term, it's a political ploy by those who see this as a new constituency. | |
| But I think looking at it as Christians, we have to look at it with a prophetic view and see that this is bigger than just the United States. | |
| All over the world, there's a drive by the likes of George Soros and his Open Society Initiative and other globalists who want to break down national borders. | |
| That's why there's such a resistance to the U.K. leaving the European Union, why there was such resistance to Donald Trump getting America out of the Trans-Pacific Partnership and the TTIP, which is the Atlantic version of it. | |
| And now NAFTA is on the table, the North American Free Trade Agreement, because the globalists want to take us back to Babel, back to that original one-world government that God put a stop to back in the days of Nimrod. | |
| That's what the globalists want. | |
| They're trying to take us back to Babel. | |
| Did you know that the World Bank dictates to countries how to run their ports? | |
| No. | |
| The World Bank tells countries how to run their ports. | |
| In fact, the most recent rule change from the World Bank to all the countries was you have to privatize your ports. | |
| We don't want the governments running the ports. | |
| We don't want the cities running the ports. | |
| We want them private. | |
| I believe it's because the World Bank can more easily control them if they're private. | |
| That's right. | |
| The World Bank lends money to third world and developing countries and essentially coerces them into following rules. | |
| But the first world countries are also following those same World Bank rules. | |
| Ports mean commerce. | |
| Yes. | |
| Right. | |
| If you can control the flow of goods, you can control the people. | |
| That's right. | |
| Oh, and in prophecy, Revelation 18, Mystery Babylon's trade sent across the ocean to ports. | |
| The World Bank is flying under the radar. | |
| Very few people pay attention to the news. | |
| Start noticing what the World Bank is doing. | |
| Well, another thing that concerns me, Sharon, both you and Jim said that this word suddenly has been stuck in your head. | |
| And privatizing the ports could have ramifications as to what is coming on those ships and being brought into the U.S. | |
|
Bioterrorism and Gene Drives
00:02:48
|
|
| Yes. | |
| And with your background in molecular biology, it concerns me that some of this prophecy could also be fulfilled through bioterrorism. | |
| And the other aspect of this, this is something that we were watching 10 years ago when I was hosting the talk show up in Columbia, Missouri, the inland ports, the idea that... | |
| It's more than just the coasts. | |
| Yes. | |
| There's an inland port in Kansas City. | |
| They were setting one up in Decatur, Illinois. | |
| That was all part of NAFTA. | |
| Right. | |
| They can basically bypass customs at the border and put something from a container ship onto a train in Mexico and then run it all the way up into Kansas City and then distribute it from there. | |
| Oh my. | |
| That was the plan. | |
| Trans-Texas corridor, right. | |
| Well, and this, in fact, I brought one with me. | |
| Let's do some biohacking. | |
| A CRISPR gene knockout kit through a bio lab. | |
| What can you use that? | |
| Well, you could create strands of bioweapons that have never existed in history. | |
| Furthermore, you could at the germline level rewrite the genetic makeup of any living thing. | |
| Using gene drive. | |
| Using gene drive technology. | |
| The UK is doing that now with rats. | |
| See, this is today, or this week, this is being discussed at the United Nations because of DARPA wanting to invest tons of taxpayer dollars into the development of gene drive technology, which they say is so terrifying in terms of its scope that this is a technology that should never even be allowed to exist, let alone to be weaponized. | |
| Of course, DARPA, the Pentagon, they're saying they have to do it because China and Russia are already developing it and we can't allow them to get ahead of us in this game. | |
| Gene drive technology is eugenics. | |
| Nothing more than eugenics. | |
| When it's applied to modifying humans, but it could also modify organisms for new strains of weaponized bio terrors, right? | |
| Exactly. | |
| We'd have no weakness against it. | |
| No way to fight. | |
| No defense. | |
| We have no defense. | |
| None. | |
| Even the flu. | |
| We're worried about the flu already. | |
| Yes. | |
| Right. | |
| I mean, this sounds like the plot of a Stephen King novel or movie, but this is actually happening and taking place. | |
| And government officials who are involved in this are saying this is terrifying, but we can't not do it because, as Tom said, the Chinese and the Russians are working on this, so we have to do it. | |
| This is what Colonel McGinnis writes about in Future War, about how this technology is not just being used to create super soldiers. | |